Bias Against International Medical Graduates in the Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Recruitment Process: Findings From a Nationwide Survey of Fellowship Program Directors

Recruitment and Retention of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Physicians: A Report from the ASTCT Talent Acquisition Task Force

A shortage of transplant and cellular therapy (TCT) physicians is expected given the expansion of TCT indications and the scope of practice of TCT programs in recent years. American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) conducted a survey of early career transplant physicians and trainees to assess the factors that prompted them to pursue to career in TCT. This was a cross-sectional survey conducted via emails sent to the ASTCT membership. Fifty-nine respondents completed the survey. The vast majority of respondents decided to pursue a career in TCT during their hematology/oncology fellowship (41%), followed by during residency (25%) or medical school (18%), and a majority of them had some exposure to TCT in their clinical training already. The most common reason for choosing to specialize in TCT was interest in the clinical practice of TCT (81%) closely followed by the scientific allure of the field (75%). Most respondents were extremely committed to remaining in this field of practice. We found that those in the field report high levels of satisfaction despite factors that would otherwise predispose them to burnout. A systematic and sustained effort to promote trainee engagement that could result in improved recruitment and retention in the field of TCT is needed. Professional societies in partnership with educational institutions could conduct outreach and help attract trainees from diverse backgrounds.

Preparing for Fellowship in Internal Medicine With a Focus on Pulmonary or Critical Care Medicine: Major Principles and New Realities

In this article, the authors provide guidance for applicants to any subspecialty in the medical specialties matching program, with a particular focus on those seeking a match into a pulmonary or critical care medicine training program, or both. The preparation, application, interview, ranking, and match steps are used to discuss available literature that informs this process. Preparing a fellowship application is discussed in terms of personal career goals, and specific strategies are suggested that can help a candidate to assess a program's fit with those goals. In addition to review of recent data on virtual interviewing and interview questioning, the authors provide practical recommendations for candidates seeking to maximize their success in the current interview environment. Finally, key points about generating a rank order list are summarized. This resource will prove useful to any candidate pursuing medical subspecialty training in the current era.

A 15-Year Analysis of Supply and Demand for Hematology and Oncology Training in the United States

PURPOSE

There is a paucity of research on the supply of the hematology and oncology workforce despite projected shortages in the United States Over the past 15 years of the hematology and oncology match (HOM), we hypothesized that there would be more growth in the number of training positions relative to applicants, higher match rates for US allopathic graduates relative to non-US allopathic graduates, and fewer applicants matching at their top fellowship choices.

METHODS

This was a national, retrospective cohort study of all applicants in the HOM (2009-2023). Match rates and applicant-to-training position ratios were calculated and compared over time with Pearson tests.

RESULTS

Growth in the number of annual training positions (426-708; 66% increase) exceeded growth in the number of interested applicants (706-945; 34% increase; P < .001). Annual applicant-to-training position ratios decreased from 1.7 to 1.3 (r = -0.813; P < .001). Match rates increased over the study period for both US allopathic graduates (79%-88%; r = 0.761; P = .001) and non-US allopathic graduates (45%-63%; r = 0.801; P < .001). During each year, match rates for US allopathic graduates exceeded those for non-US allopathic graduates (P < .001). From 2018 to 2023, US allopathic graduates (83%) had higher match rates than US osteopathic graduates (60%) and international medical graduates (50%; P < .001). The percentage of applicants that matched at one of their top three fellowship choices increased from 53% to 60% (r = 0.480; P = .070). Fewer available annual training positions went unfilled over the study period (3%-0.3%; r = - 0.870; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Match rates have increased in the HOM but remain competitive especially for non-US allopathic graduates. Future investigation is needed to understand disparities in match outcomes by additional applicant and fellowship program characteristics. Ongoing surveillance of HOM outcomes remains critical given the projected shortages in the US hematology and oncology workforce.

Demographics, motivations, and experiences of participants in transplantation or cellular therapy fellowships

BACKGROUND

Recent ASTCT guidelines have sought to establish clinical and research expectations for participants in blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) and cellular therapy (CT) fellowships. However, little is known about participants in BMT/CT fellowships and the value they find from this additional training.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the demographics, motivations, and experiences of recent participants in BMT/CT fellowships.

METHODS

We developed a 27-item online survey addressing backgrounds, application processes, training experiences, and perceived benefits among physicians who had started a clinical US-based BMT/CT fellowship between 2012-2021. Anonymous responses were solicited through program director outreach, society website postings, targeted emails, and social media.

RESULTS

Of 105 respondents (44% pediatric trainees), 4% were underrepresented minorities (URM) and 39% were non-US international medical graduates (IMGs). The most important motivations for applying were comfort with allogeneic BMT, improved career prospects, and opportunities for research and publication. Almost all respondents (92%) attended donor selection meetings, while smaller proportions visited cell processing facilities (65%), HLA labs (57%), or GMP facilities (22%). Most respondents reported ≥1 publication (26% reported 4+) based on research or experiences during their fellowship. Respondents reported improved post-fellowship comfort with all queried BMT/CT-related competencies. Seventy percent of respondents stated that they would recommend their fellowship highly to others; this corresponded to a Net Promoter Score of +65%, consistent with a strongly positive experience. Most respondents reported currently being in clinical practice (89% at academic centers), with a median of 70% of time currently spent caring for BMT/CT recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

While limited by recruitment methods and recall bias, our study demonstrated that BMT/CT fellowships are effective at increasing comfort with BMT/CT management and that most participants would highly recommend this BMT/CT training to others. Nevertheless, our study identified substantial heterogeneity in clinical responsibilities and BMT/CT-related laboratory exposure. The high representation of non-US IMGs underscores the distinct role of BMT/CT fellowships for this group, while improved URM recruitment remains an important future direction for the field. Whether advanced fellowships will ever become required for the future BMT/CT workforce, analogous to the additional training required for solid organ transplantation in other medical and pediatric subspecialties, remains uncertain.