Functional studies of dopamine control of prolactin secretion in normal women and women with hyperprolactinemic pituitary microadenoma

No difference between micro- and macroprolactinomas in the prolactin responsiveness to metoclopramide and dopamine administration

Differences between micro- and macroprolactinomas, as regards the prolactin secretory pattern in response to pharmacological challenges, have been reported in in vivo and in vitro models, and interpreted as being due to different dopaminergic regulation of prolactin release. In 32 patients with prolactin-secreting tumors, 19 with microprolactinomas and 13 with macroprolactinomas, and ten healthy volunteers, we evaluated the prolactin secretion in response to pharmacological manipulations of central dopaminergic tone. To this end, three tests were performed, in random order: (1) 4-h saline infusion; (2) 10 mg metoclopramide as i.v. bolus; (3) 4-h dopamine infusion (0.01 microgram/kg/min) with a 10-mg metoclopramide bolus given after the second hour of infusion. Dopamine infusion, compared to saline, caused a significant prolactin decrease in all the three groups of subjects, without significant difference between micro- and macroprolactinoma patients. In prolactinoma patients, administration of metoclopramide induced a significant rise in plasma prolactin which, however, was significantly lower than the one displayed by controls. Again, no difference was observed between the two groups of hyperprolactinemic patients. Dopamine infusion induced a significant and comparable increase in the prolactin response to metoclopramide in micro- and macroprolactinoma patients, while it was ineffective in control subjects. In conclusion, no differences appear to exist between micro- and macroprolactinoma patients as regards the prolactin secretory pattern during pharmacological modifications of the dopaminergic tone. A central dopaminergic defect and an increased prolactin turnover with attendant reduction of the intracellular hormone pool may both be involved in the reduced prolactin release following provocative stimuli in patients with prolactinoma.

Effect of moderate weight loss on prolactin secretion in normal female volunteers

Sleep-related prolactin secretion and prolactin responses to the infusion of low doses of the dopamine antagonist, metoclopramide, and thyrotropin-releasing hormone were measured in 11 female volunteers before and after undertaking a diet in which they lost a mean of 3.1 kg in weight in 3 weeks. No effect of weight loss on these measures was found, but there was a significant, although modest, reduction in fasting plasma tryptophan concentration without any change in the concentration of competing amino acids.

Humoral effects of metoclopramide and domperidone in normal subjects and in hypertensive patients

To evaluate whether, in humans, metoclopramide (MCP), a DA2 antagonist which readily crosses the brain-blood barrier, can stimulate plasma aldosterone (ALD) through hypophyseal-adrenal axis activation in addition to its direct adrenal antidopaminergic activity, we have investigated the effects of MCP and domperidone (DMP), a specific antagonist of peripheral DA2 receptors, on plasma ALD, adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), cortisol and prolactin (PRL) in 15 subjects. Ten controls and 5 uncomplicated essential hypertensive patients, in whom the dopaminergic tone is hypothesized to be reduced, received, according to a single-blind randomized procedure, MCP (10 mg iv) or DMP (10 mg iv) and, after an interval of at least 1 week, the reverse treatment. MCP and DMP similarly increased PRL (p less than 0.001), while only MCP significantly increased plasma ALD (p less than 0.01), ACTH (p less than 0.02) and cortisol (p less than 0.02) both in normotensives and in hypertensives, without any difference between them. These data confirm that, in spite of similar DA2 antagonistic potency of the two drugs, only MCP is able to increase plasma ALD. Since MCP significantly increased also ACTH levels we cannot exclude an involvement of this hormone on MCP-induced ALD release. Finally, the similar PRL and ALD response in normotensives and hypertensives does not support the hypothesis of a reduced dopaminergic system activity in essential hypertensives.

Metoclopramide effect on serum prolactin LH and FSH in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

In order to investigate the DA activity in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) we studied the response of LH, FSH and PRL to a dopamine receptor antagonist metoclopramide (MCP-10 mg iv) in 12 PCO subjects (7 with normal and 5 with elevated levels of prolactin). The prolactin and LH responses to metoclopramide were compared to those obtained in 6 normal cycling women. Although a significant increase in PRL levels was documented after MCP administration in all PCO patients and normal cycling women (p less than 0.01), the highest increment in PRL levels was observed in normoprolactinemic PCO subjects. In contrast a blunted PRL response was observed in hyperprolactinemic PCO patients. There was a negative correlation between basal PRL levels and the maximum net increase in PRL after MCP. In both groups of PCO subjects MCP administration caused initial decrease in LH levels followed by an increase after 4 h. In hyperprolactinemic PCO patients this observed MCP effect on LH was more pronounced and significantly different in comparison with normoprolactinemic PCO patients (p less than 0.01). MCP administration did not cause significant acute alterations in LH levels in normal cycling women and no significant FSH changes in either PCO or control subjects. A relative dopamine deficiency might cause hypersecretion of PRL and LH in patients with PCOS and hyperprolactinemia.

Acute effects of L-dopa and bromocriptine on serum PRL, LH and FSH levels in patients with hyperprolactinemic and normoprolactinemic polycystic ovary syndrome

We have investigated the importance of the dopaminergic control of gonadotropin secretion by studying LH, FSH and PRL responses to L-dopa and bromocriptine in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Both L-dopa and bromocriptine administration were followed by a statistically significant decrease in LH in the hyperprolactinemic PCO patients (compared to the normoprolactinemic subgroup - p less than 0.01 and control group - p less than 0.05); the decline was proportional to the basal level of LH. A significant positive correlation between basal LH levels and maximum net decrease of LH was observed after administration of both agents (p less than 0.01). Although both subgroups of PCO patients showed a similar decrease in PRL levels it was statistically significant only in the normoprolactinemic patients (p less than 0.01). Prolactin sensitivity to the inhibitory effect of bromocriptine and L-dopa showed a significant correlation with the basal PRL level (p less than 0.01). The response of serum FSH was variable and not significant. These results suggest that a reduction of an inhibitory influence of hypothalamic dopamine might be a cause of inappropriately elevated LH and PRL levels found in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and hyperprolactinemia.

Dysfunction of dopaminergic regulation of prolactin in patients with functioning and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas and craniopharyngiomas

The response to domperidone (a dopamine blocking agent) of serum prolactin (PRL) levels was compared in 3 patients with amenorrhea-galactorrhea without evidence of a pituitary tumor, 23 patients with prolactinomas (10 cases with histologic confirmation), 7 patients with histologically verified large nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas with normal or moderately elevated basal PRL levels, and 6 patients with histologically verified craniopharyngiomas (3 with normal basal PRL levels and 3 with elevated PRL levels). The response was compared with that of 10 patients with postpartum hyperprolactinemia and 14 normal women. Ten milligrams of intravenous domperidone induced a rapid rise in PRL that was maximal at 30 to 45 minutes in normal, postpartum, and amenorrhea-galactorrhea patients who had no sign of tumor. In contrast, domperidone failed to induce significant changes in PRL in cases of prolactinoma, nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, and craniopharyngioma with or without elevated basal PRL levels. The results suggest that dopaminergic control on PRL secretion was impaired in all tumor cases. The mechanisms of this abnormal dopaminergic control, however, may be different. Whereas dopamine control in cases of prolactinoma is altered at the level of pituitary dopamine receptors, alternative explanations must be found for those tumors with normal basal PRL levels and lack of response to domperidone.

The interaction of trh and dopaminergic mechanisms in the regulation of stimulated prolactin release in man

The manner by which dopaminergic and TRH mechanisms interact to control PRL release is not known. Whilst dopamine receptor antagonists and TRH both release PRL, it is not known if the PRL released by these two mechanisms reflects similar aspects of physiological control, or if PRL responses to these mechanisms of release can be dissociated. We addressed this question by studying the PRL responses to maximal stimulatory dose of TRH and domperidone (a DA receptor antagonist), which were administered sequentially, simultaneously or separately on different occasions. Six normal volunteers undertook three sets of studies: (1) standard PRL stimulation tests to 400 micrograms TRH, 5 mg domperidone or simultaneous TRH/domperidone administration, (2) domperidone bolus-infusion study in which either 5 mg domperidone or 400 micrograms TRH was administered i.v. at 120 min during a 240 min infusion of domperidone (50 micrograms/min) which was preceded by a 5 mg i.v. bolus of the drug, and (3) TRH bolus-infusion study in which domperidone or TRH was administered i.v. at 120 min during a 240 min infusion of TRH (0.4 micrograms/min) which was preceded by a 400 micrograms i.v. bolus of the drug. In Study 1, simultaneous TRH/domperidone administration induced an incremental rise in PRL (5195 +/- 940 mIU/l) which was significantly greater (P less than 0.0005) than with either domperidone (3730 +/- 825 mIU/l) or TRH (1335 +/- 300 mIU/l) alone. In study 2, TRH administration at 120 min resulted in a significant rise (P less than 0.01) in PRL (delta PRL 960 +/- 232 mIU/l) whilst the second dose of domperidone did not, thus suggesting that the initial bolus and subsequent infusion had resulted in complete DA receptor blockade. In Study 3, domperidone administered at 120 min induced a marked rise in PRL (delta PRL 3609 +/- 963 mIU/l). In contrast, the corresponding TRH stimulus resulted in a small rise (delta PRL 142 +/- 32 mIU/l) suggesting that the PRL release induced by the initial bolus and subsequent infusion had been near maximal. Thus, TRH is able to induce significant PRL release in the presence of maximal DA receptor blockade, and domperidone, in the presence of maximal TRH stimulation, is also capable of inducing significant PRL release. These observations together with the ability of TRH/domperidone to induce a greater PRL response than either agent alone, suggest that each stimulus has a specific releasing action on a fraction of intracellular PRL which is not accessible to the other.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Physiologic concentrations of dopamine fail to suppress prolactin secretion in patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia or prolactinomas

Several investigators have suggested that normal responsiveness to dopamine is exhibited by pituitary lactotrophs in patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas. These studies, however, have employed dopamine infusion rates that produced supraphysiologic serum dopamine concentrations. In order to further examine this issue, we infused graded doses of dopamine to normal men and women as well as to patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas. Dopamine infusion rates as low as 0.004 micrograms/kg/min, which were associated with physiologic serum dopamine levels, produced significant (p less than 0.01) suppression of prolactin in normal women and in normal males (p less than 0.05). In contrast, a 10-fold increase in the dopamine infusion rate, 0.04 micrograms/kg/min, was required in the hyperprolactinemic subjects to produce prolactin suppression similar to that found in the control subjects. Hence, prolactin secretion in both tumors and other hyperprolactinemic states is associated with a resistance to suppression by dopamine.

The inability of dynamic tests of prolactin and TSH secretion to differentiate between tumorous and non-tumorous hyperprolactinemia

Certain hyperprolactinemic patients have an obvious pituitary tumor while others with normal pituitary radiology may or may not harbor a pituitary microadenoma. A variety of biochemical tests have been proposed to distinguish between those with and those without pituitary tumors. The aims of this study were: firstly to examine these tests to assess their efficacy in differentiating between patients with radiologically-demonstrated pituitary tumors and normal controls; and secondly to establish if those hyperprolactinemic patients with normal radiology formed two distinct groups biochemically as might be expected if some did and some did not have tumors. The prolactin (PRL) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) response to domperidone and the PRL response to TRH and insulin-induced hypoglycemia have thus been examined in hyperprolactinemic subjects with and without radiological evidence of an adenoma and in normal controls. The basal serum PRL was similar in patients with and without radiological evidence of a pituitary adenoma. The serum PRL response to all stimuli studied, expressed as a percentage of initial values, was blunted in patients with known pituitary tumors with total separation from values in control subjects. Results for patients with normal pituitary radiology were similar to those for patients with tumors with minimal overlap with controls. The peak TSH increment after domperidone was exaggerated in patients with known tumors, but overlap with control values was observed in 25%. In patients with normal radiology the peak TSH increment after domperidone was similarly increased but again overlap with control values occurred in 28%. Cluster analysis showed no evidence of two subgroups of response with in the hyperprolactinemic patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Prolactin and thyrotropin response to blockade of dopamine synthesis by monoiodotyrosine in subjects with postpartum and pathological hyperprolactinemia

To better understand the state of dopamine (DA) neurotransmission in the tuberoinfundibular DA system (TIDA), monoiodotyrosine (3-iodo-L-tyrosine, MIT), a potent inhibitor of DA synthesis, was acutely administered to 8 normal women, 7 postpartum women, 8 women with pathological hyperprolactinemia and 5 women after successful removal of a prolactinoma. The effects on plasma prolactin (PRL) and thyrotropin (TSH) were compared to those induced in the same subjects by the DA receptor antagonist domperidone (DOM). MIT (1 gpo) and DOM (10 mg iv) induced qualitatively similar hormonal responses, although the PRL- and TSH-releasing effects of DOM were always greater than those of MIT. In control subjects, MIT treatment induced a consistent rise in plasma PRL (peak increment 45.2 +/- 13 ng/ml at 120 min); in the same subjects DOM induced a prompter and higher PRL response, (peak increment 147.8 +/- 26 ng/ml at 30 min). MIT failed to alter plasma TSH levels, while DOM induced a significant rise in plasma TSH. In postpartum women MIT induced a prompter and higher PRL rise than that occurring in controls (peak increment 180.3 +/- 20 ng/ml at 90 min), though also in this instance DOM proved to be a more potent PRL releaser (peak increment 345.7 +/- 88 ng/ml at 30 min) than MIT. MIT was unable to stimulate TSH secretion, while DOM induced a significant rise in plasma TSH. In women with pathological hyperprolactinemia MIT failed to alter baseline PRL levels while DOM slightly increased them (peak increment 14.7 +/- 3 ng/ml at 30 min).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect rates of different modalities for treatment of prolactin adenomas

Results of treatment of 963 patients with prolactin adenomas described in the literature were reviewed. The patient population was stratified into four subgroups: women and men with serum prolactin levels above and below 100 ng/ml for each of the treatment modalities: transsphenoidal surgery, bromocriptine, heavy ion radiation, conventional radiation, and transsphenoidal surgery plus conventional radiation. The five largest series within each subgroup were included. Success rates and recurrence rates were calculated for: (1) reduction of tumor size, (2) normalization of serum prolactin levels, and (3) normalization of other pituitary functions. Complication rates were calculated for procedural impairment of other pituitary functions. Transsphenoidal surgery was found to be the most effective treatment for lasting control, and bromocriptine for temporary control, of prolactin adenomas. Recurrent adenomas were most effectively treated by transsphenoidal surgery if serum prolactin levels were below 100 ng/ml. If serum prolactin levels were above 100 ng/ml, bromocriptine was the most effective treatment. Heavy ion radiation, with success rates comparable to those of transsphenoidal surgery and bromocriptine, but with lower recurrence rates, may eventually prove the most effective treatment of all.

Pituitary secretion after administration of a new cerebroactive drug, fipexide

The effect of a single oral dose of 400 mg fipexide on pituitary secretion was investigated in 10 elderly non-endocrine patients. Fipexide induced significant decrease (P less than 0.05) in serum prolactin (PRL) values at 90 and 120 min after drug administration, without affecting serum growth hormone (GH), gonadotropin (LH and FSH), thyrotropin (TSH) and cortisol values. Fipexide was unable to modify metoclopramide-induced PRL release in five of these patients. Our results show that this drug acts as a mild dopamine (DA) agonist, probably not directly affecting hypothalamic and/or pituitary DA receptors but indirectly via a reduced DA re-uptake at the pre-synaptic level.

Dopaminergic control of gonadotrophin secretion in normal women and in patients with pathological hyperprolactinaemia

The role of dopaminergic mechanisms in the control of gonadotrophin secretion in normal and hyperprolactinaemic subjects is controversial. Whilst bromocriptine, a potent dopamine agonist, has been used to restore normal gonadotrophin secretion in subjects with pathological hyperprolactinaemia (PHP), dopamine and dopamine agonists have been reported to suppress basal and stimulated gonadotrophin release. We therefore investigated the importance of dopaminergic control of gonadotrophin secretion by studying LH, FSH and PRL responses in normal and PHP subjects to central dopamine synthesis inhibition using monoiodotyrosine (MIT) and to a 4 h dopamine infusion designed to elevate peripheral plasma dopamine concentration to levels reported for pituitary portal plasma (1-6 ng/ml). MIT administration resulted in a significant release of PRL (peak increment 520 +/- 84% above basal) but not of LH or FSH in normal subjects. In PHP subjects there was a blunted PRL response (peak 13.3 +/- 3.5%) to MIT administration and significant LH (P less than 0.05) but not FSH release. Dopamine infusion (0.5 microgram/kg/min) resulted in suppression of PRL (min 19 +/- 3% of basal) but not of LH or FSH. A rebound of PRL (peak 188 +/- 68% of basal) but not LH or FSH occurred on cessation of dopamine. There was an apparent rise in LH (P less than 0.02 vs. normals) but not FSH in PHP patients during dopamine infusion. Plateau dopamine levels achieved during the infusion were 2.9 +/- 0.3 ng/ml and 5.9 +/- 0.8 ng/ml in normal and PHP subjects respectively. The responses to MIT show that dopamine functions as an inhibitor of PRL but not of LH or FSH in normal subjects. In PHP patients the responses suggest increased dopaminergic inhibition of LH release but loss of inhibitory control of PRL release. Physiological concentrations of plasma dopamine do not significantly inhibit LH or FSH release in normal subjects but paradoxically results in an apparent release of LH in PHP patients. We conclude that dopamine mechanisms do not play a significant role in modulating gonadotrophin release in normal subjects. In PHP patients, PRL feedback results in increased hypothalamic dopamine activity which in turn inhibits LH release. We conclude that the inhibitory action of dopamine on PRL release restores LH secretion by removing central dopaminergic inhibition through hypothalamic feedback of PRL.

The interrelationships between prolactin and thyrotrophin secretion following dopaminergic blockage in patients with mild hyperprolactinaemia without any demonstrable pituitary tumour

PRL, TSH and gonadotrophin responses to the dopaminergic antagonist, metoclopramide, were studied in mildly hyperprolactinaemic patients with normal sella radiology and CT scan. Eleven female patients with basal PRL levels ranging from 23 to 124 ng/ml were challenged with intravenous metoclopramide (10 mg) and on subsequent occasions with TRH (200 micrograms) and LHRH (100 micrograms). On the basis of the PRL secretory pattern following metoclopramide and TRH stimulation, the patients were divided into two groups. Group I comprised six subjects who were PRL non-responsive to TRH and metoclopramide. Group II (five subjects) demonstrated PRL responses to TRH and metoclopramide indistinguishable from female controls. Mean +/- SD basal PRL levels were 68.5 +/- 29.9 ng/ml in Group I and not different in Group II (40.6 +/- 12.0 ng/ml). Basal LH levels were increased in Group II, whereas FSH was increased in Group I. Basal TSH levels were lower in Group I than the controls. Following metoclopramide, Group I patients had an increase in TSH from a basal of 2.4 +/- 0.7 microU/ml to a peak of 5.9 +/- 2.7 microU/ml (P less than 0.005) which occurred at 30 min. TSH values were increased above basal at all time intervals following metoclopramide. In contrast, TSH levels did not change in Group II patients or the controls after metoclopramide administration. Both patient groups had TSH responses to TRH similar to the controls. Following LHRH, the LH increase was greater in Group II and the FSH in Group I. In neither group nor the controls did gonadotrophin levels change after metoclopramide. In Group II females, PRL responsiveness to metoclopramide was associated with TSH non-responsiveness. In Group I females, PRL levels failed to rise, whereas TSH increased. The PRL and TSH profile in Group I females is typical of a prolactinoma. It is concluded that PRL as well as TSH determinations following metoclopramide are useful indices in the assessment of hyperprolactinaemia and may be of value in differentiating the functional state from that of a pituitary tumour.

Inhibition of prolactin secretion by low-dose dopamine infusion in patients with hyperprolactinaemia

Dopamine inhibits the secretion of prolactin from the pituitary. We have examined the relation between plasma dopamine and serum prolactin in 12 patients with hyperprolactinaemia during the infusion of dopamine at low doses (0.01, 0.1 and 1 microgram/kg/min). Plasma dopamine levels were raised from less than 100 pg/ml at the lowest rate of infusion to more than 20 000 pg/ml at the highest. Suppression of prolactin secretion was seen in some patients even at the lowest rate of infusion (0.01 microgram/kg/min); marked suppression of prolactin secretion (60%; 17--83%) was found at the intermediate dose (0.1 microgram/kg/min) in 11 of the 12 subjects with little further decrease in serum prolactin (70%; 50--87%) in those in whom the rate of dopamine infusion was increased ten-fold. One patient with the highest serum prolactin (82 500 mu/l) showed no decrease in prolactin either at the lowest or intermediate rates of dopamine infusion. Serum prolactin levels returned to values similar to or greater than basal on cessation of dopamine infusion. Infusion of dopamine at doses much lower than previously used in man exposes the pituitary to a concentration of dopamine sufficient to suppress prolactin secretion. These observations have important implications in understanding the pathophysiology of prolactin secretion from the pituitary gland and for future investigations of the control of hormone release by dopamine.

Nomifensine decreases the thyroid-stimulating-hormone response to thyrotropin-releasing-hormone in normal subjects

The Thyroid-stimulating-hormone (TSH) secretion has been studied in 12 normal euthyroid subjects (4 males, 8 females) after nomifensine (NOM) administration (200 mg po). NOM is a drug which activates dopaminergic neurotransmission at the Central Nervous System level. Blood samples were drawn every h for 4 h after NOM or placebo, respectively. At the 4th hour thyrotropin-releasing-hormone (TRH) was administered in bolus (200 micrograms iv), in both studies, and additional samples were collected for 90 min. The results show a moderate suppression (NS) of TSH and a clear-cut reduction in the secretory response to TRH after NOM administration (secretory area: TRH after placebo 723 +/- 132, TRH after NOM 400 +/- 83; p less than 0.01). The data appear to confirm that dopaminergic neurotransmission exerts an inhibitory role upon TSH secretion. The mechanism by which NOM induced dopaminergic activation leads to the suppression of TSH release after TRH has not yet been elucidated. An interference in TSH storage and/or in the post receptor mechanisms involved in TRH action might be hypothesized.

Dopaminergic mechanisms regulating prolactin secretion in patients with prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma. Long-term studies after selective transsphenoidal surgery

Twenty-seven female patients with prolactin-secreting pituitary microadenoma, were studied at different intervals following selective transsphenoidal removal of the tumor. Postoperatively, all patients had normal prolactin (PRL) levels and regular menstrual cycles were restored. Sixteen of 27 patients showed positive responses to TRH and metoclopramide (MCP) within 1 mo after surgery. On the contrary, 9 patients showed evaluation of these patients demonstrated that normal neuroendocrine relationships were restored after several months since positive PRL responses to TRH and MCP could be elicited in such patients. The remaining 2 patients who showed basal PRL levels in the upper range of normal, exhibited negative responses to TRH and MCP. These patients had progressively to TRH and MCP exhibited 10-20 mo after surgery a normal decrease in PRL levels following administration of carbidopa plus L-Dopa. Negative responses to carbidopa plus L-Dopa were instead obtained in 6 postoperative patients with elevated PRL levels and negative responses to TRH and MCP. These results suggest that: 1) Hyperprolactinemia induced by "autonomous" pituitary adenomas increases hypothaLamic dopamine (DA) secretion, which in turn inhibits PRL secretion by nonadenomatous lactotropes. 2) Total selective removal of the microadenoma acutely decreases PRL concentration, but a functional inhibition of the normal lactotrope can persist for a period of few months following surgery in a certain number of patients. 3) Prolonged reduction of PRL concentration is accompanied to a normal DA tone with reestablishment of normal neuroendocrine relationships.

Regression of pituitary microadenoma during and following bromocriptine therapy: persistent defect in prolactin regulation before and throughout pregnancy

During 5 years of clinical, endocrinologic, and radiologic observations in a woman with a microprolactinoma treated medically with bromocriptine for 29 months, serial hypothalamic-pituitary studies revealed a defect in lactotrope function after prolactin (PRL) concentrations and ovulation were restored to normal. This defect persisted throughout a spontaneously conceived pregnancy in which the PRL, estradiol, and progesterone levels were subnormal, while, the dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels were normal and estriol concentrations were elevated. Levels of the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) were close to and slightly above the normal ranges. These observations are consistent with a role for PRL, interacting with hCG, in the control of estrogen and progesterone secretion by the fetoplacental unit. Lactation was initiated and maintained post partum. Pituitary function and PrL responses to suckling suggested improved lactotrope function 22 to 25 months after withdrawal of bromocriptine. The impaired lactotrope function, therefore, did not preclude normal implantation, pregnancy maintenance, onset of parturition, fetal development, and lactation.