Scoring System Prognostic of Outcome in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Current challenges in conditioning regimens for MDS transplantation

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a very heterogeneous clonal disorder. Patients with "higher-risk" MDS, defined by specific recurrent genetic abnormalities, have a poor prognosis because of a high risk of progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia with low chemosensitivity. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only treatment that offers durable disease control because the donor immune system allows graft-versus-MDS effects. In terms of preparation steps before transplantation, targeting the malignant clone by increasing the conditioning regimen intensity is still a matter of intense debate. MDS is mainly diagnosed in older patients, and high toxicity related to common myeloablative conditioning regimens has been reported. Efforts to include new drugs in the conditioning regimen to achieve the best malignant clone control without increasing toxicity have been made over the past 20 years. We summarized these retrospective and prospective studies and evaluated the limitations of the available evidence to delineate the ideal conditioning regimen.

Does IPSS-R downstaging before transplantation improve the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms?

ABSTRACT

In patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), higher revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) scores at transplant are associated with worse transplant outcome and, thus, lowering IPSS-R scores by therapeutic intervention before transplantation may seem beneficial. However, there is no evidence, to date, to support this approach. In a retrospective analysis, a total of 1482 patients with MDS with sufficient data to calculate IPSS-R score at diagnosis and at time of transplantation were selected from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation transplant registry and analyzed for transplant outcome in a multivariable Cox model including IPSS-R score at diagnosis, treatment intervention, change in IPSS-R score before transplant, and several patient and transplant variables. Transplant outcome was unaffected by IPSS-R score change in untreated patients and moderately superior in patients treated with chemotherapy with improved IPSS-R score at transplant. Improved IPSS-R score after hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or other therapies showed no beneficial effect. However, when IPSS-R score progressed after chemotherapy, HMAs, or other therapies, transplant outcome was worse than without any prior treatment. Similar results were found when reduction or increase in bone marrow (BM) blasts between diagnosis and transplantation was considered. The results show a limited benefit of IPSS-R score downstaging or reduction of BM blasts after chemotherapy and no benefit for HMAs or other treatments and thus question the role of prior therapy in patients with MDS scheduled for transplantation. The model-based survival estimates should help inform decision-making for both doctors and patients.

Systemic inflammatory autoimmune disease before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a risk factor for death in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is well known to be complicated by systemic inflammatory autoimmune disease (SIADs). However, it remains unclear how the prognosis after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with MDS is impacted by SIADs that occur before allo-HSCT. Therefore, we hypothesized that SIADs before allo-HSCT may be a risk factor for negative outcomes after allo-HSCT in patients with MDS. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, observational study of sixty-nine patients with MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia who underwent their first allo-HCT. Fourteen of the patients had SIADs before allo-HSCT. In multivariate analysis, the presence of SIADs before allo-HSCT was an independent risk factor for overall survival (HR, 3.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.34-8.42, p = 0.009). Endothelial dysfunction syndrome was identified in five of 14 patients with SIADs who required immunosuppressive therapy or intensive chemotherapy, and notably, all patients with uncontrollable SIADs at allo-HSCT developed serious endothelial dysfunction syndrome and died in the early phase after allo-HSCT. The development of SIADs in the context of MDS is thought to reflect the degree of dysfunction of hematopoietic cells in MDS and suggests a higher risk of disease progression. In addition, MDS patients with SIADs before allo-HSCT are considered to be at higher risk of endothelial dysfunction syndrome because of preexisting vascular endothelial dysfunction due to SIADs. In conclusion, SIADs before allo-HSCT constitute an independent risk factor for death in MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT.

How I reduce and treat posttransplant relapse of MDS

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only potentially curative option for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Advances in conditioning regimens and supportive measures have reduced treatment-related mortality and increased the role of transplantation, leading to more patients undergoing HSCT. However, posttransplant relapse of MDS remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for this procedure, necessitating expert management and ongoing results analysis. In this article, we review treatment options and our institutional approaches to managing MDS relapse after HSCT, using illustrative clinical cases that exemplify different clinical manifestations and management of relapse. We address areas of controversy relating to conditioning regimen intensity, chemotherapeutic bridging, and donor selection. In addition, we discuss future directions for advancing the field, including (1) the need for prospective clinical trials separating MDS from acute myeloid leukemia and focusing on posttransplant relapse, as well as (2) the validation of measurable residual disease methodologies to guide timely interventions.

Identification and surveillance of rare relapse-initiating stem cells during complete remission after transplantation

ABSTRACT

Relapse after complete remission (CR) remains the main cause of mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies and, therefore, improved biomarkers for early prediction of relapse remains a critical goal toward development and assessment of preemptive relapse treatment. Because the significance of cancer stem cells as a source of relapses remains unclear, we investigated whether mutational screening for persistence of rare cancer stem cells would enhance measurable residual disease (MRD) and early relapse prediction after transplantation. In a retrospective study of patients who relapsed and patients who achieved continuous-CR with myelodysplastic syndromes and related myeloid malignancies, combined flow cytometric cell sorting and mutational screening for persistence of rare relapse-initiating stem cells was performed in the bone marrow at multiple CR time points after transplantation. In 25 CR samples from 15 patients that later relapsed, only 9 samples were MRD-positive in mononuclear cells (MNCs) whereas flowcytometric-sorted hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) were MRD-positive in all samples, and always with a higher variant allele frequency than in MNCs (mean, 97-fold). MRD-positivity in HSPCs preceded MNCs in multiple sequential samples, in some cases preceding relapse by >2 years. In contrast, in 13 patients in long-term continuous-CR, HSPCs remained MRD-negative. Enhanced MRD sensitivity was also observed in total CD34+ cells, but HSPCs were always more clonally involved (mean, 8-fold). In conclusion, identification of relapse-initiating cancer stem cells and mutational MRD screening for their persistence consistently enhances MRD sensitivity and earlier prediction of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in MDS patients of older age

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has evolved to an essential treatment in younger and more recently in elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), the age group with the highest incidence. Less intense conditioning regimens and improvements in supportive therapy have reduced considerably transplant related mortality and in the same time increased the access to this curative treatment. Timing of HCT in the course of the disease assumes a crucial role. Detection of disease progression, geriatric assessment, comorbidity evaluation, and identification of transplant-specific risks are becoming increasingly important in this context. Novel statistical methods, molecular biomarkers, and quantification of tumor burden pre- and post-HCT will play an essential role in years to come. More effective and less toxic treatments to reduce the tumor burden before and/or after HCT are expected to improve the outcome. In this review article we discuss the current views and what we can expect.

The prognosis and risk factors for patients with complex karyotype myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is the curative treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome with a complex karyotype (CK-MDS). However, only a few studies have been limited to patients with CK-MDS undergoing allogeneic HCT. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for patients with CK-MDS undergoing allogeneic HCT. We included 691 patients with CK-MDS who received their first allogeneic HCT. The overall survival (OS) was the primary end-point, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model. The 3-year OS was 29.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.3-33.3). In the multivariable analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.11-1.88), male sex (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.11-1.71), poor haematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.20-1.81), red blood cell transfusion requirement (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.13-2.20), platelet transfusion requirement (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.46-2.35), not-complete remission (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.16-2.06), a high number of karyotype abnormality (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.18-2.25) and monosomal karyotype (HR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.05-2.12) were significantly associated with OS. Thus, the 3-year OS of allogeneic HCT was 29.8% in patients with CK-MDS, and we identified risk factors associated with poor OS.

The analysis of multiple outcomes, multiple variables and variables selection in hematopoietic cell transplantation studies

It is common to study time-to-event data in cancer research such as hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for leukemia. The extensive work has been done for the univariate survival outcome, that is, one event type. However, in practice a subject is often exposed to multiple types of outcomes. In this article, we review various types of right-censored data with multiple outcome types including competing risks data, recurrent event data, and composite endpoints. We also provide hematopoietic cell transplantation data examples.

Outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant in patients diagnosed with blast phase of myeloproliferative neoplasms: A retrospective study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) provides the only potential route to long-term remission in patients diagnosed with blast phase transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasm (BP-MPN). We report on a large, retrospective European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry-based study of BP-MPN patients undergoing allo-HCT. BP-MPN patients undergoing first allo-HCT between 2005 and 2019 were included. A total of 663 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 62 months, the estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32-36). Factors associated with lower OS were Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) <90 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.65, p < .001) and active disease at allo-HCT (HR 1.45, p < .001), whereas patients undergoing allo-HCT more recently associated with a higher OS (HR 0.96, p = .008). In a selected patient's population, the 3-year OS of patients undergoing allo-HCT in complete response (CR) and with a KPS ≥90 was 60%. KPS < 90 (HR 1.4, p = .001) and active disease (HR 1.44, p = .0004) were associated with a lower progression-free survival (PFS). Conversely, most recent allo-HCT associated with a higher PFS (HR 0.96, p = .008). Active disease at allo-HCT (HR 1.34, p = .03) was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) and allo-HCT in earlier calendar years (HR 0.96, p = .02) associated with a lower RI. Last, KPS < 90 (HR 1.91, p < .001), active disease (HR 1.74, p = .003) and allo-HCT from mismatched related donors were associated with a higher non-relapse mortality (HR 2.66, p = .003). In this large series of BP-MPN patients, about one third were alive at 3 years after transplantation. Patients undergoing allo-HCT in the more recent era, with a KPS ≥90 and in CR at transplant had a better prognosis.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms primarily affecting older persons, associated with dysplastic changes of bone marrow cells, peripheral cytopenias, and various risk of leukemic transformation. Although treatment with several drugs has shown improved disease control, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative treatment for MDS. The number of patients receiving a transplant, as well as survival, have increased past years because of the use of reduce-intensity conditioning regimens (RIC) as well as the use of haploidentical donors for transplantation. With treatment-related mortality as main limitation, pre-transplant evaluation is essential to assess risks for this older group of patients. In a recent randomized study, allo-HSCT with RIC for patients >50 years old with higher-risk MDS demonstrated superiority in survival compared with hypomethylating agents. Genetic mutations have been shown to significantly impact treatment outcomes including after transplant. Recently, a transplant-specific risk score (which includes age, donor type, performance status, cytogenetic category, recipient's cytomegalovirus status, percentage of blasts, and platelet count) has shown superiority in transplantation outcome prediction, compared with previous scoring systems. Survival remains low for most patients with TP53 mutations and novel treatment strategies are needed, such as administration of natural killer cells post-transplant, as there is no clear evidence that maintenance therapy after transplantation can improve outcomes.

Germ line predisposition variants occur in myelodysplastic syndrome patients of all ages

The frequency of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germ line variants in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) diagnosed at age 40 years or less is 15% to 20%. However, there are no comprehensive studies assessing the frequency of such variants across the age spectrum. We performed augmented whole-exome sequencing of peripheral blood samples from 404 patients with MDS and their related donors before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Single-nucleotide and copy number variants in 233 genes were analyzed and interpreted. Germ line status was established by the presence of a variant in the patient and related donor or for those seen previously only as germ line alleles. We identified P/LP germ line variants in 28 of 404 patients with MDS (7%), present within all age deciles. Patients with P/LP variants were more likely to develop higher-grade MDS than those without (43% vs 25%; P = .04). There was no statistically significant difference in outcome parameters between patients with and without a germ line variant, but the analysis was underpowered. P/LP variants in bone marrow failure syndrome genes were found in 5 patients aged less than 40 years, whereas variants in DDX41 (n = 4), telomere biology disorder genes (n = 2), and general tumor predisposition genes (n = 17) were found in patients aged more than 40 years. If presumed germ line variants were included, the yield of P/LP variants would increase to 11%, and by adding suspicious variants of unknown significance, it would rise further to 12%. The high frequency of P/LP germ line variants in our study supports comprehensive germ line genetic testing for all patients with MDS regardless of their age at diagnosis.

Myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a family of myeloid cancers with diverse genotypes and phenotypes characterized by ineffective haematopoiesis and risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Some epidemiological data indicate that MDS incidence is increasing in resource-rich regions but this is controversial. Most MDS cases are caused by randomly acquired somatic mutations. In some patients, the phenotype and/or genotype of MDS overlaps with that of bone marrow failure disorders such as aplastic anaemia, paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) and AML. Prognostic systems, such as the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), provide reasonably accurate predictions of survival at the population level. Therapeutic goals in individuals with lower-risk MDS include improving quality of life and minimizing erythrocyte and platelet transfusions. Therapeutic goals in people with higher-risk MDS include decreasing the risk of AML transformation and prolonging survival. Haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can cure MDS, yet fewer than 10% of affected individuals receive this treatment. However, how, when and in which patients with HCT for MDS should be performed remains controversial, with some studies suggesting HCT is preferred in some individuals with higher-risk MDS. Advances in the understanding of MDS biology offer the prospect of new therapeutic approaches.

Comparison of outcomes for HLA-matched sibling and haplo-identical donors in Myelodysplastic syndromes: report from the chronic malignancies working party of EBMT

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are the second common indication for an Allo-HCT. We compared the outcomes of 1414 matched sibling (MSD) with 415 haplo-identical donors (HD) transplanted with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as GVHD prophylaxis between 2014 and 2017. The median age at transplant with MSD was 58 and 61 years for HD. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was longer for HD being 20 vs 16 days for MSD (p < 0.001). Two-year overall survival (OS) and PFS (progression free survival) with MSD were significantly better at 58% compared with 50%, p ≤ 0.001, and 51% vs 47%, p = 0.029, with a HD. Relapse at 2 years was lower with a HD 23% than with MSD 29% (p = 0.016). Non relapse mortality (NRM) was higher with HD in the first 6 months post-transplant [HR 2.59 (1.5–4.48) p < 0.001] and was also higher at 2 years being 30% for HD and 20% for MSD, p ≤ 0.001. The incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV and III–IV at 100 days was comparable for MSD and HD, however, chronic GVHD at 2 years was significantly higher with MSD being 44% vs 32% for HD (p < 0.001). After multivariable analysis, OS and primary graft failure were significantly worse for HD particularly before 6 months [HR 1.93(1.24–3.0)], and HR [3.5(1.5–8.1)]. The median age of HD 37 (IQR 30–47) years was significantly lower than sibling donors 56 (IQR 49–62 years) p < 0.001. However, there was no effect on NRM, relapse or PFS. This data set suggests that a MSD donor remains the preferred choice in MDS over a haplo donor. Transplants with haploidentical donors result in satisfactory long-term outcome, justifying it’s use when no better donor is available.

Karnofsky performance status and visual analogue scale scores are simple indicators for quality of life in long-term AYA survivors who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation in childhood

The purpose of this study was to investigate Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores to explain which domains in the standardized self-reported quality of life (QOL) are instrumental for long-term hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) survivors. We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire study on 221 survivors with allogeneic-HSCT in 28 pediatric centers. Patient-reported QOL was assessed at a single time point using the 36-item Short-Form Survey (SF-36), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT), and VAS scores. KPS scores were significantly correlated with both physical and role component summary scores of the SF-36, while the VAS provided by the patient (VASpt) was significantly correlated with the mental component summary score of the SF-36 and many subscales of the FACT-BMT. The VAS provided by the participants' attending physician (VASdoc) was correlated well with KPS scores. A VASpt score more than 40% lower than KPS scores suggested mental health problems. In conclusion, KPS scores might be considered as an indicator for physical and role/social components and VASpt score as an indicator for mental components and HSCT-specific QOL.

Clinical risk factors for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Objectives: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only curative treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), although predicting post-transplant outcomes remains inconclusive. This study evaluated patients who underwent allo-HCT for MDS to identify prognostic factors and develop a clinical risk model.Methods: We evaluated 55 patients between June 2000 and March 2015 to identify prognostic factors and develop a model for three-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Cox regression analysis was performed on four factors: age ≥55 years; Hematopoietic Cell Transplant-Comorbidity Index >2; intermediate or worse cytogenetic status based on revised International Prognostic Scoring System; and unrelated donor status associated with poor OS in the univariate analysis. A clinical risk model was constructed using the sum of the regression coefficients and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and five-fold cross-validation.Results: Patient median age was 51 (range: 30-67) years. Median follow-up was 45.8 (range: 1.27-193) months; the three-year OS and EFS rates were 61.8% and 56.4%, respectively. The areas under the curves (AUCs) for OS and EFS were 0.738 and 0.778, respectively, and the average AUC for 50 times five-fold cross-validation were 0.711 and 0.723 for three-year OS and EFS, respectively.Conclusion: A four-clinical-risk-factor model that could effectively predict post-transplantation outcomes and help decision-making in MDS treatment was developed.

Assessing frailty using comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with hematologic malignancy

The incidence of hematologic malignancy increases with age; thus, the number of older patients who require intensive chemotherapy is expected to increase with the aging population. In Korea, 61.8%, 59.3%, 47.0%, and 46.7% of newly diagnosed cases of multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome, myeloproliferative disorder, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, respectively, occurred in patients aged >65 years in 2018. Health status among older patients, defined by frailty, age-related syndrome of physiological decline and increased vulnerability, is associated with adverse health outcomes. Health status is highly heterogeneous among older patients, and treatment outcomes vary according to frailty and physiologic age rather than chronologic age. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional and multidisciplinary diagnostic and treatment process that identifies multiple domains, including functional status, cognition, comorbidities, medications, socioeconomic status, and nutritional status, to develop a coordinated plan to improve treatment-related outcomes and quality of life. Frailty can be assessed with CGA findings, and CGA is considered the "gold standard of care" for frail, older patients. Through CGA, unidentified problems can be assessed, and pre-emptive and non-oncologic interventions can be delivered. CGA is an objective and reliable tool for predicting further treatment-related complications and identifying patients for whom intensive chemotherapy with curative intent is appropriate. CGA should be considered a routine practice before starting treatment planning in older patients diagnosed with hematologic malignancies who require intensive chemotherapy. Further study is needed to allocate individualized treatment plans or multidisciplinary geriatric interventions according to CGA results.

Nutritional support in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Asian perspective

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an integral part of the treatment strategy for patients with malignant or non-malignant hematological diseases. Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing allo-HSCT have significantly improved in recent decades. However, transplant-related morbidity and mortality remain major issues for allo-HSCT recipients. With regard to nutrition, patients undergoing allo-HSCT are at high risk for malnutrition. It is expected that clinical practice concerning nutritional support in allo-HSCT has been improving in recent decades; however, no data directly support this expectation. One major issue in managing nutritional support during allo-HSCT is the lack of large-scale randomized prospective studies, which leads to a lack of well-established strategies. Accordingly, we need to gather data from studies in non-HSCT and allo-HSCT settings. In some Asia-Pacific countries, a physician's lack of knowledge of nutritional support may impede the application of nutritional support practices recommended by existing guidelines. Another barrier may be the lack of access to an adequately qualified or trained registered dietitian (RD) at allo-HSCT units. Adequate training in the nutritional management of allo-HSCT patients should be provided to all RDs working with HSCT. Herein, we summarize the information on nutritional support in allo-HSCT, focusing on an Asian perspective.

Lower risk but high risk

Risk stratification is crucial to the appropriate management of most cancers, but in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), for whom expected survival can vary from a few months to more than a decade, accurate disease prognostication is especially important. Currently, patients with MDS are often grouped into higher-risk (HR) vs lower-risk (LR) disease using clinical prognostic scoring systems, but these systems have limitations. Factors such as molecular genetic information or disease characteristics not captured in the International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised (IPSS-R) can alter risk stratification and identify a subset of patients with LR-MDS who actually behave more like those with HR-MDS. This review describes the current identification and management of patients with LR-MDS whose condition is likely to behave in a less favorable manner than predicted by the IPSS-R.

Differential effects of donor lymphocyte infusion upon treatment response and GVHD according to relapse level and donor sources in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is one of the effective options for post-transplant disease control of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Its success or failure depends on the induction of antitumor immune reactions, durability of clinical responses, and severity of unwanted toxicities mainly from graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

METHODS

By analyzing 61 patients receiving DLI for post-transplant MDS relapse, we assessed treatment outcomes and affecting factors, especially focusing on the level of relapse (hematological, molecular, and imminent relapse).

RESULTS

The response rate (42.1%, 36.4%, 72.7%), and overall survival (OS) at 2 years (27.8%, 45.5%, 70.1%) were different for each relapse level with imminent relapse group showing the most promising results. For OS, response to DLI or pre-DLI chemotherapy, and time to relapse were independent prognostic factors. Meanwhile, post-DLI GVHD and time to relapse were independently predictive for DLI response; post-DLI GVHD was predictive for DLI response, but not for OS, suggesting a potential detrimental impact of GVHD on survival. The incidence of GVHD and GVHD-related deaths were 37.7% and 10.0%, respectively, and CD3+ cell doses triggering GVHD tended to be lower in cases with haploidentical donor or imminent relapse.

CONCLUSION

Despite being limited by small number of cases and its retrospective nature, this study again demonstrated the therapeutic effects of DLI in relapsed MDS, and that earlier detection and intervention at lower level relapse might possibly be associated with better results. Furthermore, we propose that tailored cell dosing schedule based on relapse level and donor source may be helpful in minimizing fatal GVHD.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome using treosulfan based compared to other reduced-intensity or myeloablative conditioning regimens. A report of the chronic malignancies working party of the EBMT

Allogeneic haematopoietic-cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative therapy for high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) is usually associated with lower non-relapse mortality (NRM), higher relapse rate and similar overall-survival (OS) as myeloablative-conditioning (MAC). Fludarabine/treosulfan (FT) is a reduced-toxicity regimen with intense anti-leukaemia activity and a favourable toxicity profile. We investigated post-transplant outcomes in 1722 MDS patients following allo-HCT with FT (n = 367), RIC (n = 687) or MAC (n = 668). FT and RIC recipients were older than MAC recipients, median age 59, 59 and 51 years, respectively (P < 0·001) but other disease characteristics were similar. The median follow-up was 64 months (1-171). Five-year relapse rates were 25% (21-30), 38% (34-42) and 25% (22-29), after FT, RIC and MAC, respectively, (P < 0·001). NRM was 30% (25-35), 27% (23-30) and 34% (31-38, P = 0·008), respectively. Five-year OS was 50% (44-55), 43% (38-47), and 43% (39-47), respectively (P = 0·03). In multivariate analysis, FT was associated with a lower risk of relapse (HR 0·55, P < 0·001) and better OS (HR 0·72, P = 0·01). MAC was associated with higher NRM (HR 1·44, P = 0·001). In conclusion, FT is associated with similar low relapse rates as MAC and similar low NRM as RIC, resulting in improved OS. FT may be the preferred regimen for allo-HCT in MDS.

Fludarabine and Melphalan Compared with Reduced Doses of Busulfan and Fludarabine Improve Transplantation Outcomes in Older Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens developed to extend the use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to older patients have resulted in encouraging outcomes. We aimed to compare the 2 most commonly used RIC regimens, i.v. fludarabine with busulfan (FluBu) and fludarabine with melphalan (FluMel), in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), we identified 1045 MDS patients age ≥60 years who underwent first HSCT with a matched related or matched (8/8) unrelated donor using an RIC regimen. The CIBMTR's definition of RIC was used: a regimen that incorporated an i.v. busulfan total dose ≤7.2 mg/kg or a low-dose melphalan total dose ≤150 mg/m². The 2 groups, recipients of FluBu (n = 697) and recipients of FluMel (n = 448), were comparable in terms of disease- and transplantation-related characteristics except for the more frequent use of antithymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab in the FluBu group (39% versus 31%). The median age was 67 years in both groups. FluMel was associated with a reduced relapse incidence (RI) compared with FluBu, with a 1-year adjusted incidence of 26% versus 44% (P ≤ .0001). Transplantation-related mortality (TRM) was higher in the FluMel group (26% versus 16%; P ≤ .0001). Because the magnitude of improvement with FluMel in RI was greater than the improvement in TRM with FluBu, disease-free survival (DFS) was better at 1 year and beyond with FluMel compared with FluBu (48% versus 40% at 1 year [P = .02] and 35% versus 27% at 3 years [P = .01]). Overall survival (OS) was comparable in the 2 groups at 1 year (63% versus 61%; P = .4) but was significantly improved with FluMel compared with FluBu at 3 years (46% versus 39%; P = .03). Our results suggest that FluMel is associated with superior DFS compared with FluBu owing to reduced RI in older patients with MDS patients. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

The post-transplant scoring system (PTSS) is associated with outcomes in patients with MDS after CD34+selected allogeneic stem cell transplant

The post-transplant scoring system (PTSS), developed by the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, is based on three independent post-transplant risk factors: grade of acute graft-versus-host disease, lack of platelet recovery before day 100, and relapse before day 100; discriminating low- (0), intermediate- (1–3), and high-risk (4–8) patients. We investigated the prognostic value of the PTSS in a cohort of patients with MDS who underwent myeloablative CD34-selected TCD transplants. From 2008 to 2018, 109 patients underwent a first TCD-HCT for MDS at our center. We used Cox proportional hazards models and different landmark analyses to evaluate the association of categorized PTSS score risk groups with overall survival (OS). Patients with an intermediate/ high risk PTSS score had decreased OS at day 180 (univariate HR 3.25 [95% CI 1.60, 6.60], p = 0.001) and at day 365 (univariate HR 5.42 [95% CI 2.21, 13.3], p < 0.001) compared to low risk PTSS scores. This association remained significant after adjusting for HCT-CI. PTSS score calculated at day 100 was not associated with OS, even after adjusting for HCT-CI subgroups. In summary, the PTSS predicted survival at day 180 and day 365 in recipients of T-cell-depleted allografts for myelodysplastic syndrome.

Dose intensity for conditioning in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: can we recommend "when and for whom" in 2021?

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for various hematologic diseases. An essential component of this procedure is the pre-transplant conditioning regimen, which should facilitate engraftment and reduce or eliminate tumor cells. The recognition of the substantial association of a graft-versus- tumor effect and the high toxicity of the commonly used conditioning regimen led to the introduction of more differentiated intensity strategies, with the aim of making hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation less toxic and safer, and thus more applicable to broader populations such as older or unfit patients. In general, prospective and retrospective studies suggest a correlation between increasing intensity and nonrelapse mortality and an inverse correlation with relapse incidence. In this review, we will summarize traditional and updated definitions for conditioning intensity strategies and the landscape of comparative prospective and retrospective studies, which may help to find the balance between the risk of non-relapse mortality and relapse. We will try to underscore the caveats regarding these definitions and analyses, by missing complex differences between intensity and toxicity as well as the broad influences of other factors in the transplantation procedure. We will summarize evidence regarding several confounders which may influence decisions when selecting the intensity of the conditioning regimen for any given patient, according to the individual risk of relapse and non-relapse mortality.

Comparison of Patient Age Groups in Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: The Medicare Coverage With Evidence Development Study

Importance

In 2010, the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) indicated that data regarding efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in the CMS beneficiary population with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were currently insufficient, but that coverage would be provided for patients enrolled in a clinical study that met its criteria for Coverage with Evidence Development (CED).

Objective

The Center for International Bone Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) submitted a study concept comparing the outcomes of patients aged 55 to 64 years vs aged 65 years or older who met those criteria, effectively providing coverage by CMS for HCT for MDS.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Data on patients aged 65 years or older were prospectively collected and their outcomes compared with patients aged 55 to 64 years. Patients were enrolled in the study from December 15, 2010, to May 14, 2014. The results reported herein were analyzed as of September 4, 2017, with a median follow-up of 47 months. The study was conducted by the CIBMTR. It comprises a voluntary working group of more than 420 centers worldwide that contribute detailed data on allogeneic and autologous HCT and cellular therapies.

Interventions

Patients with MDS received HCT according to institutional guidelines and preferences.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse-free survival, and acute and chronic graft vs host disease.

Results

During the study period, 688 patients aged 65 years or older underwent HCT for MDS and were compared with 592 patients aged 55 to 64 years. Other than age, there were no differences in patient and disease characteristics between the groups. On univariate analysis, the 3-year NRM rate was 28% vs 25% for the 65 years or older group vs those aged 55 to 64 years, respectively. The 3-year OS was 37% vs 42% for the 65 years or older group vs the 55 to 64 years age group, respectively. On multivariable analysis after adjusting for excess risk of mortality in the older group, age group had no significant association with OS (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94-1.27; P = .23) or NRM (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.93-1.52; P = .16).

Conclusions and Relevance

Older patients with MDS undergoing HCT have similar OS compared with younger patients. Based on current data, we would recommend coverage of HCT for MDS by the CMS.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01166009.

Short telomere length predicts nonrelapse mortality after stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but long-term survival is limited by the risk of transplant-related complications. Short telomere length, mediated by inherited or acquired factors, impairs cellular response to genotoxic and replicative stress and could identify patients at higher risk for toxicity after transplantation. We measured relative telomere length in pretransplant recipient blood samples in 1514 MDS patients and evaluated the association of telomere length with MDS disease characteristics and transplantation outcomes. Shorter telomere length was significantly associated with older age, male sex, somatic mutations that impair the DNA damage response, and more severe pretransplant cytopenias, but not with bone marrow blast count, MDS treatment history, or history of prior cancer therapy. Among 1267 patients ≥40 years old, telomere length in the shortest quartile was associated with inferior survival (P < .001) because of a high risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM; P = .001) after adjusting for significant clinical and genetic variables. The adverse impact of shorter telomeres on NRM was independent of recipient comorbidities and was observed selectively among patients receiving more intensive conditioning, including myeloablative regimens and higher dose melphalan-based reduced-intensity regimens. The effect of shorter telomeres on NRM was prominent among patients who developed severe acute graft-versus-host disease, suggesting that short telomere length may limit regenerative potential of mucosal tissues after acute injury. MDS patients with shorter telomere length, who have inferior survival driven by excess toxicity, could be considered for strategies focused on minimizing toxic effects of transplantation.

A Personalized Prediction Model for Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only potentially curative option for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Mortality after HCT is high, with deaths related to relapse or transplant-related complications. Thus, identifying patients who may or may not benefit from HCT is clinically important. We identified 1514 patients with MDS enrolled in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Registry and had their peripheral blood samples sequenced for the presence of 129 commonly mutated genes in myeloid malignancies. A random survival forest algorithm was used to build the model, and the accuracy of the proposed model was assessed by concordance index. The median age of the entire cohort was 59 years. The most commonly mutated genes were ASXL1(20%), TP53 (19%), DNMT3A (15%), and TET2 (12%). The algorithm identified the following variables prior to HCT that impacted overall survival: age, TP53 mutations, absolute neutrophils count, cytogenetics per International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised, Karnofsky performance status, conditioning regimen, donor age, WBC count, hemoglobin, diagnosis of therapy-related MDS, peripheral blast percentage, mutations in RAS pathway, JAK2 mutation, number of mutations/sample, ZRSR2, and CUX1 mutations. Different variables impacted the risk of relapse post-transplant. The new model can provide survival probability at different time points that are specific (personalized) for a given patient based on the clinical and mutational variables that are listed above. The outcomes' probability at different time points may aid physicians and patients in their decision regarding HCT.

Which lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes should be treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation?

Indications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remain controversial in patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome. We review prognostic factors in lower risk MDS, delineating patients with relatively poor risk who may potentially benefit from HSCT during the disease course. Results of HSCT in those patients, and main efforts to decrease non-relapse mortality (NRM) are detailed. Prospective studies are needed to determine more precisely which lower risk MDS patients may benefit from transplantation.

Cui bono? Finding the value of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Introduction: The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) vary in their risk of disease progression; progression includes increasingly severe bone marrow failure, reclassification as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and death. Prognostic tools guide recommendations for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), the only curative option. AlloSCT is typically reserved for patients with higher-risk MDS as defined by existing prognostic tools, although additional clinical and biological factors in lower-risk patients may influence this dogma.Areas covered: This review discusses the current understanding of MDS risk stratification as it pertains to the use of alloSCT in subpopulations of MDS patients with a particular focus on the use of alloSCT in patients with lower-risk disease.Expert commentary: Though high-quality data are lacking, some lower-risk MDS patients may benefit from alloSCT, which offers the only prospect of cure. Understanding the etiologic role and prognostic impact of recurring genetic events may improve existing risk stratification and become integral facets of prognostic schemata. The identification of additional factors influencing the prognoses of patients currently lumped together as 'lower-risk' will likewise improve the selection of MDS patients for early intervention or aggressive therapies such as alloSCT.

Combining gene variants with clinical characteristics improves outcome prediction in Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Genetic variants have been identified in the majority of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients and have considerably influenced the diagnosis, classification, risk stratification and treatment of MDS. To explore the prognostic significance of genomic variants and build a new prognostic scoring model, we performed next-generation sequencing of 51 known genes in 499 Chinese patients with MDS. Ultimately, the TP53, GATA2, DNMT3A, age and the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) risk stratification were included in a new Cox model and divided into three prognostic categories, and had a better prediction of overall survival. The C-index of the new prognostic scoring model (0.772) was clearly better than IPSS-R risk stratification (0.717), which was validated in 163 cases. Moreover, the new model was also suitable for the prediction of OS for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The inclusion of genomic variants and age into the IPSS-R could improve prognostic algorithms for MDS patients.

In MDS, is higher risk higher reward?

Patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) are defined by the original or revised International Prognostic Scoring System and specific genetic features. Treatment of HR-MDS is challenging. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the only curative approach, is feasible in a minority of fit or intermediate fitness patients aged <70 to 75 years who are willing to face the risks of the procedure. Response to azacitidine and decitabine, the only approved drugs for HR-MDS and considered the standard of care, is partial and transient in most patients. The development of novel more personalized and efficient drugs is an unmet medical need. During the last decade, there have been substantial advances in understanding the multiple molecular, cellular, and immunological disturbances involved in the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndrome. As a result, a number of clinical and translational studies of new more focused treatment approaches for HR-MDS patients are underway. In contrast to acute myeloid leukemia, they have not resulted in any new drug approval. This review addresses the benefits and limitations of current treatment alternatives, offers a practical individualized treatment approach, and summarizes the clinical trials in progress for HR-MDS.

Optimized EBMT transplant-specific risk score in myelodysplastic syndromes after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a clinical and transplant-specific prognostic score using data from a large cohort of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. A Cox model was fitted to detect clinical and transplant-related variables prognostic of outcome. Then, cross-validation was performed to evaluate the validity and consistency of the model. Seven independent risk factors for survival were identified: age ≥50 years, matched unrelated donor, Karnofsky Performance Status <90%, very poor cytogenetics or monosomal karyotype, positive cytomegalovirus status of the recipient, blood blasts >1%, and platelet count ≤50 × 10⁹/L prior to transplantation. Incorporating these factors into a four-level risk score yielded hazard ratios for death, with low-risk (score of 0-1) as reference, of 2.02 (95% CI: 1.41-2.90) for the intermediate-risk group (score of 2-3), 3.49 (95% CI: 2.45-4.97) for the high-risk group (score of 4-5), and 5.90 (95% CI: 4.01-8.67) for the very high-risk group (score of >5). The score was predictive of survival, relapse-free survival, relapse, and non-relapse mortality (P<0.001, respectively). Cross-validation yielded significant and reproducible improvement in prognostic ability with C-statistics being 0.609 (95% CI: 0.588-0.629) versus 0.555 for the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo registry and 0.579 for the Center for Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. Prediction was even further augmented after applying a nomogram using age and platelets as continuous variables showing C-statistics of 0.628 (95% CI: 0.616-0.637). In conclusion, compared to existing prognostic systems, this proposed transplant-specific risk score offers improved performance with respect to post-transplant risk stratification in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Frailty in Hematologic Malignancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Older adults with hematologic malignancy are a growing demographic. Estimating risk of chemotherapy toxicity based on age alone is an unreliable estimate of quality of life, functional capacity, or risk of treatment complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Dedicated geriatric assessment tools can aid the clinician in identifying geriatric syndromes such as frailty, resulting in improved prognostication to decrease morbidity and mortality. Frailty is not synonymous with individual performance status and is dynamic. Establishing the patient goals, values, and preferences is central to the consideration of malignant hematology decision process. Careful considerations of available data on the patient's prognosis based on estimated life expectancy, geriatric assessment data, and age-specific cancer mortality, with and without treatment, can reconcile the risks and benefits. Assessments of frailty can aid the clinical feasibility and burden of the treatment to the patient and family in the context of each patient's unique needs.

Scoring System Based on Post-Transplant Complications in Patients after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Study from the SFGM-TC

PURPOSE

We developed a prognostic scoring system to evaluate the prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients surviving more than 100 days allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after (allo-HCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a landmark analysis on a derivation cohort of 393 cases to identify prognostic factors for 3-year overall survival. Potential predictor variables included demographic and clinical data, transplantation modalities and early post-transplant complications. The scoring system was tested against a validation cohort which included 391 patients.

RESULTS

Complications occurring before day 100 such as relapse [HR = 6.7; 95%CI, 4.5-10.0] (4 points), lack of platelet recovery [HR, 3.6; 95%CI, 2.2-5.8] (2 points), grade-II acute GVHD [HR = 1.7; 95%CI, 1.2-2.5] (1 point) and grade-III/IV [HR = 2.6; 95%CI, 1.8 -3.8] (2 points) were the only independent predictors of 3-year OS. The 3-year OS associated with low (0), intermediate (1-3) and high (≥4) risk scores was respectively 70%, 46% and 6%. The model performed consistently in both cohorts, with good calibration.

CONCLUSION

This post-transplant scoring system is a powerful predictor of outcome after allo-HCT for MDS, and can provide useful guidance for clinicians. Additional studies are required to evaluate this scoring system for other hematologic malignancies.

Comparison of transplant-specific prognostic scoring systems in haploidentical transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome

OBJECTIVES

We intended to identify the predictive abilities of recently published transplant-specific prognostic scoring systems in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) receiving haploidentical transplantation.

METHODS

The outcomes of 73 patients with MDS receiving haploidentical transplantation were analyzed, according to the MTPSS, the TRI, and the CIBMTR scoring systems.

RESULTS

The median age of patients at transplantation was 50 (range, 19-69) years. The IPSS-R cytogenetic risks of very good/good, intermediate, and poor/very poor were, respectively, observed in 35 (48.0%), 25 (34.2%), and 13 (17.8%) patients, including 4 (5.5%) with a monosomal karyotype. Pretransplant treatment failure and high (≥3) HCT-CI were observed in 30 (41.1%) and 35 (48.0%) patients, respectively. With survivor's median follow-up of 42.3 months, the overall survival rate at 4 years of all patients was 65.5% (95% CI, 52.4-75.9). The MTPSS (100%, 77.3%, 62.5%, and 42.0% at 4 years; P = .02) and the TRI (100%, 79.9%, 76.0%, and 17.1% at 4 years; P < .01) differentiate proportionally overall survival rates according to their 4 risk groups, whereas the CIBMTR scoring system did not (P = .17).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the potential ability of the MPTSS and the TRI as prognostic tools for patients with MDS receiving haploidentical transplantation.

Mutations and prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes: karyotype-adjusted analysis of targeted sequencing in 300 consecutive cases and development of a genetic risk model

To develop a genetic risk model for primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), we queried the prognostic significance of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-derived mutations, in the context of the Mayo cytogenetic risk stratification, which includes high-risk (monosomal karyotype; MK), intermediate-risk (non-MK, classified as intermediate/poor/very poor, per the revised international prognostic scoring system; IPSS-R), and low-risk (classified as good/very good, per IPSS-R). Univariate analysis in 300 consecutive patients with primary MDS identified TP53, RUNX1, U2AF1, ASXL1, EZH2, and SRSF2 mutations as "unfavorable" and SF3B1 as "favorable" risk factors for survival; for the purposes of the current study, the absence of SF3B1 mutation was accordingly dubbed as an "adverse" mutation. Analysis adjusted for age and MK, based on our previous observation of significant clustering between MK and TP53 mutations, confirmed independent prognostic contribution from RUNX1, ASXL1, and SF3B1 mutations. Multivariable analysis that included age, the Mayo cytogenetics risk model and the number of adverse mutations resulted in HRs (95% CI) of 5.3 (2.5-10.3) for presence of three adverse mutations, 2.4 (1.6-3.7) for presence of two adverse mutations, 1.5 (1.02-2.2) for presence of one adverse mutation, 5.6 (3.4-9.1) for high-risk karyotype, 1.5 (1.1-2.2) for intermediate-risk karyotype and 2.4 (1.8-3.3) for age >70 years; HR-weighted risk point assignment generated a three-tiered genetic risk model: high (N = 65; 5-year survival 2%), intermediate (N = 100; 5-year survival 18%), and low (N = 135; 5-year survival 56%). The current study provides a practically simple risk model in MDS that is based on age, karyotype, and mutations only.

Prognostic Prediction Model for Second Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients With Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Single-Center Report

PURPOSE

To identify factors affecting survival outcomes and to develop a prognostic model for second allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT2) for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after the first autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight consecutive adult AML patients who received allo-SCT2 were analyzed in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

The 4-year overall survival (OS) rate was 28.7%. In multivariate analysis, poor cytogenetic risk at diagnosis, circulating blast ≥ 20% at relapse, duration from first transplantation to relapse < 9 months, and failure to achieve morphologic complete remission after allo-SCT2 were factors associated with poor OS. A prognostic model was developed with the following score system: intermediate and poor cytogenetic risk at diagnosis (0.5 and 1 point), peripheral blast ≥ 20% at relapse (1 point), duration from the first transplantation to relapse < 9 months (1 point), and failure to achieve morphologic complete remission after allo-SCT2 (1 point). The model identified 2 subgroups according to the 4-year OS rate: 51.3% in the low-risk group (score < 2) and 2.8% in the high-risk group (score ≥ 2) (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This prognostic model might be useful to make an appropriate decision for allo-SCT2 in relapsed AML after the first autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.

Prognostic Factors for Mortality among Day +100 Survivors after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Although day +100 survival among allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients has improved over time, longer-term survival remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for survival among patients surviving longer than 100 days using baseline characteristics and factors identified within the first 100 days after transplantation. Of 413 patients undergoing a first allogeneic HCT between 2006 and 2014, 335 survived >100 days post-transplantation. The majority underwent a myeloablative transplantation (75%) with a bone marrow (BM) (52%) graft source. One-year all-cause mortality (ACM) was 29%, with 16% relapse mortality (RM) and 12% nonrelapse mortality. In multivariable analysis, high-risk disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; P = .003), non-cytomegalovirus infection (HR, 1.79; P = .003), more days hospitalized (HR, 1.16; P < .001), and relapse (HR, 4.38; P < .001) within the first 100 days were associated with increased risk of ACM. Patients with higher income (HR, .89; P = .024) and those who received BM (HR, .52; P < .001) or umbilical cord blood (HR, .40; P = .002) relative to peripheral blood stem cells had lower risk of ACM. Our study identifies risk factors for adverse long-term survival in 100-day survivors, a time point when patients frequently are discharged from transplantation centers. In addition to disease- and transplantation-related factors, low socioeconomic status was associated with worse long-term survival, highlighting the need for focused efforts to improve outcomes in vulnerable patient populations.

[Preventative and therapeutic relapse strategies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Guidelines from the Francophone society of bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC)]

Disease relapse remains the first cause of mortality of hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). The risk of recurrence is elevated in patients with high-risk cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities, as well as when allo-HCT is performed in patients with refractory disease or with persistent molecular or radiological (PET-CT scan) residual disease. Within the frame of the 7th annual workshops of the francophone society for bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy, the working group reviewed the literature in order to elaborate unified guidelines for the prevention and treatment of relapse after allo-HCT. For high risk AML and MDS, a post transplant maintenance strategy is possible, using hypomethylating agents or TKI anti-FLT3 when the target is present. For Philadelphia positive ALL, there was a consensus for the use of post-transplant TKI maintenance. For lymphomas, there are no strong data on the use of post-transplant maintenance, and hence a preemptive strategy is recommended based on modulation of immunosuppression, close follow-up of donor chimerism, and donor lymphocytes infusion. For multiple myeloma, even though the indication of allo-HCT is controversial, our recommendation is post transplant maintenance using bortezomib, due to its a good toxicity profile without increasing the risk of GVHD.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers the only potential cure for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, with current approaches to HCT, many older patients with comorbidities are poor HCT candidates, and treatment-related morbidity and mortality may offset benefit for patients with lower-risk disease. Consequently, selection of patients with MDS for HCT should take into consideration disease risk category including mutational status, HCT comorbidity index, functional status, donor options, and available institutional resources. Formal geriatric assessment may further guide use of HCT and, if HCT is chosen, selection of conditioning intensity. Patients with higher-risk MDS should be considered for HCT at the time of diagnosis, whereas expectant nontransplant management is more appropriate for those with lower-risk disease. A high blast burden at the time of HCT increases the risk of subsequent relapse; however, the role of pretransplant cytoreductive therapy and the regimen of choice remain controversial. Patients with MDS younger than 65 years and with an HCT comorbidity index ≤ 4 may benefit from more intense conditioning regimens. The presence of complex or monosomal karyotype or mutations in TP53, DNMT3A, or other genes identify patients with poorer outcomes following HCT. Patients with TP53 mutations have particularly poor survival, and should be enrolled in clinical trials whenever possible. Several important HCT studies are ongoing and will better define the role of HCT in MDS as well as the value of pretransplant cytoreductive therapy or post-transplant relapse-prevention strategies. Given the apparent underuse of HCT in eligible patients and low enrollment in MDS HCT clinical trials to date, timely referral of patients with MDS to such trials and HCT programs is critical.

Validation of the revised IPSS at transplant in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/transformed acute myelogenous leukemia receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective analysis of the EBMT chronic malignancies working party

The International Prognostic Scoring System has been revised (IPSS-R) to predict prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes at diagnosis. To validate the use of the IPSS-R assessed before transplant rather than at diagnosis we performed a retrospective analysis of the EBMT database. A total of 579 patients had sufficient information available to calculate IPSS-R at transplant. Median overall survival (OS) from transplant was significantly different according to IPSS-R: very low 23.6 months, low 55.0 months, intermediate 19.7 months, high 13.5 months, very high 7.8 months (P<0.001). In a multivariate Cox model the following parameters were significant risk factors for OS: IPSS-R, graft source, age and prior treatment. Median relapse free survival also showed significant differences according to IPSS-R: very low: 23.6 months, low: 24.8 months, intermediate 10.6 months, high 7.9 months, very high 5.5 months (P<0.001). Multivariate risk factors for relapse-free survival (RFS) were: IPSS-R, reduced intensity conditioning, graft source and prior treatment. A trend for an increased relapse incidence was noted for very high risk IPSS-R. We conclude that the IPSS-R at transplant is a useful prognostic score for predicting OS and RFS after transplantation, capturing both disease evolution and response to prior treatment before transplant.