Distinctive pathologic findings in proximal diabetic neuropathy (diabetic amyotrophy)

Autoimmune polyneuropathies

The autoimmune peripheral neuropathies with prominent motor manifestations are a diverse collection of unusual peripheral neuropathies that are appreciated in vast clinical settings. This chapter highlights the most common immune-mediated, motor predominant neuropathies excluding acute, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP and CIDP, respectively). Other acquired demyelinating neuropathies such as distal CIDP and multifocal motor neuropathy will be covered. Additionally, the radiculoplexus neuropathies, resulting from microvasculitis-induced injury to nerve roots, plexuses, and nerves, including diabetic and nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy and neuralgic amyotrophy (i.e., Parsonage-Turner syndrome), will be included. Finally, the motor predominant peripheral neuropathies encountered in association with rheumatological disease, particularly Sjögren's syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis, are covered. Early recognition of these distinct motor predominant autoimmune neuropathies and initiation of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressant treatment likely result in improved outcomes.

Is diabetes the risk factor for poor neurological recovery after cervical spine surgery? A review of the literature

The poor prognosis of cervical spine surgery is mainly manifested as poor neurological recovery and the presence of new upper extremity dysfunction that promotes significant psychological and physiological burdens on patients. Many factors influence the prognosis of cervical spine surgery, including the age of patients, the time and mode of surgery, and the surgical technique used. However, in clinical studies, it has been observed that patients with diabetes have a higher probability of poor prognosis after surgery. Therefore, we review the pathophysiology of diabetic neuropathies and discuss its impact on cervical nerve system function, especially in cervical nerve roots and upper limb peripheral nerve conduction.

Immune mechanisms, the role of complement, and related therapies in autoimmune neuropathies

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune neuropathies have diverse presentations and underlying immune mechanisms. Demonstration of efficacy of therapeutic agents that inhibit the complement cascade would confirm the role of complement activation.

AREAS COVERED

A review of the pathophysiology of the autoimmune neuropathies, to identify those that are likely to be complement mediated.

EXPERT OPINION

Complement mediated mechanisms are implicated in the acute and chronic neuropathies associated with IgG or IgM antibodies that target the Myelin Associated Glycoprotein (MAG) or gangliosides in the peripheral nerves. Antibody and complement mechanisms are also suspected in the Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy, given the therapeutic response to plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulins, even in the absence of an identifiable target antigen. Complement is unlikely to play a role in paraneoplastic sensory neuropathy associated with antibodies to HU/ANNA-1 given its intracellular localization. In chronic demyelinating neuropathy with anti-nodal/paranodal CNTN1, NFS-155, and CASPR1 antibodies, myotonia with anti-VGKC LGI1 or CASPR2 antibodies, or autoimmune autonomic neuropathy with anti-gAChR antibodies, the response to complement inhibitory agents would depend on the extent to which the antibodies exert their effects through complement dependent or independent mechanisms. Complement is also likely to play a role in Sjogren's, vasculitic, and cryoglobulinemic neuropathies.

Immune-mediated vincristine-induced neuropathy: Unlocking therapies

Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) is a prevalent and painful complication in cancer patients that lacks effective treatments. In this issue of JEM, Starobova et al. (2021. J. Exp. Med.https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20201452) report that VIPN is driven by innate immune system activation, a discovery that unlocks immunotherapies as potential treatments.

Lumbosacral Radiculoplexus Neuropathy: Neurologic Outcomes and Survival in a Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients in the community with lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (LRPN) have milder neuropathy than referral patients, we characterized the outcomes and survival of population-based compared to referral-based LRPN cohorts.

BACKGROUND

Previously, we found that the incidence of LRPN is 4.16/100,000/y, a frequency greater than other inflammatory neuropathies. The survival of patients with LRPN is uncharacterized.

METHODS

Sixty-two episodes in 59 patients with LRPN were identified over 16 years (2000-2015). Clinical findings were compared to previous referral-based LRPN cohorts. Survival data were compared to those of age- and sex-matched controls.

RESULTS

At LRPN diagnosis, median age was 70 years, median Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) 22 points, 92% had pain, 95% had weakness, 23% were wheelchair-bound, and median modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) was 3 (range 1-4). At last follow-up, median NIS improved to 17 points (p < 0.001) with 56% having ≥4 points improvement, 16% were wheelchair-bound, and median mRS was 2. Compared to referral-based LRPN cohorts, community patients with LRPN had less impairment, less bilateral disease (37% vs 92%), and less wheelchair usage (23% vs 49%). LRPN survival was 86% at 5 years and 55% at 10 years. Compared to age- and sex-matched controls, patients with LRPN had 76% increased risk of death (p = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, diabetes, age, stroke, chronic kidney disease, peripheral artery disease, and coronary artery disease were significant mortality risk factors but LRPN was not.

CONCLUSION

LRPN is a painful, paralytic, asymmetric, monophasic, sometimes bilateral pan-plexopathy that improves over time but leaves patients with impairment. Although having LRPN increases mortality, this increase is probably due to comorbidities (diabetes) rather than LRPN itself.

Update on classification, epidemiology, clinical phenotype and imaging of the nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Single-organ vasculitis of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) is often designated nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy (NSVN). Several variants or subtypes have been distinguished, including migratory sensory neuropathy, postsurgical inflammatory neuropathy, diabetic radiculoplexus neuropathies, skin-nerve vasculitides, and, arguably, neuralgic amyotrophy. NSVN often presents as nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (LRPN). This review updates classification, clinical features, epidemiology, and imaging of these disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent study showed the annual incidence of LRPN in Olmstead County, Minnesota to be 4.16/100 000:2.79/100 000 diabetic and 1.27/100 000 nondiabetic. This study was the first to determine the incidence or prevalence of any vasculitic neuropathy. In NSVN, ultrasonography shows multifocal enlargement of proximal and distal nerves. In neuralgic amyotrophy, MRI and ultrasound reveal multifocal enlargements and focal constrictions in nerves derived from the brachial plexus. Histopathology of these chronic lesions shows inflammation and rare vasculitis. Diffusion tensor imaging of tibial nerves in NSVN revealed decreased fractional anisotropy in one study.

SUMMARY

Single-organ PNS vasculitides are the most common inflammatory neuropathies. Neuralgic amyotrophy might result from PNS vasculitis, but further study is necessary. The usefulness of focal nerve enlargements or constrictions in understanding pathological mechanisms, directing biopsies, and monitoring disease activity in NSVN should be further investigated.

Diffuse microvascular C5b-9 deposition is a common feature in muscle and nerve biopsies from diabetic patients

Terminal complement complex deposition in endomysial capillaries detected by a C5b-9 immunostain is considered a diagnostic feature for dermatomyositis. However, we found widespread microvascular C5b-9 reactivity in a substantial subset of muscle biopsies with denervation changes, and in nerve biopsies of peripheral neuropathies, particularly in patients with diabetes. It is unclear whether the presence of C5b-9 deposition signifies active immune-mediated vascular injury that requires immune suppression therapy. We retrospectively identified 63 nerve biopsies in patients with a documented history of diabetes, 26 of which had concomitant muscle biopsies, as well as 54 control nerve biopsies in patients without a documented diabetes history, 18 of which had concomitant muscle biopsies. C5b-9 immunostain was performed on all cases. 87% of the nerve biopsies and 92% of the muscle biopsies from diabetic patients showed microvascular C5b-9 reactivity, compared to 34% and 50% in non-diabetic patients. The differences were statistically significant (p < 0.0001 for nerve and p = 0.002 for muscle). The C5b-9 reactivity was generally proportional to the extent of microvascular sclerosis in diabetic patients, but unrelated to inflammation or vasculitis. C5b-9 deposition in micro-vasculature in both muscle and nerve is therefore a common feature in patients with diabetic neuropathies and may have diagnostic utility. Precaution needs to be taken before using muscle capillary C5b-9 reactivity as evidence of myositis.

Immunotherapy for diabetic amyotrophy

BACKGROUND

People with diabetes mellitus (DM) sometimes present with acute or subacute, progressive, asymmetrical pain and weakness of the proximal lower limb muscles. The various names for the condition include diabetic amyotrophy, diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathies, diabetic femoral neuropathy or Bruns-Garland syndrome. Some studies suggest that diabetic amyotrophy may be an immune-mediated inflammatory microvasculitis causing ischaemic damage of the nerves. Immunotherapies would therefore be expected to be beneficial. This is the second update of a review first published in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence from randomised trials for the efficacy of any form of immunotherapy in the treatment of diabetic amyotrophy.

SEARCH METHODS

On 5 September 2016 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase. We also contacted authors of relevant publications and other experts to obtain additional references, unpublished trials, and ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We intended to include all randomised and quasi-randomised trials of any immunotherapy in participants with the condition fulfilling all the following: diabetes mellitus as defined by internationally recognised criteria; acute or subacute onset of pain and lower motor neuron weakness involving predominantly the proximal muscles of the lower limbs; weakness that is not confined to one nerve or nerve root distribution; and exclusion of other causes of lumbosacral radiculopathies and plexopathy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently examined all references retrieved by the search to select those meeting the inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

We found only one completed placebo-controlled trial (N = 75) using intravenous methylprednisolone in diabetic amyotrophy (Dyck 2006). The results have not been fully published and were not available for analysis. The risk of bias was unclear because there was too little information to make a judgement, but we considered the trial at high risk of selective reporting. The published abstract did not report adverse events. We found no additional trials when the searches were updated in September 2016.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is presently no evidence from randomised trials to support a positive or negative effect of any immunotherapy in the treatment in diabetic amyotrophy.

Vasoregression: A Shared Vascular Pathology Underlying Macrovascular And Microvascular Pathologies?

Vasoregression is a common phenomenon underlying physiological vessel development as well as pathological microvascular diseases leading to peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy, and vascular oculopathies. In this review, we describe the hallmarks and pathways of vasoregression. We argue here that there is a parallel between characteristic features of vasoregression in the ocular microvessels and atherosclerosis in the larger vessels. Shared molecular pathways and molecular effectors in the two conditions are outlined, thus highlighting the possible systemic causes of local vascular diseases. Our review gives us a system-wide insight into factors leading to multiple synchronous vascular diseases. Because shared molecular pathways might usefully address the diagnostic and therapeutic needs of multiple common complex diseases, the literature analysis presented here is of broad interest to readership in integrative biology, rational drug development and systems medicine.

Diabetic radiculoplexus neuropathies

Diabetic radiculoplexus neuropathies (DRPN) are neuropathies clinically and pathologically distinct from the neuropathy typically associated with diabetes (DPN). DRPN are usually subacute in onset, painful, and often demonstrate a monophasic course with incomplete recovery. Pathologically, these neuropathies are due to ischemic injury from altered immunity and often have features suggestive or diagnostic of microvasculitis. Unlike DPN, immune therapy may be helpful in treatment of these conditions given their pathological substrate and therefore are important to identify early and distinguish from other neuropathies that occur in patient with diabetes.

Diabetes alters activation and repression of pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling pathways in the vasculature

A central mechanism driving vascular disease in diabetes is immune cell-mediated inflammation. In diabetes, enhanced oxidation and glycation of macromolecules, such as lipoproteins, insults the endothelium, and activates both innate and adaptive arms of the immune system by generating new antigens for presentation to adaptive immune cells. Chronic inflammation of the endothelium in diabetes leads to continuous infiltration and accumulation of leukocytes at sites of endothelial cell injury. We will describe the central role of the macrophage as a source of signaling molecules and damaging by-products which activate infiltrating lymphocytes in the tissue and contribute to the pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory microenvironment. An important aspect to be considered is the diabetes-associated defects in the immune system, such as fewer or dysfunctional athero-protective leukocyte subsets in the diabetic lesion compared to non-diabetic lesions. This review will discuss the key pro-inflammatory signaling pathways responsible for leukocyte recruitment and activation in the injured vessel, with particular focus on pro- and anti-inflammatory pathways aberrantly activated or repressed in diabetes. We aim to describe the interaction between advanced glycation end products and their principle receptor RAGE, angiotensin II, and the Ang II type 1 receptor, in addition to reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by NADPH-oxidase enzymes that are relevant to vascular and immune cell function in the context of diabetic vasculopathy. Furthermore, we will touch on recent advances in epigenetic medicine that have revealed high glucose-mediated changes in the transcription of genes with known pro-inflammatory downstream targets. Finally, novel anti-atherosclerosis strategies that target the vascular immune interface will be explored; such as vaccination against modified low-density lipoprotein and pharmacological inhibition of ROS-producing enzymes.

Vasculitic neuropathy

Vasculitis is a primary phenomenon in autoimmune diseases such as polyarteritis nodosa, Wegener's granulomatosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, microscopic polyangiitis, and essential mixed cryoglobulinemia. As a secondary feature vasculitis may complicate, for example, connective tissue diseases, infections, malignancies, and diabetes. Vasculitic neuropathy is a consequence of destruction of the vessel wall and occlusion of the vessel lumen of small epineurial arteries. Sometimes patients present with nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy, i.e., vasculitis limited to peripheral nerves and muscles with no evidence of further systemic involvement. Treatment with corticosteroids, sometimes in combination with other immunosuppressants, is required to control the inflammatory process and prevent further ischemic nerve damage.

Diabetic neuropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diabetes is the most common cause of peripheral neuropathy in the world. More than half of patients with diabetes have neuropathy, and half of patients with neuropathy have diabetes. Diabetic neuropathy is a major cause of disability and health care expense. This article reviews the various forms of diabetic neuropathy with a focus on diagnosis and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diabetes causes a wide variety of peripheral nerve problems. These can be divided into chronic neuropathies, of which distal symmetric polyneuropathy is the most common, and acute neuropathies, such as diabetic amyotrophy. There is growing evidence suggesting that prediabetic levels of hyperglycemia and other consequences of obesity and dyslipidemia contribute to neuropathy risk. Evolving literature suggests that many of the acute diabetic neuropathies are related to inflammatory mechanisms. An important exception is treatment-related neuropathy, previously known as "insulin neuritis".

SUMMARY

While disease-altering therapy continues to prove elusive, our understanding of basic disease mechanisms is improving, and new diagnostic and research tools will hopefully lead to novel therapies for distal symmetric diabetic polyneuropathy.

Immunotherapy for diabetic amyotrophy

BACKGROUND

People with diabetes mellitus (DM) sometimes present with acute or subacute, progressive, asymmetrical pain and weakness of the proximal lower limb muscles. The various names for the condition include diabetic amyotrophy or diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathies. Some studies suggest that it may be due to immune-mediated inflammatory microvasculitis causing ischaemic damage of the nerves. Immunotherapies would therefore be expected to be beneficial. This is an update of a review first published in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to review the evidence from randomised trials for the efficacy of any form of immunotherapy in the treatment of diabetic amyotrophy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (7 February 2012), CENTRAL (2012 Issue 1), MEDLINE (January 1966 to January 2012) and EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2012), and contacted authors of relevant publications and other experts to obtain additional references, unpublished trials, and ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We intended to include all randomised and quasi-randomised trials of any immunotherapy in participants with the condition fulfilling all the following: diabetes mellitus as defined by internationally recognised criteria, acute or subacute onset of pain and lower motor neuron weakness involving predominantly the proximal muscles of the lower limbs, weakness that is not confined to one nerve or nerve root distribution and exclusion of other causes of lumbosacral radiculopathies and plexopathy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently examined all references retrieved by the search to select those meeting the inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

We found only one completed controlled trial using intravenous methylprednisolone in diabetic amyotrophy (Dyck 2006). The results have not been fully published and were not available for analyses. We found no additional trials when the searches were updated in 2012.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is presently no evidence from randomised trials to support any recommendation on the use of any immunotherapy treatment in diabetic amyotrophy.

Diabetic polyneuropathies: update on research definition, diagnostic criteria and estimation of severity

Prior to a joint meeting of the Neurodiab Association and International Symposium on Diabetic Neuropathy held in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 13-18 October 2009, Solomon Tesfaye, Sheffield, UK, convened a panel of neuromuscular experts to provide an update on polyneuropathies associated with diabetes (Toronto Consensus Panels on DPNs, 2009). Herein, we provide definitions of typical and atypical diabetic polyneuropathies (DPNs), diagnostic criteria, and approaches to diagnose sensorimotor polyneuropathy as well as to estimate severity. Diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN), or typical DPN, usually develops on long-standing hyperglycaemia, consequent metabolic derangements and microvessel alterations. It is frequently associated with microvessel retinal and kidney disease-but other causes must be excluded. By contrast, atypical DPNs are intercurrent painful and autonomic small-fibre polyneuropathies. Recognizing that there is a need to detect and estimate severity of DSPN validly and reproducibly, we define subclinical DSPN using nerve conduction criteria and define possible, probable, and confirmed clinical levels of DSPN. For conduct of epidemiologic surveys and randomized controlled trials, it is necessary to pre-specify which attributes of nerve conduction are to be used, the criterion for diagnosis, reference values, correction for applicable variables, and the specific criterion for DSPN. Herein, we provide the performance characteristics of several criteria for the diagnosis of sensorimotor polyneuropathy in healthy subject- and diabetic subject cohorts. Also outlined here are staged and continuous approaches to estimate severity of DSPN.

Update on the management of diabetic polyneuropathies

The prevalence of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) can approach 50% in subjects with longer-duration diabetes. The most common neuropathies are generalized symmetrical chronic sensorimotor polyneuropathy and autonomic neuropathy. It is important to recognize that 50% of subjects with DPN may have no symptoms and only careful clinical examination may reveal the diagnosis. DPN, especially painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, is associated with poor quality of life. Although there is a better understanding of the pathophysiology of DPN and the mechanisms of pain, treatment remains challenging and is limited by variable efficacy and side effects of therapies. Intensification of glycemic control remains the cornerstone for the prevention or delay of DPN but optimization of other traditional cardiovascular risk factors may also be of benefit. The management of DPN relies on its early recognition and needs to be individually based on comorbidities and tolerability to medications. To date, most pharmacological strategies focus upon symptom control. In the management of pain, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and anticonvulsants alone or in combination are current first-line therapies followed by use of opiates. Topical agents may offer symptomatic relief in some patients. Disease-modifying agents are still in development and to date, antioxidant α-lipoic acid has shown the most promising effect. Further development and testing of therapies based upon improved understanding of the complex pathophysiology of this common and disabling complication is urgently required.

Treatment of diabetic and nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy

OPINION STATEMENT

Lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (LRPN) is a multifocal, asymmetric, painful neuropathic disorder affecting multiple levels of lumbosacral plexus, nerve roots, and distal nerves that emerge from the plexus. The disorder was first described in diabetic patients (DLRPN) and was later found to occur in nondiabetic patients as well. There have been debates as to the pathogenesis of DLRPN and LRPN. Recent detailed and extensive pathologic studies, however, have shown that the main pathogenesis is inflammation and microvasculitis affecting various components in the peripheral nerves, resulting in ischemic injury to the nerves. Even though studies on the natural history of this disorder have shown that the majority of patients recover within a few years after the attack without any treatment (although recovery is incomplete in many cases), it is a common practice, based on the pathophysiology and case series, to administer immunotherapy. Preliminary data from a controlled clinical trial failed to show significant improvement in outcomes measured by neurologic deficits (as judged by the Neuropathy Impairment Score) but did show improvement in symptoms (pain and positive sensory symptoms). Choices of immunotherapy include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, or a combination. Pain management, physical therapy, and treatment of depression remain mainstays for managing this disorder.

Painless diabetic motor neuropathy: a variant of diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus Neuropathy?

OBJECTIVE

Occasionally, diabetic patients develop painless, lower-limb, motor predominant neuropathy. Whether this is a variant of diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (DLRPN) (a painful disorder from ischemic injury and microvasculitis), a variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) or another disorder is unsettled. Here, we characterize the clinical and pathological features of painless diabetic motor predominant neuropathy.

METHODS

We identified patients with this syndrome who underwent nerve biopsy. We compared pathological features to 33 DLRPN and 25 CIDP biopsies.

RESULTS

23 patients were identified (22 had type 2 diabetes mellitus); 12 men; median age 62.2 years (range 36-78); median weight loss 30 pounds (range 0-100). Overall, the clinical features were similar to DLRPN except painless patients had more symmetrical and upper limb involvement, with slower progression and more severe impairment. Physiological testing demonstrated pan-modality sensory loss, autonomic abnormalities and axonal polyradiculoneuropathies. Nerve biopsies were similar to DLPRN showing ischemic injury (multifocal fiber loss [11/23], perineural thickening [18/23], injury neuroma [11/23], neovascularization [17/23]) and evidence of altered immunity and microvasculitis (epineurial perivascular inflammation [23/23], prior bleeding [11/23], vessel wall inflammation [15/23], and microvasculitis [3/23]). In contrast, CIDP biopsies did not show ischemic injury or microvasculitis but revealed demyelination and onion-bulbs.

INTERPRETATION

1) Painless diabetic motor neuropathy is painless DLRPN and not CIDP and is caused by ischemic injury and microvasculitis. 2) The clinical features of painless DLRPN are different from typical DLPRN being more insidious and symmetrical with slower evolution. 3) The slower evolution may explain the lack of pain.

[Pathomechanism of diabetic neuropathy: background of the pathogenesis-oriented therapy]

The pathomechanism of diabetic neuropathy remains still poorly understood, however, a broad spectrum of novel findings associated with therapeutic consequences emerged during the last decades. Both disturbed function of primary hemostasis and increased activity of coagulation system contribute to the reduced endoneurial blood flow. Increased superoxide anion production induced by hyperglycemia leads to decreased activity of glycerinaldehid-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and to consequential increased activity of alternative pathways, including the polyol-, hexosamine-, diacilglycerol protein kinase-C- and advanced glycation pathways. Advanced glycation endproducts increase the activity of the nuclear-factor kappa-B, as well as the production of vasoactive factors and cytokines (interleukin-1, -6, tumor necrosis factor alpha). The aim of pathogenetic oriented treatment is to slow down, stop or reverse the progression of neuropathy. Components of pathogenetic oriented treatment are glycaemic control, management of risk factors, benfotiamine and alpha-lipoic acid. On one hand, transketolase-activator benfotiamine inhibits alternative pathways induced by hyperglycemia (the polyol-, hexosamine-, diacilglycerol protein kinase-C-, and advanced glycation pathways), while, on the other hand, it increases the activity of the pentose-phosphate-shunt. The clinical effectiveness of benfotiamine has been shown in many international and Hungarian trials. Alpha-lipoic acid as a powerful antioxidant decreases oxidative stress and this way increases the activity of glycerinaldehid-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Alpha-lipoic acid administered in infusion or oral treatment decreases both symptoms of neuropathy and neuropathic deficit. In conclusion, the case of diabetic neuropathy illustrates well, how widening of our knowledge on pathogenesis might contribute to successful therapy.

Immunotherapy for diabetic amyotrophy

BACKGROUND

People with diabetes mellitus (DM) sometimes present with acute or subacute, progressive, asymmetrical pain and weakness of the proximal lower limb muscles. The various names for the condition include diabetic amyotrophy, or diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathies. Some studies suggest that it may be due to immune-mediated inflammatory microvasculitis causing ischaemic damage of the nerves. Immunotherapies would therefore be expected to be beneficial.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to review the evidence from randomised trials for the efficacy of any form of immunotherapy in the treatment of diabetic amyotrophy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (searched April 2 2009), MEDLINE (searched January 1966 to April 2 2009), EMBASE (searched January 1980 to April 2 2009) and contacted authors of relevant publications and other experts to obtain additional references, unpublished trials, and ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We intended to include all randomised and quasi-randomised trials of any immunotherapy in participants with the condition fulfilling all the following: diabetes mellitus as defined by internationally recognised criteria, acute or subacute onset of pain and lower motor neuron weakness involving predominantly the proximal muscles of the lower limbs, weakness that is not confined to one nerve or nerve root distribution and exclusion of other causes of lumbosacral radiculopathies and plexopathy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently examined all references retrieved by the search to select those meeting the inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

We found only one completed controlled trial using intravenous methylprednisolone in diabetic amyotrophy (Dyck 2006). The results have not been fully published and were not available for analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is presently no evidence from randomised trials to support any recommendation on the use of any immunotherapy treatment in diabetic amyotrophy.

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in proximal diabetic neuropathy

A 57-year-old man with type 2 diabetes mellitus for 10 years showed progressive loss of muscle strength in both legs, pain and muscle atrophy in the femoral region and significant weight loss. On admission, he could not stand alone and used a wheelchair. He also complained of severe pain in the lower extremities. He was diagnosed with proximal diabetic neuropathy (PDN) by characteristic clinical and electrophysiological features. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIg 0.4 g/kg×5 days) markedly reduced the severe pain and muscle weakness in the legs. Eventually, pain assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale was relieved by 80% and muscle strength was also well recovered, thereby enabling the patient to walk with a cane. The present case suggests that IVIg therapy may be effective for the relief of pain in PDN.

The spectrum of diabetic neuropathies

Diabetes mellitus is associated with many different neuropathic syndromes, ranging from a mild sensory disturbance as can be seen in a diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy, to the debilitating pain and weakness of a diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy. The etiology of these syndromes has been studied extensively, and may vary among metabolic, compressive, and immunological bases for the different disorders, as well as mechanisms yet to be discovered. Many of these disorders of nerve appear to be separate conditions with different underlying mechanisms, and some are caused directly by diabetes mellitus, whereas others are associated with it but not caused by hyperglycemia. This article discusses a number of the more common disorders of nerve found with diabetes mellitus. It discusses the symmetrical neuropathies, particularly generalized diabetic polyneuropathy, and then the focal or asymmetrical types of diabetes-associated neuropathy.

Inflammatory mediators in diabetic and non-diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy

Nerve microvasculitis and ischemic injury appear to be the primary and important pathogenic alterations in lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy of patients with (DLRPN) and without (LRPN) diabetes mellitus (DM). Here, we examine the involvement of inflammatory mediators in DLRPN and LRPN. Paraffin sections of sural nerves from 19 patients with DLRPN, 13 patients with LRPN, and 20 disease control patients were immunostained for intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB). The findings were correlated with histopathology. The pathologic and immunohistochemical alterations of DLRPN and LRPN nerves were indistinguishable. The nerves of both types of LRPN had a significantly greater number of ICAM-1 positive vessels than did the controls (P < 0.01). TNF-alpha expression was seen in Schwann cells and some macrophages of DLRPN and LRPN nerves, whereas IL-6 expression was minimal. There was greater NF-kappaB immunoreactivity in vessels and endoneurial cells of DLRPN and LRPN nerves than of the controls (P < 0.001). NF-kappaB expression correlated with the number of empty nerve strands (P < 0.01) and the frequency of axonal degeneration (P < 0.05), whereas TNF-alpha expression correlated inversely with the number of empty nerve strands of teased fibers (P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that up-regulation of inflammatory mediators target different cells at different disease stages and that these mediators may be sequentially involved in an immune-mediated inflammatory process that is shared by both DLRPN and LRPN. Up-regulated inflammatory mediators may be immunotherapeutic targets in these two conditions.

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy markedly ameliorates muscle weakness and severe pain in proximal diabetic neuropathy

A 57-year-old man with type 2 diabetes mellitus for 10 years showed progressive loss of muscle strength in both legs, pain and muscle atrophy in the femoral region and significant weight loss. On admission, he could not stand alone and used a wheelchair. He also complained of severe pain in the lower extremities. He was diagnosed with proximal diabetic neuropathy (PDN) by characteristic clinical and electrophysiological features. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIg 0.4 g/kg x 5 days) markedly reduced the severe pain and muscle weakness in the legs. Eventually, pain assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale was relieved by 80% and muscle strength was also well recovered, thereby enabling the patient to walk with a cane. The present case suggests that IVIg therapy may be effective for the relief of pain in PDN.

Vasculitic Neuropathies

BACKGROUND

Systemic vasculitis has been classically categorized as a primary disorder, such as polyarteritis nodosa, Churg-Strauss syndrome, and Wegener granulomatous, or as a secondary process, representing a complication from a connective tissue disorder (eg, rheumatoid vasculitis), infection, medication, or malignancy. Peripheral neuropathy is a well-recognized consequence of systemic vasculitis due to peripheral nerve infarction with Wallerian degeneration. Rarely, neuropathy is the sole manifestation of vasculitis, referred to as nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy (NSVN). These conditions are defined pathologically by tissue biopsy demonstrating disruption or destruction of the vessel wall with inflammatory cell infiltrates.

REVIEW SUMMARY

The diagnosis of vasculitic neuropathy is straightforward in patients with an established diagnosis of systemic vasculitis and classic features of mononeuritis multiplex. Most patients have clinical features of a subacute, progressive, generalized but asymmetric, painful, sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Laboratory tests often indicate features of systemic inflammation, such as an elevated sedimentation rate or positive anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, and electrodiagnostic evaluation shows multiple mononeuropathies or a confluent, asymmetric axonal neuropathy. Nerve biopsy is necessary to establish the diagnosis in most cases, particularly in patients with NSVN. This review summarizes the current treatment of vasculitic neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

Long-term immunosuppressive therapy is required in most cases. High-dose prednisone combined with intravenous pulse or oral daily cyclophosphamide is standard initial therapy. In those with NSVN, cyclophosphamide also should be used if prednisone monotherapy is ineffective or the patient relapses with tapering. Other agents, such as azathioprine, methotrexate, intravenous immunoglobulin, mycophenolate mofetil, plasma exchange, and rituximab can be offered to patients who are intolerant or have a contraindication to cyclophosphamide. However, evidence for the benefit of these agents is limited to case reports and small case series.

A case of diabetic amyotrophy with severe atrophy and weakness of shoulder girdle muscles showing good response to intravenous immune globulin

A 45-year-old man with insulin-dependent diabetic mellitus developed progressive asymmetrical weakness and atrophy of both shoulder girdle muscles within 1 year. In the last month, he also developed slight weakness of both thighs. Neuropathology of the sural nerve showed an axonal degeneration and perivascular inflammation and electromyography revealed neurogenic changes. Because of a diagnosis of suspected diabetic amyotrophy, intravenous immunoglobulin was administered. This treatment produced marked improvement. Physicians should take into account the possibility of diabetic amyotrophy in patients with diabetic mellitus showing primary involvement of shoulder girdle muscles marked by weakness and atrophy.

[Neuromuscular biopsy and diagnosis of vasculitis]

One characteristic histological lesion on biopsy specimens is mandatory to establish the diagnosis of vasculitis. Combined nerve and muscle biopsies, by the same cutaneous incision, improve significantly the percentage of positive results. Nerve fragments should be taken in every patient presenting sensory manifestations. Such vasculitic lesions are present in medium-sized arterioles and/or small vessels, and correspond mainly to 4 necrotizing vasculitis: panarteritis nodosa (PAN), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), Churg and Strauss syndrome and Wegener granulomatosis. Microvasculitis should be added to these classical entities, because it corresponds to small vessel wall infiltration by inflammatory cells, as observed in PAN and MPA, but without any necrosis. Microvasculitis has to be differentiated from the inflammatory cell infiltrates surrounding small vessels. However, such perivascular inflammatory cell infiltrates enable the diagnosis of probable vasculitis when associated with clusters of neo-vessels, hemosiderin deposits, or a focal damage of nerve fibers. Grossly, one third of vasculitis diagnosis is confirmed on muscle fragments, a second third on nerve fragments, and the last third on both nerve and muscle fragments. Moreover, in the search for vasculitis, an unpredicted diagnosis of lymphoma or amyloidosis is occasionally established on the neuro-muscular biopsy.

Combined nerve and muscle biopsy in the diagnosis of vasculitic neuropathy. A 16-year retrospective study of 202 cases

We reviewed 202 biopsies performed on patients with suspected vasculitic neuropathy, of which 24 Churg-Strauss cases are studied separately. Specimens from the superficial peroneal nerve and peroneus brevis muscle were taken simultaneously by one incision. Without taking into account constitutional signs, systemic involvement was present in 131 patients, whereas the remaining 47 corresponded to non-systemic patients with lesions limited to peripheral nervous system and adjoining muscles. Diagnosis of panarteritis nodosa or microscopic polyangiitis, according to the size of involved vessels, was attested by an infiltration of vessel walls by inflammatory cells associated with fibrinoid necrosis or sclerosis. Microvasculitis was diagnosed when inflammatory infiltration concerned small vessels with few or no smooth-muscle fibers and without any necrosis. Microvasculitis was present in 11 of 46 non-systemic cases, and this predominance is statistically significant. Isolated perivascular cell infiltrates in the epineurium were considered not significant but allowed the diagnosis of 'probable vasculitis' if associated with at least one of the following features: regenerating small vessels, endoneurial purpura, asymmetric nerve fiber loss, and/or asymmetric acute axonal degeneration. Necrotizing vasculitis was visible in 60 cases: in nerve (16 cases), in muscle (19 cases), and both (25 cases). Microvasculitis was present in 25 cases: in nerve (19 cases), muscle (four cases), or both (two cases). Moreover, granulomatous vasculitis was found in the nerve of one non-systemic patient presenting also sarcoid granulomas in muscle. There were 24 'probable vasculitis' and 68 negative cases. Muscle biopsy improved the yield of definite vasculitis by 27%.

Therapy for vasculitic neuropathies

The term vasculitis refers to a pathologic condition defined by inflammatory cell infiltration and destruction of blood vessels. Systemic vasculitis is classified as primary (eg, polyarteritis nodosa, Churg-Strauss syndrome) or secondary, the latter associated with connective tissue disorders, infections, medications, and rarely, as a paraneoplastic phenomenon. Neuropathy is a common complication of systemic vasculitis and is related to ischemic nerve fiber damage with axon loss. Peripheral neuropathy may be the sole manifestation of vasculitis, a condition termed nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy (NSVN). Treatment of vasculitic neuropathy requires long-term immunosuppressive therapies with potential side effects. The diagnosis of vasculitis should be established by tissue (preferably nerve) biopsy. High-dose prednisone is the standard platform therapy for patients with systemic and NSVN; for those with systemic vasculitis, at least 3 to 12 months of treatment with cyclophosphamide (monthly intravenous pulse or daily oral therapy) is also necessary to sustain remission and allow successful prednisone tapering. The use of cyclophosphamide in patients with NSVN is controversial, but recent retrospective data suggest that those treated with prednisone and cyclophosphamide from the outset fare better than those initially treated only with prednisone. If prednisone is administered as monotherapy, cyclophosphamide should be added after several months if there is no improvement or relapse occurs with tapering of prednisone. Intravenous pulse and daily oral cyclophosphamide probably offer similar efficacy, although the risk of complications is greater with oral therapy. Azathioprine can be safely substituted for cyclophosphamide after 3 months without an increased relapse rate. Azathioprine, methotrexate, intravenous immune globulin, mycophenolate mofetil, plasma exchange, and rituximab can be offered to patients who are intolerant or have a contraindication to cyclophosphamide. However, efficacy is unproven for any of these therapies. Interferon-alpha, sometimes combined with plasma exchange, is used to treat vasculitis associated with hepatitis B infection. Some patients also may improve with corticosteroids. The classification of diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy as a vasculitic disorder remains controversial. However, there is compelling pathological evidence that this condition represents a T-cell-mediated microvasculitis. Some patients treated with intravenous corticosteroids may have greater recovery and improved pain control.

Inflammation and wound healing: the role of bacteria in the immuno-regulation of wound healing

Wound healing is a sequence of complex events, an imbalance of which can result in a failure of the wound to heal, with significant implications for patients and health care services alike. Although the exact mechanism that underlies these events is not fully understood, inflammatory processes and the innate immune system play a vital role, not only in normal wound healing but also in the pathophysiology of delayed wound healing. These defense mechanisms are affected by underlying disease states and medical conditions, for example, diabetes, venous insufficiency, and the inflammation associated with acute trauma. Importantly, however, these processes are also modulated in health by bacteria within the wound. This article examines the role of the mediators of inflammation involved in the wound-healing process and discusses the function of these mediators when normal healing fails. The reaction of the wound to bacterial contamination and the effect of bacteria on wound healing are also discussed.

Pulsed methylprednisolone is a safe and effective treatment for diabetic amyotrophy

There is evidence that diabetic amyotrophy is caused by a microvasculitis of the vasa nervorum. We compared the outcome of patients treated with pulsed methylprednisolone to the published natural history of diabetic amyotrophy and assessed the safety of this treatment in patients with diabetes. We retrospectively reviewed the case records of 10 episodes of diabetic amyotrophy in 9 patients treated with pulsed oral or intravenous methylprednisolone. In 6 episodes there was marked improvement in pain within days of starting treatment. Strength improved more slowly but faster than the natural history of the disease. Treatment started within 2 months of symptom onset was associated with rapid improvement in pain; and very early treatment, started within 4 weeks of symptom onset, resulted in rapid improvement of both strength and pain. Blood glucose increased on treatment days but no patient required lasting changes in diabetic treatment as the result of this therapy and no other serious adverse effects were seen. We conclude that pulsed methylprednisolone appears to be a safe and effective treatment for diabetic amyotrophy.

Diabetic thoracic radiculopathy: an unusual cause of post-thoracotomy pain

Persistent pain is common following thoracotomy. A 64-year-old retired electrician with Type 2 diabetes presented with chest wall and abdominal pain 3 months following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Postoperatively the patient had suffered pain despite a functioning thoracic epidural catheter. Following investigation, his persistent pain was due to diabetic thoracic radiculopathy (DTR). The disorder is characterized by pain, sensory loss, abdominal and thoracic muscle weakness in patients with diabetes. As in this patient, the pain and sensory loss usually resolve within one year after onset. The disorder may be distinguished from intercostal neuralgia based upon clinical and electromyographic features.

Focal and multifocal neuropathies

The focal and multifocal neuropathies affect only a minority of patients with diabetes; however, they form a major clinical problem in terms of diagnosis, development of significant symptoms and signs, and often inadequate therapy. Diagnosis requires accurate and detailed clinical history and neurologic examination combined with targeted neurophysiologic tests, which differ considerably from those carried out in day-to-day practice. Because of their relatively infrequent occurrence, treatment is not evidence based.

Diabetic and nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathies: new insights into pathophysiology and treatment

Diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (DLRPN) (also called diabetic amyotrophy) is a well-recognized subacute, painful, asymmetric lower-limb neuropathy that is associated with weight loss and type II diabetes mellitus. Nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (LRPN) has received less attention. Comparison of large cohorts with DLRPN and LRPN demonstrated that age at onset, course, type and distribution of symptoms and impairments, laboratory findings, and outcomes are similar. Both conditions are lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathies that are associated with weight loss and begin focally with pain but that evolve into widespread, bilateral paralytic disorders. Although both are monophasic illnesses, patients have prolonged morbidity from pain and weakness, and many patients become wheelchair-dependent. Although motor-predominant, there is unequivocal evidence that autonomic and sensory nerves are also involved. Cutaneous nerves from patients with DLRPN and LRPN show pathological evidence of ischemic injury (multifocal fiber loss, perineurial thickening and degeneration, neovascularization, microfasciculation, and swollen axons with accumulated organelles) and microvasculitis (mural and perivascular inflammation, separation and fragmentation of mural smooth muscle layers of microvessels and hemosiderin-laden macrophages). Controlled trials with immune-modulating therapies in DLRPN are in progress, and preliminary data suggest that such therapy may be beneficial in LRPN. It is likely that DLRPN and LRPN are immune-mediated neuropathies that should be separated from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and from systemic necrotizing vasculitis.

Vasculitic neuropathies

Vasculitis typically affects the 50- to 400-micron vessels of the vasa nervorum, leading to randomly distributed ischemia along the course of the nerve. This, in turn, leads to a distinctive picture, multiple mononeuropathy, as a frequent but not invariant clinical consequence of vasculitis. The diagnosis of vasculitic neuropathy is usually made by biopsy histologic confirmation. The response to treatment varies among different vasculitides; vasculitis restricted to the peripheral nervous system is often especially responsive.