Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study of Olanzapine for Chemotherapy-Related Anorexia in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric, Hepatopancreaticobiliary, and Lung Cancer

Oncological and Survival Endpoints in Cancer Cachexia Clinical Trials: Systematic Review 6 of the Cachexia Endpoints Series

BACKGROUND

In patients receiving anti-cancer treatment, cachexia results in poorer oncological outcomes. However, there is limited understanding and no systematic review of oncological endpoints in cancer cachexia (CC) trials. This review examines oncological endpoints in CC clinical trials.

METHODS

An electronic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases (1990-2023) was performed. Eligibility criteria comprised participants ≥ 18 years old; controlled design; ≥ 40 participants; and a cachexia intervention for > 14 days. Trials reporting at least one oncological endpoint were selected for analysis. Data extraction was performed using Covidence and followed PRISMA guidelines and the review was registered (PROSPERO CRD42022276710).

RESULTS

Fifty-seven trials were eligible, totalling 9743 patients (median: 107, IQR: 173). Twenty-six (46%) trials focussed on a single tumour site: eight in lung, six in pancreatic, six in head and neck and six in GI cancers. Forty-two (74%) studies included patients with Stage III/IV disease, and 41 (70%) included patients receiving palliative anti-cancer treatment. Ten studies (18%) involved patients on curative treatment. Twenty-eight (49%) studies used pharmacological interventions, 29 (50%) used oral nutrition, and two (4%) used enteral or parenteral nutrition. Reported oncological endpoints included overall survival (OS, n = 46 trials), progression-free survival (PFS, n = 7), duration of response (DR, n = 1), response rate (RR, n = 9), completion of treatment (TC, n = 11) and toxicity/adverse events (AE, n = 42). Median OS differed widely from 60 to 3468 days. Of the 46 studies, only three reported a significant positive effect on survival. Seven trials showed a difference in AE, four in TC, one in PFS and one in RR. Reported significances were unreliable due to missing adjustments for extensive multiple testing. Only three of the six trials using OS as the primary endpoint reported pre-trial sample size calculations, but only one recruited the planned number of patients.

CONCLUSION

In CC trials, oncological endpoints were mostly secondary and only few significant findings have been reported. Due to heterogeneity in oncological settings, nutritional and metabolic status and interventions, firm conclusions about CC treatment are not possible. OS and AE are relevant endpoints, but future trials targeting clinically meaningful hazard ratios will required more homogeneous patient cohorts, adequate pre-trial power analyses and adherence to statistical testing standards.

Oncology: What You May Have Missed in 2024

Over the past 5 decades, substantial advances in oncology have reshaped cancer care, reflecting the dynamic role of internal medicine physicians in patients' journey from screening to diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance. This review highlights 10 landmark studies from 2024 that address emerging therapies and evolving clinical standards. Immunotherapy remains a central focus, with checkpoint inhibitors redefining the management of solid tumors and showing expanded applications across disease sites and earlier stages of disease. Targeted therapies and antibody-drug conjugates, including trastuzumab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin, are enhancing precision treatment options in metastatic cancer. Meanwhile, advances in supportive care, such as magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate cancer screening, ponsegromab for cachexia, and celiac plexus radiosurgery for pain, show enhanced symptom management and quality of life for patients. These innovations highlight the critical role of multidisciplinary approaches, where internal medicine physicians contribute to co-management and toxicity monitoring, ultimately optimizing patient care. By staying current with these developments, internal medicine physicians are positioned to navigate complex oncologic care, ensuring that the benefits of novel therapies are maximized while mitigating their challenges.

Comprehensive insights into emerging advances in the Neurobiology of anorexia

BACKGROUND

Anorexia is a complex eating disorder influenced by genetic, environmental, psychological, and socio-cultural factors. Research into its molecular mechanisms and neural circuits has deepened our understanding of its pathogenesis. Recent advances in neuroscience, molecular biology, and genetics have revealed key molecular and neural circuit mechanisms underlying anorexia.

AIM OF REVIEW

Clarify the peripheral and central molecular mechanisms regulating various types of anorexia, identify key cytokines and neural circuits, and propose new strategies for its treatment. Key scientific concepts of review: Anorexia animal models, including activity-induced, genetic mutation, and inflammation-induced types, are explored for their relevance to studying the disorder. Anorexic behavior is regulated by cytokines, hormones (like GDF15, GLP-1, and leptin), and neural circuits such as AgRP, serotonergic, dopaminergic, and glutamatergic pathways. Disruptions in these pathways, including GABAergic signaling in AgRP neurons and 5-HT2C and D2 receptors, contribute to anorexia. Potential therapies target neurotransmitter receptors, ghrelin receptors, and the GDF15-GFRAL pathway, offering insights for treating anorexia, immune responses, and obesity.

Efficacy of triplet antiemetic prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with soft tissue sarcomas receiving consecutive-day doxorubicin and ifosfamide therapy

BACKGROUND

Doxorubicin and ifosfamide (AI) therapy for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is given as a 5-day continuous-dose chemotherapy regimen, and classified as carrying high emetic risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of triplet antiemetic prophylaxis, consisting of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone (DEX), and an NK1 receptor antagonist, against chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) induced by AI therapy, and to determine the prophylactic antiemetic effect of the addition of olanzapine (OLZ) to this triplet antiemetic prophylaxis in cases of poor antiemesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who received AI therapy for STS between October 2011 and October 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Patients who did not receive the standard triplet antiemetic prophylaxis of granisetron, DEX, and aprepitant were excluded. Primary endpoint was the rate of complete response (CR) and secondary endpoint was the rate of significant nausea prevention during the acute (days 1-6), delayed (days 7-10), and overall (days 1-10) periods. In addition, CR rate and significant nausea prevention during the acute phase were compared before and after the addition of OLZ in patients who received OLZ as antiemetic prophylaxis in the subsequent cycle due to poor antiemetic control.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients were analyzed. CR rate for all patients was 32.8% in the acute phase, 53.4% in the delayed phase, and 29.3% in the overall period. The significant nausea prevention rate was 19.0%, 43.1%, and 13.8%, respectively. Sixteen patients received additional OLZ as an antiemetic prophylaxis. Their CR rate before and after the addition of OLZ during the acute phase improved significantly, from 6.3 to 43.8% (P = 0.041). The rate of significant nausea prevention tended to improve, from 6.3 to 43.8% (P = 0.077).

CONCLUSION

Control of CINV with granisetron, DEX, and aprepitant was poor in patients with STS receiving AI therapy. Addition of OLZ to this standard triplet antiemetic prophylaxis may improve CINV control in the subsequent cycle in patients who experience inadequate CINV control during their first cycle of AI therapy.

Medication management: supportive care medications in older adults with cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review raises awareness regarding the lack of data available for healthcare professionals caring for older adults with cancer when using supportive care medications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Guidelines for supportive cancer care lack concrete recommendations on the appropriate use of medications in older adults with cancer. Some guidelines, such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Older Adult Oncology guideline, contain vital information for prescribers to consider when choosing a supportive care medication. Information at present in most guidelines is generally vague, identifying areas where caution is required in older adults, without specific details.

SUMMARY

Research is needed to assess the efficacy and safety of supportive cancer care medications in older adults.

Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted early-onset gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC) is a distinct subtype of gastric cancer with increasing incidence, characterized by unique clinical and pathological features. This propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study aims to compare the perioperative safety and outcomes of EOGC patients who underwent laparoscopic versus robotic radical gastrectomy, providing a scientific basis for surgical treatment of EOGC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 252 patients diagnosed with EOGC at or before the age of 45, who underwent robotic or laparoscopic radical gastrectomy between January 2015 and April 2021. After propensity score matching, 47 patients in the robotic surgery group and 94 in the laparoscopic surgery group were compared. The study evaluated intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, pathological results, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

The robotic surgery group showed less intraoperative bleeding (50 ml vs. 100 ml, p = 0.042) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (6 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.008) compared to the laparoscopic group. The number of positive lymph nodes was higher in the robotic group (median 2 vs. 1, p = 0.016), but the number of lymph nodes harvested did not significantly differ. No significant differences were found in overall survival (3-year OS: 65.9% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.596) and disease-free survival (3-year DFS: 61.4% vs. 61.7%, p = 0.765) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic resection for EOGC is non-inferior to laparoscopic surgery in terms of perioperative outcomes and long-term prognosis. This study suggests that robotic surgery may be a viable option for the treatment of EOGC.

MASCC antiemetic consensus recommendations: resource-limited settings

PURPOSE

Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains an essential supportive care need for patients receiving cancer treatment. Due to inadequate access to antiemetics in many countries, guideline-recommended CINV prophylaxis is not always possible. Our goal was to formulate antiemetic recommendations for resource-limited settings and define alternative antiemetic regimens for the CINV prophylaxis after highly (HEC) and moderately emetic chemotherapy (MEC), when NK1-receptor antagonists are not accessible.

METHODS

The recommendations based on the MASCC/ESMO 2023 Guideline Update were considered as the best option. The stratification based on a meta-analysis published by Filetti et al. (2023) was used in order to select and rank NK1-receptor antagonist-free regimens by their probability of achieving complete response. Alternative NK1-receptor antagonist-free regimens based on olanzapine are proposed, ranked by their efficacy as "better" and "good" options when "best" regimens recommended by the MASCC/ESMO 2023 Guideline Update were not available or affordable.

RESULTS

For the prevention of acute CINV, in patients receiving HEC (HEC-cisplatin and AC-HEC) with no access to an NK1-receptor antagonist, a 3-drug regimen including single doses of a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and olanzapine given before chemotherapy is recommended as an alternative option. Olanzapine and dexamethasone are recommended days 2-4 after chemotherapy. The O10PD regimen (10 mg olanzapine, palonosetron, and dexamethasone) is suggested as the alternative regimen in the category "better." Other 5-HT3-receptor antagonists (ondansetron, granisetron) may be used if palonosetron is not affordable (category "good"). No guideline is possible for the alternative regimens to prevent acute CINV following MEC because of limited (carboplatin, AUC ≥ 5) or unavailable data (oxaliplatin chemotherapy in women aged < 50 years). Limited data are also available on the management of CINV following trastuzumab-deruxtecan.

CONCLUSION

The most effective prevention of CINV recommended by the MASCC/ESMO 2023 Guideline Update must be given when available and affordable. These recommendations were developed to facilitate decision on which regimen to use when the best MASCC/ESMO 2023 recommended regimen is not accessible because NK1-receptor antagonists are either not available or not affordable.

Mechanisms and pharmacotherapy of cancer cachexia-associated anorexia

Cachexia is a multifactorial metabolic syndrome characterized by weight and skeletal muscle loss caused by underlying illnesses such as cancer, heart failure, and renal failure. Inflammation, insulin resistance, increased muscle protein degradation, decreased food intake, and anorexia are the primary pathophysiological drivers of cachexia. Cachexia causes physical deterioration and functional impairment, loss of quality of life, lower response to active treatment, and ultimately morbidity and mortality, while the difficulties in tackling cachexia in its advanced phases and the heterogeneity of the syndrome among patients require an individualized and multidisciplinary approach from an early stage. Specifically, strategies combining nutritional and exercise interventions as well as pharmacotherapy that directly affect the pathogenesis of cachexia, such as anti-inflammatory, metabolism-improving, and appetite-stimulating agents, have been proposed, but none of which have demonstrated sufficient evidence to date. Nevertheless, several agents have recently emerged, including anamorelin, a ghrelin receptor agonist, growth differentiation factor 15 neutralization therapy, and melanocortin receptor antagonist, as candidates for ameliorating anorexia associated with cancer cachexia. Therefore, in this review, we outline cancer cachexia-associated anorexia and its pharmacotherapy, including corticosteroids, progesterone analogs, cannabinoids, anti-psychotics, and thalidomide which have been previously explored for their efficacy, in addition to the aforementioned novel agents, along with their mechanisms.

Effects of olanzapine in the improvement of body weight and appetite in patients with cancer or receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the effects of olanzapine in the improvement of body weight and appetite in patients with cancer or receiving chemotherapy through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched the following databases from their inception to April 23, 2024: Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The mean difference (MD) and risk ratios were used to calculate by random effects models. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with > 5% weight gain.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies with 3457 participants were included. For primary outcomes, 1 study with 124 participants showed olanzapine increased the proportion of patients with > 5% weight gain compared with placebo (60% vs. 9%, P < 0.001). Versus active controls (3 studies, 439 participants), no significant difference in the proportion of patients with > 5% weight gain (RR = 1.69, 95%CI: 0.91 to 3.13, I2 = 27%, P = 0.10), with moderate-quality evidence. Olanzapine increased appetite scores compared to both placebo (1 study, 112 participants; MD = 3, 95%CI: 2.3 to 3.7, P < 0.001) and active controls (2 studies, 106 participants; MD = 4.96, 95%CI: 4.61 to 5.30, I2 = 0%, P < 0.01). For mean weight change, olanzapine showed no significant differences versus placebo (2 studies, 164 participants, MD = 2.78 kg, 95%CI: - 1.60 to 7.17, I2 = 48%, P = 0.21) or active controls (2 studies, 480 participants, MD = 0.44 kg, 95%CI: - 1.04 to 1.91, I2 = 58%, P = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

Olanzapine appears to be a potential option for improving appetite and weight gain in cancer patients. Future trials need to focus on the optimal target dose and use durations of olanzapine. Registered: https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-kpv4h-v .

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of olanzapine-based prophylactic antiemetic therapy for delayed and persistent nausea and vomiting in patients with HER2-positive or HER2-low breast cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan: ERICA study (WJOG14320B)

BACKGROUND

Nausea and vomiting are common adverse events associated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). We evaluated the efficacy of an olanzapine-based triplet regimen for preventing nausea and vomiting in patients receiving their first cycle T-DXd.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (ERICA) phase II study enrolled patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low metastatic breast cancer receiving their first cycle of T-DXd. Patients were randomized to olanzapine 5 mg or placebo once daily (1 : 1 ratio) from day 1 to day 6, plus a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone 6.6 mg intravenously or 8 mg orally on day 1. The total observation period was 504 h (21 days) from the first T-DXd administration. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no emetic events and no rescue medications, in the delayed phase (24-120 h after T-DXd), with the type I error rate of 0.2 (one-sided) for the comparison. Secondary endpoints included no nausea rate in the delayed and persistent phases (120-504 h), adverse event by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and patient-reported outcomes version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE).

RESULTS

In total, 168 patients were enrolled at 43 sites in Japan (November 2021-September 2023) with 162 patients (olanzapine, n = 80; placebo, n = 82) included in the per protocol set. The primary endpoint was met as the delayed phase CR rate was significantly greater with olanzapine than placebo (70.0% versus 56.1%, P = 0.047). Efficacy was maintained in the persistent phase (63.9% versus 44.4%). No nausea rate was also greater with olanzapine (delayed phase: 57.5% versus 37.8%; persistent phase: 51.4% versus 31.9%). CR rates in the delayed phase favored olanzapine across subgroups. Appetite loss was also decreased with olanzapine. Hyperglycemia and somnolence were mostly of low-grade severity.

CONCLUSION

Olanzapine 5 mg for 6 days with 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone appears effective for T-DXd-treated patients to prevent delayed and persistent nausea and vomiting.

Ponsegromab for the Treatment of Cancer Cachexia

BACKGROUND

Cachexia is a common complication of cancer and is associated with an increased risk of death. The level of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), a circulating cytokine, is elevated in cancer cachexia. In a small, open-label, phase 1b study involving patients with cancer cachexia, ponsegromab, a humanized monoclonal antibody inhibiting GDF-15, was associated with improved weight, appetite, and physical activity, along with suppressed serum GDF-15 levels.

METHODS

In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, 12-week trial, we assigned patients with cancer cachexia and an elevated serum GDF-15 level (≥1500 pg per milliliter) in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive ponsegromab at a dose of 100 mg, 200 mg, or 400 mg or to receive placebo, administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks for three doses. The primary end point was the change from baseline in body weight at 12 weeks. Key secondary end points were appetite and cachexia symptoms, digital measures of physical activity, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 187 patients underwent randomization. Of these patients, 40% had non-small-cell lung cancer, 32% had pancreatic cancer, and 29% had colorectal cancer. At 12 weeks, patients in the ponsegromab groups had significantly greater weight gain than those in the placebo group, with a median between-group difference of 1.22 kg (95% credible interval, 0.37 to 2.25) in the 100-mg group, 1.92 (95% credible interval, 0.92 to 2.97) in the 200-mg group, and 2.81 (95% credible interval, 1.55 to 4.08) in the 400-mg group. Improvements were observed across measures of appetite and cachexia symptoms, along with physical activity, in the 400-mg ponsegromab group relative to placebo. Adverse events of any cause were reported in 70% of the patients in the ponsegromab group and in 80% of those in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with cancer cachexia and elevated GDF-15 levels, the inhibition of GDF-15 with ponsegromab resulted in increased weight gain and overall activity level and reduced cachexia symptoms, findings that confirmed the role of GDF-15 as a driver of cachexia. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05546476.).

The multifactorial effect of obesity on the effectiveness and outcomes of cancer therapies

Epidemiology studies have demonstrated a clear association between obesity and the development of several distinct malignancies, with excessive visceral adiposity being an increasingly prevalent feature in patients with cancer presenting for therapeutic intervention. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have helped to inform effective and safe dosing of traditional systemically administered anticancer agents in adult patients with cancer and obesity, but there remains much debate not only regarding the effect of obesity on the more novel targeted molecular and immune-based therapies, but also about how obesity is best defined and measured clinically. Low muscle mass is associated with poor outcomes in cancer, and body composition studies using biochemical and imaging modalities are helping to fully delineate the importance of both obesity and sarcopenia in clinical outcomes; such studies might also go some way to explaining how obesity can paradoxically be associated with favourable clinical outcomes in certain cancers. As the cancer survivorship period increases and the duration of anticancer treatment lengthens, this Review highlights the challenges facing appropriate treatment selection and emphasizes how a multidisciplinary approach is warranted to manage weight and skeletal muscle loss during and after cancer treatment.

Melanocortin-4 receptor antagonist TCMCB07 alleviates chemotherapy-induced anorexia and weight loss in rats

Cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy often experience anorexia and weight loss that substantially deteriorates overall health, reduces treatment tolerance and quality of life, and worsens oncologic outcomes. There are currently few effective therapeutic options to mitigate these side effects. The central melanocortin system, which plays a pivotal role in regulating appetite and energy homeostasis, presents a logical target for treating anorexia and weight loss. In this preclinical study, we evaluated the efficacy of TCMCB07, a synthetic antagonist of the melanocortin-4 receptor, in mitigating anorexia and weight loss in several rat models of chemotherapy: cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and a combination of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil. Our results indicate that peripheral administration of TCMCB07 improved appetite, stabilized body weight, preserved fat and heart mass, and slightly protected lean mass after multiple cycles of chemotherapy. Furthermore, combining TCMCB07 with a growth differentiation factor 15 antibody enhanced treatment effectiveness. Similar effects from TCMCB07 treatment were observed in a rat tumor model following combination chemotherapy. No notable adverse effects nor increased chemotherapy-related toxicities were observed with TCMCB07 treatment. These findings suggest that peripheral administration of TCMCB07 holds promise as a therapeutic approach for alleviating chemotherapy-induced anorexia and weight loss, potentially benefiting numerous patients undergoing chemotherapy.

SEOM clinical guidelines for cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (2023)

Cancer-related anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) is a debilitating condition afflicting up to 80% of advanced-stage cancer patients. Characterized by progressive weight loss, muscle wasting, and metabolic abnormalities, CACS significantly compromises patients' quality of life and treatment outcomes. This comprehensive review navigates through its intricate physiopathology, elucidating its stages and diagnostic methodologies. CACS manifests in three distinct stages: pre-cachexia, established cachexia, and refractory cachexia. Early detection is pivotal for effective intervention and is facilitated by screening tools, complemented by nutritional assessments and professional evaluations. The diagnostic process unravels the complex interplay of metabolic dysregulation and tumor-induced factors contributing to CACS. Management strategies, tailored to individual patient profiles, encompass a spectrum of nutritional interventions. These include dietary counseling, oral nutritional supplements, and, when necessary, enteral nutrition and a judicious use of parenteral nutrition. Specific recommendations for caloric intake, protein requirements, and essential nutrients address the unique challenges posed by CACS. While pharmacological agents like megestrol acetate may be considered, their use requires careful evaluation of potential risks. At its core, this review underscores the imperative for a holistic and personalized approach to managing CACS, integrating nutritional interventions and pharmacological strategies based on a nuanced understanding of patient's condition.

Opportunities and Solutions: Unintentional Weight Loss

ABSTRACT

In this narrative review, the authors provide a concise overview of current information on the identification and management of unintentional weight loss (UWL) in clinical care settings. Unintended weight loss can occur widely and is often multifactorial. Clinicians should use screening tools to identify those experiencing UWL. Management includes nutrition assessments and diagnosing malnutrition when present. Nutrition counseling by a registered dietitian nutritionist should address the causes and manifestations of UWL. Individualized dietary plans with supplementation and/or nutrition support and medications for appetite stimulation may be considered. The presence of UWL at the end of life should be addressed in line with the patient's care plan. Managing UWL is part of the multidisciplinary care teams' responsibilities.

Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for cancer cachexia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cancer cachexia affects more than half of all cancer patients, reducing survival rates. Evidence-based approaches are urgently needed to optimize treatment.

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of different pharmacotherapies for cancer cachexia. Three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched for the period from January 1, 2000, to March 20, 2024. The netmeta package in R software was used to calculate the pooled effect, employing a random effects model.

RESULTS

Seven placebo-controlled randomized trials involving 1421 patients were analyzed. Pairwise analysis showed that body weight increases were 4.6 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-8.37 kg) for olanzapine, 3.82 kg (95% CI 0.73-6.91 kg) for espindolol (20 mg), 2.36 kg (95% CI 1.84-2.89 kg) for anamorelin (100 mg), and 1.31 kg (95% CI 0.42-2.19 kg) for anamorelin (50 mg). In terms of safety profiles, olanzapine demonstrated the lowest odds ratio when compared to placebo, at 0.26 (95% CI 0.07-0.94), followed by anamorelin (50 mg) at 0.86 (95% CI 0.30-2.48), and anamorelin (100 mg) at 0.89 (95% CI 0.42-1.88). However, network meta-analysis could not confirm the superiority of olanzapine over anamorelin in terms of efficacy and safety.

CONCLUSION

Both olanzapine and anamorelin are useful in improving body weight in patients with cancer cachexia. Personalization may be helpful for different patients.

A Biobehavioral Perspective on Caring for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Survivors with Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Among the potential complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is common and associated with significant physical and psychosocial symptom burden. Despite substantial advances in GVHD treatment, the global immune suppression that frequently accompanies GVHD treatment also contributes to high rates of physical and emotional suffering and mortality. The complex manifestations of GVHD and its treatment warrant a multidisciplinary team-based approach to managing patients' multi-organ system comorbidities. A biobehavioral framework can enhance our understanding of the complex association between medications, physical symptoms, and psychosocial distress in patients with GVHD. Hence, for this perspective, we highlight the importance of addressing both the physical and psychosocial needs experienced by patients with GVHD and provide guidance on how to approach and manage those symptoms and concerns as part of comprehensive cancer care.

Central neural mechanisms of cancer cachexia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cachexia is a devasting syndrome which impacts a large number of patients with cancer. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the central mechanisms of cancer cachexia. In particular, it focuses on the role of the central nervous system (CNS), the melanocortin system, circulating hormones and molecules which are produced by and act on the CNS and the psychological symptoms of cancer cachexia.

RECENT FINDINGS

A growing body of evidence suggests that a central mechanism of action underpins this multi-system disorder. Recent research has focused on the role of neuroinflammation that drives the sickness behaviour seen in cancer cachexia, with emphasis on the role of the hypothalamus. Melanocortin receptor antagonists are showing promise in preclinical studies. There are also new pharmacological developments to overcome the short half-life of ghrelin. GDF-15 has been identified as a core target and trials of compounds that interfere with its signalling or its central receptor are underway.

SUMMARY

Understanding the central mechanisms of cancer cachexia is pivotal for enhancing treatment outcomes in patients. While emerging pharmacological interventions targeting these pathways have shown promise, further research is essential.

Effects of a semi-interpenetrating network hydrogel loaded with oridonin and DNase-I on the healing of chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis

The aim of this study was to develop a semi-interpenetrating network (IPN) hydrogel system suitable for the oral environment, capable of controlled release of DNase-I and oridonin (ORI), to exert antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and reparative effects on chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis (OM). This IPN was based on the combination of ε-polylysine (PLL) and hetastarch (HES), loaded with DNase-I and ORI (ORI/DNase-I/IPN) for OM treatment. In vitro studies were conducted to evaluate degradation, adhesion, release analysis, and bioactivity including cell proliferation and wound healing assays using epidermal keratinocyte and fibroblast cell lines. Furthermore, the therapeutic effects of ORI/DNase-I/IPN were investigated in vivo using Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats with chemoradiotherapy-induced OM. The results demonstrated that the IPN exhibited excellent adhesion to wet mucous membranes, and the two drugs co-encapsulated in the hydrogel were released in a controlled manner, exerting inhibitory effects on bacteria and degrading NETs in wound tissues. The in vivo wound repair effect, microbiological assays, H&E and Masson staining supported the non-toxicity of ORI/DNase-I/IPN, as well as its ability to accelerate the healing of oral ulcers and reduce inflammation. Overall, ORI/DNase-I/IPN demonstrated a therapeutic effect on OM in rats by significantly accelerating the healing process. These findings provide new insights into possible therapies for OM.

Anamorelin for the Treatment of Cancer Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The following review will highlight the development of anamorelin to treat cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) including the potential benefits, limitations, and future directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid peptide hormone, is secreted by the stomach mucosa and regulates appetite, promotes lipogenesis, increases body weight, improves gastric motility, reduces catabolic wasting and inflammation. Several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials evaluating anamorelin, a ghrelin agonist, for the treatment of CACS have reported improvement in appetite and body composition including both lean body and fat mass; however, most studies noted no improvement in physical function as assessed by measuring non-dominant hand-grip strength. Common adverse effects of anamorelin include the development of diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia, and less frequently, hepatic abnormalities and cardiovascular events including conduction abnormalities, hypertension, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Anamorelin has the potential to stimulate appetite, improve gastric movement, and may have anti-inflammatory effects on patients with CACS. In patients with cancer, studies involving anamorelin combined with other multimodal treatments including nutrition counseling (branched chain amino acids, omega 3 fatty acids, and other nutrients), exercise, treatment of hormonal abnormalities including hypogonadism and hypovitaminosis D, and anti-inflammatory agents are needed. Compliance with multimodality treatment has been a barrier and future studies may need to incorporate motivational counseling to promote adherence.

Ageing-related considerations for medication used in supportive care in cancer

Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies have shown that a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) prior to a patient commencing systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) results in improved quality of life outcomes and is associated with a decreased risk of grade 3-5 toxicity; however, data are lacking in relation to adverse drug events (ADE) associated with supportive care medications. Supportive care medications are prescribed as prophylactic agents in a SACT regimen, for management of treatment related toxicity and for symptoms caused by the disease itself. While necessary, the commencement of SACT and supportive medications may cause, or exacerbate, a significant drug burden in older patients, some of whom may have existing comorbidities. For many medications, older adults are underrepresented in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling studies. In this article we will review ageing-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, as well as how these changes may impact supportive care medications. Additional considerations for prescribing these medications in older adults with cancer, such as polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications, drug-drug interactions, and anticholinergic burden, as well as ageing-related considerations and recommendations for supportive care medications commonly used in older adults with cancer are also reviewed.

Multidisciplinary Standards and Evolving Therapies for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is a challenging disease that presents at an advanced stage and results in many symptoms that negatively influence patients' quality of life and reduce their ability to receive effective treatment. Early implementation of expert multidisciplinary care with nutritional support, exercise, and palliative care for both early-stage and advanced disease promises to maintain or improve the patients' physical, social, and psychological well-being, decrease aggressive interventions at the end of life, and ultimately improve survival. Moreover, advances in treatment strategies in the neoadjuvant and metastatic setting combined with novel therapeutic agents targeting the key drivers of the disease are leading to improvements in the care of patients with pancreatic cancer. Here, we emphasize the multidisciplinary supportive and therapeutic care of patients with PDA, review current guidelines and new developments of neoadjuvant and perioperative treatments for localized disease, as well as the treatment standards and the evolving field of precision oncology and immunotherapies for advanced PDA.

Tryptophan metabolism and kynurenine metabolites in cancer: systemic nutritional and metabolic implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the role of Tryptophan (Trp) metabolism and Kynurenine (Kyn) metabolites in nutritional and metabolic changes in cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Trp is in part utilized for protein and neurotransmitters biosynthesis, but more than 95% is implicated in Kyn pathways. In this molecular cascade, metabolites are produced with distinct biological activities regulating the immune response and neurotransmission with potential implications in malnutrition/cachexia during cancer. Immune dysfunction is a phenomenon occurring during cancer and malnutrition. Kyn metabolites regulate lymphocytes activity and recent data in animals showed that the inhibition of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) via 1-methyl-tryptophan determines partial amelioration of inflammation, but no positive effects on the preservation of muscularity were observed. Kynurenines seem to contribute to muscle catabolism via NAD+ biosynthesis and ROS generation. Trp metabolism via the serotonin biosynthesis is involved in appetite control in cancer. Moreover, kynurenines have a role in determining fatigue in conditions associated with inflammation.

SUMMARY

Trp metabolism has implications in immune and energy balance in cancer. The modulation of Trp and kynurenines have impact on central nervous system mechanisms, including appetite, fatigue, and muscle wasting/cachexia. Research focusing on these clinical implications will open new scenario for therapeutic interventions aimed at counteracting nutritional derangements in cancer.

Should Cannabis be Used for Anorexia in Patients With Cancer?

Healthcare professionals are frequently asked about the benefits of cannabis for appetite or anorexia-cachexia syndrome. In popular culture, cannabis has a reputation of causing an increased hunger, slang termed "the munchies," so many patients consume this with the hope that it may improve the loss of appetite associated with serious illness such as cancer. There have only been a few randomized, controlled trials studying the controversial question as to if cannabis improves appetite. These studies are small and show no statistically significant benefit for appetite and one small study showed improvement of taste for foods. Due to regulation barriers, the studies have use synthetic products, not the products that represent what is more commonly used in the population, often whole flower smoked, vaporized or oral products. Despite the popularity of cannabis in culture, often touted as a panacea for all maladies, the evidence and education for several adverse effects and potential drug interactions have has yet to catch up with the cultural craze. International cannabis experts in the United States and Australia do not routinely certify patients for medical cannabis off trial for anorexia-cachexia, but one expert in Canada would consider use in selected cancer patients.

Updates in Cancer Cachexia: Clinical Management and Pharmacologic Interventions

Despite a better understanding of the mechanisms causing cancer cachexia (CC) and development of promising pharmacologic and supportive care interventions, CC persists as an underdiagnosed and undertreated condition. CC contributes to fatigue, poor quality of life, functional impairment, increases treatment related toxicity, and reduces survival. The core elements of CC such as weight loss and poor appetite should be identified early. Currently, addressing contributing conditions (hypothyroidism, hypogonadism, and adrenal insufficiency), managing nutrition impact symptoms leading to decreased oral intake (nausea, constipation, dysgeusia, stomatitis, mucositis, pain, fatigue, depressed mood, or anxiety), and the addition of pharmacologic agents when appropriate (progesterone analog, corticosteroids, and olanzapine) is recommended. In Japan, the clinical practice has changed based on the availability of Anamorelin, a ghrelin receptor agonist that improved lean body mass, weight, and appetite-related quality of life (QoL) compared to a placebo, in phase III trials. Other promising therapeutic agents currently in trials include Espindolol, a non-selective β blocker and a monoclonal antibody to GDF-15. In the future, a single therapeutic agent or perhaps multiple medications targeting the various mechanisms of CC may prove to be an effective strategy. Ideally, these medications should be incorporated into a multimodal interdisciplinary approach that includes exercise and nutrition.

An open, multicenter, exploratory study of apatinib mesylate maintenance therapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (ChiCTR1800019375)

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the efficacy of apatinib in maintenance therapy in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC).

METHODS

Twenty-six patients from three centers were enrolled from November 2018 to September 2021. These patients received 2 weeks apatinib, administered at 250 mg qd. Then apatinib dose may be administered to 500 mg qd continuous in 4 weeks cycle if no patients experienced adverse reaction. Enrolled patients can receive a combination of radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life (QOL) score, and adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

Median PFS of all patients was 3.2 months (95% CI: 2.06-4.33). Median OS of all patients was 7.3 months (95% CI: 2.14-12.46). The DCR was 92.3%. The ORR was 30.8%. In univariate analysis, the results showed that ECOG score 0-1 (HR = 0.31, p = 0.006) and treated with apatinib for more than 60 days (HR = 0.31, p = 0.003) were independent prognostic indicators affecting PFS, and ECOG score 0-1 (HR = 0.40, p = 0.027) and moderately differentiated or highly differentiated (HR = 0.38, p = 0.048) were independent prognostic indicators of OS. The most common adverse events among treated subjects included hypertension (46.1%), fatigue (42.3%), and hand-foot syndrome (23.1%). There were only two cases (7.7%) of Grade III or above adverse reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance therapy with apatinib is an effective and well-tolerated regimen in patients with R/M HNSCC.

Bridging gaps in cancer cachexia Care: Current insights and future perspectives

Cachexia is characterized by severe weight loss and skeletal muscle depletion, and is a threat to cancer patients by worsening their prognosis. International guidelines set indications for the screening and diagnosis of cancer cachexia and suggest interventions (nutritional support, physical exercise, and pharmacological treatments). Nevertheless, real-life experience not always aligns with such indications. We aimed to review the current state of the field and the main advancements, with a focus on real-life clinical practice from the perspectives of oncologists, nutrition professionals, and radiologists. Pragmatic solutions are proposed to improve the current management of the disease, emphasizing the importance of increasing awareness of clinical nutrition's benefits, fostering multidisciplinary collaboration, promoting early identification of at-risk patients, and leveraging available resources. Given the distinct needs of patients who are receiving oncologic anti-cancer treatments and those in the follow-up phase, the use of tailored approaches is encouraged. The pivotal role of healthcare professionals in managing patients in active treatment is highlighted, while patient and caregiver empowerment should be strengthened in the follow-up phase. Telemedicine and web-based applications represent valuable tools for continuous monitoring of patients, facilitating timely and personalized intervention through effective communication between patients and healthcare providers. These actions can potentially improve the outcomes, well-being, and survival of cancer patients with cachexia.

Vitamin and Mineral Supplementation, Weight Gain, and Poor Appetite in Patients With Cancer: Many Questions and Fewer Answers

Patients with cancer or with a history of cancer often seek nutritional advice. In turn, cancer health care providers are often asked questions related to nutrition and cancer. Should I take high-dose vitamins or other high-dose supplements? Should I take a regular-dose vitamin or other regular-dose nutritional supplements? Will I experience weight loss during postoperative chemotherapy? What should be my weight goals during and after adjuvant therapy? In the setting of advanced cancer, what should I do to keep my appetite and weight up? This review attempts to provide data-driven answers to some of these commonly posed questions.

Mirtazapine as Appetite Stimulant in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Anorexia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Currently there is no standard therapy to improve cancer-related anorexia, hampering survival. Mirtazapine has been suggested as a feasible option in this context.

Objectives

To assess the effect of mirtazapine on appetite and energy consumption in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial including adults was performed in a tertiary cancer care center from August 2018 to May 2022 with a follow-up of 8 weeks. Overall, 134 patients were screened; 114 were assessed for eligibility and 28 were excluded.

Interventions

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive mirtazapine, 15 mg, or placebo for 2 weeks followed by a dose escalation to 30 mg until week 8 or placebo. Both groups received nutritional assessment and dietary advice.

Main outcomes and measures

Appetite was assessed by the Anorexia Cachexia Scale and energy intake. Dietary parameters were evaluated at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks, with a 24-hour dietary recall, and energy quantification based on the Mexican system of nutritional equivalents.

Results

A total of 86 patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomized to the placebo (n = 43) or the mirtazapine group (n = 43). The mean (SD) age was 63.5 (11.2) years, 41 were women (57.7%) and had adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scale score of 1, stage IV NSCLC, and were receiving first-line treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There was no difference in appetite scores in patients who received mirtazapine or placebo after 4 and 8 weeks. After 4 weeks, mirtazapine significantly increased energy intake (379.3 kcal; 95% CI, 1382.6-576.1; P < .001) including proteins (22.5 g; 95% CI, 11.5-33.4; P = .001), carbohydrates (43.4 g; 95% CI, 13.1-73.8; P = .006), and fats (13.2 g; 95% CI, 6.0-20.4; P = .006). Fats intake was significantly higher in patients in the mirtazapine group (14.5 g vs 0.7 g; P = .02) after 8 weeks. The mirtazapine group significantly decreased the proportion of patients with sarcopenia (82.8% vs 57.1%, P = .03) at 8 weeks. Patients on mirtazapine tolerated the treatment well, but reported a higher perception of nightmares at 2 weeks based on a 10 cm VAS score (0 [25th-75th percentile, 0-1] vs 0 [25th-75th percentile, 0-0] in the control group; P = .009) but this finding was nonsignificant after 4 and 8 weeks.

Conclusion and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial of patients with advanced NSCLC, there was no difference in appetite scores in all patients who received mirtazapine or placebo, but the mirtazapine group had a significant increase in energy intake through the 4- and 8-week follow-up, mainly in fat intake, which is a better and crucial source of energy. The addition of mirtazapine in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and anorexia may help these patients achieve their energy requirements and improve health-related quality of life, specifically emotional and cognitive functioning.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04748523.

Diet and Nutritional Supplementation in Patients With Cancer: Is More Necessarily Better?

This editorial and the accompanying article summarize evidence-based guidelines that can inform dietary recommendations in oncology practices.

A Review of Olanzapine in the Treatment of Cancer Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CAS) is a multifactorial condition that is highly prevalent in advanced cancer patients and associated with significant reduction in functional performance, reduction in quality of life, and increased mortality. Currently, no medications are approved for this indication. Recently, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) released a rapid recommendation suggesting that low-dose olanzapine once daily may be used to treat cancer cachexia. Many questions still exist on how to use olanzapine for this indication in clinical practice. The objective of this review is to identify existing knowledge on the use of olanzapine for CAS.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted to identify the primary literature that involved olanzapine for anorexia and cachexia in cancer patients between 2000 and 2023.

RESULTS

Seven articles were identified and are discussed here, including two randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled studies, one randomized comparative study, two prospective open-label studies, one retrospective chart review, and one case report.

CONCLUSIONS

Low dose olanzapine (2.5-5 mg once daily) may be useful in the treatment of CAS for increasing appetite, reducing nausea and vomiting, and promoting weight gain. Further large-scale multi-center randomized placebo-controlled studies will be needed to investigate the impact of olanzapine on weight change in CAS patients.

Low-dose versus standard-dose olanzapine with triple antiemetic therapy for prevention of highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with solid tumours: a single-centre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Olanzapine is an effective antiemetic agent but it results in substantial daytime somnolence when administered at the standard dose. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of low-dose versus standard-dose olanzapine after highly emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with solid tumours.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial done in a tertiary care referral centre in India (Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai). Patients aged 13-75 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, who were receiving doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide or high-dose cisplatin for a solid tumour were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), with block randomisation (block sizes of 2 or 4) and stratified by sex, age (≥55 or <55 years), and chemotherapy regimen, to receive low-dose (2·5 mg) oral olanzapine or standard-dose (10·0 mg) oral olanzapine daily for 4 days, in combination with a triple antiemetic regimen. Study staff were masked to treatment allocation but patients were aware of their group assignment. The primary endpoint was complete control, defined as no emetic episodes, no rescue medications, and no or mild nausea in the overall phase (0-120 hours), assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population (ie, all eligible patients who received protocol-specified treatment, excluding those who had eligibility violations and who withdrew consent after randomisation). Daytime somnolence was the safety endpoint of interest. Non-inferiority was shown if the upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI for the difference in the complete control proportions between the treatment groups excluded the non-inferiority margin of 10%. This study is registered with the Clinical Trial Registry India, CTRI/2021/01/030233, is closed to accrual, and this is the final data analysis.

RESULTS

Between Feb 9, 2021, and May 30, 2023, 356 patients were pre-screened for eligibility, of whom 275 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (134 to the 2·5 mg olanzapine group and 141 to the 10·0 mg olanzapine group). 267 patients (132 in the 2·5 mg group and 135 in the 10·0 mg group) were included in the mITT population, of whom 252 (94%) were female, 15 (6%) were male, and 242 (91%) had breast cancer. 59 (45%) of 132 patients in the 2·5 mg olanzapine group had complete control in the overall phase versus 59 (44%) of 135 in the 10·0 mg olanzapine group (difference -1·0% [one-sided 95% CI -100·0 to 9·0]; p=0·87). In the overall phase, there were significantly fewer patients in the 2·5 mg olanzapine group than in the 10·0 mg olanzapine group with daytime somnolence of any grade (86 [65%] of 132 vs 121 [90%] of 135; p<0·0001) and of severe grade on day 1 (six]5%] vs 54 [40%]; p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that olanzapine 2·5 mg is non-inferior to 10·0 mg in antiemetic efficacy and results in reduced occurrence of daytime somnolence among patients receiving highly emetic chemotherapy and should be considered as a new standard of care.

FUNDING

Progressive Ladies Welfare Association.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with gastric cancer

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with gastric cancer (GC), published in late 2022 and the updated ESMO Gastric Cancer Living Guideline published in July 2023, were adapted in August 2023, according to previously established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with GC. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with GC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), coordinated by ESMO and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different Asian regions represented by the 10 oncological societies. The latter are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with GC across the different regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, whilst respecting the differences in screening practices, molecular profiling and age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies, between the different regions of Asia.

Addressing cancer anorexia-cachexia in older patients: Potential therapeutic strategies and molecular pathways

Cancer cachexia (CC) syndrome, a feature of cancer-associated muscle wasting, is particularly pronounced in older patients, and is characterised by decreased energy intake and upregulated skeletal muscle catabolic pathways. To address CC, appetite stimulants, anabolic drugs, cytokine mediators, essential amino acid supplementation, nutritional counselling, cognitive behavioural therapy, and enteral nutrition have been utilised. However, pharmacological treatments that have also shown promising results, such as megestrol acetate, anamorelin, thalidomide, and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, have been associated with gastrointestinal and cardiovascular complications. Emerging evidence on the efficacy of probiotics in modulating gut microbiota also presents a promising adjunct to traditional therapies, potentially enhancing nutritional absorption and systemic inflammation control. Additionally, low-dose olanzapine has demonstrated improved appetite and weight management in older patients undergoing chemotherapy, offering a potential refinement to current therapeutic approaches. This review aims to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underpinning CC, with a particular focus on the role of anorexia in exacerbating muscle wasting, and to propose pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies to mitigate this syndrome, particularly emphasising the needs of an older demographic. Future research targeting CC should focus on refining appetite-stimulating drugs with fewer side-effects, specifically catering to the needs of older patients, and investigating nutritional factors that can either enhance appetite or minimise suppression of appetite in individuals with CC, especially within this vulnerable group.

Evaluation of Anorexia in Cancer and Its Association with Autonomic Nervous System Activity Assessed by Heart Rate Variability

Alterations in the central nervous system in cancer patients are pivotal in determining appetite dysregulation and body weight loss (BWL). Autonomic nervous system activity was tested by measuring heart rate variability (HRV) in cancer patients presenting with anorexia. We considered inpatients with different types of cancer and investigated anorexia using their FAACT scores. HRV was evaluated by a three-channel Holter ECG. The domains of low frequencies (LF, sympathetic activity) and high frequencies (HF, parasympathetic activity) were calculated. Also, SDNN (autonomic activity) and RMSSD (parasympathetic activity) were assessed. We enrolled 56 patients with cancer and 23 controls. In cancer patients, RMSSD and SDNN were lower than in controls (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009). Sympathetic activity (LF nu) was lower in cancer patients than in controls (p = 0.023), including sympathovagal balance (LF/HF nu ratio) (p = 0.025). RMSSD was reduced in anorexic (p < 0.001) and non-anorexic (p = 0.003) cancer patients compared to controls. The SDNN was lower in anorexic cancer patients than in non-anorexic cancer patients (p = 0.025), and it was lower in anorexic cancer patients than in controls (p = 0.001). LF nu was lower in anorexic cancer patients than in controls (p = 0.015), as was LF/HF (p = 0.031). SDNN was negatively correlated with BWL in the cancer group (rho = -0.40; p = 0.007). Our data support the hypothesis that autonomic nervous system dysregulation exists in patients with cancer presenting with anorexia, with implications for its diagnosis and treatment.

Optimizing the Continuum of Care in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) still ranks as the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite the recent progress in the therapeutic algorithm of the advanced disease with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and next-generation HER2-directed therapies, survival rates remain poor, with a median survival hardly exceeding 12 months. Furthermore, only 40% of patients remain eligible for second- and later-line treatments due to the aggressiveness of the disease and the rapid deterioration of performance status (PS). Thus, current research is focusing either on the identification of novel treatment options or the development of personalized strategies to optimize the continuum of care and ultimately improve patients' outcome. In this article, we provide an overview of the current treatment landscape for advanced GC with a particular emphasis on later-line treatments and outline novel perspectives on the horizon.

The role of pharmacists in multimodal cancer cachexia care

Cancer cachexia is a complex syndrome, and multidisciplinary management has the potential to improve patient outcomes and efficiency of care. Multidisciplinary management consists primarily of exercise, nutrition, and pharmacotherapy. The pharmacist's role in cancer cachexia is to contribute to appropriate pharmacotherapy practices. For example, anamorelin is an oral drug with ghrelin-like effects that may improve the pathogenesis of cancer cachexia by stimulating appetite and increasing food intake and body weight. Many patients with cancer cachexia are under treatment with anticancer agents, and pharmacists need to determine whether symptoms such as anorexia and nausea are due to cancer cachexia or anticancer agents. Based on that determination, they are then expected to suggest supportive care to the physician. Provision of multidisciplinary care for cancer cachexia requires communication with not only physicians but also with nurses, dietitians, and other professionals so that nutritional therapy can be provided at the time cachexia is detected. However, the role of pharmacists in the management of cancer cachexia is not well established, and there is no evidence that pharmacist interventions are of benefit to patients. In this article, to contribute to the treatment of cancer cachexia by multidisciplinary care, we describe the role of pharmacists in cancer cachexia as currently practiced at our hospital. We also consider future challenges to this type of multidisciplinary care. Evidence concerning multidisciplinary treatment of cancer cachexia is scarce, including therapeutic agents, and there is a current lack of collaboration among medical professionals and education in cancer cachexia. Solving these problems will require efforts in the practice and evaluation of treatment for cancer cachexia.

The Incidence and Management of Cancer-Related Anorexia During Treatment with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Cancer-related anorexia is a common complication and frequently occurs in cancer patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). Anorexia contributes to malnutrition, body weight loss, and cachexia in affected patients. Furthermore, patients who experience anorexia have worse outcomes than those who maintain their appetite, highlighting the importance of managing anorexia and related symptoms. However, as the causes of anorexia are both diverse and interconnected, there have been challenges in evaluating and implementing effective interventions. In this review, we described the contributing factors to cancer-related anorexia and reviewed recent literature for the frequency of anorexia symptoms in patients treated with VEGFR-TKIs. Additionally, we evaluated the evidence for current interventions and the potential benefits of multimodal and multidisciplinary approaches to care. The frequency of anorexia symptoms in patients who received VEGFR-TKIs ranged from 14%-58% for all-grade anorexia and 0%-6% for grade 3 or 4 anorexia. While many of the interventions for cancer-related anorexia have minimal benefit or adverse events, recent advances in our understanding of cancer-related anorexia suggest that multimodal therapy with multidisciplinary care is a promising avenue of investigation. Several studies currently underway are anticipated to further assess the effectiveness of multimodal approaches.

Update on the treatment of cancer cachexia

Cancer cachexia is a complex multifaceted syndrome involving functional impairment and changes in body composition that cannot be reversed by nutritional support. Cancer cachexia is characterized by decreased skeletal muscle mass, increased lipolysis, and decreased food intake. Cancer cachexia decreases chemotherapy tolerance as well as quality of life. However, because no fully effective interventions are available, cancer cachexia remains an unmet need in cancer treatment. In recent years, several discoveries and treatments for cancer cachexia have been studied, and guidelines have been published. We believe that the development of effective strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer cachexia will lead to breakthroughs in cancer treatment.

Loss of appetite in patients with cancer: an update on characterization, mechanisms, and palliative therapeutics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past year, loss of appetite in patients with cancer has continued to be an area of active investigation. This review provides an update of recently published findings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the emergence of new cancer therapeutic agents, this symptom of loss of appetite continues to trouble patients, and it continues to be associated with poor survival. Recent preclinical research promises to lead to newer approaches and newer, more effective palliative agents. Recent clinical research shows that agents such as olanzapine, anamorelin, and cannabis either do or might palliate this symptom.

SUMMARY

Loss of appetite in patients with cancer remains an important area of clinical and research focus. Recent published data provide greater clarity with respect to how to palliate this symptom. Today, although clinicians have more options to palliate cancer-associated loss of appetite than ever before, questions remain unanswered about how to palliate this symptom optimally and how to improve the quality of life of patients who suffer from it.

Cancer Cachexia: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update

ASCO Rapid Recommendations Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual. The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options. See the Appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, online only).

Malnutrition, sarcopenia, and cancer cachexia in gynecologic cancer

Patients with gynecologic cancers are at risk for malnutrition, cancer cachexia, and sarcopenia. Accumulating data supports that malnourished patients with gynecologic cancer have worse overall survival, increased healthcare utilization and costs, and a higher incidence of postoperative complications and treatment toxicity than those who are not malnourished. Malnutrition is defined as insufficient energy intake, leading to altered body composition and subsequent impaired physical and cognitive function, and can result in sarcopenia and cachexia, defined as the loss of lean body mass and loss of body weight respectively. The etiology of cancer-related malnutrition is complex, resulting from a systemic pro-inflammatory state of malignancy with upregulation of muscle degradation pathways and metabolic derangements, including lipolysis and proteolysis, that may not respond to nutritional repletion alone. Numerous validated scoring systems and radiographic measures have been described to define and quantify the severity of malnutrition and muscle loss in both clinical and research settings. "Prehabilitation" and optimization of nutrition and functional status early in therapy may combat the development or worsening of malnutrition and associated syndromes and ultimately improve oncologic outcomes, but limited data exist in the context of gynecologic cancer. Multi-modality nutrition and physical activity interventions have been proposed to combat the biophysical losses related to malnutrition. Several trials are underway in gynecologic oncology patients to address these aims, but significant gaps in knowledge persist. Pharmacologic interventions and potential immune targets for combating cachexia related to malignancy are discussed in this review and may provide opportunities to target disease and cachexia. This article reviews currently available data regarding the implications, diagnostics, physiology, and intervention strategies for gynecologic oncology patients with malnutrition and its associated conditions.