Intensive chemotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: CALGB 50202 (Alliance 50202)

Primary large B-cell lymphomas of immune-privileged sites

ABSTRACT

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) encompasses a diverse spectrum of aggressive B-cell lymphomas with remarkable genetic heterogeneity and myriad clinical presentations. Multiplatform genomic analyses of DLBCL have identified oncogenic drivers within genetic subtypes that allow for pathologic subclassification of tumors into discrete entities with shared immunophenotypic, genetic, and clinical features. Robust classification of lymphoid tumors establishes a foundation for precision medicine and enables the identification of novel therapeutic vulnerabilities within biologically homogeneous entities. Most cases of DLBCL involving the central nervous system (CNS), vitreous, and testis exhibit immunophenotypic features suggesting an activated B-cell (ABC) origin. Shared molecular features include frequent comutations of MYD88 (L265P) and CD79B and frequent genetic alterations promoting immune evasion, which are hallmarks of the MCD/C5/MYD88 genetic subtype of DLBCL. Clinically, these lymphomas primarily arise within anatomic sanctuary sites and have a predilection for remaining confined to extranodal sites and strong CNS tropism. Given the shared clinical and molecular features, the umbrella term primary large B-cell lymphoma of immune-privileged sites (IP-LBCL) was proposed. Other extranodal DLBCL involving the breast, adrenal glands, and skin are often ABC DLBCL but are more heterogeneous in their genomic profile and involve anatomic sites that are not considered immune privileged. In this review, we describe the overlapping clinical, pathologic, and molecular features of IP-LBCL and highlight important considerations for diagnosis, staging, and treatment. We also discuss potential therapeutic vulnerabilities of IP-LBCL including sensitivity to inhibitors of Bruton tyrosine kinase, immunomodulatory agents, and immunotherapy.

De-escalated Induction Therapy and Thiotepa/Busulfan-based Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Thiotepa-based autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improves survival in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), but > 30% of patients are unable to undergo ASCT following commonly used intensive induction regimens.

METHODS

This retrospective population-based study included consecutive patients ≥ 18 years old with PCNSL who were intended for ASCT in Alberta, Canada between 2011 and 2022. A reduced-intensity induction protocol was further abbreviated in 2018 to decrease toxicity and expediate ASCT by incorporating rituximab, procarbazine, and only 2 doses of high-dose methotrexate and 1 cycle of high-dose cytarabine before consolidation with thiotepa-busulfan conditioning. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Among 71 patients with median age 58 years (range 26-72), ASCT was completed in 56 (79%), with the transplantation rate among patients > 60 years old increasing by 30% following the abbreviation of induction therapy. With median follow-up time 3.9 years, 4-year PFS and OS were 69% (95% CI 56%-79%) and 80% (95% CI 67%-88%) for all patients and 75% (95% CI 57%-86%) and 85% (95% CI 68%-93%) for ASCT recipients, respectively. There was 1 death due to treatment-related mortality during induction and none after ASCT, including among 17 transplanted patients > 60 years old.

CONCLUSION

An abbreviated induction regimen followed by thiotepa-busulfan-based ASCT achieves high transplantation rates with low risks of relapse and treatment-related mortality, thereby providing an effective treatment strategy for PCNSL.

Brain tumor-related epilepsy: an overview on neuropsychological, behavioral, and quality of life issues and assessment methodology

Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is a rare disease in which brain tumor (BT) and epilepsy overlap simultaneously and can have a negative impact on a patient's neuropsychological, behavioral, and quality of life (QoL) spheres. In this review we (a) addressed the main neuropsychological, behavioral, and QoL issues that may occur in BTRE patients, (b) described how BT, BTRE, and their respective treatments can impact these domains, and (c) identified tools and standardized evaluation methodologies specific for BTRE patients. Neuropsychological disorders and behavioral issues can be direct consequences of BTRE and all related treatments, such as surgery, anti-cancer and anti-seizure medication, corticosteroids, etc., which can alter the structure of specific brain areas and networks, and by emotional aspects reactive to BTRE diagnosis, including the possible loss of autonomy, poor prognosis, and fear of death. Unfortunately, it seems there is a lack of uniformity in assessment methodologies, such as the administration of different batteries of neuropsychological tests, different times, frames, and purposes. Further research is needed to establish causality and deepen our understanding of the interplay between all these variables and our intervention in terms of diagnosis, treatment, psychosocial assessment, and their timing. We propose that the care of these patients to rely on the concepts of "BTRE-induced disability" and "biopsychosocial model" of BTRE, to prompt healthcare providers to handle and monitor BTRE-related psychological and social aspects, as to maintain the patient's best possible QoL.

Novel Therapies for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive form of lymphoma that can involve the brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges and eyes. PCNSL prognosis continues to be poor, with 5-year survival rates of 30-40%. Therapeutic options are especially limited for relapsed/refractory (r/r) PCNSL. In recent years, studies shed light on the pathogenesis and oncogenic pathways driving PCNSL, leading to the development of novel therapeutics. In this review, we discuss the evidence supporting these novel agents and present ongoing clinical studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Key oncogenic drivers of PCNSL include activation of the NFkB pathway, cell cycle dysregulation, somatic hypermutation and immune evasion, leading to the investigation of targeted therapeutics and immunotherapeutics to inhibit these pathways. Such approaches include BTK inhibitors, mTOR/PI3K inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents (IMIDs), immune checkpoint inhibitors and CD19-based CAR T-cells. The therapeutic repertoire for PCNSL is rapidly evolving, and a multi-modality approach including intensive chemotherapy regimens and novel therapies will likely be utilized in the future.

Advances in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Optimal initial management can have a significant impact in long-term outcome in primary CNS lymphoma. This article reviews recent advances and the state of the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Genomic analysis of CSF cell-free DNA has emerged as a new diagnostic tool for PCNSL. Treatment options have likewise evolved, with mature data from first-line chemotherapy-based prospective trials disclosing excellent results in younger (< 60-65) patients, with a cure achieved in a majority. However, results in older patients remain dismal, with several new salvage options under investigation including BTK pathway-targeted therapies, and CAR-T cell treatments. Meanwhile, low-dose radiation has emerged as an additional alternative for consolidation therapy. For younger PCNSL patients, the goal of treatment is now a cure, with the next frontier being the development of therapies affording optimized neurocognitive outcome and lower toxicity. Treatment for older patients remains however an unmet need, with several promising clinical trials ongoing.

EGFLAM exhibits oncogenic activity and shows promise as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most lethal primary brain tumor, characterized by dismal survival rates. Novel molecular targets are urgently required to enhance therapeutic outcomes. A combination of bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation was employed to investigate the role of EGFLAM in GBM. The Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas provided a platform for gene expression profiling, while siRNA-mediated knockdown and overexpression assays in GBM cell lines, alongside in vivo tumorigenesis models, facilitated functional validation. EGFLAM was found to be significantly overexpressed in GBM tissues, correlating with adverse prognostic factors and higher tumor grades, particularly in patients over the age of 41. Functional assays indicated that EGFLAM is vital for maintaining GBM cell proliferation, viability, and invasiveness. Knockdown of EGFLAM expression led to a marked decrease in tumorigenic capabilities. Proteomic interactions involving EGFLAM, such as with NUP205, were implicated in cell cycle regulation, providing insight into its oncogenic mechanism. In vivo studies further demonstrated that silencing EGFLAM expression could inhibit tumor growth, underscoring its therapeutic potential. The study identifies EGFLAM as a pivotal oncogenic factor in GBM, serving as both a prognostic biomarker and a viable therapeutic target. These findings lay the groundwork for future research into EGFLAM-targeted therapies, aiming to improve clinical outcomes for GBM patients.

Sintilimab (anti-PD-1 antibody) combined with high-dose methotrexate, temozolomide, and rituximab (anti-CD20 antibody) in primary central nervous system lymphoma: a phase 2 study

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and frequently fatal lymphoma subtype. The programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway has emerged as a potential therapeutic target, but the effectiveness of PD-1 antibody sintilimab in combination with immunochemotherapy as a frontline treatment for PCNSL remains to be determined. In this phase 2 trial (ChiCTR1900027433) with a safety run-in, we included patients aged 18-70 with newly diagnosed PCNSL. Participants underwent six 21-day cycles of a SMTR regimen, which includes sintilimab (200 mg, Day 0), rituximab (375 mg/m2, Day 0), methotrexate (3.0 g/m2, Day 1 or 1.0 g/m2 for patients aged ≥65 years), and temozolomide (150 mg/m2/d, Days 1-5). Among 27 evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 96.3% (95% confidence interval: 81-99.9%), with 25 complete responses. At a median follow-up of 24.4 months, the medians for duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were not reached. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities were increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (17.9%) and aspartate aminotransferase (14.3%). Additionally, baseline levels of interferon-α and the IL10/IL6 ratio in cerebrospinal fluid emerged as potential predictors of PFS, achieving areas under the curve of 0.88 and 0.84, respectively, at 2 years. Whole-exome sequencing revealed a higher prevalence of RTK-RAS and PI3K pathway mutations in the durable clinical benefit group, while a greater frequency of Notch and Hippo pathway mutations in the no durable benefit group. These findings suggest the SMTR regimen is highly efficacious and tolerable for newly diagnosed PCNSL, warranting further investigation.

Myeloablative vs nonmyeloablative consolidation for primary central nervous system lymphoma: results of Alliance 51101

ABSTRACT

Although it is evident that standard-dose whole-brain radiotherapy as consolidation is associated with significant neurotoxicity, the optimal consolidative strategy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is not defined. We performed a randomized phase 2 clinical trial via the US Alliance cancer cooperative group to compare myeloablative consolidation supported by autologous stem cell transplantation with nonmyeloablative consolidation after induction therapy for PCNSL. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial to be initiated that eliminates whole-brain radiotherapy as a consolidative approach in newly diagnosed PCNSL. Patients aged 18 to 75 years were randomly assigned in a 1:1 manner to induction therapy (methotrexate, temozolomide, rituximab, and cytarabine) followed by consolidation with either thiotepa plus carmustine and autologous stem cell rescue vs induction followed by nonmyeloablative, infusional etoposide plus cytarabine. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 113 patients were randomized, and 108 (54 in each arm) were evaluable. More patients in the nonmyeloablative arm experienced progressive disease or death during induction (28% vs 11%; P = .05). Thirty-six patients received autologous stem cell transplant, and 34 received nonmyeloablative consolidation. The estimated 2-year PFS was higher in the myeloablative vs nonmyeloablative arm (73% vs 51%; P = .02). However, a planned secondary analysis, landmarked at start of the consolidation, revealed that the estimated 2-year PFS in those who completed consolidation therapy was not significantly different between the arms (86% vs 71%; P = .21). Both consolidative strategies yielded encouraging efficacy and similar toxicity profiles. This trial was registered at www.clininicals.gov as #NCT01511562.

Diagnostics and treatment delay in primary central nervous system lymphoma: What the neurosurgeon should know

PURPOSE

The gold standard for diagnostics in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is histopathological diagnosis after stereotactic biopsy. Yet, PCNSL has a multidisciplinary diagnostic work up, which associated with diagnostic delay and could result in treatment delay. This article offers recommendations to neurosurgeons involved in clinical decision-making regarding (novel) diagnostics and care for patients with PCNSL with the aim to improve uniformity and timeliness of the diagnostic process for patients with PCNSL.

METHODS

We present a mini review to discuss the role of stereotactic biopsy in the context of novel developments in diagnostics for PCNSL, as well as the role for cytoreductive surgery.

RESULTS

Cerebrospinal fluid-based diagnostics are supplementary and cannot replace stereotactic biopsy-based diagnostics.

CONCLUSION

Histopathological diagnosis after stereotactic biopsy of the brain remains the gold standard for diagnosis. Additional diagnostics should not be a cause of diagnostic delay. There is currently no sufficient evidence supporting cytoreductive surgery in PCNSL, with recent studies showing contradictive data and suboptimal study designs.

Lenalidomide, rituximab, and methotrexate are effective in newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma

Not available.

Primary central nervous system lymphomas: EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

This EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations for managing primary DLBCL of the CNS.The guideline covers clinical, imaging and pathological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up.Algorithms for first-line and salvage treatments are provided.The author group encompasses a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe.Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors' collective expert opinion.

The role of upfront lenalidomide maintenance for primary central nervous system lymphoma following first-line methotrexate treatment: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Consolidation therapy improves the duration of response among patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Lenalidomide maintenance has shown encouraging results in older patients with PCNSL. Herein, we performed a retrospective, single-center analysis to evaluate the effect of lenalidomide maintenance on the duration of response in patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL.

METHODS

Sixty-nine adult patients with PCNSL who achieved complete remission or partial remission (PR) after induction therapy were enrolled. The median age of patients was 58.0 years. The maintenance group (n = 35) received oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day) for 21 days, every 28 days for 24 months; the observation group did not undergo any further treatment.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 32.6 months, the maintenance group experienced fewer relapse events. However, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was similar between groups (36.1 vs. 30.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.446). Lenalidomide maintenance significantly improved PFS and overall survival (OS) only among patients who experienced PR after induction. The median duration of lenalidomide maintenance was 18 months; lenalidomide was well tolerated and minimally impacted the quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study was the first to evaluate lenalidomide maintenance as a frontline treatment among patients with PCNSL, PFS and OS did not improve, although the safety profile was satisfactory.

The natural history of neurolymphomatosis

BACKGROUND

Neurolymphomatosis is a lymphoid malignancy of the peripheral nervous system and its natural history is poorly understood.

METHODS

We performed PubMed search and extracted clinical data for Kaplan-Meier statistics to determine outcome parameters over time. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to compare prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Our search identified 559 patients and their median age was 61 years. Median overall survival (OS) was 12.0 (range 10.0-15.0) months. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was the most frequent histology, involving the brachial plexus, cranial nerves, and sciatic nerve. None had molecular profiling. There was a progressive lengthening of OS in successive decades, from 0.5 (95% CI 0.0-0.8) to 26.4 (95% CI 18.0-34.8) months between 1951 and 2022 (r2 = 0.0528, p < 0.00001). Time from first treatment (treatment 1) to progression increased from 2.0 to 36.0 (95% CI 6.5-50.7) months (r2 = 0.0961, p = 0.00236). Time from symptom onset to diagnosis remained unchanged (r2 = 0.0000556, p = 0.939). Patients were most frequently treated with methotrexate, rituximab, and/or radiation either alone or in combination. Primary neurolymphomatosis had a better prognosis than secondary neurolymphomatosis. No OS difference was noted between B- and T-cell disease, but low-grade B-cell performed better than Burkitt's lymphoma.

DISCUSSION

Better outcome for patients with neurolymphomatosis is noted over time. But timely diagnosis remains a major problem that needs improvement.

Comparison of differing dose levels of methotrexate for patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

It has long been established that high-dose methotrexate is an essential part of therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma. When regimens utilizing high-dose methotrexate were first studied, a dose of 8 g/m2 was used. More recently, reduced dosing strategies have been studied and adopted in attempts to reduce rates of adverse events. Studies utilizing 3.5 g/m2 of methotrexate have shown promising outcomes and improved rates of adverse events but there have never been any randomized head-to-head studies of differing dose levels of high-dose methotrexate. The purpose of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of different dosing strategies of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

METHODS

This single center retrospective review was conducted between 07/01/2013 to 6/3/2020. The patient population was separated into two arms based upon dose of methotrexate. The high intensity (HiHD) arm was defined as patients who received doses > 3.5 g/m2, while the low intensity (LiHD) arm received ≤ 3.5 g/m2. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints include efficacy via 2-year overall survival (OS), progression to transplant, and utilization of consolidation or salvage therapy. Safety was assessed through monitoring of relevant laboratory studies.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients were included in this analysis. Baseline demographics were similar between groups, with the LiHD group trending toward older age. There were 78 patients eligible for assessment for ORR; there was no significant difference between the two groups (42.0% LiHD vs. 44.4% HiHD; p = 1.0). Rates of OS, progression to transplant and progression to consolidation chemotherapy were not different between groups. There were statistically significantly higher rates of renal and/or hepatic dysfunction with the first dose in the HiHD group compared with the LiHD group (11.5% LiHD vs. 64.3% HiHD; p ≤ 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In this PCNSL patient cohort, there is no difference in terms of efficacy between HiHD LiHD methotrexate, but patients in the HiHD group had higher rates of renal and hepatic dysfunction. Limitations include small sample size and disparity between group sizes.

Improved early outcome prediction by MRI-based 3D tumor volume assessment in patients with CNS lymphomas

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system lymphomas (CNSL) display remarkable clinical heterogeneity, yet accurate prediction of outcomes remains challenging. The IPCG criteria are widely used in routine practice for the assessment of treatment response. However, the value of the IPCG criteria for ultimate outcome prediction is largely unclear, mainly due to the uncertainty in delineating complete from partial responses during and after treatment.

METHODS

We explored various MRI features including semi-automated 3D tumor volume measurements at different disease milestones and their association with survival in 93 CNSL patients undergoing curative-intent treatment.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, patients with more than 3 lymphoma lesions, periventricular involvement, and high 3D tumor volumes showed significantly unfavorable PFS and OS. At first interim MRI during treatment, the IPCG criteria failed to discriminate outcomes in responding patients. Therefore, we randomized these patients into training and validation cohorts to investigate whether 3D tumor volumetry could improve outcome prediction. We identified a 3D tumor volume reduction of ≥97% as the optimal threshold for risk stratification (=3D early response, 3D_ER). Applied to the validation cohort, patients achieving 3D_ER had significantly superior outcomes. In multivariate analyses, 3D_ER was independently prognostic of PFS and OS. Finally, we leveraged prognostic information from 3D MRI features and circulating biomarkers to build a composite metric that further improved outcome prediction in CNSL.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed semi-automated 3D tumor volume measurements as strong and independent early predictors of clinical outcomes in CNSL patients. These radiologic features could help improve risk stratification and help guide future treatment approaches.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma involving the central nervous system: biologic rationale for targeted therapy

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma curable even in advanced stages. DLBCL involving the central nervous system (CNS) is more difficult to cure and fewer treatment options exist. Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) refers to aggressive lymphomas confined to the CNS, and are almost always DLBCL. Standard approaches for PCNSL use high-dose methotrexate-based combinations as induction therapy and younger patients often receive dose-intensive consolidation. However, dose-intensive therapies are not suitable for all patients, and older patients have fewer effective treatment options. Patients with relapsed or chemotherapy-refractory disease have a very poor prognosis. Secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) describes aggressive lymphomas involving the CNS at initial presentation or relapses within the CNS after treatment for systemic DLBCL. Isolated CNS relapse is often managed as PCNSL, but patients with synchronous involvement of DLBCL in both the periphery and the CNS pose a unique clinical challenge. Insights into the molecular circuitry of DLBCL have identified distinct genetic subtypes including cases with a predilection for CNS invasion. PCNSL and subsets of SCNSL are characterized by chronically activated B-cell receptor and NFκB signaling along with genetic evidence of immune evasion which may be exploited therapeutically. Improved mechanistic understanding of targetable pathways underpinning CNS lymphomas has led to numerous clinical trials testing targeted agent combinations and immunotherapy approaches with promising early results. Biologically rational strategies may further improve the cure rate of CNS lymphomas, either by overcoming intrinsic or acquired treatment resistance and/or by being broadly applicable to patients of all ages.

Diagnostic, Pathologic, and Therapeutic Considerations for Primary CNS Lymphoma

Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare lymphoma representing 3% of CNS malignancies. The diagnosis is complicated by the unique risks associated with brain biopsy, and the treatment is similarly complicated by the restriction of effective therapeutics able to cross the blood-brain barrier. Currently, the majority of individuals diagnosed with this disease are immunocompetent although immune deficiency related to HIV or immunosuppressive therapy remains an important risk factor. Improvements in both frontline therapy and consolidation options, including the use of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, have translated to improved survival. Unfortunately, patients experiencing relapsed or refractory disease often fare poorly. Here, we review key clinical, pathologic, and therapeutic aspects of PCNSL and highlight challenging clinical scenarios that may be encountered by the treating oncologist.

A Systematic Review of Cognitive Function, Anxiety, and Depression in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze the effects of different treatments on cognitive functioning, anxiety, and depression in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in multiple databases including the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Sino Med, Wei Pu, Wan Fang, CNKI, and Google Scholar. The search included studies published through June 20, 2023, focusing on cognitive function, anxiety, and depression in adult patients newly diagnosed with PCNSL. Various measurement tools and scales were used to assess the primary outcomes. Descriptive systematic reviews were conducted to integrate the literature and summarize the effects of different treatment modalities on cognitive functioning, anxiety, and depression in PCNSL patients. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022370250).

RESULTS

A total of 43 studies were included. Induction chemotherapy was associated with improved cognitive function and reduced anxiety and depression in the majority of patients. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was found to lead to cognitive impairment, particularly in executive, attention, memory, and motor function. Low-dose WBRT, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) treatments did not result in significant cognitive impairment. Anxiety and depression were observed to decrease over the long term.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the cognitive functioning, anxiety, and depression of patients with PCNSL can be improved with appropriate treatments. However, patients treated with WBRT are at a higher risk of cognitive decline compared to those receiving other treatment modalities. Therefore, special attention should be given to patients undergoing WBRT, and a comprehensive analysis should be conducted to reduce neurotoxicity and address early cognitive problems in these patients.

Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma, Treatment Outcomes - 10 Year Experience. Single Center Study

Background

Primary central nervous system lymphoma(PCNSL) is an aggressive, rare form of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, characterized by the absence of systemic disease. There are limited data and no strictly defined guidelines for management of PCNSL.

Objective

The aim of this study was to report a 10 year experience of PCNSL treatment, to evaluate treatment outcomes and asses Progression Free and Overall Survival of these patients.

Methods

Study was conducted on the Haematology Clinic, Clinical center University of Sarajevo, BH, in the period from January 2012.-December 2022. Total sample of 24 patients were enrolled. All have undergone diagnostic surgery. Patients were treated with regimens based on High dose Methotrexate, with/without whole brain radiotherapy as consolidation. Treatment response was captured by imaging techniques. Patients who have relapsed were evaluated with imaging techniques and treated according to Methotrexate-based treatment protocols.

Results

We have captured equal gender distribution. The median age of patients was 59.5 years (range 20-79). Pathohistological analysis confirmed DLBCL diagnosis in 22 patients, T cell lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphoma, each in 1 patient. Chemotherapy, chemotherapy combined with WBRT and radiotherapy were given to 5, 18 and 1 patients, respectively. The overall complete response rate (CR) was 87,15%. Those receiving combined modality-treatment had higher CR than those receiving chemotherapy (94,4% versus 60%). Out of 24 patients, 11 of them relapsed. The median time to relapse was 29 months (from 1 to 105). After second line of the treatment, CR was 54,5%, while 45,45% of patients died during the treatment. 4 patients relapsed for the second time with median time to relapse of 9 months (from 2 to 77). 2 year OS rate was 67%, and the median OS rate was 45,9 months. 2 year PFS rate was 31%.

Conclusion

The OS and PFS rates indicate the usage of new drugs and consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with PCNSL in order to achieve better treatment outcomes.

Development and validation of a model to predict acute kidney injury following high-dose methotrexate in patients with lymphoma

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a model for predicting acute kidney injury (AKI) after high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) exposure.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Multisite integrated health system throughout Minnesota and Wisconsin.

PATIENTS

Adult patients with lymphoma who received HDMTX as a 4-h infusion.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

LASSO methodology was used to identify factors available at the outset of therapy that predicted incident AKI within 7 days following HDMTX. The model was then validated in an independent cohort. The incidence of AKI within 7 days following HDMTX was 21.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 18.4%-24.8%) in the derivation cohort (435 unique patients who received a total of 1642 doses of HDMTX) and 15.6% (95% CI 5.3%-24.8%) in the validation cohort (55 unique patients who received a total of 247 doses of HDMTX). Factors significantly associated with AKI after HDMTX in the multivariable model included age ≥ 55 years, male sex, and lower HDMTX dose number. Other factors that were not found to be significantly associated with AKI on multivariable analysis, but were included in the final model, were body surface area, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The c-statistic of the model was 0.72 (95% CI 0.69-0.75) in the derivation cohort and 0.72 (95% CI 0.60-0.84) in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

This model utilizing identified sociodemographic and clinical factors is predictive of AKI following HDMTX administration in adult patients with lymphoma.

Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is a rare and aggressive malignancy that primarily affects the brain, spinal cord, and meninges. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of CNSL encompassing its epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment modalities, and prognosis. Although the main focus is on primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), ocular lymphoma, primary leptomeningeal lymphoma, and secondary CNS lymphoma are also discussed. The pathobiology of CNSL involves the infiltration of malignant lymphocytes within the CNS parenchyma or leptomeninges. Various risk factors and immunological mechanisms contribute to its development, including immunodeficiency states, chronic inflammation, and genomic alterations. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for appropriate management, given the heterogeneous clinical presentation. The neuroimaging, systemic imaging, and other modalities for diagnosis and evaluation for extent of disease involvement will be discussed. Additionally, the importance of histopathological examination, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, and molecular testing in confirming the diagnosis and guiding treatment decisions are highlighted. The treatment landscape for CNSL has evolved significantly. Therapeutic approaches encompass a multimodal strategy combining high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy, consolidation with whole-brain radiation therapy, and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue. Recent advancements in targeted therapies and immunomodulatory agents offer promising avenues for future treatment options. We review the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors influencing the survival of CNSL patients, including age, performance status, disease stage, and genetic abnormalities.

Central Nervous System Lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma and common manifestations of secondary CNS lymphoma.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Lymphoma can arise in the CNS de novo (primary CNS lymphoma) or as the result of systemic disease (secondary CNS lymphoma). Symptoms may include focal neurologic deficits related to the disease site, cognitive decline, and symptoms of increased intracranial pressure. Standard treatment may differ based on lymphoma subtype and location. A majority of CNS lymphoma is diffuse large B-cell subtype and exhibits aggressive behavior. First-line treatment is generally methotrexate-based polychemotherapy. Response rates to treatment are high, approximately 80% to 90% for primary CNS lymphoma, but relapse is common. Consolidation approaches including myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell rescue, nonmyeloablative chemotherapy, radiation, and medical maintenance regimens reduce rates of relapse. The recent development of targeted agents such as Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunomodulatory strategies have shown promise in the treatment of CNS lymphoma. Immunotherapy in the form of checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cells is being studied. More indolent forms of lymphoma may be treated with radiation or targeted therapy.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

CNS lymphoma is an uncommon but clinically meaningful manifestation of extranodal lymphoma. The diagnosis requires a high level of suspicion for rapid initiation of potentially curative treatment.

How I treat secondary CNS involvement by aggressive lymphomas

Secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (SCNSL) is a rare but clinically challenging scenario with historically disappointing outcomes. SCNSL refers to lymphoma that has spread into the CNS concurrently with systemic disease or CNS relapse during or after frontline immunochemotherapy, presenting with or without systemic lymphoma. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) denotes the most common entity, but an increased incidence is observed in other histologies, such as Burkitt lymphoma and mantle-cell lymphoma. The incidence, timing in disease course, location, evidence supporting the use of CNS prophylaxis, and treatment pathways vary according to histology. No randomized data exist to delineate the best treatment approaches with current recommendations based on retrospective and single-arm studies. However, a regimen comprising immunochemotherapy, incorporating agents that cross the blood-brain barrier, followed by thiotepa-containing conditioning and autologous stem-cell transplant outlined in the international MARIETTA study demonstrated improvement in outcomes, representing a major accomplishment in the care of patients with DLBCL with SCNSL. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell denotes a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with systemic aggressive lymphomas, with emerging data also demonstrating efficacy without higher neurotoxicity in those with SCNSL. In this manuscript we discuss 5 clinical scenarios and review the evidence supporting our recommendations.

Evidence-based management of primary and secondary CNS lymphoma

Central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma has traditionally had very poor outcomes however advances in management have resulted in dramatic improvements and long-term survival of patients. We describe the evidence for treatment strategies for these aggressive disorders. In primary CNS lymphoma there are randomized trial data to inform treatment decisions but these are lacking to guide management in secondary CNS lymphoma. Dynamic assessment of patient fitness and frailty is key throughout treatment, alongside delivery of CNS-bioavailable therapy and enrolment in clinical trials, at each stage of the disease. Intensive high-dose methotrexate-containing induction followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation with thiotepa-based conditioning is recommended for patients who are fit. Less intensive chemoimmunotherapy, novel agents (including Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, cereblon targeting immunomodulatory agents, and checkpoint inhibitors in the context of clinical trials), and whole brain radiotherapy may be reserved for less fit patients or disease which is chemoresistant. Data regarding the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells therapy is emerging, and concerns regarding greater toxicity have not been realized. Future areas of prospective studies include the identification of those at high risk of developing CNS lymphoma, management in elderly or frail patients as well as incorporating novel agents into regimens, particularly for those with chemoresistant disease.

Primary intracranial lymphomas-incidence and survival: a population-based study

Biopsy is recommended for patients with primary intracranial lymphoma to confirm the diagnosis, but the effect of tumor resection is still controversial. We conducted this retrospective study to better understand the epidemiology of primary intracranial lymphoma in the USA and explore the relationship between surgical resection and prognosis. Data regarding primary intracranial lymphoma, including incidence, were extracted from the SEER database. We analyzed the difference in incidence between different groups of people. We explored the effect of surgery on the survival of patients by the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated the possible prognostic indicators by multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. The incidence significantly increased with age. The non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander population exhibited the highest incidence, and the incidence was significantly higher in males than females. A total of 6428 cases were included in the cohort study, and most of the patients were diagnosed in the sixth to seventh decade of life. Sixty percent of tumors were supratentorial tumors. Surgery, especially total resection, significantly improved overall survival and cancer-specific survival. The survival of female patients, patients diagnosed before reaching 60 years of age, patients diagnosed after 2010, and patients with supratentorial lymphomas was better than that of their counterparts. The survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was worse than that of their counterparts. We conducted a comprehensive retrospective analysis of patients with primary intracranial lymphoma. We analyzed the difference in incidence between different groups of people. Surgery significantly improved overall and cancer-specific survival. The results of our research can help clinicians and patients better understand the epidemiology and management of primary intracranial lymphoma.

A cerebral lymphoma mimicking a meningioma: case report

Introduction

Cerebral lymphoma is a rare and aggressive brain tumor. It accounts for 1% of all non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) and 2% of all brain tumors. Untreated brain lymphoma has a very poor prognosis, with an overall life expectancy of around 1.5 months.

Case presentation

The authors report the case of a 35-year-old patient, with no previous pathological history, who presented for 3 weeks with deafness and recently aggravated otalgia. In MRI, brain imaging revealed a formation initially suggestive of an aggressive meningioma, and the histological study of the operative specimen was in favor of a diffuse large-cell non-germ-center B NHL.

Clinical discussion

Primary central nervous system lymphoma is an extra-nodal NHL localized to the brain, meninges, spinal cord, and eyes. In 90% of cases, these are diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, the other types being poorly characterized low-grade lymphomas, T-cell lymphomas, and Burkitt's lymphomas. MRI with gadolinium contrast is the gold standard for diagnosis which enhancement is homogeneous and well-limited, frequently associated with perilesional vascular edema. In T2-weighted sequences, there is a weak signal with restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted imaging. The management of brain lymphoma is currently based on chemotherapy with high-dose methotrexate combined with the other agents, mainly rituximab.

Conclusion

Cerebral lymphoma remains a non-negligible entity of central nervous system tumors, which can be confused with several other tumors, mainly glial and meningioma.

Impact of Thiotepa-Based Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma in First Complete Remission: A University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

The choice between nonmyeloablative chemotherapy (NMA-C) or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) as consolidation in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), and timing of autoHCT differs among centers. We aimed to clarify these points.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed PCNSL adult patients who received consolidation in CR1 or underwent autoHCT during their treatment course. Cohort A included those who underwent autoHCT in CR1, cohort B included those who underwent NMA-C in CR1, and cohort C included patients who underwent autoHCT in CR2+. We compared cohorts A and B, and cohorts A and C. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-related mortality (TRM) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR).

RESULTS

36 patients were included in cohort A, 30 in cohort B, and 14 in cohort C. The 5-year OS for cohorts A vs B and vs C were 90.7% vs 62.8% (P = .045) and vs 77.9% (P = .32), respectively. The 5-year PFS from diagnosis for cohorts A vs B was 87.8% vs 37.3% (P < .001). The 5-year PFS from autoHCT for cohorts A vs C was 87.6% vs 58.4% (P = .023). The 5-year TRM and CIR in cohorts A vs B was 9.4% vs 9.5% (P = .674), and 2.9% vs 53.2% (P < .001), respectively. The 5-year TRM and CIR in cohorts A vs C from the time of autoHCT was 9.5% vs 22.1% (P = .188), and 2.9% vs 19.5% (P = .104), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite the limitations, thiotepa-based autoHCT in CR1 appears to improve outcomes in eligible patients with PCNSL.

Immunochemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in primary central nervous system lymphoma: a National Cancer Database analysis

Debate remains over the role of rituximab, a large molecule with reduced central nervous system (CNS) penetration, in therapy for primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Since 2013, the National Cancer Database has distinguished between chemotherapy and immunotherapy for frontline treatment. In this setting, rituximab would be the only standard frontline immunotherapy. We examined factors associated with the receipt of immunotherapy using a multivariate regression model for relative risk, with a random intercept to account for the hospital-specific treatment selection process. Patients were matched using a 1:1 propensity score to limit possible confounders, and overall survival (OS) was compared in the matched cohort. We identified 4691 patients with PCNSL diagnosed between 2013 and 2018. The use of immunotherapy has increased from 45% in 2013 to 76% in 2018. Immunotherapy use was associated with sociodemographic variables and local (hospital level) preference rather than clinical factors. The main factors associated with reduced use of immunotherapy included male sex, Black race or Hispanic ethnicity (compared with White non-Hispanic), HIV+ status, treatment in a lower-volume hospital, and earlier year of diagnosis. We matched 2830 patients for the survival analysis. Receipt of immunotherapy was associated with a significantly better OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.83). There was heterogeneity according to age, because the advantage of immunotherapy was more pronounced for patients aged ≤75 years (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80) than for those older than 75 years (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70-1.08). Overall, our findings support the current trend toward rituximab use, although a nuanced approach should be adopted when treating older patients.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) in older patients

INTRODUCTION

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare, chemo and radio-sensitive tumor limited to the central nervous system. The incidence of PCSNL increases notably in the elderly population which represented approximately half of the patients. The limit of 'elderly' population remained debated and nonuniform, including 60 years as a cutoff for brain radiotherapy, 65 years for autologous stem-cell transplantation, and 70 years for the last clinical trials. Current therapeutic options include first line treatment based on high-dose methotrexate based polychemotherapy, consolidation chemotherapy, and adapted autologous stem cell transplantation for highly selected patients. At relapse, single agent targeted therapies or salvage chemotherapy followed by intensive consolidation are promising therapeutic options. Nevertheless, improving management of elderly patients is an urgent medical need that currently remains unresolved.

OBJECTIVE

We will focus on elderly patients with PCNSL and their specificities including clinical presentations, available therapeutic options and adaptations to be made.

CONCLUSION

To improve survival, it will be necessary to personalized and adapt the treatments, to each patient and his comorbidities, to increase their effectiveness and limit their toxicity in this frail population. Finally, inclusion of these patients in clinical trials is one of the major challenges to significantly change PCNSL elderly patient prognosis.

First line treatments in primary central nervous system lymphomas in young patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide an update on current first-line treatments as well as on-going studies in immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based polychemotherapy is widely used in induction treatment (IT). Among HD-MTX-based regimens, the best association is not yet defined. IT should be followed by a consolidation or a maintenance according to patient's age and performance status. Thiotepa-based intensive chemotherapy (IC) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has improved survival in eligible patients compared to a nonmyeloablative consolidation. Because of the high risk of neurotoxicity, conventional whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT; 36-40 Gy) has been abandoned. Reduced-WBRT (23.4 Gy) is an alternative option in patients under 60 years-old in complete response after IT. Its safety remains to be demonstrated in elderly patients. The benefit of maintenance strategies to reduce the risk of relapse is being assessed in several studies in patients beyond 70 years-old.

SUMMARY

HD-MTX-based polychemotherapy remains the corner stone of the IT, but the best regimen is not yet defined. Clinical trials assessing new IT regimens are ongoing. Intensive consolidation with IC + ASCT benefits patients up to 70 years-old. Predictive factors are under investigation to better define therapeutic response and guide treatment adjustment.

First-line induction chemotherapy with high-dose methotrexate versus teniposide in patients with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) versus teniposide (TEN) in patients with newly diagnosed immunocompetent primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs).

METHODS

The study included immunocompetent, adult patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL at 22 centers in China from 2007 to 2016. The patients received HD-MTX or TEN as first-line induction therapy. The objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed for each patient cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were eligible: 62 received HD-MTX, while 34 received teniposide. The overall response rate was 73.2% and 72.7% in the MTX and the TEN cohorts, respectively (P = 0.627). The median progression-free survival was 28.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.7-51.2] in the MTX cohort and 24.3 months (95% CI: 16.6-32.1) in the TEN cohort (P = 0.75). The median overall survival was 31 months (95% CI: 26.8-35.2) in the MTX cohort and 32 months (95% CI: 27.6-36.4) in the TEN cohort (P = 0.77). The incidence of any grade of coagulopathy/deep-vein thrombosis and gastrointestinal disorders was significantly higher in the MTX cohort than in the TEN cohort; no significant difference was found in the incidence of other adverse events between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first multicenter study using TEN as the main agent compared with HD-MTX in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma. The TEN-based regimen was non-inferior to the HD-MTX-based regimen with similar overall responses.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provided Class III evidence that the teniposide-based regimen was non-inferior to high-dose methotrexate - based regimen with similar overall responses and long-time survival in immunocompetent patients with PCNSL.

Pretreatment findings on magnetic resonance imaging in primary central nervous system lymphoma may predict overall survival duration

BACKGROUND

and purpose: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) lesions often show avid contrast enhancement on T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI sequences. However, several case reports and a clinical study have described PCNSL in patients with no contrast enhancement on MRI. We assessed whether overall survival (OS) time was related to any tumor characteristics (lesion location, volume, and number; contrast enhancement; necrosis; proximity to the subarachnoid space; and edema) on MRI in patients with PCNSL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records (MRI features, pathology, and survival data) of all patients at our institution with PCNSL who had been seen from, 2007 through 2017, and had undergone pretreatment MRI.

RESULTS

We identified 79 patients (42 men, 37 women) with a mean age at diagnosis of 61.7 ± 10.4 years. The mean OS duration was 44.6 ± 41.7 months. The most common pathological diagnosis (74 patients) was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. No associations were found between OS time and lesion location, volume, and number; contrast enhancement; necrosis; proximity to the subarachnoid space; or edema. However, a sole patient with non-enhancing PCNSL on MRI was found to have low-grade disease, with prolonged survival (>83 months). Several other patients with leptomeningeal disease had a mean OS time of 80 months. Patients with hemorrhagic lesions had a mean OS of 25.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival time for patients with PCNSL may be longer than previously thought, especially for patients with leptomeningeal seeding and lesions with hemorrhagic components Also, non-enhancing tumors may be less aggressive than enhancing tumors.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a diffuse large B cell lymphoma in which the brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges and/or eyes are exclusive sites of disease. Pathophysiology is incompletely understood, although a central role seems to comprise immunoglobulins binding to self-proteins expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and alterations of genes involved in B cell receptor, Toll-like receptor and NF-κB signalling. Other factors such as T cells, macrophages or microglia, endothelial cells, chemokines, and interleukins, probably also have important roles. Clinical presentation varies depending on the involved regions of the CNS. Standard of care includes methotrexate-based polychemotherapy followed by age-tailored thiotepa-based conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation and, in patients unsuitable for such treatment, consolidation with whole-brain radiotherapy or single-drug maintenance. Personalized treatment, primary radiotherapy and only supportive care should be considered in unfit, frail patients. Despite available treatments, 15-25% of patients do not respond to chemotherapy and 25-50% relapse after initial response. Relapse rates are higher in older patients, although the prognosis of patients experiencing relapse is poor independent of age. Further research is needed to identify diagnostic biomarkers, treatments with higher efficacy and less neurotoxicity, strategies to improve the penetration of drugs into the CNS, and roles of other therapies such as immunotherapies and adoptive cell therapies.

Challenges in the management of primary central nervous system lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Stereotactic biopsy remains the gold standard for the pathological diagnosis of PCNSL. However, certain new auxiliary diagnostic methods are considered to have good application prospects; these include cytokine and tumor circulating DNA, among others. Although new drugs such as immunomodulators, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors have brought hope owing to their improved efficacy, the high recurrence rate and subsequent high mortality remain barriers to long-term survival. Increasing emphasis is therefore being placed on consolidation treatments. Consolidation treatment strategies include whole brain radiotherapy, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and non-myeloablative chemotherapy. As studies directly comparing the effectiveness and safety of different consolidation treatment schemes are lacking, the optimal consolidation strategy remains uncertain. This article will review the diagnosis and treatment of PCNSL, focusing on the progress in research pertaining to consolidation therapy.

Older patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: Survival and prognostication across 20 U.S. cancer centers

There is a paucity of large-scale data delineating outcomes and prognostication of older patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). We retrospectively analyzed 539 newly-diagnosed PCNSL patients ages ≥60 years across 20 U.S. academic centers. The median age was 70 years (range 60-88); at least one geriatric syndrome was present in 46%; the median Cumulative Index Ratings Scale-Geriatrics (CIRS-G) score was 6 (range, 0-27); and 36% had impairment in activities of daily living (ADL). The most common induction regimens were high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) ± rituximab; methotrexate, temozolomide, rituximab (MTR); and rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine (R-MPV). Overall, 70% of patients achieved remission, with 14% undergoing consolidative autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and 24% receiving maintenance. With 58-month median follow-up, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 17 months (95% CI 13-22 months) and 43 months (95% CI 31-56 months), respectively. Three-year PFS and OS were highest with MTR (55% and 74%, respectively). With single-agent methotrexate ± rituximab, 3-year PFS and OS were 30% (p = .0002) and 47% (p = .0072). On multivariate analysis, increasing age at diagnosis and Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was associated with inferior PFS; age, hypoalbuminemia, higher CIRS-G score, and ECOG PS adversely affected OS. Among patients receiving maintenance, 3-year PFS was 65% versus 45% without maintenance (p = 0.02), with 3-year OS of 84% versus 61%, respectively (p = .0003). Altogether, outcomes in older PCNSL patients appeared optimized with HD-MTX combination induction regimens and maintenance therapy. Furthermore, several prognostic factors, including geriatric measures, were associated with inferior outcomes.

Management of primary and secondary CNS lymphoma

Central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma has traditionally had very poor outcomes however advances in management have seen dramatic improvements and long-term survival of patients. In primary CNS lymphoma there are now randomised trial data to inform practice, however secondary CNS lymphoma has a lack of randomised trial data and CNS prophylaxis remains a contentious area. We describe treatment strategies in these aggressive disorders. Dynamic assessment of patient fitness and frailty is key throughout treatment alongside delivery of CNS-bioavailable therapy and enrolment in clinical trials. Intensive high-dose methotrexate-containing induction followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is preferred for patients who are fit. Less intensive chemoimmunotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy and novel therapies may be reserved for patients unfit or chemoresistant. It is essential to better define patients at increased risk of CNS relapse, as well as effective prophylactic strategies to prevent it. Future prospective studies incorporating novel agents are key.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and the treatment of primary CNS lymphoma

This review focuses on the recent progress in the management of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Multiomic analyses allowed to better understand the tumorigenesis of PCNSL and to establish a molecular classification with prognostic value that will optimize patient management and guide future targeted approaches. Cooperative clinical trials have demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy, in selected fit patients, of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation as post-induction consolidation, that will progressively replace whole brain radiotherapy associated with a much higher risk of delayed neurotoxicity. Several novel treatments have shown efficacy and overall good tolerance in PCNSL patients, such as Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, imids, immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T). This opens promising therapeutic perspectives to improve the current standard treatment, especially for elderly and unfit patients who represent a growing population.

Temporalis muscle thickness predicts early relapse and short survival in primary CNS lymphoma

Background

Most patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) achieve durable remission whereas a minority die in the first year. Sarcopenia is a powerful predictor of mortality in the brain and systemic cancers. Temporalis muscle thickness (TMT) is a validated radiographic measure of sarcopenia. We hypothesized that patients with thin TMT at diagnosis would have early progression and short survival.

Methods

Two blinded operators retrospectively measured TMT in 99 consecutive brain MRIs from untreated patients with PCNSL.

Results

We generated a receiver operator characteristic curve and chose a single threshold defining thin TMT in all patients as <5.65 mm, at which specificity and sensitivity for 1-year progression were 98.4% and 29.7% and for 1-year mortality were 97.4% and 43.5% respectively. Those with thin TMT were both more likely to progress (P < .001) and had higher rates of mortality (P < .001). These effects were independent of the effect of age, sex, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in a cox regression. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center score did not predict progression-free survival or overall survival as well as TMT. Patients with thin TMT received fewer cycles of high-dose methotrexate and were less likely to receive consolidation but neither variable could be included in the Cox regression due to violation of the proportional hazards assumption.

Conclusions

We conclude that PCNSL patients with thin TMT are at high risk for early relapse and short survival. Future trials should stratify patients by TMT to avoid confounding.

Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling for Detection, Risk Stratification, and Classification of Brain Lymphomas

PURPOSE

Clinical outcomes of patients with CNS lymphomas (CNSLs) are remarkably heterogeneous, yet identification of patients at high risk for treatment failure is challenging. Furthermore, CNSL diagnosis often remains unconfirmed because of contraindications for invasive stereotactic biopsies. Therefore, improved biomarkers are needed to better stratify patients into risk groups, predict treatment response, and noninvasively identify CNSL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We explored the value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for early outcome prediction, measurable residual disease monitoring, and surgery-free CNSL identification by applying ultrasensitive targeted next-generation sequencing to a total of 306 tumor, plasma, and CSF specimens from 136 patients with brain cancers, including 92 patients with CNSL.

RESULTS

Before therapy, ctDNA was detectable in 78% of plasma and 100% of CSF samples. Patients with positive ctDNA in pretreatment plasma had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS, P < .0001, log-rank test) and overall survival (OS, P = .0001, log-rank test). In multivariate analyses including established clinical and radiographic risk factors, pretreatment plasma ctDNA concentrations were independently prognostic of clinical outcomes (PFS HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.9; P = .03; OS HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.2; P = .006). Moreover, measurable residual disease detection by plasma ctDNA monitoring during treatment identified patients with particularly poor prognosis following curative-intent immunochemotherapy (PFS, P = .0002; OS, P = .004, log-rank test). Finally, we developed a proof-of-principle machine learning approach for biopsy-free CNSL identification from ctDNA, showing sensitivities of 59% (CSF) and 25% (plasma) with high positive predictive value.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate robust and ultrasensitive detection of ctDNA at various disease milestones in CNSL. Our findings highlight the role of ctDNA as a noninvasive biomarker and its potential value for personalized risk stratification and treatment guidance in patients with CNSL.

[Media: see text].

Long term outcomes in older patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: an analysis of the Texas Cancer Registry

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that carries a poor prognosis in the elderly. The aim of this study is to investigate treatment patterns and survival trends in patients ≥ 65 years with PCNSL through data provided by the Texas Cancer Registry. Adults ≥ 65 years diagnosed with PCNSL and followed between 1995-2017 were identified and separated into three eras: 1995-2003, 2004-2012, and 2013-2017. Baseline covariates compared included patient demographics and treatments administered. Pearson's chi-squared test and Cox proportional hazard models compared covariates; overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed via Kaplan-Meier methodology. There were 375 patients; 104 (27.7%) in 1995-2003, 146 (38.9%) in 2004-2012, and 125 (33.3%) in 2013-2017. There were 50 (48.1%), 55 (37.7%), and 31 (24.8%) in 1995-2003, 2004-2012, and 2013-2017, respectively, that did not receive treatment. At last follow up, 101 (97.1%), 130 (89.0%), and 94 (75.2%) in each era died, of which 89 (85.6%), 112 (76.7%), and 70 (56.0%) were attributed to PCNSL. Median OS per era was eight (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.06-10.93), six (95% CI, 2.30-9.69), and five months (95% CI, 2.26-7.73) (p = 0.638). DSS per era was nine (95% CI: 0.00, 26.53), 10 (95% CI: 5.14, 14.86), and 19 (95% CI, 0.00-45.49) (p = 0.931) months. Spinal cord as primary disease site (HR: 0.668 [95% CI, 0.45-0.99], p = 0.049), and chemotherapy (HR 0.532 [95% CI, 0.42-0.673], p =  < 0.001) or chemotherapy + radiation (HR, 0.233 [95% CI, 0.11-0.48] p < 0.001) had better outcomes compared to no therapy or radiation therapy alone. Survival in older patients ≥ 65 with PCNSL has not improved per our analysis of the TCR from 1995-2017 despite increasing trends of treatment utilization. Strategies to augment recruitment of older individuals in trials are needed in order to determine who would derive treatment benefit and minimize treatment toxicities.

A Systematic Review of High-Dose Methotrexate for Adults with Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is confined within the CNS. Due to its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is the backbone for induction chemotherapy. This systematic review was conducted to observe outcomes among different HDMTX doses (low, <3 g/m²; intermediate, 3-4.9 g/m²; high, ≥5 g/m²) and regimens used in the treatment of PCNSL. A PubMed search resulted in 26 articles reporting clinical trials using HDMTX for PCNSL, from which 35 treatment cohorts were identified for analysis. The median dose of HDMTX used for induction was 3.5 g/m² (interquartile range IQR, 3-3.5); the intermediate dose was most frequently used in the studies examined (24 cohorts, 69%). Five cohorts used HDMTX monotherapy, 19 cohorts used HDMTX + polychemotherapy, and 11 cohorts used HDMTX + rituximab ± polychemotherapy. Pooled overall response rate (ORR) estimates for low, intermediate, and high dose HDMTX cohorts were 71%, 76%, and 76%, respectively. Pooled 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) estimates for low, intermediate, and high HDMTX dose cohorts were 50%, 51%, and 55%, respectively. Regimens that included rituximab showed a tendency to have higher ORR and 2-year PFS than those that did not include rituximab. These findings indicate that current protocols utilizing 3-4 g/m² of HDMTX in combination with rituximab provide therapeutic efficacy in PCNSL.

Research on the Damage of the Central Nervous System Lymphoma to the Nervous System

Management of central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma requires multidisciplinary care. The disease can manifest in the context of immunocompromised states or in the context of chronic infections. Nervous system damage from this lymphoma has highly variable presentation that is dependent on the location of the tumor lesions. Damage from disease progression can lead to lasting neurologic deficits and even death. However, some lesions are a consequence of radiation-induced neurotoxicity. This review discusses the sources of and consequences of brain damage due to tumor damage and the associated effect of clinical therapies. We discuss workup, management, and treatments. These include chemotherapy and radiation techniques. We discuss potential complications and avoidance strategies. The review will serve as a user-friendly resource for clinicians.

Safety and efficacy of induction immunochemotherapy with rituximab, methotrexate, ifosfamide, and vincristine (R-MIV) in patients with primary CNS lymphoma including recent COVID-19 pandemic experience

Clinical data on primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCNSL) patients is mostly generated from prospective studies, and many frail real-world patients are not included. Recently,the diagnosis and treatment of PCNSL patients was confounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, treatment with high-dose cytarabine was linked to increased risk of pneumonia and virus persistence. We report on outcome of the induction regimen R-MIV (rituximab, methotrexate, ifosfamide, and vincristine) involving intensive administration of high-dose methotrexate (3.5 g/m² ) with ifosfamide, every 2 weeks and rituximab once per week for six doses. The median age and performance status (PS) for 64 patients was 58 years and 2 (PS 3; 22%) respectively. The overall response rate by magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography (MRI/CT) was 73% (n = 46/63), with an additional 17.5% (n = 11/63) patients without measurable disease at baseline. Grade 3-4 haematological toxicity was low for R-MIV (neutropenia: 25% and thrombocytopenia: 1%). Three patients (4.7%) died from treatment-related toxicity. Co-existence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with cytomegalovirus reactivation and the varicella-zoster virus in two patients was fatal. Fifty patients (78%) were eligible for consolidation. Median progression-free and overall survival were not reached (median follow-up: 44 months). In conclusion, the R-MIV regimen is feasible in routine practice, effective and safe, even during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation versus whole-brain radiotherapy consolidation in primary central nervous system lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The management of newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) includes administration of high-dose methotrexate based regimens followed by consolidation therapy to minimize the risk of relapse. However, the best consolidation strategy (autologous hematopoietic cell transplant [auto-HCT] vs. whole-brain radiotherapy [WBRT]) is controversial. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials that compared auto-HCT versus WBRT consolidation for patients with PCNSL after first-line treatment.The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), response rates (overall response rate [ORR] and complete remission [CR]), relapse rate, treatment-related mortality (TRM), and neuropsychological adverse events. We performed a pooled analysis of the single-arm studies that incorporated auto-HCT or WBRT consolidation and evaluated neurocognitive outcomes. Only two studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 240). There was no significant difference in OS (HR = 1.50; 95% CI = 0.95-2.36), PFS (HR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.44-2.22), ORR (RR = 1.48; 95% CI = 0.90-2.44), CR rate (RR = 1.21; 95% CI = 0.90-1.63), relapse rate (RR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.05-4.28), and TRM (RR = 5.67; 95% CI = 1.01-31.91). The neuropsychological tests to assess neurocognitive domains were different and inconsistently reported in the two studies and therefore we were unable to perform a meta-analysis but provide a descriptive assessment. Both the studies showed a significant decline in the attention/executive function (based on the trail making test A and trail making test B) in those receiving WBRT compared to auto-HCT. We found 9 single-arm phase II studies that reported data on outcomes associated with either auto-HCT (5 studies) or WBRT (4 studies) consolidation. Of these, two studies (n = 43) reported data on neurocognitive decline following auto-HCT consolidation. Pooled proportion of patients with neurocognitive decline in these studies was 6% (95% CI, 0%-17%) for those receiving auto-HCT and there was no heterogeneity between studies (I²  = 0%). Three studies (n = 122) reported data on neurocognitive decline following WBRT consolidation. Pooled proportion of patients with neurocognitive decline in these studies was 43% (95% CI, 11%-78%) for those receiving WBRT and there was high heterogeneity between studies (I²  = 94%). There was significant heterogeneity between subgroups (p = 0.035). The outcomes were not significantly different in patients with PCNSL receiving auto-HCT or WBRT consolidation therapies, however, there is a higher degree of neurocognitive decline associated with WBRT compared to auto-HCT consolidation. The decision to choose a consolidation strategy needs to be individualized based on age, frailty, and co-morbidities.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Background Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is rare, with a treatment backbone that typically includes high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy, with radiation often reserved for persistent or progressive disease. In this study, we report the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with PCNSL to potentially defer whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or as salvage after WBRT. Methodology We performed a single-institution, retrospective review of 20 patients with PCNSL who received single-fraction or fractionated SRS to 32 lesions between September 1992 and July 2019. Results The median age at SRS was 67 years (interquartile range (IQR) = 56-74 years). The median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at SRS was 80 (IQR = 50-80). In total, 18 (90%) patients received methotrexate-based chemotherapy prior to SRS, with a median of eight cycles (IQR = 5-10). A total of 10 patients received SRS for recurrent disease after chemotherapy and/or WBRT, nine patients received SRS for the persistent disease after chemotherapy alone, and one patient received up-front SRS. Overall, five patients received SRS following WBRT. The median SRS dose was 16 Gy (IQR = 14-22.5 Gy) in one fraction (IQR = 1-5 fractions). Eight patients (40%) were treated with consolidative pomalidomide or lenalidomide following SRS. The local control rate was 100% (32/32 lesions at a median follow-up of 15 months). In total, 13 of 16 (81%) patients with available follow-up experienced distant brain recurrence. The median time to distant failure following SRS was 10 months (IQR = 1-16 months). Three patients received salvage SRS, and three patients received salvage WBRT. The median overall survival from diagnosis was 39 months (95% confidence interval = 24-54 months). KPS at the time of SRS was significantly correlated with time to progression (p = 0.002). The use of lenalidomide or pomalidomide after SRS was associated with improved overall survival after SRS (three vs. 14 months, p = 0.035). Consolidative etoposide and cytarabine after initial methotrexate-based chemotherapy was also associated with improved survival following SRS (eight vs. 47 months, p = 0.028). Conclusions SRS offers effective local tumor control for patients with PCNSL; however, the majority of patients experience distant progression. SRS may have a role in the salvage setting for patients with recurrence after WBRT, or allow deferral of WBRT in select patients, although systemic therapy appears to strongly influence outcomes in this cohort.

Genomic Profiling Reveals Differences in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Large B-Cell Lymphoma, With Subtyping Suggesting Sensitivity to BTK Inhibition

BACKGROUND

B-cell primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCL) is diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) confined to the CNS. Less than 50% of patients with PCL achieve complete remission with current therapies. We describe the findings from comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of a cohort of 69 patients with PCL, 36 cases of secondary CNS lymphoma (SCL), and 969 cases of DLBCL to highlight their differences and characterize the PCL cohort. In addition, we highlight the differences in frequency of germinal center B-cell like (GCB) and non-GCB subtypes and molecular subtypes, particularly MCD and EZH subtypes, between PCL and DLBCL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-nine cases of B-cell PCL, 36 cases of secondary CNS lymphoma (SCL), and 969 cases of DLBCL were evaluated by CGP of 405 genes via DNAseq and 265 genes via RNAseq for fusions (FoundationOne Heme). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated from 1.23 Mb of sequenced DNA.

RESULTS

Genomic alterations with significant differences between PCL and DLBCL included MYD88, ETV6, PIM1, PRDM1, CXCR4, TP53, and CREBBP, while only MYD88 was significantly different between SCL and DLBCL. PCL cases were significantly enriched for the MCD molecular subtypes, which have an excellent response to BTKi. We report a patient with a durable complete response to BTKi consistent with their genomic profile. EBV status, CD274 amplification, and TMB status suggest that 38% of PCL patients may benefit from ICPI; however further study is warranted.

CONCLUSION

CGP of PCLs reveals biomarkers, genomic alterations, and molecular classifications predictive of BTKi efficacy and potential ICPI efficacy. Given the limitations of standard of care for PCL, CGP is critical to identify potential therapeutic approaches for patients in this rare form of lymphoma.