1
|
Denneman N, Post R, Coert BA, van den Berg R, Verbaan D, Vandertop WP. Resilience After High-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Prospective Cohort Study on Quality of Life. Neurosurgery 2024:00006123-990000000-01233. [PMID: 38912823 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Treatment of patients who present with poor clinical condition is often postponed until neurological improvement is observed. Despite previous studies, it is still unclear how survivors perceive their quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to evaluate self-perceived QoL in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who present with poor clinical condition, as defined by World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grades 4 to 5, compared with those who present in more favorable clinical condition (WFNS 1-3). METHODS Between 2011 and 2021, 1160 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were admitted to the Amsterdam UMC. Among the 845 patients who survived, 537 participated in the QoL questionnaires. Patient characteristics, complications, EQ-5D questionnaires, modified Rankin Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were analyzed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables or the Pearson χ2 test for categorical variables. RESULTS Of the 537 responders, 452 (84%) presented with low grade (WFNS 1-3) and 85 (16%) presented with high grade (WFNS 4-5). The high-grade group reported a self-perceived QoL score of 70 (of 100), while the low-grade group reported a score of 75 (P = .12). The mean EQ-5D index value was 0.74 for the high-grade group and 0.81 for the low-grade group (P < .01). In the high-grade group, 61 patients (72%) had a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-3) compared with 419 (94%) in the low-grade group (P < .001). CONCLUSION High-grade WFNS patients rated their QoL as satisfactory, with only a marginal 5-point difference on a 100-point scale compared with low-grade WFNS patients. In addition, almost three-quarters of high-grade WFNS survivors achieved a favorable outcome. Given that a subset of patients, despite presenting with a poor clinical condition, still achieve a favorable outcome, these findings reinforce our perspective advocating for early and comprehensive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Denneman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurovascular Disorders, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - René Post
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurovascular Disorders, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Coert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurovascular Disorders, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - René van den Berg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurovascular Disorders, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dagmar Verbaan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurovascular Disorders, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Peter Vandertop
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurovascular Disorders, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anna A, Marita D, Lars E, Lovisa T, Lotti O. Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage treated in Swedish intensive care: A registry study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2024. [PMID: 38812348 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) is a life-threatening disease with high mortality and morbidity. Patients with aSAH in Sweden are cared for at one of six neuro intensive care units (NICU) or at a general intensive care unit (ICU).This study aimed to describe the incidence, length of stay, time in ventilator and mortality for these patients. METHODS This is a retrospective, descriptive study of patients with aSAH, registered in the Swedish Intensive care Registry between 2017 and 2019. The cohort was divided in sub-cohorts (NICU and general ICU) and regions. Mortality was analysed with logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 1520 patients with aSAH from five regions were included in the study. Mean age of the patients were 60.6 years and 58% were female. Mortality within 180 days of admission was 30% (n = 456) of which 17% (n = 258) died during intensive care. A majority of the patients were treated at one hospital and in one ICU (70%, n = 1062). More than half of the patients (59%, n = 897) had their first intensive care admission at a hospital with a NICU. Patients in the North region had the lowest median GCS (10) and the highest SAPS3 score (60) when admitted to NICU. Treatment with invasive mechanical ventilation differed significantly between regions; 91% (n = 80) in the region with highest proportion versus 56% (n = 94) in the region with the lowest proportion, as did mortality; 16% (n = 44) versus 8% (n = 23). No differences between regions were found regarding age, sex and length of stay. CONCLUSIONS Patients with aSAH treated in a NICU or in an ICU in Sweden differs in characteristics. The study further showed some differences between regions which might be reduced if there were national consensus and treatment guidelines implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnlind Anna
- Department of Neurosurgery in Linköping, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Danielsson Marita
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- The Swedish National Patient Insurance Company (Löf), Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Engerström Lars
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Vrinnevi Hospital, Norrköping, Sweden
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Tobieson Lovisa
- Department of Neurosurgery in Linköping, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Orwelius Lotti
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ryan D, Ikramuddin S, Alexander S, Buckley C, Feng W. Three Pillars of Recovery After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Narrative Review. Transl Stroke Res 2024:10.1007/s12975-024-01249-6. [PMID: 38602660 DOI: 10.1007/s12975-024-01249-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating neurologic disease with high mortality and disability. There have been global improvements in survival, which has contributed to the prevalence of patients living with long-term sequelae related to this disease. The focus of active research has traditionally centered on acute treatment to reduce mortality, but now there is a great need to study the course of short- and long-term recovery in these patients. In this narrative review, we aim to describe the core pillars in the preservation of cerebral function, prevention of complications, the recent literature studying neuroplasticity, and future directions for research to enhance recovery outcomes following aSAH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Ryan
- Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27704, USA
| | - Salman Ikramuddin
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Sheila Alexander
- School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA
| | | | - Wuwei Feng
- Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27704, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nobels-Janssen E, Postma EN, Abma IL, van Dijk JMC, de Ridder IR, Schenck H, Moojen WA, den Hertog MH, Nanda D, Potgieser ARE, Coert BA, Verhagen WIM, Bartels RHMA, van der Wees PJ, Verbaan D, Boogaarts HD. Validity of the modified Rankin Scale in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized study. BMC Neurol 2024; 24:23. [PMID: 38216872 PMCID: PMC10785372 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03479-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The modified Rankin Scale (mRS), a clinician-reported outcome measure of global disability, has never been validated in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The aims of this study are to assess: (1) convergent validity of the mRS; (2) responsiveness of the mRS; and (3) the distribution of mRS scores across patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS This is a prospective randomized multicenter study. The mRS was scored by a physician for all patients, and subsequently by structured interview for half of the patients and by self-assessment for the other half. All patients completed EuroQoL 5D-5L, RAND-36, Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale (SS-QoL) and Global Perceived Effect (GPE) questionnaires. Convergent validity and responsiveness were assessed by testing hypotheses. RESULTS In total, 149 patients with aSAH were included for analysis. The correlation of the mRS with EQ-5D-5L was r = - 0.546, while with RAND-36 physical and mental component scores the correlation was r = - 0.439and r = - 0.574 respectively, and with SS-QoL it was r = - 0.671. Three out of four hypotheses for convergent validity were met. The mRS assessed through structured interviews was more highly correlated with the mental component score than with the physical component score of RAND-36. Improvement in terms of GPE was indicated by 83% of patients; the mean change score of these patients on the mRS was - 0.08 (SD 0.915). None of the hypotheses for responsiveness were met. CONCLUSION The results show that the mRS generally correlates with other instruments, as expected, but it lacks responsiveness. A structured interview of the mRS is best for detecting disabling neuropsychological complaints. REGISTRATION URL: https://trialsearch.who.int ; Unique identifier: NL7859, Date of first administration: 08-07-2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Nobels-Janssen
- Department of Neurology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
| | - E N Postma
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I L Abma
- IQ healthcare and Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J M C van Dijk
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - I R de Ridder
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - H Schenck
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - W A Moojen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - M H den Hertog
- Department of Neurology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - D Nanda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - A R E Potgieser
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - B A Coert
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W I M Verhagen
- Department of Neurology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - R H M A Bartels
- Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands
| | - P J van der Wees
- IQ healthcare and Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - D Verbaan
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H D Boogaarts
- Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoh BL, Ko NU, Amin-Hanjani S, Chou SHY, Cruz-Flores S, Dangayach NS, Derdeyn CP, Du R, Hänggi D, Hetts SW, Ifejika NL, Johnson R, Keigher KM, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Lucke-Wold B, Rabinstein AA, Robicsek SA, Stapleton CJ, Suarez JI, Tjoumakaris SI, Welch BG. 2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2023; 54:e314-e370. [PMID: 37212182 DOI: 10.1161/str.0000000000000436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
AIM The "2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage" replaces the 2012 "Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage." The 2023 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. METHODS A comprehensive search for literature published since the 2012 guideline, derived from research principally involving human subjects, published in English, and indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline, was conducted between March 2022 and June 2022. In addition, the guideline writing group reviewed documents on related subject matter previously published by the American Heart Association. Newer studies published between July 2022 and November 2022 that affected recommendation content, Class of Recommendation, or Level of Evidence were included if appropriate. Structure: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a significant global public health threat and a severely morbid and often deadly condition. The 2023 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guideline provides recommendations based on current evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to preventing, diagnosing, and managing patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' and their families' and caregivers' interests. Many recommendations from the previous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ziegeler B, D' Souza W, Vinton A, Mulukutla S, Shaw C, Carne R. Neurological Health: Not Merely the Absence of Disease: Current Wellbeing Instruments Across the Spectrum of Neurology. Am J Lifestyle Med 2023; 17:299-316. [PMID: 36896041 PMCID: PMC9989493 DOI: 10.1177/15598276221086584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Well-being and quality of life can vary independently of disease. Instruments measuring well-being and quality of life are commonly used in neurology, but there has been little investigation into the extent in which they accurately measure wellbeing/quality of life or if they merely reflect a diseased state of an individual. DESIGN Systematic searches, thematic analysis and narrative synthesis were undertaken. Individual items from instruments represented in ≥ 5 publications were categorised independently, without prior training, by five neurologists and one well-being researcher, as relating to 'disease-effect' or 'Well-being' with a study-created instrument. Items were additionally categorised into well-being domains. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE and PsycINFO from 1990 to 2020 were performed, across the 13 most prevalent neurological diseases. RESULTS 301 unique instruments were identified. Multiple sclerosis had most unique instruments at 92. SF-36 was used most, in 66 studies. 22 instruments appeared in ≥ 5 publications: 19/22 'well-being' outcome instruments predominantly measured disease effect (Fleiss kappa = .60). Only 1/22 instruments was categorised unanimously as relating to well-being. Instruments predominantly measured mental, physical and activity domains, over social or spiritual. CONCLUSIONS Most neurological well-being or quality-of-life instruments predominantly measure disease effect, rather than disease-independent well-being. Instruments differed widely in well-being domains examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Cameron Shaw
- University Hospital Geelong, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Göcking B, Biller-Andorno N, Brandi G, Gloeckler S, Glässel A. Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Clinical Decision-Making: A Qualitative Pilot Study Exploring Perspectives of Those Directly Affected, Their Next of Kin, and Treating Clinicians. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:3187. [PMID: 36833886 PMCID: PMC9958564 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exploring the experience and impact of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) from three perspectives, that of those directly affected (AFs), their next of kin (NoK), and treating clinicians, is a way to support and empower others to make informed medical decisions. METHODS In a Swiss neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU), eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted as part of a Database of Individual Patient Experiences (DIPEx) pilot project and thematically analyzed. Interviews were held with two clinicians, five people experiencing aSAH, and four NoK 14-21 months after the bleeding event. RESULTS Qualitative analysis revealed five main themes from the perspective of clinicians: emergency care, diagnosis and treatment, outcomes, everyday life in the ICU, and decision-making; seven main themes were identified for AFs and NoK: the experience of the aSAH, diagnosis and treatment, outcomes, impact on loved ones, identity, faith, religion and spirituality, and decision-making. Perspectives on decision-making were compared, and, whereas clinicians tended to focus their attention on determining treatment, AFs and NoK valued participation in shared decision-making processes. CONCLUSIONS Overall, aSAH was perceived as a life-threatening event with various challenges depending on severity. The results suggest the need for tools that aid decision-making and better prepare AFs and NoK using accessible means and at an early stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrix Göcking
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nikola Biller-Andorno
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Giovanna Brandi
- Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sophie Gloeckler
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Glässel
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Algburi HA, Ismail M, Mallah SI, Alduraibi LS, Albairmani S, Abdulameer AO, Alayyaf AS, Aljuboori Z, Andaluz N, Hoz SS. Outcome measures in neurosurgery: Is a unified approach better? A literature review. Surg Neurol Int 2023; 14:61. [PMID: 36895248 PMCID: PMC9990809 DOI: 10.25259/sni_949_2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Accurate assessment and evaluation of health interventions are crucial to evidence-based care. The use of outcome measures in neurosurgery grew with the introduction of the Glasgow Coma Scale. Since then, various outcome measures have appeared, some of which are disease-specific and others more generally. This article aims to address the most widely used outcome measures in three major neurosurgery subspecialties, "vascular, traumatic, and oncologic," focusing on the potential, advantages, and drawbacks of a unified approach to these outcome measures. Methods A literature review search was conducted by using PubMed MEDLINE and Google scholar Databases. Data for the three most common outcome measures, The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), were extracted and analyzed. Results The original objective of establishing a standardized, common language for the accurate categorization, quantification, and evaluation of patients' outcomes has been eroded. The KPS, in particular, may provide a common ground for initiating a unified approach to outcome measures. With clinical testing and modification, it may offer a simple, internationally standardized approach to outcome measures in neurosurgery and elsewhere. Based on our analysis, Karnofsky's Performance Scale may provide a basis of reaching a unified global outcome measure. Conclusion Outcome measures in neurosurgery, including mRS, GOS, and KPS, are widely utilized assessment tools for patients' outcomes in various neurosurgical specialties. A unified global measure may offer solutions with ease of use and application; however, there are limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hagar A Algburi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Baghdad, College of Medicine, Al Risafa, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Mustafa Ismail
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Baghdad, College of Medicine, Al Risafa, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Saad I Mallah
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland - Bahrain, Busaiteen, Bahrain
| | - Linah S Alduraibi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sulaiman Al Rajhi University, College of Medicine, Al Bukayriyah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sama Albairmani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Al_Iraqia University, College of Medicine, Al Risafa, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Aanab O Abdulameer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Baghdad, College of Medicine, Al Risafa, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Abdulaziz Saad Alayyaf
- Department of Neurosugery, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, College of Medicine, Al Kharj - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zaid Aljuboori
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Norberto Andaluz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Samer S Hoz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ziebart A, Abdulazim A, Wenz F, Kleindienst N, Mocarz-Kleindienst M, Galea I, Rinkel GJE, Etminan N. Validation of the German version of the subarachnoid haemorrhage outcome tool (SAHOT). Eur Stroke J 2022; 8:320-327. [PMID: 37021152 PMCID: PMC10069186 DOI: 10.1177/23969873221144813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) outcome tool (SAHOT) is the first SAH-specific patient reported outcome measure, and was developed in the UK. We aimed to validate the SAHOT outside the UK, and therefore endeavored to adapt the SAHOT into German and to test its psychometric properties. Methods: We adapted and pilot tested the German version. We applied the SAHOT, Quality of Life after Brain Injury, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and EuroQol questionnaires in a cohort of 89 patients with spontaneous SAH after discharge. We assessed internal consistency by Cronbach’s α, test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation, and validity by Pearson correlations with established measures. Sensitivity to change was evaluated following neurorehabilitation by effect sizes. Results: The translation of SAHOT resulted in a German version that is semantically and conceptually equivalent to the English version. Internal consistency was good regarding the physical domain (α = 0.83) and excellent for the other domains (α = 0.92–0.93). Test–retest reliability indicated a high level of stability with an intraclass correlation of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83–0.86). All domains correlated moderately or strongly with established measures ( r = 0.41–0.74; p < 0.01). SAHOT total scores showed moderate sensitivity to change (Cohen’s d = −0.68), while mRS and GOSE showed no significant sensitivity to change. Conclusion: The SAHOT can be adapted to other health care systems and societies than the UK. The German version of the SAHOT is a reliable and valid instrument, and can be used in future clinical studies and individual assessment after spontaneous SAH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Ziebart
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Amr Abdulazim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Fabian Wenz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nikolaus Kleindienst
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maria Mocarz-Kleindienst
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Translation Studies and Slavic Languages, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Ian Galea
- Clinical Neurosciences, Clinical & Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Gabriel JE Rinkel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nima Etminan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bradley H, Zhu Y, Duan X, Kang H, Qu B. HIV-Specific Reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022; 8:e39015. [PMID: 36222289 PMCID: PMC9782451 DOI: 10.2196/39015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of people living with HIV and AIDS is multidimensional and complex. Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has been increasingly recognized to be the key factor for providing patient-centered health care to meet the lifelong needs of people living with HIV and AIDS from diagnosis to death. However, there is currently no consensus on a PROM recommended for health care providers and researchers to assess health outcomes in people living with HIV and AIDS. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize and categorize the available validated HIV-specific PROMs in adults living with HIV and AIDS and to assess these PROMs using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology. METHODS This systematic review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A literature search of 3 recommended databases (PubMed, Embase, and PsychINFO) was conducted on January 15, 2021. Studies were included if they assessed any psychometric property of HIV-specific PROMs in adults living with HIV and AIDS and met the eligibility criteria. The PROMs were assessed for 9 psychometric properties, evaluated in each included study following the COSMIN methodology by assessing the following: the methodological quality assessed using the COSMIN risk of bias checklist; overall rating of results; level of evidence assessed using the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach; and level of recommendation. RESULTS A total of 88 PROMs classified into 8 categories, assessing the psychometric properties of PROMs for adults living with HIV and AIDS, were identified in 152 studies including 79,213 people living with HIV and AIDS. The psychometric properties of most included PROMs were rated with insufficient evidence. The PROMs that received class A recommendation were the Poz Quality of Life, HIV Symptom Index or Symptoms Distress Module of the Adult AIDS Clinical Trial Group, and People Living with HIV Resilience Scale. In addition, because of a lack of evidence, recommendations regarding use could not be made for most of the remaining assessed PROMs (received class B recommendation). CONCLUSIONS This systematic review recommends 3 PROMs to assess health outcomes in adults living with HIV and AIDS. However, all these PROMs have some shortcomings. In addition, most of the included PROMs do not have sufficient evidence for assessing their psychometric properties and require a more comprehensive validation of the psychometric properties in the future to provide more scientific evidence. Thus, our findings may provide a reference for the selection of high-quality HIV-specific PROMs by health care providers and researchers for clinical practice and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yaxin Zhu
- Institute for International Health Professions Education and Research, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiyu Duan
- Institute for International Health Professions Education and Research, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Hao Kang
- Administration Department of Nosocomial Infection, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Bo Qu
- Institute for International Health Professions Education and Research, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.,School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Andersen CR, English SW, Delaney A. Made to measure—Selecting outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage research. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1000454. [PMID: 36212648 PMCID: PMC9532574 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1000454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been limited new high-level evidence generated to guide aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) management in the past decade. The choice of outcome measures used in aSAH clinical trials may be one of the factors hindering progress. In this narrative review we consider the current process for determining “what” to measure in aSAH and identify some of the shortcomings of these approaches. A consideration of the unique clinical course of aSAH is then discussed and how this impacts on selecting the best timepoints to assess change in the chosen constructs. We also review the how to critically appraise different measurement instruments and some of the issues with how these are applied in the context of aSAH. We conclude with current initiatives to improve outcome selection in aSAH and future directions in the research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R. Andersen
- Northern Clinical School, Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Intensive Care Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- *Correspondence: Christopher R. Andersen
| | - Shane W. English
- Department of Medicine (Critical Care), uOttawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Anthony Delaney
- Northern Clinical School, Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Intensive Care Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Simon-Pimmel J, Foucher Y, Léger M, Feuillet F, Bodet-Contentin L, Cinotti R, Frasca D, Dantan E. Methodological quality of multivariate prognostic models for intracranial haemorrhages in intensive care units: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e047279. [PMID: 34548347 PMCID: PMC8458313 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with severe spontaneous intracranial haemorrhages, managed in intensive care units, face ethical issues regarding the difficulty of anticipating their recovery. Prognostic tools help clinicians in counselling patients and relatives and guide therapeutic decisions. We aimed to methodologically assess prognostic tools for functional outcomes in severe spontaneous intracranial haemorrhages. DATA SOURCES Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations, we conducted a systematic review querying Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane in January 2020. STUDY SELECTION We included development or validation of multivariate prognostic models for severe intracerebral or subarachnoid haemorrhage. DATA EXTRACTION We evaluated the articles following the CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies and Transparent Reporting of multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis statements to assess the tools' methodological reporting. RESULTS Of the 6149 references retrieved, we identified 85 articles eligible. We discarded 43 articles due to the absence of prognostic performance or predictor selection. Among the 42 articles included, 22 did not validate models, 6 developed and validated models and 14 only externally validated models. When adding 11 articles comparing developed models to existing ones, 25 articles externally validated models. We identified methodological pitfalls, notably the lack of adequate validations or insufficient performance levels. We finally retained three scores predicting mortality and unfavourable outcomes: the IntraCerebral Haemorrhages (ICH) score and the max-ICH score for intracerebral haemorrhages, the SubArachnoid Haemorrhage International Trialists score for subarachnoid haemorrhages. CONCLUSIONS Although prognostic studies on intracranial haemorrhages abound in the literature, they lack methodological robustness or show incomplete reporting. Rather than developing new scores, future authors should focus on externally validating and updating existing scores with large and recent cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne Simon-Pimmel
- UMR 1246 Methods in Patients-Centered Outcomes and Health Research, INSERM, Nantes, France
| | - Yohann Foucher
- UMR 1246 Methods in Patients-Centered Outcomes and Health Research, INSERM, Nantes, France
- Biostatistician, University Hospital Centre Nantes, Nantes, Pays de la Loire, France
| | - Maxime Léger
- UMR 1246 Methods in Patients-Centered Outcomes and Health Research, INSERM, Nantes, France
- Medical Intensive Care, Angers University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Fanny Feuillet
- UMR 1246 Methods in Patients-Centered Outcomes and Health Research, INSERM, Nantes, France
- Biostatistics and Methodology Unit, University Hospital Centre Nantes, Nantes, Pays de la Loire, France
| | - Laetitia Bodet-Contentin
- UMR 1246 Methods in Patients-Centered Outcomes and Health Research, INSERM, Nantes, France
- Intensive Care Unit, Regional University Hospital Centre Tours, Tours, Centre, France
| | - Raphaël Cinotti
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Laennec, Saint-Herblain, University Hospital of Nantes, France, Université de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Denis Frasca
- UMR 1246 Methods in Patients-Centered Outcomes and Health Research, INSERM, Nantes, France
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, University Hospital Centre Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Etienne Dantan
- UMR 1246 Methods in Patients-Centered Outcomes and Health Research, INSERM, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Patient-Reported Outcome for Endovascular Treatment versus Microsurgical Clipping in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. World Neurosurg 2021; 155:e695-e703. [PMID: 34500096 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has a high mortality with significant impact on quality of life despite effective management strategies including endovascular treatment and/or microsurgical clipping. Although the modalities have undergone clinical comparison, they have not been evaluated on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This study compared endovascular versus microsurgical treatment using a PRO measure. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional telephonic survey of adult patients conducted at Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar between 2017 and 2019. Candidate study participants were identified from procedure logs and hospital electronic health records for endovascular treatment (N = 32) versus microsurgical clipping (N = 32) of cerebral aneurysm. The primary outcome measure was the short version of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QoL) measure. The secondary outcome measure was the screened clinician-reported modified Rankin Scale (mRS) for all screened patients (n = 137). Mean scores were compared for the 2 treatment groups. RESULTS The SS-QoL mean score was 4.23 (standard deviation ± 0.77) in endovascular treatment and 4.19 ± 0.19 in surgical clipping (P = 0.90). In exploratory analysis, mean physical domain score was 3.17 ± 0.60 versus 2.98 ± 0.66 in endovascular treatment and surgical clipping groups, respectively. Mean psychosocial domain scores were 4.43 ± 0.85 versus 4.18 ± 0.0.92, respectively. In multivariable analysis, none of the clinical variables were significantly related to SS-QoL except vasospasm irrespective of intervention received. In secondary outcome analysis, modified Rankin Scale score was higher for endovascular treatment (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Published evidence has supported clinical benefits of endovascular treatment for cerebral aneurysm treatment, but this study did not find any difference in PROs. Future studies of treatments should include PRO to identify potential differences from the patient's perspective.
Collapse
|
14
|
Custal C, Koehn J, Borutta M, Mrochen A, Brandner S, Eyüpoglu IY, Lücking H, Hoelter P, Kuramatsu JB, Kornhuber J, Schwab S, Huttner HB, Gerner ST. Beyond Functional Impairment: Redefining Favorable Outcome in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 50:729-737. [PMID: 34284375 DOI: 10.1159/000517242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For outcome assessment in patients surviving subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), the modified Rankin scale (mRS) represents the mostly established outcome tool, whereas other dimensions of outcome such as mood disorders and impairments in social life remain unattended so far. OBJECTIVE The aim of our study was to correlate 12-month functional and subjective health outcomes in SAH survivors. METHODS All SAH patients treated over a 5-year period received outcome assessment at 12 months, including functional scores (mRS and Barthel Index [BI]), subjective health measurement (EQ-5D), and whether they returned to work. Analyses - including utility-weighted mRS - were conducted to detect associations and correlations among different outcome measures, especially in patients achieving good functional outcome (i.e., mRS 0-2) at 12 months. RESULTS Of 351 SAH survivors, 287 (81.2%) achieved favorable functional outcome at 12 months. Contrary to the BI, the EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) showed a strong association with different mRS grades, accentuated in patients with favorable functional outcome. Despite favorable functional outcome, patients reported a high rate of impairments in activities (24.0%), pain (33.4%), and anxiety/depression (42.5%). Further, multivariable analysis revealed (i) impairments in activities (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 0.872 [0.817-0.930]), (ii) presence of depression or anxiety (OR [95% CI]: 0.836 [0.760-0.920]), and (iii) return to work (OR [95% CI]: 1.102 [0.1.013-1.198]) to be independently associated with self-reported subjective health. CONCLUSION Established stroke scores mainly focusing on functional outcomes do poorly reflect the high rate of subjective impairments reported in SAH survivors, specifically in those achieving good functional outcome. Further studies are needed to investigate whether psychoeducational approaches aiming at improving coping mechanisms and perceived self-efficacy may result in higher subjective health in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Custal
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julia Koehn
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Borutta
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Mrochen
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Brandner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ilker Y Eyüpoglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hannes Lücking
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Philip Hoelter
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joji B Kuramatsu
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Kornhuber
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stefan Schwab
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hagen B Huttner
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stefan T Gerner
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nobels-Janssen E, Abma IL, Verhagen WIM, Bartels RHMA, van der Wees PJ, Boogaarts JD. Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for patients who have recovered from a subarachnoid hemorrhage: the "questionnaire for the screening of symptoms in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage" (SOS-SAH). BMC Neurol 2021; 21:162. [PMID: 33863304 PMCID: PMC8051103 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-021-02184-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients who have been successfully treated for an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) often retain multiple health complaints, including mood disorders, cognitive complaints, fatigue, and problems with social participation. These problems are not always fully addressed during hospital visits or in current outcome measures, such as the modified Rankin score and the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Here, we present the development of the “Questionnaire for the Screening of Symptoms in aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage” (SOS-SAH), which screens for the self-reported symptoms of patients with mild disabilities. Methods During the development of the SOS-SAH we adhered to the PROM-cycle framework for the selection and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The SOS-SAH was developed in an iterative process informed by a literature study. Patients and healthcare professionals were involved in the development process through participating in a working group, interviews, and a cognitive validation study. Results and conclusions Relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were identified for patients with aSAH. The SOS-SAH was developed primarily using domains and items from existing PROMs and, if necessary, by developing new items. The SOS-SAH consists of 40 items and covers 14 domains: cognitive abilities, hypersensitivity to stimuli, anxiety, depression, fatigue, social roles, personality change, language, vision, taste, smell, hearing, headache, and sexual function. It also includes a proxy measurement for use by family members to assess cognitive functioning and personality change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edith Nobels-Janssen
- Department of Neurology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. .,Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, HB, 6500, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Inger L Abma
- IQ Healthcare and Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Wim I M Verhagen
- Department of Neurology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald H M A Bartels
- Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, HB, 6500, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Philip J van der Wees
- IQ Healthcare and Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen D Boogaarts
- Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, HB, 6500, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
DE Graaf JA, Visser-Meily JM, Schepers VP, Baars A, Kappelle LJ, Passier PE, Wermer MJ, DE Wit DC, Post MW. Comparison between EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS-10 to evaluate health-related quality of life 3 months after stroke: a cross-sectional multicenter study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 57:337-346. [PMID: 33448750 DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.21.06335-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the use of patient-reported outcome measures to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) has been advocated, it is still open to debate which patient-reported outcome measure should be preferred to evaluate HRQoL after stroke. AIM To compare the measurement properties (including concurrent validity and discriminant ability) between the 5-dimensional 5-level EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-Question Global Health Short Form (PROMIS-10) to evaluate HRQoL 3 months after stroke. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Neurology outpatient clinics in 6 Dutch hospitals. POPULATION The participants 360 consecutive individuals with stroke. Their median age was 71 years, 143 (39.7%) were female and 335 (93.0%) had suffered an ischemic stroke. METHODS The EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS-10, modified Rankin Scale and two items on experienced decrease in health and activities post-stroke were administered by a stroke nurse or nurse practitioner through a telephone interview 3 months after stroke. The internal consistency, distribution, floor/ceiling effects, inter-correlations and discriminant ability (using the modified Rankin Scale and experienced decrease in health and in activities post-stroke as external anchors) were calculated for both the EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS-10. RESULTS Ninety-six percent of the participants were living at home and 50.9% experienced minimal or no disabilities (modified Rankin Scale 0-1) 3 months after stroke. A ceiling effect and a non-normal left skewed distribution were observed in the EQ-5D-5L. The PROMIS-10 showed higher internal consistency (α=0.90) compared to the EQ-5D-5L (α=0.75). Both the EQ-5D-5L and the PROMIS-10 were strongly correlated with the modified Rankin Scale (r=0.62 and 0.60 respectively). The PROMIS-10 showed better discriminant ability in less affected individuals with stroke, whereas the EQ-5D-5L showed slightly better discriminant ability in more affected individuals with stroke. CONCLUSIONS Both EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS-10 prove to be useful instruments to evaluate HRQoL in patients who are living at home 3 months after stroke. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT The clinical rehabilitation impact depended on the setting and underlying goal which patient-reported outcome measure is preferred to evaluate HRQoL 3 months after stroke. The PROMIS-10 should be preferred to detect differences in less affected stroke patients, whereas the EQ-5D-5L provides slightly more information in more affected stroke patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joris A DE Graaf
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands -
| | - Johanna M Visser-Meily
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vera P Schepers
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Annette Baars
- Department of Rehabilitation, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - L Jaap Kappelle
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Patricia E Passier
- Department of Rehabilitation, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke J Wermer
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle C DE Wit
- Department of Rehabilitation, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel W Post
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Six-month mortality and functional outcomes in aneurysmal sub-arachnoid haemorrhage patients admitted to intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand: A prospective cohort study. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 80:92-99. [PMID: 33099375 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.07.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2019] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Historical studies suggest survivors of aneurysmal sub-arachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) have at least a moderate burden of functional impairment. However, there is a paucity of modern data concerning these outcomes in those admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Accordingly, the aim of this multicentre prospective observational cohort study was to provide contemporary epidemiological data concerning 6-month outcomes of adult aneurysmal SAH patients admitted to ICU in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). Between March 2016 and June 2018 (inclusive), 357 patients requiring ICU admission were enrolled into the study, from eleven (n = 11) neurosurgical centres in ANZ. The majority of patients were female (n = 242, 68%), the median [IQR] age was 57 [49, 67] years, and almost all were living independently prior to their SAH (n = 337, 94%). 38% (n = 134) suffered a high-grade (WFNS 4-5) SAH. The median index ICU and hospital lengths of stay (LOS) were 9 [4-14], and 20 [13-29] days, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 22% (n = 77). Of the evaluable cohort (n = 348), a further nine (n = 9) patients had died by 6-months, yielding an all cause mortality of 25% (n = 86). Moreover, 35% (n = 114) of assessable patients were 'dead or disabled' (modified Rankin scale ≥4) at 6-months, and there was significant variation between sites, independent of SAH severity. Overall, these patients consumed substantial healthcare resources, and given the burden of mortality and morbidity, in addition to the variability between institutions, there may be opportunity to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
|