Editorial: Growth hormone therapy in childhood: titration versus weight-based dosing?

Short and Long-Term Effects of Growth Hormone in Children and Adolescents With GH Deficiency

The syndrome of impaired GH secretion (GH deficiency) in childhood and adolescence had been identified at the end of the 19th century. Its non-acquired variant (naGHD) is, at childhood onset, a rare syndrome of multiple etiologies, predominantly characterized by severe and permanent growth failure culminating in short stature. It is still difficult to diagnose GHD and, in particular, to ascertain impaired GH secretion in comparison to levels in normally-growing children. The debate on what constitutes an optimal diagnostic process continues. Treatment of the GH deficit via replacement with cadaveric pituitary human GH (pit-hGH) had first been demonstrated in 1958, and opened an era of therapeutic possibilities, albeit for a limited number of patients. In 1985, the era of recombinant hGH (r-hGH) began: unlimited supply meant that substantial long-term experience could be gained, with greater focus on efficacy, safety and costs. However, even today, the results of current treatment regimes indicate that there is still a substantial fraction of children who do not achieve adult height within the normal range. Renewed evaluation of height outcomes in childhood-onset naGHD is required for a better understanding of the underlying causes, whereby the role of various factors - diagnostics, treatment modalities, mode of treatment evaluation - during the important phases of child growth - infancy, childhood and puberty - are further explored.

Individualised growth response optimisation (iGRO) tool: an accessible and easy-to-use growth prediction system to enable treatment optimisation for children treated with growth hormone

BACKGROUND

Growth prediction models (GPMs) exist to support clinical management of children treated with growth hormone (GH) for growth hormone deficiency (GHD), Turner syndrome (TS) and for short children born small for gestational age (SGA). Currently, no prediction system has been widely adopted.

CONTENT

The objective was to develop a stand-alone web-based system to enable the widespread use of an 'individualised growth response optimisation' (iGRO) tool across European endocrinology clinics. A modern platform was developed to ensure compatibility with IT systems and web browsers. Seventeen GPMs derived from the KIGS database were included and tested for accuracy.

SUMMARY

The iGRO system demonstrated prediction accuracy and IT compatibility. The observed discrepancies between actual and predicted height may support clinicians in investigating the reasons for deviations around the expected growth and optimise treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This system has the potential for wide access in endocrinology clinics to support the clinical management of children treated with GH for these three indications.

Towards optimal treatment with growth hormone in short children and adolescents: evidence and theses

Treatment with growth hormone (GH) has become standard practice for replacement in GH-deficient children or pharmacotherapy in a variety of disorders with short stature. However, even today, the reported adult heights achieved often remain below the normal range. In addition, the treatment is expensive and may be associated with long-term risks. Thus, a discussion of the factors relevant for achieving an optimal individual outcome in terms of growth, costs, and risks is required. In the present review, the heterogenous approaches of treatment with GH are discussed, considering the parameters available for an evaluation of the short- and long-term outcomes at different stages of treatment. This discourse introduces the potential of the newly emerging prediction algorithms in comparison to other more conventional approaches for the planning and evaluation of the response to GH. In rare disorders such as those with short stature, treatment decisions cannot easily be deduced from personal experience. An interactive approach utilizing the derived experience from large cohorts for the evaluation of the individual patient and the required decision-making may facilitate the use of GH. Such an approach should also lead to avoiding unnecessary long-term treatment in unresponsive individuals.

A pilot study of discontinuous, insulin-like growth factor 1-dosing growth hormone treatment in young children with FGFR3 N540K-mutated hypochondroplasia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the growth promoting effect of a recombinant growth hormone (rGH) treatment protocol adjusted on insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) dosing in children affected by the most severe forms of FGFR3 N540K-mutated hypochondroplasia.

STUDY DESIGN

Midterm results of an open-label, single-center, nonrandomized, 2003-2020 pilot trial to final stature, including 6 children (mean age, 2.6 ± 0.7 years; mean height SDS, -3.0 ± 0.5) with the N540K mutation of FGFR3 gene who received an rGH dosage titrated to an IGF-1 level close to 1.5 SDS of the normal range. rGH therapy was interrupted 1 day per week, 1 month per year, and 6 months every 2 years.

RESULTS

The mean height SDS increased by 1.9 during the 6.1 ± 0.9-year study period, reaching -0.8 to -1.3 at age 8.7 ± 1 years. The mean±SDS baseline IGF-1 value was -1.6 ± 0.5 before rGH treatment and 1.4±0.3 during the last year of observation. The average cumulative rGH dose was 0.075 ± 0.018 mg/kg/day (range, 0.059-0.100 mg/kg/day). Trunk/leg disproportion was improved.

CONCLUSION

IGF-1-dosing rGH treatment durably improves growth and reduces body disproportion in children with severe forms of hypochondroplasia.

A national study of physician recommendations to initiate and discontinue growth hormone for short stature

OBJECTIVES

Overall growth hormone (GH) use depends on decisions to both initiate treatment and continue treatment. The determinants of both are unclear. We studied how physicians decided to begin GH in idiopathic short stature and how, after an initial course of treatment, they decided to continue, intensify (increase the dose), or terminate treatment.

METHODS

We used a national census study of 727 pediatric endocrinologists involving a structured questionnaires with a factorial experimental design. Main outcome measures were GH recommendations for previously untreated children and those children who were treated with GH for 1 year.

RESULTS

The response rate was 90%. In previously untreated children, recommendations to initiate GH were consistent with guidelines and also influenced by family preferences and physician attitudes (P<.001). In children treated with GH, recommendations on whether to continue GH were influenced by the growth response to therapy (P<.01) but were divided regarding course of action. With identical growth responses to treatment, physician decisions diverged (intensify versus discontinue GH) and were driven by independent, nonphysiologic, and contextual factors (eg, physician attitudes, family preferences, and GH-initiation recommendation; each P<.001). Together, attitudinal and contextual factors exerted more influence on continuation decisions than did the growth response to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Physician decisions to initiate GH are largely consistent with evidence-based medicine. However, decisions about continuing GH vary and are strongly influenced by factors other than response to treatment. With a potential market of 500 000 US children and costs exceeding $10 billion per year, changes in GH use may depend on potentially modifiable physician attitudes and family preferences as much as physiologic evidence.

Comparison between weight-based and IGF-I-based growth hormone (GH) dosing in the treatment of children with GH deficiency and influence of exon 3 deleted GH receptor variant

OBJECTIVE

Compare the most frequently used weight-based GH dosing with an IGF-I level-based strategy in the treatment of children with severe GH deficiency. Additionally, analyse the influence of the GH receptor exon 3 polymorphism on IGF-I levels during GH therapy.

DESIGN

Thirty children with GH deficiency on treatment with GH for 4.3+/-3.2 yr in a single University Hospital were divided in group W (weight-based GH dosing) and group I (IGF-I-based dosing). In group I, GH doses were changed by 8.3 microg/kg d to maintain IGF-I levels between 0 and +2 SDS, whereas in group W the dose was fixed at 30 microg/kg d in prepubertal and 50 microg/kg d in pubertal patients. Growth velocity was measured after 1 yr, IGF-I and IGFBP3 levels quarterly. GH receptor exon 3 was genotyped by PCR.

RESULTS

Most patients in Group I reached target IGF-I levels after 6 months with a GH dose ranging between 25 and 66 microg/kg d (mean+/-SD, 38+/-8). Each change of 8.3 microg/kg d of GH dose, resulted in change of 1.17+/-0.6 SDS of IGF-I levels. Mean IGF-I levels were higher in Group I 0.8+/-0.5 SDS than in Group W -0.3+/-1.9 SDS (p<0.05), but growth velocities were similar, 6.8+/-2.6 cm/yr and 6.9+/-2.6 cm/yr (p=NS), respectively. Serum IGFBP3 levels were similar in both groups and were less useful to individualize GH therapy. Even treated with a similar mean GH dose, patients carrying at least one GH receptor d3-allele reached higher IGF-I levels (0.7+/-1.2 SDS) than those homozygous for the full-length allele (-0.3+/-1.2 SDS; p<0.05), however, growth velocities were not different.

CONCLUSIONS

By adjusting the GH dose, it was feasible to maintain IGF-I in the desired range (0-+2 SDS). Patients carrying at least one GH receptor d3-allele reached higher circulating IGF-I levels than those homozygous for the full-length allele. A multiple regression analysis failed to demonstrate an independent influence of IGF-I levels on GV during the 12 months of observation.

Idiopathic short stature: management and growth hormone treatment

In the management of ISS auxological, biochemical, psychosocial and ethical elements have to be considered. In boys with constitutional delay of growth and puberty androgens are effective in increasing height and sexual characteristics, but adult height is unchanged. GH therapy is efficacious in increasing height velocity and adult height, but the inter-individual variation is considerable. The effect on psychosocial status is uncertain. Factors affecting final height gain include GH dose, height deficit in comparison to midparental height, age and first year height velocity. In case of a low predicted adult height at the onset of puberty, addition of a GnRH analogue can be considered. Although GH therapy appears safe, long-term monitoring is recommended.