Patterns of adjuvant chemotherapy use in a population-based cohort of patients with resected stage II or III colon cancer

Guidance for Treating the Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

The need for evidence-based data in the rapidly growing group of older patients is vast and more elderly-specific studies are desperately needed, for which there is clear demand from both patients and providers. Notably, many of the studies discussed in this review included unplanned subset analyses based on age and/or were not originally stratified by age; therefore, these data, particularly overall survival data, need to be interpreted with some caution as they may not be statistically valid based on the initial trial design and statistical plan. As we await data from ongoing elderly-specific trials, our recommendation for managing older patients with CRC should include geriatric screening tools (e.g., CSGA, VES-13, G8, CARG, CRASH) to help guide treatment adjustments for improved tolerability without sacrificing efficacy. For patients with a positive screen for significant geriatric concerns, a full geriatric assessment is recommended to guide treatment approach and supportive care. Prior data support the use of all approved medications for CRC in older adults who are fit; however, treatment breaks and dose attenuation with potential escalation are reasonable options for these patients. Ultimately, management decisions in the care of older adults with mCRC must be made through shared decision-making with the patient with consideration for the patient's functional status, comorbidities, goals of care, social support, as well as potential toxicities and possible effect on QoL.

Treatment Utilization and Outcomes for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Older Patients

Importance

The number of older patients (80 years and older) diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is expected to increase. Although current guidelines recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) followed by resection, little is known about management and outcomes in this older population.

Objective

To assess the trends in management of older patients diagnosed with LARC who had a surgical resection.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Patients 80 years and older who had a surgical resection for LARC were identified in the 2004-2016 National Cancer Database. Patients were grouped based on therapy sequence: (1) surgery followed by adjuvant therapy (AT), ie, chemotherapy or radiation; (2) surgery alone; or (3) NACRT followed by surgical resection. Data were analyzed in May 2021.

Exposures

NACRT followed by surgery, and surgery with or without AT.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to examine the association of NACRT with the risk of death.

Results

Of 3868 patients with LARC who underwent surgical resection, 2042 (52.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 83.4 (3.0) years. A total of 2273 (58.8%) received NACRT followed by surgical resection. Factors independently associated with NACRT were more recent diagnosis, age 80 to 85 years (vs 86 years and older), fewer comorbidities, larger tumors, and node-positive disease. The Kaplan-Meier analyses with IPTW showed that 3-year and 5-year OS for NACRT (3-year: 68.9%; 95% CI, 67.0-70.8; 5-year: 51.1%; 95% CI, 49.0-53.4) vs surgery with AT (3-year: 64.4%; 95% CI, 59.0-70.2; 5-year: 43.0%; 95% CI, 37.4-49.5) vs surgery alone (3-year: 55.8%; 95% CI, 52.0-60.0; 5-year: 34.7%; 95% CI, 30.8-39.0) was significantly different (P < .001). After adjusting for confounders, patients who received NACRT were more likely to undergo an R0 resection (adjusted odds ratio, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.62-2.88), which independently improved OS (P < .001). Moreover, receipt of NACRT was independently associated with a 25% decreased risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82) compared with alternative treatment sequences.

Conclusions and Relevance

Approximately 40% of older patients with LARC did not receive the current standard of care. In this cohort, NACRT was associated with a higher likelihood of an R0 resection and improved OS. Clinicians should advocate for receipt of NACRT in older patients with LARC.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Benefit in Elderly Stage II/III Colon Cancer Patients

Background

Studies providing more evidence to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in elderly colon cancer patients are expected.

Methods

We obtained data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to calculate the cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate, and comparisons of survival difference between different subgroups were performed using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were carried out to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of different clinicopathological characteristics.

Results

In stage II colon cancer patients aged 70 years or older, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the 5-year CSS rates of no chemotherapy and chemotherapy groups were 82.0% and 72.4%, respectively (P &lt; 0.001). In stage III colon cancer patients aged 70 years or older, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the 5-year CSS rates of no chemotherapy and chemotherapy groups were 50.7% and 61.3%, respectively (P &lt; 0.001). Patients with chemotherapy receipt were independently associated with a 35.8% lower cancer-specific mortality rate (HR = 0.642, 95% CI: 0.620-0.665, P &lt; 0.001) compared with those who did not receive chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered during the treatment of stage III colon cancer patients aged 70 years or older, but the chemotherapy benefit in elderly stage II colon cancer is suboptimal.

Colon cancer survival in California from 2004 to 2011 by stage at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status

BACKGROUND

Disparities in cancer survival exist between groups. This study aims to examine these disparities in stage-, sex-, race/ethnicity-, and socioeconomic-specific colon cancer net survival in California for adults diagnosed between 2004 and 2011.

METHODS

We estimated age-standardized net survival using the Pohar Perme estimator for colon cancer by stage at diagnosis (localized, regional, and distant), sex, race/ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic), and socioeconomic status (SES). Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database on adults diagnosed with malignant colon cancer during 2004-2011 in California were included (n = 78,285). County-level SES was approximated using quintile groupings based on the Federal Poverty Level.

RESULTS

Five-year survival for all included adults was 66.0 % (95 % CI: 65.6 %-66.4 %). The difference between Non-Hispanic White (White) adults and Non-Hispanic Black (Black) adults was 9.3 %, and between White adults and Hispanic adults was 3.4 %. A higher proportion of Black (24.5 %) and Hispanic (21.4 %) adults were diagnosed with distant disease compared to White adults (19.4 %). Differences in sex-specific survival were minimal, with only differences between Hispanic men (62.0 % [60.5 %-63.4 %]) and women (65.9 % [64.4 %-67.3 %]). SES differences were largest between the lowest quintile 63.0 % (62.3 %-65.2 %) and the highest quintile 67.8 % (66.8 %-68.8 %). SES-, stage-, and race/ethnicity-stratified analysis demonstrated improving trends for White adults with localized and regional disease, and Hispanic adults with regional disease.

CONCLUSION

Colon cancer survival in California is lower for Black and Hispanic adults than for White adults in all three categories: stage, sex, and SES, suggesting the need for improved health policy for Hispanic and Black adults.

Development of a Model for Predicting Early Discontinuation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage III Colon Cancer

PURPOSE

To develop a tool that can be used to predict early discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy among patients with stage III colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Through record linkage of Alberta administrative and tumor registry databases, we identified a cohort of individuals age ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with stage III colon cancer and who received adjuvant chemotherapy in Alberta between 2004 and 2015. Early discontinuation was defined as receipt of < 5 months of a planned 6-month course of chemotherapy. By a systematic review of the literature and a survey of medical oncologists, the following candidate variables were identified: age (years), number of comorbidities (0, 1, ≥ 2), cancer stage (IIIC v IIIA-B), type of chemotherapy (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin; capecitabine and oxaliplatin; or monotherapy), time from surgery to chemotherapy initiation (weeks), type of treatment facility (academic or community), and distance from home to treatment center (kilometers). Models developed using penalized logistic regression and the random forest algorithm were compared. Model performance was assessed using the C-statistic, Brier score, and a calibration plot. Internal validation was performed using the bootstrap method.

RESULTS

From an initial 3,115 patients identified, 1,378 were deemed eligible for inclusion. Of these patients, 474 patients (34.4%) failed to complete at least 5 months of chemotherapy. Although well calibrated, the penalized logistic regression model had poor discrimination (optimism-adjusted C-statistic, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.67). In contrast, the random forest model achieved adequate discrimination (optimism-adjusted C-statistic, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.82). Although the degree of calibration of the random forest was acceptable, it was slightly worse than that of the penalized logistic regression model.

CONCLUSION

Internal validation of our random forest model suggests that it may have clinical utility. Additional research regarding its external validation and clinical impact is needed.

Variation in receipt of therapy and survival with provider volume for medical oncology in non-curative esophago-gastric cancer: a population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

While surgical care by high-volume providers for esophago-gastric cancer (EGC) yields better outcomes, volume-outcome relationships are unknown for systemic therapy. We examined receipt of therapy and outcomes in the non-curative management of EGC based on medical oncology provider volume.

METHODS

We conducted a population based retrospective cohort study of non-curative EGC over 2005-2017 by linking administrative healthcare datasets. The volume of new EGC consultations per medical oncology provider per year was calculated and divided into quintiles. High-volume (HV) medical oncologists were defined as the 4-5th quintiles. Outcomes were receipt of chemotherapy and overall survival (OS). Multivariate logistic and Cox-proportional hazards regressions examined the association between management by HV medical oncologist, receipt of systemic therapy, and OS.

RESULTS

7011 EGC patients with non-curative management consulted with medical oncology. 1-year OS was superior for HV medical oncologists (> 11 patients/year), with 28.4% (95% CI 26.7-30.2%) compared to 25.1% (95% CI 23.8-26.3%) for low volume (p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity burden, rurality, income quintile, and diagnosis year, HV medical oncologist was independently associated with higher odds of receiving chemotherapy (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.26), and independently associated with superior OS (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical oncology provider volume was associated with variation in non-curative management and outcomes of EGC. Care by an HV medical oncologist was independently associated with higher odds of receiving chemotherapy and superior OS, after adjusting for case mix. This information is important to inform disease care pathways and care organization; an increase in the number of HV medical oncologists may reduce variation and improve outcomes.

Prognostic factors of adjuvant chemotherapy discontinuation among stage III colon cancer patients: A survey of medical oncologists and a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Factors that are prognostic of early discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy among stage III colon cancer patients have yet to be described. To address this gap, a survey of medical oncologists and a systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted.

Methods

A survey was distributed in March 2019 to medical oncologists who treat colon cancer within Alberta, Canada. Clinicians were asked to rank the prognostic importance of a set of variables using a Likert scale and agreement was quantified using a weighted Cohen's kappa. In addition, we systematically searched four databases up to July 2019. Meta‐analyses were conducted using a random‐effects model.

Results

Of the 25 clinicians who were sent the survey, 14 responded. Overall, there was no agreement regarding which variables were prognostic of early discontinuation (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.05‐0.18). From an initial 3927 articles, 18 investigations were identified for inclusion in our review. Based upon evidence from both the survey and the systematic review, the following four variables were identified as being prognostic of early discontinuation: (a) comorbidity (OR_{2+ vs 0} = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.30‐1.79); (b) performance status (OR_{ECOG 2+ vs 0‐1} = 1.33; 95%CI = 1.07‐1.65); (c) T stage (OR_{T4 vs T1‐2} = 1.57; 95% CI = 0.99‐2.50); and (d) chemotherapy regimen (estimates not pooled due to heterogeneity). In addition to these factors, there was some suggestion that age, marital status/social support, muscle mass, N stage, and tumor grade had prognostic value.

Conclusions

Current evidence is heterogeneous and limited. Additional research is needed to confirm our findings and to explore additional prognostic factors.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. Is there a role in the older adult?

As global life expectancy has increased in most countries, there is a rising percentage of patients over 65 years old being diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Despite an increase in the incidence and prevalence of colorectal cancer in older adults, this cohort receives adjuvant therapy at a decreased rate due to anticipated intolerance. The presumed limitations seem to be based on chronologic age, competing life limiting diagnoses, and the paucity of data studying this population in major clinical trials. This review explores the data regarding disparities in the treatment of older patients with colorectal cancer, safety and efficacy of adjuvant therapy, and newer tools to make decisions based on the biologic age, rather than chronologic age, of the patient.

Development and external validation of a predictive scoring system associated with metastasis of T1-2 colorectal tumors to lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

It is critical for determining the optimum therapeutic solutions for T1-2 colorectal cancer (CRC) to accurately predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) status. The purpose of the present study is to establish and verify a nomogram to predict LNM status in T1-2 CRCs.

METHODS

A total of 16 600 T1-2 CRC patients were enrolled and classified into the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. The independent predictive parameters were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses to develop a nomogram to predict the probability of LNM status. The calibration curve, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram, and an external verification cohort was to verify the applicability of the nomogram.

RESULTS

Seven independent predictors of LNM in T1-2 CRC were identified in the multivariable analysis, including age, tumor site, tumor grade, perineural invasion, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, clinical assessment of LNM, and T stage. A nomogram incorporating the seven predictors was constructed. The nomogram yielded good discrimination and calibration, with AUROCs of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.75), 0.70 (95% CI: 0.67-0.74), and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79) in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. DCA showed that the predictive scoring system had high clinical application value.

CONCLUSIONS

We proposed a novel predictive model for LNM in T1-2 CRC patients to assist physicians in making treatment decisions. The nomogram is advantageous for tailoring therapy in T1-2 CRC patients.

HemOnc: A new standard vocabulary for chemotherapy regimen representation in the OMOP common data model

Systematic application of observational data to the understanding of impacts of cancer treatments requires detailed information models allowing meaningful comparisons between treatment regimens. Unfortunately, details of systemic therapies are scarce in registries and data warehouses, primarily due to the complex nature of the protocols and a lack of standardization. Since 2011, we have been creating a curated and semi-structured website of chemotherapy regimens, HemOnc.org. In coordination with the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) Oncology Subgroup, we have transformed a substantial subset of this content into the OMOP common data model, with bindings to multiple external vocabularies, e.g., RxNorm and the National Cancer Institute Thesaurus. Currently, there are >73,000 concepts and >177,000 relationships in the full vocabulary. Content related to the definition and composition of chemotherapy regimens has been released within the ATHENA tool (athena.ohdsi.org) for widespread utilization by the OHDSI membership. Here, we describe the rationale, data model, and initial contents of the HemOnc vocabulary along with several use cases for which it may be valuable.

Nutritional status predicts adjuvant chemotherapy outcomes for stage III colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

Previously, adjuvant chemotherapy using oxaliplatin was a standard treatment for patients with node-positive colorectal cancer (CRC) who underwent curative surgery. The factor predicting adverse events and therapeutic effect have not yet been established.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 42 patients diagnosed with stage III CRC between April 2009 and March 2013 in our institution were included in this study. The indicators of host nutritional status were body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, Onodera's prognostic nutritional index (OPNI), and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS). The indicators of host immunocompetence was total lymphocyte counts, total neutrophil counts, granulocytes/lymphocytes ratio (G/L ratio).

RESULTS

The overall recurrence rate was 26.1%. Patients who had a recurrence were more likely to be older. The recurrence was not associated with type of regimen or adverse events. The cases with a few cumulative doses and relative dose intensity of oxaliplatin experienced significantly more recurrence. Nutritional status indicators, such as the serum albumin level, OPNI, and the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) were associated with the adjuvant chemotherapy outcome. Our study results indicated worse nutritional status induced worse disease-free survival (DFS) and more recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The host's nutritional status associated with outcomes in stage III CRC patients.

Age-related inequalities in colon cancer treatment persist over time: a population-based analysis

Background

Older people experience poorer outcomes from colon cancer. We examined if treatment for colon cancer was related to age and if inequalities changed over time.

Methods

Data from the UK population-based Northern and Yorkshire Cancer Registry on 31 910 incident colon cancers (ICD10 C18) diagnosed between 1999–2010 were obtained. Likelihood of receipt of: (1) cancer-directed surgery, (2) chemotherapy in surgical patients, (3) chemotherapy in non-surgical patients by age, adjusting for sex, area deprivation, cancer stage, comorbidity and period of diagnosis, was examined.

Results

Age-related inequalities in treatment exist after adjustment for confounding factors. Patients aged 60– 69, 70–79 and 80+ years were significantly less likely to receive surgery than those aged <60 years (multivariable ORs (95% CI) 0.84(0.74 to 0.95), 0.54(0.48 to 0.61) and 0.19(0.17 to 0.21), respectively). Age-related differences in receipt of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (but not chemotherapy in non-surgical patients) narrowed over time for the ’younger old’ (aged <80 years) but did not diminish for the oldest patients.

Conclusions

Age inequality in treatment of colon cancer remains after adjustment for confounders, suggesting age remains a major factor in treatment decisions. Research is needed to better understand the cancer treatment decision-making process, and how to influence this, for older patients.

Association analyses of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway with the progression and prognosis of colon cancer

The present study investigated the association between the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway with tumor progression and prognosis of colon cancer. A total of 62 patients with colon cancer were selected as the colon cancer group, and 40 patients with colon lesions were selected as the benign colon lesion group. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression levels of JAK-1 and STAT-3 proteins in colon tissues. The association of JAK-1 and STAT-3 proteins with the pathological parameters and prognosis of colon cancer were analyzed. The total positive rates of JAK-1 and STAT-3 proteins in lesions of patients in the colon cancer group were significantly higher compared with those in the benign colon lesion group (P<0.05). The positive expression of JAK-1 and STAT-3 proteins in patients with colon cancer were not significantly associated with sex, age, tumor differentiation degree and neurovascular invasion (P>0.05), but significantly associated with the clinical stage of colon cancer, tumor infiltration depth and lymph node metastasis (P<0.05). The survival time of patients with colon cancer with positively-expressed JAK-1 and STAT-3 proteins was significantly shorter compared with that of patients with negatively-expressed JAK-1 and STAT-3 proteins (P<0.05). tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, lymph node metastasis and the expression of JAK-1 and STAT-3 proteins in the tumor were associated with the prognosis of patients with colon cancer (P<0.05). TNM stage and the expression levels of JAK-1 and STAT-3 proteins were independent risk factors influencing the prognosis of colon cancer (P<0.05). The JAK/STAT signal may be used as a novel tumor marker and prognostic factor for the diagnosis, assessment and prognosis of colon cancer.

Impact of Tumor Deposits on Oncologic Outcomes in Stage III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of tumor deposits in stage III colon adenocarcinoma is poorly described.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of tumor deposits on oncologic outcomes in patients with stage III colon cancer.

DESIGN

This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

The 2010 to 2014 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with resected stage III colon adenocarcinoma on final pathology.

PATIENTS

Patients were divided into 3 groups: lymph nodes+tumor deposits-, lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, and lymph nodes-tumor deposits+.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome was 5-year overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 74,577 patients, there were 55,800 patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits-, 13,740 patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, and 5037 patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+. The groups had similar patient and facility characteristics, but patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+ had more advanced tumor characteristics. Patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ were less likely to receive adjuvant systemic therapy (52% vs 74% lymph nodes+tumor deposits- and 75% lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, p < 0.001) and had a longer delay to initiation of adjuvant treatment (>8 weeks; 43% vs 33% lymph nodes+tumor deposits- and 33% lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, p < 0.001). Patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+ had the lowest 5-year overall survival (46.0% vs 63.4% lymph nodes+tumor deposits- vs 61.9% lymph nodes-tumor deposits+, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ had similar 5-year overall survival compared with patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits- with ≤3 positive lymph nodes (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-1.01). Patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+ had worse prognosis regardless of the number of involved lymph nodes (≤3 +lymph nodes: HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.28-1.47 and ≥4 +lymph nodes: HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.22-1.38). Of those not receiving adjuvant treatment, patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ were younger and had more adverse tumor features than lymph node+ disease. Lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ was independently associated with less delivery of adjuvant systemic therapy (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.80-0.82).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective analysis of a prospective database.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of patients with N1c disease is similar to nodal involvement without tumor deposits, yet these patients were less likely to receive adjuvant systemic therapy. Improvement in the delivery of appropriate care in these patients may increase survival and should be a target of future quality initiatives. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A666.

Management of locally advanced rectal cancer in the elderly: a critical review and algorithm

Colorectal cancer incidence and death rates have been declining over the past 10 years. However, it remains the second leading cause of death in men ages 60-79 and the third leading cause of death in men over 80 and in women over 60 years old. However, there is little data specific to the treatment of the elder patient, since few of these patients are included in trials. With the advent of improved therapies, there are many alternative options available. Still, no definitive consensus or guidelines have been defined for this particular patient population. The goal of this study is to review the literature on the management of rectal cancer in the elderly and to propose treatment algorithms to help the oncology team in treatment decision-making.

Use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer in Puerto Rico: A population-based study

Objective

This study aims to examine factors associated with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and the use of oxaliplatin after curative resection in stage III colon cancer patients and assesses the effect of their use in three-year survival.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted using Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry-Health Insurance Linkage Database. The study cohort consisted of stage III colon cancer patients with a curative surgery in the period 2008–2012. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between adjuvant chemotherapy and oxaliplatin use and overall survival and risk of death, respectively.

Results

Overall, 75% of the study population received adjuvant chemotherapy during the study period. Factors statistically associated with receiving adjuvant chemotherapy within four months after resection included being married (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.64; 95% CI 1.18–2.28; p = 0.003), and being enrolled in Medicare (AOR 1.68; 95% CI: 1.03–2.75; p = 0.039) or Medicaid and Medicare dual eligible (AOR 1.66; 95% CI: 1.06–2.60; p = 0.028). However, patients aged ≥70 years were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (AOR 0.22; 95%CI 0.14–0.36; p<0.001).

Discussion

We observed a significant reduction in mortality in adjuvant chemotherapy treated patients. Similarly, patients <70 years treated with oxaliplatin had significantly lower risk of death than those who did not, although for patients ≥70 years no statistical significance was achieved. Future studies should assess effective interventions to reduce barriers to access guideline-based recommended colon cancer treatment.

Colon cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study

BACKGROUND

In the first CONCORD study (2008), 5-year survival for patients diagnosed with colon cancer between 1990 and 1994 in the United States was among the highest in the world (60%), but there were large racial disparities in most participating states. The CONCORD-2 study (2015) enabled the examination of survival trends between 1995 and 2009 for US states by race and stage.

METHODS

The authors analyzed data from 37 state population-based cancer registries, covering approximately 80% of the US population, for patients who were diagnosed with colon cancer between 2001 and 2009 and were followed through 2009. Survival up to 5 years was corrected for background mortality (net survival) using state-specific and race-specific life tables and age-standardized using the International Cancer Survival Standard weights. Survival is presented by race (all, black, white), stage, state, and calendar period (2001-2003 and 2004-2009) to account for changes in methods used to collect stage.

RESULTS

Five-year net survival increased by 0.9%, from 63.7% between 2001 and 2003 to 64.6% between 2004 and 2009. More black than white patients were diagnosed with distant-stage disease between 2001 and 2003 (21.5% vs 17.2%) and between 2004 and 2009 (23.3% vs 18.8%). Survival improved for both blacks and whites, but 5-year net survival was 9-10% lower for blacks than for whites both between 2001 and 2003 (54.7% vs 64.5%) and between 2004 and 2009 (56.6% vs 65.4%). The absolute difference between blacks and whites decreased by only 1% during the decade.

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year net survival from colon cancer increased slightly over time. Survival among blacks diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 had still not reached the level of that among whites diagnosed between 1990 and 1994, some 15 to 20 years earlier. These findings suggest a need for more targeted efforts to improve screening and to ensure timely, appropriate treatment, especially for blacks, to reduce this large and persistent disparity in survival. Cancer 2017;123:5014-36. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Effect of a Shortened Duration of FOLFOX Chemotherapy on the Survival Rate of Patients with Stage II and III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

FOLFOX chemotherapy is widely used as an adjuvant treatment for advanced colon cancer. The duration of adjuvant chemotherapy is usually set to 6 months, which is based on a former study of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy. However, the FOLFOX regimen is known to have complications, such as peripheral neuropathy. The aim of this study was to compare the survival rates and complications experienced by patients receiving either 4 or 6 months of FOLFOX chemotherapy.

METHODS

Retrospective data analysis was performed for stage II and III patients who underwent radical resection of colon cancer. We compared the 5-year survival rates and the occurrence of complications in patients who completed only 8 cycles of FOLFOX chemotherapy with patients who completed 12 cycles of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Among 188 patients who underwent adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy for stage II or III colon cancer, 83 (44.1%) completed 6 months of FOLFOX chemotherapy and 64 (34.0%) patients discontinued after 4 months of chemotherapy. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates did not show a significant difference. Patients in the 6-month group had peripheral neuropathy more frequently (p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year overall and disease-free survival were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Large-scale prospective studies are necessary for the analysis of complications and survival rates.

Management of stage III colon cancer in the elderly: Practice patterns and outcomes in the general population

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have established surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) as the standard management for stage III colon cancer; however, the extent to which these results apply to elderly patients in routine practice is unclear. This article describes the management and outcomes of elderly patients with stage III colon cancer.

METHODS

All cases of surgically resected colon cancer from 2002 to 2008 were identified with the population-based Ontario Cancer Registry. Pathology reports were obtained for a random sample (25% of all cases); those with stage III disease constituted the study population. The utilization of ACT, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) in elderly patients (≥70 years) and nonelderly patients (<70 years) were compared.

RESULTS

The study population included 2920 patients, and 1521 (52%) were elderly. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates increased with advanced age: <70 years, 2% and 5%; 70 to 74 years, 3% and 7%; 75 to 79 years, 5% and 8%, and ≥80 years, 9% and 16% (P < .001). ACT was delivered to 48% of elderly patients and to 81% of younger patients (P < .001). Factors independently associated with ACT utilization among the elderly were a younger age (P < .001), male sex (P = .041), and no comorbidities (P = .001). Among elderly patients, ACT was associated with improved CSS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.88) and OS (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.83); however, the magnitude of the benefit was smaller for elderly patients than younger patients (HR for CSS, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42-0.67; HR for OS 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45-0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Half of elderly patients with stage III colon cancer do not receive ACT. Although the effect size is smaller than that in younger patients, ACT is associated with improved long-term survival. Cancer 2017;123:2840-49. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Impact of Dose Reductions, Delays Between Chemotherapy Cycles, and/or Shorter Courses of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer Patients: a Single-Center Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

Most stage II or III colorectal cancer patients are receiving nowadays a 4 to 6-month course of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, delays between cycles, reductions in the doses of chemotherapy drugs, or even permanent omissions of chemotherapy cycles might take place due to side effects or patient's preference. We examined the impact of these treatment modifications on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from colorectal cancer patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy in our Department. Patients were categorized in five groups based on whether they had or not delays between chemotherapy cycles, dose reductions, and permanent omissions of chemotherapy cycles. Three-year RFS and OS of the five different groups were compared using the log-rank test and the Sidak approach.

RESULTS

Five hundred and eight patients received treatment. Twenty seven percent of the patients had the full course of chemotherapy; the others had delays, dose reductions, or early termination of the treatment. No statistically significant differences were observed in 3-year RFS and OS between the five groups. A trend for worse RFS was noticed with early termination of treatment. A similar trend was also noticed for OS but only for stage II patients.

CONCLUSION

In colorectal cancer patients, receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, delays between chemotherapy cycles, dose reductions of chemotherapy drugs, or even early termination of the treatment course do not seem to have a negative impact in 3-year RFS and OS; however, due to the trend of worse RFS in patients receiving shorter courses of chemotherapy, further studies are needed.

Is Chemotherapy or Radiation Therapy in Addition to Surgery Beneficial for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the Elderly? A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Study

INTRODUCTION

Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for Stages II and III rectal cancer recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative intent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. It is unclear whether therapies in addition to surgery are truly beneficial in elderly patients. Our aim was to compare the survival of patients over 80 with Stages II and III rectal cancer undergoing curative intent surgery with or without additional therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB 2006-2011) was queried for patients over 80 with Stages II and III rectal cancer. The primary outcome was overall survival. Patients were stratified based upon therapy group. Univariate group comparisons were made. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The query yielded 3098 patients over 80 with Stage II (N = 1566) or Stage III (N = 1532) disease. Approximately, half of the patients received surgery only. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed improved survival for patients receiving neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy in addition to surgery, but there was no significant difference between those that received guideline concordant care (GCC), neoadjuvant chemoradiation only, or post-operative chemotherapy only. Cox proportional hazard modeling identified age >90 and margin positivity as independent risk factors for decreased overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of NCDB data for Stages II and III rectal cancer in patients over 80 shows a survival benefit of adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant therapy over surgery alone. There does not appear to be a difference in survival between patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, post-resection adjuvant chemotherapy, or GCC.

Chemotherapy use and adoption of new agents is affected by age and comorbidities in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has changed substantially in the last 2 decades, but to the authors' knowledge, the effect of age and comorbidities on chemotherapy use has not been well studied to date.

METHODS

Patients with mCRC who were being treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy between January 1995 to December 2009 were studied using the LifeLink Health Plan Claims Database. The cohort was divided into older (aged >70 years) and younger (aged ≤70 years) patients. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to assess comorbidity burden. The Wilcoxon and chi-square tests were used in univariate and logistic regression in multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 16,087 patients were identified, with 24% of the patients who were receiving chemotherapy being aged >70 years. The percentage of patients with a CCI >1 receiving chemotherapy increased over time (14% in 1996 vs 40% after 2004; P<.05). Older patients were less likely to receive treatment with >2 agents compared with younger patients (15% vs.22% and 11% vs.16%, respectively, in 2003 and 2009; P<.001). After approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1998, the use of irinotecan was lower in older compared with younger patients, a difference that resolved by 2002 (15% vs 38% [P<.05]; 62% in both groups [P = .9], respectively). Similarly, oxaliplatin was used more frequently in younger patients in 2003 (22% vs 15%; P<.05), with a decrease in this difference noted by 2009 (64% vs 60%; P = .95). On multivariate analysis, older age (odds ratio, 0.65; P<.001) and a CCI >1 (odds ratio, 0.84; P<.001) were found to be associated with a lower likelihood of receiving combination chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this commercially insured population, the percentage of older patients treated for mCRC was low, and the rate of chemotherapy adoption was found to lag behind that of younger patients. However, the percentage of older patients with comorbidities receiving therapy increased over time. Cancer 2016;122:3191-8. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and grade III-V toxicities among elderly stage III colon cancer patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to provide insight in the use, intensity and toxicity of therapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and capecitabine monotherapy (CapMono) among elderly stage III colon cancer patients treated in everyday clinical practice.

METHODS

Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were used. All stage III colon cancer patients aged ≥70 years diagnosed in the southeastern part between 2005 and 2012 and treated with CAPOX or CapMono were included. Differences in completion of all planned cycles, cumulative dosages and toxicity between both regimens were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-three patients received CAPOX and 164 patients received CapMono; 33% (n = 63) of the patients receiving CAPOX completed all planned cycles of both agents, whereas 55% (n = 90) of the patients receiving CapMono completed all planned cycles (P < 0.0001). The median cumulative dosage capecitabine was lower for patients treated with CAPOX (163,744 mg/m(2), interquartile range [IQR] 83,397-202,858 mg/m(2)) than for patients treated with CapMono (189,195 mg/m(2), IQR 111,667-228,125 mg/m(2), P = 0.0003); 54% (n = 105) of the patients treated with CAPOX developed grade III-V toxicity, whereas 38% (n = 63) of the patients treated with CapMono developed grade III-V toxicity (P = 0.0026). After adjustment for patient and tumour characteristics, CapMono was associated with a lower odds of developing grade III-V toxicity than CAPOX (odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.89). For patients treated with CAPOX, the most common toxicities were gastrointestinal (29%), haematological (14%), neurological (11%) and other toxicity (13%). For patients treated with CapMono, dermatological (17%), gastrointestinal (13%) and other toxicity (11%) were the most common.

CONCLUSION

CAPOX is associated with significantly more grade III-V toxicities than CapMono, which had a pronounced impact on the cumulative dosage received and completion of all planned cycles. In this light, CapMono seems preferable over CAPOX.

Clinical Practice in the Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Colon Cancer in South Korea: a Multi-Center, Prospective, Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy is a crucial part of treatment for patients with locally advanced colon cancer. This study was conducted to investigate the actual practice in the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk stage II or stage III colon cancer in South Korea.

METHODS

This was a 24-month open-label, prospective, observational study conducted at 12 centers across South Korea. Patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery were included, and data were collected at baseline, third, and sixth month.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients were included in the analyses. Of five available regimens (FOLFOX, CAPOX, 5-FU/LV, capecitabine, and UFT/LV), FOLFOX was most commonly used (82.5%). Investigators indicated the "efficacy" as the major cause for selecting FOLFOX or CAPOX. For 5-FU/LV, capecitabine, or UFT/LV, the "safety" or "patient's characteristics (age, comorbidity, and stage)" was one of the most important selecting factors. Patients receiving 5-FU/LV, capecitabine, or UFT/LV had older age, worse PS and lower disease stage (stage II) than patients receiving FOLFOX or CAPOX. Hematologic toxicities were the most common cause of dose adjustment and treatment delay.

CONCLUSIONS

In South Korea, FOLFOX was the most commonly used regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy and its efficacy was the main cause for selecting this regimen. Patients receiving 5-FU/LV, capecitabine, or UFT/LV had older age, worse PS and lower disease stage (stage II) than patients receiving FOLFOX or CAPOX.

Effect of Adjuvant FOLFOX Chemotherapy Duration on Outcomes of Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated that patients with stage III colon cancer who receive adjuvant FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy experience an improved disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). However, the magnitude of benefit among patients who discontinue FOLFOX early is not well known. We sought to examine the rate of FOLFOX treatment completion, determine the factors associated with adherence, and explore the relationship between duration of FOLFOX treatment and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed patients diagnosed with stage III colon cancer from 2006 to 2010 and initiated at least 1 cycle of adjuvant FOLFOX at any 1 of 5 regional cancer centers in British Columbia. Logistic regression models were constructed to determine the clinical factors associated with treatment completion, which was defined as receipt of ≥ 10 cycles of FOLFOX. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression that accounted for known prognostic factors were used to evaluate the relationship between early FOLFOX discontinuation and DFS and OS.

RESULTS

We identified 616 patients: median age of 62 years (range, 26-80), 321 (52%) men, 536 (87%) with T3/4 tumors, and 245 (40%) with N2 disease. Among them, 183 (30%) received < 10 and 433 (70%) received ≥ 10 cycles. Adjusting for covariates, female sex and the absence of obstruction or perforation were each associated with receiving ≥ 10 cycles of FOLFOX (odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-2.32; P = .01 and OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.08-3.05; P = .02, respectively). In multivariate analyses, early discontinuation of FOLFOX did not affect DFS or OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% CI, 0.82-1.63; P = .40 and HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.70-1.61; P = .76, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Early discontinuation of FOLFOX was not associated with differences in survival outcomes, lending support to clinical trials that are under way to evaluate the efficacy of shorter durations of therapy.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: relative dose intensity and survival among veterans

Background

Given the paucity of information on dose intensity, the objective of this study is to describe the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer, focusing on relative dose intensity (RDI), overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Methods

Retrospective cohort of 367 patients diagnosed with stage III colon cancer in 2003–2008 and treated at 19 VA medical centers. Kaplan-Meier curves summarize 5-year OS and 3-year DFS by chemotherapy regimen and RDI, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model these associations.

Results

5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FU/LV) was the most commonly initiated regimen in 2003 (94.4%) and 2004 (62.7%); in 2005–2008, a majority of patients (60%-74%) was started on an oxaliplatin-based regimen. Median RDI was 82.3%. Receipt of >70% RDI was associated with better 5-year OS (p < 0.001) and 3-year DFS (P = 0.009) than was receipt of ≤70% RDI, with 5-year OS rates of 66.3% and 50.5%, respectively and 3-year DFS rates of 66.1% and 52.7%, respectively. In the multivariable analysis of 5-year OS, oxaliplatin + 5-FU/LV (versus 5-FU/LV) (HR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.34-0.91), >70% RDI at the first year (HR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.37-0.89) and married status (HR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.45-0.97) were associated with significantly decreased risk of death, while age ≥75 (versus 55–64) (HR = 2.06; 95% CI = 1.25-3.40), Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.06-1.30), T4 tumor status (versus T1/T2) (HR = 5.88; 95% CI = 2.69-12.9), N2 node status (HR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.12-2.50) and bowel obstruction (HR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.36-3.95) were associated with significantly increased risk. Similar associations were observed for DFS.

Conclusion

Patients with stage III colon cancer who received >70% RDI had improved 5-year OS. The association between RDI and survival needs to be examined in studies of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer outside of the VA.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1038-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Refining the Chemotherapy Approach for Older Patients With Colon Cancer

Population studies support an increased incidence of most cancers among older adults. Colorectal cancer has high prevalence in the aging population, with a median age of 69 years at diagnosis and 74 years at death. The vast majority of patients with colon cancer (CC) will require chemotherapy treatments during their disease course, challenging oncologists with the task of tailoring therapy for older patients with CC in the face of limited evidence-based data to guide them. Factors such as comorbidity, performance status, cognitive function, and social support may affect decision making and complicate tolerance of any recommended therapy. In recent years, attention to the specific needs of the aging population with cancer has given rise to the field of geriatric oncology in general, and has generated an increasing fund of knowledge on which to base chemotherapy delivery for this specific population of patients with CC. This article will review the available data specifically for chemotherapy management of older patients with CC in the postoperative and metastatic settings.

Chemotherapy usage patterns in a US-wide cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of biologic therapies for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), few studies have examined patterns of care or predictors of specific treatment approaches.

METHODS

We assessed 4877 mCRC patients who received chemotherapy between January 2004 and March 2011 at academic, private, and community-based oncology practices subscribing to a US-wide chemotherapy order entry (system capturing disease, patient, provider, and treatment data. Multivariable analyses of these prospectively recorded characteristics were used to identify independent predictors of specific therapeutic choices. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Throughout the study period, fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin combination was the most commonly used first-line chemotherapy regimen, representing 71% of first-line therapy by 2007. First-line bevacizumab use averaged 51%, peaking at 55% in 2006. Of those who received first-line bevacizumab, 34% continued to receive bevacizumab in the second-line. Only 26% of patients in our cohort ever received an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab = 22%; panitumumab = 6%) at some point in their treatment course. Patients treated at academic centers, with longer duration of first-line therapy, and at sites in the western United States were statistically more likely to receive an anti-EGFR antibody. Anti-EGFR antibody use fell by 18% after the US Food and Drug Administration limited its use to patients with KRAS wild-type tumors in June 2009.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of this US-wide mCRC cohort demonstrates that bevacizumab has been more consistently integrated into treatment regimens than anti-EGFR antibody therapies, particularly in first-line therapy. However, treatment choices vary substantially according to specific patient, practice, and provider characteristics.

Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CapOX) as an Adjuvant Therapy in Japanese for Stage II/III Colon Cancer in a Group at High Risk of Recurrence in Retrospective Study

A number of large-scale clinical trials have demonstrated that using a combination of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines as an adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III colon cancer improved the prognosis. However, there has only been experience in Japanese patients with using CapOX therapy, in which capecitabine and oxaliplatin are used in combination. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CapOX in Japanese patients as an adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer in a single institute retrospective study. The efficacy and safety of CapOX as an adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer and stage II patients who had a signature for high risk of recurrence were evaluated in patients who had undergone surgery at our institution between December 1, 2009 and March 31, 2013. Forty-one patients received CapOX therapy during the study period: 23 men and 18 women with median age of 68.0 years (35-79 years). Performance status was 0 for 33 patients, and PS 1 for eight patients. The clinical stages were stage II in 14 patients, stage IIIA in 15 patients, and stage IIIB in 12 patients. The median number of CapOX cycles was eight (two to eight courses). The treatment completion rate was 82.9%. Five-year DFS rates were 63.8%. Five-year OS rates were 71.0%. In terms of adverse events, the serious adverse events of grade 3 or higher seen among all patients were neutropenia in four patients, thrombocytopenia in one patient, and peripheral sensory neuropathy in seven patients. However, hand-foot syndrome, which is characteristic of capecitabine, was not observed. Efficacy and tolerability of CapOX in Japanese patients as an adjuvant chemotherapy after colon cancer surgery was demonstrated.

Reduced risk of distant recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer aged 75 years or older

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on the risk of distant recurrence in elderly with stage III colon cancer, treated in daily practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One thousand two hundred and ninety-one stage III colon cancer patients diagnosed in the southern Netherlands between 2003 and 2008 were included. Propensity score matching was applied to create a subsample to reduce bias caused by differences between patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and patients not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. For both the total study population and the propensity score matched sample, Cox regression analysis was used to discriminate independent risk factors for distant recurrence.

RESULTS

Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) was correlated with a reduced risk of distant recurrence in both the total study population [hazard ratio (HR) CT versus nCT 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.70] and in the propensity score matched sample (HR CT versus nCT 0.46, 95% CI 0.33-0.63). In separate analyses for patients aged <75 and ≥75 years, the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the risk of distant recurrence remained comparable for both age groups (HR CT versus nCT 0.50, 95% CI 0.37-0.68 and 0.57, 95% CI 0.36-0.90, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Distant recurrence risks at higher age definitely warrant consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly stage III colon cancer patients. This decision should be based on a multidisciplinary and functional assessment of the patient, not on age.

The impact of emerging safety and effectiveness evidence on the use of physician-administered drugs: the case of bevacizumab for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Spending on physician-administered drugs is high and uses not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are frequent. Although these drugs may be targets of future policy efforts to rationalize use, little is known regarding how physicians respond to emerging safety and effectiveness evidence.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We analyzed changes in bevacizumab (Avastin) use for breast cancer in response to its market launch (February 2008), 2 FDA meetings reviewing data suggesting that its risks exceed its benefits (July 2010 and June 2011), and the FDA's withdrawal of approval (November 2011).

DATA

Data from a population-based audit of oncologists' prescribing (IntrinsiQ Intellidose) were used to measure the monthly number of breast cancer patients treated with bevacizumab (January 2008-April 2012).

METHODS

The number of bevacizumab patients following each regulatory action was estimated using negative binomial regression, compared with patients before the first FDA meeting, adjusting for cancer stage, treatment line, patient age, and outpatient office affiliation.

RESULTS

Bevacizumab use for breast cancer increased significantly after FDA approval. After all regulatory actions, there was a 65% decline (95% CI, 64%-65%) in use compared with the period before the first meeting. The largest decline was in the 6-month period after the first meeting (37%; 95% CI, 28%-47%). The rate of decline did not differ by patient or cancer characteristics and differed minimally by office affiliation.

DISCUSSION

Bevacizumab use for breast cancer declined dramatically after FDA meetings and regulatory actions, a period without changes in guideline recommendations or insurance coverage. Physicians seem to be responsive to emerging evidence concerning physician-administered drug safety and effectiveness.

Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in a Canadian province: a population-based analysis

PURPOSE

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend adjuvant chemotherapy after curative-intent surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Studies have shown variable rates of adherence to adjuvant therapy CPGs. This study sought to determine the proportion of patients in Nova Scotia receiving CPG-concordant adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 weeks of surgery for CRC in 2001 to 2005, and to identify factors associated with chemotherapy receipt beyond 12 weeks from surgery or chemotherapy nonreceipt.

METHODS

Patients with stages IIB or III colon or stages II or III rectal cancer who underwent curative-intent surgery in Nova Scotia were identified through the provincial cancer registry and anonymously linked to 14 administrative health databases. Chart review was conducted to obtain chemotherapy data and reasons for chemotherapy nonreceipt. Logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with receipt of chemotherapy and meeting the 12-week benchmark (P < .05).

RESULTS

A total of 1,151 patients were identified, of whom 59% received chemotherapy. Factors predicting chemotherapy receipt were male sex, age < 75 years, no hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery, stage III disease, no prior cancer diagnosis, and rectal cancer. Of the 679 patients who received chemotherapy, 479 (72%) met the 12-week benchmark, with male sex, urban residence, less social deprivation, colon cancer and increased length of hospital stay as significant factors. Of the 472 patients who did not receive chemotherapy, the most common reason for nonreceipt was no consultation with a medical oncologist (53%).

CONCLUSION

A number of factors influence adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy CPGs for CRC and should be incorporated in future work as novel regimens enter clinical practice.

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant FOLFOX and 5FU/LV chemotherapy for patients with stage II colon cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin (5FU/LV), and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) compared with 5FU/LV alone and 5FU/LV compared with observation alone for patients who had resected stage II colon cancer.

METHODS

We developed 2 Markov models to represent the adjuvant chemotherapy and follow-up periods and a single Markov model to represent the observation group. We used calibration to estimate the transition probabilities among different toxicity levels. The base case considered 60-year-old patients who had undergone an uncomplicated hemicolectomy for stage II colon cancer and were medically fit to receive 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. We measured health outcomes in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and estimated costs using 2007 US dollars.

RESULTS

In the base case, adjuvant chemotherapy of the FOLFOX regimen had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $54,359/QALY compared with the 5FU/LV regimen, and the 5FU/LV regimen had an ICER of $14,584/QALY compared with the observation group from the third-party payer perspective. The ICER values were most sensitive to 5-year relapse probability, cost of adjuvant chemotherapy, and the discount rate for the FOLFOX arm, whereas the ICER value of 5FU/LV was most sensitive to the 5-year relapse probability, 5-year survival probability, and the relapse cost. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicates that the ICER of 5FU/LV is less than $50,000/QALY with a probability of 99.62%, and the ICER of FOLFOX as compared with 5FU/LV is less than $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY with a probability of 44.48% and 97.24%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although adjuvant chemotherapy with 5FU/LV is cost-effective at all ages for patients who have undergone an uncomplicated hemicolectomy for stage II colon cancer, FOLFOX is not likely to be cost-effective as compared with 5FU/LV.

Prevalence of off-label use and spending in 2010 among patent-protected chemotherapies in a population-based cohort of medical oncologists

PURPOSE

The prevalence of off-label anticancer drug use is not well characterized. The extent of off-label use is a policy concern because the clinical benefits of such use to patients may not outweigh costs or adverse health outcomes.

METHODS

Prescribing data from IntrinsiQ Intellidose data systems, a pharmacy software provider maintaining a population-based cohort database of medical oncologists, was analyzed. Use of the most commonly prescribed anticancer drugs ("chemotherapies") that were patent protected and administered intravenously to patients in 2010 was examined. Use was classified as "on-label" if the cancer site, stage, and therapy line met the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indication. All other use was "off-label." Off-label use was divided by whether it conformed to National Comprehensive Care Network (NCCN) Compendium recommendations, a basis of insurer coverage policies. IMS Health National Sales Perspectives was used to estimate national spending by use category.

RESULTS

Ten chemotherapies met inclusion criteria. On-label use amounted to 70%, and off-label use amounted to 30%. Fourteen percent of use conformed to an NCCN-supported off-label indication, and 10% of off-label use was associated with an FDA-approved cancer site, but an NCCN-unsupported cancer stage and/or line of therapy. Total national spending on these chemotherapies amounted to $12 billion (B; $7.3B on-label, $2B off-label and NCCN supported; $2.5B off-label and NCCN unsupported).

CONCLUSION

Commonly used, novel chemotherapies are more often used on-label than off-label in contemporary practice. Off-label use is composed of a roughly equal mix of chemotherapy applied in clinical settings supported by the NCCN and those that are not.

The IDEA (International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy) Collaboration: Prospective Combined Analysis of Phase III Trials Investigating Duration of Adjuvant Therapy with the FOLFOX (FOLFOX4 or Modified FOLFOX6) or XELOX (3 versus 6 months) Regimen for Patients with Stage III Colon Cancer: Trial Design and Current Status

The International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) collaboration was established to prospectively combine and analyze data from several randomized trials conducted around the world to answer whether a three-month course of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy (FOLFOX4/modified FOLFOX6 or XELOX) is non-inferior to the current standard six-month treatment for patients with stage III colon cancer, with a primary endpoint of three years disease-free survival. The IDEA steering committee comprises two members from each group coordinating an individual trial and two members from a secretariat who coordinate combining of the data and management of the joint analysis. Members of the IDEA agreed to combine the data from their individual trials to enable definitive analysis consisting of at least 10,500 patients. With accrual of 8,797 patients at the end of February 2013, the IDEA is on track to achieve its accrual objective of at least 10,500 patients by the end of 2013.

Infused chemotherapy use in the elderly after patent expiration

PURPOSE

The use of anticancer drugs (chemotherapies) is an important determinant of national spending trends. Recent policies have aimed to accelerate generic entry among chemotherapies to generate cost savings.

METHODS

We examined the effects of generic entry on the choice of chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) between 2006 and 2009 using autoregressive-moving average modeling with case control. A nationally representative sample of oncologists and patients with cancer (age ≥ 65 years) was employed to estimate the magnitude and significance of the impact of the generic entry of irinotecan in February 2008 on the number of administrations of irinotecan compared with oxaliplatin.

RESULTS

The generic entry of irinotecan resulted in a 17% to 19% decrease (P < .001) in use among elderly patients with MCRC compared with oxaliplatin. The results were robust to multiple sensitivity checks.

CONCLUSION

This study provides novel and robust estimates of the decline in use of a chemotherapy to treat a common cancer in the elderly after patent expiration. The results suggest estimates from a previous Office of the Inspector General report of the potential savings derived from the generic entry of irinotecan for public payers are an overestimate, likely confounded by oncologists' response to financial incentives, changes in scientific evidence, and promotional activities. As calls for improving the quality and cost efficiency of oncology increase, future empirical work is needed to examine the responsiveness of oncologists' treatment decision making to incentives among patients of all ages and insurance types.

Histamine type 2 receptor antagonists as adjuvant treatment for resected colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Anecdotal reports of tumour regression with histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs) have lead to a series of trials with this class of drug as adjuvant therapy to try and improve outcomes in patients with resected colorectal cancers. There was a plausible scientific rationale suggesting merit in this strategy. This included improved immune surveillance (by way of increasing tumour infiltrating lymphocytes), inhibiting the direct proliferative effect of histamine as a growth factor for colorectal cancer and, in the case of cimetidine, inhibiting endothelial expression of E-selectin (a cell adhesion molecule thought to be critical for metastatic spread).

OBJECTIVES

To determine if H(2)RAs improve overall survival when used as pre- and/or postoperative therapy in colorectal cancer patients who have had surgical resection with curative intent. We also stratified the results to see if there was an improvement in overall survival in terms of the specific H(2)RA used.

SEARCH METHODS

Randomised controlled trials were identified using a sensitive search strategy in the following databases: MEDLINE (1964 to present), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2009), EMBASE (1980 to present) and Cancerlit (1983 to present).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Criteria for study selection included: patients with colorectal cancer surgically resected with curative intent; H(2)RAs used i) at any dose, ii) for any length of time, iii) with any other treatment modality and iv) in the pre-, peri- or post-operative period. The results were stratified for the H(2)RA used.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The literature search retrieved 142 articles. There were six studies included in the final analysis, published from 1995 to 2007, including a total of 1229 patients. All patients were analysed by intention to treat according to their initial allocation. Log hazard ratios and standard errors of treatment effects (on overall survival) were calculated using the Cochrane statistical package RevMan Version 5. Hazard ratios and standard errors were recorded from trial publications or, if not provided, were estimated from published actuarial survival curves using a spreadsheet designed for this purpose (http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/1745-6215-8-16-S1.xls).

MAIN RESULTS

Of the six identified trials, five used cimetidine as the experimental H(2)RA, whereas one used ranitidine. There was a trend towards improved survival when H(2)RAs were utilised as adjuvant therapy in patients having curative-intent surgery for colorectal cancer (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.48-1.03, P = 0.07). Analysis of the five cimetidine trials (n = 421) revealed a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.87).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Of the H(2)RAs evaluated cimetidine appears to confer a survival benefit when given as an adjunct to curative surgical resection of colorectal cancers. The trial designs were heterogeneous and adjuvant therapy has evolved since these trials were performed. Further prospective randomised studies are warranted.

How do initial signals of quality influence the diffusion of new medical products? The case of new cancer drug treatments

PURPOSE

Objective measures of a new treatment's expected ability to improve patients' health are presumed to be significant factors influencing physicians' treatment decisions. Physicians' behavior may also be influenced by their patients' disease severity and insurance reimbursement policies, firm promotional activities and public media reports. This chapter examines how objective evidence of the incremental effectiveness of novel drugs to treat cancer ("chemotherapies") impacts the rate at which physicians' adopt these treatments into practice, holding constant other factors.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY

The novelty of the analysis resides in the dataset and estimation strategy employed. Data is derived from a United States population-based chemotherapy order entry system, IntrinsiQ Intellidose. Quality/price endogeneity is overcome by employing sample selection methods and an estimation strategy that exploits quality variation at the molecule-indication level. Pooled diffusion rates across molecule-indication pairs are estimated using nonparametric hazard models.

FINDINGS

Results suggest incremental effectiveness is negatively and nonsignificantly associated with the diffusion of new chemotherapies; faster rates of diffusion are positively and significantly related to low five-year survival probabilities and measures of perceived clinical significance. Results are robust to numerous specification checks, including a measure of alternative therapeutic availability. We discuss the magnitude and potential direction of bias introduced by several threats to internal validity. Evidence of incremental effectiveness does not appear to motivate the rate of specialty physician diffusion of new medical treatment; in all models high risk of disease mortality and perceptions of therapeutic quality are significant drivers of physician use of novel chemotherapies.

VALUE/ORIGINALITY

Understanding the rate of technological advance across different clinical settings, as well as the product-, provider-, and patient-level determinants of this rate, is an important subject for future research.