Antibody Drug Conjugates: Nonclinical Safety Considerations

FZ-AD005, a Novel DLL3-Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugate with Topoisomerase I Inhibitor, Shows Potent Antitumor Activity in Preclinical Models

Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is overexpressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and has been considered an attractive target for SCLC therapy. Rovalpituzumab tesirine was the first DLL3-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) to enter clinical studies. However, serious adverse events limited progress in the treatment of SCLC with rovalpituzumab tesirine. In this study, we developed a novel DLL3-targeted ADC, FZ-AD005, by using DXd with potent cytotoxicity and a relatively better safety profile to maximize the therapeutic index. FZ-AD005 was generated by a novel anti-DLL3 antibody, FZ-A038, and a valine-alanine (Val-Ala) dipeptide linker to conjugate DXd. Moreover, Fc-silencing technology was introduced in FZ-AD005 to avoid off-target toxicity mediated by FcγRs and showed negligible Fc-mediated effector functions in vitro. In preclinical evaluation, FZ-AD005 exhibited DLL3-specific binding and demonstrated efficient internalization, bystander killing, and excellent in vivo antitumor activities in cell line-derived xenograft and patient-derived xenograft models. FZ-AD005 was stable in circulation with acceptable pharmacokinetic profiles in cynomolgus monkeys. FZ-AD005 was well tolerated in rats and monkeys. The safety profile of FZ-AD005 was favorable, and the highest nonseverely toxic dose was 30 mg/kg in cynomolgus monkeys. In conclusion, FZ-AD005 has the potential to be a superior DLL3-targeted ADC with a wide therapeutic window and is expected to provide clinical benefits for the treatment of patients with SCLC.

Preclinical activity of datopotamab deruxtecan, a novel TROP2 directed antibody-drug conjugate targeting trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP2) in ovarian carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is associated with the highest gynecologic cancer mortality. The development of novel, effective combinations of targeted therapeutics remains an unmet medical need. We evaluated the preclinical activity of datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-Dxd), a novel TROP2 targeting antibody drug conjugate (ADC) in ovarian cancer cell lines and xenografts with variable TROP2 expression.

METHODS

In vitro cell viability with Dato-DXd was assessed using flow-cytometry based assays against a panel of EOC primary cell lines with variable TROP2 expression. Fluorescent anti-phospho-histone H2A.X antibody was used to detect dsDNA breaks by flow-cytometry. The in vivo antitumor activity of Dato-DXd was tested in TROP2 overexpressing xenografts.

RESULTS

TROP2 overexpressing (3+) and moderate (2+) expressing EOC cell lines demonstrated higher sensitivity to Dato-DXd when compared to TROP2 negative tumors. Dato-DXd exposed TROP2+ EOC demonstrated increased dsDNA breaks and Annexin-V positivity (a marker of apoptosis) when compared to tumor cells exposed to the non-binding conjugate (p = 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively). Dato-DXd induced significant antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) in the presence of peripheral-blood-lymphocytes. While negligible activity was detected against EOC cell lines with low TROP2 expression, Dato-DXd demonstrated significant bystander killing against tumor cells with low/negligible TROP2 when such cells were admixed with TROP2 3+ tumor cells in vitro. Dato-DXd showed tumor growth suppression against EOC cell line derived xenograft models that overexpress TROP2 at 3+ levels, prolonging survival when compared to controls, with minimal toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Dato-DXd shows promising preclinical activity against TROP2 overexpressing ovarian cancers. Future clinical trials in ovarian cancer patients are warranted.

Unlocking the potential of bispecific ADCs for targeted cancer therapy

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are biologically targeted drugs composed of antibodies and cytotoxic drugs connected by linkers. These innovative compounds enable precise drug delivery to tumor cells, minimizing harm to normal tissues and offering excellent prospects for cancer treatment. However, monoclonal antibody-based ADCs still present challenges, especially in terms of balancing efficacy and safety. Bispecific antibodies are alternatives to monoclonal antibodies and exhibit superior internalization and selectivity, producing ADCs with increased safety and therapeutic efficacy. In this review, we present available evidence and future prospects regarding the use of bispecific ADCs for cancer treatment, including a comprehensive overview of bispecific ADCs that are currently in clinical trials. We offer insights into the future development of bispecific ADCs to provide novel strategies for cancer treatment.

Targeting CD33+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia with GLK-33, a Lintuzumab-Auristatin Conjugate with a Wide Therapeutic Window

CD33 (Siglec-3) is a cell surface receptor expressed in approximately 90% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts, making it an attractive target for therapy of AML. Although previous CD33-targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) like gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO, Mylotarg) have shown efficacy in AML treatment, they have suffered from toxicity and narrow therapeutic window. This study aimed to develop a novelADCwith improved tolerability and a wider therapeutic window. GLK-33 consists of the anti-CD33 antibody lintuzumab and eight mavg-MMAU auristatin linkerpayloads per antibody. The experimental methods included testing in cell cultures, patient-derived samples, mouse xenograft models, and rat toxicology studies. GLK-33 exhibited remarkable efficacy in reducing cell viability within CD33-positive leukemia cell lines and primary AML samples. Notably, GLK-33 demonstrated antitumor activity at single dose as low as 300 mg/kg in mice, while maintaining tolerability at single dose of 20 to 30 mg/kg in rats. In contrast with both GO and lintuzumab vedotin, GLK-33 exhibited a wide therapeutic window and activity against multidrug-resistant cells. The development of GLK-33 addresses the limitations of previous ADCs, offering a wider therapeutic window, improved tolerability, and activity against drug-resistant leukemia cells. These findings encourage further exploration of GLK-33 in AML through clinical trials.

Approaches to improve the translation of safety, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic index of ADCs

1. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an important class of cancer therapies. They are complex molecules, comprising an antibody, a cytotoxic payload, and a linker. ADCs intend to confer high specificity by targeting a unique antigen expressed predominately on the surface of the tumour cells than on the normal cells and by releasing the potent cytotoxic drug inside the tumour causing cytotoxic cell death. Despite high specificity to tumour antigens, many ADCs are associated with off-target and on-target off-tumour toxicities, often leading to safety concerns before achieving the desirable clinical efficacy. Therefore, it is crucial to improve the therapeutic index (TI) of ADCs to enable the full potential of this important therapeutic modality. 2. The review summarises current approaches to improve the translation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and TI of ADCs. Common safety findings of ADCs resulting from off-target and on-target toxicities and nonclinical approaches to de-risk ADC safety will be discussed; multiple approaches of using preclinical and clinical dose and exposure data to calculate TI to guide clinical dosing will be elaborated; different approaches to improve TI of ADCs, including selecting the right target, right payload-linker and patients, optimising physicochemical properties, and using fractionation dosing, will also be discussed.

Antibody drug conjugates: Design implications for clinicians

OBJECTIVE

There are currently 11 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) that are FDA approved for use in oncologic disease states, with many more in the pipeline. The authors aim to review the pharmacokinetic profiles of the components of ADCs to engage pharmacist practitioners in practical considerations in the care of patients. This article provides an overview on the use of ADCs in the setting of organ dysfunction, drug-drug interactions, and management of on- and off-target adverse effects.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of the literature on ADCs through September 2023 was conducted. Clinical trials as well as articles on ADC design and functional components, adverse effects, and pharmacokinetics were reviewed. Reviewed literature included prescribing information as well as tertiary sources and primary literature.

DATA SUMMARY

A total of 11 ADCs were reviewed for the purpose of this article. A description of the mechanism of action and structure of ADCs is outlined, and a table containing description of each currently FDA-approved ADC is included. Various mechanisms of ADC toxicity are reviewed, including how ADC structure may be implicated.

CONCLUSION

It is imperative that pharmacist clinicians understand the design and function of each component of an ADC to continue to assess new approvals for use in oncology patients. Understanding the design of the ADC can help a pharmacy practitioner compare and contrast adverse effect profiles to support their multidisciplinary teams and to engage patients in education and management of their care.

Immune-related adverse events of antibody-based biological medicines in cancer therapy

Recombinant antibodies (Abs) are an integral modality for the treatment of multiple tumour malignancies. Since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of rituximab as the first monoclonal antibody (mAb) for cancer treatment, several mAbs and antibody (Ab)-based therapies have been approved for the treatment of solid tumour malignancies and other cancers. These Abs function by either blocking oncogenic pathways or angiogenesis, modulating immune response, or by delivering a conjugated drug. The use of Ab-based therapy in cancer patients who could benefit from the treatment, however, is still limited by associated toxicity profiles which may stem from biological features and processes related to target binding, alongside biochemical and/or biophysical characteristics of the therapeutic Ab. A significant immune-related adverse event (irAE) associated with Ab-based therapies is cytokine release syndrome (CRS), characterized by the development of fever, rash and even marked, life-threatening hypotension, and acute inflammation with secondary to systemic uncontrolled increase in a range of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Here, we review irAEs associated with specific classes of approved, Ab-based novel cancer immunotherapeutics, namely immune checkpoint (IC)-targeting Abs, bispecific Abs (BsAbs) and Ab-drug-conjugates (ADCs), highlighting the significance of harmonization in preclinical assay development for safety assessment of Ab-based biotherapeutics as an approach to support and refine clinical translation.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates-Evolution and Perspectives

Antineoplastic therapy is one of the main research themes of this century. Modern approaches have been implemented to target and heighten the effect of cytostatic drugs on tumors and diminish their general/unspecific toxicity. In this context, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a promising and successful strategy. The aim of this review was to assess different aspects regarding ADCs. They were presented from a chemical and a pharmacological perspective and aspects like structure, conjugation and development particularities alongside effects, clinical trials, safety issues and perspectives and challenges for future use of these drugs were discussed. Representative examples include but are not limited to the following main structural components of ADCs: monoclonal antibodies (trastuzumab, brentuximab), linkers (pH-sensitive, reduction-sensitive, peptide-based, phosphate-based, and others), and payloads (doxorubicin, emtansine, ravtansine, calicheamicin). Regarding pharmacotherapy success, the high effectiveness expectation associated with ADC treatment is supported by the large number of ongoing clinical trials. Major aspects such as development strategies are first discussed, advantages and disadvantages, safety and efficacy, offering a retrospective insight on the subject. The second part of the review is prospective, focusing on various plans to overcome the previously identified difficulties.

A simple and highly sensitive LC-MS workflow for characterization and quantification of ADC cleavable payloads

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) payloads are cleavable drugs that act as the warhead to exert an ADC's cytotoxic effects on cancer cells intracellularly. A simple and highly sensitive workflow is developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of six ADC payloads, namely SN-38, MTX, DXd, MMAE, MMAF and Calicheamicin (CM). The workflow consists of a short and simple sample extraction using a methanol-ethanol mixture, followed by a fast liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis. The results showed that well-validated linear response ranges of 0.4-100 nM for SN38, MTX and DXd, 0.04-100 nM for MMAE and MMAF, 0.4-1000 nM for CM were achieved in mouse serum. Recoveries for all six payloads at three different concentrations (low, medium and high) were more than 85%. An ultra-low sample volume of only 5 µL of serum is required due to the high sensitivity of the method. This validated method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study to quantify MMAE in mouse serum samples.

Antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies targeting cancers: applications of click chemistry

Engineering approaches using antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) and bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are designed to overcome the limitations of conventional chemotherapies and therapeutic antibodies such as drug resistance and non-specific toxicity. Cancer immunotherapies have been shown to be clinically successful with checkpoint blockade and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy; however, overactive immune systems still represent a major problem. Given the complexity of a tumor environment, it would be advantageous to have a strategy targeting two or more molecules. We highlight the necessity and importance of a multi-target platform strategy against cancer. Approximately 400 ADCs and over 200 bsAbs are currently being clinically developed for several indications, with promising signs of therapeutic activity. ADCs include antibodies that recognize tumor antigens, linkers that stably connect drugs, and powerful cytotoxic drugs, also known as payloads. ADCs have direct therapeutic effects by targeting cancers with a strong payload. Another type of drug that uses antibodies are bsAbs, targeting two antigens by linking to antigen recognition sites or bridging cytotoxic immune cells to tumor cells, resulting in cancer immunotherapy. Three bsAbs and one ADC have been approved for use by the FDA and the EMA in 2022. Among these, two of the bsAbs and the one ADC are used for cancers. We introduced that bsADC, a combination of ADC and bsAbs, has yet to be approved and several candidates are in the early stages of clinical development in this review. bsADCs technology helps increase the specificity of ADCs or the internalization and killing ability of bsAbs. We also briefly discuss the application of click chemistry in the efficient development of ADCs and bsAbs as a conjugation strategy. The present review summarizes the ADCs, bsAbs, and bsADCs that have been approved for anti-cancer or currently in development. These strategies selectively deliver drugs to malignant tumor cells and can be used as therapeutic approaches for various types of cancer.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a), a HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate with topoisomerase I inhibitor payload, shows antitumor activity in uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma with HER2/neu expression

OBJECTIVES

Carcinosarcomas are highly aggressive gynecologic malignancies containing both carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements with heterogeneous HER2/neu expression and limited therapeutic options. We compared the efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a), a novel HER2/neu-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) to an ADC isotype control (MAAA-9199) against primary uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

Twelve primary carcinosarcoma (CS) cell lines were evaluated for HER2/neu surface expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and by flow cytometry, and gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays. The in vitro experiments included cytotoxicity and bystander killing effect assays on three cell lines of variable HER2/neu expression. In vivo activity was studied in a mouse CS xenograft model of 3+ HER2/neu uterine CS.

RESULTS

In vitro studies showed that DS-8201a was highly effective against uterine and ovarian CS cell lines demonstrating 3+ HER2/neu expression compared to MAAA-9199 control; there was no significant improvement in the 0 HER2/neu CS cell line. However, DS-8201a induced efficient bystander killing of 0 HER2/neu tumor cells when admixed with 3+ HER2/neu cells. In vivo studies confirmed that DS-8201a was more effective than MAAA-9199 in 3+ HER2/neu-expressing CS xenografts.

CONCLUSION

DS-8201a may represent a novel and highly effective ADC against HER2/neu-expressing CS.

Learn from antibody–drug conjugates: consideration in the future construction of peptide-drug conjugates for cancer therapy

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide due to high heterogeneity. Although chemotherapy remains the mainstay of cancer therapy, non-selective toxicity and drug resistance of mono-chemotherapy incur broad criticisms. Subsequently, various combination strategies have been developed to improve clinical efficacy, also known as cocktail therapy. However, conventional “cocktail administration” is just passable, due to the potential toxicities to normal tissues and unsatisfactory synergistic effects, especially for the combined drugs with different pharmacokinetic properties. The drug conjugates through coupling the conventional chemotherapeutics to a carrier (such as antibody and peptide) provide an alternative strategy to improve therapeutic efficacy and simultaneously reduce the unspecific toxicities, by virtue of the advantages of highly specific targeting ability and potent killing effect. Although 14 antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have been approved worldwide and more are being investigated in clinical trials so far, several limitations have been disclosed during clinical application. Compared with ADCs, peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs) possess several advantages, including easy industrial synthesis, low cost, high tissue penetration and fast clearance. So far, only a handful of PDCs have been approved, highlighting tremendous development potential. Herein, we discuss the progress and pitfalls in the development of ADCs and underline what can learn from ADCs for the better construction of PDCs in the future.

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin Treatment Results in Decreased Proliferation and Differentiation of Human Megakaryocytes but Does Not Inhibit Mature Platelet Function

Mylotarg (Gemtuzumab ozogamicin [GO]), an antibody drug conjugate comprising a CD33-directed antibody linked to calicheamicin, is approved for use in certain acute myeloid leukemia patients. Following reports of prolonged thrombocytopenia and hemorrhagic events in a subset of patients, a detailed series of in vitro and ex vivo studies was performed at the request of regulators, both to look at the effects of GO on platelet production and to determine whether treatment with GO was likely to affect platelet aggregation under a variety of conditions. Treatment with GO resulted in cellular cytotoxicity and/or decreased differentiation during human megakaryocyte development. However, GO did not impair platelet aggregation under the experimental conditions evaluated. Ultimately, the effect of GO on megakaryocyte development observed in our studies was determined to have no impact on the risk-benefit assessment in the intended patient population, as thrombocytopenia is a known side effect of GO, and monitoring of platelet counts in patients is already strongly recommended.

Antibody-drug conjugates: What drives their progress?

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are on the brink of widespread use for the targeted treatment of cancer. ADCs manage the toxicity of drugs with unacceptable narrow therapeutic windows by guiding highly toxic compounds to the target cells, thereby sparing healthy cells. In this review, we describe approved ADCs and discuss their modes of action, together with medicinal chemical aspects, to evaluate the potential for improvement and to combat tumor-acquired resistance. A recent research focus has centered on the stimulation of immune responses to induce immunogenic cell death and the influence on the tumor microenvironment to enhance bystander effects.

Too advanced for assessment? Advanced materials, nanomedicine and the environment

Advanced materials, and nanomaterials, are promising for healthcare applications and are in particular in the spotlight of medical innovation since rapidly developed nano-formulated vaccines provide relief in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Further increased rapid growth is to be expected as more and more products are in development and reach the market, beneficial for human health. However, the human body is not a dead end and these products are likely to enter the environment, whereas their fate and effects in the environment are unknown. This part of the life-cycle of advanced medicinal products tends to be overlooked, if the perspective is human-centered and excludes the connectedness of human activity with, and consequences for our environment. Gaps are reviewed that exist in awareness, perspective taking, inclusion of environmental concerns into research and product development and also in available methodologies and regulatory guidance. To bridge these gaps, possible ways forward start to emerge, that could help to find a more integrative way of assessing human and environmental safety for advanced material medicinal products and nanomedicines.

An Innovative Site-Specific Anti-HER2 Antibody-Drug Conjugate with High Homogeneity and Improved Therapeutic Index

Purpose

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a potent cancer therapeutic option in recent years. DP303c is a HER2-targeting ADC with a cleavable linker-MMAE payload. The current study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potentials of DP303c in vitro as well as in vivo.

Materials and Methods

Size exclusion chromatography (SEC), reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were used to analyze the physicochemical characterization of DP303c. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a cell-based assay, and bio-layer interferometry (BLI) were used to evaluate DP303c’s affinity with HER2 and Fc receptors. A confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to observe the internalization of DP303c. Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and cytotoxicity assays were used to investigate the activity of DP303c in vitro. The antitumor activity of DP303c was assessed in vivo in the HER2-positive cell-derived xenograft model.

Results

DP303c was a site-specific anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate with a monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) with an average drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) of 2.0. DP303c showed a high affinity with HER2 and could be effectively internalized. In vitro and in vivo, DP303c showed stronger antitumor activity as compared to trastuzumab-DM1 (T-DM1) in a series of HER2-positive cancer cells and cell-derived xenograft (CDX) models, especially in the lower HER2-expressing cells. DP303c also exhibited high serum stability and a good PK profile.

Conclusion

DP303c was a steady and homogenous DAR 2 ADC that was predicted to deliver MMAE inhibitor to tumor cells. DP303c demonstrated remarkable anticancer efficacy against T-DM1 in xenograft models. DP303c was a strong candidate for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive cancer.

Pathophysiological and pharmacological considerations to improve the design and application of antibody-drug conjugates

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) have emerged as one of the pillars of clinical disease management in oncology. The biggest hurdle to widespread development and application of ADCs has been a narrow therapeutic index. Advances in antibody technologies and formats as well as novel linker and payload chemistries have begun to facilitate structural improvements to ADCs. However, the interplay of structural characteristics with physiologic and pharmacologic factors determining therapeutic success has garnered less attention. This review elaborates on the pharmacology of ADCs, the pathophysiology of cancerous tissues, and the reciprocal consequences on ADC properties and functions. While most currently approved ADCs utilize either microtubule inhibition or DNA damage as primary mechanisms of action, we present arguments to expand this repertoire and highlight the need for payload mechanisms that exploit disease-specific vulnerabilities. We promote the idea that the choice of antibody format, targeting antigen, linker properties, and payload of an ADC should be deliberately fit for purpose by taking the pathophysiology of disease and the specific pharmacology of the drug entity into account, thus allowing a higher probability of clinical success.

Therapeutic Potential of MF-TTZ-MMAE, a Site-Specifically Conjugated Antibody-Drug Conjugate, for the Treatment of HER2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer

With three clinically approved antibody-drug conjugates targeting HER2, this target is clearly identified to be of interest in oncology. Moreover, the advent of new bioconjugation technologies producing site-specific homogenous conjugates led to the opportunity of developing new medicines linking antibodies and payloads. Here, a new relevant HER2-targeting ADC was obtained by the conjugation of monomethyl auristatin E onto trastuzumab using McSAF Inside bioconjugation technology. The antibody-drug conjugate formed presented an average drug-to-antibody ratio of 4 with a high homogeneity and an excellent stability especially when incubated with human serum albumin or in human plasma. Moreover, it demonstrated a strong efficacy in an HER2 xenograft tumor model in mice, superior to the clinically approved antibody-drug conjugate ado-trastuzumab emtansine, with a complete tumor regression observed both macroscopically and microscopically demonstrating its therapeutic potential.

[Non-clinical safety evaluations of next-generation therapeutic antibodies]

Since the first monoclonal antibody was approved by FDA in 1986, numerous therapeutic antibodies have been developed along with advances in antibody engineering and finally, the number of approved therapeutic antibodies by FDA exceeded 100 in 2021. Although therapeutic antibodies were thought to be safer than conventional small molecule drugs, non-clinical safety evaluations of antibodies become more important because antibody-specific toxicity has been found. The depletion of target molecules for antibody drugs is a problem due to the limited number of promising targets. However, to overcome this, some technologies which can enhance the activity of antibodies and enable to add new functions to antibodies have been developed. In particular, bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates are considered to be attracting technologies as the next-generation antibody modalities. Several drugs applying these technologies have been approved in a recent decade. On the other hand, there is still plenty of room for improvement in these technologies which sometimes occur unexpected toxicity, so the safety of drugs applying these technologies should be carefully evaluated. Here some important considerations for the non-clinical safety evaluations of bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates are discussed based on a literature review of these types of antibody drugs (approved or terminated due to toxicity).

Stepping forward in antibody-drug conjugate development

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are cancer therapeutic agents comprised of an antibody, a linker and a small-molecule payload. ADCs use the specificity of the antibody to target the toxic payload to tumor cells. After intravenous administration, ADCs enter circulation, distribute to tumor tissues and bind to the tumor surface antigen. The antigen then undergoes endocytosis to internalize the ADC into tumor cells, where it is transported to lysosomes to release the payload. The released toxic payloads can induce apoptosis through DNA damage or microtubule inhibition and can kill surrounding cancer cells through the bystander effect. The first ADC drug was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000, but the following decade saw no new approved ADC drugs. From 2011 to 2018, four ADC drugs were approved, while in 2019 and 2020 five more ADCs entered the market. This demonstrates an increasing trend for the clinical development of ADCs. This review summarizes the recent clinical research, with a specific focus on how the in vivo processing of ADCs influences their design. We aim to provide comprehensive information about current ADCs to facilitate future development.

Introduction to Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are innovative biopharmaceutical products in which a monoclonal antibody is linked to a small molecule drug with a stable linker. Most of the ADCs developed so far are for treating cancer, but there is enormous potential for using ADCs to treat other diseases. Currently, ten ADCs have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and more than 90 ADCs are under worldwide clinical development. Monoclonal antibodies have evolved from research tools to powerful therapeutics in the past 30 years. Tremendous strides have been made in antibody discovery, protein bioengineering, formulation, and delivery devices. This manuscript provides an overview of the biology, chemistry, and biophysical properties of each component of ADC design. This review summarizes the advances and challenges in the field to date, with an emphasis on antibody conjugation, linker-payload chemistry, novel payload classes, drug-antibody ratio (DAR), and product development. The review emphasizes the lessons learned in the development of oncology antibody conjugates and look towards future innovations enabling other therapeutic indications. The review discusses resistance mechanisms to ADCs, and give an opinion on future perspectives.

Innovative Bioconjugation Technology for Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Proof of Concept in a CD30-Positive Lymphoma Mouse Model

To overcome stability and heterogeneity issues of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) produced with existing bioconjugation technologies incorporating a maleimide motif, we developed McSAF Inside, a new technology based on a trifunctionalized di(bromomethyl)pyridine scaffold. Our solution allows the conjugation of a linker-payload to previously reduced interchain cysteines of a native antibody, resulting in disulfide rebridging. This leads to highly stable and homogeneous ADCs with control over the drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) and the linker-payload position. Using our technology, we synthesized an ADC, MF-BTX-MMAE, built from anti-CD30 antibody cAC10 (brentuximab), and compared it to Adcetris, the first line treatment against CD30-positive lymphoma, in a CD30-positive lymphoma model. MF-BTX-MMAE displayed improved DAR homogeneity, with a solid batch-to-batch reproducibility, as well as enhanced stability in thermal stress conditions or in the presence of a free thiol-containing protein, such as human serum albumin (HSA). MF-BTX-MMAE showed antigen-binding, in vitro cytotoxicity, in vivo efficacy, and tolerability similar to Adcetris. Therefore, in accordance with current regulatory expectations for the development of new ADCs, McSAF Inside technology gives access to relevant ADCs with improved characteristics and stability.

Physical Stability Studies of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) Under Stressed Conditions

The conjugation of cytotoxic drugs to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) generates heterogeneous drug load distribution. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) are physically less stable as compared to their parent molecule due to modifications made in order to link drugs to the interchain sulfhydryl groups of monoclonal antibodies. The conjugation of small molecule drugs to mAbs alters the physicochemical properties of mAbs and also impacts their degradation profile. The use of appropriate analytical tools to monitor physical stability changes is necessary to identify key product quality attributes such as aggregation. This chapter discusses suitable stress conditions and the use of stability indicating analytical methods to detect degradation products.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Patient and Treatment Selection

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a promising drug platform designed to enhance the therapeutic index and minimize the toxicity of anticancer agents. ADCs have experienced substantial progress and technological growth over the past decades; however, several challenges to patient selection and treatment remain. Methods to optimally capture all patients who may benefit from a particular ADC are still largely unknown. Although target antigen expression remains a biomarker for patient selection, the impact of intratumor heterogeneity on antigen expression, as well as the dynamic changes in expression with treatment and disease progression, are important considerations in patient selection. Better understanding of these factors, as well as minimum levels of target antigen expression required to achieve therapeutic efficacy, will enable further optimization of selection strategies. Other important considerations include understanding mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to ADCs. Ongoing efforts in the design of its constituent parts to possess the intrinsic ability to overcome these mechanisms, including use of the "bystander effect" to enhance efficacy in heterogeneous or low target antigen-expressing tumors, as well as modulation of the chemical and immunophenotypic properties of antibodies and linker molecules to improve payload sensitivity and therapeutic efficacy, are under way. These strategies may also lead to improved safety profiles. Similarly, combination strategies using ADCs with other cytotoxic or immunomodulatory agents are also under development. Great strides have been made in ADC technology. With further refinements, this therapeutic modality has the potential to make an important clinical impact on a wider range of tumor types.

Mechanistic Modeling of Intra-Tumor Spatial Distribution of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Insights into Dosing Strategies in Oncology

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) provide targeted delivery of cytotoxic agents directly inside tumor cells. However, many ADCs targeting solid tumors have exhibited limited clinical efficacy, in part, due to insufficient penetration within tumors. To better understand the relationship between ADC tumor penetration and efficacy, previously applied Krogh cylinder models that explore tumor growth dynamics following ADC administration in preclinical species were expanded to a clinical framework by integrating clinical pharmacokinetics, tumor penetration, and tumor growth inhibition. The objective of this framework is to link ADC tumor penetration and distribution to clinical efficacy. The model was validated by comparing virtual patient population simulations to observed overall response rates from trastuzumab‐DM1 treated patients with metastatic breast cancer. To capture clinical outcomes, we expanded upon previous Krogh cylinder models to include the additional mechanism of heterogeneous tumor growth inhibition spatially across the tumor. This expansion mechanistically captures clinical response rates by describing heterogeneous ADC binding and tumor cell killing; high binding and tumor cell death close to capillaries vs. low binding, and high tumor cell proliferation far from capillaries. Sensitivity analyses suggest that clinical efficacy could be optimized through dose fractionation, and that clinical efficacy is primarily dependent on the ADC‐target affinity, payload potency, and tumor growth rate. This work offers a mechanistic basis to predict and optimize ADC clinical efficacy for solid tumors, allowing dosing strategy optimization to improve patient outcomes.

Preclinical Development of MGC018, a Duocarmycin-based Antibody-drug Conjugate Targeting B7-H3 for Solid Cancer

B7-H3, also referred to as CD276, is a member of the B7 family of immune regulatory proteins. B7-H3 is overexpressed on many solid cancers, including prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, non-small cell lung cancer, and breast cancer. Overexpression of B7-H3 is associated with disease severity, risk of recurrence and reduced survival. In this article, we report the preclinical development of MGC018, an antibody-drug conjugate targeted against B7-H3. MGC018 is comprised of the cleavable linker-duocarmycin payload, valine-citrulline-seco duocarmycin hydroxybenzamide azaindole (vc-seco-DUBA), conjugated to an anti-B7-H3 humanized IgG1/kappa mAb through reduced interchain disulfides, with an average drug-to-antibody ratio of approximately 2.7. MGC018 exhibited cytotoxicity toward B7-H3-positive human tumor cell lines, and exhibited bystander killing of target-negative tumor cells when cocultured with B7-H3-positive tumor cells. MGC018 displayed potent antitumor activity in preclinical tumor models of breast, ovarian, and lung cancer, as well as melanoma. In addition, antitumor activity was observed toward patient-derived xenograft models of breast, prostate, and head and neck cancer displaying heterogeneous expression of B7-H3. Importantly, MGC018 exhibited a favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profile in cynomolgus monkeys following repeat-dose administration. The antitumor activity observed preclinically with MGC018, together with the positive safety profile, provides evidence of a potentially favorable therapeutic index and supports the continued development of MGC018 for the treatment of solid cancers. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/molcanther/19/11/2235/F1.large.jpg.

Advances in epidermal growth factor receptor specific immunotherapy: lessons to be learned from armed antibodies

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been recognized as an important therapeutic target in oncology. It is commonly overexpressed in a variety of solid tumors and is critically involved in cell survival, proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenesis. This multi-dimensional role of EGFR in the progression and aggressiveness of cancer, has evolved from conventional to more targeted therapeutic approaches. With the advent of hybridoma technology and phage display techniques, the first anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (Cetuximab and Panitumumab) were developed. Due to major limitations including host immune reactions and poor tumor penetration, these antibodies were modified and used as guiding mechanisms for the specific delivery of readily available chemotherapeutic agents or plants/bacterial toxins, giving rise to antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and immunotoxins (ITs), respectively. Continued refinement of ITs led to deimmunization strategies based on depletion of B and T-cell epitopes or substitution of non-human toxins leading to a growing repertoire of human enzymes capable of inducing cell death. Similarly, the modification of classical ADCs has resulted in the first, fully recombinant versions. In this review, we discuss significant advancements in EGFR-targeting immunoconjugates, including ITs and recombinant photoactivable ADCs, which serve as a blueprint for further developments in the evolving domain of cancer immunotherapy.

PF-06804103, A Site-specific Anti-HER2 Antibody-Drug Conjugate for the Treatment of HER2-expressing Breast, Gastric, and Lung Cancers

The approval of ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2⁺ metastatic breast cancer validated HER2 as a target for HER2-specific antibody-drug conjugates (ADC). Despite its demonstrated clinical efficacy, certain inherent properties within T-DM1 hamper this compound from achieving the full potential of targeting HER2-expressing solid tumors with ADCs. Here, we detail the discovery of PF-06804103, an anti-HER2 ADC designed to have a widened therapeutic window compared with T-DM1. We utilized an empirical conjugation site screening campaign to identify the engineered ĸkK183C and K290C residues as those that maximized in vivo ADC stability, efficacy, and safety for a four drug-antibody ratio (DAR) ADC with this linker-payload combination. PF-06804103 incorporates the following novel design elements: (i) a new auristatin payload with optimized pharmacodynamic properties, (ii) a cleavable linker for optimized payload release and enhanced antitumor efficacy, and (iii) an engineered cysteine site-specific conjugation approach that overcomes the traditional safety liabilities of conventional conjugates and generates a homogenous drug product with a DAR of 4. PF-06804103 shows (i) an enhanced efficacy against low HER2-expressing breast, gastric, and lung tumor models, (ii) overcomes in vitro- and in vivo-acquired T-DM1 resistance, and (iii) an improved safety profile by enhancing ADC stability, pharmacokinetic parameters, and reducing off-target toxicities. Herein, we showcase our platform approach in optimizing ADC design, resulting in the generation of the anti-HER2 ADC, PF-06804103. The design elements of identifying novel sites of conjugation employed in this study serve as a platform for developing optimized ADCs against other tumor-specific targets.

T-DM1-induced thrombocytopenia in breast cancer patients: New perspectives

PURPOSE

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is overexpressed in 15-20% of patients with breast cancer. HER2 overexpression is the result of a genetic alteration and this marker is associated with poor clinical outcomes. HER2-targeted therapy can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with either early or advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. One such therapy is the antibody drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), a combination of trastuzumab and the cytotoxic antimicrotubule agent DM1. After T-DM1 binds HER2, DM1 is subsequently released into the cell. T-DM1 is generally well tolerated and has a relatively low incidence of adverse events. However, there are clinical concerns regarding T-DM1-induced high-grade thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

Here, we summarize the incidence of thrombocytopenia from several clinical trials and review experimental studies to explore the causes for T-DM1-induced thrombocytopenia. Progress in several other ADCs targeting HER2-positive breast cancer was also reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that T-DM1 uptake by megakaryocytes occurs through either Fcγ receptor binding or through pinocytosis, and we suggest several methods through which these processes could be interrupted to potentially improve the clinical safety of T-DM1. More generally, we recommend that toxicity should be carefully addressed during the development of ADCs.

Tunable pH-Sensitive 2-Carboxybenzyl Phosphoramidate Cleavable Linkers

We previously described a pH-sensitive phosphoramidate linker scaffold that can be tuned to release amine-containing drugs at various pH values. In these previous studies it was determined that the tunability of this linker was dependent upon the proximity of an acidic group (e.g., carboxylic acid or pyridinium). In this study, we confirmed that the tunability of pH-triggered amine-release was also dependent upon the pKa of the proximal acidic group. A series of 2-carboxybenzyl phosphoramidates was prepared in which the pKa of the proximal benzoic acid was predictably attenuated by substituents on the benzoate ring consistent with their σ-values.

Tissue cross-reactivity studies of CPGJ701 in humans, cynomolgus monkeys and Sprague-Dawley rats and correlation analysis with in vivo toxicity

BACKGROUND

CPGJ701 is a recombinant humanized anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) monoclonal antibody-derivative of the cytotoxic agent maytansine (DM1) conjugate for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Tissue cross-reactivity (TCR) studies of CPGJ701 in a complete panel of normal human, cynomolgus monkey and Sprague-Dawley were performed to provide evidence for selecting animal species for use in preclinical toxicity studies and predicting primary target organs and clinical adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

METHODS

TCR studies were carried out to evaluate the distribution of reactivity and the TCR of CPGJ701 in paraffin sections of 32 tissues and/or organs (such as the heart, lung, liver, and kidney) from at least three unrelated normal human, cynomolgus monkey and Sprague-Dawley rat donors. The TCR of CPGJ701was detected by one-step immunohistochemical method using 50 µg/mL biotin-labeled CPGJ701 as the primary antibody. Moreover, a negative biotin-labeled human IgG control group, a blank phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) control group, and a positive human breast cancer tissue control group were also used to exclude false positive and false negative results. The specific positive binding and distribution of reactivity of CPGJ701 were detected in the human breast cancer tissue and 32 tissues from normal humans, cynomolgus monkeys and Sprague-Dawley rats under a microscope.

RESULTS

The TCR of CPGJ701 in humans and cynomolgus monkeys was highly consistent but showed some differences compared to the TCR of CPGJ701 in Sprague-Dawley rats. The binding of CPGJ701 to target tissues, such as the liver, adrenal gland, thyroid, fallopian tube, spinal cord and skin, was observed in humans and cynomolgus monkeys but not in Sprague-Dawley rats. Specific binding to the placenta was only found in Sprague-Dawley rats. The cell types to which CPGJ701 specifically bound, including epithelial cells, cardiomyocytes and nerve cells, were identical in humans, cynomolgus monkeys and rats.

CONCLUSIONS

The TCR of CPGJ701 was in accord with the targeting characteristics of the humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody. The consistency of CPGJ701 binding to human and cynomolgus monkey tissues indicated that the cynomolgus monkey is a relevant animal species for evaluating the preclinical safety of CPGJ701. The targeting (binding site) of CPGJ701 in Sprague-Dawley rats indicated that it is also a useful animal species for evaluating antibody-dependent toxicity and non-antibody-dependent toxicity. In conclusion, these TCR studies of CPGJ701 could provide information for selecting relevant animal species for nonclinical studies and predicting clinical ADRs.

Opportunities for use of one species for longer-term toxicology testing during drug development: A cross-industry evaluation

An international expert working group representing 37 organisations (pharmaceutical/biotechnology companies, contract research organisations, academic institutions and regulatory bodies) collaborated in a data sharing exercise to evaluate the utility of two species within regulatory general toxicology studies. Anonymised data on 172 drug candidates (92 small molecules, 46 monoclonal antibodies, 15 recombinant proteins, 13 synthetic peptides and 6 antibody-drug conjugates) were submitted by 18 organisations. The use of one or two species across molecule types, the frequency for reduction to a single species within the package of general toxicology studies, and a comparison of target organ toxicities identified in each species in both short and longer-term studies were determined. Reduction to a single species for longer-term toxicity studies, as used for the development of biologicals (ICHS6(R1) guideline) was only applied for 8/133 drug candidates, but might have been possible for more, regardless of drug modality, as similar target organ toxicity profiles were identified in the short-term studies. However, definition and harmonisation around the criteria for similarity of toxicity profiles is needed to enable wider consideration of these principles. Analysis of a more robust dataset would be required to provide clear, evidence-based recommendations for expansion of these principles to small molecules or other modalities where two species toxicity testing is currently recommended.

Evaluation of Quantitative Relationship Between Target Expression and Antibody-Drug Conjugate Exposure Inside Cancer Cells

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) employ overexpressed cell surface antigens to deliver cytotoxic payloads inside cancer cells. However, the relationship between target expression and ADC efficacy remains ambiguous. In this manuscript, we have addressed a part of this ambiguity by quantitatively investigating the effect of antigen expression levels on ADC exposure within cancer cells. Trastuzumab-valine-citrulline-monomethyl auristatin E was used as a model ADC, and four different cell lines with diverse levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression were used as model cells. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of total trastuzumab, released monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), and total MMAE were measured inside the cells and in the cell culture media following incubation with two different concentrations of ADC. In addition, target expression levels, target internalization rate, and cathepsin B and MDR1 protein concentrations were determined for each cell line. All the PK data were mathematically characterized using a cell-level systems PK model for ADC. It was found that SKBR-3, MDA-MB-453, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-468 cells had ∼800,000, ∼250,000, ∼50,000, and ∼10,000 HER2 receptors per cell, respectively. A strong linear relationship (R ² > 0.9) was observed between HER2 receptor count and released MMAE exposure inside the cancer cells. There was an inverse relationship found between HER2 expression level and internalization rate, and cathepsin B and multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) expression level varied slightly among the cell lines. The PK model was able to simultaneously capture all the PK profiles reasonably well while estimating only two parameters. Our results demonstrate a strong quantitative relationship between antigen expression level and intracellular exposure of ADCs in cancer cells. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In this manuscript, we have demonstrated a strong linear relationship between target expression level and antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) exposure inside cancer cells. We have also shown that this relationship can be accurately captured using the cell-level systems pharmacokinetics model developed for ADCs. Our results indirectly suggest that the lack of relationship between target expression and efficacy of ADC may stem from differences in the pharmacodynamic properties of cancer cells.

An FDA oncology analysis of toxicities associated with PBD-containing antibody-drug conjugates

With a new generation of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that contain a drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) of 2, the question remains whether advances in technology have resulted in more stable and tumor-specific ADCs. These ADCs are anticipated to cause minimal systemic exposures of payloads, with toxicities being evident mainly at tumor sites. We examined 15 ADCs with PBD-dimer payloads and a DAR of 2 and concluded that dose limiting toxicities in animals and in humans are generally related to the payload. Both the payloads and the ADCs had pro-inflammatory responses causing severe toxicities that were at times of low incidence, making it difficult to assess a cause-effect relationship. Due to their low incidence, single-patient cohorts may not detect these events and such design may not be suitable in first-in-human (FIH) trials. The commonly proposed approach by the sponsors for FIH dose selection was 1/6^th highest non-severely toxic dose (HNSTD) in monkeys. This approach resulted in an acceptable balance of safety and efficient dose escalation in phase 1 trials, when using data from repeat-dose toxicology studies and body surface area for scaling. No sponsor used the data generated in rodents or proposed novel approaches for FIH dose selection.

Improved Inhibition of Tumor Growth by Diabody-Drug Conjugates via Half-Life Extension

Despite some clinical success with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in patients with solid tumors and hematological malignancies, improvements in ADC design are still desirable due to the narrow therapeutic window of these compounds. Tumor-targeting antibody fragments have distinct advantages over monoclonal antibodies, including more rapid tumor accumulation and enhanced penetration, but are subject to rapid clearance. Half-life extension technologies such as PEGylation and albumin-binding domains (ABDs) have been widely used to improve the pharmacokinetics of many different types of biologics. PEGylation improves pharmacokinetics by increasing hydrodynamic size to reduce renal clearance, whereas ABDs extend half-life via FcRn-mediated recycling. In this study, we used an anti-oncofetal antigen 5T4 diabody conjugated with a highly potent cytotoxic pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) warhead to assess and compare the effects of PEGylation and albumin binding on the in vivo efficacy of antibody fragment drug conjugates. Conjugation of 2× PEG20K to a diabody improved half-life from 40 min to 33 h, and an ABD-diabody fusion protein exhibited a half-life of 45 h in mice. In a xenograft model of breast cancer MDA-MB-436, the ABD-diabody-PBD showed greater tumor growth suppression and better tolerability than either PEG-diabody-PBD or diabody-PBD. These results suggest that the mechanism of half-life extension is an important consideration for designing cytotoxic antitumor agents.

Engineering a HER2-specific antibody-drug conjugate to increase lysosomal delivery and therapeutic efficacy

We improve the potency of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) containing the HER2-specific antibody pertuzumab by reducing their affinity for HER2 by >250-fold at acidic endosomal pH relative to near neutral pH. These engineered pertuzumab variants show increased lysosomal delivery and cytotoxicity towards tumor cells expressing intermediate HER2 levels. In HER2^int xenograft tumor models in mice, the variants show higher therapeutic efficacy than the parent ADC and a clinically-approved HER2-specific ADC.

Bispecific Antibodies in the Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies

Monoclonal antibody therapies are an important approach for the treatment of hematologic malignancies, but typically show low single‐agent activity. Bispecific antibodies, however, redirect immune cells to the tumor for subsequent lysis, and preclinical and accruing clinical data support single‐agent efficacy of these agents in hematologic malignancies, presaging an exciting era in the development of novel bispecific formats. This review discusses recent developments in this area, highlighting the challenges in delivering effective immunotherapies for patients.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates for the Therapy of Thoracic Malignancies

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a novel class of therapeutic agents incorporating both target-specific monoclonal antibodies and cytotoxic small molecules via a chemical linker. They were first introduced into the clinic for the treatment of advanced hematologic malignancies. The only approved ADC for solid tumors targets erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase (HER2), a validated antigen in breast cancer. Many ADCs are under active investigation for various types of solid tumors. In this article, we review the literature from several perspectives including the design, pharmacology, and mechanism-based toxicities of antibody-drug conjugates. We then discuss ADCs currently in clinical development for thoracic malignancies.

Payload of T-DM1 binds to cell surface cytoskeleton-associated protein 5 to mediate cytotoxicity of hepatocytes

Off-target toxicity is a major cause of dose-limiting toxicity for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), mechanisms of which remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that cytoskeleton-associated protein 5 (CKAP5) serves as a cell surface target for T-DM1 and that binding of T-DM1 to CKAP5 is mediated by payload (DM1). This study introduces a novel molecular mechanism of ADC payload-mediated interaction with cell surface molecules to induce cytotoxicity. Upon binding to CKAP5, T-DM1 causes cell membrane damage and leads to calcium influx into the cells, resulting in disorganized microtubule network and apoptosis. While binding of T-DM1 with HER2 is critical for killing HER2-positive tumor cells, our data suggest that cytotoxicity induced by T-DM1 interaction with CKAP5 may preferentially damage normal cells/tissues where HER2 expression is low or missing to cause off-target toxicity. This study provides molecular basis of ADC-induced off-target cytotoxicity and opens a new avenue for developing next generation of ADCs.

Bispecifics and antibody-drug conjugates: A positive synergy

Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are antibodies with two different paratopes. In the past decade, advances in protein engineering have enabled the development of more than 100 formats of BsAbs. With two BsAbs approved for therapeutic use and more than 60 in clinical trials, this research area has shifted from being effervescent to being a mainstream therapeutic development topic. In parallel, recent progress in protein conjugation and cytotoxicity of small molecule drugs has resulted in a boom in monospecific antibody therapeutics development such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Recent examples have demonstrated how BsAbs approaches can be used to generate ADCs with better efficacy and safety profile. Rather than examining these two different yet similar areas independently, this minireview will explore the potential synergies that can exist between them.

A Brief Introduction to Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Toxicologic Pathologists

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging class of anticancer therapeutics, delivering highly cytotoxic molecules directly to cancer cells. ADCs are composed of an antibody, a small molecule drug, and a linker attaching one to another. Antibodies are directed to a large variety of antigens overexpressed on tumor cells, tumor vasculature, or tumor-supporting stroma. After internalization, the ADC is transferred to lysosomes where the cytotoxic component is released, finally killing the target cell. All ADCs are administered via intravenous injection. Once in the circulation, linker stability in plasma is of high importance. In vivo studies in animals address the release of payload over time and typically measure total antibody, conjugated ADC, and free drug. ADC development is driven by ICH (International Council for Harmonisation) guidelines S6(R1) and S9. Dose-limiting toxicities of current ADCs are mainly associated with the payload and correlate well between clinical trials and nonclinical studies in rodents and nonrodents. This mini review is intended to provide general information about ADCs in oncology and shall assist the toxicologic pathologist in correctly interpreting morphological findings acquired in toxicity studies with this entity.

Cyclic RGD-Peptide-Functionalized Polylipopeptide Micelles for Enhanced Loading and Targeted Delivery of Monomethyl Auristatin E

Monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) is an extremely potent peptide drug that is currently used in the form of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) for treating different cancers. ADCs are, however, associated with low drug conjugation, immunogenicity, small scale production, and high costs. Here, cRGD-functionalized polylipopeptide micelles (cRGD-Lipep-Ms) were explored for enhanced loading and targeted delivery of MMAE to HCT-116 colorectal tumor xenografts. Interestingly, cRGD-Lipep-Ms achieved an MMAE loading content of 5.5 wt %, which was 55-fold higher than that of poly(ethylene glycol)- b-poly(d,l-lactide) micelles. MMAE-loaded cRGD-Lipep-Ms (MMAE-cRGD-Lipep-Ms) showed a small hydrodynamic size of 59 nm, minimal drug leakage in 10% FBS, and efficient uptake and superb antiproliferative activity in α_vβ₅-overexpressing HCT-116 tumor cells. Remarkably, MMAE-cRGD-Lipep-Ms displayed over 10-fold better toleration than free MMAE in mice and completely suppressed growth of HCT-116 colorectal tumor xenografts. These polylipopeptide micelles have appeared to be an attractive alternative to ADCs for targeted delivery of potent peptide drugs.

Through the barricades: overcoming the barriers to effective antibody-based cancer therapeutics

Since the turn of the century, cancer therapy has undergone a transformation in terms of new treatment modalities and renewed optimism in achieving long-lived tumor control and even cure. This is, in large part, thanks to the widespread incorporation of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) into standard treatment regimens. These new therapies have, across many settings, significantly contributed to improved clinical responses, patient quality of life and survival. Moreover, the flexibility of the antibody platform has led to the development of a wide range of innovative and combinatorial therapies that continue to augment the clinician's armory. Despite these successes, there is a growing awareness that in many cases mAb therapy remains suboptimal, primarily due to inherent limitations imposed by the immune system's own homeostatic controls and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Here, we discuss the principal barriers that act to constrain the tumor-killing activity of antibody-based therapeutics, particularly those involving antibody glycans, using illustrative examples from both pre-clinical and market approved mAbs. We also discuss strategies that have been, or are in development to overcome these obstacles. Finally, we outline how the growing understanding of the biological terrain in which mAbs function is shaping innovation and regulation in cancer therapeutics.

Drug conjugates-an emerging approach to treat breast cancer

Breast cancer treatment using a single drug is associated with a high failure rate due, in part, to the heterogeneity of drug response within individuals, nonspecific target action, drug toxicity, and/or development of resistance. Use of dual-drug therapies, including drug conjugates, may help overcome some of these roadblocks by more selective targeting of the cancer cell and by acting at multiple drug targets rather than one. Drug-conjugate approaches include linking drugs to antibodies (antibody-drug conjugates), radionuclides (radioimmunoconjugates), nanoparticles (nanoparticle-drug conjugates), or to other drugs (drug-drug conjugates). Although all of these conjugates might be designed as effective treatments against breast cancer, the focus of this review will be on drug-drug conjugates because of the increase in versatility of these types of drugs with respect to mode of action at the level of the cancer cell either by creating a novel pharmacophore or by increasing the potency and/or efficacy of the drugs' effects at their respective molecular targets. The development, synthesis, and pharmacological characteristics of drug-drug conjugates will be discussed in the context of breast cancer with the hope of enhancing drug efficacy and reducing toxicities to improve patient quality of life.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates as Cancer Therapeutics: Past, Present, and Future

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an innovative therapeutic approach that provides novel treatment options and hope for patients with cancer. By coupling monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to cytotoxic small-molecule payloads with a plasma-stable linker, ADCs offer the potential for increased drug specificity and fewer off-target effects than systemic chemotherapy. As evidence for the potential of these therapies, many new ADCs are in various stages of clinical development. Because their structure poses unique challenges to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterization, it is critical to recognize the differences between ADCs and conventional chemotherapy in the design of ADC clinical development strategies. Although some properties may be determined mainly by either the mAb or the small-molecule portion, the behavior of these agents is not always predictable. Furthermore, because the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of ADCs are influenced by all 3 of its components (mAb, linker, and payload), it is important to characterize the intact molecule, any target-mediated catabolic clearance of the mAb, and the ADME properties of the small-molecule payload. Here we describe key issues in the clinical development of ADCs, including considerations for designing first-in-human studies for ADCs. We discuss some difficulties of ADC pharmacokinetic characterization and current approaches to overcoming these challenges. Finally, we consider all aspects of clinical pharmacology assessment required during drug development, using examples from the literature to illustrate the discussion.