Theophylline increases "on" time in advanced parkinsonian patients

Allosteric Interactions between Adenosine A2A and Dopamine D2 Receptors in Heteromeric Complexes: Biochemical and Pharmacological Characteristics, and Opportunities for PET Imaging

Adenosine and dopamine interact antagonistically in living mammals. These interactions are mediated via adenosine A_2A and dopamine D₂ receptors (R). Stimulation of A_2AR inhibits and blockade of A_2AR enhances D₂R-mediated locomotor activation and goal-directed behavior in rodents. In striatal membrane preparations, adenosine decreases both the affinity and the signal transduction of D₂R via its interaction with A_2AR. Reciprocal A_2AR/D₂R interactions occur mainly in striatopallidal GABAergic medium spiny neurons (MSNs) of the indirect pathway that are involved in motor control, and in striatal astrocytes. In the nucleus accumbens, they also take place in MSNs involved in reward-related behavior. A_2AR and D₂R co-aggregate, co-internalize, and co-desensitize. They are at very close distance in biomembranes and form heteromers. Antagonistic interactions between adenosine and dopamine are (at least partially) caused by allosteric receptor–receptor interactions within A_2AR/D₂R heteromeric complexes. Such interactions may be exploited in novel strategies for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, substance abuse, and perhaps also attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Little is known about shifting A_2AR/D₂R heteromer/homodimer equilibria in the brain. Positron emission tomography with suitable ligands may provide in vivo information about receptor crosstalk in the living organism. Some experimental approaches, and strategies for the design of novel imaging agents (e.g., heterobivalent ligands) are proposed in this review.

The non-selective adenosine antagonist theophylline reverses the effects of dopamine antagonism on tremor, motor activity and effort-based decision-making

Considerable evidence indicates that adenosine and dopamine systems interact in the regulation of basal ganglia function. Nonselective adenosine antagonists such as the methylxanthine caffeine as well as selective adenosine A_2A antagonists have been shown to produce antiparkinsonian and antidepressant effects in animal models. The present studies were conducted to assess if another methylxantine, theophylline, can reverse motor and motivational impairments induced by dopamine antagonism in rats. RESULTS: Theophylline (3.75-30.0 mg/kg, IP) reversed tremulous jaw movements (TJMs), catalepsy, and locomotor suppression induced by the dopamine D2 antagonist pimozide. It also reversed TJMs induced by the muscarinic receptor agonist pilocarpine, which is a well-known tremorogenic agent. Parallel studies assessed the ability of theophylline (5.0-20.0 mg/kg, IP) to reverse the changes in effort-related choice behavior induced by the dopamine D1 antagonist ecopipam (0.2 mg/kg, IP) and the D2 antagonist haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg, IP). Rats were tested on two different operant choice tasks which assess the tendency to work for a preferred reinforcer by lever pressing (for palatable pellets or a high 5% sucrose solution) vs. approaching and consuming a less preferred reinforcer (freely available lab chow or a less concentrated 0.3% sucrose solution). Theophylline restored food and sucrose-reinforced lever pressing in animals treated with the D2 antagonist. However, it was unable to reverse the effects of the D1 antagonist. Overall, the effects of theophylline resembled those previously reported for adenosine A_2A antagonists, and suggest that theophylline could be clinically useful for the treatment of motor and motivational symptoms in humans.

Adenosine A2A-dopamine D2 receptor-receptor interaction in neurons and astrocytes: Evidence and perspectives

The discovery of receptor-receptor interactions in the early 1980s, together with a more accurate focusing of allosteric mechanisms in proteins, expanded the knowledge on the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signaling processes. GPCRs were seen to operate not only as monomers, but also as quaternary structures shaped by allosteric interactions. These integrative mechanisms can change the function of the GPCRs involved, leading to a sophisticated dynamic of the receptor assembly in terms of modulation of recognition and signaling. In this context, the heterodimeric complex formed by the adenosine A_2A and the dopamine D₂ receptors likely represents a prototypical example. The pharmacological evidence obtained, together with the tissue distribution of the A_2A-D₂ heteromeric complexes, suggested they could represent a target for new therapeutic strategies addressing significant disorders of the central nervous system. The research findings and the perspectives they offer from the therapeutic standpoint are the focus of the here presented discussion.

Adenosine 2A Receptor Antagonists for the Treatment of Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease

Background

Treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease (PD) remains an unmet challenge. Adenosine 2A (A_2A) receptors are located along the indirect pathway and represent a potential target to enhance l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-DOPA) antiparkinsonian action.

Methods

This article summarizes the preclinical and clinical literature on A_2A antagonists in PD, with a specific focus on their effect on off time, on time, and dyskinesia.

Findings

Several A_2A receptor antagonists have been tested in preclinical studies and clinical trials. In preclinical studies, A_2A antagonists enhanced l-DOPA antiparkinsonian action without exacerbating dyskinesia, but A_2A antagonists were generally administered in combination with a subthreshold dose of l-DOPA, which is different to the paradigms used in clinical trials, where A_2A antagonists were usually added to an optimal antiparkinsonian regimen. In clinical settings, A_2A antagonists generally reduced duration of off time, by as much as 25% in some studies. The effect of on time duration is less clear, and in a few studies an exacerbation of dyskinesia was reported. Two A_2A antagonists have been tested in phase III settings: istradefylline and preladenant. Istradefylline was effective in two phase III trials, but ineffective in another; the drug has been commercially available in Japan since 2013. In contrast, preladenant was ineffective in a phase III trial and the drug was discontinued. A phase III study with tozadenant will begin in 2015; the drug was effective at reducing off time in a phase IIb study. Other A_2A antagonists are in development at the preclinical and early clinical levels.

G-protein-coupled receptor type A heteromers as an emerging therapeutic target

INTRODUCTION

The discovery of receptor-receptor interactions (RRIs) in the early 1980s provided evidence that G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) operate not only as monomers but also as heteromers, in which integration of the incoming signals takes place already at the plasma membrane level through allosteric RRIs. These integrative mechanisms give sophisticated dynamics to the structure and function of these receptor assemblies in terms of modulation of recognition, G-protein signaling and selectivity and switching to β-arrestin signaling.

AREAS COVERED

The present review briefly describes the concept of direct RRI and the available data on the mechanisms of oligomer formation. Further, pharmacological data concerning the best characterized heteromers involving type A GPCRs will be analyzed to evaluate their profile as possible targets for the treatment of various diseases, in particular of impacting diseases of the CNS.

EXPERT OPINION

GPCR heteromers have the potential to open a completely new field for pharmacology with likely a major impact in molecular medicine. Novel pharmacological strategies for the treatment of several pathologies have already been proposed. However, several challenges still exist to accurately characterize the role of the identified heteroreceptor complexes in pathology and to develop heteromer-specific ligands capable of efficiently exploiting their pharmacological features.

Caffeine has greater potency and efficacy than theophylline to reverse the motor impairment caused by chronic but not acute interruption of striatal dopaminergic transmission in rats

In order to assess whether caffeine and theophylline have the same potency and efficacy to reverse the impairment of motor function caused by acute or chronic interruption of striatal dopamine transmission, a comparison of their dose-response relationship was made in the acute model of haloperidol-induced catalepsy, and the chronic model of unilateral lesion of the dopamine nigrostriatal pathway with 6-hydroxydopamine. At equimolar doses, both drugs reduced catalepsy intensity and increased its onset latency in a dose-dependent fashion, showing comparable potencies and attaining the maximal effect at similar doses. Catalepsy intensity: caffeine ED₅₀ = 24.1 μmol/kg [95% CI, 18.4-31.5]; theophylline ED₅₀ = 22.0 μmol/kg [95% CI, 17.0-28.4]. Catalepsy latency: caffeine ED₅₀ = 27.0 μmol/kg [95% CI, 21.1-34.6]; theophylline ED₅₀ = 28.8 μmol/kg [95% CI, 22.5-36.7]. In one group of hemiparkinsonian rats (n = 5), caffeine caused a dose-dependent recovery of the contralateral forepaw stepping: ED₅₀ = 2.4 μmol/kg/day [95% CI, 1.9-3.1]), reaching its maximum at the dose of 5.15 μmol/kg/day. When the treatment of these same rats was switched to 5.15 μmol/kg/day of theophylline, the stepping recovery was only 51 ± 12% of that induced by caffeine. Assessing the dose-response relationship of theophylline in another group of hemiparkinsonian rats (n = 7) revealed that it caused stepping recovery in an all-or-none fashion. Thus, the three lower doses had no effect, but at the dose of 5.15 μmol/kg/day theophylline suddenly increased the stepping to 56 ± 5% of the maximal effect observed when the treatment of these same rats was switched to an equimolar dose of caffeine. Increasing the dose of theophylline up to 15.45 μmol/kg/day caused no further stepping improvement since it was only 41 ± 6% of the maximal effect produced by caffeine at the dose of 5.15 μmol/kg/day. Given that theophylline showed less potency and efficacy than caffeine to reverse the motor impairment caused by chronic, but not acute, interruption of striatal dopaminergic transmission in rats, it is suggested that caffeine would provide more benefits than theophylline to improve the motor function in patients with Parkinson's disease.

A role for dopamine-mediated learning in the pathophysiology and treatment of Parkinson's disease

Dopamine contributes to corticostriatal plasticity and motor learning. Dopamine denervation profoundly alters motor performance, as in Parkinson's disease (PD); however, the extent to which these symptoms reflect impaired motor learning is unknown. Here, we demonstrate a D2 receptor blockade-induced aberrant learning that impedes future motor performance when dopamine signaling is restored, an effect diminished by coadministration of adenosine antagonists during blockade. We hypothesize that an inappropriate corticostriatal potentiation in striatopallidal cells of the indirect pathway underlies aberrant learning. We demonstrate synaptic potentiation in striatopallidal neurons induced by D2 blockade and diminished by application of an adenosine antagonist, consistent with behavioral observations. A neurocomputational model of the basal ganglia recapitulates the behavioral pattern and further links aberrant learning to plasticity in the indirect pathway. Thus, D2-mediated aberrant learning may contribute to motor deficits in PD, suggesting new avenues for the development of therapeutics.

Adenosine A(2A) receptors measured with [C]TMSX PET in the striata of Parkinson's disease patients

Adenosine A_2A receptors (A2ARs) are thought to interact negatively with the dopamine D₂ receptor (D2R), so selective A2AR antagonists have attracted attention as novel treatments for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, no information about the receptor in living patients with PD is available. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between A2ARs and the dopaminergic system in the striata of drug-naïve PD patients and PD patients with dyskinesia, and alteration of these receptors after antiparkinsonian therapy. We measured binding ability of striatal A2ARs using positron emission tomography (PET) with [7-methyl-¹¹C]-(E)-8-(3,4,5-trimethoxystyryl)-1,3,7-trimethylxanthine ([¹¹C]TMSX) in nine drug-naïve patients with PD, seven PD patients with mild dyskinesia and six elderly control subjects using PET. The patients and eight normal control subjects were also examined for binding ability of dopamine transporters and D2Rs. Seven of the drug-naïve patients underwent a second series of PET scans following therapy. We found that the distribution volume ratio of A2ARs in the putamen were larger in the dyskinesic patients than in the control subjects (p<0.05, Tukey-Kramer post hoc test). In the drug-naïve patients, the binding ability of the A2ARs in the putamen, but not in the head of caudate nucleus, was significantly lower on the more affected side than on the less affected side (p<0.05, paired t-test). In addition, the A2ARs were significantly increased after antiparkinsonian therapy in the bilateral putamen of the drug-naïve patients (p<0.05, paired t-test) but not in the bilateral head of caudate nucleus. Our study demonstrated that the A2ARs in the putamen were increased in the PD patients with dyskinesia, and also suggest that the A2ARs in the putamen compensate for the asymmetrical decrease of dopamine in drug-naïve PD patients and that antiparkinsonian therapy increases the A2ARs in the putamen. The A2ARs may play an important role in regulation of parkinsonism in PD.

Pathophysiological roles for purines: adenosine, caffeine and urate

The motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) are primarily due to the degeneration of the dopaminergic neurons in the nigrostriatal pathway. However, several other brain areas and neurotransmitters other than dopamine such as noradrenaline, 5-hydroxytryptamine and acetylcholine are affected in the disease. Moreover, adenosine because of the extensive interaction of its receptors with the dopaminergic system has been implicated in the pathophysiology of the disease. Based on the involvement of these non-dopaminergic neurotransmitters in PD and the sometimes severe adverse effects that limit the mainstay use of dopamine-based anti-parkinsonian treatments, recent assessments have called for a broadening of therapeutic options beyond the traditional dopaminergic drug arsenal. In this review we describe the interactions between dopamine and adenosine receptors that underpin the pre-clinical and clinical rationale for pursuing adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists as symptomatic and potentially neuroprotective treatment of PD. The review will pay particular attention to recent results regarding specific A(2A) receptor-receptor interactions and recent findings identifying urate, the end product of purine metabolism, as a novel prognostic biomarker and candidate neuroprotectant in PD.

Pharmacologic prevention of aspiration pneumonia: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Aspiration pneumonia is a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Several approaches, including bed positioning, dietary changes, and oral hygiene, have been proposed to prevent aspiration pneumonia, yet few data are available on the efficacy of pharmacologic interventions in reducing the rate of aspiration.

OBJECTIVE

This study was a systematic literature review of the pharmacologic prevention of aspiration pneumonia.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1996-2006); EMBASE (1974-2006); Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (1982-2006); Health Services Technology, Administration, and Research (HealthSTAR) (1975-2006); and the Cochrane Library for relevant articles. References of all included articles were reviewed. Studies were included if they had a prospective, controlled design with a primary outcome of prevention of aspiration pneumonia. Surrogate outcomes that had a direct link to decreasing the incidence of aspiration pneumonia were considered. Selected articles were reviewed independently by 2 authors.

RESULTS

Of 1108 studies reviewed, 20 were analyzed. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may be beneficial in selected patients at high risk for aspiration. Capsaicin may be a low-risk approach to stimulate swallowing and cough reflexes. Amantadine, cabergoline, and theophylline may cause serious adverse events, and their routine use for prevention of aspiration pneumonia is not recommended. Cilostazol should not be used because of the increased risk for bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited information is available on benefits and risks to guide an evidence-based approach to the pharmacologic prevention of aspiration pneumonia. Considering the high incidence of aspiration pneumonia in older adults, large randomized clinical trials on the effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions are warranted.

Evaluation of distribution of adenosine A2A receptors in normal human brain measured with [11C]TMSX PET

Adenosine A(2A) receptor (A2AR) is thought to interact with dopamine D(2) receptor. Selective A2AR antagonists have attracted attention as the treatment of Parkinson's disease. In this study, we investigated the distribution of the A2ARs in the living human brain using positron emission tomography (PET) and [7-methyl-(11)C]-(E)-8-(3,4,5-trimethoxystyryl)-1,3,7-trimethylxanthine ([(11)C]TMSX). We recruited five normal male subjects. A dynamic series of PET scans was performed for 60 min, and the arterial blood was sampled during the scan to measure radioactivity of the parent compound and labeled metabolites. Circular regions of interest of 10-mm diameter were placed in the PET images over the cerebellum, brainstem, thalamus, head of caudate nucleus, anterior and posterior putamen, frontal lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, occipital lobe, and posterior cingulate gyrus for each subject. A two-tissue, three-compartment model was used to estimate K(1), k(2), k(3), and k(4) between metabolite-corrected plasma and tissue time activity of [(11)C]TMSX. The binding potential (BP) was the largest in the anterior (1.25) and posterior putamen (1.20), was next largest in the head of caudate nucleus (1.05) and thalamus (1.03), and was small in the cerebral cortex, especially frontal lobe (0.46). [(11)C]TMSX PET showed the largest BP in the striatum in which A2ARs were enriched as in postmortem and nonhuman studies reported, but that the binding of [(11)C]TMSX was relatively larger in the thalamus to compare with other mammals. To date, [(11)C]TMSX is the only promising PET ligand, which is available to clinical use for mapping the A2ARs in the living human brain.

Drug Insight: new drugs in development for Parkinson's disease

For many years, levodopa has given most patients with Parkinson's disease excellent symptomatic benefit. This agent does not slow down the progression of the disease, however, and it can induce motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in the long term. The other available antiparkinsonian agents also have drawbacks, and as a consequence research into antiparkinsonian drugs is expected to take new and different directions in the coming years. The most promising approaches include the development of 'neuroprotective' drugs that are capable of blocking or at least slowing down the degenerative process that is responsible for cellular death; 'restorative' strategies intended to restore normal brain function; more-effective agents for replacing dopamine loss; and symptomatic and antidyskinetic drugs that act on neurotransmitters other than dopamine or target brain areas other than the striatum. In this Review, we discuss the numerous drugs in development that target the primary motor disorder in Parkinson's disease.

Reversion of levodopa-induced motor fluctuations by the A2A antagonist CSC is associated with an increase in striatal preprodynorphin mRNA expression in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats

The molecular mechanisms involved in the reversion of levodopa-induced motor fluctuations by the adenosine A2A antagonist 8-(3-chlorostryryl) caffeine (CSC) were investigated in rats with a 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced lesion and compared with the ones achieved by the kappa-opioid agonist, U50,488. Animals were treated with levodopa (50 mg/kg/day) for 22 days and for one additional week with levodopa + CSC (5 mg/kg/day), levodopa + U50,488 (1 mg/kg/day), or levodopa + vehicle. The reversion of the decrease in the duration of levodopa-induced rotations by CSC, but not by U50,488, was maintained until the end of the treatment and was associated with a further increase in levodopa-induced preprodynorphin mRNA in the lesioned striatum, being higher in the ventromedial striatum. The increase in striatal preprodynorphin expression, particularly in the ventromedial striatum, may be related to the reversion of levodopa-induced motor fluctuations in the CSC-treated animals, suggesting a role of the direct striatal output pathway activity in the ventromedial striatum in the pathophysiology of motor fluctuations.

Therapeutic potential of adenosine A2A receptor antagonists in Parkinson's disease

In the pursuit of improved treatments for Parkinson's disease (PD), the adenosine A(2A) receptor has emerged as an attractive nondopaminergic target. Based on the compelling behavioral pharmacology and selective basal ganglia expression of this G-protein-coupled receptor, its antagonists are now crossing the threshold of clinical development as adjunctive symptomatic treatment for relatively advanced PD. The antiparkinsonian potential of A(2A) antagonism has been boosted further by recent preclinical evidence that A(2A) antagonists might favorably alter the course as well as the symptoms of the disease. Convergent epidemiological and laboratory data have suggested that A(2A) blockade may confer neuroprotection against the underlying dopaminergic neuron degeneration. In addition, rodent and nonhuman primate studies have raised the possibility that A(2A) receptor activation contributes to the pathophysiology of dyskinesias-problematic motor complications of standard PD therapy--and that A(2A) antagonism might help prevent them. Realistically, despite being targeted to basal ganglia pathophysiology, A(2A) antagonists may be expected to have other beneficial and adverse effects elsewhere in the central nervous system (e.g., on mood and sleep) and in the periphery (e.g., on immune and inflammatory processes). The thoughtful design of new clinical trials of A(2A) antagonists should take into consideration these counterbalancing hopes and concerns and may do well to shift toward a broader set of disease-modifying as well as symptomatic indications in early PD.

Adenosine A2A antagonism reverses levodopa-induced motor alterations in hemiparkinsonian rats

To evaluate the possible involvement of adenosine A(2A) receptor-mediated mechanisms in levodopa-induced motor fluctuations, we investigated the effects of CSC (8-(3-chlorostryryl) caffeine), a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist, on levodopa-induced motor alterations in rats with unilateral 6-OHDA lesion. Acute and chronic administration of CSC was studied to evaluate the possible reversion or prevention of these levodopa effects. In a first set of experiments, rats were treated with levodopa (25 mg/kg with benserazide, twice daily, i.p.) for 22 days and on day 23 CSC (5 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered immediately before levodopa. In a second set of experiments, rats were treated daily for 22 days with levodopa and CSC (5 mg/kg/day, i.p.). The duration of the rotational behavior induced by chronic levodopa decreased after 22 days (P < 0.05). Acute administration of CSC on day 23 reversed levodopa-induced shortening in motor response duration (P < 0.01). Chronic CSC administration did not prevent the shortening in response duration induced by levodopa. Our results demonstrate that the adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist CSC reverses but does not prevent levodopa-induced motor alterations in parkinsonian rats. These results suggest a role for adenosine A(2A) receptor-mediated mechanisms in the pathophysiology of levodopa-induced motor response complications. These findings suggest that the antagonism of adenosine A(2A) receptors might confer clinical benefit to parkinsonian patients under levodopa therapy suffering from motor complication syndrome.

Current evidence for neuroprotective effects of nicotine and caffeine against Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder affecting 1 to 3% of individuals over the age of 65 years. While effective therapy exists for treating the bradykinesia, rigidity and tremor associated with the disease, the cause is unknown. There is no treatment available to prevent or slow the progressive neuronal loss in the substantia nigra and associated decreased levels of dopamine in the striatum that underlie the cardinal features of the disease. Both retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies have consistently demonstrated an inverse association between cigarette smoking and PD, leading to theories that smoking in general and nicotine in particular might be neuroprotective. Nicotine has been shown in animals to stimulate the release of dopamine in the striatum, and to preserve nigral neurons and striatal dopamine levels in laboratory animals with lesioned nigrostriatal pathways. Coffee and caffeine consumption have also been shown in epidemiological studies to be inversely related to PD risk. Caffeine is an adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist that enhances locomotor activity in animal models of parkinsonism. Theophylline, a related compound that has A(2A) receptor blocking properties, has been shown in one small trial to improve motor function in patients with PD. Recently, potent and highly selective A(2A) receptor antagonists have been developed that have demonstrated improvement in motor function in animal models of parkinsonism. Exciting findings are emerging that demonstrate attenuation of dopaminergic neurotoxicity with caffeine and other adenosine receptor antagonists in mice given the neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), suggesting that these compounds may be neuroprotective. Evidence for the neuroprotective potential of nicotine and caffeine is compelling, but further work is needed before testing these and related compounds in clinical trials for both individuals at high risk of developing PD and those with early, untreated disease.

A double-blind crossover, placebo-controlled study of the adenosine A2A antagonist theophylline in Parkinson's disease

Blockade of the adenosine A2A receptor potentiates the effects of levodopa in experimental animals and may offer a novel nondopaminergic target for drug therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD). Open-label trials suggest that the nonspecific adenosine antagonist theophylline improves parkinsonian symptoms and increases ON time in advanced patients with PD. In a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial, the authors investigated the ability of stable plasma levels of theophylline (between 10-20 microg/mL after 15 days of treatment) to modulate the long-duration response and the short-duration response of levodopa in 10 patients with PD. Although theophylline induced a longer duration of the effect of levodopa in all Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale variables considered, including dyskinesias, maximal levodopa-induced improvement and the duration of the effect of levodopa did not differ significantly from placebo. Only the secondary variable "akinesia" showed a statistical tendency to a more prolonged beneficial response with theophylline during an acute levodopa test (short-duration response), and tremor worsened with theophylline during levodopa withdrawal (long-duration response). No differences were observed during the subacute course of study medication added to levodopa. During this exploratory study, the effects of theophylline were not strong enough to potentiate clearly the antiparkinsonian action of levodopa or to increase ON time in patients with advanced PD.

Non-dopaminergic drug treatment of Parkinson's disease

Several lines of evidence suggest that substitution of the dopaminergic striatal deficit only represents one important aspect of the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) because neurotransmitter systems other than the dopaminergic one also degenerate and aggravate parkinsonian motor, vegetative and cognitive symptoms. Thus, regulation and balance of altered non-dopaminergic neurotransmission could provide an additional benefit for parkinsonian patients (PP). Moreover, onset of motor complications, psychosis and loss of drug efficacy increasingly reduce parkinsonian quality of life in the course of long-term dopamine substitution. Indirect stimulation of the dopaminergic neurotransmission via non-dopaminergic systems is an upcoming interesting strategy to solve these problems. Treatment of L-dopa-associated dyskinesias represents a further important future task of non-dopaminergic drug therapy. NMDA antagonists are a promising therapeutic option but further trials are necessary to elucidate their efficacy. A further peripheral effect of L-dopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDI) application is increased homocysteine synthesis with its putative hypothetical additional central impact on neurodegeneration and progression of PD. Long-term monitoring with subsequent therapeutic decrease of homocysteine levels with folic acid could result in substantial clinical benefits at reasonable costs for PP. Also, it could hypothetically influence altered dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic neurotransmission beside its impact on occurrence of vascular disease and altered striatal microvascularisation in PD. The interesting field of non-dopaminergic drug therapy is emerging and will hopefully lead to a better understanding of PD and subsequently improve drug therapy of parkinsonian symptoms, which do not respond to dopaminergic substitution or are long-term complications of dopamine substitution.