Atypical Presentation of Amniotic Fluid Embolism

Amniotic fluid embolism: the known and not known

Amniotic fluid embolism was first recognized in 1926, in a Brazilian journal case report, on the basis of large amounts of fetal material in the maternal pulmonary vasculature at autopsy. The first English language description appeared in 1941 and consisted of eight parturients dying suddenly in which, once again, fetal material was seen in the pulmonary vasculature. A control group of 34 pregnant women dying of other recognized causes did not have fetal material in their lungs. The incidence of recognized, serious illness is on the order of two to eight per 100,000, with a mortality rate ranging from 13% to 35%. The diagnosis rests largely on one or more of four clinical signs: circulatory collapse, respiratory distress, coagulopathy, and seizures/ coma. The only confirmatory laboratory test remains autopsy findings although serum tests for fetal antigen, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, and complement are currently being investigated. One of the paradoxes of diagnosis is that fetal material in the pulmonary circulation at autopsy is specific for amniotic fluid embolism, while the same finding in the living is not. The mechanism of disease remains uncertain although the best available evidence suggests that complement activation might have a role. In contrast, mast cell degranulation probably is not a mechanism, so amniotic fluid embolism is not an anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reaction as has been occasionally suggested. Perhaps the greatest unknown is not why 1 in 50,000 pregnant women develop what appears to be an immune response to their fetus, but rather why the other 49,999 do not?

Amniotic fluid embolism: an evidence-based review

We conducted an evidence-based review of information about [corrected] amniotic fluid embolism (AFE). The estimated incidence of AFE is 1:15,200 and 1:53,800 deliveries in North America and Europe, respectively. The case fatality rate and perinatal mortality associated with AFE are 13-30% and 9-44%, respectively. Risk factors associated with an [corrected] increased risk of AFE include advanced maternal age, placental abnormalities, operative deliveries, eclampsia, polyhydramnios, cervical lacerations, [corrected] and uterine rupture. The hemodynamic response in [corrected] AFE is biphasic, with initial pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure, followed by left ventricular failure. Promising therapies include selective pulmonary vasodilators and recombinant activated factor VIIa. Important topics for future research are presented.

Responding to amniotic fluid embolism

Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE), an uncommon disorder with a high fatality rate, is an obstetric emergency that requires swift recognition and intervention to save both the mother's life and that of her child.The high mortality rate and varying theories as to its cause make it difficult to diagnose AFE, which can occur at any point during labor and delivery, including during cesarean birth. These factors make it important for perioperative nurses to understand and recognize AFE when it occurs in the OR. Rapid delivery of the fetus is imperative for the survival of both mother and child. Monitoring and aggressively providing respiratory and circulatory support interventions are required if the mother is to survive AFE.

Amniotic fluid embolus: a review of the literature

PURPOSE

To review the literature since 1979 to determine the natural history, etiology, diagnosis and potential treatment of amniotic fluid embolus (AFE).

SOURCE

English language articles and books published between June 1976 and June 1998 were identified by a computerized medline search using the title or text word amniotic fluid embolus. This same search strategy was repeated and updated to October 1999 by an independent individual using both Medline and Embase. The search was also expanded to include Science Citation Index listing Morgan's 1979 review article. All relevant publications were retrieved and their bibliographies were scanned for additional sources.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Randomized controlled trials are not possible with amniotic fluid emboli. The majority of the literature consists of clinical reports combined with occasional limited reviews. Knowledge obtained from these reports suggests that amniotic fluid emboli present as a spectrum of disease that ranges from a subclinical entity to one that is rapidly fatal. Because cases are sporadic and the diagnosis is often unconfirmed, little progress has been made towards understanding its etiology or defining the risk factors. Present management is empirical and directed towards the maintenance of oxygenation, circulatory support and the correction of coagulopathy.

CONCLUSION

Amniotic fluid embolus continues to be a life-threatening but potentially reversible complication unique to pregnancy. It cannot be predicted nor prevented. Review of the literature reveals that there are no standardized investigational methods or protocols to confirm the diagnosis in suspected cases.

Amniotic fluid embolism and isolated disseminated intravascular coagulation

PURPOSE

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a well-known complication of an amniotic fluid embolus. However, clinical experience has shown that, in some patients, clinical hemorrhage may be the initial presentation. Mortality in this subset of patients is high. This report describes a patient with a suspected amniotic fluid embolus who survived and in whom the initial presentation was post partum hemorrhage.

CLINICAL FEATURES

During the post delivery repair of a fourth degree perineal tear a 29 yr old prima gravida was noted to have excessive vaginal bleeding despite a well contracted uterus. Laboratory investigations revealed a decrease in hemoglobin from 126 g x l(-1) to 86 g x l(-1) and a severe disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (PT 27.5 sec, APPT 149 sec, direct fibrinogen < 0.6 g x l(-1), FDP > 640 g x l(-1)). Treatment included massive blood component therapy and, eventually, total abdominal hysterectomy. The patient subsequently recovered without sequelae. In the absence of any other explanation, the coagulopathy was considered to be secondary to amniotic fluid embolus.

CONCLUSION

Amniotic fluid embolus remains an important cause of maternal mortality. Clinical reports, reviews of the literature, and the development of the national registry have all contributed to our understanding of this syndrome. Contrary to earlier beliefs, not all patients present with sudden cardiorespiratory collapse. As the present case illustrates, a less common presentation is the development of an isolated DIC in the peripartum period without antecedent hemodynamic or respiratory instability. Therefore, anesthesiologists must maintain a high index of suspicion for the disorder in order to facilitate early recognition and treatment.