Randomized phase III trial of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil followed by surgery versus up-front surgery in locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma

Less is more: Exploring neoadjuvant immunotherapy as a de-escalation strategy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treatment

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) constitutes a significant global cancer burden, given its high prevalence and associated mortality. Despite substantial progress in survival rates due to the enhanced multidisciplinary approach to treatment, these methods often lead to severe tissue damage, compromised function, and potential toxicity. Thus, there is an imperative need for novel, effective, and minimally damaging treatment modalities. Neoadjuvant treatment, an emerging therapeutic strategy, is designed to reduce tumor size and curtail distant metastasis prior to definitive intervention. Currently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has optimized the treatment approach for a subset of HNSCC patients, yet it has not produced a noticeable enhancement in overall survival (OS). In the contemporary cancer therapeutics landscape, immunotherapy is gaining traction at an accelerated pace. Notably, neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAIT) has shown promising radiological and pathological responses, coupled with encouraging efficacy in several clinical trials. This potentially paves the way for a myriad of possibilities in treatment de-escalation of HNSCC, which warrants further exploration. This paper reviews the existing strategies and efficacies of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), along with potential de-escalation strategies. Furthermore, the challenges encountered in the context of the de-escalation strategies of NAIT are explored. The aim is to inform future research directions that strive to improve the quality of life (QoL) for patients battling HNSCC.

Oral Metronomic Chemotherapy in Advanced and Metastatic Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Need of the Hour

Aim

The present review article aims to compile the best available evidence-based data on oral metronomic chemotherapy (OMCT) including its mechanism of action, its utility, and future directions.

Methods

A systematic search was carried out in PubMed database for available English literature from last 10 years between 2011 and 2021. Keyword combinations used were 'Oral Metronomic chemotherapy for oral cancer, mechanism of action of OMCT, Oral metronomic chemotherapy in India, OMCT in recurrent and palliative treatment of oral cancers.'

Results

Multitudes of studies have been published recently stating the role of OMCT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but the studies with the category of level of evidence required to advocate OMCT as a recognized therapy are still scarce. On careful stratification of these studies, we found that OMCT has a lot to offer in palliative settings, recurrent, and metastatic HNSCC. There is some limited evidence of its role in adjuvant therapy as maintenance and in neoadjuvant setting.

Conclusion

With current evidence, there is a definite role of OMCT in treatment of oral SCC. OMCT can be an alternative in patients who are not tolerable or affordable for standard palliative chemotherapy and also an option for patient who are waiting for surgery. However, results of ongoing and future studies on exact mechanism, indications, and implications of this drug regimen would help in integration OMCT in current standard of therapy.

Graphical abstract

Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

As a substantial waiting time is usually required for radical surgery, safe and effective preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is desired for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, the significance of NAC in advanced HNSCC is still unclear. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of NAC using the paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab (PCE) regimen.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the background characteristics, incidence of adverse events, overall response rate (ORR), pathological response, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) in 26 patients. Patients receiving the PCE regimen were further divided into two groups based on the number of chemotherapy cycles (one cycle or more) and eligibility for cisplatin. Patients aged ≥ 75 years and those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min were classified as ineligible for cisplatin.

RESULTS

The median age was 70 (27-81) years. The median eGFR at treatment initiation was 63.2 (41.1-89.7) mL/min. Fourteen (53.8%) patients were ineligible for cisplatin. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia was observed in 11 of 25 (42.3%) patients. No delay in or withdrawal from surgery was observed. The ORR was 65.4%. The 2-year RFS and OS were 61.5% and 76.7%, respectively. No significant differences in safety and efficacy between the number of chemotherapy cycles and cisplatin eligibility were observed.

CONCLUSION

NAC using the PCE regimen for patients with locally advanced HNSCC, including cisplatin-ineligible patients, has acceptable toxicity and favorable efficacy.

Pre-surgical Tumor Marking by Tattooing in Patients Offered with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (Nact) for Advance Staged Oral Carcinomas

We described a novel technique of marking the oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) tumors before the pre-operative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The pre-operative NACT may shrink the tumor, making it difficult for the oncosurgeon to identify the pre-NACT tumor area to be included in the surgical resection. Difficulty lies in exact topographic replication/documentation of examination findings on superficial or mucosal surface levels, primarily due to limited surface landmarks. This technique helps to identify the pre-NACT tumor margins during surgical resection and to achieve maximum oncological safety and refining surgical planning.

Derived Neutrophils to Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Survival Benefit from TPF Induction Chemotherapy in Local Advanced Oral Squamous Cellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) in predicting the prognosis of patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (LAOSCC) and to assess the survival benefits from docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (TPF) induction chemotherapy (IC).

METHODS

Patients from a phase III trial involving TPF IC in stage III/IVA OSCC patients (NCT01542931) were enrolled. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, and the area under the curve was computed to determine dNLR cutoff points. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazards models were used for longitudinal analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients were identified (median age: 55.4 years; range: 26 to 75 years; median follow-up: 90 months; range: 3.2 to 93 months). The cutoff point for the dNLR was 1.555. Multivariate analysis showed that the dNLR was an independent negative predictive factor for survival (overall survival (OS): hazard ratio (HR) = 1.154, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.018-1.309, p = 0.025; disease-free survival (DFS): HR = 1.123, 95% CI: 1.000-1.260, p = 0.050; local recurrence-free survival (LRFS): HR = 1.134, 95% CI: 1.002-1.283, p = 0.047; distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS): HR = 1.146, 95% CI: 1.010-1.300, p = 0.035). A low dNLR combined with cTNM stage III disease predicted benefit from TPF IC for the patients [OS (χ2 = 4.674, p = 0.031), DFS (χ2 = 7.134, p = 0.008), LRFS (χ2 = 5.937, p = 0.015), and DMFS (χ2 = 4.832, p = 0.028)].

CONCLUSIONS

The dNLR is an independent negative predictive factor in LAOSCC patients. Patients with cTNM stage III disease and a low dNLR can benefit from TPF IC.

TCF12 induces ferroptosis by suppressing OTUB1-mediated SLC7A11 deubiquitination to promote cisplatin sensitivity in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Chemotherapy resistance is a major obstacle to effective cancer treatment, and promotion of ferroptosis can suppress cisplatin resistance in tumor cells. TCF12 plays a suppressive role in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but whether it participates in the regulation of cisplatin resistance by modulating ferroptosis remains unclear. Here, we found that TCF12 expression was decreased in OSCC cells compared with normal oral cells, and it was reduced in cisplatin (DDP)-resistant OSCC cells compared with parental cells. Moreover, overexpression of TCF12 sensitized DDP-resistant cells to DDP by promoting ferroptosis. Intriguingly, silencing TCF12 reversed the promotion effect of the ferroptosis activator RSL3 on ferroptosis and DDP sensitivity, and overexpressing TCF12 antagonized the effect of the ferroptosis inhibitor liproxstatin-1 on ferroptosis and DDP resistance. Mechanically, TCF12 promoted ubiquitination of SLC7A11 and decreased SLC7A11 protein stability through transcriptional repression of OTUB1, thereby facilitating ferroptosis. Consistently, SLC7A11 overexpression neutralized the promotion effect of TCF12 on ferroptosis and DDP sensitivity. Additionally, upregulation of TCF12 hindered the growth of mouse OSCC xenografts and enhanced the DDP sensitivity of xenografts by inducing ferroptosis. In conclusion, TCF12 enhanced DDP sensitivity in OSCC cells by promoting ferroptosis, which was achieved through modulating SLC7A11 expression via transcriptional regulation of OTUB1.

Anti-PD-(L)1-Based Neoadjuvant Therapy in Head and Neck Carcinoma: a Meta-analysis of Prospective Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiprogressive disease (PD)-(L)1-based neoadjuvant therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients and identify potential prognostic biomarkers.

DATA SOURCES

Databases were systematically searched for prospective clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-(L)1-based neoadjuvant therapy for HNSCC before January 12, 2024.

REVIEW METHODS

We estimated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were further performed.

RESULTS

A total of 570 patients from 20 studies were included. The pooled major pathological response (MPR), pathological complete response (pCR), and partial pathological response (PPR) rates were 30.7%, 15.3%, and 68.2%, respectively. Surgical complications, surgical delayed rate, all grade treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) and ≥Grade 3 TRAEs were 0.6%, 0.3%, 82.6%, and 9.7%, respectively. Best MPR or pCR rate was detected in patients receiving neoadjuvant anti-PD-(L)1 therapy + radiotherapy (with MPR rate of 75.5% and pCR rate of 51.1%) and neoadjuvant anti-PD-(L)1 therapy + chemotherapy groups (with MPR rate of 57.5% and pCR rate of 26.7%). No differences were detected in subgroups stratified by neoadjuvant treatment cycles, human papillomavirus (HPV) status, and tumor location. Patients with baseline Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥ 20 have higher MPR and pCR rates compared to patients with CPS < 20. High Tumor Cell Proportion Score was also associated with MPR and pCR. Objective response rate is a strong predictor of MPR (odds ratio [OR] = 7.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.20%-18.91%) and pCR (OR = 3.24, 95% CI = 1.40%-7.48%).

CONCLUSION

Anti-PD-(L)1-based neoadjuvant therapy was effective and safe for HNSCC patients.

Efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy in oral cavity cancer: An eight-year experience at a Portuguese reference center

BACKGROUND

Induction chemotherapy has been described as an option in locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma when the surgical morbidity is expected to be high. This work aimed to evaluate the outcome and safety of induction chemotherapy in this setting.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective and observational study including patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma, treated with induction chemotherapy between January 2010 and December 2018. Outcomes included induction chemotherapy toxicity, treatment response, disease-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 108 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients were included. Ninety-six (88.9%) had stage IV disease, while 12 (11.1%) had stage III. Eighty-four patients (80.8%) achieved at least a partial response to induction chemotherapy at clinical evaluation, and 75 (72.1%) at radiological evaluation. Seventy-eight patients have been proposed for subsequent definitive treatments, with no differences obtained in prognosis, when comparing surgical to non-surgical approaches. In patients treated with definitive treatments, improved five-year disease-free survival was obtained if at least a clinical (56.3%; p=0.001) or radiological (52.9%; p=0.001) partial response was achieved after induction chemotherapy. Similarly, superior five-year overall survival was verified for those achieving at least clinical (51.1%; p<0.0001) or radiological (52.6%; p=0.001) partial response. Also, accomplishing a pathologic complete response (n=22.6%) significantly improved disease-free survival (p=0.039) and overall survival (p=0.005). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed in 52 patients (41.8%).

CONCLUSION

Responses to induction chemotherapy predicted prognosis in our population, however important toxicities were observed. Further studies are necessary to identify induction chemotherapy response predictors and subgroups who may benefit from this approach.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The neoadjuvant immunotherapy approach marks a significant shift in the treatment paradigm of potentially curable HNSCC. Here, current therapies, despite being highly individualized and advanced, often fall short in achieving satisfactory long-term survival rates and are frequently associated with substantial morbidity.The primary advantage of this approach lies in its potential to intensify and enhance treatment regimens, offering a distinct modality that complements the existing triad of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Checkpoint inhibitors have been at the forefront of this evolution. Demonstrating moderate yet significant survival benefits in the recurrent-metastatic setting with a relatively better safety profile compared to conventional treatments, these agents hold promise when considered for earlier stages of HNSCC.On the other hand, a significant potential benefit of introducing immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant phase is the possibility of treatment de-escalation. By reducing the tumor burden before surgery, this strategy could lead to less invasive surgical interventions. The prospect of organ-sparing protocols becomes a realistic and highly valued goal in this context. Further, the early application of immunotherapy might catalyze a more effective and durable immune response. The induction of an immune memory may potentially lead to a more effective surveillance of residual disease, decreasing the rates of local, regional, and distant recurrences, thereby enhancing overall and recurrence-free survival.However, neoadjuvant immunotherapy is not without its challenges. One of the primary concerns is the safety and adverse events profile. While data suggest that adverse events are relatively rare and manageable, the long-term safety profile in the neoadjuvant setting, especially in the context of curative intent, remains a subject for ongoing research. Another unsolved issue lies in the accurate assessment of treatment response. The discrepancy between radiographic assessment using RECIST criteria and histological findings has been noted, indicating a gap in current imaging techniques' ability to accurately reflect the true efficacy of immunotherapy. This gap underscores the necessity for improved imaging methodologies and the development of new radiologic and pathologic criteria tailored to evaluate the response to immunotherapy accurately.Treatment combinations and timing represent another layer of complexity. There is a vast array of possibilities in combining immunotherapy agents with conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiation, and other experimental treatments. Determining the optimal treatment regimen for individual patients becomes an intricate task, especially when comparing small, single-arm, non-randomized trials with varying regimens and outcome measures.Moreover, one needs to consider the importance of pre- and intraoperative decision-making in the context of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. As experience with this treatment paradigm grows, there is potential for more tailored surgical approaches based on the patient's remaining disease post-neoadjuvant treatment. This consideration is particularly relevant in extensive surgeries, where organ-sparing protocols could be evaluated.In practical terms, the multi-modal nature of this treatment strategy introduces complexities, especially outside clinical trial settings. Patients face challenges in navigating the treatment landscape, which involves coordination across multiple medical disciplines, highlighting the necessity for streamlined care pathways at specialized centers to facilitate effective treatment management if the neoadjuvant approach is introduced to the real-world.These potential harms and open questions underscore the critical need for meticulously designed clinical trials and correlational studies to ensure patient safety and efficacy. Only these can ensure that this new treatment approach is introduced in a safe way and fulfils the promise it theoretically holds.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy shows major pathological response and low recurrence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade (neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy) for patients with resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted. Patients with initially diagnosed, resectable HNSCCs who received the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and radical surgery were included. Correlation analysis between patients' clinical characteristics and pathological responses, and survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were included. The majority of patients (55, 69.6%) were diagnosed at locally advanced stages and most of them (58, 73.4%) had tumor located at the oral cavity. Nearly half of patients (35, 44.3%) received two cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and the rest had three or more cycles. The R0 resection rate was 98.7%. In the pathological evaluation, 53.1% of patients reached pathological complete responses or major pathological responses. After a median follow-up of 17.0 months, the 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 87.2% and 97.4%, respectively. The pathological response showed a significantly positive association with survival benefits (p < 0.001). Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer had the best pathological response and survival outcomes. Besides, history of radiation at head and neck region and poor pathological response were found to be independent risk factors of DFS for patients receiving such treatments.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy of HNSCC showed high rate of pathological response and low recurrence rate, holding promise for becoming the new standard of care for resectable HNSCC.

New induction chemotherapy using intra-arterial infusion for tongue squamous cell carcinoma to avoid reconstructive surgery: A 6 case reports

Most tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) classified as T3 require reconstructive surgery, which inevitably causes problems with oral functions. We propose new induction chemotherapy using intra-arterial infusion for TSCC classified as T3 to avoid reconstructive surgery. This chemotherapy regimen consists of intra-arterial infusion of docetaxel and cisplatin and systemic administration of 5-fluorouracil. As a result of this treatment, the therapeutic effect was a complete response in five patients and a partial response in one patient, and the overall response rate was 100%. All six patients underwent partial resection because their tumors shrank with this induction chemotherapy. In addition, adverse events of grade 3 or more did not occur in all six patients. The median follow-up duration for all patients was 34 months, and they are alive. This intra-arterial chemotherapy regimen was shown to be highly efficacious and safe.

Supramolecular nanodrug targeting CDK4/6 overcomes BAG1 mediated cisplatin resistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Chemoresistance to cisplatin remains a significant challenge affecting the prognosis of advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, the specific biomarkers and underlying mechanisms responsible for cisplatin resistance remain elusive. Through comprehensive bioinformatic analyses, we identified a potential biomarker, BCL2 associated athanogene-1 (BAG1), showing elevated expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Since OSCC represents the primary pathological type of HNSCC, we investigated BAG1 expression in human tumor tissues and cisplatin resistant OSCC cell lines, revealing that silencing BAG1 induced apoptosis in cisplatin-resistant cells both in vitro and in vivo. This effect led to impaired cell viability of cisplatin resistant OSCC cells and indicated a positive correlation between BAG1 expression and the G1/S transition during cell proliferation. Based on these insights, the administration of a CDK4/6 inhibitor in combination with cisplatin effectively overcame cisplatin resistance in OSCC through the CDK4/6-BAG1 axis. Additionally, to enable simultaneous drug delivery and enhance synergistic antitumor efficacy, we developed a novel supramolecular nanodrug LEE011-FFERGD/CDDP, which was validated in an OSCC orthotopic mouse model. In summary, our study highlights the potential of a combined administration of CDK4/6 inhibitor and cisplatin as a promising therapeutic regimen for treating advanced or cisplatin resistant OSCC.

Acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid inhibits cell proliferation and growth of oral squamous cell carcinoma via RAB7B-mediated autophagy

Natural products can overcome the limitations of conventional chemotherapy. Acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid (AKBA) as a natural product extracted from frankincense, exhibited chemotherapeutic activities in different cancers. However, whether AKBA exerts inhibiting effect of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells growth and the mechanism need to be explored. We attempted to investigate the therapeutic effects of AKBA against OSCC and explore the mechanism involved. Here we attempt to disclose the cell-killing effect of AKBA on OSCC cell lines and try to figure out the specifical pathway. The presence of increase autophagosome and the production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species were confirmed after the application of AKBA on OSCC cells, and RAB7B inhibition enhanced autophagosome accumulation. Though the increase autophagosome was detected induced by AKBA, autophagic flux was inhibited as the failure fusion of autophagosome and lysosome. Cal27 xenografts were established to verify the role of anti-OSCC cells of AKBA in vivo. Based above findings, we speculate that natural product AKBA suppresses OSCC cells growth via RAB7B-mediated autophagy and may serve as a promising strategy for the therapy of OSCC.

Outcomes of 3-year follow up with induction vs first line chemotherapy in oral cancer patients: An observational hospital-based study

OBJECTIVE

Our study aims to analyse and compare the efficacy, adverse effect profile and survival among the Paclitaxel/Cisplatin/5-Flurouracil (TPF) induction chemotherapy and Paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) first line or cisplatin chemotherapy in a high-volume tertiary care cancer centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

215 patients with oral cavity cancer were recruited in this study. Patients with stages I-IIc underwent surgical resection or radiation therapy 66-74 GY/fraction. Patients of Stages III-IV were administered with either induction chemotherapy TPF or PC or cisplatin regimen. Treatment responses were assessed by CT and MRI. Response rates, survival and adverse effects data were tabulated and analysed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 49.2 ± 11.68 years. Symptoms were ulceration (33.5%), growth (20.5%), pain (13%), ulcer-proliferative growth (8.4%) and swelling (13, 6%). The tumour site was found at the base of the tongue, C01 (42.2%) followed by C06 (35.8%), C08 (6.5%), C07 (5.2%) and C05 (4.6%). There were no significant differences ( P > 0.05) in efficacy and survival outcomes between the different groups of treatment. Median survival was achieved within 36 months. The major side effect observed were anaemia (15.81%), diarrhoea (36.2%), dyspepsia (28.8%), fever (33.95%), mucositis (28.85%), myalgia (33.95%) and nausea (7.9%). Survival among the responder categories (CR, PR and NR) was significantly different as per Log-rank analysis ( P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

TPF induction therapy and PC first line chemotherapy showed similar efficacy, safety profile and survival whereas cisplatin shows poor efficacy and safety and survival in Indian oral cancer patients.

Latin American Consensus on the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is well known as a serious health problem worldwide, especially in low-income countries or those with limited resources, such as most countries in Latin America. International guidelines cannot always be applied to a population from a large region with specific conditions. This study established a Latin American guideline for care of patients with head and neck cancer and presented evidence of HNSCC management considering availability and oncologic benefit. A panel composed of 41 head and neck cancer experts systematically worked according to a modified Delphi process on (1) document compilation of evidence-based answers to different questions contextualized by resource availability and oncologic benefit regarding Latin America (region of limited resources and/or without access to all necessary health care system infrastructure), (2) revision of the answers and the classification of levels of evidence and degrees of recommendations of all recommendations, (3) validation of the consensus through two rounds of online surveys, and (4) manuscript composition. The consensus consists of 12 sections: Head and neck cancer staging, Histopathologic evaluation of head and neck cancer, Head and neck surgery-oral cavity, Clinical oncology-oral cavity, Head and neck surgery-oropharynx, Clinical oncology-oropharynx, Head and neck surgery-larynx, Head and neck surgery-larynx/hypopharynx, Clinical oncology-larynx/hypopharynx, Clinical oncology-recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer, Head and neck surgery-reconstruction and rehabilitation, and Radiation therapy. The present consensus established 48 recommendations on HNSCC patient care considering the availability of resources and focusing on oncologic benefit. These recommendations could also be used to formulate strategies in other regions like Latin America countries.

Higher overall survival rates of oral squamous cell carcinoma treated with metronomic neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Distant metastasis is an important prognostic factor for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). It involves the direct spread of tumor cells through blood vessels or via lymph nodes; however, there are currently no well-established treatments for its prevention in patients with OSCC. To investigate the impact of metronomic neoadjuvant chemotherapy on OSCC, we conducted a retrospective analysis of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 alone. Fifty-four patients underwent up-front surgery, while 106 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 alone. A serious adverse event occurred in one of patient treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (1%); however, all patients underwent resection. The 5-year overall survival rate was higher with S-1 than with up-front surgery (96% vs. 81%, P = 0.002). Moreover, neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased the overall survival rate of patients with poorly or moderately differentiated tumors, but not those with well-differentiated tumors. By analyzing a cohort of 523 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients in the Cancer Genome Atlas, we identified genetic variants associated with histological differentiation. The frequency of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants or deletions in 5 genes associated with HNSCC correlated with histological differentiation, some of which indicated the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in well-differentiated HNSCC. The vessel marker CD31 was highly expressed in poorly differentiated OSCC, whereas the anti-angiogenic molecule, LCN2, which is induced by the activation of the Wnt pathway, was highly expressed in well-differentiated OSCC. The present study showed that overall survival rates were higher in patients with poorly or moderately differentiated OSCC who received metronomic neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which was attributed to a difference in angiogenesis based on the characteristic landscape of pathogenic mutations according to histological differentiation.

Phase 3 RCT comparing docetaxel-platinum with docetaxel-platinum-5FU as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in borderline resectable oral cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5FU) is one of the treatment options in very locally advanced oral cancer with a survival advantage over PF (cisplatin and 5FU). TP (docetaxel and cisplatin) has shown promising results with a lower rate of adverse events but has never been compared to TPF.

METHODS

In this phase 3 randomized superiority study, adult patients with borderline resectable locally advanced oral cancers were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either TP or TPF. After the administration of 2 cycles, patients were evaluated in a multidisciplinary clinic and further treatment was planned. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events.

RESULTS

495 patients were randomized in this study, 248 patients in TP arm and 247 in TPF arm. The 5-year OS was 18.5% (95% CI 13.8-23.7) and 23.9% (95% CI 18.1-30.1) in TP and TPF arms, respectively (Hazard ratio 0.778; 95% CI 0.637-0.952; P = 0.015). Following NACT, 43.8% were deemed resectable, but 34.5% underwent surgery. The 5-year OS was 50.7% (95% CI 41.5-59.1) and 5% (95%CI 2.9-8.1), respectively, in the surgically resected versus unresected cohort post NACT (P < 0.0001). Grade 3 or above adverse events were seen in 97 (39.1%) and 179 (72.5%) patients in the TP and TPF arms, respectively (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

NACT with TPF has a survival benefit over TP in borderline resectable oral cancers, with an increase in toxicity which is manageable. Patients who undergo surgery achieve a relatively good, sustained survival.

The clinical implication and translational research of OSCC differentiation

BACKGROUND

The clinical value and molecular characteristics of tumor differentiation in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remain unclear. There is a lack of a related molecular classification prediction system based on pathological images for precision medicine.

METHODS

Integration of epidemiology, genomics, experiments, and deep learning to clarify the clinical value and molecular characteristics, and develop a novel OSCC molecular classification prediction system.

RESULTS

Large-scale epidemiology data (n = 118,817) demonstrated OSCC differentiation was a significant prognosis indicator (p < 0.001), and well-differentiated OSCC was more chemo-resistant than poorly differentiated OSCC. These results were confirmed in the TCGA database and in vitro. Furthermore, we found chemo-resistant related pathways and cell cycle-related pathways were up-regulated in well- and poorly differentiated OSCC, respectively. Based on the characteristics of OSCC differentiation, a molecular grade of OSCC was obtained and combined with pathological images to establish a novel prediction system through deep learning, named ShuffleNetV2-based Molecular Grade of OSCC (SMGO). Importantly, our independent multi-center cohort of OSCC (n = 340) confirmed the high accuracy of SMGO.

CONCLUSIONS

OSCC differentiation was a significant indicator of prognosis and chemotherapy selection. Importantly, SMGO could be an indispensable reference for OSCC differentiation and assist the decision-making of chemotherapy.

Locally Advanced oral Squamous cell Carcinomas: Auditing and Outcome Appraisal

Introduction: Patients with OSCC in India (oral squamous cell carcinoma) presents at a later stage with approximately 28% presenting at stage III and 64% at stage IV disease. In this retrospective study we have reviewed the treatment modalities rendered and outcomes associated for the management of locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma in our Institute. We evaluated the survival data and the factors effecting survival. Methods: Kaplan Meir method was used to evaluate OS and DFS rate and log rank test was used to compare the survival amongst groups. Cox regression analysis (univariate and multivariate) was used to evaluate the hazard ratio to find out the possible factors influencing risk of death and disease. Results: The median OS and DFS in our study were 32 and 24 months respectively. On a subset analysis of only T4b patients who underwent either upfront surgery or induction chemotherapy followed by surgery there was no significant difference in OS and DFS. All patients with TURD had partial response after induction chemotherapy and were subjected to surgical resection followed by adjuvant therapy. Conclusion: Extracapsular spread, bone involvement, skin infiltration, treatments, surgical margins and Lymph node size are the prime predictors of survival.Upfront surgery remains the standard of care for resectable LAOSCC. Induction chemotherapy might improve the resectability in technically unresectable OSCC. There is no difference in survival between concurrent chemoradiation, sequential chemoradiation and radical radiotherapy in the management of unresectable disease.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-04168-4.

Radiomic biomarkers for platinum-refractory head and neck cancer in the era of immunotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are recommended as the first-line therapy for platinum-refractory head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a disease with a poor prognosis. However, biomarkers in this situation are rare. The objective was to identify radiomic features-associated biomarkers to guide the prognosis and treatment opinions in the era of ICI.

METHODS

A total of 31 platinum-refractory HNSCC patients were retrospectively enrolled. Of these, 65.5% (20/31) received ICI-based therapy and 35.5% (11/31) did not. Radiomic features of the primary site at the onset of recurrent metastatic (R/M) status were extracted. Prognostic and predictive radiomic biomarkers were analysed.

RESULTS

The median overall survival from R/M status (R/M OS) was 9.6 months. Grey-level co-occurrence matrix-associated texture features were the most important in identifying the patients with or without 9-month R/M death. A radiomic risk-stratification model was established and equally separated the patients into high-, intermittent- and lower-risk groups (1-year R/M death rate, 100.0% vs. 70.8% vs. 27.1%, p = 0.001). Short-run high grey-level emphasis (SRHGE) was more suitable than programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in selecting whether patients received ICI-based therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomic features were effective prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Future studies are warranted.

An immune cell infiltration landscape classification to predict prognosis and immunotherapy effect in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Tumor immune cell infiltration (ICI) is associated with the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients and the effect of immunotherapy. The combat algorithm was used to merge the data from three databases and the Cell-type Identification by Estimating Relative Subsets of RNA Transcripts (CIBERSORT) algorithm to quantify the amount of infiltrated immune cells. Unsupervised consistent cluster analysis was used to determine ICI subtypes, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were determined according to these subtypes. The DEGs were then clustered again to obtain the ICI gene subtypes. The principal component analysis (PCA) and the Boruta algorithm were used to construct the ICI scores. Three different ICI clusters and gene clusters with a prognosis of significant difference were found and the ICI score was constructed. Patients with higher ICI scores have a better prognosis following internal and external verification. Besides, the proportion of patients with effective immunotherapy was higher than those with low scores in two external datasets with immunotherapy. This study shows that the ICI score is an effective prognostic biomarker and a predictor of immunotherapy.

New Histopathologic Risk Model for Early T-stage Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Focusing on a Modified Worst Pattern of Invasion System and a New Tumor Budding Score

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is treated based on the TNM staging. However, early T-stage OSCC still exhibits substantial nodal metastasis and death rates. Recent literature highlights the independent prognostic value of worst pattern of invasion (WPOI) and tumor budding in OSCC. Nevertheless, WPOI-5 is uncommon in early T-stage OSCC, and the definitions of tumor budding and WPOI-4 overlap. Moreover, WPOI assessment is subjective, and tumor budding evaluation varies across studies. To address these limitations, we aimed to develop a modified WPOI system and a novel tumor budding scoring system that assesses single cells and high-density tumor budding. We also evaluated a new histopathologic risk model for early T-stage OSCC. The study cohort comprised 37 pT1 and 64 pT2 OSCCs. The modified WPOI demonstrated superior interobserver agreement compared with the original system (κ value: 0.98 vs. 0.53). In the multivariate analysis, modified WPOI and tumor budding score were independent prognostic factors for nodal metastasis and disease-free survival, while modified WPOI predicted disease-specific survival. By integrating these factors, our risk model stratified the patients into 3 groups. Notably, the intermediate-risk and high-risk groups exhibited significantly higher rates of nodal metastasis, recurrence, and tumor-related death. Conversely, none in the low-risk group had nodal metastasis or succumbed to the disease. Our model offered simplified scoring and potentially improved prognostic predictions. In conclusion, we've developed a modified WPOI system, a new tumor budding scoring system, and a reliable risk model that classifies early T-stage OSCC patients into distinct risk groups with significant prognostic differences.

Clinical decision pathway and management of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multidisciplinary consensus in Asia-Pacific

OBJECTIVES

To develop consensus on patient characteristics and disease-related factors considered in deciding treatment approaches for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) based on real-world treatment patterns in 4 territories in Asia-Pacific.

METHODS

A three-round modified Delphi involving a multidisciplinary panel of HN surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists was used. Of 41 panelists recruited, responses of 26 from Australia, Japan, Singapore, and Taiwan were analyzed. All panelists had ≥five years' experience managing LA-HNSCC patients and treated ≥15 patients with LA-HNSCC annually.

RESULTS

All statements on definitions of LA-HNSCC, treatment intolerance and cisplatin dosing reached consensus. 4 of 7 statements on unresectability, 2 of 4 on adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 7 of 13 on induction chemotherapy, 1 of 8 on absolute contraindications and 7 of 11 on relative contraindications to high-dose cisplatin did not reach consensus. In all territories except Taiwan, high-dose cisplatin was preferred in definitive and adjuvant settings for patients with no contraindications to cisplatin; weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2) preferred for patients with relative contraindications to high-dose cisplatin. For Taiwan, the main treatment option was weekly cisplatin. For patients with absolute contraindications to cisplatin, carboplatin ± 5-fluorouracil or radiotherapy alone were preferred alternatives in both definitive and adjuvant settings.

CONCLUSION

This multidisciplinary consensus provides insights into management of LA-HNSCC in Asia-Pacific based on patient- and disease-related factors that guide selection of treatment modality and systemic treatment. Despite strong consensus on use of cisplatin-based regimens, areas of non-consensus showed that variability in practice exists where there is limited evidence.

The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy as compared to upfront surgery for the management of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the field of head and neck oncology has always been debated. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) by comparison to upfront surgery, in terms of overall survival, disease-free survival, response rates, positive surgical margins, loco-regional recurrence, distant metastasis, and toxicity. Prospective and retrospective studies were identified from a search of the PubMed, PubMed Central, and Cochrane Library databases (publication date between January 1, 1995 and January 1, 2022), as well as hand searches. Three randomized clinical trials and five retrospective studies reporting a total of 1373 patients were retrieved (493 treated with NACT, 880 treated with upfront surgery). All statistical analyses were done using RevMan 5.4. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups for all outcomes (overall survival P = 0.41, disease-free survival P = 0.91, loco-regional recurrence P = 0.12, distant metastasis P = 0.23), except positive margins (P = 0.007); a reduced risk of positive margins was observed for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The pooled proportion of patients with a complete pathological response (17%) was inadequate to obtain an improvement in survival. The lower margin positivity rate, leading to resectability with clear margins, may be a benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced OSCC; however, this treatment failed to provide a benefit in terms of survival and the response rate.

Individualized risk assessment of distant metastases in oral cavity carcinoma: a validated predictive-score model

BACKGROUND

We aimed to develop and validate a risk-scoring system for distant metastases (DMs) in oral cavity carcinoma (OCC).

METHODS

Patients with OCC who were treated at 4 tertiary cancer institutions with curative surgery with or without postoperative radiation/chemoradiation therapy were randomly assigned to discovery or validation cohorts (3:2 ratio). Cases were staged on the basis of tumor, node, and metastasis staging according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control guidelines. Predictors of DMs on multivariable analysis in the discovery cohort were used to develop a risk-score model and classify patients into risk groups. The utility of the risk classification was evaluated in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

Overall, 2749 patients were analyzed. Predictors (risk score coefficient) of DMs in the discovery cohort were the following: pathological stage (p)T3-4 (0.4), pN+ (N1: 0.8; N2: 1.0; N3: 1.5), histologic grade (G) 3 (G3, 0.7), and lymphovascular invasion (0.4). The DM risk groups were defined by the sum of the following risk score coefficients: high (>1.7), intermediate (0.7-1.7), and standard risk (<0.7). The 5-year DM rates (high/intermediate/standard risk groups) were 30%/15%/4% in the discovery cohort (C-index = 0.79) and 35%/16%/5% in the validation cohort, respectively (C-index = 0.77; both P < .001). In the whole cohort, this predictive model showed excellent discriminative ability in predicting DMs without locoregional failure (29%/11%/1%), later (>2 year) DMs (11%/4%/2%), and DMs in patients treated with surgery (20%/12%/5%), postoperative radiation therapy (34%/17%/4%), and postoperative chemoradiation therapy (39%/18%/7%) (all P < .001). The 5-year overall survival rates in the overall cohort were 25%/51%/67% (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at higher risk for DMs were identified by use of a predictive-score model for DMs that included pT3-4, pN1/2/3, G3, and lymphovascular invasion. Identified patients may be evaluated for individualized risk-adaptive treatment escalation and/or surveillance strategies.

Revisiting the concept of neoadjuvant and induction therapy in head and neck cancer with the advent of immunotherapy

The treatment of locally advanced (LA) Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is based on surgery followed by (chemo)radiation or on curative (chemo)radiation, depending on site and stage. Despite optimal locoregional treatment, about 50% of patients recur, with a huge impact on prognosis and substantial morbidity. The advent of immunotherapy (IT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) changed the paradigm of systemic treatment for recurrent/metastatic (RM) disease, showing activity, efficacy, and safety in both platinum-resistant and platinum-naïve patients. Such data led clinicians to design clinical trials to investigate early administration of IT even in the neoadjuvant or window of opportunity setting. In this review, we examine the published and ongoing trials investigating IT in the neoadjuvant setting for LA HNSCC. We address the current challenges of this treatment modality: optimal patient selection for neoadjuvant IT; choosing the appropriate systemic approach to enhance response without compromising tolerability; determining the ideal study endpoint, with a focus on major pathological response as a potential surrogate for overall survival; evaluating treatment response through imaging, considering the discordance between radiological and pathological assessments; and the influence of neoadjuvant IT response on locoregional treatment de-escalation strategies.

Metronomic Chemotherapy in Oral Cancer: A Review

Treatment of locally advanced oral cancer requires multidisciplinary care, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, which varies based on the stage of the disease, site of involvement, and surgical access. Oral cancer usually presents with an increased recurrence rate and potential for distant metastatic spread. It confers a poor prognosis with a 50% mortality rate after five years. Oral metronomic chemotherapy aims to achieve higher patient compliance due to its ease of administration, lower dosage, and lesser side effects than conventional IV regimens of platinum-based drugs. In this review, we have summarized the relevant literature to benefit the readers regarding the potential application of metronomic therapy in the management of oral cancer.

Circ-ILF2 in oral squamous cell carcinoma promotes cisplatin resistance and induces M2 polarization of macrophages

Cisplatin (CDDP) chemoresistance is one of the predominant factors in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) treatment failure. Uncovering the mechanisms underlying CDDP resistance is of great importance in OSCC therapy. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a newly discovered class of noncoding RNAs, which are reported to participate in the progression of various diseases, including cancer. However, the function of circRNAs in CDDP resistance in OSCC remains unclear. Quantitative reverse transcription PCR was used to search for different circRNAs between OSCC cell lines and CDDP-resistant cell lines. The results showed that circ-ILF2 expression was higher in CDDP-resistant OSCC cell lines. The stability of circ-ILF2 was also confirmed using RNase R and actinomycin D assays. Functional experiments, including cytotoxicity, apoptosis and growth rate assays, showed that upregulation of circ-ILF2 contributes to CDDP resistance. Luciferase reporter-gene, RNA pull-down and quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assays showed that circ-ILF2 functions as a microRNA sponge for miR-1252. Luciferase reporter assays, RNA pull-down, RT-qPCR and Western blotting showed that miR-1252 directly targeted and regulated the expression of KLF8. Circ-ILF2 plays an important role in CDDP resistance in OSCC. Circ-ILF2 exerts its function through the miR-1252/KLF8 pathway. In addition, tumour-associated macrophages (TAM) play important roles in cancer progressions, our results showed that circ-ILF2 in OSCC cells induced the M2 polarization of macrophages which provided new thoughts on immunotherapy. Our results suggest that circ-ILF2 may represent a potential therapeutic target in CDDP-resistant OSCC.

Neoadjuvant tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced oral or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world retrospective study

Objectives

The treatment of locally advanced oral or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LAOOPSCC) is surgery and radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy but with unsatisfactory survival rate. Neoadjuvant programmed death-1 (PD-1) therapy are being used in several clinical trials. Therefore, in this retrospective study we aimed to determine the feasibility of neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus chemotherapy followed by surgery for LAOOPSCC.

Materials and methods

The clinical data of 33 patients with LAOOPSCC who received neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy between April 2021 and October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with stage III-IV LAOOPSCC received tislelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and cisplatin every 3 weeks (Q3W) for two cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. A median follow-up period was 20 months.

Results

The objective response rate (ORR) was 66.7%, with the major pathological response (MPR) rate at 54.5%, and the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 33.3%. Sixteen patients underwent limited surgeries, and 15 patients were remitted from undergoing mandibulectomy and 9 patients were remitted from undergoing near total glossectomy or total glossectomy. A significant difference in the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was observed in patients who achieved major pathological response (MPR) than who did not. The most common adverse events in neoadjuvant therapy were alopecia, decreased appetite or anorexia, leukopenia, and fatigue.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy are feasible and safe, with a high pathological response and possible organ preservation in oral or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. However, further studies with a larger cohort of patients and longer follow-up period is required to strengthen our findings and evaluate the survival benefits of the treatment.

Clinical Advances and Future Directions of Oncolytic Virotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

Oncolytic viruses (OVs), without harming normal tissues, selectively infect and replicate within tumor cells, to release immune molecules and tumor antigens, achieving immune-mediated destruction of tumors and making them one of the most promising immunotherapies for cancer. Many clinical studies have demonstrated that OVs can provide clinical benefits for patients with different types of tumors, at various stages, including metastatic and previously untreatable cases. When OVs are used in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and other treatments, they can synergistically enhance the therapeutic effects. The concept of oncolytic virotherapy (OVT) was proposed in the early 20th century. With advancements in genetic engineering, genetically modified viruses can further enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. In recent years, global research on OV treatment of malignant tumors has increased dramatically. This article comprehensively reviews the findings from relevant research and clinical trials, providing an overview of the development of OVT and its application in the clinical treatment of head and neck cancer. The aim is to offer insights for future clinical and fundamental research on OVT.

Plumbagin has an inhibitory effect on the growth of TSCC PDX model and it enhances the anticancer efficacy of cisplatin

BACKGROUND

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas are the sixth most common malignant tumors worldwide. Tongue squamous cell carcinoma is a common malignant tumor of this type, and it is associated with poor prognosis, a high rate of recurrence and a low survival rate. Plumbagin is derived from Plumbago zeylanica L, several studies report that plumbagin could inhibit cell, tumor metastasis, induce apoptosis in various cancer cells. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model can maintain the heterogeneity and microenvironment of human tumors, is a powerful research tool for developing potentially effective therapies for TSCC.

METHODS

Tumor tissues obtained from TSCC patients were implanted into immunodeficient mice to establish TSCC PDX models. Subsequently, the PDX models were used to evaluate the anti-tumor effects of plumbagin on TSCC. Furthermore, we conducted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and explored the mRNA expression profiles between the treatment and control groups. We selected eight mRNAs related to the characteristics and prognosis of TSCC patients for further analysis.

RESULTS

Plumbagin could inhibit the growth of TSCC PDX models and inhibit expression of Akt/mTOR pathway. In addition, plumbagin was shown to increase drug sensitivity to cisplatin. The eight mRNAs selected for further analysis, AXL, SCG5, VOPP1, DCBLD2 and DRAM1 are cancer-promoting genes, DUSP1, AQP5 and BLNK are cancer suppressor genes. And they were related to the diagnosis, growth, prognosis, and immune cell infiltration in TSCC patients.

CONCLUSION

Plumbagin exhibits an inhibitory effect on the growth of the PDX model of TSCC. Moreover, plumbagin enhances the inhibitory effects of cisplatin.

A phase 2 study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus durvalumab in resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) are treated with surgery followed by adjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy or definitive chemoradiation, but recurrence rates are high. Immune checkpoint blockade improves survival in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC; however, the role of chemo-immunotherapy in the curative setting is not established.

METHODS

This phase 2, single-arm, multicenter study evaluated neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel, and durvalumab in patients with resectable locally advanced HNSCC. The primary end point was a hypothesized pathologic complete response rate of 50%. After chemo-immunotherapy and surgical resection, patients received study-defined, pathologic risk adapted adjuvant therapy consisting of either durvalumab alone (low risk), involved field radiation plus weekly cisplatin and durvalumab (intermediate risk), or standard chemoradiation plus durvalumab (high risk).

RESULTS

Between December 2017 and November 2021, 39 subjects were enrolled at three centers. Oral cavity was the most common primary site (69%). A total of 35 of 39 subjects underwent planned surgical resection; one subject had a delay in surgery due to treatment-related toxicity. The most common treatment-related adverse events were cytopenias, fatigue, and nausea. Post treatment imaging demonstrated an objective response rate of 57%. Pathologic complete response and major pathologic response were achieved in 29% and 49% of subjects who underwent planned surgery, respectively. The 1-year progression-free survival was 83.8% (95% confidence interval, 67.4%-92.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel, and durvalumab before surgical resection of HNSCC were safe and feasible. Although the primary end point was not met, encouraging rates of pathologic complete response and clinical to pathologic downstaging were observed.

Clinical implications of heat shock protein 70 in oral carcinogenesis and prediction of progression and recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients: a retrospective clinicopathological study

BACKGROUND

Oral cancer is a common cause of death worldwide. The search for novel biomarkers for oral cancer is an ongoing struggle. Prognostic biomarkers are of great importance in diagnosis, and prediction of the cancer outcome. There are several disagreements in oral cancer studies over the role of heat shock proteins as prognostic markers. The current study investigated HSP70 expression in diverse tissues ranging from normal oral mucosa to dysplastic oral epithelium and oral squamous cell carcinoma to determine its role in oral carcinogenesis. Moreover, HSP70 was evaluated concerning different prognostic parameters to determine its capability in predicting cancer progression. Recurrence of tumor was recorded, and patients` disease-free survival was calculated and analyzed considering HSP70 expression to determine the potential utility of HSP70 immuno-expression in predicting recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective study was accomplished on 50 cases of OSCC. Biopsies from the cancerous tissue, the free surgical margin, and the normal oral mucosa were used. The grading of dysplastic epithelium and OSCCs followed the criteria of WHO classification (2017). The clinicopathological and follow-up records for each patient were retrieved. Pearson's Chi-square test, one-way ANOVA, and post hoc tests were used to analyze the variance of HSP70 immuno-expression concerning different parameters. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compute and visualize disease-free survival, and the log-rank test was used to analyze the data. With Cox regression, univariate and multivariate survival analyses were run. A P-value of 0.05 or less was regarded as statistically significant.

RESULTS

A significant increased expression of HSP70 was observed as the tissue progressed from normal to dysplastic epithelium, and carcinoma (P = 0.000). HSP70 revealed a significant increased expression by progression from mild to severe dysplasia (P = 0.023), and also from well to moderately and poorly differentiated carcinoma (P = 0.000). High HSP70 immuno-expression was significantly associated with progression of OSCC; large-sized tumors (P = 0.002), advanced TNM clinical stages (P = 0.001), positive nodal involvement (P = 0.001), presence of recurrence (P = .008), and reduced DFS (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

HSP70 has a crucial contribution to oral carcinogenesis, and its immune-expression could potentially be used as predictor of progression and recurrence of OSCC patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

Definitive Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Cancers: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center

Mansi AgrawalVidya KonduruBackground  Oral cavity cancers require definitive surgical resection as the primary treatment, but with advanced T stage, complete resection with pathologically negative margins might be difficult to achieve. Induction chemotherapy helps achieve the balance between resection and morbidity in locally advanced technically unresectable tumors. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of surgery in locally advanced, technically unresectable oral cavity cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Materials and Methods  A retrospective analysis of patients with borderline resectable, locally advanced oral cavity cancers who were given NACT between February 2017 and December 2021 was conducted. Data regarding clinical and pathological characteristics, NACT, surgery, adjuvant therapy, and recurrences was analyzed. Results  Of the 69 patients in the study, 69.6% had tongue cancer, rest were gingivobuccal complex cancers. All tumors were resected based on the post-NACT tumor volume and clear margins were achieved in 42% of cases. About 85.4% of the tongue cancers required a lesser resection than anticipated, thereby following the concept of organ and functional preservation post-NACT as proposed by Licitra et al. About 30.4% had ypT0 and 17.4% had ypN0. Recurrence and survival rates noted in our study were comparable to those reported in literature. Lymph node density of more than or equal to 0.07 was found in all recurrent cases. Conclusions  Induction chemotherapy offers a chance of achieving adequate surgical resection while reducing morbidity and improving functional outcomes for patients with technically unresectable oral cavity cancers. Nodal disease may not respond to chemotherapy as well as the primary tumor. There is a need for comprehensive evaluation of prognostic factors, which could help identify the patients who will most benefit with NACT.

Neoadjuvant use of oncolytic herpes virus G47Δ prevents local recurrence after insufficient resection in tongue cancer models

A complete resection of tongue cancer is often difficult. We investigate the usefulness of administering G47Δ (teserpaturev), a triple-mutated oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1, prior to resection. G47Δ exhibits good cytopathic effects and replication capabilities in all head and neck cancer cell lines tested. In an orthotopic SCCVII tongue cancer model of C3H/He mice, an intratumoral inoculation with G47Δ significantly prolongs the survival. Further, mice with orthotopic tongue cancer received neoadjuvant G47Δ (or mock) therapy with or without "hemilateral" resection, the maximum extent avoiding surgical deaths. Neoadjuvant G47Δ and resection led to 10/10 survival (120 days), whereas the survivals for G47Δ alone and resection alone were 6/10 and 5/10, respectively: all control animals died by day 11. Furthermore, 100% survival was achieved with neoadjuvant G47Δ therapy even when the resection area was narrowed to "partial," providing insufficient resection margins, whereas hemilateral resection alone caused death by local recurrence in half of the animals. G47Δ therapy caused increased number of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ and CD4+ cells, increased F4/80+ cells within the residual tongues, and increased expression of immune-related genes in and around the tumor. These results imply that neoadjuvant use of G47Δ is useful for preventing local recurrence after tongue cancer surgery.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

Surgery is a common treatment option in oral cavity cancer (and less frequently in oropharyngeal cancer) to remove the primary tumour and sometimes neck lymph nodes. People with early-stage disease may undergo surgery alone or surgery plus radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy/biotherapy, or a combination of these. Timing and extent of surgery varies. This is the third update of a review originally published in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relative benefits and harms of different surgical treatment modalities for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 9 February 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared two or more surgical treatment modalities, or surgery versus other treatment modalities, for primary tumours of the oral cavity or oropharynx.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Our primary outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival, locoregional recurrence, and recurrence; and our secondary outcomes were adverse effects of treatment, quality of life, direct and indirect costs to patients and health services, and participant satisfaction. We used standard Cochrane methods. We reported survival data as hazard ratios (HRs). For overall survival, we reported the HR of mortality, and for disease-free survival, we reported the combined HR of new disease, progression, and mortality; therefore, HRs below 1 indicated improvement in these outcomes. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified four new trials, bringing the total number of included trials to 15 (2820 participants randomised, 2583 participants analysed). For objective outcomes, we assessed four trials at high risk of bias, three at low risk, and eight at unclear risk. The trials evaluated nine comparisons; none compared different surgical approaches for excision of the primary tumour. Five trials evaluated elective neck dissection (ND) versus therapeutic (delayed) ND in people with oral cavity cancer and clinically negative neck nodes. Elective ND compared with therapeutic ND probably improves overall survival (HR 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 0.83; I2 = 0%; 4 trials, 883 participants; moderate certainty) and disease-free survival (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.70; I2 = 12%; 5 trials, 954 participants; moderate certainty), and probably reduces locoregional recurrence (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.78; I2 = 0%; 4 trials, 458 participants; moderate certainty) and recurrence (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.70; I2 = 0%; 3 trials, 633 participants; moderate certainty). Elective ND is probably associated with more adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 1.31, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.54; I2 = 0%; 2 trials, 746 participants; moderate certainty). Two trials evaluated elective radical ND versus elective selective ND in people with oral cavity cancer, but we were unable to pool the data as the trials used different surgical procedures. Neither study found evidence of a difference in overall survival (pooled measure not estimable; very low certainty). We are unsure if there is a difference in effect on disease-free survival (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.11; 1 trial, 104 participants; very low certainty) or recurrence (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.33; 1 trial, 143 participants; very low certainty). There may be no difference between the interventions in terms of adverse events (1 trial, 148 participants; low certainty). Two trials evaluated superselective ND versus selective ND, but we were unable to use the data. One trial evaluated supraomohyoid ND versus modified radical ND in 332 participants. We were unable to use any of the primary outcome data. The evidence on adverse events was very uncertain, with more complications, pain, and poorer shoulder function in the modified radical ND group. One trial evaluated sentinel node biopsy versus elective ND in 279 participants. There may be little or no difference between the interventions in overall survival (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.11; low certainty), disease-free survival (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.07; low certainty), or locoregional recurrence (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.19; low certainty). The trial provided no usable data for recurrence, and reported no adverse events (very low certainty). One trial evaluated positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) following chemoradiotherapy (with ND only if no or incomplete response) versus planned ND (before or after chemoradiotherapy) in 564 participants. There is probably no difference between the interventions in overall survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.31; moderate certainty) or locoregional recurrence (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.06; moderate certainty). One trial evaluated surgery plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone and provided very low-certainty evidence of better overall survival in the surgery plus radiotherapy group (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.59; 35 participants). The data were unreliable because the trial stopped early and had multiple protocol violations. In terms of adverse events, subcutaneous fibrosis was more frequent in the surgery plus radiotherapy group, but there were no differences in other adverse events (very low certainty). One trial evaluated surgery versus radiotherapy alone for oropharyngeal cancer in 68 participants. There may be little or no difference between the interventions for overall survival (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.09 to 7.46; low certainty) or disease-free survival (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.27 to 4.22; low certainty). For adverse events, there were too many outcomes to draw reliable conclusions. One trial evaluated surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy versus chemotherapy. We were unable to use the data for any of the outcomes reported (very low certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found moderate-certainty evidence based on five trials that elective neck dissection of clinically negative neck nodes at the time of removal of the primary oral cavity tumour is superior to therapeutic neck dissection, with increased survival and disease-free survival, and reduced locoregional recurrence. There was moderate-certainty evidence from one trial of no difference between positron emission tomography (PET-CT) following chemoradiotherapy versus planned neck dissection in terms of overall survival or locoregional recurrence. The evidence for each of the other seven comparisons came from only one or two studies and was assessed as low or very low-certainty.

Overexpression of CD73 is associated with recurrence and poor prognosis of gingivobuccal oral cancer as revealed by transcriptome and deep immune profiling of paired tumor and margin tissues

BACKGROUND

For various cancers, differences in response to treatment and subsequent survival period have been reported to be associated with variation in immune contextures.

AIM

We sought to identify whether such association exists in respect of gingivobuccal oral cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed deep immune profiling of tumor and margin tissues collected from 46 treatment naïve, Human Papillomavirus (HPV) negative, patients. Each patient was followed for 24 months and prognosis (recurrence/death) noted. Key findings were validated by comparing with TCGA-HNSC cohort data.

RESULTS

About 28% of patients showed poor post-treatment prognosis. These patients exhibited a high probability of recurrence even within 1 year and death within 2 years. There was restricted immune cell infiltration in tumor, but not in margin, among these patients. Reduced expression of eight immune-related genes (IRGs) (NT5E, THRA, RBP1, TLR4, ITGA6, BMPR1B, ITGAV, SSTR1) in tumor strongly predicted better quality of prognosis, both in our patient cohort and in TCGA-HNSC cohort. Tumors of patients with better prognosis were associated with (a) lower CD73+ cells with concomitant lower expression level of NT5E/CD73, (b) higher proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, NK cells, M1 macrophages, (c) higher %Granzyme+ cells, (d) higher TCR and BCR repertoire diversities. CD73 expression in tumor was associated with low CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, low immune repertoire diversity, and advanced cancer stage.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

High infiltration of anti-tumor immune cells in both tumors and margins results in good prognosis, while in patients with minimal infiltration in tumors in spite of high infiltration in margins results in poor prognosis. Targeted CD73 immune-checkpoint inhibition may improve clinical outcome.

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective single-arm trial (Illuminate Trial)

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (LAOSCC) is associated with a high rate of recurrence and poor survival. Given the recent successes of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAICT) in solid tumors, it is promising to use this treatment modality to achieve a better pathological response and improve the survival of LAOSCC, and clinical evidence is needed to assess its safety and efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective trial of NAICT with toripalimab (PD-1 inhibitor) and albumin paclitaxel/cisplatin (TTP) was conducted in patients with clinical stage III and IVA OSCC. Intravenous albumin paclitaxel (260 mg/m 2 ), cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 ), and toripalimab (240 mg) were given in sequence on day 1 of each 21 day cycle for two cycles, followed by radical surgery and risk-adapted adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. The primary endpoints were safety and major pathological response (MPR). Targeted next generation sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence were performed to assess clinical molecular characteristics and the tumor immune microenvironment in the pre-NAICT and post-NAICT tumor samples.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled. NAICT was well-tolerated with a low incidence of grades 3-4 adverse events in three patients. The completion rates of NAICT and subsequent R0 resection were 100%. The MPR rate was 60%, including a 30% pathological complete response. MPR was achieved in all four patients with a combined positive score of PD-L1>10. The density of tertiary lymphatic structure in post-NAICT tumor samples predicted the pathological response to NAICT. During the median 23-month follow-up, the disease-free survival was 90%, and the overall survival was 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

NAICT with the TTP protocol in LAOSCC is feasible and well tolerated, with a promising MPR and no obstruction on subsequent surgery. This trial is supportive of further randomized trials using NAICT in LAOSCC.

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab with preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Background

This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (LA-HNSCCs).

Methods

In this prospective, single-arm, single-centre clinical trial, patients meeting the inclusion criteria were treated with preoperative neoadjuvant therapy with 200 mg pembrolizumab combined with 75 mg/m2 cisplatin and 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel. This was followed by surgery and postoperative adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was the postoperative pathological complete response (pCR) rate. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.

Results

A total of 22 patients were enrolled. The location of primary lesion showed: hypopharynx were 15 (68.2%), oropharynx were 6 (27.3%) and oral cavity was 1 (4.5%). The postoperative pCR rate, was 36.4% (8/22), and there was no delay to surgery due to adverse drug reactions. The rate of laryngeal function preservation was 90.9% (20/22). Delayed wound healing was the main surgical complication, with an incidence of 22.7% (5/22). The median follow-up time was 9.5 months, and only 1 patient (4.55%) suffered a regional recurrence.

Conclusion

Preoperative treatment with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in resectable LA-HNSCC has a high pCR rate with no significant impact on surgical safety. This treatment was found to increase the rate of laryngeal function preservation. However, the effects of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on long-term prognosis in LA-HNSCCs require further study.

Survival Outcomes and Factors Affecting Survival in Resectable Locally Advanced Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Management of locally advanced OSCC include primary surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy or chemo radiation, concurrent chemo radiation, induction chemotherapy followed by surgery or non surgical methods. In resectable disease the role of induction chemotherapy is questionable and surgery remains the first choice. In this study we aimed at evaluating the survival and factors effecting survival in locally advanced oral cancer. retrospective review of patient records was made. Kaplan Meir method was used to evaluate OS and DFS rate and log rank test was used to compare the survival amongst groups. Cox regression analysis (univariate and multivariate) was used to evaluate the hazard ratio to find out the possible factors influencing risk of death and disease. The 3 year OS of the entire cohort was 56.80% and 3 year DFS was 52.4%. ECS, surgical margin, PNI, LVI and LN size were independent risk factors for poor overall and disease free survival. We identified ECS, positive margin, LVI, PNI and LN size as independent risk factors effecting survival. These factors justify the use of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemo radiation according to the already available guidelines.

Current Treatment Strategies and Risk Stratification for Oral Carcinoma

Management of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) involves a multidisciplinary team approach. Surgery is ideally the primary treatment option for nonmetastatic OSCC, and less invasive curative surgical approaches are preferred in early-stage disease to minimize surgical-related morbidity. For patients at high risk of recurrence, adjuvant treatment using radiation therapy or chemoradiation is often used. Systemic therapy may also be used in the neoadjuvant setting (for advanced-stage disease with the intent of mandibular preservation) or in the palliative setting (for nonsalvageable locoregional recurrence and/or distant metastases). Patient involvement in treatment decision is the key for patient-driven management, particularly in clinical situation with poor prognosis, for example, early postoperative recurrence before planned adjuvant therapy.

Management and outcome of locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma

Management of locally advanced OSCC is multimodal. No single therapy has been proved to be efficacious. However there is a trend towards surgical intervention in operable disease. In this review we appraise the various therapies used for the management of locally advanced OSCC. We review the literature with regards to the various treatment options for locally advanced OSCC. We categorically divided the manuscript into resectable, unresectable and technically unresectable disease. Surgery is the ideal treatment modality for resectable disease. For unresectable disease concurrent chemoradiation appears to improve survival compared to radiotherapy alone. Induction therapy might downstage tumors in the unresectable category. Targeted and Immunotherapy is reserved for recurrent, metastatic or platinum refractory OSCC. Management of locally advanced OSCC is multimodal with surgery playing the primary role. In the event where the tumor is in operable concurrent chemoradiotherapy is regarded as the best treatment modality. Induction chemotherapy currently cannot be recommended for resectable or even unresectable oral squamous cell carcinomas. However for technically unresectable disease it might play a role in improving respectability but it depends on the response of the tumor. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy is currently used for recurrent, metastatic and/or platinum refractory Head and Neck cancers. Currently it is not recommended for initial management of locally advanced disease.

Can adjuvant radiotherapy be omitted for oral cavity cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery? A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgery and postoperative adjuvant therapy comprise the standard treatment for locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma (LAROSCC), while preoperative neoadjuvant therapy is being explored without sufficient confirmation of improved survival. De-escalation regimens after neoadjuvant therapy, such as those omitting adjuvant radiotherapy, may provide comparable or better outcomes, suggesting rigorous assessment of adjuvant therapy outcomes is needed in LAROSCC patients. The authors thus performed this retrospective study in LAROSCC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery, to compare the outcomes for overall survival (OS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) between the adjuvant radiotherapy (radio) and nonradiotherapy (nonradio) cohorts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with LAROSCC who received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery were enrolled and divided into radio and nonradio cohorts to determine whether adjuvant radiotherapy could be omitted after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2021, 192 patients were enrolled. No significant differences were found in OS or LRFS between the radio and nonradio patient cohorts. The 10-year estimated OS rates were 58.9 versus 44.1% in radio versus nonradio cohorts, while 10-year estimated LRFS rates were 55.4 versus 48.2%, respectively. For clinical stage III patients, 10-year OS rates were 62.3 versus 62.6% (radio vs. nonradio), and estimated 10-year LRFS rates were 56.5 versus 60.7% (radio vs. nonradio). Multivariate Cox regression modeling of postoperative variables showed pathologic response of primary tumor and pathologic regional lymph nodes staging were associated with survival, while the adjuvant radiotherapy exposure was not included in the model due to nonsignificance.

CONCLUSION

These findings support further prospective evaluation of adjuvant radiotherapy omission, and suggest that de-escalation trials are warranted for LAROSCC surgery patients who received neoadjuvant therapy.

Reliability of gene-expression profiling from tumor biopsy for refining neoadjuvant strategies in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

While recent clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors showed promising results in a subset of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), there is a need for the identification of robust biomarkers in tumor biopsies to improve patient selection. This context suggests unravelling transcriptomic heterogeneity between untreated paired samples from same patient with HNSCC. Based on previous studies and the analysis of publicly available gene expression profiles of paired tumor biopsies and surgical resection specimens, we discuss the reliability of tumor biopsy to capture the overall activation of targetable biological pathways in patients with HNSCC. Further studies investigating intratumor transcriptomic heterogeneity as well as the effect of sampling methods on gene expression are needed in patients with HNSCC, in order to develop innovative and relevant biomarker-driven neoadjuvant strategies.

Assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil in patients with oral cavity cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF) has been studied in patients with head and neck cancer. Its impact on patients with oral cavity cancer was not specified.

METHODS

We consecutively reviewed medical files of patients with untreated oral cavity cancer who received neoadjuvant TPF chemotherapy in our department from January 2017 to April 2020. Outcomes included the objective response to TPF chemotherapy, factors associated with the response, and progression and survival in different response groups.

RESULTS

A total of 167 patients were included, with half of stage IV disease. Complete or partial response was observed in 51 patients. A total of 91 patients had stable disease, and 25 patients had progressive disease. The response was not associated with age, sex, anatomic subsite, and the tumor's T stage. It was related with N stage (p < 0.001) and clinical stage (p = 0.004). Most patients with bulky nodes or nodes with obvious necrosis showed low response or even progressed after neoadjuvant TPF chemotherapy. The planned surgery was conducted in 159 patients. Disease relapse mostly occurred in 2 years after treatment. The 2-year overall survival and the progression-free survival were 89.0% and 85.2% for patients with complete or partial response, 62.4% and 55.6% for patients with stable disease, and 12.5% and 4.2% for patients with progressive disease, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The response of neoadjuvant TPF chemotherapy in patients with oral cavity cancer is related to disease stage, especially the nodal stage. Patients with complete or partial response developed less progression events and better survival.

Response to induction chemotherapy predicts survival outcomes in oropharyngeal cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of induction chemotherapy (IC) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) remains controversial. Its interpretation can be confounded by heterogeneity in chemosensitivity and human papillomavirus (HPV) status. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of IC response in HPV-positive and -negative OPSCC.

METHODS

Patients with OPSCC who underwent IC and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Radiologic response to IC by ≥50% was defined as IC-sensitive (IC-s), while lesser response was deemed as IC-resistant (IC-r). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 51 HPV-positive and 57 HPV-negative patients were included. IC-s patients accounted for 55.6%, 62.7%, and 49.1% in the entire cohort, HPV-positive, and HPV-negative subgroup, respectively. Compared with IC-r subgroup, IC-s was associated with better clinical outcomes either in the entire cohort (3y-PFS 91.7%vs.43.7%, P < 0.001; 3y-OS 98.3% vs. 67.4%, P = 0.002), the HPV-positive subgroup (3-year PFS 94.7% vs. 47.9%, P < 0.001; 3-year OS 100% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.055) or the HPV-negative subgroup (3-year PFS 88.2% vs. 40.9%, P = 0.001; 3-year OS 96.4% vs. 63.1%, P = 0.026). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that response to IC represents an independent prognosticator for 3-year PFS (HR, 0.088; 95% CI, 0.027-0.289; P < 0.001) and 3-year OS (HR, 0.100; 95% CI, 0.021-0.477; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Response to IC exerts a critical predictive effect on prognosis of both HPV-positive and -negative OPSCC. Personalized treatment strategy based on IC response is worthy of further exploration in the future.

Treatment outcomes of primary surgery versus chemoradiotherapy for T4 oropharyngeal cancers

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been the standard of care for locally advanced diseases regardless of human papillomavirus infection status. Other treatment options include surgery followed by adjuvant therapy and induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT or radiotherapy. However, for locally advanced T4 laryngeal or hypopharyngeal diseases, surgery is preferred over CCRT. Given the improvement in the functional outcomes of surgery, examining the oncologic outcomes in OPSCC patients is critical. This study aimed to determine whether differences in overall survival (OS) exist between surgery and CCRT. Oropharyngeal cancer patients included in the cancer registry of our hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with T4 disease who underwent curative treatment were identified. In this study, the primary and secondary outcomes were OS and disease-free survival (DFS), respectively. Potential confounding factors were also evaluated. Details regarding recurrence pattern were listed. From 2014 to 2018, 74 newly diagnosed oropharyngeal cancer patients were identified from our cancer registry database, 60 of whom satisfied our inclusion criteria. Our findings showed an OS of 25.5 months and DFS of 17.5 months. No significant difference in both of OS and DFS were observed between the surgery and CCRT cohorts. Sex, stage, second primary cancer, IC, and primary treatment were not correlated with DFS. Male sex was the only significant factor identified, with an HR of 0.2 for OS (95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.71). No significant difference in both OS and DFS were observed between the CCRT and surgery cohorts. CCRT remains the standard of care for locally advanced disease.

Potential use of EGFR-targeted molecular therapies for tumor suppressor CYLD-negative and poor prognosis oral squamous cell carcinoma with chemoresistance

BACKGROUND

Tumor suppressor CYLD dysfunction by loss of its expression, triggers malignant transformation, especially drug resistance and tumor invasion/metastasis. Although loss of CYLD expression is significantly associated with poor prognosis in a large variety of tumors, no clinically-effective treatment for CYLD-negative cancer patients is available.

METHODS

We focused on oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), and sought to develop novel therapeutic agents for CYLD-negative cancer patients with poor prognosis. CYLD-knockdown OSCC cells by using CYLD-specific siRNA, were used to elucidate and determine the efficacy of novel drug candidates by evaluating cell viability and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like change. Therapeutic effects of candidate drug on cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) model and usefulness of CYLD as a novel biomarker using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model were further investigated.

RESULTS

CYLD-knockdown OSCC cells were resistant for all currently-available cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents for OSCC, such as, cisplatin, 5-FU, carboplatin, docetaxel, and paclitaxel. By using comprehensive proteome analysis approach, we identified epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a receptor tyrosine kinase, played key roles in CYLD-knockdown OSCC cells. Indeed, cell survival rate in the cisplatin-resistant CYLD-knockdown OSCC cells was markedly inhibited by treatment with clinically available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), such as gefitinib. In addition, gefitinib was significantly effective for not only cell survival, but also EMT-like changes through inhibiting transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling in CYLD-knockdown OSCC cells. Thereby, overall survival of CYLD-knockdown CDX models was significantly prolonged by gefitinib treatment. Moreover, we found that CYLD expression was significantly associated with gefitinib response by using PDX models.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results first revealed that EGFR-targeted molecular therapies, such as EGFR-TKIs, could have potential to be novel therapeutic agents for the CYLD-negative OSCC patients with poor prognosis.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in technically unresectable head and neck cancers: a retrospective audit

Background

The data regarding the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in technically unresectable head and neck cancer (HNC) is limited and real-world studies are needed to look for the efficacy and toxicities of this approach.

Patients and methods

This is a retrospective study conducted in the Medical Oncology department of our hospital. All technically unresectable HNC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy between May 2018 and May 2020 were included in this analysis. Patients received three-drug regimen docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen, two-drug regimens included docetaxel + cisplatin, paclitaxel + carboplatin both weekly and 3-weekly. The resectability assessment was done clinically and radiologically after completing three neoadjuvant cycles. Overall survival was calculated from the first day of chemotherapy to the date of last follow-up or date of death.

Results

A total of 119 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the specified time. Response assessment showed partial response in 41.9% of patients with three-drug regimens and 37.5% of patients with other regimens. Out of 119 patients, 56 (47%) patients were offered radical intent therapy. Resectability was achieved in 32.3% of three-drug regimen patients and 26.1% of other patients. Surgery was feasible in 33 (27.7%) patients, and postoperative radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy were done in 30 patients (25.2%), and surgery with only postoperative radiotherapy was done in 3 patients (2.5%). Radical chemoradiotherapy was done in 23 patients (19.3%). The estimated median survival for patients who could undergo surgery was 18 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 14.9-21.0], and nonsurgical patients were 9 months (95% CI, 7.3-10.6) (p = 0.0001).

Conclusion

Our study shows that neoadjuvant chemotherapy in technically unresectable HNC patients can make the disease resectable in around one-third of the patients. The patients who could undergo surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had significantly improved survival as compared to those who could not.