1
|
Li Q, Ai L, Zuo L, Li J, Zhao F, Xu A, Zhang B, Cai L, Hu Y, Sun C. Circulating plasma cells as a predictive biomarker in Multiple myeloma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med 2024; 56:2338604. [PMID: 38599340 PMCID: PMC11008311 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2338604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Circulating plasma cells (CPCs) are defined by the presence of peripheral blood clonal plasma cells, which would contribute to the progression and dissemination of multiple myeloma (MM). An increasing number of studies have demonstrated the predictive potential of CPCs in the past few years. Therefore, there is a growing need for an updated meta-analysis to identify the specific relationship between CPCs and the prognosis of MM based on the current research status. METHODS The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were screened to determine eligible studies from inception to November 5, 2023. Publications that reported the prognostic value of CPCs in MM patients were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted to pool the results. Subgroup analyses were performed based on region, sample size, cut-off value, detection time, initial treatment, and data type. The association between CPCs level and clinicopathological characteristics, including the International Staging System (ISS), Revised-ISS (R-ISS), and cytogenetic abnormalities were also evaluated. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 17.0 software. RESULTS Twenty-two studies with a total of 5637 myeloma patients were enrolled in the current meta-analysis. The results indicated that myeloma patients with elevated CPCs were expected to have a poor OS (HR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.81-2.66, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.93-3.12, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses did not alter the prognostic role of CPCs, regardless of region, sample size, cut-off value, detection time, initial treatment, or data type. Moreover, the increased CPCs were significantly related to advanced tumour stage (ISS III vs. ISS I-II: pooled OR = 2.89, 95% CI: 2.41-3.46, p < 0.001; R-ISS III vs. R-ISS I-II: pooled OR = 3.65, 95% CI: 2.43-5.50, p < 0.001) and high-risk cytogenetics (high-risk vs. standard-risk: OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.60-3.08, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis confirmed that the increased number of CPCs had a negative impact on the PFS and OS of MM patients. Therefore, CPCs could be a promising prognostic biomarker that helps with risk stratification and disease monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qun Li
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lisha Ai
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Liping Zuo
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Junying Li
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Fei Zhao
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Aoshuang Xu
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Bo Zhang
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Li Cai
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yu Hu
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Chunyan Sun
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chu B, Wang YT, Gao S, Shi L, Lu MQ, Fang LJ, Xiang QQ, Chen Y, Wang MZ, Wang LF, Sun K, Yang J, Duan F, Bao L. R2-ISS staging combined with circulating plasma cells improves risk stratification for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a single-center real-world study. Ann Hematol 2024:10.1007/s00277-024-05806-9. [PMID: 38955826 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-05806-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate if circulating plasma cells (CPC) detected by flow cytometry could add prognostic value of R2-ISS staging. We collected the electronic medical records of 336 newly diagnosed MM patients (NDMM) in our hospital from January 2017 to June 2023. The median overall survival (OS) for patients and R2-ISS stage I-IV were not reached (NR), NR, 58 months and 53 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in OS between patients with stage I and patients with stage II (P = 0.309) or between patients with stage III and patients with stage IV (P = 0.391). All the cases were re-classified according to R2-ISS stage and CPC numbers ≥ 0.05% (CPC high) or<0.05% (CPC low) into four new risk groups: Group 1: R2-ISS stage I + R2-ISS stage II and CPC low, Group 2: R2-ISS stage II and CPC high + R2-ISS stage III and CPC low, Group 3: R2-ISS stage III and CPC high + R2-ISS stage IV and CPC low, Group 4: R2-ISS stage IV and CPC high. The median OS were NR, NR, 57 months and 32 months. OS of Group 1 was significantly longer than that of Group 2 (P = 0.033). OS in Group 2 was significantly longer than that of Group 3 (P = 0.007). OS in Group 3 was significantly longer than that of Group 4 (P = 0.041). R2-ISS staging combined with CPC can improve risk stratification for NDMM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Chu
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 31 East Xinjiekou Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China
| | - Yu-Tong Wang
- Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Shan Gao
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 31 East Xinjiekou Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China
| | - Lei Shi
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 31 East Xinjiekou Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China
| | - Min-Qiu Lu
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 31 East Xinjiekou Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China
| | - Li-Juan Fang
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 31 East Xinjiekou Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China
| | - Qiu-Qing Xiang
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 31 East Xinjiekou Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China
| | - Yuan Chen
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 31 East Xinjiekou Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China
| | - Meng-Zhen Wang
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 31 East Xinjiekou Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China
| | - Li-Fang Wang
- Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100035, China
| | - Kai Sun
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 31 East Xinjiekou Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China
| | - Jing Yang
- Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Fangfang Duan
- Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100035, China
| | - Li Bao
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 31 East Xinjiekou Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Malard F, Neri P, Bahlis NJ, Terpos E, Moukalled N, Hungria VTM, Manier S, Mohty M. Multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2024; 10:45. [PMID: 38937492 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-024-00529-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a haematological lymphoid malignancy involving tumoural plasma cells and is usually characterized by the presence of a monoclonal immunoglobulin protein. MM is the second most common haematological malignancy, with an increasing global incidence. It remains incurable because most patients relapse or become refractory to treatments. MM is a genetically complex disease with high heterogeneity that develops as a multistep process, involving acquisition of genetic alterations in the tumour cells and changes in the bone marrow microenvironment. Symptomatic MM is diagnosed using the International Myeloma Working Group criteria as a bone marrow infiltration of ≥10% clonal plasma cells, and the presence of at least one myeloma-defining event, either standard CRAB features (hypercalcaemia, renal failure, anaemia and/or lytic bone lesions) or biomarkers of imminent organ damage. Younger and fit patients are considered eligible for transplant. They receive an induction, followed by consolidation with high-dose melphalan and autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation, and maintenance therapy. In older adults (ineligible for transplant), the combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone is the preferred option. If relapse occurs and requires further therapy, the choice of therapy will be based on previous treatment and response and now includes immunotherapies, such as bi-specific monoclonal antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florent Malard
- Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine INSERM UMRs938, Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France.
| | - Paola Neri
- Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Nizar J Bahlis
- Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Evangelos Terpos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Nour Moukalled
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Salomon Manier
- Department of Hematology, Lille University Hospital and INSERM UMR-S1277 and CNRS UMR9020, Lille, France
| | - Mohamad Mohty
- Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine INSERM UMRs938, Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morè S, Corvatta L, Manieri VM, Morsia E, Offidani M. The Challenging Approach to Multiple Myeloma: From Disease Diagnosis and Monitoring to Complications Management. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2263. [PMID: 38927968 PMCID: PMC11202048 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16122263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) has significantly improved in the last few decades due to several factors such as new biological discoveries allowing to better stratify disease risk, development of more effective therapies and better management of side effects related to them. However, handling all these aspects requires an interdisciplinary approach involving multiple knowledge and collaboration of different specialists. The hematologist, faced with a patient with MM, must not only choose a treatment according to patient and disease characteristics but must also know when therapy needs to be started and how to monitor it during and after treatment. Moreover, he must deal not only with organ issues related to MM such as bone disease, renal failure or neurological disease but also with adverse events, often very serious, related to novel therapies, particularly new generation immunotherapies such as CAR T cell therapy and bispecific antibodies. In this review, we provide an overview on the newer MM diagnostic and monitoring strategies and on the main side effects of MM therapies, focusing on adverse events occurring during treatment with CAR T cells and bispecific antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Morè
- Clinica di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (E.M.)
| | - Laura Corvatta
- U.O.C. Medicina, Ospedale Profili, 60044 Fabriano, Italy;
| | - Valentina Maria Manieri
- Clinica di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (E.M.)
| | - Erika Morsia
- Clinica di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (E.M.)
| | - Massimo Offidani
- Clinica di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (E.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wijnands C, Armony G, Noori S, Gloerich J, Bonifay V, Caillon H, Luider TM, Brehmer S, Pfennig L, Srikumar T, Trede D, Kruppa G, Dejoie T, van Duijn MM, van Gool AJ, Jacobs JFM, Wessels HJCT. An automated workflow based on data independent acquisition for practical and high-throughput personalized assay development and minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma patients. Clin Chem Lab Med 2024; 0:cclm-2024-0306. [PMID: 38872409 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Minimal residual disease (MRD) status in multiple myeloma (MM) is an important prognostic biomarker. Personalized blood-based targeted mass spectrometry detecting M-proteins (MS-MRD) was shown to provide a sensitive and minimally invasive alternative to MRD-assessment in bone marrow. However, MS-MRD still comprises of manual steps that hamper upscaling of MS-MRD testing. Here, we introduce a proof-of-concept for a novel workflow using data independent acquisition-parallel accumulation and serial fragmentation (dia-PASEF) and automated data processing. METHODS Using automated data processing of dia-PASEF measurements, we developed a workflow that identified unique targets from MM patient sera and personalized protein sequence databases. We generated patient-specific libraries linked to dia-PASEF methods and subsequently quantitated and reported M-protein concentrations in MM patient follow-up samples. Assay performance of parallel reaction monitoring (prm)-PASEF and dia-PASEF workflows were compared and we tested mixing patient intake sera for multiplexed target selection. RESULTS No significant differences were observed in lowest detectable concentration, linearity, and slope coefficient when comparing prm-PASEF and dia-PASEF measurements of serial dilutions of patient sera. To improve assay development times, we tested multiplexing patient intake sera for target selection which resulted in the selection of identical clonotypic peptides for both simplex and multiplex dia-PASEF. Furthermore, assay development times improved up to 25× when measuring multiplexed samples for peptide selection compared to simplex. CONCLUSIONS Dia-PASEF technology combined with automated data processing and multiplexed target selection facilitated the development of a faster MS-MRD workflow which benefits upscaling and is an important step towards the clinical implementation of MS-MRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charissa Wijnands
- Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gad Armony
- Translational Metabolic Laboratory, Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Somayya Noori
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jolein Gloerich
- Translational Metabolic Laboratory, Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hélène Caillon
- Biochemistry Laboratory, Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Theo M Luider
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Dejoie
- Biochemistry Laboratory, Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Martijn M van Duijn
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alain J van Gool
- Translational Metabolic Laboratory, Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joannes F M Jacobs
- Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans J C T Wessels
- Translational Metabolic Laboratory, Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kostopoulos IV, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Rousakis P, Malandrakis P, Panteli C, Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou E, Angelis N, Spiliopoulou V, Syrigou RE, Bakouros P, Dimitrakopoulou G, Fotiou D, Migkou M, Kanellias N, Paschalidis N, Gavriatopoulou M, Kastritis E, Dimopoulos MA, Tsitsilonis OE, Terpos E. Low circulating tumor cell levels correlate with favorable outcomes and distinct biological features in multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol 2024. [PMID: 38860642 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
There is growing interest in multiple myeloma (MM) circulating tumor cells (CTCs), but their rareness in peripheral blood (PB) and inconsistency in cutoffs question their clinical utility. Herein, we applied next-generation flow cytometry in 550 bone marrow (BM) and matched PB samples to define an optimal CTC cutoff for both transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients. Deep phenotyping was performed to investigate unique microenvironmental features associated with CTC dissemination. CTCs were detected in 90% of patients (median 0.01%; range: 0.0002%-12.6%) and increased levels associated with adverse features. Correlations were observed between high CTC percentages and a diffused MRI pattern, a distinct BM composition characterized by altered B-cell differentiation together with an expansion of effector cells and tumor-associated macrophages, as well as a greater phenotypic dissimilarity between BM and PB clonal cells. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) gradually worsened with each logarithmic increment of CTCs. Conversely, NDMM patients without CTCs showed unprecedented outcomes, with 5-year PFS and OS rates of 83% and 97%, respectively. A cutoff of 0.02% CTCs was independent of the ISS, LDH, and cytogenetics in a multivariate analysis of risk factors for PFS. The 0.02% CTC cutoff synergized with the MGUS-like phenotype and the R-ISS for improving the risk stratification systems. MRD negativity was less frequent if CTCs were ≥0.02% at diagnosis, but whenever achieved, the poor prognosis of these patients was abrogated. This study shows the clinical utility of CTC assessment in MM and provides evidence toward a consensus cutoff for risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis V Kostopoulos
- Department of Biology, School of Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Pantelis Rousakis
- Department of Biology, School of Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Malandrakis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Chrysanthi Panteli
- Department of Biology, School of Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Nikolaos Angelis
- Department of Biology, School of Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasiliki Spiliopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Rodanthi-Eleni Syrigou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Bakouros
- Department of Biology, School of Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgia Dimitrakopoulou
- Department of Biology, School of Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Despina Fotiou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Magdalini Migkou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kanellias
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Paschalidis
- Mass Cytometry-CyTOF Laboratory, Center for Clinical Research, Experimental Surgery and Translational Research, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Gavriatopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Efstathios Kastritis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Ourania E Tsitsilonis
- Department of Biology, School of Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelos Terpos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kogure Y, Handa H, Ito Y, Ri M, Horigome Y, Iino M, Harazaki Y, Kobayashi T, Abe M, Ishida T, Ito S, Iwasaki H, Kuroda J, Shibayama H, Sunami K, Takamatsu H, Tamura H, Hayashi T, Akagi K, Shinozaki T, Yoshida T, Mori I, Iida S, Maeda T, Kataoka K. ctDNA improves prognostic prediction for patients with relapsed/refractory MM receiving ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. Blood 2024; 143:2401-2413. [PMID: 38427753 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023022540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT It remains elusive how driver mutations, including those detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), affect prognosis in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we performed targeted-capture sequencing using bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) and ctDNA of 261 RRMM cases uniformly treated with ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in a multicenter, prospective, observational study. We detected 24 and 47 recurrently mutated genes in BMPC and ctDNA, respectively. In addition to clonal hematopoiesis-associated mutations, varying proportion of driver mutations, particularly TP53 mutations (59.2% of mutated cases), were present in only ctDNA, suggesting their subclonal origin. In univariable analyses, ctDNA mutations of KRAS, TP53, DIS3, BRAF, NRAS, and ATM were associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS). BMPC mutations of TP53 and KRAS were associated with inferior PFS, whereas KRAS mutations were prognostically relevant only when detected in both BMPC and ctDNA. A total number of ctDNA mutations in the 6 relevant genes was a strong prognostic predictor (2-year PFS rates: 57.3%, 22.7%, and 0% for 0, 1, and ≥2 mutations, respectively) and independent of clinical factors and plasma DNA concentration. Using the number of ctDNA mutations, plasma DNA concentration, and clinical factors, we developed a prognostic index, classifying patients into 3 categories with 2-year PFS rates of 57.9%, 28.6%, and 0%. Serial analysis of ctDNA mutations in 94 cases revealed that TP53 and KRAS mutations frequently emerge after therapy. Thus, we clarify the genetic characteristics and clonal architecture of ctDNA mutations and demonstrate their superiority over BMPC mutations for prognostic prediction in RRMM. This study is a part of the C16042 study, which is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03433001.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasunori Kogure
- Division of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Handa
- Department of Hematology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Yuta Ito
- Division of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Clinical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaki Ri
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yuichi Horigome
- Department of Hematology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Masaki Iino
- Department of Hematology, Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan
| | - Yoriko Harazaki
- Department of Hematology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kobayashi
- Department of Hematology, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Masahiro Abe
- Department of Hematology, Kawashima Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Tadao Ishida
- Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigeki Ito
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Iwate, Japan
| | - Hiromi Iwasaki
- Department of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Junya Kuroda
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hirohiko Shibayama
- Department of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazutaka Sunami
- Department of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | | | - Hideto Tamura
- Department of Hematology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Hayashi
- Department of Hematology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kiwamu Akagi
- Division of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Shinozaki
- Department of Information and Computer Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Ikuo Mori
- Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Iida
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takahiro Maeda
- Division of Precision Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Keisuke Kataoka
- Division of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Neri P, Lee H, Bahlis NJ. Artificial Intelligence Individualized Risk Classifier in Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1207-1210. [PMID: 38452316 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Neri
- Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Holly Lee
- Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Nizar J Bahlis
- Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Derman BA, Fonseca R. Measurable Residual Disease and Decision-Making in Multiple Myeloma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:477-495. [PMID: 38184470 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
Measurable (minimal) residual disease (MRD) has already proven to be one of the most important prognostic factors in multiple myeloma (MM). Each improvement in the depth of MRD testing has led to superior discrimination of outcomes, and sustained MRD negativity seems to be paramount to durable responses. Peripheral blood assays to assess for MRD are still under investigation but hold promise as complementary tools to bone marrow MRD assays such as next-generation sequencing and flow cytometry. Herein, the authors explore the evidence and potential benefits and drawbacks of MRD-adapted clinical decision-making in MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Derman
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| | - Rafael Fonseca
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, MCCRB 3-001, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tembhare PR, Sriram H, Khanka T, Gawai S, Bagal B, Ghogale SG, Deshpande N, Girase K, Patil J, Hasan SK, Shetty D, Ghosh K, Chatterjee G, Rajpal S, Patkar NV, Jain H, Punatar S, Gokarn A, Nayak L, Mirgh S, Jindal N, Sengar M, Khattry N, Subramanian PG, Gujral S. Circulating tumor plasma cells and peripheral blood measurable residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma patients not planned for upfront transplant. Hemasphere 2024; 8:e63. [PMID: 38566804 PMCID: PMC10983024 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Circulating tumor plasma cells (CTPCs) provide a noninvasive alternative for measuring tumor burden in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Moreover, measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in peripheral blood (PBMRD) can provide an ideal alternative to bone marrow MRD, which is limited by its painful nature and technical challenges. However, the clinical significance of PBMRD in NDMM still remains uncertain. Additionally, data on CTPC in NDMM patients not treated with transplant are scarce. We prospectively studied CTPC and PBMRD in 141 NDMM patients using highly sensitive multicolor flow cytometry (HS-MFC). PBMRD was monitored at the end of three cycles (PBMRD1) and six cycles (PBMRD2) of chemotherapy in patients with detectable baseline CTPC. Patients received bortezomib-based triplet therapy and were not planned for an upfront transplant. Among baseline risk factors, CTPC ≥ 0.01% was independently associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.77; p = 0.0047) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.9; p = 0.023) on multivariate analysis. In patients with detectable baseline CTPC, undetectable PBMRD at both subsequent time points was associated with longer PFS (HR = 0.46; p = 0.0037), whereas detectable PBMRD at any time point was associated with short OS (HR = 3.25; p = 0.004). Undetectable combined PBMRD (PBMRD1 and PBMRD2) outperformed the serum-immunofixation-based response. On multivariate analysis, detectable PBMRD at any time point was independently associated with poor PFS (HR = 2.0; p = 0.025) and OS (HR = 3.97; p = 0.013). Thus, our findings showed that CTPC and PBMRD assessment using HS-MFC provides a robust, noninvasive biomarker for NDMM patients not planned for an upfront transplant. Sequential PBMRD monitoring has great potential to improve the impact of the existing risk stratification and response assessment models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashant R. Tembhare
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Harshini Sriram
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Twinkle Khanka
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Sanghamitra Gawai
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Bhausaheb Bagal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityMumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Sitaram G. Ghogale
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Nilesh Deshpande
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Karishma Girase
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Jagruti Patil
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Syed Khaizer Hasan
- Hasan Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Dhanalaxmi Shetty
- Department of Cancer Cytogenetics, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Kinjalka Ghosh
- Department of Biochemistry, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityMumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Gaurav Chatterjee
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Sweta Rajpal
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Nikhil V. Patkar
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Hasmukh Jain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityMumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Sachin Punatar
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Anant Gokarn
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Lingaraj Nayak
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Sumeet Mirgh
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Nishant Jindal
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Manju Sengar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityMumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Navin Khattry
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Papagudi G. Subramanian
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Sumeet Gujral
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityMumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gupta R, Jevremovic D, Mathew SJ, Kumar S. Multiparametric Flow Cytometry in the Evaluation of Plasma Cell Proliferative Disorders: Current Paradigms for Clinical Practice. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2024; 24:e88-e95. [PMID: 38142203 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
Diagnosis of plasma cell proliferative disorders (PCPDs) is primarily based on the demonstration of monoclonal protein (M-Protein) in blood and/ or urine which often precedes clinical manifestations of the disease. The basic pathophysiology behind the M-protein presence is the proliferation of clonal plasma cells (PCs) in bone marrow or extramedullary sites and is assessed using cytomorphology and immunophenotyping. The role of multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) for PC identification is technically the most valuable tool in this context as it characterizes as well as quantifies the clonal PCs based on differential expression of various immunophenotypic (IPT) markers. From a diagnostic perspective, MFC is critical in the definite identification of the clonal PCs and delineates benign and borderline entities at one end of the spectrum (MGUS, SMM) with lower clonal PC% and, malignant diseases at the other end (MM and PCL) with higher clonal PC fraction. The role of MFC in assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) and monitoring of progression in MM and various PCPDs has been validated in multiple clinical studies and is probably one of the most promising tools for predicting treatment outcomes. Furthermore, MFC also plays a crucial role in disease prognostication based on specific IPT profiles. An additional role of MFC in the current clinical scenario is the evaluation of tumor microenvironment based on immune cell repertoire, which is reflecting encouraging results across. Thus, in the current review we concisely describe the role of MFC as a reliable and essential modality in PCPDs, from diagnosis to prediction of treatment outcome and disease monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritu Gupta
- Department of Laboratory Oncology, Dr. BRAIRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi, India; Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - Dragan Jevremovic
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Shaji Kumar
- Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huang Z, Fu Y, Yang H, Zhou Y, Shi M, Li Q, Liu W, Liang J, Zhu L, Qin S, Hong H, Liu Y. Liquid biopsy in T-cell lymphoma: biomarker detection techniques and clinical application. Mol Cancer 2024; 23:36. [PMID: 38365716 PMCID: PMC10874034 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-024-01947-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
T-cell lymphoma is a highly invasive tumor with significant heterogeneity. Invasive tissue biopsy is the gold standard for acquiring molecular data and categorizing lymphoma patients into genetic subtypes. However, surgical intervention is unfeasible for patients who are critically ill, have unresectable tumors, or demonstrate low compliance, making tissue biopsies inaccessible to these patients. A critical need for a minimally invasive approach in T-cell lymphoma is evident, particularly in the areas of early diagnosis, prognostic monitoring, treatment response, and drug resistance. Therefore, the clinical application of liquid biopsy techniques has gained significant attention in T-cell lymphoma. Moreover, liquid biopsy requires fewer samples, exhibits good reproducibility, and enables real-time monitoring at molecular levels, thereby facilitating personalized health care. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current liquid biopsy biomarkers used for T-cell lymphoma, focusing on circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA, antibodies, and cytokines. Additionally, we discuss their clinical application, detection methodologies, ongoing clinical trials, and the challenges faced in the field of liquid biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zongyao Huang
- Department of Pathology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yao Fu
- Department of Pathology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Hong Yang
- Department of Pathology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yehan Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Min Shi
- Department of Pathology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Qingyun Li
- Genecast Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Wuxi, 214104, China
| | - Weiping Liu
- Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Junheng Liang
- Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, 210032, Jiangsu, China
| | - Liuqing Zhu
- Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, 210032, Jiangsu, China
| | - Sheng Qin
- Department of Pathology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| | - Huangming Hong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Pathology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Guerrero C, Puig N, Cedena MT, Calasanz MJ, Gutierrez NC, Fernandez M, Oriol A, Ríos-Tamayo R, Hernandez MT, Martínez-Martínez R, Bargay J, de Arriba F, Palomera L, Gonzalez-Rodriguez AP, Gonzalez Perez MS, Orfao A, Mateos MV, Martinez-Lopez J, Rosiñol L, Bladé J, Lahuerta JJ, San-Miguel JF, Paiva B. Predictors of unsustained measurable residual disease negativity in transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2024; 143:597-603. [PMID: 38048552 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023022083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT The role of measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity as a biomarker to stop treatment is being investigated in transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Thus, it is important to identify risk factors of MRD resurgence and/or progressive disease (PD) among patients achieving undetectable MRD to avoid undertreating them. Here, we studied 267 newly diagnosed transplant-eligible patients with MM enrolled in the GEM2012MENOS65 and GEM2014MAIN clinical trials who achieved MRD negativity by next-generation flow cytometry. After a median follow-up of 73 months since the first MRD negative assessment, 111 of the 267 (42%) patients showed MRD resurgence and/or PD. The only prognostic factors at diagnosis that predicted MRD resurgence and/or PD were an International Staging System (ISS) 3 and the presence of ≥0.01% circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Failure to achieve MRD negativity after induction also predicted higher risk of MRD resurgence and/or PD. Patients having 0 vs 1 vs ≥2 risk factors (ISS 3, ≥0.01% CTCs, and late MRD negativity) showed 5-year rates of MRD resurgence and/or PD of 16%, 33%, and 57%, respectively (P < .001). Thus, these easily measurable risk factors could help refine the selection of patients for whom treatment cessation after MRD negativity is being investigated in clinical trials. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01916252 and NCT02406144.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camila Guerrero
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBER-ONC) number CB16/12/00369, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Noemi Puig
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca Hematología, Instituto de investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - María-Teresa Cedena
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - María-José Calasanz
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBER-ONC) number CB16/12/00369, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Norma C Gutierrez
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca Hematología, Instituto de investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Manuela Fernandez
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Albert Oriol
- Department of Hematology, Institut Català d'Oncologia L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rafael Ríos-Tamayo
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Joan Bargay
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Son Llatzer, Institut d'Investigacio Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Felipe de Arriba
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Morales Meseguer, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria-Pascual Parrilla, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Luis Palomera
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Marta-Sonia Gonzalez Perez
- Department of Hematology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Servizio Galego de Saúde, Compostela, Spain
| | - Alberto Orfao
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca Hematología, Instituto de investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - María-Victoria Mateos
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca Hematología, Instituto de investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | | | - Laura Rosiñol
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic, Institut de Recerca Biomedica August Pi i Suñer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Bladé
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic, Institut de Recerca Biomedica August Pi i Suñer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan-Jose Lahuerta
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesus F San-Miguel
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBER-ONC) number CB16/12/00369, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Bruno Paiva
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBER-ONC) number CB16/12/00369, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
D'Agostino M, Bertuglia G, Rota-Scalabrini D, Belotti A, Morè S, Corradini P, Oliva S, Ledda A, Grasso M, Pavone V, Ronconi S, Vincelli ID, Ballanti S, Velluti C, Cellini C, Gozzetti A, Palmas AD, Gamberi B, Mancuso K, Paris L, Zambello R, Petrucci MT, Bruno B, Musto P, Gay F. Predictors of unsustained measurable residual disease negativity in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2024; 143:592-596. [PMID: 38048557 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023022080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT The prognostic impact of achieving and in particular maintaining measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity in multiple myeloma is now established; therefore, identifying among MRD-negative patients the ones at higher risk of losing MRD negativity is of importance. We analyzed predictors of unsustained MRD negativity in patients enrolled in the FORTE trial (NCT02203643). MRD was performed by multiparameter flow cytometry (sensitivity of 10-5) at premaintenance and every 6 months thereafter. The cumulative incidence (CI) of MRD resurgence and/or progression was analyzed in MRD-negative patients. A total of 306 of 474 (65%) MRD-negative patients were analyzed. After a median follow-up of 50.4 months from MRD negativity, 185 of 306 (60%) patients were still MRD negative and progression free, 118 (39%) lost their MRD-negative status, and 3 patients (1%) died without progression. Amp1q vs normal (4-year CI, 63% vs 34), ≥2 concomitant high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities vs 0 (4-year CI, 59% vs 33%), circulating tumor cells at baseline (high vs low at 4-year CI, 62% vs 32%), and time-to-reach MRD negativity postconsolidation vs preconsolidation (4-year CI, 46% vs 35%) were associated with a higher risk of unsustained MRD negativity in a multivariate Fine-Gray model. During the first 2 years of maintenance, patients receiving carfilzomib-lenalidomide vs lenalidomide alone had a lower risk of unsustained MRD negativity (4-year CI, 20% vs 33%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia D'Agostino
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Bertuglia
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Delia Rota-Scalabrini
- Medical Oncology Department Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Turin, Italy
| | - Angelo Belotti
- Department of Hematology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sonia Morè
- Clinica di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Paolo Corradini
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Oliva
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Ledda
- Ematologia/Centro Trapianti Midollo Osseo, Ospedale A. Businco, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Pavone
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Hospital Cardinale G. Panico, Tricase, Italy
| | - Sonia Ronconi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
| | - Iolanda Donatella Vincelli
- Divisione di Ematologia, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Stelvio Ballanti
- Sezione di Ematologia e Immunologia Clinica, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, località Sant'Andrea delle Fratte, Perugia, Italy
| | - Cristina Velluti
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Claudia Cellini
- U.O.C. Ematologia, Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Gozzetti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico S. Maria alle Scotte, Siena, Italy
| | - Angelo D Palmas
- Struttura Complessa Ematologia, Ospedale San Francesco, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Nuoro, Nuoro, Italy
| | | | - Katia Mancuso
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia Seràgnoli, Bologna, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Laura Paris
- Division of Hematology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Renato Zambello
- Hematology Section, Department of Medicine, Padua University School of Medicine, Padua, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Petrucci
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Benedetto Bruno
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Pellegrino Musto
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Aldo Moro University School of Medicine, Bari, Italy
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Gay
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gupta L, Suku P, Dash A, Bose P, Sharma P, Mallik N, Sreedharanunni S, Varma N, Jandial A, Malhotra P, Sachdeva MUS. Detection of circulating normal and tumor plasma cells in newly diagnosed patients of multiple myeloma and their associations with clinical and laboratory parameters. Curr Probl Cancer 2024; 48:101025. [PMID: 37951052 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.101025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Circulating plasma cells (CPCs) are frequently noted in variable frequencies in the entire spectrum of plasma cells neoplasms. With advent of high sensitivity multi-parametric flow cytometry, it is not only possible to detect CPCs present in very low numbers, but also to categorise them into circulating tumor plasma cells (CTPCs) and circulating normal plasma cells (CNPCs), based on their marker-profile. This study used multi-colour flow cytometry to evaluate the load of both CTPCs & CNPCs at the time of diagnosis and at six months' time-point of therapy, and evaluated associations of both with clinical and laboratory parameters. METHODS Twenty one newly diagnosed MM patients were enrolled. Six to nine millilitres of EDTA-anticoagulated peripheral blood sample was used for flow cytometry. A ten colour antibody panel was used for analysis of CPCs, which were categorised further into CTPCs and CNPCs. Approximately 4.8 million events were acquired for the analysis. The percentage &absolute numbers of CTPCs and CNPCs were noted and the proportion of CTPCs out of all CPCs (CTPCs + CNPCs) were also calculated for evaluating their statistical associations. RESULTS All 21 patients of newly diagnosed MM showed presence of CPCs (CTPCs and/or CNPCs) at the time of diagnosis. The CTPCs were detected in 76 % of the study population. The median percentage and absolute counts of CTPCs were 0.52 % and 54.9 cells /µL, respectively. CNPCs were found in 95 % and the median percentage and absolute counts of CNPCs were 0.025 % and 2.66 cells/µL. After six months of therapy, CPCs (CTPCs and/or CNPCs) were found in all nine patients evaluated for this assay. CTPCs were found 33 %, with a median of 0.075 % and CNPCs were found in 89 % with a median of 0.01 %. Our study showed that the load of CTPCs was found to be higher in patients with presence of lytic bone lesions, plasmacytoma, presence of PCs on peripheral blood film by light microscopy, presence of Chr 1p32 deletion, expression of CD56 and CD81 on CTPCs, and in patients with absence of very good partial response (VGPR). Conversely, the load of CTPCs was significantly lower in patients with concomitant amyloidosis. Also, percentage of bone marrow plasma cells exhibited a significant positive correlation with the absolute count of CTPCs. We observed that the mean percentage of CNPCs was significantly higher in female patients. The load of CNPCs was lower in patients with thrombocytopenia and with hypoalbuminemia. CONCLUSION Increased burden of CTPCs was associated with presence of lytic lesions, plasmacytomas, Chr 1p32 deletion, expression of CD56 and CD81 on tumor cells and with failure to achieve very good partial response. The CNPCs were lower in patients with thrombocytopenia and with hypoalbuminemia. To best ot our knowledge, this is the first study from India on the relevance of circulating tumor plasma cells and the first study in the world to analyse the associations of circulating normal plasma cells in newly diagnosed patients of multiple myeloma. The study also highlights the utility of multi-parametric flow cytometry in identification and enumeration of circulating plasma cells. MICRO ABSTRACT Circulating plasma cells indicates poorer outcomes in patients of multiple myeloma. Twenty one newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients were evaluated by flow cytometry to enumerate and characterise circulating tumor plasma cells (CTPCs) and circulating normal plasma cells (CNPCs). Higher load of CTPCs correlated with known poor prognostic markers and poor response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leena Gupta
- Former Junior Resident, MD Pathology, Department of Hematology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Pratibha Suku
- Junior Research Fellow, Department of Hematology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Aishwarya Dash
- PhD Scholar, Department of Hematology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Parveen Bose
- Senior Lab Technician, Department of Hematology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Praveen Sharma
- Assistant Professor, Department of Hematology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Nabhajit Mallik
- Assistant Professor, Department of Hematology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Sreejesh Sreedharanunni
- Associate Professor, Department of Hematology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Neelam Varma
- Former Professor & Head, Department of Hematology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Aditya Jandial
- Former Senior Research Associate, Department of Clinical Hematology and Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Pankaj Malhotra
- Professor and Head, Department of Clinical Hematology and Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Man Updesh Singh Sachdeva
- Professor, Department of Hematology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu X, Wu F, Ye W, Deng J, Zhang M, Zhang C, Yu Q, Cao L, Gan S, Ma J. Prognostic value of circulating plasma cells detected by flow cytometry in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e071548. [PMID: 38216195 PMCID: PMC10810043 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disorder. The most widely accepted staging system for MM is the revised International Staging System based on cytogenetic and clinical biomarkers. The circulating clonal plasma cells (CPCs) were reported to have potential prognostic impact on MM. Among various diagnostic approaches, multiparametric flow cytometry (FCM) offers heightened sensitivity, minimal invasiveness and reproducibility. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of quantifying CPCs via FCM in newly diagnosed symptomatic MM (NDMM) patients. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCE PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and references of included studies. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES We included observational studies that evaluated the prognostic value of CPCs detected by FCM in NDMM. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were screened and extracted independently by two investigators. The pooled results originated from random effects models. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). To evaluate the prognostic value of CPCs in NDMM, HRs and their 95% CI for both OS and PFS were derived using COX multivariable models. These values were then used to compute the pooled estimated effect. RESULTS Our meta-analysis encompassed a total of 2704 NDMM patients from 11 studies up to 27 August 2022. The pooled HR for OS and PFS in CPC-positive (CPCs+) group and CPC-negative group were 1.95 (95% CI 1.24 to 3.07) and 2.07 (95% CI 1.79 to 2.39), respectively. The autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) failed to eliminate the adverse impact on OS and PFS. The heterogeneity may stem from the use of novel agents or traditional chemotherapy as initial treatment. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis indicates CPCs+ had an adverse impact on the prognosis of NDMM patients in the total population, and the adverse impact could not be eliminated by ASCT. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021272381.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyan Liu
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Feifei Wu
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Wu Ye
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jili Deng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Lymphoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Mengmeng Zhang
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Congli Zhang
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Qingfeng Yu
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Li Cao
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Silin Gan
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Jie Ma
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ikeda D, Terao T, Oura M, Uehara A, Tabata R, Narita K, Takeuchi M, Machida Y, Matsue K. Analysis of baseline circulating tumor cells integrated with PET/CT findings in transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma. Blood Adv 2024; 8:37-46. [PMID: 38150271 PMCID: PMC10784675 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT We aimed to improve prognostic predictors in patients with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma (TIE-MM) by combining baseline circulating clonal tumor cells (CTCs) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) findings. The factors associated with prognosis were retrospectively investigated in 126 patients with TIE-MM who underwent CTC quantification by multiparameter flow cytometry and PET/CT at the initial presentation. The total lesion glycolysis (TLG) level was calculated using the Metavol software. The median percentage of CTC was 0.06% (range, 0%-4.82%), and 54 patients (42.9%) demonstrated high CTC levels. High CTC levels were associated with significantly poorer progression-free survival (PFS, 2-year 43.4% vs 68.1%; P < .001) and overall survival (OS, 5-year 39.0% vs 68.3%; P < .001). Similarly, high TLG levels significantly worsened the PFS (2-year, 41.2% vs 67.6%; P = .038) and OS (5-year, 37.7% vs 63.1%; P = .019). The multivariate analyses showed that Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) III, high CTC and TLG levels, and complete response were significant prognostic factors for PFS and OS. A novel predictive model was constructed using CTCs, TLG, and R-ISS III. The patients were stratified into 3 groups according to the number of risk factors, revealing an extremely high-risk group with a 2-year PFS of 0% and a 5-year OS of 20%. Patients without any high-risk features had better prognosis, with a 2-year PFS of 78.6% and a 5-year OS of 79.5%. The combination of CTCs and volumetric assessment of PET/CT at diagnosis augments the existing stratification systems and may pave the way for a risk-adapted treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Ikeda
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Toshiki Terao
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Mitsuaki Oura
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsushi Uehara
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Rikako Tabata
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kentaro Narita
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masami Takeuchi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Youichi Machida
- Department of Radiology, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kosei Matsue
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pérez-Escurza O, Flores-Montero J, Óskarsson JÞ, Sanoja-Flores L, Del Pozo J, Lecrevisse Q, Martín S, Reed ER, Hákonardóttir GK, Harding S, Þorsteinsdóttir S, Rögnvaldsson S, Love TJ, Durie B, Kristinsson SY, Orfao A. Immunophenotypic assessment of clonal plasma cells and B-cells in bone marrow and blood in the diagnostic classification of early stage monoclonal gammopathies: an iSTOPMM study. Blood Cancer J 2023; 13:182. [PMID: 38072838 PMCID: PMC10711003 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-023-00944-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is the earliest discernible stage of multiple myeloma (MM) and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). Early diagnosis of MG may be compromised by the low-level infiltration, undetectable to low-sensitive methodologies. Here, we investigated the prevalence and immunophenotypic profile of clonal (c) plasma cells (PC) and/or cB-lymphocytes in bone marrow (BM) and blood of subjects with a serum M-component from the iSTOPMM program, using high-sensitive next-generation flow cytometry (NGF), and its utility in the diagnostic classification of early-stage MG. We studied 164 paired BM and blood samples from 82 subjects, focusing the analysis on: 55 MGUS, 12 smoldering MM (SMM) and 8 smoldering WM (SWM). cPC were detected in 84% of the BM samples and cB-lymphocytes in 45%, coexisting in 39% of cases. In 29% of patients, the phenotypic features of cPC and/or cB-lymphocytes allowed a more accurate disease classification, including: 19/55 (35%) MGUS, 1/12 (8%) SMM and 2/8 (25%) SWM. Blood samples were informative in 49% of the BM-positive cases. We demonstrated the utility of NGF for a more accurate diagnostic classification of early-stage MG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oihane Pérez-Escurza
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC-University of Salamanca); Cytometry Service, NUCLEUS; Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Juan Flores-Montero
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC-University of Salamanca); Cytometry Service, NUCLEUS; Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium of Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | | | - Luzalba Sanoja-Flores
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium of Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Department of Hematology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Julio Del Pozo
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC-University of Salamanca); Cytometry Service, NUCLEUS; Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Quentin Lecrevisse
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC-University of Salamanca); Cytometry Service, NUCLEUS; Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium of Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Silvia Martín
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC-University of Salamanca); Cytometry Service, NUCLEUS; Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Elín Ruth Reed
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | | | | | - Sigrún Þorsteinsdóttir
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Department of Science, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Thorvardur Jon Love
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Department of Science, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Brian Durie
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sigurður Yngvi Kristinsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Department of Science, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Alberto Orfao
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC-University of Salamanca); Cytometry Service, NUCLEUS; Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain.
- Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
- Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain.
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium of Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gay F. A rational approach to functional high-risk myeloma. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2023; 2023:433-442. [PMID: 38066896 PMCID: PMC10727111 DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2023000443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is a clinically and biologically highly heterogeneous disease, as the overall survival can vary from more than a decade in patients with standard risk disease treated with intensive chemotherapy to 2-3 years in patients with high-risk features. The current staging systems, which rely on baseline biological risk factors to stratify patients into groups with differing risks of progression or death, are sometimes suboptimal tools for identifying high-risk patients. This is particularly evident when considering the so-called functional high-risk patients-patients who do not necessarily display baseline high-risk features but typically show a suboptimal response to induction therapy or relapse early after treatment initiation: the survival of these patients is particularly poor even in the context of newer therapies. The prompt identification, as well as a consistent definition, of this subset of patients, as well as their management, currently represents an unmet medical need. In this review we explore the main characteristics of functional high-risk patients, the available known risk factors and scoring systems, and the possible management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Gay
- Division of Hematology 1, Clinical Trial Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Science, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wijnands C, Noori S, Donk NWCJVD, VanDuijn MM, Jacobs JFM. Advances in minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2023; 60:518-534. [PMID: 37232394 DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2023.2209652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by the clonal expansion of plasma cells and the excretion of a monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-protein), or fragments thereof. This biomarker plays a key role in the diagnosis and monitoring of MM. Although there is currently no cure for MM, novel treatment modalities such as bispecific antibodies and CAR T-cell therapies have led to substantial improvement in survival. With the introduction of several classes of effective drugs, an increasing percentage of patients achieve a complete response. This poses new challenges to traditional electrophoretic and immunochemical M-protein diagnostics because these methods lack sensitivity to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD). In 2016, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) expanded their disease response criteria with bone marrow-based MRD assessment using flow cytometry or next-generation sequencing in combination with imaging-based disease monitoring of extramedullary disease. MRD status is an important independent prognostic marker and its potential as a surrogate endpoint for progression-free survival is currently being studied. In addition, numerous clinical trials are investigating the added clinical value of MRD-guided therapy decisions in individual patients. Because of these novel clinical applications, repeated MRD evaluation is becoming common practice in clinical trials as well as in the management of patients outside clinical trials. In response to this, novel mass spectrometric methods that have been developed for blood-based MRD monitoring represent attractive minimally invasive alternatives to bone marrow-based MRD evaluation. This paves the way for dynamic MRD monitoring to allow the detection of early disease relapse, which may prove to be a crucial factor in facilitating future clinical implementation of MRD-guided therapy. This review provides an overview of state-of-the-art of MRD monitoring, describes new developments and applications of blood-based MRD monitoring, and suggests future directions for its successful integration into the clinical management of MM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charissa Wijnands
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Somayya Noori
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn M VanDuijn
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joannes F M Jacobs
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kubicki T, Derman BA, Dytfeld D, Jakubowiak AJ. Measurable residual disease in peripheral blood in myeloma: dream or reality. Curr Opin Oncol 2023; 35:574-580. [PMID: 37621165 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Therapeutic advancements in multiple myeloma have led to increasingly deeper and more durable responses, creating a need for highly sensitive and applicable techniques for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment. Bone marrow assays can deeply assess for MRD, but it is not conducive to performing frequent and dynamic evaluations, which may be needed for MRD-adapted treatment approaches. Recently, numerous techniques for MRD assessment in peripheral blood have come under investigation, and their integration into routine clinical practice is eagerly anticipated. RECENT FINDINGS The identification of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), evaluation of cell-free DNA, and measuring monoclonal protein concentration with mass spectrometry are promising research areas for assessing myeloma in peripheral blood. CTCs assessment and cell-free DNA may carry prognostic significance, but they lack the sensitivity of bone marrow-based techniques. Mass spectrometry has already been implemented in clinical practice in certain centers, but its full potential has yet to be fully realized. This review focuses on recent developments in these fields, emphasizing the potential future roles of these assessments. SUMMARY MRD assessment in peripheral blood is still in the development stage but holds promise for not only complementing bone marrow based evaluations but also potential for improving sensitivity.
Collapse
|
22
|
Tian M, Liang X, Xu W, Yi X, Yue T, Zhang Y, Yu S, Yan Y, Hu Z, Zhang N, Wang J, Hu R, Sun X, Nie Y, Dai Y, Jin F. More than 2% circulating plasma cells as a prognostic biomarker in a large cohort of patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol 2023; 102:2943-2945. [PMID: 37434095 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05362-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mengru Tian
- Hematology Department, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
- Laboratory of Cancer Precision Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, 519 Dongminzhu Street, Changchun, 130061, Jilin, China
| | - Xinyue Liang
- Hematology Department, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
| | - Weiling Xu
- Radiology Department, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Xingcheng Yi
- Laboratory of Cancer Precision Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, 519 Dongminzhu Street, Changchun, 130061, Jilin, China
| | - Tingting Yue
- Hematology Department, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
- Laboratory of Cancer Precision Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, 519 Dongminzhu Street, Changchun, 130061, Jilin, China
| | - Yingjie Zhang
- Hematology Department, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
- Laboratory of Cancer Precision Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, 519 Dongminzhu Street, Changchun, 130061, Jilin, China
| | - Shanshan Yu
- Hematology Department, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
| | - Yurong Yan
- Hematology Department, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
| | - Zhongli Hu
- Hematology Department, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
| | - Nan Zhang
- Hematology Department, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
| | - Jingxuan Wang
- Hematology Department, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
| | - Rui Hu
- Hematology Department, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
| | - Xiaoxiao Sun
- Hematology Department, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
| | - Yuanyuan Nie
- Hematology Department, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
| | - Yun Dai
- Laboratory of Cancer Precision Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, 519 Dongminzhu Street, Changchun, 130061, Jilin, China.
| | - Fengyan Jin
- Hematology Department, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Roshal M, Gao Q. Flow Cytometry in Diagnosis, Prognostication, and Monitoring of Multiple Myeloma and Related Disorders. Clin Lab Med 2023; 43:363-375. [PMID: 37481317 DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
Flow cytometry plays a critical role in the diagnosis, prognostication, therapy response evaluation, and clinical management of plasma cell neoplasms. The review summarizes how flow cytometry is used in the initial evaluation to distinguish primary and secondary clonal plasma cell populations from each other and from reactive plasma cells. We further illustrate the kinds of prognostic information the assessment can provide at diagnosis and disease follow-up of primary plasma cell neoplasms. Technical requirements for MRD assays and their use in therapy efficacy assessment and clinical decision-making in multi-myeloma are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikhail Roshal
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
| | - Qi Gao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ma NY, Li Q, Li XL, Zeng YJ, Huang DZ, Duan YS, Xia J, Liu BD, Rao LY, Rao J, Zhang X. Lactate Decreases Bortezomib Sensitivity and Predicts Poor Clinical Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma. Curr Med Sci 2023; 43:679-688. [PMID: 37326888 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-023-2747-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Metabolic disorders are regarded as hallmarks of multiple myeloma (MM) and are responsible for rapid cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth. However, the exact biological roles of metabolites in MM cells have not been fully explored. This study aimed to explore the feasibility and clinical significance of lactate for MM and investigate the molecular mechanism of lactic acid (Lac) in the proliferation of myeloma cells and cell sensitivity to bortezomib (BTZ). METHODS Metabolomic analysis of the serum was carried out to obtain metabolites expression and clinical characteristics in MM patients. The CCK8 assay and flow cytometry were used to detect cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle changes. Western blotting was used to detect the potential mechanism and apoptosis- and cycle-related protein changes. RESULTS Lactate was highly expressed in both the peripheral blood and bone marrow of MM patients. It was significantly correlated with Durie-Salmon Staging (DS Staging) and the International Staging System (ISS Staging) and the serum and urinary involved/uninvolved free light chain ratios. Patients with relatively high lactate levels had a poor treatment response. Moreover, in vitro experiments showed that Lac could promote the proliferation of tumor cells and decrease the proportion of G0/G1-phase cells, which was accompanied by an increased proportion of S-phase cells. In addition, Lac could decrease tumor sensitivity to BTZ by disrupting the expression of nuclear factor kappa B subunit 2 (NFkB2) and RelB. CONCLUSION Metabolic changes are important in MM cell proliferation and treatment response; lactate could be used as a biomarker in MM and as a therapeutic target to overcome cell resistance to BTZ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na-Ya Ma
- Medical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
- State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Qiong Li
- Medical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
- State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Xin-Lei Li
- Medical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
- State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Yun-Jing Zeng
- Medical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
- State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - De-Zhi Huang
- Medical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
- State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Yi-Shuo Duan
- Medical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
- State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Jing Xia
- Medical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
- State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Bang-Dong Liu
- Medical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
- State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Ling-Yi Rao
- Medical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
- State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Jun Rao
- Medical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, 215031, China.
| | - Xi Zhang
- Medical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, 215031, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Medina-Herrera A, Sarasquete ME, Jiménez C, Puig N, García-Sanz R. Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Past, Present, and Future. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3687. [PMID: 37509348 PMCID: PMC10377959 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Responses to treatment have improved over the last decades for patients with multiple myeloma. This is a consequence of the introduction of new drugs that have been successfully combined in different clinical contexts: newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible or ineligible patients, as well as in the relapsed/refractory setting. However, a great proportion of patients continue to relapse, even those achieving complete response, which underlines the need for updated response criteria. In 2014, the international myeloma working group established new levels of response, prompting the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) for those patients already in complete or stringent complete response as defined by conventional serological assessments: the absence of tumor plasma cells in 100,000 total cells or more define molecular and immunophenotypic responses by next-generation sequencing and flow cytometry, respectively. In this review, we describe all the potential methods that may be used for MRD detection based on the evidence found in the literature, paying special attention to their advantages and pitfalls from a critical perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Medina-Herrera
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - María Eugenia Sarasquete
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Cristina Jiménez
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Noemí Puig
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Ramón García-Sanz
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hao Y, Zhang F, Ma Y, Luo Y, Zhang Y, Yang N, Liu M, Liu H, Li J. Potential biomarkers for the early detection of bone metastases. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1188357. [PMID: 37404755 PMCID: PMC10315674 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1188357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The clinical manifestations of bone metastases are diversified while many sites remain asymptomatic at early stage. As the early diagnosis method is not perfect and the early symptoms of tumor bone metastasis are not typical, bone metastasis is not easy to be detected. Therefore, the search for bone metastasis-related markers is effective for timely detection of tumor bone metastases and the development of drugs to inhibit bone metastases. As a result, bone metastases can only be diagnosed when symptoms are found, increasing the risk of developing skeletal-related event (SREs), which significantly impairs the patient's quality of life. Therefore, the early diagnosis of bone metastases is of great importance for the treatment and prognosis of cancer patients. Changes of bone metabolism indexes appear earlier in bone metastases, but the traditional biochemical indexes of bone metabolism lack of specificity and could be interfered by many factors, which limits their application in the study of bone metastases. Some new biomarkers of bone metastases have good diagnostic value, such as proteins, ncRNAs, circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Therefore, this study mainly reviewed the initial diagnostic biomarkers of bone metastases which were expected to provide references for the early detection of bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Hao
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Henan Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Zhengzhou, China
- Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Feifan Zhang
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Henan Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Zhengzhou, China
- Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China
| | - Yan Ma
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Henan Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yage Luo
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Henan Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yongyong Zhang
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Henan Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ning Yang
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Henan Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Zhengzhou, China
| | - Man Liu
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Henan Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hongjian Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jitian Li
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Henan Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Zhengzhou, China
- Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China
- Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Oliva S, Genuardi E, Paris L, D'Agostino M, Rogers J, Rota-Scalabrini D, Jacob AP, Patriarca F, Luppi M, Bertazzoni P, Velluti C, Capra A, Saraci E, Rossi M, Allegra A, Mina R, Gentile M, Kirsch IR, Belotti A, Cavo M, Bruno B, Musto P, Boccadoro M, Zamagni E, Gay F. Prospective evaluation of minimal residual disease in the phase II FORTE trial: a head-to-head comparison between multiparameter flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 60:102016. [PMID: 37396800 PMCID: PMC10314153 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Limited data are available on the concordance between multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in a large trial for multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Methods MRD was explored in the FORTE trial for transplant-eligible MM patients randomised to three carfilzomib-based induction-intensification-consolidation treatments and carfilzomib-lenalidomide (KR) vs R maintenance. MRD was assessed by 8-colour 2nd-generation flow cytometry in patients with ≥very good partial response before maintenance. NGS was performed in case of suspected complete response (CR) in a correlative subanalysis. Biological/prognostic concordance between MFC and NGS, conversion to MRD negativity during maintenance, and 1-year/2-year sustained MRD negativity were explored. Findings Between September 28, 2015 and December 22, 2021, 2020 samples were available for MFC and 728 for the simultaneous MFC/NGS correlation in the "suspected CR population". Median follow-up was 62 months. Biological agreement was 87% at the 10-5 and 83% at the 10-6 cut-offs. A remarkable prognostic concordance was observed: hazard ratios in MFC-MRD and NGS-MRD-negative vs -positive patients were 0.29 and 0.27 for progression-free survival (PFS) and 0.35 and 0.31 for overall survival, respectively (p < 0.05). During maintenance, 4-year PFS was 91% and 97% in 1-year sustained MFC-MRD-negative and NGS-MRD-negative patients (10-5), respectively, and 99% and 97% in 2-year sustained MFC-MRD-negative and NGS-MRD-negative patients, regardless of treatment received. The conversion rate from pre-maintenance MRD positivity to negativity during maintenance was significantly higher with KR vs R both by MFC (46% vs 30%, p = 0.046) and NGS (56% vs 30%, p = 0.046). Interpretation The significant biological/clinical concordance between MFC and NGS at the same sensitivity suggests their possible use in the evaluation of one of the currently strongest predictors of outcome. Funding Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Oliva
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Elisa Genuardi
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Laura Paris
- Division of Hematology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Mattia D'Agostino
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Jennifer Rogers
- Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF), Norwalk, CT, USA
| | - Delia Rota-Scalabrini
- Multidisciplinary Oncology Outpatient Clinic, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Patriarca
- Hematologic Clinic and Transplant Center, University Hospital of Central Friuli, DAME, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Mario Luppi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Materno Infantili e dell'Adulto, UNIMORE, UOC Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Cristina Velluti
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Andrea Capra
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Elona Saraci
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Marco Rossi
- SOC Ematologia, Department of Oncology/Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese-Ciaccio and Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Alessandro Allegra
- Division of Hematology, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood “Gaetano Barresi”, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Roberto Mina
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | | | - Angelo Belotti
- Department of Hematology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michele Cavo
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Benedetto Bruno
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Pellegrino Musto
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, “Aldo Moro” University School of Medicine, Bari, Italy
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, AOU Consorziale Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Mario Boccadoro
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Elena Zamagni
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Gay
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bou Zerdan M, Kassab J, Saba L, Haroun E, Bou Zerdan M, Allam S, Nasr L, Macaron W, Mammadli M, Abou Moussa S, Chaulagain CP. Liquid biopsies and minimal residual disease in lymphoid malignancies. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1173701. [PMID: 37228488 PMCID: PMC10203459 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1173701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment using peripheral blood instead of bone marrow aspirate/biopsy specimen or the biopsy of the cancerous infiltrated by lymphoid malignancies is an emerging technique with enormous interest of research and technological innovation at the current time. In some lymphoid malignancies (particularly ALL), Studies have shown that MRD monitoring of the peripheral blood may be an adequate alternative to frequent BM aspirations. However, additional studies investigating the biology of liquid biopsies in ALL and its potential as an MRD marker in larger patient cohorts in treatment protocols are warranted. Despite the promising data, there are still limitations in liquid biopsies in lymphoid malignancies, such as standardization of the sample collection and processing, determination of timing and duration for liquid biopsy analysis, and definition of the biological characteristics and specificity of the techniques evaluated such as flow cytometry, molecular techniques, and next generation sequencies. The use of liquid biopsy for detection of minimal residual disease in T-cell lymphoma is still experimental but it has made significant progress in multiple myeloma for example. Recent attempt to use artificial intelligence may help simplify the algorithm for testing and may help avoid inter-observer variation and operator dependency in these highly technically demanding testing process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maroun Bou Zerdan
- Department of Internal Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
| | - Joseph Kassab
- Cleveland Clinic, Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Ludovic Saba
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Myeloma and Amyloidosis Program, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, United States
| | - Elio Haroun
- Department of Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Sabine Allam
- Department of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Balamand, Lebanon
| | - Lewis Nasr
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, TX, United States
| | - Walid Macaron
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, TX, United States
| | - Mahinbanu Mammadli
- Department of Internal Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
| | | | - Chakra P. Chaulagain
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Myeloma and Amyloidosis Program, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Burgos L, Tamariz-Amador LE, Puig N, Cedena MT, Guerrero C, Jelínek T, Johnson S, Milani P, Cordon L, Perez JJ, Lasa M, Termini R, Oriol A, Hernandez MT, Palomera L, Martinez-Martinez R, de la Rubia J, de Arriba F, Rios R, Gonzalez ME, Gironella M, Cabañas V, Casanova M, Krsnik I, Perez-Montaña A, González-Calle V, Rodriguez-Otero P, Maisnar V, Hajek R, Van Rhee F, Jimenez-Zepeda V, Palladini G, Merlini G, Orfao A, de la Cruz J, Martinez-Lopez J, Lahuerta JJ, Rosiñol L, Blade J, Mateos MV, San-Miguel JF, Paiva B. Definition and Clinical Significance of the Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance-Like Phenotype in Patients With Monoclonal Gammopathies. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3019-3031. [PMID: 36930848 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The existence of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and light-chain (AL) amyloidosis who present with a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS)-like phenotype has been hypothesized, but methods to identify this subgroup are not standardized and its clinical significance is not properly validated. PATIENTS AND METHODS An algorithm to identify patients having MGUS-like phenotype was developed on the basis of the percentages of total bone marrow (BM) plasma cells (PC) and of clonal PC within the BM PC compartment, determined at diagnosis using flow cytometry in 548 patients with MGUS and 2,011 patients with active MM. The clinical significance of the algorithm was tested and validated in 488 patients with smoldering MM, 3,870 patients with active MM and 211 patients with AL amyloidosis. RESULTS Patients with smoldering MM with MGUS-like phenotype showed significantly lower rates of disease progression (4.5% and 0% at 2 years in two independent series). There were no statistically significant differences in time to progression between treatment versus observation in these patients. In active newly diagnosed MM, MGUS-like phenotype retained independent prognostic value in multivariate analyses of progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; P = .001) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.56; P = .039), together with International Staging System, lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic risk, transplant eligibility, and complete remission status. Transplant-eligible patients with active MM with MGUS-like phenotype showed PFS and OS rates at 5 years of 79% and 96%, respectively. In this subgroup, there were no differences in PFS and OS according to complete remission and measurable residual disease status. Application of the algorithm in two independent series of patients with AL predicted for different survival. CONCLUSION We developed an open-access algorithm for the identification of MGUS-like patients with distinct clinical outcomes. This phenotypic classification could become part of the diagnostic workup of MM and AL amyloidosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leire Burgos
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Luis-Esteban Tamariz-Amador
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Noemi Puig
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Maria-Teresa Cedena
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CIBERONC, Instituto de Investigación IMAS12, Madrid, Spain
| | - Camila Guerrero
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Tomas Jelínek
- Department of Haematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Sarah Johnson
- Myeloma Center/Division of Hematology Oncology/Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Paolo Milani
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia and Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Jose J Perez
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Marta Lasa
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Rosalinda Termini
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Albert Oriol
- Institut Català d'Oncologia and Institut Josep Carreras, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Luis Palomera
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | - Felipe de Arriba
- Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB-Arrixaca, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Rafael Rios
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Mercedes Gironella
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Valentin Cabañas
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca. IMIB-Arrixaca. University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Maria Casanova
- Hematology Department, Hospital Costa del Sol Marbella, Marbella, Spain
| | - Isabel Krsnik
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Verónica González-Calle
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Paula Rodriguez-Otero
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Vladimir Maisnar
- 4th Department of Medicine-Haematology, Charles University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Hajek
- Department of Haematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Fritz Van Rhee
- Myeloma Center/Division of Hematology Oncology/Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Victor Jimenez-Zepeda
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Department of Hematology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Giovanni Palladini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia and Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Merlini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia and Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberto Orfao
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, USAL-CSIC), Department of Medicine and Cytometry Service, University of Salamanca, CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Javier de la Cruz
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CIBERONC, Instituto de Investigación IMAS12, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquin Martinez-Lopez
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CIBERONC, Instituto de Investigación IMAS12, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan-Jose Lahuerta
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CIBERONC, Instituto de Investigación IMAS12, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Rosiñol
- Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit. Department of Hematology. Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. IDIBAPS., Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Blade
- Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit. Department of Hematology. Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. IDIBAPS., Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria-Victoria Mateos
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jesus F San-Miguel
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Bruno Paiva
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Li S, Zhang E, Cai Z. Liquid biopsy by analysis of circulating myeloma cells and cell-free nucleic acids: a novel noninvasive approach of disease evaluation in multiple myeloma. Biomark Res 2023; 11:27. [PMID: 36890597 PMCID: PMC9997021 DOI: 10.1186/s40364-023-00469-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematological cancer with high spatial- and temporal-heterogeneity. Invasive single-point bone marrow sampling cannot capture the tumor heterogeneity and is difficult to repeat for serial assessments. Liquid biopsy is a technique for identifying and analyzing circulating MM cells and cell products produced by tumors and released into the circulation, allowing for the minimally invasive and comprehensive detection of disease burden and molecular alterations in MM and monitoring treatment response and disease progression. Furthermore, liquid biopsy can provide complementary information to conventional detection approaches and improve their prognostic values. This article reviewed the technologies and applications of liquid biopsy in MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuchan Li
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No. 79, Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.,Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Enfan Zhang
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No. 79, Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.,Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhen Cai
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No. 79, Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. .,Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
van de Donk NWCJ. How We Manage Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma With Circulating Tumor Cells. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1342-1349. [PMID: 36450104 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.Careful evaluation of peripheral blood for the presence of circulating plasma cells by morphologic assessment or by flow cytometric analysis is an essential component of the diagnostic workup in all patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) to timely differentiate between MM and primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL), which is the most aggressive plasma cell dyscrasia. The improvement in survival over time is more modest in pPCL, compared with what has been achieved in MM. pPCL is currently defined by the presence of ≥ 5% circulating plasma cells. However, this cutoff is now challenged by new data, from three large cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed MM, showing that a threshold of 2% circulating tumor cells (CTCs) by flow cytometry can be used to identify a subset of patients with ultra-high-risk MM with comparable prognosis as patients with pPCL. These patients may benefit from more intensified first-line therapies, or from enrollment into specific clinical trials, designed for ultra-high-risk MM and pPCL. Apart from differentiating MM from pPCL, the quantification of CTCs is also useful for risk stratification in MM. The detection of CTCs above a threshold of 0.01%-0.07% (much lower than the threshold to define pPCL) appears to be an independent predictor of poor clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed MM. Additional studies, including transplant-ineligible patients or with incorporation of novel immunotherapies, are needed to identify a definitive prognostic CTC cutoff. The next step will be the incorporation of CTC detection into existing staging systems to improve risk stratification and treatment personalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels W C J van de Donk
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Cancer Biology and Immunology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jelinek T, Bezdekova R, Zihala D, Sevcikova T, Anilkumar Sithara A, Pospisilova L, Sevcikova S, Polackova P, Stork M, Knechtova Z, Venglar O, Kapustova V, Popkova T, Muronova L, Chyra Z, Hrdinka M, Simicek M, Garcés JJ, Puig N, Cedena MT, Jurczyszyn A, Castillo JJ, Penka M, Radocha J, Mateos MV, San-Miguel JF, Paiva B, Pour L, Rihova L, Hajek R. More Than 2% of Circulating Tumor Plasma Cells Defines Plasma Cell Leukemia-Like Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1383-1392. [PMID: 36315921 PMCID: PMC9995102 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Primary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is the most aggressive monoclonal gammopathy. It was formerly characterized by ≥ 20% circulating plasma cells (CTCs) until 2021, when this threshold was decreased to ≥ 5%. We hypothesized that primary PCL is not a separate clinical entity, but rather that it represents ultra-high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) characterized by elevated CTC levels. METHODS We assessed the levels of CTCs by multiparameter flow cytometry in 395 patients with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible MM to establish a cutoff for CTCs that identifies the patients with ultra-high-risk PCL-like MM. We tested the cutoff on 185 transplant-eligible patients with MM and further validated on an independent cohort of 280 transplant-ineligible patients treated in the GEM-CLARIDEX trial. The largest published real-world cohort of patients with primary PCL was used for comparison of survival. Finally, we challenged the current 5% threshold for primary PCL diagnosis. RESULTS Newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible patients with MM with 2%-20% CTCs had significantly shorter progression-free survival (3.1 v 15.6 months; P < .001) and overall survival (14.6 v 33.6 months; P = .023) than patients with < 2%. The 2% cutoff proved to be applicable also in transplant-eligible patients with MM and was successfully validated on an independent cohort of patients from the GEM-CLARIDEX trial. Most importantly, patients with 2%-20% CTCs had comparable dismal outcomes with primary PCL. Moreover, after revealing a low mean difference between flow cytometric and morphologic evaluation of CTCs, we showed that patients with 2%-5% CTCs have similar outcomes as those with 5%-20% CTCs. CONCLUSION Our study uncovers that ≥ 2% CTCs is a biomarker of hidden primary PCL and supports the assessment of CTCs by flow cytometry during the diagnostic workup of MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Jelinek
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Renata Bezdekova
- Department of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - David Zihala
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Tereza Sevcikova
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.,Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Anjana Anilkumar Sithara
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.,Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | | | - Sabina Sevcikova
- Babak Myeloma Group, Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Petra Polackova
- Department of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Stork
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University, Czech Republic
| | - Zdenka Knechtova
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University, Czech Republic
| | - Ondrej Venglar
- Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Veronika Kapustova
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Tereza Popkova
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Ludmila Muronova
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Zuzana Chyra
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Matous Hrdinka
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Simicek
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Juan-Jose Garcés
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBER-ONC number CB16/12/00369, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Noemi Puig
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cancer (IBMCC-USAL, CSIC), CIBER-ONC number CB16/12/00233, Salamanca, Spain
| | | | - Artur Jurczyszyn
- Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Center, Department of Hematology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Faculty of Medicine Cracow, Poland
| | - Jorge J Castillo
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Miroslav Penka
- Department of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jakub Radocha
- 4th Department of Internal Medicine-Hematology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Maria Victoria Mateos
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cancer (IBMCC-USAL, CSIC), CIBER-ONC number CB16/12/00233, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jesús F San-Miguel
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBER-ONC number CB16/12/00369, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Bruno Paiva
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBER-ONC number CB16/12/00369, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ludek Pour
- Babak Myeloma Group, Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lucie Rihova
- Department of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Hajek
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Marcon C, Simeon V, Deias P, Facchin G, Corso A, Derudas D, Montefusco V, Offidani M, Petrucci MT, Zambello R, Stocchi R, Fanin R, Patriarca F. Experts' consensus on the definition and management of high risk multiple myeloma. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1096852. [PMID: 36755858 PMCID: PMC9899889 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1096852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
High risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) at diagnosis is currently recognized according to the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) which was set up in 2015. Since then, new clinical and biological prognostic factors have been developed, which could implement the definition of High Risk (HR) category. We conducted a survey in order to identify which additional parameters, both clinical and biological, are considered more useful for the clinical practice and to evaluate if the management of Multiple Myeloma (MM) should change on the basis of the risk category. A questionnaire, consisting of 8 statements, was submitted to 6 Italian experts, from the European Myeloma Network (EMN) Research Italy, using the Delphi method. The colleagues were asked to answer each question using a scale between 0 and 100. If a statement did not reach at least 75 out of 100 points from all the participants, it was rephrased on the basis of the proposal of the experts and resubmitted in a second or further round, until a consensus was reached among all. From the first round of the survey a strong consensus was reached regarding the opportunity to revise the R-ISS including chromosome 1 abnormality, TP53 mutation or deletion, circulating plasma cells by next generation flow and extramedullary plasmacytomas. No consensus was reached for the definition of "double hit" MM and for the application in clinical practice of treatment strategies based on the risk category. In the second round of the Delphi questionnaire, "double-hit" MM was recognized by the association of at least two high-risk cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities. Moreover, the experts agreed to reserve an intensified treatment only to specific conditions, such as plasma cell leukaemia or patients with multiple extramedullary plasmacytomas, while they admitted that there are not sufficient real word data in order to modify treatment on the basis of MRD assessment in clinical practice. This survey suggests that the definition of HRMM should be implemented by additional clinical and biological risk factors, that will be useful to guide treatment in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Marcon
- Division of Hematology, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy,Department of Area Medica, Udine University, Udine, Italy,*Correspondence: Chiara Marcon,
| | - Valentina Simeon
- Division of Hematology, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy,Department of Area Medica, Udine University, Udine, Italy
| | - Paola Deias
- Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Center, Department of Medical Science, R. Binaghi Hospital, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gabriele Facchin
- Division of Hematology, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Daniele Derudas
- Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Center, A. Businco Cancer Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Vittorio Montefusco
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Offidani
- Clinical Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Petrucci
- Division of Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Renato Zambello
- Clinical Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Raffaella Stocchi
- Division of Hematology, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Renato Fanin
- Division of Hematology, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy,Department of Area Medica, Udine University, Udine, Italy
| | - Francesca Patriarca
- Division of Hematology, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy,Department of Area Medica, Udine University, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Garcés JJ, San-Miguel JF, Paiva B. Reply to I.V. Kostopoulos et al. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:710-711. [PMID: 36179276 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Juan-Jose Garcés
- Juan-Jose Garcés, PhD, Jesus F. San-Miguel, MD, PhD, and Bruno Paiva, PhD, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Cancer Center Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), Navarra, Spain
| | - Jesus F San-Miguel
- Juan-Jose Garcés, PhD, Jesus F. San-Miguel, MD, PhD, and Bruno Paiva, PhD, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Cancer Center Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), Navarra, Spain
| | - Bruno Paiva
- Juan-Jose Garcés, PhD, Jesus F. San-Miguel, MD, PhD, and Bruno Paiva, PhD, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Cancer Center Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), Navarra, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kostopoulos IV, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Rousakis P, Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou E, Panteli C, Malandrakis P, Angelis N, Kanellias N, Orologas-Stavrou N, Papanota A, Fotiou D, Migkou M, Gavriatopoulou M, Kastritis E, Tsitsilonis O, Terpos E, Dimopoulos MA. Circulating Plasma Cells in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Prognostic and More. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:708-710. [PMID: 36179274 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis V Kostopoulos
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Pantelis Rousakis
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Chrysanthi Panteli
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Malandrakis
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Angelis
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kanellias
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristina Papanota
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Despina Fotiou
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Magdalini Migkou
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Gavriatopoulou
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Efstathios Kastritis
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ourania Tsitsilonis
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelos Terpos
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
- Ioannis V. Kostopoulos, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pantelis Rousakis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Chrysanthi Panteli, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Panagiotis Malandrakis, MD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Angelis, MSc, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Kanellias, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Nikolaos Orologas-Stavrou, MSc, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Aristina Papanota, MD, Despina Fotiou, MD, PhD, Magdalini Migkou, MD, PhD, Maria Gavriatopoulou, MD, PhD, and Efstathios Kastritis, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Ourania Tsitsilonis, MD, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Evangelos Terpos, MD, PhD, and Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pacelli P, Raspadori D, Bestoso E, Gozzetti A, Bocchia M. "Friends and foes" of multiple myeloma measurable/minimal residual disease evaluation by next generation flow. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1057713. [PMID: 36518304 PMCID: PMC9742464 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1057713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Next Generation Flow (NGF) represents a gold standard for the evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients at any stage of treatment. Although the assessment of MRD is still not universally employed in clinical practice, numerous studies have demonstrated the strength of MRD as a reliable predictor of long-term outcome, and its potential to supersede the prognostic value of CR. The possibility to acquire millions of events, in combination with the use of standard reagents and a good expertise in the analysis of rare populations, led to high chance of success and a sensitivity of 10-6 that is superimposable to the one of Next Generation Sequencing molecular techniques. Some minor bias, correlated to the protocols applied, to the quality of samples and to the high heterogeneity of plasma cells phenotype, may be overcome using standard protocols and having at disposition personnel expertise for MRD analysis. With the use of NGF we can today enter a new phase of the quantification of residual disease, switching from the definition of "minimal" residual disease to "measurable" residual disease. This review takes account of the principle "friends and foes" of Myeloma "Measurable" Residual Disease evaluation by NGF, to give insights into the potentiality of this technique. The optimization of the quality of BM samples and the analytic expertise that permits to discriminate properly the rare pathologic clones, are the keys for obtaining results with a high clinical value that could be of great impact and relevance in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Pacelli
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | | | - Elena Bestoso
- Hematology Unit, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy
| | - Alessandro Gozzetti
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
- Hematology Unit, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy
| | - Monica Bocchia
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
- Hematology Unit, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Termini R, Žihala D, Terpos E, Perez-Montaña A, Jelínek T, Raab M, Weinhold N, Mai EK, Grab AL, Corre J, Vergez F, Sacco A, Chiarini M, Giustini V, Tucci A, Rodriguez S, Moreno C, Perez C, Maia C, Martín-Sánchez E, Guerrero C, Botta C, Garces JJ, Lopez A, Tamariz-Amador LE, Prosper F, Bargay J, Cabezudo ME, Ocio EM, Hájek R, Martinez-Lopez J, Solano F, Iglesias R, Paiva A, Geraldes C, Vitoria H, Gomez C, De Arriba F, Ludwig H, Garcia-Guiñon A, Casanova M, Alegre A, Cabañas V, Sirvent M, Oriol A, de la Rubia J, Hernández-Rivas JÁ, Palomera L, Sarasa M, Rios P, Puig N, Mateos MV, Flores-Montero J, Orfao A, Goldschmidt H, Avet-Loiseau H, Roccaro AM, San-Miguel JF, Paiva B. Circulating Tumor and Immune Cells for Minimally Invasive Risk Stratification of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:4771-4781. [PMID: 36074126 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early intervention in smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) requires optimal risk stratification to avoid under- and overtreatment. We hypothesized that replacing bone marrow (BM) plasma cells (PC) for circulating tumor cells (CTC), and adding immune biomarkers in peripheral blood (PB) for the identification of patients at risk of progression due to lost immune surveillance, could improve the International Myeloma Working Group 20/2/20 model. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We report the outcomes of 150 patients with SMM enrolled in the iMMunocell study, in which serial assessment of tumor and immune cells in PB was performed every 6 months for a period of 3 years since enrollment. RESULTS Patients with >0.015% versus ≤0.015% CTCs at baseline had a median time-to-progression of 17 months versus not reached (HR, 4.9; P < 0.001). Presence of >20% BM PCs had no prognostic value in a multivariate analysis that included serum free light-chain ratio >20, >2 g/dL M-protein, and >0.015% CTCs. The 20/2/20 and 20/2/0.015 models yielded similar risk stratification (C-index of 0.76 and 0.78). The combination of the 20/2/0.015 model with an immune risk score based on the percentages of SLAN+ and SLAN- nonclassical monocytes, CD69+HLADR+ cytotoxic NK cells, and CD4+CXCR3+ stem central memory T cells, allowed patient' stratification into low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high-risk disease with 0%, 20%, 39%, and 73% rates of progression at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that CTCs outperform BM PCs for assessing tumor burden. Additional analysis in larger series are needed to define a consensus cutoff of CTCs for minimally invasive stratification of SMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalinda Termini
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CCUN, CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | - David Žihala
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Evangelos Terpos
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Tomáš Jelínek
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Marc Raab
- Heidelberg University Clinic Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Heidelberg University Clinic Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias K Mai
- Heidelberg University Clinic Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna Luise Grab
- Heidelberg University Clinic Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jill Corre
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Unité 1037, INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Francois Vergez
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Unité 1037, INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Sara Rodriguez
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CCUN, CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Cristina Moreno
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CCUN, CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Cristina Perez
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CCUN, CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Catarina Maia
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CCUN, CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Esperanza Martín-Sánchez
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CCUN, CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Camilla Guerrero
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CCUN, CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Cirino Botta
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Juan-Jose Garces
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CCUN, CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Aitziber Lopez
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CCUN, CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Felipe Prosper
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CCUN, CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Joan Bargay
- Hospital Sont LLatzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Enrique M Ocio
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Roman Hájek
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | - Artur Paiva
- Flow Cytometry Unit (UGOC), Department of Clinical Pathology, Centro Hospitalare Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Catarina Geraldes
- Flow Cytometry Unit (UGOC), Department of Clinical Pathology, Centro Hospitalare Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Helena Vitoria
- Centro Hospitalare Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - Felipe De Arriba
- Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB-Arrixaca, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Heinz Ludwig
- Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, Clinic Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | - Valentin Cabañas
- Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca de Murcia, IMIB Arrixaca, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Albert Oriol
- Institut Català d'Oncologia Institut Josep Carreras, Badalona, Spain
| | - Javier de la Rubia
- University Hospital de La Fe, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Catholic University of Valencia, CIBERONC CB16/12/00284, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Luis Palomera
- Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Pablo Rios
- Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelara, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Noemi Puig
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica de Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Maria-Victoria Mateos
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica de Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Juan Flores-Montero
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Centro de Investigación del Cancer (IBMCC-USAL, CSIC), Department of Medicine, Cytometry Service, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Salamanca (IBSAL) and CIBER-ONC (number CB16/12/00400), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Alberto Orfao
- Translational and Clinical Research Program, Centro de Investigación del Cancer (IBMCC-USAL, CSIC), Department of Medicine, Cytometry Service, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Salamanca (IBSAL) and CIBER-ONC (number CB16/12/00400), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Heidelberg University Clinic Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hervé Avet-Loiseau
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Unité 1037, INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Jesus F San-Miguel
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CCUN, CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Bruno Paiva
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CCUN, CIBER-ONC numbers CB16/12/00369, CB16/12/00489, Pamplona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Monoclonal Gammopathies of Clinical Significance: A Critical Appraisal. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14215247. [PMID: 36358666 PMCID: PMC9659226 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS) refers to a recently coined term describing a complex and heterogeneous group of nonmalignant monoclonal gammopathies. These patients are characterized by the presence of a commonly small clone and the occurrence of symptoms that may be associated with the clone or with the monoclonal protein through diverse mechanisms. This is an evolving, challenging, and rapidly changing field. Patients are classified according to the key organ or system involved, with kidneys, skin, nerves, and eyes being the most frequently affected. However, multiorgan involvement may be the most relevant clinical feature at the presentation or during the course. This review delves into the definition, history, differential diagnosis, classification, prognosis, and treatment of this group of entities by analyzing the evidence accumulated to date from a critical perspective. Abstract Monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance (MGCSs) represent a group of diseases featuring the association of a nonmalignant B cells or plasma cells clone, the production of an M-protein, and singularly, the existence of organ damage. They present a current framework that is difficult to approach from a practical clinical perspective. Several points should be addressed in order to move further toward a better understanding. Overall, these entities are only partially included in the international classifications of diseases. Its definition and classification remain ambiguous. Remarkably, its real incidence is unknown, provided that a diagnostic biopsy is mandatory in most cases. In fact, amyloidosis AL is the final diagnosis in a large percentage of patients with renal significance. On the other hand, many of these young entities are syndromes that are based on a dynamic set of diagnostic criteria, challenging a timely diagnosis. Moreover, a specific risk score for progression is lacking. Despite the key role of the clinical laboratory in the diagnosis and prognosis of these patients, information about laboratory biomarkers is limited. Besides, the evidence accumulated for many of these entities is scarce. Hence, national and international registries are stimulated. In particular, IgM MGCS deserves special attention. Until now, therapy is far from being standardized, and it should be planned on a risk and patient-adapted basis. Finally, a comprehensive and coordinated multidisciplinary approach is needed, and specific clinical trials are encouraged.
Collapse
|
39
|
Musso N, Romano A, Bonacci PG, Scandura G, Pandino C, Camarda M, Russo GI, Di Raimondo F, Cacciola E, Cacciola R. Label-Free Enrichment of Circulating Tumor Plasma Cells: Future Potential Applications of Dielectrophoresis in Multiple Myeloma. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms231912052. [PMID: 36233350 PMCID: PMC9569623 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231912052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
In multiple myeloma (MM), circulating tumor plasma cells (CTPCs) are an emerging prognostic factor, offering a promising and minimally invasive means for longitudinal patient monitoring. Recent advances highlight the complex biology of plasma cell trafficking, highlighting the phenotypic and genetic signatures of intra- and extra-medullary MM onset, making CTPC enumeration and characterization a new frontier of precision medicine for MM patients, requiring novel technological platforms for their standardized and harmonized detection. Dielectrophoresis (DEP) is an emerging label-free cell manipulation technique to separate cancer cells from healthy cells in peripheral blood samples, based on phenotype and membrane capacitance that could be successfully tested to enumerate and isolate CTPCs. Herein, we summarize preclinical data on DEP development for CTPC detection, as well as their clinical and research potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Musso
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
- StLab SRL, 95126 Catania, Italy
| | - Alessandra Romano
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Medical Specialties, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-095-378-2971
| | - Paolo Giuseppe Bonacci
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
| | - Grazia Scandura
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Medical Specialties, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
| | - Clarissa Pandino
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Medical Specialties, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio Ivan Russo
- Urology Section, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95125 Catania, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Raimondo
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Medical Specialties, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
| | - Emma Cacciola
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “G.F. Ingrassia”, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
- Hemostasis/Hematology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Rodolico-San Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Rossella Cacciola
- Hemostasis/Hematology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Rodolico-San Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Steps towards a Multiple Myeloma Cure? J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12091451. [PMID: 36143236 PMCID: PMC9504254 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma survival has increased in last 20 years because of new treatments, better clinical management due to novel diagnostic tools such as imaging, and better understanding of the disease, biologically and genetically. Novel drugs have been introduced that act with different therapeutic mechanisms, but so have novel therapeutic strategies such as consolidation and maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant. Imaging (such as PET-CT and MRI) has been applied at diagnosis and after therapy for minimal residual disease monitoring. Multiparametric flow and molecular NGS may detect, with high-sensitivity, residual monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. With this novel therapeutic and biological approach, a considerable fraction of multiple myeloma patients can achieve durable remission or even MGUS-like regression, which can ultimately lead to disease disappearance. The big dogma, “Myeloma is an incurable disease”, is hopefully fading.
Collapse
|
41
|
Allegra A, Cancemi G, Mirabile G, Tonacci A, Musolino C, Gangemi S. Circulating Tumour Cells, Cell Free DNA and Tumour-Educated Platelets as Reliable Prognostic and Management Biomarkers for the Liquid Biopsy in Multiple Myeloma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174136. [PMID: 36077672 PMCID: PMC9454477 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Even though the presently employed biomarkers in the detection and management of multiple myeloma are demonstrating encouraging results, the mortality percentage of the malignancy is still elevated. Thus, searching for new diagnostic or prognostic markers is pivotal. Liquid biopsy allows the examination of circulating tumour DNA, cell-free DNA, extracellular RNA, and cell free proteins, which are released into the bloodstream due to the breakdown of tumour cells or exosome delivery. Liquid biopsy can now be applied in clinical practice to diagnose, and monitor multiple myeloma, probably allowing a personalized treatment of the disease. Abstract Liquid biopsy is one of the fastest emerging fields in cancer evaluation. Circulating tumour cells and tumour-originated DNA in plasma have become the new targets for their possible employ in tumour diagnosis, and liquid biopsy can define tumour burden without invasive procedures. Multiple Myeloma, one of the most frequent hematologic tumors, has been the target of therapeutic progresses in the last few years. Bone marrow aspirate is the traditional tool for diagnosis, prognosis, and genetic evaluation in multiple myeloma patients. However, this painful procedure presents a relevant drawback for regular disease examination as it requires an invasive practice. Moreover, new data demonstrated that a sole bone marrow aspirate is incapable of expressing the multifaceted multiple myeloma genetic heterogeneity. In this review, we report the emerging usefulness of the assessment of circulating tumour cells, cell-free DNA, extracellular RNA, cell-free proteins, extracellular vesicles, and tumour-educated platelets to evaluate the changing mutational profile of multiple myeloma, as early markers of disease, reliable predictors of prognosis, and as useful tools to perform less invasive monitoring in multiple myeloma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Allegra
- Division of Hematology, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood “Gaetano Barresi”, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Gabriella Cancemi
- Division of Hematology, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood “Gaetano Barresi”, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Mirabile
- Division of Hematology, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood “Gaetano Barresi”, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tonacci
- Clinical Physiology Institute, National Research Council of Italy (IFC-CNR), 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Caterina Musolino
- Division of Hematology, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood “Gaetano Barresi”, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Gangemi
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chakraborty R, Lentzsch S. Circulating Tumor Cell Burden as a Component of Staging in Multiple Myeloma: Ready for Prime Time? J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3099-3102. [PMID: 35759726 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rajshekhar Chakraborty
- Multiple Myeloma and Amyloidosis Program, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Suzanne Lentzsch
- Multiple Myeloma and Amyloidosis Program, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bertamini L, Oliva S, Rota-Scalabrini D, Paris L, Morè S, Corradini P, Ledda A, Gentile M, De Sabbata G, Pietrantuono G, Pascarella A, Tosi P, Curci P, Gilestro M, Capra A, Galieni P, Pisani F, Annibali O, Monaco F, Liberati AM, Palmieri S, Luppi M, Zambello R, Fazio F, Belotti A, Tacchetti P, Musto P, Boccadoro M, Gay F. High Levels of Circulating Tumor Plasma Cells as a Key Hallmark of Aggressive Disease in Transplant-Eligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3120-3131. [PMID: 35666982 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE High levels of circulating tumor plasma cells (CTC-high) in patients with multiple myeloma are a marker of aggressive disease. We aimed to confirm the prognostic impact and identify a possible cutoff value of CTC-high for the prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), in the context of concomitant risk features and minimal residual disease (MRD) achievement. METHODS CTC were analyzed at diagnosis with two-tube single-platform flow cytometry (sensitivity 4 × 10-5) in patients enrolled in the multicenter randomized FORTE clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02203643). MRD was assessed by second-generation multiparameter flow cytometry (sensitivity 10-5). We tested different cutoff values in series of multivariate (MV) Cox proportional hazards regression analyses on PFS outcome and selected the value that maximized the Harrell's C-statistic. We analyzed the impact of CTC on PFS and OS in a MV analysis including baseline features and MRD negativity. RESULTS CTC analysis was performed in 401 patients; the median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range, 45-54 months). There was a modest correlation between the percentage of CTC and bone marrow plasma cells (r = 0.38). We identified an optimal CTC cutoff of 0.07% (approximately 5 cells/µL, C-index 0.64). In MV analysis, CTC-high versus CTC-low patients had significantly shorter PFS (hazard ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.97, P < .001; 4-year PFS 38% v 69%) and OS (hazard ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.49 to 4.56; P < .001; 4-year OS 68% v 92%). The CTC levels, but not the bone marrow plasma cell levels, affected the outcome. The only factor that reduced the negative impact of CTC-high was the achievement of MRD negativity (interaction P = .039). CONCLUSION In multiple myeloma, increasing levels of CTC above an optimal cutoff represent an easy-to-assess, robust, and independent high-risk factor. The achievement of MRD negativity is the most important factor that modulates their negative prognostic impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Bertamini
- SSD Clinical Trial in Oncoematologia e Mieloma Multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Stefania Oliva
- SSD Clinical Trial in Oncoematologia e Mieloma Multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Delia Rota-Scalabrini
- Multidisciplinary Oncology Outpatient Clinic, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Torino, Italy
| | - Laura Paris
- Division of Hematology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Sonia Morè
- Clinica di Ematologia, AOU Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Paolo Corradini
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Ledda
- Ematologia/CTMO, Ospedale "A. Businco," Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni De Sabbata
- Ematologia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, Trieste, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Pietrantuono
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | | | | | - Paola Curci
- Unit of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, AOUC Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Milena Gilestro
- SSD Clinical Trial in Oncoematologia e Mieloma Multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Andrea Capra
- SSD Clinical Trial in Oncoematologia e Mieloma Multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Piero Galieni
- UOC Ematologia e Terapia cellulare, Ospedale C. e G. Mazzoni, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Francesco Pisani
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Ombretta Annibali
- Unit of Hematology, Stem Cell Transplantation, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Monaco
- SC Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Anna Marina Liberati
- Università degli Studi di Perugia, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni, Italy
| | | | - Mario Luppi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Materno Infantili e dell'Adulto, UNIMORE, UOC Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Renato Zambello
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), Hematology and Clinical Immunology Section, Padova University School of Medicine, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesca Fazio
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Belotti
- Department of Hematology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paola Tacchetti
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy
| | - Pellegrino Musto
- Unit of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, AOUC Policlinico, Bari, Italy.,Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, "Aldo Moro" University School of Medicine, Bari, Italy
| | - Mario Boccadoro
- SSD Clinical Trial in Oncoematologia e Mieloma Multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesca Gay
- SSD Clinical Trial in Oncoematologia e Mieloma Multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|