1
|
Hirata Y, Lyu HG, Azimuddin AM, Lu P, Ajith J, Schmeisser JA, Ninan EP, Lee KH, Badgwell BD, Mansfield P, Ikoma N. Cost Analysis for Robotic and Open Gastrectomy. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2024; 5:e396. [PMID: 38883961 PMCID: PMC11175903 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the magnitude of the perioperative costs associated with robotic gastrectomy (RG). Background A robotic surgery platform has a high implementation cost and requires maintenance costs; however, whether the overall cost of RG, including all perioperative costs, is higher than conventional open gastrectomy (OG) remains unknown. Methods Patients who underwent a major gastrectomy during February 2018 through December 2021 were retrospectively identified. We calculated the perioperative costs of RG and OG and compared them overall as well as in different phases, including intraoperative costs and 30-day postsurgery inpatient and outpatient costs. We investigated factors potentially associated with high cost and estimated the likelihood of RG to reduce overall cost under a Bayesian framework. All cost data were converted to ratios to the average cost of all operations performed at our center in year FY2021. Results We identified 119 patients who underwent gastrectomy. The incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo >IIIa; RG, 10% vs OG, 13%) did not significantly differ between approaches. The median length of stay was 3 days shorter for RG versus OG (4 vs 7 days, P < 0.001). Intraoperative cost ratios were significantly higher for RG (RG, 2.6 vs OG, 1.7; P < 0.001). However, postoperative hospitalization cost ratios were significantly lower for RG (RG, 2.8 vs OG, 3.9; P < 0.001). Total perioperative cost ratios were similar between groups (RG, 6.1 vs OG, 6.4; P = 0.534). The multiple Bayesian generalized linear analysis showed RG had 76.5% posterior probability of overall perioperative cost reduction (adjusted risk ratio of 0.95; 95% credible interval, 0.85-1.07). Conclusions Despite increased intraoperative costs, total perioperative costs in the RG group were similar to those in the OG group because of reduced postoperative hospitalization costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Hirata
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Heather G Lyu
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ahad M Azimuddin
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Pamela Lu
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeeva Ajith
- Finance, Analytics & Treasury, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jason A Schmeisser
- Finance, Analytics & Treasury, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elizabeth P Ninan
- Division of Procedures and Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kyung Hyun Lee
- Center for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Brian D Badgwell
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Paul Mansfield
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang C, Ding Y, Mao Z, Wang W. Nanoplatform-Mediated Autophagy Regulation and Combined Anti-Tumor Therapy for Resistant Tumors. Int J Nanomedicine 2024; 19:917-944. [PMID: 38293604 PMCID: PMC10826716 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s445578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
The overall cancer incidence and death toll have been increasing worldwide. However, the conventional therapies have some obvious limitations, such as non-specific targeting, systemic toxic effects, especially the multidrug resistance (MDR) of tumors, in which, autophagy plays a vital role. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new treatments to reduce adverse reactions, improve the treatment efficacy and expand their therapeutic indications more effectively and accurately. Combination therapy based on autophagy regulators is a very feasible and important method to overcome tumor resistance and sensitize anti-tumor drugs. However, the less improved efficacy, more systemic toxicity and other problems limit its clinical application. Nanotechnology provides a good way to overcome this limitation. Co-delivery of autophagy regulators combined with anti-tumor drugs through nanoplatforms provides a good therapeutic strategy for the treatment of tumors, especially drug-resistant tumors. Notably, the nanomaterials with autophagy regulatory properties have broad therapeutic prospects as carrier platforms, especially in adjuvant therapy. However, further research is still necessary to overcome the difficulties such as the safety, biocompatibility, and side effects of nanomedicine. In addition, clinical research is also indispensable to confirm its application in tumor treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caixia Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuan Ding
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhengwei Mao
- MOE Key Laboratory of Macromolecular Synthesis and Functionalization, Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Weilin Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tkacz J, Ireland A, Agatep B, Ellis L, Balaji H, Khaki AR. An assessment of the direct and indirect costs of bladder cancer preceding and following a cystectomy: a real-world evidence study. J Med Econ 2024; 27:963-971. [PMID: 39028539 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2382639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To estimate the direct and indirect costs of bladder cancer prior to and following cystectomy in a U.S. sample of patients. METHODS This retrospective, observational analysis of de-identified patients with bladder cancer utilized the MarketScan Commercial Claims & Encounters and Health & Productivity Management databases. Adult patients with bladder cancer plus ≥ 1 claim for partial or radical cystectomy between 1 October 2015 and 31 December 2020 (date of the cystectomy = index date) and who were continuously enrolled for 6 months pre- (baseline) and post-index (follow-up) were included in the sample. All-cause total healthcare costs and indirect costs associated with short-term and long-term disability (STD and LTD) employer claims were assessed during each of the 6-month baseline and follow-up periods. RESULTS The study included N = 142 patients; mean age 56 ± 6 years, 76% (male), and 42% had a baseline Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2. Baseline mean total all-cause direct healthcare costs were $51,473 ± $48,560 (median: $36,202), and $99,524 ± 86,839 (median: $75,444) during follow-up. At baseline, 32% of patients had ≥ 1 STD claim, equating to a mean 134 ± 303 h lost and $2,353 ± $6,445 in total payments per patient. Follow up STD claims increased 23.4% equating to a mean 218 ± 324 h lost and $3,679 ± $7,795 per patient. Patient LTD claims increased from baseline to follow-up (1-3%), with post-cystectomy LTD claims resulting in 574 ± 490 h lost, and $1,636 ± $1,429 in total payments. Over 85% of the population had a cystectomy related complication, the most common were genitourinary-related (47.9%) and infection/sepsis (33.1%). CONCLUSIONS Cystectomy was associated with complications and decreased work productivity post-surgery. Findings may aid to inform decisions regarding cystectomy vs. bladder preservation approaches, and underscores an ongoing need to further develop bladder preservation therapies within the bladder cancer treatment landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Ireland
- Real World Value and Evidence, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, NJ, USA
| | | | - Lorie Ellis
- Real World Value and Evidence, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, NJ, USA
| | - Hiremagalur Balaji
- Real World Value and Evidence, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, NJ, USA
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quality and Safety Considerations in Image Guided Radiation Therapy: An ASTRO Safety White Paper Update. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:97-111. [PMID: 36585312 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This updated report on image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) is part of a series of consensus-based white papers previously published by the American Society for Radiation Oncology addressing patient safety. Since the first white papers were published, IGRT technology and procedures have progressed significantly such that these procedures are now more commonly used. The use of IGRT has now extended beyond high-precision treatments, such as stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy, and into routine clinical practice for many treatment techniques and anatomic sites. Therefore, quality and patient safety considerations for these techniques remain an important area of focus. METHODS AND MATERIALS The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened an interdisciplinary task force to assess the original IGRT white paper and update content where appropriate. Recommendations were created using a consensus-building methodology, and task force members indicated their level of agreement based on a 5-point Likert scale from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." A prespecified threshold of ≥75% of raters who selected "strongly agree" or "agree" indicated consensus. SUMMARY This IGRT white paper builds on the previous version and uses other guidance documents to primarily focus on processes related to quality and safety. IGRT requires an interdisciplinary team-based approach, staffed by appropriately trained specialists, as well as significant personnel resources, specialized technology, and implementation time. A thorough feasibility analysis of resources is required to achieve the clinical and technical goals and should be discussed with all personnel before undertaking new imaging techniques. A comprehensive quality-assurance program must be developed, using established guidance, to ensure IGRT is performed in a safe and effective manner. As IGRT technologies continue to improve or emerge, existing practice guidelines should be reviewed or updated regularly according to the latest American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group reports or guidelines. Patient safety in the application of IGRT is everyone's responsibility, and professional organizations, regulators, vendors, and end-users must demonstrate a clear commitment to working together to ensure the highest levels of safety.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cozzi S, Ruggieri MP, Alì E, Ghersi SF, Vigo F, Augugliaro M, Giaccherini L, Iori F, Najafi M, Bardoscia L, Botti A, Trojani V, Ciammella P, Iotti C. Moderately Hypofractionated Helical Tomotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Ten-year Experience of a Mono-institutional Series of 415 Patients. In Vivo 2023; 37:777-785. [PMID: 36881094 PMCID: PMC10026640 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Radiotherapy represents an important therapeutic option in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). As helical tomotherapy may improve toxicity outcomes, we aimed to evaluate and report the toxicity and clinical outcomes of localized PCa patients treated with moderately hypofractionated helical tomotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 415 patients affected by localized PCa and treated with moderately hypofractionated helical tomotherapy in our department from January 2008 to December 2020. All patients were stratified according to the D'Amico risk classification: low-risk 21%, favorable intermediate-risk 16%, unfavorable intermediate-risk 30.4%, and high-risk 32.6%. The dose prescription for high-risk patients was 72.8 Gy to the prostate (planning tumor volume-PTV1), 61.6 Gy to the seminal vesicles (PTV2), and 50.4 Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes (PTV3) in 28 fractions; for low- and intermediate-risk patients 70 Gy for PTV1, 56 Gy for PTV2, and 50.4 Gy for PTV3 in 28 fractions. Image-guided radiation therapy was performed daily in all patients by mega-voltage computed tomography. Forty-one percent of patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Acute and late toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.5.0 (CTCAE). RESULTS Median follow-up was 82.7 months (range=12-157 months) and the median age of patients at diagnosis was 72.5 years (range=49-84 years). The 3, 5, and 7 yr overall survival (OS) rates were 95%, 90%, and 84%, respectively, while 3, 5, and 7 yr disease-free survival (DFS) were 96%, 90%, and 87%, respectively. Acute toxicity was as follows: genitourinary (GU) G1 and G2 in 35.9% and 24%; gastrointestinal (GI) in 13.7% and 8%, with G3 or more acute toxicities less than 1%. The late GI toxicity G2 and G3 were 5.3% and 1%, respectively, and the late GU toxicity G2 and G3 were 4.8% and 2.1%, respectively, and only three patients had a G4 toxicity. CONCLUSION Hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for PCa treatment appeared to be safe and reliable, with favorable acute and late toxicity rates and encouraging results in terms of disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Cozzi
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy;
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Lèon Bèrard, Lyon, France
| | - Maria Paola Ruggieri
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Emanuele Alì
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Federica Vigo
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Matteo Augugliaro
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Lucia Giaccherini
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Federico Iori
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Masoumeh Najafi
- Skull Base Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Lilia Bardoscia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, San Luca Hospital, USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Lucca, Italy
| | - Andrea Botti
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Valeria Trojani
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Cinzia Iotti
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
When Patience is a Failing: The Case for Patient Reported Outcomes Adoption. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00091-3. [PMID: 36724856 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
7
|
Zhang GY, Zhang R, Bai P, Li SM, Zhang YY, Chen YR, Huang MN, Wu LY. Concurrent definitive chemoradiation incorporating intensity-modulated radiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in high risk locally advanced cervical squamous cancer: a phase II study. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1331. [PMID: 36539745 PMCID: PMC9764592 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10406-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the prognosis of locally advanced cervical cancer has improved dramatically, survival for those with stage IIIB-IVA disease or lymph nodes metastasis remains poor. It is believed that the incorporation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy into the treatment of cervical cancer might yield an improved loco-regional control, whereas more cycles of more potent chemotherapy after the completion of concurrent chemotherapy was associated with a diminished distant metastasis. We therefore initiated a non-randomized prospective phaseII study to evaluate the feasibility of incorporating both these two treatment modality into the treatment of high risk locally advanced cervical cancer. OBJECTIVES To determine whether the incorporation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and the addition of adjuvant paclitaxel plus cisplatin regimen into the treatment policy for patients with high risk locally advanced cervical cancer might improve their oncologic outcomes. STUDY DESIGN Patients were enrolled if they had biopsy proven stage IIIA-IVA squamous cervical cancer or stage IIB disease with metastatic regional nodes. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was delivered with dynamic multi-leaf collimators using 6MV photon beams. Prescription for PTV ranged from 45.0 ~ 50.0 Gy at 1.8 Gy ~ 2.0 Gy/fraction in 25 fractions. Enlarged nodes were contoured separately and PTV-nodes were boosted simultaneously to a total dose of 50.0-65 Gy at 2.0- 2.6 Gy/fraction in 25 fractions. A total dose of 28 ~ 35 Gy high-dose- rate brachytherapy was prescribed to point A in 4 ~ 5 weekly fractions using an iridium- 192 source. Concurrent weekly intravenous cisplatin at 30 mg/m2 was initiated on the first day of radiotherapy for over 1-h during external-beam radiotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was scheduled within 4 weeks after the completion of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy and repeated 3 weeks later. Paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 was given as a 3-h infusion on day1, followed by cisplatin 35 mg/m2 with 1-h infusion on day1-2 (70 mg/m2 in total). RESULTS Fifty patients achieved complete response 4 weeks after the completion of the treatment protocol, whereas 2 patients had persistent disease. After a median follow-up period of 66 months, loco-regional (including 2 persistent disease), distant, and synchronous treatment failure occurred in 4,5, and 1, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival, loco-regional recurrence-free survival, distant-metastasis recurrence-free survival was 80.5%, 90.3%, and 88.0%, respectively. Four of the patients died of the disease, and the 5-year overall survival was 92.1%. Most of the toxicities reported during concurrent chemo-radiotherapy were mild and transient. The occurrence of hematological toxicities elevated mildly during adjuvant chemotherapy, as 32% (16/50) and 4% (2/50) patients experienced grade 3-4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Grade 3-4 late toxicities were reported in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS The incorporation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and adjuvant paclitaxel plus cisplatin chemotherapy were highly effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer. The former yields an improved loco-regional control, whereas distant metastases could be effectively eradicated with mild toxicities when adjuvant regimen was prescribed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gong-yi Zhang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Gynecological Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, NO.17 Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Rong Zhang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Gynecological Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, NO.17 Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Ping Bai
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Gynecological Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, NO.17 Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Shu-min Li
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Gynecological Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, NO.17 Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Yuan-yuan Zhang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Gynecological Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, NO.17 Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Yi-ran Chen
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Gynecological Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, NO.17 Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Man-ni Huang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Gynecological Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, NO.17 Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Ling-ying Wu
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Gynecological Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, NO.17 Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021 China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mitchell JM, Gresenz CR. The Influence of Practice Structure on Urologists' Treatment of Men With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. Med Care 2022; 60:665-672. [PMID: 35880758 PMCID: PMC9378464 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vertical and horizontal integration among health care providers has transformed the practice arrangements under which many physicians work. OBJECTIVE To examine the influence of type of practice structure, and by implication the financial incentives associated with each structure, on treatment received among men newly diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. RESEARCH DESIGN We compiled a unique database from cancer registry records from 4 large states, Medicare enrollment and claims for the years 2005-2014 and SK & A physician surveys corroborated by extensive internet searches. We estimated a multinomial logit model to examine the influence of urologist practice structure on type of initial treatment received. RESULTS The probability of being monitored with active surveillance was 7.4% and 4.2% points higher for men treated by health system and nonhealth system employed urologists ( P <0.01), respectively, in comparison to men treated by single specialty urology practices. Among multispecialty practices, the rate of active surveillance use was 3% points higher compared with single specialty urology practices( P <0.01). Use of intensity modulated radiation therapy among urologists with ownership in intensity modulated radiation therapy was 17.4% points higher compared with urologists working in small single specialty practices. CONCLUSIONS Physician practice structure attributes are significantly associated with type of treatment received but few studies control for such factors. Our findings-coupled with the observation that urologist practice structure shifted substantially over this time period due to mergers of small urology groups-provide one explanation for the limited uptake of active surveillance among men with low-risk disease in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean M. Mitchell
- McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University, Old North 314, 37 & “O” Streets, NW, Washington DC 20007
| | - Carole Roan Gresenz
- Department of Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, 3800 Reservoir Road, NW, Washington DC 20007
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Williams SB, Shan Y, Fero KE, Movva G, Baillargeon J, Tyler DS, Chamie K. Comparing costs of renal preservation versus radical nephroureterectomy management among patients with non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:345.e1-345.e7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
10
|
Chen LW, Cao Y, D'Rummo K, Shen X. Estimation of Patient Out of Pocket Cost for Radiation Therapy by Insurance Type and Treatment Modality. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:e481-e485. [PMID: 35447387 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial toxicity is increasingly identified as an important issue in cancer care. Limited data are available on direct out of pocket (OOP) costs for radiation therapy, which are important for providers and patients. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 247 consecutive patients with non-metastatic breast and prostate cancer treated with curative intent. Data were collected on demographics, treatments received and insurance plan specifications, including annual OOP maximum, deductibles, co-insurance rates, OOP already paid prior to starting radiation therapy, and actual estimated OOP for radiation therapy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between insurance factors, radiation technique, concurrent systemic therapy, and month of treatment with a patient reaching OOP maximum with radiation treatment. RESULTS 137 and 110 breast and prostate cancer patients were evaluated. Mean plan specified annual OOP maximum for commercial and Medicare Advantage plans were $4064 and $4661, respectively; 100% of commercially insured patients and 54.7% Medicare Advantage patients reached their OOP maximum with radiation therapy. Annual OOP maximum for Medicare plus supplement, Medicaid, and Tricare were minimal. On multivariable analysis, concurrent systemic therapy (OR 6.20, p=.03) was associated with patient reaching OOP maximum, but radiation technique was not. CONCLUSION Out of pocket cost for radiation therapy services may be reasonably estimated based on insurance type and structure. Medicare plus supplement and Medicaid plans have negligible OOP, while all patients with commercial plans reached annual OOP maximums. This study provides practical information to help providers to better counsel patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke W Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Ying Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Kevin D'Rummo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Xinglei Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bree KK, Shan Y, Hensley PJ, Lobo N, Hu C, Tyler DS, Chamie K, Kamat AM, Williams SB. Management, Surveillance Patterns, and Costs Associated With Low-Grade Papillary Stage Ta Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Among Older Adults, 2004-2013. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e223050. [PMID: 35302627 PMCID: PMC8933744 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Low-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is associated with extremely low rates of progression and cancer-specific mortality; however, patients with low-risk NMIBC may often receive non-guideline-recommended and potentially costly surveillance testing and treatment. OBJECTIVE To describe current surveillance and treatment practices, cancer outcomes, and costs of care for low-grade papillary stage Ta (low-grade Ta) NMIBC and identify factors associated with increased cost of care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based cohort study identified 13 054 older adults (aged 66-90 years) diagnosed with low-grade Ta tumors in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-linked Medicare database from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2013. Medicare claims data through December 31, 2014, were also reviewed. Data were analyzed from April 1 to October 6, 2021. EXPOSURES Surveillance testing and treatment among patients with low-grade Ta NMIBC. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was patterns in population-level surveillance and treatment practice over time among patients with low-grade Ta NMIBC. Secondary outcomes were recurrence (defined as receipt of subsequent transurethral resection of bladder tumor >3 months after index diagnosis of NMIBC and initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor), progression (defined as receipt of definitive treatment for bladder cancer), and costs of care. RESULTS Among 13 054 patients who met inclusion criteria, 9596 (73.5%) were male and 3458 (26.5%) were female, with a median age of 76 years (IQR, 71-81 years). A total of 403 patients (3.1%) were Black, 120 (0.9%) were Hispanic, 12 123 (92.9%) were White, and 408 (3.1%) were of other races and/or ethnicities. Rates of surveillance cystoscopy increased over the study period (from 79.3% in 2004 to 81.5% in 2013; P = .007), with patients receiving a median of 3.0 cystoscopies per year (IQR, 2.0-4.0 per year). Rates of upper tract imaging (particularly computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) also increased over the study period (from 30.4% in 2004 to 47.0% in 2013; P < .001), with most patients receiving a median of 2.0 imaging tests per year (IQR, 1.0-2.0 per year). The use of urine cytologic testing or other urine biomarker assessment also increased (from 44.8% in 2004 to 54.9% in 2013; P < .001). Rates of adherence to current guidelines were similar over time (eg, a median of 4398 patients [55.2%] received ≤2 cystoscopies per year in 2004-2008 vs a median of 2736 patients [53.8%] in 2009-2013; P = .11), suggesting overuse of all surveillance testing modalities. With regard to treatment, 2250 patients (17.2%) received intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin, and 792 patients (6.1%) received intravesical chemotherapy (excluding receipt of a single perioperative dose). Among all patients with low-grade Ta NMIBC, 217 (1.7%) experienced disease recurrence and 52 (0.4%) experienced disease progression. The total annual median costs of low-grade Ta surveillance testing and treatment increased by 60% (from $34 792 in 2004 to $53 986 in 2013), with higher 1-year median expenditures noted among those with disease recurrence ($76 669) vs no disease recurrence ($53 909) at the end of the study period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, despite low rates of disease recurrence and progression, rates of surveillance testing increased during the study period. The annual cost of care also increased over time, particularly among patients with recurrent disease. Efforts to improve adherence to current practice guidelines, with the focus on limiting overuse of surveillance testing and treatment, may mitigate associated increasing costs of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly K. Bree
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Yong Shan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| | - Patrick J. Hensley
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Niyati Lobo
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Chengrui Hu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| | - Douglas S. Tyler
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| | - Karim Chamie
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles
| | - Ashish M. Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Stephen B. Williams
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Demystifying radiation oncology clinical trial concerns for protocol scientific review and institutional review board committee members. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2022; 27:100911. [PMID: 35345873 PMCID: PMC8956792 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials are essential for evaluating advanced technologies and treatment approaches involving radiation therapy to improve outcomes for cancer patients. Clinical trials at cancer centers with designation from the National Cancer Institute must undergo scientific review in additional to Institutional Review Board approval. Given the highly specialized nature and rapidly advancing technologies of radiation therapy, and the small number of radiation oncology investigators at some centers, a lack of radiation oncology expertise among reviewers may present challenges at some cancer centers. This commentary aims to provide an overview of radiation therapy and special considerations for radiation oncology research that will serve as a helpful resource in the scientific review of clinical trials involving cancer patients.
Collapse
|
13
|
Qian J, Huang C, Zhu Z, He Y, Wang Y, Feng N, He S, Li X, Zhou L, Zhang C, Gong Y. NFE2L3 promotes tumor progression and predicts a poor prognosis of bladder cancer. Carcinogenesis 2022; 43:457-468. [PMID: 35022660 DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgac006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The high incidence and vulnerability to recurrence of bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) is a challenge in the clinical. Recent studies have revealed that NFE2L3 plays a vital role in the carcinogenesis and progression of different human tumors. However, the role of NFE2L3 in bladder cancer has not been elucidated. In this study, NFE2L3 expression was significantly increased in bladder cancer samples. Its high expression was associated with advanced clinicopathological characteristics and was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in 106 patients with BLCA. In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that NFE2L3 knockdown inhibited bladder cancer cells proliferation by inducing the cell cycle arrest and cell apoptosis. Meanwhile, NFE2L3 overexpression promotes BLCA cell migration and invasion in vitro cell lines and in vivo xenografts. Moreover, we identified many genes and pathway alterations associated with tumor progression and metastasis by performing RNA-Seq analysis and functional enrichment of NFE2L3 overexpressing BLCA cells. Mechanistic investigation reveals that overexpression of NFE2L3 promoted epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in bladder cancer cells with decreased expression of gap junction-associated protein ZO-1 and epithelial marker E-cadherin with the elevation of transcription factors Snail1 and Snail2. Finally, we performed a comprehensive proteomics analysis to explore more potential molecular mechanisms. Our findings revealed that NFE2L3 might serve as a valuable clinical prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in BLCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinqin Qian
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Cong Huang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Zhenpeng Zhu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Yuhui He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Urology, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214000, China
| | - Ninghan Feng
- Department of Urology, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214000, China
| | - Shiming He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Cuijian Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Yanqing Gong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Prospective Randomized Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) vs. Conventional Fractionated Radiotherapy (CFRT) for Chinese Patients with Early-Stage Localized Prostate Cancer. Curr Oncol 2021; 29:27-37. [PMID: 35049677 PMCID: PMC8774487 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29010003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has potential radiobiologic and economic advantages over conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) in localized prostate cancer (PC). This study aimed to compare the effects of these two distinct fractionations on patient-reported quality of life (PRQOL) and tolerability. Methods: In this prospective phase II study, patients with low- and intermediate-risk localized PC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the SBRT (36.25 Gy/5 fractions/2 weeks) or CFRT (76 Gy/38 fractions/7.5 weeks) treatment groups. The primary endpoint of variation in PRQOL at 1 year was assessed by changes in the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire scores and analysed by z-tests and t-tests. Results: Sixty-four eligible Chinese men were treated (SBRT, n = 31; CFRT, n = 33) with a median follow-up of 2.3 years. At 1 year, 40.0%/46.9% of SBRT/CFRT patients had a >5-point decrease in bowel score (p = 0.08/0.28), respectively, and 53.3%/46.9% had a >2-point decrease in urinary score (p = 0.21/0.07). There were no significant differences in EPIC score changes between the arms at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, but SBRT was associated with significantly fewer grade ≥ 1 acute and 1-year late gastrointestinal toxicities (acute: 35% vs. 87%, p < 0.0001; 1-year late: 64% vs. 84%, p = 0.03), and grade ≥ 2 acute genitourinary toxicities (3% vs. 24%, p = 0.04) compared with CFRT. Conclusion: SBRT offered similar PRQOL and less toxicity compared with CFRT in Chinese men with localized PC.
Collapse
|
15
|
Assessment of MRI-Linac Economics under the RO-APM. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10204706. [PMID: 34682829 PMCID: PMC8539760 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The implementation of the radiation oncology alternative payment model (RO-APM) has raised concerns regarding the development of MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART). We sought to compare technical fee reimbursement under Fee-For-Service (FFS) to the proposed RO-APM for a typical MRI-Linac (MRL) patient load and distribution of 200 patients. In an exploratory aim, a modifier was added to the RO-APM (mRO-APM) to account for the resources necessary to provide this care. Traditional Medicare FFS reimbursement rates were compared to the diagnosis-based reimbursement in the RO-APM. Reimbursement for all selected diagnoses were lower in the RO-APM compared to FFS, with the largest differences in the adaptive treatments for lung cancer (−89%) and pancreatic cancer (−83%). The total annual reimbursement discrepancy amounted to −78%. Without implementation of adaptive replanning there was no difference in reimbursement in breast, colorectal and prostate cancer between RO-APM and mRO-APM. Accommodating online adaptive treatments in the mRO-APM would result in a reimbursement difference from the FFS model of −47% for lung cancer and −46% for pancreatic cancer, mitigating the overall annual reimbursement difference to −54%. Even with adjustment, the implementation of MRgART as a new treatment strategy is susceptible under the RO-APM.
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu Y, Hall IJ, Filson C, Howard DH. Trends in the use of active surveillance and treatments in Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:432.e1-432.e10. [PMID: 33308973 PMCID: PMC8374746 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment for men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer has changed over time given the increased attention to the harms associated with over-diagnosis and the development of protocols for active surveillance. METHODS We examined trends in the treatment of men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2004 and 2015, using the most recently available data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER)-Medicare. Patients were stratified by Gleason score, age, and race groups. RESULTS The use of active surveillance increased from 22% in 2004-2005 to 50% in 2014-2015 for patients with a Gleason score of 6 or below and increased from 9% in 2004-2005 to 13% in 2014-2015 for patients with a Gleason score of 7 or above. Patients with a Gleason score of 7 or above had increased use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and prostatectomy, especially among patients aged 75 years and older. Among patients with a Gleason score of 6 or below non-Hispanic black men were less likely to undergo active surveillance than non-Hispanic white men. CONCLUSIONS There has been a large increase in the use of active surveillance among men with a Gleason score of 6 or below. However, non-Hispanic black men with a Gleason score of 6 or below are less likely to receive active surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Liu
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ingrid J Hall
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - David H Howard
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Viani GA, Arruda CV, Oliveira R. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy with conformational radiotherapy (3D-RT) for prostate cancer in the brazilian health system. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2021; 67:724-730. [DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20210078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
18
|
Pessoa RR, Maroni P, Kukreja J, Kim SP. Comparative effectiveness of robotic and open radical prostatectomy. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:2158-2170. [PMID: 34159098 PMCID: PMC8185666 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy (RP) has undergone a remarkable transformation from open to minimally-invasive surgery over the last two decades. However, it is important to recognize there is still conflicting evidence regarding key outcomes. We aimed to summarize current literature on comparative effectiveness of robotic and open RP for key outcomes including oncologic results, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures, safety and postoperative complications, and healthcare costs. The bulk of the paper will discuss and interpret limitations of current data. Finally, we will also highlight future directions of both surgical approaches and its potential impact on health care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Maroni
- Division of Urology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Janet Kukreja
- Division of Urology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Simon P Kim
- Division of Urology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Cancer Outcomes and Public Policy Effectiveness Research (COPPER), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Donath E, Alcaidinho A, Delouya G, Taussky D. The one hundred most cited publications in prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:611-623. [PMID: 33674184 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to identify the leaders in research on prostate brachytherapy through a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited publications in the field. METHODS AND MATERIALS A broad search was performed with the term "prostate brachytherapy" using the Web of Science database to generate wide-ranging results that were reviewed by reading the abstracts and, if necessary, the articles to select the top 100 most cited publications. RESULTS The median of the total citation count was 187 (range 132-1464). The median citation per year index (citations/year since publication) was 13.5 (range 6.3-379.0). In all publications, the first author was also the corresponding author. The top publishing countries of the first author included the United States (n = 78), Canada (n = 6), the UK (n = 5), and Germany (n = 4). The journal with the most publications was the International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (n = 38). There were 27 more publications on low-dose-rate (LDR) than on high-dose-rate (HDR) (43 vs 16) among the top 100. HDR publications had only one first author that had three articles in comparison to LDR publications, which had four first authors, each with three articles on LDR. The United States was the leading country in 43.8% of HDR publications (n = 7) and 88.4% of LDR publications (n = 38). CONCLUSIONS Our bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited publications clearly demonstrates the North American dominance in the publications of prostate brachytherapy, especially in LDR. However, European first authors were more frequent in HDR publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisheva Donath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alexandre Alcaidinho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Guila Delouya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Daniel Taussky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sakai-Bizmark R, Ross MG, Estevez D, Bedel LEM, Marr EH, Tsugawa Y. Evaluation of Hospital Cesarean Delivery-Related Profits and Rates in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e212235. [PMID: 33739430 PMCID: PMC7980096 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE A high cesarean delivery rate in US hospitals indicates the potential overuse of this procedure; however, underlying causes of the excessive use of cesarean procedures in the US have not been fully understood. OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between the probability of cesarean delivery at the patient-level and profit per procedure from cesarean deliveries. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This observational, cross-sectional study used a nationally representative sample of hospital discharge data from women at low risk for cesarean birth who delivered newborns between 2010 and 2014 in the US. Data were gathered from the Nationwide Readmissions Database from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, compiled by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Data cleaning and analyses were conducted between August 2019 and May 2020. EXPOSURES Hospital-level median value of profits from cesarean deliveries, defined as the difference between the charge and the cost for cesarean delivery calculated for each hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Our primary outcome was the individual-level probability of undergoing a cesarean delivery. We examined the association with the hospital-level median value of profits per procedure for cesarean delivery (defined as the difference between the charge and the cost for cesarean delivery) using hierarchical regression models adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics and year-fixed effects. RESULTS A total of 13 215 853 deliveries were included in our analyses (mean [SE] age, 27.4 [0] years), of which 2 202 632 (16.7%) were cesarean deliveries. After adjusting for potential confounders, pregnant women were more likely to have a cesarean birth when they delivered at hospitals with higher profits per procedure from cesarean deliveries. Women cared for at hospitals with the highest (adjusted odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14; P = .005) and second-highest profit quartiles (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13; P = .007) had higher probabilities of a cesarean delivery compared with those cared for at hospitals in the lowest profit quartile. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cross-sectional study of US nationally representative hospital discharge data, hospitals with higher profits per cesarean procedure were associated with an increased probability of delivering newborns through cesarean birth. These findings highlight the potential influence financial incentives play in determining a high cesarean delivery rate in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rie Sakai-Bizmark
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
- Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Torrance
| | - Michael G. Ross
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Torrance
| | - Dennys Estevez
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Lauren E. M. Bedel
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Emily H. Marr
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Yusuke Tsugawa
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Williams SB, Howard LE, Foster ML, Klaassen Z, Sieluk J, De Hoedt AM, Freedland SJ. Estimated Costs and Long-term Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated With Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in the Veterans Affairs Health System. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e213800. [PMID: 33787908 PMCID: PMC8013821 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Management of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) represents a clinical challenge due to high failure rates despite prior bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy. OBJECTIVE To describe real-world patient characteristics, long-term outcomes, and the economic burden in a population with high-risk NMIBC treated with BCG therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study identified 412 patients with high-risk NMIBC from 63 139 patients diagnosed with bladder cancer who received at least 1 dose of BCG within Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) centers across the US from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2015. Adequate induction BCG therapy was defined as at least 5 installations, and adequate maintenance BCG therapy was defined as at least 7 installations. Data were analyzed from January 2, 2020, to January 20, 2021. EXPOSURES Intravesical BCG therapy, including adequate induction BCG therapy, was defined as at least 5 intravesical instillations of BCG within 70 days from BCG therapy start date. Adequate maintenance BCG therapy was defined as at least 7 installations of BCG within 274 days of the start (the first instillation) of adequate induction BCG therapy (ie, adequate induction BCG plus some form of additional BCG). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate outcomes, including event-free survival. All-cause expenditures were summarized as medians with corresponding interquartile ranges (IQRs) and adjusted to 2019 USD. RESULTS Of the 412 patients who met inclusion criteria, 335 (81%) were male and 77 (19%) were female, with a median age of 67 (IQR, 61-74) years. Follow-up was 2694 person-years. A total of 392 patients (95%) received adequate induction BCG therapy, and 152 (37%) received adequate BCG therapy. For all patients with high-risk NMIBC, the 10-year progression-free survival rate and disease-specific death rate were 78% and 92%, respectively. Patients with carcinoma in situ (Cis) had worse disease-free survival than those without Cis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.34-2.56). Total median costs at 1 year were $29 459 (IQR, $14 991-$52 060); at 2 years, $55 267 (IQR, $28 667-$99 846); and at 5 years, $117 361 (IQR, $59 680-$211 298). Patients with progressive disease had significantly higher median 5-year costs ($232 729 [IQR, $151 321-$341 195] vs $94 879 [IQR, $52 498-$172 631]; P < .001), with outpatient care, pharmacy, and surgery-related costs contributing. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Despite adequate induction BCG therapy, only 37% of patients received adequate BCG therapy. Patients with Cis had increased risk of progression, and progression regardless of Cis was associated with significantly increased costs relative to patients without progression. Extrapolating cost figures, regardless of progression, resulted in nationwide costs at 1 year of $373 million for patients diagnosed with high-risk NMIBC in 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen B. Williams
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| | - Lauren E. Howard
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Meagan L. Foster
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zachary Klaassen
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta
| | | | | | - Stephen J. Freedland
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
- Center for Integrated Research on Cancer and Lifestyle, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Würnschimmel C, Tilki D, Huland H, Graefen M, Beyer B. [Quality criteria in urology : How to obtain comparable results?]. Urologe A 2021; 60:193-198. [PMID: 33439289 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01437-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The standardization of procedural flow and medical documentation increasingly allows further possibilities. The best-known example of process standardization is the centralized treatment of complex clinical pictures, while patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) enable standardized documentation. Using the example of prostate cancer, existing literature on the topic of quality optimization in medicine is discussed. The following key points are addressed: (1) Increasing use of standardized PROMs for outcome documentation. (2) The transfer of complex clinical pictures to dedicated specialized centers has been shown to increase the quality of patient care as long as standardized PROMs are used. (3) Healthcare policymakers benefit from the use of PROMs and increasingly pursue a "value-based healthcare" approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Würnschimmel
- Martini-Klinik Prostatakrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - D Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostatakrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.,Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - H Huland
- Martini-Klinik Prostatakrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - M Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostatakrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - B Beyer
- Martini-Klinik Prostatakrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
de Oliveira RAR, Guimarães GC, Mourão TC, de Lima Favaretto R, Santana TBM, Lopes A, de Cassio Zequi S. Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center experience. J Robot Surg 2021; 15:859-868. [PMID: 33417155 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01179-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) treatment has been greatly impacted by the robotic surgery. The economics literature about PCa is scarce. We aim to carry-out cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses of the robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) using the "time-driven activity-based cost" methodology. Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy in 2013 were retrospectively analyzed in a cancer center over a 5-year period. Fifty-six patients underwent RALP and 149 patients underwent retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). The amounts were subject to a 5% discount as correction of monetary value considering time elapsed. Calculation of the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICER) related to events avoided and the Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) related to "QALY saved" were performed. QALY was performed using values of utility and "disutility" weights from the "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry". Hypothetical cohorts were simulated with 1000 patients in each group, based on the treatment outcomes. Total and average costs were R$1,903,671.93, and R$12,776.32 for the RRP group, and R$1,373,987.26, and R$24,535.49 for the RALP group, respectively. The costs to treat the hypothetical cohorts were R$10,010,582.35 for RRP, and R$19,224,195.90 for RALP. ICER calculation evidenced R$9,213,613.55 of difference between groups. ICUR was R$ 22,690.83 per QALY saved. Limitations were the lack of cost-effectiveness analyses related to re-hospitalization rates and complications, single center perspective, and currency-translation differences. Medical fees were not included. RALP showed advantages in cost-effectiveness and cost-utility over RRP in the long term. Despite the increased costs to the introduction of robotic technology, its adoption should be encouraged due to the gains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Almeida Rosa de Oliveira
- Department of Uro-Oncology, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, Rua Martiniano de Carvalho, 965, São Paulo, SP, 01323-030, Brazil.,ACCamargo Cancer Center, Urology Division, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Thiago Camelo Mourão
- Department of Uro-Oncology, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, Rua Martiniano de Carvalho, 965, São Paulo, SP, 01323-030, Brazil.
| | - Ricardo de Lima Favaretto
- Department of Uro-Oncology, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, Rua Martiniano de Carvalho, 965, São Paulo, SP, 01323-030, Brazil
| | - Thiago Borges Marques Santana
- Department of Uro-Oncology, BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, Rua Martiniano de Carvalho, 965, São Paulo, SP, 01323-030, Brazil.,ACCamargo Cancer Center, Urology Division, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ademar Lopes
- Head of Pelvic Surgery Department, ACCamargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Predicting Radiotherapy Impact on Late Bladder Toxicity in Prostate Cancer Patients: An Observational Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13020175. [PMID: 33419144 PMCID: PMC7825573 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim of our study was to elaborate a suitable model on bladder late toxicity in prostate cancer (PC) patients treated by radiotherapy with volumetric technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS PC patients treated between September 2010 and April 2017 were included in the analysis. An observational study was performed collecting late toxicity data of any grade, according to RTOG and CTCAE 4.03 scales, cumulative dose volumes histograms were exported for each patient. Vdose, the value of dose to a specific volume of organ at risk (OAR), impact was analyzed through the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test. Logistic regression was used as the final model. The model performance was estimated by taking 1000 samples with replacement from the original dataset and calculating the AUC average. In addition, the calibration plot (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test) was used to evaluate the performance of internal validation. RStudio Software version 3.3.1 and an in house developed software package "Moddicom" were used. RESULTS Data from 175 patients were collected. The median follow-up was 39 months (min-max 3.00-113.00). We performed Mann-Whitney rank-sum test with continuity correction in the subset of patients with late bladder toxicity grade ≥ 2: a statistically significant p-value with a Vdose of 51.43 Gy by applying a logistic regression model (coefficient 4.3, p value 0.025) for the prediction of the development of late G ≥ 2 GU toxicity was observed. The performance for the model's internal validation was evaluated, with an AUC equal to 0.626. Accuracy was estimated through the elaboration of a calibration plot. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary results could help to optimize treatment planning procedures and customize treatments.
Collapse
|
25
|
Reitblat C, Bain PA, Porter ME, Bernstein DN, Feeley TW, Graefen M, Iyer S, Resnick MJ, Stimson CJ, Trinh QD, Gershman B. Value-Based Healthcare in Urology: A Collaborative Review. Eur Urol 2021; 79:571-585. [PMID: 33413970 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT In response to growing concerns over rising costs and major variation in quality, improving value for patients has been proposed as a fundamentally new strategy for how healthcare should be delivered, measured, and remunerated. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the literature regarding the implementation and impact of value-based healthcare in urology. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review was performed to identify studies that described the implementation of one or more elements of value-based healthcare in urologic settings and in which the associated change in healthcare value had been measured. Twenty-two publications were selected for inclusion. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Reorganization of urologic care around medical conditions was associated with increased use of guidelines-compliant care for men with prostate cancer, and improved outcomes for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Measuring outcomes for every patient was associated with improved prostate cancer outcomes, while the measurement of costs using time-driven activity-based costing was associated with reduced resource utilization in a pediatric multidisciplinary clinic. Centralization of urologic cancer care in the UK, Denmark, and Canada was associated with overall improved outcomes, although systems integration in the USA yielded mixed results among urologic cancer patients. No studies have yet examined bundled payments for episodes of care, expanding the geographic reach for centers of excellence, or building enabling information technology platforms. CONCLUSIONS Few studies have critically assessed the actual or simulated implementation of value-based healthcare in urology, but the available literature suggests promising early results. In order to effectively redesign care, there is a need for further research to both evaluate the potential results of proposed value-based healthcare interventions and measure their effects where already implemented. PATIENT SUMMARY While few studies have evaluated the implementation of value-based healthcare in urology, the available literature suggests promising early results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanan Reitblat
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul A Bain
- Countway Library, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael E Porter
- Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA; Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David N Bernstein
- Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Combined Orthopedic Residency Program (HCORP), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas W Feeley
- Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA; Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Matthew J Resnick
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Embold Health, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - C J Stimson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Boris Gershman
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Leapman MS, Wang R, Ma S, Gross CP, Ma X. Regional Adoption of Commercial Gene Expression Testing for Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:52-58. [PMID: 33237277 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Importance Although tissue-based genomic tests can aid in treatment decision-making for patients with prostate cancer, little is known about their clinical adoption. Objective To evaluate regional adoption of genomic testing for prostate cancer and understand common trajectories of uptake shared by regions. Design, Setting, and Participants This dynamic cohort study of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer used administrative claims from Blue Cross Blue Shield Axis, the largest source of commercial health insurance in the US, to characterize temporal trends in the use of commercial, tissue-based genomic testing and calculate the proportion of tested patients at the hospital referral region (HRR) level. Eligible patients from July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2018, were those aged 40 to 89 years with prostate cancer diagnosed from July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures Group-based trajectory modeling was used to classify regions according to discrete trajectories of adoption of commercial, tissue-based genomic testing for prostate cancer. Across regions with distinct trajectories, HRR-level sociodemographic and health care contextual characteristics were compared, using data previously calculated among Medicare beneficiaries. Results A total of 92 418 men with prostate cancer who met inclusion criteria were identified; the median (interquartile range) age at diagnosis was 60 (56-63) years. Overall, the proportion of patients who received genomic testing increased from 0.8% in July 2012 to June 2013 to 11.3% in July 2017 to June 2018. Trajectory modeling identified 5 distinct regional trajectories of genomic testing adoption. Although less than 1% of patients in each group were tested at baseline, group 1 (lowest adoption) increased to 4.0%. Groups 2 (7.8%), 3 (14.6%), and 4 (17.3%) experienced more modest growth, while in group 5 (highest adoption), use increased to 33.8% of patients tested from June 2017 to July 2018. Compared with regions that more slowly adopted testing, HRRs with the highest rate of adoption (group 5) had higher HRR-level education measures (percentage [SD] with college education: group 1, 25.6% [4.8%]; vs group 2, 27.5% [7.3%]; vs group 3, 30.3% [9.1%]; vs group 4, 29.8% [8.2%]; vs group 5, 30.4% [11.4%]; P for trend = .03), median (SD) household income (group 1, $50 412.8 [$6907.4]; vs group 2, $54 419.6 [$11 324.5]; vs group 3, $61 424.0 [$17 723.8]; vs group 4, $58 508.3 [$15 174.6]; vs group 5, $58 367.0 [$13 180.5]; P for trend = .005), and prostate cancer resources, including clinician density (No. [SD] of clinicians per 100 000: group 1, 2.5 [0.3]; vs group 2, 2.5 [0.5]; vs group 3, 2.6 [0.5]; vs group 4, 2.7 [0.7]; vs group 5, 2.6 [0.5]; P for trend = .04) and prostate cancer screening (percentage [SD] of prostate-specific antigen testing among patients aged 68-74 y: group 1, 29.4% [11.8%]; vs group 2, 32.4% [11.2%]; vs group 3, 33.1% [12.7%]; vs group 4, 36.1% [9.7%]; vs group 5, 28.8% [11.8%]; P for trend = .05). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of patients with prostate cancer, the adoption of commercial tissue-based genomic testing for prostate cancer was highly variable in the US at the regional level and may be associated with contextual measures related to socioeconomic status and patterns of prostate cancer care. These findings highlight factors underlying differential adoption of prognostic technologies for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Leapman
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.,Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Rong Wang
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Shuangge Ma
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Cary P Gross
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Xiaomei Ma
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Qin Y, Han H, Xue Y, Wu C, Wei X, Liu Y, Cao Y, Ruan Y, He J. Comparison and trend of perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy: nationwide inpatient sample 2009-2014. Int Braz J Urol 2020; 46:754-771. [PMID: 32648416 PMCID: PMC7822360 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To make a further evaluation of perioperative outcomes between the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP), we conducted a comparison and trend analysis by using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2009 to 2014. Materials and Methods: Adult prostate cancer patients with radical prostatectomy were abstracted from the NIS. RARP and ORP were identified according to the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. The perioperative outcomes included blood transfusion, intraoperative and postoperative complications, prolonged length of stay (pLOS), and in-hospital mortality. Propensity score matching method and multivariable logistic regression model were performed to adjust for the pre-defined covariates. The annual percent change (APC) was used to detect the change trend of rates for outcomes. Results: A total of 77.054 patients were included in our study. According to the results of propensity score matching analyses, RARP outperformed ORP in blood transfusion (1.96% vs. 9.40%), intraoperative complication (0.73% vs. 1.25%), overall postoperative complications (8.87% vs. 11.97%), and pLOS (13.39% vs. 36.70%). We also found that there was a significant decreasing tendency of incidence in blood transfusion (APC=-9.81), intraoperative complication (APC=-12.84), and miscellaneous surgical complications (APC=-14.09) for the RARP group. The results of multivariable analyses were almost consistent with those of propensity score matching analyses. Conclusions: The RARP approach has lower incidence rates of perioperative complications than the ORP approach, and there is a potential decreasing tendency of complication incidence rates for the RARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingyi Qin
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hedong Han
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongping Xue
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Cheng Wu
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Wei
- Mount Sinai St. Luke's and West Medical Center, New York, USA.,Department of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| | - Yuzhou Liu
- Mount Sinai St. Luke's and West Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Yang Cao
- Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Yiming Ruan
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia He
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.,Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Carrion A, Ingelmo-Torres M, Lozano JJ, Montalbo R, D'Anna M, Mercader C, Velez E, Ribal MJ, Alcaraz A, Mengual L. Prognostic classifier for predicting biochemical recurrence in localized prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2020; 39:493.e17-493.e25. [PMID: 33189527 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of the study was to develop an improved classifier for predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) in clinically localized PCa patients after radical prostatectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Retrospective study including 122 PCa patients who attended our department between 2000 and 2007. Gene expression patterns were analyzed in 21 samples from 7 localized, 6 locally advanced, and 8 metastatic PCa patients using Illumina microarrays. Expression levels of 41 genes were validated by quantitative PCR in 101 independent PCa patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify individual predictors of BCR. A risk score for predicting BCR including clinicopathological and gene expression variables was developed. Interaction networks were built by GeneMANIA Cytoscape plugin. RESULTS A total of 37 patients developed BCR (36.6%) in a median follow-up of 120 months. Expression levels of 7,930 transcripts differed between clinically localized and locally advanced-metastatic PCa groups (FDR < 0.1). We found that expression of ASF1B and MCL1 as well as Gleason score, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and positive margins were independent prognostic factors of BCR. A risk score generated using these variables was able to discriminate between 2 groups of patients with a significantly different probability of BCR (HR 6.24; CI 3.23-12.4, P< 0.01), improving the individual discriminative performance of each of these variables on their own. Direct interactions between the 2 genes of the model were not found. CONCLUSION Combination of gene expression patterns and clinicopathological variables in a robust, easy-to-use, and reliable classifier may contribute to improve PCa risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Carrion
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Ingelmo-Torres
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan José Lozano
- CIBERehd. Plataforma de Bioinformática, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Spain
| | - Ruth Montalbo
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maurizio D'Anna
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Clàudia Mercader
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elena Velez
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria José Ribal
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lourdes Mengual
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fernandez C, Croke J, Alfieri J, Golden DW. A guide to curriculum inquiry for brachytherapy simulation-based medical education. Brachytherapy 2020; 19:S1538-4721(20)30173-2. [PMID: 34756355 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brachytherapy is a required clinical competency within radiation oncology training but decreased utilization and volume have limited trainee exposure. Simulation-based medical education is an established educational tool that allows learners to engage in higher-order learning in a safe space and has unique application in brachytherapy instruction. METHODS AND MATERIALS We reviewed best practices in curriculum development for simulation-based medical education in brachytherapy, current works in brachytherapy simulation, and identify areas for future development. RESULTS The systematic curriculum inquiry method as it relates to brachytherapy was described using the "six-step approach" of problem identification and general needs assessment, targeted needs assessment, goals and objectives, educational strategies, implementation, and evaluation and feedback. Best practices in simulation identified several features of effective learning, including feedback, repetitive practice, and curriculum integration. A review of current simulation-based medical education brachytherapy publications revealed five manuscripts to date with a focus on feasibility across a variety of disease sites, including the prostate, cervical, breast, and head and neck. Potential areas of future development include curricular quality improvement, long-term outcomes, objectives that scale to the learner's competencies, and expansion beyond psychomotor skills. CONCLUSIONS Brachytherapy is an essential modality in radiation oncology. Simulation-based medical education provides a powerful opportunity to improve brachytherapy training effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Fernandez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jennifer Croke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanne Alfieri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Daniel W Golden
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bagheri I, Shan Y, Klaassen Z, Kamat AM, Konety B, Mehta HB, Baillargeon JG, Srinivas S, Tyler DS, Swanson TA, Kaul S, Hollenbeck BK, Williams SB. Comparing Costs of Radical Versus Partial Cystectomy for Patients Diagnosed With Localized Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Understanding the Value of Surgical Care. Urology 2020; 147:127-134. [PMID: 32980405 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare costs associated with radical versus partial cystectomy. Prior studies noted substantial costs associated with radical cystectomy, however, they lack surgical comparison to partial cystectomy. METHODS A total of 2305 patients aged 66-85 years diagnosed with clinical stage T2-4a muscle-invasive bladder cancer from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2011 were included. Total Medicare costs within 1 year of diagnosis following radical versus partial cystectomy were compared using inverse probability of treatment-weighted propensity score models. Cox regression and competing risks analysis were used to determine overall and cancer-specific survival, respectively. RESULTS Median total costs were not significantly different for radical than partial cystectomy in 90 days ($73,907 vs $65,721; median difference $16,796, 95% CI $10,038-$23,558), 180 days ($113,288 vs $82,840; median difference $36,369, 95% CI $25,744-$47,392), and 365 days ($143,831 vs $107,359; median difference $34,628, 95% CI $17,819-$53,558), respectively. Hospitalization, surgery, pathology/laboratory, pharmacy, and skilled nursing facility costs contributed largely to costs associated with either treatment. Patients who underwent partial cystectomy had similar overall survival but had worse cancer-specific survival (Hazard Ratio 1.45, 95% Confidence Interval, 1.34-1.58, P < .001) than patients who underwent radical cystectomy. CONCLUSION While treatments for bladder cancer are associated with substantial costs, we showed radical cystectomy had comparable total costs when compared to partial cystectomy among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, partial cystectomy resulted in worse cancer-specific survival further supporting radical cystectomy as a high-value surgical procedure for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iyla Bagheri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Yong Shan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Zachary Klaassen
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Jacques G Baillargeon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Sealy Center on Aging, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | - Sunay Srinivas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Todd A Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Sapna Kaul
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | | | - Stephen B Williams
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Matulay JT, Tabayoyong W, Duplisea JJ, Chang C, Daneshmand S, Gore JL, Holzbeierlein JM, Karsh LI, Kim SP, Konety BR, Li R, McKiernan JM, Messing EM, Steinberg GD, Williams SB, Kamat AM. Variability in adherence to guidelines based management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer among Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) members. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:796.e1-796.e6. [PMID: 32430255 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The American Urological Association (AUA) introduced evidence-based guidelines for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in 2016. We sought to assess the implementation of these guidelines among members of the Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) with an aim to identifying addressable gaps. METHODS AND MATERIALS An SUO approved survey was distributed to 747 members from December 28, 2018 to February 2, 2019. This 14-question online survey (Qualtrics, SAP SE, Germany) consisted of 38 individual items addressing specific statements from the AUA NMIBC guidelines within 3 broad categories - initial diagnosis, surveillance, and imaging/biomarkers. Adherence to guidelines was assessed by dichotomizing responses to each item that was related to recommended action statement within the guidelines. Statistical analysis was applied using Pearson's chi-squared test, where a P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS A total of 121 (16.2%) members completed the survey. Members reported a mean of 71% guidelines adherence; adherence was higher for the intermediate- and high-risk subgroups (82% and 76%, respectively) compared to low-risk (58%). Specifically, adherence to guideline recommended cystoscopic surveillance intervals for low-risk disease differed based on clinical experience (60.9% [<10 years] vs. 36.8% [≥10 years], P = 0.01) and type of fellowship training (55.2% [urologic oncology] vs. 28.0% [none/other], P = 0.02). CONCLUSION Adherence to guidelines across risk-categories was higher for intermediate- and high-risk patients. Decreased adherence observed for low-risk patients resulted in higher than recommended use of cytology, imaging, and surveillance cystoscopy. These results identify addressable gaps and provide impetus for targeted interventions to support high-value care, especially for low-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin T Matulay
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - William Tabayoyong
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Jonathan J Duplisea
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Courtney Chang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Simon P Kim
- Division of Urology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - James M McKiernan
- Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Edward M Messing
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Department of Urology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Stephen B Williams
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch-Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rodin D, Chien AT, Ellimoottil C, Nguyen PL, Kakani P, Mossanen M, Rosenthal M, Landrum MB, Sinaiko AD. Physician and facility drivers of spending variation in locoregional prostate cancer. Cancer 2020; 126:1622-1631. [PMID: 31977081 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Revised: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the most common male cancer, with a wide range of treatment options. Payment reform to reduce unnecessary spending variation is an important strategy for reducing waste, but its magnitude and drivers within prostate cancer are unknown. METHODS In total, 38,971 men aged ≥66 years with localized prostate cancer who were enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service and were included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database from 2009 to 2014 were included. Multilevel linear regression with physician and facility random effects was used to examine the contributions of urologists, radiation oncologists, and their affiliated facilities to variation in total patient spending in the year after diagnosis within geographic region. The authors assessed whether spending variation was driven by patient characteristics, disease risk, or treatments. Physicians and facilities were sorted into quintiles of adjusted patient-level spending, and differences between those that were high-spending and low-spending were examined. RESULTS Substantial variation in spending was driven by physician and facility factors. Differences in cancer treatment modalities drove more variation across physicians than differences in patient and disease characteristics (72% vs 2% for urologists, 20% vs 18% for radiation oncologists). The highest spending physicians spent 46% more than the lowest and had more imaging tests, inpatient care, and radiotherapy spending. There were no differences across spending quintiles in the use of robotic surgery by urologists or the use of brachytherapy by radiation oncologists. CONCLUSIONS Significant differences were observed for patients with similar demographics and disease characteristics. This variation across both physicians and facilities suggests that efforts to reduce unnecessary spending must address decision making at both levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Rodin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alyna T Chien
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chad Ellimoottil
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pragya Kakani
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew Mossanen
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Meredith Rosenthal
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary Beth Landrum
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anna D Sinaiko
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tang C, Lei X, Smith GL, Pan HY, Hess K, Chen A, Hoffman KE, Chapin BF, Kuban DA, Anscher M, Tina Shih YC, Frank SJ, Smith BD. Costs and Complications After a Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Treated With Time-Efficient Modalities: An Analysis of National Medicare Data. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 10:282-292. [PMID: 32298794 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent trends in payer and patient preferences increasingly incentivize time-efficient (≤2-week treatment time) prostate cancer treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS National Medicare claims from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2014, were analyzed to identify newly diagnosed prostate cancers. Three "radical treatment" cohorts were identified (prostatectomy, brachytherapy, and stereotactic body radiation therapy [SBRT]) and matched to an active surveillance (AS) cohort by using inverse probability treatment weighting via propensity score. Total costs at 1 year after biopsy were calculated for each cohort, and treatment-specific costs were estimated by subtracting total 1-year costs in each radical treatment group from those in the AS group. RESULTS Mean 1-year adjusted costs were highest among patients receiving SBRT ($26,895), lower for prostatectomy ($23,632), and lowest for brachytherapy ($19,980), whereas those for AS were $9687. Costs of radical modalities varied significantly by region, with the Mid-Atlantic and New England regions having the highest cost ranges (>$10,000) and the West South Central and Mountain regions the lowest range in costs (<$2000). Quantification of toxic effects showed that prostatectomy was associated with higher genitourinary incontinence (hazard ratio [HR] = 10.8 compared with AS) and sexual dysfunction (HR = 3.5), whereas the radiation modalities were associated with higher genitourinary irritation/bleeding (brachytherapy HR = 1.7; SBRT HR = 1.5) and gastrointestinal ulcer/stricture/fistula (brachytherapy HR = 2.7; SBRT HR = 3.0). Overall mean toxicity costs were highest among patients treated with prostatectomy ($3500) followed by brachytherapy ($1847), SBRT ($1327), and AS ($1303). CONCLUSIONS Time-efficient treatment techniques exhibit substantial variability in toxicity and costs. Furthermore, geographic location substantially influenced treatment costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hubert Y Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kenneth Hess
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Aileen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian F Chapin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Deborah A Kuban
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mitchell Anscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ya-Chen Tina Shih
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jeong Y, Oh JG, Kang JK, Moon SR, Lee KK. Three-dimensional dose reconstruction-based pretreatment dosimetric verification in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol J 2020; 38:60-67. [PMID: 32229810 PMCID: PMC7113150 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2020.00066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We performed three-dimensional (3D) dose reconstruction-based pretreatment verification to evaluate gamma analysis acceptance criteria in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Pretreatment verification for 28 VMAT plans for prostate cancer was performed using the COMPASS system with a dolphin detector. The 3D reconstructed dose distribution of the treatment planning system calculation (TC) was compared with that of COMPASS independent calculation (CC) and COMPASS reconstruction from the dolphin detector measurement (CR). Gamma results (gamma failure rate and average gamma value [GFR and γAvg]) and dose-volume histogram (DVH) deviations, 98%, 2% and mean dose-volume difference (DD98%, DD2% and DDmean), were evaluated. Gamma analyses were performed with two acceptance criteria, 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm. Results The GFR in 2%/2 mm criteria were less than 8%, and those in 3%/3 mm criteria were less than 1% for all structures in comparisons between TC, CC, and CR. In the comparison between TC and CR, GFR and γAvg in 2%/2 mm criteria were significantly higher than those in 3%/3 mm criteria. The DVH deviations were within 2%, except for DDmean (%) for rectum and bladder. Conclusions The 3%/3 mm criteria were not strict enough to identify any discrepancies between planned and measured doses, and DVH deviations were less than 2% in most parameters. Therefore, gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm and DVH related parameters could be a useful tool for pretreatment verification for VMAT in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri Jeong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wonkwang University Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
| | - Jeong Geun Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wonkwang University Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
| | - Jeong Ku Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wonkwang University Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
| | - Sun Rock Moon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wonkwang University Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
| | - Kang Kyoo Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wonkwang University Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Risk of Pelvic Fracture With Radiation Therapy in Older Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:485-492. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 09/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
36
|
Chin S, Eccles CL, McWilliam A, Chuter R, Walker E, Whitehurst P, Berresford J, Van Herk M, Hoskin PJ, Choudhury A. Magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy: A review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64:163-177. [PMID: 31646742 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) is a promising approach to improving clinical outcomes for patients treated with radiation therapy. The roles of image guidance, adaptive planning and magnetic resonance imaging in radiation therapy have been increasing over the last two decades. Technical advances have led to the feasible combination of magnetic resonance imaging and radiation therapy technologies, leading to improved soft-tissue visualisation, assessment of inter- and intrafraction motion, motion management, online adaptive radiation therapy and the incorporation of functional information into treatment. MRgRT can potentially transform radiation oncology by improving tumour control and quality of life after radiation therapy and increasing convenience of treatment by shortening treatment courses for patients. Multiple groups have developed clinical implementations of MRgRT predominantly in the abdomen and pelvis, with patients having been treated since 2014. While studies of MRgRT have primarily been dosimetric so far, an increasing number of trials are underway examining the potential clinical benefits of MRgRT, with coordinated efforts to rigorously evaluate the benefits of the promising technology. This review discusses the current implementations, studies, potential benefits and challenges of MRgRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Chin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cynthia L Eccles
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Alan McWilliam
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Robert Chuter
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma Walker
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Philip Whitehurst
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Joseph Berresford
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Marcel Van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter J Hoskin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ogita M, Yamashita H, Sawayanagi S, Takahashi W, Nakagawa K. Efficacy of a hydrogel spacer in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020; 50:303-309. [DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyz171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
We aimed to compare the dose constraints fulfillment rate of the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy treatment plan before and after a hydrogel spacer insertion.
Methods
The planning computed tomography scans of 39 patients who received stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer were used. All patients inserted a hydrogel spacer and underwent computed tomography scans before and after spacer insertion. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plans according to NCCN classification, low-, intermediate- and high-risk, were made for each patient. Clinical target volume included prostate and seminal vesicle 2 cm for high risk, prostate and seminal vesicle 1 cm for intermediate risk and prostate only for low risk. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy including a seven-field conformal technique with 76 Gy in 38 fractions. Dose constraints for rectum and bladder were V70 Gy ≤ 15%, V65 Gy ≤ 30% and V40 Gy ≤ 60%.
Results
Among 39 patients, 35 (90%), 19 (49%) and 13 (33%) and 38 (97%), 38 (97%) and 34 (87%) patients before and after the spacer insertion fulfilled rectum dose constraints for low-, intermediate- and high-risk plans, respectively. A hydrogel spacer significantly reduced rectum dose and improved the rectum dose constraints fulfillment rate in intermediate (P < 0.01) and high (P < 0.01), but no difference was found in low-risk plan (P = 0.25). On multivariate analysis, spacer use was associated with the higher rectum dose constraints fulfillment rate.
Conclusions
A hydrogel spacer reduced rectum dose and improved the dose constraints fulfillment rate in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plan. Although IMRT is the standard treatment, 3D-CRT using a hydrogel spacer may be a treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mami Ogita
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideomi Yamashita
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Subaru Sawayanagi
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wataru Takahashi
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichi Nakagawa
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nabi J, Friedlander DF, Chen X, Cole AP, Hu JC, Kibel AS, Dasgupta P, Trinh QD. Assessment of Out-of-Pocket Costs for Robotic Cancer Surgery in US Adults. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e1919185. [PMID: 31940036 PMCID: PMC6991257 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Expensive technologies-including robotic surgery-experience rapid adoption without evidence of superior outcomes. Although previous studies have examined perioperative outcomes and costs, differences in out-of-pocket costs for patients undergoing robotic surgery are not well understood. OBJECTIVE To assess out-of-pocket costs and total payments for 5 types of common oncologic procedures that can be performed using an open or robotic approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective, cross-sectional, propensity score-weighted analysis was performed using deidentified insurance claims for 1.9 million enrollees from the MarketScan database from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017. The final study sample comprised 15 893 US adults aged 18 to 64 years who were enrolled in an employer-sponsored health plan. Patients underwent either an open or robotic radical prostatectomy, hysterectomy, partial colectomy, radical nephrectomy, or partial nephrectomy for a solid-organ malignant neoplasm. Statistical analysis was performed from December 18, 2018, to June 5, 2019. EXPOSURES Type of surgical procedure-robotic vs open. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome of interest was out-of-pocket costs associated with robotic and open surgery. The secondary outcome of interest was associated total payments. RESULTS Among 15 893 patients (11 102 men; mean [SD] age, 55.4 [6.6] years), 8260 underwent robotic and 7633 underwent open procedures; patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy were older than those undergoing open hysterectomy (mean [SD] age, 55.7 [6.7] vs 54.6 [7.2] years), and patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy had more comorbidities than those undergoing robotic radical nephrectomy (≥2 comorbidities, 658 of 861 [76.4%] vs 244 of 347 [70.3%]). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the robotic approach was associated with lower out-of-pocket costs for all procedures: -$137.75 (95% CI, -$240.24 to -$38.63) for radical prostatectomy (P = .006); -$640.63 (95% CI, -$933.62 to -$368.79) for hysterectomy (P < .001); -$1140.54 (95% CI, -$1397.79 to -$896.54) for partial colectomy (P < .001); -$728.32 (95% CI, -$1126.90 to -$366.08) for radical nephrectomy (P < .001); and -$302.74 (95% CI, -$523.14 to -$97.10) for partial nephrectomy (P = .003). The robotic approach was similarly associated with lower adjusted total payments: -$3872.62 (95% CI, -$5385.49 to -$2399.04) for radical prostatectomy (P < .001); -$29 640.69 (95% CI, -$36 243.82 to -$23 465.94) for hysterectomy (P < .001); -$38 151.74 (95% CI, -$46 386.16 to -$30 346.22) for partial colectomy; (P < .001); -$33 394.15 (95% CI, -$42 603.03 to -$24 955.20) for radical nephrectomy (P < .001); and -$9162.52 (95% CI, -$12 728.33 to -$5781.99) for partial nephrectomy (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found significant variation in perioperative costs according to surgical technique for both patients (out-of-pocket costs) and payers (total payments); the robotic approach was associated with lower out-of-pocket costs for all studied oncologic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junaid Nabi
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David F. Friedlander
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xi Chen
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexander P. Cole
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jim C. Hu
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Adam S. Kibel
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Prokar Dasgupta
- Medical Research Council Centre for Transplantation, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
|
40
|
Santos PMG, Barsky AR, Vapiwala N. Proton beam therapy after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2019; 126:1135-1136. [PMID: 31774555 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Mae G Santos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew R Barsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Survival After Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: An Epidemiologic Study. Ann Surg 2019; 274:e507-e514. [PMID: 31663972 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS To determine the potential survival benefit associated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) compared to open radical prostatectomy (ORP) for prostate cancer. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA RALP has become the dominant surgical approach for localized disease in the absence of randomized clinical evidence and despite of the factor that RALP is more expensive than ORP. METHODS We performed a cohort study involving patients who underwent RALP and ORP for localized prostate cancer at the Commission on Cancer-accredited hospitals in the United States. Overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score-matched analyses. An interrupted time-series analysis using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program database was also performed. RESULTS From 2010 to 2011, 37,645 patients received RALP and 12,655 patients received ORP. At a median follow-up of 60.7 months, RALP was associated with improved overall survival by both univariate [hazard ratio (HR), 0.69; P < 0.001] and multivariate analysis (HR, 0.76; P < 0.001) compared with ORP. Propensity score-matched analysis demonstrated improved 5-year all-cause mortality (3.9% vs 5.5%, HR, 0.73; P < 0.001) for RALP. The interrupted time-series analysis demonstrated the adoption of robotic surgery coincided with a systematic improvement in the 5-year cancer-specific survival rate of 0.17% (95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.25) per year after 2003 (P = 0.004 for change of trend), as compared to the time before adoption of RALP (1998-2003, annual percentage change, 0.01%; 95% confidence interval, -0.06 to 0.08). Sensitivity analysis suggested that the results from the interrupted time-series analysis were consistent with the improvement in the all-cause mortality demonstrated in the survival analysis (P = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS In this epidemiologic analysis, RALP was associated with a small but statistically significant improvement in 5-year all-cause mortality compared to ORP for localized prostate cancer. This is the first time in the literature to report a survival benefit with RALP. Our findings have significant quality and cost implications, and provide assurance regarding a dominant adoption of more expensive technology in the absence of randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
|
42
|
Huben NB, Hussein AA, May PR, Whittum M, Krasowski C, Ahmed YE, Jing Z, Khan H, Kim HL, Schwaab T, Underwood W, Kauffman EC, Mohler JL, Guru KA. Development of a Patient-Based Model for Estimating Operative Times for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. J Endourol 2019; 32:730-736. [PMID: 29631438 DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a methodology for predicting operative times for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using preoperative patient, disease, procedural, and surgeon variables to facilitate operating room (OR) scheduling. METHODS The model included preoperative metrics: body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists score, clinical stage, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk, prostate weight, nerve-sparing status, extent and laterality of lymph node dissection, and operating surgeon (six surgeons were included in the study). A binary decision tree was fit using a conditional inference tree method to predict operative times. The variables most associated with operative time were determined using permutation tests. Data were split at the value of the variable that results in the largest difference in mean for surgical time across the split. This process was repeated recursively on the resultant data. RESULTS A total of 1709 RARPs were included. The variable most strongly associated with operative time was the surgeon (surgeons 2 and 4-102 minutes shorter than surgeons 1, 3, 5, and 6, p < 0.001). Among surgeons 2 and 4, BMI had the strongest association with surgical time (p < 0.001). Among patients operated by surgeons 1, 3, 5, and 6, RARP time was again most strongly associated with the surgeon performing RARP. Surgeons 1, 3, and 6 were on average 76 minutes faster than surgeon 5 (p < 0.001). The regression tree output in the form of box plots showed operative time median and ranges according to patient, disease, procedural, and surgeon metrics. CONCLUSION We developed a methodology that can predict operative times for RARP based on patient, disease and surgeon variables. This methodology can be utilized for quality control, facilitate OR scheduling, and maximize OR efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil B Huben
- 1 Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York.,2 Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine , Dothan, Alabama
| | - Ahmed A Hussein
- 1 Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York.,3 Department of Urology, Cairo University , Cairo, Egypt
| | - Paul R May
- 1 Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York
| | - Michelle Whittum
- 1 Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York
| | - Collin Krasowski
- 1 Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York
| | - Youssef E Ahmed
- 1 Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York
| | - Zhe Jing
- 1 Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York
| | - Hijab Khan
- 1 Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York
| | - Hyung L Kim
- 4 Department of Urology, Cedar Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles, California
| | - Thomas Schwaab
- 1 Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York
| | - Willie Underwood
- 1 Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York
| | - Eric C Kauffman
- 1 Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York
| | - James L Mohler
- 1 Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York
| | - Khurshid A Guru
- 1 Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lee WR. Proton‐beam therapy after radical prostatectomy: Continued DVH idolatry? Cancer 2019; 125:4136-4138. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- W. Robert Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology Duke University Durham North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Williams SB, Shan Y, Ray-Zack MD, Hudgins HK, Jazzar U, Tyler DS, Freedland SJ, Swanson TA, Baillargeon JG, Hu JC, Kaul S, Kamat AM, Gore JL, Mehta HB. Comparison of Costs of Radical Cystectomy vs Trimodal Therapy for Patients With Localized Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. JAMA Surg 2019; 154:e191629. [PMID: 31166593 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Importance Earlier studies on the cost of muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatments lack granularity and are limited to 180 days. Objective To compare the 1-year costs associated with trimodal therapy vs radical cystectomy, accounting for survival and intensity effects on total costs. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based cohort study used the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database and included 2963 patients aged 66 to 85 years who had received a diagnosis of clinical stage T2 to T4a muscle-invasive bladder cancer from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2011. The data analysis was performed from March 5, 2018, through December 4, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures Total Medicare costs within 1 year of diagnosis following radical cystectomy vs trimodal therapy were compared using inverse probability of treatment-weighted propensity score models that included a 2-part estimator to account for intrinsic selection bias. Results Of 2963 participants, 1030 (34.8%) were women, 2591 (87.4%) were white, 129 (4.4%) were African American, and 98 (3.3%) were Hispanic. Median costs were significantly higher for trimodal therapy than radical cystectomy in 90 days ($83 754 vs $68 692; median difference, $11 805; 95% CI, $7745-$15 864), 180 days ($187 162 vs $109 078; median difference, $62 370; 95% CI, $55 581-$69 160), and 365 days ($289 142 vs $148 757; median difference, $109 027; 95% CI, $98 692-$119 363), respectively. Outpatient care, radiology, medication expenses, and pathology/laboratory costs contributed largely to the higher costs associated with trimodal therapy. On inverse probability of treatment-weighted adjusted analyses, patients undergoing trimodal therapy had $136 935 (95% CI, $122 131-$152 115) higher mean costs compared with radical cystectomy 1 year after diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance Compared with radical cystectomy, trimodal therapy was associated with higher costs among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The differences in costs were largely attributed to medication and radiology expenses associated with trimodal therapy. Extrapolating cost figures resulted in a nationwide excess spending of $468 million for trimodal therapy compared with radical cystectomy for patients who received a diagnosis of bladder cancer in 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen B Williams
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Yong Shan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Mohamed D Ray-Zack
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Hogan K Hudgins
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Usama Jazzar
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | | | - Todd A Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Jacques G Baillargeon
- Sealy Center on Aging, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Jim C Hu
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Sapna Kaul
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Hemalkumar B Mehta
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Schad M, Kowalchuk R, Beriwal S, Showalter TN. How might financial pressures have impacted brachytherapy? A proposed narrative to explain the declines in cervical and prostate brachytherapy utilization. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:780-786. [PMID: 31439465 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Rates of brachytherapy administration in the United States have declined for both cervical and prostate cancers, and we argue that the available facts suggest financial considerations are a major contributor to this issue. In this narrative, we discuss financial pressures that have existed for cervical and prostate brachytherapy and how they may have influenced their declining usage, consider other proposed influences, and provide suggestions for future research to understand the scope of the issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Roman Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, Dess RT, Kishan AU, Beeler WH, Gharzai LA, Jaworski EM, Mehra R, Hearn JWD, Morgan TM, Salami SS, Cooperberg MR, Mahal BA, Soni PD, Kaffenberger S, Nguyen PL, Desai N, Feng FY, Zumsteg ZS, Spratt DE. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Over 6,000 Patients Treated On Prospective Studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:778-789. [PMID: 30959121 PMCID: PMC6770993 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 239] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 02/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Utilization of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for treatment of localized prostate cancer is increasing. Guidelines and payers variably support the use of prostate SBRT. We therefore sought to systematically analyze biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), physician-reported toxicity, and patient-reported outcomes after prostate SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic search leveraging Medline via PubMed and EMBASE for original articles published between January 1990 and January 2018 was performed. This was supplemented by abstracts with sufficient extractable data from January 2013 to March 2018. All prospective series assessing curative-intent prostate SBRT for localized prostate cancer reporting bRFS, physician-reported toxicity, and patient-reported quality of life with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Meta-analyses were performed with random-effect modeling. Extent of heterogeneity between studies was determined by the I2 and Cochran's Q tests. Meta-regression was performed using Hartung-Knapp methods. RESULTS Thirty-eight unique prospective series were identified comprising 6116 patients. Median follow-up was 39 months across all patients (range, 12-115 months). Ninety-two percent, 78%, and 38% of studies included low, intermediate, and high-risk patients. Overall, 5- and 7-year bRFS rates were 95.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.3%-97.5%) and 93.7% (95% CI, 91.4%-95.5%), respectively. Estimated late grade ≥3 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity rates were 2.0% (95% CI, 1.4%-2.8%) and 1.1% (95% CI, 0.6%-2.0%), respectively. By 2 years post-SBRT, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary and bowel domain scores returned to baseline. Increasing dose of SBRT was associated with improved biochemical control (P = .018) but worse late grade ≥3 GU toxicity (P = .014). CONCLUSIONS Prostate SBRT has substantial prospective evidence supporting its use, with favorable tumor control, patient-reported quality of life, and levels of toxicity demonstrated. SBRT has sufficient evidence to be supported as a standard treatment option for localized prostate cancer while ongoing trials assess its potential superiority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C Jackson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jessica Silva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Holly E Hartman
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Robert T Dess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Whitney H Beeler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Laila A Gharzai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Rohit Mehra
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jason W D Hearn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Simpa S Salami
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Brandon A Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Payal D Soni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Neil Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Zachary S Zumsteg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gurunathan S, Qasim M, Park CH, Arsalan Iqbal M, Yoo H, Hwang JH, Uhm SJ, Song H, Park C, Choi Y, Kim JH, Hong K. Cytotoxicity and Transcriptomic Analyses of Biogenic Palladium Nanoparticles in Human Ovarian Cancer Cells (SKOV3). NANOMATERIALS 2019; 9:nano9050787. [PMID: 31121951 PMCID: PMC6566439 DOI: 10.3390/nano9050787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer incidence continues to increase at an alarming rate. Although various therapeutic approaches exist for ovarian cancer, they have limitations, including undesired side effects. Therefore, nanoparticle (NP)-mediated therapy may be a viable, biocompatible, and suitable alternative. To the best of our knowledge, no comprehensive analysis has been undertaken on the cytotoxicity and cellular pathways involved in ovarian cancer cells, particularly SKOV3 cells. Here, we investigated the effect of palladium NPs (PdNPs) and the molecular mechanisms and cellular pathways involved in ovarian cancer. We assayed cell viability, proliferation, cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, DNA damage, and apoptosis and performed an RNA-Seq analysis. The results showed that PdNPs elicited concentration-dependent decreases in cell viability and proliferation and induced increasing cytotoxicity at increasing concentrations, as determined by leakage of lactate dehydrogenase, increased levels of reactive oxygen species and malondialdehyde, and decreased levels of antioxidants like glutathione and superoxide dismutase. Furthermore, our study revealed that PdNPs induce mitochondrial dysfunction by altering mitochondrial membrane potential, reducing adenosine triphosphate levels, inducing DNA damage, and activating caspase 3, all of which significantly induced apoptosis in SKOV3 cells following PdNPs treatment. Gene ontology (GO) term analysis of PdNPs-exposed SKOV3 cells showed various dysregulated pathways, particularly nucleosome assembly, telomere organization, and rDNA chromatin silencing. When genes downregulated by PdNPs were applied to GO term enrichment analysis, nucleosome assembly was the top-ranked biological pathway. We also provide evidence for an association between PdNPs exposure and multiple layers of epigenetic transcriptional control and establish a molecular basis for NP-mediated apoptosis. These findings provide a foundation, potential targets, and novel insights into the mechanism underlying toxicity and pathways in SKOV3 cells, and open new avenues to identify novel targets for ovarian cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangiliyandi Gurunathan
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology and Humanized Pig Center (SRC), Konkuk Institute of Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
| | - Muhammad Qasim
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology and Humanized Pig Center (SRC), Konkuk Institute of Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
| | - Chan Hyeok Park
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology and Humanized Pig Center (SRC), Konkuk Institute of Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
| | - Muhammad Arsalan Iqbal
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology and Humanized Pig Center (SRC), Konkuk Institute of Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
| | - Hyunjin Yoo
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology and Humanized Pig Center (SRC), Konkuk Institute of Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
| | - Jeong Ho Hwang
- Animal Model Research Group, Jeonbuk Department of Inhalation Research, Korea Institute of Toxicology, 30 Baekhak1-gil, Jeongeup, Jeollabuk-do 56212, Korea.
| | - Sang Jun Uhm
- Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Sangji Youngseo College, Wonju 26339, Korea.
| | - Hyuk Song
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology and Humanized Pig Center (SRC), Konkuk Institute of Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
| | - Chankyu Park
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology and Humanized Pig Center (SRC), Konkuk Institute of Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
| | - Youngsok Choi
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology and Humanized Pig Center (SRC), Konkuk Institute of Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
| | - Jin-Hoi Kim
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology and Humanized Pig Center (SRC), Konkuk Institute of Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
| | - Kwonho Hong
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology and Humanized Pig Center (SRC), Konkuk Institute of Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Murillo R, Robles C. Research Needs for Implementing Cancer Prevention and Early Detection in Developing Countries: From Scientists' to Implementers' Perspectives. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2019; 2019:9607803. [PMID: 31205949 PMCID: PMC6530220 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9607803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Implementation of evidence-based cancer prevention and early detection in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is challenging. Limited and inappropriate introduction of novel alternatives results in an equity gap whereby low-income populations receive a lower benefit. Implementation research represents an opportunity to foster the adoption and expansion of evidence-based cancer control strategies; however, scientific development in high-income countries does not necessarily fulfill the particular needs of LMIC in the field. A review on the link between implementation research and practice, the tension between theory and pragmatism, the conflict around implementation research methods, and determinants of research priority definition was carried out by considering the perspective of cancer prevention and early detection implementers in LMIC. Basic principles and alternatives to overcome implementation research challenges in these settings are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raúl Murillo
- Centro Javeriano de Oncología – Hospital Universitario San Ignacio – Bogotá, Colombia
- Prevention and Implementation Group – International Agency for Research on Cancer – Lyon, France
| | - Claudia Robles
- Unit of Infections and Cancer (UNIC), Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme - Institut Catala d' Oncologia – Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cole AP, Krasnova A, Ramaswamy A, Friedlander DF, Fletcher SA, Sun M, Choueiri TK, Weissman JS, Kibel AS, Trinh QD. Prostate cancer in the medicare shared savings program: are Accountable Care Organizations associated with reduced expenditures for men with prostate cancer? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2019; 22:593-599. [DOI: 10.1038/s41391-019-0138-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
50
|
Connelly TM, Malik Z, Sehgal R, Byrnes G, Coffey JC, Peirce C. The 100 most influential manuscripts in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Robot Surg 2019; 14:155-165. [PMID: 30949890 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00956-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Since the first robotic assisted surgery in 1985, the number of procedures performed annually has steadily increased. Bibliometric analysis highlights the key studies that have influenced current practice in a field of interest. We use bibliometric analysis to evaluate the 100 most cited manuscripts on robotic surgery and discuss their content and influence on the evolution of the platform. The terms 'robotic surgery,' 'robot assisted surgery' and 'robot-assisted surgery' were used to search Thomson Reuters Web of Science database for full length, English language manuscripts. The top 100 cited manuscripts were analyzed by manuscript type, surgical specialty, first and last author, institution, year and journal of publication. 14,980 manuscripts were returned. Within the top 100 cited manuscripts, the majority featured urological surgery (n = 28), followed by combined results from multiple surgical subspecialties (n = 15) and colorectal surgery (n = 13). The majority of manuscripts featured case series/reports (n = 42), followed by comparative studies (n = 24). The most cited paper authored by Nelson et al. (432 citations) reviewed technological advances in the field. The year and country with the greatest number of publications were 2009 (n = 15) and the USA (n = 68). The Johns Hopkins University published the most top 100 manuscripts (n = 18). The 100 most cited manuscripts reflect the progression of robotic surgery from a basic instrument-holding platform to today's articulated instruments with 3D technology. From feasibility studies to multicenter trials, this analysis demonstrates how robotic assisted surgery has gained acceptance in urological, colorectal, general, cardiothoracic, orthopedic, maxillofacial and neuro surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara M Connelly
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland.
| | - Zoya Malik
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Rishabh Sehgal
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Gerrard Byrnes
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
| | - J Calvin Coffey
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Colin Peirce
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|