1
|
Dulai PS, Singh S, Jairath V, Wong E, Narula N. Integrating Evidence to Guide Use of Biologics and Small Molecules for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:396-408.e2. [PMID: 37949249 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Advances in science have led to the development of multiple biologics and small molecules for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). This growth in advanced medical therapies has been accompanied by an increase in methodological innovation to study and compare therapies. Guidelines provide an evidence-based approach to integrating therapies into routine practice, but they are often unable to provide timely recommendations as new therapies come to market, and they have limited incorporation of real-world evidence when making recommendations. This limits the scope and usability of guidelines, and a gap remains in defining how best to position and integrate advanced medical therapies for IBD. In this review, we provide a framework for clinicians and researchers to understand key differences in sources of evidence, how different methodologies are applied to study the comparative effectiveness of advanced medical therapies in IBD, and considerations for how these sources of evidence can be used to better integrate current guideline recommendations. Over time, we anticipate this framework will allow for a transition to living guidelines and/or practice recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parambir S Dulai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emily Wong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neeraj Narula
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qiao H, Chen Y, Qian C, Guo Y. Clinical data mining: challenges, opportunities, and recommendations for translational applications. J Transl Med 2024; 22:185. [PMID: 38378565 PMCID: PMC10880222 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05005-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical data mining of predictive models offers significant advantages for re-evaluating and leveraging large amounts of complex clinical real-world data and experimental comparison data for tasks such as risk stratification, diagnosis, classification, and survival prediction. However, its translational application is still limited. One challenge is that the proposed clinical requirements and data mining are not synchronized. Additionally, the exotic predictions of data mining are difficult to apply directly in local medical institutions. Hence, it is necessary to incisively review the translational application of clinical data mining, providing an analytical workflow for developing and validating prediction models to ensure the scientific validity of analytic workflows in response to clinical questions. This review systematically revisits the purpose, process, and principles of clinical data mining and discusses the key causes contributing to the detachment from practice and the misuse of model verification in developing predictive models for research. Based on this, we propose a niche-targeting framework of four principles: Clinical Contextual, Subgroup-Oriented, Confounder- and False Positive-Controlled (CSCF), to provide guidance for clinical data mining prior to the model's development in clinical settings. Eventually, it is hoped that this review can help guide future research and develop personalized predictive models to achieve the goal of discovering subgroups with varied remedial benefits or risks and ensuring that precision medicine can deliver its full potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huimin Qiao
- Medical Big Data and Bioinformatics Research Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Yijing Chen
- School of Public Health and Health Management, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Changshun Qian
- School of Information Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, China
| | - You Guo
- Medical Big Data and Bioinformatics Research Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
- School of Public Health and Health Management, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
- School of Information Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, China.
- Ganzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Big Data, Ganzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Orriëns LB, van Hulst K, van der Burg JJW, van den Hoogen FJA, Willemsen MAAP, Erasmus CE. Comparing the evidence for botulinum neurotoxin injections in paediatric anterior drooling: a scoping review. Eur J Pediatr 2024; 183:83-93. [PMID: 37924348 PMCID: PMC10858158 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-05309-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
Paediatric anterior drooling has a major impact on the daily lives of children and caregivers. Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin type-A (BoNT-A) injections are considered an effective treatment to diminish drooling. However, there is no international consensus on which major salivary glands should be injected to obtain optimal treatment effect while minimizing the risk of side effects. This scoping review aimed to explore the evidence for submandibular BoNT-A injections and concurrent submandibular and parotid (i.e. four-gland) injections, respectively, and assess whether outcomes could be compared across studies to improve decision making regarding the optimal initial BoNT-A treatment approach for paediatric anterior drooling. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant studies (until October 1, 2023) on submandibular or four-gland BoNT-A injections for the treatment of anterior drooling in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Similarities and differences in treatment, patient, outcome, and follow-up characteristics were assessed. Twenty-eight papers were identified; 7 reporting on submandibular injections and 21 on four-gland injections. No major differences in treatment procedures or timing of follow-up were found. However, patient characteristics were poorly reported, there was great variety in outcome measurement, and the assessment of side effects was not clearly described. Conclusion: This review highlights heterogeneity in outcome measures and patient population descriptors among studies on paediatric BoNT-A injections, limiting the ability to compare treatment effectiveness between submandibular and four-gland injections. These findings emphasize the need for more extensive and uniform reporting of patient characteristics and the implementation of a core outcome measurement set to allow for comparison of results between studies and facilitate the optimization of clinical practice guidelines. What is Known: • There is no international consensus on which salivary glands to initially inject with BoNT-A to treat paediatric drooling. What is New: • Concluding on the optimal initial BoNT-A treatment based on literature is currently infeasible. There is considerable heterogeneity in outcome measures used to quantify anterior drooling.and clinical characteristics of children treated with intraglandular BoNT-A are generally insufficiently reported. • Consensus-based sets of outcome measures and patient characteristics should be developed and implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn B Orriëns
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Division of Paediatrics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Karen van Hulst
- Department of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan J W van der Burg
- Department of Paediatric Rehabilitation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands
- School of Pedagogical and Educational Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J A van den Hoogen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Michèl A A P Willemsen
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Division of Paediatrics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Corrie E Erasmus
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Division of Paediatrics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ollila TA, Taher R, Moku P, Olszewski AJ. Immunochemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in primary central nervous system lymphoma: a National Cancer Database analysis. Blood Adv 2023; 7:5470-5479. [PMID: 37459209 PMCID: PMC10515309 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Debate remains over the role of rituximab, a large molecule with reduced central nervous system (CNS) penetration, in therapy for primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Since 2013, the National Cancer Database has distinguished between chemotherapy and immunotherapy for frontline treatment. In this setting, rituximab would be the only standard frontline immunotherapy. We examined factors associated with the receipt of immunotherapy using a multivariate regression model for relative risk, with a random intercept to account for the hospital-specific treatment selection process. Patients were matched using a 1:1 propensity score to limit possible confounders, and overall survival (OS) was compared in the matched cohort. We identified 4691 patients with PCNSL diagnosed between 2013 and 2018. The use of immunotherapy has increased from 45% in 2013 to 76% in 2018. Immunotherapy use was associated with sociodemographic variables and local (hospital level) preference rather than clinical factors. The main factors associated with reduced use of immunotherapy included male sex, Black race or Hispanic ethnicity (compared with White non-Hispanic), HIV+ status, treatment in a lower-volume hospital, and earlier year of diagnosis. We matched 2830 patients for the survival analysis. Receipt of immunotherapy was associated with a significantly better OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.83). There was heterogeneity according to age, because the advantage of immunotherapy was more pronounced for patients aged ≤75 years (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80) than for those older than 75 years (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70-1.08). Overall, our findings support the current trend toward rituximab use, although a nuanced approach should be adopted when treating older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A. Ollila
- Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Rashida Taher
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Prashanth Moku
- Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Adam J. Olszewski
- Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang Y, Agarwal SK, Chen H, Chatterjee S, Johnson ML, Aparasu RR. Real-world Comparative Effectiveness of Methotrexate-based Combinations for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Clin Ther 2023; 45:e177-e186. [PMID: 37573225 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Guidelines recommend using disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after monotherapy. Little is known about the real-world comparative effectiveness of these MTX-DMARD combinations. This study compared the effectiveness of various MTX-based DMARD combinations for patients with RA initiating MTX-DMARD combination therapy using administrative claims database. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included adults (aged ≥18 years) with RA who initiated MTX combination treatment with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), non-TNFi bDMARDs, or targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) between July 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013 (index date), from the MarketScan Commercial Claims Data. Patients had continuous enrollment from the 6 months of preindex period until the 12 months of postindex period. The MTX-based DMARD combination therapy cohort was defined as ≥1 MTX prescription in the first 30 days from the index date and ≥14 days overlapping use of the prescription fills of the MTX and the index DMARD. Effectiveness was measured by using the claims algorithm (dosing, switching, addition, oral glucocorticoid use, or multiple glucocorticoid injection). Propensity score analysis with the inverse probability of treatment weighting (PS-IPTW), estimated by using the generalized boosted machine learning method, was used to balance the distribution of baseline variables between the combination groups. Multivariable logistic regression using PS-IPTW was conducted to compare the effectiveness of the combination groups. Sensitivity analysis evaluated the modified effectiveness algorithms or the time to the first treatment failure. FINDINGS A total of 3174 adult patients with RA starting an MTX-DMARD combination therapy were identified (mean [SD] age, 50 [9] years), including 1568 (49%) initiating a csDMARD + MTX, 1343 (42%) initiating TNFi + MTX, and 240 (8%) initiating non-TNFi bDMARD + MTX, and 23 (1%) initiating tsDMARD + MTX. Owing to the small sample, the tsDMARD combination group was not included in the comparative analysis. Algorithm-based therapy effectiveness was found in 9.95% of the csDMARD + MTX, 20.48% of the TNFi + MTX, and 20.83% of the non-TNFi + MTX groups. PS-IPTW showed that the csDMARD combination is less effective (adjusted odds ratio, 0.422; 95% CI, 0.341-0.524) than the TNFi combination; however, the non-TNFi biologic combination had similar effectiveness (aOR, 1.063; 95% CI, 0.680-1.662) compared to the TNFi combination. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the main results. IMPLICATIONS Among RA patients initiating MTX-DMARD combinations, both non-TNFi biologics and TNFi-based combinations with MTX were equally effective, but csDMARD + MTX was less effective than the TNFi plus MTX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinan Huang
- Department of Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, Oxford. Mississippi, USA
| | - Sandeep K Agarwal
- Section of Immunology, Allergy & Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hua Chen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Satabdi Chatterjee
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael L Johnson
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rajender R Aparasu
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee E, Hines RB, Zhu J, Rovito MJ, Dharmarajan KV, Mazumdar M. Association between adjuvant radiation treatment and breast cancer-specific mortality among older women with comorbidity burden: A comparative effectiveness analysis of SEER-MHOS. Cancer Med 2023; 12:18729-18744. [PMID: 37706222 PMCID: PMC10557861 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Comprehensive Cancer Network suggested that older women with low-risk breast cancer (LRBC; i.e., early-stage, node-negative, and estrogen receptor-positive) could omit adjuvant radiation treatment (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) if they were treated with hormone therapy. However, the association between RT omission and breast cancer-specific mortality among older women with comorbidity is not fully known. METHODS 1105 older women (≥65 years) with LRBC in 1998-2012 were queried from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey data resource and were followed up through July 2018. Latent class analysis was performed to identify comorbidity burden classes. A propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to Cox regression models to obtain subdistribution hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI for cancer-specific mortality considering other causes of death as competing risks, overall and separately by comorbidity burden class. RESULTS Three comorbidity burden (low, moderate, and high) groups were identified. A total of 318 deaths (47 cancer-related) occurred. The IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that RT omission was not associated with short-term, 5- and 10-year cancer-specific death (p = 0.202 and p = 0.536, respectively), regardless of comorbidity burden. However, RT omission could increase the risk of long-term cancer-specific death in women with low comorbidity burden (HR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.17, 3.33), which warrants further study. CONCLUSIONS Omission of RT after BCS is not associated with an increased risk of cancer-specific death and is deemed a reasonable treatment option for older women with moderate to high comorbidity burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunkyung Lee
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of Central Florida College of Health Professions and SciencesFloridaOrlandoUSA
| | - Robert B. Hines
- Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of Central Florida College of MedicineFloridaOrlandoUSA
| | - Jianbin Zhu
- Department of Statistics and Data ScienceUniversity of Central Florida College of SciencesFloridaOrlandoUSA
- Research Institute, Advent HealthFloridaOrlandoUSA
| | - Michael J. Rovito
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of Central Florida College of Health Professions and SciencesFloridaOrlandoUSA
| | - Kavita V. Dharmarajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Geriatrics Palliative MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Madhu Mazumdar
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery ScienceIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim ES, Kang B. Infliximab vs adalimumab: Points to consider when selecting anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in pediatric patients with Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:2784-2797. [PMID: 37274072 PMCID: PMC10237103 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i18.2784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Biologic agents with various mechanisms against Crohn’s disease (CD) have been released and are widely used in clinical practice. However, two anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL), are the only biologic agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration for pediatric CD currently. Therefore, in pediatric CD, the choice of biologic agents should be made more carefully to achieve the therapeutic goal. There are currently no head-to-head trials of biologic agents in pediatric or adult CD. There is a lack of accumulated data for pediatric CD, which requires the extrapolation of adult data for the positioning of biologics in pediatric CD. From a pharmacokinetic point of view, IFX is more advantageous than ADL when the inflammatory burden is high, and ADL is expected to be advantageous over IFX in sustaining remission in the maintenance phase. Additionally, we reviewed the safety profile, immunogenicity, preference, and compliance between IFX and ADL and provide practical insights into the choice of anti-TNF therapy in pediatric CD. Careful evaluation of clinical indications and disease behavior is essential when prescribing anti-TNF agents. In addition, factors such as the efficacy of induction and maintenance of remission, safety profile, immunogenicity, patient preference, and compliance play an important role in evaluating and selecting treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Sil Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, South Korea
| | - Ben Kang
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rogowski P, Schönecker S, Konnerth D, Schäfer A, Pazos M, Gaasch A, Niyazi M, Boelke E, Matuschek C, Haussmann J, Braun M, Pölcher M, Würstlein R, Harbeck N, Belka C, Corradini S. Adjuvant Therapy for Elderly Breast Cancer Patients after Breast-Conserving Surgery: Outcomes in Real World Practice. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2334. [PMID: 37190263 PMCID: PMC10137115 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the standard of care of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in elderly female patients (≥65 years) treated outside of clinical trials and to identify potential factors related to the omission of RT and the interaction with endocrine therapy (ET). All women treated with BCS at two major breast centers between 1998 and 2014 were evaluated. Data were provided by the Tumor Registry Munich. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were identified using multivariate Cox regression analysis. The median follow-up was 88.4 months. Adjuvant RT was performed in 82% (2599/3171) of patients. Irradiated patients were younger (70.9 vs. 76.5 years, p < 0.001) and were more likely to receive additional chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and ET (p = 0.014). Non-irradiated patients more often had non-invasive DCIS tumors (pTis: 20.3% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001) and did not undergo axillary surgery (no axillary surgery: 50.5% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001). Adjuvant RT was associated with improved locoregional tumor control after BCS in invasive tumors (10-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS): 94.0% vs. 75.1%, p < 0.001, 10-year lymph node recurrence-free survival (LNRFS): 98.1% vs. 93.1%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed significant benefits for local control with postoperative RT. Furthermore, RT led to increased locoregional control even in patients who received ET (10-year LRFS 94.8% with ET + RT vs. 78.1% with ET alone, p < 0.001 and 10-year LNRFS: 98.2% vs. 95.0%, p = 0.003). Similarly, RT alone had significantly better locoregional control rates compared to ET alone (10-year LRFS 92.6% with RT alone vs. 78.1% with ET alone, p < 0.001 and 10-year LNRFS: 98.0% vs. 95.0%, p = 0.014). The present work confirms the efficacy of postoperative RT for breast carcinoma in elderly patients (≥65 years) treated in a modern clinical setting outside of clinical trials, even in patients who receive ET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Schönecker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Dinah Konnerth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Annemarie Schäfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Montserrat Pazos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Aurélie Gaasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Edwin Boelke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Christiane Matuschek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Jan Haussmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Braun
- Breast Centre, Red Cross Hospital, 80634 Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Pölcher
- Breast Centre, Red Cross Hospital, 80634 Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Breast Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CCC Munich LMU, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CCC Munich LMU, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen F, Hu W, Cai J, Chen S, Si A, Zhang Y, Liu W. Instrumental variable-based high-dimensional mediation analysis with unmeasured confounders for survival data in the observational epigenetic study. Front Genet 2023; 14:1092489. [PMID: 36816039 PMCID: PMC9932046 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1092489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: High dimensional mediation analysis is frequently conducted to explore the role of epigenetic modifiers between exposure and health outcome. However, the issue of high dimensional mediation analysis with unmeasured confounders for survival analysis in observational study has not been well solved. Methods: In this study, we proposed an instrumental variable based approach for high dimensional mediation analysis with unmeasured confounders in survival analysis for epigenetic study. We used the Sobel's test, the Joint test, and the Bootstrap method to test the mediation effect. A comprehensive simulation study was conducted to decide the best test strategy. An empirical study based on DNA methylation data of lung cancer patients was conducted to illustrate the performance of the proposed method. Results: Simulation study suggested that the proposed method performed well in the identifying mediating factors. The estimation of the mediation effect by the proposed approach is also reliable with less bias compared with the classical approach. In the empirical study, we identified two DNA methylation signatures including cg21926276 and cg26387355 with a mediation effect of 0.226 (95%CI: 0.108-0.344) and 0.158 (95%CI: 0.065-0.251) between smoking and lung cancer using the proposed approach. Conclusion: The proposed method obtained good performance in simulation and empirical studies, it could be an effective statistical tool for high dimensional mediation analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangyao Chen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China,Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Weiwei Hu
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jiaxin Cai
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Shiyu Chen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Aima Si
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yuxiang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Basic Medical Science, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China,*Correspondence: Wei Liu,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Roadmap to Sail the Seas of IBD Therapies. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11226717. [PMID: 36431194 PMCID: PMC9697479 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The drug pipeline for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has dramatically expanded over the last two decades, and it is expected to further grow in the upcoming years with the introduction of new agents with different mechanisms of action. However, such an increase of therapeutic options needs to be paralleled with an appropriate development of research to help physicians in the decision-making process when choosing which drug to prescribe. On the population level, comparative effectiveness research (CER) is intended to explore and identify relevant differences-in terms of both efficacy and safety outcomes-amongst different therapeutic regimens and/or strategies, in order to find the correct placement for each treatment in the therapeutic algorithm. CER revolves around three cornerstones: network meta-analyses, head-to-head trials and real-world studies, each of which has specific pros and cons, and can therefore offer answers to different questions. In this review, we aim to provide an overview on the methodological features specific to each of these research approaches, as well as to illustrate the main findings coming from CER on IBD target therapies (i.e., biologics and small molecules) and to discuss their appropriate interpretation.
Collapse
|
11
|
O'Haire S, Degeling K, Franchini F, Tran B, Luen SJ, Gaff C, Smith K, Fox S, Desai J, IJzerman M. Comparing Survival Outcomes for Advanced Cancer Patients Who Received Complex Genomic Profiling Using a Synthetic Control Arm. Target Oncol 2022; 17:539-548. [PMID: 36063280 PMCID: PMC9512745 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-022-00910-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complex genomic profiling (CGP) has transformed cancer treatment decision making, yet there is a lack of robust and quantifiable evidence for how utilisation of CGP improves patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated cohort level clinical effectiveness of CGP to improve overall survival (OS) in real-world advanced cancer patients using a registry-based matched control population. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two cohorts of advanced and refractory cancer patients were seen in consecutive series for early phase trial enrolment consideration. The first cohort (CGP group) accessed tumour profiling via a research study; while the second cohort that followed was not profiled. Overall survival between cohorts was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. Potential confounding was analysed and adjusted for using stabilised weights based on propensity scores. RESULTS Within the CGP group, 25 (17.6%) patients received treatment informed by CGP results and this subgroup had significantly improved survival compared with CGP patients in whom results did not impact their treatment (unadjusted HR = 0.44, (0.22-0.88), p = 0.02). However, when comparing the entire CGP cohort with the No CGP cohort, no significant survival benefit was evident with adjusted median OS for CGP of 13.5 months (9.2-17.0) compared with 11.0 (9.2-17.4) for No CGP (adjusted HR = 0.92, (0.65-1.30), p = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS This study utilised real-world data to simulate a control arm and quantify the clinical effectiveness of genomic testing. The magnitude of survival benefit for patients who had CGP result-led treatments was insufficient to drive an overall survival gain for the entire tested population. Translation of CGP into clinics requires strategies to ensure higher rates of tested patients obtain clinical benefit to deliver on the value proposition of CGP in an advanced cancer population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie O'Haire
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. .,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Koen Degeling
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fanny Franchini
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ben Tran
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephen J Luen
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kortnye Smith
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephen Fox
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jayesh Desai
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maarten IJzerman
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Masurkar PP, Chatterjee S, Sherer JT, Chen H, Johnson ML, Aparasu RR. Risk of Serious Adverse Events Associated With Individual Cholinesterase Inhibitors Use in Older Adults With Dementia: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Drugs Aging 2022; 39:453-465. [PMID: 35666463 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-022-00944-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are used as first-line pharmacotherapy to manage dementia. However, there are limited data regarding their relative safety. This study evaluated the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) associated with individual ChEIs in older adults with dementia and also examined sex-based and dose-based effects on this risk. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study using 2013-2015 US Medicare claims data involving Parts A, B, and D. Patients aged ≥ 65 years with a dementia diagnosis and incident use of the ChEIs, namely donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine, were included. The primary outcome of interest was SAEs defined as emergency department visits, inpatient hospitalizations, or death within 6 months of ChEI initiation. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with propensity score (PS) as a covariate and inverse probability of treatment weighting generated using generalized boosted models was used to assess the risk of SAEs across individual ChEIs. RESULTS The study included 767,684 older adults with dementia who were incident new users of ChEIs (donepezil 79.42%, rivastigmine 17.67%, galantamine 2.91%). SAEs were observed in 15.5% of the cohort within 6 months of ChEI prescription. Cox regression model with PS as covariate found that patients prescribed rivastigmine (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.12; 95% CI 1.03-1.33) and galantamine (aHR 1.51; 95% CI 1.24-1.84) were at increased risk of SAEs compared with patients on donepezil. Stratified analyses revealed that rivastigmine was associated with an 18% increased risk for SAEs in females (aHR 1.18; 95% CI 1.06-1.31), and galantamine was associated with a 71% increased risk in males (aHR 1.71; 95% CI 1.17-2.51) compared with donepezil. High and recommended index doses of rivastigmine and galantamine were associated with an increased risk of SAEs compared with donepezil. The findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION The study found that the risk of SAEs varied across individual ChEIs, with sex and dose moderating these effects. Therefore, these moderating effects should be carefully considered in personalizing dementia care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prajakta P Masurkar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Road, Houston, TX, 77204-5047, USA
| | - Satabdi Chatterjee
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Road, Houston, TX, 77204-5047, USA
- Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA
| | - Jeffrey T Sherer
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hua Chen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Road, Houston, TX, 77204-5047, USA
| | - Michael L Johnson
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Road, Houston, TX, 77204-5047, USA
| | - Rajender R Aparasu
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Road, Houston, TX, 77204-5047, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zeng J, Banerjee I, Henry AS, Wood DJ, Shachter RD, Gensheimer MF, Rubin DL. Natural Language Processing to Identify Cancer Treatments With Electronic Medical Records. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2021; 5:379-393. [PMID: 33822653 DOI: 10.1200/cci.20.00173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Knowing the treatments administered to patients with cancer is important for treatment planning and correlating treatment patterns with outcomes for personalized medicine study. However, existing methods to identify treatments are often lacking. We develop a natural language processing approach with structured electronic medical records and unstructured clinical notes to identify the initial treatment administered to patients with cancer. METHODS We used a total number of 4,412 patients with 483,782 clinical notes from the Stanford Cancer Institute Research Database containing patients with nonmetastatic prostate, oropharynx, and esophagus cancer. We trained treatment identification models for each cancer type separately and compared performance of using only structured, only unstructured (bag-of-words, doc2vec, fasttext), and combinations of both (structured + bow, structured + doc2vec, structured + fasttext). We optimized the identification model among five machine learning methods (logistic regression, multilayer perceptrons, random forest, support vector machines, and stochastic gradient boosting). The treatment information recorded in the cancer registry is the gold standard and compares our methods to an identification baseline with billing codes. RESULTS For prostate cancer, we achieved an f1-score of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.00) for radiation and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.00) for surgery using structured + doc2vec. For oropharynx cancer, we achieved an f1-score of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.93) for chemoradiation and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.95) for surgery using doc2vec. For esophagus cancer, we achieved an f1-score of 1.0 (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.0) for both chemoradiation and surgery using all combinations of structured and unstructured data. We found that employing the free-text clinical notes outperforms using the billing codes or only structured data for all three cancer types. CONCLUSION Our results show that treatment identification using free-text clinical notes greatly improves upon the performance using billing codes and simple structured data. The approach can be used for treatment cohort identification and adapted for longitudinal cancer treatment identification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaming Zeng
- Department of Management Science and Engineering, Huang Engineering Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Imon Banerjee
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - A Solomon Henry
- Research Informatics Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Douglas J Wood
- Research Informatics Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Ross D Shachter
- Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University School of Engineering, Stanford, CA
| | - Michael F Gensheimer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Daniel L Rubin
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Radiology, and Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wall-Wieler E, Bateman BT, Hanlon-Dearman A, Roos LL, Butwick AJ. Association of Epidural Labor Analgesia With Offspring Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorders. JAMA Pediatr 2021; 175:698-705. [PMID: 33871547 PMCID: PMC8056314 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Epidural labor analgesia (ELA) has been associated with an increased offspring risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Whether this finding may be explained by residual confounding remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To assess the association between ELA and offspring risk of ASD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Longitudinal cohort study of vaginal deliveries of singleton live infants born from 2005 to 2016 from a population-based data set linking information from health care databases in Manitoba, Canada; offspring were followed from birth until 2019 or censored by death or emigration. Data were analyzed from October 19, 2020, to January 22, 2021. EXPOSURES Epidural labor analgesia. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES At least 1 inpatient or outpatient diagnosis of ASD in offspring aged at least 18 months. For the full population and a sibling cohort, inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to control for potential confounders. RESULTS Of the 123 175 offspring included in this study (62 647 boys [50.9%]; mean [SD] age of mothers, 28.2 [5.8] years), 47 011 (38.2%) were exposed to ELA; 2.1% (985 of 47 011) of exposed vs 1.7% (1272 of 76 164) of unexposed offspring were diagnosed with ASD in the follow-up period (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95% CI, 1.15-1.36). After adjusting for maternal sociodemographic, prepregnancy, pregnancy, and perinatal covariates, ELA was not associated with an offspring risk of ASD (inverse probability of treatment-weighted HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.97-1.20). In the within-siblings design adjusting for baseline covariates, ELA was not associated with ASD (inverse probability of treatment-weighted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.78-1.22). Results from sensitivity analyses restricted to women without missing data who delivered at or after 37 weeks of gestation, firstborn infants only, and offspring with ASD classified with at least 2 diagnostic codes were consistent with findings from the main analyses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In a Canadian population-based birth cohort study, no association between ELA exposure and an increased offspring risk of ASD was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Wall-Wieler
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada,Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Brian T. Bateman
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ana Hanlon-Dearman
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Leslie L. Roos
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada,Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Alexander J. Butwick
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pasic I, Paulson K, Dozois G, Schultz KR, Lipton JH, Kumar R. Inferior outcomes with reduced intensity conditioning followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in fit individuals with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Canadian single-center study and a comparison to registry data. Leuk Lymphoma 2021; 62:2193-2201. [PMID: 33827366 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1910688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can offer cure to some patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). It remains unclear how conditioning intensity affects transplant outcomes in ALL. In this retrospective study, we compared outcomes between 27 patients <60 who received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) at Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Center (PMCC) and 226 Cell Therapy Transplant Canada (CTTC) age-matched controls who received myeloablative conditioning (MAC) between 2007 and 2018. Compared to CTTC patients, PMCC patients had an inferior 2-y OS: 0.29 (95% CI: 0.11-0.49) vs 0.63 (0.56-0.70), HR = 2.10 (1.23-3.55), p = 0.006, higher TRM: 0.41 (0.22-0.60) vs 0.24 (0.18-0.30), HR = 2.00 (1.05-3.81), p = 0.04 and a trend toward increased risk of relapse: 0.36 (0.17-0.56) versus 0.17 (0.12-0.22), HR = 1.72 (0.82-3.62), p = 0.15. In multivariate analysis, RIC and the use of T-cell depletion (TCD) were associated with inferior OS. In ALL patients <60, the use of RIC with TCD is associated with inferior allogeneic HCT outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Pasic
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kristjan Paulson
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba/University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Graham Dozois
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kirk R Schultz
- Michael Cuccione Childhood Cancer Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jeffrey H Lipton
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rajat Kumar
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu S, Reese TJ, Kawamoto K, Del Fiol G, Weir C. A systematic review of theoretical constructs in CDS literature. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:102. [PMID: 33731089 PMCID: PMC7968272 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01465-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Studies that examine the adoption of clinical decision support (CDS) by healthcare providers have generally lacked a theoretical underpinning. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model may provide such a theory-based explanation; however, it is unknown if the model can be applied to the CDS literature. Objective Our overall goal was to develop a taxonomy based on UTAUT constructs that could reliably characterize CDS interventions. Methods We used a two-step process: (1) identified randomized controlled trials meeting comparative effectiveness criteria, e.g., evaluating the impact of CDS interventions with and without specific features or implementation strategies; (2) iteratively developed and validated a taxonomy for characterizing differential CDS features or implementation strategies using three raters. Results Twenty-five studies with 48 comparison arms were identified. We applied three constructs from the UTAUT model and added motivational control to characterize CDS interventions. Inter-rater reliability was as follows for model constructs: performance expectancy (κ = 0.79), effort expectancy (κ = 0.85), social influence (κ = 0.71), and motivational control (κ = 0.87). Conclusion We found that constructs from the UTAUT model and motivational control can reliably characterize features and associated implementation strategies. Our next step is to examine the quantitative relationships between constructs and CDS adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siru Liu
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
| | - Thomas J Reese
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kensaku Kawamoto
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Charlene Weir
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Elghafari A, Finkelstein J. Automated Identification of Common Disease-Specific Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research Using ClinicalTrials.gov: Algorithm Development and Validation Study. JMIR Med Inform 2021; 9:e18298. [PMID: 33460388 PMCID: PMC7899806 DOI: 10.2196/18298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Common disease-specific outcomes are vital for ensuring comparability of clinical trial data and enabling meta analyses and interstudy comparisons. Traditionally, the process of deciding which outcomes should be recommended as common for a particular disease relied on assembling and surveying panels of subject-matter experts. This is usually a time-consuming and laborious process. Objective The objectives of this work were to develop and evaluate a generalized pipeline that can automatically identify common outcomes specific to any given disease by finding, downloading, and analyzing data of previous clinical trials relevant to that disease. Methods An automated pipeline to interface with ClinicalTrials.gov’s application programming interface and download the relevant trials for the input condition was designed. The primary and secondary outcomes of those trials were parsed and grouped based on text similarity and ranked based on frequency. The quality and usefulness of the pipeline’s output were assessed by comparing the top outcomes identified by it for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to a list of 80 outcomes manually abstracted from the most frequently cited and comprehensive reviews delineating clinical outcomes for COPD. Results The common disease-specific outcome pipeline successfully downloaded and processed 3876 studies related to COPD. Manual verification indicated that the pipeline was downloading and processing the same number of trials as were obtained from the self-service ClinicalTrials.gov portal. Evaluating the automatically identified outcomes against the manually abstracted ones showed that the pipeline achieved a recall of 92% and precision of 79%. The precision number indicated that the pipeline was identifying many outcomes that were not covered in the literature reviews. Assessment of those outcomes indicated that they are relevant to COPD and could be considered in future research. Conclusions An automated evidence-based pipeline can identify common clinical trial outcomes of comparable breadth and quality as the outcomes identified in comprehensive literature reviews. Moreover, such an approach can highlight relevant outcomes for further consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anas Elghafari
- Center for Biomedical and Population Health Informatics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Joseph Finkelstein
- Center for Biomedical and Population Health Informatics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cazzola M, Celli B. Triple Therapy Is Also Effective in Real-World When Used in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Who Are Frequent Exacerbators. Respiration 2021; 100:93-95. [PMID: 33454710 DOI: 10.1159/000512728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Cazzola
- Chair of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy,
| | - Bartolome Celli
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pharmacist-led collaborative medication management programs for oral antineoplastic therapies: A systematic literature review. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2020; 61:e7-e18. [PMID: 33358357 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the structure, process, and outcomes of pharmacist-led collaborative medication management programs for oral antineoplastic therapies (OATs). METHODS Included studies were peer-reviewed journal articles published in English, between January 2000 to May 2020, and reporting on pharmacist-led collaborative medication management programs for patients on OATs. To be included, studies had to report on the pharmacy practice model, pharmacist interventions, and outcomes of the medication management program. The Donabedian model informed the data extraction and summary. Two independent researchers assessed the risk of bias (confounding) for all included studies (n = 12) using the NIH tool and Cochrane ROBINS-I for observational research. RESULTS There were 12 studies that met inclusion criteria. The structure of the programs included hiring oncology pharmacists to deliver interventions, standardized templates for electronic medical record documentation, and administrative workflow changes (e.g., automatic referrals). The most common pharmacist interventions (processes) were patient education and counseling, adverse event monitoring, and dose modifications. All studies reported one or more positive outcomes, including improved patient adherence, safety, cost savings, cost avoidance, and patient satisfaction. All included studies used an observational study designs, and the majority of studies had moderate to high risk of bias. CONCLUSION The evidence suggests that pharmacist-led collaborative medication management programs may have beneficial clinical and economic outcomes. The implementation of these programs could be strengthened by using a conceptual framework to guide program development, implementation, and evaluation and effectiveness-hybrid study designs to assess clinical and implementation outcomes. The risk of bias should be addressed by using more robust study designs and rigorous data collection and analysis methods.
Collapse
|
20
|
Wall-Wieler E, Robakis TK, Cesta CE, Masarwa R, Lyell DJ, Liu C, Platt RW, Carmichael SL. Antidepressant Use around Conception, Prepregnancy Depression, and Risk of Ectopic Pregnancy. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2020; 65:845-853. [PMID: 32436752 PMCID: PMC7658419 DOI: 10.1177/0706743720927829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the risk of ectopic pregnancy among women with and women without antidepressant prescriptions around conception and examine whether this risk differs by prepregnancy depression status. METHODS We conducted a cohort study of all pregnancies between November 1, 2008, and September 30, 2015, identified in the nationwide (American) IBM® MarketScan® Databases. At least one day's supply of antidepressants in the 3 weeks after a woman's last menstrual period defined active antidepressant use around conception. At least one depression diagnosis in the year before the last menstrual period defined prepregnancy depression. Relative risk (RR) of ectopic pregnancy was estimated using unadjusted and inverse probability of treatment (IPT)-weighted log-binomial models. RESULTS Of the 1,703,245 pregnancies, 106,788 (6.3%) women had a prepregnancy depression diagnosis. Among women with a depression diagnosis, 40,287 (37.7%) had an active antidepressant prescription around conception; the IPT-weighted risk of ectopic pregnancy was similar among women who did and did not fill an antidepressant prescription around conception (IPT-weighted RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.10). Overall, the risk of ectopic pregnancy was higher among women who had a prepregnancy depression diagnosis than women who did not have a prepregnancy depression diagnosis (IPT-weighted RR = 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.15). CONCLUSIONS This study's findings suggest that women who have a prepregnancy depression diagnosis are at a slightly increased risk of ectopic pregnancy, and among women who have a prepregnancy depression diagnosis, the use of antidepressants around conception does not increase the risk of ectopic pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thalia K. Robakis
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - Carolyn E. Cesta
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden
| | - Reem Masarwa
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Deirdre J. Lyell
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA
| | - Can Liu
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA
| | - Robert W. Platt
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Suzan L. Carmichael
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lee E, Hines RB, Wright JL, Nam E, Rovito MJ, Liu X. Effects of Radiation Therapy and Comorbidity on Health-Related Quality of Life and Mortality Among Older Women With Low-Risk Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Retrospective Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9:e18056. [PMID: 33090111 PMCID: PMC7691089 DOI: 10.2196/18056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Revised: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Breast Cancer Guidelines Committee suggests that the omission of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery can be a reasonable option among older women with low-risk breast cancer (early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive, and node-negative) if they are treated with endocrine therapy. However, RT usage in this group of women still exceeds 50%. Conversely, older women tend to forego RT (even when necessary) due to cost, inconvenience, and potential adverse responses associated with RT. Understanding health-related quality of life (HRQOL) change with receipt of RT among older women in the modern era is limited due to the under-representation of this population in clinical trials. Objective The proposed study aims to examine the associations of RT with HRQOL trajectories as well as survival outcomes among older women with 5-10 years of follow-up. We will also assess whether prediagnosis comorbidity burden influences receipt of RT and whether the associations between RT and HRQOL trajectory and survival outcomes are modified by the comorbidity burden. Methods We will use a retrospective cohort study design with the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results database linked to the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS). Older women (≥65 years) who were diagnosed with low-risk breast cancer in 1998-2014, received breast-conserving surgery, and participated in MHOS 1998-2016 are eligible for this analysis. The latent class analysis clustering method will be used to identify each patient’s prediagnosis comorbidity burden, and HRQOL will be evaluated using the Short Form 36/Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey scales. The inverse-weighted estimates of the probability of treatment will be included to control for treatment selection bias and confounding effects in subsequent analysis. The association of RT with HRQOL trajectory will be evaluated using inverse-weighted multilevel growth mixture models. The inverse-weighted Cox regression model will be used to obtain hazard ratios with 95% CIs for the association of RT with survival outcomes. Differential effects of RT on both outcomes according to comorbidity burden class will also be evaluated. Results As of October 2020, the study was approved by the institutional review board, and SEER-MHOS data were obtained from the National Cancer Institute. Women with low-risk breast cancer who met inclusion and exclusion criteria have been identified, and prediagnosis comorbidity burden class has been characterized using latent class analysis. Further data analysis will begin in November 2020, and the first manuscript will be submitted in a peer-reviewed journal in February 2021. Conclusions This research can potentially improve clinical outcomes of older women with low-risk breast cancer by providing them additional information on the HRQOL trajectories when they make RT treatment decisions. It will facilitate informed, shared treatment decision making and cancer care planning to ultimately improve the HRQOL of older women with breast cancer. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/18056
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunkyung Lee
- College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
| | - Robert B Hines
- College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
| | - Jean L Wright
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Eunji Nam
- Department of Social Welfare, Incheon National University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Michael J Rovito
- College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
| | - Xinliang Liu
- College of Community Innovation and Education, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bayón Cabeza M, Pérez Rivas FJ, Zamora Sarabia AL, de Las Heras Mosteiro J, Becerril Rojas B, Rodriguez Barrientos R. [Diabetic patient control in Primary Care: Influence of service portfolio and other factors]. Aten Primaria 2020; 52:617-626. [PMID: 32576384 PMCID: PMC7713397 DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2020.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 11/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the effect of the type of follow-up according to Service Portfolio and other associated factors, in the reduction of HbA1c levels in people with a new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and poor initial control. DESIGN Analytical observational study of a cohort under routine clinical practice conditions. LOCATION 262 Primary Health Care Centres in Madrid. PARTICIPANTS 1,838 individuals older than 18 years with a new diagnosis of type 2 DM and initial HbA1c levels ≥ 7%, or ≥ 8.5% if older than 75 years. INTERVENTIONS The exposure variable was the type of follow-up according to Portfolio, categorised as minimum, medium, and optimal, according to the number of interventions performed and periodicity of type of therapeutic-pharmacological plan. MAIN MEASUREMENTS A study was made of the comorbidity, therapeutic-pharmacological plan, diet - exercise advice and deprivation index. The main outcome was the difference between the final and initial HbA1c. RESULTS After 2 years of follow-up there was a mean decrease in HbA1c by -1.7 percentage points (95% CI: -1.6;-1.8), which was 0.36 points higher in patients with optimal follow-up: -2.1 (95% CI: -1.7;-2.4). The factors associated with a decrease in HbA1c were the optimal follow-up -0.29 (95% CI: -0.5;-0.1), the medium follow-up -0.26 (95% CI: -0.5; -0.0), and the initial HbA1c value -0.9 (95% CI: -0.9; -0.9. The factors associated with the increase were insulin treatment and living in socially disadvantaged areas. CONCLUSIONS Glycaemic control was improved in patients with a new diagnosis of diabetes in which optimal follow-up is performed as proposed in the Service Portfolio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianela Bayón Cabeza
- Dirección Técnica de Procesos y Calidad, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, España.
| | - Francisco Javier Pérez Rivas
- Dirección Técnica de Procesos y Calidad, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, España; Departamento de Enfermería, Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | | | - Julio de Las Heras Mosteiro
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Salud Pública, e Inmunología y Microbiología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, España
| | - Beatriz Becerril Rojas
- Unidad de Apoyo Técnico, Gerencia Adjunta de Procesos Asistenciales, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Ricardo Rodriguez Barrientos
- Unidad de apoyo a la investigación, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, España; Investigación en Servicios de Salud y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Head-to-head trials in inflammatory bowel disease: past, present and future. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 17:365-376. [PMID: 32303700 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-020-0293-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
With the increase in the number of novel drugs for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comparing therapeutic options or strategies has become a key challenge in IBD trials. Head-to-head trials designed and powered to enable formal comparisons are the gold standard in comparative research. Indeed, these trials are requested by some health authorities for evaluating the positioning of new treatments in IBD, as well as helping prescribing physicians to select the most appropriate treatment options for their patients. Despite head-to-head trials including aminosalicylate therapy in IBD having been performed decades ago, the first results of a randomized controlled trial directly comparing biologic agents with different modes of action have only now been published, mainly owing to important methodological issues. This Perspective provides an overview of the past, current and future concepts in IBD trial design, with a detailed focus on the role of comparative research and the challenges and pitfalls in undertaking and interpreting the results from such studies.
Collapse
|
24
|
Hess LM, Grabner M, Wang L, Liepa AM, Li XI, Cui ZL, Bowman L, Schelman WR. Reliability of Conclusions from Early Analyses of Real-World Data for Newly Approved Drugs in Advanced Gastric Cancer in the United States. Pragmat Obs Res 2020; 11:27-43. [PMID: 32431558 PMCID: PMC7205419 DOI: 10.2147/por.s241427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As real-world data resources expand and improve, there will increasingly be opportunities to study the effectiveness of interventions. There is a need to ensure that study designs explore potential sources of bias and either acknowledge or mitigate them, in order to improve the accuracy of findings. The objective of this study was to understand newly approved drug utilization patterns in real-world clinical settings over time. Methods This retrospective study included three sources of real-world data (claims, electronic health records, and recoded data from a quality care program) collected from patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who initiated therapy with either trastuzumab or ramucirumab. Linear regression was used to investigate trends in the use of these drugs for the care of patients with gastric cancer over time from Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Results Eligible patients (n=1700) had consistent demographic and clinical characteristics over time. After regulatory approval, trastuzumab was used in later lines of therapy and then shifted to earlier lines (p=0.002), while ramucirumab utilization remained consistent over time after FDA approval (p=0.49). Ramucirumab augmentation, defined as the addition of the drug after initiation of a line of therapy, decreased over time (p=0.03), and trastuzumab augmentation remained consistent over time (p=0.58). Conclusion Since treatment effectiveness may change across lines of treatment, bias may arise if there are changes in the use of the drug (such as line migration) during the time period of analysis using real-world data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Hess
- Global Patient Outcomes, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Michael Grabner
- Life Sciences Research, HealthCore Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Liya Wang
- Life Sciences Research, HealthCore Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Astra M Liepa
- Global Patient Outcomes, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Xiaohong Ivy Li
- Global Statistics, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Lee Bowman
- Global Patient Outcomes, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Carbognin L, Simbolo M, Caliò A, Vicentini C, Delfino P, Sperduti I, Fassan M, Schettini F, Dieci MV, Griguolo G, Pilotto S, Fiorio E, Arpino G, Guarneri V, De Placido S, Conte P, Manfrin E, Brunelli M, Scambia G, Scarpa A, Tortora G, Bria E. Targeted next-generation sequencing identifies genomic abnormalities potentially driving the prognosis of early-stage invasive lobular breast carcinoma patients stratified according to a validated clinico-pathological model. Breast 2020; 50:56-63. [PMID: 32028173 PMCID: PMC7375560 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The clinico-pathological and molecular factors that drive the prognosis of invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) are not entirely explored. In this regard, the development and validation of a prognostic model for ILC and the investigation of the distribution of molecular abnormalities (focusing on CDK4/6 alterations) according to prognosis were the aims of this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two clinico-pathological multi-center data-sets of early-stage ILC patients (Training/Validation Set, TS/VS) were gathered. A 3-class model was developed according to the multivariate analysis for disease-free-survival (DFS) and externally validated. Mutational, copy number variation and transcriptomic analyses by targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) were performed (and validated with quantitative PCR) in an explorative cohort of patients with poor and good prognosis. RESULTS Data from overall 773 patients (TS/VS: 491/282) were gathered. The developed model significantly discriminated low/intermediate/high risk in the TS (10-years DFS: 76.3%/67.6%/39.8%, respectively, p<0.0001) and in the VS (p<0.0001). In the explorative cohort for molecular analysis (34 patients), CDK4 gain was present exclusively in the poor prognosis group (35.0%, p = 0.03; OR 7.98, 95%CI 1.51-42.1, p = 0.014). Moreover, CDK4 and 6 overexpression showed a trend toward an association with poor prognosis (OR 2.7, 95%CI 0.4-18.1, p = 0.3; OR 3.29, 95%CI 0.56-19.25, p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS A risk stratification model, able to accurately separate early-stage ILC patients' prognosis into different risk classes according to clinico-pathological variables, allowed to investigate potential biomarkers of prognosis with targeted NGS. CDK4 gain is suggested for future validation as a prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic opportunity in ILC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa Carbognin
- University of Verona, Verona, Italy; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Michele Simbolo
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Anna Caliò
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Caterina Vicentini
- ARC-Net Research Centre and Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Pietro Delfino
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Biostatistics, 'Regina Elena' National Cancer Institute, Roma, Italy
| | - Matteo Fassan
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Gaia Griguolo
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Sara Pilotto
- University of Verona, Verona, Italy; U.O.C. Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Elena Fiorio
- U.O.C. Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Grazia Arpino
- Medical Oncology, Federico II University, Napoli, Italy
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Pierfranco Conte
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy; ARC-Net Research Centre and Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Emilio Bria
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cross RK, Chiorean M, Vekeman F, Xiao Y, Wu E, Chao J, Wang AW. Assessment of the real-world safety profile of vedolizumab using the United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0225572. [PMID: 31800627 PMCID: PMC6892509 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Vedolizumab is the first gut-selective integrin blocker indicated for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to examine the adverse events (AEs) profile of vedolizumab compared to anti-tumor necrosis factors (anti-TNFs) indicated for CD and UC using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. AE reports with vedolizumab (5/20/2014-6/30/2015) and CD/UC-indicated anti-TNF drugs (adalimumab, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, and golimumab, during 8/1/1998-6/30/2015) as primary suspects were extracted from the FAERS database. AEs associated with vedolizumab were compared for signals of disproportionate reporting against anti-TNF drugs and all other drugs (1969-6/30/2015), using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) algorithms. The search retrieved 499 reports for vedolizumab and 119,620 reports for anti-TNFs, with 35.9% and 32.1% of these, respectively, being serious AEs. With the PRR approach, vedolizumab-associated reports had signals for 22 groups of AEs (9 were associated with serious outcomes) relative to anti-TNFs and had 34 signals relative to all other drugs. Signals detected included those reported as warnings in prescribing information and new AEs related to cardiovascular disease. Due to the voluntary nature of FAERS, this finding should be considered hypothesis generating (rather than hypothesis testing). Longer-term observational studies are required to evaluate the safety of vedolizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond K. Cross
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Michael Chiorean
- Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | | | | | - Eric Wu
- Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Jingdong Chao
- AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Anthony W. Wang
- AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ewald H, Ioannidis JPA, Ladanie A, Mc Cord K, Bucher HC, Hemkens LG. Nonrandomized studies using causal-modeling may give different answers than RCTs: a meta-epidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol 2019; 118:29-41. [PMID: 31704350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate how estimated treatment effects agree between nonrandomized studies using causal modeling with marginal structural models (MSM-studies) and randomized trials (RCTs). STUDY DESIGN Meta-epidemiological study. SETTING MSM-studies providing effect estimates on any healthcare outcome of any treatment were eligible. We systematically sought RCTs on the same clinical question and compared the direction of treatment effects, effect sizes, and confidence intervals. RESULTS The main analysis included 19 MSM-studies (1,039,570 patients) and 141 RCTs (120,669 patients). MSM-studies indicated effect estimates in the opposite direction from RCTs for eight clinical questions (42%), and their 95% CI (confidence interval) did not include the RCT estimate in nine clinical questions (47%). The effect estimates deviated 1.58-fold between the study designs (median absolute deviation OR [odds ratio] 1.58; IQR [interquartile range] 1.37 to 2.16). Overall, we found no systematic disagreement regarding benefit or harm but confidence intervals were wide (summary ratio of odds ratios [sROR] 1.04; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.23). The subset of MSM-studies focusing on healthcare decision-making tended to overestimate experimental treatment benefits (sROR 1.44; 95% CI 0.99 to 2.09). CONCLUSION Nonrandomized studies using causal modeling with MSM may give different answers than RCTs. Caution is still required when nonrandomized "real world" evidence is used for healthcare decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Ewald
- Department of Clinical Research, Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland; University Medical Library, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - John P A Ioannidis
- Department of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Aviv Ladanie
- Department of Clinical Research, Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kimberly Mc Cord
- Department of Clinical Research, Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Heiner C Bucher
- Department of Clinical Research, Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lars G Hemkens
- Department of Clinical Research, Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Berntsen GKR, Dalbakk M, Hurley JS, Bergmo T, Solbakken B, Spansvoll L, Bellika JG, Skrøvseth SO, Brattland T, Rumpsfeld M. Person-centred, integrated and pro-active care for multi-morbid elderly with advanced care needs: a propensity score-matched controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:682. [PMID: 31581947 PMCID: PMC6777026 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4397-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Person-centred care (PCC) focusing on personalised goals and care plans derived from "What matters to you?" has an impact on single disease outcomes, but studies on multi-morbid elderly are lacking. Furthermore, the combination of PCC, Integrated Care (IC) and Pro-active care are widely recognised as desirable for multi-morbid elderly, yet previous studies focus on single components only, leaving synergies unexplored. The effect of a synergistic intervention, which implements 1) Person-centred goal-oriented care driven by "What matters to you?" with 2) IC and 3) pro-active care is unknown. METHODS Inspired by theoretical foundations, complexity science, previous health service research and a patient-driven evaluation of care quality, we designed the Patient-Centred Team (PACT) intervention across primary and secondary care. The PACT team collaborate with the patient to make and deliver a person-centred, integrated and proactive multi-morbidity care-plan. The control group receives conventional care. The study design is a pragmatic six months prospective, controlled clinical trial based on hospital electronic health record data of 439 multi-morbid frail elderly at risk for emergency (re) admissions referred to PACT and 779 propensity score matched controls in Norway, 2014-2016. Outcomes are emergency admissions, the sum of emergency inpatient bed days, 30-day readmissions, planned and emergency outpatient visits and mortality at three and six months follow-up. RESULTS The Rate Ratios (RR) for emergency admissions was 0,9 (95%CI: 0,82-0,99), for sum of emergency bed days 0,68 (95%CI:0,52-0,79) and for 30-days emergency readmissions 0,72 (95%CI: 0,41-1,24). RRs were 2,3 (95%CI: 2,02-2,55) and 0,9 (95%CI: 0,68-1,20) for planned and emergency outpatient visits respectively. The RR for death at 3 months was 0,39 (95% CI: 0,22-0,70) and 0,57 (95% CI: 0,34-0,94) at 6 months. CONCLUSION Compared with propensity score matched controls, the care process of frail multi-morbid elderly who received the PACT intervention had a reduced risk of high-level emergency care, increased use of low-level planned care, and substantially reduced mortality risk. Further study of process differences between groups is warranted to understand the genesis of these results better. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02541474 ), registered Sept 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. K. R. Berntsen
- Norwegian Center for e-health research, University Hospital of North Norway Trust, Universitetssykehuset, PB 35, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
- Institute of community medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, PO Box 6050 Langnes, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - M. Dalbakk
- Clinic of general medicine, University Hospital of North Norway Trust, Universitetssykehuset, PB 100, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
| | - J. S. Hurley
- Norwegian Center for e-health research, University Hospital of North Norway Trust, Universitetssykehuset, PB 35, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
| | - T. Bergmo
- Norwegian Center for e-health research, University Hospital of North Norway Trust, Universitetssykehuset, PB 35, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
| | - B. Solbakken
- Clinic of general medicine, University Hospital of North Norway Trust, Universitetssykehuset, PB 100, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
| | - L. Spansvoll
- Clinic of general medicine, University Hospital of North Norway Trust, Harstad hospital, PB 1065, 9480 Harstad, Norway
| | - J. G. Bellika
- Norwegian Center for e-health research, University Hospital of North Norway Trust, Universitetssykehuset, PB 35, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
| | - S. O. Skrøvseth
- Norwegian Center for e-health research, University Hospital of North Norway Trust, Universitetssykehuset, PB 35, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
| | - T. Brattland
- Director of Health and Care, Tromsø Municipality, PB 6900, Tromsø, 9299 Norway
| | - M. Rumpsfeld
- Clinic of general medicine, University Hospital of North Norway Trust, Universitetssykehuset, PB 100, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Olszewski AJ, Barth PM, Reagan JL. Use of bone-modifying agents and clinical outcomes in older adults with multiple myeloma. Cancer Med 2019; 8:6945-6954. [PMID: 31566898 PMCID: PMC6853813 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2019] [Revised: 08/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Guidelines recommend bone‐modifying agents (BMAs) for all patients initiating treatment for myeloma. We examined adherence to this recommendation, and BMA effectiveness in the era of bortezomib/lenalidomide‐based therapy among Medicare beneficiaries. Methods From the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results‐Medicare registry, we selected beneficiaries receiving anti‐myeloma chemotherapy in 2007‐2013. We matched BMA recipients (within 90 days of first chemotherapy) to nonrecipients using a propensity score, balancing patient‐, disease‐, and therapy‐related confounders. Cumulative incidence of skeletal‐related events (SREs) and overall survival (OS) was compared in proportional hazard models accounting for competing risks and immortal‐time bias. Results Among 4611 patients with median age of 76 years, 51% received BMA. Bone‐modifying agents use remained steady over time (P = .87) and was significantly less frequent for patients who were older, with comorbidities, without prior SRE, and those treated without bortezomib or lenalidomide. In a propensity score‐matched cohort, BMA recipients experienced a lower incidence of SRE (11.0% vs 14.6% at 3 years; subhazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60‐0.89) and better OS (53.3% vs 47.8% at 3 years; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77‐0.95). The results were consistent in the subgroup (76%) treated with bortezomib and/or immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). The incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) was 3.2% at 3 years. Conclusions In this observational study, the observed benefits of early BMA administration among patients treated with contemporary anti‐myeloma regimens were similar to historical clinical trials. Frequent omission of BMA highlights a remediable deficiency in the quality of supportive care, and suggests that timely administration may be a useful indicator of quality care in myeloma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J Olszewski
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Peter M Barth
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - John L Reagan
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hines RB, Jiban MJH, Specogna AV, Vishnubhotla P, Lee E, Zhang S. The association between post-treatment surveillance testing and survival in stage II and III colon cancer patients: An observational comparative effectiveness study. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:418. [PMID: 31053096 PMCID: PMC6500008 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5613-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The best strategy for surveillance testing in stage II and III colon cancer patients following curative treatment is unknown. Previous randomized controlled trials have suffered from design limitations and yielded conflicting evidence. This observational comparative effectiveness research study was conducted to provide new evidence on the relationship between post-treatment surveillance testing and survival by overcoming the limitations of previous clinical trials. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database combined with Medicare claims (SEER-Medicare). Stage II and III colon cancer patients diagnosed from 2002 to 2009 and between 66 to 84 years of age were eligible. Adherence to surveillance testing guidelines-including carcinoembryonic antigen, computed tomography, and colonoscopy-was assessed for each year of follow-up and overall for up to three years post-treatment. Patients were categorized as More Adherent and Less Adherent according to testing guidelines. Patients who received no surveillance testing were excluded. The primary outcome was 5-year cancer-specific survival; 5-year overall survival was the secondary outcome. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using generalized boosted models was employed to balance covariates between the two surveillance groups. IPTW-adjusted survival curves comparing the two groups were performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Weighted Cox regression was used to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the relative risk of death for the Less Adherent group versus the More Adherent group. RESULTS There were 17,860 stage II and III colon cancer cases available for analysis. Compared to More Adherent patients, Less Adherent patients experienced slightly better 5-year cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.90) and worse 5-year noncancer-specific survival (HR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.43-1.82) for years 2 to 5 of follow-up. There was no difference between the groups in overall survival (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.98-1.10). CONCLUSIONS More surveillance testing did not improve 5-year cancer-specific survival compared to less testing and there was no difference between the groups in overall survival. The results of this study support a risk-stratified, shared decision-making surveillance strategy to optimize clinical and patient-centered outcomes for colon cancer patients in the survivorship phase of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert B Hines
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, 6900 Lake Nona Blvd, Orlando, FL, 328270, USA.
| | - Md Jibanul Haque Jiban
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, 6900 Lake Nona Blvd, Orlando, FL, 328270, USA
| | - Adrian V Specogna
- University of Central Florida College of Health Professions and Sciences, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | - Eunkyung Lee
- University of Central Florida College of Health Professions and Sciences, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Shunpu Zhang
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, 6900 Lake Nona Blvd, Orlando, FL, 328270, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Moss HA, Melamed A, Wright JD. Measuring cause-and-effect relationships without randomized clinical trials: Quasi-experimental methods for gynecologic oncology research. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 152:533-539. [PMID: 30876500 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Clinical research in gynecologic oncology has seen a proliferation of studies that investigate the effectiveness of treatments using existing data sources such as cancer registries, electronic health records, and insurance claims. These observational studies are often feasible when randomized trial may not be, and may be more generalizable than randomized trials, because of greater diversity in the study populations. While statistical methods such as multivariable regression, matching, stratification, and weighting can adjust for the confounding in observational studies, statistical adjustment cannot control for confounders that are unmeasured in the data. Observational studies comparing the effectiveness of treatments for gynecologic malignancies are susceptible to bias from unmeasured confounding because factors like functional status, frailty and disease burden, which influence treatment selection and outcome, are often not reported in existing data sources. Like randomized trials, quasi-experimental designs attempt to account for both measured and unmeasured confounding by exploiting natural experiments arising in the real world. These methods are underutilized in gynecologic oncology research and are particularly relevant to studies that use large datasets to study the effectiveness of treatments. In this review, we consider methodological challenges that arise in the analysis of non-randomized studies, and describe how application of quasi-experimental methodology can estimate unbiased treatment effects even in the presence of unmeasured confounders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley A Moss
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jason D Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ali AA, Tawk R, Xiao H, Campbell E, Semykina A, Montero AJ, Mogos M, Diaby V. Comparative effectiveness of radiotherapy for early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in elderly women using real-world data. Cancer Med 2019; 8:117-127. [PMID: 30548840 PMCID: PMC6346228 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy is the recommended treatment after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for early-stage breast cancer (BC). However, there is no clear evidence whether radiotherapy after BCS improves the survival of elderly women diagnosed with early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+) BC. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival benefit associated with radiotherapy plus hormonal therapy vs hormonal therapy alone after BCS for early-stage HR+ BC patients. METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results linked with Medicare data, we identified elderly (65 years and older) women diagnosed with early-stage HR+ BC (2006-2011) who received hormonal therapy with or without radiotherapy after BCS. A log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score matching were used to estimate the overall survival (OS) benefit associated with radiotherapy after BCS. RESULTS Of the 5688 patients, there were 303 deaths from any cause. One hundred and eighty-five (61%) of these deaths occurred in the hormonal therapy group, and 118 (39%) deaths occurred in the radiotherapy plus hormonal therapy group. The mean survival time in the radiotherapy plus hormonal therapy group was 5.32 ± 1.86 years compared with 4.92 ± 1.86 years in the hormonal therapy group. Based on the adjusted and propensity score matching analysis, patients in the adjuvant radiotherapy group had a lower risk of death compared with those who did not receive radiotherapy. Radiotherapy plus hormonal therapy decreased the risk of death by 32%. The effect estimates were similar in the adjusted and matched cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy plus hormonal therapy resulted in a significant improvement in the OS of elderly women diagnosed with HR+ BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Askal A. Ali
- Economic, Social & Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical SciencesFlorida A&M UniversityTallahasseeFlorida
| | - Rima Tawk
- Institute of Public Health, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical SciencesFlorida A&M UniversityTallahasseeFlorida
| | - Hong Xiao
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy (POP), College of PharmacyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleFlorida
| | - Ellen Campbell
- Economic, Social & Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical SciencesFlorida A&M UniversityTallahasseeFlorida
| | | | - Alberto J. Montero
- Cleveland ClinicDepartment of Solid Tumor OncologyTaussig Cancer InstituteClevelandOhio
| | - Muluberhan Mogos
- Department of Women, Children and Family Health ScienceUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoIllinois
| | - Vakaramoko Diaby
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy (POP), College of PharmacyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleFlorida
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lv M, Wang Y, Chang YJ, Zhang XH, Xu LP, Jiang Q, Jiang H, Lu J, Chen H, Han W, Wang FR, Wang JZ, Chen Y, Yan CH, Zhang YY, Sun YQ, Mo XD, Zhu HH, Jia JS, Zhao T, Wang J, Liu KY, Huang XJ. Myeloablative Haploidentical Transplantation Is Superior to Chemotherapy for Patients with Intermediate-risk Acute Myelogenous Leukemia in First Complete Remission. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 25:1737-1748. [PMID: 30478089 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Revised: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although myeloablative HLA haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) following pretransplant anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulated grafts (ATG+G-CSF) has been confirmed as an alternative to HSCT from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD), the effect of haplo-HSCT on postremission treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with intermediate risk (int-risk AML) who achieved first complete remission (CR1) has not been defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this prospective trial, among 443 consecutive patients ages 16-60 years with newly diagnosed de novo AML with int-risk cytogenetics, 147 patients with molecular int-risk AML who achieved CR1 within two courses of induction and remained in CR1 at 4 months postremission either received chemotherapy (n = 69) or underwent haplo-HSCT (n = 78). RESULTS The 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly higher in the haplo-HSCT group than in the chemotherapy group (74.3% vs. 47.3%; P = 0.0004 and 80.8% vs. 53.5%; P = 0.0001, respectively). In the multivariate analysis with propensity score adjustment, postremission treatment (haplo-HSCT vs. chemotherapy) was an independent risk factor affecting the LFS [HR 0.360; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.163-0.793; P = 0.011], OS (HR 0.361; 95% CI, 0.156-0.832; P = 0.017), and cumulative incidence of relapse (HR 0.161; 95% CI, 0.057-0.459; P = 0.001) either in entire cohort or stratified by minimal residual disease after the second consolidation. CONCLUSIONS Myeloablative haplo-HSCT with ATG+G-CSF is superior to chemotherapy as a postremission treatment in patients with int-risk AML during CR1. Haplo-HSCT might be a first-line postremission therapy for int-risk AML in the absence of HLA-MSDs. Haplo-HSCT might be superior to chemotherapy as a first-line postremission treatment of intermediate-risk AML in CR1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Lv
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Ying-Jun Chang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Hui Zhang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Lan-Ping Xu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Qian Jiang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Hao Jiang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Jin Lu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Huan Chen
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Wei Han
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Feng-Rong Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Jing-Zhi Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Yao Chen
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Chen-Hua Yan
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Yuan-Yuan Zhang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Yu-Qian Sun
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Mo
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Hu Zhu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Jin-Song Jia
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Ting Zhao
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Kai-Yan Liu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Jun Huang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Beijing, China. .,Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ristau BT, Handorf EA, Cahn DB, Kutikov A, Uzzo RG, Smaldone MC. Partial nephrectomy is not associated with an overall survival advantage over radical nephrectomy in elderly patients with stage Ib-II renal masses: An analysis of the national cancer data base. Cancer 2018; 124:3839-3848. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 01/01/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin T. Ristau
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth A. Handorf
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - David B. Cahn
- Urologic Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Robert G. Uzzo
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Marc C. Smaldone
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Conventional Radiation for Anal Cancer in the Veterans Affairs System. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:109-115. [PMID: 30102186 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2018] [Revised: 04/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Compared with conventional radiation therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) may reduce acute toxicity from anal cancer treatment, potentially leading to improved long-term outcomes. We analyze the effect of IMRT on short- and long-term outcomes among a large sample of US veterans. METHODS AND MATERIALS From a national Veterans Affairs database, we identified 779 patients (n = 403 conventional radiation therapy, n = 376 IMRT) with locally advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2015 and treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Radiation treatment planning and dosimetric constraints were not standardized across patients. We analyzed the effect of IMRT on short-term outcomes (acute toxicity, treatment breaks, and incomplete chemotherapy) and long-term outcomes (survival and ostomy placement) in multivariable logistic regression, Fine-Gray, and frailty models, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS IMRT was associated with decreased radiation treatment breaks ≥5 days (odds ratio [OR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.91; P = .02), increased rates of receiving 2 cycles of mitomycin C chemotherapy (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.22-3.45; P = .007), increased rates of receiving 2 cycles of any chemotherapy (OR 3.45; 95% CI 1.82-6.25; P < .001), and decreased risk of ostomy related to tumor recurrence or progression (subdistribution hazard ratio 0.60; 95% CI 0.37-0.99; P = .045). IMRT was not associated with a decrease in grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity (P = .79), hospitalization for gastrointestinal toxicity (P = .59), or cancer-specific survival (P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS Among a large sample of US veterans with anal cancer, IMRT was associated with higher rates of receiving 2 chemotherapy cycles, decreased radiation treatment breaks, and decreased rates of ostomy placement. IMRT appears to offer substantial benefits over conventional radiation therapy for patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy for anal cancer.
Collapse
|
36
|
Smith A, Howell D, Crouch S, Painter D, Blase J, Wang HI, Hewison A, Bagguley T, Appleton S, Kinsey S, Burton C, Patmore R, Roman E. Cohort Profile: The Haematological Malignancy Research Network (HMRN): a UK population-based patient cohort. Int J Epidemiol 2018; 47:700-700g. [PMID: 29618056 PMCID: PMC6005016 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Debra Howell
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Simon Crouch
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Dan Painter
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - John Blase
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Han-I Wang
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ann Hewison
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Simon Appleton
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sally Kinsey
- Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Unit, Leeds General Infirmary
| | - Cathy Burton
- St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Russell Patmore
- Queens Centre for Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK
| | - Eve Roman
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Edwards DC, Cahn DB, Smaldone MC, Kutikov A. Use of administrative data for comparative effectiveness research in the treatment of non-prostate genitourinary malignancies. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:193-212. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2017] [Revised: 07/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
38
|
Guptill JT, Raja S, Sanders DB, Narayanaswami P. Comparative effectiveness clinical trials to advance treatment of myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2018; 1413:69-75. [PMID: 29377158 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Revised: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) presents many challenges for establishing treatment efficacy through clinical trials. Among these are the rarity and heterogeneity of the disease, spontaneous fluctuations, prolonged latency to effect for many immunosuppressive drugs, and the uncertain generalizability of results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Prospective observational study designs may overcome some of these limitations, but attention is required to ensure that internal validity is not compromised. Observational comparative effectiveness research (CER) utilizes data obtained during routine clinical care to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in real-life practice conditions, thereby improving generalizability to the clinic. Compared with RCTs, observational CER studies may be less resource intensive and costly. Recent advances that have improved the feasibility of CER studies for MG are (1) the development of MG common data elements, (2) the publication of international consensus guidance for MG treatment, and (3) the development of a web-based REDCap database that can be shared and adapted to standardize data collection. This infrastructure could be used for multisite comparisons of commonly used therapies and provides longitudinal information on patient- and clinician-centered MG outcome measures. A challenge is to design studies that address the potential limitations of observational trials, such as confounding and selection and information bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey T Guptill
- Department of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Shruti Raja
- Department of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Donald B Sanders
- Department of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Pushpa Narayanaswami
- Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yoo S, Hegarty SE, Mishra MV, Patel N, Cantrell LA, Showalter TN. Definitive Radiation Therapy for Stage I-II Endometrial Cancer: An Observational Study of Nonoperative Management. Am J Clin Oncol 2017; 40:582-589. [PMID: 26083557 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is limited evidence to inform the management of patients with endometrial cancer who are not candidates for hysterectomy, and treatment alternatives have not been compared directly in randomized trials. We analyzed the prognostic factors and outcomes for patients with stage I or II endometrial adenocarcinoma in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results public database. METHODS We identified a cohort of patients with stage I-II endometrial adenocarcinoma who were managed without hysterectomy and who were diagnosed during 1989 to 2010. Patients with prior primary tumors were excluded. Statistical analyses were performed to test associations between patient characteristics, radiotherapy modality, and overall and endometrial cancer-specific survival. Multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of radiation therapy (RT) type on survival outcomes after adjusting for other factors. RESULTS Among the 997 women included in the analyses, 605 received no RT (60.7%), 207 (20.8%) received external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone, and 185 (18.6%) received brachytherapy, either alone or in combination with EBRT. After adjusting for other tumor and demographic factors, RT type was not associated with overall or endometrial cancer-specific survival. Significant predictors of survival included: tumor stage and grade, age at diagnosis, and marital status. CONCLUSIONS For patients in this population-based cohort with early-stage endometrial cancer managed without hysterectomy, the delivery of brachytherapy was not associated with improved survival, compared with EBRT alone. It seems worthwhile to pursue future clinical trials to evaluate definitive EBRT-alone strategies, omitting brachytherapy, for selected patients with medically inoperable endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stella Yoo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington
| | - Sarah E Hegarty
- Kimmel Cancer Center & Jefferson Medical College, Division of Biostatistics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark V Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Leigh A Cantrell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Learning health systems use routinely collected electronic health data (EHD) to advance knowledge and support continuous learning. Even without randomization, observational studies can play a central role as the nation’s health care system embraces comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research. However, neither the breadth, timeliness, volume of the available information, nor sophisticated analytics, allow analysts to confidently infer causal relationships from observational data. However, depending on the research question, careful study design and appropriate analytical methods can improve the utility of EHD. The introduction to a series of four papers, this review begins with a discussion of the kind of research questions that EHD can help address, noting how different evidence and assumptions are needed for each. We argue that when the question involves describing the current (and likely future) state of affairs, causal inference is not relevant, so randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are not necessary. When the question is whether an intervention improves outcomes of interest, causal inference is critical, but appropriately designed and analyzed observational studies can yield valid results that better balance internal and external validity than typical RCTs. When the question is one of translation and spread of innovations, a different set of questions comes into play: How and why does the intervention work? How can a model be amended or adapted to work in new settings? In these “delivery system science” settings, causal inference is not the main issue, so a range of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research designs are needed. We then describe why RCTs are regarded as the gold standard for assessing cause and effect, how alternative approaches relying on observational data can be used to the same end, and how observational studies of EHD can be effective complements to RCTs. We also describe how RCTs can be a model for designing rigorous observational studies, building an evidence base through iterative studies that build upon each other (i.e., confirmation across multiple investigations).
Collapse
|
41
|
Davidson RJ, Kaszniak AW. Conceptual and methodological issues in research on mindfulness and meditation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 70:581-92. [PMID: 26436310 DOI: 10.1037/a0039512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 302] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Both basic science and clinical research on mindfulness, meditation, and related constructs have dramatically increased in recent years. However, interpretation of these research results has been challenging. The present article addresses unique conceptual and methodological problems posed by research in this area. Included among the key topics is the role of first-person experience and how it can be best studied, the challenges posed by intervention research designs in which true double-blinding is not possible, the nature of control and comparison conditions for research that includes mindfulness or other meditation-based interventions, issues in the adequate description of mindfulness and related trainings and interventions, the question of how mindfulness can be measured, questions regarding what can and cannot be inferred from self-report measures, and considerations regarding the structure of study design and data analyses. Most of these topics are germane to both basic and clinical research studies and have important bearing on the future scientific understanding of mindfulness and meditation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Davidson
- Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry and the Center for Investigating Healthy Minds-Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison
| | - Alfred W Kaszniak
- Departments of Psychology, Neurology, and Psychiatry and Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Trends in use and outcome of postoperative radiotherapy following mastectomy: A population-based study. Radiother Oncol 2016; 122:2-10. [PMID: 27641786 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2016] [Revised: 08/25/2016] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of the present population-based study was to evaluate the role and effectiveness of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in clinical practice. METHODS The study included 16,675 patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 1988 to 2012 and resident within the catchment area of the Munich Cancer Registry. Use of PMRT, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), cumulative incidence of time to local recurrence, relative survival and conditional overall survival (cOS), were analysed for different time periods (1988-1997 and 1998-2012). RESULTS Variables favouring the use of PMRT on multivariate logistic regression analysis included young age, large tumour size, positive resection margin and positive nodal status. Over time, a significant increase of PMRT was registered for patients with ⩾4 positive lymph nodes. Moreover, the present findings track a less frequent use of PMRT in elderly patients. After adjusting for age, tumour characteristics and therapies, the Cox regression analysis for LRFS identified PMRT as an independent predictor for improved local control (HR: 2.145; 95% CI: 1.787-2.574, p<0.0001). Patients with 1-3 involved lymph nodes had a 10-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence of 13.7% following mastectomy, compared to 6.5% following PMRT (p=0.0001). Comparable findings were obtained for patients presenting with ⩾4 positive lymph nodes. All effects were smaller or extinct in elderly patients aged ⩾70years. On multivariate analysis for cOS, no significant advantage for PMRT could be detected (HR: 1.084; 95% CI: 0.986-1.191, p=0.095). CONCLUSION The present study was useful in providing an overview on trends in the adoption of PMRT over a 25-year period. An increase in the use of PMRT from 1988 to 2012 was observed, especially in high-risk patients with ⩾4 positive lymph nodes. Patients selected for PMRT had an improved local control and an equivalent relative survival compared to patients who had no indication for PMRT.
Collapse
|
43
|
Editorial Comment. Urology 2016; 95:101-2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
44
|
Emerging Methodology of Intraoperative Hemodynamic Monitoring Research. CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s40140-016-0176-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
45
|
Limitations of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) Prognostic Tool for Prediction of Metastases and Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality in Patients Treated With External Beam Radiation Therapy. Am J Clin Oncol 2016; 39:173-80. [PMID: 24487421 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the performance of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) prognostic tool for freedom-from-metastases (FFM) and cause-specific survival (CSS) in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and to determine whether the performance of CAPRA is influenced by androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use or the presence of Gleason pattern 5 (GP-5). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 612 patients from a prospective database of 718 patients treated with dose-escalated EBRT from 1998 to 2008 who met CAPRA scoring criteria were included in the study. Performance of CAPRA and association of CAPRA score, GP-5 and short-term or long-term ADT use (STAD or LTAD, respectively) with FFM and CSS were evaluated using Cox models. The impact of ADT use on accuracy of the CAPRA-based CaPSURE model for CSS was assessed. The discriminatory ability of the CAPRA model and modified models incorporating GP-5 and ADT use were compared using the C-index. RESULTS Increasing CAPRA score correlated with worse FFM and CSS, and was prognostic for FFM and CSS for the overall cohort. CAPRA showed poorer discrimination for FFM and CSS in patients treated with EBRT+LTAD than those who received EBRT alone or EBRT+STAD. The addition of GP-5 and ADT use to CAPRA score increased the predictive accuracy of the CAPRA model for both FFM (C-index 0.809 vs. 0.779, P<0.001) and CSS (C-index 0.864 vs. 0.796, P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS The CAPRA score should be modified to incorporate GP-5 and ADT use for risk adjustment and risk prediction in prostate cancer patients who receive EBRT.
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) aims to provide patients and physicians with evidence-based guidance on treatment decisions. As researchers conduct CER they face myriad challenges. Although inadequate control of confounding is the most-often cited source of potential bias, selection bias that arises when patients are differentially excluded from analyses is a distinct phenomenon with distinct consequences: confounding bias compromises internal validity, whereas selection bias compromises external validity. Despite this distinction, however, the label "treatment-selection bias" is being used in the CER literature to denote the phenomenon of confounding bias. Motivated by an ongoing study of treatment choice for depression on weight change over time, this paper formally distinguishes selection and confounding bias in CER. By formally distinguishing selection and confounding bias, this paper clarifies important scientific, design, and analysis issues relevant to ensuring validity. First is that the 2 types of biases may arise simultaneously in any given study; even if confounding bias is completely controlled, a study may nevertheless suffer from selection bias so that the results are not generalizable to the patient population of interest. Second is that the statistical methods used to mitigate the 2 biases are themselves distinct; methods developed to control one type of bias should not be expected to address the other. Finally, the control of selection and confounding bias will often require distinct covariate information. Consequently, as researchers plan future studies of comparative effectiveness, care must be taken to ensure that all data elements relevant to both confounding and selection bias are collected.
Collapse
|
47
|
Carbognin L, Sperduti I, Ciccarese M, Fabi A, Petrucelli L, Vari S, Forcignanò RC, Nortilli R, Vicentini C, Pilotto S, Merler S, Zampiva I, Brunelli M, Manfrin E, Giannarelli D, Tortora G, Bria E. Prognostic model for advanced breast carcinoma with luminal subtype and impact of hormonal maintenance: Implications for post-progression and conditional survival. Breast 2016; 29:24-30. [PMID: 27394675 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2016] [Revised: 06/05/2016] [Accepted: 06/23/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this analysis was to develop and validate a prognostic model for advanced breast cancer (ABC) with luminal subtype based on the combination of clinical, pathological and therapeutic predictors to provide a practical tool to evaluate patients' prognosis. METHODS Clinical and pathological data were retrospectively correlated to progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS) using a Cox model. Significant treatment variables were adjusted with the propensity score analysis. A continuous score to identify risk classes was derived according to model ratios. The performance of the risk-class model was tested for post-progression survival (PPS) and conditional survival (CS) as well. RESULTS Data from 335 patients (3 institutions) were gathered (median follow-up 58 months). At multivariate analysis Ki67, Performance Status (PS) and number of metastatic sites were significant predictors for PFS, whereas Ki67, PS, brain metastases, PFS after 1st-line therapy, number of chemotherapy lines, hormonal therapy and maintenance were significant predictors for OS. The hormonal maintenance resulted to be prognostic after adjustment with propensity score analysis. A two-class model significantly differentiated low-risk and high-risk patients for 2-year PFS (31.5% and 11.0%, p < 0.0001), and 3-years OS (57.1% and 4.8%, p < 0.0001). A three-class model separated low risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients for 2-year PFS (40.8%, 24.4%, and 11.0%, p < 0.0001) and 3-year OS (68.1%, 24.8%, and 4.8%, p < 0.0001). Both models equally discriminate the luminal ABC prognosis in terms of PPS and CS. CONCLUSIONS A risk stratification model including 'easy-to-obtain' clinical, pathological and therapeutic parameters accurately separates luminal ABC patients into different risk classes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa Carbognin
- Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy; Breast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Biostatistics, 'Regina Elena' National Cancer Institute, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Alessandra Fabi
- Medical Oncology 'A', 'Regina Elena' National Cancer Institute, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Sabrina Vari
- Medical Oncology 'A', 'Regina Elena' National Cancer Institute, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Rolando Nortilli
- Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy; Breast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Cecilia Vicentini
- Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Sara Pilotto
- Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Sara Merler
- Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Ilaria Zampiva
- Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Breast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy; Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Breast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy; Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Biostatistics, 'Regina Elena' National Cancer Institute, Roma, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy; Breast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Emilio Bria
- Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy; Breast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Disanto G, Benkert P, Lorscheider J, Mueller S, Vehoff J, Zecca C, Ramseier S, Achtnichts L, Findling O, Nedeltchev K, Radue EW, Sprenger T, Stippich C, Derfuss T, Louvion JF, Kamm CP, Mattle HP, Lotter C, Du Pasquier R, Schluep M, Pot C, Lalive PH, Yaldizli Ö, Gobbi C, Kappos L, Kuhle J. The Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Cohort-Study (SMSC): A Prospective Swiss Wide Investigation of Key Phases in Disease Evolution and New Treatment Options. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0152347. [PMID: 27032105 PMCID: PMC4816556 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2015] [Accepted: 03/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The mechanisms leading to disability and the long-term efficacy and safety of disease modifying drugs (DMDs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) are unclear. We aimed at building a prospective cohort of MS patients with standardized collection of demographic, clinical, MRI data and body fluids that can be used to develop prognostic indicators and biomarkers of disease evolution and therapeutic response. The Swiss MS Cohort (SMSC) is a prospective observational study performed across seven Swiss MS centers including patients with MS, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), radiologically isolated syndrome or neuromyelitis optica. Neurological and radiological assessments and biological samples are collected every 6-12 months. We recruited 872 patients (clinically isolated syndrome [CIS] 5.5%, relapsing-remitting MS [RRMS] 85.8%, primary progressive MS [PPMS] 3.5%, secondary progressive MS [SPMS] 5.2%) between June 2012 and July 2015. We performed 2,286 visits (median follow-up 398 days) and collected 2,274 serum, plasma and blood samples, 152 cerebrospinal fluid samples and 1,276 brain MRI scans. 158 relapses occurred and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores increased in PPMS, SPMS and RRMS patients experiencing relapses. Most RRMS patients were treated with fingolimod (33.4%), natalizumab (24.5%) or injectable DMDs (13.6%). The SMSC will provide relevant information regarding DMDs efficacy and safety and will serve as a comprehensive infrastructure available for nested research projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Disanto
- Department of Neurology, Regional Hospital Lugano (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Pascal Benkert
- Clinical Trial Unit, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Lorscheider
- Neurology, Departments of Medicine, Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Mueller
- Department of Neurology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Jochen Vehoff
- Department of Neurology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Chiara Zecca
- Department of Neurology, Regional Hospital Lugano (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Simon Ramseier
- Department of Neurology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Lutz Achtnichts
- Department of Neurology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Findling
- Department of Neurology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Till Sprenger
- Neurology, Departments of Medicine, Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Medical Image Analysis Centre, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Stippich
- Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Derfuss
- Neurology, Departments of Medicine, Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Christian P. Kamm
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Heinrich P. Mattle
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Renaud Du Pasquier
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Myriam Schluep
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Pot
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Geneva (HUG), Geneva
| | - Patrice H. Lalive
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Geneva (HUG), Geneva
| | - Özgür Yaldizli
- Neurology, Departments of Medicine, Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Claudio Gobbi
- Department of Neurology, Regional Hospital Lugano (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Neurology, Departments of Medicine, Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- * E-mail: (JK); (LK)
| | - Jens Kuhle
- Neurology, Departments of Medicine, Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- * E-mail: (JK); (LK)
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
One of the important components of patient-centered healthcare is comparative effectiveness research (CER), which aims at generating evidence from the real-life setting. The primary purpose of CER is to provide comparative information to the healthcare providers, patients, and policy makers about the standard of care available. This involves research on clinical questions unanswered by the explanatory trials during the regulatory approval process. Main methods of CER involve randomized controlled trials and observational methods. The limitations of these two methods have been overcome with the help of new statistical methods. After the evidence generation, it is equally important to communicate the results to all the interested organizations. CER is beginning to have its impact in the clinical practice as its results become part of the clinical practice guidelines. CER will have far-reaching scientific and financial impact. CER will make both the treating physician and the patient equally responsible for the treatment offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Dang
- Founder and CEO, MarksMan Healthcare Solutions, Kopar Khairane, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kirandeep Kaur
- Department of Pharmacology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Olszewski AJ, Falah J, Castillo JJ. Survival Claims From Observational Data on Cancer Therapy. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:1425-7. [PMID: 26884574 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.64.7644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J Olszewski
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence; and Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket, RI
| | - Jaleh Falah
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence; and Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket, RI
| | - Jorge J Castillo
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|