Is It Time to Reconsider the Concepts of "Universal Donor" and "ABO Compatible" Transfusions?

Understanding the benefits of universal plasma and cryoprecipitate in hospitals in England

BACKGROUND

Group AB plasma does not contain anti-A or anti-B antibodies and is therefore considered universal but is in limited supply (4% of the population). There is currently no licensed universal plasma available, and therefore current clinical guidelines for transfusion require the donor and recipient to be blood group compatible. We sought to understand the benefits of universal plasma to hospitals in England, to inform R&D priorities going forward.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To understand the benefits of universal plasma (cryoprecipitate included), we distributed two surveys to hospitals (267 in total) in England.

RESULTS

Safety was the perceived top benefit of universal plasma (95%), with cost identified as the main barrier to adoption (82%), although the majority of respondents were willing to pay more for universal components. Ninety-five respondents felt they would replace all or part of their stock holding with universal plasma, with 91% anticipating that their overall stock holding of plasma would reduce as well as there will be a reduction in their plasma wastage (by up to 25%). Hospitals (56%) thought that the availability of universal plasma would support more rapid provision of plasma for transfusion, particularly in emergency situations, with the emergency/trauma department deemed to be the area that would see the greatest benefit from these universal blood components.

DISCUSSION

The response to both the potential clinical and operational benefits of a universal plasma and cryoprecipitate was positive.

Reduction of anti-A and anti-B isoagglutinin titers of group O whole blood units employing an ABO antibody immune adsorption column

BACKGROUND

Massive hemorrhage is a leading cause of death from trauma. There is growing interest in group O whole blood transfusions to mitigate coagulopathy and hemorrhagic shock. Insufficient availability of low-titer group O whole blood is a barrier to routine use. We tested the efficacy of the Glycosorb® ABO immunoadsorption column to reduce anti-A/B titers in group O whole blood.

METHODS

Six group O whole blood units were collected from healthy volunteers, and centrifuged to separate platelet poor plasma. Platelet-poor plasma was filtered through a Glycosorb® ABO antibody immunoabsorption column, then reconstituted to prepare post-filtration whole blood. Anti-A/B titers, CBC, free hemoglobin, and thromboelastography (TEG) assays were performed on pre-and post-filtration whole blood.

RESULTS

Mean( ± SEM) anti-A (224 ± 65 pre vs 13 ± 4 post) and anti-B (138 ± 38 pre vs 11 ± 4 post) titers were significantly reduced (p = 0.004) in post-filtration whole blood. No significant changes were detected in CBC, free hemoglobin, and TEG parameters on day 0. Free hemoglobin increased throughout storage (48 mg/dl ± 24 Day 0 vs 73 ± 35 Day 7 vs 96 ± 44 Day 14; p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

The Glycosorb® ABO column can significantly reduce anti-A/B isoagglutinin titers of group O whole blood units. Glycosorb® ABO could be employed to provide whole blood with lower risk of hemolysis and other consequences of infusing ABO incompatible plasma. Preparation of group O whole blood with substantially reduced anti-A/B would also increase the supply of low-titer group O whole blood for transfusion.

How do we forecast tomorrow's transfusion? - Next generation transfusion practices to improve recipient safety

Recipient safety measures play a key role in overall transfusion efficacy. The key advances in safety over the first century of transfusion medicine have been the development of techniques to prevent hemolytic transfusion reactions, hemolytic disease of the newborn and transmission of viral pathogens. While these risks remain important, they affect many fewer patients than previously. We propose that some of the most important current safety issues relate to toxicities broadly encompassed by the immunomodulatory effects of allogeneic transfusion. These include (1) universal leukoreduction to mitigate nosocomial infections, inflammation and organ injury, (2) removal of stored supernatant and its attendant toxic contents that cause dysfunctional immunity and organ injury, (3) avoiding infusing ABO incompatible antigen and antibody that can lead to bleeding, platelet refractoriness and inflammation, (3) minimizing prophylactic transfusions (particularly of plasma and platelets) except where benefit is proven, and (4) avoiding use of normal saline which is linked to renal failure and possibly hemolysis. Accompanying these safety measures will be the continued growth of one of the most important safety measures, patient blood management, which has as one benefit the avoidance of unnecessary and harmful transfusions. Reducing the toxicity of transfusions will enhance the improved clinical outcomes seen with patient blood management.

ABO blood group antigens and differential glycan expression: Perspective on the evolution of common human enzyme deficiencies

Enzymes catalyze biochemical reactions and play critical roles in human health and disease. Enzyme variants and deficiencies can lead to variable expression of glycans, which can affect physiology, influence predilection for disease, and/or directly contribute to disease pathogenesis. Although certain well-characterized enzyme deficiencies result in overt disease, some of the most common enzyme deficiencies in humans form the basis of blood groups. These carbohydrate blood groups impact fundamental areas of clinical medicine, including the risk of infection and severity of infectious disease, bleeding risk, transfusion medicine, and tissue/organ transplantation. In this review, we examine the enzymes responsible for carbohydrate-based blood group antigen biosynthesis and their expression within the human population. We also consider the evolutionary selective pressures, e.g. malaria, that may account for the variation in carbohydrate structures and the implications of this biology for human disease.

Choice of ABO Group for Blood Component Transfusion in ABO-Incompatible Solid Organ Transplantation: A Questionnaire Survey in Korea and Guideline Proposal

The number of ABO-incompatible solid organ transplantations (ABOi SOTs) has markedly increased worldwide since the early 2000s. We investigated the choice of ABO group for blood component transfusion in ABOi SOT. We conducted a survey by e-mailing a questionnaire to blood bank specialists at 77 major hospitals in Korea, among whom 34 responded to the survey. In major ABOi SOT, for red blood cells (RBCs), the recipient’s type (70.6%) was the most common choice, followed by group O (29.4%); for platelets, group AB (50.0%) was the most common choice, followed by the donor type (38.2%); for plasma, group AB (55.9%) was the most common choice, followed by the donor type (32.4%). In bidirectional ABOi SOT, for RBCs, the recipient’s type (55.9%) was the most common choice, followed by group O (44.1%); for platelets and plasma, group AB was the most common choice (94.1% and 97.1%, respectively). The policies for transfusion in ABOi SOT were diverse. We suggest a guideline on the choice of ABO group for transfusion in ABOi SOT to secure patient health and enable an efficient use of blood components.

Pediatric Hemovigilance and Adverse Transfusion Reactions

Some types of transfusion reactions occur more frequently in the pediatric than the adult population. Allergic reactions are the most common, followed by nonhemolytic transfusion reactions; male children seem most susceptible to such reactions. Platelets are often implicated and pulmonary reactions are understudied in children. Clinical sequelae in neonates, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia/chronic lung disease and intraventricular hemorrhage, have received increasing attention in relation to transfusion. There is a need to better understand the pathophysiology of transfusion reactions in neonatal and pediatric populations so preventive strategies can be undertaken. There is also a need for robust hemovigilance systems.

Blood Banking and Transfusion Medicine Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic

SARS-CoV-2 (also known as COVID-19) has been an unprecedented challenge in many parts of the medical field with blood banking being no exception. COVID-19 has had a distinctly negative effect on our blood collection nationwide forcing blood banks, blood centers, and the US government to adopt new policies to adapt to a decreased blood supply as well as to protect our donors from COVID-19. These policies can be seen distinctly in patient blood management and blood bank operations. We are also faced with developing policies and procedures for a nontraditional therapy, convalescent plasma; its efficacy and safety is still not completely elucidated as of yet.

Small Animal Transfusion Medicine

Transfusion medicine can be a lifesaving intervention. Component therapy has expanded the availability and blood products available. Patient safety and minimizing risk is important and can be accomplished through proper donor screening, collection, storage, compatibility testing, administration, and monitoring. The pros and cons of available products must be considered and tailored to each individual patient. Recent discoveries include new antigens and blood types, microbial effects on blood type, and the association between blood type and disease prevalence.

Transfusion medicine: A research agenda for the coming years

The important scientific and clinical advances of the last century in transfusion medicine include methods for avoiding hemolytic transfusion reactions and preventing transmission of viral infectious diseases. The next great clinical advances will require improving the efficacy and safety of transfusions, as well as acknowledgement of the now proven serious complications of transfusion, including nosocomial infection, thrombosis, inflammation and multi-organ failure. Possible strategies include (1) universal leukoreduction to mitigate transfusion immunomodulation effects and improve storage conditions, (2) minimizing transfusion of ABO incompatible antibodies and cellular/soluble antigens, (3) substituting use of safer solutions for normal saline during apheresis, component infusion and washing (4) new techniques to improve the efficacy and safety of blood components, including improved storage solutions/conditions, supernatant removal by washing, and rejuvenation and (5) maximizing the risk to benefit ratio of transfusions by employing more restrictive and physiologic indications for transfusion (including patient blood management) and improving clinical decision making through novel laboratory and bedside tests such as thromboelastography.