1
|
Fereydooni S, Lorenz K, Azarfar A, Luckett T, Phillips JL, Becker W, Giannitrapani K. Identifying provider, patient and practice factors that shape long-term opioid prescribing for cancer pain: a qualitative study of American and Australian providers. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e082033. [PMID: 38514141 PMCID: PMC10961503 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prescribing long-term opioid therapy is a nuanced clinical decision requiring careful consideration of risks versus benefits. Our goal is to understand patient, provider and context factors that impact the decision to prescribe opioids in patients with cancer. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of the raw semistructured interview data gathered from 42 prescribers who participated in one of two aligned concurrent qualitative studies in the USA and Australia. We conducted a two-part analysis of the interview: first identifying all factors influencing long-term prescribing and second open coding-related content for themes. RESULTS Factors that influence long-term opioid prescribing for cancer-related pain clustered under three key domains (patient-related, provider-related and practice-related factors) each with several themes. Domain 1: Patient factors related to provider-patient continuity, patient personality, the patient's social context and patient characteristics including racial/ethnic identity, housing and socioeconomic status. Domain 2: Provider-related factors centred around provider 'personal experience and expertise', training and time availability. Domain 3: Practice-related factors included healthcare interventions to promote safer opioid practices and accessibility of quality alternative pain therapies. CONCLUSION Despite the differences in the contexts of the two countries, providers consider similar patient, provider and practice-related factors when long-term prescribing opioids for patients with cancer. Some of these factors may be categorised as cognitive biases that may intersect in an already disadvantaged patient and exacerbate disparities in the treatment of their pain. A more systematic understanding of these factors and how they impact the quality of care can inform appropriate interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karl Lorenz
- Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Azin Azarfar
- University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Tim Luckett
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jane L Phillips
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation), University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - William Becker
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Karleen Giannitrapani
- VA Center for Innovation to Implementation, Menlo Park, California, USA
- Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bulls HW, Hamm M, Wasilko R, Cameron FDA, Belin S, Goodin BR, Liebschutz JM, Wozniak A, Sabik LM, Schenker Y, Merlin JS. "I Refused to Get Addicted to Opioids": Exploring Attitudes About Opioid Use Disorder in Patients With Advanced Cancer Pain and Their Support People. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:1030-1038. [PMID: 36709854 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Patients with advanced cancer are commonly prescribed opioids, yet patient attitudes about opioid risks (eg, opioid use disorder, or OUD) are understudied. Our objective was to use in-depth qualitative interviews to understand perceptions of opioid prescribing and OUD in patients with advanced, solid-tumor cancers and their support people. We conducted a qualitative study using a rigorous inductive, qualitative descriptive approach to examine attitudes about OUD in patients with advanced cancer (n = 20) and support providers (n = 11). Patients with cancer hold 2 seemingly distinct views: prescription opioids are addictive, yet OUD cannot happen to me or my loved one. Participants described general concerns about the addictive nature of prescription opioids ("My biggest concern… would just be the risk of getting addicted to the medication or even like, overdosing it"), while separating cancer pain management from OUD when considering prescription opioid risks and benefits ("They need to make sure they get the right ones, when they're taking it away from you."). Finally, participants identified personal characteristics and behaviors that they felt were protective against developing OUD (commonly control, willpower, and responsibility). This rigorous qualitative study demonstrates that patients with advanced cancer and their support people simultaneously hold concerns about the addictive nature of prescription opioids, while distancing from perceptions of OUD risks when using opioids for cancer pain management. Given high rates of opioid exposure during advanced cancer treatment, it is important to explore opportunities to promote a balanced understanding of prescription opioid use and OUD risks in this population. PERSPECTIVE: Though prescription opioids carry risk of OUD, there is little data to help guide patients with advanced cancer. Findings suggest that there is a need to develop new, innovative strategies to promote effective pain management and minimize opioid risks in this complex population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailey W Bulls
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Palliative Research Center (PaRC), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Challenges in Managing and Preventing Pain Clinical Research Center (CHAMPP), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Megan Hamm
- Qualitative, Evaluation, and Stakeholder Engagement Services (QualEASE), Center for Research on Health Care Data Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Rachel Wasilko
- Qualitative, Evaluation, and Stakeholder Engagement Services (QualEASE), Center for Research on Health Care Data Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Flor de Abril Cameron
- Qualitative, Evaluation, and Stakeholder Engagement Services (QualEASE), Center for Research on Health Care Data Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Shane Belin
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Palliative Research Center (PaRC), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Burel R Goodin
- Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jane M Liebschutz
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Antoinette Wozniak
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Lindsay M Sabik
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Yael Schenker
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Palliative Research Center (PaRC), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jessica S Merlin
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Palliative Research Center (PaRC), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Challenges in Managing and Preventing Pain Clinical Research Center (CHAMPP), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hu X, Kaplan CM, Martin MY, Walker MS, Stepanski E, Schwartzberg LS, Vidal GA, Graetz I. Race Differences in Patient-Reported Symptoms during Chemotherapy among Women with Early-Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:167-174. [PMID: 36166516 PMCID: PMC9905215 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Symptom burden differences may contribute to racial disparities in breast cancer survival. We compared symptom changes from before to during chemotherapy among women with breast cancer. METHODS This observational study followed a cohort of Black and White women diagnosed with Stage I-III, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer from a large cancer center in 2007 to 2015, and reported symptoms before and during chemotherapy. We identified patients who experienced a one-standard deviation (SD) increase in symptom burden after starting chemotherapy using four validated composite scores (General Physical Symptoms, Treatment Side Effects, Acute Distress, and Despair). Kitagawa-Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition was used to quantify race differences in symptom changes explained by baseline characteristics (sociodemographic, baseline scores, cancer stage) and first-line chemotherapy regimens. RESULTS Among 1,273 patients, Black women (n = 405, 31.8%) were more likely to report one-SD increase in General Physical Symptoms (55.6% vs. 48.2%, P = 0.015), Treatment Side Effects (74.0% vs. 63.4%, P < 0.001), and Acute Distress (27.4% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.010) than White women. Baseline characteristics and first-line chemotherapy regimens explained a large and significant proportion of the difference in Acute Distress changes (93.7%, P = 0.001), but not General Physical Symptoms (25.7%, P = 0.25) or Treatment Side Effects (16.4%, P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS Black women with early-stage breast cancer were more likely to experience significant increases in physical and psychological symptom burden during chemotherapy. Most of the difference in physical symptom changes remained unexplained by baseline characteristics, which suggests inadequate symptom management among Black women. IMPACT Future studies should identify strategies to improve symptom management among Black women and reduce differences in symptom burden. See related commentary by Rosenzweig and Mazanec, p. 157.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Hu
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Cameron M Kaplan
- Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science and Innovation, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michelle Y Martin
- Center for Innovation in Health Equity Research, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | | | | | - Gregory A Vidal
- West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Germantown, Tennessee.,School of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Ilana Graetz
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bulls HW, Hamm M, Wasilko R, de Abril Cameron F, Belin S, Goodin BR, Liebschutz JM, Wozniak A, Sabik LM, Merlin JS, Schenker Y. Manifestations of Opioid Stigma in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Perspectives From Patients and Their Support Providers. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1594-e1602. [PMID: 35878073 PMCID: PMC9835931 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stigma surrounding prescription opioids, or opioid stigma, is increasingly recognized as a barrier to effective and guideline-concordant cancer pain management. Patients with advanced cancer report high rates of pain and prescription opioid exposure, yet little is known about how opioid stigma may manifest in this population. METHODS We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 20 patients with advanced cancer and 11 support providers between March 2020, and May 2021. We took a rigorous inductive, qualitative descriptive approach to characterize how opioid stigma manifests in the lives of patients with advanced cancer. RESULTS Patients and their support providers described three primary manifestations of opioid stigma: (1) direct experiences with opioid stigma and discrimination in health care settings (eg, negative, stigmatizing interactions in pharmacies or a pain clinic); (2) concerns about opioid stigma affecting patient care in the future, or anticipated stigma; and (3) opioid-restricting attitudes and behaviors that may reflect internalized stigma and fear of addiction (eg, feelings of guilt). CONCLUSION This qualitative study advances our understanding of opioid stigma manifestations in patients with advanced cancer, as well as coping strategies that patients may use to alleviate their unease (eg, minimizing prescription opioid use, changing clinicians, and distancing from perceptions of addiction). In recognition of the costs of undermanaged cancer pain, it is important to consider innovative treatment strategies to address opioid stigma and improve pain management for patients with advanced cancer. Future research should examine opportunities to build an effective, multilevel opioid stigma intervention targeting patients, clinicians, and health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailey W. Bulls
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Challenges in Managing and Preventing Pain Clinical Research Center (CHAMPP), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Megan Hamm
- Qualitative, Evaluation, and Stakeholder Engagement Services (QualEASE), Center for Research on Health Care Data Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Rachel Wasilko
- Qualitative, Evaluation, and Stakeholder Engagement Services (QualEASE), Center for Research on Health Care Data Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Flor de Abril Cameron
- Qualitative, Evaluation, and Stakeholder Engagement Services (QualEASE), Center for Research on Health Care Data Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Shane Belin
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Burel R. Goodin
- Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Jane M. Liebschutz
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Antoinette Wozniak
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Lindsay M. Sabik
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jessica S. Merlin
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Challenges in Managing and Preventing Pain Clinical Research Center (CHAMPP), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Yael Schenker
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sullivan DR, Iyer AS, Enguidanos S, Cox CE, Farquhar M, Janssen DJA, Lindell KO, Mularski RA, Smallwood N, Turnbull AE, Wilkinson AM, Courtright KR, Maddocks M, McPherson ML, Thornton JD, Campbell ML, Fasolino TK, Fogelman PM, Gershon L, Gershon T, Hartog C, Luther J, Meier DE, Nelson JE, Rabinowitz E, Rushton CH, Sloan DH, Kross EK, Reinke LF. Palliative Care Early in the Care Continuum among Patients with Serious Respiratory Illness: An Official ATS/AAHPM/HPNA/SWHPN Policy Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 206:e44-e69. [PMID: 36112774 PMCID: PMC9799127 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202207-1262st] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients with serious respiratory illness and their caregivers suffer considerable burdens, and palliative care is a fundamental right for anyone who needs it. However, the overwhelming majority of patients do not receive timely palliative care before the end of life, despite robust evidence for improved outcomes. Goals: This policy statement by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and partnering societies advocates for improved integration of high-quality palliative care early in the care continuum for patients with serious respiratory illness and their caregivers and provides clinicians and policymakers with a framework to accomplish this. Methods: An international and interprofessional expert committee, including patients and caregivers, achieved consensus across a diverse working group representing pulmonary-critical care, palliative care, bioethics, health law and policy, geriatrics, nursing, physiotherapy, social work, pharmacy, patient advocacy, psychology, and sociology. Results: The committee developed fundamental values, principles, and policy recommendations for integrating palliative care in serious respiratory illness care across seven domains: 1) delivery models, 2) comprehensive symptom assessment and management, 3) advance care planning and goals of care discussions, 4) caregiver support, 5) health disparities, 6) mass casualty events and emergency preparedness, and 7) research priorities. The recommendations encourage timely integration of palliative care, promote innovative primary and secondary or specialist palliative care delivery models, and advocate for research and policy initiatives to improve the availability and quality of palliative care for patients and their caregivers. Conclusions: This multisociety policy statement establishes a framework for early palliative care in serious respiratory illness and provides guidance for pulmonary-critical care clinicians and policymakers for its proactive integration.
Collapse
|
6
|
Azizoddin DR, Schreiber K, Beck MR, Enzinger AC, Hruschak V, Darnall BD, Edwards RR, Allsop MJ, Tulsky JA, Boyer E, Mackey S. Chronic pain severity, impact, and opioid use among patients with cancer: An analysis of biopsychosocial factors using the CHOIR learning health care system. Cancer 2021; 127:3254-3263. [PMID: 34061975 PMCID: PMC9981278 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the biopsychosocial underpinnings of chronic noncancer pain, relatively little is known about the contribution of psychosocial factors to chronic cancer pain. The authors aimed to characterize associations between biopsychosocial factors and pain and opioid use among individuals with chronic pain and cancer. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 700 patients with chronic pain and cancer seeking treatment at an academic tertiary pain clinic. Patients completed demographic questionnaires and validated psychosocial and pain measures. Multivariable, hierarchical linear and logistic regressions assessed the relative contributions of biopsychosocial factors to the primary dependent variables of pain severity, pain interference, and opioid use. RESULTS Participants were 62% female and 66% White with a mean age of 59 ± 15 years, and 55% held a college degree or higher. Older age, African American or "other" race, sleep disturbance, and pain catastrophizing were significantly associated with higher pain severity (F(5,657) = 22.45; P ≤ .001; R2 = 0.22). Depression, sleep disturbance, pain catastrophizing, lower emotional support, and higher pain severity were significantly associated with pain interference (F(5,653) = 9.47; P ≤ .001; R2 = 0.44). Lastly, a poor cancer prognosis (Exp(B) = 1.62) and sleep disturbance (Exp(B) = 1.02) were associated with taking opioids, whereas identifying as Asian (Exp(B) = 0.48) or Hispanic (Exp(B) = 0.47) was associated with lower odds of using opioids. CONCLUSIONS Modifiable psychological factors-specifically sleep disturbance, depression, and pain catastrophizing-were uniquely associated with pain and opioid use in patients with chronic pain and diverse cancer diagnoses. Future behavioral pain interventions that concurrently target sleep may improve pain among patients with cancer. LAY SUMMARY Feeling depressed, worrying about pain, and bad sleep are related to higher pain symptoms in individuals with chronic pain and cancer. Specifically, those who struggle to sleep have worse pain and use more opioids. Also, individuals who have a bad prognosis for their cancer are more likely to be using opioid pain medications. Although race and cancer are related to chronic pain in patients, psychological well-being is also strongly related to this same pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desiree R. Azizoddin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kristin Schreiber
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Andrea C. Enzinger
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts,Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Valerie Hruschak
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beth D. Darnall
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Robert R. Edwards
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew J. Allsop
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - James A. Tulsky
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts,Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Sean Mackey
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Azizoddin DR, Knoerl R, Adam R, Kessler D, Tulsky JA, Edwards RR, Enzinger AC. Cancer pain self-management in the context of a national opioid epidemic: Experiences of patients with advanced cancer using opioids. Cancer 2021; 127:3239-3245. [PMID: 33905550 PMCID: PMC8355015 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The US opioid epidemic has prompted dramatic changes in public attitudes and regulations governing opioid prescribing. Little is known about the experiences of patients with advanced cancer using opioids in the context of the epidemic. METHODS Semistructured interviews of 26 patients with advanced cancer were conducted between May 2019 and April 2020; their experiences self-managing chronic pain with opioids were evaluated. RESULTS Patients consistently described the negative impact of the opioid epidemic on their ability to self-manage pain. Negative media coverage and personal experiences with the epidemic promoted stigma, fear, and guilt surrounding opioid use. As a result, many patients delayed initiating opioids and often viewed their decision to take opioids as a moral failure-as "caving in." Patients frequently managed this internal conflict through opioid-restricting behaviors (eg, skipping or taking lower doses). Stigma also impeded patient-clinician communication; patients often avoided discussing opioids or purposely conveyed underusing them to avoid being labeled a "pill seeker." Patients experienced structural barriers to obtaining opioids such as prior authorizations, delays in refills, or being questioned by pharmacists about their opioid use. Barriers were stressful, amplified stigma, interfered with pain control, and reinforced ambivalence about opioids. CONCLUSIONS The US opioid epidemic has stigmatized opioid use and undermined pain management in individuals with advanced cancer. Interventions seeking to alleviate cancer pain should attend to the multiple, negative influences of the opioid crisis on patients' ability to self-manage. LAY SUMMARY Patients with advanced cancer suffer from significant pain and frequently receive opioids to manage their pain. Of the 26 patients with advanced cancer interviewed, the majority of patients experienced stigma about their opioid use for cancer pain management. All patients felt that the opioid epidemic fostered this stigma. Several struggled to use opioids for pain because of this stigma and the logistical complications they experienced with pharmacies and insurance coverage. Many were afraid to share their concerns about opioids with their providers. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desiree R Azizoddin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Faber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert Knoerl
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rosalind Adam
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - Daniela Kessler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Faber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James A Tulsky
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Faber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert R Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrea C Enzinger
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Faber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gurney JK, Stanley J, Adler J, McLeod H, Atkinson J, Sarfati D. National Study of Pain Medicine Access Among Māori and Non-Māori Patients With Lung Cancer in New Zealand. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7:1276-1285. [PMID: 34383597 PMCID: PMC8389912 DOI: 10.1200/go.21.00141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pain is among the most common and consequential symptoms of cancer, particularly in the context of lung cancer. Māori have extremely high rates of lung cancer, and there is evidence that Māori patients with lung cancer are less likely to receive curative treatment and more likely to receive palliative treatment and to wait longer for their treatment than non-Māori New Zealanders. The extent to which Māori patients with lung cancer are also less likely to have access to pain medicines as part of their supportive care remains unclear. METHODS Using national-level Cancer Registry and linked health records, we describe access to subsidized pain medicines among patients with lung cancer diagnosed over the decade spanning 2007-2016 and compare access between Māori and non-Māori patients. Descriptive and logistic regression methods were used to compare access between ethnic groups. RESULTS We observed that the majority of patients with lung cancer are accessing some form of pain medicine and there do not appear to be strong differences between Māori and non-Māori in terms of overall access or the type of pain medicine dispensed. However, Māori patients appeared more likely than non-Māori to first access pain medicines within 2 weeks before their death and commensurately less likely to access them more than 24 weeks before death. CONCLUSION Given the plausibility that there are differences in first access to pain medicines (particularly opioid medicines) among Māori approaching end of life, further investigation of the factors contributing to this disparity is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason K Gurney
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - James Stanley
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jonathan Adler
- Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Heather McLeod
- School of Nursing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - June Atkinson
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Diana Sarfati
- Te Aho o Te Kahu-Cancer Control Agency, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|