Anti-Hu Antibodies in Patients With Neurologic Side Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Opsoclonus-Ataxia Syndrome in a Patient With Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

To describe a case of post-immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome (OMAS), with complete clinical remission after treatment.

METHODS

A 52-year-old man was admitted because of subacute-onset vertigo, dysarthria, vomiting, and weight loss. He was under atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) monotherapy (23 cycles) for metastatic small-cell lung cancer, with excellent response.

RESULTS

On examination (1 month after symptom onset), the patient had opsoclonus, dysarthria, severe truncal and gait ataxia, and mild appendicular ataxia without myoclonus (SARA score 26/40). Brain MRI showed mild cerebellar atrophy, and CSF analysis disclosed pleocytosis and oligoclonal bands. Anti-SOX1 antibodies were detected in serum and CSF. Atezolizumab was stopped, and corticosteroids and monthly IV immunoglobulins were administered. Chemotherapy (carboplatin and etoposide) was also started because of cancer progression. Three months later, examination showed regression of the opsoclonus, truncal ataxia, and dysarthria and persistence of very mild gait ataxia (SARA score 3.5/40), which completely regressed at last examination (20 months after onset).

DISCUSSION

The clinical pattern and reversibility bring the present case close to a few patients with paraneoplastic OMAS described before the ICI era. More research is needed to clarify the pathogenesis and outcomes of OMAS in the context of ICI.

Neurological Immune-Related Adverse Events Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of various advanced and aggressive types of malignancy has significantly increased both survival and long-term remission rates. ICIs block crucial inhibitory pathways of the immune system, in order to trigger an aggravated immune response against the tumor. However, this enhanced immune activation leads to the development of numerous immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which may affect any system. Although severe neurological irAEs are relatively rare, they carry a high disability burden, and they can be potentially life-threatening. Therefore, clinicians must be alert and act promptly when individuals receiving ICIs present with new-onset neurological symptoms. In this narrative review, we have collected all the currently available data regarding the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of post-ICI neurological irAEs. This review aims to raise physicians' awareness, enrich their knowledge regarding disease pathogenesis, and guide them through the diagnosis and management of post-ICI neurological irAEs.

Central nervous system adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may trigger immune-related adverse events which rarely affect the central nervous system (CNS-irAEs). Over the past few years, cumulative data have led to the characterization of well defined syndromes with distinct cancer and antibody associations as well as different outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most frequent CNS-irAE is encephalitis, which includes three main groups: meningoencephalitis, a nonfocal syndrome usually responsive to corticosteroids; limbic encephalitis, associated with high-risk paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) antibodies (e.g. anti-Hu, anti-Ma2) and neuroendocrine cancers, characterized by poor treatment response and outcomes; and cerebellar ataxia, with variable outcomes (worse when high-risk PNS antibodies are detected). Additionally, a diffuse encephalopathy without inflammatory findings, with poor response to corticosteroids and high mortality has been described. The spectrum of CNS-irAEs also includes meningitis, myelitis, and rarer presentations. A subset of CNS-irAEs (i.e. limbic encephalitis and/or rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia) is undistinguishable from ICI-naïve PNS.

SUMMARY

The clinical and outcomes diversity of CNS-irAEs suggests different pathogenic mechanisms, which need to be understood to establish more effective and specific treatment modalities. It is crucial to identify biomarkers able to predict which patients will experience severe CNS-irAEs, to anticipate their diagnosis, and to predict long-term outcomes.

Anti-Hu antibody associated paraneoplastic neurological syndrome in a child with ganglioneuroblastoma: A rare case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Paraneoplastic neurological syndrome with anti-Hu antibody (Hu-PNS) is a neurological disorder that occur in patients with malignancy. The syndrome has a wide range of presentations and can present before diagnosis of primary malignancy. Familiarity with these paraneoplastic neurological syndromes can help early recognition and take appropriate regimens.

PATIENTS CONCERNS

Diagnosis and treatment of Hu-PNS.

DIAGNOSES

This is retrospective study that analyzed the clinical data of this case. Through retrospective analysis and targeted antibody screening, serum anti-Hu antibody was detected. Subsequent spinal imaging revealed a mass in the paraspinal region, which was confirmed as ganglioneuroblastoma by pathologic examination.

INTERVENTIONS

The child was treated with a course of intravenous immunoglobulin and radical surgical operation without chemotherapy.

OUTCOMES

The neurological symptoms were gradually improved and no signs indicate disease progression or tumor recurrence.

LESSONS

Hu-PNS has rarely been reported in children with ganglioneuroblastomas. They can mimic non-neoplastic processes, making detection and diagnosis difficult. Serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid onconeural antibody can strongly indicate occult cancers. Early detection of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes can help take appropriate regimens and improve prognosis.

Autoimmune Movement Disorders Complicating Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may trigger autoimmune neurological conditions, including movement disorders (MD).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to characterize MDs occurring as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of ICIs.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of case reports/series of MDs as irAEs of ICIs was performed.

RESULTS

Of 5682 eligible papers, 26 articles with 28 patients were included. MDs occur as a rare complication of cancer immunotherapy with heterogeneous clinical presentations and in most cases in association with other irAEs. Inflammatory basal ganglia T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery abnormalities are rarely observed, but brain imaging is frequently unrevealing. Cerebrospinal fluid findings are frequently suggestive of inflammation. Half of cases are associated with a wide range of autoantibodies. Steroids and ICI withdrawal usually lead to improvement, even though some patients experienced relapses or a severe clinical course.

CONCLUSION

MDs are a rare complication of ICIs that should be promptly recognized to offer patients a correct diagnosis and treatment.

Neurological Adverse Events Related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Practical Review

The increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in cancer therapy has brought attention to their associated neurotoxicities, termed neurological immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs). Despite their relatively rare incidence, n-irAEs pose a significant risk, potentially leading to severe, long-lasting disabilities or even fatal outcomes. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of n-irAEs, focusing on their recognition and management. The review addresses a spectrum of n-irAEs, encompassing myositis, myasthenia gravis, various neuropathies, and central nervous system complications, such as encephalitis, meningitis, and demyelinating diseases. The key features of n-irAEs are emphasized in this review, including their early onset after initiation of ICIs, potential association with non-neurological irAEs and/or concurrent oncological response, the significance of ruling out other etiologies, and the expected improvement upon discontinuation of ICIs and/or immunosuppression. Furthermore, this review delves into considerations for ICI re-challenge and the intricate nature of n-irAEs within the context of pre-existing autoimmune and paraneoplastic syndromes. It underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment, highlighting the pivotal role of severity grading in guiding treatment decisions.

Central nervous system immune-related disorders after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a multicenter study

Background

COVID-19 vaccines have been approved due to their excellent safety and efficacy data and their use has also permitted to reduce neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2. However, clinical trials were underpowered to detect rare adverse events. Herein, the aim was to characterize the clinical spectrum and immunological features of central nervous system (CNS) immune-related events following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Methods

Multicenter, retrospective, cohort study (December 1, 2020-April 30, 2022). Inclusion criteria were (1) de novo CNS disorders developing after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (probable causal relationship as per 2021 Butler criteria) (2); evidence for an immune-mediated etiology, as per (i) 2016 Graus criteria for autoimmune encephalitis (AE); (ii) 2015 Wingerchuk criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders; (iii) criteria for myelitis.

Results

Nineteen patients were included from 7 tertiary referral hospitals across Italy and France (one of them being a national referral center for AE), over almost 1 year and half of vaccination campaign. Vaccines administered were mRNA-based (63%) and adenovirus-vectored (37%). The median time between vaccination and symptoms onset was 14 days (range: 2-41 days). CSF was inflammatory in 74%; autoantibodies were detected in 5%. CSF cytokine analysis (n=3) revealed increased CXCL-10 (IP-10), suggesting robust T-cell activation. The patients had AE (58%), myelitis (21%), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) (16%), and brainstem encephalitis (5%). All patients but 2 received immunomodulatory treatment. At last follow-up (median 130 days; range: 32-540), only one patient (5%) had a mRS>2.

Conclusion

CNS adverse events of COVID-19 vaccination appear to be very rare even at reference centers and consist mostly of antibody-negative AE, myelitis, and ADEM developing approximately 2 weeks after vaccination. Most patients improve following immunomodulatory treatment.

Autonomic nervous system involvement in autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes

In autoimmune neurological diseases, the autonomic nervous system can be the primary target of autoimmunity (e.g. autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy), or, more frequently, be damaged together with other areas of the nervous system (e.g. Guillain-Barré syndrome). Patients with autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) often develop dysautonomia; however, the frequency and spectrum of autonomic signs and symptoms remain ill defined except for those scenarios in which dysautonomia is a core feature of the disease. Such is the case of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, Morvan syndrome or anti-NMDAR encephalitis; in the latter, patients with dysautonomia have been reported to carry a more severe disease and to retain higher disability than those without autonomic dysfunction. Likewise, the presence of autonomic involvement indicates a higher risk of death due to neurological cause in patients with anti-Hu PNS. However, in anti-Hu and other PNS, as well as in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitors' toxicities, the characterization of autonomic involvement is frequently overshadowed by the severity of other neurological symptoms and signs. When evaluated with tests specific for autonomic function, patients with autoimmune encephalitis or PNS usually show a more widespread autonomic involvement than clinically suggested, which may reflect a potential gap of care when it comes to diagnosing dysautonomia. This review aims to revise the autonomic involvement in patients with autoimmune encephalitis and PNS, using for that purpose an antibody-based approach. We also discuss and provide general recommendations for the evaluation and management of dysautonomia in these patients.

Pathogenesis and immunopathology of paraneoplastic disorders

Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS) represent a rare group of immune-mediated complications associated with an underlying tumor. Ectopic protein expression in neoplastic cells or an aberrant immune regulation in the course of hematooncologic diseases or thymomas trigger an autoimmune response that may affect any part of the central and/or peripheral nervous system. Recent advances in drug therapies as well as novel animal models and neuropathologic studies have led to further insights on the immune pathomechanisms of PNS. Although the syndromes share common paths in pathogenesis, they may differ in the disease course, prognosis, and therapy targets, depending on the localization and type of antibody epitope. Neuropathologic hallmarks of PNS associated with antibodies directed against intracellular epitopes are characterized by T cell-dominated inflammation, reactive gliosis including microglial nodules, and neuronal degeneration. By contrast, the neuropathology of cell surface antibody-mediated PNS strongly depends on the targeted antigen and varies from B cell/plasma cell-dominated inflammation and well-preserved neurons together with a reduced expression of the target antigen in anti-NMDAR encephalitis to irreversible Purkinje cell loss in anti-P/Q-type VGCC antibody-associated paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration. The understanding of different pathomechanisms in PNS is important because they strongly correspond with therapy response and prognosis, and should guide treatment decisions.

General features, pathogenesis, and laboratory diagnostics of autoimmune encephalitis

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a group of inflammatory conditions that can associate with the presence of antibodies directed to neuronal intracellular, or cell surface antigens. These disorders are increasingly recognized as an important differential diagnosis of infectious encephalitis and of other common neuropsychiatric conditions. Autoantibody diagnostics plays a pivotal role for accurate diagnosis of AE, which is of utmost importance for the prompt recognition and early treatment. Several AE subgroups can be identified, either according to the prominent clinical phenotype, presence of a concomitant tumor, or type of neuronal autoantibody, and recent diagnostic criteria have provided important insights into AE classification. Antibodies to neuronal intracellular antigens typically associate with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and poor prognosis, whereas antibodies to synaptic/neuronal cell surface antigens characterize many AE subtypes that associate with tumors less frequently, and that are often immunotherapy-responsive. In addition to the general features of AE, we review current knowledge on the pathogenic mechanisms underlying these disorders, focusing mainly on the potential role of neuronal antibodies in the most frequent conditions, and highlight current theories and controversies. Then, we dissect the crucial aspects of the laboratory diagnostics of neuronal antibodies, which represents an actual challenge for both pathologists and neurologists. Indeed, this diagnostics entails technical difficulties, along with particularly interesting novel features and pitfalls. The novelties especially apply to the wide range of assays used, including specific tissue-based and cell-based assays. These assays can be developed in-house, usually in specialized laboratories, or are commercially available. They are widely used in clinical immunology and in clinical chemistry laboratories, with relevant differences in analytic performance. Indeed, several data indicate that in-house assays could perform better than commercial kits, notwithstanding that the former are based on non-standardized protocols. Moreover, they need expertise and laboratory facilities usually unavailable in clinical chemistry laboratories. Together with the data of the literature, we critically evaluate the analytical performance of the in-house vs commercial kit-based approach. Finally, we propose an algorithm aimed at integrating the present strategies of the laboratory diagnostics in AE for the best clinical management of patients with these disorders.

Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes

OBJECTIVE

Progress is ongoing in understanding paraneoplastic neurologic disorders, with new syndromes and antibodies being described and more detailed evidence available to guide workup for diagnosis and treatment to improve outcomes. Many excellent reviews have summarized the molecular features of different antibodies, but this article emphasizes the clinical features of each syndrome that may help guide initial diagnosis and treatment, which often should occur before an antibody or cancer is found to confirm the diagnosis.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Recent findings include updated diagnostic criteria with validated sensitivity and specificity, discovery of novel antibodies, and clinical findings that increase the likelihood of an underlying paraneoplastic disorder. Suggestive syndromes that have been recently identified include faciobrachial dystonic seizures and pilomotor auras in anti-leucine-rich glioma inactivated protein 1 encephalitis, extreme delta brush on EEG in N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor encephalitis, déjà vu aura in anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) encephalitis, and sleep disturbances in several disorders. In addition, there is confirmed utility of brain positron emission tomography (PET) and CSF markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen and oligoclonal bands, as well as improved tests for the presence of leptomeningeal cancer cells in CSF. Associations of cancer immunotherapies with paraneoplastic syndromes and herpes simplex virus encephalitis (and COVID-19) with NMDA-receptor encephalitis have been described.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

All neurologists should be aware of advances regarding paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes, as patients can present with a wide variety of neurologic symptoms and earlier diagnosis and treatment can improve outcomes.

Neurological adverse events related to immune-checkpoint inhibitors in Spain: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neurological immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors can have several clinical manifestations, but the syndromes and prognostic factors are still not well known. We aimed to characterise and group the clinical features, with a special focus in patients presenting with encephalopathy, and to identify predictors of response to therapy and survival.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included patients with neurological immune-related adverse events from 20 hospitals in Spain whose clinical information, serum samples, and CSF samples were studied at Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Patients with pre-existing paraneoplastic syndromes or evidence of alternative causes for their neurological symptoms were excluded. We reviewed the clinical information, classified their clinical features, and determined the presence of neural antibodies. Neurological status was assessed by the treating physician one month after adverse event onset (as improvement vs no improvement) and at the last evaluation (complete recovery or modified Rankin Scale score decrease of at least 2 points, indicating good outcome, vs all other modified Rankin Scale scores, indicating poor outcome); if the participant had died, the date and cause of death were recorded. We used Fisher's exact tests and Mann-Whitney U tests to analyse clinical features, and multivariable logistic regression to analyse prognostic factors.

FINDINGS

From Jan 1, 2018, until Feb 1, 2023, 83 patients with suspected neurological immune-related adverse events after use of immune checkpoint inhibitors were identified, of whom 64 patients were included. These patients had a median age of 67 years (IQR 59-74); 42 (66%) were male and 22 (34%) were female. The predominant tumours were lung cancer (30 [47%] patients), melanoma (13 [21%] patients), and renal cell carcinoma (seven [11%] patients). Neural antibodies were detected in 14 (22%) patients; 52 (81%) patients had CNS involvement and 12 (19%) had peripheral nervous system involvement. Encephalopathy occurred in 45 (70%) patients, 12 (27%) of whom had antibodies or well defined syndromes consistent with definite paraneoplastic or autoimmune encephalitis, 24 (53%) of whom had encephalitis without antibodies or clinical features characteristic of a defined syndrome, and nine (20%) of whom had encephalopathy without antibodies or inflammatory changes in CSF or brain MRI. Nine (14%) of 64 patients had combined myasthenia and myositis, five of them with myocarditis. Even though 58 (91%) of 64 patients received steroids and 31 (48%) of 64 received additional therapies, 18 (28%) did not improve during the first month after adverse event onset, and 11 of these 18 people died. At the last follow-up for the 53 remaining patients (median 6 months, IQR 3-13), 20 (38%) had a poor outcome (16 deaths, one related to a neurological immune-related adverse event). Mortality risk was increased in patients with lung cancer (vs those with other cancers: HR 2·5, 95% CI 1·1-6·0) and in patients with encephalopathy without evidence of CNS inflammation or combined myocarditis, myasthenia, and myositis (vs those with the remaining syndromes: HR 5·0, 1·4-17·8 and HR 6·6, 1·4-31·0, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

Most neurological immune-related adverse events involved the CNS and were antibody negative. The presence of myocarditis, myasthenia, and myositis, of encephalopathy without inflammatory changes, or of lung cancer were independent predictors of death. Most deaths occurred during the first month of symptom onset. If our findings are replicated in additional cohorts, they could confirm that these patients need early and intensive treatment.

FUNDING

The Instituto de Salud Carlos III and the European Union.

Revisiting anti-Hu paraneoplastic autoimmunity: phenotypic characterization and cancer diagnosis

Anti-Hu are the most frequent antibodies in paraneoplastic neurological syndromes, mainly associated with an often limited stage small cell lung cancer. The clinical presentation is pleomorphic, frequently multifocal. Although the predominant phenotypes are well characterized, how different neurological syndromes associate is unclear. Likewise, no specific study assessed the performance of new-generation CT and PET scanners for cancer screening in these patients. Herein, we aimed to describe the clinical pattern and cancer screening in a retrospective cohort of 466 patients with anti-Hu autoimmunity from the French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes registry. Clinical presentation, cancer screening and diagnosis were analysed. Among the 466 patients, 220 (54%) had multifocal neurological involvement. A hierarchical cluster analysis grouped the patients into (i) mainly limbic encephalitis, (ii) predominantly peripheral neuropathy and (iii) broad involvement of the nervous system (mixed group). Compared with limbic encephalitis and mixed groups, patients in the neuropathy group more frequently had a chronic onset of symptoms (29 versus 13 and 17%), elevated CSF proteins (83 versus 47 and 67%) and died from cancer progression (67 versus 15 and 28%; all P < 0.05). No significant difference in overall survival was observed between groups. Dysautonomia and brainstem signs were associated with a higher risk of death from the neurological cause; cancer diagnosis was the main predictor of all-cause death, especially when diagnosed within 2 years from clinical onset (all P < 0.05). Three hundred and forty-nine (75%) patients had cancer: in 295 (84%) neurological symptoms preceded tumour diagnosis, being lung cancer in 262 (89%), thereof small cell lung cancer in 227 (87%). First CT scan revealed lung cancer in 205/241 (85%), and PET scan shortened the interval to diagnosis when the initial CT scan was negative [7 months (1-66) in 27 patients versus 14 months (2-45) in 6; P < 0.001]. Although cancer diagnosis mostly occurred within 2 years from clinical onset, 13/295 (4%) patients exceeded that threshold. Conversely, 33 patients (7%) were 'cancer-free' after 2 years of follow-up. However, 13/33 (39%) had initial suspicious imaging findings that spontaneously regressed. In conclusion, although anti-Hu autoimmunity clinical presentation is mostly multifocal, we observed patients with a predominant limbic syndrome or isolated sensory neuropathy. Early implementation of PET scan shortens the interval to cancer diagnosis, which was the strongest predictor of death, especially if diagnosed ≤2 years from clinical onset. As cancer was diagnosed >2 years after clinical onset in few patients, screening should be extended up to 5 years. In addition, tumour regression was suspected in a substantial proportion of 'cancer-free' patients.

Frequency and Referral Patterns of Neural Antibody Studies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experience From an Autoimmune Neurology Center

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the frequency of paraneoplastic or autoimmune encephalitis antibodies examined in a referral center changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

The number of patients who tested positive for neuronal or glial (neural) antibodies during pre-COVID-19 (2017-2019) and COVID-19 (2020-2021) periods was compared. The techniques used for antibody testing did not change during these periods and included a comprehensive evaluation of cell-surface and intracellular neural antibodies. The chi-square test, Spearman correlation, and Python programming language v3 were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Serum or CSF from 15,390 patients with suspected autoimmune or paraneoplastic encephalitis was examined. The overall positivity rate for antibodies against neural-surface antigens was similar in the prepandemic and pandemic periods (neuronal 3.2% vs 3.5%; glial 6.1 vs 5.2) with a mild single-disease increase in the pandemic period (anti-NMDAR encephalitis). By contrast, the positivity rate for antibodies against intracellular antigens was significantly increased during the pandemic period (2.8% vs 3.9%, p = 0.01), particularly Hu and GFAP.

DISCUSSION

Our findings do not support that the COVID-19 pandemic led to a substantial increase of known or novel encephalitis mediated by antibodies against neural-surface antigens. The increase in Hu and GFAP antibodies likely reflects the progressive increased recognition of the corresponding disorders.

Neurologic Complications of Cancer Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment over the past decade. As it is increasingly introduced into routine clinical practice, immune-related complications have become more frequent. Accurate diagnosis and treatment are essential, with the goal of reduced patient morbidity. This review aims to discuss the various clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatments, and prognosis of neurologic complications associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive T-cell therapies, and T-cell redirecting therapies. We also outline a suggested clinical approach related to the clinical use of these agents.

Neurological outcomes in immune checkpoint inhibitor-related neurotoxicity

While the spectrum of neurological immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events is expanding, patients' outcomes are not well documented. This study aimed to assess outcomes of neurological immune-related adverse events and to identify prognostic factors. All patients experiencing grade ≥2 neurological immune-related adverse events identified at two clinical networks (French Reference Center for Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes, Lyon; and OncoNeuroTox, Paris) over five years were included. Modified Rankin scores were assessed at onset, 6, 12, 18 months, and last visit. A multi-state Markov model was used to estimate the transition rates between minor disability (mRS <3), severe disability (mRS 3-5), and death (mRS 6), over the study period. The state-to-state transition rates were estimated using maximum likelihood and variables were introduced into the different transitions to study their effects. A total of 147 patients were included out of 205 patients with a suspicion of neurological immune-related adverse events. The median age was 65 years (range 20-87) and 87/147 patients (59.2%) were male. Neurological immune-related adverse events involved the peripheral nervous system in 87/147 patients (59.2%), the central nervous system in 51/147 (34.7%), and both systems in 9/147 (6.1%). Paraneoplastic-like syndromes were observed in 30/147 patients (20.4%). Cancers included lung cancers (36.1%), melanoma (30.6%), urological cancers (15.6%), and others (17.8%). Patients were treated with programmed cell death protein (ligan) 1 (PD(L)1) inhibitors (70.1%), CTLA4 inhibitors (3.4%) or both (25.9%). Severe disability was reported in 108/144 patients (75.0%) at onset and in 33/146 patients (22.6%) at last visit (median follow-up duration: 12 months, range 0.5-50); 48/147 (32.7%) patients died, from cancer progression (17/48, 35.4%), neurological toxicity (15/48, 31.2%), other causes (10/48, 20.8%) or unknown causes (6/48, 12.5%). The rate of transition from severe to minor disability independently increased with melanoma [compared to lung cancer, hazard ratio = 3.26, 95%CI (1.27; 8.41)] and myositis/neuromuscular junction disorders [hazard ratio = 8.26, 95%CI (2.90; 23.58)], and decreased with older age [hazard ratio = 0.68, 95%CI (0.47; 0.99)] and paraneoplastic-like syndromes [hazard ratio = 0.29, 95%CI (0.09; 0.98)]. In patients with neurological immune-related adverse events, myositis/neuromuscular junction disorders and melanoma increase the transition rate from severe to minor disability, while older age and paraneoplastic-like syndromes result in poorer neurological outcomes; future studies are needed to optimize the management of such patients.

Advances in treatments of patients with classical and emergent neurological toxicities of anticancer agents

The neurotoxicity associated to the anticancer treatments has received a growing body of interest in the recent years. The development of innovating therapies over the last 20years has led to the emergence of new toxicities. Their diagnosis and management can be challenging in the clinical practice and further research is warranted to improve the understanding of their pathogenic mechanisms. Conventional treatments as radiation therapy and chemotherapy are associated to well-known and under exploration emerging central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) toxicities. The identification of the risk factors and a better understanding of their pathogeny through a "bench to bedside and back again" approach, are the first steps towards the development of toxicity mitigation strategies. New imaging techniques and biological explorations are invaluable for their diagnosis. Immunotherapies have changed the cancer treatment paradigm from tumor cell centered to immune modulation towards an efficient anticancer immune response. The use of the immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T cells) lead to an increase in the incidence of immune-mediated toxicities and new challenges in the neurological patient's management. The neurological ICI-related adverse events (n-irAE) are rare but potentially severe and may present with both CNS and PNS involvement. The most frequent and well characterized, from a clinical and biological standpoint, are the PNS phenotypes: myositis and polyradiculoneuropathy, but the knowledge on CNS phenotypes and their treatments is expanding. The n-irAE management requires a good balance between dampening the autoimmune toxicity without impairing the anticancer immunity. The adoptive cell therapies as CAR-T cells, a promising anticancer strategy, trigger cellular activation and massive production of proinflammatory cytokines inducing frequent and sometime severe toxicity known as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome. Their management requires a close partnership between oncologist-hematologists, neurologists, and intensivists. The oncological patient's management requires a multidisciplinary clinical team (oncologist, neurologist and paramedical) as well as a research team leading towards a better understanding and a better management of the neurological toxicities.

Neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: An update of clinical presentations, diagnosis, and management

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has represented a major advance in cancer treatment. By enhancing endogenous immune responses to destroy cancer cells, ICIs can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with possible involvement of any organ system. IrAEs are frequent, particularly those involving the skin or the endocrine system, and usually completely reversible after temporary immunosuppression, while neurological irAEs (n-irAEs) are relatively rare, often severe, and they carry a considerable risk of mortality and long-term disability. They usually affect the peripheral nervous system, mainly manifesting as myositis, polyradiculoneuropathy, or cranial neuropathy, and, less frequently, involve the central nervous system, causing encephalitis, meningitis, or myelitis. Although somehow reminiscent of the disorders that neurologists are familiar to deal with in their daily practice, n-irAEs are characterized by distinctive features from their idiopathic counterparts; for instance, myositis may have a predominant oculo-bulbar involvement reminiscent of myasthenia gravis and frequently associates with myocarditis; peripheral neuropathy, although often resembling Guillain-Barré syndrome, usually responds to corticosteroids. Remarkably, several associations between the neurological phenotype and the type of ICIs or the type of cancer have emerged in the last few years, and the growing administration of ICIs in patients with neuroendocrine cancers has led to an increased number of reports of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (triggered or worsened by ICIs). This review aims to update current knowledge regarding the clinical presentation of n-irAEs. We also discuss the essential parts of the diagnostic approach, and we provide general recommendations for the management of these disorders.