1
|
CVETANOVIC ANAS, LAMBERTINI MATTEO, PUNIE KEVIN, MATOVINA BRKO GORANAG, ZIVKOVIC NIKOLAD, POPOVIC MAJAJ, MILOVIC KOVACEVIC MARIJANAM, POPOVIC LAZARS. Pharmacological methods for ovarian function and fertility preservation in women with cancer: A literature review. Oncol Res 2024; 32:1309-1322. [PMID: 39055889 PMCID: PMC11267035 DOI: 10.32604/or.2024.049743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Oncofertility is an extremely significant topic that is increasingly being discussed owing to increased evidence indicating that fertility preservation does not affect the treatment outcomes of patients with cancer but significantly contributes to preserving life quality. The effect of chemotherapy can range from minimal effects to complete ovarian atrophy. Limited data are available on the effects of monoclonal antibodies and targeted therapies on the ovaries and fertility. Temporary ovarian suppression by administering a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during chemotherapy decreases the gonadotoxic effect of chemotherapy, thereby diminishing the chance of developing premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). At present, the concomitant administration of GnRH analogs during chemotherapy is the only accepted pharmacological method for preserving ovarian function. Notably, most randomized studies on the effectiveness of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy in preventing POI have been conducted in women with breast cancer, with a considerably small number of studies on patients with hematological malignancies. Furthermore, most randomized controlled trials on breast cancer have revealed a decrease in treatment-induced POI risk, regardless of the hormone receptor status. In addition, studies on hematological malignancies have yielded negative results; nevertheless, the findings must be interpreted with caution owing to numerous limitations. Current guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend sperm, oocyte, and embryo cryopreservation as a standard practice and only offering GnRHa to patients when proven fertility preservation methods are not feasible. In this manuscript, we present a comprehensive literature overview on the application of ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy in patients with cancer by addressing preclinical and clinical data, as well as future perspectives in this field that upcoming research should focus on.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ANA S. CVETANOVIC
- Department for Oncology, Medical Faculty Nis, University of Nis, Nis, 18000, Serbia
- Clinic of Oncology, University Clinical Centre Nis, Nis, 18000, Serbia
| | - MATTEO LAMBERTINI
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, 16100, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, 16100, Italy
| | - KEVIN PUNIE
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3001, Belgium
| | - GORANA G. MATOVINA BRKO
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, 21208, Serbia
| | - NIKOLA D. ZIVKOVIC
- Department for Pathology, Medical Faculty Nis, University of Nis, Nis, 18000, Serbia
- Center for Pathology, University Clinical Centre Nis, Nis, 18000, Serbia
| | - MAJA J. POPOVIC
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, 21208, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia
| | | | - LAZAR S. POPOVIC
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, 21208, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Magaton IM, Arecco L, Mariamidze E, Jankovic K, Stana M, Buzzatti G, Trevisan L, Scavone G, Ottonello S, Fregatti P, Massarotti C, von Wolff M, Lambertini M. Fertility and Pregnancy-Related Issues in Young BRCA Carriers With Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2024; 18:11782234241261429. [PMID: 38882447 PMCID: PMC11179469 DOI: 10.1177/11782234241261429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Approximately 10% to 15% of breast cancer cases in young women are diagnosed in patients harbouring germline (g) pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs) in the BReast CAncer 1 (BRCA1) or BReast CAncer 2 (BRCA2) genes. Preclinical and clinical studies showed a potential negative effect of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) PVs on ovarian reserve and reproductive potential, even before starting anticancer therapies. The aim of this article is to summarize the current literature on the fertility potential of young gBRCA1/2 PVs carriers with breast cancer and the risk of gonadotoxicity associated with anticancer treatments. Moreover, we describe the available evidence on the efficacy of fertility preservation techniques in young gBRCA1/2 PVs carriers and the safety data on having a pregnancy after breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isotta Martha Magaton
- Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Women's Hospital, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elene Mariamidze
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Todua Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgien
| | - Kristina Jankovic
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Clinic Center Nis, Nis, Serbia
| | - Mihaela Stana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elysee Hospital, Alba Iulia, Romania
| | - Giulia Buzzatti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Unit of Hereditary Cancer, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lucia Trevisan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Unit of Hereditary Cancer, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Graziana Scavone
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Ottonello
- Departent of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Piero Fregatti
- Department of Surgery, U.O.C. Clinica di Chirurgia Senologica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI Department), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal-Child Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Michael von Wolff
- Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Women's Hospital, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Silvestris E, Cormio G, Loizzi V, Corrado G, Arezzo F, Petracca EA. Fertility Preservation in BRCA1/2 Germline Mutation Carriers: An Overview. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:615. [PMID: 38792636 PMCID: PMC11122448 DOI: 10.3390/life14050615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2024] [Revised: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are responsible for a higher incidence of breast and ovarian cancer (from 55% up to 70% vs. 12% in the general population). If their functions have been widely investigated in the onset of these malignancies, still little is known about their role in fertility impairment. Cancer patients treated with antineoplastic drugs can be susceptible to their gonadotoxicity and, in women, some of them can induce apoptotic program in premature ovarian follicles, progressive depletion of ovarian reserve and, consequently, cancer treatment-related infertility (CTRI). BRCA variants seem to be associated with early infertility, thus accelerating treatment impairment of ovaries and making women face the concrete possibility of an early pregnancy. In this regard, fertility preservation (FP) procedures should be discussed in oncofertility counseling-from the first line of prevention with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to the new experimental ovarian stem cells (OSCs) model as a new way to obtain in vitro-differentiated oocytes, several techniques may represent a valid option to BRCA-mutated patients. In this review, we revisit knowledge about BRCA involvement in lower fertility, pregnancy feasibility, and the fertility preservation (FP) options available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Silvestris
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.C.); (V.L.); (F.A.); (E.A.P.)
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.C.); (V.L.); (F.A.); (E.A.P.)
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Vera Loizzi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.C.); (V.L.); (F.A.); (E.A.P.)
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Giacomo Corrado
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00136 Rome, Italy;
| | - Francesca Arezzo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.C.); (V.L.); (F.A.); (E.A.P.)
| | - Easter Anna Petracca
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.C.); (V.L.); (F.A.); (E.A.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dervin T, Ranisavjevic N, Laot L, Mayeur A, Duperier C, Steffann J, Borghese R, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Frydman N, Benachi A, Sonigo C, Grynberg M. Knowledge, acceptability and personal attitude toward pre-implantation 1 genetic testing (PGT) and pre-natal diagnosis (PND) for females carrying BRCA pathogenic variant according to fertility preservation experience. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40:1381-1390. [PMID: 37154838 PMCID: PMC10310597 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02798-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-M) and prenatal diagnosis (PND) followed by medical termination of pregnancy when the fetus is affected are two procedures developed to avoid the transmission of a severe hereditary disease which can be proposed to females that carried BRCA pathogenic variants. These females can also be offered fertility preservation (FP) when diagnosed with cancer or even before a malignancy occurs. The aim of the study was to evaluate the acceptability and personal attitude of women carrying a BRCA mutation toward techniques that can prevent BRCA transmission to their progeny. METHODS Female mutated for BRCA1 or BRCA2 were invited to complete an online survey of 49 queries anonymously between June and August 2022. RESULTS A total of 87 participants responded to the online survey. Overall, 86.2% of women considered that PGT-M should be proposed to all BRCA mutation carriers regardless of the severity of the family history, and 47.1% considered or would consider PGT-M for themselves. For PND, these percentages were lower reaching 66.7% and 29.9%, respectively. Females with personal history of breast cancer or FP achievement were more prone to undergo PND for themselves despite the overall acceptability of this procedure. Among the subgroup who had undergone FP (n = 58), there was no significant difference in acceptance of principle and personal attitude toward PGT-M and PND compared to the group without FP. CONCLUSION BRCA pathogenic variants female carriers do need information about reproductive issues, even if they are not prone to undergo PGT-M nor PND for themselves. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Traicie Dervin
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Université Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, Antoine Beclere Hospital, F-92140, Clamart, France
| | - Noémie Ranisavjevic
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, CHU and University of Montpellier, 371 Avenue du Doyen Gaston, Giraud, 34090, Montpellier, France
| | - Lucie Laot
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Université Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, Antoine Beclere Hospital, F-92140, Clamart, France
| | - Anne Mayeur
- Service de Biologie de La Reproduction - CECOS, Université Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Antoine Beclere Hospital, F-92140, Clamart, France
| | - Constance Duperier
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Université Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, Antoine Beclere Hospital, F-92140, Clamart, France
| | - Julie Steffann
- Université Paris Cité, Imagine INSERM UMR1163, Service de Médecine Génomique Des Maladies Rares, Groupe Hospitalier Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Roxana Borghese
- Université Paris Cité, Imagine INSERM UMR1163, Service de Médecine Génomique Des Maladies Rares, Groupe Hospitalier Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - Nelly Frydman
- Service de Biologie de La Reproduction - CECOS, Université Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Antoine Beclere Hospital, F-92140, Clamart, France
| | - Alexandra Benachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, DMU Santé Des Femmes Et Des Nouveau-Nés, Université Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Antoine Beclere Hospital, F-92140, Clamart, France
| | - Charlotte Sonigo
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Université Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, Antoine Beclere Hospital, F-92140, Clamart, France
- Université Paris Saclay, Inserm, Physiologie Et Physiopathologie Endocrinienne, F-94276, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Michael Grynberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Université Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, Antoine Beclere Hospital, F-92140, Clamart, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Soldato D, Arecco L, Agostinetto E, Franzoi MA, Mariamidze E, Begijanashvili S, Brunetti N, Spinaci S, Solinas C, Vaz-Luis I, Di Meglio A, Lambertini M. The Future of Breast Cancer Research in the Survivorship Field. Oncol Ther 2023; 11:199-229. [PMID: 37005952 PMCID: PMC10260743 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-023-00225-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Prevalence of survivors of breast cancer has been steadily increasing in the last 20 years. Currently, more than 90% of women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer are expected to be alive at 5 years from diagnosis thanks to early detection and breakthrough innovations in multimodal treatment strategies. Alongside this advancement in clinical outcomes, survivors of breast cancer might experience several specific challenges and present with unique needs. Survivorship trajectories after diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can be significantly impacted by long-lasting and severe treatment-related side effects, including physical problems, psychological distress, fertility issues in young women, and impaired social and work reintegration, which add up to patients' individual risk of cancer recurrence and second primary malignancies. Alongside cancer-specific sequelae, survivors still present with general health needs, including management of chronic preexisting or ensuing conditions. Survivorship care should implement high-quality, evidence-based strategies to promptly screen, identify, and address survivors' needs in a comprehensive way and minimize the impact of severe treatment sequelae, preexisting comorbidities, unhealthy lifestyles, and risk of recurrence on quality of life. This narrative review focuses on core areas of survivorship care and discuss the state of the art and future research perspectives in key domains including selected long-term side effects, surveillance for recurrences and second cancers, well-being promotion, and specific survivors' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Soldato
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - L Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - E Agostinetto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - M A Franzoi
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - E Mariamidze
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Todua Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - S Begijanashvili
- Department of Clinical Oncology, American Hospital Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - N Brunetti
- Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - S Spinaci
- Division of Breast Surgery, Villa Scassi Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - C Solinas
- Medical Oncology, AOU Cagliari, Policlinico Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Italy
| | - I Vaz-Luis
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - A Di Meglio
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hong YH, Park C, Paik H, Lee KH, Lee JR, Han W, Park S, Chung S, Kim HJ. Fertility Preservation in Young Women With Breast Cancer: A Review. J Breast Cancer 2023; 26:221-242. [PMID: 37387349 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Fertility preservation is a major concern in young patients diagnosed with breast cancer and planning to receive multimodality treatment, including gonadotoxic chemotherapy with or without age-related decline through long-term endocrine therapy. Most breast cancer patients undergo multimodality treatments; many short-term and long-term side effects arise during these therapies. One of the most detrimental side effects is reduced fertility due to gonadotoxic treatments with resultant psychosocial stress. Cryopreservation of oocytes, embryos, and ovarian tissue are currently available fertility preservation methods for these patients. As an adjunct to these methods, in vitro maturation or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist could also be considered. It is also essential to communicate well with patients in the decision-making process on fertility preservation. It is essential to refer patients diagnosed with breast cancer on time to fertility specialists for individualized treatment, which may lead to desirable outcomes. To do so, a multimodal team-based approach and in-depth discussion on the treatment of breast cancer and fertility preservation is crucial. This review aims to summarize infertility risk related to currently available breast cancer treatment, options for fertility preservation and its details, barriers to oncofertility counseling, and psychosocial issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeon Hee Hong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Changhee Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Haerin Paik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Hun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ryeol Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonshik Han
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seho Park
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seockhoon Chung
- Department of Psychiatry, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Condorelli M, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Ferrari A, Grinshpun A, Hamy AS, de Azambuja E, Carrasco E, Peccatori FA, Di Meglio A, Paluch-Shimon S, Poorvu PD, Venturelli M, Rousset-Jablonski C, Senechal C, Livraghi L, Ponzone R, De Marchis L, Pogoda K, Sonnenblick A, Villarreal-Garza C, Córdoba O, Teixeira L, Clatot F, Punie K, Graffeo R, Dieci MV, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, Duhoux FP, Puglisi F, Ferreira AR, Blondeaux E, Peretz-Yablonski T, Caron O, Saule C, Ameye L, Balmaña J, Partridge AH, Azim HA, Demeestere I, Lambertini M. Safety of assisted reproductive techniques in young women harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 with a pregnancy after prior history of breast cancer. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100300. [PMID: 34775302 PMCID: PMC8593447 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge is growing on the safety of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in cancer survivors. No data exist, however, for the specific population of breast cancer patients harboring germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 30 centers worldwide including women diagnosed at ≤40 years with stage I-III breast cancer, between January 2000 and December 2012, harboring known germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Patients included in this analysis had a post-treatment pregnancy either achieved through use of ART (ART group) or naturally (non-ART group). ART procedures included ovulation induction, ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and embryo transfer under hormonal replacement therapy. RESULTS Among the 1424 patients registered in the study, 168 were eligible for inclusion in the present analysis, of whom 22 were in the ART group and 146 in the non-ART group. Survivors in the ART group conceived at an older age compared with those in the non-ART group (median age: 39.7 versus 35.4 years, respectively). Women in the ART group experienced more delivery complications compared with those in the non-ART group (22.1% versus 4.1%, respectively). No other apparent differences in obstetrical outcomes were observed between cohorts. The median follow-up from pregnancy was 3.4 years (range: 0.8-8.6 years) in the ART group and 5.0 years (range: 0.8-17.6 years) in the non-ART group. Two patients (9.1%) in the ART group experienced a disease-free survival event (specifically, a locoregional recurrence) compared with 40 patients (27.4%) in the non-ART group. In the ART group, no patients deceased compared with 10 patients (6.9%) in the non-ART group. CONCLUSION This study provides encouraging safety data on the use of ART in breast cancer survivors harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, when natural conception fails or when they opt for ART in order to carry out preimplantation genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Condorelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Fertility Clinic, Brussels, Belgium; Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - M Ceppi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - A Ferrari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery III-Breast Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - A Grinshpun
- Breast Oncology Unit Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - A S Hamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - E de Azambuja
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - E Carrasco
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F A Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A Di Meglio
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Breast Oncology Unit Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - P D Poorvu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - M Venturelli
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - C Rousset-Jablonski
- Department of Surgery, Centre Léon Bérard and INSERM U1290 RESHAPE, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - C Senechal
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - L Livraghi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy; University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - R Ponzone
- Gynecological Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - L De Marchis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - K Pogoda
- Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - A Sonnenblick
- Oncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - C Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico
| | - O Córdoba
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma, Spain
| | - L Teixeira
- Breast Disease Unit, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - F Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - K Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - R Graffeo
- Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland (CSSI), Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - M V Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - J A Pérez-Fidalgo
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA University Hospital of Valencia, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain
| | - F P Duhoux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Clinic, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - F Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy; Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - A R Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - E Blondeaux
- Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - T Peretz-Yablonski
- Breast Oncology Unit Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - O Caron
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - C Saule
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - L Ameye
- Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - J Balmaña
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - H A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico
| | - I Demeestere
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Fertility Clinic, Brussels, Belgium; Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Arecco L, Ruelle T, Martelli V, Boutros A, Latocca MM, Spinaci S, Marrocco C, Massarotti C, Lambertini M. How to Protect Ovarian Function before and during Chemotherapy? J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10184192. [PMID: 34575299 PMCID: PMC8467797 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10184192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
A significant number of women receive a cancer diagnosis before their age of natural menopause. Among these patients, the most frequent neoplasms are breast cancer, gynecological, and hematological malignancies. Premature ovarian insufficiency and infertility are among the most feared short- to long-term consequences of anticancer treatments in premenopausal patients. Both patient- and treatment-related characteristics are key factors in influencing the risk of gonadotoxicity with the use of chemotherapy. The cryopreservation of oocytes/embryos is a standard strategy for fertility preservations offered to young women interested in future family planning, but it does not allow gonadal function protection during chemotherapy. Ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during chemotherapy is now recommended as an option to reduce the risk of gonadotoxicity in order to avoid the negative consequences of premature ovarian insufficiency in premenopausal women receiving cytotoxic therapy, including those not interested in fertility preservation. This review summarizes the risk of treatment-induced gonadotoxicity in premenopausal patients and the evidence available on the protective role of administering GnRHa during chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Arecco
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (L.A.); (M.M.L.); (C.M.)
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy; (T.R.); (V.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Tommaso Ruelle
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy; (T.R.); (V.M.); (A.B.)
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Valentino Martelli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy; (T.R.); (V.M.); (A.B.)
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Andrea Boutros
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy; (T.R.); (V.M.); (A.B.)
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Maddalena Latocca
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (L.A.); (M.M.L.); (C.M.)
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy; (T.R.); (V.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Stefano Spinaci
- Division of Breast Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL3, 16149 Genova, Italy;
| | - Camilla Marrocco
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (L.A.); (M.M.L.); (C.M.)
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy;
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (L.A.); (M.M.L.); (C.M.)
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy; (T.R.); (V.M.); (A.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-010-555-4254; Fax: +39-010-555-6536
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Buonomo B, Massarotti C, Dellino M, Anserini P, Ferrari A, Campanella M, Magnotti M, De Stefano C, Peccatori FA, Lambertini M. Reproductive issues in carriers of germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes: an expert meeting. BMC Med 2021; 19:205. [PMID: 34503502 PMCID: PMC8431919 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02081-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthy individuals and patients with cancer who are carriers of germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes face multiple reproductive challenges that require appropriate counseling and specific expertise. MAIN BODY On December 5th-7th, 2019, patient advocates and physicians with expertise in the field of reproductive medicine, fertility preservation, and oncology were invited to "San Giuseppe Moscati" Hospital in Avellino (Italy) for a workshop on reproductive management of women with germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes. From the discussion regarding the current evidence and future prospective in the field, eight main research questions were formulated and eight recommendations were developed regarding fertility, fertility preservation, preimplantation genetic testing, and pregnancy in healthy carriers and patients with cancer. CONCLUSION Several misconceptions about the topic persist among health care providers and patients often resulting in a discontinuous and suboptimal management. With the aim to offer patient-tailored counseling about reproductive issues, both awareness of current evidences and research should be promoted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Buonomo
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Miriam Dellino
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Paola Anserini
- Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Alberta Ferrari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery III-Breast Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, and Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Campanella
- aBRCAdabra, National Patient Advocacy Association for carriers of BRCA genes mutation, Palermo, Italy
| | - Mirosa Magnotti
- ACTO Campania, Alleanza Contro il Tumore Ovarico, Avellino, Italy
| | - Cristofaro De Stefano
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, "San Giuseppe Moscati" Hospital, Avellino, Italy
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy. .,Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moragón S, Di Liello R, Bermejo B, Hernando C, Olcina E, Chirivella I, Lluch A, Cejalvo JM, Martínez MT. Fertility and breast cancer: A literature review of counseling, preservation options and outcomes. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 166:103461. [PMID: 34461268 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Fertility preservation is an important issue in breast cancer patients undergoing oncological treatment. Fertility counseling is a crucial need given the physical and psychological stress experienced by patients. Cryopreservation of mature oocytes is currently the standard fertility-preserving procedure. Other options such as ovarian tissue preservation or gonadal protection during chemotherapy are still experimental, but have proven effectiveness. Prompt referral to a fertility unit is highly recommended in order to ensure quality of care. In this article, we focus on the different strategies to preserve fertility in breast cancer patients, assessing also the safety of pregnancy and breastfeeding after cancer. A systemic literature review was performed for research articles published in English in PubMed, or as abstracts from the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meetings, using the search terms "breast cancer" and "fertility".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Moragón
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Raimondo Di Liello
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania ''Luigi Vanvitelli'', Naples, Italy
| | - Begoña Bermejo
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Center for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC), Spain
| | - Cristina Hernando
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ernesto Olcina
- Hematology and Oncology Department, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Isabel Chirivella
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Lluch
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Center for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC), Spain
| | - Juan Miguel Cejalvo
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Center for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC), Spain.
| | - María Teresa Martínez
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fertility Preservation and Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-021-00420-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
12
|
Martelli V, Latocca MM, Ruelle T, Perachino M, Arecco L, Beshiri K, Razeti MG, Tagliamento M, Cosso M, Fregatti P, Lambertini M. Comparing the Gonadotoxicity of Multiple Breast Cancer Regimens: Important Understanding for Managing Breast Cancer in Pre-Menopausal Women. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2021; 13:341-351. [PMID: 34079366 PMCID: PMC8164347 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s274283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Over the last several decades, improvements in breast cancer treatment have contributed to increased cure rates for women diagnosed with this malignancy. Consequently, great importance should be paid to the long-term side effects of systemic therapies. For young women (defined as per guideline ≤40 years at diagnosis) who undergo chemotherapy, one of the most impactful side effects on their quality of life is premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) leading to fertility-related problems and the side effects of early menopause. Regimens, type, and doses of chemotherapy, as well as the age of patients and their ovarian reserve at the time of treatment are major risk factors for treatment-induced POI. For these reasons, childbearing desire and preservation of ovarian function and/or fertility should be discussed with all premenopausal patients before planning the treatments. This manuscript summarizes the available fertility preservation techniques in breast cancer patients, the risk of treatment-induced POI with different anticancer treatments, and the possible procedures to prevent it. A special focus is paid to the role of oncofertility counseling, as a central part of the visit in this setting, during which the patient should receive all the information about the potential consequences of the disease and of the proposed treatment on her future life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentino Martelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Maddalena Latocca
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Tommaso Ruelle
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marta Perachino
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Kristi Beshiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Razeti
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Tagliamento
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cosso
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Piero Fregatti
- U.O.C. Clinica Di Chirurgia Senologica, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Integrated Diagnostic Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Postchemotherapy hippocampal functional connectivity patterns in patients with breast cancer: a longitudinal resting state functional MR imaging study. Brain Imaging Behav 2021; 14:1456-1467. [PMID: 30877468 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-019-00067-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The hippocampus plays a key role in cognitive function and emotion regulation due to its wide connection with the whole brain. This study examined the acute effect of chemotherapy on hippocampal and subfield functional connectivity and neuropsychological status in breast cancer patients (BC). This IRB approved study included 29 BC and 25 age matched healthy controls (HCs) who underwent resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (Rs-fMRI), neuropsychological tests and blood examinations at baseline and one week after completing chemotherapy or in the same time interval. Within-group comparisons and group-by-time interactions analysis of hippocampus- and subregion- based functional connectivity were performed between the two groups. Functional connectivity changes were correlated with changes of blood examination and neuropsychological test scores in the BC group. The BC group had higher depression and anxiety scores, poorer performance on visual mobility, auditory memory and executive function than HCs (p < 0.05), and significantly abnormal estrodiol, total cholesterol and triglycerides (p < 0.05). BC survivors showed significant hippocampal functional connectivity changes mainly in the left insula, temporal lobe (Gaussian Random Field theory correction, P < 0.001) and the left inferior frontal gyrus (P < 0.01). The functional connections from the anterior hippocampus to the left temporal lobe were greater than the posterior hippocampus (P < 0.05). The hippocampus functional connectivity alterations were closely related to changes in depression scores, estrodiol and triglycerides (all p < 0.05). Chemotherapy induced especially anterior hippocampal functional connectivity abnormality, which is related to depression symptom, estrodiol and triglycerides disorders.
Collapse
|
14
|
Biswas L, Tyc K, Yakoubi WE, Morgan K, Xing J, Schindler K. Meiosis interrupted: the genetics of female infertility via meiotic failure. Reproduction 2021; 161:R13-R35. [PMID: 33170803 PMCID: PMC7855740 DOI: 10.1530/rep-20-0422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Idiopathic or 'unexplained' infertility represents as many as 30% of infertility cases worldwide. Conception, implantation, and term delivery of developmentally healthy infants require chromosomally normal (euploid) eggs and sperm. The crux of euploid egg production is error-free meiosis. Pathologic genetic variants dysregulate meiotic processes that occur during prophase I, meiotic resumption, chromosome segregation, and in cell cycle regulation. This dysregulation can result in chromosomally abnormal (aneuploid) eggs. In turn, egg aneuploidy leads to a broad range of clinical infertility phenotypes, including primary ovarian insufficiency and early menopause, egg fertilization failure and embryonic developmental arrest, or recurrent pregnancy loss. Therefore, maternal genetic variants are emerging as infertility biomarkers, which could allow informed reproductive decision-making. Here, we select and deeply examine human genetic variants that likely cause dysregulation of critical meiotic processes in 14 female infertility-associated genes: SYCP3, SYCE1, TRIP13, PSMC3IP, DMC1, MCM8, MCM9, STAG3, PATL2, TUBB8, CEP120, AURKB, AURKC, andWEE2. We discuss the function of each gene in meiosis, explore genotype-phenotype relationships, and delineate the frequencies of infertility-associated variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leelabati Biswas
- Department of Genetics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Katarzyna Tyc
- Department of Genetics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Warif El Yakoubi
- Department of Genetics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Katie Morgan
- Department of Genetics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Jinchuan Xing
- Department of Genetics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Karen Schindler
- Department of Genetics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vuković P, Peccatori FA, Massarotti C, Miralles MS, Beketić-Orešković L, Lambertini M. Preimplantation genetic testing for carriers of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 157:103201. [PMID: 33333149 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The detection of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant has relevant implications for the patients and their family members. Family planning, prophylactic surgery and the possibility of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) to avoid transmittance of pathogenic variants to the offspring are relevant topics in this setting. PGT-M is valuable option for BRCA carriers, but it remains a controversial and underdiscussed topic. Although the advances in PGT technologies have improved pregnancy rate, there are still several important challenges associated with its use. The purpose of this review is to report the current evidence on PGT-M for BRCA1/2 carriers, ethical concerns and controversy associated with its use, reproductive implications of BRCA pathogenic variants, underlying areas in which an educational effort would be beneficial as well as possibilities for future research efforts in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Vuković
- Division of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia.
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20125, Italy.
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, 16132, Italy.
| | | | - Lidija Beketić-Orešković
- Division of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia; Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia.
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, 16132, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, 16126, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lambertini M, Peccatori FA, Demeestere I, Amant F, Wyns C, Stukenborg JB, Paluch-Shimon S, Halaska MJ, Uzan C, Meissner J, von Wolff M, Anderson RA, Jordan K. Fertility preservation and post-treatment pregnancies in post-pubertal cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines †. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1664-1678. [PMID: 32976936 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 235] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - F A Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - I Demeestere
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Fertility Clinic, CUB-Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - F Amant
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Wyns
- Department of Gynecology and Andrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - J-B Stukenborg
- NORDFERTIL Research Lab Stockholm, Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Division of Oncology, Sharrett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - M J Halaska
- Department of OB/GYN, 3(rd) Medical Faculty, Charles University and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - C Uzan
- Department of Breast and Gynecologic Surgery, APHP, Hospital Pitié Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - J Meissner
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M von Wolff
- University Women's Hospital, Division Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Bern, Switzerland
| | - R A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - K Jordan
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Anderson RA, Amant F, Braat D, D'Angelo A, Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM, Demeestere I, Dwek S, Frith L, Lambertini M, Maslin C, Moura-Ramos M, Nogueira D, Rodriguez-Wallberg K, Vermeulen N. ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation. Hum Reprod Open 2020; 2020:hoaa052. [PMID: 33225079 PMCID: PMC7666361 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 269] [Impact Index Per Article: 67.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the recommended management for women and transgender men with regards to fertility preservation (FP), based on the best available evidence in the literature? SUMMARY ANSWER The ESHRE Guideline on Female Fertility Preservation makes 78 recommendations on organization of care, information provision and support, pre-FP assessment, FP interventions and after treatment care. Ongoing developments in FP are also discussed. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The field of FP has grown hugely in the last two decades, driven by the increasing recognition of the importance of potential loss of fertility as a significant effect of the treatment of cancer and other serious diseases, and the development of the enabling technologies of oocyte vitrification and ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) for subsequent autografting. This has led to the widespread, though uneven, provision of FP for young women. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION The guideline was developed according to the structured methodology for development of ESHRE guidelines. After formulation of key questions by a group of experts, literature searches and assessments were performed. Papers published up to 1 November 2019 and written in English were included in the review. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS Based on the collected evidence, recommendations were formulated and discussed until consensus was reached within the guideline group. A stakeholder review was organized after finalization of the draft. The final version was approved by the guideline group and the ESHRE Executive Committee. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE This guideline aims to help providers meet a growing demand for FP options by diverse groups of patients, including those diagnosed with cancer undergoing gonadotoxic treatments, with benign diseases undergoing gonadotoxic treatments or those with a genetic condition predisposing to premature ovarian insufficiency, transgender men (assigned female at birth), and women requesting oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss.The guideline makes 78 recommendations on information provision and support, pre-FP assessment, FP interventions and after treatment care, including 50 evidence-based recommendations-of which 31 were formulated as strong recommendations and 19 as weak-25 good practice points and 3 research only recommendations. Of the evidence-based recommendations, 1 was supported by high-quality evidence, 3 by moderate-quality evidence, 17 by low-quality evidence and 29 by very low-quality evidence. To support future research in the field of female FP, a list of research recommendations is provided. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION Most interventions included are not well studied in FP patients. As some interventions, e.g. oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, are well established for treatment of infertility, technical aspects, feasibility and outcomes can be extrapolated. For other interventions, such as OTC and IVM, more evidence is required, specifically pregnancy outcomes after applying these techniques for FP patients. Such future studies may require the current recommendations to be revised. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The guideline provides clinicians with clear advice on best practice in female FP, based on the best evidence currently available. In addition, a list of research recommendations is provided to stimulate further studies in FP. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS The guideline was developed and funded by ESHRE, covering expenses associated with the guideline meetings, with the literature searches and with the dissemination of the guideline. The guideline group members did not receive payment. R.A.A. reports personal fees and non-financial support from Roche Diagnostics, personal fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, IBSA and Merck Serono, outside the submitted work; D.B. reports grants from Merck Serono and Goodlife, outside the submitted work; I.D. reports consulting fees from Roche and speaker's fees from Novartis; M.L. reports personal fees from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Takeda, and Theramex, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. DISCLAIMER This guideline represents the views of ESHRE, which were achieved after careful consideration of the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. In the absence of scientific evidence on certain aspects, a consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders has been obtained. Adherence to these clinical practice guidelines does not guarantee a successful or specific outcome, nor does it establish a standard of care. Clinical practice guidelines do not replace the need for application of clinical judgment to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type. ESHRE makes no warranty, express or implied, regarding the clinical practice guidelines and specifically excludes any warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular use or purpose. (Full disclaimer available at www.eshre.eu/guidelines.) †ESHRE Pages content is not externally peer reviewed. The manuscript has been approved by the Executive Committee of ESHRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Academic Medical Centres Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gynaecology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Oncology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Didi Braat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arianna D'Angelo
- Wales Fertility Institute, Swansea Bay Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Fertility Clinic, CUB-Hôpital Erasme and Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Lucy Frith
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Mariana Moura-Ramos
- Reprodutive Medicine Unit, Unit of Clinical Psychology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,University of Coimbra, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Daniela Nogueira
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, INOVIE Fertilité Clinique Croix du Sud, Toulouse, France
| | - Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Gynaecology and Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nathalie Vermeulen
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Central Office, Grimbergen, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Knabben L, Siegenthaler F, Imboden S, Mueller MD. Fertility in BRCA mutation carriers: counseling BRCA-mutated patients on reproductive issues. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 2020; 43:171-177. [PMID: 33027047 DOI: 10.1515/hmbci-2020-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Genetic testing rates for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) have steadily increased during the past decades resulting in a growing population of young and healthy mutation carriers. Available data on fertility issues in BRCA mutation carriers is rising but the results remain to some extent still conflicting. We have performed a systematic literature review in order to get an overview concerning the current evidence on fertility issues in BRCA mutation carriers. Data were analyzed critically with the aim to deliver physicians a solid basis for (onco) fertility counseling in women with BRCA mutations. Content We present the latest data on cancer risks in women with HBOC and analyze the influence of cancer treatment and preventive surgery on the reproductive potential. Epidemiological studies on fertility issues in BRCA mutation carriers showed heterogeneous results. However, several authors showed a decreased ovarian reserve with lower Anti-Müllerien hormone (AMH) levels and poorer response to ovarian stimulation in BRCA positive women. The diagnosis of BRCA mutations influences reproductive decision-making. Additionally, the shortened reproductive window and the need to complete family planning early has a significant psychological impact. Summary and Outlook This article highlights the importance of fertility counseling in BRCA mutation carriers. Individual fertility counseling is mandatory. Fertility preservation strategies should be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Knabben
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Franziska Siegenthaler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Sara Imboden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Michael D Mueller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Arecco L, Perachino M, Damassi A, Latocca MM, Soldato D, Vallome G, Parisi F, Razeti MG, Solinas C, Tagliamento M, Spinaci S, Massarotti C, Lambertini M. Burning Questions in the Oncofertility Counseling of Young Breast Cancer Patients. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2020; 14:1178223420954179. [PMID: 32952399 PMCID: PMC7476336 DOI: 10.1177/1178223420954179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The improved prognosis of breast cancer patients makes survivorship issues an area of crucial importance. In this regard, an increased attention is needed toward the development of potential anticancer treatment-related long-term side-effects, including gonadal failure and infertility in young women. Therefore, fertility preservation and family planning are crucial issues to be addressed in all young women of reproductive age with newly diagnosed cancer. Despite a growing availability of data on the efficacy and safety of fertility preservation options and the fact that conceiving after prior history of breast cancer has become more accepted over time, there are still several gray zones in this field so that many physicians remain uncomfortable to deal with these topics. The purpose of this review is to answer some of the most controversial questions frequently asked by patients during their oncofertility counseling, in order to provide a detailed and up-to-date overview on the evidence available in this field to physicians involved in the care of young women with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marta Perachino
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Damassi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Maddalena Latocca
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Davide Soldato
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Giacomo Vallome
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesca Parisi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Razeti
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Cinzia Solinas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Tutela della Salute Sardegna, Hospital A.Segni Ozieri, Sassari, Italy
| | - Marco Tagliamento
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Stefano Spinaci
- Division of Breast Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi e ASL3, Genova, Italy
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Merlino L, Chiné A, Galli C, Piccioni MG. BRCA1/2 genes mutations, ovarian reserve and female reproductive outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 72:339-348. [PMID: 32744451 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4784.20.04624-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes mutations seems to impact female fertility, in addition to increasing the risk of ovarian and breast cancer. Several studies had investigated this issue but data available are still controversial. In order to clarify the role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in female fertility and ovarian function we carried out a systematic review of the literature with the aim to establish a possible management's strategy of these patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A review of current literature regarding BRCA mutation (BRCAm) and fertility was conducted using the PubMed tool to select remarkable articles with the keywords "BRCA1/2 gene," "BRCA1/2 mutation," "anti-Müllerian hormone," "female fertility," "ovarian reserve" and "premature ovarian failure." EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS In current literature there are controversial findings about the relation between BRCA genes mutations and lifespan of female reproductive age. Several studies showed an higher risk of premature ovarian insufficiency of BRCAs mutations carriers, according to lower serum AMH level, primordial follicle count, or fewer oocyte yield after ovarian stimulation; on the other hand more recent studies reported not significant differences in serum AMH level or in reproductive outcomes between mutated and non-mutated BRCA patients. For this reason, currently there is not a strict recommendation for routine evaluation of fertility in female carriers of BRCA mutations. Nevertheless, the strong advice to complete childbearing by age 40 and then to undergo a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and the increased risk of infertility as a result of anticancer treatment in breast cancer BRCAm patients, make the issue of fertility and pregnancy planning in these women worthy of consideration. CONCLUSIONS A dedicated counseling to discuss these issues, eventually associated with a personalized assessment of serum AMH or antral follicle count in order to have a panoramic view of ovarian reserve, may be useful in the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Merlino
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy -
| | - Alessandra Chiné
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Cecilia Galli
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria G Piccioni
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kramer I, Schaapveld M, Oldenburg HSA, Sonke GS, McCool D, van Leeuwen FE, Van de Vijver KK, Russell NS, Linn SC, Siesling S, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Schmidt MK. The Influence of Adjuvant Systemic Regimens on Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk and Receptor Subtype. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 111:709-718. [PMID: 30698719 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Revised: 08/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing number of breast cancer (BC) survivors are at risk of developing contralateral breast cancer (CBC). We aimed to investigate the influence of various adjuvant systemic regimens on, subtype-specific, risk of CBC. METHODS This population-based cohort study included female patients diagnosed with first invasive BC between 2003 and 2010; follow-up was complete until 2016. Clinico-pathological data were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and additional data on receptor status through linkage with PALGA: the Dutch Pathology Registry. Cumulative incidences (death and distant metastases as competing risk) and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated for all invasive metachronous CBC and CBC subtypes. RESULTS Of 83 144 BC patients, 2816 developed a CBC; the 10-year cumulative incidence was 3.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.7% to 4.0%). Overall, adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.80), endocrine therapy (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.52), and trastuzumab with chemotherapy (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.73) were strongly associated with a reduced CBC risk. Specifically, taxane-containing chemotherapy (HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.62) and aromatase inhibitors (HR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.44) were associated with a large CBC risk reduction. More detailed analyses showed that endocrine therapy statistically significantly decreased the risk of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive CBC (HR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.47) but not ER-negative CBC (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.93) compared with no endocrine therapy. Patients receiving chemotherapy for ER-negative first BC had a higher risk of ER-negative CBC from 5 years of follow-up (HR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.62 to 4.99) compared with patients not receiving chemotherapy for ER-negative first BC. CONCLUSION Endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, as well as trastuzumab with chemotherapy reduce CBC risk. However, each adjuvant therapy regimen had a different impact on the CBC subtype distribution. Taxane-containing chemotherapy and aromatase inhibitors were associated with the largest CBC risk reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Kramer
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Hester S A Oldenburg
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Koen K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicola S Russell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Department of Surgical Oncology.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Service Research, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chemotherapy-induced brain changes in breast cancer survivors: evaluation with multimodality magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Imaging Behav 2020; 13:1799-1814. [PMID: 30937827 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-019-00074-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Chemotherapy related cognitive impairments are common in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. These cognitive dysfunctions are mainly attributable to chemotherapy related brain structural and functional alterations. Multimodality magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can reveal brain gray matter volume loss, white matter microstructural disruption, reduced gray matter density, impaired cerebral blood flow and brain structural and functional connection networks at both local and global levels. This review outlines the potential applications of multimodality MR imaging techniques in chemotherapy induced cognitive deficit in breast cancer survivors and provides future research perspective in this field.
Collapse
|
23
|
Sella T, Partridge AH. Fertility Counseling and Preservation in Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-019-00348-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
24
|
Zhang X, Niu J, Che T, Zhu Y, Zhang H, Qu J. Fertility preservation in BRCA mutation carriers-efficacy and safety issues: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2020; 18:11. [PMID: 32070378 PMCID: PMC7027288 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-019-0561-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BRCA mutation carriers face various situations that influence their fertility potential. There is still a lack of guideline or expert consensus on Fertility Preservation (FP) in BRCA mutation carriers and the necessity and safety of FP in BRCA mutation carriers is still in dispute. This review aims to focus on the population of BRCA mutation carriers by analyzing the existing FP strategies, comprehensively comparing the pros and cons of each strategy and its applicability.FP is a suggestion for BRCA mutation carriers with birth planning. Different FP strategies have different characteristics. Considering the particularity of BRCA mutation carriers, multiple factors need to be carefully considered. This review focuses on the applicability of each FP method for carriers under various circumstances. Available FP strategies including oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, and egg/embryo donation are analyzed by comparing existing methods comprehensively. In the attempt to provide an up-to-date decision-making guidance. Conditions taking into consideration were the carrier's age, the risk of breast and ovarian metastasis, plans for oncotherapy, FP outcome, time available for FP intervention and accessibility.Overall, FP is necessary and safe for BRCA mutation carriers. Among all available FP methods, oocyte cryopreservation is the most reliable procedure; ovarian tissue cryopreservation is the only way for preserving both fertility and endocrine function, recommended for pre-pubertal carriers and when time is limited for oocyte stimulation. A clear framework provides frontline clinical practitioners a new thought and eventually benefit thousands of BRCA mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofu Zhang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College of Soochow University, Ren Ai Road 199, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Jingxin Niu
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College of Soochow University, Ren Ai Road 199, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Tuanjie Che
- Laboratory of Precision Medicine and Translational Medicine, Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Science and Technology Town Hospital, Suzhou, 215153, China
| | - Yibei Zhu
- Department of Immunology, Medical College of Soochow University, Ren Ai Road 199, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Hongtao Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China
| | - Jing Qu
- Department of Cell Biology, Medical College of Soochow University, Ren Ai Road 199, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcomes in young women with breast cancer. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 37:709-715. [PMID: 31872386 PMCID: PMC7125060 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01658-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcome. The main purpose and research question of the study is to determine the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcomes. Methods Prospective study: 67 breast cancer patients between 18 and 40 years old, undergoing a fertility preservation by means of oocyte storage were considered. Inclusions criteria for the study were age between 18 and 40 years old, BMI between 18 and 28, breast cancer neoplasm stage I and II according to American Joint Committee on Cancer classification (2017) and no metastasis. Exclusion criteria: age over 40 years old, BMI < 18 and > 28, breast cancer neoplasm stage III and IV and do not performed the BRCA test. A total of 21 patients had not performed the test and were excluded. Patients were divided into four groups: Group A was composed by 11 breast cancer patients with BRCA 1 mutations, Group B was composed by 11 breast cancer patients with BRCA 2 mutations, Group C was composed by 24 women with breast cancer without BRCA mutations, and Group D (control) was composed by 181 normal women. Results Group A showed significant lower AMH levels compared to Group C and D (1.2 ± 1.1 vs 4.5 ± 4.1 p < 0.05 and 1.2 ± 1.1 vs 3.8 ± 2.5 p < 0.05). BRCA1 mutated patients showed a significant lower rate of mature oocytes (MII) compared to Group C (3.1 ± 2.3 vs 7.2 ± 4.4 p < 0,05) and Group D (3.1 ± 2.3 vs 7.3 ± 3.4; p < 0,05). Breast cancer patients needed a higher dose of gonadotropins compared to controls (Group A 2206 ± 1392 Group B2047.5 ± 829.9 Group C 2106 ± 1336 Group D 1597 ± 709 p < 0,05). No significant differences were found among the groups considering basal FSH levels, duration of stimulation, number of developed follicles, and number of total retrieved oocytes. Regarding BRCA2 mutation, no effect on fertility was shown in this study. Conclusions The study showed that BRCA1 patients had a higher risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) confirmed by a diminished ovarian reserve and a lower number of mature oocytes suitable for cryopreservation.
Collapse
|
26
|
Lambertini M, Olympios N, Lequesne J, Calbrix C, Fontanilles M, Loeb A, Leheurteur M, Demeestere I, Di Fiore F, Perdrix A, Clatot F. Impact of Taxanes, Endocrine Therapy, and Deleterious Germline BRCA Mutations on Anti-müllerian Hormone Levels in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Anthracycline- and Cyclophosphamide-Based Chemotherapy. Front Oncol 2019; 9:575. [PMID: 31355134 PMCID: PMC6640206 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Limited evidence exists on the impact of adding a taxane, using endocrine therapy and carrying a deleterious germline BRCA mutation on ovarian reserve measured by anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) levels of young breast cancer patients receiving (neo)adjuvant cyclophosphamide- and anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Methods: This is a biomarker analysis including young (≤ 40 years) early breast cancer patients with known germline BRCA mutational status and available prospectively collected frozen plasma samples before and after chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of either six cycles of FEC (5 fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) or three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel (D, 100 mg/m2). Endocrine therapy consisted of tamoxifen (±GnRH agonists). AMH levels at baseline, 1 and 3 years after diagnosis were compared according to type of chemotherapy (FEC only vs. FEC-D), use of endocrine therapy (yes vs. no) and deleterious germline BRCA mutations (mutated vs. negative). Results: Out of 148 included patients, 127 (86%) received D following FEC chemotherapy, 90 (61%) underwent endocrine therapy, and 35 (24%) had deleterious germline BRCA mutations. In the whole cohort, AMH levels drastically dropped 1 year after diagnosis (p < 0.0001) with a slight but significant recovery at 3 years (p < 0.0001). One year after diagnosis, patients treated with FEC only had higher median AMH levels than those who received FEC-D (0.22 vs. 0.04 μg/L, p = 0.0006); no difference was observed at 3 years (0.06 and 0.18 μg/L, p = 0.47). Patients under endocrine therapy had significantly higher AMH levels than those who did not receive this treatment 1 year after diagnosis (0.12 vs. 0.02 μg/L; p = 0.008), with no difference at 3 years (0.11 and 0.20 μg/L, p = 0.22). AMH levels were similar between BRCA-mutated and BRCA-negative patients at baseline (1.94 vs. 1.66 μg/L, p = 0.53), 1 year (0.09 vs. 0.06 μg/L, p = 0.39) and 3 years (0.25 vs. 0.16 μg/L; p = 0.43) after diagnosis. Conclusions: In breast cancer patients receiving FEC chemotherapy, adding D appeared to negatively impact on their ovarian reserve in the short-term; no further detrimental effect was observed for endocrine therapy use and presence of a deleterious germline BRCA mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Nathalie Olympios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Justine Lequesne
- Department of Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Céline Calbrix
- Department of Bio-Pathology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Maxime Fontanilles
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.,IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | - Agnès Loeb
- Department of Medical Information, Henri Becquerel Centre, Rouen, France
| | | | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Fertility Clinic, CUB-Hôpital Erasme and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Di Fiore
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.,IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | - Anne Perdrix
- Department of Bio-Pathology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.,IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.,IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lambertini M, Olympios N, Lequesne J, Calbrix C, Fontanilles M, Loeb A, Leheurteur M, Demeestere I, Di Fiore F, Perdrix A, Clatot F. Impact of Taxanes, Endocrine Therapy, and Deleterious Germline BRCA Mutations on Anti-müllerian Hormone Levels in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Anthracycline- and Cyclophosphamide-Based Chemotherapy. Front Oncol 2019. [PMID: 31355134 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00575/full] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Limited evidence exists on the impact of adding a taxane, using endocrine therapy and carrying a deleterious germline BRCA mutation on ovarian reserve measured by anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) levels of young breast cancer patients receiving (neo)adjuvant cyclophosphamide- and anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Methods: This is a biomarker analysis including young (≤ 40 years) early breast cancer patients with known germline BRCA mutational status and available prospectively collected frozen plasma samples before and after chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of either six cycles of FEC (5 fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) or three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel (D, 100 mg/m2). Endocrine therapy consisted of tamoxifen (±GnRH agonists). AMH levels at baseline, 1 and 3 years after diagnosis were compared according to type of chemotherapy (FEC only vs. FEC-D), use of endocrine therapy (yes vs. no) and deleterious germline BRCA mutations (mutated vs. negative). Results: Out of 148 included patients, 127 (86%) received D following FEC chemotherapy, 90 (61%) underwent endocrine therapy, and 35 (24%) had deleterious germline BRCA mutations. In the whole cohort, AMH levels drastically dropped 1 year after diagnosis (p < 0.0001) with a slight but significant recovery at 3 years (p < 0.0001). One year after diagnosis, patients treated with FEC only had higher median AMH levels than those who received FEC-D (0.22 vs. 0.04 μg/L, p = 0.0006); no difference was observed at 3 years (0.06 and 0.18 μg/L, p = 0.47). Patients under endocrine therapy had significantly higher AMH levels than those who did not receive this treatment 1 year after diagnosis (0.12 vs. 0.02 μg/L; p = 0.008), with no difference at 3 years (0.11 and 0.20 μg/L, p = 0.22). AMH levels were similar between BRCA-mutated and BRCA-negative patients at baseline (1.94 vs. 1.66 μg/L, p = 0.53), 1 year (0.09 vs. 0.06 μg/L, p = 0.39) and 3 years (0.25 vs. 0.16 μg/L; p = 0.43) after diagnosis. Conclusions: In breast cancer patients receiving FEC chemotherapy, adding D appeared to negatively impact on their ovarian reserve in the short-term; no further detrimental effect was observed for endocrine therapy use and presence of a deleterious germline BRCA mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Nathalie Olympios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Justine Lequesne
- Department of Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Céline Calbrix
- Department of Bio-Pathology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Maxime Fontanilles
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
- IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | - Agnès Loeb
- Department of Medical Information, Henri Becquerel Centre, Rouen, France
| | | | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Fertility Clinic, CUB-Hôpital Erasme and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Di Fiore
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
- IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | - Anne Perdrix
- Department of Bio-Pathology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
- IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
- IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Xue C, Wei W, Sun P, Zheng W, Diao X, Xu F, Huang J, An X, Xia W, Hong R, Jiang K, Huang R, Yuan Z, Wang S, Li A, Zou R, Shi Y. Pretreatment anti-Mullerian hormone-based nomogram predicts menstruation status after chemotherapy for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 173:619-628. [PMID: 30392113 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4997-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ovarian function is important for optimizing endocrine treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (eBC). The aim of the study was to determine whether patients' pretreatment levels of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) were associated with menses status after chemotherapy and to build a predictive nomogram model for amenorrhea in women with HR+ eBC. METHODS Between August 2013 and December 2014, 120 premenopausal patients with HR+ eBC were included retrospectively. The associations among age, prechemotherapy levels of AMH, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH),and estradiol (E2) and the 2-year postchemotherapy menses status were analyzed. We determined the cutoff values of hormone levels by using the biostatistical tool (Cutoff Finder). A novel nomogram was established to predict the 2-year amenorrhea status based on the logistic analysis. Concordance index (C-index) was used to validate the capacity. RESULTS One hundred nine women (90.8%) experienced amenorrhea after chemotherapy. AMH < 0.965 ng/ml predicted amenorrhea at 2 years (AUC 0.84, sensitivity 74% and specificity 81.8%), independent of age. The predictive nomogram based on age and pretreatment AMH and FSH levels was developed to predict the probability of 2-year postchemotherapy amenorrhea with a C-index of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.91). CONCLUSIONS In premenopausal patients with HR+ eBC, prechemotherapy AMH concentration was associated with the patient's 2-year amenorrhea status, independent of age. The nomogram model based on age and pretreatment AMH and FSH levels accurately predicted the 2-year amenorrhea status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Xue
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Wenwen Wei
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Peng Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Wei Zheng
- Department of Ultrasound and Electrocardiogram, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Xiaoju Diao
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Fei Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Jiajia Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Xin An
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Wen Xia
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Ruoxi Hong
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Kuikui Jiang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Riqing Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Zhongyu Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Shusen Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Anhua Li
- Department of Ultrasound and Electrocardiogram, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Ruhai Zou
- Department of Ultrasound and Electrocardiogram, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Yanxia Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jacobson M, Bernardini M, Sobel ML, Kim RH, McCuaig J, Allen L. No. 366-Gynaecologic Management of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2018; 40:1497-1510. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.05.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
30
|
Jacobson M, Bernardini M, Sobel ML, Kim RH, McCuaig J, Allen L. No 366 - Prise en charge gynécologique du cancer du sein et de l'ovaire héréditaire. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2018; 40:1511-1527. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
31
|
Premature ovarian aging in BRCA carriers: a prototype of systemic precocious aging? Oncotarget 2018; 9:15931-15941. [PMID: 29662617 PMCID: PMC5882308 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Though former evidence implies a correlation of breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation with reduced ovarian reserve, the data is yet inconsistent. Our aim was to investigate biomarkers of ovarian aging in a cohort of young healthy carriers of the BRCA mutation. We hypothesized that the role played by BRCA genes in aging pathways is not exclusive to the ovary. Experimental Design Healthy female BRCA carriers, 40 years or younger and healthy male BRCA carriers, 50 years or younger, were enrolled in the study. Serum anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH), fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), Klotho and IL-1 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Ovarian AMH and protein kinase B (AKT) mRNA from BRCA carriers who underwent prophylactic oophorectomy and from age-matched, healthy, non-carriers who underwent partial oophorectomy due to benign conditions were analyzed by qPCR. Results Thirty-three female (median age 35y) and 20 male (44y) BRCA carriers were enrolled into the study and matched to control non-carriers (34y and 43y, respectively). Serum AMH level was significantly lower in BRCA female carriers than in both non-carrier controls and age-matched nomograms. The levels of ovarian AMH and AKT mRNA were significantly lower in carriers than in controls. The systemic aging cytokines FGF-23, klotho and IL-1 displayed a differential expression in carriers of both genders. FGF-23 level was higher in carriers (P=0.06). Conclusions Our results suggest a link between BRCA mutation, accelerated ovarian aging and systemic aging-related pathophysiology.
Collapse
|
32
|
Grynberg M, Raad J, Comtet M, Vinolas C, Cédrin-Durnerin I, Sonigo C. Fertility preservation in BRCA-mutated women: when and how? Future Oncol 2018; 14:483-490. [PMID: 29327596 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA 1 and 2 genes play a critical role in the safeguarding of DNA integrity. It is now well established that BRCA1 and BRCA2-mutated women are at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancers. However, several lines of evidence indicate that this genetic status may also be associated with ovarian dysfunction, in particular a reduced ovarian reserve. Considering the gonadal toxicity of cancer treatments and the recommendation of prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy around 40 years, young BRCA mutation carriers are confronted with difficult family planning decisions. Recent development in fertility preservation offers new possibilities for these women, not only before a potential cancer treatment, but also in healthy carriers. If the pregnancy seems to be safe in this population, oocyte vitrification following ovarian stimulation might help BRCA-mutated patients to conceive after cancer treatment or to undergo prenatal genetic diagnosis in order to avoid the risk of transmitting the genetic abnormality to their offspring. The present article aims to extensively discuss the fertility issues related to BRCA gene mutations and the questions raised by the possibility of fertility in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaël Grynberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France.,University Paris Sud XI, 94276, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.,Unité Inserm U1133, Université Paris-Diderot, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Jade Raad
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France
| | - Marjorie Comtet
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Avenue du 14 Juillet, 93140 Bondy, France.,University Paris XIII, 93017, Bobigny, France
| | - Claire Vinolas
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Avenue du 14 Juillet, 93140 Bondy, France
| | - Isabelle Cédrin-Durnerin
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Avenue du 14 Juillet, 93140 Bondy, France
| | - Charlotte Sonigo
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France.,Inserm U1185, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94276, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Srikanthan A, Amir E, Bedard P, Giuliani M, Hodgson D, Laframboise S, Prica A, Yee K, Greenblatt E, Lewin J, Gupta A. Fertility preservation in post-pubescent female cancer patients: A practical guideline for clinicians. Mol Clin Oncol 2017; 8:153-158. [PMID: 29387409 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2017.1486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Increasing accessibility of fertility preservation (FP) options has permitted women to retain fertility following anticancer therapies. Several published guidelines have made recommendations for FP however their implementation into practice is currently unknown. In this review, we aim to provide oncology clinicians practical information about FP options for post-pubescent female cancer patients and recommendations for care delivery in order to answer preliminary questions and help triage whether FP referral is appropriate. Herein, we present a resource for oncology providers to guide them with FP discussions. Key points that are discussed in this critical review include: i) All cancer patients beginning a new plan of care should be informed of potential fertility risk. ii) If a woman requests further information on FP interventions, referral to a FP clinic should be made. iii) Given the evolving technologies in this area, patients should be informed of those which are proven and unproven, with oocyte and embryo preservation recognized as standard practice. iv) Random start (independent of menstrual cycle day) techniques are available to minimize oncologic treatment delays. v) Specific protocols for ovarian stimulation may be center-specific. vi) There is unlikely an increased cancer recurrence risk as a result of stimulation protocols in women with hormone-sensitive cancers. vii) Lastly, given the absence of consensus in the literature, routine use of GnRH analogs is not recommended for all cancer patients, however may be considered in select cases, such as high-risk women in whom definitive FP is not possible or feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amirrtha Srikanthan
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Eitan Amir
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Philippe Bedard
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Meredith Giuliani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - David Hodgson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Stephanie Laframboise
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Anca Prica
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Karen Yee
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Ellen Greenblatt
- Mount Sinai Centre for Fertility and Reproductive Health, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5T 2Z5, Canada
| | - Jeremy Lewin
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Abha Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.,Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fertility and pregnancy issues in BRCA -mutated breast cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev 2017; 59:61-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2017] [Revised: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 07/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
35
|
Ekwueme DU, Allaire BT, Parish WJ, Thomas CC, Poehler D, Guy GP, Aldridge AP, Lahoti SR, Fairley TL, Trogdon JG. Estimation of Breast Cancer Incident Cases and Medical Care Costs Attributable to Alcohol Consumption Among Insured Women Aged <45 Years in the U.S. Am J Prev Med 2017; 53:S47-S54. [PMID: 28818245 PMCID: PMC5854476 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Revised: 04/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study estimated the percentage of breast cancer cases, total number of incident cases, and total annual medical care costs attributable to alcohol consumption among insured younger women (aged 18-44 years) by type of insurance and stage at diagnosis. METHODS The study used the 2012-2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, cancer incidence data from two national registry programs, and published relative risk measures to estimate the: (1) alcohol-attributable fraction of breast cancer cases among younger women by insurance type; (2) total number of breast cancer incident cases attributable to alcohol consumption by stage at diagnosis and insurance type among younger women; and (3) total annual medical care costs of treating breast cancer incident cases attributable to alcohol consumption among younger women. Analyses were conducted in 2016; costs were expressed in 2014 U.S. dollars. RESULTS Among younger women enrolled in Medicaid, private insurance, and both groups, 8.7% (95% CI=7.4%, 10.0%), 13.8% (95% CI=13.3%, 14.4%), and 12.3% (95% CI=11.4%, 13.1%) of all breast cancer cases, respectively, were attributable to alcohol consumption. Localized stage was the largest proportion of estimated attributable incident cases. The estimated total number of breast cancer incident alcohol-attributable cases was 1,636 (95% CI=1,570, 1,703) and accounted for estimated total annual medical care costs of $148.4 million (95% CI=$140.6 million, $156.1 million). CONCLUSIONS Alcohol-attributable breast cancer has estimated medical care costs of nearly $150 million per year. The current findings could be used to support evidence-based interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in younger women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donatus U Ekwueme
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | | | | | - Cheryll C Thomas
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Diana Poehler
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Gery P Guy
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Sejal R Lahoti
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Temeika L Fairley
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Justin G Trogdon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Johnson L, Sammel MD, Domchek S, Schanne A, Prewitt M, Gracia C. Antimüllerian hormone levels are lower in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Fertil Steril 2017; 107:1256-1265.e6. [PMID: 28476184 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2016] [Revised: 03/15/2017] [Accepted: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels in women at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer compared with healthy low-risk control women. DESIGN Prospective cohort. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) Reproductive-age women with a uterus and both ovaries were analyzed in four groups: BRCA1 mutation carriers, BRCA2 carriers, BRCA-negative women, and low-risk controls. INTERVENTION(S) Self-collected dried blood spot. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) AMH levels. RESULT(S) One hundred ninety-five women were included: 55 BRCA1 carriers, 50 BRCA2 carriers, 26 BRCA negative women, and 64 low-risk controls. After adjusting for confounders, BRCA2 carriers had AMH levels that were 33% lower than control women and an increased odds of having AMH <1 ng/mL. BRCA1 carriers and BRCA-negative women had AMH levels similar to control women. When analysis was restricted to regularly menstruating women younger than 40 years of age, BRCA2 carriers continued to demonstrate significantly lower AMH levels and increased likelihood of low AMH. Also, in this restricted group, BRCA-negative women demonstrated AMH levels that were 42% lower than control women. No difference in AMH was observed for BRCA1 carriers. CONCLUSION(S) We observed significantly lower AMH levels among BRCA2 carriers compared with low-risk control women. These results were stable across all models. BRCA-negative women also had lower AMH values, but only in models restricted to young regularly menstruating women. In contrast to earlier analyses, BRCA1 carriers had AMH values that were similar to low-risk control women, but this may be due to differences in the population studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Johnson
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Reproductive Endocrinology Associates of Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina.
| | - Mary D Sammel
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Women's Health Clinical Research Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Susan Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Allison Schanne
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Maureen Prewitt
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Clarisa Gracia
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
de la Noval BD. Potential implications on female fertility and reproductive lifespan in BRCA germline mutation women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 294:1099-1103. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4187-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2016] [Accepted: 08/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
38
|
Long-term consequences of ovarian ablation for premenopausal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 157:565-73. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3842-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Accepted: 05/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
39
|
Reimer T, Kempert S, Gerber B, Thiesen HJ, Hartmann S, Koczan D. SLCO1B1*5 polymorphism (rs4149056) is associated with chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea in premenopausal women with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:337. [PMID: 27234217 PMCID: PMC4884353 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2373-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 05/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Because inheritance is recognized as playing a role in age at menarche and natural menopause, the development of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) might depend on inherited genetic factors; however, studies that explore such a correlation are few and have received scant attention. Given the importance of this topic we conducted a comprehensive genotype study in young women (≤45 years) with early-stage breast cancer. Methods Our approach tested the effect of variant polymorphisms in drug metabolism enzymes (DMEs) using a predesigned pharmacogenomics panel (TaqMan® OpenArray®, Life Technologies GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) in premenopausal women (n = 50). Patients received contemporary chemotherapy; in all cases a cyclophosphamide-based regimen with a dose of at least 500 mg/m2 for six cycles. CIA was considered to be present in women with no resumption of menstrual bleeding within 12 months after completion of chemotherapy or goserelin. Results Twenty-six patients (52 %) showed CIA during follow-up whereas 24 women (48 %) remained premenopausal. Of all the DMEs studied, only the SLCO1B1*5 (rs4149056) genotype was associated with the development of CIA (P = 0.017). Of the 26 patients who were homozygous for the T/T allele SLCO1B1*5, 18 (69.2 %) developed CIA compared with 8 (30.8 %) of the 22 patients who were heterozygous (C/T allele). The association of heterozygous SLCO1B1*5 allele (OR 0.038; 95%CI: 0.05–0.92) with a lower risk of developing CIA remained significant in a binary logistic regression analysis that include age, SLCO1B1*5 allele variants, and goserelin therapy. Conclusions Patient age and SLCO1B1*5 allele variants predict the likelihood of young women with breast cancer developing CIA. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2373-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toralf Reimer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Klinikum Suedstadt, Suedring 81, Rostock, 18059, Germany.
| | - Sarah Kempert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Klinikum Suedstadt, Suedring 81, Rostock, 18059, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Klinikum Suedstadt, Suedring 81, Rostock, 18059, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Thiesen
- Institute of Immunology, University of Rostock, P.O.B. 100888, Rostock, 18055, Germany
| | - Steffi Hartmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Klinikum Suedstadt, Suedring 81, Rostock, 18059, Germany
| | - Dirk Koczan
- Institute of Immunology, University of Rostock, P.O.B. 100888, Rostock, 18055, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lambertini M, Del Mastro L. Fertility preservation in BRCA-mutated breast cancer patients. BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT 2016. [DOI: 10.2217/bmt-2016-0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
A possible side effect of anticancer treatments in premenopausal women is the occurrence of premature ovarian failure and subsequent infertility. The inheritance of a deleterious genetic mutation in the BRCA1 or 2 genes generates the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Additional fertility counseling for breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations is warranted to educate them about the available fertility preservation options in the context of their unique concerns (i.e., prophylactic gynecologic surgery, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and risk of developing long-term treatment-related premature ovarian failure). In this report we discuss the available options for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer, with a particular focus on the specific issues in breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
- BrEAST Data Centre, Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, & l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Woodard TL, Bolcun-Filas E. Prolonging Reproductive Life after Cancer: The Need for Fertoprotective Therapies. Trends Cancer 2016; 2:222-233. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2016.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2016] [Revised: 03/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
42
|
Allaire BT, Ekwueme DU, Guy GP, Li C, Tangka FK, Trivers KF, Sabatino SA, Rodriguez JL, Trogdon JG. Medical Care Costs of Breast Cancer in Privately Insured Women Aged 18-44 Years. Am J Prev Med 2016; 50:270-7. [PMID: 26775906 PMCID: PMC5836737 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2015] [Revised: 08/05/2015] [Accepted: 08/31/2015] [Indexed: 09/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer in women aged 18-44 years accounts for approximately 27,000 newly diagnosed cases and 3,000 deaths annually. When tumors are diagnosed, they are usually aggressive, resulting in expensive treatment costs. The purpose of this study is to estimate the prevalent medical costs attributable to breast cancer treatment among privately insured younger women. METHODS Data from the 2006 MarketScan database representing claims for privately insured younger women were used. Costs for younger breast cancer patients were compared with a matched sample of younger women without breast cancer, overall and for an active treatment subsample. Analyses were conducted in 2013 with medical care costs expressed in 2012 U.S. dollars. RESULTS Younger women with breast cancer incurred an estimated $19,435 (SE=$415) in additional direct medical care costs per person per year compared with younger women without breast cancer. Outpatient expenditures comprised 94% of the total estimated costs ($18,344 [SE=$396]). Inpatient costs were $43 (SE=$10) higher and prescription drug costs were $1,048 (SE=$64) higher for younger women with breast cancer than in younger women without breast cancer. For women in active treatment, the burden was more than twice as high ($52,542 [SE=$977]). CONCLUSIONS These estimates suggest that breast cancer is a costly illness to treat among younger, privately insured women. This underscores the potential financial vulnerability of women in this age group and the importance of health insurance during this time in life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gery P Guy
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Chunyu Li
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Susan A Sabatino
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Juan L Rodriguez
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Justin G Trogdon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
BRCA mutation carriers show normal ovarian response in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2015; 104:1162-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2015] [Revised: 07/12/2015] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
44
|
Sénéchal C, Rousset-Jablonski C. [Should a systematic fertility preservation be proposed to healthy women carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation?]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 43:800-5. [PMID: 26476890 DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2015.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 09/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Should all women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes mutations be considered at risk of prematurely impaired fertility, and thus should a fertility preservation systematically be proposed? Women carrying mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2 are at high risk for breast and tubo-ovarian cancer. The treatment of a breast cancer at a young age, unrare in this population, is associated with a risk of infertility, due to the ovarian toxicity of chemotherapy, to the recommended duration of hormonotherapy when indicated, and to the time advised before starting a pregnancy. Furthermore, some data in the literature suggest a higher risk of premature ovarian failure among women with BRCA1/2 mutation: advance of the age at menopause and poorer response to ovarian stimulation have been observed. Several pathophysiological hypotheses support this finding, as the involvement of the BRCA genes in maintaining telomere length, the DNA repair anomalies promoting oocyte apoptosis, differences in FMR1 genotype. Current fertility preservation techniques have limitations, some of them being specific to BRCA1/2 women: absence of oncological risk due to stimulation in BRCA1/2 women not clearly demonstrated, oocyte vitrification techniques limited rentability, graft of ovarian cortex not suitable in these women at high risk. Thus, data on the increased risk of premature ovarian failure remaining weak, such a systematic proposal seems questionable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Sénéchal
- Gynécologue médicale, unité d'oncogénétique, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - C Rousset-Jablonski
- Gynécologue médicale, département de chirurgie, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laënnec, 69008 Lyon, France; Service de gynécologie obstétrique, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, hospices civils de Lyon, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pelosi E, Forabosco A, Schlessinger D. Genetics of the ovarian reserve. Front Genet 2015; 6:308. [PMID: 26528328 PMCID: PMC4606124 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2015] [Accepted: 09/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Primordial follicles or non-growing follicles (NGFs) are the functional unit of reproduction, each comprising a single germ cell surrounded by supporting somatic cells. NGFs constitute the ovarian reserve (OR), prerequisite for germ cell ovulation and the continuation of the species. The dynamics of the reserve is determined by the number of NGFs formed and their complex subsequent fates. During the reproductive lifespan, the OR progressively diminishes due to follicle atresia as well as recruitment, maturation, and ovulation. The depletion of the OR is the major determining driver of menopause, which ensues when the number of primordial follicles falls below a threshold of ∼1,000. Therefore, genes and processes involved in follicle dynamics are particularly important to understand the process of menopause, both in the typical reproductive lifespan and in conditions like primary ovarian insufficiency, defined as menopause before age 40. Genes and their variants that affect the timing of menopause thereby provide candidates for diagnosis of and intervention in problems of reproductive lifespan. We review the current knowledge of processes and genes involved in the development of the OR and in the dynamics of ovarian follicles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Pelosi
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - David Schlessinger
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Munster PN. More Options for Fertility Preservation for Patients With Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:2413-5. [PMID: 26101241 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.9304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela N Munster
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Oocyte aging has a significant impact on reproductive outcomes both quantitatively and qualitatively. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the age-related decline in reproductive success have not been fully addressed. BRCA is known to be involved in homologous DNA recombination and plays an essential role in double-strand DNA break repair. Given the growing body of laboratory and clinical evidence, we performed a systematic review on the current understanding of the role of DNA repair in human reproduction. We find that BRCA mutations negatively affect ovarian reserve based on convincing evidence from in vitro and in vivo results and prospective studies. Because decline in the function of the intact gene occurs at an earlier age, women with BRCA1 mutations exhibit accelerated ovarian aging, unlike those with BRCA2 mutations. However, because of the still robust function of the intact allele in younger women and because of the masking of most severe cases by prophylactic oophorectomy or cancer, it is less likely one would see an effect of BRCA mutations on fertility until later in reproductive age. The impact of BRCA2 mutations on reproductive function may be less visible because of the delayed decline in the function of normal BRCA2 allele. BRCA1 function and ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM)-mediated DNA repair may also be important in the pathogenesis of age-induced increase in aneuploidy. BRCA1 is required for meiotic spindle assembly, and cohesion function between sister chromatids is also regulated by ATM family member proteins. Taken together, these findings strongly suggest the implication of BRCA and DNA repair malfunction in ovarian aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kutluk Oktay
- Division of Reproductive Medicine and Laboratory of Molecular Reproduction & Fertility Preservation, Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation and IVF, New York, New York
| | - Volkan Turan
- Division of Reproductive Medicine and Laboratory of Molecular Reproduction & Fertility Preservation, Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation and IVF, New York, New York
| | - Shiny Titus
- Division of Reproductive Medicine and Laboratory of Molecular Reproduction & Fertility Preservation, Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation and IVF, New York, New York
| | - Robert Stobezki
- Division of Reproductive Medicine and Laboratory of Molecular Reproduction & Fertility Preservation, Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation and IVF, New York, New York
| | - Lin Liu
- Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Association of tamoxifen use and ovarian function in patients with invasive or pre-invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015. [PMID: 26208485 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3511-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The impact of long-term tamoxifen therapy on ovarian function is not known. Understanding these effects will help reproductive-aged patients who desire future pregnancy make more informed decisions regarding their treatment. This is a retrospective cohort study in patients identified through the UCSF Cancer Registry and SPORE database. We enrolled women with a history of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or early stage invasive breast cancer who were premenopausal at diagnosis and did not receive chemotherapy. Menstrual histories were obtained through electronic and paper surveys. We compared the age of menopause onset and menstrual pattern changes between women who received tamoxifen (TAM) and those who did not receive tamoxifen (control). Neither group received chemotherapy. 250 subjects were included in this study (125 TAM, 125 control). Mean age of menopause onset was 51.0 for both the groups and was not associated with duration of tamoxifen use or the age at tamoxifen initiation. Menstrual pattern changes, including amenorrhea, were more frequent in the TAM group than control group (any change: 48% TAM vs. 15 % control, p < 0.001; amenorrhea: 22% TAM vs. 3% control, p < 0.001). Older age was associated with an increased risk of developing amenorrhea within 6 months of starting tamoxifen (HR 1.32, p < 0.001). Menstrual pattern changes are common in premenopausal women taking tamoxifen. Tamoxifen use in the absence of chemotherapy is not associated with an earlier age onset of menopause in patients with DCIS or invasive breast cancer and is unlikely to significantly accelerate ovarian aging.
Collapse
|
49
|
IVF for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients--efficacy and safety issues. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32:1171-8. [PMID: 26126877 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0519-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2015] [Accepted: 06/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Potential risks on future fertility have become a dominant issue in consultation and management of newly diagnosed young cancer patients. Several fertility preservation strategies are currently available. Of those, ovarian stimulation followed by IVF and embryo cryopreservation is the most established one and is especially applicable in reproductive aged breast cancer patients. AIM The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive review on ovarian stimulation and IVF for fertility preservation in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. METHODS Review of relevant literature is available through PubMed and Google scholar. RESULTS The use of IVF for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients raises dilemmas regarding efficacy and safety of controlled ovarian stimulation. Among these are the suggested role of malignancy and BRCA mutation in reducing ovarian response to stimulation, strategies designated to protect against hyper-estrogenic state associated with stimulation (co-treatment with tamoxifen or letrozole), and possible adjustments to accommodate oncologic-related time constraints. CONCLUSION Ovarian stimulation followed by IVF forms an important fertility preservation strategy for newly diagnosed young breast cancer patients, though live born rates following thawed embryo transfer in these patients are still lacking. Recent advances in controlled ovarian stimulation protocols provide practical options for some of the challenges that breast cancer patients present.
Collapse
|
50
|
Changes in the expression of DNA double strand break repair genes in primordial follicles from immature and aged rats. Reprod Biomed Online 2015; 30:303-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2014] [Revised: 11/14/2014] [Accepted: 11/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|