Radiotherapy in younger patients with advanced aggressive B-cell lymphoma-long-term results from the phase 3 R-MegaCHOEP trial

The role of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma has not been fully elucidated. The R-MegaCHOEP trial investigated the use of high-dose chemotherapy and rituximab with subsequent autologous stem cell transplantations compared to conventional immunochemotherapy (R-CHOEP) for high-risk patients up to 60 years. The study protocol included RT for patients with bulky (maximum diameter ≥7.5 cm) or extranodal disease. Two-hundred sixty-one patients were analyzed, 120 of whom underwent RT. The most frequently irradiated regions were mediastinum (n = 50) and paraaortic (n = 27). Median RT dose was 36 Gray in median fractions of 1.8 Gray. Acute toxicities were mostly mild to moderate, with only 24 and 8 grade 3 and 4 toxicities reported during RT. Patients with bulky disease who received RT showed significantly better 10-year EFS, PFS and OS (EFS: 64% vs. 35%; p < 0.001; PFS 68% vs. 47%; p = 0.003; OS: 72% vs. 59%; p = 0.011). There was no significant increase in secondary malignancies with the use of RT. RT administered for consolidation of bulky disease after immunochemotherapy improved the prognosis of young high-risk patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and should be considered part of first-line therapy. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00129090.

Stable use of radiotherapy in lymphoma patients over time - A comprehensive national overview of radiotherapy use in Sweden with focus on older patients

Background and purpose

The role of radiotherapy (RT) in lymphoma is constantly refined with the advent of novel treatments. However, RT is still an effective treatment and tolerability is high. Therefore, we aimed to describe the use of RT in primary treatment of lymphoma over calendar time, with a specific focus on older patients (age ≥ 70 years) with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes.

Materials & Methods

All adult patients diagnosed with lymphoma from 2007 to 2018 in Sweden were included and followed for survival until end of 2020. Patient characteristics and relative survival (RS) were described for patients with NHL by subtype and RT use.

Results

In the cohort of lymphoma patients aged ≥ 70 years (n = 12,698) 11 % received RT as part of primary treatment. No decline in use of RT over calendar period was seen. Use of RT as monotherapy was associated with stage I-II disease and older age among patients with stage III-IV disease. Patients with indolent lymphomas aged ≥ 70 years who were selected for treatment with RT as monotherapy with a dose of ≥ 20 Gy had 2-year RS rate of 100 % which remained similar at five years. For patients with DLBCL, RT as monotherapy with a dose of ≥ 20 Gy was mostly administered to patients aged ≥ 85 years with a 2-year RS rate of 68 %.

Conclusion

The use of RT in first-line lymphoma treatment was stable over calendar time. RT monotherapy is associated with encouraging outcomes among patients with NHL aged ≥ 70 years who were selected to receive this.

Plasmablastic Lymphoma. A State-of-the-Art Review: Part 2-Focus on Therapy

The objective of this two-part review is to present a current and comprehensive understanding of the diagnosis and management of plasmablastic lymphoma. The first part, which was published previously, focused on the study of epidemiology, etiology, clinicopathological characteristics, differential diagnosis, prognostic variables, and the impact of plasmablastic lymphoma on specific populations. This second part addresses the difficult topic of the treatment of plasmablastic lymphoma, specifically examining both the conventional, consolidated approach and the novel therapeutic strategy.

The progress of novel strategies on immune-based therapy in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be cured with standard front-line immunochemotherapy, whereas nearly 30-40% of patients experience refractory or relapse. For several decades, the standard treatment strategy for fit relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL patients has been high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-SCT). However, the patients who failed in salvage treatment or those ineligible for subsequent auto-SCT have dismal outcomes. Several immune-based therapies have been developed, including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and novel small molecules. Meanwhile, allogeneic SCT and radiotherapy are still necessary for disease control for fit patients with certain conditions. In this review, to expand clinical treatment options, we summarize the recent progress of immune-related therapies and prospect the future indirections in patients with R/R DLBCL.

Consolidative Radiotherapy after Complete Remission following R-CHOP Immunochemotherapy in Stage III-IV Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are treated with rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). The role of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) remains unclear among patients with advanced DLBCL who achieved complete remission (CR) after R-CHOP immunochemotherapy. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify the role of consolidative RT among these patients. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing RT to no RT following CR after R-CHOP immunochemotherapy in Ann Arbor stage III-IV DLBCL patients. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, and disease-free survival (DFS) was the secondary endpoint. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. Review Manager (version 5.4) was used to analyze the data. Six retrospective studies involving 813 patients who received R-CHOP ± consolidative RT were identified. OS was higher in the consolidative RT group, with an HR of 2.01 and a 95% CI of 1.30 to 3.12 (p = 0.002). DFS was also higher in the RT group, with an HR of 2.18 and a 95% CI of 1.47 to 3.24 (p < 0.0001). The results suggested that consolidative RT improved OS and DFS compared to no RT among advanced-stage DLBCL patients. Further research is needed to determine the optimal radiation fields and the appropriate indications for consolidative RT for advanced-stage DLBCL patients in the rituximab era.

The new German evidence-based guideline on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-key aspects for radiation oncologists

PURPOSE

Diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive lymphoma subtype treated successfully with immunochemotherapy. However, there are conflicting data on the role and impact of consolidative radiation therapy (RT). The publication of the national evidence-based guideline on DLBCL prompted us to review relevant passages on radiation oncology.

METHODS

The following article reviews the evidence and recommendations given in the current German evidence-based guideline on DLBCL regarding RT and summarizes pivotal aspects. Additional literature is presented to provide a comprehensive background for the published recommendations.

RESULTS

RT shall be administered to all patients with localized positron emission tomography(PET)-positive residues after completion of immunochemotherapy and should use a dose of 30-40 Gray in normofractionation. For RT planning, PET information before and after immunochemotherapy shall be used, with either a PET-CT in the RT treatment position or an image fusion to the planning CT. Conformal techniques shall be used for target volume coverage, with a risk-benefit evaluation for the individual patient. Additionally, RT may be used in the treatment context of various subtypes of DLBCL as well as in the recurrent or refractory treatment situation.

CONCLUSION

RT remains an integral part of the treatment repertoire of DLBCL. With the use of PET-guided treatment, RT is indicated for patients with metabolically active tumors. In the context of the ongoing development of targeted therapies, new RT indications may evolve.

Patient Survival With and Without Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Era of PET and Rituximab

Purpose

The benefit of radiation therapy (RT) becomes uncertain in the treatment of early stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the era of rituximab, positron emission topography (PET), and computed tomography (CT). We sought to retrospectively review modern patients with early stage I-II DLBCL treated with rituximab and staged by PET-CT to better define which patients benefit from consolidative RT.

Methods and Materials

Patients with early stage I-II DLBCL from 1998 to 2017 were reviewed coinciding with our institutional utilization of rituximab with the standard regimen of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone and PET-CT. Relevant clinical information was used to calculate National Comprehensive Cancer Network international prognostic index (IPI) scores. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model were used for overall survival (OS).

Results

Seventy-seven patients received chemoimmunotherapy alone, and 41 received chemoimmunotherapy plus RT. Median follow-up time was 9.5 years. On univariate analysis, extranodal disease (P = .04) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network IPI (P < .001) were significantly correlated with OS. Five-year OS was 87% versus 67%, and 10-year OS was 67% versus 58%, numerically higher favoring RT (P = .16). On multivariate Cox regression analysis of OS controlling for IPI and extranodal disease, the addition of RT was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio of 0.4, P = .01).

Conclusions

The current analysis supports the use of consolidative RT in early stage DLBCL given an OS benefit on multivariate analysis. Further prospective randomized data are needed to confirm these findings.

Nomogram-Based Prediction of Overall and Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients with Primary Bone Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Population-Based Study

Background

Primary bone diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PD-DLBCL) accounts for more than 80% of primary bone lymphoma. We created two nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with PD-DLBCL for this rare disease.

Methods

In total, 891 patients diagnosed with PB-DLBCL between 2007 and 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to explore independent prognostic factors and create nomograms for OS and CSS. The area under the curve (AUC), the calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curve analysis were used to evaluate the nomograms.

Results

Four variables were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS, and three variables were identified as independent prognostic factors for CSS. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated the strong discriminatory power of the nomograms. The calibration and DCA curves showed that the nomograms had a satisfactory ability to predict OS and CSS. The K-M curves showed that age, gender, primary site, chemotherapy, and tumor stage affected patient survival.

Conclusions

In patients with PD-DLBCL, age, race, primary site, and chemotherapy affected OS, while age, race, and chemotherapy affected CSS. The two nomograms created based on the aforementioned variables provided more accurate individual survival predictions for PD-DLBCL patients and can help physicians make appropriate clinical decisions.

Time trends in primary therapy and relative survival of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by stage: a nationwide, population-based study in the Netherlands, 1989-2018

It is unclear whether survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) continues to increase in an era where rituximab-containing chemotherapy reigns for almost two decades. Therefore, we evaluated trends in primary therapy and relative survival (RS) among Dutch DLBCL patients diagnosed between 1989 and 2018. Analyses were performed separately according to the stage I (N = 6952) and stage II–IV disease (N = 20,676), stratified by calendar period and age (18–64, 65–74, and ≥75 years). The use of chemotherapy ± radiotherapy increased over time across all age and stage groups. As of the mid-2000s, >95% of chemotherapy-treated patients received chemoimmunotherapy, irrespective of age and stage. Overall, RS increased significantly over time across all age groups, especially after 2003 when rituximab-containing chemotherapy had become the standard of care. However, RS increased less pronounced between 2003–2010 and 2011–2018 than between 1989–2002 and 2003–2010. These findings were congruent across all studied stage groups. Five-year RS across the three age groups during 2011–2018 was 96%, 84%, and 67% for stage I DLBCL and 75%, 60%, and 46% for stage II–IV DLBCL. Collectively, survival in DLBCL increased modestly beyond the initial introduction of rituximab, with apparent survival differences across age and stage that warrant novel treatment approaches.

Outcomes of adults with lymphoma treated with nonmyeloablative TLI-ATG and radiation boost to high risk or residual disease before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant

We evaluated the impact on survival of antithymocyte globulin conditioning (TLI-ATG) with radiation (RT) boost to high risk or residual disease before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) for adults with lymphoma (excluding mycosis fungoides and low-grade NHL other than SLL/CLL). Of 251 evaluable patients, 36 received an RT boost within 3 months of allo-HCT at our institution from 2001 to 2016. At the time of TLI-ATG, patients who received boost vs no boost had a lower rate of CR (11% vs 47%, p = 0.0003), higher rates of bulky disease (22% vs 4%, p < 0.0001), extranodal disease (39% vs 5%, p < 0.0001), and positive PET (75% vs 28%, p < 0.00001). In the boost group, the median (range) largest axial lesion diameter was 5.2 cm (1.8-22.3). Median follow-up was 50.2 months (range: 1-196). There was no significant difference in OS, time to recurrence, or time to graft failure with vs without boost. A trend toward higher percent donor CD3⁺ chimerism was seen with vs without boost (p = 0.0819). The worst boost-related toxicity was grade 2 dermatitis. RT boost may help successfully mitigate the risk of high risk or clinically evident residual disease in adults with lymphoma undergoing allo-HCT.

Salvage radiotherapy for primary refractory and relapsed diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, accounting for 30-40% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases and presenting later in life, most often in the sixth decade. Although DLBCL is curable, long-term remission rates are only 60-80%. The most recent major advance in upfront therapy for DLBCL was the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab, which was approved in the late 1990s; now, 25 years later, up to 40% of patients will experience primary refractory or relapsed disease, thereby underscoring the importance of salvage therapy. Radiation therapy can be highly effective in DLBCL, both initially as consolidation therapy and later as salvage therapy and is currently being explored in the context of immune and cellular therapies. The aim of this review is to examine the therapeutic approaches for relapsed or refractory DLBCL, with a focus on whether using radiation therapy as salvage therapy can improve the likelihood of cure.

Long-term results of PET-guided radiation in patients with advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP

Consolidative radiation therapy (RT) for advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial, with routine practice continuing to include RT in patients with initial bulky disease or residual masses. Positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography is a sensitive modality for detecting the presence of residual disease at the end of treatment (EOT). A PET-guided approach to selectively administering RT has been the policy in British Columbia since 2005. Patients with advanced-stage DLBCL diagnosed from 1 January 2005 to 1 March 2017 and treated with at least 6 cycles of R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone plus rituximab), who underwent EOT PET, were included in this analysis. Those with complete metabolic response (PET-negative [PET-NEG]) were observed; those with PET-positive (PET-POS) scans were offered consolidative RT, when feasible. Of the patient records reviewed, 723 were identified, with median follow-up of 4.3 years: 517 (72%) were PET-NEG; 206 (28%) were PET-POS. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) at 3 years were 83% vs 56% and 87% vs 64%, in patients with PET-NEG and PET-POS scans, respectively. PET-POS patients with nonprogressing disease treated with consolidative RT (109 and 206; 53%) had outcomes approaching those of PET-NEG patients, with 3-year estimates of 76% and 80% for TTP and OS. PET-NEG patients who had bulky disease (≥10 cm) at diagnosis had outcomes indistinguishable from those without bulk, despite the omission of RT. These data suggest that patients with advanced-stage DLBCL who are PET-NEG at EOT and receive no RT have excellent outcomes. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET can reliably guide selective administration of consolidative RT, even in patients with initially bulky disease.

Impact on survival through consolidation radiotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a comprehensive meta-analysis

Rituximab has improved response rates and overall survival in B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality for lymphomas, but there is uncertainty on its use as consolidation after chemo-immunotherapy mainly in advanced stages. We evaluated its efficacy with a comprehensive meta-analysis and a systematic search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and abstracts from ASCO, ASH, ESMO and ASTRO published from June 1966 and December 2018. We identified 11 trials that evaluated consolidation radiotherapy following chemotherapy in a randomized fashion in 4'584 patients. The primary endpoint of this meta-analysis was PFS. As three of the eleven trials were retracted, this data is based on 2414 patients. For the primary endpoint (PFS), we found a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 (0.51 to 1.17, pooled (tau2: 0.25; I2: 85%), and a HR of 0.80 (0.53 to 1.21, pooled (bivariate meta-analysis). For overall survival, the HR is 0.93 (0.61 to 1.40; pooled (tau2: 0.25; I2: 74%) and 0.86 (0.58 to 1.27) in a bivariate meta-analysis. The lack of benefit did not change over time (p-value: 0.95 (tau2: 0.32; I2: 88%), and was also absent for PFS when stratifying for chemotherapy, the use of Rituximab, age, the dose of radiotherapy, application to patients in complete remission and with bulky disease. None of the trials used a PET-guided approach. This meta-analysis revealed no survival benefit when consolidation radiotherapy is given to unselected DLBCL patients following chemotherapy. These results need to be considered in future trials in the PET-CT era.

Impact of High-Dose Methotrexate on the Outcome of Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Skeletal Involvement

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with extra nodal skeletal involvement is rare. It is currently unclear whether these lymphomas should be treated in the same manner as those without skeletal involvement. We retrospectively analyzed the impact of combining high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) with an anthracycline-based regimen and rituximab as first-line treatment in a cohort of 93 patients with DLBCL and skeletal involvement with long follow-up. Fifty patients (54%) received upfront HD-MTX for prophylaxis of CNS recurrence (high IPI score and/or epidural involvement) or because of skeletal involvement. After adjusting for age, ECOG, high LDH levels, and type of skeletal involvement, HD-MTX was associated with an improved PFS and OS (HR: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1-0.3, p < 0.001 and HR: 0.1, 95% CI: 0.04-0.3, p < 0.001, respectively). Patients who received HD-MTX had significantly better 5-year PFS and OS (77% vs. 39%, p <0.001 and 83 vs. 58%, p < 0.001). Radiotherapy was associated with an improved 5-year PFS (74 vs. 48%, p = 0.02), whereas 5-year OS was not significantly different (79% vs. 66%, p = 0.09). A landmark analysis showed that autologous stem cell transplantation was not associated with improved PFS or OS. The combination of high-dose methotrexate and an anthracycline-based immunochemotherapy is associated with an improved outcome in patients with DLBCL and skeletal involvement and should be confirmed in prospective trials.

Radiotherapy for Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Radiotherapy (RT) plays a diverse and essential role in the contemporary management of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and remains the single most powerful monotherapeutic intervention for both aggressive and indolent subtypes. Over the past decade, there have been significant advancements in radiation oncology practice, which have made modern treatments safer and more conformal. Despite this sophistication and evidence supporting a continued role for RT, numerous data suggest that utilization is on the decline. In this review, we discuss the rationale for RT in 4 commonly encountered scenarios: combined modality therapy for limited-stage aggressive NHL, consolidation therapy for advanced-stage aggressive NHL, and the changing roles of salvage RT for relapsed/refractory NHL in an era of new frontiers such as cellular therapies. We also evaluate current strategies to treat indolent histologies. We conclude with perspectives on how RT for the hematological malignancies may continue to evolve.

[Adult non-Hodgkin bone lymphomas]

Two forms of bone lymphomas can be distinguished: the primary bone lymphoma (PBL) and the secondary bone lymphoma (SBL). PBL is a rare disease with a good prognosis. Clinical manifestations and imaging findings are usually non-specific. Patient can present with pain, swelling of affected bone or pathologic fracture. Positron emission tomography-CT scan is a sensitive imaging modality and very useful for staging, restaging, surveillance of recurrence, and monitoring of treatment response of lymphoma. The diagnosis of PBL is often difficult and made after biopsy examination. Most patients have diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients have been treated with radiotherapy, chemotherapy or combination of both. Localized disease, low IPI (International Prognostic Index) and complete remission after initial treatment were associated with a better outcome. Management of late sequelae deserves particular attention. SBL is more common than PBL; this is a disseminated lymphoma with concomitant involvement of the skeleton. We review the clinical, imaging and pathologic features of bone lymphomas; and discuss therapeutic modalities as well as prognosis of these lymphomas in the era of immunochemotherapy.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma mimicking chronic osteomyelitis of the ankle joint: A case report

Lymphoma is the seventh most common type of malignancy in both males and females. It may develop in any location where lymphomatous tissue exists. Although extranodal presentation in the lower limb and pelvis are uncommon, it could present with diverse manifestations. We report an unusual case of primary extranodal large B-cell lymphoma of the ankle joint initially presumed to be a chronic osteomyelitis. This case report discusses the impact of imaging studies on decision-making and highlights the need to consider malignancy in chronic infections.

Stage I-II diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab and chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy

We set to identify prognostic factors in a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients with stage I-II diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab-chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy from 2001 through 2017 at our institution. We identified 143 patients with median follow-up of 7.7 years. The majority were male (59.4%), had stage II (53.1%), had stage-modified IPI 0-1 (smIPI, 58.1%), and had non-bulky disease (<7 cm, 68.5%). 99 patients (69.2%) received rituximab-chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, and 44 patients (30.8%) received rituximab-chemotherapy alone. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 81.2% and 88.9%, respectively. The 5-year PFS for those with smIPI 0-1 versus 2-4 was 89.5% versus 69.7%, respectively (P = 0.005). Bulky disease (≥7 cm) was associated with worse PFS and OS on univariable and multivariable analyses (P < 0.05). Patients with smIPI 0-1 without bulky disease have excellent outcomes. However, patients with smIPI 2-4 or bulky disease have a high risk of progression.

Emerging Role of Consolidative Radiotherapy After Complete Remission Following R-CHOP Immunochemotherapy in Stage III-IV Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Single Institutional and Case-Matched Control Study

Purpose

The role of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) after complete-remission (CR) following rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed the survival outcomes and patterns of failure with our institutional experience.

Material and Methods

Between 2009 and 2018, 206 patients with stage III-IV DLBCL achieved CR after receiving R-CHOP. Propensity-score matching was used to analyze the role of consolidative RT. The consolidative RT group (n = 34) and the R-CHOP alone group (n = 68) were matched at a 1:2 ratio. After propensity-score matching, 102 patients were analyzed.

Results

With a median follow-up of 39.7 months, 26 patients (25.5%) showed local recurrence. Only one patient failed at the previous RT field. RT was delivered to bulky sites, head and neck lesions, testes, and bone with median dose of 30.6 Gy. The most common site of failure was head and neck lesions followed by bulky sites. The 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and isolated-local recurrence free survival (LRFS) were 73.5, 64.0, and 79.9%. In univariate and multivariate analysis, bone marrow involvement and consolidative RT were associated with isolated LRFS (p = 0.006 and 0.032) significantly.

Conclusion

Consolidative RT improved isolated local control. Based on the pattern of failure, we carefully suggest to radiate on initially involved bulky sites or head and neck lesions. Further studies need to be done to find out the optimal radiation dose and selection of RT site.

An overview of the tumors affecting the spine-inside to out

Spine tumors may arise within or surrounding the spinal cord and/or vertebral column. Spinal tumors can be benign or malignant. Based on their epicenter, they may be classified as intradural-intramedullary, intradural-extramedullary, or extradural. Of these, extradural lesions are the most common, and are typically metastatic. Primary bone tumors of the spinal column comprise 5% of all primary skeletal tumors. The majority of primary spinal column tumors are benign, with malignant tumors comprising only 20%. Overall, spine metastases are the most common malignant spine tumor, and these usually arise from primaries such as lung, breast, and prostate cancers. The advent of improved systemic therapies leading to improved survival and the frequent use of imaging has positioned metastatic spine disease as the new epidemic in oncology. For spine tumors, establishing the correct diagnosis is heavily reliant on magnetic resonance imaging and histological confirmation. In this review, we will provide an overview of the epidemiology, radiological and histopathological features, and the natural history of key primary (benign and malignant) spinal cord and column tumors and metastatic spine tumors. Treatment principles for primary spinal cord or column tumors are aimed toward curative resection, whereas palliative resection forms the treatment principle for most metastatic tumors.

Primary bone lymphoma: Clinical presentation and therapeutic considerations

•

Primary lymphoma of bone is a rare entity with unspecific symptoms.

•

Typical radiology is a large soft-tissue tumor around non-destructed bone.

•

Treatment is based on systemic chemotherapy.

•

Chemotherapy seems to produce a better outcome than radiotherapy alone.

•

Positiv factors: age<60 y, solitary lesion, low LDH, favourable ECOG and IPI scores.

Background

Primary lymphoma of bone (PBL) is a rare entity. Due to unspecific clinical signs and equivocal radiographs diagnosis may be delayed. This retrospective report of 109 PBL cases demonstrates typical aspects of the lesion. Treatment and prognostic factors are evaluated.

Methods

Retrospectively patient records were reviewed. All patients were followed for evidence of local or distant recurrence. Overall survival (OS) was used as clinical outcome.

Results

The median age of the 109 patients was 62.8 years. The most common symptoms were pain (76%), swelling (29%), neurologic symptoms and pathological fracture (16% each). Mean duration of symptoms was 8 months (0–197 months).

19% of patients had indolent NHL subtypes, 72% aggressive NHL subtypes and 7% cases Hodgkin disease. Cyclophosphamid, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP plus rituximab (RCHOP) were given in 88 (81%) of patients. Radiotherapy was delivered in 67 (61%) of cases. 51 (47%) patients received both. Surgical interventions were restricted to cases with complications as fractures.

The 5-year OS was 66%. The 5-year OS was 66%. In the subgroup of 78 patients with aggressive NHL subtype there was a highly significant benefit for chemotherapy or chemotherapy and radiation in comparison to no treatment or radiation alone. Raised LDH, age, IPI and ECOG performance were prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis, age and raised LDH levels only kept significance.

Conclusions

In our series of primary bone lymphoma, chemotherapy resulted in a better outcome than Radiotherapy alone. Long-term survival is based on the stage of the disease, favoring younger (<60 years) patients with solitary bone lesions, low level of LDH and favourable ECOG performance status and IPI scores.

Role of Radiation Therapy Differs Between Stages in Primary Bone Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Rituximab Era: A Population-Based Analysis

Background: Primary bone B-cell lymphoma (PB-DLBCL) is a rare entity for which existing data is limited. Whether radiotherapy (RT) should be omitted in the modern treatment of PB-DLBCL is still under debate. We used the SEER database to compare the outcomes among adult patients treated with and without RT in rituximab era. Methods: We included adult patients with PB-DLBCL diagnosed from 2002 to 2016 from SEER 18. The effect of RT on overall survival (OS) using univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) Cox proportional regression and propensity score matching (PSM) was assessed for the entire cohort and subgroups by stages. We calculated the standardized incidence ratio to estimate the short- and long-term risk for second primary malignancies (SPM) from 2002 to 2016 in SEER 18 and 1983-2016 in SEER 9. Results: A total of 1,320 patients were identified, including 856 with early-stage (ES) and 464 with advanced-stage (AS). A decreasing trend was observed in the ES cohort after 2002, while the rate of RT utilization remained stable in the AS cohort over the past three decades. Most patients in ES (63.9%) underwent RT, whereas only 42.2% of AS patients received it. RT significantly improved survival both in UVA and MVA (P < 0.001, P = 0.010, respectively). PSM analysis further validated the survival advantage of RT (P = 0.018). Moreover, a novel web-based prediction model was established to individualize the potential benefit from RT. In subgroup analyses, OS was improved with RT in those who had ES disease (p < 0.001) but not in those who had AS disease (P = 0.776). With short-term follow up in SEER 18, none of the subgroups showed a significantly elevated risk of developing SPMs. However, RT significantly elevated the late toxicities of second malignancies in ES patients diagnosed at the age of 18-39 or those with appendicular sites of bone involvement. Conclusion: This population-based analysis is the largest PB-DLBCL dataset to date and demonstrates a significant survival benefit associated with RT in early stages rather than advanced stages. In the absence of randomized controlled trials, RT should be considered in ES disease with cautions of second cancers in specific subsets of patients.

Primary Bone Lymphoma: A Case Series and Review of Literature

Primary bone lymphoma (PBL) is a subtype of lymphoma that exclusively affects skeletal tissue. Despite the relatively common involvement of skeletal structures as a manifestation of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), primary and exclusive involvement of the skeletal system is rare. The prevalence of PBL is estimated to be 3–7% amongst primary bone tumors and less than 2% amongst all lymphomas in adults. However, the definition of primary bone lymphoma has been inconsistent over time. Within our institution, we identified four cases of primary bone lymphoma based on diagnostic criteria formed from the general consensus of multiple organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG). Here, we discuss the distinct characteristics amongst these cases in addition to performing a systematic review of current literature regarding this lymphoproliferative entity.

Clinicopathological Features, Treatment, and Prognosis in Primary Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma of the Breast: A Retrospective Study of 46 Patients

BACKGROUND Primary lymphoma of the breast is rare, and primary diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the breast is very rare. This study aimed to identify the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment associated with prognosis in patients with primary DLBCL of the breast. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study included the clinical and treatment data from 46 women with a histological diagnosis of primary DLBCL. Patients were staged using Ann Arbor staging criteria, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the international prognostic index (IPI) scores were obtained. Laboratory finding included serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and the immunohistochemistry findings were recorded. RESULTS Patients (n=46), included stage I (n=18), stage II (n=18), stage III (n=3), and stage IV DLBCL (n=9). Treatment included chemotherapy with rituximab (n=16), and radiotherapy (n=12). The median follow-up time was 40.5 months, the 5-year OS rate was 36.2%, and the 5-year PFS rate was 29.1%. Univariate analysis showed that clinical stage, serum LDH, the IPI score, chemotherapy cycles >3, and Bcl-2 and Bcl-6 expression were correlated with the 5-year OS and PFS. Multivariate risk regression analysis showed that the number of chemotherapy cycles (>3) and Bcl-6 expression were independent prognostic factors in primary DLBCL of the breast (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS A retrospective study of 46 patients with primary DLBCL of the breast showed that >3 cycles of chemotherapy and expression of Bcl-6 resulted in improved OS and PFS. Radiotherapy controlled local tumor recurrence but did not improve the OS and PFS. Rituximab did not improve patient survival.

Hematologic Malignancies

Radiation therapy plays a critical role in the management of a wide range of hematologic malignancies. The optimal radiation dose and target volume, and safe and effective ways of integrating radiation with systemic agents, vary depending on the histologic subtypes, stage at presentation, patient performance status, response to systemic therapy if given, treatment intent, and patient preferences. Limiting doses to surrounding organs without sacrificing disease control is of paramount importance. Reducing radiation doses and treatment volume in selected cases, and the use of advanced radiotherapy technology, can improve the therapeutic ratio of patients receiving radiation therapy for hematologic malignancies.

A multi-institutional and case-matched control study on treatment outcomes of consolidative radiotherapy after a full course of R-CHOP compared with R-CHOP alone in Stage I-II diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (KROG 17-02)

We compared treatment outcomes between rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy alone with R-CHOP followed by consolidative radiation therapy (RT) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We analyzed 404 patients with Stage I-II DLBCL who received six to eight cycles of R-CHOP and achieved a good response after a full course of chemotherapy. Propensity-score matching was used to assess the role of consolidative RT. The R-CHOP alone group (n = 184) was matched in a 1:2 ratio with the R-CHOP plus RT group (n = 92). Twenty-four (13.0%) of 184 patients receiving R-CHOP alone and 8 (8.7%) of 92 patients receiving R-CHOP plus RT had bulky diseases (>7.5 cm). A Deauville score of 1-2 was achieved for 159 (86.4%) of 184 patients receiving R-CHOP alone and 84 (91.3%) of 92 patients receiving R-CHOP plus RT. After a median follow-up time of 42 months, the recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (86.7% vs 93.0%, P = 0.464) and overall survival rate (88.3% vs 95.1%, P = 0.295) at 5 years did not differ significantly between the R-CHOP alone and R-CHOP plus RT arms. In the additional multivariate analyses, large tumor size (>7.5 cm) was significantly associated with decreased RFS (hazard ratio, 2.368 and confidence interval, 1.837-6.697; P = 0.048). Consolidative radiation was not a significant factor for RFS (P = 0.563). Tumor size was a significant factor for RFS in the rituximab era. The outcome of omitting consolidative RT for good responders after six to eight cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy was acceptable in early-stage DLBCL without a bulky disease.

Beneficial effect of consolidative radiotherapy for patients with lymphoma and skeletal involvement

The objectives of this study were to analyze the clinical features of patients with bone involved lymphoma and identify the prognostic factors and to explore the optimized treatment strategy for bone involved lymphoma.A total of 1948 patients with lymphoma in our cancer center from September 2006 to October 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Among these, 109 patients with skeletal involvement in lymphoma were enrolled. According to the pathologic subtypes, the patients were divided into 3 subgroups: classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (T-NHL). The clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) of 3 groups of patients were reviewed, and the prognostic factors were analyzed.There were 9 (3 unifocal, 6 multifocal) patients with primary bone lymphoma. The 5-year OS of cHL, B-NHL, and T-NHL patients was 88.24%, 54.09%, and 61.58%, respectively. Advanced stage, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), age above 60, high International Prognostic Index score, and treatment without radiotherapy for the bone involved were significant poor prognostic factors for OS of all patients in univariate analysis. There was a trend toward better OS not only in limited-stage but also in advanced-stage patients with radiotherapy for the bone involved compared with the patients without radiotherapy. Elevated LDH level and age above 60 were the independent unfavorable prognostic factor in multivariate analysis.Elevated LDH level and age above 60 predict the poor prognosis of patients with bone involvement. The potential for long-term survival suggests that additional consolidative radiotherapy for the site of skeleton involvement may have a better chance of long-term success.

Are Higher Doses of Consolidation Radiation Therapy Necessary in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Involving Osseous Sites?

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate whether higher doses of consolidation radiation therapy (RT), which have been traditionally recommended for osseous sites in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), are still necessary.

Methods and materials

Patients with DLBCL with osseous involvement treated with first-line chemotherapy followed by consolidation RT between 1995 and 2016 were reviewed. The primary endpoint was 5-year freedom from local recurrence, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Outcomes based on the RT dose received were also assessed.

Results

A total of 51 patients were identified. The most common chemotherapy regimens were rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (80%) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (12%) with a median of 6 cycles (range, 3-8 cycles). After chemotherapy, 82% of patients achieved a complete response (CR), and 18% achieved a partial response (PR). All patients in PR were deemed appropriate for consolidation RT. The median dose was 29 Gy (24 Gy for CR; 36 Gy for PR). After a median follow-up of 86 months, 8 patients relapsed, with 2 relapses in the RT field after consolidation RT of 30 and 39.6 Gy, respectively. Overall, the 5-year freedom from local recurrence was 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91%-100%), disease-free survival was 76% (95% CI, 65%-89%), and overall survival was 86% (95% CI, 76%-96%). No dose-response relationship was observed.

Conclusions

In patients with DLBCL with osseous involvement who achieved a CR after first-line chemotherapy, 20 to 30 Gy of consolidation RT led to high rates of local control. Higher doses should be reserved for patients in PR.

Consolidative mediastinal irradiation of malignant lymphoma using active scanning proton beams: clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison

PURPOSE

Current research approaches in lymphoma focus on reduction of therapy-associated long-term side effects. Especially in mediastinal lymphoma, proton beam radiotherapy (PT) may be a promising approach for reducing the dose to organs at risk (OAR).

PATIENTS

In total, 20 patients were irradiated with active scanning PT at Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) between September 2014 and February 2017. For comparative analysis, additional photon irradiation plans with helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were calculated and quantitative and qualitative dose evaluations were made for both treatment modalities. Toxicity and survival outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Clinical target volume coverage was comparable in both treatment modalities and did not significantly differ between IMRT and PT. Nevertheless, PT showed superiority regarding the homogeneity index (HI_PT = 1.041 vs. HI_IMRT = 1.075, p < 0.001). For all OAR, PT showed significantly higher dose reductions compared with IMRT. In particular, the dose to the heart was reduced in PT (absolute dose reduction of D_mean of 3.3 Gy [all patients] and 4.2 Gy [patients with pericardial involvement]). Likewise, the subgroup analysis of female patients, who were expected to receive higher doses to the breast, showed a higher dose reduction in D_mean of 1.2 Gy (right side) and 2.2 Gy (left side). After a median follow-up of 32 months (range 21-48 months), local and distant progression free survival (LPFS and DPFS) were 95.5% and 95.0%, respectively. Radiotherapy was tolerated well with only mild (grade 1-2) radiation-induced acute and chronic side effects.

CONCLUSION

A significant reduction in the dose to the surrounding OAR was achieved with PT compared with photon irradiation, without compromising target volume coverage. Dosimetric advantages may have the potential to translate into a reduction of long-term radiation-induced toxicity in young patients with malignant lymphoma of the mediastinum.

Role of Radiation Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Guidelines from the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group

Approximately 30% to 40% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) will have either primary refractory disease or relapse after chemotherapy. In transplant-eligible patients, those with disease sensitive to salvage chemotherapy will significantly benefit from high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. The rationale for considering radiation therapy (RT) for selected patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL as a part of the salvage program is based on data regarding the patterns of relapse and retrospective series showing improved local control and clinical outcomes for patients who received peritransplant RT. In transplant-ineligible patients, RT can provide effective palliation and, in selected cases, be administered with curative intent if the relapsed/refractory disease is localized. We have reviewed the indications for RT in the setting of relapsed/refractory DLBCL and provided recommendations regarding the optimal timing of RT, dose fractionation scheme, and treatment volume in the context of specific case scenarios.

Hitting a Moving Target: Successful Management of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Involving the Mesentery With Volumetric Image-guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

INTRODUCTION

We report successful treatment of mesenteric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) using localized involved site radiation therapy (ISRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and daily computed tomography (CT)-image guidance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with mesenteric DLBCL treated with RT between 2011 and 2017 were reviewed. Clinical and treatment characteristics were analyzed for an association with local control, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were eligible. At diagnosis, the median age was 52 years (range, 38-76 years), and 57% (n = 13) had stage I/II DLBCL. All patients received frontline chemotherapy (ChT) (R-CHOP [rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone], n = 19; dose-adjusted R-EPOCH [rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin], n = 4) with median 6 cycles. Prior to RT, salvage ChT for refractory DLBCL was given to 43% (n = 10) and autologous stem cell transplantation was administered in 13% (n = 3). At the time of RT, positron emission tomography-CT revealed 5-point scale of 1 to 3 (48%; n = 11), 4 (9%; n = 2), and 5 (44%; n = 10). All patients received IMRT, daily CT imaging, and ISRT. The median RT dose was 40 Gy (range, 16.2-49.4 Gy). Relapse or progression occurred in 22% (n = 5). At a median follow-up of 37 months, the 3-year local control, PFS, and overall survival rates were 80%, 75%, and 96%, respectively. Among patients treated with RT after complete metabolic response to frontline ChT (n = 8), the 3-year PFS was 100%, compared with 61% for patients with a history of chemorefractory DLBCL (n = 15; P = .055). Four of the 5 relapses occurred in patients with 5-point scale of 5 prior to RT (P = .127).

CONCLUSION

Mesenteric involvement of DLBCL can be successfully targeted with localized ISRT fields using IMRT and daily CT-image guidance.

Extranodal Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: Molecular Features, Prognosis, and Risk of Central Nervous System Recurrence

OPINION STATEMENT

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) arises from extranodal organs in about 30% of cases. Its prognosis and risk of recurrence in the central nervous system (CNS) vary according to the primary site of origin. Recent studies begin to clarify these differences using molecular classification. Testicular, breast, and uterine DLBCL (as well as possibly primary cutaneous DLBCL, leg-type) share a high prevalence of the non-germinal center B cell (non-GCB) phenotype and the MYD88/CD79B-mutated (MCD) genotype. These biologic features, which resemble primary CNS lymphoma, may underlie their stage-independent propensity for CNS involvement. Management of these lymphomas should involve CNS prophylaxis, preferably using systemic high-dose methotrexate to prevent intraparenchymal recurrence. Involvement of the kidneys, adrenal glands, ovary, bone marrow, lung, or pleura usually indicates disseminated disease, conferring worse prognosis. Involvement of these sites is often associated with high CNS-International Prognostic Index (IPI), concurrent MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 rearrangements, or intravascular lymphoma-risk factors warranting CNS prophylaxis. In contrast, craniofacial, thyroid, localized bone, or gastric lymphomas have a variable prevalence of the non-GCB phenotype and lack MYD88 mutations. Their outcomes with standard immunochemotherapy are excellent, and the risk of CNS recurrence is low. We recommend individualized consideration of CNS prophylaxis based on the CNS-IPI score and anatomical proximity in cases of epidural, orbital, or skull involvement. Rituximab-containing immunochemotherapy is a standard approach for all extranodal DLBCLs. Surgery is no longer required for any primary site, but routine consolidative radiation therapy is recommended for testicular lymphoma. Radiation therapy also appears to be associated with better progression-free survival in primary bone DLBCL. Future studies should better distinguish primary from secondary sites of extranodal involvement, and investigate the association of newly identified genotypes with the risk of CNS or systemic recurrence.

The role of radiotherapy as salvage and/or consolidation treatment in relapsed/refractory and high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

Many salvage therapies have been proposed for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphomas or for consolidation in the case of suboptimal response. Radiotherapy (RT) is one modality of salvage therapy, but its place is currently not well defined.

METHOD

This study reports a retrospective review of patients receiving unplanned radiotherapy for R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or as consolidation therapy after second-line chemotherapy, treated in our hospital.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with a median age of 53.5 years [19-89] were selected. The histologic type was DLBCL in 35 cases (68%), PMBCL in 8 cases (16%), and secondary transformed NHL in 8 cases (16%). Median aaIPI was 1 [0-4], and 17 patients (33%) had a high tumor burden (bulky disease). Sixteen patients (31%) were irradiated for a response considered to be insufficient, 18 patients (36%) were refractory, and 17 patients (33%) had relapsed. Patients were irradiated with a median dose of 40 Gy [15-44], 29 (57%) by a conformal 3D technique and 22 (43%) by tomotherapy. With a median follow-up of 36 months [1.0-127.8] after irradiation, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 62% and 72%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, adverse factors associated with PFS and OS in our cohort were age >70 years (HR = 5.06, P = .02) and post-RT relapse (HR = 12.24, P = .002), whereas favorable factors were number of lines of chemotherapy <3 (HR = 0.02, P = .03) and bulky disease (HR = 0.02, P = .009).

CONCLUSION

Due to its low toxicity and ease of use, radiotherapy should therefore remain an available option in patients with R/R DLBCL or as consolidation therapy in patients with high-risk disease, mostly in patients with chemo-sensitive disease or bulky disease.

Consolidative Radiotherapy to Residual Masses After Chemotherapy Is Associated With Improved Outcome in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. A Retrospective, Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

The role of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) in advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is not established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a population-based retrospective analysis of patients with DLBCL in Western Norway during 2003 to 2008, 170 consecutive patients admitted to Haukeland University Hospital (HUS) and 94 to Stavanger University Hospital (SUS) were included. The mean age was 64 years (range, 17-95 years), 147 patients (56%) were male, 80 patients (30%) had stage I/II, 126 patients (48%) stage III/IV, and 57 patients (22%) had primary extranodal disease.

RESULTS

There were no differences between hospitals in patient characteristics, use of rituximab, number of chemotherapy courses or cumulative doses, or in distribution of response categories after chemotherapy. The use of RT was significantly different: 17 patients (23%) received RT at SUS and 92 patients (65%) at HUS (P < .001). For 219 patients with International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of 0 to 3, 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 67% at SUS and 81% at HUS (P = .012). For 73 patients with complete response after chemotherapy there were no differences in survival between patients with and without RT. For 138 patients with any residual mass after chemotherapy, there were highly significant differences in favor of receiving RT (n = 81) versus no RT (n = 57): 5-year CSS 89% versus 69% (P < .001), and 5-year overall survival 82% versus 59% (P = .005). The effect of RT on residual mass was evident in most subgroups, mainly in low to intermediate risk, but not in high-risk (IPI 4-5) patients.

CONCLUSION

With the limitations of a retrospective study, these data suggest that consolidative RT might improve survival in DLBCL patients with a residual mass after chemotherapy, also in advanced disease.

Primary bone lymphoma of the talus: a challenging diagnosis

PURPOSE

Diagnostic challenges are common in clinical practice and diagnostic or classification criteria for musculoskeletal conditions cannot overshadow clinical skills.

METHODS

We present the case of a young man who complained of prolonged articular pain and mild swelling of the right ankle in the absence of other remarkable data. Apparently fulfilling the Budapest diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome, the patient was treated accordingly, but the pain increased over time. Then the patient underwent an additional diagnostic workup including synovial and bone biopsies in 2 separate occasions with the second one demonstrating diffuse lymphoid infiltrate compatible with lymphoma.

RESULTS

The conclusive diagnosis of primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the talus was made and adequate treatment initiated.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic difficulties as well as the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for complex cases are highlighted in this report.

Radiation therapy improves survival in patients with testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma<sup/>

In 120 Stage I-IV testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated from 1964 to 2015, we assessed the benefits of prophylactic contralateral testicular radiation (RT) and prophylactic central nervous system (CNS) therapy on overall, progression free, testicular relapse free, and CNS relapse free survival (OS, PFS, TRFS, and CRFS, respectively). Seventy percent of patients received RT, 53% received anthracyclines and rituximab (modern therapy), and 61% received CNS prophylaxis. On univariate analysis RT was associated with improved TRFS, PFS, and trended toward improved OS. On multivariate analysis (MVA), RT was significantly associated with improved OS and PFS; the PFS benefit persisted among patients receiving modern therapy. CNS prophylaxis was associated with improved OS, PFS, and TRFS, but not CRFS on univariate analysis, and was not significant on MVA. RT is associated with improved survival, and should be considered for all testicular DLBCL patients, but additional strategies are needed to prevent CNS relapse.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in very elderly patients over 80 years old: Incorporating consolidative radiation therapy into management decisions

Purpose

The population of patients aged 80 years or older who are diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) continues to increase, but an optimal treatment strategy has not been established. We sought to examine the influence of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) on outcome and toxicity among the very elderly diagnosed with stage I-IV DLBCL.

Methods and materials

We evaluated 131 patients treated at a single institution between 2002 and 2014 who were eligible for RT after successful treatment with chemotherapy.

Results

The median age was 83 years (range, 80-96). Advanced-stage disease was present in 61.8% of patients. Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone was administered to 80% of patients (n = 108), and 23.7% of patients received consolidative RT. Among early-stage (ES) patients treated with 3 to 4 cycles of chemotherapy and RT (n = 12) versus 6 to 8 cycles of chemotherapy alone (n = 17), there were no statistically significant differences in 3-year disease-free, progression-free, or overall survival rates. The 3 year disease-free survival was 91.7% versus 88.2% among patients treated with combined modality therapy versus chemotherapy alone (P = .78). The 3-year overall survival was 82.5% versus 87.5% among patients treated with combined modality therapy compared with chemotherapy alone (P = .852). Anemia and neuropathy occurred more frequently among ES patients who received 6 to 8 cycles of chemotherapy alone. Among advanced-stage patients with bulky disease (n = 35), consolidative RT to sites of bulky disease may have improved local control (3-year local control, 100% vs 60.3%, P = .160).

Conclusions

Among patients aged 80 years or older who have with ES DLBCL, 3 to 4 cycles of chemotherapy followed by RT is at least equivalent in efficacy to chemotherapy alone and is associated with lower levels of toxicity, which suggests that it may be a better choice for therapy when trying to balance treatment efficacy and tolerability.

Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) comprises a heterogeneous group with pathophysiological, genetic and clinical features. Many patients can be cured with R-CHOP therapy, which is the current standard regimen. Despite recent progress in improving patient survival, the 40% survival of DLBCL patients remains poor. Therefore, the most important issue for patients with DLBCL remains the development of a new front-line therapy. Several studies have reported that intensified chemotherapy with dose-adjusted EPOCH-R or R-ACVBP was superior to R-CHOP. Gene expression profiling has identified two distinct forms of DLBCL: activated B cell-like (ABC) and germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) types. ABC DLBCL exhibits a worse prognosis than GCB DLBCL by molecular diagnosis after R-CHOP therapy. Next-generation sequencing has identified unique oncogenic mechanisms and genetic complexity, which has provided rational therapeutic targets. There are also a number of biomarkers, including CD5, and prognostic factors. Efforts to distinguish many biomarkers will be crucial for individualized treatment in the future.