Disparities in Use of Human Epidermal Growth Hormone Receptor 2-Targeted Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Racial Differences in Breast Cancer Survival Between Black and White Women According to Tumor Subtype: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Despite effective early-detection approaches and innovative treatments, Black women in the United States have higher breast cancer mortality rates compared with White women. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the extent of disparities in breast cancer survival between Black and White women according to tumor subtype.

METHODS

A comprehensive database search was performed for full-text, English-language articles published from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2022. Included studies compared survival between Black and White female patients with breast cancer within subtypes defined by hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu (HER2; now known as ERBB2) status. Random-effects models were used to combine study-specific results and generate pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs for breast cancer-specific or overall survival (OS). A protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021268212).

RESULTS

Eighteen studies including 228,885 (34,262 Black; 182,466 White) patients with breast cancer were identified. Compared with White women, Black women had a higher risk of breast cancer death for all tumor subtypes. The summary risk of breast cancer death was 50% higher among hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative [HER2-] tumors (RR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.30 to 1.72]), 34% higher for hormone receptor+/HER2+ (RR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.10 to 1.64]), 20% higher for hormone receptor-negative (-)/HER2+ (RR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.43]), and 17% higher among individuals with hormone receptor-/HER2- tumors (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.25). Black women also had poorer OS than White women for all subtypes.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest there are both subtype-specific and subtype-independent mechanisms that contribute to disparities in breast cancer survival between Black and White women, which require multilevel interventions to address and achieve health equity.

Existing Health Inequities in the Treatment of Advanced and Metastatic Cancers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study aims to identify health inequities related to the medical treatment and supportive care of patients with advanced/metastatic cancer and recommend solutions to promote health equity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite robust strides in the development of therapeutic strategies for advanced and metastatic cancer, significant disparities in treatment access and implementation exist. Race, socioeconomic status, gender, and geography represent just a few of the individual-level factors which contribute to challenges in treatment administration, thorough evaluation of germline genetics and tumor genomics, and quality palliative and end-of-life care. Given the increasing complexity of cancer treatments and our enhanced understanding of tumor biology, efforts to uniformly provide equitable and high-level care to all patients are needed. In this review we will discuss factors that contribute to health inequities in patients with advanced and metastatic cancer diagnoses, highlighting opportunities for intervention, ongoing challenges in change implementation, and national and international society recommendations to eliminate disparities. Acknowledging existing inequities and engaging in multilevel discourse with key stakeholders is needed to optimize care practices to the benefit of all patients.

Racial and sociodemographic disparities in the use of targeted therapies in advanced ovarian cancer patients with Medicare

OBJECTIVE

To describe sociodemographic and racial disparities in receipt of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and bevacizumab among insured patients with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to identify patients with advanced stage, high grade serous ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcome of interest was receipt of PARPi or bevacizumab at any time after diagnosis. χ2 tests were used to compare categorical variables. Factors independently associated with the receipt of PARPi and/or bevacizumab were identified using a multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The cohort included 6242 patients; 276 (4.4%) received PARPi, 2142 (34.3%) received bevacizumab, and 389 (6.2%) received both. Receipt of either targeted treatment increased over the study period. On univariate analysis, patients who received either targeted therapy were younger (63% vs 48% aged <75 years; p<0.001), had a lower comorbidity index (86% vs 80% Charlson Comorbidity Index 0-1; p<0.001), and higher socioeconomic status (74% vs 71% high socioeconomic status; p=0.047) compared with those who did not receive targeted therapy. In the multivariable model, non-Hispanic black patients were less likely than non-Hispanic white patients to receive either targeted therapy (odds ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.98; p=0.032). Older patients (aged >74 years) were also less likely to receive PARPi or bevacizumab compared with those aged 65-69 years (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Sociodemographic and racial disparities exist in receipt of PARPi and bevacizumab among patients with advanced ovarian cancer insured by Medicare. As targeted therapies become more commonly used, a widening disparity gap is likely.

Promoting informed approaches in precision oncology and clinical trial participation for Black patients with cancer: Community-engaged development and pilot testing of a digital intervention

BACKGROUND

Black patients with cancer are less likely to receive precision cancer treatments than White patients and are underrepresented in clinical trials. To address these disparities, the study aimed to develop and pilot-test a digital intervention to improve Black patients' knowledge about precision oncology and clinical trials, empower patients to increase relevant discussion, and promote informed decision-making.

METHODS

A community-engaged approach, including a Community Advisory Board and two rounds of key informant interviews with Black patients with cancer, their relatives, and providers (n = 48) was used to develop and refine the multimedia digital intervention. Thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative data. The intervention was then pilot-tested with 30 Black patients with cancer to assess feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, knowledge, decision self-efficacy, and patient empowerment; Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test was used to analyze quantitative data.

RESULTS

The digital tool was found to be feasible, acceptable, and culturally appropriate. Key informants shared their preferences and recommendations for the digital intervention and helped improve cultural appropriateness through user and usability testing. In the pilot test, appreciable improvement was found in participants' knowledge about precision oncology (z = -2.04, p = .052), knowledge about clinical trials (z = -3.14, p = .001), and decisional self-efficacy for targeted/immune therapy (z = -1.96, p = .0495).

CONCLUSIONS

The digital intervention could be a promising interactive decision-support tool for increasing Black patients' participation in clinical trials and receipt of precision treatments, including immunotherapy. Its use in clinical practice may reduce disparities in oncology care and research.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

We developed a digital interactive decision support tool for Black patients with cancer by convening a Community Advisory Board and conducting interviews with Black patients with cancer, their relatives, and providers. We then pilot-tested the intervention with newly diagnosed Black patients with cancer and found appreciable improvement in participants' knowledge about precision oncology, knowledge about clinical trials, and confidence in making decisions for targeted/immune therapy. Our digital tool has great potential to be an affordable and scalable solution for empowering and educating Black patients with cancer to help them make informed decisions about precision oncology and clinical trials and ultimately reducing racial disparities.

Disparities in PI3K/mTOR inhibitor use, toxicities, and outcomes among patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Novel agents such as PI3K and mTOR inhibitors (PI3K/mTORi) have expanded treatment options in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Nevertheless, mortality rates remain disproportionately high for Black patients and patients with lower socioeconomic status. Furthermore, clinical trials for these novel agents lacked diversity, so their toxicity profile in minority populations is uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of EHR-derived data from the Flatiron Health Database for patients with HR+, HER2- MBC. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with PI3K/mTORi use and toxicity outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 9169 patients with MBC were included in our analysis, of which 1780 (19.4%) received a PI3K/mTORi. We estimated the conditional total effect of insurance through Medicaid, and found lower odds of use of PI3K/mTORi among patients on Medicaid compared to those with commercial insurance (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.99, p = 0.049). Odds of PI3K/mTORi use were higher for patients treated at an academic center (OR 1.28, CI 1.06-1.55, p = 0.01). Modeled as a controlled direct effect, Black/African American (Black/AA) race had no impact on odds of PI3K/mTOR use. Black/AA patients had twice the odds of developing hyperglycemia on PI3K/mTORi compared to White patients (OR 2.02, CI 1.24-3.39, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This analysis of real-world data suggests that the use of PI3K/mTORi is influenced by socioeconomic factors. We also found racial disparities in toxicity outcomes, with Black/AA patients having twice the risk of hyperglycemia. Our findings call for greater efforts to ensure access to novel treatments and improve their tolerability in diverse populations.

Increasing Clinical Trial Participation of Black Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer

Despite racial disparities in breast cancer mortality, Black women remain underrepresented in clinical trials. In this mixed methods research, 48 Black women were engaged via focus group discussions and in-depth interviews to better understand the lived experience of women with breast cancer. The results of this qualitative study informed the development of a subsequent online survey to identify barriers, motivators, and other factors that influence decision-making by Black women diagnosed with breast cancer when considering clinical trial participation. Among the 257 Black survey participants, most (95%) were aware of clinical trials; of those, most viewed them as lifesaving (81%) and/or benefiting others (90%). Negative perceptions such as serious side effects (58%), not receiving real treatment (52%), or risk of potential harm (62%) were indicated. Barriers included financial expenses (49%), concerns that their condition could be made worse (29%), that they would receive a placebo (28%), or that treatment was unapproved (28%). Participants were more likely than their health care providers (HCPs) to initiate discussions of clinical trials (53% versus 33%), and 29% of participants indicated a need for more information about risks and benefits, even after having those conversations. The most trustworthy sources of information on clinical trials were HCPs (66%) and breast cancer support groups (64%). These results suggest that trusted communities are key for providing education on clinical trials. However, there is also a need for HCPs to proactively discuss clinical trials with patients to ensure that they are adequately informed about all aspects of participation.

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in triple-negative breast cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) continues to be a significant concern, especially among minority populations, where treatment disparities are notably pronounced. Addressing these disparities, especially among African American women and other minorities, is crucial for ensuring equitable healthcare.

AREAS COVERED

This review delves into the continuum of TNBC treatment, noting that the standard of care, previously restricted to chemotherapy, has now expanded due to emerging clinical trial results. With advances like PARP inhibitors, immunotherapy, and antibody-drug conjugates, a more personalized treatment approach is on the horizon. The review highlights innovative interventions tailored for minorities, such as utilizing technology like text messaging, smartphone apps, and targeted radio programming, coupled with church-based behavioral interventions.

EXPERT OPINION

Addressing TNBC treatment disparities demands a multifaceted approach, blending advanced medical treatments with culturally sensitive community outreach. The potential of technology, especially in the realm of promoting health awareness, is yet to be fully harnessed. As the field progresses, understanding and integrating the socio-economic, biological, and access-related challenges faced by minorities will be pivotal for achieving health equity in TNBC care.

A Public Health Emergency: Breast Cancer Among Black Communities in the United States

While Black people have a similar incidence of breast cancer compared to White people, they have a 40% increased death rate. Black people are more likely to be diagnosed with aggressive subtypes such as triple-negative breast cancer. However, despite biological factors, systemic racism and social determinants of health create delays in care and barriers to treatment. While genetic testing holds incredible promise for Black people, uptake remains low and results may be challenging to interpret. There is a need for more robust, multidisciplinary, and antiracist interventions to reverse breast cancer-related racial disparities.

Disparities in Breast Cancer Care-How Factors Related to Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Drive Inequity

Breast cancer survival has increased significantly over the last few decades due to more effective strategies for prevention and risk modification, advancements in imaging detection, screening, and multimodal treatment algorithms. However, many have observed disparities in benefits derived from such improvements across populations and demographic groups. This review summarizes published works that contextualize modern disparities in breast cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and presents potential strategies for reducing disparities. We conducted searches for studies that directly investigated and/or reported disparities in breast cancer prevention, detection, or treatment. Demographic factors, social determinants of health, and inequitable healthcare delivery may impede the ability of individuals and communities to employ risk-mitigating behaviors and prevention strategies. The disparate access to quality screening and timely diagnosis experienced by various groups poses significant hurdles to optimal care and survival. Finally, barriers to access and inequitable healthcare delivery patterns reinforce inequitable application of standards of care. Cumulatively, these disparities underlie notable differences in the incidence, severity, and survival of breast cancers. Efforts toward mitigation will require collaborative approaches and partnerships between communities, governments, and healthcare organizations, which must be considered equal stakeholders in the fight for equity in breast cancer care and outcomes.

Machine learning prediction of pathological complete response and overall survival of breast cancer patients in an underserved inner-city population

BACKGROUND

Generalizability of predictive models for pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients requires diverse datasets. This study employed four machine learning models to predict pCR and OS up to 7.5 years using data from a diverse and underserved inner-city population.

METHODS

Demographics, staging, tumor subtypes, income, insurance status, and data from radiology reports were obtained from 475 breast cancer patients on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in an inner-city health system (01/01/2012 to 12/31/2021). Logistic regression, Neural Network, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosted Regression models were used to predict outcomes (pCR and OS) with fivefold cross validation.

RESULTS

pCR was not associated with age, race, ethnicity, tumor staging, Nottingham grade, income, and insurance status (p > 0.05). ER-/HER2+ showed the highest pCR rate, followed by triple negative, ER+/HER2+, and ER+/HER2- (all p < 0.05), tumor size (p < 0.003) and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) (p < 0.01). Machine learning models ranked ER+/HER2-, ER-/HER2+, tumor size, and BPE as top predictors of pCR (AUC = 0.74-0.76). OS was associated with race, pCR status, tumor subtype, and insurance status (p < 0.05), but not ethnicity and incomes (p > 0.05). Machine learning models ranked tumor stage, pCR, nodal stage, and triple-negative subtype as top predictors of OS (AUC = 0.83-0.85). When grouping race and ethnicity by tumor subtypes, neither OS nor pCR were different due to race and ethnicity for each tumor subtype (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Tumor subtypes and imaging characteristics were top predictors of pCR in our inner-city population. Insurance status, race, tumor subtypes and pCR were associated with OS. Machine learning models accurately predicted pCR and OS.

Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer: from Detection to Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Update on current racial disparities in the detection and treatment of breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death among Black and Hispanic women. Mammography rates among Black and Hispanic women have surpassed those among White women, with studies now advocating for earlier initiation of breast cancer screening in Black women. Black, Hispanic, Asian, and American Indian and Alaskan Native women continue to experience delays in diagnosis and time to treatment. Further, racial discrepancies in receipt of guideline-concordant care, access to genetic testing and surgical reconstruction persist. Disparities in the initiation, completion, toxicity, and efficacy of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted drug therapy remain for racially marginalized women. Efforts to evaluate the impact of race and ethnicity across the breast cancer spectrum are increasing, but knowledge gaps remain and further research is necessary to reduce the disparity gap.

Characteristics, healthcare utilization, and outcomes of patients with HER2-low breast cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment for HER2-low [defined as ImmunoHistoChemistry (IHC) 1 + or 2 + and negative/normal in Situ Hybridization (ISH)] breast cancer patients is rapidly evolving, yet we lack critical information about the HER2-low population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women aged 18 years or older diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010 and 2016 in North Carolina. Analyses were conducted for the overall cohort and a stage IV sub-cohort. We examined demographic and clinical characteristics, and characterized prevalence of HER2-low disease and healthcare utilization. We estimated adjusted rate ratios for the association between HER2 classifications and utilization outcomes, and hazard ratios for 3-year all cause mortality (stage IV only).

RESULTS

The overall and stage IV cohorts included 12,965 and 635 patients, respectively. HER2-low patients represented more than half of both cohorts (59% overall, 53% stage IV). HER2-low patients were more likely than IHC 0 patients to have hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease. In the stage IV cohort, HER2-low patients were more likely to be Black (26% vs. 16% IHC 0, p = 0.0159). In both cohorts, rates of hospitalizations were slightly higher among HER2-low patients. There were no survival differences between HER2-low and IHC 0 among stage IV patients.

CONCLUSION

New treatment options for HER2-low breast cancer may have potential for significant impact at the population level particularly for patients with stage IV disease. In light of racial differences between HER2-low and IHC 0 patients observed in our cohort, research- and practice-based efforts to ensure equitable adoption of new treatment guidelines for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer will be essential.

From Race to Racism and Disparities to Equity: An Actionable Biopsychosocial Approach to Breast Cancer Outcomes

PURPOSE

Racial disparities in outcomes of breast cancer in the United States have widened over more than 3 decades, driven by complex biologic and social factors. In this review, we summarize the biological and social narratives that have shaped breast cancer disparities research across different scientific disciplines in the past, explore the underappreciated but crucial ways in which these 2 strands of the breast cancer story are interwoven, and present 5 key strategies for creating transformative interdisciplinary research to achieve equity in breast cancer treatment and outcomes.

DESIGN

We first review the key differences in tumor biology in the United States between patients racialized as Black versus White, including the overrepresentation of triple-negative breast cancer and differences in tumor histologic and molecular features by race for hormone-sensitive disease. We then summarize key social factors at the interpersonal, institutional, and social structural levels that drive inequitable treatment. Next, we explore how biologic and social determinants are interwoven and interactive, including historical and contemporary structural factors that shape the overrepresentation of triple-negative breast cancer among Black Americans, racial differences in tumor microenvironment, and the complex interplay of biologic and social drivers of difference in outcomes of hormone receptor positive disease, including utilization and effectiveness of endocrine therapies and the role of obesity. Finally, we present 5 principles to increase the impact and productivity of breast cancer equity research.

RESULTS

We find that social and biologic drivers of breast cancer disparities are often cyclical and are found at all levels of scientific investigation from cells to society. To break the cycle and effect change, we must acknowledge and measure the role of structural racism in breast cancer outcomes; frame biologic, psychosocial, and access factors as interwoven via mechanisms of cumulative stress, inflammation, and immune modulation; take responsibility for the impact of representativeness (or the lack thereof) in genomic and decision modeling on the ability to accurately predict the outcomes of Black patients; create research that incorporates the perspectives of people of color from inception to implementation; and rigorously evaluate innovations in equitable cancer care delivery and health policies.

CONCLUSIONS

Innovative, cross-disciplinary research across the biologic and social sciences is crucial to understanding and eliminating disparities in breast cancer outcomes.

Patterns of Evidence-Based Care for the Diagnosis, Staging, and First-line Treatment of Breast Cancer by Race-Ethnicity: A SEER-Medicare Study

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic disparities in guideline-recommended breast cancer treatment are well documented, however studies including diagnostic and staging procedures necessary to determine treatment indications are lacking. The purpose of this study was to characterize patterns in delivery of evidence-based services for the diagnosis, clinical workup, and first-line treatment of breast cancer by race-ethnicity.

METHODS

SEER-Medicare data were used to identify women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2000 and 2017 at age 66 or older (n = 2,15,605). Evidence-based services included diagnostic procedures (diagnostic mammography and breast biopsy), clinical workup (stage and grade determination, lymph node biopsy, and HR and HER2 status determination), and treatment initiation (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and HER2-targeted therapy). Poisson regression was used to estimate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each service.

RESULTS

Black and American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) women had significantly lower rates of evidence-based care across the continuum from diagnostics through first-line treatment compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW) women. AIAN women had the lowest rates of HER2-targeted therapy and hormone therapy initiation. While Black women also had lower initiation of HER2-targeted therapy than NHW, differences in hormone therapy were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest patterns along the continuum of care from diagnostic procedures to treatment initiation may differ across race-ethnicity groups.

IMPACT

Efforts to improve delivery of guideline-concordant treatment and mitigate racial-ethnic disparities in healthcare and survival should include procedures performed as part of the diagnosis, clinical workup, and staging processes.

Determinants of targeted cancer therapy use in community oncology practice: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Rummler-Brache process mapping

BACKGROUND

Precision medicine holds enormous potential to improve outcomes for cancer patients, offering improved rates of cancer control and quality of life. Not all patients who could benefit from targeted cancer therapy receive it, and some who may not benefit do receive targeted therapy. We sought to comprehensively identify determinants of targeted therapy use among community oncology programs, where most cancer patients receive their care.

METHODS

Guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 community cancer care providers and mapped targeted therapy delivery across 11 cancer care delivery teams using a Rummler-Brache diagram. Transcripts were coded to the framework using template analysis, and inductive coding was used to identify key behaviors. Coding was revised until a consensus was reached.

RESULTS

Intention to deliver precision medicine was high across all participants interviewed, who also reported untenable knowledge demands. We identified distinctly different teams, processes, and determinants for (1) genomic test ordering and (2) delivery of targeted therapies. A key determinant of molecular testing was role alignment. The dominant expectation for oncologists to order and interpret genomic tests is at odds with their role as treatment decision-makers' and pathologists' typical role to stage tumors. Programs in which pathologists considered genomic test ordering as part of their staging responsibilities reported high and timely testing rates. Determinants of treatment delivery were contingent on resources and ability to offset delivery costs, which low- volume programs could not do. Rural programs faced additional treatment delivery challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified novel determinants of targeted therapy delivery that potentially could be addressed through role re-alignment. Standardized, pathology-initiated genomic testing may prove fruitful in ensuring patients eligible for targeted therapy are identified, even if the care they need cannot be delivered at small and rural sites which may have distinct challenges in treatment delivery. Incorporating behavior specification and Rummler-Brache process mapping with determinant analysis may extend its usefulness beyond the identification of the need for contextual adaptation.

Trends in Disparities and Transitions of Treatment in Patients With Early Breast Cancer in China and the US, 2011 to 2021

Importance

Breast cancer treatment has profoundly improved in China recently. However, trends in disparities and transitions of treatment in early-stage cancer between China and the US are not well known.

Objective

To identify changes for patients with early breast cancer by using large databases from China and the US.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter cross-sectional study used the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer (CSCO BC) database from hospitals in 13 provinces in China and the Flatiron Health (hereinafter referred to as Flatiron) database from more than 280 community oncology clinics in the US. Patients with stage I to III breast cancer diagnosed from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021, were included. Data were analyzed from June 10 to December 1, 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The distribution of age, clinical stage, and cancer subtypes at diagnosis were examined overall and by year. The mean annual percent change (MAPC) from 2011 to 2021 in systemic therapy and surgery was also analyzed.

Results

A total of 57 720 patients with early breast cancer were screened from the CSCO BC (n = 45 970) and Flatiron (n = 11 750) databases. The median age at diagnosis in China among the 41 449 patients included in the age analysis was 47 (IQR, 40-56) years; in the US, the median age was 64 (IQR, 54-73) years. Among patients with clinical stage data in the CSCO BC (n = 22 794) and Flatiron (n = 4413) databases, the proportion of stage I cancer was 7250 (31.8%) vs 2409 (54.6%); stage II cancer, 10 043 (44.1%) vs 1481 (33.6%); and stage III cancer, 5501 (24.1%) vs 523 (11.9%). The proportion of hormone receptor-positive cancer in China was 69.8%, lower than that in the US (87.5%). For patients with ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-positive cancer, the proportion in China (30.2%) was higher than that in the US (15.6%). For neoadjuvant therapy, the annual rate increased from 247 of 1553 (15.9%) to 200 of 790 (25.3%) in China, with an MAPC of -4.4% (95% CI, -50.6% to 85.0%; P = .89). For patients with ERBB2-positive cancer, the proportion treated with trastuzumab in early-stage cancer in China increased significantly, with an MAPC of 22.1% (95% CI, 17.4%-26.9%; P < .001), and overtook that in the Flatiron database since 2017 (1684 [68.5%] vs 550 [62.5%]; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that disparities in treatment of early breast cancer narrowed between China and the US during the study period. The rapid growth of trastuzumab treatment in China was suggestive of differential access to targeted ERBB2 therapy.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Locoregional Recurrence Among Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Node-Negative Breast Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the TAILORx Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Whether racial and ethnic disparities in locoregional recurrence (LRR) exist among patients with similar access to care treated in randomized clinical trials is unknown.

Objective

To examine racial and ethnic differences in LRR among patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2 [formerly HER2 or HER2/neu])-negative, node-negative breast cancer enrolled in the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This unplanned retrospective post hoc analysis examined a prospective multicenter clinical trial population of women with breast cancer enrolled between 2006 and 2010, with 9 years of follow-up. The TAILORx investigators randomized patients to treatment based on their Oncotype DX recurrence score, including endocrine therapy alone (recurrence score <11), endocrine therapy alone vs chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy (recurrence score 11-25), or chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy (recurrence score >25). Patients with unknown race and ethnicity or lack of follow-up were excluded from this analysis. Data analysis was performed between December 2021 and March 2022.

Main Outcome and Measures

Locoregional recurrence was defined as ipsilateral in breast, skin, chest wall, or regional nodal recurrence without concurrent distant recurrence, and was stratified by racial and ethnic group. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier and adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for survival analyses.

Results

Of the 10 273 women enrolled in TAILORx, this analysis included 9369 with T1-2N0 HR-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer. Of these patients, 428 (4.6%) were Asian, 886 (9.4%) were Hispanic, 676 (7.2%) were non-Hispanic Black (hereinafter Black), and 7406 (78.8%) were non-Hispanic White (hereinafter White). Assigned treatment receipt was high, with a 9.3% (n = 870) crossover of treatment groups and a median endocrine therapy duration of longer than 60 months, ranging from 61.1 to 65.9 months, across racial and ethnic groups. A total of 6818 patients (72.6%) received radiation (6474 [96.1%] after breast-conserving surgery and 344 [13.0%] after mastectomy). At a median follow-up of 94.8 months (range, 1-138 months), 8-year LRR rates were 3.6% (95% CI, 1.6%-5.6%) in Asian patients, 3.9% (95% CI, 2.2%-5.4%) in Black patients, 3.1% in Hispanic patients (95% CI, 1.7%-4.5%), and 1.8% (95% CI, 1.5%-2.3%) in White patients (P < .001). In survival analyses adjusted for patient, tumor, and treatment factors, Asian race (hazard ratio, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.12-3.29]) and Black race (1.78 [1.15-2.77]) were independently associated with LRR. In adjusted survival analyses for breast cancer mortality, LRR was independently associated with increased breast cancer mortality (hazard ratio, 5.71 [95% CI, 3.50-9.31]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this post hoc analysis, racial and ethnic differences in LRR were observed among patients with T1-2N0 HR-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer despite high rates of treatment receipt in this clinical trial population, with the highest LRR rates in Asian and Black patients. Further study is needed to understand whether failure to rescue after LRR may contribute to racial disparities in breast cancer mortality.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00310180.

Social determinants of health and CDK4/6 inhibitor use and outcomes among patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Survival outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have improved due to novel agents such as CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). Nevertheless, Black patients and patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) continue to bear a disproportionate mortality burden.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of EHR-derived data from the Flatiron Health Database (FHD). A dataset was constructed to include Black/African-American (Black/AA) and White patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative MBC. Outcomes included CDK4/6i use (overall and first-line), and rates of leukopenia, dose reduction, and time on treatment for first-line CDK4/6i. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with use and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 6802 patients with MBC were included, of which 5187 (76.3%) received CDK4/6i. Of those, 3186 (61.4%) received CDK4/6i first-line. Overall, 86.7% of patients were categorized as White and 13.3% as Black/AA; 22.4% were > 75 years old; 12.6% were treated at an academic site; 3.3% had Medicaid insurance. In addition to advanced age and poorer performance status, lower use of CDK4/6i was associated with Black/AA vs White race (72.9% vs 76.8%; OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99, p = 0.04) and Medicaid vs commercial insurance (69.6% vs 77.4%; OR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.95, p = 0.02). Odds of CDK4/6i use were twofold higher for patients treated at an academic center (p < 0.001). Rates of CDK4/6i-induced leukopenia and dose reductions did not differ significantly by race, insurance type, or treatment site. Time on CDK4/6i was significantly lower among Medicaid patients (395 days) than patients with commercial insurance (558 days) or Medicare (643 days) (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

This analysis of real-world data suggests that Black race and lower SES are associated with decreased CDK4/6i use. However, among patients treated with CDK4/6i, subsequent toxicity outcomes are similar. Efforts to ensure access to these life-prolonging medications are warranted.

Pharmacogenomics and health disparities, are we helping?

Pharmacogenomics has been at the forefront of precision medicine during the last few decades. Precision medicine carries the potential of improving health outcomes at both the individual as well as population levels. To harness the benefits of its initiatives, careful dissection of existing health disparities as they relate to precision medicine is of paramount importance. Attempting to address the existing disparities at the early stages of design and implementation of these efforts is the only guarantee of a successful just outcome. In this review, we glance at a few determinants of existing health disparities as they intersect with pharmacogenomics research and implementation. In our opinion, highlighting these disparities is imperative for the purpose of researching meaningful solutions. Failing to identify, and hence address, these disparities in the context of the current and future precision medicine initiatives would leave an already strained health system, even more inundated with inequality.

Association of interleukin-8 and risk of incident and recurrent depression in long-term breast cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

In cancer patients, an interleukin (IL)-8 gene variant that leads to higher production of IL-8, is associated with lower risk of depressive symptoms. In non-cancer adults, higher levels of IL-8 correlate with lower severity of depressive symptoms, decreased risk of suicide, and improved treatment response in females, but not males. This study evaluates the prospective association between circulating levels IL-8 and incident and recurrent major depressive disorder in breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

In this single site, prospective cohort study with protocol modification extending follow-up from 24- to 32 months, recruitment occurred between September 2013 and January 2018, and follow-up was completed February 2021. Participants were identified from a Kaiser Permanente of Southern California health plan-based sample of 219 breast cancer survivors, who were two or more years since diagnosis of early stage breast cancer (TNM 0-II), aged 55 to 85 years, with no major depression or health events in last year. Circulating levels of IL-8 were obtained at enrollment. Primary outcome was time to incident or recurrent major depressive disorder as diagnosed by interview and DSM-5 criteria.

RESULTS

Among 219 participants (mean age, 70 years; 100% female; 16 [7.3%] Asian, 42 [19.2%] Black, 161 [73.5%] White), 84% completed 24 months follow-up. After protocol modification, 59% completed 32 months follow-up. Median follow-up was 28.5 months. The primary endpoint occurred in 27 participants (12.4%, 5.7 events /100 person years; 95% CI 2.7 - 8.8). Higher IL-8 was associated with lower risk of incident and recurrent depression (hazard ratio, HR, 0.52, 95% CI 0.26 - 1.05). Among those with levels of IL-8 in the highest quartile, the primary endpoint occurred in 2 participants (3.6%; 1.6 events/100 person years; 95% CI 1.3 - 1.9), as compared to 25 participants in the pooled lower quartiles (15.2%; 7.2 events/100 persons years; 95%CI 7.0 - 7.4; rate difference, 5.6 per 100 person years, 95%CI 5.2 - 5.9; HR, 0.21, 95%CI 0.05 - 90, multivariable adjusted HR, 0.20, 95%CI 0.05 - 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Among breast cancer survivors, higher IL-8 at enrollment was associated with a decreased risk of incident and recurrent major depression. These findings provide insights into mechanisms of depression risk and development of novel therapies for depression prevention, and suggest that testing for IL-8 may have prognostic value in identifying resilience or risk of depression.

Sociodemographic disparities in molecular testing for breast cancer

PURPOSE

Molecular testing is a critical component of breast cancer care used to identify the presence of estrogen and/or progesterone receptors (jointly hormone receptors-HRs) and the expression of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) on a tumor. Our objective was to characterize trends and predictors of lack of molecular testing among female breast cancer patients overall and by sociodemographic characteristics.

METHODS

We examined data on female breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-18. Joinpoint regression analyses assessed annual percent change (APC) in lack of ER, PR, or HER2 testing. Multivariable, multilevel logistic regression models identified factors associated with lack of molecular testing.

RESULTS

A nominally lower proportion of rural patients did not receive molecular testing (e.g., 1.8% in rural vs. 2.3% in urban for HER2). For all tests, a higher proportion of Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black women were not tested. Across all characteristics, improvement in testing was noted, although disparities among groups remained. For example, lack of HER2 testing improved from 3.2 to 1.7% in White patients (APC = - 10.05) but was consistently higher in Black patients 3.9 to 2.3% (APC = - 8.21). Multivariable, multilevel models showed that older, non-Hispanic Black, and unpartnered women were at greater odds of not receiving molecular testing.

CONCLUSIONS

While lack of molecular testing of breast cancer patients is relatively rare, racial/ethnic, insurance status, and age-related disparities have been identified. To reduce testing and downstream treatment and outcome disparities, it is imperative for all breast cancer patients to receive molecular testing.

Efficacy and safety of inetetamab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a subgroup analysis in the HOPES study

Background

Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inetetamab plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

A HOPES study was conducted on patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Eligible patients were randomly divided into test group and control group at a 2:1 ratio. Among them, patients in test group received inetetamab plus vinorelbine. Concurrently, patients in the control group received vinorelbine. During the trial, safety evaluation was conducted every 4 weeks and efficacy evaluation was conducted every 8 weeks. As assessed by the Response Criteria Evaluation in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 criteria, the primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Safety was estimated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 2.0. Efficacy and safety of the postoperative recurrent-metastases first-line subgroup in the HOPES registry study of inetetamab was analyzed and compared with previous clinical studies of trastuzumab in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Results

In total, we included 315 patients. Among them, 114 patients in the postoperative recurrent-metastases first-line subgroup were assigned to the full analysis set (FAS) (test group, 72; and control group, 42). The test group significantly prolonged median PFS (mPFS) (11.1 vs. 3.3 months of the control group; P<0.0001). ORR and DCR were remarkably higher than the control group (ORR, 61.5% vs. 29.7% with an increase of 31.8%, P=0.0224; DCR, 93.8% vs. 59.4% with an increase of 34.4%, P=0.0003). Efficacy and safety of postoperative recurrent-metastases first-line subgroup in the HOPES study was comparable to previous clinical studies of trastuzumab as first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Conclusions

Inetetamab has shown efficacy and safety equivalent to trastuzumab for patients in the first-line treatment of postoperative recurrence-metastases HER2-positive breast cancer, which confirms its important status and potential as first-line treatment. Inetetamab provides more first-line targeted therapy options for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Challenges in Access to New Therapeutic Agents: Marginalized Patients With Cancer in Pakistan and the Need for New Guidelines

Cancer care disparities persist among the medically underserved patients with cancer in Pakistan. To determine the access that marginalized patients with cancer have to chemotherapy and newer targeted agents in Pakistan approved by essential medicine list 2017, the barriers that patients face in getting such access, the implications of the barriers for the effectiveness of treatment, and ways of overcoming those barriers, with particular attention to breast cancer (BC), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), need to be addressed.

Health care disparities and major barriers in access to essential targeted therapies in low- and middle-income countries

Impact of public health insurance coverage of novel anticancer medication on medical expenditure and patient affordability in a provincial medical centre of China: a propensity score-matching analysis with the quasi-experimental design

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about the impact of the government's efforts in having novel anticancer medicines covered by the public health insurance system in China. This study targeted the above policy implemented in Fujian province in 2017, analysed the policy impact on the medical expenditure of cancer treatment and patient affordability based on the clinical data of Fujian provincial medical centre.

METHODS

The study included 253 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive patients with breast cancer who completed at least one course of trastuzumab treatment extracted from the hospital health information system of the provincial medical centre of Fujian. We adopted the propensity score-matching method to mimic a quasi-experimental design to estimate the impact of the public health insurance coverage policy on all the indicated patients with a before-after comparison of the total breast cancer-associated direct medical expenditures for a standard course of treatment or maintenance treatment and the proportionate patient out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure based on the real clinical data.

RESULTS

We found evidence of an association between the public health insurance coverage of novel breast cancer medication and the reductions of the medical expenditure by US$18661.02 (95% CI 13 836.57 to 28 201.45), and the proportionate patient OOP expenditure by 24% (95% CI0.20 to 0.27). The medical expenditure and the proportionate patient OOP expenditure might be generally reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

The coverage of innovative antibreast cancer medicines by the public health insurance was found to be associated with a reduction of the medical expenditure and share of patient OOP expenditure for cancer treatment of the indicated patients. Patients with lower ability-to-pay did not benefit well from the coverage policy. To maximise the welfare of the public health insurance coverage of novel anticancer medication, the study called for strengthened health insurance benefit packages of the rural patient and the patient enrolled in the urban and rural resident health insurance programme, who might have lower ability-to-pay and need more support from the public security system.

The impact of race and ethnicity in breast cancer-disparities and implications for precision oncology

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and is one of the leading causes of cancer death. The incidence, pathological features, and clinical outcomes in breast cancer differ by geographical distribution and across racial and ethnic populations. Importantly, racial and ethnic diversity in breast cancer clinical trials is lacking, with both Blacks and Hispanics underrepresented. In this forum article, breast cancer researchers from across the globe discuss the factors contributing to racial and ethnic breast cancer disparities and highlight specific implications of precision oncology approaches for equitable provision of breast cancer care to improve outcomes and address disparities.

Disparities in Surgical Oncology: Management of Advanced Cancer

Significant variations in the patterns of care, incidence, and mortality rates of several common cancers have been noted. These disparities have been attributed to a complex interplay of factors, including genetic, environmental, and healthcare-related components. Within this review, primarily focusing on commonly occurring cancers (breast, lung, colorectal), we initially summarize the burden of these disparities with regard to incidence and screening patterns. We then explore the interaction between several proven genetic, epigenetic, and environmental influences that are known to contribute to these disparities.

De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer

In the modern era, highly effective anti-HER2 therapy is associated with low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer raising the question of whether local therapy de-escalation by radiation omission is possible in patients with small-node negative tumors treated with lumpectomy. To evaluate existing data on radiation omission, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to test the hypothesis that RT omission results in equivalent overall survival (OS) in stage 1 (T1N0) HER2+ breast cancer. We excluded patients that received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. We stratified the cohort by receipt of adjuvant radiation. We identified 6897 patients (6388 RT; 509 no RT). Patients that did not receive radiation tended to be ≥70 years-old (odds ratio [OR] = 3.69, 95% CI: 3.02-4.51, p < 0.0001), to have ≥1 comorbidity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06-1.68, p = 0.0154), to be Hispanic (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.00-2.22, p = 0.049), and to live in lower income areas (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07-1.64, p = 0.0266). Radiation omission was associated with a 3.67-fold (95% CI: 2.23-6.02, p < 0.0001) increased risk of death. While other selection biases that influence radiation omission likely persist, these data should give caution to radiation omission in T1N0 HER2+ breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with biosimilar trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpressed non-metastatic breast cancer: patterns of use and clinical outcomes in India

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is associated with poor prognosis and access to anti-HER2 treatment is still a challenge in lower-middle income countries. The availability of the biosimilar trastuzumab has improved access by lowering the costs. We report the pattern of use of neoadjuvant ± adjuvant trastuzumab and outcomes in patients with HER2-positive non-metastatic breast cancer treated with regimens incorporating shorter durations of therapy and the use of the biosimilar trastuzumab compared to the innovator.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant ± adjuvant trastuzumab (innovator (n = 34 (33%)) and biosimilar (n = 70 (67%)) manufactured by Biocon Biologics) with chemotherapy. Information regarding chemotherapy regimens, duration of trastuzumab use (≤12 weeks and >12 weeks), pathological response (Miller Payne grade), disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and safety data were collected from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients were analysed with a median age of 51 years (range: 23-82); of these, 57% were postmenopausal, 31.8% were hormone receptor positive and 62.9% had stage III disease. The overall pathological complete response (p-CR) in both breast and axilla increased to 37.6% in patients treated with trastuzumab preoperatively as compared to 22.2% in patients who did not receive any trastuzumab. Patients receiving innovator trastuzumab and biosimilar trastuzumab showed a p-CR of 28.5% and 41.7%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range: 3-114), there were 18 relapses and 11 deaths. The 3-year DFS was 87.1% and OS was 92.2%. Cardiac dysfunction developed in 4 of 78 (5.1%) evaluable patients.

CONCLUSION

Access to anti-HER2 therapy in the treatment of non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in resource-constrained settings has improved significantly with the availability of the biosimilar trastuzumab. Imbalances in patient profiles at baseline in routine clinical practice led to inconclusive outcomes of ≤12 weeks versus >12 weeks trastuzumab treatment. However, on the basis of historical data, patients could be offered shorter duration of trastuzumab when a standard 1-year treatment of adjuvant trastuzumab is not feasible in resource-constrained settings. The p-CR using the biosimilar trastuzumab in neoadjuvant treatment has been observed to be comparable to the innovator trastuzumab.

Baseline characteristics and first-line treatment patterns in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the SystHERs registry

BACKGROUND

Systemic Therapies for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Study (SystHERs, NCT01615068) was a prospective, observational disease registry designed to identify treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in real-world treatment settings.

METHODS

SystHERs enrolled patients aged ≥ 18 years with recently diagnosed HER2-positive MBC. Treatment regimens and clinical management were determined by the treating physician. In this analysis, patients were compared descriptively by first-line treatment, age, or race. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the associations between baseline variables and treatment selections. Clinical outcomes were assessed in patients treated with trastuzumab (Herceptin [H]) + pertuzumab (Perjeta [P]).

RESULTS

Patients were enrolled from June 2012 to June 2016. As of February 22, 2018, 948 patients from 135 US treatment sites had received first-line treatment, including HP (n = 711), H without P (n = 175), or no H (n = 62) (with or without chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy). Overall, 68.7% received HP + taxane and 9.3% received H without P + taxane. Patients aged < 50 years received HP (versus H without P) more commonly than those ≥ 70 years (odds ratio 4.20; 95% CI, 1.62-10.89). Chemotherapy was less common in patients ≥ 70 years (68.2%) versus those < 50 years (88.0%) or 50-69 years (87.4%). Patients treated with HP had median overall survival of 53.8 months and median progression-free survival of 15.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis of real-world data shows that most patients with HER2-positive MBC received first-line treatment with HP + taxane. However, older patients were less likely to receive dual HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy.

Are there socio-economic inequalities in utilization of predictive biomarker tests and biological and precision therapies for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Novel biological and precision therapies and their associated predictive biomarker tests offer opportunities for increased tumor response, reduced adverse effects, and improved survival. This systematic review determined if there are socio-economic inequalities in utilization of predictive biomarker tests and/or biological and precision cancer therapies.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycINFO were searched for peer-reviewed studies, published in English between January 1998 and December 2019. Observational studies reporting utilization data for predictive biomarker tests and/or cancer biological and precision therapies by a measure of socio-economic status (SES) were eligible. Data was extracted from eligible studies. A modified ISPOR checklist for retrospective database studies was used to assess study quality. Meta-analyses were undertaken using a random-effects model, with sub-group analyses by cancer site and drug class. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for each study. Pooled utilization ORs for low versus high socio-economic groups were calculated for test and therapy receipt.

RESULTS

Among 10,722 citations screened, 62 papers (58 studies; 8 test utilization studies, 37 therapy utilization studies, 3 studies on testing and therapy, 10 studies without denominator populations or which only reported mean socio-economic status) met the inclusion criteria. Studies reported on 7 cancers, 5 predictive biomarkers tests, and 11 biological and precision therapies. Thirty-eight studies (including 1,036,125 patients) were eligible for inclusion in meta-analyses. Low socio-economic status was associated with modestly lower predictive biomarker test utilization (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-1.05; 10 studies) and significantly lower biological and precision therapy utilization (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.91; 30 studies). Associations with therapy utilization were stronger in lung cancer (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-1.00; 6 studies), than breast cancer (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.78-1.10; 8 studies). The mean study quality score was 6.9/10.

CONCLUSIONS

These novel results indicate that there are socio-economic inequalities in predictive biomarker tests and biological and precision therapy utilization. This requires further investigation to prevent differences in outcomes due to inequalities in treatment with biological and precision therapies.

Determinants of Guideline-Discordant Breast Cancer Care

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based breast cancer treatment guidelines recommend the most appropriate course of therapy based on tumor characteristics and extent of disease. Evaluating the multilevel factors associated with guideline discordance is critical to identifying strategies to eliminate breast cancer survival disparities.

METHODS

We identified females diagnosed with a first primary, stage I-III breast cancer between the ages of 20-69 years of age from the population-based Seattle-Puget Sound Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. Participants completed a survey about social support, utilization of patient support services, hypothesized barriers to care, and initiation of breast cancer treatment. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Among 1,390 participants, 10% reported guideline-discordant care. In analyses adjusted for patient-level sociodemographic factors, individuals who did not have someone to go with them to appointments or drive them home (OR 1.96; 95% CI, 1.09-3.59) and those who had problems talking to their doctors or their staff (OR 2.03; 95% CI, 1.13-3.64) were more likely to be guideline discordant than those with social support or without such problems, respectively. Use of patient support services was associated with a 43% lower odds of guideline discordance (OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Although guideline discordance in this cohort of early-stage breast cancer survivors diagnosed <70 years of age was low, instrumental social support, patient support services, and communication with doctors and their staff emerged as potential multilevel intervention targets for improving breast cancer care delivery.

IMPACT

This study supports extending the reach of interventions designed to improve guideline concordance.

Precision community: a mixed methods study to identify determinants of adoption and implementation of targeted cancer therapy in community oncology

Background

Precision medicine has enormous potential to improve cancer outcomes. Over one third of the 1.5 million Americans diagnosed with cancer each year have genetic mutations that could be targeted with an FDA-approved drug to treat their disease more effectively. However, the current uptake of targeted cancer therapy in clinical practice is suboptimal. Tumor testing is not widely used, and treatments based on molecular and genomic profiling are often not prescribed when indicated. Challenges with the uptake of precision medicine may disproportionately impact cancer patients in rural communities and other underserved populations. The objective of this study is to identify the determinants of adoption and implementation of precision cancer therapy to design an implementation strategy for community oncology practices, including those in rural areas.

Methods

This study is an explanatory sequential mixed methods study to identify factors associated with the use of targeted cancer therapy. Levels of targeted therapy use will be ascertained by secondary analysis of medical records to identify concordance with 18 national guideline recommendations for use of precision medicine in the treatment of breast, colorectal, lung, and melanoma skin cancer. Concurrently, facilitators and barriers associated with the use of precision cancer therapy will be elicited from interviews with up to a total of 40 oncologists, administrators, pathology, and pharmacy staff across the participating sites. Qualitative analysis will be a template analysis based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. Quantitative data aggregated at the practice level will be used to rank oncology practices’ adherence to targeted cancer therapy guidelines. Determinants will be compared among high and low users to isolate factors likely to facilitate targeted therapy use. The study will be conducted in eight community oncology practices, with an estimated 4121 targeted therapy treatment decision-making opportunities over a 3-year period.

Discussion

Despite unprecedented investment in precision medicine, translation into practice is suboptimal. Our study will identify factors associated with the uptake of precision medicine in community settings. These findings will inform future interventions to increase equitable uptake of evidence-based targeted cancer treatment.

Initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab for human epidermal growth receptor 2-positive early invasive breast cancer in a population-based cohort study of older women in England

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidance on recommended treatment for older patients with breast cancer is often ambiguous, particularly in the context of comorbidities and poor functional status. Older patients, aged 70 years and over, account for a substantial proportion of women with breast cancer yet are underrepresented in randomized controlled trials. This paper investigates the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab in older patients in routine care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women, aged 50 years and over, newly diagnosed with human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early invasive breast cancer from January 2014 to December 2017 were identified from the England Cancer Registry. Chemotherapy and trastuzumab use was obtained from the Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy (SACT) dataset. Patient and tumor characteristics influential in treatment decision-making were included in multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression models.

RESULTS

10% of women had HER2-positive tumors. Initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab decreased with age from ≥70% among women aged 50-64 years to <15% among women aged 80+ years. Initiation varied additionally by tumor characteristics and number of comorbidities. Age remained a factor in treatment decisions despite favorable other factors, with lower use among women aged 70+ years. There was also marked variation across geographical regions.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with operable HER2-positive early invasive breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab was started less frequently as age increased, regardless of tumor characteristics or comorbidity burden. There was substantial variation in the proportion of women who started these treatments across the country.

Factors Influencing Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Trastuzumab Choice in Older Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-positive Breast Cancer Patients

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate influence factors for adjuvant chemotherapy regimen choice on the basis of trastuzumab in older human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer under multi-disciplinary team (MDT) modality.

Materials and Methods: HER2-positive breast cancer patients aged ≥ 60 years who received breast cancer surgery between April 2013 and December 2017 in Shanghai Ruijin Hospital were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical and pathological features, MDT recommendations, administration of adjuvant treatment, cardiotoxicity, and disease outcome information were reviewed and analyzed.

Results: A total of 222 older HER2-positive breast cancer patients were included and recommended to receive adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab therapy. Paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (PH, 41/222, 18.5%), docetaxel plus carboplatin and trastuzumab (TCH, 62/222, 27.9%), and antharcyclines plus cyclophosphamide followed by taxanes and trastuzumab (AC-TH, 119/222, 53.6%) were the three main regimens. Patients with T1a-b (P<0.001), grade 1-2 (P=0.008), node-negative (P<0.001), stage I (P<0.001), low Ki-67 level (P<0.001) disease, with cardiovascular comorbidities (P=0.011), and aged ≥ 70 years (P<0.001) were more likely to be recommended to PH regimen. Among the 178 patients who finally received adjuvant chemotherapy plus one-year trastuzumab treatment, only four patients (4/117, 3.4%) were recorded to have asymptomatic LVEF declining ≥ 10% but remaining ≥ 50% within one-year trastuzumab treatment.

Conclusions: Clinical factors, including age, tumor size, node status, and cardiovascular comorbidity influenced the recommendation of trastuzumab with chemotherapy for older HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Low risk older HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with PH had favorable outcome and good cardiac safety, which needed further clinical validation.

Treatment patterns and survival in HER2-positive early breast cancer: a whole-of-population Australian cohort study (2007-2016)

BACKGROUND

Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) demonstrate that trastuzumab improves survival in patients with human epidermal growth factor 2-positive early breast cancer (HER2 + EBC), but real-world patients and clinical practice often differ from RCTs. We examine real-world treatment patterns and outcomes associated with trastuzumab for HER2 + EBC.

METHODS

We identified all Australians dispensed trastuzumab for HER2 + EBC between 1/1/2007 and 30/6/2016. We estimated the proportion of patients completing 12 months of treatment (defined as ≥350 days of exposure within 540 days of initiation). We estimated overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) by using trastuzumab dispensing for metastatic breast cancer as a surrogate for recurrence.

RESULTS

Our study included 14,644 patients. Among patients with ≥540 days of follow-up (n = 11,903), 67.4% completed 12 months of trastuzumab. OS rates at 5 and 9 years were 92.7 and 87.9%, and RFS rates at 5 and 9 years were 86.8 and 81.4%, respectively. Patients who completed 12 months of trastuzumab had a 9-year OS rate of 90.2% compared with 86.2% among patients receiving <12 months of therapy (adjusted HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world HER2 + EBC patients are less likely to complete 12 months of trastuzumab than some clinical trial counterparts but have survival outcomes comparable to those reported in landmark RCTs.

Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care Among Older Women With Stage I-III Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Background: This study examined receipt of guideline-concordant care (GCC) according to evidence-based treatment guidelines and quality measures and specific types of treatment among older women with breast cancer. Patients and Methods: A total of 142,433 patients aged ≥66 years diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer between 2007 and 2011 were identified in the SEER-Medicare linked database. Algorithms considering cancer characteristics and the appropriate course of care as per guidelines versus actual care received determined receipt of GCC. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the likelihood of GCC and specific types of treatment for women aged ≥75 versus 66 to 74 years. Results: Overall, 39.7% of patients received GCC. Patients diagnosed at stage II or III, with certain preexisting conditions, and of nonwhite race were less likely to receive GCC. Patients with hormone-negative tumors, higher grade tumors, and greater access to oncology care resources were more likely to receive GCC. Patients aged ≥75 years were approximately 40% less likely to receive GCC or adjuvant endocrine therapy, 78% less likely to have any surgery, 61% less likely to have chemotherapy, and about half as likely to have radiation therapy than those aged 66 to 74 years. Conclusions: Fewer than half of older women with breast cancer received GCC, with the lowest rates observed among the oldest age groups, racial/ethnic minorities, and women with later-stage cancers. However, patients with more aggressive tumor characteristics and greater access to oncology resources were more likely to receive GCC. Considering that older women have the highest incidence of breast cancer and that many are diagnosed at stages requiring more aggressive treatment, efforts to increase rates of earlier stage diagnosis and the development of less toxic treatments could help improve GCC and survival while preserving quality of life.

Differences in Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis by Ethnicity, Insurance Status, and Family Income in Young Women in the USA

PURPOSE

Describe the clinical and epidemiological data from young women with breast cancer and determine the association between ethnicity, insurance status, family income, and breast cancer stage at the diagnosis in this population.

METHODS

Women under the age of 40 diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2010 to 2014 and identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries database were included. Binary logistic regression was applied in order to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for factors that were potentially predictive for receiving a breast cancer diagnosis at stage I.

RESULTS

Of 14,379 young women with invasive breast cancer, 70.9% of the patients were white, 15.9% black, and 13.2% classified as other ethnicity (American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander). The initial clinical stage at diagnosis was stage I in 28.2%, II in 45.2%, III in 19.0%, and IV in 7.6%. The chi-square test showed a significant association between clinical stage at diagnosis and family income (p < 0.0001), insurance status (p < 0.0001), and ethnicity (p < 0.0001). The ORs for being diagnosed at stage I, regarding different factors, revealed that women with family income higher than US$ 85,000 were more likely to be diagnosed with stage I (OR [95%CI], 1.306 [1.173-1.454]; p value < 0.0001) when compared with patients with family income of less than US$ 60,000. Black women were less likely to be diagnosed with stage I (OR [95%CI], 0.676 [0.605-0.755]; p value < 0.0001), when compared with white women. Uninsured women were less likely to be diagnosed with stage I (OR [95%CI], 0.586 [0.529-0.648]; p value < 0.0001) when compared with women with insurance coverage.

CONCLUSION

Among young US women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, most of them presented early stage disease. Women with black ethnicity, low income, and uninsured are at risk for late-stage presentation. Improvements in strategies to allow earlier breast cancer diagnosis in these at risk population are urged.

Prognostic nomogram for patients with non-metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer in a prospective cohort

PURPOSE

A nomogram is a reliable tool to generate individualized risk prediction by combining prognostic factors. We aimed to construct a nomogram for predicting the survival in patients with non-metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer in a prospective cohort.

METHODS

We analyzed 1304 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with non-metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer between January 2008 and December 2016 in our institution. Independent prognostic factors were identified to build a nomogram using the COX proportional hazard regression model. The prediction of the nomogram was evaluated by concordance index (C-index), calibration and subgroup analysis. External validation was performed in a cohort of 6379 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

RESULTS

Through the COX proportional hazard regression model, five independent prognostic factors were identified. The nomogram predicting overall survival achieved a C-index of 0.78 in the training cohort and 0.74 in the SEER cohort. The calibration plot displayed favorable accordance between the nomogram prediction and the actual observation for 3-year overall survival in both cohorts. The quartiles of the nomogram score classified patients into subgroups with distinct overall survival.

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated a novel nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with non-metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer, which presented a favorable discrimination ability. This model may assist clinical decision making and patient-clinician communication in clinical practice.

Disparities and Trends in Genetic Testing and Erlotinib Treatment among Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Despite reports of socioeconomic disparities in rates of genetic testing and targeted therapy treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), little is known about whether such disparities are changing over time.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis to identify disparities and trends in genetic testing and treatment with erlotinib. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we identified 9,900 patients with stage IV NSCLC diagnosed in 2007 to 2011 at age 65 or older. We performed logistic regression analyses to identify patient factors associated with odds of receiving a genetic test and erlotinib treatment, and to assess trends in these differences with respect to diagnosis year.

RESULTS

Patients were more likely to receive genetic testing if they were under age 75 at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR), 1.55] independent of comorbidity level, and this age-based gap showed a decrease over time (OR, 0.93). For untested patients, erlotinib treatment was associated with race (OR, 0.58, black vs. white; OR, 2.45, Asian vs. white), and was more likely among female patients (OR, 1.45); for tested patients, erlotinib treatment was less likely among low-income patients (OR, 0.32). Most of these associations persisted or increased in magnitude.

CONCLUSIONS

Race and sex are associated with rates of erlotinib treatment for patients who did not receive genetic testing, and low-income status is associated with treatment rates for those who did receive testing. The racial disparity remained stable over time, while the income-based disparity grew larger.

IMPACT

Attention to reducing disparities is needed as precision cancer treatments continue to be developed.

Access to high-cost drugs for advanced breast cancer in Latin America, particularly trastuzumab

Provision of high-level healthcare is a challenge for all low- to middle-income countries (LMICs) since healthcare systems are heterogeneous, face many challenges such as inadequate funding, inequitable distribution of resources and services and usually are not adequately equipped to deal with a huge problem such as breast cancer. The development of anti-HER2 therapies can be considered one of the most important examples of the translation of molecular biology knowledge into clinical benefits for cancer patients. While a variety of novel therapeutic strategies are emerging, current treatment regimens remain focussed on targeted therapy with monoclonal antibodies, mainly trastuzumab, the first agent developed in this field. While these results have revolutionised the outcome of HER2+ patients in clinical trials and in high-income countries where they are widely available, results have not impacted the natural history of this aggressive disease in most of the world. Unfortunately, the availability of these drugs is far from universal in many LMICs, and in Latin America, in particular, patients with HER2+ breast cancer are treated exclusively with standard chemotherapy, a more toxic and less efficient therapy. While the complexity of the situation and the multiple factors that have an impact in this scenario are recognised, we need to map the future and develop feasible strategies to address possible solutions to the problem of drug access. A clear and unbiased diagnosis of the situation is a good starting point. Defining healthcare priorities and a clear strategy for the allocation of resources is difficult but mandatory. In this article, we will discuss current and future challenges regarding access (and lack of access) to high-cost cancer drugs in Latin America, with a focus on anti-HER2 therapies.

Targeted agents for HER2-positive breast cancer in older adults: current and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

One-third of breast cancer (BC) cases worldwide occur in women aged 65 years and older, with 10 to 15% overexpressing the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Although several HER2-targeted therapies have been developed, the lack of data regarding their use in older patients hampers evidence-based decision-making for this population.

AREAS COVERED

We review current evidence on the efficacy and safety of HER2-targeted therapies in older adults with BC, focusing on approved therapies such as trastuzumab, lapatinib, pertuzumab, ado-trastuzumab-emtansine, and neratinib. Additionally, we discuss drugs under development to target the HER2-receptor, and to overcome resistance to existing therapies. Finally, we highlight the cardiotoxicity of HER2-targeted drugs among older adults.

EXPERT OPINION

Older adults are underrepresented in trials of HER2-targeted therapies in BC. We propose strategies to increase recruitment of older adults in clinical trials in order to increase the evidence base to treat this growing population.

Trastuzumab uptake in HER2-positive breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Overexpression of the HER2 gene is predictive of treatment benefit with trastuzumab therapy for breast cancer (BC) patients. The study objective was to investigate whether all eligible patients with HER2-positive BC initiated trastuzumab therapy. A systematic search was conducted through PubMed, Web of Science PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Cochrane Library. From 2651 studies identified, 107 observational studies were included for full text review, of which 26 met the inclusion criteria and an additional 7 studies were identified through citation searching. Two independent reviewers extracted data for accuracy and completeness. From 33 observational studies, 14,644 patients were exposed to trastuzumab therapy. Age range varied across studies; the youngest cohort had a median age of 50 and the oldest had a median age of 84. Sample sizes ranged from 11 to 1928 and included patients from 10 countries. Studies were heterogenous and few studies accounted for confounders. We identified large variability in uptake of trastuzumab in HER2-positive early BC patients (9.1-100%) and metastatic BC patients (50.8-84.0%). The pooled uptake was 71.3% (95% CI 64.6-77.9%), with high heterogeneity (I² = 99.05%). The most conservative predictors of higher uptake included younger age (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.36-3.20) and lower Charlson Comorbidity Index of patients (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.32-1.99). In addition, tumour characteristics including higher tumour grade (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.23-2.45), larger tumour size (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.54-2.10), advanced tumour stage (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.44-2.96) and hormone receptor negative tumor (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.35-1.77) were associated with higher uptake. The uptake of trastuzumab therapy varied widely between studies and across subgroups suggesting that there may be some inequalities in the use of this agent. However, our findings should be interpreted with caution due to study heterogeneity and potential confounding, and thus additional studies of individual level data which control for confounders are needed to understand more about inequalities in uptake.

Use of trastuzumab as an adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in China: The Nvwa study

The aim of this study was to understand current trends in trastuzumab use in China as a neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer and identify factors influencing trastuzumab use.This was a retrospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study of patients diagnosed with HER2+ breast cancer (stage I-III), between July 2013 and June 2014, at 155 hospitals in 29 provinces/cities in China. Demographic and clinical data, including tumor characteristics and details of adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapies used, were collected. Data analysis included univariate analysis, multivariate logistic regression, and subgroup analyses.Of 4994 HER2+ patients (mean age 51.1 ± 9.9 years) included, only 29.8% received trastuzumab, with 30.5% in adjuvant therapy and 18.3% in neoadjuvant therapy. The highest rates of adjuvant trastuzumab were in Beijing (59.3%), Jiangsu (57.1%), and Ningxia (50.0%), while those of neoadjuvant trastuzumab were in Guangdong (24.8%), Beijing (14.1%), and Zhejiang (10.7%). Multivariate regression results revealed that factors associated with trastuzumab use were medical insurance cover for trastuzumab, residing locally to the hospital, more lymph node involvement, and more advanced tumor stage. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy were likely to be younger, premenopausal and non-local, and had lymph node metastases, more advanced tumor, and progesterone receptor positive tumor.Trastuzumab use in patients with HER2+ breast cancer is relatively low in China, especially for neoadjuvant therapy. Insurance coverage seems to be the most correlated factor that influences the use of trastuzumab in Chinese patients with HER2+ breast cancer.