Respiratory System Mechanics During Low Versus High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Open Abdominal Surgery: A Substudy of PROVHILO Randomized Controlled Trial

Respiratory mechanics and mechanical power during low vs. high positive end-expiratory pressure in obese surgical patients - A sub-study of the PROBESE randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We aimed to characterize intra-operative mechanical ventilation with low or high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment manoeuvres (RM) regarding intra-tidal recruitment/derecruitment and overdistension using non-linear respiratory mechanics, and mechanical power in obese surgical patients enrolled in the PROBESE trial.

DESIGN

Prospective, two-centre substudy of the international, multicentre, two-arm, randomized-controlled PROBESE trial.

SETTING

Operating rooms of two European University Hospitals.

PATIENTS

Forty-eight adult obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Intra-operative protective ventilation with either PEEP of 12 cmH2O and repeated RM (HighPEEP+RM) or 4 cmH2O without RM (LowPEEP).

MEASUREMENTS

The index of intra-tidal recruitment/de-recruitment and overdistension (%E2) as well as airway pressure, tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate (RR), resistance, elastance, and mechanical power (MP) were calculated from respiratory signals recorded after anesthesia induction, 1 h thereafter, and end of surgery (EOS).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were analyzed in each group. PEEP was higher (mean ± SD, 11.7 ± 0.4 vs. 3.7 ± 0.6 cmH2O, P < 0.001) and driving pressure lower (12.8 ± 3.5 vs. 21.7 ± 6.8 cmH2O, P < 0.001) during HighPEEP+RM than LowPEEP, while VT and RR did not differ significantly (7.3 ± 0.6 vs. 7.4 ± 0.8 ml∙kg-1, P = 0.835; and 14.6 ± 2.5 vs. 15.7 ± 2.0 min-1, P = 0.150, respectively). %E2 was higher in HighPEEP+RM than in LowPEEP following induction (-3.1 ± 7.2 vs. -12.4 ± 10.2%; P < 0.001) and subsequent timepoints. Total resistance and elastance (13.3 ± 3.8 vs. 17.7 ± 6.8 cmH2O∙l∙s-2, P = 0.009; and 15.7 ± 5.5 vs. 28.5 ± 8.4 cmH2O∙l, P < 0.001, respectively) were lower during HighPEEP+RM than LowPEEP. Additionally, MP was lower in HighPEEP+RM than LowPEEP group (5.0 ± 2.2 vs. 10.4 ± 4.7 J∙min-1, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this sub-cohort of PROBESE, intra-operative ventilation with high PEEP and RM reduced intra-tidal recruitment/de-recruitment as well as driving pressure, elastance, resistance, and mechanical power, as compared with low PEEP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The PROBESE study was registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov, identifier: NCT02148692 (submission for registration on May 23, 2014).

Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Rhinoplasty Surgery; Risks and Benefits

Aims

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) on surgical field bleeding and its respiratory and hemodynamic consequences in rhinoplasty surgeries.

Materials and methods

This single-blind clinical trial performed in Amir Al-Momenin university Hospital in 2018. Seventy cases of rhinoplasty surgery patients Enrolled and were randomized into two groups; intervention (PEEP = 5) and comparison group (PEEP = 0). Surgical field bleeding and arterial oxygen saturation pulmonary dynamics and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated during operation and in post anesthesia care unit. Data were analyzed by SPSS software using descriptive and analytical statistics.

Results

PEEP applying had no negative effect on surgical bleeding as well as surgeon satisfaction, heart rate and blood pressure were similar in two groups. Pulmonary dynamics and oxygenation were stable and within normal values in all cases. The mean peak airway pressure was 17.87 ± 2.24 in the PEEP group and 16.08 ± 3.37 in the ZEEP group (P = 0.029).

Conclusion

applying low level PEEP during anesthesia improved recovery oxygen saturation but had no negative effects on the patient`s hemodynamics, and did not aggravate bleeding and visual clarity.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03854-7.

Effect of individualized PEEP titration by ultrasonography on perioperative pulmonary protection and postoperative cognitive function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of the individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) lung protection ventilation strategy by combining driving pressure (ΔP) and pulmonary ultrasound (LUS)-based titration on lung function and postoperative cognitive function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

A total of 108 patients with COPD undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery under general anesthesia were included in this study. They were randomly divided into three groups (n = 36): traditional volume ventilation group (Group C), fixed PEEP 5 cmH₂O group (Group P), and ΔP combined with LUS-based PEEP titration in the resuscitation room group (Group T). All three groups were given volume ventilation mode, I:E = 1:2; In group C, VT was 10 mL/kg and PEEP was 0 cmH₂O; In groups P and T, VT was 6 mL/kg and PEEP was 5 cmH₂O; After mechanical ventilation for 15 min in Group T, ΔP in combination with LUS was used to titrate PEEP. The oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), airway platform pressure (Pplat), dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and venous interleukin-6(IL-6) were recorded at the corresponding time points, and the final PEEP value in Group T was recorded.

RESULTS

The final PEEP value of Group T was (6.4 ± 1.2) cmH₂O; Compared with groups C and P: PaO₂/FiO₂ and Cdyn in Group T were significantly increased (P < 0.05) and value of IL-6 was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) at the corresponding time points. Compared with group C, the MoCA score on day 7 after surgery in Group T was significantly higher (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the traditional ventilation strategy, the individualized ΔP combined with LUS-based PEEP titration in patients with COPD during the perioperative period of laparoscopic surgery can play a better role in lung protection and can improve postoperative cognitive function.

Lung-protective ventilation during Trendelenburg pneumoperitoneum surgery: A randomized clinical trial

Study objective To assess the effects of a protective ventilation strategy during Trendelenburg pneumoperitoneum surgery on postoperative oxygenation.

DESIGNS

Parallel-group, randomized trial.

SETTING

Operating room of a university hospital, Italy.

PATIENTS

Morbidly obese patients undergoing Trendelenburg pneumoperitoneum gynaecological surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to standard (SV: tidal volume = 10 ml/kg of predicted body weight, PEEP = 5 cmH₂O) or protective (PV: tidal volume = 6 ml/kg of predicted body weight, PEEP = 10 cmH₂O, recruitment maneuvers) ventilation during anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcome was PaO₂/FiO₂ one hour after extubation. Secondary outcomes included day-1 PaO₂/FiO₂, day-2 respiratory function and intraoperative respiratory/lung mechanics, assessed through esophageal manometry, end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) measurement and pressure-volume curves.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty patients were analyzed (31 in SV group, 29 in PV group). Median [IqR] tidal volume was 350 ml [300-360] in PV group and 525 [500-575] in SV group. Median PaO₂/FiO₂ one hour after extubation was 280 mmHg [246-364] in PV group vs. 298 [250-343] in SV group (p = 0.64). Day-1 PaO₂/FiO_2, day-2 forced vital capacity, FEV-1 and Tiffenau Index were not different between groups (all p > 0.10). Intraoperatively, 59% of patients showed complete airway closure during pneumoperitoneum, without difference between groups: median airway opening pressure was 17 cmH₂O. In PV group, airway and transpulmonary driving pressure were lower (12 ± 5 cmH₂O vs. 17 ± 7, p < 0.001; 9 ± 4 vs. 13 ± 7, p < 0.001), PaCO₂ and respiratory rate were higher (48 ± 8 mmHg vs. 42 ± 12, p < 0.001; 23 ± 5 breaths/min vs. 16 ± 4, p < 0.001). Intraoperative EELV was similar between PV and SV group (1193 ± 258 ml vs. 1207 ± 368, p = 0.80); ratio of tidal volume to EELV was lower in PV group (0.45 ± 0.12 vs. 0.32 ± 0.09, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In obese patients undergoing Trendelenburg pneumoperitoneum surgery, PV did not improve postoperative oxygenation nor day-2 respiratory function. PV was associated with intraoperative respiratory mechanics indicating less injurious ventilation. The high prevalence of complete airway closure may have affected study results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospectively registered on http://clinicaltrials.govNCT03157479 on May 17th, 2017.

Non-invasive over-distension measurements: data driven vs model-based

Clinical measurements offer bedside monitoring aiming to minimise unintended over-distension, but have limitations and cannot be predicted for changes in mechanical ventilation (MV) settings and are only available in certain MV modes. This study introduces a non-invasive, real-time over-distension measurement, which is robust, predictable, and more intuitive than current methods. The proposed over-distension measurement, denoted as OD, is compared with the clinically proven stress index (SI). Correlation is analysed via R² and Spearman r_s. The OD safe range corresponding to the unit-less SI safe range (0.95-1.05) is calibrated by sensitivity and specificity test. Validation is fulfilled with 19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients data (196 cases), including assessment across ARDS severity. Overall correlation between OD and SI yielded R² = 0.76 and Spearman r_s = 0.89. Correlation is higher considering only moderate and severe ARDS patients. Calibration of OD to SI yields a safe range defined: 0 ≤ OD ≤ 0.8 cmH₂O. The proposed OD offers an efficient, general, real-time measurement of patient-specific lung mechanics, which is more intuitive and robust than SI. OD eliminates the limitations of SI in MV mode and its less intuitive lung status value. Finally, OD can be accurately predicted for new ventilator settings via its foundation in a validated predictive personalized lung mechanics model. Therefore, OD offers potential clinical value over current clinical methods.

Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure titration on respiration and circulation in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery in prone position under general anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration on intraoperative respiration and circulation in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery in prone position under general anesthesia.

METHODS

We prospectively selected 80 elderly patients (39 males and 41 females) aged over 65 years old, at American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade II or III, who underwent elective prone spinal surgery under general anesthesia, for this study. These patients were randomly divided into titration group and control group, with 40 cases in each group. PEEP of the titration group was increased from 0 to 20 cmH₂O by steps of 2 cmH₂O. For the control group, PEEP was constantly at 5 cmH₂O and ventilation was maintained throughout the surgery. Dynamic pulmonary compliance (Cdyn) measurements were recorded when each PEEP level was kept for 1 min during titration, and individualized PEEP was determined by maximal Cdyn. MAP (mean arterial pressure), heart rate (HR), and CVP (Central venous pressure) were recorded at the set of prone position (T₀), PEEP ventilation for 10 min (T₁), 30 min (T₂), 60 min (T₃), end of surgery (T₄), and 20 min after extubation (T₅). Mean airway pressure (Pmean) and Cdyn were recorded from T₀ to T₄. Blood gas analysis was performed from T₀ to T₅ to calculate intrapulmonary shunt fraction (Qs/Qt) and OI (PaO₂/FiO₂). The rate of phenylephrine use during mechanical ventilation and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

The individualized PEEP obtained by titration for 1 min in the titration group was (12.38±2.67) cmH₂O, which was significantly higher than the 5 cmH₂O in constant PEEP of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in MAP, HR, and CVP between the two groups at different time points, and no significant difference was noted in Pmean between the two groups from T₀ to T₄ (all P>0.05). From T₂ to T₄, Cdyn was significantly higher, and Qs/Qt was lower in the titration group than those in the control group (all P<0.05). From T₂ to T₅, the OI in the titration group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The rate of phenylephrine use was significantly higher in the titration group than that in the control group (10 patients (25%) vs. 3 patients (8%), P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the titration group was significantly lower than that in the control group (2 cases (5%) vs. 8 cases (20%), P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with a constant PEEP of 5 cmH₂O, intraoperative individualized PEEP titration in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery in prone position can improve oxygenation, reduce intrapulmonary shunt and postoperative pulmonary complications. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registration number ChiCTR2000040722, https://www.chictr.org.cn).

Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure following alveolar recruitment manoeuvres in lung-healthy anaesthetized dogs: a randomized clinical trial on early postoperative arterial oxygenation

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the effect of intraoperative stepwise alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARMs), followed by individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), defined as PEEP at maximal respiratory system compliance + 2 cmH₂O (PEEP_maxCrs+2), with that of spontaneous ventilation (SV) and controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) without ARM or PEEP on early postoperative arterial oxygenation in anaesthetized healthy dogs.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, nonblinded clinical study.

ANIMALS

A total of 32 healthy client-owned dogs undergoing surgery in dorsal recumbency.

METHODS

Dogs were ventilated intraoperatively (inspired oxygen fraction: 0.5) with one of the following strategies: SV, CMV alone, and CMV with PEEP_maxCrs+2 following a single ARM (ARM1) or two ARMs (ARM2, the second ARM at the end of surgery). Arterial blood gas analyses were performed before starting the ventilatory strategy, at the end of surgery, and at 5, 10, 15, 30 and 60 minutes after extubation while breathing room air. Data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests (p < 0.050).

RESULTS

At any time point after extubation, PaO₂ was not significantly different between groups. At 5 minutes after extubation, PaO₂ was 95.1 (78.1-104.0), 93.8 (88.3-104.0), 96.9 (86.6-115.0) and 89.1 (87.6-102.0) mmHg in the SV, CMV, ARM1 and ARM2 groups, respectively. PaO₂ decreased at 30 minutes after extubation in the CMV, ARM1 and ARM2 groups (p < 0.050), but it did not decrease after 30 minutes in the SV group. Moderate hypoxaemia (PaO₂, 60-80 mmHg) was observed in one dog in the ARM1 group and two dogs each in the SV and ARM2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Intraoperative ARMs, followed by PEEP_maxCrs+2, did not improve early postoperative arterial oxygenation compared with SV or CMV alone in healthy anaesthetized dogs. Therefore, this ventilatory strategy might not be clinically advantageous for improving postoperative arterial oxygenation in healthy dogs undergoing surgery when positioned in dorsal recumbency.

Effects of two stepwise lung recruitment strategies on respiratory function and haemodynamics in anaesthetised pigs: A randomised crossover study

BACKGROUND

Lung recruitment manoeuvres and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can improve lung function during general anaesthesia. Different recruitment manoeuvre strategies have been described in large international trials: in the protective ventilation using high vs. low PEEP (PROVHILO) strategy, tidal volume (VT) was increased during volume-controlled ventilation; in the individualised peri-operative open-lung approach vs. standard protective ventilation in abdominal surgery (iPROVE) strategy, PEEP was increased during pressure-controlled ventilation.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of the PROVHILO strategy and the iPROVE strategy on respiratory and haemodynamic variables.

DESIGN

Randomised crossover study.

SETTING

University hospital research facility.

ANIMALS

A total of 20 juvenile anaesthetised pigs.

INTERVENTIONS

Animals were assigned randomly to one of two sequences: PROVHILO strategy followed by iPROVE strategy or vice-versa (n = 10/sequence). In the PROVHILO strategy, VT was increased stepwise by 4 ml kg-1 at a fixed PEEP of 12 cmH2O until a plateau pressure of 30 to 35 cmH2O was reached. In the iPROVE strategy, at fixed driving pressure of 20 cmH2O, PEEP was increased up to 20 cmH2O followed by PEEP titration according to the lowest elastance of the respiratory system (ERS).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We assessed regional transpulmonary pressure (Ptrans), respiratory system mechanics, gas exchange and haemodynamics, as well as the centre of ventilation (CoV) by electrical impedance tomography.

RESULTS

During recruitment manoeuvres with the PROVHILO strategy compared with the iPROV strategy, dorsal Ptrans was lower at end-inspiration (16.3 ± 2.7 vs. 18.6 ± 3.1 cmH2O, P = 0.001) and end-expiration (4.8 ± 2.6 vs. 8.8 ± 3.4 cmH2O, P  < 0.001), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was higher (77 ± 11 vs. 60 ± 14 mmHg, P < 0.001). At 1 and 15 min after recruitment manoeuvres, ERS was higher in the PROVHILO strategy than the iPROVE strategy (24.6 ± 3.9 vs. 21.5 ± 3.4 and 26.7 ± 4.3 vs. 24.0 ± 3.8 cmH2O l-1; P  < 0.001, respectively). At 1 min, PaO2 was lower in PROVHILO compared with iPROVE strategy (57.1 ± 6.1 vs. 59.3 ± 5.1 kPa, P = 0.013), but at 15 min, values did not differ. CoV did not differ between strategies.

CONCLUSION

In anaesthetised pigs, the iPROVE strategy compared with the PROVHILO strategy increased dorsal Ptrans at the cost of lower MAP during recruitment manoeuvres, and decreased ERS thereafter, without consistent improvement of oxygenation or shift of the CoV.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered and approved by the Landesdirektion Dresden, Germany (DD24-5131/338/28).

Perioperative Open-lung Approach, Regional Ventilation, and Lung Injury in Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

In the Protective Ventilation in Cardiac Surgery (PROVECS) randomized, controlled trial, an open-lung ventilation strategy did not improve postoperative respiratory outcomes after on-pump cardiac surgery. In this prespecified subanalysis, the authors aimed to assess the regional distribution of ventilation and plasma biomarkers of lung epithelial and endothelial injury produced by that strategy.

METHODS

Perioperative open-lung ventilation consisted of recruitment maneuvers, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) = 8 cm H2O, and low-tidal volume ventilation including during cardiopulmonary bypass. Control ventilation strategy was a low-PEEP (2 cm H2O) low-tidal volume approach. Electrical impedance tomography was used serially throughout the perioperative period (n = 56) to compute the dorsal fraction of ventilation (defined as the ratio of dorsal tidal impedance variation to global tidal impedance variation). Lung injury was assessed serially using biomarkers of epithelial (soluble form of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products, sRAGE) and endothelial (angiopoietin-2) lung injury (n = 30).

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients (age = 64 ± 12 yr; EuroSCORE II = 1.65 ± 1.57%) undergoing elective on-pump cardiac surgery were studied. Induction of general anesthesia was associated with ventral redistribution of tidal volumes and higher dorsal fraction of ventilation in the open-lung than the control strategy (0.38 ± 0.07 vs. 0.30 ± 0.10; P = 0.004). No effect of the open-lung strategy on the dorsal fraction of ventilation was noted at the end of surgery after median sternotomy closure (open-lung = 0.37 ± 0.09 vs. control = 0.34 ± 0.11; P = 0.743) or in extubated patients at postoperative day 2 (open-lung = 0.63 ± 0.18 vs. control = 0.59 ± 0.11; P > 0.999). Open-lung ventilation was associated with increased intraoperative plasma sRAGE (7,677 ± 3,097 pg/ml vs. 6,125 ± 1,400 pg/ml; P = 0.037) and had no effect on angiopoietin-2 (P > 0.999).

CONCLUSIONS

In cardiac surgery patients, open-lung ventilation provided larger dorsal lung ventilation early during surgery without a maintained benefit as compared with controls at the end of surgery and postoperative day 2 and was associated with higher intraoperative plasma concentration of sRAGE suggesting lung overdistension.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Dependency of respiratory system mechanics on positive end-expiratory pressure and recruitment maneuvers in lung healthy pediatric patients-A randomized crossover study

BACKGROUND

The lungs of pediatric patients are subjected to tidal derecruitment during mechanical ventilation and in contrast to adult patients this unfavorable condition cannot be resolved with small c increases. This raises the question if higher end-expiratory pressure increases or recruitment maneuvers may resolve tidal derecruitment in pediatric patients.

AIMS

We hypothesized that higher PEEP resolves tidal derecruitment in pediatric patients and that recruitment maneuvers between the pressure changes support the improvement of respiratory system mechanics.

METHODS

The effects of end-expiratory pressure changes from 3 to 7 cmH₂ O and vice versa without and with intermediate recruitment maneuvers on respiratory system mechanics and regional ventilation were investigated in 57 mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. The intratidal respiratory system compliance was determined from volume and pressure data before and after PEEP changes and categorized to indicate tidal derecruitment.

RESULTS

Tidal derecruitment occurred comparably frequently at PEEP 3 cmH₂ O without (13 out of 14 cases) and with recruitment maneuver (14 out of 14 cases) and at PEEP 7 cmH₂ O without (13 out of 14 cases) and with recruitment maneuver (13 out of 15 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that contrary to our hypothesis, PEEP up to 7 cmH₂ O is not sufficient to resolve tidal derecruitment and that recruitment maneuvers may be dispensable in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients.

Comparative effects of open-lung positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and fixed PEEP on respiratory system compliance in the isoflurane anaesthetised healthy dog

This study was performed to assess the effects of open-lung positive end-expiratory pressure (OL-PEEP) following stepwise recruitment manoeuvre (RM) and those of a fixed PEEP of 5 cm H₂O without previous RM on respiratory system compliance (Crs) and selected cardiovascular variables in healthy dogs under general anaesthesia. Forty-five healthy client-owned dogs undergoing surgery were anaesthetised and mechanically ventilated (tidal volume, VT = 10-12 mL/kg; PEEP = 0 cm H₂O) for 1 min (baseline) and randomly allocated into zero positive end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP), PEEP (5 cm H₂O) and OL-PEEP treatment groups. In the OL-PEEP group, a stepwise RM was performed and the individual OL-PEEP was subsequently applied. The Crs, heart rate (HR) and non-invasive mean arterial pressure (NIMAP) were registered at baseline and then every 10 min during 60 min. In the ZEEP group, Crs decreased from baseline. In the PEEP group, Crs was not different from either baseline or ZEEP group values. In the OL-PEEP group, Crs was higher than both baseline and ZEEP group values at all time points as well as of those in the PEEP group during at least 20 min after RM. There were no differences for HR and NIMAP between groups. A clinically relevant hypotension following RM was observed in 40% of dogs. Therefore, an individually set OL-PEEP following stepwise RM improved Crs in anaesthetised healthy dogs, although transient but clinically relevant hypotension was observed during RM in some dogs. Fixed PEEP of 5 cm H₂O without previous RM did not improve Crs, although it prevented it from decreasing.

Effect of open-lung vs conventional perioperative ventilation strategies on postoperative pulmonary complications after on-pump cardiac surgery: the PROVECS randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether a perioperative open-lung ventilation strategy prevents postoperative pulmonary complications after elective on-pump cardiac surgery.

METHODS

In a pragmatic, randomized, multicenter, controlled trial, we assigned patients planned for on-pump cardiac surgery to either a conventional ventilation strategy with no ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and lower perioperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels (2 cm H₂O) or an open-lung ventilation strategy that included maintaining ventilation during CPB along with perioperative recruitment maneuvers and higher PEEP levels (8 cm H₂O). All study patients were ventilated with low-tidal volumes before and after CPB (6 to 8 ml/kg of predicted body weight). The primary end point was a composite of pulmonary complications occurring within the first 7 postoperative days.

RESULTS

Among 493 randomized patients, 488 completed the study (mean age, 65.7 years; 360 (73.7%) men; 230 (47.1%) underwent isolated valve surgery). Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 133 of 243 patients (54.7%) assigned to open-lung ventilation and in 145 of 245 patients (59.2%) assigned to conventional ventilation (p = 0.32). Open-lung ventilation did not significantly reduce the use of high-flow nasal oxygenotherapy (8.6% vs 9.4%; p = 0.77), non-invasive ventilation (13.2% vs 15.5%; p = 0.46) or new invasive mechanical ventilation (0.8% vs 2.4%, p = 0.28). Mean alive ICU-free days at postoperative day 7 was 4.4 ± 1.3 days in the open-lung group vs 4.3 ± 1.3 days in the conventional group (mean difference, 0.1 ± 0.1 day, p = 0.51). Extra-pulmonary complications and adverse events did not significantly differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A perioperative open-lung ventilation including ventilation during CPB does not reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications as compared with usual care. This finding does not support the use of such a strategy in patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02866578. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02866578.

Imaging the Injured Lung: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Use

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) consists of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure characterized by massive and heterogeneously distributed loss of lung aeration caused by diffuse inflammation and edema present in interstitial and alveolar spaces. It is defined by consensus criteria, which include diffuse infiltrates on chest imaging-either plain radiography or computed tomography. This review will summarize how imaging sciences can inform modern respiratory management of ARDS and continue to increase the understanding of the acutely injured lung. This review also describes newer imaging methodologies that are likely to inform future clinical decision-making and potentially improve outcome. For each imaging modality, this review systematically describes the underlying principles, technology involved, measurements obtained, insights gained by the technique, emerging approaches, limitations, and future developments. Finally, integrated approaches are considered whereby multimodal imaging may impact management of ARDS.

Should we titrate ventilation based on driving pressure? Maybe not in the way we would expect

Mechanical ventilation maintains adequate gas exchange in patients during general anaesthesia, as well as in critically ill patients without and with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Optimization of mechanical ventilation is important to minimize ventilator induced lung injury and improve outcome. Tidal volume (V_T), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), respiratory rate (RR), plateau pressures as well as inspiratory oxygen are the main parameters to set mechanical ventilation. Recently, the driving pressure (∆P), i.e., the difference of the plateau pressure and end-expiratory pressure of the respiratory system or of the lung, has been proposed as a key role parameter to optimize mechanical ventilation parameters. The ∆P depends on the V_T as well as on the relative balance between the amount of aerated and/or overinflated lung at end-expiration and end-inspiration at different levels of PEEP. During surgery, higher ∆P, mainly due to V_T, was progressively associated with an increased risk to develop post-operative pulmonary complications; in two large randomized controlled trials the reduction in ∆P by PEEP did not result in better outcome. In non-ARDS patients, ∆P was not found even associated with morbidity and mortality. In ARDS patients, an association between ∆P (higher than 13-15 cmH₂O) and mortality has been reported. In several randomized controlled trials, when ∆P was minimized by the use of higher PEEP with or without recruitment manoeuvres, this strategy resulted in equal or even higher mortality. No clear data are currently available about the interpretation and clinical use of ∆P during assisted ventilation. In conclusion, ∆P is an indicator of severity of the lung disease, is related to V_T size and associated with complications and mortality. We advocate the use of ∆P to optimize individually V_T but not PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients with and without ARDS.

Respiratory mechanics during general anaesthesia

Intraoperative mechanical ventilation is mandatory during many surgical procedures. Knowledge in this field has been widely derived from the experience in the treatment of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the intensive care unit. However, also in surgical patients without lung injury, mechanical ventilation settings affect the clinical outcome, and in particular the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). A deep understanding of respiratory physiology is mandatory for the clinician, in order to tailor ventilation settings based on the specific characteristics of each patient. In this paper we will discuss the basis of lung physiology applied to the mechanical ventilation in the operating room. The role of compliance, tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), plateau pressure, driving pressure, stress index, mechanical power and other ventilator-derived parameters will be discussed. The above-mentioned physiological parameters are easy to measure and can guide the clinician to assess and titrate mechanical ventilation parameters, but the clinical impact of guiding mechanical ventilation based on these parameters has yet to be determined.

Lung volumes, respiratory mechanics and dynamic strain during general anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

Driving pressure (ΔP) represents tidal volume normalised to respiratory system compliance (C_RS) and is a novel parameter to target ventilator settings. We conducted a study to determine whether C_RS and ΔP reflect aerated lung volume and dynamic strain during general anaesthesia.

METHODS

Twenty non-obese patients undergoing open abdominal surgery received three PEEP levels (2, 7, or 12 cm H₂O) in random order with constant tidal volume ventilation. Respiratory mechanics, lung volumes, and alveolar recruitment were measured to assess end-expiratory aerated volume, which was compared with the patient's individual predicted functional residual capacity in supine position (FRCp).

RESULTS

C_RS was linearly related to aerated volume and ΔP to dynamic strain at PEEP of 2 cm H₂O (intraoperative FRC) (r=0.72 and r=0.73, both P<0.001). These relationships were maintained with higher PEEP only when aerated volume did not overcome FRCp (r=0.73, P<0.001; r=0.54, P=0.004), with 100 ml lung volume increases accompanied by 1.8 ml cm H₂O^-1 (95% confidence interval [1.1-2.5]) increases in C_RS. When aerated volume was greater or equal to FRCp (35% of patients at PEEP 2 cm H₂O, 55% at PEEP 7 cm H₂O, and 75% at PEEP 12 cm H₂O), C_RS and ΔP were independent from aerated volume and dynamic strain, with C_RS weakly but significantly inversely related to alveolar dead space fraction (r=-0.47, P=0.001). PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment yielded higher C_RS and reduced ΔP only at aerated volumes below FRCp (P=0.015 and 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

During general anaesthesia, respiratory system compliance and driving pressure reflect aerated lung volume and dynamic strain, respectively, only if aerated volume does not exceed functional residual capacity in supine position, which is a frequent event when PEEP is used in this setting.