1
|
Lammers SWM, Geurts SME, Hermans KEPE, van Hellemond IEG, Swinkels ACP, Smorenburg CH, van der Sangen MJC, Kroep JR, Honkoop AH, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, de Roos WK, Imholz ALT, Vriens IJH, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Ovarian function recovery in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant anastrozole treatment: updated results from the phase 3 DATA trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07411-w. [PMID: 38940981 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07411-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure (CIOFF) may experience ovarian function recovery (OFR). Earlier, we showed that OFR during treatment with anastrozole impacted the prognosis of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) patients with CIOFF. Here, we present the long-term follow-up results. METHODS Postmenopausal women with HR+ BC who were 45-57 years of age and received chemotherapy were identified from the phase 3 DATA study (NCT00301457) on the extended use of anastrozole. Eligible patients were categorised into two groups: patients with CIOFF and definitely postmenopausal patients. Patients with CIOFF were monitored for OFR. Disease-free survival (DFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with OFR and patients without OFR using multivariable Cox regression analyses, including OFR as a time-dependent covariate. BC-specific mortality (BCSM) was compared between groups using the Fine and Gray method. RESULTS This study included 656 patients: 395 patients with CIOFF and 261 definitely postmenopausal patients. OFR occurred in 39 (12%) of 329 patients with CIOFF who were monitored for OFR. The median follow-up time was 13.3 years. Patients with OFR experienced a deterioration in DFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-2.81), DRFS (HR = 1.51; 95% CI 0.73-3.11), OS (HR = 1.64; 95% CI 0.75-3.55), and BCSM (subdistribution HR = 1.98; 95% CI 0.84-4.63) when compared with patients without OFR. CONCLUSION In patients with CIOFF, OFR during treatment with anastrozole was associated with a deterioration in BC outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of adequate ovarian function suppression in this subgroup of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senna W M Lammers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra M E Geurts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Karlijn E P E Hermans
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Astrid C P Swinkels
- Clinical Research Department, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Carolien H Smorenburg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Judith R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Aafke H Honkoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | - Wilfred K de Roos
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ingeborg J H Vriens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Müller V, Fasching PA, Nabieva N, Fehm TN, Thill M, Schmidt M, Kühn T, Banys-Paluchowski M, Belleville E, Juhasz-Böss I, Untch M, Kolberg HC, Harbeck N, Aktas B, Stickeler E, Kreuzeder J, Hartkopf AD, Janni W, Ditsch N. Systemic Therapy of Premenopausal Patients with Early Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer - Controversies and Standards in Healthcare. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:673-685. [PMID: 37614683 PMCID: PMC10442909 DOI: 10.1055/a-2073-1887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
In patients with existing ovarian function, there are some special aspects to adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR pos./HER2 neg.) breast cancer. Treatment options include tamoxifen with or without a GnRH analog, and aromatase inhibitors with a GnRH analog. Furthermore, ovarian function is affected by previous chemotherapy. Both aromatase inhibitors (+GnRH analogs) and GnRH analogs in combination with tamoxifen are supposed to be indicated for patients at increased risk of recurrence. However, national and international guidelines and therapy recommendations do not provide a clear definition of intermediate or high risk; as a result, therapy decisions are often made for each patient on an individual basis. This is also reflected in the considerable variability at national and international levels, e.g., with regard to the use of aromatase inhibitors + GnRH analogs. This review summarizes the data on completed studies (e.g., SOFT, TEXT, EBCTCG meta-analyses) and the current multigene testing studies (TailorX, RxPonder, ADAPT), discusses the rationale for current studies (e.g., CLEAR-B), and looks ahead to future questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | | | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | | | | | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, München, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf), University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The benefit from removing ovaries to control premenopausal breast cancer growth was identified more than 100 years ago. Subsequent identification of estrogen receptor (ER) enabled targeting of this approach. Development of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists facilitated a reversible method of ovarian function suppression, suitable for young women with early breast cancer. Clinical trials have established the value of including ovarian suppression to reduce recurrence of ER-positive premenopausal early breast cancer. Ovarian suppression administered with chemotherapy can reduce the risk of premature menopause in ER-negative cancer, and increase the prospect of future pregnancy in premenopausal women, regardless of tumor hormone receptor status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prudence A Francis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Univeristy of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; St Vincent's Hopsital Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Van Houdt M, Han SN, Pauwels S, Billen J, Neven P. Measurable Serum Estradiol and Estrone in Women 36-56 Years During Adjuvant Treatment With Aromatase Inhibitors for a Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Case Studies and Cross-sectional Study Using an Ultra-sensitive LC-MS/MS-Method. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:84-90. [PMID: 36376236 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Ovarian function recovery (OFR) during adjuvant use of an aromatase inhibitor (AI) negatively impacts breast cancer outcome. We measured serum FSH and estrogen levels in consecutive AI-users with an uncertain menopausal status during follow-up and report associated risk factors of OFR METHODS: A retrospective cross sectional observational monocentric study including breast cancer patients in follow-up using an adjuvant AI, age 36 to 56 years, with at least one serum estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1) measurement between 2013 and 2020. Estrogens were quantified using a sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method (LC-MS/MS). Women on LHRH agonist were included while those with a bilateral oophorectomy or ovarian irradiation were not. We aimed to identify risk factors of OFR considering age, body mass index (BMI), previous chemotherapy and duration of AI use. Univariable analysis was used to evaluate risk factors of OFR. RESULTS E2/E1 levels were assessed in 207 patients with a median age of 50 years (range 36-56). 17 of 159 on AI (10.7%) and 3 of 48 on AI + LHRH (6.3%) had OFR. Seven out of 17 patients (41,2%) with OFR in the AI only group and 2 out of 3 patients (66,7%) in the AI+LHRH agonist group were in amenorrhea. Age <50 y and adjuvant chemotherapy were statistically significantly different between the OFR group and the group with postmenopausal estrogen levels. CONCLUSION Breast cancer patients aged 36 to56 years need to be monitored closely during adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors: to confirm menopausal status, to evaluate compliance and to ensure ovarian activity remains adequately suppressed. Estrone might be a better marker then estradiol to detect ovarian reactivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Van Houdt
- Gynecology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven.
| | - S N Han
- Gynecology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven; Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven
| | - S Pauwels
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven
| | - J Billen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven
| | - P Neven
- Gynecology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven; Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dackus GM, Jóźwiak K, Sonke GS, van der Wall E, van Diest PJ, Siesling S, Hauptmann M, Linn SC. Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitors or Tamoxifen following Chemotherapy for Perimenopausal Breast Cancer Patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1506-1514. [PMID: 34101806 PMCID: PMC8562974 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The benefit of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AI) vs tamoxifen has been investigated in randomized clinical trials for premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with early, estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer. The optimal endocrine treatment for chemotherapy-treated perimenopausal women, who generally develop chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea, is uncertain. Methods All Dutch women who received adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine treatment for stage I-III, ER+ (>10% positive cells), invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2007 were identified through the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Included women were considered perimenopausal based on an age at diagnosis of 45 to 50 years (n = 2295). For each patient, AI treatment duration relative to total endocrine treatment duration was calculated. Predominantly tamoxifen-treated patients (AI < 25%) were compared with those receiving AI and tamoxifen for a similar duration (AI 25%-75%) and those mostly using AI (AI > 75%). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival were calculated using time-dependent Cox regression. Results After an average follow-up of 7.6 years, 377 RFS events occurred. Women mostly receiving AI (AI > 75%) had the best RFS (adjusted HR = 0.63, 95% confidence interval = 0.46 to 0.86) followed by those receiving AI 25% to 75% (adjusted HR = 0.85, 95% confidence interval = 0.65 to 1.12) compared with predominantly tamoxifen-treated women. Trend analyses showed that every 10% increase in AI-endocrine treatment ratio reduced RFS event risk by 5% (2-sided Ptrend = .002). In total, 236 deaths occurred; hazard ratios for overall survival showed similar trends. Conclusions These results suggest that the best adjuvant endocrine treatment for chemotherapy-treated, ER+ breast cancer patients diagnosed aged 45-50 years consists of mainly AI followed by a switch strategy and mainly tamoxifen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwen Mhe Dackus
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Haus O, Fehrbelliner Straße 38, 16816, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elsken van der Wall
- Division Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511DT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology & Services Research (HTSR), University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Haus O, Fehrbelliner Straße 38, 16816, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rousset-Jablonski C. [How to diagnose menopause? Postmenopausal women management: CNGOF and GEMVi clinical practice guidelines]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2021; 49:318-328. [PMID: 33867317 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The diagnosis of menopause is sometimes difficult. The objective of this chapter is to describe the process of diagnosing menopause in a physiological situation, then in different clinical situations: women using hormonal contraception (per os, implant or intrauterine device), women with a history of hysterectomy, women previously treated for cancer. A review of the literature was carried out via Pubmed, Medline and Cochrane Library. The recommendations of international societies were also taken into account: International Menopause Society (IMS) https://www.imsociety.org, European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS) https://www.emas-online.org. In a classic situation, the diagnosis of menopause is a clinical diagnosis, made retrospectively, based on a 12-month period of consecutive amenorrhoea in a compatible age group (after 45 years of age). No hormonal dosage or imaging is indicated to make a diagnosis of menopause in a classic situation. In women using oestroprogestogen or progestative-only-pill contraception, implant, or Levonorgestrel-intrauterine device (LNG IUD), hormonal assays or pelvic ultrasound are neither recommended to make a diagnosis of menopause (grade C), nor to decide to stop contraception (grade C). The proposed strategy is the discontinuation of oral contraception, removal of the implant or LNG-IUD, and clinical follow-up (occurrence of amenorrhea) (expert opinion). In women with a history of hysterectomy, in the absence of evaluable clinical symptoms (amenorrhea), a repeat FSH≥40 combined with low estradiol (<20pg/ml) at least 3 months after the procedure could be a diagnostic orientation towards menopausal status. After cancer, in women who have received gonadotoxic treatment, the classic clinical criteria of 12 months of amenorrhea cannot be used to make a diagnosis of menopause with certainty (expert opinion). No further examination can be recommended to make a definite diagnosis of menopause (expert opinion). In breast cancer, the hormonal status to be taken into account when choosing initial hormone therapy is the one found before starting any treatment. If at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer the menopausal status is not known due to hormonal contraception, it is preferable to consider the patient as non-menopausal by default for the choice of hormone therapy for the cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Rousset-Jablonski
- Department of Surgical Oncology, centre Léon-Bérard, 28 Prom. Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008 Lyon, France; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lyon Sud University Hospital, hospices civils de Lyon, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France; Research on HealthcAre PErformance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE More than 5,000 premenopausal women are diagnosed with lung cancer annually in the United States. Limited data exist regarding the risk of treatment-related amenorrhea, a surrogate for infertility and early menopause, after systemic therapies for lung cancer. METHODS Premenopausal women diagnosed with lung cancer under age 50 were surveyed at diagnosis and annually thereafter about their menstrual status as a part of the Mayo Clinic Epidemiology and Genetics of Lung Cancer Research Program. Types of lung cancer-directed treatments were recorded, and frequencies of self-reported menopause at each survey were calculated. RESULTS A cohort of 182 premenopausal women were included in this study, with average age at lung cancer diagnosis 43 years (SD 6). Among the 85 patients who received chemotherapy, 64% self-reported that they had become menopausal within a year of diagnosis. Platinum salts were universally included in these chemotherapy regimens, and the majority of these women also received taxanes within 1 year of diagnosis. Only 15% of the 94 patients who did not receive systemic therapy within 1 year of diagnosis experienced self-reported menopause. Three patients received targeted therapy alone, two of whom remained premenopausal at the final qualifying survey, completed a median of 3 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Chemotherapy for lung cancer patients appears to increase risk of early loss of menses in survivors.
Collapse
|
8
|
Sella T, Partridge AH. Fertility Counseling and Preservation in Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-019-00348-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
9
|
Silva C, Ribeiro Rama AC, Reis Soares S, Moura-Ramos M, Almeida-Santos T. Adverse reproductive health outcomes in a cohort of young women with breast cancer exposed to systemic treatments. J Ovarian Res 2019; 12:102. [PMID: 31672154 PMCID: PMC6824094 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-019-0581-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer in young women. Fortunately current survival rates of BC are significant which makes future fertility very important for quality of life of BC survivors. Chemotherapy carries a significant risk of infertility in BC patients so it is important to support fertility preservation decisions in premenopausal women. Amenorrhea has long been used as a surrogate marker of infertility in cancer patients but more reliable ovarian reserve (OR) markers are available. This study aimed to prospectively measure levels of OR in a cohort of young women with breast cancer exposed to chemotherapy, to identify adverse reproductive health outcomes in this population and to assess the influence of patient and treatment-related factors in those outcomes. Methods This prospective observational study included premenopausal women with breast cancer aged 18–40 years at diagnosis and proposed for (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were evaluated before, during and a minimum of 9 months after the end of chemotherapy. Reproductive health outcomes: menses, hormonal and ultrasound OR markers, recovery of ovarian function and Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI). Results A total of 38 patients were included (mean age 32.9 ± 3.5 years). Levels of OR significantly decreased during the study. At the last follow up, 35 patients had AMH below the expected values for age; eight presented postmenopausal FSH; ten had not recovered their ovarian function and five met the defined criteria for POI. Age and baseline AMH were positively correlated with AMH at the last follow-up. AMH levels were higher in the group of patients treated with trastuzumab and lower in those under hormonal therapy, at the last follow-up. Conclusions Significant effects of systemic treatments on several reproductive outcomes and a strong relation of those outcomes with patient’s age and baseline level of AMH were observed. Our results point to a possible lower gonadotoxicity when treatment includes targeted therapy with trastuzumab. Also, this investigation highlights the lack of reliable OR markers in women under hormonal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Silva
- Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - Ana Cristina Ribeiro Rama
- Pharmaceutical Services, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), EPE, Coimbra, Portugal.,Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - Mariana Moura-Ramos
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), EPE, Coimbra, Portugal.,Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioural Intervention, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Teresa Almeida-Santos
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), EPE, Coimbra, Portugal.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Hellemond IEG, Vriens IJH, Peer PGM, Swinkels ACP, Smorenburg CH, Seynaeve CM, van der Sangen MJC, Kroep JR, de Graaf H, Honkoop AH, Erdkamp FLG, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Kitzen JJEM, de Boer M, de Roos WK, Linn SC, Imholz ALT, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Ovarian Function Recovery During Anastrozole in Breast Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Function Failure. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 109:3858846. [PMID: 29546343 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are given as adjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women, also to those with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure. The current analysis reports on endocrine data of patients with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure who were included in the phase III DATA study assessing different durations of adjuvant anastrozole after tamoxifen. Methods We identified all patients with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure. Women who underwent a bilateral ovariectomy or used luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists before random assignment were excluded. Plasma estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were monitored until 30 months after random assignment at local laboratories. We aimed to determine the ovarian function recovery (OFR) rate during AI use by the cumulative incidence competing risk method and analyzed the trend of estradiol levels during AI use by a nested case-control approach in which a subset of control subjects were compared with the OFR patients excluding the value at OFR diagnosis. Results The 329 eligible patients had a median age of 50.0 years (range = 45-57 years) at random assignment. Thirty-nine patients developed OFR, corresponding with a 30-month recovery rate of 12.4%. Of these, 11 (28.2%) were age 50 years or older at AI initiation. The estradiol level decreased statistically significantly by 37.8% (95% CI = 27.4% to 46.7%) over the initial 30 months of AI treatment in both groups. However, the estradiol levels in the women who experienced OFR remained statistically significantly higher (difference = 20.6%, 95% CI = 2.0% to 42.7%) prior to OFR diagnosis compared with those who did not experience OFR. Conclusions The risk of OFR during AI treatment in breast cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure is relevant, even beyond 45 years. Furthermore, women experiencing OFR had statistically significant higher estradiol levels during AI treatment (before OFR) than those without, with potential consequences regarding efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene E G van Hellemond
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ingeborg J H Vriens
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Petronella G M Peer
- Biostatistics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid C P Swinkels
- Clinical Research Department, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation IKNL, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Caroline M Seynaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Judith R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hiltje de Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Aafke H Honkoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Frans L G Erdkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jos J E M Kitzen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Wïlfred K de Roos
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xue C, Wei W, Sun P, Zheng W, Diao X, Xu F, Huang J, An X, Xia W, Hong R, Jiang K, Huang R, Yuan Z, Wang S, Li A, Zou R, Shi Y. Pretreatment anti-Mullerian hormone-based nomogram predicts menstruation status after chemotherapy for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 173:619-628. [PMID: 30392113 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4997-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ovarian function is important for optimizing endocrine treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (eBC). The aim of the study was to determine whether patients' pretreatment levels of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) were associated with menses status after chemotherapy and to build a predictive nomogram model for amenorrhea in women with HR+ eBC. METHODS Between August 2013 and December 2014, 120 premenopausal patients with HR+ eBC were included retrospectively. The associations among age, prechemotherapy levels of AMH, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH),and estradiol (E2) and the 2-year postchemotherapy menses status were analyzed. We determined the cutoff values of hormone levels by using the biostatistical tool (Cutoff Finder). A novel nomogram was established to predict the 2-year amenorrhea status based on the logistic analysis. Concordance index (C-index) was used to validate the capacity. RESULTS One hundred nine women (90.8%) experienced amenorrhea after chemotherapy. AMH < 0.965 ng/ml predicted amenorrhea at 2 years (AUC 0.84, sensitivity 74% and specificity 81.8%), independent of age. The predictive nomogram based on age and pretreatment AMH and FSH levels was developed to predict the probability of 2-year postchemotherapy amenorrhea with a C-index of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.91). CONCLUSIONS In premenopausal patients with HR+ eBC, prechemotherapy AMH concentration was associated with the patient's 2-year amenorrhea status, independent of age. The nomogram model based on age and pretreatment AMH and FSH levels accurately predicted the 2-year amenorrhea status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Xue
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Wenwen Wei
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Peng Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Wei Zheng
- Department of Ultrasound and Electrocardiogram, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Xiaoju Diao
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Fei Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Jiajia Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Xin An
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Wen Xia
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Ruoxi Hong
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Kuikui Jiang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Riqing Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Zhongyu Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Shusen Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Anhua Li
- Department of Ultrasound and Electrocardiogram, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Ruhai Zou
- Department of Ultrasound and Electrocardiogram, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Yanxia Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651#, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jayasinghe YL, Wallace WHB, Anderson RA. Ovarian function, fertility and reproductive lifespan in cancer patients. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 2018; 13:125-136. [PMID: 30058903 DOI: 10.1080/17446651.2018.1455498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The increasing survival of girls and young women after cancer has led to a rapid growth in research into assessment of ovarian function after treatment. AREAS COVERED This aim of this review is to discuss normal ovarian function over time, the impact of cancer treatment on ovarian function, the assessment of ovarian reserve after treatment, and pretreatment predictors of ovarian recovery. EXPERT COMMENTARY Ovarian function damage after chemotherapy and radiotherapy will impact on fertility and reproductive lifespan, but with great variability. Age at menopause has implications for the duration of estrogen deficiency, with its own adverse health consequences. This has led to identification of the key treatment and patient factors at the time of treatment, notably age and ovarian reserve that impact on post-treatment ovarian function. However, most studies have used outcome measures such as ongoing menses, or biomarkers such as anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), with few reporting on fertility or age at menopause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin L Jayasinghe
- a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia
| | - W Hamish B Wallace
- b Department of Haematology and Oncology , Royal Hospital for Sick Children , Edinburgh , UK
| | - Richard A Anderson
- c MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute , University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chlebowski RT, Pan K. Complexity of intermittent letrozole adjuvant therapy. Lancet Oncol 2017; 19:13-15. [PMID: 29158010 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30854-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rowan T Chlebowski
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
| | - Kathy Pan
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Anderson RA, Mansi J, Coleman RE, Adamson DJA, Leonard RCF. The utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in the diagnosis and prediction of loss of ovarian function following chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2017; 87:58-64. [PMID: 29117576 PMCID: PMC5733385 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Revised: 09/27/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Aim Chemotherapy results in permanent loss of ovarian function in some premenopausal women. Accurate identification in women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer (eBC) would allow optimisation of subsequent endocrine treatment. We sought to assess whether analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) using a sensitive automated assay could identify women who would not regain ovarian function after chemotherapy. Methods Data from women in the Ovarian Protection Trial in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients (OPTION) trial of goserelin (a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue) for ovarian protection were analysed. Women were assessed for premature ovarian insufficiency (POI: amenorrhoea with elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)) at 24 months after diagnosis. The accuracy of AMH for the diagnosis of POI and its prediction from measurement at the end of chemotherapy was calculated. Results AMH below the level of detection showed good diagnostic accuracy for POI at 24 months (n = 73) with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve of 0.86, sensitivity 1.0 and specificity 0.73 at the assay limit of detection. In women aged >40 at diagnosis who did not receive goserelin, AMH measured at end of chemotherapy also gave good prediction of POI at 24 months (area under the curve (AUC) 0.89 95% CI 0.75–1.0, n = 32), with sensitivity 0.91, specificity 0.82, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 42.8. FSH gave slightly lower AUC, and specificity was low at 0.55. Age but not tamoxifen impacted on AMH levels. Conclusion Using this sensitive AMH assay, the finding of an undetectable AMH level in women aged >40 at the end of chemotherapy for eBC gave a good prediction that ovarian function would not return. This may allow alterations in post-chemotherapy endocrine management. Chemotherapy for early breast cancer results in permanent loss of ovarian function in some women. We assessed the accuracy of measurement of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) at end of chemotherapy for prediction of this in women aged >40 at diagnosis. AMH measured at end of chemotherapy gave good prediction of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) at 24 months. This may allow optimisation of subsequent endocrine treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - J Mansi
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and Biomedical Research Centre, King's College London, UK
| | - R E Coleman
- Department of Oncology, Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK
| | - D J A Adamson
- Tayside Cancer Centre, Ward 32, Ninewells Hospital Dundee, UK
| | - R C F Leonard
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Imperial College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Denlinger CS, Sanft T, Baker KS, Baxi S, Broderick G, Demark-Wahnefried W, Friedman DL, Goldman M, Hudson M, Khakpour N, King A, Koura D, Kvale E, Lally RM, Langbaum TS, Melisko M, Montoya JG, Mooney K, Moslehi JJ, O'Connor T, Overholser L, Paskett ED, Peppercorn J, Rodriguez MA, Ruddy KJ, Silverman P, Smith S, Syrjala KL, Tevaarwerk A, Urba SG, Wakabayashi MT, Zee P, Freedman-Cass DA, McMillian NR. Survivorship, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017; 15:1140-1163. [PMID: 28874599 PMCID: PMC5865602 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Many cancer survivors experience menopausal symptoms, including female survivors taking aromatase inhibitors or with a history of oophorectomy or chemotherapy, and male survivors who received or are receiving androgen-ablative therapies. Sexual dysfunction is also common in cancer survivors. Sexual dysfunction and menopause-related symptoms can increase distress and have a significant negative impact on quality of life. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship provide recommendations for screening, evaluation, and treatment of sexual dysfunction and menopausal symptoms to help healthcare professionals who work with survivors of adult-onset cancer in the posttreatment period.
Collapse
|
16
|
Chlebowski RT, Pan K, Col NF. Ovarian suppression in combination endocrine adjuvant therapy in premenopausal women with early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 161:185-190. [PMID: 27785653 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4024-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The benefits of adding ovarian suppression to either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant breast cancer therapy in premenopausal women are controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of relevant randomized trials. METHODS We identified and combined four qualifying trials reporting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using meta-analysis. RESULTS Combining ABCSG-12, SOFT, and TEXT studies, there were 65 fewer DFS events (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.57-1.39) but 30 more deaths for ovarian suppression plus aromatase inhibitor compared to ovarian suppression plus tamoxifen (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.93-1.84, P = 0.12, τ = 0.03, heterogeneity, P = 0.18). DFS and OS were more concordant for combined SOFT and E-3193 findings; for ovarian suppression plus tamoxifen compared to tamoxifen alone, there were 24 fewer DFS events (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67-1.07, P = 0.09, τ 2 = 0) and 14 fewer deaths (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53-1.07). The SOFT Estrogen Substudy demonstrated inconsistent estrogen suppression with combined ovarian suppression and aromatase inhibitor. CONCLUSION Given the discordance between DFS and OS and inconsistent estrogen suppression with ovarian suppression plus aromatase inhibitor, adding aromatase inhibitor to ovarian suppression as adjuvant therapy in premenopausal women is premature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowan T Chlebowski
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1124 W. Carson Street, Torrance, CA, 90502, USA.
| | - Kathy Pan
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1124 W. Carson Street, Torrance, CA, 90502, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Papakonstantinou A, Foukakis T, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Bergh J. Is Estradiol Monitoring Necessary in Women Receiving Ovarian Suppression for Breast Cancer? J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:1573-9. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.65.3493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors’ suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice. A 36-year-old premenopausal woman had been diagnosed with stage III breast cancer. After an initial biopsy confirmed breast cancer, she underwent mastectomy and axillary node dissection for a left-sided breast cancer, measuring 7 cm. The tumor had lobular histology and was considered grade 2 of 3. Metastatic carcinoma was identified in 10 of 13 axillary nodes. Immunohistochemical studies showed that the tumor was strongly positive for estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and had a Ki-67 score of 15% (> 20% is considered high according to a Swedish quality control study and the St Gallen Expert Consensus). 1 , 2 There was no amplification of the HER2/neu gene. Staging scans were negative for metastatic disease. In the adjuvant setting, she received three cycles of anthracycline-cyclophosphamide combination chemotherapy followed by three cycles of taxane chemotherapy and then locoregional radiotherapy. After completion of chemotherapy, she developed amenorrhea. As adjuvant endocrine therapy, she began monthly goserelin administration to achieve ovarian function suppression (OFS), in combination with the aromatase inhibitor (AI) exemestane. She experienced menopausal symptoms including hot flashes, vaginal dryness, and sexual dysfunction. After two monthly treatments with goserelin and exemestane, a sensitive assay for serum estradiol was checked and returned at 16 pg/mL (61 pmol/L); postmenopausal range for sensitive assay is less than 15 pg/mL (< 50 pmol/L). The patient has now been referred to our unit to discuss further management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jonas Bergh
- Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|