1
|
Möbus V, Lück HJ, Ladda E, Klare P, Engels K, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Grischke EM, Wachsmann G, Forstbauer H, Untch M, Marmé F, Blohmer JU, Jackisch C, Huober J, Stickeler E, Reinisch M, Link T, Sinn B, Janni W, Denkert C, Seiler S, Solbach C, Schmatloch S, Rey J, Loibl S. GAIN2 trial overall survival with intense versus tailored dose dense chemotherapy in early breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:66. [PMID: 39080281 PMCID: PMC11289103 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00675-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
GAIN-2 trial evaluated the optimal intense dose-dense (idd) strategy for high-risk early breast cancer. This study reports the secondary endpoints pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS). Patients (n = 2887) were randomized 1:1 between idd epirubicin, nab-paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (iddEnPC) versus leukocyte nadir-based tailored regimen of dose-dense EC and docetaxel (dtEC-dtD) as adjuvant therapy, with neoadjuvant therapy allowed after amendment. At median follow-up of 6.5 years (overall cohort) and 5.7 years (neoadjuvant cohort, N = 593), both regimens showed comparable 5-year OS rates (iddEnPC 90.8%, dtEC-dtD 90.0%, p = 0.320). In the neoadjuvant setting, iddEnPC yielded a higher pCR rate than dtEC-dtD (51.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.045). Patients achieving pCR had significantly improved 5-year iDFS (88.7% vs. 70.1%, HR 0.33, p < 0.001) and OS rates (93.9% vs. 83.1%, HR 0.32, p < 0.001), but OS outcomes were comparable regardless of pCR status. Thus, iddEnPC demonstrates superior pCR rates compared to dtEC-dtD, yet with comparable survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Möbus
- Medizinische Klinik II, Abt. Hämatologie/Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | - Peter Klare
- Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen, Berlin, Germany
| | - Knut Engels
- Zentrum für Pathologie, Zytologie und Molekularpathologie Neuss, Neuss, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Helmut Forstbauer
- GOSPL - Gesellschaft für onkologische Studien Troisdorf, Troisdorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf), University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Mattea Reinisch
- Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Theresa Link
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bruno Sinn
- Institut für Pathologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg University Hospital (UKGM), and University Cancer Center Frankfurt-Marburg (UCT), Marburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Julia Rey
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Y, Li WX, Wu JH, Chen GH, Yang CM, Lu H, Wang X, Wang SS, Huang H, Cai L, Zhao L, Peng RJ, Lin Y, Tang J, Zeng J, Zhang LH, Ke YL, Wang XM, Liu XM, Zhang AQ, Xu F, Bi XW, Huang JJ, Li JB, Pang DM, Xue C, Shi YX, He ZY, Lin HX, An X, Xia W, Cao Y, Guo Y, Hong RX, Jiang KK, Zhong YY, Zhang G, Tienchaiananda P, Oikawa M, Yuan ZY, Chen QJ. Does the Dose of Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy Affect the Triple-negative Breast Cancer Benefit from Extended Capecitabine Metronomic Therapy? An Exploratory Analysis of the SYSUCC-001 Trial. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2024; 16:223-231. [PMID: 38628818 PMCID: PMC11020346 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s447290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Results from studies of extended capecitabine after the standard adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were inconsistent, and only low-dose capecitabine from the SYSUCC-001 trial improved disease-free survival (DFS). Adjustment of the conventional adjuvant chemotherapy doses affect the prognosis and may affect the efficacy of subsequent treatments. This study investigated whether the survival benefit of the SYSUCC-001 trial was affected by dose adjustment of the standard adjuvant chemotherapy or not. Patients and Methods We reviewed the adjuvant chemotherapy regimens before the extended capecitabine in the SYSUCC-001 trial. Patients were classified into "consistent" (standard acceptable dose) and "inconsistent" (doses lower than acceptable dose) dose based on the minimum acceptable dose range in the landmark clinical trials. Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the impact of dose on the survival outcomes. Results All 434 patients in SYSUCC-001 trial were enrolled in this study. Most of patients administered the anthracycline-taxane regimen accounted for 88.94%. Among patients in the "inconsistent" dose, 60.8% and 47% received lower doses of anthracycline and taxane separately. In the observation group, the "inconsistent" dose of anthracycline and taxane did not affect DFS compared with the "consistent" dose. Moreover, in the capecitabine group, the "inconsistent" anthracycline dose did not affect DFS compared with the "consistent" dose. However, patients with "consistent" taxane doses benefited significantly from extended capecitabine (P=0.014). The sufficient dose of adjuvant taxane had a positive effect of extended capecitabine (hazard ratio [HR] 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 4.06). Conclusion This study found the dose reduction of adjuvant taxane might negatively impact the efficacy of capecitabine. Therefore, the reduction of anthracycline dose over paclitaxel should be given priority during conventional adjuvant chemotherapy, if patients need dose reduction and plan for extended capecitabine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wen-Xia Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jia-Hua Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Geng-Hang Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chun-Min Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hai Lu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xi Wang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shu-Sen Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Heng Huang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Lianjiang People’s Hospital, Lianjiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li Cai
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li Zhao
- Department of Breast Oncology, Guangzhou First People Hospital, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Rou-Jun Peng
- Department of Integrated Therapy in Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ying Lin
- Department of Breast Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jun Tang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jian Zeng
- Department of Breast Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Le-Hong Zhang
- Department of Breast Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yong-Li Ke
- Department of Breast Oncology, General Hospital of PLA Guangzhou Military Area, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xian-Ming Wang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xin-Mei Liu
- Department of Breast Oncology, Haikou People’s Hospital, Haikou, People’s Republic of China
| | - An-Qin Zhang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fei Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xi-Wen Bi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jia-Jia Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- Department of Good Clinical Practice, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Dan-Mei Pang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Foshan First People’s Hospital, Foshan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Cong Xue
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yan-Xia Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhen-Yu He
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Huan-Xin Lin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xin An
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wen Xia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ye Cao
- Department of Good Clinical Practice, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ying Guo
- Department of Good Clinical Practice, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ruo-Xi Hong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Kui-Kui Jiang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yong-Yi Zhong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ge Zhang
- Law Sau Fai Institute for Advancing Translational Medicine in Bone and Joint Diseases (TMBJ), School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong
| | - Piyawan Tienchaiananda
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Rangsit University, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Masahiro Oikawa
- The Department of Breast Surgery, New-wa-kai Oikawa Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Zhong-Yu Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qian-Jun Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome/Departments of Gynecologic Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martins-Branco D, Kassapian M, Debien V, Caparica R, Eiger D, Dafni U, Andriakopoulou C, El-Abed S, Ellard SL, Izquierdo M, Vicente M, Chumsri S, Piccart-Gebhart M, Moreno-Aspitia A, Knop AS, Lombard J, de Azambuja E. The impact of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents administration concomitantly with adjuvant anti-HER2 treatments on the outcomes of patients with early breast cancer: a sub-analysis of the ALTTO study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 203:497-509. [PMID: 37938495 PMCID: PMC11052564 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07159-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) administration impacts the outcomes of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC). METHODS ALTTO (NCT00490139) patients were categorized by ESA use during adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment. Disease-free-survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and time-to-distant recurrence (TTDR) were analyzed by ESA administration, with subgroup analyses according to prognostic factors. Log-rank tests and Cox modeling were performed. Adverse events (AEs) of ESA-interest were compared. RESULTS Among 8381 patients recruited in ALTTO, 123 (1.5%) received ESA concomitantly with study treatment. The median age of patients receiving ESA was 54 years, 39.0% premenopausal, most had tumor size > 2 cm (56.9%), node-positive (58.5%), and positive estrogen receptor expression (61.8%). Median follow-up was shorter in the ESA group [6.1 years (IQR 5.3-7.0) vs. 6.9 years (6.0-7.1); p < 0.001]. There was no DFS difference by ESA administration (log-rank p = 0.70), with 3- and 7-year DFS of 89.2% (95% CI 81.8-93.8%) and 81.6% (71.4-88.5%) in ESA group vs. 88.3% (87.6-89.0%) and 80.0% (79.1-80.9%) in No-ESA group. In subgroup analyses, the interaction of ESA administration with menopausal status was statistically significant (unadjusted p = 0.024; stratified p = 0.033), favoring premenopausal women receiving ESA. We observed no significant association of ESA administration with OS (log-rank p = 0.57; 7-year OS in ESA 88.6% vs. 90.0% in non-ESA) or TTDR. ESA-interest AEs were experienced by eight (6.5%) patients receiving ESA and 417 (5.1%) in the No-ESA group (p = 0.41). CONCLUSION ESA administration to patients receiving adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment for HER2-positive EBC was safe and not associated with a negative impact on survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Martins-Branco
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Meylemeersch, 90, Anderlecht, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Véronique Debien
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Meylemeersch, 90, Anderlecht, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rafael Caparica
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Meylemeersch, 90, Anderlecht, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daniel Eiger
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Meylemeersch, 90, Anderlecht, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Urania Dafni
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens & Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | - Malou Vicente
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Meylemeersch, 90, Anderlecht, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Saranya Chumsri
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Martine Piccart-Gebhart
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Ann Søegaard Knop
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Janine Lombard
- Calvary Mater Hospital & Australia and New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group (BCT-ANZ), Newcastle, Australia
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Rue Meylemeersch, 90, Anderlecht, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dimitrakopoulos FI, Goussia A, Koliou GA, Dadouli K, Batistatou A, Kourea HP, Bobos M, Arapantoni-Dadioti P, Tzaida O, Koletsa T, Chrisafi S, Sotiropoulou M, Papoudou-Bai A, Nicolaou I, Charchanti A, Mauri D, Aravantinos G, Binas I, Res E, Psyrri A, Pectasides D, Bafaloukos D, Koumarianou A, Bompolaki I, Rigakos G, Karanikiotis C, Koutras A, Zagouri F, Gogas H, Fountzilas G. Ten-year clinical outcome, toxicity and compliance of dose-dense sequential adjuvant administration of cyclophosphamide & epirubicin followed by docetaxel in patients with early breast cancer: A hellenic cooperative oncology group observational study (HE 10/10) with concurrent investigation of significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Breast 2024; 73:103668. [PMID: 38176305 PMCID: PMC10791571 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dose-dense sequential (dds) chemotherapy has changed the clinical outcome of patients with early breast cancer (BC). To investigate the impact of dose intensity (DI) in the adjuvant setting of BC, this observational trial (HE 10/10) was conducted assessing the long-term survival outcome, safety and toxicity of a currently widely used chemotherapeutic regimen. In addition, the prognostic significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes were also evaluated in the same cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS Totally, 1054 patients were prospectively enrolled in the current study with 1024 patients being eligible, while adequate tissue was available for 596 of them. TILs, CD8+ lymphocytes in intratumoral areas in contact with malignant cells (iCD8), CD8+ lymphocytes in tumor stroma (sCD8) as well as the total number of CD8+ lymphocytes within the tumor area (total CD8) were assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS Within a median follow-up of 125.18 months, a total of 200 disease-free survival (DFS) events (19.5%) were reported. Importantly, the 10-year DFS and OS rates were 78.4% (95% CI 75.0-81.5) and 81.7% (95% CI 79.0-84.1), respectively. Interestingly, higher CD8+ T cells as well as TILs in the tumor microenvironment were associated with an improved long-term survival outcome. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, this study confirms the significance of dds adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen in terms of long-term survival outcome, safety and toxicity as well as the prognostic significance of TILs and infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes in BC patients with early-stage disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Foteinos-Ioannis Dimitrakopoulos
- Division of Oncology, University Hospital of Patras "Panagia the Help", University of Patras, Patras, Greece; Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
| | - Anna Goussia
- Department of Pathology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece; Department of Pathology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus
| | | | - Katerina Dadouli
- Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Anna Batistatou
- Department of Pathology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Helen P Kourea
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, Greece
| | - Mattheos Bobos
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Olympia Tzaida
- Department of Pathology, Metaxas Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| | - Triantafyllia Koletsa
- Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Sofia Chrisafi
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | - Irene Nicolaou
- Department of Histopathology, Agii Anargiri Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Antonia Charchanti
- Department of Anatomy-Histology-Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Davide Mauri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Gerasimos Aravantinos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Binas
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| | - Eleni Res
- Third Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Amanda Psyrri
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokratio Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Anna Koumarianou
- Hematology-Oncology Unit, Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | | | - Georgios Rigakos
- Third Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Angelos Koutras
- Division of Oncology, University Hospital of Patras "Panagia the Help", University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Flora Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National Andistrian U Kapodniversity of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Helen Gogas
- First Department of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - George Fountzilas
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Medical Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Su D, Zhang T, Huang H, Su X, Li Y, Wei X, Zhang Y. Selection of breast cancer subtypes to improve benefits of intensive dose‑dense chemotherapy: A systematic meta‑analysis. Oncol Lett 2024; 27:4. [PMID: 38028182 PMCID: PMC10665989 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.14136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer mortality among women worldwide. A large number of patients experience recurrence and BC-associated mortality following adjuvant chemotherapy. The present study aimed to determine the most suitable pathological subtype of BC to benefit from intensive dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy. A total of four electronic databases were searched from inception up to March 10, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies comparing DD chemotherapy with standard chemotherapy in patients with BC were included. Pairwise random effects and network meta-analyses were performed to summarize efficacy and safety outcomes. A total of 27 original studies including 27,580 patients with BC were included. In terms of efficacy, the present study evaluated overall survival, disease-free survival, event-free survival, recurrence-free survival, pathological complete response and objective remission rate. Significant differences were identified in overall, hormone receptor+ (HR+) and HR- subgroups. Furthermore, from the network analysis, the HR+ and Her2- subgroups had the highest ranking, and these findings suggested that HR+/Her2- patients with BC should adhere to a treatment strategy including intensive DD chemotherapy, which is also characterized by an acceptable safety profile. In conclusion, patients with HR+ and Her2- BC were revealed to be the most suitable pathological type and are most likely to benefit from intense DD chemotherapy. The present study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD2022420351567.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Su
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, P.R. China
| | - Tianqi Zhang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, P.R. China
| | - Huimin Huang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoyu Su
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, P.R. China
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, P.R. China
| | - Xiuyan Wei
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, P.R. China
| | - Yingshi Zhang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang K, Jakub J, Gabriel E, Moreno-Aspitia A, McLaughlin S. Overall Survival Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node Negative T1 Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7026-7035. [PMID: 37490162 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13977-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS) of upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by surgery in patients with clinical T1 clinically node negative triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 48,329 women with cT1N0 TNBC from 2006 to 2016 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Patients were categorized into five pathologic subgroups based on ACT versus NACT and definitive pathologic stage after surgery: ACT with unchanged stage (pT0-1N0), ACT with pathologic upstage (any nodal disease, > pT1N0), NACT with pCR (ypT0-isN0), NACT with stable disease (SD) (ypT1N0), and NACT with progressive disease (PD) (any nodal disease, > ypT1N0). The primary outcome was 5 year OS. RESULTS Patients with TNBC who underwent upfront surgery followed by ACT had better OS compared with those who received NACT (p < 0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) for death for NACT compared with ACT was 1.42 (95% CI 1.26-1.59, p < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. Patients who underwent upfront surgery followed by ACT and whose pathological stage was unchanged from clinical stage had similar outcomes compared with those who received NACT and attained pCR with 5 year OS of 92.7% versus 93.3% (p = 0.34). Patients with clinical T1cN0 tumors who underwent NACT with pCR had better outcomes compared with those who underwent ACT with unchanged stages. (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS For cT1N0 TNBC patients, OS of upfront surgery followed by ACT was not inferior to those who underwent NACT. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better outcomes in cT1c patients who attained pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Huang
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - James Jakub
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Emmanuel Gabriel
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia
- Jacoby Center for Breast Health, Division of Hematology Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Sarah McLaughlin
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yu KD. Inconsistent Data Between Distant Relapse Events and Breast Cancer-Specific Death Events in India Lidocaine Trial. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4707-4708. [PMID: 37433105 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ke-Da Yu
- Ke-Da Yu, MD, PhD, Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center and Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Badwe RA, Joshi S, Hawaldar R, Gupta S. Reply to S. Broens et al and K.-D. Yu. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4708-4709. [PMID: 37433099 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rajendra Achyut Badwe
- Rajendra Achyut Badwe, MS and Shalaka Joshi, MS, MCh, MRes, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; Rohini Hawaldar, BSc, DCM, Department of Clinical Research, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; and Sudeep Gupta, MBBS, MD, DM (Medical Oncology), Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Shalaka Joshi
- Rajendra Achyut Badwe, MS and Shalaka Joshi, MS, MCh, MRes, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; Rohini Hawaldar, BSc, DCM, Department of Clinical Research, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; and Sudeep Gupta, MBBS, MD, DM (Medical Oncology), Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Rohini Hawaldar
- Rajendra Achyut Badwe, MS and Shalaka Joshi, MS, MCh, MRes, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; Rohini Hawaldar, BSc, DCM, Department of Clinical Research, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; and Sudeep Gupta, MBBS, MD, DM (Medical Oncology), Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Sudeep Gupta
- Rajendra Achyut Badwe, MS and Shalaka Joshi, MS, MCh, MRes, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; Rohini Hawaldar, BSc, DCM, Department of Clinical Research, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; and Sudeep Gupta, MBBS, MD, DM (Medical Oncology), Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gluz O, Kuemmel S, Nitz U, Braun M, Lüdtke-Heckenkamp K, von Schumann R, Darsow M, Forstbauer H, Potenberg J, Uleer C, Grischke EM, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Zu Eulenburg C, Kates R, Jóźwiak K, Graeser M, Wuerstlein R, Baehner R, Christgen M, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Nab-paclitaxel weekly versus dose-dense solvent-based paclitaxel followed by dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide in high-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: results from the neoadjuvant part of the WSG-ADAPT-HR+/HER2- trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:531-542. [PMID: 37062416 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In high-risk hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC), nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel showed promising efficacy versus solvent-based (sb)-paclitaxel in neoadjuvant trials; however, optimal patient and therapy selection remains a topic of ongoing research. Here, we investigate the potential of Oncotype DX® recurrence score (RS) and endocrine therapy (ET) response (low post-endocrine Ki67) for therapy selection. PATIENTS AND METHODS Within the WSG-ADAPT trial (NCT01779206), high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC patients were randomized to (neo)adjuvant 4× sb-paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q2w or 8× nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 q1w, followed by 4× epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (90 mg + 600 mg) q2w; inclusion criteria: (i) cN0-1, RS 12-25, and post-ET Ki67 >10%; (ii) cN0-1 with RS >25. Patients with cN2-3 or (G3, baseline Ki67 ≥40%, and tumor size >1 cm) were allowed to be included without RS and/or ET response testing. Associations of key factors with pathological complete response (pCR) (primary) and survival (secondary) endpoints were analyzed using statistical mediation and moderation models. RESULTS Eight hundred and sixty-four patients received neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (n= 437) or sb-paclitaxel (n = 427); nab-paclitaxel was superior for pCR (20.8% versus 12.9%, P = 0.002). pCR was higher for RS >25 versus RS ≤25 (16.0% versus 8.4%, P = 0.021) and for ET non-response versus ET response (15.1% versus 6.0%, P = 0.027); no factors were predictive for the relative efficacy of nab-paclitaxel versus sb-paclitaxel. Patients with pCR had longer distant disease-free survival [dDFS; hazard ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.91, P = 0.024]. Despite favorable prognostic association of RS >25 versus RS ≤25 with pCR (odds ratio 3.11, 95% CI 1.71-5.63, P ≤ 0.001), higher RS was unfavorably associated with dDFS (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS In high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC, neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel q1w appears superior to sb-paclitaxel q2w regarding pCR. Combining RS and ET response assessment appears to select patients with highest pCR rates. The disadvantage of higher RS for dDFS is reduced in patients with pCR. These are the first results from a large neoadjuvant randomized trial supporting the use of RS to help select patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach; University Clinics Cologne, Cologne.
| | - S Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen; Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - U Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach
| | - M Braun
- Breast Center, Rotkreuz Clinics Munich, Munich
| | - K Lüdtke-Heckenkamp
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Niels Stensen-Kliniken, Georgsmarienhütte
| | - R von Schumann
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach
| | - M Darsow
- Breast Center, Luisenhospital, Duesseldorf; Practice for Senologic Oncology, Duesseldorf
| | | | | | - C Uleer
- Frauenaerzte am Bahnhofsplatz, Practice of Gynecology and Oncology, Hildesheim
| | - E M Grischke
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Tuebingen, Tuebingen
| | - B Aktas
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Essen, Essen; University Clinics Leipzig, Women's Clinic, Leipzig
| | - C Schumacher
- Breast Center, St. Elisabeth Hospital Cologne, Cologne
| | - C Zu Eulenburg
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg
| | - R Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach
| | - K Jóźwiak
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin
| | - M Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach; Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg
| | - R Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - M Christgen
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - H H Kreipe
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - N Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jang JY, Kim D, Kim ND. Recent Developments in Combination Chemotherapy for Colorectal and Breast Cancers with Topoisomerase Inhibitors. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24098457. [PMID: 37176164 PMCID: PMC10178955 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24098457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
DNA topoisomerases are important enzymes that stabilize DNA supercoiling and resolve entanglements. There are two main types of topoisomerases in all cells: type I, which causes single-stranded DNA breaks, and type II, which cuts double-stranded DNA. Topoisomerase activity is particularly increased in rapidly dividing cells, such as cancer cells. Topoisomerase inhibitors have been an effective chemotherapeutic option for the treatment of several cancers. In addition, combination cancer therapy with topoisomerase inhibitors may increase therapeutic efficacy and decrease resistance or side effects. Topoisomerase inhibitors are currently being used worldwide, including in the United States, and clinical trials on the combination of topoisomerase inhibitors with other drugs are currently underway. The primary objective of this review was to comprehensively analyze the current clinical landscape concerning the combined application of irinotecan, an extensively investigated type I topoisomerase inhibitor for colorectal cancer, and doxorubicin, an extensively researched type II topoisomerase inhibitor for breast cancer, while presenting a novel approach for cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Yoon Jang
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Drug Development, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea
| | - Donghwan Kim
- Functional Food Materials Research Group, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju-gun 55365, Republic of Korea
| | - Nam Deuk Kim
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Drug Development, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Braybrooke J, Bradley R, Gray R, Hills RK, Pan H, Peto R, Dodwell D, McGale P, Taylor C, Aihara T, Anderson S, Blum J, Cardoso F, Chen X, Crown JP, Ejlertsen B, Friedl TWP, Harbeck N, Janni W, Jensen MB, Mamounas E, Narui K, Nitz U, Norton L, O'Shaughnessy J, Piccart M, Robert N, Shao ZM, Slamon D, Sparano J, Watanabe T, Yothers G, Yu KD, Berry R, Boddington C, Clarke M, Davies C, Davies L, Duane F, Evans V, Gay J, Gettins L, Godwin J, James S, Lui H, Lui Z, MacKinnon E, Mannu G, McHugh T, Morris P, Read S, Straiton E, Buzdar A, Suman VJ, Hunt KK, Leonard RCF, Mansi J, Delbaldo C, Piedbois P, Quinaux E, Fesl C, Gnant M, Sölkner L, Steger G, Eikesdal HP, Lønning PE, Bee V, Fung H, Mackey J, Martin M, Press M, De Azambuja E, Gelber R, Regan M, Di Leo A, Van Dooren V, Nogaret JM, Bartlett J, Chen BE, Gelmon K, Goss PE, Levine MN, Parulekar W, Pritchard KI, Shepherd L, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Shulman LN, Winer E, Gelman RS, Harris JR, Henderson C, Shapiro CL, Christiansen P, Ewertz M, Mouridsen HT, Van Leeuwen E, Linn S, Van Rossum AGJ, Van Tinteren H, Van Werkhoven E, Goldstein L, Gray R, Eiermann W, Gianni L, Valagussa P, Bogaerts J, Bonnefoi H, Poncet C, Huovinen R, Joensuu H, Bonneterre J, Fargeot P, Fumoleau P, Kerbrat P, Luporsi E, Namer M, Carrasco EM, Segui MA, Meisner C, Loibl S, Nekljudova V, Thomssen C, Von Minckwitz G, Kümmel S, Lopez M, Vici P, Fountzilas G, Koliou G, Mavroudis D, Saloustros E, Brain E, Delaloge S, Michiels S, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Bines J, Sarmento RMB, Bonadonna G, Brambilla C, Rossi A, Bliss J, Coombes RC, Kilburn L, Marty M, Amadori D, Boccardo F, Nanni O, Rubagotti A, Scarpi E, Masuda N, Toi M, Ueno T, Ishikawa T, Matsumoto K, Takao S, Sommer H, Foroglou P, Giokas G, Kondylis D, Lissaios B, Reinisch M, Lee KS, Nam BH, Ro JS, De Matteis A, Perrone F, Tang G, Wolmark N, Hozumi Y, Nomura Y, Earl H, Hiller L, Vallier AL, De Mastro L, Venturini M, Delozier T, Lemonnier J, Martin AL, Roché H, Spielmann M, Chen X, Shen K, Albain K, Barlow W, Budd GT, Gralow J, Hayes D, Bartlett-Lee P, Ellis P, Bianco AR, De Laurentiis M, De Placido S, Wildiers H, Hsu L, Eremin O, Walker LG, Ahlgren J, Blomqvist C, Holmberg L, Lindman H, Asmar L, Jones SE, Gluz O, Liedtke C, Arriagada R, Bergsten-Nordström E, Carey L, Coleman R, Cuzick J, Davidson N, Dignam J, Dowsett M, Francis PA, Goetz MP, Goodwin P, Halpin-Murphy P, Hill C, Jagsi R, Mukai H, Ohashi Y, Pierce L, Poortmans P, Raina V, Rea D, Robertson J, Rutgers E, Salgado R, Spanic T, Tutt A, Viale G, Wang X, Whelan T, Wilcken N, Cameron D, Bergh J, Swain SM. Anthracycline-containing and taxane-containing chemotherapy for early-stage operable breast cancer: a patient-level meta-analysis of 100 000 women from 86 randomised trials. Lancet 2023; 401:1277-1292. [PMID: 37061269 PMCID: PMC11023015 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00285-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer substantially improves survival compared with no chemotherapy. However, concerns about short-term and long-term side-effects of anthracyclines have led to increased use of taxane chemotherapy without anthracycline, which could compromise efficacy. We aimed to better characterise the benefits and risks of including anthracycline, and the comparative benefits of different anthracycline-taxane regimens. METHODS We did an individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing taxane regimens with versus without anthracycline, and updated our previous meta-analysis of anthracycline regimens with versus without taxane, as well as analysing 44 trials in six related comparisons. We searched databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and meeting abstracts to identify trials assessing anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy. Adjuvant or neoadjuvant trials were eligible if they began before Jan 1, 2012. Primary outcomes were breast cancer recurrence and cause-specific mortality. Log-rank analyses yielded first-event rate ratios (RRs) and CIs. FINDINGS 28 trials of taxane regimens with or without anthracycline were identified, of which 23 were deemed eligible, and 15 provided data on 18 103 women. Across all 15 trials that provided individual data, recurrence rates were 14% lower on average (RR 0·86, 95% CI 0·79-0·93; p=0·0004) with taxane regimens including anthracycline than those without. Non-breast cancer deaths were not increased but there was one additional acute myeloid leukaemia case per 700 women treated. The clearest reductions in recurrence were found when anthracycline was added concurrently to docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide versus the same dose of docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (10-year recurrence risk 12·3% vs 21·0%; risk difference 8·7%, 95% CI 4·5-12·9; RR 0·58, 0·47-0·73; p<0·0001). 10-year breast cancer mortality in this group was reduced by 4·2% (0·4-8·1; p=0·0034). No significant reduction in recurrence risk was found for sequential schedules of taxane plus anthracycline when compared with docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (RR 0·94, 0·83-1·06; p=0·30). For the analysis of anthracycline regimens with versus without taxane, 35 trials (n=52 976) provided individual patient data. Larger recurrence reductions were seen from adding taxane to anthracycline regimens when the cumulative dose of anthracycline was the same in each group (RR 0·87, 0·82-0·93; p<0·0001; n=11 167) than in trials with two-fold higher cumulative doses of non-taxane (mostly anthracycline) in the control group than in the taxane group (RR 0·96, 0·90-1·03; p=0·27; n=14 620). Direct comparisons between anthracycline and taxane regimens showed that a higher cumulative dose and more dose-intense schedules were more efficacious. The proportional reductions in recurrence for taxane plus anthracycline were similar in oestrogen receptor-positive and oestrogen receptor-negative disease, and did not differ by age, nodal status, or tumour size or grade. INTERPRETATION Anthracycline plus taxane regimens are most efficacious at reducing breast cancer recurrence and death. Regimens with higher cumulative doses of anthracycline plus taxane provide the greatest benefits, challenging the current trend in clinical practice and guidelines towards non-anthracycline chemotherapy, particularly shorter regimens, such as four cycles of docetaxel-cyclophosphamide. By bringing together data from almost all relevant trials, this meta-analysis provides a reliable evidence base to inform individual treatment decisions, clinical guidelines, and the design of future clinical trials. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council.
Collapse
|
12
|
Edwards IA, De Carlo F, Sitta J, Varner W, Howard CM, Claudio PP. Enhancing Targeted Therapy in Breast Cancer by Ultrasound-Responsive Nanocarriers. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24065474. [PMID: 36982548 PMCID: PMC10053544 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, the response to cancer treatments is highly variable, and severe side effects and toxicity are experienced by patients receiving high doses of chemotherapy, such as those diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer. The main goal of researchers and clinicians is to develop new effective treatments that will be able to specifically target and kill tumor cells by employing the minimum doses of drugs exerting a therapeutic effect. Despite the development of new formulations that overall can increase the drugs’ pharmacokinetics, and that are specifically designed to bind overexpressed molecules on cancer cells and achieve active targeting of the tumor, the desired clinical outcome has not been reached yet. In this review, we will discuss the current classification and standard of care for breast cancer, the application of nanomedicine, and ultrasound-responsive biocompatible carriers (micro/nanobubbles, liposomes, micelles, polymeric nanoparticles, and nanodroplets/nanoemulsions) employed in preclinical studies to target and enhance the delivery of drugs and genes to breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaiah A. Edwards
- Department of Radiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Flavia De Carlo
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Juliana Sitta
- Department of Radiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - William Varner
- Department of Radiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Candace M. Howard
- Department of Radiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Pier Paolo Claudio
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yuan P, Kang Y, Ma F, Fan Y, Wang J, Wang X, Yue J, Luo Y, Zhang P, Li Q, Xu B. Effect of Epirubicin Plus Paclitaxel vs Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel on Disease-Free Survival Among Patients With Operable ERBB2-Negative and Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e230122. [PMID: 36826820 PMCID: PMC9958529 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Adjuvant therapy is an important and effective treatment for breast cancer. However, there is a lack of head-to-head clinical trials comparing the regimens epirubicin plus paclitaxel (EP) vs epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (EC-P) in breast cancer. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the noninferiority of a cyclophosphamide-free (EP) regimen compared with the standard EC-P regimen for patients with operable hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative, lymph node-positive breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective, open-label, phase 3, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 1, 2010, to June 30, 2016, in the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing. Patients with hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative, lymph node-positive operable breast cancer were included and randomized into 2 treatment groups. Data were analyzed from June 30, 2016, to November 1, 2022. INTERVENTIONS Patients received adjuvant epirubicin (75 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (EP regimen) or epirubicin (90 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (EC-P regimen) as the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), distant DFS, and safety. RESULTS A total of 900 patients were registered, and 813 eligible patients (median age, 48 [IQR, 41-56] years) were randomly assigned to the EP group (n = 407) or the EC-P group (n = 406) after the surgical procedure. Through a median follow-up of 93.6 (IQR, 60.9-114.1) months, the hazard ratio (HR) of DFS for EP vs EC-P was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.62-1.10; 5-year DFS, 86.0% vs 80.6%; noninferior P = .001). The 5-year OS for the ITT population treated with the EP or the EC-P regimen was 94.7% vs 95.0%, respectively (HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.61-1.49]). Patients in the EP group had more frequent toxic effect events than those in the EC-P group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this prospective, open-label, phase 3, randomized clinical trial, the EP regimen was noninferior to the EC-P regimen. These findings supported that the EP regimen could be an effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for women with ERBB2-negative breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01134523.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Yuan
- Department of VIP Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yikun Kang
- Department of VIP Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Fan
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiayu Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xue Wang
- Department of VIP Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Yue
- Department of VIP Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Luo
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Pin Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qing Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Binghe Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lai JI, Chao TC, Liu CY, Huang CC, Tseng LM. A systemic review of taxanes and their side effects in metastatic breast cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:940239. [PMID: 36303832 PMCID: PMC9592970 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.940239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Taxanes-containing chemotherapy constitutes an essential backbone for both early and metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the two major taxane drugs—paclitaxel and docetaxel—have distinct safety profiles. In this review, we summarize the safety outcome and management following treatment with both taxanes from selected clinical trials. We utilized PubMed to perform literature search before April 2021. Five phase III randomized controlled trials with reports of individual taxane adverse events (AEs) were included in this review. Grade 3/4 AEs were summarized and discussed extensively. The rates of grade 3/4 neutropenia were higher with docetaxel than with paclitaxel. For non-hematologic grade 3/4 AEs, peripheral neuropathy was more frequent with paclitaxel while fluid retention was more frequent with docetaxel. Compared to paclitaxel, docetaxel had a higher rate of grade 3/4 gastrointestinal AEs. Grade 3/4 myalgia were generally comparable between the two taxanes. Except for neutropenia, the incidence rate of grade 3/4 AEs of taxanes was generally manageable. Peripheral neuropathy was more common with paclitaxel while grade 3/4 neutropenia was more common with docetaxel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiun-I. Lai
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Center of Immuno-Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ta-Chung Chao
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Yu Liu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Cheng Huang
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Experimental Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Public Health, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ling-Ming Tseng
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Experimental Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Ling-Ming Tseng, ;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rubovszky G, Kocsis J, Boér K, Chilingirova N, Dank M, Kahán Z, Kaidarova D, Kövér E, Krakovská BV, Máhr K, Mriňáková B, Pikó B, Božović-Spasojević I, Horváth Z. Systemic Treatment of Breast Cancer. 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2022; 28:1610383. [PMID: 35898593 PMCID: PMC9311257 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This text is based on the recommendations accepted by the 4th Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer, modified based on the international consultation and conference within the frames of the Central-Eastern European Academy of Oncology. The professional guideline primarily reflects the resolutions and recommendations of the current ESMO, NCCN and ABC5, as well as that of the St. Gallen Consensus Conference statements. The recommendations cover classical prognostic factors and certain multigene tests, which play an important role in therapeutic decision-making. From a didactic point of view, the text first addresses early and then locally advanced breast cancer, followed by locoregionally recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Within these, we discuss each group according to the available therapeutic options. At the end of the recommendations, we summarize the criteria for treatment in certain rare clinical situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gábor Rubovszky
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, National Institute of Oncology, Chest and Abdominal Tumours Chemotherapy “B”, Budapest, Hungary,*Correspondence: Gábor Rubovszky,
| | - Judit Kocsis
- Center of Oncoradiology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary
| | - Katalin Boér
- Department of Oncology, Szent Margit Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Nataliya Chilingirova
- Clinic Center of Excellence, Heart and Brain Hospital, Science and Research Institute, Medical University-Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria
| | - Magdolna Dank
- Oncology Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Erika Kövér
- Institute of Oncotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Bibiana Vertáková Krakovská
- 1st Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia,Medical Oncology Department, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Károly Máhr
- Department of Oncology, Szent Rafael Hospital of Zala County, Zalaegerszeg, Hungary
| | - Bela Mriňáková
- 1st Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia,Medical Oncology Department, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Béla Pikó
- County Oncology Centre, Pándy Kálmán Hospital of Békés County Council, Gyula, Hungary
| | | | - Zsolt Horváth
- Center of Oncoradiology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy in the trastuzumab era: final long-term results of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Phase III HE10/05 Trial. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:695-703. [PMID: 35610366 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01846-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with anthracyclines and taxanes achieved an 18% reduction of recurrence risk in early breast cancer (BC). The optimal chemotherapy schedule and interval between cycles remain under investigation. METHODS Overall, 990 patients were randomised to receive either three cycles of epirubicin (E, 110 mg/m2) every 2 weeks followed by 3 cycles of paclitaxel (T, 200 mg/m2) every 2 weeks followed by three cycles of intensified CMF (Control Arm A, E-T-CMF) that was previously used in BC or three cycles of epirubicin followed by three cycles of CMF followed by nine consecutive weekly cycles of docetaxel (wD) 35 mg/m2 (Arm B, E-CMF-wD) or nine consecutive weekly cycles of paclitaxel (wT) 80 mg/m2 (Arm C, E-CMF-wT). Trastuzumab was administered for HER2-positive disease. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 13.3 years, 330 disease-free survival (DFS) events (33.3%) were reported. DFS and overall survival (OS) did not differ between patients in the combined B and C arms versus arm A either in the entire cohort (HR = 0.90, P = 0.38 and HR = 0.85, P = 0.20) or among trastuzumab-treated patients (HR = 0.69, P = 0.13 and HR = 0.67, P = 0.13). Thirty-four patients (3.4%) developed secondary neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS Overall, no significant differences in survival were found amongst the studied regimens after a long-term observational period. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000151033.
Collapse
|
17
|
The impact of anthracyclines in intermediate and high-risk HER2-negative early breast cancer-a pooled analysis of the randomised clinical trials PlanB and SUCCESS C. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:1715-1724. [PMID: 35194193 PMCID: PMC9174181 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01690-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-taxane-containing chemotherapy (AC-T) is the standard of care in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative early breast cancer (EBC), but recent studies suggest omission of anthracyclines for reduced toxicity without compromising efficacy. Methods Based on individual patient data (n = 5924) pooled from the randomised Phase III trials PlanB and SUCCESS C, we compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between intermediate to high-risk HER2-negative EBC-patients treated with either six cycles of docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC6) or an AC-T regime using univariable and adjusted multivariable Cox regression models. Results AC-T conferred no significant DFS or OS advantage in univariable (DFS: hazard ratio (HR) for TC vs. AT 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89–1.24, P = 0.57; OS: HR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.80–1.26, P = 1.00) and adjusted multivariable analysis (DFS: HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86–1.19, P = 0.91; OS: HR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.77–1.22, P = 0.79). Patients receiving TC6 had significantly fewer grade 3–4 adverse events. Exploratory subgroup analysis showed that AC-T was associated with significantly better DFS and OS in pN2/3 patients, specifically in those with lobular histology. Conclusion For most patients with HER2-negative EBC, AC-T is not associated with a survival benefit compared to TC6. However, patients with lobular pN2/pN3 tumours seem to benefit from anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
18
|
Coolbrandt A, Vancoille K, Dejaeger E, Peeters H, Laenen A, Neven P, Punie K, Wildiers H. Preventing taxane-related peripheral neuropathy, pain and nail toxicity: a prospective self-controlled trial comparing hilotherapy with frozen gloves in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 192:293-301. [PMID: 34982322 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06477-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The prevention of taxane-related toxicities at the extremities is highly important for patients' treatment and quality-of-life. Several studies endorse hand/foot-cooling using frozen gloves as a prophylactic intervention. Unlike frozen gloves, hilotherapy produces cooling at a constant temperature. Comparative data with frozen gloves are unavailable. METHODS This prospective self-controlled study explores the efficacy of hilotherapy at the right hand and foot compared to frozen gloves at the left in patients with early breast cancer treated with weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 or three-weekly docetaxel 75 mg/m2. Patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment. Primary and secondary endpoints were the incidence of any-grade and ≥ grade 2 side-effects (peripheral neuropathy, pain and nail toxicities), and perceived comfort of both interventions. RESULTS Sixty-two patients participated. The incidence of any-grade side-effects was similar on both sides, 85.5% with hilotherapy and 90.3% with frozen gloves (p = 1.000). The incidence of ≥ grade 2 side-effects at the extremities was significantly lower with hilotherapy: 43.6% compared to 61.3% with frozen gloves (p = 0.013). Perceived comfort was significantly better for hilotherapy than for frozen gloves (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Compared to frozen gloves, continuous cooling of hands and feet using hilotherapy produces better prevention of ≥ grade 2 patient-reported side-effects at the extremities (peripheral neuropathy, pain and nail toxicities). Perceived comfort was significantly better for hilotherapy. From a clinical and patient perspective, hilotherapy is a better alternative for preventing clinically significant taxane-related side-effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemarie Coolbrandt
- Department of Oncology Nursing, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium. .,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - K Vancoille
- Department of Oncology Nursing, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Dejaeger
- Department of Oncology Nursing, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Peeters
- Department of Oncology Nursing, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Laenen
- Interuniversity Centre for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Neven
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Punie
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Wildiers
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Möbus V, Lück HJ, Ladda E, Klare P, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Grischke EM, Wachsmann G, Forstbauer H, Untch M, Marmé F, Blohmer JU, Jackisch C, Huober J, Stickeler E, Reinisch M, Link T, Sinn BV, Janni W, Denkert C, Furlanetto J, Engels K, Solbach C, Schmatloch S, Rey J, Burchardi N, Loibl S. Phase III randomised trial comparing intense dose-dense chemotherapy to tailored dose-dense chemotherapy in high-risk early breast cancer (GAIN-2). Eur J Cancer 2021; 156:138-148. [PMID: 34450552 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The GAIN-2 trial was designed to identify a superior intense dose-dense (idd) strategy for high-risk patients with early breast cancer. Here, we report an interim analysis, at which the predefined futility boundary was crossed. PATIENTS AND METHODS GAIN-2 was an open-label, randomised, multicentre phase III trial. Two thousand eight hundred and eighty seven patients were randomised 1:1 between three courses each of idd epirubicin (E) 150 mg/m2, nab-paclitaxel (nP) 330 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide (C) 2000 mg/m2 (iddEnPC) versus four cycles of leucocyte nadir-based tailored and dose-dense EC (dtEC) followed by four cycles of tailored and dose-dense docetaxel (dtD) (dtEC-dtD). RESULTS The duration of median follow-up was 45.8 (range 0.0-88.3) months. Trial objectives included invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) as the primary end-point. A total of 593 patients received the treatment as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. At the time of futility interim analysis, 414 events for iDFS were reported. Overall, there was no difference in iDFS between iddEnPC and dtEC-dtD with 4-year iDFS rates of 84.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 82.0-86.4%). Among all predefined subgroups, hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-), lobular cancer and ≤50 years subgroups predicted for better iDFS in the dtEC-dtD arm. Overall, 88.1% of patients completed all treatment in both arms. Haematological toxicity grade 3/4 and grade 3/4 non-haematological adverse events were significantly higher with iddEnPC (iddEnPC 50.8% vs dtEC-dtD 45.1%, P = 0.002), especially arthralgia and peripheral sensory neuropathy. Two treatment-related deaths occurred during dtEC-dtD, corresponding to a low mortality rate of 0.07%. CONCLUSIONS iDFS is equal in both regimens, but tailoring dose-dense chemotherapy improved outcomes in HR+/HER2-, lobular cancer and patients ≤50 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Möbus
- Department of Medicine II, Hematology & Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Marcus Schmidt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Grischke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Clinics Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer and Gynecologic Oncology Center, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Germany
| | - Frederik Marmé
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Mannheim, Germany
| | | | | | - Jens Huober
- Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Mattea Reinisch
- Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Theresa Link
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bruno V Sinn
- Institute of Pathology, Charité- University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Knut Engels
- Center of Pathology, Cytology and Molecular Pathology Neuss, Germany
| | | | | | - Julia Rey
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li BX, Chen XJ, Ding TJ, Liu YH, Ma TT, Zhang GL, Wang XM. Potentially Overestimated Efficacy of Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Paclitaxel compared with Solvent-based Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis. J Cancer 2021; 12:5164-5172. [PMID: 34335933 PMCID: PMC8317518 DOI: 10.7150/jca.59794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) has exhibited clinical efficacy in breast cancer treatment, but toxicities can be yielded more at the same time. We did this meta-analysis aiming to unambiguously compare nab-PTX with conventional solvent-based paclitaxel (sb-PTX) in breast cancer patients of all stages. Method: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for head-to-head randomized controlled trials of nab-PTX and sb-PTX in breast cancer. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval was used for dichotomous variables while Hazard ratio (HR) was used for time-to-event outcomes. Results: Our review finally included 9 studies with 3508 patients. Nab-PTX showed a benefit on objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.22 [1.04-1.43], P=0.01) as well as non-inferiority compared with sb-PTX in disease control rate (DCR) (RR=1.01 [0.98-1.04], P=0.44), overall survival (OS) (HR=0.99 [0.93-1.05], P=0.81) and disease free survival/progression free survival (DFS/PFS) (HR=0.92 [0.81-1.05], P=0.21). However, when it comes to toxicities (fatigue, nausea or vomiting, peripheral sensory neuropathy and adverse event related discontinuation), results favored sb-PTX (RR=2.89 [1.07-7.8], 3.15 [1.78-5.59], 2.11 [1.32-3.37], 2.02 [1.61-2.53]; P<0.05). Patients with metastatic tumors or undergoing conventional schedule responses better to nab-PTX than the compared groups (RR of ORR in metastatic vs early or locally advanced patients: 1.46 [1.09-1.96] vs 1.01 [0.94-1.08]; conventional vs dose dense group: 1.59 [1.23-2.06] vs 1.01 [0.91-1.12]). Conclusions: Nab-PTX can improve ORR compared with paclitaxel and should be given priority to when aiming to reduce tumor load in breast cancer. Sb-PTX of dose dense schedule is recommended when toxicity of nab-PTX is hard to bear for breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing-Xue Li
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, No.23 Gallery Back Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100010, PR China.,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.11 East Road, North of the Third Ring, Chaoyang District, 100029, PR China
| | - Xin-Jie Chen
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, No.23 Gallery Back Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100010, PR China.,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.11 East Road, North of the Third Ring, Chaoyang District, 100029, PR China
| | - Tong-Jing Ding
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, No.23 Gallery Back Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100010, PR China.,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.11 East Road, North of the Third Ring, Chaoyang District, 100029, PR China
| | - Yi-Hua Liu
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.11 East Road, North of the Third Ring, Chaoyang District, 100029, PR China
| | - Ting-Ting Ma
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, No.23 Gallery Back Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100010, PR China
| | - Gan-Lin Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, No.23 Gallery Back Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100010, PR China
| | - Xiao-Min Wang
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, No.23 Gallery Back Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100010, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gkionis L, Aojula H, Harris LK, Tirella A. Microfluidic-assisted fabrication of phosphatidylcholine-based liposomes for controlled drug delivery of chemotherapeutics. Int J Pharm 2021; 604:120711. [PMID: 34015381 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Microfluidic enables precise control over the continuous mixing of fluid phases at the micrometre scale, aiming to optimize the processing parameters and to facilitate scale-up feasibility. The optimization of parameters to obtain monodispersed drug-loaded liposomes however is challenging. In this work, two phosphatidylcholines (PC) differing in acyl chain length were selected, and used to control the release of the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin hydrochloride, an effective drug used to treat breast cancer. Microfluidics was used to rapidly screen manufacturing parameters and PC formulations to obtain monodispersed unilamellar liposomal formulations with a reproducible size (i.e. < 200 nm). Cholesterol was included in all liposomal formulations; some formulations also contained DMPC(1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) and/or DSPC(1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine). Systematic variations in microfluidics total flow rate (TFR) settings were performed, while keeping a constant flow rate ratio (FRR). A total of six PC-based liposomes were fabricated using the optimal manufacturing parameters (TFR 500 μL/min, FRR 0.1) for the production of reproducible, stable liposome formulations with a narrow size distribution. Liposomes actively encapsulating doxorubicin exhibited high encapsulation efficiencies (>80%) for most of the six formulations, and sustained drug release profiles in vitro over 48 h. Drug release profiles varied as a function of the DMPC/DSPC mol content in the lipid bilayer, with DMPC-based liposomes exhibiting a sustained release of doxorubicin when compared to DSPC liposomes. The PC-based liposomes, with a slower release of doxorubicin, were tested in vitro, as to investigate their cytotoxic activity against three human breast cancer cell lines: the non-metastatic ER+/PR + MCF7 cells, the triple-negative aggressive MDA-MB 231 cells, and the metastatic HER2-overexpressing/PR + BT474 cells. Similar cytotoxicity levels to that of free doxorubicin were reported for DMPC5 and DMPC3 binary liposomes (IC50 ~ 1 μM), whereas liposomes composed of a single PC were less cytotoxic (IC50 ~ 3-4 μM). These results highlight that microfluidics is suitable for the manufacture of monodispersed and size-specific PC-based liposomes in a controlled single-step; furthermore, selected PC-based liposome represent promising nanomedicines for the prolonged release of chemotherapeutics, with the aim of improving outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonidas Gkionis
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Harmesh Aojula
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Lynda K Harris
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom; Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, 5th floor (Research), St Mary's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Annalisa Tirella
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tolaney SM, Garrett-Mayer E, White J, Blinder VS, Foster JC, Amiri-Kordestani L, Hwang ES, Bliss JM, Rakovitch E, Perlmutter J, Spears PA, Frank E, Tung NM, Elias AD, Cameron D, Denduluri N, Best AF, DiLeo A, Baizer L, Butler LP, Schwartz E, Winer EP, Korde LA. Updated Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: STEEP Version 2.0. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2720-2731. [PMID: 34003702 PMCID: PMC10166345 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) criteria, established in 2007, provide standardized definitions of adjuvant breast cancer clinical trial end points. Given the evolution of breast cancer clinical trials and improvements in outcomes, a panel of experts reviewed the STEEP criteria to determine whether modifications are needed. METHODS We conducted systematic searches of ClinicalTrials.gov for adjuvant systemic and local-regional therapy trials for breast cancer to investigate if the primary end points reported met STEEP criteria. On the basis of common STEEP deviations, we performed a series of simulations to evaluate the effect of excluding non-breast cancer deaths and new nonbreast primary cancers from the invasive disease-free survival end point. RESULTS Among 11 phase III breast cancer trials with primary efficacy end points, three had primary end points that followed STEEP criteria, four used STEEP definitions but not the corresponding end point names, and four used end points that were not included in the original STEEP manuscript. Simulation modeling demonstrated that inclusion of second nonbreast primary cancer can increase the probability of incorrect inferences, can decrease power to detect clinically relevant efficacy effects, and may mask differences in recurrence rates, especially when recurrence rates are low. CONCLUSION We recommend an additional end point, invasive breast cancer-free survival, which includes all invasive disease-free survival events except second nonbreast primary cancers. This end point should be considered for trials in which the toxicities of agents are well-known and where the risk of second primary cancer is small. Additionally, we provide end point recommendations for local therapy trials, low-risk populations, noninferiority trials, and trials incorporating patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Julia White
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Jared C Foster
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | | | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Durham, NC
| | - Judith M Bliss
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eileen Rakovitch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Patricia A Spears
- University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Elizabeth Frank
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - David Cameron
- University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ana F Best
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Angelo DiLeo
- Hospital of Prato, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - Lawrence Baizer
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | | | - Elena Schwartz
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Larissa A Korde
- Cancer Therapy and Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schick J, Ritchie RP, Restini C. Breast Cancer Therapeutics and Biomarkers: Past, Present, and Future Approaches. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2021; 15:1178223421995854. [PMID: 33994789 PMCID: PMC8100889 DOI: 10.1177/1178223421995854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer death in women and the second-most common cancer. An estimated 281 550 new cases of invasive BC will be diagnosed in women in the United States, and about 43 600 will die during 2021. Continual research has shed light on all disease areas, including tumor classification and biomarkers for diagnosis/prognosis. As research investigations evolve, new classes of drugs are emerging with potential benefits in BC treatment that are covered in this manuscript. The initial sections present updated classification and terminology used for diagnosis and prognosis, which leads to the following topics, discussing the past and present treatments available for BC. Our review will generate interest in exploring the complexity of the cell cycle and its association with cancer biology as part of the plethora of target factors toward developing newer drugs and effective therapeutic management of BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Schick
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, Clinton Township, MI, USA
| | - Raquel P Ritchie
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, Clinton Township, MI, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Carolina Restini
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, Clinton Township, MI, USA
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kim R, Kin T. Reconsidering the Meaning of Curing Primary Breast Cancer as a Systemic Disease. Front Oncol 2021; 11:639420. [PMID: 33816282 PMCID: PMC8012902 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.639420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ryungsa Kim
- Department of Breast Surgery, Hiroshima Mark Clinic, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takanori Kin
- Department of Breast Surgery, Hiroshima City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wuerstlein R, Harbeck N, Grischke EM, Forstmeyer D, von Schumann R, Krabisch P, Lüdtke-Heckenkamp K, Stefek A, Stoetzer O, Grafe A, Kaltenecker G, Forstbauer H, Augustin D, Schrader I, Tio J, Nitz U, Gluz O, Kates RE, Graeser MK. Protroca: A Noninterventional Study on Prophylactic Lipegfilgrastim against Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Nonselected Breast Cancer Patients. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:50-58. [PMID: 33716632 DOI: 10.1159/000506622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Protroca evaluated the efficacy and safety of primary and secondary prophylaxis of neutropenia with lipegfilgrastim (Lonquex®) in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Patients and Methods Of the 255 patients enrolled, 248 patients were evaluable for the intent-to-treat (ITT) and 194 patients for the per-protocol set. Primary and secondary end points after lipegfilgrastim treatment were assessed. Results Nine patients of the ITT set receiving lipegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis (n = 222) had febrile neutropenia of grade 3-4 (5 patients) or infection of grade 3-4 (4 patients); 1/26 of those receiving secondary prophylaxis had an event. Dose reductions were performed in 9.5% of the patients. Postponement of cancer CT cycles for >3 days occurred in <15% of patients; 10.8% (92/851 AEs) and 8% (2/25 SAEs) of documented adverse events and serious adverse events, respectively, were related to lipegfilgrastim. Conclusions Application of lipegfilgrastim was effective as primary and secondary prophylaxis in the prevention of CT-induced neutropenia in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center and CCC Munich, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.,West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center and CCC Munich, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.,West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Forstmeyer
- University Clinic Leipzig, University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Raquel von Schumann
- Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Andrea Stefek
- Johanniter Clinics Stendal, Breast Center Altmark, Stendal, Germany
| | - Oliver Stoetzer
- Medical Center for Hematology and Oncology Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Doris Augustin
- Donau-Isar Clinic Deggendorf, Breast Center, Deggendorf, Germany
| | - Iris Schrader
- Gynecological Oncological Practice Hanover, Hanover, Germany
| | - Joke Tio
- University Clinic Münster, Breast Center, Münster, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Monika Karla Graeser
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhu S, Li Y, Chen W, Fei X, Shen K, Chen X. Molecular Subtype May Be More Associated With Prognosis and Chemotherapy Benefit Than Tumor Size in T1N0 Breast Cancer Patients: An Analysis of 2,168 Patients for Possible De-Escalation Treatment. Front Oncol 2021; 11:636266. [PMID: 33680973 PMCID: PMC7933524 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.636266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Breast cancer (BC) patients with T1N0 tumors have relatively favorable clinical outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether molecular subtypes can aide in prognostic prediction for such small, nodal-negative BC cases and guide decision-making about escalating or de-escalating treatments. Patients and Methods T1N0 BC patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2017 were included and classified into three subgroups according to receptor status: 1) hormonal receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)−; 2) HER2+; and 3) triple negative (TN) (HR−/HER2−). Patients’ characteristics and relapse events were reviewed. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess the iDFS and BCSS. The effects of risk factors and adjuvant treatment benefits were evaluated by calculating hazard ratios (HRs) for invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) with Cox proportional hazards models. Results In total, 2,168 patients (1,435 HR+/HER2−, 427 HER2+, 306 TN) were enrolled. The 5-year iDFS rates were 93.6, 92.7, and 90.6% for HR+/HER2−, HER2+, and TN patients, respectively (P = 0.039). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that molecular subtype (P = 0.043), but not tumor size (P = 0.805), was independently associated with iDFS in T1N0 BC. TN patients [HRs = 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.11–2.84, P = 0.018] had a higher recurrence risk than HR+/HER2− patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy benefit was not demonstrated in all T1N0 patients but interacted with molecular subtype status. TN (adjusted HRs = 2.31, 95% CI = 0.68–7.54) and HER2+ (adjusted HRs = 2.26, 95% CI = 0.95–5.63) patients receiving chemotherapy had superior iDFS rates. Regarding BCSS, molecular subtype tended to be related to outcome (P = 0.053) and associated with chemotherapy benefit (P = 0.005). Conclusion Molecular subtype was more associated with disease outcome and chemotherapy benefit than tumor size in T1N0 BC patients, indicating that it may guide possible clinical de-escalating therapy in T1N0 BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siji Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yafen Li
- Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiguo Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaochun Fei
- Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kunwei Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaosong Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chen W, Tu Q, Shen Y, Tang K, Hong M, Shen Y. Sequential vs concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy of anthracycline and taxane for operable breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:52. [PMID: 33602236 PMCID: PMC7890894 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02150-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whether a sequential or concurrent regimen of anthracyclines and taxanes is superior for breast cancer is controversial. We compared the efficacy of two regimens in patients with operable breast cancer based on all relevant published data of phase III randomized controlled trials. Methods A comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was performed up to May 2020. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the different efficacy on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for the two chemotherapy regimens. Subgroup analyses were further carried out in terms of node status and anthracycline selection. Results Compared to the concurrent regimen, the sequential regimen did not improve the DFS or OS in the population studied. Subgroup analysis showed that in node-positive patients, the sequential regimen had better DFS, but not OS, than the concurrent regimen. In sequential regimen, patients who received doxorubicin and taxanes had improved DFS and OS than patients who were administered epirubicin and taxanes. Furthermore, for patients who received doxorubicin and taxanes, compared to the sequential regimen, fewer cycles (4 cycles) of concurrent treatment resulted in a worse DFS and OS, which can be rescued by more cycles (6 cycles). Conclusions The sequential regimen of anthracyclines and taxanes for patients with operable breast cancer did not yield a significant benefit in DFS or OS over the concurrent regimen. The sequential regimen, however, provided a better DFS than concurrent regimen for node-positive patients. Interestingly, further subgroup analysis showed that for node-positive patients who were given doxorubicin and taxanes, more cycles (6 cycles) of the concurrent regimen may rescue the efficacy for fewer cycles (4 cycles).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanjing Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, China
| | - Qian Tu
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, China
| | - Yanfei Shen
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang, 322100, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kejun Tang
- Department of Surgery, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Mengying Hong
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, 310009, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yong Shen
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang, 310006, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence rate in T1abN0M0 triple-negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2020; 25:100211. [PMID: 33113437 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is known for its higher recurrence rate in short-term (3-5 years) follow-up and limited systemic therapeutic methods (chemotherapy). Current literature debates over whether chemotherapy should be given to TNBC with a very early disease stage (T1a/bN0). This meta-analysis aimed to compare short-term recurrence rate between patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or not for this population. METHODS We performed a comprehensive search in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane library from January 2008 to December 2019. Raw data on local or distance recurrence events was extracted, odds ratio (OR) values, 95% confidence interval (CI) values, and P values were then calculated. RESULTS 9 studies out of 426 were included in the meta-analysis. Our main results showed that breast cancer recurrence rate in T1a/bN0 TNBC patients receiving chemotherapy was significantly lower than those without chemotherapy (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.78, P = 0.001). Similar results were detected in the T1b group (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.78). The main result remained stable after sensitivity analysis. No significant publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS Our results revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy reduced recurrence rate for T1mi/a/bN0 TNBC, especially for T1bN0. The benefit of chemotherapy for T1mi/aN0 disease is still debated.
Collapse
|
29
|
de Gregorio A, Häberle L, Fasching PA, Müller V, Schrader I, Lorenz R, Forstbauer H, Friedl TWP, Bauer E, de Gregorio N, Deniz M, Fink V, Bekes I, Andergassen U, Schneeweiss A, Tesch H, Mahner S, Brucker SY, Blohmer JU, Fehm TN, Heinrich G, Lato K, Beckmann MW, Rack B, Janni W. Gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk early breast cancer-results from the randomized phase III SUCCESS-A trial. Breast Cancer Res 2020; 22:111. [PMID: 33097092 PMCID: PMC7583247 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-01348-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background When chemotherapy is indicated in patients with early breast cancer, regimens that contain anthracyclines and taxanes are established standard treatments. Gemcitabine has shown promising effects on the response and prognosis in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The SUCCESS-A trial (NCT02181101) examined the addition of gemcitabine to a standard chemotherapy regimen in high-risk early breast cancer patients. Methods A total of 3754 patients with at least one of the following characteristics were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment arms: nodal positivity, tumor grade 3, age ≤ 35 years, tumor larger than 2 cm, or negative hormone receptor status. The treatment arms received either three cycles of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide, followed by three cycles of docetaxel (FEC → Doc); or three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel and gemcitabine (FEC → Doc/Gem). The primary study aim was disease-free survival (DFS), and the main secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and safety. Results No differences were observed in the 5-year DFS or OS between FEC → Doc and FEC → Doc/Gem. The hazard ratio was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.78 to 1.12; P = 0.47) for DFS and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.19; P = 0.60) for OS. For patients treated with FEC → Doc and FEC → Doc/Gem, the 5-year probabilities of DFS were 86.6% and 87.2%, and the 5-year probabilities of OS were 92.8% and 92.5%, respectively. Conclusion Adding gemcitabine to a standard chemotherapy does not improve the outcomes in patients with high-risk early breast cancer and should therefore not be included in the adjuvant treatment setting. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02181101 and EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT 2005-000490-21. Registered September 2005.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelie de Gregorio
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Biostatistics Unit, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Ralf Lorenz
- Gynecologic Practice Dr. Lorenz, N. Hecker, Dr. Kreiss-Sender, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Helmut Forstbauer
- Hemato-Oncological Practice Dres Forstbauer and Ziske, Troisdorf, Germany
| | - Thomas W P Friedl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Emanuel Bauer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Nikolaus de Gregorio
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Miriam Deniz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Visnja Fink
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Inga Bekes
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ulrich Andergassen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division of Gynecologic Oncology and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Department of Oncology, Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Georg Heinrich
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Fürstenwalde, Germany
| | - Krisztian Lato
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Brigitte Rack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
John P, Osani MC, Kodali A, Buchsbaum R, Bannuru RR, Erban JK. Comparative Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis. Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 21:e22-e37. [PMID: 32917538 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are several regimens recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for HER2-negative operable breast cancer. To our knowledge, no trials have yet been performed comparing these regimens head to head. We performed a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of NCCN-recommended chemotherapy regimens. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to February 2020. We included randomized clinical trials comparing adjuvant regimens in predominantly node-positive operable breast cancer patients. We compared (1) DDACT, (2) TCx4 cycles, (3) TAC, and (4) ACWKT. Common comparators were (5) AC, (6) ACT, and (7) ACD. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The Cochrane risk of bias tool assessed quality of the studies. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated as measures of treatment effects with AC as reference. We used Bayesian hierarchical random-effects models with noninformative priors for mixed multiple treatment comparisons. Effectiveness was estimated by disease-free and overall survival using ORs. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Safety outcomes included febrile neutropenia. RESULTS We identified 7 randomized controlled trials with 16,332 patients. TC (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.71 [0.36-1.40]), TAC (0.77 [0.37-1.57]), ACWKT (0.68 [0.34-1.38]), and DDACT (0.72 [0.35-1.42]) were similar for overall survival. TC (0.64 [0.36-1.14]), TAC (0.67 [0.39-1.15]), ACWKT (0.63 [0.37-1.07]), and DDACT (0.59 [0.35-1.01]) had similar disease-free survival benefit. With regard to toxicity, TAC (2.67 [0.30-21.04]) had the highest odds of febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION The current generation of regimens are similar in efficacy. Given the lower toxicity of TCx4 comparatively, it is an acceptable alternative for lower-risk early-stage HER2-negative breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Preethi John
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
| | - Mikala C Osani
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Abhigna Kodali
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Rachel Buchsbaum
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Raveendhara R Bannuru
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - John K Erban
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Paluch-Shimon S, Cherny NI, de Vries EGE, Dafni U, Piccart MJ, Latino NJ, Cardoso F. Application of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (V.1.1) to the field of early breast cancer therapies. ESMO Open 2020; 5:e000743. [PMID: 32893189 PMCID: PMC7476474 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Click here to listen to the Podcast BACKGROUND: The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) is a validated value scale for solid tumour anticancer treatments. Form 1 of the ESMO-MCBS, used to grade therapies with curative intent including adjuvant therapies, has only been evaluated for a limited number of studies. This is the first large-scale field testing in early breast cancer to assess the applicability of the scale to this data set and the reasonableness of derived scores and to identify any shortcomings to be addressed in future modifications of the scale. METHOD Representative key studies and meta-analyses of the major modalities of adjuvant systemic therapy of breast cancer were identified for each of the major clinical scenarios (HER2-positive, HER2-negative, endocrine-responsive) and were graded with form 1 of the ESMO-MCBS. These generated scores were reviewed by a panel of experts for reasonableness. Shortcomings and issues related to the application of the scale and interpretation of results were identified and critically evaluated. RESULTS Sixty-five studies were eligible for evaluation: 59 individual studies and 6 meta-analyses. These studies incorporated 101 therapeutic comparisons, 61 of which were scorable. Review of the generated scores indicated that, with few exceptions, they generally reflected contemporary standards of practice. Six shortcomings were identified related to grading based on disease-free survival (DFS), lack of information regarding acute and long-term toxicity and an inability to grade single-arm de-escalation scales. CONCLUSIONS Form 1 of the ESMO-MCBS is a robust tool for the evaluation of the magnitude of benefit studies in early breast cancer. The scale can be further improved by addressing issues related to grading based on DFS, annotating grades with information regarding acute and long-term toxicity and developing an approach to grade single-arm de-escalation studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Urania Dafni
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas, Athens, Greece
| | - Martine J Piccart
- Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institut Jules Bordet, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Nicola Jane Latino
- ESMO-MCBS Working Group, European Society for Medical Oncology, Viganello, Switzerland
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Prieto-Callejero B, Rivera F, Fagundo-Rivera J, Romero A, Romero-Martín M, Gómez-Salgado J, Ruiz-Frutos C. Relationship between chemotherapy-induced adverse reactions and health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e21695. [PMID: 32872042 PMCID: PMC7437745 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000021695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Chemotherapy does not only affect cancer cells; it also affects, to a greater or lesser degree, all other cells in the body. This toxicity should be assessed according to its severity, frequency, and duration, taking into account objective and subjective dimensions in its assessment. This assessment is a highly relevant aspect when providing care to chemotherapy patients, mainly due to the impact of the treatment on the patient's quality of life, as well as the vital risk it may imply under certain circumstances. For all this, the objective of this study was to assess the relationship between chemotherapy-associated adverse reactions and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS With this purpose, a descriptive cross-sectional study was developed on 110 breast cancer patients who were treated with docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide. RESULTS It is worth highlighting the negative effect of nausea, dysgeusia, peripheral neuropathy, loss of appetite, myalgia, and peripheral edema on the quality of life. Likewise, it is worth mentioning peripheral neuropathy as the toxicity that affects a greater number of quality-of-life indicators. CONCLUSIONS To sum up, it would be necessary to make health professionals aware of the importance of chemotherapy-associated adverse reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francisco Rivera
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Seville, Seville
| | - Javier Fagundo-Rivera
- Department of Health and Emergencies, Spanish Red Cross, Local Committee of Seville, Doctoral Programme, University of Huelva, Huelva
| | - Adolfo Romero
- University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Nursing and Podiatry Department, Health Sciences School, University of Málaga, Málaga
| | | | - Juan Gómez-Salgado
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Unit, Sociology, Social Work and Public Health Department, Labour Sciences Faculty, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain
- Safety and Health Postgraduate Programme, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Guayaquil, Ecuador
| | - Carlos Ruiz-Frutos
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Unit, Sociology, Social Work and Public Health Department, Labour Sciences Faculty, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain
- Safety and Health Postgraduate Programme, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Guayaquil, Ecuador
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Conte B, Bruzzone M, Lambertini M, Poggio F, Bighin C, Blondeaux E, De Laurentiis M, Valle E, Cognetti F, Nisticò C, De Placido S, Garrone O, Gamucci T, Montemurro F, Puglisi F, Cardinali B, Fregatti P, Miglietta L, Boccardo F, Ceppi M, Del Mastro L. Effect of dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer patients according to immunohistochemically defined luminal subtype: an exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial. Eur J Cancer 2020; 136:43-51. [PMID: 32634760 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Luminal A-like and luminal B-like subtypes have different sensitivity to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, but their role in predicting dose-dense (DD) efficacy in the high-risk setting is unknown. In this exploratory analysis of the Gruppo Italiano Mammella 2 (GIM2) trial, we investigated DD efficacy according to luminal-like subtypes. METHODS Patients with node-positive early breast cancer were randomised to receive either DD or standard-interval (SI) anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by paclitaxel. In our analysis, luminal A-like cohort was identified as having a Ki67 < 20% and a progesterone receptor (PgR) ≥ 20%; luminal B-like cohort as having a Ki67 ≥ 20% and/or a PgR < 20%. RESULTS Out of 2003 patients enrolled in the GIM2 trial, 412 had luminal A-like and 638 luminal B-like breast cancer. After a median follow-up of 7.9 years, disease-free survival (DFS) was 80.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.4-84.5) and 70.5% (66.5-74.2) in luminal A-like and luminal B-like cohorts; overall survival (OS) was 91.6% (88.2-94.1) and 85.1% (81.7-87.9), respectively. We found no significant interaction between treatment and luminal subtype (interaction p = 0.603 and 0.535 for DFS and OS, respectively). When DD efficacy was investigated separately in each cohort, luminal-B like cohort appeared to benefit more from the DD schedule both in terms of DFS (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.72 [95% CI 0.54-0.96]) and OS (unadjusted HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.40-0.94]), compared with the luminal A-like cohort (unadjusted HR for DFS 0.89 [95% CI 0.59-1.33]; unadjusted HR for OS 0.83 [95% CI 0.45-1.54]). CONCLUSIONS No significant interaction between luminal-like subtype and treatment was observed. Patients in the luminal B-like cohort seemed to benefit more from DD schedule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetta Conte
- Medical Oncology Unit 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy; Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Carrer de Rosselló, 149, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marco Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Medical Oncology Department, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 1632, Genoa, GE, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Francesca Poggio
- Medical Oncology Unit 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Claudia Bighin
- Medical Oncology Unit 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Eva Blondeaux
- Medical Oncology Unit 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Michelino De Laurentiis
- Breast Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Fondazione "G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131, Naples, NA, Italy
| | - Enrichetta Valle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Businco, Via Edward Jenner, 1, 09121, Cagliari, CA, Italy
| | - Francesco Cognetti
- Department of Clinical and Molecolar Medicine, La Sapienza University, Viale Regina Elena, 324, 00161, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Cecilia Nisticò
- Department of Medical Oncology 1, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Regina Elena", Via Elio Chianesi, 53, 00128, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Sabino De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, NA, Italy
| | - Ornella Garrone
- Breast Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce e Carle, Via Michele Coppino, 26, 12100, Cuneo, CN, Italy
| | - Teresa Gamucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, Via dei Monti Tiburtini, 385/389, 00157, Rome, RM, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale SS Trinità, Località San Marciano, 03039, Sora, FR, Italy
| | - Filippo Montemurro
- Multidisciplinary Oncology Outpatient Clinic, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Strada Provinciale, 142, 10060, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Piazzale Massimiliano Kolbe, 4, 33100, Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico Aviano - National Cancer Institute, Via Franco Gallini, 2, 33081, Aviano, PN, Italy
| | - Barbara Cardinali
- Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Piero Fregatti
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 1612, Genoa, GE, Italy; Department of Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 1632, Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Loredana Miglietta
- Medical Oncology Unit 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Francesco Boccardo
- Medical Oncology Department, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 1632, Genoa, GE, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceppi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy; Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Andersen Hammond E, Pitz M, Steinfeld K, Lambert P, Shay B. An Exploratory Randomized Trial of Physical Therapy for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2020; 34:235-246. [PMID: 31976819 DOI: 10.1177/1545968319899918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of taxane treatment and cannot currently be prevented or adequately treated. Physical therapy is often used for neural rehabilitation following injury but has not been evaluated in this patient population. Methods. Single-blind, randomized controlled exploratory study compared standard care to a physical therapy home program (4 visits) throughout adjuvant taxane chemotherapy for stage I-III patients with breast cancer (n = 48). Patient questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing evaluated the treatment effect throughout chemotherapy to 6 months post treatment. Nonrandomized subgroup analysis observed effect of general exercise on sensory preservation comparing those reporting moderate exercise throughout chemotherapy to those that did not exercise regularly. Clinical Trial Registration. clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02239601). Results. The treatment group showed strong trends toward less pain (odds ratio [OR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-1.01; P = .053) and pain decreased over time (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.94; P = .002). Pain pressure thresholds (P = .034) and grip dynamometry (P < .001) were improved in the treatment group. For the nonrandomized subgroup analysis, participants reporting general exercise had preservation of vibration (Left P = .001, Right P = .001) and normal heat pain thresholds (Left P = .021, Right P = .039) compared with more sedentary participants. Conclusion. Physical therapy home program may improve CIPN pain in the upper extremity for patients with breast cancer, and general exercise throughout chemotherapy treatment was observed to have correlated to preservation of sensory function. Further research is required to confirm the impact of a physical therapy home program on CIPN symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marshall Pitz
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | | | - Barbara Shay
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Prieto-Callejero B, Rivera F, Andrés-Villas M, Gómez-Salgado J. Influence of the Sense of Coherence, the Doctor-Patient Relationship, Optimism and Non-Haematological Adverse Reactions on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Cancer. J Clin Med 2019; 8:E2043. [PMID: 31766496 PMCID: PMC6947165 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8122043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 10/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumour in women around the world. The objective of this study was to quantify the number of non-haematological adverse reactions associated with chemotherapy, as well as to assess the effect of the sense of coherence, optimism-pessimism and the quality of the doctor-patient relationship on the quality of life of breast cancer patients. To this end, a cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted involving 110 breast cancer patients who were treated with docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide during the period 2012-2014. The difference in the quality of life in patients who have five or fewer toxicities compared to those with more than six is highlighted. This difference is not as important when comparing patients with 6 to 10 toxicities and those with more than 10. The multivariate model used in this study corroborates the direct implication of the sense of coherence on the quality of life and adds the number of adverse reactions as a new construct. This has virtually the same impact on the quality of life of these patients, but in reverse. In conclusion, to improve the quality of life of breast cancer patients it would be necessary to have an impact on the number of adverse reactions involved in chemotherapeutic treatment, as well as on psychological interventions, with the sense of coherence as a possible starting point.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francisco Rivera
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Seville, 41018 Seville, Spain
| | - Montserrat Andrés-Villas
- Department of Social, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain;
| | - Juan Gómez-Salgado
- Department of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, University School of Social Work, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain;
- Safety and Health Postgraduate Programme, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Guayaquil 091650, Ecuador
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Khoo C, Gilchrist J, Williamson JP, Paul M, Kefford R. Pneumocystis jirovecii in a patient on dose-dense chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Respirol Case Rep 2019; 7:e00459. [PMID: 31312456 PMCID: PMC6611505 DOI: 10.1002/rcr2.459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
A 70-year-old woman underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for early breast cancer. After her fourth cycle of chemotherapy, she developed severe fatigue and cough with rapid-onset hypoxic respiratory failure. Investigations demonstrated extensive bilateral consolidation with positive bronchial washings for Pneumocystis jirovecii by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Despite high-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, she progressed to multi-organ failure and succumbed. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) has traditionally rarely occurred in women on adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy but may pose a more serious risk in dose-dense regimes due to higher concurrent exposure to anti-emetic corticosteroids. Clinicians are alerted to the need for vigilance of this rare complication and for rationalization of dexamethasone dosage to mitigate this risk, particularly in the era of modern triple-agent anti-emetic regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Khoo
- Cancer Program, MQ HealthMacquarie University HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jenny Gilchrist
- Cancer Program, MQ HealthMacquarie University HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Miriam Paul
- Macquarie University HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Richard Kefford
- Cancer Program, MQ HealthMacquarie University HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Herr D, Wischnewsky M, Joukhadar R, Chow O, Janni W, Leinert E, Fink V, Stüber T, Curtaz C, Kreienberg R, Blettner M, Wollschläger D, Wöckel A. Does chemotherapy improve survival in patients with nodal positive luminal A breast cancer? A retrospective Multicenter Study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0218434. [PMID: 31283775 PMCID: PMC6613686 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In this study based on the BRENDA data, we investigated the impact of endocrine ± chemotherapy for luminal A, nodal positive breast cancer on recurrence free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, we analysed if tumor size of luminal A breast cancer influences survival in patients with the same number of positive lymph nodes. Methods In this retrospective multi-centre cohort study data of 1376 nodal-positive patients with primary diagnosis of luminal A breast cancer during 2001–2008 were analysed. The results were stratified by therapy and adjusted by age, tumor size and number of affected lymph nodes. Results In our study population, patients had a good to excellent prognosis (5-year RFS: 91% and tumorspecific 5-year OS 96.5%). There was no significant difference in RFS stratified by patients with only endocrine therapy and with endocrine plus chemo-therapy. Patients with 1–3 affected lymph nodes had no significant differences in OS treated only with endocrine therapy or with endocrine plus chemotherapy, independent of tumor size. Patients with large tumors and more than 3 affected lymph nodes had a significant worse survival as compared to the small tumors. However, despite the worse prognosis of those, adjuvant chemotherapy failed in order to improve RFS. Conclusions According to our data, nodal positive patients with luminal A breast cancer have, if any, a limited benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor size and nodal status seem to be of prognostic value in terms of survival, however both tumor size as well as nodal status were not predictive for a benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Herr
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Würzburg University Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Manfred Wischnewsky
- Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Ralf Joukhadar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Würzburg University Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Olivia Chow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Würzburg University Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany
| | - Elena Leinert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany
| | - Visnja Fink
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja Stüber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Würzburg University Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Carolin Curtaz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Würzburg University Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Kreienberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Würzburg University Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abu-Khalaf MM, Safonov A, Stratton J, Wang S, Hatzis C, Park E, Pusztai L, Gross CP, Russell R. Examining the cost-effectiveness of baseline left ventricular function assessment among breast cancer patients undergoing anthracycline-based therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 176:261-270. [PMID: 31020471 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05178-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a lack of consensus to guide which breast cancer patients require left ventricular function assessment (LVEF) prior to anthracycline therapy; the cost-effectiveness of screening this patient population has not been previously evaluated. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of the Yale Nuclear Cardiology Database, including 702 patients with baseline equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA) scan prior to anthracycline and/or trastuzumab therapy. We sought to examine associations between abnormal baseline LVEF and potential cardiac risk factors. Additionally, we designed a Markov model to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ERNA screening for women aged 55 with stage I-III breast cancer from a payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. RESULTS An abnormal LVEF was observed in 2% (n = 14) of patients. There were no significant associations on multivariate analysis performed on self-reported risk factors. Our analysis showed LVEF screening is cost-effective with ICER of $45,473 per QALY gained. For a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/ QALY, LVEF screening had an 81.9% probability of being cost-effective. Under the same threshold, screening was cost-effective for non-anthracycline cardiotoxicity risk of RR ≤ 0.58, as compared to anthracycline regimens. CONCLUSIONS Age, preexisting cardiac risk factors and coronary artery disease did not predict a baseline abnormal LVEF. While the prevalence of an abnormal baseline LVEF is low in patients with breast cancer, our results suggest that cardiac screening prior to anthracycline is cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maysa M Abu-Khalaf
- Section of Solid Tumors, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| | - Anton Safonov
- Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Shiyi Wang
- Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Christos Hatzis
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Esther Park
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Cary P Gross
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Raymond Russell
- Cardiovascular Institute of Rhode Island, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gray R, Bradley R, Braybrooke J, Liu Z, Peto R, Davies L, Dodwell D, McGale P, Pan H, Taylor C, Barlow W, Bliss J, Bruzzi P, Cameron D, Fountzilas G, Loibl S, Mackey J, Martin M, Del Mastro L, Möbus V, Nekljudova V, De Placido S, Swain S, Untch M, Pritchard KI, Bergh J, Norton L, Boddington C, Burrett J, Clarke M, Davies C, Duane F, Evans V, Gettins L, Godwin J, Hills R, James S, Liu H, MacKinnon E, Mannu G, McHugh T, Morris P, Read S, Wang Y, Wang Z, Fasching P, Harbeck N, Piedbois P, Gnant M, Steger G, Di Leo A, Dolci S, Francis P, Larsimont D, Nogaret JM, Philippson C, Piccart M, Linn S, Peer P, Tjan-Heijnen V, Vliek S, Mackey J, Slamon D, Bartlett J, Bramwell VH, Chen B, Chia S, Gelmon K, Goss P, Levine M, Parulekar W, Pater J, Rakovitch E, Shepherd L, Tu D, Whelan T, Berry D, Broadwater G, Cirrincione C, Muss H, Weiss R, Shan Y, Shao YF, Wang X, Xu B, Zhao DB, Bartelink H, Bijker N, Bogaerts J, Cardoso F, Cufer T, Julien JP, Poortmans P, Rutgers E, van de Velde C, Carrasco E, Segui MA, Blohmer JU, Costa S, Gerber B, Jackisch C, von Minckwitz G, Giuliano M, De Laurentiis M, Bamia C, Koliou GA, Mavroudis D, A'Hern R, Ellis P, Kilburn L, Morden J, Yarnold J, Sadoon M, Tulusan AH, Anderson S, Bass G, Costantino J, Dignam J, Fisher B, Geyer C, Mamounas EP, Paik S, Redmond C, Wickerham DL, Venturini M, Bighin C, Pastorino S, Pronzato P, Sertoli MR, Foukakis T, Albain K, Arriagada R, Bergsten Nordström E, Boccardo F, Brain E, Carey L, Coates A, Coleman R, Correa C, Cuzick J, Davidson N, Dowsett M, Ewertz M, Forbes J, Gelber R, Goldhirsch A, Goodwin P, Hayes D, Hill C, Ingle J, Jagsi R, Janni W, Mukai H, Ohashi Y, Pierce L, Raina V, Ravdin P, Rea D, Regan M, Robertson J, Sparano J, Tutt A, Viale G, Wilcken N, Wolmark N, Wood W, Zambetti M. Increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy by more frequent administration or sequential scheduling: a patient-level meta-analysis of 37 298 women with early breast cancer in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2019; 393:1440-1452. [PMID: 30739743 PMCID: PMC6451189 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)33137-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 221] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2018] [Revised: 11/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing the dose intensity of cytotoxic therapy by shortening the intervals between cycles, or by giving individual drugs sequentially at full dose rather than in lower-dose concurrent treatment schedules, might enhance efficacy. METHODS To clarify the relative benefits and risks of dose-intense and standard-schedule chemotherapy in early breast cancer, we did an individual patient-level meta-analysis of trials comparing 2-weekly versus standard 3-weekly schedules, and of trials comparing sequential versus concurrent administration of anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy. The primary outcomes were recurrence and breast cancer mortality. Standard intention-to-treat log-rank analyses, stratified by age, nodal status, and trial, yielded dose-intense versus standard-schedule first-event rate ratios (RRs). FINDINGS Individual patient data were provided for 26 of 33 relevant trials identified, comprising 37 298 (93%) of 40 070 women randomised. Most women were aged younger than 70 years and had node-positive disease. Total cytotoxic drug usage was broadly comparable in the two treatment arms; colony-stimulating factor was generally used in the more dose-intense arm. Combining data from all 26 trials, fewer breast cancer recurrences were seen with dose-intense than with standard-schedule chemotherapy (10-year recurrence risk 28·0% vs 31·4%; RR 0·86, 95% CI 0·82-0·89; p<0·0001). 10-year breast cancer mortality was similarly reduced (18·9% vs 21·3%; RR 0·87, 95% CI 0·83-0·92; p<0·0001), as was all-cause mortality (22·1% vs 24·8%; RR 0·87, 95% CI 0·83-0·91; p<0·0001). Death without recurrence was, if anything, lower with dose-intense than with standard-schedule chemotherapy (10-year risk 4·1% vs 4·6%; RR 0·88, 95% CI 0·78-0·99; p=0·034). Recurrence reductions were similar in the seven trials (n=10 004) that compared 2-weekly chemotherapy with the same chemotherapy given 3-weekly (10-year risk 24·0% vs 28·3%; RR 0·83, 95% CI 0·76-0·91; p<0·0001), in the six trials (n=11 028) of sequential versus concurrent anthracycline plus taxane chemotherapy (28·1% vs 31·3%; RR 0·87, 95% CI 0·80-0·94; p=0·0006), and in the six trials (n=6532) testing both shorter intervals and sequential administration (30·4% vs 35·0%; RR 0·82, 95% CI 0·74-0·90; p<0·0001). The proportional reductions in recurrence with dose-intense chemotherapy were similar and highly significant (p<0·0001) in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative disease and did not differ significantly by other patient or tumour characteristics. INTERPRETATION Increasing the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy by shortening the interval between treatment cycles, or by giving individual drugs sequentially rather than giving the same drugs concurrently, moderately reduces the 10-year risk of recurrence and death from breast cancer without increasing mortality from other causes. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council.
Collapse
|
40
|
Möbus V, Jackisch C, Lück HJ, du Bois A, Thomssen C, Kuhn W, Nitz U, Schneeweiss A, Huober J, Harbeck N, von Minckwitz G, Runnebaum IB, Hinke A, Konecny GE, Untch M, Kurbacher C. Ten-year results of intense dose-dense chemotherapy show superior survival compared with a conventional schedule in high-risk primary breast cancer: final results of AGO phase III iddEPC trial. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:178-185. [PMID: 29069370 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Primary breast cancer (BC) patients with extensive axillary lymph-node involvement have a limited prognosis. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft fuer Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) trial compared intense dose-dense (idd) adjuvant chemotherapy with conventionally scheduled chemotherapy in high-risk BC patients. Here we report the final, 10-year follow-up analysis. Patients and methods Enrolment took place between December 1998 and April 2003. A total of 1284 patients with 4 or more involved axillary lymph nodes were randomly assigned to receive 3 courses each of idd sequential epirubicin, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (iddEPC) q2w or standard epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (EC → P) q3w. Event-free survival (EFS) was the primary end point. Results A total of 658 patients were assigned to receive iddEPC and 626 patients were assigned to receive EC → P. The median duration of follow-up was 122 months. EFS was 47% (95% CI 43% to 52%) in the standard group and 56% (95% CI 52% to 60%) in the iddEPC group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.87; log-rank P = 0.00014, one-sided]. This benefit was independent of menopausal, hormone receptor or HER2 status. Ten-year overall survival (OS) was 59% (95% CI 55% to 63%) for patients in the standard group and 69% (95% CI 65% to 73%) for patients in the iddEPC group (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.87; log-rank P = 0.0007, two-sided). Nine versus two cases of secondary myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome were observed in the iddEPC and the EC → P arm, respectively. Conclusion The previously reported OS benefit of iddEPC in comparison to conventionally dosed EC → P has been further increased and achieved an absolute difference of 10% after 10 years of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Möbus
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - C Jackisch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach am Main, Germany
| | - H J Lück
- Gynecologic Oncology Practice, Hannover, Germany
| | - A du Bois
- Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Klinikum Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - C Thomssen
- Department of Gynecology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - W Kuhn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - U Nitz
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Evangelic Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - A Schneeweiss
- National Centre of Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - N Harbeck
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - I B Runnebaum
- Department of Gynecology, University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - A Hinke
- WiSP Research Institute, Langenfeld, Germany
| | - G E Konecny
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - M Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Kurbacher
- Medical Center, Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cámara RJA, Schwentner L, Friedl TWP, Deniz M, Fink V, Lato K, Widschwendter P, Rack B, Janni W, Singer S, Bekes I. Quality of life during and after adjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy with or without Gemcitabine in high-risk early breast cancer: results of the SUCCESS A trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175:627-635. [PMID: 30900137 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05171-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In high-risk early breast cancer, adjuvant taxane-Gemcitabine combinations result in a recurrence-free survival similar to single-agent taxanes. However, haematologic toxicities and need for dose reductions are more frequent in combinations. Which option ultimately provides a better quality of life (QoL) is unknown. We compared the QoL curves before, during, and up to one year after three cycles of Fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by three cycles of Docetaxel-Gemcitabine or Docetaxel. METHODS Overall, 3691 women with recent R0-resection of a primary epithelial breast cancer participated in the nationwide SUCCESS A clinical trial. The centres sent QoL questionnaires of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer before and up to 15 months after randomisation to Docetaxel-Gemcitabine versus Docetaxel. Multilevel analysis by chemotherapy arm estimated the QoL time curves, questionnaire return, and dropout. RESULTS The combination caused one-point higher global QoL (95% confidence ±1; p = 0.05) and 1.1 lower odds of adherence to the outcome (95% confidence 1.0-1.1; p = 0.23) than the monotherapy. In both groups, a 10-point decrease during therapy preceded a 16-point increase after chemotherapy (p < 0.001). The secondary QoL outcomes showed transient superiority of the combination at the end of chemotherapy. Discontinuation from chemotherapy and its reasons were equal in both groups. CONCLUSIONS While patients perceive a one-point QoL difference as meaningless, a six-point increase is clinically relevant for them. That is, both regimens cause the same relevant long-term QoL improvement. With the similar recurrence-free survival, the lower toxicity, and the shorter chemotherapy duration in mind, taxanes without Gemcitabine are the preference. This challenges previous recommendations supporting combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael J A Cámara
- Institute for Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Informatics, Medical Centre of the University of Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Lukas Schwentner
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.,GYNOVA, Praxis für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Reith bei Kitzbühel, Austria
| | - Thomas W P Friedl
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Miriam Deniz
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Visnja Fink
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Krisztian Lato
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter Widschwendter
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Brigitte Rack
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Susanne Singer
- Institute for Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Informatics, Medical Centre of the University of Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Inga Bekes
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lan Y, Tang G, Heitjan DF. Statistical modeling and prediction of clinical trial recruitment. Stat Med 2019; 38:945-955. [PMID: 30411375 DOI: 10.1002/sim.8036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Revised: 08/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Real-time prediction of clinical trial accrual can support logistical planning, ensuring that studies meet but do not exceed sample size targets. We describe a novel, simulation-based prediction method that is founded on a realistic model for the underlying processes of recruitment. The model reflects key features of enrollment such as the staggered initiation of new centers, heterogeneity in enrollment capacity, and declining accrual within centers. The model's first stage assumes that centers join the trial (ie, initiate accrual) according to an inhomogeneous Poisson process in discrete time. The second part assumes that each center's enrollment pattern reflects an early plateau followed by a slow decline, with a burst at the end of the trial following the announcement of an imminent closing date. By summing up achieved and projected enrollment, one can predict accrual as a function of time and, thereby, the time when the trial will achieve a planned enrollment target. We applied our method retrospectively to two real-world trials: NSABP B-38 and REMATCH (Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure). In both studies, the proposed method produced prediction intervals for time to completion that were more accurate than those from conventional predictions that assume a constant rate of enrollment, estimated either from the entire trial to date or over a recent time window. The advantage is substantial in the early stages of NSABP B-38. We conclude that a method based on a realistic accrual model offers improved accuracy in the prediction of enrollment landmarks, especially at the early stages of large trials that involve many centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Lan
- Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Biostatistics and Programming, Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey
| | - Gong Tang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel F Heitjan
- Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Henderson J, Adams P, Barber K. Factors Determining Anthracycline Use in Hormone Receptor Positive, Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2019; 19:e475-e480. [PMID: 30852142 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anthracyclines are associated with significant toxicities whereas nonanthracyclines have proven to be better tolerated. A 21-gene assay allows clinicians to predict who will not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy and avoid systemic toxicities. Physicians are using the recurrence score to guide chemotherapy selection, despite the lack of evidence. In this study we examined factors associated with prescribing patterns for an anthracycline-based chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive stage I to III breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective study using the Michigan Breast Oncology Quality Initiative data set (February 1, 2006 to December 31, 2015). Women with histologically confirmed stage I to III invasive breast cancer with estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor-positive, HER2/neu-negative receptor status were included. We used χ2 analysis to determine associations of these characteristics with the 21-gene assay score and anthracycline use. RESULTS A total of 17,788 patients were evaluated. Most tumors were stage I (60%). Most procedures were lumpectomy with radiation (66%). Anthracyclines were used more often in stage III patients (69%), younger patients (40% for patients younger than 65 years), and those with higher 21-gene recurrence scores. Patients with low recurrence scores were more likely to receive anthracyclines if lymph node-positive (10%) than if lymph node-negative (1%; P < .001). Patients with high recurrence scores and lymph node-positive status were just as likely to receive an anthracycline-based as a nonanthracycline-based regimen (47.5% vs. 49.2%; P = .89). CONCLUSION These data indicate that medical oncologists might be anticipating the results of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer study (TAILORx) and the Clinical Outcomes in ER+HER2-node-positive Breast Cancer Patients Who Were Treated According to the Recurrence Score Results: Evidence From a Large Prospectively Designed Registry (RxPonder) trials and are avoiding the potential serious complications associated with anthracycline treatment in patients least likely to receive benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Adams
- Genesys Hurley Cancer Institute, Flint, MI
| | - Kimberly Barber
- Genesys Research Office, Ascension Genesys, Grand Blanc, MI.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hartkopf AD, Müller V, Wöckel A, Lux MP, Janni W, Nabieva N, Taran FA, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Belleville E, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Kolberg HC, Overkamp F, Schneeweiss A, Tesch H. Update Breast Cancer 2019 Part 1 - Implementation of Study Results of Novel Study Designs in Clinical Practice in Patients with Early Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79:256-267. [PMID: 30880824 PMCID: PMC6414304 DOI: 10.1055/a-0842-6614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
For many years, small but significant advancements have been made time and again in the prevention and treatment of early breast cancer. The so-called panel gene analyses are becoming more and more important in prevention, since the risk due to the tested genes is better understood and as a result, concepts for integration in health care can be developed. In the adjuvant situation, the first study in the so-called post-neoadjuvant situation was able to demonstrate a clear improvement in the prognosis with an absent pathological complete remission following trastuzumab or pertuzumab + trastuzumab. Additional studies with this post-neoadjuvant therapeutic concept are still being conducted at present. The CDK4/6 inhibitors which had shown a significant improvement in progression-free survival in a metastatic situation are currently being tested in the adjuvant situation in large therapeutic studies. These and other new data for the treatment or prevention of primary breast cancer are presented in this review against the backdrop of current studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Breast cancer treatment is multidisciplinary. Most women with early stage breast cancer are candidates for breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy or mastectomy. The risk of local recurrence and the chance of survival does not differ with these approaches. Sentinel node biopsy is used for axillary staging, and individualized approaches are minimizing the need for axillary dissection in women with positive sentinel nodes. Adjuvant systemic therapy is used in most women based on proven survival benefit, and molecular profiling to individualize treatment based on risk is now a clinical reality for patients with hormone receptor-positive cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy-Ann Moo
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Rachel Sanford
- Breast Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Chau Dang
- Breast Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Intense dose-dense epirubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide versus weekly paclitaxel, liposomal doxorubicin (plus carboplatin in triple-negative breast cancer) for neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk early breast cancer (GeparOcto-GBG 84): A randomised phase III trial. Eur J Cancer 2018; 106:181-192. [PMID: 30528802 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Revised: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND GeparOcto compared efficacy and safety of two chemotherapy regimens in high-risk early breast cancer (BC): sequential treatment with intense dose-dense epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (iddEPC) and weekly treatment with paclitaxel plus non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (M, Myocet®) with additional carboplatin (PM(Cb)) in triple-negative BC (TNBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with cT1c-cT4a-d and centrally assessed human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-positive BC or TNBC were eligible, irrespective of nodal status, luminal B-like tumours only if pN+. Patients were randomised (stratified by BC subtype, Ki67, lymphocyte-predominant BC) to receive 18 weeks of E (150 mg/m2) followed by P (225 mg/m2) followed by C (2000 mg/m2), each q2w for 3 cycles or weekly P (80 mg/m2) plus M (20 mg/m2) plus, in TNBC, Cb (area under curve (AUC) 1.5). HER2-positive BC patients additionally received trastuzumab (6 [loading dose 8]mg/kg q3w) and pertuzumab (420 [840]mg q3w) with all P and C cycles. Primary end-point was pathological complete response (pCR, ypT0/is ypN0), secondary end-points included other pCR definitions, pCR in stratified subpopulations, tolerability and compliance. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02125344. RESULTS 945/961 randomised patients started treatment. The median age was 48 years; 7.6% had cT3-4, 46% cN+, 66% G3, 40% HER2-positive, 43% TNBC. pCR rate with iddEPC was 48.3%, with PM(Cb) 48.0%, respectively (PM(Cb) versus iddEPC odds ratio 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.28, P = 0.979) with no significant differences observed in TNBC, HER2-positive, luminal B-like subtypes. 16.4% with iddEPC and 34.1% with PM(Cb) discontinued treatment (P < 0.001), mainly due to adverse events; two patients on PM(Cb) died. CONCLUSIONS In high-risk early BC there is no difference in pCR rates following neoadjuvant treatment with iddEPC or weekly PM(Cb), respectively. iddEPC is one of the effective dose-dense regimens feasible in daily practice.
Collapse
|
47
|
Goldvaser H, Ribnikar D, Majeed H, Ocaña A, Amir E. Absolute benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in contemporary clinical trials: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 71:68-75. [PMID: 30366201 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Revised: 10/13/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many adjuvant breast cancer trials have observed smaller than anticipated differences between experimental and control groups. Accurate estimation of the absolute benefits of treatment is essential for the planning of clinical trials. METHODS We searched PubMed to identify contemporary randomized trials comparing different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer. The absolute difference in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall-survival between experimental and control groups were extracted, weighted by individual study sample size and pooled. Analyses were performed for estrogen receptor (ER) negative and ER-positive disease. Meta-regression explored the influence of patients and tumor characteristics and median follow-up on the benefit from treatment. RESULTS Analysis included 19 studies comprising 41,564 patients. Studies comparing chemotherapy regimens of different generations showed the largest difference in 5-year DFS (+7.4% for 3rd vs. 2nd generation and +5.9% for 2nd vs. 1st generation for ER-negative disease, and +2.3% for 3rd vs. 2nd generation and +1.8% for 2nd vs. 1st generation for ER-positive disease). Studies comparing chemotherapy regimens from the same generation showed smaller differences in DFS in both subgroups. Meta-regression showed that larger tumors and nodal involvement had significant greater magnitude of effect on 5-year DFS for ER-negative, but not ER-positive disease. Age and menopausal status had no effect in either subgroup. CONCLUSIONS Absolute differences between adjuvant chemotherapy regimens of the same generation are small even in ER-negative disease. Enrichment of trials for patients with poor clinical features results in larger magnitudes of benefit from treatment at 5 years in ER-negative, but not ER-positive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadar Goldvaser
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, POB 39040, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Domen Ribnikar
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
| | - Habeeb Majeed
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
| | - Alberto Ocaña
- Translational Research Unit, Centro Regional de Investigaciones Biomedicas Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, Albacete University Hospital, calle Francisco Javier de Moya, 02006 Albacete, Spain
| | - Eitan Amir
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Caparica R, Bruzzone M, Poggio F, Ceppi M, de Azambuja E, Lambertini M. Anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy versus docetaxel and cyclophosphamide in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 174:27-37. [PMID: 30465156 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5055-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Standard adjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-negative breast cancer consists generally in an anthracycline and taxane-based regimen (A+T). The TC (docetaxel and cyclophosphamide) regimen arises as a potential alternative, although individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could not demonstrate the non-inferiority of TC over A+T. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing 6 cycles of TC versus sequential A+T in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify RCTs comparing TC versus A+T. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Subgroup analyses of DFS according to hormone receptor status, lymph node involvement, and menopausal status were performed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for DFS and OS were extracted from each trial, and a pooled analysis was conducted using the random-effect model. The Higgins' I-Squared Test was used to quantify heterogeneity. RESULTS Seven RCTs were included (12,741 patients). Overall, no difference was observed between TC and A+T in DFS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.96-1.20) and OS (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.90-1.22). A trend favoring A+T was observed in hormone receptor-negative (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.93-1.34) and N2 patients (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.82-1.90). Emesis/vomiting, mucositis, thrombocytopenia and sensory neuropathy were significantly more frequent with A+T. CONCLUSION As adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer, sequential A+T regimen was associated with increased risk of toxicities and no clear survival benefit as compared to 6 cycles of TC. Higher-risk patients may benefit the most from A+T, whilst TC may be an efficacious and less toxic alternative for lower-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Caparica
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Boulevard de Waterloo 121, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marco Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesca Poggio
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceppi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Boulevard de Waterloo 121, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Boulevard de Waterloo 121, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Schmitt M, Wilhelm OG, Noske A, Schricker G, Napieralski R, Vetter M, Aubele M, Perkins J, Lauber J, Ulm K, Thomssen C, Martens JWM, Weichert W, Kiechle M. Clinical Validation of PITX2 DNA Methylation to Predict Outcome in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy. Breast Care (Basel) 2018; 13:425-433. [PMID: 30800037 DOI: 10.1159/000493016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer patients at high risk for recurrence are treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, but not all patients do equally benefit from such a regimen. To further improve therapy decision-making, biomarkers predicting outcome are of high unmet medical need. Methods: The percent DNA methylation ratio (PMR) of the promoter gene coding for the Paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) was determined by a validated methylation-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. The multicenter study was conducted in routinely collected archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from 205 lymph node-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Results: The cut-off for the PITX2 methylation status (PMR = 12) was confirmed in a randomly selected cohort (n = 60) and validated (n = 145) prospectively with disease-free survival (DFS) at the 10-year follow-up. DFS was significantly different between the PMR ≤ 12 versus the PMR > 12 group with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.74 (p < 0.001) in the validation cohort and also for the patient subgroup treated additionally with endocrine therapy (HR 2.47; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Early-stage lymph node-positive breast cancer patients with low PITX2 methylation do benefit from adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Patients with a high PITX2 DNA methylation ratio, approximately 30%, show poor outcome and should thus be considered for alternative chemotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manfred Schmitt
- Therawis Diagnostics GmbH, Munich, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Aurelia Noske
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Martina Vetter
- Department of Gynecology, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | | | | | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynecology, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - John W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilko Weichert
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
de Boniface J, Schmidt M, Engel J, Smidt ML, Offersen BV, Reimer T. What Is the Best Management of cN0pN1(sn) Breast Cancer Patients? Breast Care (Basel) 2018; 13:331-336. [PMID: 30498417 DOI: 10.1159/000491704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Although the majority of breast cancer patients are clinically node-negative (cN0) at diagnosis, 15-20% will have a metastatic sentinel lymph node (SLN, pN1(sn)). While a less radical approach regarding axillary surgery in cN0 patients with a positive SLN biopsy is advocated, the limitations of 5 published trials on axillary management in pN1(sn) are discussed intensely in the literature and support the performance of ongoing validation and extension trials, especially considering the lack of data in the setting of mastectomy. As locoregional radiotherapy has a significant effect on both recurrence and survival, a standardization of locoregional radiotherapy in the situation of SLN biopsy alone in pN1(sn) patients has to be defined in the future, and de-escalation trials should embrace a truly multidisciplinary approach. This is also of utmost importance considering the fact that high-volume nodal disease requires an intensified adjuvant chemotherapy strategy to which patients omitting axillary dissection cannot be stratified. Finally, there is mounting evidence that the therapeutic role of extensive axillary surgery in low-volume nodal disease is negligible, and multidisciplinary and translational efforts must be undertaken to individualize treatment in order to gain a reasonable balance between necessary staging information and unnecessary treatment-related morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana de Boniface
- Department of Surgery, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jutta Engel
- Munich Cancer Registry (MCR), Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE) at the University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology & Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|