1
|
Friedrichs-Maeder C, Proix T, Tcheng TK, Skarpaas T, Rao VR, Baud MO. Seizure Cycles under Pharmacotherapy. Ann Neurol 2024; 95:743-753. [PMID: 38379195 DOI: 10.1002/ana.26878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was undertaken to determine the effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs) on multidien (multiday) cycles of interictal epileptiform activity (IEA) and seizures and evaluate their potential clinical significance. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed up to 10 years of data from 88 of the 256 total adults with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy who participated in the clinical trials of the RNS System, an intracranial device that keeps records of IEA counts. Following adjunctive ASM trials, we evaluated changes over months in (1) rates of self-reported disabling seizures and (2) multidien IEA cycle strength (spectral power for periodicity between 4 and 40 days). We used a survival analysis and the receiver operating characteristics to assess changes in IEA as a predictor of seizure control. RESULTS Among 56 (33.3%) of the 168 adjunctive ASM trials suitable for analysis, ASM introduction was followed by an average 50 to 70% decrease in multidien IEA cycle strength and a concomitant 50 to 70% decrease in relative seizure rate for up to 12 months. Individuals with a ≥50% decrease in IEA cycle strength in the first 3 months of an ASM trial had a higher probability of remaining seizure responders (≥50% seizure rate reduction, p < 10-7) or super-responders (≥90%, p < 10-8) over the next 12 months. INTERPRETATION In this large cohort, a decrease in multidien IEA cycle strength following initiation of an adjunctive ASM correlated with seizure control for up to 12 months, suggesting that fluctuations in IEA mirror "disease activity" in pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy and may have clinical utility as a biomarker to predict treatment response. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:743-753.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Friedrichs-Maeder
- Sleep-Wake-Epilepsy Center, NeuroTec, Center for Experimental Neurology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Timothée Proix
- Fundamental Neurosciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Tara Skarpaas
- NeuroPace, Mountain View, California, USA; currently Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Vikram R Rao
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Maxime O Baud
- Sleep-Wake-Epilepsy Center, NeuroTec, Center for Experimental Neurology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nica A. Drug-resistant juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: A literature review. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2024; 180:271-289. [PMID: 38461125 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2024.02.385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
The ILAE's Task Force on Nosology and Definitions revised in 2022 its definition of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), the most common idiopathic generalized epilepsy disorder, but this definition may well change again in the future. Although good drug response could almost be a diagnostic criterion for JME, drug resistance (DR) is observed in up to a third of patients. It is important to distinguish this from pseudoresistance, which is often linked to psychosocial problems or psychiatric comorbidities. After summarizing these aspects and the various definitions applied to JME, the present review lists the risk factors for DR-JME that have been identified in numerous studies and meta-analyses. The factors most often cited are absence seizures, young age at onset, and catamenial seizures. By contrast, photosensitivity seems to favor good treatment response, at least in female patients. Current hypotheses on DR mechanisms in JME are based on studies of either simple (e.g., cortical excitability) or more complex (e.g., anatomical and functional connectivity) neurophysiological markers, bearing in mind that JME is regarded as a neural network disease. This research has revealed correlations between the intensity of some markers and DR, and above all shed light on the role of these markers in associated neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders in both patients and their siblings. Studies of neurotransmission have mainly pointed to impaired GABAergic inhibition. Genetic studies have generally been inconclusive. Increasing restrictions have been placed on the use of valproate, the standard antiseizure medication for this syndrome, owing to its teratogenic and developmental risks. Levetiracetam and lamotrigine are prescribed as alternatives, as is vagal nerve stimulation, and there are several other promising antiseizure drugs and neuromodulation methods. The development of better alternative treatments is continuing to take place alongside advances in our knowledge of JME, as we still have much to learn and understand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Nica
- Epilepsy Unit, Reference Center for Rare Epilepsies, Neurology Department, Clinical Investigation Center 1414, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France; Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), INSERM, Rennes University, Rennes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Daquin G, Bonini F. The landscape of drug resistant absence seizures in adolescents and adults: Pathophysiology, electroclinical spectrum and treatment options. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2024; 180:256-270. [PMID: 38413268 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
The persistence of typical absence seizures (AS) in adolescence and adulthood may reduce the quality of life of patients with genetic generalized epilepsies (GGEs). The prevalence of drug resistant AS is probably underestimated in this patient population, and treatment options are relatively scarce. Similarly, atypical absence seizures in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) may be unrecognized, and often persist into adulthood despite improvement of more severe seizures. These two seemingly distant conditions, represented by typical AS in GGE and atypical AS in DEE, share at least partially overlapping pathophysiological and genetic mechanisms, which may be the target of drug and neurostimulation therapies. In addition, some patients with drug-resistant typical AS may present electroclinical features that lie in between the two extremes represented by these generalized forms of epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Daquin
- Epileptology and Cerebral Rythmology, AP-HM, Timone hospital, Marseille, France
| | - F Bonini
- Epileptology and Cerebral Rythmology, AP-HM, Timone hospital, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Devinsky O, Elder C, Sivathamboo S, Scheffer IE, Koepp MJ. Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy: Misunderstandings, Challenges, and Opportunities. Neurology 2024; 102:e208076. [PMID: 38165295 PMCID: PMC11097769 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000208076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
The idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE) make up a fifth of all epilepsies, but <1% of epilepsy research. This skew reflects misperceptions: diagnosis is straightforward, pathophysiology is understood, seizures are easily controlled, epilepsy is outgrown, morbidity and mortality are low, and surgical interventions are impossible. Emerging evidence reveals that patients with IGE may go undiagnosed or misdiagnosed with focal epilepsy if EEG or semiology have asymmetric or focal features. Genetic, electrophysiologic, and neuroimaging studies provide insights into pathophysiology, including overlaps and differences from focal epilepsies. IGE can begin in adulthood and patients have chronic and drug-resistant seizures. Neuromodulatory interventions for drug-resistant IGE are emerging. Rates of psychiatric and other comorbidities, including sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, parallel those in focal epilepsy. IGE is an understudied spectrum for which our diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, scientific understanding, and therapies remain inadequate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orrin Devinsky
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (O.D., C.E.), New York University School of Medicine, New York, Department of Neuroscience (S.S.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Department of Neurology (S.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; Departments of Medicine and Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital (S.S.), Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine, Austin Health (I.E.S.), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (I.E.S.), and Department of Pediatrics (I.E.S.), Royal Children's Hospital, The University of Melbourne; The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy (M.J.K.), University College London Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Elder
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (O.D., C.E.), New York University School of Medicine, New York, Department of Neuroscience (S.S.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Department of Neurology (S.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; Departments of Medicine and Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital (S.S.), Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine, Austin Health (I.E.S.), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (I.E.S.), and Department of Pediatrics (I.E.S.), Royal Children's Hospital, The University of Melbourne; The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy (M.J.K.), University College London Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom
| | - Shobi Sivathamboo
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (O.D., C.E.), New York University School of Medicine, New York, Department of Neuroscience (S.S.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Department of Neurology (S.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; Departments of Medicine and Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital (S.S.), Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine, Austin Health (I.E.S.), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (I.E.S.), and Department of Pediatrics (I.E.S.), Royal Children's Hospital, The University of Melbourne; The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy (M.J.K.), University College London Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom
| | - Ingrid E Scheffer
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (O.D., C.E.), New York University School of Medicine, New York, Department of Neuroscience (S.S.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Department of Neurology (S.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; Departments of Medicine and Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital (S.S.), Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine, Austin Health (I.E.S.), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (I.E.S.), and Department of Pediatrics (I.E.S.), Royal Children's Hospital, The University of Melbourne; The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy (M.J.K.), University College London Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom
| | - Matthias J Koepp
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (O.D., C.E.), New York University School of Medicine, New York, Department of Neuroscience (S.S.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Department of Neurology (S.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; Departments of Medicine and Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital (S.S.), Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine, Austin Health (I.E.S.), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (I.E.S.), and Department of Pediatrics (I.E.S.), Royal Children's Hospital, The University of Melbourne; The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy (M.J.K.), University College London Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cerulli Irelli E, Gesche J, Schlabitz S, Fortunato F, Catania C, Morano A, Labate A, Vorderwülbecke BJ, Gambardella A, Baykan B, Holtkamp M, Di Bonaventura C, Beier CP. Epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone: Electroclinical features and prognostic patterns. Epilepsia 2024; 65:84-94. [PMID: 37872695 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone (GTCA) is a common but poorly characterized idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) syndrome. Hence, we investigated electroclinical features, seizure outcome, and antiseizure medication (ASM) withdrawal in a large cohort of GTCA patients. METHODS In this multicenter retrospective study, GTCA patients defined according to the diagnostic criteria of the International League Against Epilepsy (2022) were included. We investigated prognostic patterns, drug resistance at the last visit, and ASM withdrawal, along with their prognostic factors. RESULTS We included 247 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at onset of 17 years (13-22) and a median follow-up duration of 10 years (IQR = 5-20). Drug resistance at the last visit was observed in 40 (16.3%) patients, whereas the median latency to achieve 2-year remission was 24 months (IQR = 24-46.5) with a median number of 1 (IQR = 1-2) ASM. During the long-term follow-up (i.e., 202 patients followed ≥5-years after the first ASM trial), 69 (34.3%) patients displayed an early remission pattern and 36 (17.9%) patients displayed a late remission pattern, whereas 16 (8%) and 73 (36.3%) individuals had no-remission and relapsing-remitting patterns, respectively. Catamenial seizures and morning predominance of generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) independently predicted drug resistance at the last visit according to multivariable logistic regression. Treatment withdrawal was attempted in 63 (25.5%) patients, with 59 (93.7%) of them having at least a 12-month follow-up after ASM discontinuation. At the last visit, 49 (83%) of those patients had experienced GTCS recurrence. A longer duration of seizure freedom was the only factor predicting a higher chance of successful ASM withdrawal according to multivariable Cox regression. SIGNIFICANCE GTCA could be considered a relatively easily manageable IGE syndrome, with a low rate of drug resistance and a high prevalence of early response to treatment. Nevertheless, a considerable proportion of patients experience relapsing patterns of seizure control, highlighting the need for appropriate counseling and lifestyle recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joanna Gesche
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sophie Schlabitz
- Epilepsy Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Cecilia Catania
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Angelo Labate
- Neurophysiopathology and Movement Disorders Clinic, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Bernd J Vorderwülbecke
- Epilepsy Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Betül Baykan
- Departments of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Martin Holtkamp
- Epilepsy Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Christoph P Beier
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Peña-Ceballos J, Moloney PB, Valentin A, O'Donnell C, Colleran N, Liggan B, Staunton-Grufferty B, Ennis P, Grogan R, Mullins G, Costello DJ, Doherty CP, Sweeney KJ, El Naggar H, Kilbride RD, Widdess-Walsh P, O'Brien D, Delanty N. Vagus nerve stimulation in refractory idiopathic generalised epilepsy: An Irish retrospective observational study. Seizure 2023; 112:98-105. [PMID: 37778300 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Refractory idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE; also known as genetic generalised epilepsy) is a clinical challenge due to limited available therapeutic options. While vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is approved as an adjunctive treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy, there is limited evidence supporting its efficacy for refractory IGE. METHODS We conducted a single-centre retrospective analysis of adult IGE patients treated with VNS between January 2003 and January 2022. We analysed the efficacy, safety, tolerability, stimulation parameters and potential clinical features of VNS response in this IGE cohort. RESULTS Twenty-three IGE patients were implanted with VNS between January 2003 and January 2022. Twenty-two patients (95.65%) were female. The median baseline seizure frequency was 30 per month (interquartile range [IQR]= 140), including generalised tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), absences, myoclonus, and eyelid myoclonia with/without absences. The median number of baseline anti-seizure medications (ASM) was three (IQR= 2). Patients had previously failed a median of six ASM (IQR= 5). At the end of the study period, VNS therapy remained active in 17 patients (73.9%). amongst patients who continued VNS, thirteen (56.5% of the overall cohort) were considered responders (≥50% seizure frequency reduction). Amongst the clinical variables analysed, only psychiatric comorbidity correlated with poorer seizure outcomes, but was non-significant after applying the Bonferroni correction. Although 16 patients reported side-effects, none resulted in the discontinuation of VNS therapy. SIGNIFICANCE Over half of the patients with refractory IGE experienced a positive response to VNS therapy. VNS represents a viable treatment option for patients with refractory IGE, particularly for females, when other therapeutic options have been exhausted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patrick B Moloney
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; FutureNeuro, the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Antonio Valentin
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cara O'Donnell
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Niamh Colleran
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brenda Liggan
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Patricia Ennis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Roger Grogan
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gerard Mullins
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Daniel J Costello
- FutureNeuro, the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Colin P Doherty
- FutureNeuro, the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Hany El Naggar
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; FutureNeuro, the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ronan D Kilbride
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter Widdess-Walsh
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Donncha O'Brien
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Norman Delanty
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; FutureNeuro, the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jiang T, Zhang X, Zhang M, Liu M, Zhu H, Sun Y. Drug-resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy: A meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors. Epilepsy Behav 2023; 146:109364. [PMID: 37523796 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) is a common epilepsy syndrome with early age onset and generally good seizure outcomes. This study aims to determine the incidence and predictive risk factors for drug-resistant IGE. METHODS We systematically searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) in November 2022 and included 12 eligible studies which reported long-term outcomes (mean = 14.05) after antiseizure medications (ASMs) from 2001 to 2020. We defined drug resistance as the persistence of any seizure despite ASMs treatment (whether as monotherapies or in combination) given the criteria of drug resistance varied in original studies. A random-effects model was used to evaluate the prevalence of refractory IGE. Studies reporting potential poor prognostic factors were included for subsequent subgroup meta-analysis. RESULTS The pooled prevalence of drug resistance in IGE cohorts was 27% (95% CI: 0.19-0.36). Subgroup analysis of the risk factors revealed that the psychiatric comorbidities (odds ratio (OR): 4.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.97-7.98), combined three seizure types (absences, myoclonic jerks, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures) (OR: 5.37, 95% CI: 3.16-9.13), the presence of absence seizure (OR: 4.38, 95% CI: 2.64-7.28), generalized polyspike trains (GPT) (OR: 4.83, 95% CI: 2.42-9.64), sex/catamenial epilepsy (OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.97-5.37), and status epilepticus (OR: 5.94, 95% CI: 2.23-15.85) increased the risk of poor prognosis. Other factors, including age onset, family history, and side effects of ASMs, were insignificantly associated with a higher incidence of refractory IGE. CONCLUSION Drug resistance is a severe complication of IGE. Further standardized research about clinical and electroencephalography factors is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tong Jiang
- Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.
| | - Xiaohan Zhang
- Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.
| | - Mengwen Zhang
- Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.
| | - Min Liu
- Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.
| | - Haifang Zhu
- Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.
| | - Yanping Sun
- Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mangaard S, Gesche J, Krøigård T, Beier CP. Association of symptoms of psychiatric disease and electroencephalographic patterns in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2023; 145:109293. [PMID: 37315408 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE) are genetic epilepsies with alterations of thalamo-frontocortical circuits that play a major role in seizure generation and propagation. Psychiatric diseases and drug resistance are strongly associated, but it remains unknown if they are symptoms of the same pathophysiological process. Hypothesizing that the same network alterations are associated with the frequency of epileptic discharges (ED) and psychiatric symptoms, we here tested the association of self-reported psychiatric symptoms and IGE severity estimated by electroencephalographic (EEG) biomarkers. METHODS Idiopathic generalized epilepsies patients were asked to fill out four validated psychiatric screening tools assessing symptoms of personality disorders (Standard Assessment of Personality- Abbreviated Scale), depression (Major Depression Inventory), impulsiveness (Barratt Impulsiveness Scale), and anxiety (brief Epilepsy Anxiety Survey Instrument). Blinded to results and clinical data on the patients, we analyzed the patients' EEGs, assessed, and quantified ED. The number and duration of ED divided by the duration of the EEG served as a proxy for the severity of IGE that was correlated with the results of the psychiatric screening. RESULTS Paired data from 64 patients were available for analysis. The duration of EDs per minute EEG was inversely associated with the time since the last seizure. The number of patients with generalized polyspike trains (n = 2), generalized paroxysmal fast activity (n = 3), and prolonged epileptiform discharges (n = 10) were too low for statistically meaningful analyses. Self-reported symptoms of depression, personality disorder, and impulsivity were not associated with EDs. In contrast, the duration of EDs per minute EEG was associated with self-reported symptoms of anxiety in univariate analyses, not significant, however, following adjustment for time since the last seizure in regression models. SIGNIFICANCE Self-reported symptoms of psychiatric diseases were not strongly associated with EDs as the best available quantifiable biomarker of IGE severity. As expected, the duration of EDs per minute and anxiety was inversely associated with time since the last seizure. Our data argue against a direct link between the frequency of EDs - as an objective proxy of IGE severity - and psychiatric symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofie Mangaard
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Joanna Gesche
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Thomas Krøigård
- Department of Neurophysiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Christoph P Beier
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; OPEN, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rubboli G, Beier CP, Selmer KK, Syvertsen M, Shakeshaft A, Collingwood A, Hall A, Andrade DM, Fong CY, Gesche J, Greenberg DA, Hamandi K, Lim KS, Ng CC, Orsini A, Striano P, Thomas RH, Zarubova J, Richardson MP, Strug LJ, Pal DK. Variation in prognosis and treatment outcome in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: a Biology of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy Consortium proposal for a practical definition and stratified medicine classifications. Brain Commun 2023; 5:fcad182. [PMID: 37361715 PMCID: PMC10288558 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Reliable definitions, classifications and prognostic models are the cornerstones of stratified medicine, but none of the current classifications systems in epilepsy address prognostic or outcome issues. Although heterogeneity is widely acknowledged within epilepsy syndromes, the significance of variation in electroclinical features, comorbidities and treatment response, as they relate to diagnostic and prognostic purposes, has not been explored. In this paper, we aim to provide an evidence-based definition of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy showing that with a predefined and limited set of mandatory features, variation in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy phenotype can be exploited for prognostic purposes. Our study is based on clinical data collected by the Biology of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy Consortium augmented by literature data. We review prognosis research on mortality and seizure remission, predictors of antiseizure medication resistance and selected adverse drug events to valproate, levetiracetam and lamotrigine. Based on our analysis, a simplified set of diagnostic criteria for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy includes the following: (i) myoclonic jerks as mandatory seizure type; (ii) a circadian timing for myoclonia not mandatory for the diagnosis of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy; (iii) age of onset ranging from 6 to 40 years; (iv) generalized EEG abnormalities; and (v) intelligence conforming to population distribution. We find sufficient evidence to propose a predictive model of antiseizure medication resistance that emphasises (i) absence seizures as the strongest stratifying factor with regard to antiseizure medication resistance or seizure freedom for both sexes and (ii) sex as a major stratifying factor, revealing elevated odds of antiseizure medication resistance that correlates to self-report of catamenial and stress-related factors including sleep deprivation. In women, there are reduced odds of antiseizure medication resistance associated with EEG-measured or self-reported photosensitivity. In conclusion, by applying a simplified set of criteria to define phenotypic variations of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, our paper proposes an evidence-based definition and prognostic stratification of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Further studies in existing data sets of individual patient data would be helpful to replicate our findings, and prospective studies in inception cohorts will contribute to validate them in real-world practice for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Rubboli
- Correspondence may also be addressed to: Guido Rubboli Danish Epilepsy Center, Filadelfia/University of Copenhagen Kolonivej 2A, Dianalund 4293, Denmark E-mail:
| | - Christoph P Beier
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense 5000, Denmark
| | - Kaja K Selmer
- Department of Research and Innovation, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo 0372, Norway
- National Centre for Epilepsy, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo 1337, Norway
| | - Marte Syvertsen
- Department of Neurology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Health Trust, Oslo 3004, Norway
| | - Amy Shakeshaft
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London SW1H 9NA, UK
| | - Amber Collingwood
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Anna Hall
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Danielle M Andrade
- Adult Epilepsy Genetics Program, Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto M5T 0S8, Canada
| | - Choong Yi Fong
- Division of Paediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| | - Joanna Gesche
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense 5000, Denmark
| | - David A Greenberg
- Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus 43215, USA
| | - Khalid Hamandi
- Department of Neurology, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK
| | - Kheng Seang Lim
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| | - Ching Ching Ng
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| | - Alessandro Orsini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa 56126, Italy
| | | | - Pasquale Striano
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Disease Unit, IRCCS Istituto ‘G. Gaslini’, Genova 16147, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genova 16132, Italy
| | - Rhys H Thomas
- Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
| | - Jana Zarubova
- Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 150 06, Czech Republic
- Motol University Hospital, Prague 150 06, Czech Republic
| | - Mark P Richardson
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London SW1H 9NA, UK
- School of Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Lisa J Strug
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto M5G 1X8, Canada
- Departments of Statistical Sciences and Computer Science and Division of Biostatistics, The University of Toronto, Toronto M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Deb K Pal
- Correspondence to: Deb K. Pal Maurice Wohl Clinical Neurosciences Institute Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London 5 Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RX, UK E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Neurophysiology of Juvenile and Progressive Myoclonic Epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 40:100-108. [PMID: 36735458 DOI: 10.1097/wnp.0000000000000913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY Myoclonus can be epileptic or nonepileptic. Epileptic myoclonus has been defined in clinical, neurophysiological, and neuroanatomical terms. Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) is typically considered to be an adolescent-onset idiopathic generalized epilepsy with a combination of myoclonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and absence seizures and normal cognitive status that responds well to anti-seizure medications but requires lifelong treatment. EEG shows generalized epileptiform discharges and photosensitivity. Recent observations indicate that the clinical picture of JME is heterogeneous and a number of neuropsychological and imaging studies have shown structural and functional abnormalities in the frontal lobes and thalamus. Advances in neurophysiology and imaging suggest that JME may not be a truly generalized epilepsy, in that restricted cortical and subcortical networks appear to be involved rather than the entire brain. Some patients with JME may be refractory to anti-seizure medications and attempts have been made to identify neurophysiological biomarkers predicting resistance. Progressive myoclonic epilepsy is a syndrome with multiple specific causes. It is distinct from JME because of the occurrence of progressive neurologic dysfunction in addition to myoclonus and generalized tonic-clonic seizures but may sometimes be difficult to distinguish from JME or misdiagnosed as drug-resistant JME. This article provides an overview of progressive myoclonic epilepsy and focuses on the clinical and neurophysiological findings in the two most commonly recognized forms of progressive myoclonic epilepsy-Unverricht-Lundborg disease (EPM1) and Lafora disease (EPM2). A variety of neurophysiological tests can be used to distinguish between JME and progressive myoclonic epilepsy and between EPM1 and EPM2.
Collapse
|
11
|
Gesche J, Beier CP. Drug resistance in idiopathic generalized epilepsies: Evidence and concepts. Epilepsia 2022; 63:3007-3019. [PMID: 36102351 PMCID: PMC10092586 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Although approximately 10%-15% of patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE)/genetic generalized epilepsy remain drug-resistant, there is no consensus or established concept regarding the underlying mechanisms and prevalence. This review summarizes the recent data and the current hypotheses on mechanisms that may contribute to drug-resistant IGE. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase for studies on mechanisms of drug resistance published since 1980. The literature shows neither consensus on the definition nor a widely accepted model to explain drug resistance in IGE or one of its subsyndromes. Large-scale genetic studies have failed to identify distinct genetic causes or affected genes involved in pharmacokinetics. We found clinical and experimental evidence in support of four hypotheses: (1) "network hypothesis"-the degree of drug resistance in IGE reflects the severity of cortical network alterations, (2) "minor focal lesion in a predisposed brain hypothesis"-minor cortical lesions are important for drug resistance, (3) "interneuron hypothesis"-impaired functioning of γ-aminobutyric acidergic interneurons contributes to drug resistance, and (4) "changes in drug kinetics"-genetically impaired kinetics of antiseizure medication (ASM) reduce the effectiveness of available ASMs. In summary, the exact definition and cause of drug resistance in IGE is unknown. However, published evidence suggests four different mechanisms that may warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Gesche
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christoph P Beier
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dalic LJ, Warren AEL, Spiegel C, Thevathasan W, Roten A, Bulluss KJ, Archer JS. Paroxysmal fast activity is a biomarker of treatment response in deep brain stimulation for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Epilepsia 2022; 63:3134-3147. [PMID: 36114808 PMCID: PMC10946931 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Epilepsy treatment trials typically rely on seizure diaries to determine seizure frequency, but these are time-consuming and difficult to maintain accurately. Fast, reliable, and objective biomarkers of treatment response are needed, particularly in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), where high seizure frequency and comorbid cognitive and behavioral issues are additional obstacles to accurate diary-keeping. Here, we measured generalized paroxysmal fast activity (GPFA), a key interictal electrographic feature of LGS, and correlated GPFA burden with seizure diaries during a thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment trial (Electrical Stimulation of the Thalamus in Epilepsy of Lennox-Gastaut Phenotype [ESTEL]). METHODS GPFA and electrographic seizure counts from intermittent, 24-h electroencephalograms (EEGs) were compared to 3-month diary-recorded seizure counts in 17 young adults with LGS (mean age ± SD = 24.9 ± 6.6) in the ESTEL study, a randomized clinical trial of DBS lasting 12 months (comprising a 3-month baseline and 9 months of postimplantation follow-up). RESULTS Baseline median seizures measured by diaries numbered 2.6 (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.4-5) per day, compared to 284 (IQR = 120.5-360) electrographic seizures per day, confirming that diaries capture only a small fraction of seizure burden. Across all patient EEGs, the average number of GPFA discharges per hour of sleep was 138 (IQR =72-258). GPFA duration and frequency, quantified over 2-h windows of sleep EEG, were significantly associated with diary-recorded seizure counts over 3-month intervals (p < .001, η2 p = .30-.48). For every GPFA discharge, there were 20-25 diary seizures witnessed over 3 months. There was high between-patient variability in the ratio between diary seizure burden and GPFA burden; however, within individual patients, the ratio was similar over time, such that the percentage change from pre-DBS baseline in seizure diaries strongly correlated with the percentage change in GPFA. SIGNIFICANCE When seeking to optimize treatment in patients with LGS, monitoring changes in GPFA may allow rapid titration of treatment parameters, rather than waiting for feedback from seizure diaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda J. Dalic
- Department of Medicine, Austin HealthUniversity of MelbourneHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Neurology, Austin HealthHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
| | - Aaron E. L. Warren
- Department of Medicine, Austin HealthUniversity of MelbourneHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental HealthHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
- Murdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Chloe Spiegel
- Department of Neurology, Austin HealthHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
| | - Wesley Thevathasan
- Department of Medicine, Austin HealthUniversity of MelbourneHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
- Bionics InstituteEast MelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of MedicineUniversity of Melbourne, and Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne HospitalParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Annie Roten
- Department of Neurology, Austin HealthHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
| | - Kristian J. Bulluss
- Bionics InstituteEast MelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Austin HealthHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
- Department of SurgeryUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - John S. Archer
- Department of Medicine, Austin HealthUniversity of MelbourneHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Neurology, Austin HealthHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental HealthHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
- Murdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stevelink R, Al-Toma D, Jansen FE, Lamberink HJ, Asadi-Pooya AA, Farazdaghi M, Cação G, Jayalakshmi S, Patil A, Özkara Ç, Aydın Ş, Gesche J, Beier CP, Stephen LJ, Brodie MJ, Unnithan G, Radhakrishnan A, Höfler J, Trinka E, Krause R, Irelli EC, Di Bonaventura C, Szaflarski JP, Hernández-Vanegas LE, Moya-Alfaro ML, Zhang Y, Zhou D, Pietrafusa N, Specchio N, Japaridze G, Beniczky S, Janmohamed M, Kwan P, Syvertsen M, Selmer KK, Vorderwülbecke BJ, Holtkamp M, Viswanathan LG, Sinha S, Baykan B, Altindag E, von Podewils F, Schulz J, Seneviratne U, Viloria-Alebesque A, Karakis I, D'Souza WJ, Sander JW, Koeleman BP, Otte WM, Braun KP. Individualised prediction of drug resistance and seizure recurrence after medication withdrawal in people with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 53:101732. [PMID: 36467455 PMCID: PMC9716332 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A third of people with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) are drug-resistant. Three-quarters have a seizure relapse when attempting to withdraw anti-seizure medication (ASM) after achieving seizure-freedom. It is currently impossible to predict who is likely to become drug-resistant and safely withdraw treatment. We aimed to identify predictors of drug resistance and seizure recurrence to allow for individualised prediction of treatment outcomes in people with JME. METHODS We performed an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis based on a systematic search in EMBASE and PubMed - last updated on March 11, 2021 - including prospective and retrospective observational studies reporting on treatment outcomes of people diagnosed with JME and available seizure outcome data after a minimum one-year follow-up. We invited authors to share standardised IPD to identify predictors of drug resistance using multivariable logistic regression. We excluded pseudo-resistant individuals. A subset who attempted to withdraw ASM was included in a multivariable proportional hazards analysis on seizure recurrence after ASM withdrawal. The study was registered at the Open Science Framework (OSF; https://osf.io/b9zjc/). FINDINGS Our search yielded 1641 articles; 53 were eligible, of which the authors of 24 studies agreed to collaborate by sharing IPD. Using data from 2518 people with JME, we found nine independent predictors of drug resistance: three seizure types, psychiatric comorbidities, catamenial epilepsy, epileptiform focality, ethnicity, history of CAE, family history of epilepsy, status epilepticus, and febrile seizures. Internal-external cross-validation of our multivariable model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0·70 (95%CI 0·68-0·72). Recurrence of seizures after ASM withdrawal (n = 368) was predicted by an earlier age at the start of withdrawal, shorter seizure-free interval and more currently used ASMs, resulting in an average internal-external cross-validation concordance-statistic of 0·70 (95%CI 0·68-0·73). INTERPRETATION We were able to predict and validate clinically relevant personalised treatment outcomes for people with JME. Individualised predictions are accessible as nomograms and web-based tools. FUNDING MING fonds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remi Stevelink
- Department of Child Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, European Reference Network EpiCARE, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
- Department of Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, European Reference Network EpiCARE, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
- Corresponding author. Department of Child Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Dania Al-Toma
- Department of Child Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, European Reference Network EpiCARE, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
| | - Floor E. Jansen
- Department of Child Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, European Reference Network EpiCARE, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
| | - Herm J. Lamberink
- Department of Child Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, European Reference Network EpiCARE, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
| | - Ali A. Asadi-Pooya
- Epilepsy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Zand, Shiraz, Iran
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 909 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Mohsen Farazdaghi
- Epilepsy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Zand, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Gonçalo Cação
- Department of Neurology, Unidade Local de Saude do Alto Minho, Estrada de Santa Luzia, Viana do Castelo, 4904-858, Portugal
| | - Sita Jayalakshmi
- Department of Neurology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Minister Road, Secunderabad, 500003, India
| | - Anuja Patil
- Department of Neurology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Minister Road, Secunderabad, 500003, India
| | - Çiğdem Özkara
- Department of Neurology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Kocamustafapaşa caddesi, Istanbul, 34098, Turkey
| | - Şenay Aydın
- Department of Neurology, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Belgrat Kapı yolu, Istanbul, 34020, Turkey
| | - Joanna Gesche
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense, 5000, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense, 5000, Denmark
| | - Christoph P. Beier
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense, 5000, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense, 5000, Denmark
| | - Linda J. Stephen
- Epilepsy Unit, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Martin J. Brodie
- Epilepsy Unit, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Gopeekrishnan Unnithan
- Department of Neurology, R. Madhavan Nayar Center for Comprehensive Epilepsy Care, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Chalakkuzhi, Medical College Road, Trivandrum, 695011, India
| | - Ashalatha Radhakrishnan
- Department of Neurology, R. Madhavan Nayar Center for Comprehensive Epilepsy Care, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Chalakkuzhi, Medical College Road, Trivandrum, 695011, India
| | - Julia Höfler
- Department of Neurology and Neuroscience Institute, Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Paracelsus Medical University and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, European Reference Network EpiCARE, Ignaz-Harrer Straße 79, Salzburg, 5020, Austria
| | - Eugen Trinka
- Department of Neurology and Neuroscience Institute, Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Paracelsus Medical University and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, European Reference Network EpiCARE, Ignaz-Harrer Straße 79, Salzburg, 5020, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute for Neurorehabilitation and Space Neurology, Hellbrunner Straße 34, Salzburg, 3100, Austria
- Department of Public Health, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, Hall in Tirol, 6060, Austria
| | - Roland Krause
- Bioinformatics Core Facility, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, 6 Ave du Swing, Belvaux, 4367, Luxembourg
| | | | - Emanuele Cerulli Irelli
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Epilepsy Unit, Sapienza, University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 30, Rome, 00185, Italy
| | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Epilepsy Unit, Sapienza, University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 30, Rome, 00185, Italy
| | - Jerzy P. Szaflarski
- Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Neurobiology, UAB Epilepsy Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Laura E. Hernández-Vanegas
- Department of Clinical Research, Epilepsy Clinic, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Insurgentes Sur 3877, Mexico, 14269, Mexico
| | - Monica L. Moya-Alfaro
- Department of Clinical Research, Epilepsy Clinic, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Insurgentes Sur 3877, Mexico, 14269, Mexico
| | - Yingying Zhang
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610000, China
| | - Dong Zhou
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610000, China
| | - Nicola Pietrafusa
- Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio, 4, Rome, 00165, Italy
| | - Nicola Specchio
- Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio, 4, Rome, 00165, Italy
| | - Giorgi Japaridze
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Neurology and Neuropsychology, 83/11 Vazha-Pshavela Ave., Tbilisi, 186, Georgia
| | - Sándor Beniczky
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Danish Epilepsy Centre, Filadelfia, Visby Allé 5, Dianalund, 4293, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 99, Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
| | - Mubeen Janmohamed
- Department of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Patrick Kwan
- Department of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
- Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marte Syvertsen
- Department of Neurology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Dronninggata 28, Drammen, 3004, Norway
| | - Kaja K. Selmer
- National Centre for Epilepsy & Department of Research and Innovation, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, G. F. Henriksens vei 29, Sandvika, 1337, Norway
| | - Bernd J. Vorderwülbecke
- Department of Neurology, Epilepsy-Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany
| | - Martin Holtkamp
- Department of Neurology, Epilepsy-Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany
| | | | - Sanjib Sinha
- Department of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Hosur Road, Bangalore, 560029, India
| | - Betül Baykan
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Millet Cad, Istanbul, 34390, Turkey
| | - Ebru Altindag
- Department of Neurology, Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Abide-i Hürriyet Cad, Istanbul, 34381, Turkey
| | - Felix von Podewils
- Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Center, University Medicine Greifswald, Sauerbruchstraße, Greifswald, 17489, Germany
| | - Juliane Schulz
- Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Center, University Medicine Greifswald, Sauerbruchstraße, Greifswald, 17489, Germany
| | - Udaya Seneviratne
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, 55 Victoria Parade, Melbourne, Victoria, 3065, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia
| | - Alejandro Viloria-Alebesque
- Department of Neurology, Hospital General de la Defensa, Vía Ibérica 1, Zaragoza, 50009, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) Aragón, Avda. San Juan Bosco 13, Zaragoza, 50009, Spain
| | - Ioannis Karakis
- Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, 49 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive SE, Office 335, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA
| | - Wendyl J. D'Souza
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, 55 Victoria Parade, Melbourne, Victoria, 3065, Australia
| | - Josemir W. Sander
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610000, China
- Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Achterweg 7, Heemstede, Netherlands
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Bobby P.C. Koeleman
- Department of Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, European Reference Network EpiCARE, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
| | - Willem M. Otte
- Department of Child Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, European Reference Network EpiCARE, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
| | - Kees P.J. Braun
- Department of Child Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, European Reference Network EpiCARE, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
EEG Markers of Treatment Resistance in Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy: From Standard EEG Findings to Advanced Signal Analysis. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102428. [PMID: 36289690 PMCID: PMC9598660 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) represents a common form of epilepsy in both adult and pediatric epilepsy units. Although IGE has been long considered a relatively benign epilepsy syndrome, a remarkable proportion of patients could be refractory to treatment. While some clinical prognostic factors have been largely validated among IGE patients, the impact of routine electroencephalography (EEG) findings in predicting drug resistance is still controversial and a growing number of authors highlighted the potential importance of capturing the sleep state in this setting. In addition, the development of advanced computational techniques to analyze EEG data has opened new opportunities in the identification of reliable and reproducible biomarkers of drug resistance in IGE patients. In this manuscript, we summarize the EEG findings associated with treatment resistance in IGE by reviewing the results of studies considering standard EEGs, 24-h EEG recordings, and resting-state protocols. We discuss the role of 24-h EEG recordings in assessing seizure recurrence in light of the potential prognostic relevance of generalized fast discharges occurring during sleep. In addition, we highlight new and promising biomarkers as identified by advanced EEG analysis, including hypothesis-driven functional connectivity measures of background activity and data-driven quantitative findings revealed by machine learning approaches. Finally, we thoroughly discuss the methodological limitations observed in existing studies and briefly outline future directions to identify reliable and replicable EEG biomarkers in IGE patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Li Z, Cao W, Sun H, Wang X, Li S, Ran X, Zhang H. Potential clinical and biochemical markers for the prediction of drug-resistant epilepsy: A literature review. Neurobiol Dis 2022; 174:105872. [PMID: 36152944 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Drug resistance is a major challenge in the treatment of epilepsy. Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) accounts for 30% of all cases of epilepsy and is a matter of great concern because of its uncontrollability and the high burden, mortality rate, and degree of damage. At present, considerable research has focused on the development of predictors to aid in the early identification of DRE in an effort to promote prompt initiation of individualized treatment. While multiple predictors and risk factors have been identified, there are currently no standard predictors that can be used to guide the clinical management of DRE. In this review, we discuss several potential predictors of DRE and related factors that may become predictors in the future and perform evidence rating analysis to identify reliable potential predictors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ZhiQiang Li
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Wei Cao
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - HuiLiang Sun
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - ShanMin Li
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - XiangTian Ran
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Buchhalter J, Neuray C, Cheng JY, D’Cruz O, Datta AN, Dlugos D, French J, Haubenberger D, Hulihan J, Klein P, Komorowski RW, Kramer L, Lothe A, Nabbout R, Perucca E, der Ark PV. EEG Parameters as Endpoints in Epilepsy Clinical Trials- An Expert Panel Opinion Paper. Epilepsy Res 2022; 187:107028. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.107028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
17
|
Conrad EC, Chugh N, Ganguly TM, Gugger JJ, Tizazu EF, Shinohara RT, Raghupathi R, Becker DA, Gelfand MA, Omole AT, Decker BM, Pathmanathan JS, Davis KA, Ellis CA. Using Generalized Polyspike Train to Predict Drug-Resistant Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 2022; 39:459-465. [PMID: 33298682 PMCID: PMC8184865 DOI: 10.1097/wnp.0000000000000803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The authors tested the hypothesis that the EEG feature generalized polyspike train (GPT) is associated with drug-resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). METHODS The authors conducted a single-center case-control study of patients with IGE who had outpatient EEGs performed between 2016 and 2020. The authors classified patients as drug-resistant or drug-responsive based on clinical review and in a masked manner reviewed EEG data for the presence and timing of GPT (a burst of generalized rhythmic spikes lasting less than 1 second) and other EEG features. A relationship between GPT and drug resistance was tested before and after controlling for EEG duration. The EEG duration needed to observe GPT was also calculated. RESULTS One hundred three patients were included (70% drug-responsive and 30% drug-resistant patients). Generalized polyspike train was more prevalent in drug-resistant IGE (odds ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-11.4; P = 0.02). This finding persisted when controlling for EEG duration both with stratification and with survival analysis. A median of 6.5 hours (interquartile range, 0.5-12.7 hours) of EEG recording was required to capture the first occurrence of GPT. CONCLUSIONS The findings support the hypothesis that GPT is associated with drug-resistant IGE. Prolonged EEG recording is required to identify this feature. Thus, >24-hour EEG recording early in the evaluation of patients with IGE may facilitate prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin C. Conrad
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Nanak Chugh
- Department of Community Physicians, John Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A
| | - Taneeta M. Ganguly
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - James J. Gugger
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Etsegenet F. Tizazu
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Russell T. Shinohara
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Ramya Raghupathi
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Danielle A. Becker
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Michael A. Gelfand
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Armina T. Omole
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Barbara M. Decker
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Jay S. Pathmanathan
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Kathryn A. Davis
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Colin A. Ellis
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Janmohamed M, Nhu D, Kuhlmann L, Gilligan A, Tan CW, Perucca P, O’Brien TJ, Kwan P. Moving the field forward: detection of epileptiform abnormalities on scalp electroencephalography using deep learning—clinical application perspectives. Brain Commun 2022; 4:fcac218. [PMID: 36092304 PMCID: PMC9453433 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
The application of deep learning approaches for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges is a nascent field, with most studies published in the past 5 years. Although many recent models have been published demonstrating promising results, deficiencies in descriptions of data sets, unstandardized methods, variation in performance evaluation and lack of demonstrable generalizability have made it difficult for these algorithms to be compared and progress to clinical validity. A few recent publications have provided a detailed breakdown of data sets and relevant performance metrics to exemplify the potential of deep learning in epileptiform discharge detection. This review provides an overview of the field and equips computer and data scientists with a synopsis of EEG data sets, background and epileptiform variation, model evaluation parameters and an awareness of the performance metrics of high impact and interest to the trained clinical and neuroscientist EEG end user. The gold standard and inter-rater disagreements in defining epileptiform abnormalities remain a challenge in the field, and a hierarchical proposal for epileptiform discharge labelling options is recommended. Standardized descriptions of data sets and reporting metrics are a priority. Source code-sharing and accessibility to public EEG data sets will increase the rigour, quality and progress in the field and allow validation and real-world clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mubeen Janmohamed
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne, VIC 3004 , Australia
- Department of Neurology, Alfred Health , Melbourne, VIC 3004 , Australia
- Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital , Melbourne, VIC 3050 , Australia
| | - Duong Nhu
- Department of Data Science and AI, Faculty of IT, Monash University , Clayton, VIC 3800 , Australia
| | - Levin Kuhlmann
- Department of Data Science and AI, Faculty of IT, Monash University , Clayton, VIC 3800 , Australia
| | - Amanda Gilligan
- Neurosciences Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare Hospital , Melbourne, VIC 3121 , Australia
| | - Chang Wei Tan
- Department of Data Science and AI, Faculty of IT, Monash University , Clayton, VIC 3800 , Australia
| | - Piero Perucca
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne, VIC 3004 , Australia
- Department of Neurology, Alfred Health , Melbourne, VIC 3004 , Australia
- Department of Medicine, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC 3084 , Australia
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, Austin Health , Melbourne, VIC 3084 , Australia
| | - Terence J O’Brien
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne, VIC 3004 , Australia
- Department of Neurology, Alfred Health , Melbourne, VIC 3004 , Australia
| | - Patrick Kwan
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne, VIC 3004 , Australia
- Department of Neurology, Alfred Health , Melbourne, VIC 3004 , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bartolini E, Ferrari AR, Lattanzi S, Pradella S, Zaccara G. Drug-resistant epilepsy at the age extremes: Disentangling the underlying etiology. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 132:108739. [PMID: 35636351 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of epilepsy is highest at the extreme age ranges: childhood and elderly age. The most common syndromes in these demographics - self-limited epilepsies of childhood and idiopathic generalized epilepsies in pediatric age, focal epilepsy with structural etiology in older people - are expected to be drug responsive. In this work, we focus on such epilepsy types, overviewing the complex clinical background of unexpected drug-resistance. For self-limited epilepsies of childhood and idiopathic generalized epilepsies, we illustrate drug-resistance resulting from syndrome misinterpretation, reason on possible unexpected courses of epilepsy, and explicate the influence of inappropriate treatments. For elderly-onset epilepsy, we show the challenges in differential diagnosis possibly leading to pseudoresistance and analyze how drug-resistant epilepsy can arise in stroke, neurocognitive disorders, brain tumors, and autoimmune encephalitis. In children and senior people, drug-resistance can be regarded as a hint to review the diagnosis or explore alternative therapeutic strategies. Refractory seizures are not only a therapeutic challenge, but also a cardinal sign not to be overlooked in syndromes commonly deemed to be drug-responsive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Bartolini
- Department of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Anna Rita Ferrari
- Department of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Simona Lattanzi
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Silvia Pradella
- USL Centro Toscana, Neurology Unit, Nuovo Ospedale Santo Stefano, Prato, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhang J, Wu D, Yang H, Lu H, Ji Y, Liu H, Zang Z, Lu J, Sun W. Correlations Between Structural Brain Abnormalities, Cognition and Electroclinical Characteristics in Patients With Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy. Front Neurol 2022; 13:883078. [PMID: 35651335 PMCID: PMC9149597 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.883078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore the structural brain abnormality and its relationship with neuropsychological disorders and electroclinical characteristics in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) patients. Methods Sixty-seven patients diagnosed with JME and 56 healthy controls were enrolled. All subjects underwent MRI using T1-weighted 3D brain structural images with 1 mm thickness. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and surface-based morphometry (SBM) analyses were performed. They also underwent a series of neuropsychological tests to assess cognitive function. The correlation analyses were conducted between structural changes, neuropsychological outcomes, and electroclinical features. Results The gray matter concentration (GMC) was decreased in the bilateral pre-central and post-central gyrus, right anterior cingulate gyrus, left posterior orbital region, bilateral occipital regions, bilateral hippocampus and bilateral caudate nucleus in the JME groups (corrected P < 0.05). The evaluation of gray matter volume (GMV) showed significant decrease respectively in bilateral pre-central and post-central gyrus, left paracentral lobule, left orbital gyrus, left amygdala, left basal ganglia and left thalamus of JME patients (P < 0.05). The cortex thicknesses of the right inferior temporal gyrus, right insular gyrus, and right cingulate gyrus had negative correlations with the disease duration significantly. At the same time, the whole-brain white matter volume was positively associated with the course of the disease (P < 0.05). Patients with persistent abnormal EEG discharges had significantly less whole-brain gray matter volume than JME patients with normal EEG (P = 0.03). Correlation analyses and linear regression analyses showed that, in addition to the gray matter volumes of frontal and parietal lobe, the temporal lobe, as well as the basal ganglia and thalamus, were also significantly correlated with neuropsychological tests' results (P < 0.05). Conclusion The JME patients showed subtle structural abnormalities in multiple brain regions that were not only limited to the frontal lobe but also included the thalamus, basal ganglia, parietal lobe, temporal lobe and some occipital cortex, with significant involvement of the primary somatosensory cortex and primary motor cortex. And we significantly demonstrated a correlation between structural abnormalities and cognitive impairment. In addition, the course of disease and abnormal discharges had a specific negative correlation with the structural changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dan Wu
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Haoran Yang
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongjuan Lu
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yichen Ji
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Huixin Liu
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenxiang Zang
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Lu
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Sun
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Das Pektezel L, Tezer FI, Saygi S. Electroclinical spectrum of generalized paroxysmal fast activity in adults without epileptic encephalopathy. Neurol Sci 2022; 43:3857-3866. [DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05808-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
22
|
Sisterson ND, Kokkinos V, Urban A, Li N, Richardson RM. Responsive neurostimulation of the thalamus improves seizure control in idiopathic generalised epilepsy: initial case series. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022; 93:491-498. [PMID: 35217517 PMCID: PMC9016239 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-327512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Up to 40% of patients with idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE) are drug resistant and potentially could benefit from intracranial neuromodulation of the seizure circuit. We present outcomes following 2 years of thalamic-responsive neurostimulation for IGE. METHODS Four patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy underwent RNS System implantation in the bilateral centromedian (CM) nucleus region. Electrophysiological data were extracted from the clinical patient data management system and analysed using a specialised platform (BRAINStim). Postoperative visualisation of electrode locations was performed using Lead-DBS. Seizure outcomes were reported using the Engel scale. RESULTS Patients experienced a 75%-99% reduction in seizure frequency with decreased seizure duration and severity (Engel class IB, IC, IIA and IIIA), as well as significant improvements in quality of life. Outcomes were durable through at least 2 years of therapy. Detection accuracy for all patients overall decreased over successive programming epochs from a mean of 96.5% to 88.3%. Most electrodes used to deliver stimulation were located in the CM (7/10) followed by the posterior dorsal ventral lateral (2/2), posterior ventral posterior lateral (3/4) and posterior ventral ventral lateral (2/3). In all patients, stimulation varied from 0.2 to 2.0 mA and amplitude only increased over successive epochs. The raw percentage of intracranial electroencephalography recordings with stimulations delivered to electrographic seizures was 24.8%, 1.2%, 7.6% and 8.8%. CONCLUSION Closed-loop stimulation of the CM region may provide significant improvement in seizure control and quality of life for patients with drug-resistant IGE. Optimal detection and stimulation locations and parameters remain an active area of investigation for accelerating and fine-tuning clinical responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel D Sisterson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vasileios Kokkinos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexandra Urban
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ningfei Li
- Department of Neurology, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA .,Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Irelli EC, Cocchi E, Ramantani G, Caraballo RH, Giuliano L, Yilmaz T, Morano A, Panagiotakaki E, Operto FF, Giraldez BG, Silvennoinen K, Casciato S, Comajuan M, Balestrini S, Fortunato F, Coppola A, Di Gennaro G, Labate A, Sofia V, Kluger GJ, Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité DGA, Gambardella A, Baykan B, Sisodiya SM, Arzimanoglou A, Striano P, Di Bonaventura C. Electroclinical Features and Long-term Seizure Outcome in Patients With Eyelid Myoclonia With Absences. Neurology 2022; 98:e1865-e1876. [PMID: 35292555 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Eyelid myoclonia with absences (EMA) is a generalized epilepsy syndrome whose prognosis and clinical characteristics are still partially undefined. We investigated electroclinical endophenotypes and long-term seizure outcome in a large cohort of EMA patients. METHODS In this multicenter retrospective study, EMA patients with ≥5 years of follow-up were included. We investigated prognostic patterns and sustained terminal remission (STR), along with their prognostic factors. Moreover, a two-step cluster analysis was used to investigate the presence of distinct EMA endophenotypes. RESULTS We included 172 patients, with a median age at onset of 7 years (interquartile range (IQR) 5-10) and a median follow-up duration of 14 years (IQR 8.25-23.75). Sixty-six patients (38.4%) displayed a non-remission pattern, whereas remission and relapse patterns were encountered in 56 (32.6%) and 50 (29.1%) subjects. Early epilepsy onset, history of febrile seizures (FS) and eyelid myoclonia (EM) status epilepticus significantly predicted a non-remission pattern according to multinomial logistic regression analysis. STR was achieved by 68 (39.5%) patients with a mean latency of 14.05 years (SD ± 12.47). Early epilepsy onset, psychiatric comorbidities, and a history of FS and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) were associated with a lower probability of achieving STR according to a Cox regression proportional hazards model. Antiseizure medication (ASM) withdrawal was attempted in 62/172 patients, and seizures relapsed in 74.2%. Cluster analysis revealed two distinct clusters with 86 patients each. Cluster 2, which we defined as "EMA-plus", was characterized by an earlier age at epilepsy onset, higher rate of intellectual disability, EM status epilepticus, generalized paroxysmal fast activity, self-induced seizures, FS, and poor ASM response, whereas Cluster 1, the "EMA-only" cluster, was characterized by a higher rate of seizure remission and more favorable neuropsychiatric outcome. DISCUSSION Early epilepsy onset was the most relevant prognostic factor for poor treatment response. A long latency between epilepsy onset and ASM response was observed, suggesting the impact of age-related brain changes in EMA remission. Finally, our cluster analysis showed a clear-cut distinction of EMA patients into an EMA-plus insidious subphenotype and an EMA-only benign cluster that strongly differed in terms of remission rates and cognitive outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Enrico Cocchi
- Department of Precision Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York
| | - Georgia Ramantani
- Department of Neuropediatrics, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roberto H Caraballo
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de Pediatría "Prof. Dr. Juan P Garrahan", Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Loretta Giuliano
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Tulay Yilmaz
- Departments of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Alessandra Morano
- Dvepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleni Panagiotakaki
- Department of Paediatric Clinical Epileptology, Sleep Disorders and Functional Neurology, University Hospitals of Lyon (HCL), Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Lyon, France
| | - Francesca F Operto
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Beatriz Gonzalez Giraldez
- Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Service, Hospital Universitario and IIS Fundación Jiménez Díaz and CIBERER, Madrid, Spain
| | - Katri Silvennoinen
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | | | - Marion Comajuan
- Department of Paediatric Clinical Epileptology, Sleep Disorders and Functional Neurology, University Hospitals of Lyon (HCL), Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Antonietta Coppola
- Department of Neuroscience and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | | | - Angelo Labate
- Institute of Neurology, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Vito Sofia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Gerhard J Kluger
- Clinic for Neuropediatrics and Neurorehabilitation, Epilepsy Center for Children and Adolescents, Schoen Clinic Vogtareuth, Vogtareuth, Germany
| | | | | | - Betul Baykan
- Departments of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sanjay M Sisodiya
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Alexis Arzimanoglou
- Department of Paediatric Clinical Epileptology, Sleep Disorders and Functional Neurology, University Hospitals of Lyon (HCL), Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Lyon, France
| | - Pasquale Striano
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS "Istituto Giannina Gaslini", Genova, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cerulli Irelli E, Barone FA, Mari L, Morano A, Orlando B, Salamone EM, Marchi A, Fanella M, Fattouch J, Placidi F, Giallonardo AT, Izzi F, Di Bonaventura C. Generalized Fast Discharges Along the Genetic Generalized Epilepsy Spectrum: Clinical and Prognostic Significance. Front Neurol 2022; 13:844674. [PMID: 35356452 PMCID: PMC8960043 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.844674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the electroclinical characteristics and the prognostic impact of generalized fast discharges in a large cohort of genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE) patients studied with 24-h prolonged ambulatory electroencephalography (paEEG). Methods This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 202 GGE patients. The occurrence of generalized paroxysmal fast activity (GPFA) and generalized polyspike train (GPT) was reviewed. GGE patients were classified as having idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) or another GGE syndrome (namely perioral myoclonia with absences, eyelid myoclonia with absences, epilepsy with myoclonic absences, generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, or GGE without a specific epilepsy syndrome) according to recent classification proposals. Results GPFA/GPT was found in overall 25 (12.4%) patients, though it was significantly less frequent in IGE compared with other GGE syndromes (9.3 vs. 25%, p = 0.007). GPFA/GPT was found independently of seizure type experienced during history, the presence of mild intellectual disability/borderline intellectual functioning, or EEG features. At multivariable analysis, GPFA/GPT was significantly associated with drug resistance (p = 0.04) and with a higher number of antiseizure medications (ASMs) at the time of paEEG (p < 0.001) and at the last medical observation (p < 0.001). Similarly, GPFA/GPT, frequent/abundant generalized spike-wave discharges during sleep, and a higher number of seizure types during history were the only factors independently associated with a lower chance of achieving 2-year seizure remission at the last medical observation. Additionally, a greater number of GPFA/GPT discharges significantly discriminated between patients who achieved 2-year seizure remission at the last medical observation and those who did not (area under the curve = 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.57–0.97, p = 0.02) Conclusion We found that generalized fast discharges were more common than expected in GGE patients when considering the entire GGE spectrum. In addition, our study highlighted that GPFA/GPT could be found along the entire GGE continuum, though their occurrence was more common in less benign GGE syndromes. Finally, we confirmed that GPFA/GPT was associated with difficult-to-treat GGE, as evidenced by the multivariable analysis and the higher ASM load during history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Cerulli Irelli
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico “Umberto I”, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Luisa Mari
- Epilepsy Center, Neurology Unit, University Hospital of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Morano
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico “Umberto I”, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Biagio Orlando
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico “Umberto I”, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Michele Salamone
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico “Umberto I”, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Marchi
- Epilepsy Center, Neurology Unit, University Hospital of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Fanella
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico “Umberto I”, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Jinane Fattouch
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico “Umberto I”, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Placidi
- Epilepsy Center, Neurology Unit, University Hospital of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Teresa Giallonardo
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico “Umberto I”, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Izzi
- Epilepsy Center, Neurology Unit, University Hospital of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico “Umberto I”, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Carlo Di Bonaventura
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
High rates of early remission pattern in adult-onset compared with earlier-onset idiopathic generalized epilepsy: A long-term follow-up study. Seizure 2021; 94:52-56. [PMID: 34864252 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate electroclinical characteristics and prognostic patterns of adult-onset vs. younger-onset idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) patients during long-term follow-up. METHODS In this single-center retrospective cohort comparative study, adult-onset IGE was defined as onset after 20 years of age. Patients with a follow-up duration between 10 and 30 years from epilepsy diagnosis were enrolled. Maximum follow-up duration was limited to 30 years to ensure a better comparison of prognostic data between adult-onset and younger-onset patients. The Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) method was applied to obtain FDR-adjusted p-values. RESULTS A total of 177 IGE patients were recruited and 27 adult-onset IGE patients were identified (15.3%). Follow-up duration was similar between younger- and adult-onset IGE patients and 74% of subjects performed at least one 24-hour EEG recording. Of adult-onset IGE patients, 8/27 were diagnosed with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, while 19/27 were diagnosed with generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) only. EEG photosensitivity and absence seizures were significantly less frequent among adult-onset IGE patients as compared with younger subjects. When considering prognostic patterns, an early remission pattern was significantly higher among adult-onset IGE patients as compared with younger-onset IGE patients (55.6% vs. 24%, adjusted p value = 0.007). Antiseizure medication withdrawal was attempted in 3/27 adult-onset patients, and all had GTCS relapses. CONCLUSION Our study contributes to better defining the electroclinical characteristics and long-term follow-up of adult-onset IGE patients. A favorable long-term seizure outcome was found in adult-onset IGE patients, as evidenced by the high rates of early remission pattern when compared with younger onset patients.
Collapse
|
26
|
Seneviratne U, Cook M, D'Souza W. Brainwaves beyond diagnosis: Wider applications of electroencephalography in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Epilepsia 2021; 63:22-41. [PMID: 34755907 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) has long been used as a versatile and noninvasive diagnostic tool in epilepsy. With the advent of digital EEG, more advanced applications of EEG have emerged. Compared with technologically advanced practice in focal epilepsies, the utilization of EEG in idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) has been lagging, often restricted to a simple diagnostic tool. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of broader applications of EEG beyond this narrow scope, discussing how the current clinical and research applications of EEG may potentially be extended to IGE. The current literature, although limited, suggests that EEG can be used in syndromic classification, guiding antiseizure medication therapy, predicting prognosis, unraveling biorhythms, and investigating functional brain connectivity of IGE. We emphasize the need for longer recordings, particularly 24-h ambulatory EEG, to capture discharges reflecting circadian and sleep-wake cycle-associated variations for wider EEG applications in IGE. Finally, we highlight the challenges and limitations of the current body of literature and suggest future directions to encourage and enhance more extensive applications of this potent tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udaya Seneviratne
- Department of Neuroscience, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Neuroscience, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Cook
- Department of Neuroscience, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wendyl D'Souza
- Department of Neuroscience, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Xu C, Gong Y, Wang Y, Chen Z. New advances in pharmacoresistant epilepsy towards precise management-from prognosis to treatments. Pharmacol Ther 2021; 233:108026. [PMID: 34718071 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.108026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Epilepsy, one of the most severe neurological diseases, is characterized by abrupt recurrent seizures. Despite great progress in the development of antiseizure drugs (ASDs) based on diverse molecular targets, more than one third of epilepsy patients still show resistance to ASDs, a condition termed pharmacoresistant epilepsy. The management of pharmacoresistant epilepsy involves serious challenges. In the past decade, promising advances have been made in the use of interdisciplinary techniques involving biophysics, bioinformatics, biomaterials and biochemistry, which allow more precise prognosis and development of drug target for pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Notably, novel experimental tools such as viral vector gene delivery, optogenetics and chemogenetics have provided a framework for promising approaches to the precise treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. In this review, historical achievements especially recent advances of the past decade in the prognosis and treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsy from both clinical and laboratory settings are presented and summarized. We propose that the further development of novel experimental tools at cellular or molecular levels with both temporal and spatial precision are necessary to make improve the management and drug development for pharmacoresistant epilepsy in the clinical arena.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cenglin Xu
- Key Laboratory of Neuropharmacology and Translational Medicine of Zhejiang Province, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yiwei Gong
- Institute of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi Wang
- Key Laboratory of Neuropharmacology and Translational Medicine of Zhejiang Province, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China; Institute of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhong Chen
- Key Laboratory of Neuropharmacology and Translational Medicine of Zhejiang Province, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China; Institute of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kamitaki BK, Janmohamed M, Kandula P, Elder C, Mani R, Wong S, Perucca P, O'Brien TJ, Lin H, Heiman GA, Choi H. Clinical and EEG factors associated with antiseizure medication resistance in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Epilepsia 2021; 63:150-161. [PMID: 34705264 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to determine which combination of clinical and electroencephalography (EEG) characteristics differentiate between an antiseizure medication (ASM)-resistant vs ASM-responsive outcome for patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). METHODS This was a case-control study of ASM-resistant cases and ASM-responsive controls with IGE treated at five epilepsy centers in the United States and Australia between 2002 and 2018. We recorded clinical characteristics and findings from the first available EEG study for each patient. We then compared characteristics of cases vs controls using multivariable logistic regression to develop a predictive model of ASM-resistant IGE. RESULTS We identified 118 ASM-resistant cases and 114 ASM-responsive controls with IGE. First, we confirmed our recent finding that catamenial epilepsy is associated with ASM-resistant IGE (odds ratio [OR] 3.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-10.41, for all study subjects) after covariate adjustment. Other independent factors seen with ASM resistance include certain seizure-type combinations (absence, myoclonic, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures [OR 7.06, 95% CI 2.55-20.96]; absence and generalized tonic-clonic seizures [OR 4.45, 95% CI 1.84-11.34]), as well as EEG markers of increased generalized spike-wave discharges (GSWs) in sleep (OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.12-11.36 for frequent and OR 7.21, 95% CI 1.50-54.07 for abundant discharges in sleep) and the presence of generalized polyspike trains (GPTs; OR 5.49, 95% CI 1.27-38.69). The discriminative ability of our final multivariable model, as measured by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, was 0.80. SIGNIFICANCE Multiple clinical and EEG characteristics independently predict ASM resistance in IGE. To improve understanding of a patient's prognosis, clinicians could consider asking about specific seizure-type combinations and track whether they experience catamenial epilepsy. Obtaining prolonged EEG studies to record the burden of GSWs in sleep and assessing for the presence of GPTs may provide additional predictive value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad K Kamitaki
- Department of Neurology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Mubeen Janmohamed
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Neurology Department, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Departments of Medicine and Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Padmaja Kandula
- Department of Neurology, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher Elder
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ram Mani
- Department of Neurology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Stephen Wong
- Department of Neurology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Piero Perucca
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Neurology Department, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Departments of Medicine and Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, and Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Terence J O'Brien
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Neurology Department, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Departments of Medicine and Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Haiqun Lin
- School of Nursing, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Gary A Heiman
- Department of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Hyunmi Choi
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bandopadhyay R, Singh T, Ghoneim MM, Alshehri S, Angelopoulou E, Paudel YN, Piperi C, Ahmad J, Alhakamy NA, Alfaleh MA, Mishra A. Recent Developments in Diagnosis of Epilepsy: Scope of MicroRNA and Technological Advancements. BIOLOGY 2021; 10:1097. [PMID: 34827090 PMCID: PMC8615191 DOI: 10.3390/biology10111097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, characterized by recurrent seizures, resulting from abnormally synchronized episodic neuronal discharges. Around 70 million people worldwide are suffering from epilepsy. The available antiepileptic medications are capable of controlling seizures in around 60-70% of patients, while the rest remain refractory. Poor seizure control is often associated with neuro-psychiatric comorbidities, mainly including memory impairment, depression, psychosis, neurodegeneration, motor impairment, neuroendocrine dysfunction, etc., resulting in poor prognosis. Effective treatment relies on early and correct detection of epileptic foci. Although there are currently a few well-established diagnostic techniques for epilepsy, they lack accuracy and cannot be applied to patients who are unsupportive or harbor metallic implants. Since a single test result from one of these techniques does not provide complete information about the epileptic foci, it is necessary to develop novel diagnostic tools. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current diagnostic tools of epilepsy, including electroencephalography (EEG) as well as structural and functional neuroimaging. We further discuss recent trends and advances in the diagnosis of epilepsy that will enable more effective diagnosis and clinical management of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritam Bandopadhyay
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, Punjab, India;
| | - Tanveer Singh
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Bryan, TX 77807, USA;
| | - Mohammed M. Ghoneim
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, AlMaarefa University, Ad Diriyah 13713, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Sultan Alshehri
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Efthalia Angelopoulou
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (E.A.); (C.P.)
| | - Yam Nath Paudel
- Neuropharmacology Research Strength, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Subang Jaya 47500, Selangor, Malaysia;
| | - Christina Piperi
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (E.A.); (C.P.)
| | - Javed Ahmad
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Najran University, Najran 11001, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Nabil A. Alhakamy
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia; (N.A.A.); (M.A.A.)
| | - Mohamed A. Alfaleh
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia; (N.A.A.); (M.A.A.)
- Vaccines and Immunotherapy Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Awanish Mishra
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, Punjab, India;
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)—Guwahati, Changsari, Guwahati 781101, Assam, India
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Baheti N, Rathore C, Bansal AR, Shah S, Veedu HK, Prakash S, Kanhere K, Jaiswal SK, Jukkarwala A, Murthy JMK, Radhakrishnan K. Treatment outcomes in drug resistant juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: Valproate resistance may not be the end of the road. Seizure 2021; 92:112-117. [PMID: 34496330 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine treatment responses to various antiseizure medicines (ASMs) in patients with drug resistant juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (DRJME) METHODS: We reviewed records of all JME patients attending epilepsy clinics at 5 centers during a 5-year period. We used International Consensus Criteria to diagnose JME and International League Against Epilepsy Criteria to define drug resistance and sustained seizure freedom. We only used broad spectrum medicines which included valproate, lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, clobazam, phenobarbitone, clonazepam, and zonisamide. We considered an ASM successful if patient achieved seizure freedom within 3 months of attaining maintenance dose. RESULTS We studied 116 patients (61 males) with DRJME. At terminal followup, 82 (70.7%) patients had achieved sustained seizure freedom with a mean followup of 3.2 ± 1.3 years after last dose change. In patients where valproate failed as first- or second-line ASM (n=70; 60.3%), 49(70%) became seizure-free. In this group, 33(67%) patients became seizure-free after addition of lamotrigine. Success rate of lamotrigine and valproate combination was 69% as compared to 9% with all other combinations (p = 0.001). In patients who were not exposed to valproate as initial therapy (n=46), 33 (71.7%) became seizure-free, 30 (91%) after adding valproate. At last follow-up, 75 (90%) seizure-free patients were receiving valproate including 45 (55%) patients with a combination of valproate and lamotrigine. Only one of 24 patients became seizure-free after failing valproate and lamotrigine combination. CONCLUSION Seizure freedom can be achieved in two-thirds of patients with DRJME. A combination of valproate and lamotrigine is the most effective duotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeraj Baheti
- Department of Neurology, Dr. G. M. Taori Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India
| | - Chaturbhuj Rathore
- Department of Neurology, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute and Research Center, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, India.
| | - Atma Ram Bansal
- Department of Neurology, Medanta-Medicity Hospital, Gurugram, India
| | - Saumya Shah
- Medical Institute of Central California and Kern Medical Outpatient Clinic, Bakersfield, CA, USA
| | - Hari Kunhi Veedu
- Medical Institute of Central California and Kern Medical Outpatient Clinic, Bakersfield, CA, USA
| | - Sanjay Prakash
- Department of Neurology, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute and Research Center, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, India
| | - Kalyani Kanhere
- Department of Neurology, Dr. G. M. Taori Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India
| | | | - Anis Jukkarwala
- Department of Neurology, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ascoli M, Mastroianni G, Gasparini S, Striano P, Cianci V, Neri S, Bova V, Mammì A, Gambardella A, Labate A, Aguglia U, Ferlazzo E. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to drug-resistant juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Expert Rev Neurother 2021; 21:1265-1273. [PMID: 33993822 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2021.1931126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), also known as Janz syndrome, is a common form of generalized epilepsy of presumed genetic origin representing up to 10% of all epilepsy cases. Despite adequate anti-seizure medication (ASM) treatment, seizures persist in one-third of JME patients. AREAS COVERED A literature search was conducted using Pubmed search on the topics of drug-resistant JME. EXPERT OPINION About 30% of JME patients are drug-resistant. Valproate (VPA) is considered the first-choice drug. In women of childbearing potential, levetiracetam (LEV) should represent the first-choice treatment. Alternative monotherapy or add-on therapy should be considered in subjects with resistant seizures after the exclusion of pseudo-drug resistance. The choice of the add-on ASM depends on the predominant seizure type. In subjects with persistent bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, LEV or lamotrigine should be firstly considered. In patients with difficult-to-treat myoclonic seizures, clonazepam or LEV are recommended. In case of persistent absences, ethosuximide should be considered. With appropriate selection and safeguards in place, VPA should remain available as an option in women of childbearing potential whose seizures are resistant to other treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Ascoli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.,Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital, Via Melacrino, Reggio, Calabria, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mastroianni
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital, Via Melacrino, Reggio, Calabria, Italy
| | - Sara Gasparini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.,Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital, Via Melacrino, Reggio, Calabria, Italy
| | - Pasquale Striano
- Paediatric Neurology and Muscular Disease Unit, IRCCS Institute "Giannina Gaslini", Genova, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Vittoria Cianci
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital, Via Melacrino, Reggio, Calabria, Italy
| | - Sabrina Neri
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Valentina Bova
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital, Via Melacrino, Reggio, Calabria, Italy
| | - Anna Mammì
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Antonio Gambardella
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Angelo Labate
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Umberto Aguglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.,Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital, Via Melacrino, Reggio, Calabria, Italy.,Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, Viale Europa, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Edoardo Ferlazzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.,Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital, Via Melacrino, Reggio, Calabria, Italy.,Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, Viale Europa, Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jensen CD, Gesche J, Krøigård T, Beier CP. Prognostic Value of Generalized Polyspike Trains and Prolonged Epileptiform EEG Runs. J Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 38:208-212. [PMID: 31880591 DOI: 10.1097/wnp.0000000000000679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A considerable proportion of patients with genetic/idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) suffer from persistent seizures. In this study, it was questioned if generalized polyspike trains (GPT) or prolonged epileptiform EEG runs allow identification of difficult-to-treat patients in a first seizure clinic setting or after recurrent seizures. METHODS The first routine outpatient EEGs from untreated patients (later diagnosed with IGE) and routine EEGs from IGE patients with persistent seizures despite medical treatment were analyzed. Seizure outcome and clinical characteristics were retrospectively assessed based on the patients' records. RESULTS In routine EEGs recorded after first seizure in untreated patients (n = 79), the prevalence of GPT (n = 1; 1.3%) and prolonged epileptiform EEG runs (n = 13; 16.5%) was low. At follow-up, 24 patients (30.4%) were not seizure free, and 3 (3.8%) of them developed drug-resistant IGE. None of the interictal discharges studied was associated with long-term seizure outcome. Treated IGE patients with recurrent seizures (n = 69) had a similar prevalence of GPT (n = 3; 4.3%) and prolonged epileptiform EEG runs (n = 7; 10.1%). At follow-up, 42 patients (60.8%) suffered persistent seizures, and 18 (26%) were drug resistant. Generalized polyspike train and prolonged epileptiform EEG runs had a higher prevalence in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (GPT: 11.1% vs. 2%; P = 0.1; prolonged epileptiform EEG runs: 27.8% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.004) and persistent seizures (GPT: 7.1% vs. 0%; P = 0.16; prolonged epileptiform EEG runs: 16.7% vs. 0%; P = 0.03) as compared with nonresistant patients. CONCLUSIONS Generalized polyspike train and prolonged epileptiform EEG runs were associated with persistent seizures and drug-resistant IGE, but the overall prevalence was low. In a first seizure clinic setting, the diagnostic value of these biomarkers was limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joanna Gesche
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Neurology Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark ; and
| | - Thomas Krøigård
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christoph P Beier
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Neurology Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark ; and
- OPEN, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Baud MO, Schindler K, Rao VR. Under-sampling in epilepsy: Limitations of conventional EEG. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2020; 6:41-49. [PMID: 33532669 PMCID: PMC7829106 DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The cyclical structure of epilepsy was recently (re)-discovered through years-long intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) obtained with implanted devices. In this review, we discuss how new revelations from chronic EEG relate to the practice and interpretation of conventional EEG. We argue for an electrographic definition of seizures and highlight the caveats of counting epileptiform discharges in EEG recordings of short duration. Limitations of conventional EEG have practical implications with regard to titrating anti-seizure medications and allowing patients to drive, and we propose that chronic monitoring of brain activity could greatly improve epilepsy care. An impending paradigm shift in epilepsy will involve using next-generation devices for chronic EEG to leverage known biomarkers of disease state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime O. Baud
- Sleep Wake Epilepsy Center, NeuroTec and Center for Experimental Neurology, Department of Neurology, Inselspital Bern, University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
- Wyss Center for Bio- and Neuro-engineering, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kaspar Schindler
- Sleep Wake Epilepsy Center, NeuroTec and Center for Experimental Neurology, Department of Neurology, Inselspital Bern, University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Vikram R. Rao
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Katerelos A, Zagkos N, Alexopoulou D, Mouskou S, Korona A, Manolakos E. Pharmacoresistant epilepsy associated with mutations in the KCNB1 and RELN genes. A case report. JOURNAL OF EPILEPTOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.21307/jepil-2020-006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
35
|
Cerulli Irelli E, Morano A, Barone FA, Fisco G, Fanella M, Orlando B, Fattouch J, Manfredi M, Giallonardo AT, Di Bonaventura C. Persistent treatment resistance in genetic generalized epilepsy: A long‐term outcome study in a tertiary epilepsy center. Epilepsia 2020; 61:2452-2460. [DOI: 10.1111/epi.16708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Cerulli Irelli
- Epilepsy Unit Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico “Umberto I”, “Sapienza” University Rome Italy
| | - Alessandra Morano
- Epilepsy Unit Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico “Umberto I”, “Sapienza” University Rome Italy
| | - Francesca A. Barone
- Epilepsy Unit Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico “Umberto I”, “Sapienza” University Rome Italy
| | - Giacomo Fisco
- Epilepsy Unit Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico “Umberto I”, “Sapienza” University Rome Italy
| | - Martina Fanella
- Epilepsy Unit Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico “Umberto I”, “Sapienza” University Rome Italy
| | - Biagio Orlando
- Epilepsy Unit Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico “Umberto I”, “Sapienza” University Rome Italy
| | - Jinane Fattouch
- Epilepsy Unit Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico “Umberto I”, “Sapienza” University Rome Italy
| | - Mario Manfredi
- Epilepsy Unit Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico “Umberto I”, “Sapienza” University Rome Italy
| | - Anna Teresa Giallonardo
- Epilepsy Unit Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico “Umberto I”, “Sapienza” University Rome Italy
| | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Epilepsy Unit Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico “Umberto I”, “Sapienza” University Rome Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Choi H, Detyniecki K, Bazil C, Thornton S, Crosta P, Tolba H, Muneeb M, Hirsch LJ, Heinzen EL, Sen A, Depondt C, Perucca P, Heiman GA. Development and validation of a predictive model of drug-resistant genetic generalized epilepsy. Neurology 2020; 95:e2150-e2160. [PMID: 32759205 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000010597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a clinical prediction model for antiepileptic drug (AED)-resistant genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE). METHOD We performed a case-control study of patients with and without drug-resistant GGE, nested within ongoing longitudinal observational studies of AED response at 2 tertiary epilepsy centers. Using a validation dataset, we tested the predictive performance of 3 candidate models, developed from a training dataset. We then tested the candidate models' predictive ability on an external testing dataset. RESULTS Of 5,189 patients in the ongoing longitudinal study, 121 met criteria for AED-resistant GGE and 468 met criteria for AED-responsive GGE. There were 66 patients with GGE in the external dataset, of whom 17 were cases. Catamenial epilepsy, history of a psychiatric condition, and seizure types were strongly related with drug-resistant GGE case status. Compared to women without catamenial epilepsy, women with catamenial epilepsy had about a fourfold increased risk for AED resistance. The calibration of 3 models, assessing the agreement between observed outcomes and predictions, was adequate. Discriminative ability, as measured with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), ranged from 0.58 to 0.65. CONCLUSION Catamenial epilepsy, history of a psychiatric condition, and the seizure type combination of generalized tonic clonic, myoclonic, and absence seizures are negative prognostic factors of drug-resistant GGE. The AUC of 0.6 is not consistent with truly effective separation of the groups, suggesting other unmeasured variables may need to be considered in future studies to improve predictability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunmi Choi
- From the Department of Neurology (H.C., C.B., P.C., M.M.) and Institute for Genomic Medicine (E.L.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Statistics and Biostatistics (S.T.), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ; Department of Neurology (H.T., L.J.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.S.), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (C.D.), Free University of Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience (P.P.), Monash University; Departments of Medicine and Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Genetics (G.A.H.), Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ.
| | - Kamil Detyniecki
- From the Department of Neurology (H.C., C.B., P.C., M.M.) and Institute for Genomic Medicine (E.L.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Statistics and Biostatistics (S.T.), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ; Department of Neurology (H.T., L.J.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.S.), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (C.D.), Free University of Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience (P.P.), Monash University; Departments of Medicine and Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Genetics (G.A.H.), Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Carl Bazil
- From the Department of Neurology (H.C., C.B., P.C., M.M.) and Institute for Genomic Medicine (E.L.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Statistics and Biostatistics (S.T.), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ; Department of Neurology (H.T., L.J.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.S.), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (C.D.), Free University of Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience (P.P.), Monash University; Departments of Medicine and Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Genetics (G.A.H.), Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Suzanne Thornton
- From the Department of Neurology (H.C., C.B., P.C., M.M.) and Institute for Genomic Medicine (E.L.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Statistics and Biostatistics (S.T.), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ; Department of Neurology (H.T., L.J.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.S.), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (C.D.), Free University of Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience (P.P.), Monash University; Departments of Medicine and Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Genetics (G.A.H.), Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Peter Crosta
- From the Department of Neurology (H.C., C.B., P.C., M.M.) and Institute for Genomic Medicine (E.L.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Statistics and Biostatistics (S.T.), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ; Department of Neurology (H.T., L.J.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.S.), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (C.D.), Free University of Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience (P.P.), Monash University; Departments of Medicine and Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Genetics (G.A.H.), Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Hatem Tolba
- From the Department of Neurology (H.C., C.B., P.C., M.M.) and Institute for Genomic Medicine (E.L.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Statistics and Biostatistics (S.T.), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ; Department of Neurology (H.T., L.J.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.S.), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (C.D.), Free University of Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience (P.P.), Monash University; Departments of Medicine and Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Genetics (G.A.H.), Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Manahil Muneeb
- From the Department of Neurology (H.C., C.B., P.C., M.M.) and Institute for Genomic Medicine (E.L.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Statistics and Biostatistics (S.T.), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ; Department of Neurology (H.T., L.J.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.S.), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (C.D.), Free University of Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience (P.P.), Monash University; Departments of Medicine and Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Genetics (G.A.H.), Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Lawrence J Hirsch
- From the Department of Neurology (H.C., C.B., P.C., M.M.) and Institute for Genomic Medicine (E.L.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Statistics and Biostatistics (S.T.), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ; Department of Neurology (H.T., L.J.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.S.), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (C.D.), Free University of Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience (P.P.), Monash University; Departments of Medicine and Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Genetics (G.A.H.), Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Erin L Heinzen
- From the Department of Neurology (H.C., C.B., P.C., M.M.) and Institute for Genomic Medicine (E.L.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Statistics and Biostatistics (S.T.), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ; Department of Neurology (H.T., L.J.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.S.), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (C.D.), Free University of Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience (P.P.), Monash University; Departments of Medicine and Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Genetics (G.A.H.), Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Arjune Sen
- From the Department of Neurology (H.C., C.B., P.C., M.M.) and Institute for Genomic Medicine (E.L.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Statistics and Biostatistics (S.T.), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ; Department of Neurology (H.T., L.J.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.S.), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (C.D.), Free University of Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience (P.P.), Monash University; Departments of Medicine and Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Genetics (G.A.H.), Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Chantal Depondt
- From the Department of Neurology (H.C., C.B., P.C., M.M.) and Institute for Genomic Medicine (E.L.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Statistics and Biostatistics (S.T.), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ; Department of Neurology (H.T., L.J.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.S.), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (C.D.), Free University of Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience (P.P.), Monash University; Departments of Medicine and Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Genetics (G.A.H.), Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Piero Perucca
- From the Department of Neurology (H.C., C.B., P.C., M.M.) and Institute for Genomic Medicine (E.L.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Statistics and Biostatistics (S.T.), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ; Department of Neurology (H.T., L.J.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.S.), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (C.D.), Free University of Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience (P.P.), Monash University; Departments of Medicine and Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Genetics (G.A.H.), Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Gary A Heiman
- From the Department of Neurology (H.C., C.B., P.C., M.M.) and Institute for Genomic Medicine (E.L.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Statistics and Biostatistics (S.T.), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ; Department of Neurology (H.T., L.J.H.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.S.), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (C.D.), Free University of Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience (P.P.), Monash University; Departments of Medicine and Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne; Department of Neurology (P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; and Department of Genetics (G.A.H.), Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Atalar AÇ, Vanlı-Yavuz EN, Yılmaz E, Bebek N, Baykan B. Reflex epileptic features in patients with focal epilepsy of unknown cause. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019; 190:105633. [PMID: 31865219 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2019] [Revised: 11/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is a gap of knowledge regarding reflex seizures in patients with focal epilepsy of unknown cause (FEUC). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, demographic and clinical characteristics of reflex seizures in patients with FEUC to provide an insight to the underlying ictogenic mechanisms and to draw attention to this important but under-investigated topic. PATIENTS AND METHODS After carefully questioning for reflex triggers, 186 patients diagnosed according to ILAE criteria and followed-up for a minimum of 5 years were included. The demographic and clinical properties as well as electrophysiological and neuroimaging data of these patients were reevaluated and compared to the patients without reflex seizures. RESULTS The reflex seizure rate was 6.5 % in patients with FEUC. Patients with reflex features had lower monotherapy rates (p = 0.005) and higher major depression rates (p = 0.001) than patients without reflex features. The distribution of the patients according to their reflex triggers were as follows: hot-water induced (n = 3, 25 %), photosensitive (n = 2, 16.7 %), eating- induced (n = 2, 16.7 %), musicogenic (n = 2, 16.7 %), startle induced (n = 2, 16.7 %) and both musicogenic and startle type (n = 1, 8.3 %) respectively. The drug resistance rate of patients with reflex seizures was 25 % (n = 3). One patient with drug resistant reflex seizures showed benefit from epilepsy surgery and became seizure-free during last 3 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION A careful and thoroughly history taking specifically questioning and focusing on seizure inducing factors in patients with FEUC is needed to confirm the presence of reflex seizures in patients with FEUC, who had higher rates of polytherapy and major depression. Elaborative evaluation of reflex features in FEUC might contribute to effective seizure control, ensure new therapeutic approaches, enlighten the obscurity and the resulting anxiety of having a diagnosis of FEUC in epilepsy patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arife Çimen Atalar
- Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Departments of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Istanbul, Turkey; Istanbul Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Ebru Nur Vanlı-Yavuz
- Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Departments of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Istanbul, Turkey; Koc University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ebru Yılmaz
- Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Turkey
| | - Nerses Bebek
- Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Departments of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Betül Baykan
- Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Departments of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Martins-Ferreira R, Chaves J, Carvalho C, Bettencourt A, Chorão R, Freitas J, Samões R, Boleixa D, Lopes J, Ramalheira J, da Silva BM, Martins da Silva A, Costa PP, Leal B. Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for genetic generalized epilepsies: a three microRNA panel. Eur J Neurol 2019; 27:660-666. [PMID: 31746515 DOI: 10.1111/ene.14129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Genetic generalized epilepsies (GGEs) encompass a group of syndromes of mainly genetic causes, characterized by the involvement of both hemispheres. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs with a critical role in the regulation of neuronal biological processes through gene expression modulation. Dysregulated miRNA expression has been shown in epilepsy. Due to their stability in biological fluids like serum, miRNAs have assumed a prominent role in biomarker research. Our aim was to evaluate circulating levels of three miRNAs in GGE patients and assess their putative diagnostic value. METHODS MiR-146a, miR-155 and miR-132 were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction in the serum of 79 GGE patients (47 women, 32 men, 35.1 ± 12.4 years) and 67 healthy individuals (41 women, 26 men, 42.4 ± 10.1 years). Relative expression values were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess diagnostic value. MiRNA expression was correlated with clinicopathological features. RESULTS Serum levels of miR-146a and miR-155 were significantly upregulated in GGE patients relative to controls (3.13 and 6.05, respectively). Combined miR-146a, miR-155 and miR-132 serum levels performed well as a diagnostic biomarker, discriminating GGE patients from controls with an area under the curve of 0.85, 80% specificity and 73% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that miR-146a, miR-155 and miR-132 may partake in GGE epileptogenesis. A panel of three circulating miRNAs with potential value as a GGE biomarker is reported for the first time. Novel biomarkers may help to identify new treatment targets and contribute to improved patients' quality of life through earlier diagnosis and a more precise prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - J Chaves
- UMIB - Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Serviço de Neurologia, Hospital de Santo António-Centro Hospitalar, Universitário do Porto - Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
| | - C Carvalho
- Lab. Imunogenética - DPIM, ICBAS-UPorto, Porto, Portugal.,UMIB - Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - A Bettencourt
- Lab. Imunogenética - DPIM, ICBAS-UPorto, Porto, Portugal.,UMIB - Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - R Chorão
- Serviço de Neurologia, Hospital de Santo António-Centro Hospitalar, Universitário do Porto - Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
| | - J Freitas
- Serviço de Neurologia, Hospital de Santo António-Centro Hospitalar, Universitário do Porto - Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
| | - R Samões
- Serviço de Neurologia, Hospital de Santo António-Centro Hospitalar, Universitário do Porto - Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
| | - D Boleixa
- Lab. Imunogenética - DPIM, ICBAS-UPorto, Porto, Portugal
| | - J Lopes
- Serviço de Neurofisiologia, Hospital de Santo António-Centro Hospitalar, Universitário do Porto - Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
| | - J Ramalheira
- Serviço de Neurofisiologia, Hospital de Santo António-Centro Hospitalar, Universitário do Porto - Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
| | - B M da Silva
- Lab. Imunogenética - DPIM, ICBAS-UPorto, Porto, Portugal.,UMIB - Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - A Martins da Silva
- UMIB - Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Serviço de Neurofisiologia, Hospital de Santo António-Centro Hospitalar, Universitário do Porto - Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
| | - P P Costa
- UMIB - Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Departamento de Genética Humana, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr Ricardo Jorge - Porto. Rua Pedro Nunes, Porto, Portugal
| | - B Leal
- Lab. Imunogenética - DPIM, ICBAS-UPorto, Porto, Portugal.,UMIB - Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Long-term follow-up of a large cohort with focal epilepsy of unknown cause: deciphering their clinical and prognostic characteristics. J Neurol 2019; 267:838-847. [DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09656-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
40
|
Janmohamed M, Brodie MJ, Kwan P. Pharmacoresistance - Epidemiology, mechanisms, and impact on epilepsy treatment. Neuropharmacology 2019; 168:107790. [PMID: 31560910 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.107790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 09/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Understanding the natural history of and factors associated with pharmacoresistant epilepsy provides the foundation for formulating mechanistic hypotheses that can be evaluated to drive the development of novel treatments. This article reviews the modern definition of drug-resistant epilepsy, its prevalence and incidence, risk factors, hypothesized mechanisms, and the implication of recognizing pharmacoresistance in therapeutic strategies. This article is part of the special issue entitled 'New Epilepsy Therapies for the 21st Century - From Antiseizure Drugs to Prevention, Modification and Cure of Epilepsy'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mubeen Janmohamed
- Department of Neuroscience, Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Patrick Kwan
- Department of Neuroscience, Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rubboli G, Gardella E. Reader response: Generalized polyspike train: An EEG biomarker of drug-resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Neurology 2019; 93:562-563. [PMID: 31527101 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000008141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
42
|
Generalized polyspike train. Neurology 2018; 91:1117. [DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000006797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|