1
|
Chen JF, Al-Ahmadie H. Molecular Classification of Urothelial Carcinoma. Surg Pathol Clin 2025; 18:41-51. [PMID: 39890308 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2024.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2025]
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma exhibits a wide spectrum of morphologic and molecular heterogeneity. Advances in molecular testing have improved our understanding of the molecular biology of urothelial carcinoma, including recurrent genomic alterations and transcriptomic features, leading to the development of molecular classification schemes with potential therapeutic implications. This review summarizes the molecular characteristics of urothelial carcinoma, focusing on genomic and transcriptomic features, updates on variant histology, and novel biomarkers that may guide contemporary and future clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie-Fu Chen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Hikmat Al-Ahmadie
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gandara DR, Agarwal N, Gupta S, Klempner SJ, Andrews MC, Mahipal A, Subbiah V, Eskander RN, Carbone DP, Riess JW, Sammons S, Snider J, Bouzit L, Cho-Phan C, Price M, Li G, Quintanilha JCF, Huang RSP, Ross JS, Fabrizio D, Oxnard GR, Graf RP. Tumor mutational burden and survival on immune checkpoint inhibition in >8000 patients across 24 cancer types. J Immunother Cancer 2025; 13:e010311. [PMID: 39915003 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/14/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is uncertainty around clinical applicability of tumor mutational burden (TMB) across cancer types, in part because of inconsistency between TMB measurements from different platforms. The KEYNOTE 158 trial supported United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Foundation Medicine test (FoundationOneCDx) at TMB≥10 mut/Mb as a companion diagnostic (CDx) for single-agent pembrolizumab in second+line. Using a large real-world dataset with validated survival endpoint data, we evaluated clinical validity of TMB measurement by the test in over 8000 patients across 24 cancer types who received single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). METHODS Patients with advanced-stage cancers from 24 cancer types treated with single-agent anti-PD(L)1 therapy in standard-of-care settings were included. Deidentified data from electronic health records from approximately 280 cancer treatment facilities were captured into a clinico-genomic database. This study used the TMB algorithm from the FDA-approved test supporting solid tumor CDx and composite mortality variable validated against the national death index: real-world overall survival (rwOS). Following a prespecified analysis plan, rwOS by TMB level was assessed using Cox PH models adjusted for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, prior treatment, microsatellite instability, sex, age, opioid rx pretherapy, and socioeconomic assessment. RESULTS 8440 patients met inclusion criteria. Adjusting for aforementioned factors, increasing TMB was significantly associated with rwOS across tumor types; HRs (95% CIs) relative to TMB<5: TMB 5 to <10: 0.95 (0.89 to 1.02), TMB 10 to <20: 0.79 (0.73 to 0.85), TMB≥20: 0.52 (0.47 to 0.58). For individual cancer types with prespecified statistical power, adjusted rwOS comparing TMB≥10 vs TMB<10 significantly favored TMB≥10 in 9 of 10 cancer types. In microsatellite stable subcohorts (except colorectal cancer), TMB≥10 remained associated with enriched ICI benefit. Exploratory assessments of patients receiving ICI+chemotherapy (n=4369) observed more favorable rwOS only in TMB≥20. CONCLUSIONS Across >8000 patients treated with single-agent ICI, and within individual cancer types with sufficient power, elevated TMB based on the FDA-approved CDx was associated with more favorable rwOS compared with similar patients with lower TMB levels. This biomarker deserves further clinical investigation to potentially guide the use of immunotherapy in expanded clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Gandara
- Department of Medicine, Cancer Ctr So./Division of Hematologic & Oncology, UC Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Utah Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Samuel J Klempner
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Miles C Andrews
- Department of Medicine, Monash University Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amit Mahipal
- Lake Health University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ramez N Eskander
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, UC San Diego Health Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - David P Carbone
- The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jonathan W Riess
- UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Sarah Sammons
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | - Megan Price
- Flatiron Health Inc, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gerald Li
- Foundation Medicine Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ryon P Graf
- Foundation Medicine Inc, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mouawad A, Boutros M, Chartouni A, Attieh F, Kourie HR. Tumor mutational burden: why is it still a controversial agnostic immunotherapy biomarker? Future Oncol 2025; 21:493-499. [PMID: 39711461 PMCID: PMC11812421 DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2444862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2024] [Accepted: 12/17/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024] Open
Abstract
For the past few years, researchers and oncologists have been pushing to find biomarkers that would help predict which treatment option would best work on a patient. Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) is one of the latest biomarkers that is being studied and considered as a promising agnostic immunotherapy biomarker. However, it still shows controversial results in studies due to the difficulty in finding solid comparable results. This is a consequence of different cutoff definitions among many cancer types, age ranges, and the use of different sequencing assays, in addition to its association with other biomarkers such as PD-L1. Finally, the use of composite biomarkers to assess the genetic signature of a tumor might be the way forward to seriously use TMB as an agnostic biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Mouawad
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth, Beyrouth, Lebanon
| | - Marc Boutros
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth, Beyrouth, Lebanon
| | - Antoine Chartouni
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth, Beyrouth, Lebanon
| | - Fouad Attieh
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth, Beyrouth, Lebanon
| | - Hampig Raphaël Kourie
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth, Beyrouth, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fléchon A, Morales-Barrera R, Powles T, Alva A, Özgüroğlu M, Csöszi T, Loriot Y, Rodriguez-Vida A, Géczi L, Cheng SY, Fradet Y, Oudard S, Vulsteke C, Gunduz S, Mamtani R, Yu EY, Montesa Pino A, Anido U, Sendur MA, Gravis G, Révész J, Kostorov V, Huillard O, Ma J, Rajasagi M, Vajdi A, Lunceford J, Cristescu R, Imai K, Homet Moreno B, Matsubara N. Association of Tumor Mutational Burden and PD-L1 with the Efficacy of Pembrolizumab with or without Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:5353-5364. [PMID: 39475359 PMCID: PMC11609623 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The three-arm, phase III KEYNOTE-361 study did not meet its dual primary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) with first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma. This prespecified exploratory analysis assessed the association of tumor mutational burden (TMB) and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) with clinical outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS TMB and PD-L1 CPS were determined via whole-exome sequencing and PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx, respectively. The association was evaluated in each treatment arm using logistic regression [objective response rate (ORR)] and Cox proportional hazards regression models (PFS and OS); one-sided (pembrolizumab monotherapy; pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy) and two-sided (chemotherapy) nominal P values were calculated. Significance was prespecified at α = 0.05 without multiplicity adjustment. Efficacy was evaluated by prespecified cutoffs of 175 mutations/exome (TMB) and CPS 10 (PD-L1). RESULTS Of the 993 treated patients, 820 (82.6%) and 993 (100%) had evaluable TMB and CPS data, respectively. Continuous TMB was positively associated with ORR, PFS, and OS for pembrolizumab monotherapy (one-sided P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.007, respectively); PFS and OS for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (one-sided P = 0.007 and P = 0.010, respectively); and OS for chemotherapy alone (two-sided P = 0.040). Continuous PD-L1 CPS showed evidence of anticipated association with ORR and PFS for pembrolizumab monotherapy. The subgroup with TMB ≥175 mutations/exome and PD-L1 CPS ≥10 had the highest PFS and OS improvements with pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that TMB may be predictive of the response to pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- B7-H1 Antigen/genetics
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Mutation
- Female
- Male
- Aged
- Middle Aged
- Exome Sequencing
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/genetics
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality
- Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Urologic Neoplasms/genetics
- Urologic Neoplasms/pathology
- Urologic Neoplasms/mortality
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/genetics
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
- Aged, 80 and over
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aude Fléchon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Rafael Morales-Barrera
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts Health NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ajjai Alva
- University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Mustafa Özgüroğlu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tibor Csöszi
- County Oncology Centre, Hetényi Géza Hospital, Szolnok, Hungary
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Alejo Rodriguez-Vida
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lajos Géczi
- Medical Oncology Center and the National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Susanna Y. Cheng
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Yves Fradet
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Stéphane Oudard
- Georges Pompidou European Hospital, University Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Christof Vulsteke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maria Middelares Hospital, Gent, Belgium
- Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Seyda Gunduz
- Istinye University Liv Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- Minimally Invasive Therapeutics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Ronac Mamtani
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Evan Y. Yu
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Alvaro Montesa Pino
- UGC Medical Oncology, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Urbano Anido
- Department of Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Mehmet A.N. Sendur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - János Révész
- Institute of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology, Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County Hospital and University Teaching Hospital, Miskolc, Hungary
| | - Vladimir Kostorov
- Leningrad Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ulitsa Savushkina, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Olivier Huillard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Cochin, Institut du Cancer Paris, Cancer Research for Personalized Medicine (CARPEM), AP-HP Centre, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Larroquette M, Lefort F, Domblides C, Héraudet L, Robert G, Ravaud A, Gross-Goupil M. How Immunotherapy Has Redefined the Treatment Paradigm of Metastatic or Locally Advanced Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1780. [PMID: 38730732 PMCID: PMC11083785 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
In the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal for metastatic bladder cancer has expanded considerably, with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin, and anti-fibroblast growth factor receptor agents. Clinical trials evaluating ICIs as neoadjuvants, adjuvants, or first- or second-line treatments have produced conflicting results. However, first-line therapeutic strategies have been redefined by the recent publication of results from two clinical trials: CheckMate-901, which demonstrated the superiority of combined treatment with nivolumab and chemotherapy in extending overall survival, and EV-302, which demonstrated that combined treatment with pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin reduced the risk of death by 53%. In this review, we discuss the role of ICIs, alone or in combination, in bladder cancer management in the metastatic and adjuvant settings in 2024, considering the latest published trials. The potential role of ICIs as neoadjuvants is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Larroquette
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital Saint André, University Hospital of Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
- Bordeaux University, CNRS UMR 5095, IBGC, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Félix Lefort
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital Saint André, University Hospital of Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Charlotte Domblides
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital Saint André, University Hospital of Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
- ImmunoConcEpt, CNRS UMR 5164, Bordeaux University, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Luc Héraudet
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital Saint André, University Hospital of Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Grégoire Robert
- Urology Department, University Hospital of Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Alain Ravaud
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital Saint André, University Hospital of Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital Saint André, University Hospital of Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Singh H, Sahgal P, Kapner K, Corsello SM, Gupta H, Gujrathi R, Li YY, Cherniack AD, El Alam R, Kerfoot J, Andrews E, Lee A, Nambiar C, Hannigan AM, Remland J, Brais L, Leahy ME, Rubinson DA, Schlechter BL, Meyerson M, Kuang Y, Paweletz CP, Lee JK, Quintanilha JC, Aguirre AJ, Perez KJ, Huffman BM, Rossi H, Abrams TA, Kabraji S, Trusolino L, Bertotti A, Sicinska ET, Parikh AR, Wolpin BM, Schrock AB, Giannakis M, Ng K, Meyerhardt JA, Hornick JL, Sethi NS, Cleary JM. RAS/RAF Comutation and ERBB2 Copy Number Modulates HER2 Heterogeneity and Responsiveness to HER2-directed Therapy in Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:1669-1684. [PMID: 38345769 PMCID: PMC11018475 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-2581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE ERBB2-amplified colorectal cancer is a distinct molecular subtype with expanding treatments. Implications of concurrent oncogenic RAS/RAF alterations are not known. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Dana-Farber and Foundation Medicine Inc. Colorectal cancer cohorts with genomic profiling were used to identify ERBB2-amplified cases [Dana-Farber, n = 47/2,729 (1.7%); FMI, n = 1857/49,839 (3.7%)]. Outcomes of patients receiving HER2-directed therapies are reported (Dana-Farber, n = 9; Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine clinicogenomic database, FH-FMI CGDB, n = 38). Multisite HER2 IHC and genomic profiling were performed to understand HER2 intratumoral and interlesional heterogeneity. The impact of concurrent RAS comutations on the effectiveness of HER2-directed therapies were studied in isogenic colorectal cancer cell lines and xenografts. RESULTS ERBB2 amplifications are enriched in left-sided colorectal cancer. Twenty percent of ERBB2-amplified colorectal cancers have co-occurring oncogenic RAS/RAF alterations. While RAS/RAF WT colorectal cancers typically have clonal ERBB2 amplification, colorectal cancers with co-occurring RAS/RAF alterations have lower level ERRB2 amplification, higher intratumoral heterogeneity, and interlesional ERBB2 discordance. These distinct genomic patterns lead to differential responsiveness and patterns of resistance to HER2-directed therapy. ERBB2-amplified colorectal cancer with RAS/RAF alterations are resistant to trastuzumab-based combinations, such as trastuzumab/tucatinib, but retain sensitivity to trastuzumab deruxtecan in in vitro and murine models. Trastuzumab deruxtecan shows clinical efficacy in cases with high-level ERBB2-amplified RAS/RAF coaltered colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS Co-occurring RAS/RAF alterations define a unique subtype of ERBB2-amplified colorectal cancer that has increased intratumoral heterogeneity, interlesional discordance, and resistance to trastuzumab-based combinations. Further examination of trastuzumab deruxtecan in this previously understudied cohort of ERBB2-amplified colorectal cancer is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harshabad Singh
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Pranshu Sahgal
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge MA, USA
| | - Kevin Kapner
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | | | - Hersh Gupta
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge MA, USA
| | - Rahul Gujrathi
- Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center and Boston University, Boston, MA USA
| | - Yvonne Y. Li
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge MA, USA
| | - Andrew D. Cherniack
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge MA, USA
| | - Raquelle El Alam
- Department of Radiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Joseph Kerfoot
- Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Elizabeth Andrews
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Annette Lee
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Chetan Nambiar
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Alison M. Hannigan
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Joshua Remland
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Lauren Brais
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Meghan E. Leahy
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Douglas A. Rubinson
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Benjamin L. Schlechter
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Matthew Meyerson
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge MA, USA
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Yanan Kuang
- Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Cloud P. Paweletz
- Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | | | | | - Andrew J. Aguirre
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge MA, USA
| | - Kimberly J. Perez
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Brandon M. Huffman
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Humberto Rossi
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Thomas A. Abrams
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Sheheryar Kabraji
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Livio Trusolino
- Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| | - Andrea Bertotti
- Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| | - Ewa T. Sicinska
- Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Aparna R. Parikh
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Brian M. Wolpin
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | | | - Marios Giannakis
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Jason L. Hornick
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Nilay S. Sethi
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - James M. Cleary
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fukuokaya W, Koike Y, Yata Y, Komura K, Uchimoto T, Tsujino T, Saruta M, Takahara K, Fujita K, Minami T, Adachi T, Hirasawa Y, Hashimoto T, Ohno Y, Uemura H, Shiroki R, Azuma H, Kimura T. Real world evidence of enfortumab vedotin in patients with advanced urothelial cancer: A multicenter observational study. Int J Urol 2024; 31:342-347. [PMID: 38113343 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the characteristics of patients and assess the effectiveness of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in those with treatment-resistant advanced urothelial cancer in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicenter observational study was conducted on 103 evaluable patients with advanced urothelial cancer who received EV. Outcomes were assessed by radiographic response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), with treatment-related adverse events (trAEs). Radiographic response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, while trAEs were studied in line with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. RESULTS The median follow-up was 8.9 months (range, 0.1-16.4). The observed objective response rate was 50.5%. The median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 4.7-9.8), and the median OS was 14.5 months (95% CI: 12.4-not reached). Out of the 103 patients, 19 (18.4%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or more, 14 (14.7%) had an non-urothelial carcinoma histology, and 40 (38.3%) had at least one pre-existing comorbidity. There were 26 (25.2%) patients who reported 49 trAEs, with 9 (18.3%) being grade 3 or higher. The most common trAEs included rash, occurring in 18.4%. CONCLUSIONS This study describes the characteristics and outcomes of patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer receiving EV. The findings demonstrate that EV showed robust anti-tumor activity and had manageable safety profiles outside the clinical trial setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuhei Koike
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuji Yata
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Komura
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
- Translational Research Program, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Taizo Uchimoto
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuya Tsujino
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masanobu Saruta
- Department of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Takahara
- Department of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Fujita
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takafumi Minami
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahiro Adachi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Hirasawa
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yoshio Ohno
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Shiroki
- Department of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Haruhito Azuma
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rani B, Ignatz-Hoover JJ, Rana PS, Driscoll JJ. Current and Emerging Strategies to Treat Urothelial Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4886. [PMID: 37835580 PMCID: PMC10571746 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC, bladder cancer, BC) remains a difficult-to-treat malignancy with a rising incidence worldwide. In the U.S., UCC is the sixth most incident neoplasm and ~90% of diagnoses are made in those >55 years of age; it is ~four times more commonly observed in men than women. The most important risk factor for developing BC is tobacco smoking, which accounts for ~50% of cases, followed by occupational exposure to aromatic amines and ionizing radiation. The standard of care for advanced UCC includes platinum-based chemotherapy and programmed cell death (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, administered as frontline, second-line, or maintenance therapy. UCC remains generally incurable and is associated with intrinsic and acquired drug and immune resistance. UCC is lethal in the metastatic state and characterized by genomic instability, high PD-L1 expression, DNA damage-response mutations, and a high tumor mutational burden. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) achieve long-term durable responses in other cancers, their ability to achieve similar results with metastatic UCC (mUCC) is not as well-defined. Here, we discuss therapies to improve UCC management and how comprehensive tumor profiling can identify actionable biomarkers and eventually fulfill the promise of precision medicine for UCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berkha Rani
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; (B.R.); (J.J.I.-H.); (P.S.R.)
| | - James J. Ignatz-Hoover
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; (B.R.); (J.J.I.-H.); (P.S.R.)
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Adult Hematologic Malignancies & Stem Cell Transplant Section, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Priyanka S. Rana
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; (B.R.); (J.J.I.-H.); (P.S.R.)
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Adult Hematologic Malignancies & Stem Cell Transplant Section, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - James J. Driscoll
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; (B.R.); (J.J.I.-H.); (P.S.R.)
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Adult Hematologic Malignancies & Stem Cell Transplant Section, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Quintanilha JC, Storandt MH, Graf RP, Li G, Keller R, Lin DI, Ross JS, Huang RS, Schrock AB, Oxnard GR, Chakrabarti S, Mahipal A. Tumor Mutational Burden in Real-World Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: Genomic Alterations and Predictive Value for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Effectiveness. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300092. [PMID: 37410975 PMCID: PMC10581638 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is largely considered a nonimmunogenic malignancy; however, approximately 1%, of patients may have tumors with deficient mismatch repair, high microsatellite instability, or high tumor mutational burden (TMB ≥10 mutations/Mb), which may be predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. We sought to analyze outcomes of patients with high-TMB and pathogenic genomic alterations observed in this population. METHODS This study included patients with PDAC who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) at Foundation Medicine (Cambridge, MA). Clinical data were obtained from a US-wide real-world clinicogenomic pancreatic database. We report genomic alterations in those with high and low TMB, and compare outcomes on the basis of receipt of single-agent ICI or therapy regimens not containing ICI. RESULTS We evaluated 21,932 patients with PDAC who had tissue CGP data available, including 21,639 (98.7%) with low-TMB and 293 (1.3%) with high-TMB. Among patients with high-TMB, a greater number of alterations were observed in BRCA2, BRAF, PALB2, and genes of the mismatch repair pathway, whereas fewer alterations were observed in KRAS. Among patients who received an ICI (n = 51), those with high-TMB had more favorable median overall survival when compared with the low-TMB subset (25.7 v 5.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.91; P = .034). CONCLUSION Longer survival was observed in patients with high-TMB receiving ICI compared with those with low-TMB. This supports the role of high-TMB as a predictive biomarker for efficacy of ICI therapy in PDAC. Additionally, we report higher rates of BRAF and BRCA2 mutations and lower rates of KRAS mutation among patients with PDAC and high-TMB, which to our knowledge, is a novel finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sakti Chakrabarti
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Amit Mahipal
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Basile G, Bandini M, Gibb EA, Ross JS, Raggi D, Marandino L, Costa de Padua T, Crupi E, Colombo R, Colecchia M, Lucianò R, Nocera L, Moschini M, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Necchi A. Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer: 3-Year Median Follow-Up Update of PURE-01 Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:5107-5114. [PMID: 36190522 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The PURE-01 study (NCT02736266) pioneered the neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy before radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC). We herein present the survival outcomes after a median follow-up of three years. PATIENTS AND METHODS The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included 155 patients. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time from pembrolizumab initiation until radiographic disease progression precluding RC, initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, recurrence after RC, or death. Further outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS) post-RC and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression analyses for EFS were performed. Kaplan-Meier analyses compared EFS outcomes according with baseline programmed cell-death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) and according to the molecular subtypes. RESULTS After a median (interquartile range, IQR) follow-up of 39 (30-47) months, 36-month EFS and OS were 74.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 67.8-81.7] and 83.8% (95% CI, 77.8-90.2) in the ITT population, respectively. Overall, 143 (92.3%) patients underwent RC. Within the cohort of patients who did not receive additional chemotherapy (N = 125), 36-month RFS was 96.3% (95% CI, 91.6-100) for patients achieving a ypT0N0, 96.1% (95% CI, 89-100) for ypT1/a/isN0, 74.9% (95% CI, 60.2-93) for ypT2-4N0, and 58.3% (95% CI, 36.2-94.1) for ypTanyN1-3 response. EFS was significantly stratified among PD-L1 tertiles (lower tertile: 59.7% vs. medium tertile: 76.7% vs. higher tertile: 89.8%, P = 0.0013). The claudin-low and basal/squamous subtypes displayed the lowest rates of events. CONCLUSIONS At a median follow-up of three years, PURE-01 results further confirm the sustained efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab before RC. PD-L1 expression was the strongest predictor of sustained response post-RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Basile
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Bandini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Ewan A Gibb
- Decipher Urologic Cancers, Veracyte Inc., Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
| | - Daniele Raggi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Emanuele Crupi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Renzo Colombo
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Lucianò
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chiang RS, Glover MJ, Khaki AR, Srinivas S. Immunotherapy for Urothelial Carcinoma: Focus on Clinical Utility of Nivolumab. Onco Targets Ther 2022; 15:1259-1269. [PMID: 36275184 PMCID: PMC9582299 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s369043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors has brought about significant change to the treatment landscape of bladder cancer. Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor that has shown favorable results resulting in FDA approval for treatment of platinum-refractory locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. More recently, it was the first (and only) immune checkpoint inhibitor to receive FDA approval for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma in the adjuvant setting after radical surgery. Multiple trials are now actively underway to further understand the nuances in which immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab can be beneficial. In this review, we explore the development of nivolumab in terms of its mechanism of action, its growing indications in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma, and potential future directions for clinical trials. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a promising treatment for bladder cancer, but further work is needed to continue to improve outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S Chiang
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sandy Srinivas
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|