Limited Resection Versus Lobectomy for Older Patients With Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Impact of Histology

A gene-based score for the risk stratification of stage IA lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

We aim to molecularly stratify stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) for precision medicine.

METHODS

Twelve multi-institution datasets (837 cases of IA) were used to classify the high- and low-risk types (based on survival status within 5 years), and the biological differences were compared. Then, a gene-based classifying score (IA score) was trained, tested and validated by several machine learning methods. Furthermore, we estimated the significance of the IA score in the prognostic assessment, chemotherapy prediction and risk stratification of stage IA LUAD. We also developed an R package for the clinical application. The SEER database (15708 IA samples) and TCGA Pan-Cancer (1881 stage I samples) database were used to verify clinical significance.

RESULTS

Compared with the low-risk group, the high-risk group of stage IA LUAD has obvious enrichment of the malignant pathway and more driver mutations and copy number variations. The effect of the IA score on the classification of high- and low-risk stage IA LUAD was much better than that of classical clinicopathological factors (training set: AUC = 0.9, validation set: AUC = 0.7). The IA score can significantly predict the prognosis of stage IA LUAD and has a prognostic effect for stage I pancancer. The IA score can effectively predict chemotherapy sensitivity and occult metastasis or invasion in stage IA LUAD. The R package IAExpSuv has a good risk probability prediction effect for both groups and single stages of IA LUAD.

CONCLUSIONS

The IA score can effectively stratify the risk of stage IA LUAD, offering good assistance in precision medicine.

PB-LNet: a model for predicting pathological subtypes of pulmonary nodules on CT images

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation between CT imaging features and pathological subtypes of pulmonary nodules and construct a prediction model using deep learning.

METHODS

We collected information of patients with pulmonary nodules treated by surgery and the reference standard for diagnosis was post-operative pathology. After using elastic distortion for data augmentation, the CT images were divided into a training set, a validation set and a test set in a ratio of 6:2:2. We used PB-LNet to analyze the nodules in pre-operative CT and predict their pathological subtypes. Accuracy was used as the model evaluation index and Class Activation Map was applied to interpreting the results. Comparative experiments with other models were carried out to achieve the best results. Finally, images from the test set without data augmentation were analyzed to judge the clinical utility.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventy-seven patients were included and the nodules were divided into six groups: benign lesions, precursor glandular lesions, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, invasive adenocarcinoma Grade 1, Grade 2 and Grade 3. The accuracy of the test set was 0.84. Class Activation Map confirmed that PB-LNet classified the nodules mainly based on the lungs in CT images, which is in line with the actual situation in clinical practice. In comparative experiments, PB-LNet obtained the highest accuracy. Finally, 96 images from the test set without data augmentation were analyzed and the accuracy was 0.89.

CONCLUSIONS

In classifying CT images of lung nodules into six categories based on pathological subtypes, PB-LNet demonstrates satisfactory accuracy without the need of delineating nodules, while the results are interpretable. A high level of accuracy was also obtained when validating on real data, therefore demonstrates its usefulness in clinical practice.

Long-term outcome of patients with peripheral ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancer after sublobar resections

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term prognosis of patients with peripheral small ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancer after sublobar resection. We have already reported the 5-year safety and efficacy of sublobar resection and report the long-term outcomes after a 10-year follow-up period.

METHODS

Between May 2009 and April 2011, 333 patients with radiologically noninvasive peripheral lung cancer were enrolled from 51 institutions (median age, 62 years at registration) and followed up until May 6, 2021. Of these patients, sublobar resections with wedge resection as the first choice were performed in 314 patients (258 wedge resections and 56 segmentectomies), conversion lobectomies were performed in 11 patients, and 8 patients were ineligible.

RESULTS

The 10-year relapse-free survival and overall survival for the 314 patients with sublobar resections were 98.6% (95% confidence interval, 96.2-99.5) and 98.5% (95% confidence interval, 96.1-99.4), respectively. There was 1 local recurrence at the resection margin. Among the patients, second cancers were observed in 43 patients (13.4%; 95% confidence interval, 9.8-17.6), of which 18 were second lung cancers (5.8%; 95% confidence interval, 3.5-8.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancer is cured by sublobar resection, with wedge resection as the first choice, and the indications for other treatment options should be further investigated. The incidence of second cancer is similar to that in the general Japanese population.

Efficacy of thoracoscopic segmentectomy versus lobectomy in the treatment of early invasive lung adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching study

Objective

This study aimed to investigate and analyze the clinical application value of thoracoscopic segmentectomy and lobectomy in patients with invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Methods

286 patients with invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy at the First Hospital of Jiaxing City from January 2018 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into a thoracoscopic segmentectomy group(n=97) and a lobectomy group (n=189). Patients were compared after obtaining 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts. Outcome indicators included surgery-related indicators, immune-inflammation-related indicators, postoperative complications, recurrence, and metastasis.

Results

After 1:1 propensity score matching, 93 patients were included in each group. We found that the volume of intraoperative blood loss in the segmentectomy group was significantly less than in the lobectomy group (P=0.014). The duration of postoperative drainage (P = 0.005) and hospitalization (P=0.002) in the segmentectomy group were significantly shorter than in the lobectomy group. In terms of immunoinflammatory response, compared with the lobectomy group, white blood cells, neutrophils, SII, and NLR in the segmentectomy group were significantly lower than in the lobectomy group (P< 0.05). The recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in the segmentectomy and lobectomy were 80.5% and 88.2% at 1 year and 35.1% and 52.6% at 3 years, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The segmentectomy group achieved similar outcomes to the lobectomy group at 1 year and 3 years (P > 0.05). Multivariate COX regression analysis showed that CAR was an independent risk factor for RFS in patients undergoing invasive adenocarcinoma surgery.

Conclusion

Compared with lobectomy, thoracoscopic segmentectomy can effectively reduce the postoperative inflammatory response in patients with early invasive lung adenocarcinoma and promote patient recovery. Although segmentectomy is associated with a higher recurrence rate in the short term for patients with early invasive lung adenocarcinoma, the associated survival rate is similar to the lobectomy group. Segmentectomy should be considered in the treatment of early invasive lung adenocarcinoma. Meanwhile, postoperative CAR represents an independent risk factor for early postoperative recurrence in patients with IAC.

Surgeon Quality and Patient Survival After Resection for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The quality and outcomes of curative-intent lung cancer surgery vary in populations. Surgeons are key drivers of surgical quality. We examined the association between surgeon-level intermediate outcomes differences, patient survival differences, and potential mitigation by processes of care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using a baseline population-based surgical resection cohort, we derived surgeon-level cut points for rates of positive margins, nonexamination of lymph nodes, nonexamination of mediastinal lymph nodes, and wedge resections. Applying the baseline cut points to a subsequent cohort from the same population-based data set, we assign surgeons into three performance categories in reference to each metric: 1 (<25th percentile), 2 (25th-75th percentile), and 3 (>75th percentile). The sum of performance scores created three surgeon quality tiers: 1 (4-6, low), 2 (7-9, intermediate), and 3 (10-12, high). We used chi-squared, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare patient characteristics between the baseline and subsequent cohorts and across surgeon tiers. We applied Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association between patient survival and surgeon performance tier, sequentially adjusting for clinical stage, patient characteristics, and four specific processes.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2021, 39 surgeons performed 4,082 resections across the baseline and subsequent cohorts. Among 31 subsequent cohort surgeons, five were tier 1, five were tier 2, and 21 were tier 3. Tier 1 and 2 surgeons had significantly worse outcomes than tier 3 surgeons (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.72 and 1.19; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.43, respectively). Adjustment for specific processes mitigated the surgeon-tiered survival differences, with adjusted HRs of 1.02 (95% CI, 0.8 to 1.3) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.7 to 1.25), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Readily accessible intermediate outcomes metrics can be used to stratify surgeon performance for targeted process improvement, potentially reducing patient survival disparities.

Development of the semi-dry dot-blot method for intraoperative detecting micropapillary component in lung adenocarcinoma based on proteomics analysis

BACKGROUND

Micropapillary (MIP) component was a major concern in determining surgical strategy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We sought to develop a novel method for detecting MIP component during surgery.

METHODS

Differentially expressed proteins between MIP-positive and MIP-negative LUAD were identified through proteomics analysis. The semi-dry dot-blot (SDB) method which visualises the targeted protein was developed to detect MIP component.

RESULTS

Cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 2 (CRABP2) was significantly upregulated in MIP-positive LUAD (P < 0.001), and the high CRABP2 expression zone showed spatial consistency with MIP component. CRABP2 expression was also associated with decreased recurrence-free survival (P < 0.001). In the prospective cohort, the accuracy and sensitivity of detecting MIP component using SDB method by visualising CRABP2 were 82.2% and 72.7%, which were comparable to these of pathologist. Pathologist with the aid of SDB method would improve greatly in diagnostic accuracy (86.4%) and sensitivity (78.2%). In patients with minor MIP component (≤5%), the sensitivity of SDB method (63.6%) was significantly higher than pathologist (45.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative examination of CRABP2 using SDB method to detect MIP component reached comparable performance to pathologist, and SDB method had notable superiority than pathologist in detecting minor MIP component.

Patterns of Postoperative Changes in Lung Volume and Perfusion Assessed by Dual-Energy CT: Comparison of Lobectomy and Limited Resection

BACKGROUND. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and perfusion scintigraphy have limited utility for evaluating postoperative changes in regional pulmonary function after lung cancer resection surgery. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative changes in lung volume and perfusion, as assessed by dual-energy CT (DECT), between patients undergoing surgical resection of lung cancer by lobectomy versus limited resection as well as to assess associations between such changes and the lobar location of the resected tumor. METHODS. This study entailed a retrospective post hoc analysis of a prospective study that enrolled patients awaiting lung cancer resection surgery between March 2019 and February 2020. Eighty-one patients (38 men and 43 women; mean age, 60.5 ± 8.9 [SD] years), 43 of whom underwent lobectomy and 38 of whom underwent limited resection, were included. Patients underwent thoracic DECT and PFT evaluation preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Pulmonary lobes were segmented. Lobar lung volume and lung perfusion ratios (both relative to whole-lung values) were computed. Perfusion measures reflected DECT-derived iodine content. Patients completed 6-month postoperative quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires. RESULTS. Patients undergoing lobectomy, compared with those undergoing limited resection, had greater increases in the lung volume ratio of the ipsilateral nonresected lobe(s) (mean, 42.3% ± 24.2% [SD] vs 22.9% ± 13.2%, p < .001) and the contralateral lung (mean, 14.6% ± 14.0% vs 6.4% ± 6.9%, p = .002) as well as greater increases in the lung perfusion ratio of the ipsilateral nonresected lobe(s) (mean, 39.9% ± 20.7% [SD] vs 22.8% ± 17.8%, p < .001) and the contralateral lung (mean, 20.9% ± 9.4% vs 4.3% ± 5.6%, p < .001). In patients with right lower lobe tumors, the largest postoperative increases in the lung volume ratio were in the right middle lobe in those undergoing lobectomy (mean, 44.1% ± 21.0%) and limited resection (mean, 24.6% ± 14.5%), whereas the largest postoperative increase in the lung perfusion ratio was in the left lower lobe in those undergoing lobectomy (mean, 53.9% ± 8.6%) and in the right middle lobe in those undergoing limited resection (mean, 32.5% ± 24.1%). Otherwise, the largest increases in lung volume and perfusion ratios occurred in the ipsilateral nonresected lobes (vs the contra-lateral lobes), regardless of the operative approach used and the lobar location. Changes in the lung volume and perfusion ratios in the ipsilateral lobe(s) and the contralateral lung showed weak correlations with certain quality-of-life scores (e.g., for role functioning: ρ = 0.234-0.279 [volume] and -0.233 to -0.284 [perfusion]). CONCLUSION. DECT depicts patterns of lung volume and perfusion changes after lung cancer surgery, depending on the surgical approach (lobectomy vs limited resection) used and the lobar location of the tumor. CLINICAL IMPACT. DECT-derived metrics can help understand variable physiologic impacts of lung cancer resection surgeries.

Construction of a mortality risk prediction model for elderly people at risk of lobectomy for NSCLC

Background

An increasing number of lung cancer patients are opting for lobectomy for oncological treatment. However, due to the unique organismal condition of elderly patients, their short-term postoperative mortality is significantly higher than that of non-elderly patients. Therefore, there is a need to develop a personalised predictive tool to assess the risk of postoperative mortality in elderly patients.

Methods

Information on the diagnosis and survival of 35,411 older patients with confirmed lobectomy NSCLC from 2009 to 2019 was screened from the SEER database. The surgical group was divided into a high-risk mortality population group (≤90 days) and a non-high-risk mortality population group using a 90-day criterion. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method to compare the differences in overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) between the two groups. The data set was split into modelling and validation groups in a ratio of 7.5:2.5, and model risk predictors of postoperative death in elderly patients with NSCLC were screened using univariate and multifactorial logistic regression. Columnar plots were constructed for model visualisation, and the area under the subject operating characteristic curve (AUC), DCA decision curve and clinical impact curve were used to assess model predictiveness and clinical utility.

Results

Multi-factor logistic regression results showed that sex, age, race, histology and grade were independent predictors of the risk of postoperative death in elderly patients with NSCLC. The above factors were imported into R software to construct a line graph model for predicting the risk of postoperative death in elderly patients with NSCLC. The AUCs of the modelling and validation groups were 0.711 and 0.713 respectively, indicating that the model performed well in terms of predictive performance. The DCA decision curve and clinical impact curve showed that the model had a high net clinical benefit and was of clinical application.

Conclusion

The construction and validation of a predictive model for death within 90 days of lobectomy in elderly patients with lung cancer will help the clinic to identify high-risk groups and give timely intervention or adjust treatment decisions.

Subsegmentectomy versus segmentectomy resection for the treatment of operable patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background

There were new points of interest in performing subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether patients who underwent subsegmentectomy could obtain satisfactory clinical outcomes remains unclear. The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and security of surgical procedures between subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed through five online databases to identify the included literatures which presented intact clinical outcome data among different surgical procedures. The included studies were evaluated based on precise and predefined inclusion criteria.

Results

There were 4 published studies identified in this meta-analysis. A total of 325 patients who underwent subsegmentectomy and 904 patients who underwent segmentectomy were involved in this analysis. The duration of drainage [MD -0.19; 95%CI (-0.36, -0.02), p = 0.03] and postoperative hospital stay [MD -0.30; 95%CI (-0.58, -0.02), p = 0.009] of subsegmentectomy were significantly less than that of segmentectomy. There was no statistically significant difference among recurrence rate [OR 0.85; 95%CI (0.21, 3.42), p = 0.82], operation time, blood loss, incidence of complications [OR 0.83; 95%CI (0.58, 1.20), p = 0.33] between subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy in patients with stage IA NSCLC.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis was firstly performed to compare perioperative outcomes among surgical procedures. The perioperative outcomes were comparable between subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy. Subsegmentectomy might be an alternative treatment for the deep tumor with size less than 1.5 cm and mainly composed of Ground Glass Opacity (GGO).

Prediction of high-grade patterns of stage IA lung invasive adenocarcinoma based on high-resolution CT features: a bicentric study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to predict the high-grade pattern (HGP) of stage IA lung invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) based on the high-resolution CT (HRCT) features.

METHODS

The clinical, pathological, and HRCT imaging data of 457 patients (from bicentric) with pathologically confirmed stage IA IAC (459 lesions in total) were retrospectively analyzed. The 459 lesions were classified into high-grade pattern (HGP) (n = 101) and non-high-grade pattern (n-HGP) (n = 358) groups depending on the presence of HGP (micropapillary and solid) in pathological results. The clinical and pathological data contained age, gender, smoking history, tumor stage, pathological type, and presence or absence of tumor spread through air spaces (STAS). CT features consisted of lesion location, size, density, shape, spiculation, lobulation, vacuole, air bronchogram, and pleural indentation. The independent predictors for HGP were screened by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. The clinical, CT, and clinical-CT models were constructed according to the multivariable analysis results.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis suggested the independent predictors of HGP, encompassing tumor size (p = 0.001; OR = 1.090, 95% CI 1.035-1.148), density (p < 0.001; OR = 9.454, 95% CI 4.911-18.199), and lobulation (p = 0.002; OR = 2.722, 95% CI 1.438-5.154). The AUC values of clinical, CT, and clinical-CT models for predicting HGP were 0.641 (95% CI 0.583-0.699) (sensitivity = 69.3%, specificity = 79.2%), 0.851 (95% CI 0.806-0.896) (sensitivity = 79.2%, specificity = 79.6%), and 0.852 (95% CI 0.808-0.896) (sensitivity = 74.3%, specificity = 85.8%).

CONCLUSION

The logistic regression model based on HRCT features has a good diagnostic performance for the high-grade pattern of stage IA IAC.

KEY POINTS

• The AUC values of clinical, CT, and clinical-CT models for predicting high-grade patterns were 0.641 (95% CI 0.583-0.699), 0.851 (95% CI 0.806-0.896), and 0.852 (95% CI 0.808-0.896). • Tumor size, density, and lobulation were independent predictive markers for high-grade patterns. • The logistic regression model based on HRCT features has a good diagnostic performance for the high-grade patterns of invasive adenocarcinoma.

Selection of the surgical approach for patients with cStage IA lung squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based propensity score matching analysis

Background

This study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of the survival rates after segmentectomy, wedge resection, or lobectomy in patients with cStage IA lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Methods

We enrolled 4,316 patients who had cStage IA lung SCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Cox proportional hazards model was conducted to recognize the potential risk factors for overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). To eliminate potential biases of included patients, the propensity score matching (PSM) method was used. OS and LCSS rates were compared among three groups stratified according to tumor size.

Results

Kaplan–Meier analyses revealed no statistical differences in the rates of OS and LCSS between wedge resection (WR) and segmentectomy (SG) groups for patients who had cStage IA cancers. In patients with tumors ≤ 1 cm, LCSS favored lobectomy (Lob) compared to segmentectomy (SG), but a similar survival rate was obtained for wedge resection (WR) and lobectomy (Lob). For patients with tumors sized 1.1 to 2 cm, lobectomy had improved OS and LCSS rates compared to the segmentectomy or wedge resection groups, with the exception of a similar OS rate for lobectomy and segmentectomy. For tumors sized 2.1 to 3 cm, lobectomy had a higher rate of OS or LCSS than wedge resection or segmentectomy, except that lobectomy conferred a similar LCSS rate compared to segmentectomy. Multivariable analyses showed that patients aged ≥75 and tumor sizes of &gt;2 to ≤3 cm were potential risk factors for OS and LCSS, while lobectomy and first malignant primary indicator were considered protective factors. The Cox proportional analysis also confirmed that male patients aged ≥65 to &lt;75 were independent prognostic factors that are indicative of a worse OS rate.

Conclusions

The tumor size can influence the surgical procedure recommended for individuals with cStage IA lung SCC. For patients with tumors ≤1 cm, lobectomy is the recommended approach, and wedge resection or segmentectomy might be an alternative for those who cannot tolerate lobectomy if adequate surgical margin is achievable and enough nodes are sampled. For tumors &gt;1 to ≤3 cm, lobectomy showed better survival outcomes than sublobar resection. Our findings require further validation by randomized controlled trial (RCT) or other evidence.

Reappraising the clinical usability of consolidation-to-tumor ratio on CT in clinical stage IA lung cancer

Objectives

Ground-glass opacity (GGO) on computed tomography is associated with prognosis in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the stratification of the prognostic value of GGO is controversial. We aimed to evaluate clinicopathologic characteristics of early-stage NSCLC based on the consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR), conduct multi-pronged analysis, and stratify prognosis accordingly.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated 944 patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC, who underwent curative-intent lung resection between August 2018 and January 2020. The CTR was measured and used to categorize patients into six groups (1, 0%; 2, 0–25%; 3, 25–50%; 4, 50–75%; 5, 75–100%; and 6, 100%).

Results

Pathologic nodal upstaging was found in 1.8% (group 4), 9.0% (group 5), and 17.4% (group 6), respectively. The proportion of patients with a high grade of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes tended to decrease as the CTR increased. In a subtype analysis of patients with adenocarcinoma, all of the patients with predominant micro-papillary patterns were in the CTR > 50% groups, and most of the patients with predominant solid patterns were in group 6 (47/50, 94%). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that CTR 75–100% (hazard ratio [HR], 3.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58–9.36) and CTR 100% (HR, 5.58; 95% CI, 2.45–12.72) were independent prognostic factors for DFS, regardless of tumor size.

Conclusion

We demonstrated that the CTR could provide various noninvasive clinicopathological information. A CTR of more than 75% is the factor associated with a poor prognosis and should be considered when making therapeutic plans for patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Limited resection for stage IA radiologically invasive lung cancer: a real-world nationwide database study

OBJECTIVES

Radiologically invasive non-small cell lung cancer, defined as consolidation size to maximum tumour diameter ratio of over 0.5, is associated with pathological invasiveness and worse prognosis. However, there are no real-world, nationwide database studies on limited resections that consider radiological invasiveness. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic validity of limited resection, such as segmentectomy and wedge resection, in cStage IA (TNM 8th edition) radiologically invasive lung cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent complete resection according to the Japanese Joint Committee of Lung Cancer Registry Database. The relationship between surgical procedures and prognosis was examined using stratification by cT factor and radiological invasiveness.

RESULTS

Among the 5,692 patients enrolled, lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection were performed in 4,323 (80.0%), 657 (11.5%), and 712 (12.5%) patients, respectively. Multivariable analysis with or without propensity score matching indicated that older age, poor performance status, and wedge resection were significantly associated with worse prognosis and that patients who underwent segmentectomy showed an equivalent prognosis to those who underwent lobectomy. Subset analyses revealed that segmentectomy showed an equivalent prognosis to lobectomy in patients with cT1b or less, but not in those with cT1c, especially for non-pure radiological invasive cT1c; 5-year overall survival rates were 91.4% vs 90.4% in cT1b with non-pure radiological invasiveness, and 80.0% vs 83.8% in cT1b with pure radiological invasiveness, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Segmentectomy can be an alternative to lobectomy in patients with radiologically invasive lung cancer with cT1b or less, but not in those with cT1c.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 3: systematic review of evidence regarding surgery in compromised patients or specific tumors

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options [lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), thermal ablation], weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection in older patients, patients with limited pulmonary reserve and favorable tumors is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons (NRCs) with adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

In older patients, perioperative mortality is minimally altered by resection extent and only slightly affected by increasing age; sublobar resection may slightly decrease morbidity. Long-term outcomes are worse after lesser resection; the difference is slightly attenuated with increasing age. Reported short-term outcomes are quite acceptable in (selected) patients with severely limited pulmonary reserve, not clearly altered by resection extent but substantially improved by a minimally invasive approach. Quality-of-life (QOL) and impact on pulmonary function hasn't been well studied, but there appears to be little difference by resection extent in older or compromised patients. Patient selection is paramount but not well defined. Ground-glass and screen-detected tumors exhibit favorable long-term outcomes regardless of resection extent; however solid tumors <1 cm are not a reliably favorable group.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding resection extent in compromised patients and favorable tumors with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation for a framework for individualized decision-making.

Lobectomy versus segmentectomy in patients with stage T (> 2 cm and ≤ 3 cm) N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching study

Background

The safety and effectiveness of lung segmentectomy in patients with early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We have therefore reviewed the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes of patients treated with lobectomy or segmentectomy for early T (> 2 and ≤ 3 cm) N0M0 NSCLC.

Methods

We obtained data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy between 2004 and 2015. To reduce bias and imbalances between the treatment groups, propensity score matching analysis was performed. We used Kaplan–Meier curves to estimate overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). We conducted univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to identify independent prognostic factors for OS and cancer-specific survival, and applied the Cox proportional hazards model to create forest plots.

Results

Before matching, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that patients who underwent lobectomy exhibited better OS (P < 0.001) and LCSS (P = 0.001) than patients who underwent segmentectomy. However, after matching, survival differences between the groups were not significant; OS (P = 0.434) and LCSS (P = 0.593). Regression analyses revealed that age and tumor grade were independent predictors of OS and LCSS (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Patients with stage T (> 2 and ≤ 3 cm) N0M0 NSCLC undergoing segmentectomy can obtain OS and LCSS similar to those obtained with lobectomy. Further studies are required considering the solid component effects and pathologic tumor types regarding segmentectomies. Additional long-term survival and outcome analyses should be conducted with larger cohorts.

Assessment of Treatment Strategies for Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients with Comorbidities

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients frequently have major comorbidities but there is scarce data regarding the impact of these conditions on management strategies. We used simulation modeling to compare different treatments for stage I NSCLC for patients with common major comorbidities.

METHODS

We used data on NSCLC patinet outcomes and quality of life from: (1) the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database linked to Medicare claims; (2) Kaiser Permanente Southern California electronic health records; and (3) SEER-Medical Health Outcomes Survey to parameterize a novel simulation model of management and outcomes for stage I NSCLC. Relative efficacy of treatment modalities (lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge resection and stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]) was collected from existing literature and combined using evidence synthesis methods. We then simulated multiple randomized trials comparing these treatments in a variety of scenarios, estimating quality adjusted life expectancy (QALE) according to age, tumor size, histologic subtype, and comorbidity status.

RESULTS

Lobectomy and segmentectomy yielded the greatest QALE gains among all simulated age, tumor size and comorbidity groups. Optimal treatment strategies differed by patient sex and age; wedge resection was among the optimal strategies for women aged 80-84 with tumors 0-2 cm in size. SBRT was included in some optimal strategies for patients aged 80-84 with multimorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

In simulated comparative trials of four common treatments for stage I NSCLC, aggressive surgical management was typically associated with the greatest projected QALE gains despite the presence of comorbidities, although less aggressive strategies were predicted to be non-inferior in some older comorbid patient groups.

Identification of Filigree Pattern Increases Diagnostic Accuracy of Micropapillary Pattern on Frozen Section for Lung Adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The presence of micropapillary (MIP) in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma was associated with a poorer prognosis, especially in patients undergoing sublobectomy. However, data on the sensitivity of frozen section (FS) evaluation of MIP was still limited. We included the concept of filigree pattern on FS to assess its effect on the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of MIP, and verify its prognostic value in stage T1 lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A panel of five pathologists evaluated 125 patients with T1 lung adenocarcinoma from January to February 2014 as a study cohort, and 151 patients from January to February 2020 as a validation cohort. The diagnostic accuracy of filigree and classical micropapillary (cMIP) pattern on FS was investigated.

RESULTS

Diagnostic sensitivity of MIP pattern on FS increased from 43.2% to 65.3% and 56.8% to 81.1% in the study cohort and validation cohort, and both with good specificity. Filigree not only increased the sensitivity of identifying MIP when absence of cMIP, but also increased the sensitivity when presence of minor amount of cMIP. The almost perfect agreement among five pathologists was reached on cMIP and substantial agreement was reached on the filigree in the two cohorts. Moreover, the cMIP and filigree were both correlated with poorer recurrence-free survival (p_cMIP = 0.003; p_filigree = 0.032) and overall survival (p_cMIP = 0.004; p_filigree = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Identification of filigree may improve the diagnostic sensitivity of MIP pattern on FS. FS was feasible for the detection of filigree and cMIP patterns in stage T1 lung adenocarcinomas.

The presenting dental status of solid tumours with bone metastases requiring bone-targeting agents - part 4: miscellaneous cancers

This article discusses relevant information for the dental sector regarding metastatic cancers beyond breast and prostate cancer. Typically, tumour sites such as lung, renal, colorectal, gastrointestinal, thyroid, hepatic and pancreatic cancers are increasingly being referred for bone-targeting agents upon evidence of bone metastases.The current article explores the presenting dental status of these tumour groups on the background of survival outcomes. In addition, the article provides insight towards the complexity in achieving 'dental fitness' and whether 'dental stability' could be an alternative to consider via palliative dentistry in certain cases.

Bibliometric Analysis of 50 Most Cited Articles Comparing Lobectomy with Sublobar Resection

BACKGROUND

 Recent years have seen an increase in the number of studies of the sublobar resection approach in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery. The purpose of this bibliometric analysis is to assess the significance and impact of articles comparing sublobar resection and lobectomy in NSCLC surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 The Web of Science database was searched to identify studies comparing sublobar resection and lobectomy in NSCLC surgery published between 2005 and 2020 (accessed: September 11, 2020). The 50 most cited articles were analyzed by years, countries, authors, authors' affiliations, journals, journals' addresses, and impact factors.

RESULTS

 The bibliometric analysis revealed that the most cited article had 443 citations, while the total number of citations of all articles was 2,820. The mean number of citations, in turn, was 56.4 ± 75.62 (1-443) times. The highest number of publications over the past 15 years was in 2016, with eight articles. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (n = 10; 20%) had the highest number of publications on the list. The articles included in the present study were mostly (n = 35, 70%) published in U.S. journals. While multiple subject matters and analyses were presented by many studies, survival was the topic of greatest interest, with 37 (74%) studies.

CONCLUSION

 This study revealed that interest in studies comparing sublobar resection with lobectomy has increased in recent years. It also presents both quantitative and qualitative analyses of the most cited articles in the literature on this topic. Therefore, it can serve as a guide for researchers.

Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Versus Sublobar Resection for pStage I Geriatric Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objectives

The choice of resection method for geriatric patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains contentious. This study aimed to evaluate survival and perioperative outcomes after thoracoscopic lobectomy resection (LR) or sublobar resection (SR) in patients aged ≥75 years with pathologic stage (pStage) I NSCLC.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively examined 258 consecutive patients aged ≥75 years with pStage I NSCLC who underwent thoracoscopic tumor resection at our institute from 2011 to 2018. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis identified 60 patients in each group for comparison of survival-related parameters, including disease-free survival (DFS), lung cancer-specific overall survival (OS), and non-lung cancer-specific OS, using the Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

LR and SR were performed in 84 (32.6%) and 174 (67.4%) patients aged ≥75 years, respectively. The LR group had younger patients, better performance status, larger tumor sizes, and deeper tumor location than the SR group. Multivariate studies showed that the resection method was not a prognostic factor for OS. The two PSM-matched groups were not significantly different with respect to lung cancer-specific OS (p = 0.116), non-lung cancer-specific OS (p = 0.408), and DFS (p = 0.597). SR helped achieve better perioperative outcomes than LR, including fewer postoperative complications (10.0% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.011), shorter operative times (p < 0.001), decreased blood loss (p = 0.026), and shorter chest tube duration (p = 0.010) and hospital stays (p = 0.035).

Conclusions

Thoracoscopic SR may provide similar oncological outcomes to LR, but may be a safer and more feasible surgical method for geriatric patients with pStage I NSCLC.

Trend of lung cancer surgery, hospital selection, and survival between 2005 and 2016 in South Korea

Background

Studies on the clinical implication of hospital selection for patients with lung cancer are few. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze 2005–2016 data from the Korean national database to assess annual trends of lung cancer surgery and clinical outcomes according to hospital selection.

Methods

Data of 212 554 patients with lung cancer who underwent upfront surgery were screened. Trends according to sex, age, residence, and income were examined. Descriptive statistics were performed, and p_trend values were estimated. The association between survival and hospital selection was assessed using the log‐rank test. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was also performed.

Results

A total of 49 021 patients were included in this study. Surgery was prevalent among men, patients aged 61–75 years, capital area residents, and high‐income patients. However, with the increasing rate of surgery among women, patients aged ≥76 years, city residents, and middle‐income patients, the current distribution of lung cancer surgery could change. The rate of lobectomy among these groups increased. All patients, except those in capital areas, preferred a hospital outside their area of residence (HOR); the number of patients with this tendency also increased. However, this trend was not observed among low‐income patients and those aged ≥76 years. There were significant differences in survival according to hospital selection.

Conclusions

The trend of lung cancer surgery is changing. The current medical system is effective in providing lobectomy for patients including women, aged ≥76 years, city residents, and middle‐income. Increasing tendency to choose an HOR requires further study.

Comparative analysis of the long-term outcomes of segmentectomy and lobectomy for stage IA1 lung adenocarcinoma in patients with or without previous malignancy of other organs: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

For early stage non-small cell lung cancer, whether limited resection can yield comparable outcomes to those of lobectomy hasn't been established. We compared Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) after segmentectomy or lobectomy in stage IA1 (≤10 mm) lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We retrospectively recruited patients who'd been diagnosed with lung cancer for the first time and treated with segmentectomy or lobectomy, with or without previous other malignancy.

RESULTS

1788 patients were included. After propensity score matching: 5-year OS were 85.6% for segmentectomy and 84.7% for lobectomy (p=0.951); 5-year LCSS were 93.5% for segmentectomy; and 93.0% for lobectomy (p=0.726). Cox regression analysis revealed segmentectomy was comparable to lobectomy in OS and LCSS. Having a second lung cancer later in life was associated with a worse LCSS for lobectomy (p<0.05) rather than segmentectomy. After patients were stratified according to malignancy history, subgroup analyses showed no significant prognosis differences between two surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

For stage IA1 LUAD patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer for the first time, with or without previous other malignancy, segmentectomy yields comparable outcomes to those of lobectomy. It may provide better outcomes for patients with multiple suspicious nodules.

Prognostic relevance of pleural invasion for resected NSCLC patients undergoing adjuvant treatments: A propensity score-matched analysis of SEER database

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a clear benefit in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with nodal disease (stages II-III), and a minimal benefit in tumors >4 cm (stage II, TNM 8th edition). Pleural invasion (PL), classified as visceral pleural invasion (VPI, which includes PL1 and PL2, and parietal pleural invasion (PL3), is an established negative prognostic factor. However, whether PL should influence the decisional algorithm of postoperative chemotherapy is controversial.

METHODS

A survival analysis of NSCLC patients who underwent radical surgery between 2010 and 2015 included in the SEER database was performed. Tumor stage and size, number of examined and positive nodes, histology, PL, and treatment data were extracted. Propensity score matching was performed. The benefit of chemotherapy was analyzed in two subgroups: standard of care (SOC), including patients with positive nodes or tumors ≥ 4 cm; non-SOC, including patients with tumors < 4 cm and negative nodes.

RESULTS

Records of 30,858 patients were extracted. 11,708 patients were included in the propensity score-matched analysis. In the SOC subgroup, including 8089 patients, all pleural invasion degrees were associated with progressively increased risk for death and shorter overall survival (OS), independently from chemotherapy administration. However, chemotherapy significantly improved the median OS regardless of the extent of PL. In the non-SOC subgroup, including 3619 patients, only PL3 was associated with increased mortality. The administration of chemotherapy did not improve survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy should be strongly recommended in patients in the SOC-subgroup with pleural invasion. VPI is not associated with unfavorable prognosis in the non-SOC subgroup.

The Role of Surgery in Lung Cancer Treatment: Present Indications and Future Perspectives-State of the Art

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are different today, due to the increased use of screening programs and of innovative systemic therapies, leading to the diagnosis of earlier and pre-invasive tumors, and of more advanced and controlled metastatic tumors. Surgery for NSCLC remains the cornerstone treatment when it can be performed. The role of surgery and surgeons has also evolved because surgeons not only perform the initial curative lung cancer resection but they also accompany and follow-up patients from pre-operative rehabilitation, to treatment for recurrences. Surgery is personalized, according to cancer characteristics, including cancer extensions, from pre-invasive and local tumors to locally advanced, metastatic disease, or residual disease after medical treatment, anticipating recurrences, and patients' characteristics. Surgical management is constantly evolving to offer the best oncologic resection adapted to each NSCLC stage. Today, NSCLC can be considered as a chronic disease and surgery is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and treatment of recurrences, and in palliative conditions to relieve dyspnea and improve patients' comfort.

Lobectomy Can Improve the Survival of Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Lung Oligometastatic

Background: This study was to evaluate the value of lobectomy in the prognosis of Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with primary metastasis based on the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: This was a population-based retrospective study and the clinical data were collected from the National Cancer Institute's SEER database between 2010 and 2015. The effects of pulmonary surgery and surgical procedures on lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed, and the COX regression models were employed to evaluate the survival of primary surgery in patients with primary metastatic NSCLC (pmNSCLC) and the survival of surgical procedure in pmNSCLC patients. Results: A total of 55,717 patients diagnosed with pmNSCLC between 2010 and 2015 were enrolled, and pulmonary surgery was indicated in 1,575 (2.83%) patients. Surgery was an independent risk factor for LCSS (P < 0.001, HR 0.658, 95%CI: 0.637-0.680) and OS (P < 0.001, HR 0.665, 95%CI: 0.644-0.686) of pmNSCLC patients. The surgery was associated with better OS (P < 0.001, HR 0.678, 95%CI: 0.657-0.699). The site of metastasis was also related to the survival after primary tumor surgery (P = 0.001). As compared to the sublobectomy and pneumonectomy, lobectomy improved the LCSS for NSCLC patients with single-organ metastasis, rather than multiple metastases (P < 0.001). In patients receiving sublobectomy, lobectomy, and pneumonectomy, the median LCSS was 12, 28, and 13 months, respectively, and the 5-year LCSS rate was 14.39, 32.06, and 17.24%, respectively. Conclusion: The effect of locoregional surgery on the survival of pmNSCLC patients with single-organ metastasis has been underestimated, and lobectomy may be a preferred treatment for patients with single-lung metastasis.

Survival Outcomes of Lobectomy Versus Segmentectomy in Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The gold standard surgical therapy for patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection. Meanwhile, segmentectomy has emerged as an alternative choice with the advantage of fewer postoperative complications. The acceptance of this procedure remains controversial, and conflicting results exist in the retrospective trials.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this meta-analysis was to analyze the survival outcomes of lobectomy versus segmentectomy in clinical stage I NSCLC.

METHODS

A computerized literature search was done on published trials in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to June 2019 to identify clinical trials. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) were measured as outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed in the Meta-analysis Revman 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A systematic literature search was conducted including seven studies. In this meta-analysis, the LCSS and OS in the lobectomy group were linked to a markedly lower trend in comparison to the segmentectomy group without significant statistical difference (P > 0.05), indicating that lobectomy confers an equivalent survival outcome compared with segmentectomy.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found in survival outcomes between lobectomy and segmentectomy. Further large-scale, prospective, randomized trials are needed to explore reasonable surgical treatments for early-stage lung cancer.

Clinical significance of intrapulmonary lymph node dissection in pathological stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity score matching analysis

Background

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of intrapulmonary lymph node (ILN, stations 13–14) dissection on disease‐free survival (DFS) in stage IA non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in order to facilitate a more suitable determination of surgical strategies for early‐stage cases.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 416 patients with pathological stage IA NSCLC from February 2016 to November 2019. The patients were divided into a group with ILN dissection (ILN^D+ group) and a group without ILN dissection (ILN^D‐ group). DFS was compared using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared statistically using the log‐rank test before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Subgroup analysis of DFS stratified based on tumor size was also calculated.

Results

Both before and after PSM, the four‐year DFS of the ILN^D+ group was greatly increased compared to that of ILN^D‐ group (90.1% vs. 79.7%, p = 0.003; 95.5% vs. 80.6%, p = 0.003, respectively) and multivariable cox regression analysis revealed ILN dissection was an independent factor favoring DFS in stage IA NSCLC (p = 0.016 and p = 0.015, respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed the four‐year DFS was comparable between the ILN ^D+ and ILN^D‐ groups with regard to tumor size ≤1.5 cm (90.6% vs. 92.7%, p = 0.715). However, the ILN ^D+ group was found to have a better oncological outcome compared with the ILN^D‐ group with regard to tumor size >1.5 cm (90.0% vs. 73.8%, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

The prognostic impact of ILN dissection on patients with stage IA NSCLC appears to be significantly influenced by tumor size, and this should be taken into account when choosing the most appropriate therapeutic modality.

Predictors of upstage and treatment strategies for stage IA lung cancers after sublobar resection for adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma

Background

Invasive adenocarcinoma intraoperatively underestimated as adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) based on frozen section (FS) is more likely to undergo insufficient resection. We aimed to investigate the predictors of upstage and treatment strategies for stage IA invasive adenocarcinoma after sublobar resection for AIS and MIA.

Methods

We identified 2,006 patients from January 2012 to December 2016 with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma who underwent sublobar resection based on FS diagnosis to guide surgical decision-making. All FS were categorized into three groups in real-time: (I) atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), (II) AIS, and (III) MIA.

Results

A total of 272 (13.5%, 272/2,006) cases were upstaged in the final pathology (FP) diagnosis (82 AAH to AIS, 127 AIS to MIA, and nine AIS and 54 MIA to invasive adenocarcinoma), and most upstage cases (64.3%, 175/272) were attributed to sampling error. Multivariate logistic regression showed that tumor size ≥1 cm was the only independent predictor of upstage. The upstage of 209 cases to AIS or MIA had no influence on the therapy because the extent of their resection was enough. Of the 63 cases upstaged to invasive adenocarcinoma, only 13 cases agreed to receive complementary treatment: five patients underwent complementary lobectomy, and seven patients received chemotherapy. Two invasive adenocarcinoma cases without complementary treatment experienced a local recurrence after surgery. No recurrence was observed in AAH, AIS and MIA. No patient died until December 01, 2019.

Conclusions

Timely complementary treatment is encouraged in AIS/MIA upstaged to invasive adenocarcinoma based on the FP after sublobar resection to avoid local recurrence. Pathologists should be more cautious about AIS and MIA with tumor size ≥1 cm to avoid underestimation and potentially insufficient resection.

Surgical modality for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer among the elderly: analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

Background

The appropriate surgical modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among the elderly remains controversial; identifying appropriate modalities will be helpful in clinical practice.

Methods

It's a cohort study and we explored the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for identifying patients aged ≥70 years with pathologic stage IA NSCLC. Three types of surgeries were compared (lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection) via survival and stratification analyses.

Results

Overall, 6,197 patients were enrolled. Among patients aged ≥76 years with tumor diameters ≤1 cm, significant differences in survival were noted for segmentectomy vs. lobectomy [hazard ratio (HR) =0.294, P=0.007] and wedge resection vs. lobectomy (HR =0.548, P=0.017) but not in those with tumors diameters >1 cm. Among patients aged 70-75 years with tumor diameters >1-2 cm, significant differences in survival were observed for segmentectomy vs. lobectomy (HR =0.671, P=0.037) and segmentectomy vs. wedge resection (HR =0.556, P=0.003) and for wedge resection vs. lobectomy (HR =1.283, P=0.003) among those with tumor diameters >2-3 cm but not in those with tumor diameters ≤1 cm.

Conclusions

Both age and tumor size should be considered when selecting the surgical modality. Lobectomy is not recommended for lesions ≤1 cm among patients aged ≥76 years. Segmentectomy was associated with superior prognosis for tumor diameters >1-2 cm and survival favored lobectomy rather than wedge resection for NSCLCs >2-3 cm among patients aged 70-75 years. Surgeons could rely on personal experience to determine the appropriate surgical modality for NSCLCs >1 cm among patients aged ≥76 years and NSCLCs ≤1 cm among patients aged 70-75 years.

Comparison of sublobar resection and lobectomy for patients with small (≤2cm) second primary non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate whether sublobar resection (SR) is equivalent to lobectomy for small (≤ 2 cm) second primary lung cancer (SPLC).

METHODS

We identified 834 patients with T1aN0M0 SPLC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 2000-2016. Overall survival (OS) was compared between lobectomy and SR after propensity-score matching. A total of 228 patients with SPLC were identified from three institutions in China as the validation set.

RESULTS

SR was an independent risk factor for patients with 1 to 2 cm SPLC (SR vs Lob: hazard ratio [HR], 1.593; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.186-2.141; P = .002) but not for patients with SPLC ≤ 1 cm (SR vs Lob: HR, 1.206; 95% CI, 0.790-1.841; P = .385). Subgroup analysis on the SEER data indicated that OS favored lobectomy compared with SR for contralateral SPLC ≤ 2 cm but not for ipsilateral ones (ipsilateral: P = .692; contralateral: P = .030). Our multi-institutional data also revealed that SR was equivalent to lobectomy for patients with ≤2 cm ipsilateral SPLC.

CONCLUSIONS

SR is equivalent to lobectomy for SPLC ≤ 1 cm but not for SPLC > 1 to 2 cm. SR might be recommended for patients with ipsilateral small SPLC considering the difficulty in reoperations.

CT-Based Deep Learning Model for Invasiveness Classification and Micropapillary Pattern Prediction Within Lung Adenocarcinoma

Objective: Identification of tumor invasiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinomas before surgery is one of the most important guides to surgical planning. Additionally, preoperative diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary patterns is also critical for clinical decision making. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of deep learning models on classifying invasiveness degree and attempted to predict the micropapillary pattern in lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods: The records of 291 histopathologically confirmed lung adenocarcinoma patients were retrospectively analyzed and consisted of 61 adenocarcinoma in situ, 80 minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, 117 invasive adenocarcinoma, and 33 invasive adenocarcinoma with micropapillary components (>5%). We constructed two diagnostic models, the Lung-DL model and the Dense model, based on the LeNet and the DenseNet architecture, respectively.

Results: For distinguishing the nodule invasiveness degree, the area under the curve (AUC) value of the diagnosis with the Lung-DL model is 0.88 and that with the Dense model is 0.86. In the prediction of the micropapillary pattern, overall accuracies of 92 and 72.91% were obtained for the Lung-DL model and the Dense model, respectively.

Conclusion: Deep learning was successfully used for the invasiveness classification of pulmonary adenocarcinomas. This is also the first time that deep learning techniques have been used to predict micropapillary patterns. Both tasks can increase efficiency and assist in the creation of precise individualized treatment plans.

The rates of second lung cancers and the survival of surgically-resected second primary lung cancers in patients undergoing resection of an initial primary lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The Lung Cancer Screening Trial demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and lung cancer specific survival (LCSS), likely due to finding early-stage NSCLC. The purpose of our investigation is to evaluate whether long-term surveillance strategies (4+ years after surgical resection of the initial lung cancer(1LC)) would be beneficial in NSCLC patients by assessing the rates of second lung cancers(2LC) and the OS/LCSS in patients undergoing definitive surgery in 1LC as compared to 2LC (>48 months after 1LC) populations.

METHODS

SEER13/18 database was reviewed for patients during 1998-2013. Log-rank tests were used to determine the OS/LCSS differences between the 1LC and 2LC in the entire surgical group(EG) and in those having an early-stage resectable tumors (ESR, tumors <4 cm, node negative). Joinpoint analysis was used to determine rates of second cancers 4-10 year after 1LC using SEER-9 during years 1985-2014.

RESULTS

The rate of 2LCs was significantly less than all other second cancers until 2001 when the incidence of 2LCs increased sharply and became significantly greater than all other second cancers in females starting in year 2005 and in men starting in year 2010. OS/LCSS, adjusted for propensity score by using inverse probability weighting, demonstrated similar OS, but worse LCSS for 2LCs in the EG, but similar OS/LCSSs in the ESR group.

CONCLUSION

Because the rate of 2LCs are increasing and because the OS/LCSS of the 1LC and 2LC are similar in early-stage lesions, we feel that continued surveillance of patients in order to find early-stage disease may be beneficial.

Procedure-specific prognostic impact of micropapillary subtype may guide resection strategy in small-sized lung adenocarcinomas: a multicenter study

Background:

Limited resection has gradually become an acceptable treatment for lung adenocarcinomas (ADCs) presenting as ground-glass nodules (GGNs). However, its role in lung ADCs presenting as pure solid nodules (PSN) remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to identify potential candidates for limited resection in lung ADCs presenting as PSN.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed 772 patients from seven hospitals with lung ADCs ⩽2 cm, presenting as PSN on computed tomography scans, who had undergone surgery between 2009 and 2013. Histological subtypes were listed in 5% increments. To investigate the value of histological subtypes in surgical decision making, five pathologists prospectively evaluated the feasibility of identifying histological subtypes using frozen section (FS) in two cohorts.

Results:

The percentage of micropapillary (MIP) subtype had a striking impact on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for lung ADCs ⩽2 cm presenting as PSNs. In multivariable Cox analysis, segmentectomy was significantly associated with worse RFS and OS in patients with MIP >5% than lobectomy, but not in those with MIP ⩽5%. With wedge resection, worse RFS and OS were observed in patients with MIP >5% and those with MIP ⩽5% than lobectomy. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting MIP by FS were 74.2% and 85.6%, respectively, with substantial inter-rater agreement.

Conclusion:

Segmentectomy and lobectomy had similar oncological outcomes in patients with lung ADCs ⩽2 cm presenting as PSN with MIP ⩽5%. Randomized trials are necessary to validate the feasibility of intraoperative FS to choose candidates for segmentectomy.

Postoperative complications of pulmonary resection

Thoracic surgery has seen a resurgence in recent years with increasing numbers of cases taken on since the mid-2000s. There has been a paradigm shift in how we manage lung cancer with more emphasis on surgical resection, and this has been aided by minimally invasive video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) techniques. As a result, the prevalence of postoperative findings and complications is also increasing, and it is increasingly important for the general radiologist to recognise and diagnose these conditions as thoracic surgical patients may present acutely to non-thoracic surgical institutions. This review will cover both the early and late complications following a variety of lung resection surgeries.

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non-small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.

Prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy on outcomes of sublobar resection for non-small cell lung cancer ≤1 or >1 to 2 cm

Background

Lymphadenectomy is an important part of surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the prognostic impact of lymph node (LN) dissection for patients with NSCLC ≤1 and >1 to 2 cm who underwent sublobar resection is still unclear.

Methods

A group of patients numbering 7,627 with NSCLC 2 cm or less who underwent sublobar resection were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between January 2010 and November 2015. The overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were evaluated among patients who had undergone dissection of ≥4 LNs, 1 to 3 LNs or who had no-LN dissection; log-rank and Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were used for the evaluation.

Results

Patients with NSCLC ≤2 cm who underwent ≥4 LNs dissection had better OS and LCSS compared with those who underwent dissection of 1 to 3 LNs or who had no-LN dissection after sublobar resection. Subgroup analysis showed that dissection of ≥4 LNs had better OS and LCSS than those of 1 to 3 LNs dissection in NSCLC >1 to 2 cm, whereas had similar OS and LCSS in NSCLC ≤1 cm. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that dissection of 1 to 3 LNs was not an independent risk factor of OS and LCSS than dissection of ≥4 LNs in NSCLC ≤1 cm after sublobar resection.

Conclusions

The extent of LN dissection is associated with the survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC ≤2 cm after sublobar resection. Dissection of ≥4 LNs should be recommended for NSCLC >1 to 2 cm, whereas surgeons can rely on surgical skills and patient profiles to decide ≥4 LNs or 1 to 3 LNs dissection for NSCLC ≤1 cm during sublobar resection.

Diagnosis and treatment of early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: The 2019 AIOM (Italian Association of Medical Oncology) clinical practice guidelines

The Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with early and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In the current paper a panel of AIOM experts in the field of thoracic malignancies discussed these topics, analyzing available scientific evidences, with the final aim of providing a summary of clinical recommendations, which may guide physicians in their current practice.

Oncologic outcomes of segmentectomy vs lobectomy in pathologic stage IA (≤2 cm) invasive lung adenocarcinoma: A population-based study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

For early-stage invasive lung adenocarcinoma, it remains unclear whether segmentectomy can yield outcomes equivalent to those of lobectomy. This study aimed to compare survival outcomes after segmentectomy and lobectomy among patients with stage IA invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

We identified patients with stage IA (≤2 cm) invasive lung adenocarcinoma who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2015). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

A total of 5474 patients were included. Before PSM, the 5-year OS was 78.3% for patients undergoing lobectomy vs 76.5% for patients undergoing segmentectomy (P = .166) while LCSS were 86.8% vs 83.0% (P = .015). After PSM, survival analyses showed that segmentectomy had OS (75.8% vs 76.4%; P = .694) and LCSS (82.7% vs 82.9%; P = .604) equivalent to those of lobectomy. Cox regression demonstrated that segmentectomy was equivalent to lobectomy in terms of OS and LCSS before and after PSM.

CONCLUSION

For stage IA (≤2 cm) invasive lung adenocarcinoma, segmentectomy may have oncologic outcomes equivalent to those of lobectomy.

Clinical significance of PET/CT uptake for peripheral clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

In this cohort study, we determined the clinical value of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary tumors in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Study Design

A retrospective review of NSCLC patients was performed from January 2011 to December 2017. Peripheral cN0 NSCLC patients with tumor size ≤2 cm were included. SUVmax was calculated as a continuous variable for semiquantitative analyses. A receiver operating characteristic curve was analyzed to assess the cutoff threshold of SUVmax on pathological (p) nodal metastasis. We further evaluated the clinical relevance of SUVmax in peripheral cN0 NSCLC patients.

Results

A total of 670 peripheral NSCLC patients with tumor size ≤2 cm were deemed cN0 by preoperative PET/CT scan. Statistical analyses suggested significant correlations of SUVmax with smoking status (P = .026), tumor volume (P = .001), pathology type (P = .008), tumor differentiation (P < .001), vessel invasion (P = .001), plural invasion (P < .001), pT stage (P < .001), nodal involvement (P < .001), and pathological tumor node metastasis stage (P < .001). A cutoff point of SUVmax of 3.8 (P < .001) could be used to predict pathological nodal metastasis. Multivariable analyses indicated that preoperative SUVmax >3.8 (odds ratio, 12.149; P < .001) was an independent predictor of nodal metastasis. Overall survival analyses further suggested that SUVmax was an independent prognostic indicator (hazard ratio, 2.050; P = .017).

Conclusion

Preoperative SUVmax is a predictor of pathological nodal metastasis and prognosis for peripheral cN0 NSCLC patients with tumor size ≤2 cm. Our results indicate that assessment of PET SUVmax could improve stratification of these patients.

Surgical Choice for Clinical Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: View From Regional Lymph Node Metastasis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the pattern of regional lymph node (LN) metastasis of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to provide novel rationale for surgical choice (lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection) for these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinical data of patients undergoing lobectomy with systematic mediastinal LN dissection or sampling for cT1N0M0 peripheral NSCLC from January 2015 to December 2018. The regional LN metastasis pattern was analyzed based on tumor size.

RESULTS

We included a total of 354 patients for analysis. The rate of hilar or intrapulmonary LN metastasis was 13.6%. When stratified by tumor size, NSCLC less than or equal to 1 cm had no hilar or intrapulmonary LN metastasis (0%) while NSCLC greater than 2 cm but less than or equal to 3 cm had a significantly high rate of hilar or intrapulmonary LN metastasis (18.4%) and the rates of hilar, interlobar, and peripheral LN metastasis were also relatively high (5.4%, 5.4%, and 12.2%, respectively). NSCLC greater than 1.5 cm but less than or equal to 2 cm also had relatively high rates of hilar (6.5%) and peripheral (18.3%) LN metastasis, while NSCLC greater than 1 cm but less than or equal to 1.5 cm had significantly low rates of hilar or intrapulmonary (2.5%) and peripheral (2.5%) LN metastasis. Radiographic feature and histology were found to be independent predictors of regional LN metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

The pattern of regional LN metastasis in clinical stage IA peripheral NSCLC was significantly influenced by tumor size, which may provide evidence on surgical choice (lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection) for these early-stage NSCLC patients based on tumor size.

Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery subsegmentectomy: The learning curve and initial outcome

BACKGROUND

We report initial surgical results and learning process of single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) subsegmentectomy in comparison with segmentectomy in our institution as the presentative of minimal invasiveness and precise resection for early stage lung cancer.

METHODS

All patients undergoing single-port VATS sublobar anatomic resection between January 2014 and December 2018 for clinical diagnosis of lung cancer were included. The learning curve was analyzed using the cumulative summation (CUSUM) method. Comparisons were done between those who underwent single-port VATS subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 364 patients underwent single-port VATS segmentectomy and 91 patients underwent single-port VATS subsegmentectomy were included. Lung adenocarcinoma was the most common (61.1%) diagnosis. The operative time and blood loss in the subsegmentectomy group were less than the segmentectomy group. The incidence of intraoperative complication was also lower in the subsegmentectomy group. The surgical proficiency was reached at 28 cases in single-port VATS subsegmentectomy. For primary lung cancer, the tumor size in subsegmentectomy group was smaller than segmentectomy group (1.1 cm versus 1.4 cm, p = 0.026). The resection margin was smaller in subsegmentectomy group, and both groups reached adequate margin without significant difference (94.7% versus 95.5%, p = 0.737). During the follow-up period, 2 (3.5%) patients in subsegmentectomy group and 9 (4.1%) patients in segmentectomy group developed distant metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Single-port VATS subsegmentectomy is safe and feasible for small-sized lung lesion, providing the benefit of minimal invasiveness, preservation of pulmonary function, and clearance of lymphatic drainage at the intersegmental plane. The surgical proficiency could be achieved based on the experiences in single-port VATS segmentectomy.

[A Review on Comparison of Lobectomy and Segmentectomy in the Treatment of Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Lung cancer is a worldwide malignancy with high morbidity and mortality in the world. With the application of low-dose spiral computed tomography in the screening and diagnosis of lung cancer, more lung cancers are detected at an early stage and cured by surgical treatment. Anatomical lobectomy has long been the standard procedure for the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, whether intentional segmentectomy can be more used remains controversial. And this paper focuses on the question.
.

Enhancement of diagnostic performance in lung cancers by combining CEA and CA125 with autoantibodies detection

Objectives: Although low-dose computed tomography has been confirmed to have meaningful diagnostic utility, lung cancer is still the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for both genders worldwide. Thus, a novel panel with a stronger diagnostic performance for lung cancer is needed. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a new panel in lung cancer diagnosis.

Materials and Methods: The serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and seven autoantibodies were measured and statistically analyzed in samples from healthy controls and patients with lung cancer. The 316 candidates enrolled in this study were randomly assigned into two groups for the training and validation of a diagnostic panel.

Results: An optimal panel with four biomarkers (CEA, CA125, Annexin A1-Ab, and Alpha enolase-Ab) was established, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.897, a sensitivity of 86.5%, a specificity of 82.3%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 88.3%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.7%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 84.8% for the training group. The panel was validated, with an AUC of 0.856 and a sensitivity of 87.5% for the validation group. Furthermore, the new panel performed significantly better in lung cancer screening than did CEA and CA125 in all of the cohorts (p< .05).

Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of CEA and CA125 was significantly enhanced through their combination with two autoantibodies (Annexin A1-Ab, and Alpha enolase-Ab). Optimization of the measured autoantibodies is critical for generating a panel to detect lung cancer in patients.

Sublobar resection is associated with better perioperative outcomes in elderly patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Sublobar resection has emerged as an alternative to lobectomy for management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, controversy remains as to whether it is adequate for elderly patients. The present study aimed to comparatively study the perioperative outcomes and overall survival of sublobar resection vs. lobectomy for management of elderly patients (≥65 years) with clinical stage I NSCLC.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Clinical stage I NSCLC patients who underwent lobar or sublobar resection (segmentectomy and wedge resection) at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of 10 tertiary hospitals between January 2014 and September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed from the national collaborative prospective lung cancer database (LinkDoc Technology Co, Ltd., Beijing, China). Clinical data on demographic and tumor characteristics, surgical details were collected. Perioperative outcomes and overall survival were analyzed by using propensity score matching to adjust for selection bias. Subgroup analysis was further carried out to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Among the 1,579 eligible patients, 1,164 (73.7%) underwent lobectomy and 415 (26.3%) underwent sublobar resection (106 segmentectomy and 309 wedge resection). Sublobar resection was more frequently performed in patients who were elder, had more comorbidities and smaller, left-sided adenocarcinoma (P<0.001). Propensity-matched analysis showed significant association of sublobar resection with less blood loss, shorter operation time, chest drainage and hospital stay, while with less lymph node removal when compared with lobectomy (P<0.001). Short term survival analysis showed comparable results even after adjusted in the matched analysis. Similar results were obtained when limiting patients to those aged >75 years, at pathologic stage I, and those who smoking or undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or segmentectomy and lobectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Sublobar resection was associated with significantly better perioperative outcomes without compromising short term survival in elderly patients with clinical stage I NSCLC. However, the importance of patient selection and management process, as well as accurate lymph node staging must be acknowledged when making the surgical decision (clinical registration number: NCT03429673).

Treatment strategy and decision-making for elderly surgical candidates with early lung cancer

Among elderly cancer patients of the same chronological age, there is a wide range of heterogeneity in their ability to tolerate surgery. When an elderly patient comes to a thoracic surgeon, the surgeon first considers how healthy the patient is. If the patient looks healthy or in fit condition, the surgeon offers lobectomy plus mediastinal lymph node dissection. On the other hand, if the patient looks frail, the surgeon may offer, instead of a standard treatment, lobectomy without lymph node dissection, sublobar resection, or radiotherapy or may not offer any kind of treatment. This review was conducted to obtain an overview of these options and compare the treatment outcomes reported in the literature for the purpose of making a good decision for elderly surgical candidates with early lung cancer.

A Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival of TNM 8th Edition Stage I Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Models for predicting the survival outcomes of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) defined by the newly released 8th edition TNM staging system are scarce. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for predicting the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of these patients and identifying individuals with a higher risk for CSS.

METHODS

A total of 30,475 NSCLC cases were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We identified and integrated the risk factors to build a nomogram. The model was subjected to bootstrap internal validation with the SEER database, and external validation with a multicenter cohort of 1133 patients from China. The difference in the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on model-defined high- and low-risk patients was examined using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

RESULTS

Eight independent prognostic factors were identified and integrated into the model. The calibration curves showed good agreement. The concordance index (C-index) of the nomogram was higher than that of the staging system (IA1, IA2, IA3, and IB) (internal validation set 0.63 vs. 0.56; external validation set 0.66 vs. 0.55; both p < 0.01). Specifically, 21.7% of stage IB patients (7.5% of all stage I) were categorized into the high-risk group (score > 30). There was a significant interaction effect between the adjuvant chemotherapy and risk groups in the NCDB cohort (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

We established a practical nomogram to predict CSS for 8th edition stage I NSCLC. A prospective study is warranted to determine its role in identifying adjuvant chemotherapy candidates.

Big data, big contributions: outcomes research in thoracic surgery

In recent years, analysis of registry data has defined clinically significant practice patterns and treatment strategies that optimize cancer care for thoracic surgery patients. These higher-order outcome studies rely on large patient cohorts that minimize the risk of selection bias and allow for a powered analysis that is not achievable with single- or multi-institutional data. This review uses recent study examples to highlight important contributions to our knowledge of thoracic surgery and describes how outcomes research using large data can address high impact clinical questions.