Vamorolone trial in Duchenne muscular dystrophy shows dose-related improvement of muscle function

Vamorolone: a novel metabolism resistant steroid that suppresses joint destruction in chronic polyarthritis with reduced systemic side effects

OBJECTIVES

Vamorolone, a dissociated steroidal compound with reduced side effects, offers a promising alternative to traditional glucocorticoids for inflammatory diseases. Unlike conventional glucocorticoids, vamorolone lacks the hydroxyl or ketone groups required for metabolism by 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1), a key enzyme that modulates glucocorticoid activity. This study investigates vamorolone's resistance to 11β-HSD1 metabolism and assesses its therapeutic efficacy in the murine tumour necros factor-alpha-overexpressing (TNFtg) model of polyarthritis.

METHODS

11β-HSD1 metabolism and action were examined in Hs68 and primary leucocyte culture. Vamorolone 20 mg/kg/day, prednisolone (standard of care) or vehicle were administered by gavage to TNFtg or TNFtg 11β-HSD1 knock-out (TNFtg11BKOKO) animals. Body weight and disease severity were scored daily, and markers of inflammation, joint destruction and side effects assessed at day 56 of age.

RESULTS

Vamorolone was entirely resistant to 11β-HSD1 metabolism in vitro. Vamorolone demonstrated comparable anti-inflammatory actions in TNFtg mice, with a comparable reduction in joint inflammation, serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and synovitis relative to prednisolone. However, vamorolone-treated mice did not experience typical glucocorticoid side effects, including adrenal atrophy, body weight reduction, muscle wasting or inhibition of anabolic bone metabolism. These benefits persisted in 11β-HSD1 knockout mice, indicating that the efficacy of vamorolone is largely independent of 11β-HSD1 metabolism.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that at the effective anti-inflammatory dose examined in this study, vamorolone possesses a reduced profile of deleterious systemic effects relative to prednisolone. Whilst highlighting its potential for broader clinical application in inflammatory conditions, it remains unclear whether these side effects would remain mild at markedly higher doses.

Association of DMD Gene Variant Classes With Motor Outcomes in a Drug Registration Clinical Trial Setting

Background and Objectives

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is caused by pathogenic variants of the DMD gene, leading to the loss of dystrophin. Clinical variability in DMD can complicate interpretation of interventional data in clinical trials. One source of clinical variability is allelic heterogeneity (different pathogenic variants with different effects on dystrophin protein expression). We sought to determine whether gene variant classes in clinical trial participants potentially affect clinical trial data interpretation.

Methods

We analyzed 186 vamorolone trial participants with DMD (VBP15-002/003; VBP15-004) who were 4 to <7 years old and steroid-naïve at baseline. We stratified participants into gene variant classes by either variant location in the gene affecting different gene promoters (5' [Dp427-only] vs 3' [Dp427+other isoforms]) or residual dystrophin levels (null vs possible non-null [5' gene variants, exon 44 skippable, splice site]). We evaluated associations with baseline motor outcomes and treatment response (prednisone and vamorolone).

Results

Participants with variants in ex63 and downstream (null for Dp427+Dp140+Dp71 protein isoforms) showed poorer baseline motor outcomes for time to stand from supine velocity than those with variants in ex1-44 (Dp427 only). No significant baseline differences were found between likely null and possible non-null variants. Participants with only Dp427 involvement showed significantly better treatment response for the 6-minute walk distance. Most of the comparisons of baseline motor function and treatment response were similar between variant classes.

Discussion

The large variation in baseline motor function in young, steroid-naïve patients with DMD is only minimally explained by different gene variant classes. While there is strong literature support for 3' variants leading to a more severe motor and cognitive DMD phenotype, we found this variant class under-represented in our clinical trials. This suggests that they may fail inclusion criteria (failure to follow commands; poor motor function). Subgroup analyses in DMD clinical trials at a young age range based on gene variant class may not reveal significant differences and would be relatively noninformative.

A Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy-sponsored International Workshop Report on Endocrine and Bone Issues in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: An Ever-changing Landscape

In April 2023, over 30 experts and advocates from four countries met in Rome, Italy to discuss unmet needs in endocrine and bone health care for individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Despite recent advances in muscle-targeted therapy, long-term glucocorticoids (GC) remain the backbone of treatment for the foreseeable future. This affirms the need to intensify efforts that will mitigate serious complications of GC therapy, including unexpected mortality due to fat embolism syndrome following bone injury and also unrecognized adrenal suppression, early loss of ambulation linked to excess weight and/or fragility fracture, adverse cardiometabolic effects of GC, the psychosocial impact of profound growth and pubertal delay/hypogonadism, and the burden to families arising from monitoring and treating endocrine and skeletal complications of GC therapy. Delegates discussed: 1. The impact of GC therapy on the heart, 2. Predictors of fragility fractures and experience with intravenous and oral bisphosphonates plus teriparatide, 3. The effect of hormonal therapy on muscle-bone health, 4. Adrenal suppression, 5. Weight management, 6. Puberty, sexuality, fertility and gender identity, 7. The impact of early GC initiation, 8. Emerging knowledge about vamorolone (a novel dissociative steroid) and its effects on muscle, bone and endocrine health, and 9. Experiences implementing an endocrine-bone health management strategy nation-wide (in the UK). At the conclusion of the meeting, it was agreed that an endocrine-bone working group should be struck to continue the narrative, following which the International OPTIMIZE DMD Consortium was ignited to move the dial in these important areas.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of vamorolone in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

BACKGROUND

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe neuromuscular disorder, often leading to wheelchair dependence by age 13 with limited treatment options, largely relying on glucocorticosteroids. We assessed the efficacy and safety of vamorolone, a modified synthetic corticosteroid, for DMD.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using seven databases including prospective studies comparing vamorolone with glucocorticosteroids or placebo in DMD patients. We extracted data on efficacy and safety outcomes. We built fixed effects models to assess mean differences. (PROSPERO: CRD42023396908).

RESULTS

Out of 210 identified records, two study reports were included in meta-analysis providing data from 210 patients. Vamorolone at 2.0 mg/kg/day was associated with improvement time to climb four stairs velocity (MD = 0.05 95% CI [0.03 to 0.08] P = 0.0002), and time stand from supine velocity (MD = 0.07 95% CI [0.01 to 0.07] P = 0.007). A higher dose of 6.0 mg/kg/day was additionally associated with higher time to run/walk 10 m velocity (MD = 0.10 95% CI [-0.0.1 to 0.21] P = 0.07, I2 = 0%). Among these beneficial effects only improvement in time to climb four stairs velocity was sustained after a follow-up period of 30 months. Vamorolone did not inhibit growth but increased the risk of weight gain, suppression of adrenal function, and insulin resistance.

CONCLUSION

The results of our systematic review and meta-analyis are suggestive of improved efficacy and safety of vamorolone for DMD compared to standard glucocorticosteroids but the external validity of these findings as well as the medication's long-term effects remain to be determined.

Efficacy and Safety of Vamorolone in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Vamorolone has recently been approved for the management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy to replace glucocorticosteroids, which theoretically have more side effects. However, its efficacy and safety profile is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the efficacy of vamorolone in Duchenne muscular dystrophy through the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA), time to stand velocity (TTSTAND), time to run 10 m (TTRW), time to climb four stairs (TTCLIMB) and a safety profile.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 2024 (PROSPERO: CRD42024558413) for studies evaluating the effect or safety profile of vamorolone in a population with Duchenne muscular dystrophy on 6MWT, NSAA and TTSTAND. TTRW, TTCLIMB and a safety profile were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool (RoB2) and the Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies with No Control Group from the US National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, depending on the type of design. Results were expressed as mean differences or proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), depending on the outcome.

RESULTS

Six studies with a total of 145 individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and a baseline age between 4.7 and 5.5 years were included in the systematic review. Overall, the most effective dose was 6 mg/kg/day. At 24 weeks, this dose showed a statistically significant effect compared with the untreated cohorts of 41.60 m (95% CI 14.30, 68.90) on the 6MWT, 3.57 points (95% CI 1.89, 5.25) on the NSAA, 0.06 events/s (95% CI 0.02, 0.10) on the TTSTAND, approximately 0.25 m/s on the TTRW and 0.04 (95% CI -0.00, 0.08) to 0.07 events/s (95% CI 0.03, 0.11) on the TTCLIMB. There was some discrepancy in the statistical significance of some studies, although the direction of the effect was usually similar. In general, the effect was maintained in the extension studies. Adverse events were less frequent than in historical cohorts treated with glucocorticoids. Finally, the risk of bias in the included studies was low.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, vamorolone offers a statistically and clinically significant benefit in the management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, with fewer side effects than glucocorticoids. However, the number of studies limits the interpretability and generalisability of these data, requiring more studies with more participants to perform a meta-analysis.

Efficacy and safety of different doses of vamorolone in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background and objectives

Several recent clinical studies have indicated that vamorolone is comparable in effectiveness to glucocorticosteroids for treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). However, there is a lack of extensive data regarding the efficacy and safety of various doses of vamorolone. We conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy of different doses of vamorolone in boys with DMD, and compare the safety of vamorolone vs. glucocorticosteroids, prednisone or deflazacort in boys with DMD.

Methods

We performed systematic searches of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for vamorolone, glucocorticosteroids, prednisone or deflazacort in boys with DMD. We assessed statistical heterogeneity across trials based on the Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) tool test and I2 values, and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model. We used traditional meta-analysis to evaluate efficacy and safety of vamorolone 6.0 mg/kg/d vs. vamorolone 2.0 mg/kg/d and vamorolone vs. prednisone. A network meta-analysis was applied to estimated the safety of vamorolone in comparison to glucocorticosteroids, prednisone and deflazacort. Our meta-analysis were performed using Revman 5.4 software, and our network meta-analysis were performed using Stata/MP 18.0.

Results

In the meta-analysis, a total of 193 patients were analyzed across four clinical trials (97 patients receiving vamorolone 2 mg/kg per day; 96 patients receiving vamorolone 2 mg/kg per day). We observed that there were statistically significant differences in boys with DMD between vamorolone 6.0 mg/kg/d and vamorolone 2.0 mg/kg/d in TTSTANDV (MD = 0.03, 95%CI = 0.00-0.06, p = 0.04), TTRWV (MD = 0.13, 95%CI = 0.08-0.19, p < 0.01), 6MWT (MD = 24.54, 95%CI = 4.46-44.82, p = 0.02), TTCLIMBV (MD = 0.04, 95%CI = 0.01-0.06, p = 0.009), no significant difference in BMI z score (MD = 0.09, 95%CI = -0.03-0.20, p = 0.13). Indirect comparisons derived from network meta-analysis did not show significant differences among vamorolone, glucocorticosteroids, prednisone and deflazacort in BMI z score.

Conclusion

Our findings implied that boys with DMD who took vamorolone 6 mg/kg daily instead of 2 mg/kg daily may be safer and have superior motor function. However, more large sample randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our results.

Systematic Review Registration

This systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024562916).

Molecular and Biochemical Therapeutic Strategies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Significant progress has been achieved in understanding Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) mechanisms and developing treatments to slow disease progression. This review article thoroughly assesses primary and secondary DMD therapies, focusing on innovative modalities. The primary therapy addresses the genetic abnormality causing DMD, specifically the absence or reduced expression of dystrophin. Gene replacement therapies, such as exon skipping, readthrough, and gene editing technologies, show promise in restoring dystrophin expression. Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), a recent advancement in viral vector-based gene therapies, have shown encouraging results in preclinical and clinical studies. Secondary therapies aim to maintain muscle function and improve quality of life by mitigating DMD symptoms and complications. Glucocorticoid drugs like prednisone and deflazacort have proven effective in slowing disease progression and delaying loss of ambulation. Supportive treatments targeting calcium dysregulation, histone deacetylase, and redox imbalance are also crucial for preserving overall health and function. Additionally, the review includes a detailed table of ongoing and approved clinical trials for DMD, exploring various therapeutic approaches such as gene therapies, exon skipping drugs, utrophin modulators, anti-inflammatory agents, and novel compounds. This highlights the dynamic research field and ongoing efforts to develop effective DMD treatments.

Comprehensive review of adverse reactions and toxicology in ASO-based therapies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: From FDA-approved drugs to peptide-conjugated ASO

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is a devastating X-linked genetic disorder characterized by progressive muscle degeneration due to mutations in the dystrophin gene. This results in the absence or dysfunction of the dystrophin protein, leading to muscle weakness, loss of ambulation, respiratory issues, and cardiac complications, often leading to premature death. Recently, antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)-mediated exon skipping has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for DMD. Notably, the FDA has conditionally approved four ASO therapies for DMD, with numerous others in various stages of clinical development, indicating the growing interest and potential in this field. To enhance ASO-based therapies, researchers have explored the novel concept of conjugating peptides to the phosphorodiamidate morpholino backbone (PMO) of ASOs, leading to the development of peptide-conjugated PMOs (PPMOs). These PPMOs have demonstrated significantly improved pharmacokinetic profiles, potentially augmenting their therapeutic effectiveness. Despite the optimism surrounding ASOs and PPMOs, concerns persist regarding their efficacy and safety. To comprehensively evaluate these therapies, it is imperative to expand patient populations in clinical trials and conduct thorough investigations into the associated risks. This article provides a comprehensive review and discussion of the available data pertaining to adverse reactions and toxicology associated with FDA-approved ASO drugs for DMD. Furthermore, it offers insights into the emerging category of peptide-conjugated ASO drugs those are clinical and preclinical trials, shedding light on their potential benefits and challenges.

Musculoskeletal crosstalk in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and comorbidities: Emerging roles and therapeutic potentials

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a multifaceted respiratory disorder characterized by progressive airflow limitation and systemic implications. It has become increasingly apparent that COPD exerts its influence far beyond the respiratory system, extending its impact to various organ systems. Among these, the musculoskeletal system emerges as a central player in both the pathogenesis and management of COPD and its associated comorbidities. Muscle dysfunction and osteoporosis are prevalent musculoskeletal disorders in COPD patients, leading to a substantial decline in exercise capacity and overall health. These manifestations are influenced by systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, and hormonal imbalances, all hallmarks of COPD. Recent research has uncovered an intricate interplay between COPD and musculoskeletal comorbidities, suggesting that muscle and bone tissues may cross-communicate through the release of signalling molecules, known as "myokines" and "osteokines". We explored this dynamic relationship, with a particular focus on the role of the immune system in mediating the cross-communication between muscle and bone in COPD. Moreover, we delved into existing and emerging therapeutic strategies for managing musculoskeletal disorders in COPD. It underscores the development of personalized treatment approaches that target both the respiratory and musculoskeletal aspects of COPD, offering the promise of improved well-being and quality of life for individuals grappling with this complex condition. This comprehensive review underscores the significance of recognizing the profound impact of COPD on the musculoskeletal system and its comorbidities. By unravelling the intricate connections between these systems and exploring innovative treatment avenues, we can aspire to enhance the overall care and outcomes for COPD patients, ultimately offering hope for improved health and well-being.

The glucocorticoid receptor acts locally to protect dystrophic muscle and heart during disease

Absence of dystrophin results in muscular weakness, chronic inflammation and cardiomyopathy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Pharmacological corticosteroids are the DMD standard of care; however, they have harsh side effects and unclear molecular benefits. It is uncertain whether signaling by physiological corticosteroids and their receptors plays a modifying role in the natural etiology of DMD. Here, we knocked out the glucocorticoid receptor (GR, encoded by Nr3c1) specifically in myofibers and cardiomyocytes within wild-type and mdx52 mice to dissect its role in muscular dystrophy. Double-knockout mice showed significantly worse phenotypes than mdx52 littermate controls in measures of grip strength, hang time, inflammatory pathology and gene expression. In the heart, GR deletion acted additively with dystrophin loss to exacerbate cardiomyopathy, resulting in enlarged hearts, pathological gene expression and systolic dysfunction, consistent with imbalanced mineralocorticoid signaling. The results show that physiological GR functions provide a protective role during muscular dystrophy, directly contrasting its degenerative role in other disease states. These data provide new insights into corticosteroids in disease pathophysiology and establish a new model to investigate cell-autonomous roles of nuclear receptors and mechanisms of pharmacological corticosteroids.

A review on mechanistic insights into structure and function of dystrophin protein in pathophysiology and therapeutic targeting of Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked recessive genetic disorder characterized by progressive and severe muscle weakening and degeneration. Among the various forms of muscular dystrophy, it stands out as one of the most common and impactful, predominantly affecting boys. The condition arises due to mutations in the dystrophin gene, a key player in maintaining the structure and function of muscle fibers. The manuscript explores the structural features of dystrophin protein and their pivotal roles in DMD. We present an in-depth analysis of promising therapeutic approaches targeting dystrophin and their implications for the therapeutic management of DMD. Several therapies aiming to restore dystrophin protein or address secondary pathology have obtained regulatory approval, and many others are ongoing clinical development. Notably, recent advancements in genetic approaches have demonstrated the potential to restore partially functional dystrophin forms. The review also provides a comprehensive overview of the status of clinical trials for major therapeutic genetic approaches for DMD. In addition, we have summarized the ongoing therapeutic approaches and advanced mechanisms of action for dystrophin restoration and the challenges associated with DMD therapeutics.

Return of participant-level clinical trial results to participants: pilot of a simplified centralised approach

OBJECTIVES

Public access databases such as clinicaltrials.gov achieve dissemination of clinical trial design and aggregated study results. However, return of participant-level data is rarely done. A key barrier includes the proprietary ownership of data by the sponsor. Additionally, investigators may not have access to centralised data, and per International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Good Clinical Practice, must maintain the confidentiality of participants. This study piloted an approach to return both individual and aggregate clinical trial data to parents of children participating in a series of open-label clinical trials.

SETTING AND DESIGN

A small biotech company obtained central ethics approval (centralised institutional review board [IRB], non-exempt). The study was advertised via parent advocacy groups. Parents of trial participants were offered the option to contact an employee (coordinator) within the company, requesting return of their child's study results. Ethics approval covered participation in six countries. The study focused on the sequential clinical trials of vamorolone VBP15-002 (NCT02760264) and VBP15-003 (NCT02760277) (post-results).

INTERVENTIONS

Contact initiated by the parent enabled the coordinator to obtain informed consent (and separate General Data Protection Regulations consent), with phone translation when needed. Using date of birth and study site location provided by the parent, the data manager reported the participant number to the coordinator. The coordinator retrieved and compiled data, along with an aggregate summary, which was mailed via a password protected and encrypted memory device to the parent. Prereturn and postreturn surveys were sent to consented parents (n=19; 40% of 48 total trial participants) and investigators.

RESULTS

Prereturn surveys indicated a request for as much data as offered, in all formats offered. Postreturn survey showed high satisfaction with the process and data returned. Survey of the physician site investigators (n=10; 100% participation of investigators) voiced general satisfaction with the process, with some reservations.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrates an innovative, cost-effective, centralised and labour conservative approach to return of participant-level and aggregate data to participants in studies.

Efficacy and Safety of Vamorolone Over 48 Weeks in Boys With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Vamorolone is a dissociative agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor that has shown similar efficacy and reduced safety concerns in comparison with prednisone in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of vamorolone over 48 weeks and to study crossover participants (prednisone to vamorolone; placebo to vamorolone).

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and prednisone-controlled clinical trial of 2 doses of vamorolone was conducted in participants with DMD, in the ages from 4 years to younger than 7 years at baseline. The interventions were 2 mg/kg/d of vamorolone and 6 mg/kg/d of vamorolone for 48 weeks (period 1: 24 weeks + period 2: 24 weeks) and 0.75 mg/kg/d of prednisone and placebo for the first 24 weeks (before crossover). Efficacy was evaluated through gross motor outcomes and safety through adverse events, growth velocity, body mass index (BMI), and bone turnover biomarkers. This analysis focused on period 2.

RESULTS

A total of 121 participants with DMD were randomized. Vamorolone at a dose of 6 mg/kg/d showed maintenance of improvement for all motor outcomes to week 48 (e.g., for primary outcome, time to stand from supine [TTSTAND] velocity, week 24 least squares mean [LSM] [SE] 0.052 [0.0130] rises/s vs week 48 LSM [SE] 0.0446 [0.0138]). After 48 weeks, vamorolone at a dose of 2 mg/kg/d showed similar improvements as 6 mg/kg/d for North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) (vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d-vamorolone 2 mg/kg/d LSM [SE] 0.49 [1.14]; 95% CI -1.80 to 2.78, p = 0.67), but less improvement for other motor outcomes. The placebo to vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d group showed rapid improvements after 20 weeks of treatment approaching benefit seen with 48-week 6 mg/kg/d of vamorolone treatment for TTSTAND, time to run/walk 10 m, and NSAA. There was significant improvement in linear growth after crossover in the prednisone to vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d group, and rapid reversal of prednisone-induced decline in bone turnover biomarkers in both crossover groups. There was an increase in BMI after 24 weeks of treatment that then stabilized for both vamorolone groups.

DISCUSSION

Improvements of motor outcomes seen with 6 mg/kg/d of vamorolone at 24 weeks of treatment were maintained to 48 weeks of treatment. Vamorolone at a dose of 6 mg/kg/d showed better maintenance of effect compared with vamorolone at a dose of 2 mg/kg/d for most (3/5) motor outcomes. Bone morbidities of prednisone (stunting of growth and declines in serum bone biomarkers) were reversed when treatment transitioned to vamorolone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03439670.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class I evidence that for boys with DMD, the efficacy of vamorolone at a dose of 6 mg/kg/d was maintained over 48 weeks.

Comparison of pharmaceutical properties and biological activities of prednisolone, deflazacort, and vamorolone in DMD disease models

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive disabling X-linked recessive disorder that causes gradual and irreversible loss of muscle, resulting in early death. The corticosteroids prednisone/prednisolone and deflazacort are used to treat DMD as the standard of care; however, only deflazacort is FDA approved for DMD. The novel atypical corticosteroid vamorolone is being investigated for treatment of DMD. We compared the pharmaceutical properties as well as the efficacy and safety of the three corticosteroids across multiple doses in the B10-mdx DMD mouse model. Pharmacokinetic studies in the mouse and evaluation of p-glycoprotein (P-gP) efflux in a cellular system demonstrated that vamorolone is not a strong P-gp substrate resulting in measurable central nervous system (CNS) exposure in the mouse. In contrast, deflazacort and prednisolone are strong P-gp substrates. All three corticosteroids showed efficacy, but also side effects at efficacious doses. After dosing mdx mice for two weeks, all three corticosteroids induced changes in gene expression in the liver and the muscle, but prednisolone and vamorolone induced more changes in the brain than did deflazacort. Both prednisolone and vamorolone induced depression-like behavior. All three corticosteroids reduced endogenous corticosterone levels, increased glucose levels, and reduced osteocalcin levels. Using micro-computed tomography, femur bone density was decreased, reaching significance with prednisolone. The results of these studies indicate that efficacious doses of vamorolone, are associated with similar side effects as seen with other corticosteroids. Further, because vamorolone is not a strong P-gp substrate, vamorolone distributes into the CNS increasing the potential CNS side-effects.

Vamorolone: First Approval

Vamorolone (AGAMREE®) is an oral, selective, dissociative corticosteroid developed by ReveraGen BioPharma and Santhera Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of patients with muscular dystrophy. Vamorolone was approved in October 2023 for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) in patients 2 years of age and older in the USA and received a positive opinion in the EU in October 2023 for the treatment of DMD in patients 4 years of age and older. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of vamorolone leading to this first approval for DMD.

The Early Care (0-3 Years) In Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Meeting Report

Objective

This report summarizes the key discussions from the "Early Care (0-3 years) in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy" meeting, which aimed to address the challenges and opportunities in the diagnosis and care of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and female carriers within the 0-3-year age group.

Methods

The meeting brought together experts and healthcare providers who shared insights, discussed advancements in DMD care, and identified research needs. Presentations covered diagnostic challenges, approved therapies, clinical trials, identification of young female carriers, and the importance of clinical care and support for families.

Results

The meeting highlighted the importance of timely diagnosis and the lack of evidence-based guidelines for the care of children with DMD aged 0-3 years. Diagnostic challenges were discussed, including delays in receiving a DMD diagnosis and disparities based on ethnicity. The potential benefits and process of newborn screening were addressed.Approved therapeutic interventions, such as corticosteroids and exon-skipping drugs, were explored, with studies indicating the potential benefits of early initiation of corticosteroid therapy and the safety of exon-skipping drugs in DMD. Clinical trials involving infants and young boys were discussed, focusing on drugs like ataluren, vamorolone, and gene therapies.The meeting emphasized the importance of clinical care and support for families, including comprehensive information provision, early intervention services, and individualized support. The identification and care of young female carriers were also addressed.

Conclusion

The meeting provided a platform for experts and healthcare providers to discuss and identify key aspects of early care for children with DMD aged 0-3 years. The meeting emphasized the need for early diagnosis, evidence-based guidelines, and comprehensive care and support for affected children and their families. Further research, collaboration, and the development of consensus guidelines are needed to improve early diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in this population.

Dimethyl fumarate modulates the dystrophic disease program following short-term treatment

New medicines are urgently required to treat the fatal neuromuscular disease Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a potent immunomodulatory small molecule nuclear erythroid 2-related factor 2 activator with current clinical utility in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and psoriasis that could be effective for DMD and rapidly translatable. Here, we tested 2 weeks of daily 100 mg/kg DMF versus 5 mg/kg standard-care prednisone (PRED) treatment in juvenile mdx mice with early symptomatic DMD. Both drugs modulated seed genes driving the DMD disease program and improved force production in fast-twitch muscle. However, only DMF showed pro-mitochondrial effects, protected contracting muscles from fatigue, improved histopathology, and augmented clinically compatible muscle function tests. DMF may be a more selective modulator of the DMD disease program than PRED, warranting follow-up longitudinal studies to evaluate disease-modifying impact.

Therapeutic approaches for Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a monogenic muscle-wasting disorder and a priority candidate for molecular and cellular therapeutics. Although rare, it is the most common inherited myopathy affecting children and so has been the focus of intense research activity. It is caused by mutations that disrupt production of the dystrophin protein, and a plethora of drug development approaches are under way that aim to restore dystrophin function, including exon skipping, stop codon readthrough, gene replacement, cell therapy and gene editing. These efforts have led to the clinical approval of four exon skipping antisense oligonucleotides, one stop codon readthrough drug and one gene therapy product, with other approvals likely soon. Here, we discuss the latest therapeutic strategies that are under development and being deployed to treat DMD. Lessons from these drug development programmes are likely to have a major impact on the DMD field, but also on molecular and cellular medicine more generally. Thus, DMD is a pioneer disease at the forefront of future drug discovery efforts, with these experimental treatments paving the way for therapies using similar mechanisms of action being developed for other genetic diseases.

Evolving Therapeutic Options for the Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the most common childhood form of muscular dystrophy. It is caused by mutations in the DMD gene, leading to reduced or absent expression of the dystrophin protein. Clinically, this results in loss of ambulation, cardiomyopathy, respiratory failure, and eventually death. In the past decades, the use of corticosteroids has slowed down the disease progression. More recently, the development of genetically mediated therapies has emerged as the most promising treatment for DMD. These strategies include exon skipping with antisense oligonucleotides, gene replacement therapy with adeno-associated virus, and gene editing with CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) technology. In this review, we highlight the most up-to-date therapeutic progresses in the field, with emphasis on past and recent experiences, as well as the latest clinical results of DMD micro-dystrophin gene therapy. Additionally, we discuss the lessons learned along the way and the challenges encountered, all of which have helped advance the field, with the potential to finally alleviate such a devastating disease.

Advances in Dystrophinopathy Diagnosis and Therapy

Dystrophinopathies are x-linked muscular disorders which emerge from mutations in the Dystrophin gene, including Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy, and dilated cardiomyopathy. However, Duchenne muscular dystrophy interconnects with bone loss and osteoporosis, which are exacerbated by glucocorticoids therapy. Procedures for diagnosing dystrophinopathies include creatine kinase assay, haplotype analysis, Southern blot analysis, immunological analysis, multiplex PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, Sanger DNA sequencing, and next generation DNA sequencing. Pharmacological therapy for dystrophinopathies comprises glucocorticoids (prednisone, prednisolone, and deflazacort), vamorolone, and ataluren. However, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and β-blockers are the first-line to prevent dilated cardiomyopathy in dystrophinopathy patients. Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene therapy strategies involve gene transfer, exon skipping, exon reframing, and CRISPR gene editing. Eteplirsen, an antisense-oligonucleotide drug for skipping exon 51 from the Dystrophin gene, is available on the market, which may help up to 14% of Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients. There are various FDA-approved exon skipping drugs including ExonDys-51 for exon 51, VyonDys-53 and Viltolarsen for exon 53 and AmonDys-45 for exon 45 skipping. Other antisense oligonucleotide drugs in the pipeline include casimersen for exon 45, suvodirsen for exon 51, and golodirsen for exon 53 skipping. Advances in the diagnosis and therapy of dystrophinopathies offer new perspectives for their early discovery and care.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Current treatment and emerging exon skipping and gene therapy approach

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked recessive neuromuscular disorder that causes debilitating muscle weakness and atrophy due to a loss of the dystrophin protein. Patients with DMD are commonly diagnosed at about 3-5 years of age and progressively decline until complications of the disease often result in death at about 20 years of age. While there is no current cure for DMD, several treatment options focus on improving the quality of life and slowing progression of symptoms associated with the disease. The current treatment for DMD is glucocorticoids and physical therapy. Respiratory therapy, cardiac management, bone health maintenance, orthopedic interventions, and dietary considerations are also utilized in managing DMD patients. Emerging therapeutic approaches include gene transfer therapy, using adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors, and exon skipping agents. Both approaches have been shown to be relatively safe, with few significant side effects. Even though exon skipping agents produce a smaller dystrophin protein, they effectively preserve a significant portion of its function. Exon skipping agents have clinical advantages over traditional therapies, such as corticosteroids, because they slow the progression of DMD in addition to relieving symptoms. This review discusses the pathogenesis of DMD and explores the current treatment options as well as new and emerging therapies.

Modeling Early Heterogeneous Rates of Progression in Boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

BACKGROUND

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) exhibits substantial variability in rates of disease progression and response to treatment. This has hindered treatment development and complicated interpretation of drug effects in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that a multivariate combination of early-age clinical outcome measurements can explain differential disease progression.

METHODS

Data on boys with DMD (ages 4-<10 years), both treated with steroidal anti-inflammatories and untreated, were obtained from CINRG Duchenne Natural History Study (n = 209) and vamorolone VBP15-002/003/LTE (n = 46) studies. Velocities from three timed function tests (TFTs; stand from supine, run/walk 10 meters, and climb 4 stairs) were simultaneously modeled in a longitudinal latent class analysis.

RESULTS

Three classes of differentially progressing early age DMD motor trajectories were identified. Quicker decline/progression was associated with lower baseline TFT velocities, earlier loss of ability to finish a TFT, and lower predicted velocities. Earlier substantial steroid exposure was associated with greater TFT velocities while the moderate progression class was observed to have the largest difference in performance between boys treated early with steroids vs. not. Sample size calculations with the class showing the largest treatment response showed a large reduction in required sample size as compared to using summaries from all participants. Gene mutations were also investigated in post-hoc analyses, with mutations near the beginning of the DMD gene (Dp427 absent and Dp140/Dp71 present) found to be enriched in the slowest progressing class.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insight into the variation in DMD progression through a latent class analysis. Our findings show class-related trajectories of motor outcomes and pharmacological response to corticosteroids, and suggest that enrichment strategies and/or subgroup analyses could be considered further in design of therapeutic interventions in DMD.

Efficacy of vamorolone in treatment of Duchene muscle dystrophy. A meta-analysis

Background and aim

Recent studies evaluated the role of vamorolone in treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), so we aimed in our Meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of vamorolone in comparison with placebo and corticosteroids for treating DMD patients.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane library databases. We included any randomized control trials and controlled observational studies that investigated the role of vamorolone in treating DMD patients. We used RevMan software, version 5.4. to perform our meta-analysis.

Results

After a search of the literature, 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis; the total number of patients included in the study is 277 patients, 125 patients in the vamorolone group, 106 in the glucocorticoids group, and 46 in placebo (steroid naïve) group. The pooled analysis showed a statistically significant association between the vamorolone group and increased TTSTAND velocity, TTRW velocity and TTCLIMB velocity compared with the placebo group (MD = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.02-0.07, p = 0.002), (MD = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.11-0.37, p = 0.0003), and (MD = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.05-0.06, p < 0.00001), respectively. Also, the analysis showed a statistically significant association between vamorolone and increased TTRW velocity and increased Height percentile for age compared with the glucocorticoid group (MD = -0.14, 95% CI = -0.26 to -0.01, p = 0.03) and (MD = 17.82, 95% CI = 3.89-31.75, p = 0.01), respectively.

Conclusion

Our study revealed a significant association between vamorolone and increased TTSTAND velocity, TTRW velocity, and TTCLIMB velocity compared with the placebo (steroid naïve), also showed a statistically significant association between increased TTRW velocity and increased Height percentile for age compared with the glucocorticoid that enhances the privilege of vamorolone over glucocorticoid in treating DMD patients. More multicenter randomized studies are needed to support our results.

Considering the Promise of Vamorolone for Treating Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

This commentary provides an independent consideration of data related to the drug vamorolone (VBP15) as an alternative steroid proposed for treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Glucocorticoids such as prednisone and deflazacort have powerful anti-inflammatory benefits and are the standard of care for DMD, but their long-term use can result in severe adverse side effects; thus, vamorolone was designed as a unique dissociative steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, to retain efficacy and minimise these adverse effects. Extensive clinical trials (ongoing) have investigated the use of vamorolone for DMD, with two trials also for limb-girdle muscular dystrophies including dysferlinopathy (current), plus a variety of pre-clinical trials published. Vamorolone looks very promising, with similar efficacy and some reduced adverse effects (e.g., related to height) compared with other glucocorticoids, specifically prednisone/prednisolone, although it has not yet been directly compared with deflazacort. Of particular interest to clarify is the optimal clinical dose and other aspects of vamorolone that are proposed to provide additional benefits for membranes of dystrophic muscle: to stabilise and protect the sarcolemma from damage and enhance repair. The use of vamorolone (and other glucocorticoids) needs to be evaluated in terms of overall long-term efficacy and cost, and also in comparison with many candidate non-steroidal drugs with anti-inflammatory and other benefits for DMD.

Update of the Brazilian consensus recommendations on Duchenne muscular dystrophy

In the last few decades, there have been considerable improvements in the diagnosis and care of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), the most common childhood muscular dystrophy. International guidelines have been published and recently reviewed. A group of Brazilian experts has developed a standard of care based on a literature review with evidence-based graded recommendations in a two-part publication. Implementing best practice management has helped change the natural history of this chronic progressive disorder, in which the life expectancy for children of the male sex in the past used to be very limited. Since the previous publication, diagnosis, steroid treatment, rehabilitation, and systemic care have gained more significant insights with new original work in certain fields. Furthermore, the development of new drugs is ongoing, and some interventions have been approved for use in certain countries. Therefore, we have identified the need to review the previous care recommendations for Brazilian patients with DMD. Our objective was to create an evidence-based document that is an update on our previous consensus on those topics.

The Dystrophinopathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the history, epidemiology, genetics, clinical presentation, multidisciplinary management, and established and emerging therapies for the dystrophinopathies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The multidisciplinary care of individuals with dystrophinopathies continues to improve in many ways, including early surveillance and implementation of respiratory, cardiac, and orthopedic health management. The era of genetic therapeutics has altered the treatment landscape in neuromuscular disorders, including the dystrophinopathies.

SUMMARY

The dystrophinopathies are a spectrum of X-linked genetic disorders characterized by childhood-onset progressive weakness and variable cardiac and cognitive involvement. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy to slow disease progression. Additional strategies for disease amelioration and dystrophin restoration, including gene replacement therapy, are under investigation.

Current knowledge, challenges and innovations in developmental pharmacology: A combined conect4children Expert Group and European Society for Developmental, Perinatal and Paediatric Pharmacology White Paper

Developmental pharmacology describes the impact of maturation on drug disposition (pharmacokinetics, PK) and drug effects (pharmacodynamics, PD) throughout the paediatric age range. This paper, written by a multidisciplinary group of experts, summarizes current knowledge, and provides suggestions to pharmaceutical companies, regulatory agencies and academicians on how to incorporate the latest knowledge regarding developmental pharmacology and innovative techniques into neonatal and paediatric drug development. Biological aspects of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion throughout development are summarized. Although this area made enormous progress during the last two decades, remaining knowledge gaps were identified. Minimal risk and burden designs allow for optimally informative but minimally invasive PK sampling, while concomitant profiling of drug metabolites may provide additional insight in the unique PK behaviour in children. Furthermore, developmental PD needs to be considered during drug development, which is illustrated by disease- and/or target organ-specific examples. Identifying and testing PD targets and effects in special populations, and application of age- and/or population-specific assessment tools are discussed. Drug development plans also need to incorporate innovative techniques such as preclinical models to study therapeutic strategies, and shift from sequential enrolment of subgroups, to more rational designs. To stimulate appropriate research plans, illustrations of specific PK/PD-related as well as drug safety-related challenges during drug development are provided. The suggestions made in this joint paper of the Innovative Medicines Initiative conect4children Expert group on Developmental Pharmacology and the European Society for Developmental, Perinatal and Paediatric Pharmacology, should facilitate all those involved in drug development.

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B causes HDL-C abnormalities in patients and statin-resistant muscle wasting in dysferlin-deficient mice

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (MD) type 2B (LGMD2B) and Duchenne MD (DMD) are caused by mutations to the Dysferlin and Dystrophin genes, respectively. We have recently demonstrated in typically mild dysferlin- and dystrophin-deficient mouse models that increased plasma cholesterol levels severely exacerbate muscle wasting, and that DMD patients display primary dyslipidemia characterized by elevated plasma cholesterol and triglycerides. Herein, we investigate lipoprotein abnormalities in LGMD2B and if statin therapy protects dysferlin-deficient mice (Dysf) from muscle damage. Herein, lipoproteins and liver enzymes from LGMD2B patients and dysferlin-null (Dysf) mice were analyzed. Simvastatin, which exhibits anti-muscle wasting effects in mouse models of DMD and corrects aberrant expression of key markers of lipid metabolism and endogenous cholesterol synthesis, was tested in Dysf mice. Muscle damage and fibrosis were assessed by immunohistochemistry and cholesterol signalling pathways via Western blot. LGMD2B patients show reduced serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels compared to healthy controls and exhibit a greater prevalence of abnormal total cholesterol (CHOL)/HDL-C ratios despite an absence of liver dysfunction. While Dysf mice presented with reduced CHOL and associated HDL-C and LDL-C-associated fractions, simvastatin treatment did not prevent muscle wasting in quadriceps and triceps muscle groups or correct aberrant low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) protein expression. LGMD2B patients present with reduced serum concentrations of HDL-C, a major metabolic comorbidity, and as a result, statin therapy is unlikely to prevent muscle wasting in this population. We propose that like DMD, LGMD2B should be considered as a new type of genetic dyslipidemia.

Efficacy and Safety of Vamorolone vs Placebo and Prednisone Among Boys With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Question

For steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, can efficacy be retained while safety concerns are reduced among boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) with the novel partial receptor agonist vamorolone?

Findings

A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and prednisone-controlled trial of vamorolone (2 dose groups) was carried out in 121 patients with DMD. The trial met the primary (time to stand velocity after 24 weeks for vamorolone, 6 mg/kg per day vs placebo) and first 4 sequential secondary motor function end points; vamorolone showed loss of bone morbidities compared with prednisone, with no stunting of growth and no deleterious changes in bone biomarkers.

Meaning

This study found that vamorolone, a dissociative steroidal anti-inflammatory, was able to reduce bone morbidities while retaining efficacy.

Importance

Corticosteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely prescribed but long-term use shows adverse effects that detract from patient quality of life.

Objective

To determine if vamorolone, a structurally unique dissociative steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, is able to retain efficacy while reducing safety concerns with use in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).

Design, Setting, and Participants

Randomized, double-blind, placebo- and prednisone-controlled 24-week clinical trial, conducted from June 29, 2018, to February 24, 2021, with 24 weeks of follow-up. This was a multicenter study (33 referral centers in 11 countries) and included boys 4 to younger than 7 years of age with genetically confirmed DMD not previously treated with corticosteroids.

Interventions

The study included 4 groups: placebo; prednisone, 0.75 mg/kg per day; vamorolone, 2 mg/kg per day; and vamorolone, 6 mg/kg per day.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Study outcomes monitored (1) efficacy, which included motor outcomes (primary: time to stand from supine velocity in the vamorolone, 6 mg/kg per day, group vs placebo; secondary: time to stand from supine velocity [vamorolone, 2 mg/kg per day], 6-minute walk distance, time to run/walk 10 m [vamorolone, 2 and 6 mg/kg per day]; exploratory: NorthStar Ambulatory Assessment, time to climb 4 stairs) and (2) safety, which included growth, bone biomarkers, and a corticotropin (ACTH)–challenge test.

Results

Among the 133 boys with DMD enrolled in the study (mean [SD] age, 5.4 [0.9] years), 121 were randomly assigned to treatment groups, and 114 completed the 24-week treatment period. The trial met the primary end point for change from baseline to week 24 time to stand velocity for vamorolone, 6 mg/kg per day (least-squares mean [SE] velocity, 0.05 [0.01] m/s vs placebo −0.01 [0.01] m/s; 95% CI, 0.02-0.10; P = .002) and the first 4 sequential secondary end points: time to stand velocity, vamorolone, 2 mg/kg per day, vs placebo; 6-minute walk test, vamorolone, 6 mg/kg per day, vs placebo; 6-minute walk test, vamorolone, 2 mg/kg per day, vs placebo; and time to run/walk 10 m velocity, vamorolone, 6 mg/kg per day, vs placebo. Height percentile declined in prednisone-treated (not vamorolone-treated) participants (change from baseline [SD]: prednisone, −1.88 [8.81] percentile vs vamorolone, 6 mg/kg per day, +3.86 [6.16] percentile; P = .02). Bone turnover markers declined with prednisone but not with vamorolone. Boys with DMD at baseline showed low ACTH-stimulated cortisol and high incidence of adrenal insufficiency. All 3 treatment groups led to increased adrenal insufficiency.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this pivotal randomized clinical trial, vamorolone was shown to be effective and safe in the treatment of boys with DMD over a 24-week treatment period. Vamorolone may be a safer alternative than prednisone in this disease, in which long-term corticosteroid use is the standard of care.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03439670

Drug development progress in duchenne muscular dystrophy

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe, progressive, and incurable X-linked disorder caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene. Patients with DMD have an absence of functional dystrophin protein, which results in chronic damage of muscle fibers during contraction, thus leading to deterioration of muscle quality and loss of muscle mass over time. Although there is currently no cure for DMD, improvements in treatment care and management could delay disease progression and improve quality of life, thereby prolonging life expectancy for these patients. Furthermore, active research efforts are ongoing to develop therapeutic strategies that target dystrophin deficiency, such as gene replacement therapies, exon skipping, and readthrough therapy, as well as strategies that target secondary pathology of DMD, such as novel anti-inflammatory compounds, myostatin inhibitors, and cardioprotective compounds. Furthermore, longitudinal modeling approaches have been used to characterize the progression of MRI and functional endpoints for predictive purposes to inform Go/No Go decisions in drug development. This review showcases approved drugs or drug candidates along their development paths and also provides information on primary endpoints and enrollment size of Ph2/3 and Ph3 trials in the DMD space.

The Clinical Application of Remimazolam Benzenesulfonate Combined with Esketamine Intravenous Anesthesia in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

In this project, algorithm-based image processing methods in 3D endoscopic image processing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were analyzed. To enhance local information of images, an adaptive histogram equalization method with limited contrast is introduced. The influences of the algorithm on 3D endoscopic image peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), image discrete information entropy (DE), and average mean brightness error (AMBE) of images before and after the optimization before were compared. A total of 92 patients receiving ERCP at Yuhuangding Hospital between December 2019 and December 2021 were selected and divided into the control group (fentanyl+propofol) and the observation group (remimazolam benzenesulfonate+esketamine). Mean arterial pressure heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and respiratory rate (RR) of the patients at each time point including the entry into the operation room (T0), 2 minutes after the beginning of medication (T1), after endoscopy (T2), endoscopy withdrawal (T3), and postoperative awakening (T4) were recorded. The comparison of MAP between T1, T2, T3, and T4 and T0 among patients in the observation group and the control group showed statistical differences (P < 0.05). Besides, HR and RR at T4 in the observation group were obviously higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The comparison of SpO2 at T3 and T4 and that at T0 both showed statistical differences (P < 0.05). Awakening time and VAS scores in the observation group were obviously lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, and chill in the observation group was all lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The results indicated that an effective endoscopic image processing method was established based on an image enhancement algorithm, and the combination of remimazolam benzenesulfonate and esketamine showed high safety and efficacy in ERCP.

Corticosteroid Treatment-Resistance in Myasthenia Gravis

Chronic, high-dose, oral prednisone has been the mainstay of myasthenia gravis treatment for decades and has proven to be highly beneficial in many, toxic in some way to all, and not effective in a significant minority. No patient characteristics or biomarkers are predictive of treatment response leading to many patients suffering adverse effects with no benefit. Presently, measurements of treatment response, whether taken from clinician or patient perspective, are appreciated to be limited by lack of good correlation, which then complicates correlation to biological measures. Treatment response may be limited because disease mechanisms are not influenced by corticosteroids, limits on dosage because of adverse effects, or individual differences in corticosteroids. This review evaluates potential mechanisms that underlie lack of response to glucocorticoids in patients with myasthenia gravis.

Deflazacort dose optimization and safety evaluation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DOSE): A randomized, double-blind non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

US food and drug administration has recently approved deflazacort for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and recommended the dosage of 0.9 mg/kg/d for patients aged ≥5years. However, data assessing the minimal efficacious dose and need of dose-titration based on age or disease severity is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether deflazacort 0.45 mg/kg/d (proposed lower dosage) is non-inferior to 0.9 mg/kg/d among newly diagnosed patients with DMD.

METHOD

A double-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized trial, conducted between December 2018 and July 2020. Newly diagnosed patient aged 5-15 years with genetic or muscle biopsy confirmed DMD and baseline 6-min walk distance (6MWD) > 150 m were screened. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), stratified to prespecified subgroups by age (≤7years and >7years), and baseline 6MWD (≤350 m and >350 m), to receive either 0.45 mg/kg/d or 0.9 mg/kg/d regimens. The primary endpoint was the change in 6MWD, from baseline to week-24 of intervention. The trial was powered with a predefined, non-inferiority margin of 30 m. The analyses were by modified intention-to-treat (mITT).

RESULT

A total of 97 patients were enrolled, 40 receiving 0.45 mg/kg/d and 45 receiving 0.9 mg/kg/d deflazacort comprised of mITT population. For primary endpoint analysis the mean (SD) change in 6MWD from baseline to week-24 was 9.7 m (41.5) in deflazacort 0.45 mg/kg/d, and 34.7 m (43.5) for 0.9 mg/kg/d. The mean difference in change in 6MWD across the group was 24.8 m (95% CI 6.7 to 43, p value 0.008). The mean difference in change in 6MWD in the subgroups of boys ≤7 years of age was 21.8 m (95% CI -0.82, 44.5, p = 0.059), with baseline 6MWD of >350 m was 19.9 m (95% CI -2.4, 42.4; p = 0.08). The incidence of combined moderate to severe treatment-related adverse events was significant in the 0.9 mg/kg/d group by week 24 (odds ratio 0.36 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.89], p = 0.03).

DISCUSSION

The efficacy of proposed low dose deflazacort in comparison to the standard dose did not meet the prespecified criteria for non-inferiority. The low dose deflazacort was non-inferior in subgroup of patients with age ≤7 years and baseline 6MWD of >350 m.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Registry-India Identifier: CTRI/2019/02/017388.

Prognostic indicators of disease progression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A literature review and evidence synthesis

BACKGROUND

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare, severely debilitating, and fatal neuromuscular disease characterized by progressive muscle degeneration. Like in many orphan diseases, randomized controlled trials are uncommon in DMD, resulting in the need to indirectly compare treatment effects, for example by pooling individual patient-level data from multiple sources. However, to derive reliable estimates, it is necessary to ensure that the samples considered are comparable with respect to factors significantly affecting the clinical progression of the disease. To help inform such analyses, the objective of this study was to review and synthesise published evidence of prognostic indicators of disease progression in DMD. We searched MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase (via Ovid) and the Cochrane Library (via Wiley) for records published from inception up until April 23 2021, reporting evidence of prognostic indicators of disease progression in DMD. Risk of bias was established with the grading system of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM).

RESULTS

Our search included 135 studies involving 25,610 patients from 18 countries across six continents (Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America). We identified a total of 23 prognostic indicators of disease progression in DMD, namely age at diagnosis, age at onset of symptoms, ataluren treatment, ATL1102, BMI, cardiac medication, DMD genetic modifiers, DMD mutation type, drisapersen, edasalonexent, eteplirsen, glucocorticoid exposure, height, idebenone, lower limb surgery, orthoses, oxandrolone, spinal surgery, TAS-205, vamorolone, vitlolarsen, ventilation support, and weight. Of these, cardiac medication, DMD genetic modifiers, DMD mutation type, and glucocorticoid exposure were designated core prognostic indicators, each supported by a high level of evidence and significantly affecting a wide range of clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a current summary of prognostic indicators of disease progression in DMD, which will help inform the design of comparative analyses and future data collection initiatives in this patient population.

Acute serum protein and cytokine response of single dose of prednisone in adult volunteers

Pharmacological glucocorticoids are the most prescribed anti-inflammatory medications, and are chemical variants of cortisol, the circadian and stress hormone. Both endogenous and pharmacological glucocorticoids bind the glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) with high affinity, and both then bind downstream gene promoter elements (GRE) to drive positive gene transcription of many proteins. Glucocorticoid/GR complexes also bind distinct negative gene promoter elements (nGRE) to inhibit expression of genes involved in NF-κB innate immunity signaling. We sought to define the acute response of a single dose of prednisone (0.2 mg/kg) in young adult volunteers, with blood samples taken at baseline, 2, 3, 4 and 6 h post-oral dose. To control for circadian morning cortisol hitting the same molecular pathways, a day of blood draws was done without oral prednisone (same time of day), one day prior to drug day. Serum samples were processed for steroid hormone profiles (mass spectrometry; 9 steroidal hormones), proteomics (SOMAscan aptamer panels, 1,305 proteins), and inflammatory markers (Meso Scale Discovery; 10 pro-inflammatory cytokines). The pharmacological effect of the prednisone dose was shown by significant declines of adrenal steroids by 3 h after dosing. IL-10 showed drug-related increase to 4 hrs, then decrease to 6 hrs. IL-8 showed drug-related decrease in serum by 4 h, consistent with direct negative action of GR/ligand on IL-8 gene promoter. Proteomics data showed beta-2 microglobulin, TNFSF15, TSH, CST3, NBL1 to show time-related decreases with prednisone, while CXCL13 showed increases, although these require validation. In summary, a single low dose of prednisone leads to broad suppression of the adrenal axis within 3 h, and down-regulation of inflammatory serum proteins by 6 h.

Efficacy and Safety of Vamorolone in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A 30-Month Nonrandomized Controlled Open-Label Extension Trial

IMPORTANCE

Vamorolone is a synthetic steroidal drug with potent anti-inflammatory properties. Initial open-label, multiple ascending dose-finding studies of vamorolone among boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) found significant motor function improvement after 6 months treatment in higher-dose (ie, ≥2.0 mg/kg/d) groups.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate outcomes after 30 months of open-label vamorolone treatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted by the Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group at 11 US and non-US study sites. Participants were 46 boys ages 4.5 to 7.5 years with DMD who completed the 6-month dose-finding study. Data were analyzed from July 2020 through November 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were enrolled in a 24-month, long-term extension (LTE) study with vamorolone dose escalated to 2.0 or 6.0 mg/kg/d.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Change in time-to-stand (TTSTAND) velocity from dose-finding baseline to end of LTE study was the primary outcome. Efficacy assessments included timed function tests, 6-minute walk test, and NorthStar Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA). Participants with DMD treated with glucocorticoids from the Duchenne Natural History Study (DNHS) and NorthStar United Kingdom (NSUK) Network were matched and compared with participants in the LTE study receiving higher doses of vamorolone.

RESULTS

Among 46 boys with DMD who completed the dose-finding study, 41 boys (mean [SD] age, 5.33 [0.96] years) completed the LTE study. Among 21 participants treated with higher-dose (ie, ≥2.0 mg/kg/d) vamorolone consistently throughout the 6-month dose-finding and 24-month LTE studies with data available at 30 months, there was a decrease in mean (SD) TTSTAND velocity from baseline to 30 months (0.206 [0.070] rises/s vs 0.189 (0.124) rises/s), which was not a statistically significant change (-0.011 rises/s; CI, -0.068 to 0.046 rises/s). There were no statistically significant differences between participants receiving higher-dose vamorolone and matched participants in the historical control groups receiving glucocorticoid treatment (75 patients in DNHS and 110 patients in NSUK) over a 2-year period in NSAA total score change (0.22 units vs NSUK; 95% CI, -4.48 to 4.04]; P = .92), body mass index z score change (0.002 vs DNHS SD/mo; 95% CI, -0.006 to 0.010; P = .58), or timed function test change. Vamorolone at doses up to 6.0 mg/kg/d was well tolerated, with 5 of 46 participants discontinuing prematurely and for reasons not associated with study drug. Participants in the DNHS treated with glucocorticoids had significant growth delay in comparison with participants treated with vamorolone who had stable height percentiles (0.37 percentile/mo; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.52 percentile/mo) over time.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that vamorolone treatment was not associated with a change in TTSTAND velocity from baseline to 30 months among boys with DMD aged 4 to 7 years at enrollment. Vamorolone was associated with maintenance of muscle strength and function up to 30 months, similar to standard of care glucocorticoid therapy, and improved height velocity compared with growth deceleration associated with glucocorticoid treatment, suggesting that vamorolone may be an attractive candidate for treatment of DMD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03038399.

Hydrogen sulfide as a therapeutic option for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and other muscle-related diseases

Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) has been known for years as a poisoning gas and until recently evoked mostly negative associations. However, the discovery of its gasotransmitter functions suggested its contribution to various physiological and pathological processes. Although H₂S has been found to exert cytoprotective effects through modulation of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and pro-angiogenic responses in a variety of conditions, its role in the pathophysiology of skeletal muscles has not been broadly elucidated so far. The classical example of muscle-related disorders is Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), the most common and severe type of muscular dystrophy. Mutations in the DMD gene that encodes dystrophin, a cytoskeletal protein that protects muscle fibers from contraction-induced damage, lead to prominent dysfunctions in the structure and functions of the skeletal muscle. However, the main cause of death is associated with cardiorespiratory failure, and DMD remains an incurable disease. Taking into account a wide range of physiological functions of H₂S and recent literature data on its possible protective role in DMD, we focused on the description of the 'old' and 'new' functions of H₂S, especially in muscle pathophysiology. Although the number of studies showing its essential regulatory action in dystrophic muscles is still limited, we propose that H₂S-based therapy has the potential to attenuate the progression of DMD and other muscle-related disorders.

Efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids in the treatment of progressive muscular dystrophy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hormonal drug therapy has been widely used in clinical practice for the treatment of progressive muscular dystrophy (PMD). Glucocorticoids, as a common drug in the clinical treatment of PMD, have been reported in several clinical studies.

METHODS

Chinese and English databases were respectively searched using "randomized controlled trials", "Duchenne-type myotonic dystrophy", "glucocorticoids", Prednisone", "Prednisolone", and "Methylprednisolone", and "Defibrotide" were used as search terms. The meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 and Stata 13 software provided by the Cochrane system.

RESULTS

this study included five randomized controlled trials, all of which described the correct randomization method. There were four detailed descriptions of hidden distribution schemes. There were four literatures using blind method. Heterogeneity analysis showed that there was some heterogeneity between the results of the mean prognostic muscle strength, walking time of 9 meters, and 4 flights of stairs climbing between the glucocorticoid-treated group (the experimental group) and the placebo group (the control group). There were no significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in average muscle strength level, walking time of 9 meters and climbing time of 4 flights of stairs (MD =1.77; 95% CI: -0.95 to 4.48; P=0.20>0.05), (MD =-12.27; 95% CI: -35.94 to 11.40; P=0.31>0.01), (MD =-3.09; 95% CI: -11.16 to 4.99; P=0.45>0.05). In addition, glucocorticoid treatment significantly increased creatine kinase level in patients with PMD (MD =-0.28, 95% CI: -0.57 to 0.00; P=0.05). In terms of the incidence of adverse reactions, glucocorticoid treatment significantly increased the prognostic probability of acne, rapid hair growth, and emotional irritability in PMD patients (OR =2.40; 95% CI: 1.09 to 5.27; P=0.03<0.05), (OR =3.05; 95% CI: 1.55 to 5.99; P=0.001<0.05), (OR =4.04; 95% CI: 1.82 to 10.63; P=0.001<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of prognostic depression between the experimental group and the control group (OR =5.11; 95% CI: 0.80 to 32.79; P=0.09>0.05).

DISCUSSION

The results suggest that glucocorticoids have a significant effect on PMD patients, but to a certain extent they increase the incidence of adverse reactions in patients after treatment. However, due to the lack of complete clinical data in some ongoing studies, our conclusions may not be fully representative.

The Role of Glucocorticoids in Inflammatory Diseases

For more than 70 years, glucocorticoids (GCs) have been a powerful and affordable treatment option for inflammatory diseases. However, their benefits do not come without a cost, since GCs also cause side effects. Therefore, strong efforts are being made to improve their therapeutic index. In this review, we illustrate the mechanisms and target cells of GCs in the pathogenesis and treatment of some of the most frequent inflammatory disorders affecting the central nervous system, the gastrointestinal tract, the lung, and the joints, as well as graft-versus-host disease, which often develops after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In addition, an overview is provided of novel approaches aimed at improving GC therapy based on chemical modifications or GC delivery using nanoformulations. GCs remain a topic of highly active scientific research despite being one of the oldest class of drugs in medical use.

Serum biomarkers associated with baseline clinical severity in young steroid-naïve Duchenne muscular dystrophy boys

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is caused by loss of dystrophin in muscle, and while all patients share the primary gene and biochemical defect, there is considerable patient–patient variability in clinical symptoms. We sought to develop multivariate models of serum protein biomarkers that explained observed variation, using functional outcome measures as proxies for severity. Serum samples from 39 steroid-naïve DMD boys 4 to <7 years enrolled into a clinical trial of vamorolone were studied (NCT02760264). Four assessments of gross motor function were carried out for each participant over a 6-week interval, and their mean was used as response for biomarker models. Weighted correlation network analysis was used for unsupervised clustering of 1305 proteins quantified using SOMAscan^® aptamer profiling to define highly representative and connected proteins. Multivariate models of biomarkers were obtained for time to stand performance (strength phenotype; 17 proteins) and 6 min walk performance (endurance phenotype; 17 proteins) including some shared proteins. Identified proteins were tested with associations of mRNA expression with histological severity of muscle from dystrophinopathy patients (n = 28) and normal controls (n = 6). Strong associations predictive of both clinical and histological severity were found for ERBB4 (reductions in both blood and muscle with increasing severity), SOD1 (reductions in muscle and increases in blood with increasing severity) and CNTF (decreased levels in blood and muscle with increasing severity). We show that performance of DMD boys was effectively modeled with serum proteins, proximal strength associated with growth and remodeling pathways and muscle endurance centered on TGFβ and fibrosis pathways in muscle.

Current Pharmacological Strategies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a lethal, X-linked neuromuscular disorder caused by the absence of dystrophin protein, which is essential for muscle fiber integrity. Loss of dystrophin protein leads to recurrent myofiber damage, chronic inflammation, progressive fibrosis, and dysfunction of muscle stem cells. There is still no cure for DMD so far and the standard of care is principally limited to symptom relief through glucocorticoids treatments. Current therapeutic strategies could be divided into two lines. Dystrophin-targeted therapeutic strategies that aim at restoring the expression and/or function of dystrophin, including gene-based, cell-based and protein replacement therapies. The other line of therapeutic strategies aims to improve muscle function and quality by targeting the downstream pathological changes, including inflammation, fibrosis, and muscle atrophy. This review introduces the important developments in these two lines of strategies, especially those that have entered the clinical phase and/or have great potential for clinical translation. The rationale and efficacy of each agent in pre-clinical or clinical studies are presented. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of gene profiling in DMD patients has been performed to understand the molecular mechanisms of DMD.

New diagnostic and therapeutic modalities in neuromuscular disorders in children

Pediatric neuromuscular disorders are a diverse group of conditions that affect how muscle and nerve function. They involve the motor neurons, nerves, neuromuscular junction and muscles. Pathology of any of these regions leads to the inability to perform voluntary movements. Over time, the natural progression of most of these disorders is followed by significant disability, and at the most extreme, almost complete paralysis and death secondary to complications. Diagnostic measures for pediatric neuromuscular disorders, like that of most medical conditions, relies heavily on clinical presentation, history and a detailed physical examination. Primary additional diagnostic measures have included serum creatine kinase (CK) levels, electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction studies (NCS) and muscle or nerve biopsies, which has historically been the gold standard. In the last several decades less invasive testing has become more common such as muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and genetic testing.  The advances of molecular genetics, such as next generation sequencing (NGS) which includes whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), enable clinicians to pinpoint more accurately exact gene mutations. The advent of genetic testing enhances personalized medicine. The field of pediatric neuromuscular disorders is also undergoing a remarkable evolution in therapeutic modalities including novel targeted therapies such as exon skipping/inclusion and gene replacement therapies. This is a review of the initial approach to suspected neuromuscular disorders in children as well as up to date diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for the most common pediatric neuromuscular disorders. As the world enters the new decade, there are encouraging therapeutic results. However, there remain key challenges to these modalities including limitations in its applicability, optimization for delivery of gene replacement therapies and in its effectiveness.

Fish oil attenuated dystrophic muscle markers of inflammation via FFA1 and FFA4 in the mdx mouse model of DMD

In the present study we investigated the involvement of free fatty acid (FFA) receptors in the anti-inflammatory role of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in dystrophic muscles, by administering FFA blockers in the mdx mouse model of dystrophy. Mdx mice (3 months-old) were treated with fish oil capsules (FDC Vitamins; 0.4 g EPA and 0.2 g DHA; gavage) alone or concomitant to FFA1 and FFA4 blockers (GW1100 and AH7614; i.p.). C57BL/10 mice (3 months-old) and untreated-mdx mice received mineral oil and were used as controls. After 1 month of treatment, plasma markers of myonecrosis (total and cardiac creatine kinase; CK), the levels of FFA1 and FFA4 and of the markers of inflammation, nuclear transcription factor kappa B (NFkB), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 1β (IL-1β) were analyzed in the diaphragm muscle and heart by western blot. Fish oil significantly reduced total CK, cardiac CK and the levels of NFkB (diaphragm), and of TNF-α and IL-1β (diaphragm and heart) in mdx. In the dystrophic diaphragm, FFA1 was increased compared to normal. Blockers of FFA1 and FFA4 significantly inhibited the effects of fish oil treatment in both dystrophic muscles. The anti-inflammatory effects of fish oil in dystrophic diaphragm muscle and heart were mediated through FFA1 and FFA4.

Therapeutic Approaches for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Old and New

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is marked by pathogenic variants in the DMD gene, leading to reduced or absent dystrophin translation, muscle fiber destruction, loss of ambulation, cardiomyopathy, respiratory failure, and eventually death. Disease progression is slowed with use of prednisone or other corticosteroid agents. Gene replacement therapy, which is one of the focus points of this review, has emerged as the most promising potential treatment for DMD, though alternative RNA-based strategies have been employed for patients with specific pathogenic variants. While challenges remain, many of these novel therapeutic approaches hold promise for treating this devastating disease.

Overview of gene therapy in spinal muscular atrophy and Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Both 5q-linked spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are fatal monogenic neuromuscular disorders caused by loss-of-function mutations. SMA is an autosomal recessive disorder affecting motor neurons that is typically caused by homozygous whole-gene deletions of SMN1. DMD is an X-linked recessive muscle disease most often due to exon deletions, but also duplications and smaller sized variants within the DMD gene. Gene replacement therapy offers the opportunity to correct the underlying genetic defect by the introduction of a functional gene. We review the transformative work from clinical trials to United States Food and Drug Administration approval of onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi in SMA and its application in clinical practice and the early results of microdystrophin delivery in DMD. We also review the introduction of antisense oligonucleotides to alter pre-messenger RNA splicing to promote exon inclusion (as in nusinersen in SMA) or exclusion (as in eteplirsen in DMD) into neuromuscular therapeutics. There are multiple promising novel genetically mediated therapies on the horizon, which in aggregate point towards a hopeful future for individuals with SMA and DMD.

Current state of cardiac troponin testing in Duchenne muscular dystrophy cardiomyopathy: review and recommendations from the Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy expert panel

Cardiac disease is now the leading cause of death in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Clinical evaluations over time have demonstrated asymptomatic cardiac troponin elevations and acute elevations are associated with symptoms and cardiac dysfunction in DMD. Clinicians require a better understanding of the relationship of symptoms, troponin levels and progression of cardiac disease in DMD. As clinical trials begin to assess novel cardiac therapeutics in DMD, troponin levels in DMD are important for safety monitoring and outcome measures. The Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy convened an expert panel of cardiologists, scientists, and regulatory and industry specialists on 16 December 2019 in Silver Spring, Maryland and reviewed published and unpublished data from their institutions. The panel recommended retrospective troponin data analyses, prospective longitudinal troponin collection using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays, inclusion of troponin in future clinical trial outcomes and future development of clinical guidelines for monitoring and treating troponin elevations in DMD.

Standard of care versus new-wave corticosteroids in the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Can we do better?

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological corticosteroid therapy is the standard of care in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) that aims to control symptoms and slow disease progression through potent anti-inflammatory action. However, a major concern is the significant adverse effects associated with long term-use. MAIN: This review discusses the pros and cons of standard of care treatment for DMD and compares it to novel data generated with the new-wave dissociative corticosteroid, vamorolone. The current status of experimental anti-inflammatory pharmaceuticals is also reviewed, with insights regarding alternative drugs that could provide therapeutic advantage.

CONCLUSIONS

Although novel dissociative steroids may be superior substitutes to corticosteroids, other potential therapeutics should be explored. Repurposing or developing novel pharmacological therapies capable of addressing the many pathogenic features of DMD in addition to anti-inflammation could elicit greater therapeutic advantages.