1
|
Li J, Hu YT, Liu CC, Wang LH, Ju HX, Huang XF, Chi P, Du JL, Wang JP, Xiao Y, Lin GL, Zhang W, Zhao H, Liu M, Song YM, Xu D, Wang JW, Sun LF, Xie HT, Cao HF, Xiao Q, Wang J, Wu QB, Li DC, Dai S, Jiang WZ, Shen L, Yuan Y, Wang ZQ, Ding KF. Primary Surgery Followed by Selective Chemoradiotherapy Versus Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:884-895. [PMID: 38185388 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this work was to determine whether locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with negative mesorectal fascia (MRF) predicted by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be excluded from preoperative radiation therapy treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS This multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with LARC within 6 to 12 cm from the anal verge and with negative MRI-predicted MRF. Participants were randomized to the intervention group (primary surgery, in which the patients with positive pathologic [CRM] circumferential margins were subjected to chemoradiotherapy [CRT] and those with negative CRM underwent adjuvant chemotherapy according to pathologic staging) or the control group (preoperative CRT, in which all patients underwent subsequent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS A total of 275 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 140) and control (n = 135) groups, in which 33.57% and 28.15% patients were at clinical T4 stage and 85.92% and 80.45% patients were at "bad" or "ugly" risk in the intervention and control groups, respectively. There were 2 patients (1.52%) and 1 patient (0.77%) with positive CRM in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P > .05). The non-adherence rates for the intervention and control groups were 3.6% and 23.7%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 34.6 months (IQR, 18.2-45.7), 43 patients had positive events (28 patients and 15 patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively). There were 6 patients (4.4%) with local recurrence in the intervention group and none in the control group, which led to the termination of the trial. The 3-year DFS rate was 81.82% in the intervention group (95% CI, 78.18%-85.46%) and 85.37% in the control group (95% CI, 81.75%-88.99%), with a difference of -3.55% (95% CI, -3.71% to -3.39%; hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 0.94-3.30). In the per-protocol data set, the difference between 3-year DFS rates was -5.44% (95% CI, -5.63% to -5.25%; hazard ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.01-4.06). CONCLUSIONS Based on the outcomes of this trial, in patients with LARC and MRI-negative MRF, primary surgery could negatively influence their DFS rates. Therefore, primary surgery was an inferior strategy compared with preoperative CRT followed by surgery and cannot be recommended for patients with LARC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ye-Ting Hu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Cheng-Cheng Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Liu-Hong Wang
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Xing Ju
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Xue-Feng Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Pan Chi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jin-Lin Du
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Jian-Ping Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Yi Xiao
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Guo-Le Lin
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yong-Mao Song
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Dong Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jian-Wei Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Li-Feng Sun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hai-Ting Xie
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hong-Feng Cao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qian Xiao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qing-Bin Wu
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - De-Chuan Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Sheng Dai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Zhong Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Li Shen
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China; Department of Radiation Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Ministry of Education, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ying Yuan
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China; Department of Medical Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Ministry of Education, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zi-Qiang Wang
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Ke-Feng Ding
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bedrikovetski S, Traeger L, Seow W, Dudi-Venkata NN, Selva-Nayagam S, Penniment M, Sammour T. Oncological Outcomes and Response Rate After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Induction vs. Consolidation Chemotherapy vs. Standard Chemoradiation. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2024:S1533-0028(24)00056-2. [PMID: 38945765 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
TNT is now considered the preferred option for stage II-III locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, the prognostic benefit and optimal sequence of TNT remains unclear. This network meta-analysis (NMA) compared short- and long-term outcomes amongst patients with LARC receiving total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) as induction (iTNT) or consolidation chemotherapy (cTNT) with those receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) alone. A systematic literature search was performed between 2012 and 2023. A Bayesian NMA was conducted using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method with a random-effects model and vague prior distribution to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves were used to rank treatment(s) for each outcome. In total, 11 cohorts involving 8360 patients with LARC were included. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) amongst the 3 treatments. Compared with nCRT, both cTNT (OR 2.36; 95% CrI, 1.57-3.66) and iTNT (OR 1.99; 95% CrI, 1.44-2.95) significantly improved complete response (CR) rate. Notably, cTNT ranked as the best treatment for CR (SUCRA 0.90) and iTNT as the best treatment for 3-year DFS and OS (SUCRA 0.72 and 0.87, respectively). Both iTNT and cTNT strategies significantly improved CR rates compared with nCRT. cTNT was ranked highest for CR rates, while iTNT was ranked highest for 3-year survival outcomes. However, no other significant differences in DFS, OS, sphincter-saving surgery, R0 resection and postoperative complications were found amongst the treatment groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Bedrikovetski
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Luke Traeger
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Warren Seow
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | - Michael Penniment
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Tarik Sammour
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Turri G, Ostuzzi G, Vita G, Barresi V, Scarpa A, Milella M, Mazzarotto R, Ruzzenente A, Barbui C, Pedrazzani C. Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the Era of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2414702. [PMID: 38833249 PMCID: PMC11151159 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) protocols (ie, preoperative chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy) may allow better adherence and early treatment of distant micrometastases and may increase pathological complete response (pCR) rates. Objective To assess the efficacy and tolerability of TNT protocols for LARC. Data Sources MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science Core Collection electronic databases and ClinicalTrials.gov for unpublished studies were searched from inception to March 2, 2024. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials including adults with LARC who underwent rectal resection as a final treatment were included. Studies including nonoperative treatment (watch-and-wait strategy), treatments other than rectal resection, immunotherapy, or antiangiogenic agents were excluded. Among the initially identified studies, 2.9% met the selection criteria. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two authors independently screened the records and extracted data. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)-compliant pairwise and network meta-analyses with a random-effects model were performed in a frequentist framework, and the certainty of evidence was assessed according to the confidence in network meta-analysis approach. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was pCR, defined as the absence of residual tumor at pathological assessment after surgery. Secondary outcomes included tolerability, toxic effects, perioperative outcomes, and long-term survival. Results Of 925 records identified, 27 randomized clinical trials, including 13 413 adults aged 18 years or older (median age, 60.0 years [range, 42.0-63.5 years]; 67.2% male) contributed to the primary network meta-analysis. With regard to pCR, long-course chemoradiotherapy (L-CRT) plus consolidation chemotherapy (relative risk [RR], 1.96; 95% CI, 1.25-3.06), short-course radiotherapy (S-RT) plus consolidation chemotherapy (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.34-2.30), and induction chemotherapy plus L-CRT (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.09-2.25) outperformed standard L-CRT with single-agent fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Considering 3-year disease-free survival, S-RT plus consolidation chemotherapy (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14) and induction chemotherapy plus L-CRT (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24) outperformed L-CRT, in spite of an increased 5-year locoregional recurrence rate of S-RT plus consolidation chemotherapy (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.03-2.63). Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, 3 TNT protocols were identified to outperform the current standard of care in terms of pCR rates, with good tolerability and optimal postoperative outcomes, suggesting they should be recognized as first-line treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Turri
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ostuzzi
- World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Vita
- World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Valeria Barresi
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Milella
- Section of Oncology, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Renzo Mazzarotto
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Medicine, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Corrado Barbui
- World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Corrado Pedrazzani
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
He S, Zhang J, Wang R, Li L, Sun W, Wang J, Deng Y, Liang W, Dou R. Long-term Changes in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Survivors of Rectal Cancer: Longitudinal Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:834-840. [PMID: 38426539 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative bowel dysfunction, also known as low anterior resection syndrome, is common in rectal cancer survivors and significantly impacts quality of life. Although long-term longitudinal follow-up is lacking, improvement of the syndrome is commonly believed to happen only within the first 2 years. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to depict the longitudinal evolvement of low anterior resection syndrome beyond 3 years and explore factors associated with changes. DESIGN Longitudinal long-term follow-ups were performed for the single center with the largest cohort within the multicenter FOWARC randomized controlled trial. SETTING A quaternary referral center. PATIENTS Individuals diagnosed with rectal cancer who received long-course neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, followed by sphincter-preserving radical proctectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Change of low anterior resection syndrome score and stoma status. RESULTS Of the 220 patients responding to the first follow-up at a median of 39 months, 178 (80.9%) responded to the second follow-up after a median of 83 months. During this interval, the mean low anterior resection syndrome score improved from 29.5 (95% CI, 28.3-30.7) to 18.6 (95% CI, 16.6-20.6). Fifty-six (31.5%) patients reported improvement from major to no/minor severity, and 6 (3.4%) patients had new stomas because of severe bowel dysfunction. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy ( p = 0.016) was independently and negatively associated with improvement of the score. LIMITATIONS Loss of follow-up during the long-term follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS Most rectal cancer survivors with low anterior resection syndrome continued to improve beyond 3 years after proctectomy. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was negatively associated with long-term improvement of low anterior resection syndrome. See Video Abstract . CAMBIO A LARGO PLAZO DEL SNDROME DE RESECCIN ANTERIOR BAJA EN SUPERVIVIENTES DE CNCER DE RECTO SEGUIMIENTO LONGITUDINAL DE UN ENSAYO CONTROLADO ALEATORIO ANTECEDENTES:La disfunción intestinal posoperatoria, también conocida como síndrome de resección anterior baja, es común en los sobrevivientes de cáncer de recto y afecta significativamente la calidad de vida. Aunque falta un seguimiento longitudinal a largo plazo, comúnmente se cree que la mejoría del síndrome ocurre sólo dentro de los primeros dos años.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo representar la evolución longitudinal del síndrome de resección anterior baja más allá de los 3 años y explora los factores asociados con el cambio.DISEÑO:Se realizaron seguimientos longitudinales a largo plazo para el único centro con la cohorte más grande dentro del ensayo controlado aleatorio multicéntrico FOWARC.AJUSTE:Un centro de referencia cuaternario.PACIENTES:Individuos diagnosticados con cáncer de recto que recibieron quimioterapia neoadyuvante de larga duración o quimiorradioterapia, seguida de proctectomía radical con preservación del esfínter.PRINCIPALES MEDICIONES DE RESULTADO:Cambio en la puntuación del síndrome de resección anterior baja y el estado del estoma.RESULTADOS:De los 220 pacientes que respondieron al primer seguimiento con una mediana de 39 meses, 178 (80,9%) respondieron al segundo seguimiento después de una mediana de 83 meses. Durante el intervalo, la puntuación media del síndrome de resección anterior baja mejoró de 29,5 (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 28,3-30,7) a 18,6 (IC del 95%: 16,6-20,6). 56 (31,5%) pacientes informaron una mejoría de mayor a ninguna gravedad, y 6 (3,4%) pacientes tuvieron un nuevo estoma debido a una disfunción intestinal grave. La radiación neoadyuvante (p = 0,016) se asoció de forma independiente y negativa con la mejora de la puntuación.LIMITACIONES:Pérdida de seguimiento durante los seguimientos a largo plazo.CONCLUSIÓN:La mayoría de los sobrevivientes de cáncer de recto con síndrome de resección anterior baja continuaron mejorando más allá de los 3 años después de la proctectomía. La radiación neoadyuvante se asoció negativamente con la mejora a largo plazo del síndrome de resección anterior baja. (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siqi He
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Jinquan Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Runxian Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Li
- Pelvic Floor Center, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Weipeng Sun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianping Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanhong Deng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Weiwen Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Ruoxu Dou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang L, Cui X, Wu F, Chi Z, Xiao L, Wang X, Liang Z, Li X, Yu Q, Lin X, Gao C. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a systematic review. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1392499. [PMID: 38846948 PMCID: PMC11154111 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1392499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Several studies have explored the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer(LARC), particularly in microsatellite stable(MSS) or mismatch repair proficient(pMMR) LARC patients. We undertook a single-arm systematic review to comprehensively evaluate the advantages and potential risks associated with the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in conjunction with nCRT for patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, ASCO and ESMO were searched for related studies. The main outcomes were pathologic complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), anal preservation, and adverse effects (AEs). Results Fourteen articles including 533 locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients were analyzed. The pooled pCR, MPR, and anal preservation rates were 36%, 66% and 86%. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 20%. Subgroup analysis showed that; dMMR/MSI-H had a pooled pCR (100%) and MPR (100%), pMMR/MSS had a pooled pCR (38%) and MPR (60%); the short-course radiotherapy and long-course radiotherapy had pooled pCR rates of 51% and 30%, respectively. The rates of pCR for the concurrent and sequential immuno-chemoradiotherapy subgroups at 30% and 40%, mirroring pCR rates for the PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitor subgroups were 32% and 40%, respectively. Conclusion In cases of locally advanced rectal cancer, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have shown promising response rates and acceptable toxicity profiles. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy hence has a positive outcome even in MSS LARC patients. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#myprospero, identifier CRD42023465380.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Xiujing Cui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Fengpeng Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Zifeng Chi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Linlin Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Xuan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Zezheng Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Xiaoning Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Qiyao Yu
- Department of Research, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Xueqin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Chao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smith HG, Nilsson PJ, Shogan BD, Harji D, Gambacorta MA, Romano A, Brandl A, Qvortrup C. Neoadjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer: comprehensive review. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrae038. [PMID: 38747103 PMCID: PMC11094476 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy has an established role in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. However, its role continues to evolve due to both advances in the available treatment modalities, and refinements in the indications for neoadjuvant treatment and subsequent surgery. METHODS A narrative review of the most recent relevant literature was conducted. RESULTS Short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy have an established role in improving local but not systemic disease control in patients with rectal cancer. Total neoadjuvant therapy offers advantages over short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy, not only in terms of increased local response but also in reducing the risk of systemic relapses. Non-operative management is increasingly preferred to surgery in patients with rectal cancer and clinical complete responses but is still associated with some negative impacts on functional outcomes. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be of some benefit in patients with locally advanced colon cancer with proficient mismatch repair, although patient selection is a major challenge. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with deficient mismatch repair cancers in the colon or rectum is altering the treatment paradigm for these patients. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant treatments for patients with colon or rectal cancers continue to evolve, increasing the complexity of decision-making for patients and clinicians alike. This review describes the current guidance and most recent developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry G Smith
- Abdominalcenter K, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Dept. of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Benjamin D Shogan
- Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Deena Harji
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andreas Brandl
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Camilla Qvortrup
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Valentini V, Alfieri S, Coco C, D'Ugo D, Crucitti A, Pacelli F, Persiani R, Sofo L, Picciocchi A, Doglietto GB, Barbaro B, Vecchio FM, Ricci R, Damiani A, Savino MC, Boldrini L, Cellini F, Meldolesi E, Romano A, Chiloiro G, Gambacorta MA. Four steps in the evolution of rectal cancer managements through 40 years of clinical practice: Pioneering, standardization, challenges and personalization. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110190. [PMID: 38438019 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Chirurgia Digestiva, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Coco
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale 2, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico D'Ugo
- Unità di chirurgia generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Pacelli
- Unità chirurgica del peritoneo e del retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Persiani
- Unità di chirurgia generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Sofo
- Divisione di Chirurgia Addominale, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Aurelio Picciocchi
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Battista Doglietto
- Chirurgia Digestiva, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Brunella Barbaro
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Maria Vecchio
- Dipartimento di Patologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ricci
- Dipartimento di Patologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Damiani
- Gemelli Generator Real World Data Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Savino
- Gemelli Generator Real World Data Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisa Meldolesi
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuditta Chiloiro
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cai J, Lin K, Luo T, Weng J, Liu H, Yuan Z, Wan Z, Han J, Lin J, Liu X, Wang X, Huang M, Luo Y, Yu H. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is noninferior to chemoradiotherapy for early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer in the FOWARC trial. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:1434-1440. [PMID: 38472421 PMCID: PMC11058860 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02652-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The early-onset rectal cancer with rapidly increasing incidence is considered to have distinct clinicopathological and molecular profiles with high-risk features. This leads to challenges in developing specific treatment strategies for early-onset rectal cancer patients and questions of whether early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) needs aggressive neoadjuvant treatment. METHODS In this post hoc analysis of FOWARC trial, we investigated the role of preoperative radiation in early-onset LARC by comparing the clinicopathological profiles and short-term and long-term outcomes between the early-onset and late-onset LARCs. RESULTS We revealed an inter-tumor heterogeneity of clinical profiles and treatment outcomes between the early-onset and late-onset LARCs. The high-risk features were more prevalent in early-onset LARC. The neoadjuvant radiation brought less benefits of tumor response and more risk of complications in early-onset group (pCR: OR = 3.75, 95% CI = 1.37-10.27; complications: HR = 11.35, 95% CI = 1.46-88.31) compared with late-onset group (pCR: OR = 5.33, 95% CI = 1.83-15.58; complications: HR = 5.80, 95% CI = 2.32-14.49). Furthermore, the addition of radiation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy didn't improve long-term OS (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.49-3.87) and DFS (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.58-1.90) for early-onset patients. CONCLUSION Preoperative radiation plus chemotherapy may not be superior to the chemotherapy alone in the early-onset LARC. Our findings provide insight into the treatment of early-onset LARC by interrogating the aggressive treatment and alternative regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinlin Cai
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Kaixin Lin
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Tongfeng Luo
- Department of Anaesthesia, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jingrong Weng
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Haotian Liu
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ze Yuan
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zixiao Wan
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Junyi Han
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jinxin Lin
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaoxia Liu
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaolin Wang
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Meijin Huang
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yanxin Luo
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Huichuan Yu
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hu H, Zhang J, Li Y, Wang X, Wang Z, Wang H, Kang L, Liu P, Lan P, Wu X, Zhen Y, Pei H, Huang Z, Zhang H, Chen W, Zeng Y, Lai J, Wei H, Huang X, Chen J, Chen J, Tao K, Xu Q, Peng X, Liang J, Cai G, Ding K, Ding Z, Hu M, Zhang W, Tang B, Hong C, Cao J, Huang Z, Cao W, Li F, Wang X, Wang C, Huang Y, Zhao Y, Cai Y, Ling J, Xie X, Wu Z, Shi L, Ling L, Liu H, Wang J, Huang M, Deng Y. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Oxaliplatin and Fluoropyrimidine Versus Upfront Surgery for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: The Randomized, Phase III OPTICAL Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2301889. [PMID: 38564700 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in colon cancer remains unclear. This trial investigated whether 3 months of modified infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as NAC could improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced colon cancer versus upfront surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS OPTICAL was a randomized, phase III trial in patients with clinically staged locally advanced colon cancer (T3 with extramural spread into the mesocolic fat ≥5 mm or T4). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive six preoperative cycles of mFOLFOX6 or four cycles of CAPOX, followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC group), or immediate surgery and the physician's choice of adjuvant chemotherapy (upfront surgery group). The primary end point was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. RESULTS Between January 2016 and April 2021, of the 752 patients enrolled, 744 patients were included in the mITT analysis (371 in the NAC group; 373 in the upfront surgery group). At a median follow-up of 48.0 months (IQR, 46.0-50.1), 3-year DFS rates were 82.1% in the NAC group and 77.5% in the upfront surgery group (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.03]). The R0 resection was achieved in 98% of patients who underwent surgery in both groups. Compared with upfront surgery, NAC resulted in a 7% pathologic complete response rate (pCR), significantly lower rates of advanced tumor staging (pT3-4: 77% v 94%), lymph node metastasis (pN1-2: 31% v 46%), and potentially improved overall survival (stratified HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.77]). CONCLUSION NAC with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX did not show a significant DFS benefit. However, this neoadjuvant approach was safe, resulted in substantial pathologic downstaging, and appears to be a viable therapeutic option for locally advanced colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huabin Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianwei Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunfeng Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaozhong Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Liang Kang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ping Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, People's Republic of China
| | - Ping Lan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaojian Wu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunhuan Zhen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China
| | - Haiping Pei
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhongcheng Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Dongguan Kanghua Hospital, Dongguan, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenbin Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongming Zeng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiajun Lai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yuebei People's Hospital, Shaoguan, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongbo Wei
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuefeng Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiansi Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China
| | - Jigui Chen
- Department of Surgery, The Eighth Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
| | - Kaixiong Tao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
| | - Qingwen Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiang Peng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Junlin Liang
- Department of Coloproctological Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China
| | - Guanfu Cai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Kefeng Ding
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology, Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Ministry of Education, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhijie Ding
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming Hu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo Tang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
| | - Chuyuan Hong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Cao
- Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zonghai Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Wuteng Cao
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Fangqian Li
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xinhua Wang
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao Wang
- Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Huang
- Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yandong Zhao
- Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yue Cai
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiayu Ling
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyu Xie
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zehua Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Lishuo Shi
- Clinical Research Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Ling
- Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, and Center for Migrant Health Policy, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Biostatistics Shared Resource, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers School of Public Health, Brunswick, NJ
| | - Jianping Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Meijin Huang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanhong Deng
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang C, Liu X, Wang W, Miao Z, Li X, Liu D, Hu K. Treatment Options for Distal Rectal Cancer in the Era of Organ Preservation. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:434-452. [PMID: 38517596 PMCID: PMC10997725 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01194-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The introduction of total mesorectal excision into the radical surgery of rectal cancer has significantly improved the oncological outcome with longer survival and lower local recurrence. Traditional treatment modalities of distal rectal cancer, relying on radical surgery, while effective, take their own set of risks, including surgical complications, potential damage to the anus, and surrounding structure owing to the pursuit of thorough resection. The progress of operating methods as well as the integration of systemic therapies and radiotherapy into the peri-operative period, particularly the exciting clinical complete response of patients after neoadjuvant treatment, have paved the way for organ preservation strategy. The non-inferiority oncological outcome of "watch and wait" compared with radical surgery underscores the potential of organ preservation not only to control local recurrence but also to reduce the need for treatments followed by structure destruction, hopefully improving the long-term quality of life. Radical radiotherapy provides another treatment option for patients unwilling or unable to undergo surgery. Organ preservation points out the direction of treatment for distal rectal cancer, while additional researches are needed to answer remaining questions about its optimal use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaoliang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Weiping Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Zheng Miao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaoyan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Dingchao Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yang W, Qian C, Luo J, Chen C, Feng Y, Dai N, Li X, Xiao H, Yang Y, Li M, Li C, Wang D. Efficacy and Safety of Preoperative Transcatheter Rectal Arterial Chemoembolisation in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Results from a Prospective, Phase II PCAR Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:233-242. [PMID: 38342657 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
AIMS The PCAR study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of preoperative transcatheter rectal arterial chemoembolisation (TRACE) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a single-centre, prospective, phase II trial conducted in China. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years and older with histologically confirmed stage II or III rectal carcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Patients received TRACE with oxaliplatin, followed by radiotherapy with a cumulative dose of 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/time/day, five times a week for 5 weeks) and received oral S1 capsules twice daily (7 days a week for 4 weeks). Patients underwent total mesorectal excision 4-8 weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy, followed by mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX regimens for 4-6 months. The hypothesis of this study was that adding TRACE to preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy would improve tumour regression and prognosis. The primary end point was the pathological complete response rate; secondary end points included the major pathological response rate, anal preservation rate, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), 5-year overall survival and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS In total, 111 LARC patients received TRACE and subsequent scheduled treatment plans. The pathological complete response and major pathological response rates were 20.72% and 48.65%, respectively. The 5-year DFS and 5-year overall survival were 61.89% (95% confidence interval 51.45-74.45) and 74.80% (95% confidence interval 65.05-86.01), respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported in 29 patients (26.13%). The postoperative complication rate was 21.62%, without serious surgical complications. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that ypN stage (hazard ratio = 4.242, 95% confidence interval 2.101-8.564, P = 0.00017) and perineural invasion (hazard ratio = 2.319, 95% confidence interval 1.058-5.084, P = 0.0487) were independent risk factors associated with DFS, whereas ypN stage (hazard ratio = 3.164, 95% confidence interval 1.347-7.432, P = 0.0101), perineural invasion (hazard ratio = 4.118, 95% confidence interval 1.664-10.188, P = 0.0134) and serum carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199; hazard ratio = 4.142, 95% confidence interval 1.290-13.306, P = 0.0344) were independent predictors for overall survival. CONCLUSION The current study provides evidence that adding TRACE to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can improve the pathological remission rate in LARC patients with acceptable toxicity. Given its promising effectiveness and safe profile, incorporating TRACE into the standard treatment strategy for patients with LARC should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Yang
- Cancer Center, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - C Qian
- Cancer Center, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - J Luo
- Cancer Center, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - C Chen
- Cancer Center, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Y Feng
- Cancer Center, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - N Dai
- Cancer Center, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - X Li
- Cancer Center, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - H Xiao
- Cancer Center, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Y Yang
- Cancer Center, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - M Li
- Cancer Center, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - C Li
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - D Wang
- Cancer Center, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nazari R, Piozzi GN, Ghalehtaki R, Ahmadi-Tafti SM, Behboudi B, Mousavi Darzikolaee N, Aghili M, Gambacorta MA. Role of Oxaliplatin in the Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: a Review of Evidence. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2024; 18:11795549241236409. [PMID: 38510317 PMCID: PMC10952988 DOI: 10.1177/11795549241236409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is a challenging situation for radiation oncologists and colorectal surgeons. Most current approaches recommend neoadjuvant fluorouracil or capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery as a standard of care. Intensification of concurrent chemotherapy by adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil or capecitabine backbone to get better outcomes is the matter that has remained unresolved. In this review, we searched Medline and Google Scholar databases and selected 28 prospective phase II and III clinical trials that addressed this question. We discussed the potential advantages and drawbacks of incorporating oxaliplatin into concurrent chemoradiation therapy. We tried to define whether adding oxaliplatin to concurrent chemoradiation with excellent performance and high-risk features benefits some subpopulations. The available literature suggests that by adding oxaliplatin there are some benefits in enhancing response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, however, without any translated improvements in long-term outcomes including overall and disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Nazari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Reza Ghalehtaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi-Tafti
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
| | - Behnam Behboudi
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
| | - Nima Mousavi Darzikolaee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahdi Aghili
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yang Z, Zhang X, Bai X, Xi X, Liu W, Zhong W. Anti-angiogenesis in colorectal cancer therapy. Cancer Sci 2024; 115:734-751. [PMID: 38233340 PMCID: PMC10921012 DOI: 10.1111/cas.16063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
The morbidity of colorectal cancer (CRC) has risen to third place among malignant tumors worldwide. In addition, CRC is a common cancer in China whose incidence increases annually. Angiogenesis plays an important role in the development of tumors because it can bring the nutrients that cancer cells need and take away metabolic waste. Various mechanisms are involved in the formation of neovascularization, and vascular endothelial growth factor is a key mediator. Meanwhile, angiogenesis inhibitors and drug resistance (DR) are challenges to consider when formulating treatment strategies for patients with different conditions. Thus, this review will discuss the molecules, signaling pathways, microenvironment, treatment, and DR of angiogenesis in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenni Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyGeneral Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Institute of Digestive Diseases, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive DiseasesTianjinChina
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyXing'an League People's HospitalXing'an LeagueChina
| | - Xuqian Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyGeneral Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Institute of Digestive Diseases, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive DiseasesTianjinChina
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyChina Aerospace Science and Industry CorporationBeijingChina
| | - Xiaozhe Bai
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyXing'an League People's HospitalXing'an LeagueChina
| | - Xiaonan Xi
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology and College of PharmacyNankai UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Wentian Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyGeneral Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Institute of Digestive Diseases, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive DiseasesTianjinChina
| | - Weilong Zhong
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyGeneral Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Institute of Digestive Diseases, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive DiseasesTianjinChina
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Miyashita Y, Oki E, Kamori T, Akagi Y, Mori S, Hattori N, Kobayashi K, Shimokawa M, Oda Y, Mori M. Immune checkpoint status and oncogenic mutation profiling of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (KSCC1301-A2). Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:251-261. [PMID: 38455493 PMCID: PMC10914707 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are less effective in mismatch repair (MMR)-proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancers (CRCs) than in MMR-deficient CRCs. Here, we investigated changes in the tumor microenvironment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) without radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and the potential of ICIs as therapeutic agents for pMMR CRCs. Methods This was an ad hoc analysis of a KSCC1301 randomized phase II trial in which patients with untreated resectable LARC were randomly assigned to receive S-1 and oxaliplatin or folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin as NAC. Forty-nine patients were studied in this ad hoc analysis. As a reference cohort, we assessed 25 rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery without NAC outside the randomized trial. Immune checkpoint molecules (ICMs; PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, LAG3), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs; CD8, FOXP3), and other related proteins were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) using Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay version 3 was conducted in 23 patients. Results The expression levels of PD-1, CTLA-4, and LAG3 in the NAC group were significantly higher than in reference patients (p < 0.001). Additionally, the infiltration of CD8+ and FOXP3+ T cells, and the CD8/FOXP3 ratio were significantly higher in the NAC group than in reference patients (p < 0.0001). NGS analysis revealed no specific gene alteration related to TILs or ICMs. Conclusion We demonstrated changes in the tumor immune microenvironment after NAC in pMMR rectal cancer. NAC was associated with increased expression of ICMs and TILs. Rectal cancer could be susceptible to combined immunotherapy with chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Miyashita
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical ScienceKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical ScienceKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Eiji Oki
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical ScienceKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Tomohiro Kamori
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical ScienceKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Yoshito Akagi
- Department of SurgeryKurume University School of MedicineKurumeJapan
| | - Shinichiro Mori
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid SurgeryKagoshima UniversityKagoshimaJapan
| | - Norifumi Hattori
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II)Nagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
| | - Kazuma Kobayashi
- Department of SurgeryNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasakiJapan
| | - Mototsugu Shimokawa
- Department of BiostatisticsYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineYamaguchiJapan
| | - Yoshinao Oda
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical ScienceKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Masaki Mori
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical ScienceKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shen Y, Wen Y, Bi L, Yang X, Gong X, Deng X, Meng W, Wang Z. Do treated rectal tumors appear differently on MRI after chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy? Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:774-782. [PMID: 37999742 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04115-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Increasing studies have focused on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in rectal cancer. However, few studies explored the differences in radiographic variation between patients treated with NCT and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). METHODS Stage II/III rectal cancer patients from March 2016 to December 2019 meeting the criteria treated with NCRT or NCT were included. MRI features, including tumor location, longitudinal length, DWI signal, MRI tumor regression grade (mrTRG), and radiomic texture features, before and after neoadjuvant treatments were reviewed. RESULTS 116 patients with NCRT and 61 with NCT were analyzed. Among these patients, 46 patients in the NCRT group and 18 in the NCT group were responders with pathological TRG0-1. Within these responders, the mean tumor longitudinal length regression rate (TLRR) of the NCT group was 60.08 ± 11.17%, which was significantly higher than the 50.73 ± 15.28% of the NCRT group (p = 0.010). The proportion of high signal in the DWI image after NCT was higher than that of the NCRT group (88.89% vs 50.00%, p = 0.004). NCT responders had significantly higher median change rates than those of NCRT responders in 11 radiomic features, especially those shape features. CONCLUSION MRI images change differently between responders treated with NCRT and those with NCT in rectal cancer. The tumor volumetry and some radiomic features change more obviously in NCT responders, and the tumor signal changes more obviously in NCRT responders. During the evaluation of the response of the tumor to the neoadjuvant treatments, images of patients should be treated differently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Shen
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Yanqiong Wen
- Operating Room, Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Liang Bi
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Xuyang Yang
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiaoling Gong
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiangbing Deng
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| | - Wenjian Meng
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bauer PS, Gamboa AC, Otegbeye EE, Chapman WC, Rivard S, Regenbogen S, Mohammed M, Holder-Murray J, Wiseman JT, Ejaz A, Edwards-Hollingsworth K, Hawkins AT, Hunt SR, Balch G, Silviera ML. Short-course radiation with consolidation chemotherapy does not increase operative morbidity compared to long-course chemoradiation: A retrospective study of the US rectal cancer consortium. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:254-263. [PMID: 37792637 PMCID: PMC10872853 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Neoadjuvant short-course radiation and consolidation chemotherapy (SC TNT) remains less widely used for rectal cancer in the United States than long-course chemoradiation (LCRT). SC TNT may improve compliance and downstaging; however, a longer radiation-to-surgery interval may worsen pelvic fibrosis and morbidity with total mesorectal excision (TME). A single, US-center retrospective analysis has shown comparable risk of morbidity after neoadjuvant short-course radiation with consolidation chemotherapy (SC TNT) and long-course chemoradiation (LCRT). Validation by a multi-institutional study is needed. METHODS The US Rectal Cancer Consortium database (2010-2018) was retrospectively reviewed for patients with nonmetastatic, rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant LCRT or SC TNT before TME. The primary endpoint was severe postoperative morbidity. Cohorts were compared by univariate analysis. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the odds of severe complication. RESULTS Of 788 included patients, 151 (19%) received SC TNT and 637 (81%) LCRT. The SC TNT group had fewer distal tumors (33.8% vs. 50.2%, p < 0.0001) and more clinical node-positive disease (74.2% vs. 47.6%, p < 0.0001). The intraoperative complication rate was similar (SC TNT 5.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.65). There was no difference in overall postoperative morbidity (38.4% vs. 46.3%, p = 0.08). Severe morbidity was similar with low anterior resection (9.1% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.10) and abdominoperineal resection (24.4% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.49). SC TNT did not increase the odds of severe morbidity relative to LCRT on multivariable analysis (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.37-1.10). CONCLUSIONS SC TNT does not increase morbidity after TME for rectal cancer relative to LCRT. Concern for surgical complications should not discourage the use of SC TNT when aiming to increase the likelihood of complete clinical response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip S. Bauer
- Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Adriana C. Gamboa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University
| | - Ebunoluwa E. Otegbeye
- Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine
| | - William C. Chapman
- Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Samantha Rivard
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan
| | - Scott Regenbogen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan
| | - Maryam Mohammed
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
| | - Jennifer Holder-Murray
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
| | - Jason T. Wiseman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University
| | | | - Alexander T. Hawkins
- Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Steven R. Hunt
- Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Glen Balch
- Division of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University
| | - Matthew L. Silviera
- Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Teng Y, Ma D, Yan Y, Geng J, Liu Z, Zhu X, Li S, Zhang Y, Wang H, Cai Y, Yue H, Li Y, Wang W. Retrospective cohort study for thrombocytopenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1289824. [PMID: 38230393 PMCID: PMC10790981 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1289824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this article was to establish the clinical prognostic models and identify the predictive radiation dosimetric parameters for thrombocytopenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing concurrent long-term chemoradiotherapy were included. The primary outcome of interest was grade 2 or higher (2+) thrombocytopenia (platelet(PLT) count <75,000/μL). Secondary outcomes included: grade 1 or higher thrombocytopenia (PLT count<100,000/μL) and the PLT count during chemoradiotherapy and its nadir. The risk prediction model was developed by logistic regression to identify clinical predictors of 2+ thrombocytopenia. Univariate linear regression models were used to test correlations between radiation dosimetric parameters and the absolute PLT count at nadirs. Results This retrospective cohort comprised 238 patients. Fifty-four (22.6%) patients developed thrombocytopenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy, while 15 (6.3%) patients developed 2+ thrombocytopenia. Four independently associated risk factors, including age, Alb level, PLT count, and chemotherapy regimen, were included in the final model and used to form a 2+ thrombocytopenia probability estimation nomogram. The C-index was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.78-0.96). The calibration plot showed a moderate agreement, and the Brier score was 0.047 (95% CI: 0.025-0.070). The total absolute volume of bone marrow irradiated by 5 Gy, 10 Gy and 15 Gy of radiation (BM-V5ab, BM-V10ab, BM-V15ab), calculated by the volume of bone marrow multiplied by the corresponding Vx, were identified as new predictors. The nadir of PLT was found to be negatively correlated with BM-V5ab (β = -0.062, P =0.030), BM-V10ab (β = -0.065, P =0.030) and BM-V15ab (β = -0.064, P =0.042). Conclusion The occurrence of 2+ thrombocytopenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer can be predicted by the patient's baseline status and chemoradiotherapy regimen, and low dose irradiation of bone marrow can affect the level of platelets during the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Teng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Dapeng Ma
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Yan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Endoscopy Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jianhao Geng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiyan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xianggao Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Shuai Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yangzi Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Hongzhi Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yong Cai
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Haizhen Yue
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yongheng Li
- State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Weihu Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Janczak J, Ukegjini K, Bischofberger S, Turina M, Müller PC, Steffen T. Quality of Surgical Outcome Reporting in Randomised Clinical Trials of Multimodal Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:26. [PMID: 38201454 PMCID: PMC10778098 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) continue to provide the best evidence for treatment options, but the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical outcomes and complication data vary widely. The aim of this study was to measure the quality of reporting of the surgical outcome and complication data in RCTs of rectal cancer treatment and whether this quality has changed over time. METHODS Eligible articles with the keywords ("rectal cancer" OR "rectal carcinoma") AND ("radiation" OR "radiotherapy") that were RCTs and published in the English, German, Polish, or Italian language were identified by reviewing all abstracts published from 1982 through 2022. Two authors independently screened and analysed all studies. The quality of the surgical outcome and complication data was assessed based on fourteen criteria, and the quality of RCTs was evaluated based on a modified Jadad scale. The primary outcome was the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical results and complication data. RESULTS A total of 340 articles reporting multimodal therapy outcomes for 143,576 rectal cancer patients were analysed. A total of 7 articles (2%) met all 14 reporting criteria, 13 met 13 criteria, 27 met from 11 to 12 criteria, 36 met from 9 to 10 criteria, 76 met from 7 to 8 criteria, and most articles met fewer than 7 criteria (mean 5.5 criteria). Commonly underreported criteria included complication severity (15% of articles), macroscopic integrity of mesorectal excision (17% of articles), length of stay (18% of articles), number of lymph nodes (21% of articles), distance between the tumour and circumferential resection margin (CRM) (26% of articles), surgical radicality according to the site of the primary tumour (R0 vs. R1 + R2) (29% of articles), and CRM status (38% of articles). CONCLUSION Inconsistent surgical outcome and complication data reporting in multimodal rectal cancer treatment RCTs is standard. Standardised reporting of clinical and oncological outcomes should be established to facilitate comparing studies and results of related research topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Janczak
- Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital for the Region Fürstenland Toggenburg, CH-9500 Wil, Switzerland;
| | - Kristjan Ukegjini
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| | - Stephan Bischofberger
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| | - Matthias Turina
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Philip C. Müller
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Thomas Steffen
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shen Y, Wu Q, Meng W, Wei M, Deng X, Wang Z. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CAPOX) alone for low- and intermediate-risk stage II/III rectal cancer: Long-term follow-up of a prospective single-arm study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107115. [PMID: 37839296 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stratified treatment has been recommended for rectal cancer. Our previous multicenter randomized trial showed that low-/intermediate-risk rectal cancer patients did not benefit much from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In our phase II study, we found that stage II/III rectal cancer patients with low-/intermediate risks can be managed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone and achieve a good response. The current study aimed to report the long-term survival outcomes in the expanded phase II trial. METHOD Consecutive patients diagnosed with mid-low stage II/III rectal cancer with low/intermediate risk factors were included. Four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CAPOX) were given, and MRI was used for tumour response detection. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. The secondary endpoints were tumour response to NCT, tumour-related death, and overall survival. RESULTS This study enrolled 121 eligible patients. The good tumour response rate based on MRI was 82.6 %, with a pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 18.3 %. The disease-free survival rate was 82.6 %, and the overall survival rate was 96.7 % after a median follow-up time of 40 months. Two patients (1.7 %) suffered local recurrence, and 15 patients (12.4 %) suffered distant metastasis. The median disease-free survival and overall survival were 37 (9-60) and 40 (16-60) months, respectively. Tumour longitudinal length reduction and tumour regression grade on MRI were identified as predictors for poor tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION In stage II/III rectal cancer patients with low-/intermediate risks, neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone may result in an acceptable tumour response and disease-free survival. Tumour response might be predicted early.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Shen
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qingbin Wu
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wenjian Meng
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mingtian Wei
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Xiangbing Deng
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liao H, Tang C, Zhou Z, Shi H, Li T, Liang Y, Li M, Li T, Lei X. Adjuvant Radiotherapy Is Not Necessary for Stage III Mucinous Rectal Cancer: Evidence Based on Long Survival Analysis from SEER Data. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2857-2866. [PMID: 37989932 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05765-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (RMC) is less sensitive to radiotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy is still recommended for RMC patients. This study aimed to explore whether adjuvant radiotherapy is necessary for stage III RMC. METHODS Data of patients with stage III RMC were obtained from the National Cancer Institute's SEER database (2004-2015). The survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess the impact of clinicopathological parameters on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS RMC has a worse T and N stage at diagnosis than rectal adenomatous carcinoma (RAC) (all p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that histopathological type MC was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.27; 95%CI 1.14-1.41; p < 0.001) and CSS (HR 1.34; 95%CI 1.18-1.51; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis based on different treatment regimens showed no significant difference between chemotherapy group and chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group. After the propensity score matching, no significant difference was also found in OS and CSS between chemotherapy group and chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS RMC is an independent poor prognostic factor for OS and CSS. Adjuvant radiotherapy for RMC was not beneficial in improving survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hualin Liao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
| | - Cheng Tang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
| | - Zhen Zhou
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
| | - Haoran Shi
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yahang Liang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
| | - Mingming Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China
| | - Taiyuan Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
| | - Xiong Lei
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rouanet P, Castan F, Mazard T, Lemanski C, Nougaret S, Deshayes E, Chalbos P, Gourgou S, Taoum C. GRECCAR 14 - a multicentric, randomized, phase II-III study evaluating the tailored management of locally advanced rectal carcinoma after a favourable response to induction chemotherapy: Study protocol. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:2078-2086. [PMID: 37697712 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
AIM Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) is becoming standard in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma (LARC). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has proven side effects on bowel and genitourinary function. An early tumoral response to induction chemotherapy demonstrates its high prognostic value. Tailored management could be used as an alternative to systematic CRT. The GRECCAR 14 trial will attempt to personalize treatment strategy according to the patient's early tumour response to intensive chemotherapy with the aim of achieving the best toxicity-efficiency ratio. METHOD GRECCAR 14 is a multicentric, randomized, two-arm, phase II-III noninferiority trial. Patients with mid or low LARC with a predictive circumferential resection margin ≤2 mm or T3c-d stage with extramural venous invasion will be included. Evaluation of the tumoral response will be performed after six courses of high-dose FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. Good responders (GRs) will be defined by a 60% decrease in tumoral volume on magnetic resonance imaging. Patients will be randomized to CRT before surgery. The primary endpoints will be R0 resection for phase II and the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) for phase III. RESULTS Tailored management of LARC is becoming an exciting challenge for the modality of neoadjuvant treatment and for the type of surgery or its omission. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX has established efficacy, with a significant increase in the 3-year DFS. Better control of systemic disease must be accompanied by the same locoregional control, with the lowest morbidity. Our previous GRECCAR 4 trial demonstrated the high value of the early tumoral response after induction chemotherapy and the long-term safety of tailored management for GRs. CONCLUSION If GRECCAR 14 demonstrates the ability to tailor TNT for LARC, this could lead to changes in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Rouanet
- Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Florence Castan
- Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Thibault Mazard
- Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Claire Lemanski
- Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | | | - Emmanuel Deshayes
- Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Patrick Chalbos
- Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Gourgou
- Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Christophe Taoum
- Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Elashwah A, Alsuhaibani A, Abduljabbar A, Alsanea N, Alhomoud S, Ashari L, Bazarbashi S, Aljubran A, Alzahrani A, Awad A, Almanea H, Alhussini H, Alshabanah M. Retrospective Evaluation of the Impact of Dose Escalation Using Pre-operative Simultaneous Integrated Boost Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy on the Outcome of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:927-936. [PMID: 36525233 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-022-00882-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluating the outcome of pre-operative simultaneous integrated boost volumetric modulated arc therapy (SIB-VMAT) concomitant with capecitabine in patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSH&RC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, during the period January 2013-December 2019. RESULTS A total of 134 patients were enrolled. The median age at diagnosis was 59 years. All patients received pre-operative concurrent chemo-radiation therapy (CCRT) using SIB-VMAT with oral capecitabine. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered prior to CCRT in 32 patients (23.9%). The dose of radiation was 55 Gy in 94 patients (70.1%), while 40 patients (29.9%) received 50 Gy. All patients completed the CCRT treatment without breaks. No records of acute and late grade III and IV toxicities. Curative surgery was performed in all patients with a median interval of 11 (6-52) weeks between the end of CCRT and the date of surgery. No reported 30-day postoperative mortality and no grade III and IV Clavien-Dindo complications. PCR was reported in 26 patients (19.4%), while pathologically negative nodes (pN0) were achieved in 103 patients (76.9%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was utilized in 57 patients (42.5%). The 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were 93.2%, 67.1%, and 87.3%, respectively. Only tumor regression grade (TRG) was significantly correlated with LRFS, (p value 0.043). On multivariate analysis, only TRG and achievement of pN0 were significantly correlated with DFS (p value < 0.001). CONCLUSION Dose escalation utilization (SIB-VMAT) in the pre-operative treatment of LARC is well tolerated and provides effective local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Elashwah
- Section of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- Kasr Al-Eini Center of Clinical Oncology (NEMROCK), Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
| | | | - Alaa Abduljabbar
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nasser Alsanea
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Samar Alhomoud
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Luai Ashari
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shouki Bazarbashi
- Section of Medical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali Aljubran
- Section of Medical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Alzahrani
- Section of Medical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Awad
- Section of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hadeel Almanea
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hussah Alhussini
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Alshabanah
- Section of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lee SH. Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: evidence and challenge. Ann Coloproctol 2023; 39:301-306. [PMID: 37648423 PMCID: PMC10475808 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2023.00269.0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in the management of rectal cancer have dramatically changed the clinical practice of colorectal surgeons because the main focus of rectal cancer treatment has changed from sphincter-saving to an organ-preserving strategies. Modifying the delivery of systemic chemotherapy to improve patients' survival is another progress in colorectal cancer management, known as total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). TNT is a new strategy used by colorectal surgeons to improve the quality of life and survival of patients after treatment. TNT poses limitations or obstacles, such as overtreatment issues in patients with stage I rectal cancer. However, considering the quality-of-life issues in patients with low-lying rectal cancer necessitating a permanent colostomy, the indication for TNT will be expanded. This review summarizes the recently conducted clinical trials and foresees future perspectives on TNT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk-Hwan Lee
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zhang J, Li J, Huang M, Xie X, Cai Y, Hu H, Ling J, Wu Z, Deng Y. Neoadjuvant Modified FOLFOXIRI With Selective Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Long-term Outcomes of Phase II Study and Propensity-Score-Matched Comparison With Chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:934-945. [PMID: 35834598 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant modified FOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) chemotherapy with selective radiotherapy did not compromise pathologic complete response and tumor downstaging in locally advanced rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to analyze disease-free survival and local recurrence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with modified FOLFOXIRI (mFOLFOXIRI). DESIGN This was a prospective single-arm phase II study. A propensity score-adjusted method was implemented to compare outcomes against historical controls of chemoradiotherapy. SETTINGS The study was conducted at single institutions. PATIENTS One hundred 6 patients with stage II and III rectal cancers were included. INTERVENTION All patients received neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision. Patients with mesorectal fascia-positive or ycT4a/b after reevaluation with MRI received radiation before surgery. Otherwise, immediate total mesorectal excision would be performed. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES The primary end point was tumor downstaging (ypStage 0-I) rate, which was reported previously. Disease-free survival and local recurrence rate were the main outcomes for the current study. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 43.3 months, the 2-year disease-free survival rate was 85.6% and the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 78.9%. The local recurrence rate was 7.8% after surgery. After propensity score matching, 73 patients were available for comparison in each group. The pathologic complete response rate was 23.3% and 13.7% ( p = 0.14), the proportion of ypStage 0-I was 45.2% vs 39.7% ( p = 0.5), the 3-year disease-free survival was 87.6% vs 75.8% (HR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.95, p = 0.037). The local recurrence rate in the mFOLFOXIRI group was 5.5% and in the chemoradiotherapy group was 4.1% ( p = 0.70). Patients receiving mFOLFOXIRI had a lower incidence of anastomotic fistula compared with the chemoradiotherapy group (5.5% vs 17.8%, p = 0.02). LIMITATIONS This was a single-arm, nonrandomized phase II study. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI with selective radiotherapy was feasible and safe, and it improved 3-year disease-free survival compared with propensity score-matched historical controls who received chemoradiotherapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B989 .Trial registration: NCT02217020. FOLFOXIRI MODIFICADO NEOADYUVANTE CON RADIOTERAPIA SELECTIVA EN CNCER DE RECTO LOCALMENTE AVANZADO RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO DEL ESTUDIO DE FASE II Y COMPARACIN EMPAREJADA POR PUNTUACIN DE PROPENSIN CON QUIMIORRADIOTERAPIA ANTECEDENTES:La quimioterapia neoadyuvante con FOLFOXIRI modificado (ácido folínico, 5-fluoruracilo, oxaliplatino e irinotecan) con radioterapia selectiva no comprometió la respuesta patológica completa ni la reducción del estadio del tumor en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.OBJETIVO:El estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar la sobrevida libre de enfermedad y la recurrencia local de la quimioterapia neoadyuvante con FOLFOXIRI modificado (mFOLFOXIRI).DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio prospectivo de fase II de un solo brazo. Se implementó un método ajustado por puntaje de propensión para comparar los resultados con los controles históricos de quimiorradioterapia.ESCENARIO:El estudio se realizó en instituciones individuales.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron 106 pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio II y III.INTERVENCIÓN:Todos los pacientes recibieron quimioterapia neoadyuvante con mFOLFOXIRI antes de la escisión total del mesorrecto. Los pacientes con fascia mesorrectal positiva o ycT4a/b después de la reevaluación con MRI recibirían radiación antes de la cirugía. En caso contrario, se realizaría una escisión mesorrectal total inmediata.PRINCIPALES RESULTADOS Y MEDIDAS:El criterio principal de valoración fue la tasa de disminución del estadio del tumor (ypEstadio 0-I), que se informó anteriormente. La sobrevida libre de enfermedad y la tasa de recurrencia local son los principales resultados del estudio actual.RESULTADOS:Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 43,3 meses, las tasas de sobrevida libre de enfermedad a 2 y 3 años fueron del 85,6 % y 78,9 %, respectivamente. La tasa de recidiva local fue del 7,8% tras la cirugía. Después del emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión, 73 pacientes estaban disponibles para la comparación en cada grupo. La tasa de respuesta patológica completa fue de 23,3 % y de 13,7 % (p = 0,14), la proporción de ypEstadio 0-I fue del 45,2 % frente al 39,7 % (p = 0,5), la SLE a los 3 años fue del 87,6 % frente al 75,8 % (HR = 0,46, IC del 95 % 0,22-0,95, p = 0,037) y la tasa de recurrencia local fue del 5,5 % y del 4,1 % (p = 0,70) en el grupo de mFOLFOXIRI frente al grupo de quimiorradioterapia, respectivamente. Los pacientes que recibieron mFOLFOXIRI tuvieron una menor incidencia de fístula anastomótica en comparación con el grupo de quimiorradioterapia (5,5 % frente a 17,8 %, p = 0,02).LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio de fase II no aleatorizado de un solo brazo.CONCLUSIONES:El mFOLFOXIRI neoadyuvante con radioterapia selectiva fue factible y seguro, y mejoró la SSE a los 3 años en comparación con los controles históricos emparejados por puntaje de propensión que recibieron quimiorradioterapia. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B989 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianwei Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianxia Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Meijin Huang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyu Xie
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yue Cai
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Huabin Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiayu Ling
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zehua Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanhong Deng
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhang W, Zhou H, Jiang J, Zhu Y, Zou S, Jiang L, Tang Y, Liang J, Sun Y, Jiang Z, Qu W, Li Y, Zhou A. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with modified FOLFOXIRI for locally advanced rectal cancer to transform effectively EMVI and MRF from positive to negative: results of a long-term single center phase 2 clinical trial. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:592. [PMID: 37370032 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11103-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This phase 2 clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) in LARC. PATIENTS AND METHODS The patients with LARC (the lower edge more than 5 cm from the anal verge) received up to 5 cycles of mFOLFOXIRI. MRI was performed to assess the baseline and postchemotherapy TN stage. Radical resection was performed within 4-6 weeks from the last dose of chemotherapy if the tumor shrank or remained stable. Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 or XELOX was recommended. Postoperative radiation was planned for R1 resection, ypT4b, ypN2 and a positive CRM. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS From February 2016 to March 2019, 50 patients were enrolled. Forty-eight (96%) were clinically node-positive, 28 (56.5%) with MRF invasion and 39 (78.4%) were EMVI positive. The median cycle of neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy was 5 (range,1-5). A total of 46/50 (92%) patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery, all with R0 resection. The pCR rate was 4.3% (2/46). Twenty-three of 46 (50%) patients with cN + achieved a pathological node-negative status. The proportions of pathologically positive CRM and EMVI were 2.2% and 34.7%, respectively. Adjuvant radiotherapy was given to 14/46 (30.4%) patients. The most common Grade 3 or > toxicities included neutrocytopenia (50%), leukopenia (14%) and diarrhea (12%) during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy period. Clinically meaningful postoperative complications included pneumonia (n = 1), pelvic infection (n = 1) and anastomotic fistula (n = 1). With a median follow-up time of 51.2 months, local recurrences and distant metastases were confirmed in 3 (6.5%) and 9 (19.6%) of cases, respectively. The 3-year disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)rates were 75.8% and 86.8%. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI yielded a significant down-staging effect and seemed to be effective in eliminating EMVI and transforming the positive MRF to negative in LARC. The survival results are promising. The long-term follow-up showed promising DFS and OS rates accompanied by a favorable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03443661, 23/02/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17, Nanli, Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Haitao Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jun Jiang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yuelu Zhu
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Shuangmei Zou
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Liming Jiang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiotherapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianwei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yongkun Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17, Nanli, Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhichao Jiang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17, Nanli, Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wang Qu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17, Nanli, Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Aiping Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17, Nanli, Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Han Y, Qi W, Wang S, Cao W, Chen J, Cai G. Identification of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone: Results of a retrospective study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:13309-13318. [PMID: 37148548 PMCID: PMC10315751 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) appears in a few clinical studies as an alternative to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) in selected patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of nCT with or without nCRT in patients with LARC and to identify patients who may be suitable for nCT alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 155 patients with LARC who received neoadjuvant treatment (NT) were retrospectively analysed from January 2016 to June 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: nCRT (n = 101) and nCT (n = 54). More patients with locally advanced disease (cT4, cN+ and magnetic resonance imaging-detected mesorectal fascia [mrMRF] positive [+]) were found in the nCRT group. Patients in the nCRT group received a dose of 50 Gy/25 Fx irradiation with concurrent capecitabine, and the median number of nCT cycles was two. In the nCT group, the median number of cycles was four. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 30 months. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the nCRT group was significantly higher than that in the nCT group (17.5% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.047). A significant difference was observed in the locoregional recurrence rate (LRR); 6.9% in the nCRT group and 16.7% in the nCT group (p = 0.011). Among patients with initial mrMRF (+) status, the LRR in the nCRT group was significantly lower than that in the nCT group (6.1% vs. 20%, p = 0.007), but not in patients with initial mrMRF negative (-) (10.5% in each group, p = 0.647). Compared with the nCT group, a lower LRR was observed in patients in the nCRT group with initial mrMRF (+) converted to mrMRF (-) after NT (5.3% vs. 23%, p = 0.009). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding acute toxicity and overall and progression-free survivals. Multivariate analysis showed that nCRT and ypN stage were independent prognostic factors for the development of LRR. CONCLUSION Patients with initial mrMRF (-) may be suitable for nCT alone. However, patients with initial mrMRF (+) converted to mrMRF (-) after nCT are still at high risk of LRR, and radiotherapy is recommended. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi‐min Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Wei‐xiang Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Shu‐bei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Wei‐guo Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Jia‐yi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Gang Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abe S, Kawai K, Nozawa H, Sasaki K, Murono K, Emoto S, Yokoyama Y, Matsuzaki H, Nagai Y, Yoshioka Y, Shinagawa T, Sonoda H, Yamamoto Y, Oba K, Ishihara S. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy using tegafur/uracil, oral leucovorin, and irinotecan (TEGAFIRI) followed by oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: the study protocol for a phase II trial. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:450. [PMID: 37198556 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10941-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a novel treatment strategy that is an alternative to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, an optimal protocol for TNT has not yet been established. The present study will be an open-label, single-arm, single-center trial to develop a new protocol. METHODS Thirty LARC patients at high risk of distant metastasis will receive CRT consisting of long-course radiation, concurrent with tegafur/uracil, oral leucovorin, irinotecan (TEGAFIRI), followed by mFOLFOX-6 or CAPOX before undergoing surgery. DISCUSSION Since previous findings showed a high percentage of grade 3-4 adverse events with the TEGAFIRI regimen for CRT and TNT, the primary outcome of this study will be safety and feasibility. Our regimen for CRT consists of the biweekly administration of irinotecan for good patient compliance. The novel combination approach of this treatment may improve the long-term outcomes of LARC. TRIAL REGISTRATION Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs031210660.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Abe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
| | - Kazushige Kawai
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Koji Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Shigenobu Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Yokoyama
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Matsuzaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Yuzo Nagai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Yoshioka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Takahide Shinagawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Sonoda
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Yoko Yamamoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Koji Oba
- Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Liu S, Wang X, Zhuang Y, Bai S, Wu X, Ye Y, Luo H, Yu H, Wang Q, Chang H, Zeng Z, Cai P, Pan Z, Gao Y, Chen G, Xiao W. Total neoadjuvant treatment to increase the clinical complete response rate for distal locally advanced rectal cancer (TESS): A study protocol of a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Cancer Med 2023. [PMID: 37156624 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) was neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT), a new concept, attempts to deliver both systemic chemotherapy and neoadjuvant CRT prior to surgery. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to show higher tumor regression. The objective of this trial was to increase complete clinical rate (cCR) for LARC patients by optimizing tumor response, using TNT regimen as compared to conventional chemoradiotherapy. TESS, a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study, is underway. METHODS Main inclusion criteria include cT3-4aNany or cT1-4aN+ rectal adenocarcinoma aged 18-70y; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance 0-1; location ≤5 cm from anal verge. Ninety-eight patients will receive 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy Capeox (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) before, during, and after radiotherapy 50Gy/25 fractions, before TME (or other treatment decisions, such as Watch and Wait strategy) and adjuvant chemotherapy capecitabine 2 cycles. Primary endpoint is the cCR rate. Secondary endpoints include ratio of sphincter preservation strategy; pathological complete response rate and tumor regression grade distribution; local recurrence or metastasis; disease-free survival; locoregional recurrence-free survival; acute toxicity; surgical complications; long-term anal function; late toxicity; adverse effect, ECOG standard score, and quality of life. Adverse events are graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V5.0. Acute toxicity will be monitored during antitumor treatment, and late toxicity will be monitored for 3 years from the end of the first course of antitumor treatment. DISCUSSION The TESS trial aims to explore a new TNT strategy, which is expected to increase the rate of cCR and sphincter preservation rate. This study will provide new options and evidence for a new sandwich TNT strategy in patients with distal LARC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - XiaoZhong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, China
| | - YeZhong Zhuang
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - ShouMin Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - XiaoJun Wu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - YiJing Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
| | - HuiLong Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - HaiNa Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - QiaoXuan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - ZhiFan Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - PeiQiang Cai
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - ZhiZhong Pan
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - YuanHong Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Gong Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - WeiWei Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Aschele C, Glynne-Jones R. Selecting a TNT Schedule in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Can We Predict Who Actually Benefits? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092567. [PMID: 37174033 PMCID: PMC10177050 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Many consider the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) to be preoperative chemoradiotherapy, radical surgery involving a total mesorectal excision, and post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy based on the pathology of the specimen. The poor impact on distant control is a major limitation of this strategy, with metastasis rates remaining in the 25-35% range and recovery after radical surgery leading to reluctance with prescription and inconsistent patient compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy. A second limitation is the low rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) (around 10-15%) despite multiple efforts to potentiate preoperative chemoradiation regimens, which in turn means it is less effective at achieving non-operative management (NOM). Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) is a pragmatic approach to solving these problems by introducing systemic chemotherapy at an early timepoint. Enthusiasm for delivering TNT for patients with LARC is increasing in light of the results of published randomized phase III trials, which show a doubling of the pCR rate and a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent metastases. However, there has been no demonstrated improvement in quality of life or overall survival. A plethora of potential chemotherapy schedules are available around the radiotherapy component, which include preoperative induction or consolidation with a range of options (FOLFOXIRI, FOLFOX, or CAPEOX,) and a varying duration of 6-18 weeks, prior to long course chemoradiation (LCCRT) or consolidation NACT following short-course preoperative radiation therapy (SCPRT) using 5 × 5 Gy or LCCRT using 45-60 Gy, respectively. The need to maintain optimal local control is a further important factor, and preliminary data appear to indicate that the RT schedule remains a crucial issue, especially in more advanced tumors, i.e., mesorectal fascia (MRF) invasion. Thus, there is no consensus as to the optimum combination, sequence, or duration of TNT. The selection of patients most likely to benefit is challenging, as clear-cut criteria to individuate patients benefiting from TNT are lacking. In this narrative review, we examine if there are any necessary or sufficient criteria for the use of TNT. We explore potential selection for the individual and their concerns with a generalized use of this strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Aschele
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, Via Vittorio Veneto 197, 19121 La Spezia, Italy
| | - Robert Glynne-Jones
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Rd., Northwood, London HA6 2RN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mei WJ, Wang XZ, Li YF, Sun YM, Yang CK, Lin JZ, Wu ZG, Zhang R, Wang W, Li Y, Zhuang YZ, Lei J, Wan XB, Ren YK, Cheng Y, Li WL, Wang ZQ, Xu DB, Mo XW, Ju HX, Ye SW, Zhao JL, Zhang H, Gao YH, Zeng ZF, Xiao WW, Zhang XP, Zhang X, Xie E, Feng YF, Tang JH, Wu XJ, Chen G, Li LR, Lu ZH, Wan DS, Bei JX, Pan ZZ, Ding PR. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With CAPOX Versus Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Uninvolved Mesorectal Fascia (CONVERT): Initial Results of a Phase III Trial. Ann Surg 2023; 277:557-564. [PMID: 36538627 PMCID: PMC9994847 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) with CAPOX alone versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with uninvolved mesorectal fascia (MRF). BACKGROUND DATA nCRT is associated with higher surgical complications, worse long-term functional outcomes, and questionable survival benefits. Comparatively, nCT alone seems a promising alternative treatment in lower-risk LARC patients with uninvolved MRF. METHODS Patients between June 2014 and October 2020 with LARC within 12 cm from the anal verge and uninvolved MRF were randomly assigned to nCT group with 4 cycles of CAPOX (Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV day 1 and Capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 d. Repeat every 3 wk) or nCRT group with Capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily administered orally and concurrently with radiation therapy (50 Gy/25 fractions) for 5 days per week. The primary end point is local-regional recurrence-free survival. Here we reported the results of secondary end points: histopathologic response, surgical events, and toxicity. RESULTS Of the 663 initially enrolled patients, 589 received the allocated treatment (nCT, n=300; nCRT, n=289). Pathologic complete response rate was 11.0% (95% CI, 7.8-15.3%) in the nCT arm and 13.8% (95% CI, 10.1-18.5%) in the nCRT arm ( P =0.33). The downstaging (ypStage 0 to 1) rate was 40.8% (95% CI, 35.1-46.7%) in the nCT arm and 45.6% (95% CI, 39.7-51.7%) in the nCRT arm ( P =0.27). nCT was associated with lower perioperative distant metastases rate (0.7% vs. 3.1%, P =0.03) and preventive ileostomy rate (52.2% vs. 63.6%, P =0.008) compared with nCRT. Four patients in the nCT arm received salvage nCRT because of local disease progression after nCT. Two patients in the nCT arm and 5 in the nCRT arm achieved complete clinical response and were treated with a nonsurgical approach. Similar results were observed in subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS nCT achieved similar pCR and downstaging rates with lower incidence of perioperative distant metastasis and preventive ileostomy compared with nCRT. CAPOX could be an effective alternative to neoadjuvant therapy in LARC with uninvolved MRF. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yun-Feng Li
- The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Yunnan Cancer Hospital
| | - Yue-Ming Sun
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing
| | | | | | - Zu-Guang Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou
| | - Rui Zhang
- Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute
| | - Wei Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
| | - Yong Li
- Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou
| | | | - Jian Lei
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
| | - Xiang-Bin Wan
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou
| | - Ying-Kun Ren
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou
| | - Yong Cheng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P. R. China
| | - Wen-Liang Li
- First Affiliated hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming
| | | | | | - Xian-Wei Mo
- Guangxi Medical University Cancer Center, Nanning
| | - Hai-Xing Ju
- Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou
| | | | - Jing-Lin Zhao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Jiangmen
| | - Hong Zhang
- Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang
| | | | | | | | | | - Xuan Zhang
- The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Yunnan Cancer Hospital
| | - E Xie
- Shantou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shantou
| | - Yi-Fei Feng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jin-Xin Bei
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou Guangdong
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zheng R, Wang BS, Li Z, Chi P, Xu B. Combining chemotherapy and tislelizumab with preoperative split-course hypofraction radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: study protocol of a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066976. [PMID: 36927585 PMCID: PMC10030573 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) with systemic therapy has the potential to further improve the long-term efficacy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). To maximise the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy for improved prognosis, it is important to determine the optimal mix of chemotherapy, immunotherapy and SCRT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Fifty treatment-naïve patients with operable LARC (T3-4 and/or N+) will be recruited. Patients will be synchronously treated with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) chemotherapy, tislelizumab and preoperative split-course hypofraction radiotherapy (SCHR) (5×7 Gy) before surgery. Chemotherapy for CAPOX starts on day 1 of every 21-day cycle: on day 1, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 will be injected intravenously. On days 1-14, capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 was ingested two times a day. Simultaneously, tocilizumab 200 mg will be given intravenously on the first day of every 21-day cycle. A single 7 Gy SCHR treatment (day 7 of each 21-day cycle) will be delivered five times during the seventh day of treatment. The primary endpoint will be pathological complete response. The secondary outcomes will be the 3-year disease-free survival, local recurrence rate, overall survival, sphincter-sparing surgery rate, R0 resection rate, predictive biomarkers and quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiehe Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (XAHFMU) (No. 2021YF025-01). Results from our study will be disseminated in international peer-reviewed journals. All study procedures were developed in order to assure data protection and confidentiality. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05176964.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
- Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive,Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Bi-Si Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhihua Li
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Zhangzhou, Zhangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Pan Chi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Benhua Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
- Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive,Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Simillis C, Khatri A, Dai N, Afxentiou T, Jephcott C, Smith S, Jadon R, Papamichael D, Khan J, Powar MP, Fearnhead NS, Wheeler J, Davies J. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing neoadjuvant treatment strategies for stage II and III rectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 183:103927. [PMID: 36706968 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Multiple neoadjuvant therapy strategies have been used and compared for rectal cancer and there has been no true consensus as to the optimal neoadjuvant therapy regimen. The aim is to identify and compare the neoadjuvant therapies available for stage II and III rectal cancer. DESIGN A systematic literature review was performed, from inception to August 2022, of the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials comparing neoadjuvant therapies for stage II and III rectal cancer were considered. Stata was used to draw network plots, and a Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted through models utilizing the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method in WinBUGS. RESULTS A total of 58 articles were included based on 41 randomised controlled trials, reporting on 12,404 participants that underwent 15 neoadjuvant treatment regimens. No significant difference was identified between treatments for major or total postoperative complications, anastomotic leak rates, or sphincter-saving surgery. Straight to surgery (STS) ranked as best treatment for preoperative toxicity but ranked worst treatment for positive resection margins and complete response. STS had significantly increased positive resection margins compared to long-course chemoradiotherapy with short-wait (LCCRT-SW) or long-wait (LCCRT-LW) to surgery, or short-course radiotherapy with short-wait (SCRT-SW) or immediate surgery (SCRT-IS). LCCRT-SW or LCCRT-LW resulted in significantly increased complete response rates compared to STS. LCCRT-LW significantly improved 2-year overall survival compared to STS, SCRT-IS, SCRT-SW. Total neoadjuvant therapy regimes with short-course radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy (SCRT-CT-SW), induction chemotherapy followed by long-course chemoradiotherapy (CT-LCCRT-S), long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy (LCCRT-CT-S), significantly improved positive resection margins, complete response, and disease-free survival compared to STS. Chemotherapy with monoclonal antibodies followed by long-course chemoradiotherapy (CT+MAB-LCCRT+MAB-S) significantly improved complete response and positive resection margins compared to STS, and 2-year disease-free survival compared to STS, SCRT-IS, SCRT-SW, SCRT-CT-SW, LCCRT-SW, LCCRT-LW. CT+MAB-LCCRT+MAB-S ranked as best treatment for disease-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Conventional neoadjuvant therapies with short-course radiation or long-course chemoradiotherapy have oncological benefits compared to no neoadjuvant therapy without increasing perioperative complication rates. Prolonged wait to surgery may improve oncological outcomes. Total neoadjuvant therapies provide additional benefits in terms of complete response, positive resection margins, and disease-free survival. Monoclonal antibody therapy may further improve oncological outcomes but currently is only applicable to a small subgroup of patients and requires further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Simillis
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Amulya Khatri
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nick Dai
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thalia Afxentiou
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Catherine Jephcott
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah Smith
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rashmi Jadon
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Jim Khan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Michael P Powar
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicola S Fearnhead
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - James Wheeler
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Accurate tumor segmentation and treatment outcome prediction with DeepTOP. Radiother Oncol 2023; 183:109550. [PMID: 36813177 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate outcome prediction prior to treatment can facilitate trial design and clinical decision making to achieve better treatment outcome. METHOD We developed the DeepTOP tool with deep learning approach for region-of-interest segmentation and clinical outcome prediction using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DeepTOP was constructed with an automatic pipeline from tumor segmentation to outcome prediction. In DeepTOP, the segmentation model used U-Net with a codec structure, and the prediction model was built with a three-layer convolutional neural network. In addition, the weight distribution algorithm was developed and applied in the prediction model to optimize the performance of DeepTOP. RESULTS A total of 1889 MRI slices from 99 patients in the phase III multicenter randomized clinical trial (NCT01211210) on neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer was used to train and validate DeepTOP. We systematically optimized and validated DeepTOP with multiple devised pipelines in the clinical trial, demonstrating a better performance than other competitive algorithms in accurate tumor segmentation (Dice coefficient: 0.79; IoU: 0.75; slice-specific sensitivity: 0.98) and predicting pathological complete response to chemo/radiotherapy (accuracy: 0.789; specificity: 0.725; and sensitivity: 0.812). DeepTOP is a deep learning tool that could avoid manual labeling and feature extraction and realize automatic tumor segmentation and treatment outcome prediction by using the original MRI images. CONCLUSION DeepTOP is open to provide a tractable framework for the development of other segmentation and predicting tools in clinical settings. DeepTOP-based tumor assessment can provide a reference for clinical decision making and facilitate imaging marker-driven trial design.
Collapse
|
34
|
Promises and Challenges of Predictive Blood Biomarkers for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy. Cells 2023; 12:cells12030413. [PMID: 36766755 PMCID: PMC9913546 DOI: 10.3390/cells12030413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) requires a multimodal approach combining neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery. Predicting tumor response to CRT can guide clinical decision making and improve patient care while avoiding unnecessary toxicity and morbidity. Circulating biomarkers offer both the advantage to be easily accessed and followed over time. In recent years, biomarkers such as proteins, blood cells, or nucleic acids have been investigated for their predictive value in oncology. We conducted a comprehensive literature review with the aim to summarize the status of circulating biomarkers predicting response to CRT in LARC. Forty-nine publications, of which forty-seven full-text articles, one review and one systematic review, were retrieved. These studies evaluated circulating markers (CEA and CA 19-9), inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, albumin, and lymphocytes), hematologic markers (hemoglobin and thrombocytes), lipids and circulating nucleic acids (cell-free DNA [cfDNA], circulating tumor DNA [ctDNA], and microRNA [miRNA]). Post-CRT CEA levels had the most consistent association with tumor response, while cfDNA integrity index, MGMT promoter methylation, ERCC-1, miRNAs, and miRNA-related SNPs were identified as potential predictive markers. Although circulating biomarkers hold great promise, inconsistent results, low statistical power, and low specificity and sensibility prevent them from reliably predicting tumor response following CRT. Validation and standardization of methods and technologies are further required to confirm results.
Collapse
|
35
|
Automatic treatment outcome prediction with DeepInteg based on multimodal radiological images in rectal cancer. Heliyon 2023; 9:e13094. [PMID: 36785834 PMCID: PMC9918765 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant systemic treatment before surgery is a prevalent regimen in the patients with advanced-stage or high-risk tumor, which has shaped the treatment strategies and cancer survival in the past decades. However, some patients present with poor response to the neoadjuvant treatment. Therefore, it is of great significance to develop tools to help distinguish the patients that could achieve pathological complete response before surgery to avoid inappropriate treatment. Here, this study demonstrated a multi-task deep learning tool called DeepInteg. In the DeepInteg framework, the segmentation module was constructed based on the CE-Net with a context extractor to achieve end-to-end delineation of region of interest (ROI) from radiological images, then the features of segmented Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) images of each case were fused and input to the classification module based on a convolution neural network for treatment outcome prediction. The dataset with 1700 MRI and CT slices collected from the prospectively randomized clinical trial (NCT01211210) on systemic treatment for rectal cancer was used to develop and systematically optimize DeepInteg. As a result, DeepInteg achieved automatic segmentation of tumoral ROI with Dices of 0.766 and 0.719 and mIoUs of 0.788 and 0.756 in CT and MRI images, respectively. In addition, DeepInteg achieved AUC of 0.833, accuracy of 0.826 and specificity of 0.856 in the prediction for pathological complete response after treatment, which showed better performance compared with the model based on CT or MRI alone. This study provide a robust framework to develop disease-specific tools for automatic delineation of ROI and clinical outcome prediction. The well-trained DeepInteg could be readily applied in clinic to predict pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer patients.
Collapse
|
36
|
Qiu X, Jiang C, Jing S, Li A, Sun X, Shen Z. Toxicity, Disease Control, and Survival Outcomes of Intensified Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Institution Study. Cancer Manag Res 2023; 15:387-398. [PMID: 37187801 PMCID: PMC10178377 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s398592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The standard treatment regimen of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of preoperative intensive CRT in our institution. Methods A retrospective data collection and analysis of 181 LARC patients receiving oxaliplatin (85%) of standard doses in capecitabine-based preoperative CRT and two additional cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy between the end of concurrent CRT and surgery. Results The compliance of the preoperative CRT was satisfactory with 99.4%patients completed radiotherapy and 97.19%patients completed all 2 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy. Except for 20 patients diagnosed clinical complete remission (cCR) managed according to watch and wait strategy, 160 patients received R0 radical surgery. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 23.75% (38/160) and tumor regression grade (TRG) 0/1 was 40% (72/180). In terms of tumor downstaging, 89 (55.63%) had T downstaging while 115 (71.88%) had N downstaging. The 1-overall survival (OS),2-OS,3-OS and 5-OS were 98.7%, 96.5%, 91.4% and 81.5%, respectively. The total rate of sphincter preservation was 86.25% (138/160) and the rate of patients with low rectal cancer was 73.0% (54/74) without affecting local control rates and survival rates. Both acute adverse reactions to preoperative CRT and postoperative complications were tolerable and controllable. Conclusion In this retrospective study, preoperative intensive CRT of patients with LARC achieved satisfied disease control and survival outcomes and well acquired the sphincter retention rate in recent years in our institution. On the basis of these findings, a Phase III study to definitively test the intensified preoperative CRT strategy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangnan Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, People’s Republic of China
| | - Changchen Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shenghua Jing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, People’s Republic of China
| | - Aomei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiangdong Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zetian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210031, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Zetian Shen; Xiangdong Sun, Email ;
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
He W, Li Q, Li X. Changing patterns of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: A narrative review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 181:103885. [PMID: 36464124 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer has been the multidisciplinary approach of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. This reduces the local recurrence rate, but the challenge of distant metastasis still persists. The improvement in treatment approach has always been the focus of clinical research and studies have been conducted worldwide in recent years. On one hand, evidence suggests that increasing the intensity of treatment can result in better tumor regression, for example by adding a second drug to the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, or extending the interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery, or incorporating chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. On the other hand, neoadjuvant immunotherapy and selective omission of neoadjuvant radiotherapy may improve the quality of life of patients. In this article, we review the key clinical research progresses in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer, hoping to provide some valuable views on the individualized treatment for rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijing He
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Qingguo Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Xinxiang Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Strategies to Optimize Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010219. [PMID: 36612213 PMCID: PMC9818694 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant long-course concurrent chemoradiation plus surgery, followed by optional adjuvant chemotherapy, is a standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, this traditional approach has several limitations, including low pathological complete response (pCR) (10-25%), high metastasis rate (30-35%), and highly inconsistent compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy (25-75%). Treatment modalities for LARC have dramatically evolved in recent years. Multiple clinical trials have focused on optimizing strategies to achieve a win-win situation for oncologic outcomes and functions. Here, we review the latest studies into optimizing neoadjuvant treatment for LARC.
Collapse
|
39
|
Takemasa I, Hamabe A, Miyo M, Akizuki E, Okuya K. Essential updates 2020/2021: Advancing precision medicine for comprehensive rectal cancer treatment. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2022; 7:198-215. [PMID: 36998300 PMCID: PMC10043777 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
In the paradigm shift related to rectal cancer treatment, we have to understand a variety of new emerging topics to provide appropriate treatment for individual patients as precision medicine. However, information on surgery, genomic medicine, and pharmacotherapy is highly specialized and subdivided, creating a barrier to achieving thorough knowledge. In this review, we summarize the perspective for rectal cancer treatment and management from the current standard-of-care to the latest findings to help optimize treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Takemasa
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and ScienceSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoJapan
| | - Atsushi Hamabe
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and ScienceSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoJapan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| | - Masaaki Miyo
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and ScienceSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoJapan
| | - Emi Akizuki
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and ScienceSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoJapan
| | - Koichi Okuya
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and ScienceSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wang H, Jia H, Gao Y, Zhang H, Fan J, Zhang L, Ren F, Yin Y, Cai Y, Zhu J, Zhu ZJ. Serum metabolic traits reveal therapeutic toxicities and responses of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Nat Commun 2022; 13:7802. [PMID: 36528604 PMCID: PMC9759530 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35511-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) has become the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Therapeutic efficacy of nCRT is significantly affected by treatment-induced diarrhea and hematologic toxicities. Metabolic alternations in cancer therapy are key determinants to therapeutic toxicities and responses, but exploration in large-scale clinical studies remains limited. Here, we analyze 743 serum samples from 165 LARC patients recruited in a phase III clinical study using untargeted metabolomics and identify responsive metabolic traits over the course of nCRT. Pre-therapeutic serum metabolites successfully predict the chances of diarrhea and hematologic toxicities during nCRT. Particularly, levels of acyl carnitines are linked to sex disparity in nCRT-induced diarrhea. Finally, we show that differences in phenylalanine metabolism and essential amino acid metabolism may underlie distinct therapeutic responses of nCRT. This study illustrates the metabolic dynamics over the course of nCRT and provides potential to guide personalized nCRT treatment using responsive metabolic traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongmiao Wang
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049 China
| | - Huixun Jia
- grid.16821.3c0000 0004 0368 8293Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080 China ,grid.452404.30000 0004 1808 0942Department of Biostatistics, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032 China
| | - Yang Gao
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049 China
| | - Haosong Zhang
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049 China
| | - Jin Fan
- grid.452404.30000 0004 1808 0942Department of Biostatistics, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032 China
| | - Lijie Zhang
- grid.452404.30000 0004 1808 0942Department of Biostatistics, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032 China
| | - Fandong Ren
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China
| | - Yandong Yin
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China
| | - Yuping Cai
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China
| | - Ji Zhu
- grid.417397.f0000 0004 1808 0985Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, 310005 China ,grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310000 China ,Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, 310000 China ,grid.452404.30000 0004 1808 0942Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032 China ,grid.8547.e0000 0001 0125 2443Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031 China ,grid.513063.2Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032 China
| | - Zheng-Jiang Zhu
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China ,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Aging Studies, Shanghai, 201210 China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Yan H, Zhang Y, Hao Z, Lu Y, Liu H. mFOLFOX4 with or without radiation in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced middle and low rectal cancer. J Cancer Res Ther 2022; 18:2027-2032. [PMID: 36647966 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1207_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Context Neoadjuvant therapy can reduce the recurrence rate of locally advanced middle and low rectal cancer. Radiation therapy can not only bring benefits but also produce acute and late toxicity, which will affect the quality of life and organ function of patients; the application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy can avoid the toxicity of radiotherapy. Aims To investigate the efficiency and side effects of preoperative modified FOLFOX4 (mFOLFOX4) chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for locally advanced middle and low rectal cancer (LAMLRC). Methods and Material This study included 431 patients with LAMLRC receiving mFOLFOX4 chemotherapy independently or combined with radiotherapy before operation. The basic information, efficacy indicators, and adverse reactions of the two groups were recorded in detail. Side effects were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 3.0. Statistical Analysis Used Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science, IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 22). Mann-Whitney test and Chi-square test were used for comparative analysis. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Results Of 128 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 52 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), and 76 received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). The average operation time in the NCT group was 2.71 h, and that in the NCRT group was 3.35 h (P = 0.005). The pathological complete remission rates in the NCT and NCRT groups were 1.9% and 17.1%, respectively (P = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the T-stage decline rate and lymph node positive rate between the two groups. There were higher rates of leukopenia (32.7% vs. 57.9%; P < 0.05) and diarrhea (0% vs. 9.2%; P < 0.05) in the NCRT group. The 3-year overall survival rates in the NCT and NCRT groups were 80.3% and 82.8% (P = 0.715), respectively, and the respective 3-year disease-free survival rates were 68.8% and 70.5% (P = 0.966). Conclusions NCT with mFOLFOX4 independently resulted in a lower pathological complete remission rate, with less toxicity and shorter operation time. NCT with mFOLFOX4 has certain clinical usefulness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongxia Yan
- Department of Phamarcy, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Yixun Zhang
- Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Zhiying Hao
- Department of Phamarcy, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Yanjun Lu
- Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Haiyi Liu
- Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Song M, Wang H, Wang L, Li S, Zhang Y, Geng J, Zhu X, Li Y, Cai Y, Wang W. Dentate line invasion as a predictive factor of poor distant relapse-free survival in locally advanced lower rectal cancer with anal sphincter involvement. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1196. [PMCID: PMC9675199 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10299-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While an important surgical landmark of the dentate line has been established for locally advanced lower rectal cancer (LALRC), the prognostic significance of dentate line invasion (DLI) has not been well defined. This study aimed to explore the impact of DLI on prognosis in LALRC patients with anal sphincter involvement after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Methods We analyzed 210 LALRC patients and classified them into DLI group (n = 45) or non-DLI group (n = 165). The exact role of DLI in survival and failure patterns was assessed before and after propensity-score matching(PSM). Finally, 50 patients were matched. Results Before matching, patients in the DLI group had poorer 5-year distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) (P < 0.001), disease-free survival (DFS) (P < 0.001), and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.022) than those in the non-DLI group, with the exception of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (P = 0.114). After PSM, the 5-year DRFS, DFS, OS, and LRFS were 51.7% vs. 79.8%(P = 0.026), 51.7% vs. 79.8%(P = 0.029), 71.6% vs. 85.4%(P = 0.126), and 85.7% vs. 92.0%(P = 0.253), respectively, between the two groups. DLI was also an independent prognostic factor for poor DRFS with (Hazard ratio [HR] 3.843, P = 0.020) or without matching (HR 2.567, P = 0.001). The DLI group exhibited a higher rate of distant metastasis before (44.4% vs. 19.4%, P < 0.001) and after matching (48.0% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.037) and similar rates of locoregional recurrence before (13.3% vs.7.9%, P = 0.729) and after matching (16.0% vs.12.0%, P = 1.000). Conclusions DLI may portend worse DRFS and distant metastasis in LALRC patients with anal sphincter involvement, and this may be an important variable to guide clinicians. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10299-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxiaowei Song
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 People’s Republic of China
| | - Hongzhi Wang
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 People’s Republic of China
| | - Lin Wang
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department 3 of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 People’s Republic of China
| | - Shuai Li
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 People’s Republic of China
| | - Yangzi Zhang
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 People’s Republic of China
| | - Jianhao Geng
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 People’s Republic of China
| | - Xianggao Zhu
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 People’s Republic of China
| | - Yongheng Li
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 People’s Republic of China
| | - Yong Cai
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 People’s Republic of China
| | - Weihu Wang
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Li B, Wu K, Li J, Wu Q, Wu Y, Wang X, Linghu Y, Hu H, Wang H, Cao W. Locally advanced rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: is preoperative radiation necessary? J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 13:2366-2374. [PMID: 36388693 PMCID: PMC9660069 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is recommended for locally advanced rectal cancer, allowing preoperative down-staging of the primary tumor to facilitate complete surgical removal. However, further investigation is warranted for identifying whether radiotherapy is necessary for rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (RMAC). Thus, this study was designed to explore the relationship between mFOLFOX6 with or without preoperative radiotherapy and therapeutic efficacy in locally advanced RMAC. METHODS A total of 81 patients were retrospectively enrolled, with MRI-defined clinical stage II/III RMAC received neoadjuvant treatment with mFOLFOX6 alone (group A) or mFOLFOX6 plus radiation (group B), followed by total mesorectal excision. Tumor down-staging and tumor response were assessed based on post-treatment MRI-defined radiographical and pathological findings. Follow-up data were retrieved, and the Kaplan-Meier curve was used to determine the relationship between the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the two groups. RESULTS There were no significant differences in the clinical baseline characteristics of patients between group A and group B. The sphincter preservation rate in group B was 60.9%, higher than in group A (20.0%) (P=0.031). The rate of pathological complete response (pCR) was 14.0% in group B, while no patients had pCR in group A (P=0.029), and the tumor response rate in group B was higher than in group A (52.0% vs. 16.1%, P=0.001). The 3-year probability of OS in group A and B was 77.4% and 72.0% (P=0.509), and 3-year DFS was 58.1% and 56.0% (P=0.592), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant mFOLFOX6-based chemoradiotherapy could be a promising therapeutic option for patients with RMAC, which was associated with a high rate of pCR and sphincter preservation in comparison to treated with mFOLFOX6 alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biao Li
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China;,Guangdong Provincial Key laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, Guangdong Research Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ketong Wu
- Guangdong Provincial Key laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, Guangdong Research Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China;,Department of Interventional Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiao Li
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China;,Guangdong Provincial Key laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, Guangdong Research Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qianyu Wu
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China;,Guangdong Provincial Key laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, Guangdong Research Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yue Wu
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China;,Guangdong Provincial Key laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, Guangdong Research Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinhua Wang
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China;,Guangdong Provincial Key laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, Guangdong Research Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Linghu
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China;,Guangdong Provincial Key laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, Guangdong Research Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huabin Hu
- Guangdong Provincial Key laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, Guangdong Research Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China;,Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huaiming Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, Guangdong Research Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China;,Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wuteng Cao
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China;,Guangdong Provincial Key laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, Guangdong Research Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Comparison of Anastomotic Stricture/Stenosis After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer with Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision. Indian J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-022-03565-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
45
|
Abdalla A, Aref A. Is It Really the Short-Course Radiation? Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:e919. [PMID: 35616502 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Abdalla
- Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL
| | - Amr Aref
- Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Tailored Strategy for Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma (GRECCAR 4): Long-term Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:986-995. [PMID: 34759247 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic preoperative radiochemotherapy and total mesorectal excision are the standard of care for locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Some patients can be over- or undertreated. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the long-term oncological, functional, and late morbidity outcomes after tailored radiochemotherapy and induction high-dose chemotherapy. DESIGN This is a prospective, phase II, multicenter, open-label study at 16 tertiary centers in France. SETTINGS Patients were operated on by surgeons from the French GRECCAR group. PATIENTS Two hundred six patients were randomly assigned to treatment: good responders after chemotherapy (≥75% tumor volume reduction) to immediate surgery (arm A) or standard radiochemotherapy (capecitabine 50) plus surgery (arm B) and poor responders to capecitabine 50 (arm C) or intensive radiochemotherapy (capecitabine 60; 60 Gy irradiation; arm D) before surgery. INTERVENTIONS Treatment was tailored according to MRI response to induction chemotherapy. RESULTS After induction treatment, 194 patients were classified as good (n = 30, 15%) or poor (n = 164, 85%) responders; they were included in arms A and B (16 and 14 patients) or C and D (113 and 51 patients). The primary objective was obtained: R0 resection rates (90% CI) in the 4 arms were 100% (74-100), 100% (85-100), 83% (72-91), and 88% (77-95). At 5 years, overall survival rates were 90% (47.3-98.5), 93.3% (61.3-99.0), 84.3% (71.0-91.8), and 86.1% (71.6-93.5); disease-free survival rates were 80% (40.9-94.6), 89.5% (64.1-97.3), 72.9% (58.5-82.9), and 72.8% (57.7-83.2); local recurrence rates were 0%, 0%, 2.1% (0.3-13.9), and 9.3% (3.6-23.0); and metastasis rates were 20% (5.4-59.1), 10.5% (2.7-35.9), 18% (31.8-94.6), and 18.8% (10.2-33.0). Late morbidity and quality-of-life evaluations showed no significant difference between arms. LIMITATIONS Limitations were due to the small number of patients randomly assigned in the good responder arms, especially arm A without radiotherapy. CONCLUSION Tailoring preoperative radiochemotherapy based on induction treatment response appears to be promising. Future prospective trials should confirm this strategy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B761 . REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Identifier: NCT01333709. ESTRATEGIA HECHA A MEDIDA PARA EL TRATAMIENTO DEL CARCINOMA DE RECTO LOCALMENTE AVANZADO GRECCAR RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO DE UN ESTUDIO ALEATRIO MULTICNTRICO Y ABIERTO DE FASE II ANTECEDENTES:La radio-quimioterapia pré-operatoria sistemáticas y la excisión total del mesorrecto son el estándar en el tratamiento del carcinoma de recto localmente avanzado. En éste sentido, algunos pacientes podrían recibir un sobre o un infra-tratamiento.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados oncológicos, funcionales y de morbilidad a largo plazo después de radio-quimioterapia personalizada y quimioterapia de inducción a dosis elevadas.DISEÑO:Estudio aleatório multicéntrico y abierto de Fase II° realizado en 16 centros terciarios en Francia.AJUSTE:Aquellos pacientes operados por cirujanos del grupo GRECCAR francés.PACIENTES:206 pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente al tratamiento: los buenos respondedores después de quimioterapia (reducción del volumen tumoral ≥75%) a la cirugía inmediata (brazo A) o a la radio-quimioterapia estándar (Cap 50) asociada a la cirugía (brazo B); los malos respondedores a Cap 50 (brazo C) o a la radio-quimioterapia intensiva (Cap 60 (irradiación de 60 Gy) (brazo D) previas a la cirugía.INTERVENCIONES:Tratamiento adaptado según la respuesta de la RM a la TC de inducción.RESULTADOS:Después del tratamiento de inducción, 194 pacientes fueron clasificados como buenos (n = 30, 15%) o malos (n = 164, 85%) respondedores, y se incluyeron en los brazos A y B (16 y 14 pacientes) o C y D (113 y 51 pacientes). Se alcanzó el objetivo principal: las tasas de resección R0 [intervalo de confianza del 90%] en los cuatro brazos respectivamente, fueron del 100% [74-100], 100% [85-100], 83% [72-91] y 88% [77-95]. A los 5 años, las tasas fueron: de sobrevida global 90% [47,3-98,5], 93,3% [61,3-99,0], 84,3% [71,0-91,8], 86,1% [71,6-93,5]; de sobrevida libre a la enfermedad 80% [40,9-94,6], 89,5% [64,1-97,3], 72,9% [58,5-82,9], 72,8% [57,7-83,2]; de recidiva local 0, 0, 2,1% [0,3-13,9], 9,3% [3,6-23,0]; de metástasis 20% [5,4-59,1], 10,5% [2,7-35,9], 18% [31,8-94,6], 18,8% [10,2-33,0]. La evaluación tardía de la morbilidad y la calidad de vida no mostraron diferencias significativas entre los brazos.LIMITACIONES:Debido al pequeño número de pacientes asignados al azar en los brazos de buenos respondedores, especialmente en el brazo A de aquellos sin radioterapia.CONCLUSIÓN:Parecería muy prometedor el adaptar la radio-quimioterapia pré-operatoria basada en la respuesta al tratamiento de inducción. Estudios prospectivos en el futuro podrán confirmar la presente estrategia. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B761 . (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo )IDENTIFICADOR DE CLINICALTRIALS.GOV:NCT01333709. Groupe de REcherche Chirurgicale sur le CAncer du Rectum.
Collapse
|
47
|
Diefenhardt M, Schlenska-Lange A, Kuhnt T, Kirste S, Piso P, Bechstein WO, Hildebrandt G, Ghadimi M, Hofheinz RD, Rödel C, Fokas E. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer in the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 Randomized Phase 2 Trial: Early Surrogate Endpoints Revisited. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153658. [PMID: 35954320 PMCID: PMC9367426 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Early efficacy outcome measures in rectal cancer after total neoadjuvant treatment are increasingly investigated. We examined the prognostic role of pathological complete response (pCR), tumor regression grading (TRG) and neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score for disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with rectal carcinoma treated within the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 randomized phase 2 trial. Methods: Distribution of pCR, TRG and NAR score was analyzed using the Pearson’s chi-squared test. Univariable analyses were performed using the log-rank test, stratified by treatment arm. Discrimination ability of non-pCR for DFS was assessed by analyzing the ROC curve as a function of time. Results: Of the 311 patients enrolled, 306 patients were evaluable (Arm A:156, Arm B:150). After a median follow-up of 43 months, the 3-year DFS was 73% in both groups (HR, 0.95, 95% CI, 0.63–1.45, p = 0.82). pCR tended to be higher in Arm B (17% vs. 25%, p = 0.086). In both treatment arms, pCR, TRG and NAR were significant prognostic factors for DFS, whereas survival in subgroups defined by pCR, TRG or NAR did not significantly differ between the treatment arms. The discrimination ability of non-pCR for DFS remained constant over time (C-Index 0.58) but was slightly better in Arm B (0.61 vs. 0.56). Conclusion: Although pCR, TRG and NAR were strong prognostic factors for DFS in the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial, their value in selecting one TNT approach over another could not be confirmed. Hence, the conclusion of a long-term survival benefit of one treatment arm based on early surrogate endpoints should be stated with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Diefenhardt
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany; (C.R.); (E.F.)
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-(0)69-63015130; Fax: +49-(0)69-63015091
| | - Anke Schlenska-Lange
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Regensburg, 93049 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Thomas Kuhnt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany;
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site: Freiburg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital, 93049 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Wolf O. Bechstein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany;
| | - Guido Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany;
| | - Michael Ghadimi
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany;
| | - Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany;
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany; (C.R.); (E.F.)
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site: Frankfurt, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany; (C.R.); (E.F.)
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site: Frankfurt, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Matsuda C, Kudo T, Morimoto Y, Kagawa Y, Tei M, Ide Y, Miyoshi N, Takahashi H, Uemura M, Takemasa I, Satoh T, Mizushima T, Murata K, Doki Y, Eguchi H. A phase II study of neoadjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (XELOXIRI) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2022; 7:81-90. [PMID: 36643362 PMCID: PMC9831889 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Addition of perioperative multi-agent chemotherapy to the treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) may be a promising option. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin and irinotecan (XELOXIRI) as triplet neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with LARC. Methods Patients received neoadjuvant irinotecan and oxaliplatin and capecitabine and then underwent total mesorectal excision. The primary study endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Results Between June 2013 and December 2016, 55 patients were enrolled in the study. Forty-two (77.8%) of 54 completed the study protocol. The pCR rate was 7.7% (95% CI 3.0% to 18.2%). The 3-year local recurrence rate was 3.9%, the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 77.3, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 96.0%. Conclusion XELOXIRI neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to be feasible and efficacious for patients with LARC. Although neoadjuvant XELOXIRI alone did not yield our expected pCR rate, the local recurrence rate, 3-year DFS, and measures of safety met current standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chu Matsuda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan,Department of Surgery, Osaka International Cancer InstituteOsaka Prefectural Hospital OrganizationOsakaJapan
| | - Toshihiro Kudo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan,Department of Medical Oncology, Osaka International Cancer InstituteOsaka Prefectural Hospital OrganizationOsakaJapan
| | - Yoshihiro Morimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| | - Yoshinori Kagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryKansai Rosai HospitalAmagasakiJapan,Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka General Medical CenterOsakaJapan
| | | | - Yoshihito Ide
- Department of SurgeryYao Municipal HospitalOsakaJapan,Department of SurgeryJapan Community Health care Organization (JCHO) Osaka HospitalOsakaJapan
| | - Norikatsu Miyoshi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| | - Hidekazu Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| | - Mamoru Uemura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| | - Ichiro Takemasa
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and ScienceSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoJapan
| | - Taroh Satoh
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| | - Tsunekazu Mizushima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan,Department of Therapeutics for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| | - Kohei Murata
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryKansai Rosai HospitalAmagasakiJapan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lin W, Zhu C, Yao J, Liu Y, Lin H, Liu Y. Multifactorial Analysis of Clinical Prognosis of Liver Metastasis and Vascular Intervention Combined with Ablation in Colorectal Cancer. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:9690401. [PMID: 35726221 PMCID: PMC9206548 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9690401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of deaths in China. The initial stages of colorectal cancer can be treated by surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. However, in the advanced stages, it warrants an application of multimodality treatment. With advances in the medical field, there are applications of new modality of treatment that could possibly provide the appropriate treatment for the advanced stage tumours. The first site of metastasis after colorectal cancer is the liver and the conventional treatment to cure the metastatic lesion involves the administration of chemotherapy. With further advancement, chemotherapy has been directly administered at the thorough transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) which is a vascular intervention. With further advancement, the nonvascular intervention, such as radiofrequency ablations (RFAs), has been administered to the patients. A large amount of data support the use of vascular intervention (TACE) with ablation for hepatic carcinoma; there is no sufficient literature to support the application of the modality in the metastatic liver lesion. In this prospective observational study, we have enrolled 80 patients with metastatic liver lesion from the adenocarcinoma of colon or rectum, treated the patients with a combination of the TACE and ablation therapy, and followed up the patients for a period of 3 years. A multivariate analysis of the various factors that influence the prognosis and outcome has been studied and it has been concluded that the combination therapy is medically beneficial for individuals with aggressive liver lesions, improving overall as well as progression-free life span.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- WenJi Lin
- Department of Interventional, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China
| | - CongHui Zhu
- Department of Interventional, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China
| | - JiaDi Yao
- Department of Interventional, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China
| | - YuHuang Liu
- Department of Interventional, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China
| | - HuiYu Lin
- Department of Imaging, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China
| | - Yan Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Chen BY, Xie H, Li Y, Jiang XH, Xiong L, Tang XF, Lin XF, Li L, Cai PQ. MRI-Based Radiomics Features to Predict Treatment Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single Center, Prospective Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:801743. [PMID: 35646677 PMCID: PMC9133669 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.801743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
This is a prospective, single center study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of peritumor and intratumor radiomics features assessed using T2 weight image (T2WI) of baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating pathological good response to NAC in patients with LARC (including Tany N+ or T3/4a Nany but not T4b). In total, 137 patients with LARC received NAC between April 2014 and August 2020. All patients were undergoing contrast-enhanced MRI and 129 patients contained small field of view (sFOV) sequence which were performed prior to treatment. The tumor regression grade standard was based on pathological response. The training and validation sets (n=91 vs. n=46) were established by random allocation of the patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was applied to estimate the performance of different models based on clinical characteristics and radiomics features obtained from MRI, including peritumor and intratumor features, in predicting treatment response; these effects were calculated using the area under the curve (AUC). The performance and agreement of the nomogram were estimated using calibration plots. In total, 24 patients (17.52%) achieved a complete or near-complete response. For the individual radiomics model in the validation set, the performance of peritumor radiomics model in predicting treatment response yield an AUC of 0.838, while that of intratumor radiomics model is 0.805, which show no statically significant difference between then(P>0.05). The traditional and selective clinical features model shows a poor predictive ability in treatment response (AUC=0.596 and 0.521) in validation set. The AUC of combined radiomics model was improved compared to that of the individual radiomics models in the validation sets (AUC=0.844). The combined clinic-radiomics model yield the highest AUC (0.871) in the validation set, although it did not improve the performance of the radiomics model for predicting treatment response statically (P>0.05). Good agreement and discrimination were observed in the nomogram predictions. Both peritumor and intratumor radiomics features performed similarly in predicting a good response to NAC in patients with LARC. The clinic-radiomics model showed the best performance in predicting treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bi-Yun Chen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Xie
- Department of Medical Imaging, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuan Li
- Department of Colorectal, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin-Hua Jiang
- Department of Medical Imaging, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lang Xiong
- Department of Medical Imaging, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Feng Tang
- Department of Ultrasound, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Feng Lin
- Department of Medical Imaging, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Medical Imaging, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei-Qiang Cai
- Department of Medical Imaging, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|