Real-World Validation of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Current challenges in conditioning regimens for MDS transplantation

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a very heterogeneous clonal disorder. Patients with "higher-risk" MDS, defined by specific recurrent genetic abnormalities, have a poor prognosis because of a high risk of progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia with low chemosensitivity. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only treatment that offers durable disease control because the donor immune system allows graft-versus-MDS effects. In terms of preparation steps before transplantation, targeting the malignant clone by increasing the conditioning regimen intensity is still a matter of intense debate. MDS is mainly diagnosed in older patients, and high toxicity related to common myeloablative conditioning regimens has been reported. Efforts to include new drugs in the conditioning regimen to achieve the best malignant clone control without increasing toxicity have been made over the past 20 years. We summarized these retrospective and prospective studies and evaluated the limitations of the available evidence to delineate the ideal conditioning regimen.

Revisiting Timing and Decision Modeling for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

Clinical validation of the Ion Torrent Oncomine Myeloid Assay GX v2 on the Genexus Integrated Sequencer as a stand-alone assay for single-nucleotide variants, insertions/deletions, and fusion genes: Challenges, performance, and perspectives

OBJECTIVES

Myeloid neoplasms require comprehensive characterization of genetic abnormalities, including single-nucleotide variants, small insertions and deletions, and fusions and translocations for management. The Oncomine Myeloid Assay GX v2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) analyzes 17 full genes, 28 hotspot genes, 30 fusion driver genes, and 5 expression genes.

METHODS

The validation set included 192 DNA samples, 28 RNA samples, and 9 cell lines and contrived controls. The DNA and RNA were extracted from both peripheral blood and bone marrow. Library preparation, templating, and sequencing was performed on the fully automated Genexus Integrated Sequencer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The sequencing data were analyzed by manual curation, default Oncomine filters and the Oncomine Reporter (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

RESULTS

Of the 600 reference pathogenic DNA variants targeted by the assay, concordance was seen in 98.3% of unfiltered variant call format files. Precision and reproducibility were 100%, and the lower limit of detection was 2% variant allele frequency for DNA. Inability to detect variants in long homopolymer regions intrinsic to the Ion Torrent chemistry led to 7 missed variants; 100% concordance was seen with reference RNA samples.

CONCLUSIONS

This extensive clinical validation of the Oncomine Myeloid Assay GX v2 on the Genexus Integrated Sequencer with its built-in bioinformatics pipeline and Ion Torrent Oncomine Reporter shows robust performance in terms of variant calling accuracy, precision, and reproducibility, with the advantage of a rapid turnaround time of 2 days. The greatest limitation is the inability to detect variants in long homopolymer regions.

Treatment of Anemia in Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

OPINION STATEMENT

A majority of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) will present with or develop anemia. Anemia in MDS is associated with decreased quality of life and may correlate with decreased progression-free survival and overall survival. In this state of the art review we summarize current risk stratification approaches to identify lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS), the natural history of the disease, and meaningful clinical endpoints. The treatment landscape of LR-MDS with anemia is also rapidly evolving; we review the role of supportive care, erythropoietin stimulating agents, lenalidomide, luspatercept, hypomethylating agents (HMAs), and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in the management of LR-MDS with anemia. In patients with deletion 5q (del5q) syndrome lenalidomide has both efficacy and durability of response. For patients without del5q who need treatment, the management approach is impacted by serum erythropoietin (EPO) level, SF3B1 mutation status, and ring sideroblast status. Given the data from the Phase III COMMANDS trial, we utilize luspatercept in those with SF3B1 mutation or ring sideroblasts that have an EPO level < 500 U/L; in patients without an SF3B1 mutation or ring sideroblasts there is equipoise between luspatercept and use of an erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA). For patients who have an EPO level ≥ 500 U/L or have been previously treated there is not a clear standard of care. For those without previous luspatercept exposure it can be considered particularly if there is an SF3B1 mutation or the presence of ring sideroblasts. Other options include HMAs or IST; the Phase III IMERGE trial supports the efficacy of the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat in this setting and this may become a standard option in the future as well.

Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes for Older Patients: Current State of Science, Challenges, and Opportunities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) represent a diverse group of pathologically distinct diseases with varying prognoses and risks of leukemia progression. This review aims to discuss current treatment options for elderly patients with MDS, focusing on patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy or allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The challenges associated with treatment in this population and emerging therapeutic prospects are also explored.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent advancements in molecular diagnostics have enhanced risk stratification by incorporating genetic mutations, notably through the molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M). Lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) treatment ranges from observation to supportive measures and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), with emerging therapies like luspatercept showing promise. High-risk MDS (HR-MDS) is treated with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or allogenic HSCT, but outcomes remain poor. Elderly MDS patients, often diagnosed after 70, pose challenges in treatment decision-making. The IPSS-M aids risk stratification, guiding therapeutic choices. For LR-MDS, supportive care, ESAs, and novel agents like luspatercept are considered. Treatment of HR-MDS involves HMAs or allogenic HSCT. Emerging treatments, including oral HMAs and novel agents targeting FLT3, and IDH 1/2 mutations, show promise. Future research should refine treatment strategies for this elderly population focusing on quality-of-life improvement.

Management of adult patients with CMML undergoing allo-HCT: recommendations from the EBMT PH&G Committee

ABSTRACT

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a heterogeneous disease presenting with either myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic features. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only potentially curative option, but the inherent toxicity of this procedure makes the decision to proceed to allo-HCT challenging, particularly because patients with CMML are mostly older and comorbid. Therefore, the decision between a nonintensive treatment approach and allo-HCT represents a delicate balance, especially because prospective randomized studies are lacking and retrospective data in the literature are conflicting. International consensus on the selection of patients and the ideal timing of allo-HCT, specifically in CMML, could not be reached in international recommendations published 6 years ago. Since then, new, CMML-specific data have been published. The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Practice Harmonization and Guidelines (PH&G) Committee assembled a panel of experts in the field to provide the first best practice recommendations on the role of allo-HCT specifically in CMML. Recommendations were based on the results of an international survey, a comprehensive review of the literature, and expert opinions on the subject, after structured discussion and circulation of recommendations. Algorithms for patient selection, timing of allo-HCT during the course of the disease, pretransplant strategies, allo-HCT modality, as well as posttransplant management for patients with CMML were outlined. The keynote message is, that once a patient has been identified as a transplant candidate, upfront transplantation without prior disease-modifying treatment is preferred to maximize chances of reaching allo-HCT whenever possible, irrespective of bone marrow blast counts.

Kinome expression profiling improves risk stratification and therapeutic targeting in myelodysplastic syndromes

ABSTRACT

The human kinome, which comprises >500 kinases, plays a critical role in regulating numerous essential cellular functions. Although the dysregulation of kinases has been observed in various human cancers, the characterization and clinical implications of kinase expressions in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have not been systematically investigated. In this study, we evaluated the kinome expression profiles of 341 adult patients with primary MDS and identified 7 kinases (PTK7, KIT, MAST4, NTRK1, PAK6, CAMK1D, and PRKCZ) whose expression levels were highly predictive of compromised patient survival. We then constructed the kinase stratification score (KISS) by combining the weighted expressions of the 7 kinases and validated its prognostic significance in 2 external MDS cohorts. A higher KISS was associated with older age, higher peripheral blood and marrow blast percentages, higher Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) risks, complex karyotype, and mutations in several adverse-risk genes in MDS, such as ASXL1, EZH2, NPM1, RUNX1, STAG2, and TP53. Multivariate analysis confirmed that a higher KISS was an independent unfavorable risk factor in MDS. Mechanistically, the KISS-high patients were enriched for gene sets associated with hematopoietic and leukemic stem cell signatures. By investigating the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer database, we identified axitinib and taselisib as candidate compounds that could potentially target the KISS-high myeloblasts. Altogether, our findings suggest that KISS holds the potential to improve the current prognostic scheme of MDS and inform novel therapeutic opportunities.

Immune-monitoring of myelodysplastic neoplasms: Recommendations from the i4MDS consortium

Advancements in comprehending myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) have unfolded significantly in recent years, elucidating a myriad of cellular and molecular underpinnings integral to disease progression. While molecular inclusions into prognostic models have substantively advanced risk stratification, recent revelations have emphasized the pivotal role of immune dysregulation within the bone marrow milieu during MDS evolution. Nonetheless, immunotherapy for MDS has not experienced breakthroughs seen in other malignancies, partly attributable to the absence of an immune classification that could stratify patients toward optimally targeted immunotherapeutic approaches. A pivotal obstacle to establishing "immune classes" among MDS patients is the absence of validated accepted immune panels suitable for routine application in clinical laboratories. In response, we formed International Integrative Innovative Immunology for MDS (i4MDS), a consortium of multidisciplinary experts, and created the following recommendations for standardized methodologies to monitor immune responses in MDS. A central goal of i4MDS is the development of an immune score that could be incorporated into current clinical risk stratification models. This position paper first consolidates current knowledge on MDS immunology. Subsequently, in collaboration with clinical and laboratory specialists, we introduce flow cytometry panels and cytokine assays, meticulously devised for clinical laboratories, aiming to monitor the immune status of MDS patients, evaluating both immune fitness and identifying potential immune "risk factors." By amalgamating this immunological characterization data and molecular data, we aim to enhance patient stratification, identify predictive markers for treatment responsiveness, and accelerate the development of systems immunology tools and innovative immunotherapies.

Latest Insights and Therapeutic Advances in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDSs) encompass a range of hematopoietic malignancies, commonly affecting elderly individuals. Molecular alterations in the hematopoietic stem cell compartment drive disease pathogenesis. Recent advancements in genomic profiling have provided valuable insights into the biological underpinnings of MDSs and have expanded therapeutic options, particularly for specific molecularly defined subgroups. This review highlights the diagnostic principles, classification updates, prognostic stratification systems, and novel treatments, which could inform future clinical trials and enhance the management of adult MDS patients, particularly for specific molecularly defined subgroups.

A novel t(X;21)(p11.4;q22.12) translocation adds to the role of BCOR and RUNX1 in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemias

In myeloid neoplasms, both fusion genes and gene mutations are well-established events identifying clinicopathological entities. In this study, we present a thus far undescribed t(X;21)(p11.4;q22.12) in five cases with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The translocation was isolated or accompanied by additional changes. It did not generate any fusion gene or gene deregulation by aberrant juxtaposition with regulatory sequences. Molecular analysis by targeted next-generation sequencing showed that the translocation was accompanied by at least one somatic mutation in TET2, EZH2, RUNX1, ASXL1, SRSF2, ZRSR2, DNMT3A, and NRAS genes. Co-occurrence of deletion of RUNX1 in 21q22 and of BCOR in Xp11 was associated with t(X;21). BCOR haploinsufficiency corresponded to a significant hypo-expression in t(X;21) cases, compared to normal controls and to normal karyotype AML. By contrast, RUNX1 expression was not altered, suggesting a compensatory effect by the remaining allele. Whole transcriptome analysis showed that overexpression of HOXA9 differentiated t(X;21) from both controls and t(8;21)-positive AML. In conclusion, we characterized a new recurrent reciprocal t(X;21)(p11.4;q22.12) chromosome translocation in MDS and AML, generating simultaneous BCOR and RUNX1 deletions rather than a fusion gene at the genomic level.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: An Update on Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are clonal myeloid neoplasms that cause life-limiting complications from severe cytopenias and leukemic transformation. Efforts to better classify, prognosticate, and assess therapeutic responses in HR-MDS have resulted in publication of new clinical tools in the last several years. Given limited current treatment options and suboptimal outcomes, HR-MDS stands to benefit from the study of investigational agents.Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal myeloid-lineage malignancies often characterized by high-risk genetic lesions, increased blood transfusion needs, constitutional symptoms, elevated risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and therapeutic need for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Use of blast percentage and other morphologic features to define myelodysplastic neoplasm subtypes is rapidly shifting to incorporate genetics, resulting in a subset of former HR-MDS patients now being considered as AML in presence of leukemia-defining genetic alterations. A proliferation of prognostic tools has further focused use of genetic features to drive decision making in clinical management. Recently, criteria to assess response of HR-MDS to therapy were revised to incorporate more clinically meaningful endpoints and better match AML response criteria. Basic science investigations have resulted in improved understanding of the relationship between MDS genetic lesions, bone marrow stromal changes, germline predispositions, and disease phenotype. However, therapeutic advances have been more limited. There has been import of the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib, initially approved for AML; the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax and liposomal daunorubicin/cytarabine (CPX-351) are under active investigation as well. Unfortunately, effective treatment of TP53-mutated disease remains elusive, though preliminary evidence suggests improved outcomes with oral decitabine/cedazuridine over parenteral hypomethylating agent monotherapy. Investigational agents with novel mechanisms of action may help expand the repertoire of treatment options for HR-MDS and trials continue to offer a hopeful therapeutic avenue for suitable patients.

Single-cell Multiomics Analysis of Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Clinical Response to Hypomethylating Therapy

Alterations in epigenetic marks, such as DNA methylation, represent a hallmark of cancer that has been successfully exploited for therapy in myeloid malignancies. Hypomethylating agents (HMA), such as azacitidine, have become standard-of-care therapy to treat myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), myeloid neoplasms that can evolve into acute myeloid leukemia. However, our capacity to identify who will respond to HMAs, and the duration of response, remains limited. To shed light on this question, we have leveraged the unprecedented analytic power of single-cell technologies to simultaneously map the genome and immunoproteome of MDS samples throughout clinical evolution. We were able to chart the architecture and evolution of molecular clones in precious paired bone marrow MDS samples at diagnosis and posttreatment to show that a combined imbalance of specific cell lineages with diverse mutational profiles is associated with the clinical response of patients with MDS to hypomethylating therapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

MDS are myeloid clonal hemopathies with a low 5-year survival rate, and approximately half of the cases do not respond to standard HMA therapy. Our innovative single-cell multiomics approach offers valuable biological insights and potential biomarkers associated with the demethylating agent efficacy. It also identifies vulnerabilities that can be targeted using personalized combinations of small drugs and antibodies.

MDS/CMML from resource-limited region: Characteristics and comparison to tertiary reference European center

INTRODUCTION

Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) are clonal myeloid malignancies, characterized by bone marrow failure leading to cytopenias (and possible myeloproliferation for CMML) and a high propensity to evolve to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and hematological features; the prevalence of MDS subtypes, R-IPSS, and the outcome of 106 Armenian MDS/CMML patients diagnosed over the 2008-2020 period in a single Armenian Hematology center and compare them to French MDS patients included in the GFM registry.

RESULTS

Median age in the Armenian cohort was 64 years (range 19-84) and 55% were males. The main MDS subtypes were MDS-MLD (29.2%) and MDS-SLD (27.3%), the least frequent was del 5q (0.9%). By comparison, a higher prevalence of MDS-MLD, MDS-EB2, and MDS-RS was found in the French cohort. Armenian patients' cohort generally had poor access to standard MDS treatment and 42.3% of the patients were transfusion dependent. Overall survival, however, did not significantly differ between Armenian and French cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Our study stresses issues regarding epidemiology, access to diagnosis, difficulties of risk stratification, and access to treatment.

The trajectory of prognostication and risk stratification for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

ABSTRACT

Risk stratification and prognostication are crucial for the appropriate management of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) or myelodysplastic neoplasms, for whom the expected survival can vary from a few months to >10 years. For the past 5 decades, patients with MDS have been classified into higher-risk vs lower-risk disease phenotypes using sequentially developed clinical prognostic scoring systems. Factors such as morphologic dysplasia, clinical hematologic parameters, cytogenetics, and, more recently, mutational information have been captured in prognostic scoring systems that refine risk stratification and guide therapeutic management in patients with MDS. This review describes the progressive evolution and improvement of these systems which has led to the current Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System.

Clinical decision-making and treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes

ABSTRACT

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) constitute a profoundly heterogeneous myeloid malignancy with a common origin in the hemopoietic stem cell compartment. Consequently, patient management and treatment are as heterogeneous. Decision-making includes identifying risk, symptoms, and options for an individual and conducting a risk-benefit analysis. The only potential cure is allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and albeit the fraction of patients with MDS who undergo transplant increase over time because of better management and increased donor availability, a majority are not eligible for this intervention. Current challenges encompass to decrease the relapse risk, the main cause of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation failure. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) constitute firstline treatment for higher-risk MDSs. Combinations with other drugs as firstline treatment has, to date, not proven more efficacious than monotherapy, although combinations approved for acute myeloid leukemia, including venetoclax, are under evaluation and often used as rescue treatment. The treatment goal for lower-risk MDS is to improve cytopenia, mainly anemia, quality of life, and, possibly, overall survival. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) constitute firstline treatment for anemia and have better and more durable responses if initiated before the onset of a permanent transfusion need. Treatment in case of ESA failure or ineligibility should be tailored to the main disease mechanism: immunosuppression for hypoplastic MDS without high-risk genetics, lenalidomide for low-risk del(5q) MDS, and luspatercept for MDS with ring sideroblasts. Approved therapeutic options are still scarcer for MDS than for most other hematologic malignancies. Better tools to match disease biology with treatment, that is, applied precision medicines are needed to improve patient outcome.

Next-generation therapy for lower-risk MDS

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are malignant myeloid neoplasms characterized by ineffective clonal hematopoiesis leading to peripheral blood cytopenia and a variable risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. In lower-risk (LR) MDS, as defined by prognostic scoring systems recently updated with the addition of a mutation profile, therapeutic options aim to reduce cytopenia, mainly anemia. Although options for reducing the transfusion burden have recently been improved, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), lenalidomide, hypomethylating agents, and, more recently, luspatercept have shown efficacy in rarely more than 50% of patients with a duration of response often far inferior to the patient's life expectancy. Nevertheless, several new therapies are currently under investigation aiming at improving cytopenia in patients with LR-MDS, mostly by targeting different biological pathways. Targeting ligands of the transforming growth factor β pathway has led to the approval of luspatercept in LR-MDS with ring sideroblasts or SF3B1 mutation, potentially replacing first-line ESAs in this population. Here, we also discuss the evolving standard of care for the treatment of LR-MDS and explore some of the most promising next-generation agents under investigation.

How to classify risk based on clinical and molecular modeling: integrating molecular markers in the risk assessment of myelodysplastic syndrome

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), also known as "myelodysplastic neoplasm," is a heterogeneous group of clonal myeloid neoplasms that typically affects older adults. The clinical phenotype, symptoms, and complications relate to the depth of cytopenia and progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The diagnosis of MDS relies on morphologic criteria, such as evidence of dysplasia, disordered maturation, and increasing blast counts, which separate the disease into histologic subtypes with different probabilities for progression to AML. The treatment of MDS is often risk-adapted depending on the prognostic profile of each patient's disease. There has been a coevolution of diagnostic and prognostic systems for MDS developed over the past 40 years, both of which have now incorporated molecular markers. The new International Prognostic Scoring System-Molecular (IPSS-M) improves partitioning of patients compared to prior versions with resultant upgrading of 34% of patients into higher-risk groups due to the presence of mutations. The new IPSS-M also more accurately distinguishes intermediate-risk patients separating them into two tiers. The two new diagnostic classifications include MDS defined by mutations in SF3B1 and TP53, though there are differences in diagnostic criteria. Future efforts to refine MDS prognostication could investigate the interface between MDS and clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance, expand access to genomic testing, obtain results in a less invasive manner, and develop treatment-response predictors and dynamic risk models.

Frontline treatment options for higher-risk MDS: can we move past azacitidine?

Although remarkable international efforts have been ongoing for over 17 years to improve upon azacitidine, representing the standard of care therapy for higher-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), there still has not been a positive randomized trial in comparison to azacitidine. Real-world data from numerous trials have shown similar results with a median overall survival of 14-18 months, a 40%-50% overall response rate, and a complete remission rate close to 20%. Despite these outcomes, 6 randomized controlled trials have failed to improve outcomes in this patient population, although relevant issues in some of these studies included improper dose adjustments of the hypomethylating agent, lack of placebo- controlled studies, and lack of overall survival (OS) as a primary endpoint, among others. Critical updates in MDS management include the development of molecular prognostication models (eg, the molecular international prognostic scoring system), updates in classification systems highlighting significant overlap in patients with MDS-increased blasts and acute myeloid leukemia (most relevant to TP53 mutations), and refinement of response criteria. Although these paradigm-shifting studies have had great impact in MDS management, the current ongoing randomized phase 3 trials were initiated prior, and prognostic stratification remains via the revised international prognostic scoring system) and with bone marrow blast counts of <20%. Notably, azacitidine + venetoclax, azacitidine + sabatolimab, and azacitidine + magrolimab have shown exciting results in large, single-arm studies and have completed accrual in placebo-controlled, double-blind studies with OS as a primary endpoint. We all eagerly await the results of these studies.

Treatment Considerations of Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms for Pathologists

The diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) has evolved over the years with the incorporation of genetic abnormalities to establish a diagnosis, their impact on risk stratification, prognostication, and therapeutic options. Hematopathologists are the cornerstone to establish an accurate diagnosis and ensure patients receive the best available treatment option. Hematopathologists and clinicians must work closely together to establish the best disease subclassification, by combining pathologic findings with the clinical presentation. This will ensure patients receive the best therapeutic approach by better understanding the disease entity. In this review, we discuss how we approach a bone marrow biopsy report in the management of MDS.

When to use which molecular prognostic scoring system in the management of patients with MDS?

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic cancers characterized by recurrent molecular alterations driving the disease pathogenesis with a variable propensity for progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Clinical decision making for MDS relies on appropriate risk stratification at diagnosis, with higher-risk patients requiring more intensive therapy. The conventional clinical prognostic systems including the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and its revised version (IPSS-R) have dominated the risk stratification of MDS from 1997 until 2022. Concurrently, the use of next-generation sequencing has revolutionized the field by revealing multiple recurrent genetic mutations, which correlate with phenotype and prognosis. Significant efforts have been made to formally incorporate molecular data into prognostic tools to improve proper risk identification and personalize treatment strategies. In this review, we will critically compare the available molecular scoring systems for MDS focusing on areas of progress and potential limitations that can be improved in subsequent revisions of these tools.

Pulmonary infection associated with immune dysfunction is associated with poor prognosis in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome accompanied by TP53 abnormalities

The aim of this study was to examine the characteristics and prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) accompanied by TP53 abnormalities and explore potential prognostic factors and treatment responses. This retrospective analysis included 95 patients with MDS and TP53 abnormalities and 173 patients with MDS without TP53 abnormalities at the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between January 2016 and June 2023. Among patients with TP53 abnormalities, 26 (27.4%) developed AML during the disease course, with a median transformation time of 5.7 months. Complex karyotypes were observed in 73.1% of patients, and the proportions of -5 or del(5q), -7 or del(7q), +8, and -20 or del(20q) were 81.8%, 54.5%, 30.7%, and 25.0%, respectively. These patients exhibited poor survival, with a median overall survival (OS) of 7.3 months, and had 1- and 2-year OS rates of 42.2% and 21.5%, respectively. The complete response rates for azacitidine monotherapy, venetoclax combined with azacitidine, decitabine monotherapy, and decitabine combined with low-dose chemotherapy were 9.1%, 41.7%, 37.5%, and 33.3%, respectively. Long-term survival was similar among the four treatment groups. Patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) had a median OS of 21.3 months, which trended to be longer than that of patients who did not undergo allo-HSCT (5.6 months; P = 0.1449). Patients with pulmonary infection at diagnosis experienced worse OS than those without pulmonary infection (2.3 months vs. 15.4 months; P < 0.0001). Moreover, 61.9% of patients with pulmonary infection had immune dysfunction, with a ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ T lymphocytes below two. Pulmonary infections and complex karyotypes were independent adverse prognostic factors for OS. In conclusion, TP53 abnormalities in patients with MDS were frequently accompanied by complex karyotypes, and treatments based on hypomethylating agents or venetoclax have limited efficacy. Pulmonary infections associated with immune dysfunction is associated with poor prognosis.

Subclones with variants of uncertain clinical significance might contribute to ineffective hemopoiesis and leukemia predisposition

BACKGROUND

Splicing modifications, genomic instability, and hypomethylation are central mechanisms promoting myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this real-life retrospective study, to elucidate pathophysiology of clonal hemopoiesis in hematological malignancies, we investigated clinical significance of mutations in leukemia-related genes of known pathogenetic significance and of variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) in a cohort of patients with MDS and AML.

METHODS

A total of 59 consecutive subjects diagnosed with MDS, 48 with AML, and 17 with clonal cytopenia with unknown significance were screened for somatic mutations in AML-related genes by next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

We showed that TET2, SETBP1, ASXL1, EZH2, RUNX1, SRSF2, DNMT3A, and IDH1/2 were commonly mutated. MDS patients also showed a high genetic complexity, especially for SETBP1. Moreover, the presence of SETBP1 wild-type or two or more simultaneous VUS variants identified a subgroup of AML and MDS patients with better outcome, while the presence of single SETBP1 VUS variant was related to a worse prognosis, regardless TET2 mutational status.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusions, we linked both pathogenic and VUS variants in AML-related genes to clonal hematopoiesis; therefore, we proposed to consider those variants as prognostic markers in leukemia and myelodysplasia. However, further studies in larger prospective cohorts are required to validate our results.

[Recent findings in myelodysplastic syndrome]

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a heterogeneous group of myeloid disorders characterized by peripheral blood cytopenias and increased risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML).Recent developments include the classification and the estimation of prognosis. In 2022 the former 2016 WHO classification was replaced by the ICC and WHO 2022 classification. Both classifications have included precursor lesions (CHIP and ICUS), both distinguish between three molecularly cytogenetically defined subgroups - del(5q), TP53, SF3B1 - and morphologically defined subgroups with differences in blast threshold (WHO: 20%; ICC: 10%) for the differentiation from AML. However, although prognostic factors influenced the classification-subgroups, it is important to distinguish the prognosis, which is crucial for optimal therapeutic decision making. Since 2022, the IPSS-M has been available for this purpose, which represents an expansion of the well-established IPSS-R. It could improve prognosis estimation by adding molecular data, recently this could have been confirmed in real world cohorts. The IPSS-M also represents an important extension with regard to prognosis estimation for patients with therapy-related MDS.In 2020 Luspatercept has been approved for transfusion-dependent lower risk MDS patients harboring ring sideroblasts ± an SF3B1 mutation after failure of an erythropoiesis stimulating agent. The COMMANDS trial has just reported an interim analysis, where the superiority of luspatercept in the 1st line compared to erythropoietin could be demonstrated. In addition, data from the phase III trial with Imeltelstat give reason to hope that we will be able to offer a new second-line therapy to LR-MDS patients. For higher risk MDS patients azacitidine therapy remains the standard of care, results of phase III trials of combination therapies must be awaited.

Performance of IPSS-M in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after hypomethylating agent failure

Evaluation of IPSS-M and exploratory prognostic model for MDS at the time of HMA failure.

A retrospective validation of the IPSS-M molecular score in primary and therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)

A molecular scoring system (IPSS-M) was recently proposed for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We conducted a retrospective study of adults with MDS referred 2019-2021. The primary outcomes were leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS). One hundred and forty-four patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2021 were analyzed. After IPSS-M re-stratification, 33% of patients were up-staged and 11% down-staged. Median follow-up was 2.8 years and 53 patients died (37%). Cumulative incidence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformation was 20% at 3 years post-diagnosis. International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), revised version (IPSS-R) was significantly associated with LFS (log-rank p = 9.2e-05; 'very high' vs. 'low' risk HR = 3.85, p = 5.8e-04) and OS (log-rank p = 7.2e-06; 'very high' vs. 'low' HR = 5.09, p = 1.7e-04). IPSS-M was also a significant predictor of LFS (log-rank p = 1.1e-06; 'very high' vs. 'low' HR = 4.97, p = 2.2e-05) and OS (log-rank p = 4.8e-07; 'very high' vs. 'low' HR = 6.42, p = 2.5e-05) while providing better discrimination than IPSS-R for both outcomes. This mutation-incorporating prognostic index has greater discriminative potential than IPSS-R to predict AML transformation and any-cause mortality.

Novel precision medicine approaches and treatment strategies in hematological malignancies

Genetic testing has been applied for decades in clinical routine diagnostics of hematological malignancies to improve disease (sub)classification, prognostication, patient management, and survival. In recent classifications of hematological malignancies, disease subtypes are defined by key recurrent genetic alterations detected by conventional methods (i.e., cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and targeted sequencing). Hematological malignancies were also one of the first disease areas in which targeted therapies were introduced, the prime example being BCR::ABL1 inhibitors, followed by an increasing number of targeted inhibitors hitting the Achilles' heel of each disease, resulting in a clear patient benefit. Owing to the technical advances in high-throughput sequencing, we can now apply broad genomic tests, including comprehensive gene panels or whole-genome and whole-transcriptome sequencing, to identify clinically important diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers. In this review, we give examples of how precision diagnostics has been implemented to guide treatment selection and improve survival in myeloid (myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia) and lymphoid malignancies (acute lymphoblastic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia). We discuss the relevance and potential of monitoring measurable residual disease using ultra-sensitive techniques to assess therapy response and detect early relapses. Finally, we bring up the promising avenue of functional precision medicine, combining ex vivo drug screening with various omics technologies, to provide novel treatment options for patients with advanced disease. Although we are only in the beginning of the field of precision hematology, we foresee rapid development with new types of diagnostics and treatment strategies becoming available to the benefit of our patients.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Improves Outcome in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Across High-Risk Genetic Subgroups: Genetic Analysis of the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1102 Study

PURPOSE

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) improves overall survival (OS). We evaluated the impact of MDS genetics on the benefit of HCT in a biological assignment (donor v no donor) study.

METHODS

We performed targeted sequencing in 309 patients age 50-75 years with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) intermediate-2 or high-risk MDS, enrolled in the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1102 study and assessed the association of gene mutations with OS. Patients with TP53 mutations were classified as TP53multihit if two alleles were altered (via point mutation, deletion, or copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity).

RESULTS

The distribution of gene mutations was similar in the donor and no donor arms, with TP53 (28% v 29%; P = .89), ASXL1 (23% v 29%; P = .37), and SRSF2 (16% v 16%; P = .99) being most common. OS in patients with a TP53 mutation was worse compared with patients without TP53 mutation (21% ± 5% [SE] v 52% ± 4% at 3 years; P < .001). Among those with a TP53 mutation, OS was similar between TP53single versus TP53multihit (22% ± 8% v 20% ± 6% at 3 years; P = .31). Considering HCT as a time-dependent covariate, patients with a TP53 mutation who underwent HCT had improved OS compared with non-HCT treatment (OS at 3 years: 23% ± 7% v 11% ± 7%; P = .04), associated with a hazard ratio of 3.89; 95% CI, 1.87 to 8.12; P < .001 after adjustment for covariates. OS among patients with molecular IPSS (IPSS-M) very high risk without a TP53 mutation was significantly improved if they had a donor (68% ± 10% v 0% ± 12% at 3 years; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

HCT improved OS compared with non-HCT treatment in patients with TP53 mutations irrespective of TP53 allelic status. Patients with IPSS-M very high risk without a TP53 mutation had favorable outcomes when a donor was available.

Updates on risk stratification and management of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms

The majority of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms patients present with anemia. Historically, these patients were treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), with modest responses. A subset of these patients with del(5q) may do better with lenalidomide. Recently, in randomized trials, luspatercept has shown better responses compared with ESAs in treatment-naive patients and imetelstat in patients refractory to ESAs. Other evaluated novel compounds (fostamatinib, H3B-880, roxadustat, pyruvate kinase receptor activator) have not yet shown meaningful efficacy. More needs to be done to improve outcomes; in pursuance of this, participation in clinical trials evaluating novel therapies should be encouraged. While lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms tend to have an indolent course, a subset of them has a dismal prognosis. Improving prognostication and serial monitoring will help in identifying high-risk patients for appropriate management.

Validation of the molecular international prognostic scoring system in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes defined by international consensus classification

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have varied prognoses and require a risk-adapted treatment strategy for treatment optimization. Recently, a molecular prognostic model (Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS-M]) that combines clinical parameters, cytogenetic abnormalities, and mutation topography was proposed. This study validated the IPSS-M in 649 patients with primary MDS (based on the 2022 International Consensus Classification [ICC]) and compared its prognostic power to those of the IPSS and revised IPSS (IPSS-R). Overall, 42.5% of the patients were reclassified and 29.3% were up-staged from the IPSS-R. After the reclassification, 16.9% of the patients may receive different treatment strategies. The IPSS-M had greater discriminative potential than the IPSS-R and IPSS. Patients with high, or very high-risk IPSS-M might benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. IPSS-M, age, ferritin level, and the 2022 ICC categorization predicted outcomes independently. After analyzing demographic and genetic features, complementary genetic analyses, including KMT2A-PTD, were suggested for accurate IPSS-M categorization of patients with ASXL1, TET2, STAG2, RUNX1, SF3B1, SRSF2, DNMT3A, U2AF1, and BCOR mutations and those classified as MDS, not otherwise specified with single lineage dysplasia/multi-lineage dysplasia based on the 2022 ICC. This study confirmed that the IPSS-M can better risk-stratified MDS patients for optimized therapeutic decision-making.

Evaluation of new IPSS-Molecular model and comparison of different prognostic systems in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome

A risk-adapted treatment strategy is of crucial importance in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Previous risk prognostic scoring systems did not integrate molecular abnormalities. The new IPSS-Molecular (IPSS-M) model, combing genomic profiling with hematologic and cytogenetic parameters, was recently developed to evaluate the associations with leukemia-free survival (LFS), leukemic transformation, and overall survival (OS). However, it has not yet been widely validated in clinics. This study aims to further validate the prognostic power of IPSS-M based on real-world data and to compare the prognostic value of different scoring systems in patients with MDS. IPSS-M Web calculator was used to calculate a tailored IPSS-M score of the enrolled patient (N = 255), and the risk category was defined correspondingly. We next compared the IPSS-M prognostic power to that of IPSS, IPSS-R, and WPSS. We found that IPSS-M risk classification was statistically significant for 3-year OS and LFS. Compared with other tools, IPSS-M was superior in sensitivity and accuracy for 3-year OS and LFS. The mapping C-index between IPSS-R and IPSS-M categories resulted in improved discrimination across the OS, but not LFS and leukemic transformation. The result of different treatment options indicated that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) can result in a better OS than those without allo-HSCT. In conclusion, IPSS-M was a valuable tool for risk stratification compared with other risk prognostic scoring systems. However, more studies should be conducted to explore the appropriate treatment options for different groups stratified by IPSS-M.

Impact of IPSS-M implementation in real-life clinical practice

Objectives

The IPSS-M is a recently published score for risk stratification in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), based on clinical and molecular data. We aimed to evaluate its relevance on treatment choice in a real-life setting.

Methods

We retrospectively collected clinical, cytogenetic and molecular data from 166 MDS patients. We calculated IPSS-R and IPSS-M scores and compared Overall Survival (OS) and Leukemia Free Survival (LFS). We also analyzed which patients would have been affected by the re-stratification in terms of clinical management.

Results

We found that 86.1% of the patients had at least one genetic alteration. The most frequent mutated genes were SF3B1 (25.9%), DNMT3A (16.8%) and ASXL1 (14.4%). IPSS-M re-stratified 48.2% of the patients, of which 16.9% were downgraded and 31.3% were upgraded. IPSS-M improved outcome prediction, with a Harrell's c-index of 0.680 vs 0.626 for OS and 0.801 vs 0.757 for LFS. In 22.2% of the cohort, the reclassification of the IPSS-M could potentially affect clinical management; 17.4% of the patients would be eligible for treatment intensification and 4.8% for treatment reduction.

Conclusions

IPSS-M implementation in clinical practice could imply different treatment approaches in a significant number of patients. Our work validates IPSS-M in an external cohort and confirms its applicability in a real-life setting.