Cohort study of somatostatin-based radiopeptide therapy with [(90)Y-DOTA]-TOC versus [(90)Y-DOTA]-TOC plus [(177)Lu-DOTA]-TOC in neuroendocrine cancers

Radionuclide Theranostics in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper aims to address the latest findings in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) theranostics, focusing on new evidence and future directions of combined diagnosis with positron emission tomography (PET) and treatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

RECENT FINDINGS

Following NETTER-1 trial, PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE was approved by FDA and EMA and is routinely employed in advanced G1 and G2 SST (somatostatin receptor)-expressing NET. Different approaches have been proposed so far to improve the PRRT therapeutic index, encompassing re-treatment protocols, combinations with other therapies and novel indications. Molecular imaging holds a potential added value in characterizing disease biology and heterogeneity using different radiopharmaceuticals (e.g., SST and FDG) and may provide predictive and prognostic parameters. Response assessment criteria are still an unmet need and new theranostic pairs showed preliminary encouraging results. PRRT for NET has become a paradigm of modern theranostics. PRRT holds a favorable toxicity profile, and it is associated with a prolonged time to progression, reduction of symptoms, and improved patients' quality of life. In light of further optimization, different new strategies have been investigated, along with the development of new radiopharmaceuticals.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Is Effective for Clinical Control of Symptomatic Metastatic Insulinoma: A Long-Term Retrospective Analysis

Metastatic insulinoma is a rare malignant neuroendocrine tumor characterized by inappropriate insulin secretion, resulting in life-threatening hypoglycemia, which is often difficult to treat. There is currently very limited information about the efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for clinical control of hypoglycemia. The aim of this long-term retrospective study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of PRRT for improving hypoglycemia, to evaluate the change of medication after PRRT, and to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Inclusion criteria were histologically proven somatostatin receptor-positive metastatic malignant insulinoma and at least 2 cycles of [90Y]Y-DOTATOC or [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC therapy from early 2000 to early 2022. A semiquantitative scoring system was used to quantify the severity and frequency of hypoglycemic episodes under background antihypoglycemic therapy (somatostatin analog, diazoxide, everolimus, corticosteroids): score 0, no hypoglycemic episodes; score 1, hypoglycemic events requiring additional conservative treatment with optimization of nutrition; score 2, severe hypoglycemia necessitating hospitalization and combined medication or history of hypoglycemic coma. Hypoglycemic score before and after PRRT was analyzed. Time of benefit was defined as a time range of fewer hypoglycemic episodes in the observation period than at baseline. Information on antihypoglycemic medication before and after therapy, PFS, and OS was recorded. Results: Twenty-six of 32 patients with a total of 106 [90Y]Y-DOTATOC/[177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC cycles were included. The average observation period was 21.5 mo (range, 2.3-107.4 mo). Before therapy, 81% (n = 21) of the patients had a hypoglycemia score of 2 and 19% (n = 5) had a score of 1. After PRRT, 81% of patients (n = 21) had a decreased score, and the remaining 5 patients showed a stable situation. There was temporary worsening of hypoglycemia just after injection of [90Y]Y-DOTATOC/[177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC in 19% of patients. The average time of benefit in the observation period was 17.2 mo (range, 0-70.2 mo). Antihypoglycemic medication reduction was achieved in 58% (n = 15) of patients. The median OS and PFS after the start of PRRT were 19.7 mo (95% CI, 6.5-32.9 mo) and 11.7 mo (95% CI, 4.9-18.5 mo), respectively. Conclusion: To our knowledge, our study included the largest cohort of patients with malignant insulinoma to be evaluated. Long-lasting symptom control and reduction of antihypoglycemic medications were shown in most patients after late-line PRRT.

Potent molecular-targeted therapies for gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), which are characterized by neuroendocrine differentiation, can arise in various organs. NENs have been divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) based on morphological differentiation, each of which has a distinct etiology, molecular profile, and clinicopathological features. While the majority of NECs originate in the pulmonary organs, extrapulmonary NECs occur most predominantly in the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) system. Although platinum-based chemotherapy is the main therapeutic option for recurrent or metastatic GEP-NEC patients, the clinical benefits are limited and associated with a poor prognosis, indicating the clinically urgent need for effective therapeutic agents. The clinical development of molecular-targeted therapies has been hampered due to the rarity of GEP-NECs and the paucity of knowledge on their biology. In this review, we summarize the biology, current treatments, and molecular profiles of GEP-NECs based on the findings of pivotal comprehensive molecular analyses; we also highlight potent therapeutic targets for future precision medicine based on the most recent results of clinical trials.

Combination Systemic Therapies in Advanced Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs): A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Trials and Prospective Studies

There is an evolving landscape of systemic combination regimens for patients with advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). In this review, we provide a comprehensive outline of the existing clinical trials/prospective studies investigating these combinations. PubMed was searched using key relevant terms to identify articles referring to GEP-NETs and combination treatments. No systematic search of the literature or metanalysis of the data was performed, and we focused on the most recent literature results. Primarily, phase 1 and 2 clinical trials were available, with a smaller number of phase 3 trials, reporting results from combination treatments across a wide range of antiproliferative agents. We identified significant variability in the anti-tumor activity of the reported combinations, with occasional promising results, but only a very small number of practice-changing phase 3 clinical trials. Overall, the peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)-based combinations (with chemotherapy, dual PPRT, and targeted agents) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent combinations with standard chemotherapy were found to have favorable results and may be worth investigating in future, larger-scale trials. In contrast, the immune-checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations were found to have limited applicability in advanced, well-differentiated GEP-NETs.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare, aggressive skin malignancy, also known as neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin, with high rates of recurrence and distant metastasis. In refractory metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC), besides immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiation, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) may be a viable option since this type of tumor can express somatostatin receptors. Methods: We performed a comprehensive review of the literature to evaluate the efficacy of PRRT in mMCC patients. Results: Thirty-seven patients with mMCC received PRRT (1-5 cycles) with ¹⁷⁷Lu- or ⁹⁰Y-labeled somatostatin analogs (cumulative activity, 1.5-30 GBq). Radiographic response was available for 19 of 28 patients who received PRRT alone. Six (31.6%) of 19 patients showed objective responses, from partial to complete, and no severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Our analysis supports the use of PRRT in mMCC with sufficient somatostatin receptor uptake, although the quality of the available evidence is low. Prospective clinical trials are already in development and have started accruing in some parts of the world.

PRRT for higher-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms: What is still acceptable?

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a widely accepted treatment for progressive grade 1 and 2 (G1-2) gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET). There is increasing evidence that PRRT is effective for selected patients with well-differentiated (WD) G3 NET, which are now separated from neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). These preliminary data have led to prospective PRRT trials currently in progress. This article provides an update of the current role of PRRT for patients with WD-G3 NET, highlighting the importance of patient selection based on molecular imaging phenotype, as well as outlining some potential future directions in this field. Upcoming prospective trials will help define the role, sequencing, and optimization of PRRT to improve outcomes of patients with WD-G3 NET.

Optimisation of radioligand therapy in neuroendocrine tumours: Current and evolving evidence

Treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) with radioligand therapy (RLT) for example, ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE is generally well-tolerated and prolongs time to progression in most patients. However, approximately 20% of patients are nonresponders. In addition, complete responses are rare (<5% of patients), and durable responses beyond 3-4 years are uncommon. This article will discuss factors which may improve the outcomes of PRRT by using biomarkers to identify patients at high risk to be nonresponders (imaging and liquid biomarkers) and will examine mechanisms to potentially improve/optimise current RLT treatment strategies. These include mechanisms to potentiate the effects of RLT, increase tumour absorbed dose, overcoming radio-resistance and upregulation of somatostatin receptors, although larger studies will be required to demonstrate which techniques are going to be most efficacious in clinical practice.

Glucose Metabolism Modification Induced by Radioligand Therapy with [177Lu]Lu/[90Y]Y-DOTATOC in Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Prospective Pilot Study within FENET-2016 Trial

[18F]F-FDG (FDG) PET is emerging as a relevant diagnostic and prognostic tool in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), as a simultaneous decrease in [68Ga]Ga-DOTA peptides and increase in FDG uptake (the “flip-flop” phenomenon) occurs during the natural history of these tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variations on FDG PET in NEN patients treated with two different schemes of radioligand therapy (RLT) and to correlate them with clinical−pathologic variables. A prospective evaluation of 108 lesions in 56 patients (33 males and 23 females; median age, 64.5 years) affected by NENs of various primary origins (28 pancreatic, 13 gastrointestinal, 9 bronchial, 6 unknown primary (CUP-NENs) and 1 pheochromocytoma) and grades (median Ki-67 = 9%) was performed. The patients were treated with RLT within the phase II clinical trial FENET-2016 (CTID: NCT04790708). RLT was offered for 32 patients with the MONO scheme (five cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC) and for 24 with the DUO scheme (three cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC alternated with two cycles of [90Y]Y-DOTATOC). Variations in terms of the ΔSUVmax of a maximum of three target lesions per patient (58 for MONO and 50 for DUO RLT) were assessed between baseline and 3 months post-RLT FDG PET. In patients with negative baseline FDG PET, the three most relevant lesions on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET were assessed and matched on post-RLT FDG PET, to check for any possible changes in FDG avidity. Thirty-five patients (62.5%) had at least one pathological FDG uptake at the baseline scans, but the number was reduced to 29 (52%) after RLT. In the patients treated with DUO-scheme RLT, 20 out of 50 lesions were FDG positive before therapy, whereas only 14 were confirmed after RLT (p = 0.03). Moreover, none of the 30 FDG-negative lesions showed an increased FDG uptake after RLT. The lesions of patients with pancreatic and CUP-NENs treated with the DUO scheme demonstrated a significant reduction in ΔSUVmax in comparison to those treated with MONO RLT (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). Moreover, we found a mild positive correlation between the grading and ΔSUVmax in patients treated with the MONO scheme (r = 0.39, p < 0.02), while no evidence was detected for patients treated with the DUO scheme. Our results suggest that RLT, mostly with the DUO scheme, could be effective in changing NEN lesions’ glycometabolism, in particular, in patients affected by pancreatic and CUP-NENs, regardless of their Ki-67 index. Probably, associating [90Y]Y-labelled peptides, which have high energy emission and a crossfire effect, and [177Lu]Lu ones, characterized by a longer half-life and a safer profile for organs at risk, might represent a valid option in FDG-positive NENs addressed to RLT. Further studies are needed to validate our preliminary findings. In our opinion, FDG PET/CT should represent a potent tool for fully assessing a patient’s disease characteristics, both before and after RLT.

Radionuclides for Targeted Therapy: Physical Properties

A search in PubMed revealed that 72 radionuclides have been considered for molecular or functional targeted radionuclide therapy. As radionuclide therapies increase in number and variations, it is important to understand the role of the radionuclide and the various characteristics that can render it either useful or useless. This review focuses on the physical characteristics of radionuclides that are relevant for radionuclide therapy, such as linear energy transfer, relative biological effectiveness, range, half-life, imaging properties, and radiation protection considerations. All these properties vary considerably between radionuclides and can be optimised for specific targets. Properties that are advantageous for some applications can sometimes be drawbacks for others; for instance, radionuclides that enable easy imaging can introduce more radiation protection concerns than others. Similarly, a long radiation range is beneficial in targets with heterogeneous uptake, but it also increases the radiation dose to tissues surrounding the target, and, hence, a shorter range is likely more beneficial with homogeneous uptake. While one cannot select a collection of characteristics as each radionuclide comes with an unchangeable set, all the 72 radionuclides investigated for therapy—and many more that have not yet been investigated—provide numerous sets to choose between.

Accuracy of two dosimetry software programs for 177Lu radiopharmaceutical therapy using voxel-based patient-specific phantoms

Purpose

Virtual dosimetry using voxel-based patient-specific phantoms and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations offer the advantage of having a gold standard against which absorbed doses may be benchmarked to establish the dosimetry accuracy. Furthermore, these reference values assist in investigating the accuracy of the absorbed dose methodologies from different software programs. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the accuracy of the absorbed doses computed using LundADose and OLINDA/EXM 1.0.

Methods

The accuracy was based on ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE distributions of three voxel-based phantoms. SPECT projection images were simulated for 1, 24, 96, and 168 h post-administration and reconstructed with LundADose using 3D OS-EM reconstruction. Mono-exponential curves were fitted to the bio-kinetic data for the kidneys, liver, spleen, and tumours resulting in SPECT time-integrated activity (SPECT-TIA). The SPECT-TIA were used to compute mean absorbed doses using LundADose (LND-D_SPECT) and OLINDA (OLINDA-D_SPECT) for the organs. Pre-defined true activity images, were used to obtain TRUE-TIA and, together with full MC simulations, computed the true doses (MC-D_True). The dosimetry accuracy was assessed by comparing LND-D_SPECT and OLINDA-D_SPECT to MC-D_True.

Results

Overall, the results presented an overestimation of the mean absorbed dose by LND-D_SPECT compared to the MC-D_True with a dosimetry accuracy ≤6.6%. This was attributed to spill-out activity from the reconstructed LND-D_SPECT, resulting in a higher dose contribution than the MC-D_True. There was a general underestimation (<8.1%) of OLINDA-D_SPECT compared to MC-D_True attributed to the geometrical difference in shape between the voxel-based phantoms and the OLINDA models. Furthermore, OLINDA-D_SPECT considers self-doses while MC-D_True reflects self-doses plus cross-doses.

Conclusion

The better than 10% accuracy suggests that the mean dose values obtained with LND-D_SPECT and OLINDA-D_SPECT approximate the true values. The mean absorbed doses of the two software programs, and the gold standard were comparable. This work shall be of use for optimising ¹⁷⁷Lu dosimetry for clinical applications.

Optimized cocktail of 90Y/177Lu for radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors of various sizes: a simulation study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is significant interest and potential in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors via peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using one or both of 90Y and 177Lu-labeled peptides. Given the presence of different tumor sizes in patients and differing radionuclide dose delivery properties, the present study aims to use Monte Carlo simulations to estimate S-values to spherical tumors of various sizes with 90Y and 177Lu separately and in combination. The goal is to determine ratios of 90Y to 177Lu that result in the largest absorbed doses per decay of the radionuclides and the most suitable dose profiles to treat tumors of specific sizes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Particle transfer calculations and simulations were performed using the Monte Carlo GATE simulation software. Spherical tumors of different sizes, ranging from 0.5 to 20 mm in radius, were designed. Activities of 177Lu and 90Y, individually and in combination, were homogeneously placed within the total volume of the tumors. We determined the S-values to the tumors, and to the external volume outside of the tumors (cross-dose) which was used to approximate background tissue. The dose profiles were obtained for each of the different tumor sizes, and the uniformity of dose within each tumor was calculated.

RESULTS

For all tumor sizes, the self-dose and cross-dose per decay from 90Y were higher than that from 177Lu. We observed that 177Lu had the most uniform dose distribution within tumors with radii less than 5 mm. For tumors greater than 5 mm in radius, a ratio of 25% 90Y to 75% 177Lu resulted in the most uniform doses. When the ratio of 177Lu to 90Y was smaller, the uniformity improved more with increasing tumor size. The cross-dose stayed approximately constant for tumors larger than 15 mm for all ratios of 177Lu to 90Y. Finally, as the size of the tumor increased, differences in the S-values between different ratios of 177Lu to 90Y decreased.

CONCLUSION

Our work showed that to achieve a more uniform dose distribution within the tumor, 177Lu alone is more effective for small tumors. For medium and large tumors, a ratio of 90Y to 177Lu with more or less 177Lu, respectively, is recommended.

Clinical Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Clinical Practice: A Formal Consensus Exercise

Simple Summary

Well-structured international guidelines are currently available regarding the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). However, in relation to the multiplicity of treatments and the relative rarity and heterogeneity of NENs, there are many controversial issues in which clinical evidence is insufficient and for which expert opinion can be of help. A group of experts selected 14 relevant topics and formulated relative statements concerning controversial issues in several areas on diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic strategies, and patient follow-up. Specific statements have also been formulated regarding patient management on radioligand therapy (RLT), as well as in the presence of co-morbidities or bone metastases. All the statements were drafted, discussed, modified, and then approved. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) method was used to obtain consensus. The results of this paper can facilitate the clinical approach of patients with NENs in daily practice in areas where there is scarcity or absence of clinical evidence.

Abstract

Many treatment approaches are now available for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). While several societies have issued guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of NENs, there are still areas of controversy for which there is limited guidance. Expert opinion can thus be of support where firm recommendations are lacking. A group of experts met to formulate 14 statements relative to diagnosis and treatment of NENs and presented herein. The nominal group and estimate-talk-estimate techniques were used. The statements covered a broad range of topics from tools for diagnosis to follow-up, evaluation of response, treatment efficacy, therapeutic sequence, and watchful waiting. Initial prognostic characterization should be based on clinical information as well as histopathological analysis and morphological and functional imaging. It is also crucial to optimize RLT for patients with a NEN starting from accurate characterization of the patient and disease. Follow-up should be patient/tumor tailored with a shared plan about timing and type of imaging procedures to use to avoid safety issues. It is also stressed that patient-reported outcomes should receive greater attention, and that a multidisciplinary approach should be mandatory. Due to the clinical heterogeneity and relative lack of definitive evidence for NENs, personalization of diagnostic–therapeutic work-up is crucial.

Net theranostics

Theranostics is a term coined by combining the words “therapeutics” and “diagnostics,” referring to single chemical entities developed to deliver therapy and diagnosis simultaneously. Neuroendocrine tumors are rare cancers that occur in various organs of the body, and they express neuroendocrine factors such as chromogranin A and somatostatin receptor. Somatostatin analogs bind to somatostatin receptor, and when combined with diagnostic radionuclides, such as gamma‐emitters, are utilized for diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy when combined with therapeutic radionuclides, such as beta‐emitters, are effective in treating neuroendocrine tumor as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy are some of the most frequently used and successful theranostics for neuroendocrine tumor. In Japan, radiopharmaceuticals are regulated under a complex law system, creating a significant drug lag, which is a major public concern. It took nearly 10 years to obtain the approval for somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy use by the Japanese government. In 2021, ¹¹¹Lu‐DOTATATE (Lutathera), a drug for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, was covered by insurance in Japan. In this review, we summarize the history of the development of neuroendocrine tumor theranostics and theranostics in general, as therapeutic treatment for cancer in the future. Furthermore, we briefly address the Japanese point of view regarding the development of new radiopharmaceuticals.

Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Radiolabeled Peptides-Where Are We Now

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been one of the most successful and exciting examples of theranostics in nuclear medicine in recent decades and is now firmly embedded in many treatment algorithms for unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) worldwide. It is widely considered to be an effective treatment for well- or moderately differentiated neoplasms, which express high levels of somatostatin receptors that can be selectively targeted. This review article outlines the scientific basis of PRRT in treatment of NENs and describes its discovery dating back to the early 1990s. Early treatments utilizing Indium-111, a γ-emitter, showed promise in reduction in tumor size and improvement in biochemistry, but were also met with high radiation doses and myelotoxic and nephrotoxic effects. Subsequently, stable conjugation of DOTA-peptides with β-emitting radionuclides, such as Yttrium-90 and Lutetium-177, served as a breakthrough for PRRT and studies highlighted their potential in eliciting progression-free survival and quality of life benefits. This article will also elaborate on the key trials which paved the way for its approval and will discuss therapeutic considerations, such as patient selection and administration technique, to optimize its use.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies

Simple Summary

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic treatment consisting of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. This will subsequently cause lethal DNA damage to the tumor cell. The only target that is currently used in widespread clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor, which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical applications of PRRT, and discusses several PRRT-optimization strategies.

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. The only target that is currently used in clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor (SSTR), which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review provides a summary of the treatment efficacy (e.g., response rates and symptom-relief), impact on patient outcome and toxicity profile of PRRT performed with different generations of SSTR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, including the landmark randomized-controlled trial NETTER-1. In addition, multiple optimization strategies for PRRT are discussed, i.e., the dose–effect concept, dosimetry, combination therapies (i.e., tandem/duo PRRT, chemoPRRT, targeted molecular therapy, somatostatin analogues and radiosensitizers), new radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., SSTR-antagonists, Evans-blue containing vector molecules and alpha-emitters), administration route (intra-arterial versus intravenous) and response prediction via molecular testing or imaging. The evolution and continuous refinement of PRRT resulted in many lessons for the future development of radionuclide therapy aimed at other targets and tumor types.

Safety and Efficacy of Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Elderly Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients

Simple Summary

We compared the safety and efficacy of targeted radionuclide therapy between elderly (79 years old and older) and disease-matched younger patients (between 60 and 70 years of age) with metastatic neuroendocrine tumour (NET). To our knowledge, this is the first paper addressing this important clinical question of the outcome of radionuclide therapy in this particularly vulnerable population. We found that targeted radionuclide therapy did not cause increased side effects in the elderly NET population, while toxicity remains modest and comparable in both groups. We also find that survival (after adjusting for differences in life expectancy) is not inferior for the elderly compared to younger NET patients.

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a well-established treatment in somatostatin receptor-expressing neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). The safety and efficacy of PRRT in >79 years old patients (EP) have not been systematically investigated. All patients with inoperable/metastatic/progressive G1/G2 NET, >79 years (EP), treated with PRRT at the University Hospital of Basel between 2006 and 2018, were enrolled in this retrospective matched cohort study. Each patient was manually matched with ≥1 younger patient (YP = 60–70 years). The primary endpoint was toxicity. Toxicity (subacute, long-term) was graded according to the criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0. All toxicity grades ≥ 3, or whose delta (Δ) to baseline were ≥2, were considered significant. The odds ratio (OR) for developing toxicity was tested for non-inferiority of EP vs. YP. Clinical response to PRRT and overall survival (OS) were assessed as secondary outcome measures. Forty-eight EP and 68 YP were enrolled. Both cohorts were balanced regarding median time since diagnosis, tumour location, grading, treatment scheme, and baseline biochemical parameters, except for eGFR (EP: 61 ± 16 vs. YP: 78 ± 19; mL/min/1.73 m²). Twenty-two grade ≥ 3 or Δ ≥ 2 subacute hematotoxicities occurred in 10 EP (10.3% of cycles) and 37 in 19 YP (11.6% of cycles; p = NS). Long-term grade ≥ 3 renal toxicity occurred in 7 EP and 2 YP (p = NS). The median OS was 3.4 years (EP) vs. 6.0 years (YP), HR: 1.50 [0.75, 2.98], p = NS. PRRT is a valid therapeutic option in elderly NET patients with similar toxicity and non-inferior survival compared to matched younger patients.

Current update on imaging for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNEN) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with differing pathological, genetic, and clinical features. Based on clinical findings, they may be categorized into functioning and nonfunctioning tumors. Adoption of the 2017 World Health Organization classification system, particularly its differentiation between grade 3, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNET) and grade 3, poorly-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (panNEC) has emphasized the role imaging plays in characterizing these lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound can help obtain biopsy specimen and assess tumor margins and local spread. Enhancement patterns on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used to classify panNEN. Contrast enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging have been reported to be useful for characterization of panNEN and quantifying metastatic burden. Current and emerging radiotracers have broadened the utility of functional imaging in evaluating panNEN. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and somatostatin receptor imaging such as Gallium-68 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid–octreotate PET/CT may be useful for improved identification of panNEN in comparison to anatomic modalities. These new techniques can also play a direct role in optimizing the selection of treatment for individuals and predicting tumor response based on somatostatin receptor expression. In addition, emerging methods of radiomics such as texture analysis may be a potential tool for staging and outcome prediction in panNEN, however further investigation is required before clinical implementation.

Combination Therapies with PRRT

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a successful targeted radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, complete responses remain elusive. Combined treatments anticipate synergistic effects and thus better responses by combining ionizing radiation with other anti-tumor treatments. Furthermore, multimodal therapies often have a balanced toxicity profile. To date, few studies have evaluated the effect of combination therapies with PRRT, some of them phase I/II trials. This review will focus on several clinically tested, tailored approaches to improving the effects of PRRT. The aim is to help clinicians in the treatment planning of NETs to choose the most effective and safe treatment for each patient in the sense of personalized medicine. Current promising combination partners of PRRT are somatostatin analogues (SSAs), chemotherapy, molecular targeted treatment, liver radioembolization, and dual radionuclide PRRT (Lutetium-177-PRRT combined with Yttrium-90-PRRT).

90Y/177Lu-DOTATOC: From Preclinical Studies to Application in Humans

The PRRT (Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy) is a promising modality treatment for patients with inoperable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of these patients are favorably comparable with standard therapies. The protagonist in this type of therapy is a somatostatin-modified peptide fragment ([Tyr3] octreotide), equipped with a specific chelating system (DOTA) capable of creating a stable bond with β-emitting radionuclides, such as yttrium-90 and lutetium-177. In this review, covering twenty five years of literature, we describe the characteristics and performances of the two most used therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals for the NETs radio-treatment: [⁹⁰Y]Y-DOTATOC and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATOC taking this opportunity to retrace the most significant results that have determined their success, promoting them from preclinical studies to application in humans.

Targeted α-Emitter Therapy of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, arising from cells of the endocrine system, with various clinical behaviors. Although these neoplasms are considered rare, a significant increase in the incidence and detectability of NET has been noted in many epidemiological studies in recent years. Among the various therapeutic options, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), using somatostatine has been shown to be highly effective and a well-tolerated therapy, improving survival parameters. The current use of radionuclides for PRRT is β-emitters. Due to hypoxia cancer tissue could be resistant for β-emitters. Quite long penetration range had a significant impact on side effects. α-particles with higher energy and shorter penetration range in comparison to β-particles, have distinct advantages for use in targeted therapy. The clinical experience with somatostatine based targeted α therapy (TAT) in NET showed very promising results even in patienicts refractory to treatment with β-emitters. This article summarizes current developments in preclinical and clinical investigation on TAT in NET.

Retrospective study of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for Japanese patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors

Background

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs is an innovative treatment for advanced somatostatin‐positive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). PRRT cannot be performed in Japan because there is no approval or insurance cover so far.

Methods

We relied on foreign institutions to perform PRRT for Japanese patients with NETs. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of PRRT. The inclusion criteria were pathologically confirmed well‐differentiated NET and visible tumor uptake on pre‐therapeutic somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. ¹⁷⁷Lu‐DOTA‐TOC was used as the standard treatment, and patients received three infusions every 8 weeks. Until the end of 2017, combination treatment with ⁹⁰Y and ¹⁷⁷Lu‐DOTA‐TOC was performed using the same protocol.

Results

Thirty‐five patients were evaluated, and the primary lesions were pancreas, rectum, small intestine, stomach, and other locations. The partial response rate was 42.9%. Progression‐free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months and overall survival was 42.8 months. There was no significant difference in PFS between front‐line and late‐line PRRT (11.0 months vs 28.0 months; P = .383). Severe adverse events included lymphocytopenia (20.0%) and thrombocytopenia (5.7%). Myelodysplastic syndrome occurred in one case.

Conclusion

PRRT was effective and safe for Japanese patients with advanced NETs. PRRT was equally effective as front‐line and late‐line treatment.

Neuroendocrine Tumor Theranostics: An Update and Emerging Applications in Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE. Theranostics have shown great promise for delivering precision medicine, particularly in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The clinical applications of radiolabeled somatostatin analogues in imaging and radionuclide therapy have been rapidly increasing over the past 2 decades and are currently integrated into the management guidelines of NETs. This article summarizes the available literature on different somatostatin receptor-targeting radiopharmaceuticals with theranostic potential in NETs, pheochromocytomas, and paragangliomas. We discuss the clinical application, administration, and toxicity of recent FDA-approved radionuclide therapies, including ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE in advanced gastroenteropancreatic NETs and ¹³¹I-MIBG in advanced paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. CONCLUSION. Several studies support the safety and clinical efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapies in disease control and quality-of-life improvement in patients with NETs and report potential benefits of combined radionuclide treatment approaches. The utility and pitfalls of functional imaging in therapy response assessment and surveillance of NETs remain to be established.

Recent advances in co-delivery nanosystems for synergistic action in cancer treatment

Nanocarrier delivery systems have been widely studied to carry unique or dual chemical drugs. The major challenge of chemotherapies is to overcome the multidrug-resistance (MDR) of cells to antineoplastic medicines. In this context, nano-scale technology has allowed researchers to develop biocompatible nano-delivery systems to overcome the limitation of chemical agents. The development of nano-vehicles may also be directed to co-deliver different agents such as drugs and genetic materials. The delivery of nucleic acids targeting specific cells is based on gene therapy principles to replace the defective gene, correct genome errors or knock-down a particular gene. Co-delivery systems are attractive strategies due to the possibility of achieving synergistic therapeutic effects, which are more effective in overcoming the MDR of cancer cells. These combined therapies can provide better outcomes than separate delivery approaches carrying either siRNA, miRNA, pDNA, or drugs. This article reviews the main design features that need to be associated with nano-vehicles to co-deliver drugs, genes, and gene-drug combinations with efficacy. The advantages and disadvantages of co-administration approaches are also overviewed and compared with individual nanocarrier systems. Herein, future trends and perspectives in designing novel nano-scale platforms to co-deliver therapeutic agents are also discussed.

Current Status and Trends in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in the Past 20 Years (2000-2019): A Bibliometric Study

Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging therapeutic option for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and the number of publications in this field has been increasing in recent years. The aim of the present study was to present the research status and summarize the key topics through bibliometric analysis of published PRRT literature.

Methods: A literature search for PRRT research from 2000 to 2019 was conducted using the Science Citation Index Expanded of Web of Science Core Collection (limited to SCIE) on August 4, 2020. The VOSviewer, R-bibliometrix, and CiteSpace software were used to conduct the bibliometric analysis.

Results: From 2000 to 2019, a total of 681 publications (523 articles and 158 reviews) were retrieved. Annual publication outputs grew from three to 111 records. Germany had the largest number of publications, making the largest contribution to the field (n = 151, 22.17%). Active cooperation between countries/regions was observed. Kwekkeboom from the Erasmus Medical Center is perhaps a key researcher in the field of PRRT. The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and Journal of Nuclear Medicine ranked first for productive (n = 84, 12.33%) and co-cited (n = 3,438) journals, respectively. Important topics mainly included matters related to the efficacy of PRRT (e.g., ⁹⁰Y-dotatoc and ¹⁷⁷Lu-dotatate), the long-term adverse effects of PRRT (e.g., hematologic and renal toxicities), standardization of NETs and PRRT in practice, the development of medical imaging techniques, and the individual dose optimization of PRRT.

Conclusion: Using bibliometric analysis, we gained deep insight into the global status and trends of studies investigating PRRT for the first time. The PRRT field is undergoing a period of rapid development, and our study provides a valuable reference for clinical researchers and practitioners.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are a rare group of cancers accounting for about 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. About 10% of pNETs arise within endocrine tumor syndromes, such as Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). pNETs affect 30-80% of MEN1 patients, manifesting prevalently as multiple microadenomas. pNETs in patients with MEN1 are particularly difficult to treat due to differences in their growth potential, their multiplicity, the frequent requirement of extensive surgery, the high rate of post-operative recurrences, and the concomitant development of other tumors. MEN1 syndrome is caused by germinal heterozygote inactivating mutation of the MEN1 gene, encoding the menin tumor suppressor protein. MEN1-related pNETs develop following the complete loss of function of wild-type menin. Menin is a key regulator of endocrine cell plasticity and its loss in these cells is sufficient for tumor initiation. Somatic biallelic loss of wild-type menin in the neuroendocrine pancreas presumably alters the epigenetic control of gene expression, mediated by histone modifications and DNA hypermethylation, as a driver of MEN1-associated pNET tumorigenesis. In this light, epigenetic-based therapies aimed to correct the altered DNA methylation, and/or histone modifications might be a possible therapeutic strategy for MEN1 pNETs, for whom standard treatments fail.

Implementation of dose point kernel (DPK) for dose optimization of 177Lu/90Y cocktail radionuclides in internal dosimetry

BACKGROUND

Due to the importance of choosing the applicable dosimetry method in radionuclide therapy, the present study was conducted to investigate the efficiency of the implementation of Dose Point Kernel (DPK) for dose optimization of ¹⁷⁷Lu/⁹⁰Y Cocktail Radionuclides in internal Dosimetry.

METHODS

In this study, simulations and calculations of DPK were performed using the GATE/GEANT4 Monte Carlo code. For specific liver dosimetry, the NCAT phantom and convolution algorithm-based Fast Fourier Transform method was used by MATLAB software.

RESULTS

The self-dose of ¹⁷⁷Lu and ⁹⁰Y radionuclides in the liver of NCAT phantom were 1.1708E-13, and 4.8420E-11 (Gy/Bq), respectively, and the cross-dose of ¹⁷⁷Lu and ⁹⁰Y radionuclides out of the liver of NCAT phantom were 2.03615E-16, and 0.8422E-13 (Gy/Bq) respectively. Overall results showed that with an increase the value of ⁹⁰Y with quarter steps in a cocktail, the amount of the self-dose increase 1.5, 6, and 29 times respectively, and with an increase the value of ¹⁷⁷Lu in quarter step in a cocktail, the amount of the cross dose decrease 3, 15 and 68 percent respectively.

CONCLUSION

Generally, the present results indicate that the calculated DPK functions of ¹⁷⁷Lu and ⁹⁰Y cocktails can play an important role in choosing the best combination of radionuclide to optimize treatment planning in cocktail radionuclide therapy.

Targeted Cancer Therapy: What's New in the Field of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous family of neoplasms of increasing incidence and high prevalence due to their relatively indolent nature. Their wide anatomic distribution and their characteristic ability to secrete hormonally active substances pose unique challenges for clinical management. They are also characterized by the common expression of somatostatin receptors, a target that has been extremely useful for diagnosis and treatment (i.e., somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)). Chemotherapy is of limited use for NETs of non-pancreatic origin, and the only approved targeted agents for advanced progressive NETs are sunitinib for those of pancreatic origin, and everolimus for lung, gastrointestinal and pancreatic primaries. Despite recent therapeutic achievements, thus, systemic treatment options remain limited. In this review we will discuss the state-of-the-art targeted therapies in the field of NETs, and also future perspectives of novel therapeutic drugs or strategies in clinical development, including recently presented results from randomized trials of yet unapproved antiangiogenic agents (i.e., pazopanib, surufatinib and axitinib), PRRT including both approved radiopharmaceuticals (177Lu-Oxodotreotide) and others in development (177Lu-Edotreotide, 177Lu-Satoreotide Tetraxetan), immunotherapy and other innovative targeted strategies (antibody-drug conjugates, bites,…) that shall soon improve the landscape of personalized treatment options in NET patients.

Treatment personalization in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

The clinical scenario of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) is continuously changing due to significant improvements in the definition of their molecular landscapes and the introduction of innovative therapeutic approaches. Many efforts are currently employed in the integration of the genetics/epigenetics and clinical information. This is leading to an improvement of tumor classification, prognostic stratification and ameliorating the management of patients based on a personalized approach.

Consensus on molecular imaging and theranostics in neuroendocrine neoplasms

Nuclear medicine plays an increasingly important role in the management neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). Somatostatin analogue (SSA)-based positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) have been used in clinical trials and approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Focus 3 performed a multidisciplinary Delphi process to deliver a balanced perspective on molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). NETs form in cells that interact with the nervous system or in glands that produce hormones. These cells, called neuroendocrine cells, can be found throughout the body, but NETs are most often found in the abdomen, especially in the gastrointestinal tract. These tumours may also be found in the lungs, pancreas and adrenal glands. In addition to being rare, NETs are also complex and may be difficult to diagnose. Most NETs are non-functioning; however, a minority present with symptoms related to hypersecretion of bioactive compounds. NETs often do not cause symptoms early in the disease process. When diagnosed, substantial number of patients are already found to have metastatic disease. Several societies' guidelines address Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) management; however, many issues are still debated, due to both the difficulty in acquiring strong clinical evidence in a rare and heterogeneous disease and the different availability of diagnostic and therapeutic options across countries. EANM Focus 3 reached consensus on employing ⁶⁸gallium-labelled somatostatin analogue ([⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA)-based PET/CT with diagnostic CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for unknown primary NET detection, metastatic NET, NET staging/restaging, suspected extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and suspected paraganglioma. Consensus was reached on employing ¹⁸fluorine-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) PET/CT in neuroendocrine carcinoma, G3 NET and in G1-2 NET with mismatched lesions (CT-positive/[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA-negative). Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) was recommended for second line treatment for gastrointestinal NET with [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA uptake in all lesions, in G1/G2 NET at disease progression, and in a subset of G3 NET provided all lesions are positive at [¹⁸F]FDG and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA. PRRT rechallenge may be used for in patients with stable disease for at least 1 year after therapy completion. An international consensus is not only a prelude to a more standardised management across countries but also serves as a guide for the direction to follow when designing new research studies.

Initial clinical evaluation of indigenous 90Y-DOTATATE in sequential duo-PRRT approach (177Lu-DOTATATE and 90Y-DOTATATE) in neuroendocrine tumors with large bulky disease: Observation on tolerability, 90Y-DOTATATE post- PRRT imaging characteristics (bremsstrahlung and PETCT) and early adverse effects

¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) alone has lesser potential in the clinical setting of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) with large bulky disease and nonhomogeneous somatostatin receptors (SSTR) distribution, owing to lower energy (Eβmax 0.497 MeV) and a shorter particle penetration range (maximum 2–4 mm) of ¹⁷⁷Lu. In large bulky NETs, ⁹⁰Yttrium (⁹⁰Y) has the theoretical advantages because of a longer beta particle penetration range (a maximum soft tissue penetration of 11 mm). Therefore, a combination of ¹⁷⁷Lu and ⁹⁰Y is a theoretically sound concept that can result in better response in metastatic NET with large-bulky lesion and non-homogeneous SSTR distribution. The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of combining ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE PRRT as sequential duo-PRRT in metastatic NET with (≥5 cm) including the post ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE-PRRT imaging and also to determine early toxicity of the duo-PRRT approach. A total of 9 patients received combination of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE with ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE (indigenously prepared and approved) through sequential duo-PRRT approach. These 9 NET patients were included and analyzed in this study. All 9 patients had undergone post-PRRT ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE imaging, including a whole-body planar bremsstrahlung imaging followed by regional single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-computed tomography (CT) imaging and also a regional positron emission tomography–computed tomography imaging. Grading of ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE uptake was done on post-PRRT imaging by both modalities. The size of the lesions ranged from 5.5 cm to 16 cm with average size of 10 cm before sequential duo-PRRT was decided. Sequential duo-PRRT was administered because of stable, unresponsive disease following ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE in 5 patients (55.6%), progressive disease after ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE in 2 patients (22.2%), and with neoadjuvant intent in 2 patients (22.2%). The total cumulative dose of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE before duo-pRRT ranged from 11.84 GBq to 37 GBq per patient and average administered dose of 27.21 GBq per patient in this study. Out of 9 patients, 8 patients received single cycle of ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE (ranging from 2.66 GBq to 3.4 GBq per patient with average administered dose of 3.12 GBq per patient). One patient received two cycles of ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE (total dose of 6.2 GBq). Out of 9 patients, 8 patients showed excellent tracer concentration in lesions on post-PRRT ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE imaging and the remaining 1 patient showed fairly adequate ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE tracer uptake in lesion on visual analysis. There was matched ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE uptake with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and also with ¹⁷⁷LuDOTATATE in all 9 patients. The sequential duo-PRRT was well tolerated by all patients. Two patients (22.2%) developed mild nausea, one patient (11.1%) developed transient mild-grade hemoglobin toxicity, and one patient (11.1%) developed mild-grade gastrointestinal symptoms (loose motion and abdominal pain). No nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and other hematological toxicity was observed. The combination of the indigenous ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE PRRT in NET as sequential duo-PRRT was well tolerated, feasible and safe in stable, unresponsive/progressive disease following single isotope ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE therapy and also in neoadjuvant PRRT setting with large bulky lesion (≥≥5cm). Post-PRRT ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE imaging showed excellent ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE uptake in nearly all NET patients. Mild-grade early adverse effects were easily manageable and controllable in this sequential duo-PRRT approach.

Evaluation of a New 177Lu-Labeled Somatostatin Analog for the Treatment of Tumors Expressing Somatostatin Receptor Subtypes 2 and 5

Targeted radionuclide therapy of somatostatin receptor (SST)-expressing tumors is only partially addressed by the established somatostatin analogs having an affinity for the SST subtype 2 (SST2). Aiming to target a broader spectrum of tumors, we evaluated the bis-iodo-substituted somatostatin analog ST8950 ((4-amino-3-iodo)-d-Phe-c[Cys-(3-iodo)-Tyr-d-Trp-Lys-Val-Cys]-Thr-NH2), having subnanomolar affinity for SST2 and SST5, labeled with [177Lu]Lu3+ via the chelator DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid). Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK) cells stably transfected with the human SST2 (HEK-SST2) and SST5 (HEK-SST5) were used for in vitro and in vivo evaluation on a dual SST2- and SST5-expressing xenografted mouse model. natLu-DOTA-ST8950 showed nanomolar affinity for both subtypes (IC50 (95% confidence interval): 0.37 (0.22-0.65) nM for SST2 and 3.4 (2.3-5.2) for SST5). The biodistribution of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-ST8950 was influenced by the injected mass, with 100 pmol demonstrating lower background activity than 10 pmol. [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-ST8950 reached its maximal uptake on SST2- and SST5-tumors at 1 h p.i. (14.17 ± 1.78 and 1.78 ± 0.35%IA/g, respectively), remaining unchanged 4 h p.i., with a mean residence time of 8.6 and 0.79 h, respectively. Overall, [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-ST8950 targets SST2-, SST5-expressing tumors in vivo to a lower extent, and has an effective dose similar to clinically used radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. Its main drawbacks are the low uptake in SST5-tumors and the persistent kidney uptake.

Overview of Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogs for Cancer Imaging and Therapy

Identified in 1973, somatostatin (SST) is a cyclic hormone peptide with a short biological half-life. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are widely expressed in the whole body, with five subtypes described. The interaction between SST and its receptors leads to the internalization of the ligand-receptor complex and triggers different cellular signaling pathways. Interestingly, the expression of SSTRs is significantly enhanced in many solid tumors, especially gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET). Thus, somatostatin analogs (SSAs) have been developed to improve the stability of the endogenous ligand and so extend its half-life. Radiolabeled analogs have been developed with several radioelements such as indium-111, technetium-99 m, and recently gallium-68, fluorine-18, and copper-64, to visualize the distribution of receptor overexpression in tumors. Internal metabolic radiotherapy is also used as a therapeutic strategy (e.g., using yttrium-90, lutetium-177, and actinium-225). With some radiopharmaceuticals now used in clinical practice, somatostatin analogs developed for imaging and therapy are an example of the concept of personalized medicine with a theranostic approach. Here, we review the development of these analogs, from the well-established and authorized ones to the most recently developed radiotracers, which have better pharmacokinetic properties and demonstrate increased efficacy and safety, as well as the search for new clinical indications.

Australian experience of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in lung neuroendocrine tumours

Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an approved treatment modality for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs), Although Phase III randomised clinical trial data is not available for NETs of other site of origin, in practice, PRRT is used more widely in clinical practice, based on its mechanism of targeting the somatostatin receptor. Use of PRRT for lung (bronchial) NET, specifically typical and atypical carcinoid (TC, AC), has been reported only in small retrospective case series. This multicentre study adds to the evidence regarding utility of PRRT for lung NETs.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with TC and AC who received ¹⁷⁷Lu-dotatate PRRT between January 2002 and June 2019 in six hospitals across Australia was undertaken. Data regarding demographics, efficacy and toxicity was evaluated at each site by the treating clinician.

Results: Forty-eight patients (32 AC, 15 TC, 1 unclassified) received a median of four ¹⁷⁷Lu-dotatate treatments. There was a median of one prior line of systemic treatment (range: 0–3). The response rate to ¹⁷⁷Lu-dotatate was 33%, with a median overall survival of 49 months (range of 3–91), at a median follow up of 33 months. This compares favourably with GEP NET. Overall toxicity was recorded as modest.

Conclusions: ¹⁷⁷Lu-dotatate PRRT in patients with lung NETs is used in real world practice, where it appears well-tolerated with some efficacy. Further evidence could be obtained through a global prospective clinical or registry trial.

Enhancing the anti-tumour activity of 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate radionuclide therapy in somatostatin receptor-2 expressing tumour models by targeting PARP

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an important treatment option for patients with somatostatin receptor-2 (SSTR2)-expressing neuroendocrine tumour (NET) though tumour regression occurs in only a minority of patients. Therefore, novel PRRT regimens with improved therapeutic activity are needed. Radiation induced DNA damage repair is an attractive therapeutic target to increase PRRT efficacy and consequently, we have characterised a panel of preclinical models for their SSTR2 expression, in vivo growth properties and response to 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate (LuTate) PRRT to identify models with features suitable for evaluating novel therapeutic combinations. In vitro studies using the SSTR2 expressing AR42J model demonstrate that the combination of LuTate and the small molecule Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP) inhibitor, talazoparib led to increased DNA double strand breaks, as assessed by γ-H2AX foci formation, as compared to LuTate alone. Furthermore, using the AR42J tumour model in vivo we demonstrate that the combination of LuTate and talazoparib significantly improved the anti-tumour efficacy of LuTate alone. These findings support the clinical evaluation of the combination of LuTate and PARP inhibition in SSTR2-expressing NET.

Tandem peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using 90Y/177Lu-DOTATATE for neuroendocrine tumors efficacy and side-effects - polish multicenter experience

INTRODUCTION

One of the concepts of theranostics in nuclear medicine is peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), whereby labeled somatostatin analogs are used for imaging and treating inoperable or disseminated neuroendocrine tumors (NET).

AIM

The aim of the study was to determine the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of tandem 90Y /177Lu-DOTATATE in patients with disseminated NET in a multicenter trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

103 patients with NET G1/G2 treated with 90Y/177Lu-DOTATATE (1:1) with amino-acid infusion for nephroprotection were included in the study.

RESULTS

Overall survival from the disease diagnosis (OS-D) was 127.4 months and from the time of PRRT (OS-T) was 89.5 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 29.9 months. An analysis based on the proliferation index revealed a statistically significant impact on PFS and OS-T (PFS G1 vs G2, 59.3 vs 24.3 months; OS-T G1 vs G2, not reached vs 79.9 months). The effect of the primary disease site was also analyzed. For pancreatic vs small bowel vs large bowel, the PFS was 30.8 vs 30.3 vs 40.6 months, the OS-T was 94 vs 61.9 vs 131.2 months and OS-D was 130.4 vs 89.2 vs not reached months, respectively. The 2-year risk of progression was 42%. The probability of 2-year and 5-year overall survival was 89% and 62%, respectively. PRRT was well tolerated by all patients. One patient (1%) developed myelodysplastic syndrome. No other grade 3 and 4 hematological or renal toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter trial showed that tandem 90Y/177Lu-DOTATATE is highly effective and safe therapy for patients with disseminated NET.

The use of yttrium in medical imaging and therapy: historical background and future perspectives

Yttrium presents a wide palette of isotopes with interesting coordination and radiochemical properties. We review its most prominent isotopes and their diverse medical uses in therapy and imaging.

Treatment of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent a group of biologically and clinically heterogeneous neoplasms arising from the diffuse neuroendocrine system. Although NETs may develop in almost any organ, they commonly arise in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas and are referred to as gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NETs when they arise from these sites. In recent years, advances in understanding of the biology of NETs have resulted in an expansion in treatment options and improved survival for patients. This review focuses on treatment of GEP-NETS and highlights factors that govern the therapeutic approach.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

Background:

The incidence of pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (pNETs) has increased considerably in the last few decades. The characteristic features of this tumour and the development of new investigative and therapeutic methods had a great impact on its management.

Objective:

The aim of this review is to investigate the outcome of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Methods:

A comprehensive literature search strategy was used based on two databases (SCOPUS, and PubMed). We considered all studies published in English, evaluating the use of PRRT (177Luteciuim- DOTA-conjugated peptides and 90Yetrium- DOTA- conjugated peptides) in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours as a standalone entity or as a subgroup within the wider category of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (GEP NETs).

Results:

PRRT was found to be an effective treatment modality as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies in the treatment of non-operable and metastatic pNETs where other options are limited. Complete response was reported to be between 2-6% while partial response was achieved in up to 60% of cases. Survival analysis was also impressive. Progression Free Survival (PFS) reached a mean of 34 months and Overall Survival (OS) of 53 months. PRRT also proved to improve patients’ Quality of Life (QoL). Acute and sub-acute side effects like nephrotoxicity and haematotoxicity are usually mild and reversible.

Conclusion:

PRRT is well tolerated and effective treatment option for non-operable and/or metastatic pNETs. Side effects are usually mild and reversible. Larger randomized controlled trails need to be done to compare PRRT with other treatment modalities and to provide more detailed guidelines regarding patient selections, the choice of PRRT, follow up and response assessment to maximum potential benefit.

Systemic treatment for lung carcinoids: from bench to bedside

In the huge spectrum of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms, typical and atypical carcinoids should be considered as a separate biological entity from poorly differentiated forms, harboring peculiar molecular alterations. Despite their indolent behavior, lung carcinoids correlate with a worse survival. To date, only limited therapeutic options are available and novel drugs are strongly needed. In this work, we extensively reviewed scientific literature exploring available therapeutic options, new molecular targets and future perspectives in the management of well differentiated neoplasms of bronchopulmonary tree. Systemic therapy represents the main option in advanced and unresectable disease; accepted choices are somatostatin analogs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, everolimus and chemotherapy. To date, an univocal treatment strategy has not been identified yet, thus tailored therapeutic algorithms should consider treatment efficacy as well as safety profiles. Several molecular alterations found in carcinoid tumors might act as molecular targets leading to development of new therapeutic options. Further studies are necessary to identify new potential “druggable” molecular targets in the selected subset of low-grade lung carcinoids. Furthermore, evaluating the available therapies in more homogeneous population might improve their efficacy through a perfect tailoring of treatment options.

Therapy With 177Lu-DOTATATE: Clinical Implementation and Impact on Care of Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to enhance knowledge of the clinical implementation of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and its impact on care of patients with neuroendocrine tumors. CONCLUSION. Most well differentiated and some moderately and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors express large numbers of somatostatin receptors on their cell surfaces. PRRT targets these cells with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, which is a medium-energy beta emitter. Since this agent received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in 2018, tremendous effort has been exerted at institutions throughout the United States toward proper implementation of this promising therapy. This review summarizes clinical implementation of PRRT and its impact on patient care.

Neuroendocrine Tumor Therapy with Lutetium-177: A Literature Review

The worldwide incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has been increasing. They are a very diverse group of tumors which are commonly found in the gastrointestinal and bronchopulmonary tracts. These tumors usually express somatostatin receptors. Therefore, somatostatin analogs are used for symptom relief as well as treatment. Of the many therapeutic options available, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been shown to be very promising. In January 2018, the Food Drug and Authority (FDA) approved 177Lu-Dotatate for use in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Lutetium is a lower energy beta-emitting radionuclide. The therapeutic use of lutetium-177 (177Lu) has shown better results in advanced gastroenteropancreatic and bronchial neuroendocrine tumors when compared with other therapies available. Adverse effects associated with this therapy include myelotoxicity and nephrotoxicity as the radiopeptides are reabsorbed and accumulate in the renal interstitium. Everolimus is a good and safe option in patients pretreated with 177Lu-Dotatate. Lutetium, in combination with somatostatin analogs, has proven efficacy to treat gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in candidates with somatostatin receptor-positive advanced tumors and normal renal function. This therapy has great potential as it decreases tumor size, improves symptoms, and improves quality of life.

Targeted Alpha Particle Therapy for Neuroendocrine Tumours: The Next Generation of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are being seen increasingly frequently, but to date only complete surgical resection is curative. However, among the various therapeutic options, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, linking a radioactive moiety to an octreotide derivative, has been shown to be highly efficacious and a well-tolerated therapy, improving progression-free survival and probably overall survival. Nevertheless, the current radionuclides in use are beta particle emitters with non-optimal radiobiological properties. A new generation of alpha particle-emitting radionuclides is being developed, with advantages in terms of very high energy and a short path length, which should theoretically show higher efficacy. We survey the current developments in this field, emphasising the exciting potential of this novel form of therapy for NETs.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy as a Novel Treatment for Metastatic and Invasive Phaeochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

At present there is no clinical guideline or standardised protocol for the treatment of metastatic or invasive phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma (collectively known as PPGL) due to the rarity of the disease and the lack of prospective studies or extended national databases. Prognosis is mainly determined by genetic predisposition, tumour burden, rate of disease progression, and location of metastases. For patients with progressive or symptomatic disease that is not amenable to surgery, there are various palliative treatment options available. These include localised therapies including radiotherapy, radiofrequency, or cryoablation, as well as liver-directed therapies for those patients with hepatic metastases (e.g., transarterial chemoembolisation) and systemic therapies including chemotherapy or molecular targeted therapies. There is currently intense research interest in the value of radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumours, including phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma, with either iodine-131 (131I)-radiolabelled metaiodobenzylguanidine or very recently peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and the most important contemporary clinical studies will be highlighted in this review. The studies to date suggest that PRRT may induce major clinical, biochemical, and radiological changes, with 177Lu-DOTATATE being most efficacious and presenting less toxicity than 90Y-DOTATATE. Newer combination therapies with combined radioisotopes, or combinations with chemotherapeutic agents, also look promising. Given the favourable efficacy, logistic, and safety profiles, we believe that PRRT will probably become the standard treatment for inoperable metastatic PPGL in the near future, but we await data from definitive randomised controlled trials to understand its role.

What Is New in the 2017 World Health Organization Classification and 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?

The diagnosis and management of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have evolved significantly in recent years. There are several diagnostic and therapeutic challenges and controversies regarding the management of these lesions. In this review, we focus on the recent significant changes and controversial issues regarding the diagnosis and management of NENs and discuss the role of imaging in the multidisciplinary team approach.