Dopamine agonists reorient visual exploration away from the neglected hemispace

Exploring the use of dopaminergic medication to treat hemispatial inattention during in-patient post-stroke neurorehabilitation

Hemispatial inattention (HSI), a lateralised impairment of spatial processing, is a common consequence of stroke. It is a poor prognostic indicator for functional recovery and interferes with the progress during in-patient neurorehabilitation. Dopaminergic medication has shown promise in improving HSI in the chronic post-stroke period but is untested in more acute settings, e.g. during in-patient neurorehabilitation. We audited the use of dopaminergic medication in ten sequential patients with post-stroke HSI, on an open-label exploratory basis. Patients' response to medication was assessed individually, using a three-week Off-On-Off protocol. We employed a mixture of bedside and functional measures, and made a multidisciplinary judgement of efficacy in individual patients. In six out of 10 patients, there was a convincing improvement of HSI while on medication, which reversed when it was paused. There was a mean 57% relative increase in target detection in the star cancellation test on the most affected side (on vs. off medication). In the six responders, medication was therefore continued throughout their admission without adverse effects. The star cancellation test was sensitive to HSI in most patients but in two cases failed to detect changes that were picked up by a functional assessment (Kessler Functional Neglect Assessment Protocol). We found this multidisciplinary approach to be feasible in an in-patient neurorehabilitation setting. We suggest further research to explore the efficacy of dopaminergic medication in improving neurorehabilitation outcomes for patients with post-stroke HSI. We suggest that more detailed N-of-1 assessments of treatment response, with internal blinding, may be a productive approach.

Reward sensitivity predicts dopaminergic response in spatial neglect

It has recently been revealed that spatial neglect can be modulated by motivational factors including anticipated monetary reward. A number of dopaminergic agents have been evaluated as treatments for neglect, but the results have been mixed, with no clear anatomical or cognitive predictors of dopaminergic responsiveness. Given that the effects of incentive motivation are mediated by dopaminergic pathways that are variably damaged in stroke, we tested the hypothesis that the modulatory influences of reward and dopaminergic drugs on neglect are themselves related. We employed a single-dose, double-blind, crossover design to compare the effects of Co-careldopa and placebo on a modified visual cancellation task in patients with neglect secondary to right hemisphere stroke. Whilst confirming that reward improved visual search in this group, we showed that dopaminergic stimulation only enhances visual search in the absence of reward. When patients were divided into REWARD-RESPONDERs and REWARD-NON-RESPONDERs, we found an interaction, such that only REWARD-NON-RESPONDERs showed a positive response to reward after receiving Co-careldopa, whereas REWARD-RESPONDERs were not influenced by drug. At a neuroanatomical level, responsiveness to incentive motivation was most associated with intact dorsal striatum. These findings suggest that dopaminergic modulation of neglect follows an 'inverted U' function, is dependent on integrity of the reward system, and can be measured as a behavioural response to anticipated reward.

Left-shifting prism adaptation boosts reward-based learning

Visuospatial cognition has an inherent lateralized bias. Individual differences in the direction and magnitude of this bias are associated with asymmetrical D2/3 dopamine binding and dopamine system genotypes. Dopamine level affects feedback-based learning and dopamine signaling asymmetry is related to differential learning from reward and punishment. High D2 binding in the left hemisphere is associated with preference for reward. Prism adaptation (PA) is a simple sensorimotor technique, which modulates visuospatial bias according to the direction of the deviation. Left-deviating prism adaptation (LPA) induces rightward bias in healthy subjects. It is therefore possible that the right side of space increases in saliency along with left hemisphere dopaminergic activity. Right-deviating prism adaptation (RPA) has been used mainly as a control condition because it does not modulate behavior in healthy individuals. Since LPA induces a rightward visuospatial bias as a result of left hemisphere modulation, and higher dopaminergic activity in the left hemisphere is associated with preference for rewarding events we hypothesized that LPA would increase the preference for learning with reward. Healthy volunteers performed a computer-based probabilistic classification task before and after LPA or RPA. Consistent with our predictions, PA altered the preference for rewarded versus punished learning, with the LPA group exhibiting increased learning from reward. These results suggest that PA modulates dopaminergic activity in a lateralized fashion.

Patching for Diplopia Contraindicated in Patients with Brain Injury?

PURPOSE

Patching for double vision is a common palliative treatment for head-trauma patients with acquired strabismus when prisms are not feasible.

METHODS

We review literature on spatial neglect and discuss possible effects of monocular occlusion on spatial attention.

RESULTS

Patching the left eye has been shown to worsen spatial judgments in some brain-injured patients with left neglect by inhibiting the right superior colliculus further impairing contralateral leftward orienting (the Sprague Effect).

CONCLUSIONS

Because more peripheral parts of the visual field increasingly project to the contralateral superior colliculus with the temporal crescent being entirely contralateral, avoiding patching of the temporal crescent was advised, and in most cases can be achieved by taping off the spectacle lens and avoiding an elastic eye patch.

Animal Models of Cerebral Neglect and Its Cancellation

The purpose of this perspective is twofold: 1) to alert and inform the neurospychology and neurology communities on how animal models can improve our understanding of spatial neglect in humans, and 2) to serve as a guide to rehabilitation strategies. Spatial neglect is a neurological syndrome that is inextricably linked to the ability to overtly or covertly reorient attention to new loci. Literature describing variants of neglect leads to the perception of lesion-induced neglect as a uniquely human syndrome for which there are limited treatment options. To the contrary, neglect has been reversed in laboratory animals, and results show that adequate neural representations and motor mechanisms for reversal are present despite damaged or deactivated cerebral cortex. These results and conclusions provoke thought on strategies that can be employed on humans to cancel neglect, and they suggest that long-term amelioration of neglect can be induced by training of specific bypass circuits.

Pharmacological interventions for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke

BACKGROUND

Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is characterized by the inability to report or respond to people or objects presented on the side contralateral to the lesioned side of the brain and has been associated with poor functional outcomes and long stays in hospitals and rehabilitation centers. Pharmacological interventions (medical interventions only, use of drugs to improve the health condition), such as dopamine and noradrenergic agonists or pro-cholinergic treatment, have been used in people affected by USN after stroke, and effects of these treatments could provide new insights for health professionals and policy makers.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological interventions for USN after stroke.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (April 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (April 2015), MEDLINE (1946 to April 2015), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (1982 to April 2015), EMBASE (1980 to April 2015), PsycINFO (1806 to April 2015) and Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) (1982 to April 2015). We also searched trials and research registers, screened reference lists, and contacted study authors and pharmaceutical companies (April 2015).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) of pharmacological interventions for USN after stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias in the included studies and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included in the review two studies with a total of 30 randomly assigned participants. We rated the quality of the evidence as very low as the result of study limitations, small numbers of events, and small sample sizes, with imprecision in the confidence interval (CI). We were not able to perform meta-analysis because of heterogeneity related to the different interventions evaluated between included studies. Very low-quality evidence from one trial (20 participants) comparing effects of rivastigmine plus rehabilitation versus rehabilitation on overall USN at discharge showed the following: Barrage (mean difference (MD) 0.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.18 to 0.78); Letter Cancellation (MD 10.60, 95% CI 2.07 to 19.13); Sentence Reading (MD 0.20, 95% CI -0.69 to 1.09), and the Wundt-Jastrow Area Illusion Test (MD -4.40, 95% CI -8.28 to -0.52); no statistical significance was observed for the same outcomes at 30 days' follow-up. In another trial (10 participants), study authors showed statistically significant reduction in omissions in the three cancellation tasks under transdermal nicotine treatment (mean number of omissions 2.93 ± 0.5) compared with both baseline (4.95 ± 0.8) and placebo (5.14 ± 0.9) (main effect of treatment condition: F (2.23) = 11.06; P value < 0.0001). One major adverse event occurred in the transdermal nicotine treatment group, and treatment was discontinued in the affected participant. None of the included trials reported data on several of the prespecified outcomes (falls, balance, depression or anxiety, poststroke fatigue, and quality of life).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The quality of the evidence from available RCTs was very low. The effectiveness and safety of pharmacological interventions for USN after stroke are therefore uncertain. Additional large RCTs are needed to evaluate these treatments.

Dopamine transporter genotype is associated with a lateralized resistance to distraction during attention selection

Although lateral asymmetries in orienting behavior are evident across species and have been linked to interhemispheric asymmetries in dopamine signaling, the relative contribution of attentional versus motoric processes remains unclear. Here we took a cognitive genetic approach to adjudicate between roles for dopamine in attentional versus response selection. A sample of nonclinical adult humans (N = 518) performed three cognitive tasks (spatial attentional competition, spatial cueing, and flanker tasks) that varied in the degree to which they required participants to resolve attentional or response competition. All participants were genotyped for two putatively functional tandem repeat polymorphisms of the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1; SLC6A3), which are argued to influence the level of available synaptic dopamine and confer risk to disorders of inattention. DAT1 genotype modulated the task-specific effects of the various task-irrelevant stimuli across both the spatial competition and spatial cueing but not flanker tasks. Specifically, compared with individuals carrying one or two copies of the 10-repeat DAT1 allele, individuals without this allele demonstrated an immunity to distraction, such that response times were unaffected by increases in the number of distractor stimuli, particularly when these were presented predominantly in the left hemifield. All three genotype groups exhibited uniform costs of resolving leftward response selection in a standard flanker task. None of these significant effects could be explained by speed-accuracy trade-offs, suggesting that participants without the 10-repeat allele of the DAT1 tandem repeat polymorphism possess an enhanced attentional ability to suppress task-irrelevant stimuli in the left hemifield.

Cingulate neglect in humans: disruption of contralesional reward learning in right brain damage

Motivational valence plays a key role in orienting spatial attention. Nonetheless, clinical documentation and understanding of motivationally based deficits of spatial orienting in the human is limited. Here in a series of one group-study and two single-case studies, we have examined right brain damaged patients (RBD) with and without left spatial neglect in a spatial reward-learning task, in which the motivational valence of the left contralesional and the right ipsilesional space was contrasted. In each trial two visual boxes were presented, one to the left and one to the right of central fixation. In one session monetary rewards were released more frequently in the box on the left side (75% of trials) whereas in another session they were released more frequently on the right side. In each trial patients were required to: 1) point to each one of the two boxes; 2) choose one of the boxes for obtaining monetary reward; 3) report explicitly the position of reward and whether this position matched or not the original choice. Despite defective spontaneous allocation of attention toward the contralesional space, RBD patients with left spatial neglect showed preserved contralesional reward learning, i.e., comparable to ipsilesional learning and to reward learning displayed by patients without neglect. A notable exception in the group of neglect patients was L.R., who showed no sign of contralesional reward learning in a series of 120 consecutive trials despite being able of reaching learning criterion in only 20 trials in the ipsilesional space. L.R. suffered a cortical-subcortical brain damage affecting the anterior components of the parietal-frontal attentional network and, compared with all other neglect and non-neglect patients, had additional lesion involvement of the medial anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and of the adjacent sectors of the corpus callosum. In contrast to his lateralized motivational learning deficit, L.R. had no lateral bias in the early phases of attentional processing as he suffered no contralesional visual or auditory extinction on double simultaneous tachistoscopic and dichotic stimulation and detected, with no exception, single contralesional visual and auditory stimuli. In a separate study, we were able to compare L.R. with another RBD patient, G.P., who had a selective lesion in the right ACC, in the adjacent callosal connections and the medial-basal prefrontal cortex. G.P. had no contralesional neglect and displayed normal reward learning both in the left and right side of space. These findings show that contralesional reward learning is generally preserved in RBD patients with left spatial neglect and that this can be exploited in rehabilitation protocols. Contralesional reward learning is severely disrupted in neglect patients when an additional lesion of the ACC is present: however, as demonstrated by the comparison between L.R. and G.P. cases, selective unilateral lesion of the right ACC does not produce motivational neglect for the contralesional space.

Reward modulates spatial neglect

BACKGROUND

Reward has been shown to affect attention in healthy individuals, but there have been no studies addressing whether reward influences attentional impairments in patients with focal brain damage.

METHODS

Using two novel variants of a widely-used clinical cancellation task, we assessed whether reward modulated impaired attention in 10 individuals with left neglect secondary to right hemisphere stroke.

RESULTS

Reward exposure significantly reduced neglect, as measured by total targets found, left-sided targets found and centre of cancellation, across the patient group. Lesion analysis showed that lack of response to reward was associated with damage to the ipsilateral striatum.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first experimental evidence that reward can modulate attentional impairments following brain damage. These results have significant implications for the development of behavioural and pharmacological therapies for patients with attentional disorders.

Rehabilitation of spatial neglect

Spatial neglect is a frequent cause of disability associated with high costs and duration of hospital stay, increased family burden, and requirements for skilled chronic care. This condition is disproportionately more frequent with right than left hemispheric injury and it is characterized by perceptual, representational, and behavioral deficits involving or directed towards the left hemispace or the left hemibody. Spatial dysfunction is conceptualized into two major components: the perceptual/representational "where" component that results mainly from injury to posterior brain regions and the premotor/intentional "aiming" component that results mostly from damage to anterior brain regions. Additionally, deficits in arousal, vigilance, affective symptoms, and disorders of emotional communication may compound the clinical manifestations of spatial neglect. Evidence-based sources that evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatments for neglect are, unfortunately, unable to provide a unified consensus for the efficacy of a given treatment approach. The reasons for this failure are related to internal inconsistencies defining appropriate criteria for treatment success and lack of characterization of neglect mechanisms and considerations of patient characteristics related to treatment failure. In this chapter we advocate the use of visual scanning, limb activation therapy, and "general treatment" because we believe that they are appropriately supported by different sources and they may be useful for experimental trials and standardized clinical care. We advocate an integrative approach that takes advantage of the same rehabilitation strategy or task to treat different perceptual, representational, and premotor components of neglect. A variety of therapies that may be familiar to the rehabilitation team may be useful as long as they are applied in a systematized program and are based on good clinical judgment. Information regarding adjuvant pharmacological therapy is sparse but different agents with aminergic and cholinergic activity may be useful. Medication with sedative, antidopaminergic or anticholinergic properties may interfere with the rehabilitation process and should be avoided.

The nonspatial side of spatial neglect and related approaches to treatment

In addition to deficits in spatial attention, individuals with persistent spatial neglect almost universally exhibit nonspatially lateralized deficits in sustained and selective attention, and working memory. However, nonspatially lateralized deficits in neglect have received considerably less attention in the literature than deficits in spatial attention. This is in spite of the fact that nonspatially lateralized deficits better predict the chronicity and functional disability associated with neglect than spatially lateralized deficits. Furthermore, only a few treatment studies have specifically targeted nonspatially lateralized deficits as a means to improve spatial neglect. In this chapter, we will briefly review several models of spatial attention bias in neglect before focusing on nonspatial deficits and the mechanisms of nonspatial-spatial interactions and implications for treatment. Treatment approaches that more completely address nonspatial deficits and better account for their interactions with spatial attention will likely produce better outcomes.

The effects of the dopamine agonist rotigotine on hemispatial neglect following stroke

Hemispatial neglect following right-hemisphere stroke is a common and disabling disorder, for which there is currently no effective pharmacological treatment. Dopamine agonists have been shown to play a role in selective attention and working memory, two core cognitive components of neglect. Here, we investigated whether the dopamine agonist rotigotine would have a beneficial effect on hemispatial neglect in stroke patients. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled ABA design was used, in which each patient was assessed for 20 testing sessions, in three phases: pretreatment (Phase A1), on transdermal rotigotine for 7-11 days (Phase B) and post-treatment (Phase A2), with the exact duration of each phase randomized within limits. Outcome measures included performance on cancellation (visual search), line bisection, visual working memory, selective attention and sustained attention tasks, as well as measures of motor control. Sixteen right-hemisphere stroke patients were recruited, all of whom completed the trial. Performance on the Mesulam shape cancellation task improved significantly while on rotigotine, with the number of targets found on the left side increasing by 12.8% (P = 0.012) on treatment and spatial bias reducing by 8.1% (P = 0.016). This improvement in visual search was associated with an enhancement in selective attention but not on our measures of working memory or sustained attention. The positive effect of rotigotine on visual search was not associated with the degree of preservation of prefrontal cortex and occurred even in patients with significant prefrontal involvement. Rotigotine was not associated with any significant improvement in motor performance. This proof-of-concept study suggests a beneficial role of dopaminergic modulation on visual search and selective attention in patients with hemispatial neglect following stroke.

Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect

Pseudoneglect is a slight but consistent leftward attentional bias commonly observed in healthy young populations, purportedly explained by right hemispheric dominance. It has been suggested that normal aging might be associated with a decline of the right hemisphere. According to this hypothesis, a few studies have shown that elderly tend to exhibit a rightward attentional bias in line bisection. In the present study, we tested this hypothesis in young and older participants using a perceptual landmark task. Results yield evidence for an age-related shift, from a strong attentional leftward bias in young adults toward a suppressed or even a reversed bias in the elderly. Right hemisphere impairment coupled to a left hemispheric compensation might explain the perceptual shift observed in older adults. However, a decline in corpus callosum function cannot be excluded. Alternatively, these results may be in agreement with the hypothesis of an age-related specific inhibition of return dysfunction, an overt attentional orienting mechanism, and/or a decrease of dopamine.

Rehabilitation in practice: Hemispatial neglect: approaches to rehabilitation

This series of articles for rehabilitation in practice aims to cover a knowledge element of the rehabilitation medicine curriculum. Nevertheless they are intended to be of interest to a multidisciplinary audience. The competency addressed in this article is 'The trainee consistently demonstrates a knowledge of the pathophysiology of various specific impairments including cognitive dysfunction including perception' and 'management approaches for specific impairments including cognitive dysfunction including perception'. The article focuses on hemispatial neglect as a common and difficult to manage problem in clinical practice.

The effect of nicotine on visuospatial attention in chronic spatial neglect depends upon lesion location

The deficit to reorient attention from ipsilesional to contralesional space is one key feature of the spatial neglect syndrome. As previous studies suggest that reorienting of visuospatial attention is modulated by cholinergic neurotransmission, we investigated whether cholinergic stimulation with nicotine (Nicorette 2 mg, Pharmacia/Pfizer, Helsingborg, Sweden) facilitates attentional reorienting in spatial neglect patients. Nine nonsmoking patients with stable neglect symptoms were investigated in a within-subject cross-over design. We used a location-cueing paradigm and analysed reaction time (RT) differences between validly and invalidly cued, as well as between neutrally cued and uncued targets as a function of hemifield and drug. Moreover, since the nicotine effect is mediated by parietal brain areas in healthy subjects, we tested whether lesion location influences the pharmacological effect. Nicotine speeded RTs in valid and invalid trials nonspecifically, without modulating the validity effect in the location-cueing task in the whole group of patients. Lesion-symptom mapping revealed a relationship between lesion site and the pharmacological effect on reorienting to contralesional space in right parietal and temporal brain regions. We conclude that in patients with chronic spatial neglect the performance in the location-cueing paradigm can be modulated by a cholinergic stimulant provided that the lesion spares right parietal and temporal cortex.

Rehabilitation approaches to hemineglect

BACKGROUND

Hemineglect is a difficult neurologic condition to rehabilitate. It arises predominantly from right brain injury, and manifests heterogeneously in clinical deficits such as poor visual exploration to the left, inaccurate assessment of the midpoint of a line, left limb hypokinesis, and anosognosia. Most of the cognitive dysfunction produced by hemineglect is because of an asymmetric distribution of attention, either with respect to extrapersonal space or to an object being viewed. Many treatments draw on hemineglect theory to attempt to mediate the basic asymmetry of attention.

REVIEW SUMMARY

Treatment approaches can be divided into 2 main categories. Extrinsic or "top-down" approaches require active participation of the patient under the guidance of a therapist. The most common approach of this type is visual scanning therapy in which the patient is continually instructed to move the gaze leftward into the neglected space. Intrinsic or "bottom-up" approaches manipulate stimulus characteristics, sensory input, or the brain directly in an attempt to alter the interhemispheral attentional imbalance. Examples of this approach include vestibular stimulation of the left side, sensory activation of the left limb, and transcranial magnetic stimulation of the overactive left hemisphere. Combined approaches such as prism adaptation have also shown good results.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemineglect is a complicated disorder that poses challenges to treatment. A paucity of clinical trial evidence limits our ability to extrapolate experimental mediation of hemineglect to globally improved functioning. Nonetheless, many treatment approaches appear promising. Underlying neuroscience may help guide future treatment approaches.

Effects of psychostimulants on alertness and spatial bias in healthy participants

Converging evidence from neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies suggests that the ability to maintain an alert, ready-to-respond state is mediated by a network of right-hemisphere frontal and parietal cortical areas. This right lateralization may help to explain why visuospatial hemineglect, a cluster of deficits in detecting and responding to contralesional stimuli, is more common and persistent after right-hemisphere lesions. Indeed, it has been hypothesized that this asymmetry reflects a direct, functional link between alertness and spatial attention. In the present study, we investigated whether a pharmacologically induced increase in alertness would influence lateral bias in healthy people. Eighteen healthy participants were each given placebo or the psychostimulant drugs methylphenidate 40 mg or modafinil 400 mg on separate days and completed an hour-long version of the spatially sensitive landmark task. For those participants who demonstrated the expected alerting effect of modafinil, there was a significant Condition by Time interaction, consistent with the effects of the drug resisting time-on-task rightward drifts in spatial bias in the placebo condition. In contrast, no effect of methylphenidate on spatial bias was observed. These results suggest that spatial bias may be modulated by a psychostimulant-induced increase in alertness, supporting the hypothesis of a direct, functional link between right-hemisphere systems controlling alertness and visuospatial attention.

Spatial neglect: clinical and neuroscience review: a wealth of information on the poverty of spatial attention

Hemispatial neglect (HSN) is a frequent, conspicuous neurobehavioral accompaniment of brain injury. Patients with HSN share several superficial similarities, leading earlier clinical neuroscientists to view neglect as a unitary condition associated with brain structures that mediate relatively discrete spatial cognitive mechanisms. Over the last two decades, research largely deconstructed the neglect syndrome, revealing a remarkable heterogeneity of behaviors and providing insight into multiple component processes, both spatial and nonspatial, that contribute to hemispatial neglect. This review surveys visual HSN, presenting first the means for detection and diagnosis in its manifold variations. We summarize cognitive operations relevant to spatial attention and evidence for their role in neglect behaviors and then briefly consider neural systems that may subserve the component processes. Finally, we propose several methods for rehabilitating HSN, including the challenges facing remediation of such a heterogeneous cognitive disorder.

Translation Research for the Rehabilitation of Left Spatial Neglect and Associated Disorders of Attention in Stroke Patients

The syndrome of unilateral neglect, typified by a lateralized attention bias and neglect of contralateral space, is an important cause of morbidity and disability after a stroke. In this review, we discuss the challenges that face researchers attempting to elucidate the mechanisms and effectiveness of rehabilitation treatments. The neglect syndrome is a heterogeneous disorder, and it is not clear which of its symptoms cause ongoing disability. We review current methods of neglect assessment and propose logical approaches to selecting treatments, while acknowledging that further study is still needed before some of these approaches can be translated into routine clinical use. We conclude with systems-level suggestions for hypothesis development that would hopefully form a sound theoretical basis for future approaches to the assessment and treatment of neglect.

The contribution of synaptic plasticity in the basal ganglia to the processing of visual information

A mechanism for the involvement of the basal ganglia in the processing of visual information, based on dopamine-dependent modulation of the efficiency of synaptic transmission in interconnected parallel associative and limbic cortex-basal ganglia-thalamus-cortex circuits, is proposed. Each circuit consists of a visual or prefrontal area of the cortex connected with the thalamic nucleus and the corresponding areas in different nuclei of the basal ganglia. The circulation of activity in these circuits is supported by the recurrent arrival of information in the thalamus and cortex. Dopamine released in response to a visual stimulus modulates the efficiencies of "strong" and "weak" corticostriatal inputs in different directions, and the subsequent reorganization of activity in the circuit leads to disinhibition (inhibition) of the activity of those cortical neurons which are "strongly" ("weakly") excited by the visual stimulus simultaneously with dopaminergic cells. The pattern in each cortical area is the neuronal reflection of the properties of the visual stimulus processed by this area. Excitation of dopaminergic cells by the visual stimulus via the superior colliculi requires parallel activation of the disinhibitory input to the superior colliculi via the thalamus and the "direct" pathway" in the basal ganglia. The prefrontal cortex, excited by the visual stimulus via the mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus, mediates the descending influence on the activity of dopaminergic cells, simultaneously controlling dopamine release in different areas of the striatum and thus facilitating the mutual selection of neural reflections of the individual properties of the visual stimulus and their binding into an integral image.

Dopaminergic genotype biases spatial attention in healthy children

In everyday life, our sensory system is bombarded with visual input and we rely upon attention to select only those inputs that are relevant to behavioural goals. Typically, humans can shift their attention from one visual field to the other with little cost to perception. In cases of 'unilateral neglect', however, there is a persistent bias of spatial attention towards the same side as the damaged cerebral hemisphere. We used a visual orienting task to examine the influence of functional polymorphisms of the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) on individual differences in spatial attention in normally developing children. DAT1 genotype significantly influenced spatial bias. Healthy children who were homozygous for alleles that influence the expression of dopamine transporters in the brain displayed inattention for left-sided stimuli, whereas heterozygotes did not. Our data provide the first evidence in healthy individuals of a genetically mediated bias in spatial attention that is related to dopamine signalling.

Amantadine treatment of hemispatial neglect: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

The resemblance of some aspects of the hemispatial neglect syndrome (hypokinesia, decreased arousal) to aspects of Parkinsonian syndromes, and the success of amantadine in treating disorders of attention, prompted a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of amantadine, an inhibitor of the N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor that modulates dopamine transmission, in four patients with chronic hemispatial neglect.

DESIGN

Patients received placebo or 100 mg of amantadine twice a day in an ABA design. Dependent measures of drug effect included an extensive battery of tests assessing arousal, hemiinattention, hemihypokinesia, personal neglect, disability, anosognosia, family burden, and naturalistic action.

RESULTS

There was no evidence of increased adverse effects with the treatment drug compared with placebo. Of the 17 measures used to assess treatment response in the four patients (68 measures total), linear regressions revealed significant positive treatment effects on very few (four) measures (uncorrected for multiple comparisons), and scattered negative responses to treatment were evident on three measures. The vast majority of measures showed no change in response to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Possible reasons for failure of treatment effects in the present study are discussed. Additional study will be required to determine whether there are neglect patients who may benefit from amantadine.

Anatomical correlates of directional hypokinesia in patients with hemispatial neglect

Unilateral spatial neglect (neglect) is a syndrome characterized by perceptual deficits that prevent patients from attending and responding to the side of space and of the body opposite a damaged hemisphere (contralesional side). Neglect also involves motor deficits: patients may be slower to initiate a motor response to targets appearing in the left hemispace, even when using their unaffected arm (directional hypokinesia). Although this impairment is well known, its anatomical correlate has not been established. We tested 52 patients with neglect after right hemisphere stroke, and conducted an anatomical analysis on 29 of them to find the anatomical correlate of directional hypokinesia. We found that patients with directional hypokinesia had a lesion involving the ventral lateral putamen, the claustrum, and the white matter underneath the frontal lobe. Most importantly, none of the patients without directional hypokinesia had a lesion in the same region. The localization of neglect's motor deficits to the basal ganglia establishes interesting homologies with animal data; it also suggests that a relative depletion of dopamine in the nigrostriatal pathway on the same side of the lesion may be an important pathophysiological mechanism potentially amenable to intervention.

Cognitive Rehabilitation Interventions for Neglect and Related Disorders: Moving from Bench to Bedside in Stroke Patients

The spatial neglect syndrome, defined by asymmetric attention and action not attributed to primary motor or sensory dysfunction and accompanied by functional disability, is a major cause of post-stroke morbidity. In this review, we consider the challenges and obstacles facing scientific researches wishing to evaluate the mechanisms and effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions. Spatial neglect is a heterogeneous disorder, for which consensus research definitions are not currently available, and it is unclear which of the deficits associated with the syndrome causes subsequent disability. We review current opinion about methods of assessment, suggest a rational approach to selecting therapies which requires further study, and make systems-level and theoretical recommendations for building theory. We lastly review some creative questions for consideration in future research.

Functional circuitry underlying natural and interventional cancellation of visual neglect

A large body of work demonstrates that lesions at multiple levels of the visual system induce neglect of stimuli in the contralesional visual field and that the neglect dissipates as neural compensations naturally emerge. Other studies show that interventional manipulations of cerebral cortex, superior colliculus or deep-lying midbrain structures have the power to attenuate, or cancel, the neglect and reinstate orienting into a neglected hemifield, and even into a profound cortically blind field. These results, and those derived from experiments on the behavioral impacts of unilateral and bilateral lesions, lead us to evaluate the repercussions of unilateral and bilateral deactivations, neural compensations and cancellations of attentional deficits in terms of an overarching hypothesis of neglect. The cancellations can be both striking and enduring, and they suggest that therapeutic strategies can be developed to reverse or ameliorate neglect in human patients. Animal studies show that in many instances of neglect adequate representations and the accompanying motor mechanisms are present despite the lesion and they simply need to be unmasked and brought into use to effect a remedy.

Infusion of apomorphine into the dorsocentral striatum produces acute drug-induced recovery from neglect produced by unilateral medial agranular cortex lesions in rats

Previous studies have shown that systemic administration of apomorphine is effective in producing acute drug-induced recovery from neglect induced by unilateral medial agranular cortex (AGm) lesions. More recent studies have demonstrated that recovery from neglect may be due to plastic changes occurring in the dorsal central striatum (DCS). Further, lesions of the DCS produce neglect that does not respond to systemic administration of apomorphine, suggesting that this area may be crucial for the therapeutic effects of apomorphine. In the present study, the behavioral effects of apomorphine infused into the DCS of animals with AGm lesion-induced neglect were examined to determine whether the DCS is a site of drug action. An infusion of 0.375 micro g of apomorphine into the DCS, but not a lateral striatal control area, was effective in producing acute recovery from neglect. The results of this study support the crucial role of the DCS in recovery from neglect induced by unilateral AGm lesions and suggest that the DCS may be an important site of action for the therapeutic effects of apomorphine. Because dopamine agonist therapy has been shown to be effective in humans with neglect, the results of the current study may represent an important step in the development of future pharmacotherapies.

Modulation and rehabilitation of spatial neglect by sensory stimulation

After unilateral cortical or subcortical, often parieto-temporal lesions, patients exhibit a marked neglect of their contralateral space and/or body side. These patients are severely disabled in all daily activities, have a poor rehabilitation outcome and therefore require professional treatment. Unfortunately, effective treatments for neglect are just in the process of development. The present chapter reviews three aspects related to the rehabilitation of neglect. The first part summarizes findings about spontaneous recovery in patients and experimental animals with neglect. The second part deals with techniques and studies evaluating short-term sensory modulation effects in neglect. In contrast to many other neurological syndromes spatial neglect may be modulated transiently but dramatically in its severity by sensory (optokinetic, neck proprioceptive, vestibular, attentional, somatosensory-magnetic) stimulation. In part three, current treatment approaches are summarized, with a focus on three novel techniques: repetitive optokinetic stimulation, neck vibration training and peripheral somatosensory-magnetic stimulation. Recent studies of repetitive optokinetic as well as neck vibratory treatment both indicate significantly greater as well as multimodal improvements in neglect symptomatology as compared to the standard treatment of neglect. This clear superiority might result from the partial (re)activation of a distributed, multisensory vestibular network in the lesioned hemisphere. Somatosensory-magnetic stimulation of the neglected or extinguishing hand provides another feasible, non-invasive stimulation technique. It may be particularly suited for the rehabilitation of somatosensory extinction and unawareness of the contralesional body side. Finally, pharmacological approaches for the treatment of neglect are shortly addressed. Isolated drug treatment of neglect is currently no successful rehabilitation strategy due to inconsistent results as well as possible side effects. However, combined behavioural and drug treatments might yield better results. This has to be tested empirically in patient studies. In conclusion, the findings obtained in short-term sensory stimulation studies led to the development of effective techniques for the long-term rehabilitation of neglect. Future rehabilitation studies should evaluate effective treatment combinations considering all possible techniques and devices (behavioural, pharmacological, prosthetic or physiological).

Effect of background motion on line bisection performance in normal subjects

Previous studies have demonstrated that optokinetic stimulation (OKS) influences line bisection (LB) performance in normal subjects and patients with hemispatial neglect. Since subjects were required to attend to stationary targets on a moving background, prior experimental designs might have induced an illusion of target motion or induced motion (IM) in a direction opposite the background. The current study tested whether the IM affects LB performance in normal subjects and how the speed of targets also influences LB. Thirty-two right-handed normal volunteers (aged 28.0 +/- 5.3 years) were asked to bisect stationary lines with a background of horizontal OKS. These stimuli were generated by computer displayed on a large screen via a beam projector. The OKS was varied according to direction (leftward or rightward) and speed (9.4 degrees/sec or 56.1 degrees/sec), producing 4 different experimental conditions. Mean bisection errors in all conditions were compared with a control condition with no background OKS. For each condition, subjects rated the degree of IM on a 5 point scale. With fast rate OKS, subjects reported minimal IM and LB errors were in the same direction as background motion, a finding that replicates previous studies. Conversely, the slow OKS rate caused subjects to report IM and resulted in deviation of the bisection mark in a direction opposite the background OKS. While this discrepancy between the slow and fast OKS conditions might be related to motion illusion, we did not find a direct correlation between the degree of IM and bisection errors and thus reasons for these results remain unexplained.

Unilateral destruction of the dorsocentral striatum in rats produces neglect but not extinction to bilateral simultaneous stimulation

A number of previous studies have indicated that lesions of the medial agranular cortex (AGm) in rats induce multimodal neglect and extinction to bilateral simultaneous stimulation (extinction), the two major symptoms of the neglect syndrome in humans. A recent study demonstrated that lesions of dorsocentral striatum (DCS), the site of AGm projections to the striatum, produce multimodal neglect qualitatively similar to that found with AGm lesions. In the present study, the behavioral effects of unilateral DCS lesions were examined in more detail for the major manifestations of neglect: hemineglect, extinction, and allesthesia/allokinesia. Subjects were tested for extinction to bilateral simultaneous stimulation of the forepaws three times a week for 3 weeks. Neglect testing occurred twice weekly and the subjects were tested for the presence of neglect by rating the magnitude of orientation to visual, tactile, and auditory stimulation. The results indicated that DCS operates, while demonstrating severe neglect, failed to demonstrate extinction or allesthesia/allokinesia. These findings suggest that the neural mechanisms that underlie neglect and extinction are dissociable in this system. A better understanding of the neural mechanisms that underlie extinction is particularly important because humans that have recovered from neglect often continue to demonstrate the debilitating symptoms of extinction.

Treatments of unilateral neglect: a review

OBJECTIVES

To review the existing literature on treatments of unilateral neglect, to synthesize findings, and to offer recommendations for future studies.

DATA SOURCES

Computerized databases including MEDLINE and PsychINFO.

STUDY SELECTION

All studies investigating treatment(s) of unilateral neglect.

DATA EXTRACTION

Authors reviewed design and other methodologic issues.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Unilateral neglect is a common consequence of right-hemisphere stroke. It is well recognized that the disorder is heterogeneous and has numerous subtypes. There have been numerous studies showing that arousal, hemispheric activation, and spatial attention treatments may all improve neglect, at least transiently. Despite these promising outcomes, little consensus exists as to whether 1 treatment is more efficacious than others, in part because cross-study differences in methodology render meta-analyses difficult, and in part because many studies fail to document duration of treatment effects or generalization to daily activities. One possibility is that these varied and diverse treatments may all be effective, reflecting redundancy in neural circuits devoted to attention and action in space, and consequent flexibility of the spatial processing system. It remains possible, however, that different subtypes of neglect may respond differentially to treatment of various sorts. Most existing studies of neglect have relied on very small populations of neglect patients, whose neglect is characterized only generally.

CONCLUSION

Methodologic shortcomings hinder assessment of the efficacy of various types of neglect treatment. In the future, these shortcomings could be addressed with larger studies of well-characterized patients that evaluate duration of treatment effects and include functional measures. In addition, the role of overarching variables, such as reduced arousal, requires consideration. The ultimate goal of these studies might be the development of triaging strategies wherein neglect patients are assigned to treatments of most likely benefit on the basis of neuroanatomic and behavioral profiles.

Palliative treatment for stroke

Despite continued advances in prevention and treatment, stroke remains the leading cause of neurologic disability. This article reviews the broad spectrum of palliative efforts underway to treat the impairment and disability that results from stroke. Emphasis is placed on the importance of symptom control, increasing compensation, and enhancing residual and recovering function in patients with stroke. New approaches to impairment reduction have produced encouraging results, but disability reduction remains the cornerstone of care.

Spatial hemineglect in humans

The paper reviews the main findings of studies of hemispatial neglect after acquired brain lesions in people. The behavioral consequences of experimentally induced lesions in animals and electrophysiological studies, which shed light on the nature of the disorder, are briefly considered. Neglect is behaviorally defined as a deficit in processing or responding to sensory stimuli in the contralateral hemispace, a part of the own body, the part of an imagined scene, or may include the failure to act with the contralesional limbs despite intact motor functions. Neglect in humans is frequently encountered after right parieto-temporal lesions and leads to a multicomponent syndrome of sensory, motor and representational deficits. Relevant findings relating to neglect, extinction and unawareness are reviewed and include the following topics: etiological and anatomical basis, recovery; allocentric, egocentric, object-centered and representational neglect; motor neglect and directional hypokinesia; elementary sensorimotor and associated disorders; subdivisions of space and frames of reference; extinction versus neglect; covert processing of information; unawareness of deficits; human and animal models; effects of sensory stimulation and rehabilitation techniques.

Psychostimulant treatment of stroke and brain injury

Psychopharmacology is rapidly becoming an adjuvant treatment to traditional rehabilitation strategies for patients with stroke or brain injury because it helps to facilitate recovery in a time-efficient manner. Norepinephrine, dopamine, acetylcholine, and serotonin appear to play important roles in recovery from stroke or brain injury. Animal models have shown that blockade of these neurotransmitters inhibits recovery, whereas recovery is promoted by drugs that promote norepinephrine, dopamine, acetylcholine, and serotonin activity. Preliminary evidence from human trials supports these findings. Further study is needed, but expanded use of pharmacologic agents for stroke and brain-injured patients appears imminent.