Future of Neurology & Technology: Virtual and Augmented Reality in Neurology and Neuroscience Education: Applications and Curricular Strategies

Dissecting human anatomy learning process through anatomical education with augmented reality: AEducAR 2.0, an updated interdisciplinary study

Anatomical education is pivotal for medical students, and innovative technologies like augmented reality (AR) are transforming the field. This study aimed to enhance the interactive features of the AEducAR prototype, an AR tool developed by the University of Bologna, and explore its impact on human anatomy learning process in 130 second-year medical students at the International School of Medicine and Surgery of the University of Bologna. An interdisciplinary team of anatomists, maxillofacial surgeons, biomedical engineers, and educational scientists collaborated to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the study's objectives. Students used the updated version of AEducAR, named AEducAR 2.0, to study three anatomical topics, specifically the orbit zone, facial bones, and mimic muscles. AEducAR 2.0 offered two learning activities: one explorative and one interactive. Following each activity, students took a test to assess learning outcomes. Students also completed an anonymous questionnaire to provide background information and offer their perceptions of the activity. Additionally, 10 students participated in interviews for further insights. The results demonstrated that AEducAR 2.0 effectively facilitated learning and students' engagement. Students totalized high scores in both quizzes and declared to have appreciated the interactive features that were implemented. Moreover, interviews shed light on the interesting topic of blended learning. In particular, the present study suggests that incorporating AR into medical education alongside traditional methods might prove advantageous for students' academic and future professional endeavors. In this light, this study contributes to the growing research emphasizing the potential role of AR in shaping the future of medical education.

Augmented Reality Integration in Skull Base Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives: To investigate the role of augmented reality (AR) in skull base (SB) neurosurgery. Materials and Methods: Utilizing PRISMA methodology, PubMed and Scopus databases were explored to extract data related to AR integration in SB surgery. Results: The majority of 19 included studies (42.1%) were conducted in the United States, with a focus on the last five years (77.8%). Categorization included phantom skull models (31.2%, n = 6), human cadavers (15.8%, n = 3), or human patients (52.6%, n = 10). Microscopic surgery was the predominant modality in 10 studies (52.6%). Of the 19 studies, surgical modality was specified in 18, with microscopic surgery being predominant (52.6%). Most studies used only CT as the data source (n = 9; 47.4%), and optical tracking was the prevalent tracking modality (n = 9; 47.3%). The Target Registration Error (TRE) spanned from 0.55 to 10.62 mm. Conclusion: Despite variations in Target Registration Error (TRE) values, the studies highlighted successful outcomes and minimal complications. Challenges, such as device practicality and data security, were acknowledged, but the application of low-cost AR devices suggests broader feasibility.

Application effect of head-mounted mixed reality device combined with 3D printing model in neurosurgery ventricular and hematoma puncture training

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to explore the applicability of application effect of head-mounted mixed reality (MR) equipment combined with a three-dimensional (3D) printed model in neurosurgical ventricular and haematoma puncture training.

METHODS

Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format image data of two patients with common neurosurgical diseases (hydrocephalus and basal ganglia haemorrhage) were imported into 3D Slicer software for 3D reconstruction, saved, and printed using 3D printing to produce a 1:1-sized head model with real person characteristics. The required model (brain ventricle, haematoma, puncture path, etc.) was constructed and imported into the head-mounted MR device, HoloLens, and a risk-free, visual, and repeatable system was designed for the training of junior physicians. A total of 16 junior physicians who studied under this specialty from September 2020 to March 2022 were selected as the research participants, and the applicability of the equipment and model during training was evaluated with assessment score sheets and questionnaires after training.

RESULTS

According to results of the assessment and questionnaire, the doctors trained by this system are more familiar with the localization of the lateral anterior ventricle horn puncture and the common endoscopic surgery for basal ganglia haemorrhage, as well as more confident in the mastery of these two operations than the traditional training methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of head-mounted MR equipment combined with 3D printing models can provide an ideal platform for the operation training of young doctors. Through holographic images created from the combination of virtual and real images, operators can be better immersed in the operation process and deepen their understanding of the operation and related anatomical structures. The 3D printed model can be repeatedly reproduced so that doctors can master the technology, learn from mistakes, better achieve the purpose of teaching and training, and improve the effect of training.

The Role of Immersive Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Medical Communication: A Scoping Review

Communication between clinicians and patients and communication within clinical teams is widely recognized as a tool through which improved patient outcomes can be achieved. As emerging technologies, there is a notable lack of commentary on the role of immersive virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in enhancing medical communication. This scoping review aims to map the current landscape of literature on this topic and highlights gaps in the evidence to inform future endeavors. A comprehensive search strategy was conducted across 3 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase), yielding 1000 articles, of which 623 were individually screened for relevance. Ultimately, 22 articles were selected for inclusion and review. Similarities across the cohort of studies included small sample sizes, observational study design, use of questionnaires, and more VR studies than AR. The majority of studies found these technologies to improve medical communication, although user tolerability limitations were identified. More studies are required, presenting more robust findings, in order to draw more definitive conclusions and stronger recommendations for use of immersive VR/AR in clinical environments.

Reviews in Medical Education: Advances in Simulation to Address New Challenges in Neurology

Simulation is an engaging modality of medical education that leverages adult learning theory. Since its inception, educators have used simulation to train clinicians in bedside procedures and neurologic emergencies, as well as in communication, teamwork, and leadership skills. Many applications of simulation in neurology are yet to be fully adopted or explored. However, challenges to traditional educational paradigms, such as the shift to competency-based assessments and the need for remote or hybrid platforms, have created an impetus for neurologists to embrace simulation. In this article, we explore how simulation might be adapted to meet these current challenges in neurologic education by reviewing the existing literature in simulation from the field of neurology and beyond. We discuss how simulation can engage neurology trainees who seek interactive, contextualized, on-demand education. We consider how educators can incorporate simulation for competency-based evaluations and procedural training. We foresee a growing role of simulation initiatives that assess bias and promote equity. We also provide tangible solutions that make simulation an educational tool that is within reach for any educator in both high-resource and low-resource settings.

Be in the Digital Room Where it Happens, Part II: Social Media for Neurology Educators

Social media has changed the way we communicate and interact. Unsurprisingly, it has also changed how we teach and learn. Younger generations of learners have transitioned from traditional educational sources to digital ones. Medical educators need to adapt to trends in medical education and develop fluency in the digital methods used by medical learners today. This is part two of a two-part series on social media and digital education in neurology. This article provides an overview of how social media can be used as a teaching tool in medical education and provides an overview in which it is grounded. We offer practical strategies on how social media can promote lifelong learning, educator development, educator support, and foster educator identity with accompanying neurology-specific examples. We also review considerations for incorporating social media into teaching and learning practices and future directions for integrating these tools in neurology education.

Augmented reality in interventional radiology education: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Augmented reality (AR) involves digitally overlapping virtual objects onto physical objects in real space so that individuals can interact with both at the same time. AR in medical education seeks to reduce surgical complications through high-quality education. There is uncertainty in the use of AR as a learning tool for interventional radiology procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To compare AR with other learning methods in interventional radiology.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Systematic review of comparative studies on teaching techniques.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Tripdatabase, ERIC, CINAHL, SciELO and LILACS electronic databases for studies comparing AR simulation with other teaching methods in interventional radiology. This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA and the BEME Collaboration. Eligible studies were evaluated using the quality indicators provided in the BEME Collaboration Guide no. 11, and the Kirkpatrick model.

RESULTS

Four randomized clinical trials were included in this review. The level of educational evidence found among all the papers was 2B, according to the Kirkpatrick model. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was applied to assess the risk of bias for individual studies and across studies. Three studies showed an improvement in teaching of the proposed procedure through AR; one study showed that the participants took longer to perform the procedure through AR.

CONCLUSION

AR, as a complementary teaching tool, can provide learners with additional skills, but there is still a lack of studies with a higher evidence level according to the Kirkpatrick model.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/ACZBM in the Open Science Framework database.

Improving the Telemedicine Evaluation of Patients With Acute Vision Loss: A Call to Eyes

Acute vision loss related to cerebral or retinal ischemia is a time-sensitive emergency with potential treatment options including intravenous or intraarterial thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. However, patients either present in delayed fashion or present to an emergency department that lacks the subspecialty expertise to recognize and treat these conditions in a timely fashion. Moreover, healthcare systems in the United States are becoming increasingly reliant on telestroke and teleneurology services for acute neurologic care, making accurate diagnosis of acute vision loss even more challenging due to critical limitations to the remote video evaluation, including the inability to perform routine ophthalmoscopy. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a greater reliance on telemedicine services and helped to accelerate the development of novel tools and care pathways to improve remote ophthalmologic evaluation, but these tools have yet to be adapted for use in the remote evaluation of acute vision loss. Permanent vision loss can be disabling for patients and efforts must be made to increase and improve early diagnosis and management. Herein, the authors outline the importance of improving acute ophthalmologic diagnosis, outline key limitations and barriers to the current video-based teleneurology assessments, highlight opportunities to leverage new tools to enhance the remote assessment of vision loss, and propose new avenues to improve access to emergent ophthalmology subspeciality.

Training of neurologists for the 21st century: cultural and professional skills

Training of neurologists for the near future is a challenge due to the likely advances in neuroscientific methods, which will change much of our knowledge on diagnosis and treatment of neurological diseases.

OBJECTIVE

to comment on what may be more likely to be a constant in the very near future and to recommend how to prepare the neurologist for the 21st century.

METHODS

through a critical review of recent articles on the teaching of Neurology, to present a personal view on the subject.

RESULTS

Diagnostic methods and therapeutic resources in Neurology will be greatly improved, but the central core of teaching young neurologists will continue to be the clinical/anatomical correlation. The neurologist must be prepared to be the primary physician in the care of patients with neurological disorders, although the roles of consultant and clinical neuroscientist must also be considered. In addition to technical knowledge, the neurologist must be prepared to discuss not only distressing issues related to the specialty, such as the risks of genetic diseases for family members of their patients, the inexorable progression of some diseases and the need for palliative care, but also problems not directly related to Neurology that cause anxiety and depression in the patient or that are the main reason for the initial consultation.

CONCLUSION

neurology will be an even more important area of medicine and the neurologist must be well prepared to be the primary doctor to diagnose, treat and follow the patient with neurological disorders. In addition to technical knowledge, training in doctor-patient relations should be highlighted.

Are UK medical schools using recommended national curricula for the teaching of clinical neuroscience?

BACKGROUND

Medical schools are responsible for training medical students to recognise and commence management for a broad spectrum of diseases, including clinical neuroscience conditions. To guide medical schools on topics that should be taught, speciality bodies have produced speciality-based core curricula. It is unknown to what extent these guidelines are used in designing each medical school's curriculum. This survey aimed at assessing the use of these guidelines in designing clinical neuroscience curricula.

METHODS

This is a national survey. A 21-item questionnaire was sent to faculty members involved in the development of the clinical neuroscience curriculum in each medical school in the UK. Data collection occurred from1st September 2020-31 st August 2021. The Association of British Neurologists (ABN) and the Royal College of Surgeons England (RCSEng) guidelines were used as a benchmark. Descriptive statistics are reported.

RESULTS

Data was collected from 91.9% of eligible UK medical schools. 61.8% respondents were aware of ABN guidelines and 35.3% were aware of RCSEng guidelines. 17/28 (60.7%) topics recommended by the guidelines were taught in the neuroscience curricula of over 90% of the medical schools. Neurologists were involved in the design of the clinical neuroscience curriculum in 94.1% (n = 32/34) of medical schools, and neurosurgeons in 61.8%. Tutorials/seminars were used by all medical schools to teach clinical neuroscience content. Neurologists were involved in teaching at all schools and neurosurgeons in 70.6%. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)/oral examinations and single best answer (SBA)/multiple-choice question (MCQ) tests were used in all medical schools as methods of assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

There is variation between medical schools on what clinical neuroscience topics are taught and by whom. Multi-modality educational delivery was evident. Some medical schools did not currently use, advertise, or recommend external clinical neuroscience educational resources; but there was support for future use of external resources including guidelines.