1
|
Loewenthal J, Berning MJ, Wayne PM, Eckstrom E, Orkaby AR. Holistic frailty prevention: The promise of movement-based mind-body therapies. Aging Cell 2024; 23:e13986. [PMID: 37698149 PMCID: PMC10776124 DOI: 10.1111/acel.13986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Aging is characterized by fundamental cellular and molecular hallmarks that result in physiologic decline of most body systems. This may culminate in frailty, a state of decreased reserve. Because frailty is a state of multisystem dysregulation, multimodal interventions may be necessary to mitigate and prevent progression rather than interventions targeting a single system. Movement-based mind-body therapies, such as tai chi and yoga, are promising multimodal strategies for frailty prevention and treatment given their inherent multicomponent nature. In this review, we summarize the links between hallmarks of aging and frailty and how tai chi and yoga may impact these hallmarks. We review trial evidence for the impact of tai chi and yoga on frailty in older populations and discuss opportunities for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Loewenthal
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | - Peter M. Wayne
- Division of Preventive MedicineBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Elizabeth Eckstrom
- Division of General Internal Medicine & GeriatricsOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Ariela R. Orkaby
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC)VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Banerjee K, Kerzel T, Bekkhus T, de Souza Ferreira S, Wallmann T, Wallerius M, Landwehr LS, Agardy DA, Schauer N, Malmerfeldt A, Bergh J, Bartish M, Hartman J, Östman A, Squadrito ML, Rolny C. VEGF-C-expressing TAMs rewire the metastatic fate of breast cancer cells. Cell Rep 2023; 42:113507. [PMID: 38041815 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The expression of pro-lymphangiogenic VEGF-C in primary tumors is associated with sentinel lymph node metastasis in most solid cancer types. However, the impact of VEGF-C on distant organ metastasis remains unclear. Perivascular tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play a crucial role in guiding hematogenous spread of cancer cells by establishing metastatic pathways within the tumor microenvironment. This process supports breast cancer cell intravasation and metastatic dissemination. We show here that VEGF-C-expressing TAMs reduce the dissemination of mammary cancer cells to the lungs while concurrently increasing lymph node metastasis. These TAMs express podoplanin and interact with normalized tumor blood vessels expressing VEGFR3. Moreover, clinical data suggest inverse association between VEGF-C-expressing TAMs and breast cancer malignancy. Thus, our study elucidates the paradoxical role of VEGF-C-expressing TAMs in redirecting cancer cells to preferentially disseminate to lymph nodes rather than to lungs, partially achieved by normalizing tumor blood vessels and promoting lymphangiogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaveri Banerjee
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17164 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Thomas Kerzel
- San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; Vita Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Tove Bekkhus
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17164 Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Tatjana Wallmann
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17164 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Majken Wallerius
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17164 Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | - Nele Schauer
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17164 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Malmerfeldt
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17164 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonas Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17164 Stockholm, Sweden; Breast Center, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center and Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Margarita Bartish
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17164 Stockholm, Sweden; Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Segal Cancer Centre, Lady Davis Institute and Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17164 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Arne Östman
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17164 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mario Leonardo Squadrito
- San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; Vita Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
| | - Charlotte Rolny
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17164 Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chadha M, White J, Swain SM, Rakovitch E, Jagsi R, Whelan T, Sparano JA. Optimal adjuvant therapy in older (≥70 years of age) women with low-risk early-stage breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:99. [PMID: 38097623 PMCID: PMC10721824 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00591-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Older women are under-represented in breast cancer (BC) clinical trials, and treatment guidelines are primarily based on BC studies in younger women. Studies uniformly report an increased incidence of local relapse with omission of breast radiation therapy. Review of the available literature suggests very low rates of distant relapse in women ≥70 years of age. The incremental benefit of endocrine therapy in decreasing rate of distant relapse and improving disease-free survival in older patients with low-risk BC remains unclear. Integration of molecular genomic assays in diagnosis and treatment of estrogen receptor positive BC presents an opportunity for optimizing risk-tailored adjuvant therapies in ways that may permit treatment de-escalation among older women with early-stage BC. The prevailing knowledge gap and lack of risk-specific adjuvant therapy guidelines suggests a compelling need for prospective trials to inform selection of optimal adjuvant therapy, including omission of adjuvant endocrine therapy in older women with low risk BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Chadha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - J White
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - S M Swain
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA
| | - E Rakovitch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - T Whelan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, McMaster University and Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - J A Sparano
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang A, Wan J, Zhu L, Chang W, Wen L, Tao X, Jin Y. Frailty and medication adherence among older adult patients with hypertension: a moderated mediation model. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1283416. [PMID: 38115848 PMCID: PMC10728772 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1283416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Medication adherence has a critical impact on the well-being of older adult patients with hypertension. As such, the current study aimed to investigate the mediating role of health literacy between frailty and medication adherence and the moderating role of educational level. Methods This cross-sectional study included patients admitted to the geriatric unit of a hospital. Participants were interviewed using the four-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, the Frailty Phenotype Scale, and the Health Literacy Management Scale. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to assess the association between variables. Mediation and moderated mediation analyses were performed using Process version 4.1 via Model 4 and 14, respectively. Results Data from 388 participants were analyzed. The median (IQR [P25-P75]) score for medication adherence was 4.00 (2.00-4.00). Results revealed that after controlling for age, sex, hypertension complication(s) and body mass index, frailty significantly contributed to medication adherence (βtotal -0.236 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.333 to -0.140]). Medication adherence was influenced by frailty (βdirect -0.192 [95% CI -0.284 to -0.099]) both directly and indirectly through health literacy (βindirect -0.044 [95% CI -0.077 to -0.014]). Educational level moderated the pathway mediated by health literacy; more specifically, the conditional indirect effect between frailty and medication adherence was significant among older adult hypertensive patients with low, intermediate, and high educational levels (effect -0.052 [95% CI -0.092 to -0.106]; effect -0.041 [95% CI -0.071 to -0.012]; effect -0.026 [95% CI -0.051 to -0.006]). The relationship between frailty and medication adherence in older adult patients with hypertension was found to have mediating and moderating effects. Conclusion A moderated mediation model was proposed to investigate the effect of frailty on medication adherence. It was effective in strengthening medication adherence by improving health literacy and reducing frailty. More attention needs to be devoted to older adult patients with hypertension and low educational levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anshi Wang
- School of Public Health, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China
- Institutes of Brain Science, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China
| | - Jingjing Wan
- Department of Nursing, Anhui College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhu, China
| | - Lijun Zhu
- School of Public Health, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China
| | - Weiwei Chang
- School of Public Health, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China
| | - Liying Wen
- School of Public Health, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China
| | - Xiubin Tao
- Nursing Department, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China
| | - Yuelong Jin
- School of Public Health, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chapman C, Jayasekera J, Dash C, Sheppard V, Mandelblatt J. A health equity framework to support the next generation of cancer population simulation models. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2023; 2023:255-264. [PMID: 37947339 PMCID: PMC10846912 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past 2 decades, population simulation modeling has evolved as an effective public health tool for surveillance of cancer trends and estimation of the impact of screening and treatment strategies on incidence and mortality, including documentation of persistent cancer inequities. The goal of this research was to provide a framework to support the next generation of cancer population simulation models to identify leverage points in the cancer control continuum to accelerate achievement of equity in cancer care for minoritized populations. In our framework, systemic racism is conceptualized as the root cause of inequity and an upstream influence acting on subsequent downstream events, which ultimately exert physiological effects on cancer incidence and mortality and competing comorbidities. To date, most simulation models investigating racial inequity have used individual-level race variables. Individual-level race is a proxy for exposure to systemic racism, not a biological construct. However, single-level race variables are suboptimal proxies for the multilevel systems, policies, and practices that perpetuate inequity. We recommend that future models designed to capture relationships between systemic racism and cancer outcomes replace or extend single-level race variables with multilevel measures that capture structural, interpersonal, and internalized racism. Models should investigate actionable levers, such as changes in health care, education, and economic structures and policies to increase equity and reductions in health-care-based interpersonal racism. This integrated approach could support novel research approaches, make explicit the effects of different structures and policies, highlight data gaps in interactions between model components mirroring how factors act in the real world, inform how we collect data to model cancer equity, and generate results that could inform policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Chapman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, and the Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety in the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine and the Houston VA, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jinani Jayasekera
- Health Equity and Decision Sciences Research Laboratory, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Chiranjeev Dash
- Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research and Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Vanessa Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy and Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Departments of Oncology and Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program at Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yang S, Park SW, Bae SJ, Ahn SG, Jeong J, Park K. Investigation of Factors Affecting Adherence to Adjuvant Hormone Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. J Breast Cancer 2023; 26:309-333. [PMID: 37272247 PMCID: PMC10475712 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Adherence and persistence to adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT) are seldom maintained among early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) survivors, despite the significant clinical benefits of long-term AHT. As the factors influencing adherence to AHT remain unclear, this study aimed to comprehensively identify such factors and classify them into specific dimensions. METHODS PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched for qualified articles. The search mainly focused on three components: early-stage (0-III) BC, oral AHT administration, and adherence to AHT, with keywords derived from MeSH and entry terms. The factors identified were then classified into six categories based on a modified WHO multidimensional model. RESULTS Overall, 146 studies were included; the median sample size was 651 (range, 31-40,009), and the mean age of the population was 61.5 years (standard deviation, 8.3 years). Patient- and therapy-related factors were the most frequently investigated factors. Necessity/concern beliefs and self-efficacy among patient-related factors were consistently related to better adherence than depression. Although drug side effects and medication use cannot be modified easily, a refined prescription strategy for the initiation and switching of AHT is likely to increase adherence levels. CONCLUSION An effective psychological program that encourages positive views and beliefs about medication and management strategies for each therapy may be necessary to improve adherence to AHT. Social support and a sense of belonging can be enhanced through community participation and social media for better adherence to AHT. Patient-centered communication and appropriate recommendations by physicians may be attributable to better adherence outcomes. Findings from systematically organized factors that influence adherence to AHT may contribute to the establishment of intervention strategies to benefit patients with early-stage BC to achieve optimal health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seongwoo Yang
- HERINGS, The Institute of Advanced Clinical & Biomedical Research, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Won Park
- HERINGS, The Institute of Advanced Clinical & Biomedical Research, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soong June Bae
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Gwe Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyounghoon Park
- HERINGS, The Institute of Advanced Clinical & Biomedical Research, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fletcher JA, Logan B, Reid N, Gordon EH, Ladwa R, Hubbard RE. How frail is frail in oncology studies? A scoping review. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:498. [PMID: 37268891 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10933-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS The frailty index (FI) is one way in which frailty can be quantified. While it is measured as a continuous variable, various cut-off points have been used to categorise older adults as frail or non-frail, and these have largely been validated in the acute care or community settings for older adults without cancer. This review aimed to explore which FI categories have been applied to older adults with cancer and to determine why these categories were selected by study authors. METHODS This scoping review searched Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases for studies which measured and categorised an FI in adults with cancer. Of the 1994 screened, 41 were eligible for inclusion. Data including oncological setting, FI categories, and the references or rationale for categorisation were extracted and analysed. RESULTS The FI score used to categorise participants as frail ranged from 0.06 to 0.35, with 0.35 being the most frequently used, followed by 0.25 and 0.20. The rationale for FI categories was provided in most studies but was not always relevant. Three of the included studies using an FI > 0.35 to define frailty were frequently referenced as the rationale for subsequent studies, however, the original rationale for this categorisation was unclear. Few studies sought to determine or validate optimum FI categorises in this population. CONCLUSION There is significant variability in how studies have categorised the FI in older adults with cancer. An FI ≥ 0.35 to categorise frailty was used most frequently, however an FI in this range has often represented at least moderate to severe frailty in other highly-cited studies. These findings contrast with a scoping review of highly-cited studies categorising FI in older adults without cancer, where an FI ≥ 0.25 was most common. Maintaining the FI as a continuous variable is likely to be beneficial until further validation studies determine optimum FI categories in this population. Differences in how the FI has been categorised, and indeed how older adults have been labelled as 'frail', limits our ability to synthesise results and to understand the impact of frailty in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A Fletcher
- Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
| | - Benignus Logan
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Natasha Reid
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Emily H Gordon
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Rahul Ladwa
- Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Ruth E Hubbard
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mandelblatt JS, Ruterbusch JJ, Thompson HS, Zhou X, Bethea TN, Adams-Campbell L, Purrington K, Schwartz AG. Association between major discrimination and deficit accumulation in African American cancer survivors: The Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors Study. Cancer 2023; 129:1557-1568. [PMID: 36935617 PMCID: PMC10568940 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Discrimination can adversely affect health and accelerate aging, but little is known about these relationships in cancer survivors. This study examines associations of discrimination and aging among self-identified African American survivors. METHODS A population-based sample of 2232 survivors 20-79 years old at diagnosis were enrolled within 5 years of breast (n = 787), colorectal (n = 227), lung (n = 223), or prostate (n = 995) cancer between 2017 and 2022. Surveys were completed post-active therapy. A deficit accumulation index measured aging-related disease and function (score range, 0-1, where <0.20 is robust, 0.20 to <0.35 is pre-frail, and 0.35+ is frail; 0.06 is a large clinically meaningful difference). The discrimination scale assessed ever experiencing major discrimination and seven types of events (score, 0-7). Linear regression tested the association of discrimination and deficit accumulation, controlling for age, time from diagnosis, cancer type, stage and therapy, and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS Survivors were an average of 62 years old (SD, 9.6), 63.2% reported ever experiencing major discrimination, with an average of 2.4 (SD, 1.7) types of discrimination events. Only 24.4% had deficit accumulation scores considered robust (mean score, 0.30 [SD, 0.13]). Among those who reported ever experiencing major discrimination, survivors with four to seven types of discrimination events (vs. 0-1) had a large, clinically meaningful increase in adjusted deficits (0.062, p < .001) and this pattern was consistent across cancer types. CONCLUSION African American cancer survivors have high deficit accumulated index scores, and experiences of major discrimination were positively associated with these deficits. Future studies are needed to understand the intersectionality between aging, discrimination, and cancer survivorship among diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Julie J. Ruterbusch
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Hayley S. Thompson
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Traci N. Bethea
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Lucile Adams-Campbell
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Kristen Purrington
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Ann G. Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kuhn EP, Pirruccello J, Boothe JT, Li Z, Tosteson TD, Stahl JE, Schwartz GN, Chamberlin MD. Preventing metastatic recurrence in low-risk ER/PR + breast cancer patients-a retrospective clinical study exploring the evolving challenge of persistence with adjuvant endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198:31-41. [PMID: 36592233 PMCID: PMC9883310 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06849-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the genomic era, more women with low-risk breast cancer will forego chemotherapy and rely on adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) to prevent metastatic recurrence. However, some of these patients will unfortunately relapse. We sought to understand this outcome. Preliminary work suggested that early discontinuation of AET, also known as non-persistence, may play an important role. A retrospective analysis exploring factors related to our breast cancer patients' non-persistence with AET was performed. METHODS Women who underwent Oncotype-DX® testing between 2011 and 2014 with minimum 5 years follow-up were included. 'Low risk' was defined as Oncotype score < 26. Outcomes of recurrence and persistence were determined by chart review. Patient, tumor and treatment factors were collected, and persistent versus non-persistent groups compared using multivariable ANOVA and Fisher Chi square exact test. RESULTS We identified six cases of distant recurrence among low-risk patients with a median follow-up of 7.7 years. Among them, five of six patients (83%) were non-persistent with AET. The non-persistence rate in our cohort regardless of recurrence was 57/228 (25%). Non-persistent patients reported more severe side effects compared with persistent patients (p = 0.002) and were more likely to be offered a switch in endocrine therapy, rather than symptom-relief (p = 0.006). In contrast, persistent patients were 10.3 times more likely to have been offered symptom-alleviating medications compared with non-persistent patients (p < 0.001). A subset analysis revealed that patients who persisted with therapy had a higher Oncotype-DX® score than patients who discontinued early (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION Metastatic recurrence in low-risk breast cancer patients may be primarily due to non-persistence with endocrine therapy. Further work is needed to optimize care for patients who struggle with side effects. To our knowledge, these are the first published data suggesting that Oncotype-DX® score may influence persistence with AET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine P Kuhn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
| | - Jonathan Pirruccello
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - James T Boothe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Zhongze Li
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Tor D Tosteson
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - James E Stahl
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Gary N Schwartz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Mary D Chamberlin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ji J, Sun CL, Cohen HJ, Synold T, Muss H, Sedrak MS. Inflammation and Clinical Decline After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Adults With Breast Cancer: Results From the Hurria Older Patients Prospective Study. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:307-315. [PMID: 36126235 PMCID: PMC9839275 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Older breast cancer survivors are at increased risk of clinical decline after adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate whether inflammatory markers assessed before adjuvant chemotherapy are associated with chemotherapy-induced clinical decline in a population of fit older adults with breast cancer. METHODS In a prospective study of women age ≥ 65 years with stage I-III breast cancer treated with chemotherapy, we measured interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) prechemotherapy (T1). We assessed frailty status, using a Deficit Accumulation Index (DAI; categorized as robust, prefrail, and frail), at T1 and postchemotherapy (T2). The population of interest was robust women at T1. The primary outcome was chemotherapy-induced decline in frailty status, defined as decline in DAI from robust (T1) to prefrail or frail (T2). Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between inflammatory markers and the primary outcome, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS Of the 295 robust women at T1, 76 (26%) experienced chemotherapy-induced decline in frailty status, among whom 66% had high IL-6, 63% had high CRP, and 46% had high IL-6 and CRP at T1. After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, women with high IL-6 and CRP had a > three-fold (odds ratio, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.55 to 8.01; P = .003) odds of chemotherapy-induced decline in frailty status compared with women with low IL-6 and CRP. CONCLUSION In this cohort of older women with early breast cancer who were clinically fit before chemotherapy initiation, high IL-6 and CRP prechemotherapy were associated with chemotherapy-induced decline in frailty status independent of sociodemographic and clinical risk factors. Further research is needed to examine whether inflammatory markers can inform more personalized approaches to treating older breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingran Ji
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Can-Lan Sun
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | | | | | - Hyman Muss
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dinan MA, Wilson LE, Greiner MA, Spees LP, Pritchard JE, Zhang T, Kaye D, George D, Scales CD, Baggett CD, Gross CP, Leapman MS, Wheeler SB. Oral Anticancer Agent (OAA) Adherence and Survival in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). Urology 2022; 168:129-136. [PMID: 35878815 PMCID: PMC9588695 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine real-world adherence to oral anticancer agents (OAAs) and its association with outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS SEER-Medicare retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who received an OAA between 2007 and 2015. We examined A) adherence and B) overall and disease-specific 2-year survival landmarked at 3 months after OAA initiation. Adherence was assessed by calculating the proportion of days covered (PDC) within 3 months of OAA initiation, with adherent use being defined as PDC > 80%. RESULTS A total of 905 patients met study criteria, of whom 445 patients (49.2%) were categorized as adherent to initial OAA treatment. Adjusting for clinical and demographic factors revealed decreased odds of adherence associated with living within an impoverished neighborhood (OR 0.49, CI 0.0.33 - 0.74) and out-of-pocket costs > $200 (OR 0.68, CI 0.47-.98). Adherence was associated with improved 2-year survival in univariate analysis (logrank test, P = .01) and a non-significant trend toward an association with decreased all-cause (HR 0.87, CI 0.72 - 1.05) and RCC-specific survival (HR 0.84, CI 0.69 - 1.03) in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION Local poverty levels and high out-of-pocket costs are associated with poor initial adherence to OAA therapy in Medicare beneficiaries with mRCC, which in turn, suggests a trend toward poor overall and disease-specific survival. Efforts to improve outcomes in the broader mRCC population should incorporate OAA adherence and economic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela A Dinan
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, CT.
| | - Lauren E Wilson
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Melissa A Greiner
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Lisa P Spees
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH), Chapel Hill, NC; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jessica E Pritchard
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Tian Zhang
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Deborah Kaye
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Daniel George
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Charles D Scales
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Department of Surgery (Urology), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Chris D Baggett
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Cary P Gross
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, CT; Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Michael S Leapman
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, CT; Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH), Chapel Hill, NC; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pritchard JE, Wilson LE, Miller SM, Greiner MA, Cohen HJ, Kaye DR, Zhang T, Dinan MA. Association between cognitive impairment and oral anticancer agent use in older patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:2330-2343. [PMID: 35499667 PMCID: PMC9378524 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney cancer is the fastest-growing cancer diagnosis in the developed world. About 16% of new cases are stage IV, which has a low five-year survival rate. Many patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are older and may have mild cognitive impairment or dementia (MCI/D). Given prior reports of patients with dementia initiating less cancer therapy and the importance of oral anticancer agents (OAAs) in mRCC treatment, we investigated the prevalence of preexisting MCI/D in patients with mRCC and their OAA use. METHODS SEER-Medicare patients were analyzed who were ≥65 years, diagnosed with mRCC between 2007 and 2015, and had Medicare part D coverage. Patterns and predictors of (a) OAA utilization within the 12 months following mRCC diagnosis and (b) adherence (percent of days covered [PDC] ≥ 80%) during the first 90 days following treatment initiation were assessed. RESULTS Of the 2792 eligible patients, 268 had preexisting MCI/D, and 907 initiated OAA treatment within 12 months of mRCC diagnosis. Patients with preexisting MCI/D were less likely to begin an OAA than those without MCI/D (fully-adjusted HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.76). Among OAA initiators, a preexisting MCI/D diagnosis did not alter the likelihood that a person would be adherent (adjusted RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.55-1.28). CONCLUSIONS Patients with preexisting MCI/D were half as likely to start an OAA during the year following mRCC diagnosis than patients without comorbid MCI/D. The 90-day adherence of OAA initiators was not significantly different between those with and without preexisting MCI/D. In light of this, clinicians should assess mRCC patients for cognitive impairment and take steps to optimize OAA utilization by those with MCI/D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Samuel M. Miller
- National Clinician Scholars Program, Yale University
- Department of Surgery, Yale University
| | | | - Harvey Jay Cohen
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University
| | | | - Tian Zhang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center
| | - Michaela A. Dinan
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shinn EH, Busch BE, Jasemi N, Lyman CA, Toole JT, Richman SC, Symmans WF, Chavez-MacGregor M, Peterson SK, Broderick G. Network Modeling of Complex Time-Dependent Changes in Patient Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Treatment in ER+ Breast Cancer. Front Psychol 2022; 13:856813. [PMID: 35903747 PMCID: PMC9315289 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Early patient discontinuation from adjuvant endocrine treatment (ET) is multifactorial and complex: Patients must adapt to various challenges and make the best decisions they can within changing contexts over time. Predictive models are needed that can account for the changing influence of multiple factors over time as well as decisional uncertainty due to incomplete data. AtlasTi8 analyses of longitudinal interview data from 82 estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer patients generated a model conceptualizing patient-, patient-provider relationship, and treatment-related influences on early discontinuation. Prospective self-report data from validated psychometric measures were discretized and constrained into a decisional logic network to refine and validate the conceptual model. Minimal intervention set (MIS) optimization identified parsimonious intervention strategies that reversed discontinuation paths back to adherence. Logic network simulation produced 96 candidate decisional models which accounted for 75% of the coordinated changes in the 16 network nodes over time. Collectively the models supported 15 persistent end-states, all discontinued. The 15 end-states were characterized by median levels of general anxiety and low levels of perceived recurrence risk, quality of life (QoL) and ET side effects. MIS optimization identified 3 effective interventions: reducing general anxiety, reinforcing pill-taking routines, and increasing trust in healthcare providers. Increasing health literacy also improved adherence for patients without a college degree. Given complex regulatory networks’ intractability to end-state identification, the predictive models performed reasonably well in identifying specific discontinuation profiles and potentially effective interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen H. Shinn
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- *Correspondence: Eileen H. Shinn,
| | - Brooke E. Busch
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Neda Jasemi
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Cole A. Lyman
- Center for Clinical Systems Biology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - J. Tory Toole
- Center for Clinical Systems Biology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Spencer C. Richman
- Center for Clinical Systems Biology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Susan K. Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gordon Broderick
- Center for Clinical Systems Biology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kaye DR, Wilson LE, Greiner MA, Spees LP, Pritchard JE, Zhang T, Pollack CE, George D, Scales CD, Baggett CD, Gross CP, Leapman MS, Wheeler SB, Dinan MA. Patient, provider, and hospital factors associated with oral anti-neoplastic agent initiation and adherence in older patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:614-623. [PMID: 35125336 PMCID: PMC9232903 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oral anti-neoplastic agents (OAAs) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are associated with increased cancer-specific survival. However, racial disparities in survival persist and older adults have the lowest rates of cancer-specific survival. Research from other cancers demonstrates specialty access is associated with high-quality cancer care, but older adults receive cancer treatment less often than younger adults. We therefore examined whether patient, provider, and hospital characteristics were associated with OAA initiation, adherence, and cancer-specific survival after initiation and whether race, ethnicity, and/or age was associated with an increased likelihood of seeing a medical oncologist for diagnosis of mRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)Medicare data to identify patients ≥65 years of age who were diagnosed with mRCC from 2007 to 2015 and enrolled in Medicare Part D. Insurance claims were used to identify receipt of OAAs within twelve months of metastatic diagnosis, calculate proportion of days covered, and to identify the primary cancer provider and hospital. We examined provider and hospital characteristics associated with OAA initiation, adherence, and all-cause mortality after OAA initiation. RESULTS We identified 2792 patients who met inclusion criteria. Increased OAA initiation was associated with access to a medical oncologist. Patients were less likely to begin OAA treatment if their primary oncologic provider was a urologist (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.77). Provider/hospital characteristics were not associated with differences in OAA adherence or mortality. Patients who started sorafenib (odds ratio [OR] 0.50; 95% CI 0.29-0.86), were older (aged >81 OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34-0.92), and those living in high poverty ZIP codes (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.29-0.80) were less likely to adhere to OAA treatment. Furthermore, provider characteristics did not account for differences in mortality once an OAA was initiated. Last, only age > 81 years was statistically and clinically associated with a decreased relative risk of seeing a medical oncologist (risk ratio [RR] 0.87; CI 0.82-0.92). CONCLUSION Provider/hospital factors, specifically, being seen by a medical oncologist for mRCC diagnosis, are associated with OAA initiation. Older patients were less likely to see a medical oncologist; however, race and/or ethnicity was not associated with differences in seeing a medical oncologist. Patient factors are more critical to OAA adherence and mortality after OAA initiation than provider/hospital factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah R Kaye
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America; Duke-Margolis Policy Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Lauren E Wilson
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Melissa A Greiner
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Lisa P Spees
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH), Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Jessica E Pritchard
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Tian Zhang
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Craig E Pollack
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Daniel George
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Charles D Scales
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Chris D Baggett
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Cary P Gross
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Michael S Leapman
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH), Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Michaela A Dinan
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lemij AA, de Glas NA, Derks MGM, Bastiaannet E, Merkus JWS, Lans TE, van der Pol CC, van Dalen T, Vulink AJE, van Gerven L, Guicherit OR, Linthorst-Niers EMH, van den Bos F, Kroep JR, Liefers GJ, Portielje JEA. Discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy and impact on quality of life and functional status in older patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 193:567-577. [PMID: 35441273 PMCID: PMC9114046 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06583-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Side effects are the main reason for discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine geriatric predictors of treatment discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy within the first 2 years after initiation, and to study the association between early discontinuation and functional status and quality of life (QoL). Methods Patients aged ≥ 70 years with stage I–III breast cancer who received adjuvant endocrine therapy were included. The primary endpoint was discontinuation of endocrine therapy within 2 years. Risk factors for discontinuation were assessed using univariate logistic regression models. Linear mixed models were used to assess QoL and functional status over time. Results Overall, 258 patients were included, of whom 36% discontinued therapy within 2 years after initiation. No geriatric predictive factors for treatment discontinuation were found. Tumour stage was inversely associated with early discontinuation. Patients who discontinued had a worse breast cancer-specific QoL (b = − 4.37; 95% CI − 7.96 to − 0.78; p = 0.017) over the first 2 years, in particular on the future perspective subscale (b = − 11.10; 95% CI − 18.80 to − 3.40; p = 0.005), which did not recover after discontinuation. Treatment discontinuation was not associated with functional improvement. Conclusion A large proportion of older patients discontinue adjuvant endocrine treatment within 2 years after initiation, but geriatric characteristics are not predictive of early discontinuation of treatment. Discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy did not positively affect QoL and functional status, which implies that the observed poorer QoL in this group is probably not caused by adverse effects of endocrine therapy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06583-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelieke A Lemij
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke A de Glas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes G M Derks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Bastiaannet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jos W S Merkus
- Department of Surgery, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Titia E Lans
- Department of Surgery, Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital, Goes, The Netherlands
| | | | - Thijs van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelie J E Vulink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Leander van Gerven
- Department of Internal Medicine, LangeLand Hospital, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands
| | - Onno R Guicherit
- Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Judith R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit Jan Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mukand NH, Ko NY, Nabulsi NA, Hubbard CC, Chiu BCH, Hoskins KF, Calip GS. The association between physical health-related quality of life, physical functioning, and risk of contralateral breast cancer among older women. Breast Cancer 2022; 29:287-295. [PMID: 34797467 PMCID: PMC8885772 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-021-01309-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical limitations prior to cancer diagnosis may lead to suboptimal health outcomes. Our objective was to evaluate the impacts of poor physical health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and physical functioning (PF) on the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). METHODS We performed a nested case-control study of women with invasive unilateral breast cancer (UBC) who did not receive prophylactic contralateral mastectomy using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Medicare Health Outcomes Survey data resource. Among 2938 women aged ≥ 65 years diagnosed with first stage I-III UBC between 1997 and 2011, we identified 100 subsequent CBC cases and 915 matched controls without CBC using incidence density sampling without replacement. Pre-diagnosis physical HRQOL and PF were determined using Medical Outcomes Trust Short Form-36 (SF-36)/Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) responses within 2 years prior to first UBC diagnosis. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using conditional logistic regression models. RESULTS Cases and controls were similar with respect to comorbidities, stage, surgery, and radiation treatments, but differed by hormone receptor status (ER/PR-negative, 23% and 11%, respectively) of first UBC. Cases had modestly lower mean pre-diagnosis physical HRQOL (- 1.8) and PF (- 2.2) scores. In multivariable models, we observed an increased CBC risk associated with low physical HRQOL (lowest vs. highest quartile, OR = 1.8; 95% CI 0.8-4.3), but CIs included 1.0. Low PF was associated with a 2.7-fold (95% CI 1.1-6.7) increased CBC risk. CONCLUSIONS Findings indicate that low physical HRQOL, specifically poor PF, is associated with CBC risk. Efforts to understand and minimize declines in PF post-breast cancer are well motivated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nita H Mukand
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Naomi Y Ko
- School of Medicine, Section of Hematology Oncology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nadia A Nabulsi
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street MC 871, Chicago, IL, 60612<, USA
| | - Colin C Hubbard
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street MC 871, Chicago, IL, 60612<, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Brian C-H Chiu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kent F Hoskins
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gregory S Calip
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street MC 871, Chicago, IL, 60612<, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fu F, Yu L, Zeng B, Chen M, Guo W, Chen L, Lin Y, Hou J, Li J, Li Y, Li S, Chen X, Zhang W, Jin X, Cai W, Zhang K, Chen H, Qiu Y, Nie Q, Wang C, Jacobs L. Association of Adjuvant Hormone Therapy Timing With Overall Survival Among Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Negative Early Breast Cancer Without Chemotherapy. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2145934. [PMID: 35166783 PMCID: PMC8848199 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Studies have shown that delayed initiation of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with lower rates of breast cancer survival. However, it remains unclear whether delayed initiation of adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT) is associated with survival. Objective To assess the association of time to adjuvant hormone therapy (TTH) with breast cancer survival and evaluate the factors associated with AHT. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study examined data from the National Cancer Database from 2004 through 2014 to assess the association of TTH (stratified as ≤150 and >150 days) with cancer survival. All patients included were diagnosed with stage I to stage III hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (ERBB2; formerly HER2)-negative invasive breast cancer and underwent AHT without chemotherapy. Data were analyzed from April 2019 to May 2020. Exposures AHT was administered at different time points following surgical procedures for breast cancer treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) model was constructed to evaluate overall survival by adjusting for treatment facility, patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment; multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess factors associated with delayed treatment. Results A total of 144 103 patients (median [IQR] follow-up, 36.6 months [25.5-49.2 months]; mean [SD] age, 63.7 [11.6] years) were identified, which included 142 916 (99.2%) women, 11 574 (8.0%) Black patients, and 126 013 (87.4%) White patients. Of these, 134 873 patients (93.6%) had a TTH of 150 days or less and 9230 patients (6.4%) had a TTH longer than 150 days. The IPTW-based Cox model demonstrated that patients with delayed AHT (ie, a TTH past 150 days) were associated with decreased survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.26-1.35; P < .001) compared with those receiving the timely treatment (TTH ≤150 days). Several sensitivity analyses (including IPTW with stabilized weight [HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.19-1.45; P < .001], propensity score matching [HR, 1.41; 1.13-1.76; P = .002], and propensity score regression adjustment [HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.16-1.43; P < .001]) and exploratory subgroup analyses yielded similar trends. Factors associated with delayed AHT included Black racial identity (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.55-1.77), nonprivate insurance (eg, no insurance: OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.26-1.70), living in large metropolitan or metropolitan areas (reference vs urban, less urban, or rural: OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76-0.87), treatment in a community hospital (reference vs academic or research: OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98), Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index score 2 or higher (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.32), poor grade differentiation (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.32-1.53), II and III pathological stage (stage III: OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 2.76-3.54), estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/progesterone receptor-negative (PR-) or ER-/PR+ (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.13-1.31), receiving breast conservation surgery (reference vs mastectomy: OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.94), and radiotherapy (reference vs no radiotherapy: OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.52-0.61). Conclusions and Relevance The delay of the initiation of AHT past 150 days was associated with diminished survival in hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative patients with breast cancer who did not receive chemotherapy. Efforts should be made to address factors associated with delayed treatment to improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangmeng Fu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Liuwen Yu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Bangwei Zeng
- Administration Department of Nosocomial Infection, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Minyan Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Wenhui Guo
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Lili Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yuxiang Lin
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jialin Hou
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Shengmei Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Xiaobin Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Wenzhe Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Xuan Jin
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Weifeng Cai
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Kun Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Hanxi Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yibin Qiu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Qian Nie
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Chuan Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, Fujian Province, China
| | - Lisa Jacobs
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chandler Y, Schechter C, Jayasekera J, Isaacs C, Kurian AW, Cadham C, Mandelblatt J. Simulation modeling of breast cancer endocrine therapy duration by patient and tumor characteristics. Cancer Med 2021; 11:297-307. [PMID: 34918484 PMCID: PMC8729060 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Extending endocrine therapy from 5 to 10 years is recommended for women with invasive estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive breast cancers. We evaluated the benefits and harms of the five additional years of therapy. Methods An established Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Network (CISNET) model used a lifetime horizon with national and clinical trial data on treatment efficacy and adverse events and other‐cause mortality among multiple birth cohorts of U.S. women ages 25–79 newly diagnosed with ER+, non‐metastatic breast cancer. We assumed 100% use of therapy. Outcomes included life years (LYs), quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs), and breast cancer mortality. Results were discounted at 3%. Sensitivity analyses tested a 15‐year time horizon and alternative assumptions. Results Extending tamoxifen therapy duration among women ages 25–49 reduced the lifetime probability of breast cancer death from 11.9% to 9.3% (absolute difference 2.6%). This translates to a gain of 0.77 LYs (281 days)/woman (undiscounted). Adverse events reduce this gain to 0.44 QALYs and after discounting, gains are 0.20 QALYs (73 days)/woman. Extended aromatase inhibitor therapy in women 50–79 had small absolute benefits and gains were offset by adverse events (loss of 0.06 discounted QALYs). There were greater gains with extended endocrine therapy for women with node‐positive versus negative cancers, but only women ages 25–49 and 50–59 had a net QALY gain. All gains were reduced with less than 100% treatment completion. Conclusion The extension of endocrine therapy from 5 to 10 years modestly improved lifetime breast cancer outcomes, but in some women, treatment‐related adverse events may outweigh benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Chandler
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Clyde Schechter
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jinani Jayasekera
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Allison W Kurian
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Christopher Cadham
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sheppard VB, Sutton AL, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, He J, Dahman B, Edmonds MC, Hackney MH, Tadesse MG. Race and Patient-reported Symptoms in Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: A Report from the Women's Hormonal Initiation and Persistence Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:699-709. [PMID: 33514603 PMCID: PMC8330157 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) improves outcomes in women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. Suboptimal AET adherence is common, but data are lacking about symptoms and adherence in racial/ethnic minorities. We evaluated adherence by race and the relationship between symptoms and adherence. METHODS The Women's Hormonal Initiation and Persistence study included women diagnosed with nonrecurrent HR+ breast cancer who initiated AET. AET adherence was captured using validated items. Data regarding patient (e.g., race), medication-related (e.g., symptoms), cancer care delivery (e.g., communication), and clinicopathologic factors (e.g., chemotherapy) were collected via surveys and medical charts. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with adherence. RESULTS Of the 570 participants, 92% were privately insured and nearly one of three were Black. Thirty-six percent reported nonadherent behaviors. In multivariable analysis, women less likely to report adherent behaviors were Black (vs. White; OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27-0.67; P < 0.001) and with greater symptom burden (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; P < 0.05). Participants more likely to be adherent were overweight (vs. normal weight) (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.04-2.43; P < 0.05), sat ≤ 6 hours a day (vs. ≥6 hours; OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.25-2.70; P < 0.01), and were taking aromatase inhibitors (vs. tamoxifen; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.28-2.87; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Racial differences in AET adherence were observed. Longitudinal assessments of symptom burden are needed to better understand this dynamic process and factors that may explain differences in survivor subgroups. IMPACT Future interventions should prioritize Black survivors and women with greater symptom burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
- Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Arnethea L Sutton
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | | | - Jun He
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bassam Dahman
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Megan C Edmonds
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Mary Helen Hackney
- Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Mahlet G Tadesse
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mandelblatt JS, Zhou X, Small BJ, Ahn J, Zhai W, Ahles T, Extermann M, Graham D, Jacobsen PB, Jim H, McDonald BC, Patel SJ, Root JC, Saykin AJ, Cohen HJ, Carroll JE. Deficit Accumulation Frailty Trajectories of Older Breast Cancer Survivors and Non-Cancer Controls: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1053-1064. [PMID: 33484565 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated deficit accumulation and how deficits affected cognition and physical activity among breast cancer survivors and non-cancer controls. METHODS Newly diagnosed nonmetastatic survivors (n = 353) and matched non-cancer controls (n = 355) ages 60-98 years without neurological impairments were assessed presystemic therapy (or at enrollment for controls) from August 2010 to December 2016 and followed for 36 months. Scores on a 42-item index were analyzed in growth-mixture models to determine deficit accumulation trajectories separately and combined for survivors and controls. Multilevel models tested associations between trajectory and cognition (FACT-Cog and neuropsychological tests) and physical activity (IPAQ-SF) for survivors and controls. RESULTS Deficit accumulation scores were in the robust range, but survivors had higher scores (95% confidence intervals [CI]) than controls at 36 months (0.18, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.19, vs 0.16, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.17; P = .001), and averages included diverse deficit trajectories. Survivors who were robust but became frailer (8.8%) had similar baseline characteristics to those remaining robust (76.2%) but experienced a 9.6-point decline self-reported cognition (decline of 9.6 vs 3.2 points; P = .04) and a 769 MET minutes per week decline in physical activity (P < .001). Survivors who started and remained prefrail (15.0%) had self-reported and objective cognitive problems. At baseline, frail controls (9.5%) differed from robust controls (83.7%) on deficits and self-reported cognition (P < .001). Within combined trajectories, frail survivors had more sleep disturbances than frail controls (48.6% [SD = 17.4%] vs 25.0% [SD = 8.2%]; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS Most survivors and controls remained robust, and there were similar proportions on a frail trajectory. However, there were differences in deficit patterns between survivors and controls. Survivor deficit accumulation trajectory was associated with patient-reported outcomes. Additional research is needed to understand how breast cancer and its treatments affect deficit accumulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne S Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Brent J Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Health Outcome and Behavior Program and Biostatistics Resource Core, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute at the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tim Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martine Extermann
- Department of Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Paul B Jacobsen
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Heather Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brenna C McDonald
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Center for Neuroimaging, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sunita J Patel
- Departments of Population Sciences and Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - James C Root
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Departments of Psychiatry and Anesthesiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Center for Neuroimaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Harvey Jay Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Judith E Carroll
- UCLA Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wei M, Wang X, Zimmerman DN, Burt LM, Haaland B, Henry NL. Endocrine therapy and radiotherapy use among older women with hormone receptor-positive, clinically node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 187:287-294. [PMID: 33420863 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06071-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine patterns of radiotherapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET) use, associations between RT omission and ET adherence, and associations among ET and RT use and disease recurrence in older women with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. METHODS Women age 65 and older diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, clinically node-negative breast cancer between 2005 and 2018 and who did not undergo mastectomy were included. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the trends in practice patterns over time and by age. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to estimate the probability of ET discontinuation. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess associations between recurrence and ET/RT. RESULTS Of the 484 enrolled patients, 47.9% patients underwent RT and initiated ET, 27.4% received ET alone, 10.2% received RT alone, and 13.8% patients received neither. Older patients had a higher probability of receiving ET alone or neither ET nor RT (both p < 0.001). The probability of initiating ET was greater among patients who underwent RT than those who omitted RT (p < 0.001). Regardless of RT status (RT or no RT), initiation and continuation of ET may be associated with reduced risk of recurrence. CONCLUSION Patients who opt for no adjuvant therapy, or who do not tolerate ET, are at increased risk of disease recurrence if they omit RT. Clinicians should consider the likelihood a patient will adhere to ET prior to recommending omission of RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Wei
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Xuechen Wang
- Population Health Science, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Danielle N Zimmerman
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah School of Medicine, 85 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Lindsay M Burt
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Benjamin Haaland
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.,Population Health Science, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - N Lynn Henry
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. .,Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. .,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 500 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. .,Rogel Cancer Center, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Potentially Modifiable Factors Associated with Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:cancers13010107. [PMID: 33561076 PMCID: PMC7794693 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces risk of breast cancer recurrence. However, suboptimal adherence and persistence to AET remain important clinical issues. Understanding factors associated with adherence may help inform efforts to improve use of AET as prescribed. The present systematic review examined potentially modifiable factors associated with adherence to AET in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42019124200). All studies were included, whether factors were significantly associated with adherence or results were null. This review also accounted for the frequency with which a potentially modifiable factor was examined and whether univariate or multivariate models were used. This review also examined whether methodological or sample characteristics were associated with the likelihood of a factor being associated with AET adherence. A total of 68 articles were included. Potentially modifiable factors were grouped into six categories: side effects, attitudes toward AET, psychological factors, healthcare provider-related factors, sociocultural factors, and general/quality of life factors. Side effects were less likely to be associated with adherence in studies with retrospective or cross-sectional than prospective designs. Self-efficacy (psychological factor) and positive decisional balance (attitude toward AET) were the only potentially modifiable factors examined ≥10 times and associated with adherence or persistence ≥75% of the time in both univariate and multivariate models. Self-efficacy and decisional balance (i.e., weight of pros vs. cons) were the potentially modifiable factors most consistently associated with adherence, and hence may be worth focusing on as targets for interventions to improve AET adherence among breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
|
23
|
Jhawar SR, Alpert N, Taioli E, Sayan M, Bazan J, Park KU, Stover D, Cherian M, White J, Haffty B, Ohri N. Adjuvant radiation therapy alone is associated with improved overall survival compared to hormonal therapy alone in older women with estrogen receptor positive early stage breast cancer. Cancer Med 2020; 9:8345-8354. [PMID: 32942344 PMCID: PMC7666745 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) without radiation therapy (RT) is an acceptable approach for older women with early stage, estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. Toxicity and compliance remain issues with HT. Adjuvant RT alone may have better compliance, but its efficacy in the absence of HT is unclear. We aim to assess patterns of adjuvant therapy and survival outcomes among older women with early stage, ER positive (ER+) breast cancer. Methods The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to identify 130,194 women age ≥65 years with invasive ER+, node negative breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. All patients underwent BCS. Kaplan‐Meier survival curves were used to examine overall survival (OS). The association between adjuvant therapy and OS was assessed in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results Unadjusted 5/10‐year OS rates were 90.0%/64.3% for HT and RT, 84.2%/54.9% for RT alone, 78.7%/44.5% for HT alone, and 71.6%/38.0% for no treatment; p<0.001 for all. Compared to HT alone, the 10‐year multivariable hazard ratio (HR) for death for RT alone was 0.86 (95% CI 0.82‐0.91). In propensity‐matched patients who received RT alone or HT alone (n=21,326), RT alone had significantly better survival at 5 (HRadj: 0.84) and 10 (HRadj: 0.87) years. Conclusions Older women with early stage ER+ breast cancer who undergo BCS and receive both HT and RT have the best survival, while RT as single‐modality therapy had higher rates of OS at 5 and 10 years compared to HT alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin R Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Naomi Alpert
- Institute for Translational Epidemiology and Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emanuela Taioli
- Institute for Translational Epidemiology and Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mutlay Sayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Jose Bazan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ko Un Park
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Daniel Stover
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mathew Cherian
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Julia White
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Bruce Haffty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Nisha Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dezube AR, Cooper L, Jaklitsch MT. Prehabilitation of the Thoracic Surgery Patient. Thorac Surg Clin 2020; 30:249-258. [DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2020.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
25
|
Endocrine treatment and incidence of relapse in women with oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in Europe: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 183:439-450. [PMID: 32651753 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05761-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endocrine therapy (ET) is the mainstream adjuvant treatment for ER-positive breast cancer (BC). We analysed 9293 ER-positive BC patients diagnosed in nine European countries in 2009-2013 to investigate how comorbidities at diagnosis, age, stage and subtype affected ET use over time, and relapse. METHODS Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) of receiving ET were estimated according to Charlson comorbidity, age, stage and subtype using logistic regression. The 2-year cumulative incidence and adjusted sub-hazard ratios (SHRs) of relapse were estimated using competing risk analysis, with all-cause death as the competing event. The z-test was used to assess differences in the proportion of patients receiving ET in 1996-1998 and 2009-2013. RESULTS Ninety percent of the patients started adjuvant ET, range 96% (Belgium, Estonia, Slovenia, Spain)-75% (Switzerland). ORs of starting ET were lower for women aged > 75 years, with severe comorbidities, or luminal B HER2-positive cancer. The factors independently increasing the risk of relapse were: not receiving ET (SHR 2.26, 95%CI 1.02-5.03); severe comorbidity (SHR 1.94, 95%CI 1.06-3.55); luminal B, either HER2 negative (SHR 3.06, 95%CI 1.61-5.79) or positive (SHR 3.10, 95%CI 1.36-7.07); stage II (SHR 3.20, 95%CI 1.56-6.57) or stage III (SHR 7.41, 95%CI 3.48-15.73). ET use increased significantly but differently across countries from 51-85% in 1996-1998 to 86-96% in 2009-2013. CONCLUSIONS ER-positive BC patients in Europe are increasingly prescribed ET but between-country disparities persist. Older women and women with severe comorbidity less frequently receive ET. ET omission and severe comorbidity independently predict early disease relapse.
Collapse
|
26
|
Orkaby AR, Nussbaum L, Ho YL, Gagnon D, Quach L, Ward R, Quaden R, Yaksic E, Harrington K, Paik JM, Kim DH, Wilson PW, Gaziano JM, Djousse L, Cho K, Driver JA. The Burden of Frailty Among U.S. Veterans and Its Association With Mortality, 2002-2012. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2020; 74:1257-1264. [PMID: 30307533 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/gly232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty is a key determinant of clinical outcomes. We sought to describe frailty among U.S. Veterans and its association with mortality. METHODS Nationwide retrospective cohort study of regular Veterans Affairs (VA) users, aged at least 65 years in 2002-2012, followed through 2014, using national VA administrative and Medicare and Medicaid data. A frailty index (FI) for VA (VA-FI) was calculated using the cumulative deficit method. Thirty-one age-related deficits in health from diagnostic and procedure codes were included and were updated biennially. Survival analysis assessed associations between VA-FI and mortality. RESULTS A VA-FI was calculated for 2,837,152 Veterans over 10 years. In 2002, 35.5% were non-frail (FI = 0-0.10), 32.6% were pre-frail (FI = 0.11-0.20), 18.9% were mildly frail (FI = 0.21-0.30), 8.7% were moderately frail (FI = 0.31-0.40), and 4.3% were severely frail (FI > 0.40). From 2002 to 2012, the prevalence of moderate frailty increased to 12.7%and severe frailty to 14.1%. Frailty was strongly associated with survival and was independent of age, sex, race, and smoking; the VA-FI better predicted mortality than age alone. Although prevalence of frailty rose over time, compared to non-frail Veterans, 2 years' hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for mortality declined from a peak in 2004 of 2.01 (1.97-2.04), 3.49 (3.44-3.55), 5.88 (5.79-5.97), and 10.39 (10.23-10.56) for pre-frail, mildly, moderately, and severely frail, respectively, to 1.51 (1.49-1.53), 2.36 (2.33-2.39), 3.68 (3.63-3.73), 6.62 (6.53-6.71) in 2012. At every frailty level, risk of mortality was lower for women versus men and higher for blacks versus whites. CONCLUSIONS Frailty affects at least 3 of every 10 U.S. Veterans aged 65 years and older, and is strongly associated with mortality. The VA-FI could be used to more accurately estimate life expectancy and individualize care for Veterans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariela R Orkaby
- New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts.,Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa Nussbaum
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yuk-Lam Ho
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Gagnon
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Massachusetts
| | - Lien Quach
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Gerontology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel Ward
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel Quaden
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Enzo Yaksic
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kelly Harrington
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts
| | - Julie M Paik
- New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts.,Renal Section, Department of Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts
| | - Dae H Kim
- Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter W Wilson
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.,Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia.,Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.,Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta
| | - J Michael Gaziano
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Luc Djousse
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kelly Cho
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jane A Driver
- New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts.,Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Keim-Malpass J, Anderson RT, Balkrishnan R, Desai RP, Showalter SL. Evaluating the Long-Term Impact of a Cooperative Group Trial on Radiation Use and Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Adherence Among Older Women. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:3458-3465. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08430-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
28
|
Adherence trajectories of adjuvant endocrine therapy in the five years after its initiation among women with non-metastatic breast cancer: a cohort study using administrative databases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 180:777-790. [PMID: 32086655 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05549-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite the benefits of adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) for reducing recurrence and mortality risks after hormone-sensitive breast cancer, AET adherence is sub-optimal for a high proportion of women. However, little is known about long-term patterns of AET adherence over the minimally recommended 5 years. Our objectives were to: (1) identify 5-year AET adherence trajectory groups; (2) describe trajectory groups according to adherence measures traditionally used (i.e., Proportion of Days Covered); and (3) explore factors associated with trajectories. METHODS We conducted a 5-year cohort study using data from a French national study that included AET dispensing data. Women diagnosed with first non-metastatic breast cancer and having at least 1 AET dispensing in the 12 months after diagnosis were included. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify adherence trajectory groups by clustering similar patterns of monthly AET dispensing. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with trajectories. RESULTS Among 674 women, five AET adherence trajectory groups were identified: (1) quick decline and stop (5.2% of women); (2) moderate decline and stop (6.4%); (3) slow decline (17.2%); (4) high adherence (30.0%); and (5) maintenance of very high adherence (41.2%). Mean 5-year Proportion of Days Covered varied from 10 to 97% according to trajectories. Women who did not receive chemotherapy or a personalized care plan were more likely to belong to trajectories where AET adherence declined and stopped. CONCLUSION Our results provide information on the diversity of longitudinal AET adherence patterns, the timing of decline and discontinuation and associated factors that could inform healthcare professionals.
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Improvements in breast cancer (BC) mortality rates have not been seen in the older adult community, and the fact that older adults are more likely to die from their cancer than younger women establishes a major health disparity. Studies have identified that despite typically presenting with more favorable histology, older women present with more advanced disease, which may be related in part to delayed diagnosis. This is supported by examination of screening practices in older adults. Older women have a worse prognosis than younger women in both early stage disease, and more advanced and metastatic disease. Focus on the treatment of older adults has often concentrated on avoiding overtreatment, but in fact undertreatment may be one reason for the age-related differences in outcomes, and treatments need to be individualized for every older adult, and take into account patient preferences and functional status and not chronologic age alone. Given the aging population in the US, identifying methods to improve early diagnosis in this population and identify additional factors will be important to reducing this age-related disparity.
Collapse
|
30
|
Lindström LS, Yau C, Czene K, Thompson CK, Hoadley KA, Van't Veer LJ, Balassanian R, Bishop JW, Carpenter PM, Chen YY, Datnow B, Hasteh F, Krings G, Lin F, Zhang Y, Nordenskjöld B, Stål O, Benz CC, Fornander T, Borowsky AD, Esserman LJ. Intratumor Heterogeneity of the Estrogen Receptor and the Long-term Risk of Fatal Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 110:726-733. [PMID: 29361175 PMCID: PMC6037086 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive disease have a continuous long-term risk for fatal breast cancer, but the biological factors influencing this risk are unknown. We aimed to determine whether high intratumor heterogeneity of ER predicts an increased long-term risk (25 years) of fatal breast cancer. Methods The STO-3 trial enrolled 1780 postmenopausal lymph node–negative breast cancer patients randomly assigned to receive adjuvant tamoxifen vs not. The fraction of cancer cells for each ER intensity level was scored by breast cancer pathologists, and intratumor heterogeneity of ER was calculated using Rao’s quadratic entropy and categorized into high and low heterogeneity using a predefined cutoff at the second tertile (67%). Long-term breast cancer-specific survival analyses by intra-tumor heterogeneity of ER were performed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics. Results A statistically significant difference in long-term survival by high vs low intratumor heterogeneity of ER was seen for all ER-positive patients (P < .001) and for patients with luminal A subtype tumors (P = .01). In multivariable analyses, patients with high intratumor heterogeneity of ER had a twofold increased long-term risk as compared with patients with low intratumor heterogeneity (ER-positive: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.31 to 3.00; luminal A subtype tumors: HR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.18 to 4.99). Conclusions Patients with high intratumor heterogeneity of ER had an increased long-term risk of fatal breast cancer. Interestingly, a similar long-term risk increase was seen in patients with luminal A subtype tumors. Our findings suggest that intratumor heterogeneity of ER is an independent long-term prognosticator with potential to change clinical management, especially for patients with luminal A tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda S Lindström
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christina Yau
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Carlie K Thompson
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Katherine A Hoadley
- Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Laura J Van't Veer
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ron Balassanian
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - John W Bishop
- Center for Comparative Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Philip M Carpenter
- Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA
| | - Yunn-Yi Chen
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Brian Datnow
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Farnaz Hasteh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Gregor Krings
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Fritz Lin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA
| | - Yanhong Zhang
- Center for Comparative Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Bo Nordenskjöld
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Olle Stål
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Christopher C Benz
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA
| | - Tommy Fornander
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexander D Borowsky
- Center for Comparative Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Laura J Esserman
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Liu MA, DuMontier C, Murillo A, Hshieh TT, Bean JF, Soiffer RJ, Stone RM, Abel GA, Driver JA. Gait speed, grip strength, and clinical outcomes in older patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood 2019; 134:374-382. [PMID: 31167800 PMCID: PMC6659254 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019000758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate whether gait speed and grip strength predicted clinical outcomes among older adults with blood cancers. We prospectively recruited 448 patients aged 75 years and older presenting for initial consultation at the myelodysplastic syndrome/leukemia, myeloma, or lymphoma clinic of a large tertiary hospital, who agreed to assessment of gait and grip. A subset of 314 patients followed for ≥6 months at local institutions was evaluated for unplanned hospital or emergency department (ED) use. We used Cox proportional hazard models calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for survival, and logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for hospital or ED use. Mean age was 79.7 (± 4.0 standard deviation) years. After adjustment for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, cognition, treatment intensity, and cancer aggressiveness/type, every 0.1-m/s decrease in gait speed was associated with higher mortality (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.12-1.29), odds of unplanned hospitalizations (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.16-1.51), and ED visits (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.17-1.53). Associations held among patients with good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 or 1). Every 5-kg decrease in grip strength was associated with worse survival (adjusted HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07-1.43) but not hospital or ED use. A model with gait speed and all covariates had comparable predictive power to comprehensive validated frailty indexes (phenotype and cumulative deficit) and all covariates. In summary, gait speed is an easily obtained "vital sign" that accurately identifies frailty and predicts outcomes independent of performance status among older patients with blood cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Liu
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Clark DuMontier
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Tammy T Hshieh
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Jonathan F Bean
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA; and
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Jane A Driver
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Adjei A, Buckner JC, Cathcart-Rake E, Chen H, Cohen HJ, Dao D, De Luca JE, Feliciano J, Freedman RA, Goldberg RM, Hopkins J, Hubbard J, Jatoi A, Karuturi M, Kemeny M, Kimmick GG, Klepin HD, Krok-Schoen JL, Lafky JM, Le-Rademacher JG, Li D, Lichtman SM, Maggiore R, Mandelblatt J, Morrison VA, Muss HB, Ojelabi MO, Sedrak MS, Subbiah N, Sun V, Tuttle S, VanderWalde N, Wildes T, Wong ML, Woyach J. Arti Hurria, M.D.: A tribute to her shining legacy in the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 11:179-183. [PMID: 31201095 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Araba Adjei
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Jan C Buckner
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | | | - Hongbin Chen
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| | - Harvey J Cohen
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Dyda Dao
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Jo-Ellen De Luca
- Alliance for Clinical Trials Patient Advocate, United States of America
| | | | | | - Richard M Goldberg
- West Virginia University, Morgantown, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Judith Hopkins
- Novant Health, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | | | - Aminah Jatoi
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
| | - Meghan Karuturi
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | | | | | - Heidi D Klepin
- Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | | | | | | | - Daneng Li
- City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Stuart M Lichtman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Ronald Maggiore
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America
| | | | - Vicki A Morrison
- University of Minnesota, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Hyman B Muss
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | | | | | - Niveditha Subbiah
- Alliance for Clinical Trials, Protocol Operations Office, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Virginia Sun
- City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Susan Tuttle
- Southeast Clinical Oncology, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | | | - Tanya Wildes
- Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Melisa L Wong
- University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Woyach
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cardoso E, Csajka C, Schneider MP, Widmer N. Effect of Adherence on Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Oral Targeted Anticancer Drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 2019. [PMID: 28634655 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-017-0571-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The emergence of oral targeted anticancer agents transformed several cancers into chronic conditions with a need for long-term oral treatment. Although cancer is a life-threatening condition, oncology medication adherence-the extent to which a patient follows the drug regimen that is intended by the prescriber-can be suboptimal in the long term, as in any other chronic disease. Poor adherence can impact negatively on clinical outcomes, notably because most of these drugs are given as a standard non-individualized dosage despite marked inter-individual variabilities that can lead to toxic or inefficacious drug concentrations. This has been especially studied with the prototypal drug imatinib. In the context of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), increasingly advocated for oral anticancer treatment optimization, unreported suboptimal adherence affecting drug intake history may lead to significant bias in the concentration interpretation and inappropriate dosage adjustments. In the same way, suboptimal adherence may also bias the results of pharmacokinetic modeling studies, which will affect in turn Bayesian TDM interpretation that relies on such population models. Detailed knowledge of the influence of adherence on plasma concentrations in pharmacokinetic studies or in routine TDM programs is however presently missing in the oncology field. Studies on this topic are therefore eagerly awaited to better pilot the treatment of cancer with the new targeted agents and to find their optimal dosage regimen. Hence, the development and assessment of effective medication adherence programs are warranted for these treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelina Cardoso
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Chantal Csajka
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marie P Schneider
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.,Community Pharmacy, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Widmer
- Pharmacy of Eastern Vaud Hospitals, Vevey, Switzerland. .,Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Service of Biomedicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 17, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wasif N, Neville M, Gray R, Cronin P, Pockaj BA. Competing Risk of Death in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Stage I Breast Cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 229:30-36.e1. [PMID: 30930100 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of newly diagnosed breast cancers in the US are in women aged older than 65 years who can have additional comorbidities. Balancing the risks and benefits of treatment should take into account these competing risks of death. STUDY DESIGN The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-Medicare database was used to identify women with stage I breast cancer undergoing operations from 2004-2012. Using neural network analysis, comorbidities associated with mortality were grouped into clinically relevant categories. Cumulative incidence graphs and Fine and Gray competing risk regression analyses were used to study the association of age, race, comorbidity groupings, and tumor variables with 3 competing mortality outcomes: dead of disease (DOD), dead of other cancers (DOC), and non-cancer death (NCD). RESULTS The overall cumulative incidence of mortality was 4.9% for DOD, 3.7% for DOC, and 21.3% for NCD for the 47,220 patients studied. For all patients, the 5- and 8-year probability of DOD was 3% and 4.7%, for DOC 1.9% and 3.5%, and for NCD 9.8% and 18.9%, respectively. The presence of any major comorbidity (eg cardiovascular or neurologic disorders) significantly increased the probability of NCD, and estrogen receptor status was the strongest predictor of DOD. Given patient age, comorbidity, and estrogen receptor status, an estimate of competing risks of death from DOD, DOC, and NCD can be calculated. CONCLUSIONS To aid clinical decision making, we quantify competing risks of death in patients with stage I breast cancer by taking into account patient age, comorbidity, and estrogen receptor status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabil Wasif
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Robert D and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Surgical Outcomes Program, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
| | - Matthew Neville
- Robert D and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Surgical Outcomes Program, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Richard Gray
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Patricia Cronin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Barbara A Pockaj
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lee Y, Park YR, Lee JS, Lee SB, Chung IY, Son BH, Ahn SH, Lee JW. Prescription Refill Gap of Endocrine Treatment from Electronic Medical Records as a Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer Patients. J Breast Cancer 2019; 22:86-95. [PMID: 30941236 PMCID: PMC6438827 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Discontinuation of hormone therapy is known to lead to a poorer prognosis in breast cancer patients. We aimed to investigate the prescription gap as a prompt index of medication adherence by using prescription data extracted from patient electronic medical records. Methods A total of 5,928 patients diagnosed with invasive, non-metastatic breast cancer, who underwent surgery from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2009, were enrolled retrospectively. The prescription data for 4.5 years of hormonal treatment and breast cancer-related events after treatment completion were analyzed. We examined the characteristics and prognoses of breast cancer in patients with and without a 4-week gap. Results Patients with a gap showed a significantly higher risk of breast cancer recurrence, distant metastasis, breast cancer-specific death, and overall death after adjustment (hazard ratio [HR], 1.389; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.089–1.772; HR, 1.568; 95% CI, 1.158–2.123; HR, 2.108; 95% CI, 1.298–3.423; and HR, 2.102; 95% CI, 1.456–3.034, respectively). When patients were categorized based on gap summation, the lower third (160 days) and fourth (391 days) quartiles showed a significantly higher risk of distant metastasis (HR, 1.758; 95% CI, 1.186–2.606 and HR, 1.844; 95% CI, 1.262–2.693, respectively). Conclusion A gap of > 4 weeks in hormonal treatment has negative effects on breast cancer prognosis, and can hence be used as a sentinel index of higher risk due to treatment non-adherence. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether the gap can be used as a universal index for monitoring the adherence to hormonal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yura Lee
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yu Rang Park
- Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Sung Lee
- Clinical Research Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sae Byul Lee
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Il Yong Chung
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung Ho Son
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sei Hyun Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
How May Coexisting Frailty Influence Adherence to Treatment in Elderly Hypertensive Patients? Int J Hypertens 2019; 2019:5245184. [PMID: 30723553 PMCID: PMC6339701 DOI: 10.1155/2019/5245184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hypertension is considered to be the most common condition in the general population. It is the most important risk factor for premature deaths in the world. Treatment compliance at every stage is a condition for successful antihypertensive therapy, and improving the effectiveness of treatment is a major goal in preventing cardiovascular incidents. Treatment noncompliance and lack of cooperation stem from numerous problems of older age, including frailty syndrome. Objective To evaluate the effect of frailty syndrome on treatment compliance in older patients with hypertension. Methods The study sample consisted of 160 patients (91 women, 69 men) with hypertension aged 65 to 78 (mean = 72.09, SD = 7.98 years), hospitalized at the University Clinical Hospital due to exacerbation of disease symptoms. Standardised research tools were used: the Tilburg Frailty Indicator questionnaire and the questionnaire for the assessment of treatment compliance in patients with hypertension, the Hill-Bone Compliance to High Blood Pressure Therapy Scale. Results Frailty syndrome was diagnosed in 65.62% of patients: 35.62% with mild, 29.38% with moderate, and 0.62% with severe frailty. The treatment compliance was 36.14%. The prevalence of the FS and its three components (physical, psychological, social) significantly affected (p <0.05) the global score of the Hill-Bone Compliance to High Blood Pressure Therapy Scale and all subscales: “reduced sodium intake”, “appointment keeping”, and “antihypertensive medication taking”. Conclusions The coexistence of frailty syndrome has a negative impact on the compliance of older patients with hypertension. Diagnosis of frailty and of the associated difficulties in adhering to treatment may allow for targeting the older patients with a poorer prognosis and at risk of complications from untreated or undertreated hypertension and for planning interventions to improve hypertension control.
Collapse
|
37
|
Survivorship issues in older breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 174:47-53. [PMID: 30506112 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-05078-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Almost half of breast cancer survivors are aged ≥ 65 years and the proportion is likely to increase due to the aging of the population. The objectives of this article were to review studies of health outcomes among older breast cancer survivors ≥ 65 years to identify gaps in the published literature and offer suggestions for future research. METHODS The present review is based upon bibliographic searches in PubMed and CINAHL and relevant search terms. Articles published in English from January 1, 1970 through October 1, 2018 were identified using the following MeSH search terms and Boolean algebra commands. RESULTS This review has revealed that older breast cancer survivors cope with health issues related to cancer treatment and the aging process, including comorbidities, osteoporosis, symptoms, physical functioning, cognitive functioning, nutrition, and physical activity. CONCLUSIONS Additional research is needed to examine therapeutic interventions to address the health conditions older breast cancer survivors are coping with. Particular focus of further research should be on the nutritional status and physical activity levels of older breast cancer survivors. Individualized nutrition plans and tailored physical activity programs for older survivors are needed that meet people where they are and that form habits.
Collapse
|
38
|
Mandelblatt JS, Small BJ, Luta G, Hurria A, Jim H, McDonald BC, Graham D, Zhou X, Clapp J, Zhai W, Breen E, Carroll JE, Denduluri N, Dilawari A, Extermann M, Isaacs C, Jacobsen PB, Kobayashi LC, Holohan Nudelman K, Root J, Stern RA, Tometich D, Turner R, VanMeter JW, Saykin AJ, Ahles T. Cancer-Related Cognitive Outcomes Among Older Breast Cancer Survivors in the Thinking and Living With Cancer Study. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:JCO1800140. [PMID: 30281396 PMCID: PMC7237199 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.00140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine treatment and aging-related effects on longitudinal cognitive function in older breast cancer survivors. METHODS Newly diagnosed nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 344) and matched controls without cancer (n = 347) 60 years of age and older without dementia or neurologic disease were recruited between August 2010 and December 2015. Data collection occurred during presystemic treatment/control enrollment and at 12 and 24 months through biospecimens; surveys; self-reported Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function; and neuropsychological tests that measured attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE) and learning and memory (LM). Linear mixed-effects models tested two-way interactions of treatment group (control, chemotherapy with or without hormonal therapy, and hormonal therapy) and time and explored three-way interactions of ApoE (ε4+ v not) by group by time; covariates included baseline age, frailty, race, and cognitive reserve. RESULTS Survivors and controls were 60 to 98 years of age, were well educated, and had similar baseline cognitive scores. Treatment was related to longitudinal cognition scores, with survivors who received chemotherapy having increasingly worse APE scores ( P = .05) and those initiating hormonal therapy having lower LM scores at 12 months ( P = .03) than other groups. These group-by-time differences varied by ApoE genotype, where only ε4+ survivors receiving hormone therapy had short-term decreases in adjusted LM scores (three-way interaction P = .03). For APE, the three-way interaction was not significant ( P = .14), but scores were significantly lower for ε4+ survivors exposed to chemotherapy (-0.40; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.01) at 24 months than ε4+ controls (0.01; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.18; P < .05). Increasing age was associated with lower baseline scores on all cognitive measures ( P < .001); frailty was associated with baseline APE and self-reported decline ( P < .001). CONCLUSION Breast cancer systemic treatment and aging-related phenotypes and genotypes are associated with longitudinal decreases in cognitive function scores in older survivors. These data could inform treatment decision making and survivorship care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Brent J. Small
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Gheorghe Luta
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Arti Hurria
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Heather Jim
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Brenna C. McDonald
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Deena Graham
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Jonathan Clapp
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth Breen
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Judith E. Carroll
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Neelima Denduluri
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Asma Dilawari
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Martine Extermann
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Paul B. Jacobsen
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Lindsay C. Kobayashi
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Kelly Holohan Nudelman
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - James Root
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Robert A. Stern
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Danielle Tometich
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Raymond Turner
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - John W. VanMeter
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew J. Saykin
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Tim Ahles
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Chronic diseases are considered to be major determinants of frailty and it could be hypothesized that their treatment may counteract the development of frailty. However, the hypothesis that intensive treatment of chronic diseases might reduce the progression of frailty is poorly supported by existing studies. In contrast, some evidence suggests that intensive treatment of chronic diseases may increase negative health outcomes in frail older adults. In particular, if treatment of symptoms related to chronic diseases (i.e. pain in osteoarthritis, dyspnoea in respiratory disease, motor symptoms in Parkinson disease) might potentially reverse frailty, the benefits related to preventive pharmacological treatment of chronic diseases (i.e. antihypertensive treatment) in patients with prevalent frailty is not certain. In particular, several factors might alter the risk/benefit ratio of a given treatment in persons with frailty. These include: exclusion of frail persons from clinical studies, reduced life expectancy in frail persons, increased susceptibility to iatrogenic events, and functional deficits associated with frailty. Therefore, frailty acts as an effect modifier, by modifying the risks and benefits of chronic disease treatments. This hypothesis must be considered and tested in future clinical intervention studies and clinical guidelines should provide specific recommendations for the treatment of frail people, underlining the pros and the cons of pharmacological treatment and possible targets for therapy in this population. Meanwhile, in older patients, the prescribing process should be individualized and flexible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graziano Onder
- Department of Gerontology, Neuroscience and Orthopedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Davide L Vetrano
- Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alessandra Marengoni
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - J Simon Bell
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Trans-Disciplinary Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Aging, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kristina Johnell
- Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katie Palmer
- Department of Gerontology, Neuroscience and Orthopedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sheppard VB, Walker R, Phillips W, Hudson V, Xu H, Cabling ML, He J, Sutton AL, Hamilton J. Spirituality in African-American Breast Cancer Patients: Implications for Clinical and Psychosocial Care. JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND HEALTH 2018; 57:1918-1930. [PMID: 29627925 DOI: 10.1007/s10943-018-0611-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Spirituality has been shown to be important to many individuals dealing with a cancer diagnosis. While African-American breast cancer survivors have been reported to have higher levels of spirituality compared to White women, little is known about how levels of spirituality may vary among African-American breast cancer survivors. The aims of this study were to examine factors associated with spirituality among African-American survivors and test whether spirituality levels were associated with women's attitudes about treatment or health care. The primary outcome, spirituality, was nine-item scale (Cronbach's α = .99). Participants completed standardized telephone interviews that captured sociocultural, healthcare process, and treatment attitudes. Medical records were abstracted post-adjuvant therapy for treatment and clinical information. In bivariate analysis, age was not correlated with spirituality (p = .40). Married/living as married women had higher levels of spirituality (m = 32.1) than single women (m = 30.1). Contextual factors that were associated with higher levels spirituality were: collectivism (r = .44; p < 0.0001, Afrocentric worldview (r = .185; p = .01), and self-efficacy scale (r = .17; p = .02). In multivariable analysis, sociodemographic factors were not significant. Collectivism remained a robust predictor (p < 0.0001). Attitudes about the efficacy of cancer treatment were not associated with spirituality. The high levels of spirituality in African-American survivors suggest consideration of integrating spiritual care within the delivery of cancer treatment. Future studies should consider how spirituality may contribute to positive coping and/or behaviors in African-American women with high levels of spirituality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa B Sheppard
- Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 E Main St, PO Box 980149, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Hanfei Xu
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Jun He
- Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 E Main St, PO Box 980149, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA
| | - Arnethea L Sutton
- Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 E Main St, PO Box 980149, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
McGrath LJ, Overman RA, Reams D, Cetin K, Liede A, Narod SA, Brookhart MA, Hernandez RK. Use of bone-modifying agents among breast cancer patients with bone metastasis: evidence from oncology practices in the US. Clin Epidemiol 2018; 10:1349-1358. [PMID: 30288124 PMCID: PMC6162990 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s175063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) are recommended for women with bone metastasis from breast cancer to prevent skeletal-related events. We examined the usage patterns and identified the factors associated with the use of BMAs (denosumab and intravenous bisphosphonates) among women in the US. Patients and methods Electronic health records from oncology clinics were used to identify women diagnosed with bone metastasis from breast cancer between 2013 and 2014. Patients were excluded if they had recently used a BMA or had concurrent cancer at an additional primary site. The incidence of BMA initiation, interruption, and reinitiation were estimated using competing risk regression models. A generalized linear model was used to estimate risk factors for treatment initiation and interruption. Results There were 589 women diagnosed with bone metastasis from breast cancer. By 1 year, 68% of these patients (95% CI: 64%, 71%) had initiated treatment with a BMA. Denosumab and zoledronic acid were the most commonly used agents, whereas pamidronate was used infrequently. Young women were more likely to initiate a BMA than older women (adjusted risk difference: 6.4 [95% CI: 1.5, 10.9]). Of the 412 patients who initiated a BMA, 46% (95% CI: 41%, 51%) experienced an interruption within 1 year. Seventy-four percent (95% CI: 68%, 79%) of patients who interrupted their treatment had reinitiated therapy within 1 year of interruption. Conclusion The majority of women diagnosed with bone metastasis from breast cancer initiate a BMA within 1 year of diagnosis, but a large proportion, particularly among the elderly, do not use these therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Steven A Narod
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Cortina CS, Agarwal S, Mulder LL, Poirier J, Rao R, Ansell DA, Madrigrano A. Are Providers and Patients Following Hormonal Therapy Guidelines for Patients Over the Age of 70? The Influence of CALGB 9343. Clin Breast Cancer 2018; 18:e1289-e1292. [PMID: 30072192 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9343 clinical trial proved that omission of radiotherapy (RT) in patients 70 and older with T1cN0M0, estrogen receptor-positive tumors who undergo breast conservation therapy (BCT) and receive 5 years of endocrine therapy (ET) had no change in overall survival, distant disease-free survival, or breast preservation. We examined our institution's practice with this patient subset. PATIENTS AND METHODS A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed on patients 70 years and older with T1N0M0, estrogen receptor-positive tumors, and who underwent BCT between April 2010 and October 2015. RESULTS A total of 123 patients met inclusion criteria: 46% received RT and 73% received ET. The ET group had a mean age of 76.2 years, whereas the non-ET group had a mean age of 80.2 years (P = .00006). Race did not influence if patients received ET (P = .4). In patients who received ET, mean age at time of diagnosis for those that completed 5 years of therapy was 75.5 years, whereas those who stopped therapy early had a mean age of 77.6 years (P = .053). In patients who received ET but stopped early, reasons for cessation included side-effect profile (67%), death (22%), and noncompliance (11%). Of the 27% of patients that did not receive ET, 62% were not offered therapy, 24% refused, and 14% were lost to postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSION Increasing age showed significant association to not receive ET. Contraindication to ET and provider's assessment of minimal benefit are the most common reasons why patients are not prescribed ET. If patients are non-compliant with ET, RT should be reconsidered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Laurel L Mulder
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Jennifer Poirier
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Ruta Rao
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - David A Ansell
- Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Andrea Madrigrano
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lomper K, Chabowski M, Chudiak A, Białoszewski A, Dudek K, Jankowska-Polańska B. Psychometric evaluation of the Polish version of the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) in adults with hypertension. Patient Prefer Adherence 2018; 12:2661-2670. [PMID: 30587938 PMCID: PMC6296194 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s185305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Only 50%-75% of chronically ill patients take their medication as prescribed. The patient is found to adhere to treatment correctly and optimally if they accomplish 80% or more of the treatment plan. A questionnaire titled the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) has been used in studies involving various populations and proved to be a simple instrument for measuring adherence, with good psychometric properties. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop a Polish version of the ARMS (ARMS-P), an instrument that identifies levels of adherence in the hypertensive population, and evaluate its psychometric properties. METHODS This cross-sectional study included 279 patients, including 166 females (mean age 66.5 years), hospitalized between September 2016 and March 2017 in the Department of Internal Medicine, Occupational Diseases, and Hypertension of Wrocław Medical University, Poland. The 12-item ARMS was translated from English into Polish. The 12 items included in the final questionnaire comprise two subscales: adherence to taking medications (eight items) and adherence to refilling prescriptions (four items). RESULTS Patients in the good-adherence group were younger (P=0.017; P=0.048), more likely to be professionally active (P=0.041), better educated (P=0.037), and more likely to have normal blood pressure (P<0.001). They also measured their blood pressure more often (P<0.001), and took fewer pills in a day (P<0.001). Adherent patients were also more likely to take their medication on their own (P=0.016) and read information leaflets on the medication (P<0.001). The study demonstrated that the ARMS-P questionnaire has good psychometric properties that enable its use for assessing adherence in chronically ill patients, including in particular, patients with hypertension. CONCLUSION The psychometric properties of the questionnaire are satisfactory (reliability measured by means of Cronbach's α). The ARMS-P questionnaire proved to be suitable for use in the Polish population. The use of this screening tool for the assessment of adherence to treatment is recommended in this population of hypertensive patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Lomper
- Division of Nursing of Internal Diseases, Department of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Mariusz Chabowski
- Division of Surgical Procedures, Department of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland,
| | - Anna Chudiak
- Division of Nursing of Internal Diseases, Department of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Artur Białoszewski
- Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards and Allergology, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Dudek
- Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Beata Jankowska-Polańska
- Division of Nursing of Internal Diseases, Department of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Impact of persistence on survival of patients with breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy in Northeast China: a prospective study. Oncotarget 2017; 8:102499-102510. [PMID: 29254265 PMCID: PMC5731975 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2016] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this prospective study is to investigate the impact of endocrine treatment persistence on the survival of patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy and identify the risk factors influencing the treatment persistence. We enrolled 1085 patients from Northeast China who were diagnosed as stage I–III, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer between January 2007 and December 2010. The prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. Multiple logistic regression analysis was done to determine the possible risk factors for non-endocrine treatment and treatment discontinuation. Among the patients enrolled, 598 (55.1%) underwent 5 years of endocrine therapy, 278 (25.6%) less than 5 years, and 209 (19.3%) non-endocrine therapy. OS rates in the continuation, discontinuation, and non-endocrine treatment groups were 97.8%, 92.6% and 74.3%, and DFS 97.5%, 86.2% and 69.9%, respectively. After adjusting for pathological and socioeconomic factors, non-endocrine therapy and discontinuation were independent predictors for DFS and OS. Elderly patients (≥ 65 years), those living in suburban and rural areas, locally advanced patients, and receiving no radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy were more likely to receive non-endocrine therapy and discontinue endocrine treatment. In conclusion, the prospective study demonstrate that the persistence of endocrine treatment is low in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients in Northeast China. Non-endocrine treatment and early discontinuation serve as independent prognostic factors for both DFS and OS of breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy.
Collapse
|
45
|
van 't Veer LJ, Yau C, Yu NY, Benz CC, Nordenskjöld B, Fornander T, Stål O, Esserman LJ, Lindström LS. Tamoxifen therapy benefit for patients with 70-gene signature high and low risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 166:593-601. [PMID: 28776283 PMCID: PMC5668340 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4428-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 07/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer molecular prognostic tools that predict recurrence risk have mainly been established on endocrine-treated patients and thus are not optimal for the evaluation of benefit from endocrine therapy. The Stockholm tamoxifen (STO-3) trial which randomized postmenopausal node-negative patients to 2-year tamoxifen (followed by an optional randomization for an additional 3-year tamoxifen vs nil), versus no adjuvant treatment, provides a unique opportunity to evaluate long-term 20-year benefit of endocrine therapy within prognostic risk classes of the 70-gene prognosis signature that was developed on adjuvantly untreated patients. METHODS We assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis 20-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and 10-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) for 538 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, STO-3 trial patients with retrospectively ascertained 70-gene prognosis classification. Multivariable analysis of long-term (20 years) BCSS by STO-3 trial arm in the 70-gene high-risk and low-risk subgroups was performed using Cox proportional hazard modeling adjusting for classical patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS Tamoxifen-treated, 70-gene low- and high-risk patients had 20-year BCSS of 90 and 83%, as compared to 80 and 65% for untreated patients, respectively (log-rank p < 0.0001). Notably, there is equivalent tamoxifen benefit in both high (HR 0.42 (0.21-0.86), p = 0.018) and low (HR 0.46 (0.25-0.85), p = 0.013) 70-gene risk categories even after adjusting for clinico-pathological factors for BCSS. Limited tamoxifen exposure as given in the STO-3 trial provides persistent benefit for 10-15 years after diagnosis in a time-varying analysis. 10-year DMFS was 93 and 85% for low- and high-risk tamoxifen-treated, versus 83 and 70% for low- and high-risk untreated patients, respectively (log-rank p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Patients with ER-positive breast cancer, regardless of high or low 70-gene risk classification, receive significant survival benefit lasting over 10 years from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, even when given for a relatively short duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J van 't Veer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA.
| | - Christina Yau
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA
- Buck Institute for Research on Aging, 8001 Redwood Boulevard, Novato, CA, 94945, USA
| | - Nancy Y Yu
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Hälsovägen 7, 141 83, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christopher C Benz
- Buck Institute for Research on Aging, 8001 Redwood Boulevard, Novato, CA, 94945, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA
| | - Bo Nordenskjöld
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Sandbäcksgatan 7, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Tommy Fornander
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Z1:00, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olle Stål
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Sandbäcksgatan 7, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Laura J Esserman
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA
| | - Linda Sofie Lindström
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Hälsovägen 7, 141 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Uchmanowicz I, Chudiak A, Jankowska-Polańska B, Gobbens R. Hypertension and Frailty Syndrome in Old Age: Current Perspectives. Card Fail Rev 2017; 3:102-107. [PMID: 29387461 PMCID: PMC5739896 DOI: 10.15420/cfr.2017:9:2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypertension is both a health problem and a financial one globally. It affects nearly 30 % of the general population. Elderly people, aged ≥65 years, are a special group of hypertensive patients. In this group, the overall prevalence of the disease reaches 60 %, rising to 70 % in those aged ≥80 years. In the elderly population, isolated systolic hypertension is quite common. High systolic blood pressure is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, cognitive impairment and kidney disease. Considering the physiological changes resulting from ageing alongside multiple comorbidities, treatment of hypertension in elderly patients poses a significant challenge to treatment teams. Progressive disability with regard to the activities of daily life, more frequent hospitalisations and low quality of life are often seen in elderly patients. There is discussion in the literature regarding frailty syndrome associated with old age. Frailty is understood to involve decreased resistance to stressors, depleted adaptive and physiological reserves of a number of organs, endocrine dysregulation and immune dysfunction. The primary dilemma concerning frailty is whether it should only be defined on the basis of physical factors, or whether psychological and social factors should also be included. Proper nutrition and motor rehabilitation should be prioritised in care for frail patients. The risk of orthostatic hypotension is a significant issue in elderly patients. It results from an autonomic nervous system dysfunction and involves maladjustment of the cardiovascular system to sudden changes in the position of the body. Other significant issues in elderly patients include polypharmacy, increased risk of falls and cognitive impairment. Chronic diseases, including hypertension, deteriorate baroreceptor function and result in irreversible changes in cerebral and coronary circulation. Concurrent frailty or other components of geriatric syndrome in elderly patients are associated with a worse perception of health, an increased number of comorbidities and social isolation of the patient. It may also interfere with treatment adherence. Identifying causes of non-adherence to pharmaceutical treatment is a key factor in planning therapeutic interventions aimed at increasing control, preventing complications, and improving long-term outcomes and any adverse effects of treatment. Diagnosis of frailty and awareness of the associated difficulties in adhering to treatment may allow targeting of those elderly patients who have a poorer prognosis or may be at risk of complications from untreated or undertreated hypertension, and for the planning of interventions to improve hypertension control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izabella Uchmanowicz
- Division of Nursing in Internal Medicine Procedures, Department of Clinical Nursing, The Faculty of Health Sciences,Wroclaw Medical University, Poland
| | - Anna Chudiak
- Division of Nursing in Internal Medicine Procedures, Department of Clinical Nursing, The Faculty of Health Sciences,Wroclaw Medical University, Poland
| | - Beata Jankowska-Polańska
- Division of Nursing in Internal Medicine Procedures, Department of Clinical Nursing, The Faculty of Health Sciences,Wroclaw Medical University, Poland
| | - Robbert Gobbens
- The Faculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Applied Sciences,Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Merrill A, Brown DR, Klepin HD, Levine EA, Howard-Mcnatt M. Outcomes after Mastectomy and Lumpectomy in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians with Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Am Surg 2017. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481708300842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Prospective studies have shown equal outcomes after mastectomy or breast conservation in patients with invasive breast cancer; however, many of these studies excluded elderly patients. We identified patients in their eighties and nineties with clinical stage 0 to II breast cancer undergoing mastectomy or lumpectomy with or without radiation from the prospective sentinel lymph node database at Wake Forest Baptist Health and analyzed their treatment and survival. Of 92 patients, 24 (26.1%) underwent mastectomy, 22 (23.9%) lumpectomy with radiation, and 46 (50.0%) lumpectomy alone. Significant differences were noted in tumor size (P = 0.018), nodal status (P = 0.013), and stage (P = 0.011) between the groups. Only 7.6 per cent of patients had chemotherapy, whereas 51.1 per cent took antiestrogen therapy. Recurrence occurred in 11 patients. In univariate analysis, overall survival did not differ by surgery. Age was the only factor that increased risk of death (HR = 1.19, P = 0.028). In this age group, neither tumor factors nor the type of local treatment significantly influenced overall survival. Octogenarians and nonagenarians with early-stage breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery with or without radiation have equivalent survival to patients having a mastectomy.
Collapse
|
48
|
Nichol AM, Chan EK, Lucas S, Smith SL, Gondara L, Speers C, Tyldesley S. The Use of Hormone Therapy Alone Versus Hormone Therapy and Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer in Elderly Women: A Population-Based Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:829-839. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Revised: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
49
|
Bluethmann SM, Alfano CM, Clapp JD, Luta G, Small BJ, Hurria A, Cohen HJ, Sugarman S, B Muss H, Isaacs C, Mandelblatt JS. Cognitive function and discontinuation of adjuvant hormonal therapy in older breast cancer survivors: CALGB 369901 (Alliance). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 165:677-686. [PMID: 28653250 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4353-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effects of cognitive function on discontinuation of hormonal therapy in breast cancer survivors ages 65+ ("older"). METHODS Older breast cancer survivors with invasive, non-metastatic disease, and no reported cognitive difficulties were recruited from 78 Alliance sites between 2004 and 2011. Eligible survivors (n = 1280) completed baseline interviews; follow-up was conducted annually for up to 7 years. Survivors with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) cancers who initiated hormonal therapy (n = 990) were included. Self-reported cognitive function was measured using the EORTC-QLQ30 scale; a difference of eight points on the 0-100 scale was considered clinically significant. Based on varying rates of discontinuation over time, discontinuation was evaluated separately for three time periods: early (<1 year); midpoint (1-3 years); and late discontinuation (>3-5 years). Cox models for each time period were used to evaluate the effects of cognition immediately preceding discontinuation, controlling for age, chemotherapy, and other covariates. RESULTS Survivors were 65-91 years old (mean 72.6 years), and 79% had stages 1 or 2A disease. Overall, 43% discontinued hormonal therapy before 5 years. Survivors who reported lower cognitive function in the period before discontinuation had greater hazards of discontinuing therapy at the treatment midpoint (HR 1.22 per 8-point difference, CI 1.09-1.40, p < 0.001), considering covariates, but cognition was not related to discontinuation in the other periods. CONCLUSIONS Self-reported cognitive problems were a significant risk factor for discontinuation of hormonal therapy 1-3 years post-initiation. Additional research is needed on the temporality of cognitive effects and hormonal therapy to support survivorship care needs of older survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley M Bluethmann
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
| | - Catherine M Alfano
- American Cancer Society, Inc., 1875 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20009, USA
| | - Jonathan D Clapp
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street NW, suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - George Luta
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street NW, suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Brent J Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Arti Hurria
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Harvey J Cohen
- Department of Medicine and Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University, DUMC, Room 3502 Busse Building, Blue Zone, Duke South, Box 3003, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Steven Sugarman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Hyman B Muss
- Department of Medicine, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, 321 South Columbia Street, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street NW, suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Jeanne S Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street NW, suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.,Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street NW, suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Treatment Decisions and Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-017-0248-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|