1
|
Sier MA, Tweed TT, Nel J, Daher I, Bakens MJ, van Bastelaar J, Stoot JH. Hyperbaric bupivacaine versus prilocaine for spinal anesthesia combined with total intravenous anesthesia during oncological colon surgery in a 23-hour stay enhanced recovery protocol: A non-randomized study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e37957. [PMID: 38728520 PMCID: PMC11081582 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000037957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
After the success of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, perioperative care has been further optimized in accelerated enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs), where optimal pain management is crucial. Spinal anesthesia was introduced as adjunct to general anesthesia to reduce postoperative pain and facilitate mobility. This study aimed to determine which spinal anesthetic agent provides best pain relief in accelerated ERP for colon carcinoma. This single center study was a secondary analysis conducted among patients included in the aCcelerated 23-Hour erAS care for colon surgEry study who underwent elective laparoscopic colon surgery. The first 30 patients included received total intravenous anesthesia combined with spinal anesthesia with prilocaine, the 30 patients subsequently included received spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Primary endpoint of this study was the total amount of morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) administered during hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were amounts of MMEs administered in the recovery room and surgical ward, pain score using the numeric rating scale, complication rates and length of hospital stay. Compared to prilocaine, the total amount of MMEs administered was significantly lower in the bupivacaine group (n = 60, 16.3 vs 6.3, P = .049). Also, the amount of MMEs administered and median pain scores were significantly lower after intrathecal bupivacaine in the recovery room (MMEs 11.0 vs 0.0, P = .012 and numeric rating scale 2.0 vs 1.5, P = .004). On the surgical ward, median MMEs administered, and pain scores were comparable. Postoperative outcomes were similar in both groups. Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine was associated with less opioid use and better pain reduction immediately after surgery compared to prilocaine within an accelerated ERP for elective, oncological colon surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misha A.T. Sier
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thaís T.T. Tweed
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Nel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Imane Daher
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Maikel J.A.M. Bakens
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan H.M.B. Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jensen EK, Bøgevig S, Balchen T, Springborg AH, Royal MA, Storgaard IK, Lund TM, Møller K, Werner MU. Dose safety and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous bupivacaine in a novel extended-release microparticle formulation: A phase 1, dose-ascending study in male volunteers. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2024; 134:657-675. [PMID: 38482995 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
A novel microparticle-based extended-release local anaesthetic containing a bupivacaine/poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA; LIQ865A) or plain bupivacaine (LIQ865B) was examined in a first-in-human trial. The objectives were to examine the dose safety/tolerability and pharmacodynamics. Randomized subcutaneous injections of LIQ865A (n = 16) or LIQ865B (n = 12) and diluent, contralaterally, were administered in a dose-ascending manner (150- to 600-mg bupivacaine). Subjects were admitted 24 h post-injection and followed for 30 days post-injection. The risk ratios (RRs; 95% CI) of erythematous reactions for LIQ865A versus diluent was 9.00 (1.81-52.23; P = 0.006) and for LIQ865B versus diluent 2.50 (0.69-9.94; P = 0.37). The RR for the development of hematomas (LIQ865A versus diluent) were 3.25 (1.52-8.16; P = 0.004) and 4.00 (0.72-24.89; P = 0.32) (LIQ865B versus diluent). Subcutaneous indurations persisting for 4-13 weeks were seen in 6/16 subjects receiving LIQ865A. One subject receiving LIQ865A (600-mg bupivacaine) developed intermittent central nervous system (CNS) symptoms of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (85 min to 51 h post-injection) coinciding with plasma peak bupivacaine concentrations (490-533 ng/ml). Both LIQ865 formulations demonstrated dose-dependent hypoesthesia and hypoalgesia. The duration of analgesia ranged between 37 and 86 h. The overall number of local adverse events, however, prohibits clinical application without further pharmacological modifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Kjær Jensen
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain and Respiratory Support, Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DanTrials, Zelo Phase 1 Unit, Copenhagen University Hospitals-Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Søren Bøgevig
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospitals-Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Torben Balchen
- DanTrials, Zelo Phase 1 Unit, Copenhagen University Hospitals-Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anders Holten Springborg
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain and Respiratory Support, Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DanTrials, Zelo Phase 1 Unit, Copenhagen University Hospitals-Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Ida Klitzing Storgaard
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Trine Meldgaard Lund
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Møller
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen University Hospitals-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mads Utke Werner
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain and Respiratory Support, Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DanTrials, Zelo Phase 1 Unit, Copenhagen University Hospitals-Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Azimuddin A, Tzeng CWD, Prakash LR, Bruno ML, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Newhook TE, Kim MP, Ikoma N, Snyder RA, Lee JE, Perrier ND, Katz MH, Maxwell JE. Postoperative Global Period Cost Reduction Using 3 Successive Risk-Stratified Pancreatectomy Clinical Pathways. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:451-459. [PMID: 38180055 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We hypothesized that iterative revisions of our original 2016 risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathways would be associated with decreased 90-day perioperative costs. STUDY DESIGN From a single-institution retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with 3 iterations: "version 1" (V1) (October 2016 to January 2019), V2 (February 2019 to October 2020), and V3 (November 2020 to February 2022), institutional data were aggregated using revenue codes and adjusted to constant 2022-dollar value. Grand total perioperative costs (primary endpoint) were the sum of pancreatectomy, inpatient care, readmission, and 90-day global outpatient care. Proprietary hospital-based costs were converted to ratios using the mean cost of all hospital operations as the denominator. RESULTS Of 814 patients, pathway V1 included 363, V2 229, and V3 222 patients. Accordion Grade 3+ complications decreased with each iteration (V1: 28.4%, V2: 22.7%, and V3: 15.3%). Median length of stay decreased (V1: 6 days, interquartile range [IQR] 5 to 8; V2: 5 [IQR 4 to 6]; and V3: 5 [IQR 4 to 6]) without an increase in readmissions. Ninety-day global perioperative costs decreased by 32% (V1 cost ratio 12.6, V2 10.9, and V3 8.6). Reduction of the index hospitalization cost was associated with the greatest savings (-31%: 9.4, 8.3, and 6.5). Outpatient care costs decreased consistently (1.58, 1.41, and 1.04). When combining readmission and all outpatient costs, total "postdischarge" costs decreased (3.17, 2.59, and 2.13). Component costs of the index hospitalization that were associated with the greatest savings were room or board costs (-55%: 1.74, 1.14, and 0.79) and pharmacy costs (-61%: 2.20, 1.61, and 0.87; all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Three iterative risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathway refinements were associated with a 32% global period cost savings, driven by reduced index hospitalization costs. This successful learning health system model could be externally validated at other institutions performing abdominal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahad Azimuddin
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
- Texas A&M School of Medicine, Houston, TX (Azimuddin)
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Laura R Prakash
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Morgan L Bruno
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Elsa M Arvide
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Whitney L Dewhurst
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Michael P Kim
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Nancy D Perrier
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Matthew Hg Katz
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Syed AN, Baghdadi S, Muhly WT, Baldwin KD. Nausea and Vomiting After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic and Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev 2024; 12:01874474-202401000-00006. [PMID: 38194592 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.23.00176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) affects patient satisfaction, health care costs, and hospital stay by complicating the postoperative recovery period after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) spinal fusion surgery. Our goal was to identify recommendations for optimal management of PONV in AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF). METHODS We performed a systematic review in June 2022, searching the PubMed and Embase electronic databases using search terms "(Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis) AND (Postoperative) AND (Nausea) AND (Vomiting)." Three authors reviewed the 402 abstracts identified from January 1991 to June 2022. Studies that included adolescents or young adults (<21 years) with AIS undergoing PSF were selected for full-text review by consensus. We identified 34 studies reporting on incidence of PONV. Only 6 studies examined PONV as the primary outcome, whereas remaining were reported PONV as a secondary outcome. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Grades of recommendation were assigned to potential interventions or clinical practice influencing incidence of PONV with respect to operative period (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative period) on the basis that potential guidelines/interventions for PONV can be targeted at those periods. RESULTS A total of 11 factors were graded, 5 of which were related to intervention and 6 were clinical practice-related. Eight factors could be classified into the operative period-1 in the intraoperative period and 7 in the postoperative period, whereas the remaining 3 recommendations had overlapping periods. The majority of grades of recommendations given were inconclusive or conflicting. The statement that neuraxial and postoperative systemic-only opioid therapy have a similar incidence of PONV was supported by good (Grade A) evidence. There was fair (Grade B) and poor evidence (Grade C) to avoid opioid antagonists and nonopioid local analgesia using wound catheters as PONV-reducing measures. CONCLUSION Although outcomes after spinal fusion for AIS have been studied extensively, the literature on PONV outcomes is scarce and incomplete. PONV is most commonly included as a secondary outcome in studies related to pain management. This study is the first to specifically identify evidence and recommendations for interventions or clinical practice that influence PONV in AIS patients undergoing PSF. Most interventions and clinical practices have conflicting or limited data to support them, whereas others have low-level evidence as to whether the intervention/clinical practice influences the incidence of PONV. We have identified the need for expanded research using PONV as a primary outcome in patients with AIS undergoing spinal fusion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akbar Nawaz Syed
- Division of Orthopaedics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Soroush Baghdadi
- Division of Orthopaedics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Wallis T Muhly
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Keith D Baldwin
- Division of Orthopaedics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhou Y, Wang B, Duan K, Bai Z, Hu X, Xu M, Li X, Gao Y, Li J, Yang M, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Dai R, Shen Y, Wu Z, Jiang Y, Yu S, Ouyang W, Wang S. Preemptive QP001, a fast-acting meloxicam formulation, provides analgesia and reduces opioid consumption following abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Inflammopharmacology 2023; 31:2401-2410. [PMID: 37646897 DOI: 10.1007/s10787-023-01322-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND QP001, a novel meloxicam formulation, has been developed to manage moderate to severe postoperative pain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QP001 injections for moderate to severe pain following abdominal surgery. METHOD This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial enlisted patients experiencing moderate to severe pain following abdominal surgery. These patients were randomized to receive either QP001 injections (30 mg or 60 mg) or a placebo pre-surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint was the total morphine consumption within 24 h after the first administration. RESULTS A total of 108 patients were enrolled, and 106 patients completed the study. The total morphine consumption in the QP001 30 mg group and 60 mg group, versus placebo group, were significantly lower over the following 24 h (5.11[5.46] vs 8.86[7.67], P = 0.011; 3.11[3.08] vs 8.86[7.67], P < 0.001), respectively. The total morphine consumption in the QP001 30 mg and 60 mg groups, versus placebo group, was also significantly decreased over the following 48 h, including the 24-48 h period (P ≤ 0.001). The QP001 30 mg and 60 mg groups, versus placebo, showed a significant decrease in the area under the curve for pain intensity-time as well as a significant decrease in the effective pressing times of the analgesic pump over the 24 h and 48 h periods (P < 0.05). The QP001 groups, versus placebo, show no significant different in Adverse Events or Adverse Drug Reactions (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Preoperative/preemptive QP001 provides analgesia and reduces opioid consumption in patients with moderate to severe pain following abdominal surgery, while maintaining a favorable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingyong Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Bin Wang
- General Surgery, Guiyang Baijun Taikang Hospital, Chenzhou, China
| | - Kaiming Duan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhihong Bai
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xianwen Hu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Mingjun Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohong Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China
| | - Yuanli Gao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Maanshan People's Hospital, Ma'anshan, China
| | - Jiangang Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qujing No.1 Hospital, Qujing, China
| | - Mengchang Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ruping Dai
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yufei Shen
- Gynecology Department, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Ziteng Wu
- Nanjing Delova Biotech Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
| | - Yan Jiang
- Nanjing Delova Biotech Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
| | - Sen Yu
- Nanjing Delova Biotech Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
| | - Wen Ouyang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Saiying Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR. Multimodal Approach to Vertebral Body Tethering With Erector Spinae Plane Blocks and Cryoablation. Cureus 2022; 14:e31260. [PMID: 36505180 PMCID: PMC9731667 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Multimodal analgesia that combines around-the-clock medications and regional techniques can be especially effective for postoperative pain control. We describe a pediatric patient who underwent vertebral body tethering via an open thoracolumbar approach to treat juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. Erector spinae plane blocks (ESPBs), cryoablation to the intercostal nerves, and multimodal medications helped control our patient's pain well enough for her to be discharged home on postoperative day 2. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of this combination of regional techniques used for vertebral body tethering (VBT).
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Perioperative pain management is one of the domains in which Anesthesiologists are intricately involved, and which is immensely important. Adequate postoperative analgesia is central to avoid both the acute as well as chronic complications of uncontrolled postoperative pain. Preventive analgesia has been identified as an approach to mitigate the phenomenon of central sensitization, which plays an important role in the development of chronic pain after surgery. As an over-reliance on opioids for peri- and postoperative pain control is associated with opioid dependence and hyperalgesia, multimodal analgesia has taken center stage. Multimodal analgesia, in theory, will optimize perioperative pain control, reduce the chance of central sensitization, and avoid the detrimental effects of opioid overuse. Multiple classes of systemic analgesic medications have been used to accomplish these tasks, and the aim of this article is to outline these medications, their mechanisms of action, as well as the evidence behind their individual roles in multimodal analgesia. Regional anesthesia has also been embraced as a key component of multimodal analgesia in orthopedic surgery; however, over the past several years, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) emerged as a viable alternative, particularly in total knee arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archana O'Neill
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Philipp Lirk
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cihoric M, Kehlet H, Lauritsen ML, Højlund J, Kanstrup K, Foss NB. AHA STEROID trial, dexamethasone in acute high-risk abdominal surgery, the protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2022; 66:640-650. [PMID: 35124808 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Existing multimodal pathways for patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery for intestinal obstruction (IO) and perforated viscus (PV) have focused on rescue in the immediate perioperative period. However, there is little focus on the peri-operative pathophysiology of recovery in this patient group, as done to develop enhanced recovery pathways in elective care. Acute inflammation is the main driver of the perioperative pathophysiology leading to adverse outcomes. Pre-operative high-dose of glucocorticoids provides a reduction in the inflammatory response after surgery, effective pain relief in several major surgical procedures, as well as reduce fatigue and improving endothelial dysfunction. AIM To evaluate the effect of high-dose glucocorticoid on the inflammatory response, fluid distribution and recovery after acute high-risk abdominal surgery in patients with IO and PV. METHODS AHA STEROID trial is a sponsor-initiated single-center, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, assessing preoperative high-dose dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) versus placebo (normal saline) in patients undergoing emergency high-risk abdominal surgery. We plan to enroll 120 patients. Primary outcome is the reduction in C-reactive protein on postoperative day 1 as a marker of successful attenuation of the acute stress response. Secondary outcomes include perioperative changes in endothelial and other inflammatory markers, fluid distribution, pulmonary function, pain, fatigue, and mobilization. The statistical plan is outlined in the protocol. DISCUSSION The AHA STEROID trial will provide important evidence to guide the potential use of high-dose glucocorticoids in emergency high-risk abdominal surgery, with respect to different pathophysiologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjana Cihoric
- Department of Anesthesiology Hvidovre Hospital Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Henrik Kehlet
- Section for Surgical Pathophysiology Rigshospitalet Denmark
| | | | - Jakob Højlund
- Department of Anesthesiology Hvidovre Hospital Copenhagen Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Haahr‐Raunkjaer C, Mølgaard J, Elvekjaer M, Rasmussen SM, Achiam MP, Jorgensen LN, Søgaard MI, Grønbæk KK, Oxbøll A, Sørensen HBD, Meyhoff CS, Aasvang EK. Continuous monitoring of vital sign abnormalities; association to clinical complications in 500 postoperative patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2022; 66:552-562. [PMID: 35170026 PMCID: PMC9310747 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients undergoing major surgery are at risk of complications, so‐called serious adverse events (SAE). Continuous monitoring may detect deteriorating patients by recording abnormal vital signs. We aimed to assess the association between abnormal vital signs inspired by Early Warning Score thresholds and subsequent SAEs in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Methods Prospective observational cohort study continuously monitoring heart rate, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, and blood pressure for up to 96 h in 500 postoperative patients admitted to the general ward. Exposure variables were vital sign abnormalities, primary outcome was any serious adverse event occurring within 30 postoperative days. The primary analysis investigated the association between exposure variables per 24 h and subsequent serious adverse events. Results Serious adverse events occurred in 37% of patients, with 38% occurring during monitoring. Among patients with SAE during monitoring, the median duration of vital sign abnormalities was 272 min (IQR 110–447), compared to 259 min (IQR 153–394) in patients with SAE after monitoring and 261 min (IQR 132–468) in the patients without any SAE (p = .62 for all three group comparisons). Episodes of heart rate ≥110 bpm occurred in 16%, 7.1%, and 3.9% of patients in the time before SAE during monitoring, after monitoring, and without SAE, respectively (p < .002). Patients with SAE after monitoring experienced more episodes of hypotension ≤90 mm Hg/24 h (p = .001). Conclusion Overall duration of vital sign abnormalities at current thresholds were not significantly associated with subsequent serious adverse events, but more patients with tachycardia and hypotension had subsequent serious adverse events. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03491137.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Haahr‐Raunkjaer
- Department of Anaesthesiology Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Jesper Mølgaard
- Department of Anaesthesiology Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Mikkel Elvekjaer
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Søren M. Rasmussen
- Biomedical Engineering Department of Health Technology Technical University of Denmark Lyngby Denmark
| | - Michael P. Achiam
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Lars N. Jorgensen
- Digestive Disease Centre, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Mette I.V. Søgaard
- Department of Anaesthesiology Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Katja K. Grønbæk
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Anne‐Britt Oxbøll
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Helge B. D. Sørensen
- Biomedical Engineering Department of Health Technology Technical University of Denmark Lyngby Denmark
| | - Christian S. Meyhoff
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Eske K. Aasvang
- Department of Anaesthesiology Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Managing a perioperative medicine program. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2022; 36:283-298. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
11
|
Gabapentinoid Use in Perioperative Care and Current Controversies. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:139-144. [PMID: 35084656 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01012-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review summarizes the risks and benefits of gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin) for perioperative pain control and the controversies surrounding their use in a variety of settings. We review current literature with the goal of providing patient-centric and procedure-specific recommendations for the use of these medications. RECENT FINDINGS Gabapentinoids are among the most prescribed medications in the USA, and typically for off-label indications such as postoperative pain. In the perioperative setting, multimodal analgesic or "opioid-sparing" regimens have become the standard of care-and some clinical protocols include gabapentinoids. At the same time, guidelines regarding the perioperative use of gabapentinoids are conflicting and evidence supporting their broad use is lacking. Gabapentinoids administered perioperatively reduce opioid requirements and pain scores for a variety of surgeries. The extent of opioid and pain reduction, however, is not always clinically significant. These medications reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting as well as pruritis, likely as a feature of reducing opioid intake, but are associated with side effects such as dizziness, ataxia, and cognitive dysfunction. Gabapentinoids also increase the risk of respiratory depression, in particular when paired with opioids. There is thus evidence suggesting that the routine use of these medications for perioperative pain management is not recommended. An individualized, patient- and surgery-specific approach should be used, although research is still needed to determine risks and benefits during perioperative use.
Collapse
|
12
|
Oral and Parenteral vs. Parenteral Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection: An Intervention Review with Meta-Analysis. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 11:antibiotics11010021. [PMID: 35052898 PMCID: PMC8773268 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11010021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims to systematically assess the efficacy of parenteral and oral antibiotic prophylaxis compared to parenteral-only prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer resection. Published and unpublished randomized clinical trials comparing the use of oral and parenteral prophylactic antibiotics vs. parenteral-only antibiotics in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were collected searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, SCIENCE CITATION INDEX EXPANDED) without limits of date, language, or any other search filter. The outcomes included SSIs and other infectious and noninfectious postoperative complications. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB 2). A total of six studies involving 2252 patients were finally included, with 1126 cases in the oral and parenteral group and 1126 cases in the parenteral-only group. Meta-analysis results showed a statistically significant reduction of SSIs (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.72; p < 0.0001) and anastomotic leakage (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.91; p = 0.02) in the group of patients receiving oral antibiotics in addition to intravenous (IV) antibiotics compared to IV alone. Our meta-analysis shows that a combination of oral antibiotics and intravenous antibiotics significantly lowers the incidence of SSI compared with intravenous antibiotics alone.
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang H, Fan T, Li W, Yang B, Lin Q, Yang M. A nomogram to predict the risk of prolonged length of stay following primary total hip arthroplasty with an enhanced recovery after surgery program. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16:716. [PMID: 34906186 PMCID: PMC8672506 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02877-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) managed with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program and develop a prediction model for improving the perioperative management of THA. METHODS In this single-center retrospective study, patients who underwent primary THA in accordance with ERAS from May 2018 to December 2019 were enrolled in this study. The primary outcome was prolonged LOS (> 48 h) beyond the first postoperative day. We collected the clinical patient's clinical characteristics, surgery-related parameters, and laboratory tests. A logistic regression analysis explored the independent risk factors for prolonged LOS. According to published literature and clinical experience, a series of variables were selected to develop a nomogram prediction model to predict the risk of prolonged LOS following primary THA with an ERAS program. Evaluation indicators of the prediction model, including the concordance index (C-index), the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis, were reported to assess the performance of the prediction model. The bootstrap method was conducted to validate the performance of the designed nomogram. RESULTS A total of 392 patients were included in the study, of whom 189 (48.21%) had prolonged LOS. The logistics regression analysis demonstrated that age, sex, hip deformities, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative Day 1 (POD) hemoglobin (Hb), POD albumin (ALB), and POD interleukin-6 (IL-6) were independent risk factors for prolonged LOS. The C-index was 0.863 (95% CI 0.808 to 0.918) and 0.845 in the bootstrapping validation, respectively. According to the results of the calibration, ROC curve, and decision curve analyses, we found that the nomogram showed satisfactory performance for prolonged LOS in this study. CONCLUSIONS We explored the risk factors for prolonged LOS following primary THA with an ERAS program and developed a prediction model. The designed nomogram was expected to be a precise and personalized tool for predicting the risk and prognosis for prolonged LOS following primary THA with an ERAS program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haosheng Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Central Hospital (Affiliated Hospital To Taizhou College), Donghai Street, Taizhou, 317700, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Tingting Fan
- Department of Endocrinology, Baoji City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Baoji, Shaanxi Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenle Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, People's Republic of China
- Clinical Medical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Orthopedics, Baoji City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Baoji, Shaanxi Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Lin
- Department of Orthopedics, Baoji City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Baoji, Shaanxi Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Mingyu Yang
- Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Central Hospital (Affiliated Hospital To Taizhou College), Donghai Street, Taizhou, 317700, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Faulkner HR, Coopey SB, Sisodia R, Kelly BN, Maurer LR, Ellis D. Does An ERAS Protocol Reduce Postoperative Opiate Prescribing in Plastic Surgery? JPRAS Open 2021; 31:22-28. [PMID: 34869817 PMCID: PMC8626793 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2021.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are effective at reducing inpatient opiate use. There is a paucity of studies on the effects of an ERAS protocol on outpatient opiate prescriptions. The aim of this study was to determine whether an ERAS protocol for plastic and reconstructive surgery would reduce opiate use in the outpatient postoperative setting. Methods A statewide (Massachusetts, USA) controlled substance prescription monitoring database was retrospectively reviewed to assess the prescribing patterns of a single academic plastic surgeon performing common plastic surgical outpatient operations. The time period prior to implementation of the ERAS protocol was then compared with the time period following protocol implementation. An additional three months of post-implementation data were then compared with those of each of the previous time periods to investigate whether the results were sustained. Results A comparison of opiate prescriptions in pre-ERAS, immediate post-ERAS procedures, and follow-up ERAS implementation procedures revealed a statistically significant decrease in opiate prescriptions after ERAS protocol implementation. This decrease in the quantity of opiates prescribed was sustained over time. Conclusions ERAS protocols are effective at reducing outpatient opiate prescriptions after a variety of plastic surgery operations. Appropriate patient and physician education is paramount for success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather R Faulkner
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Suzanne B Coopey
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Wexford, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rachel Sisodia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bridget N Kelly
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lydia R Maurer
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dan Ellis
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rollins KE, Lobo DN, Joshi GP. Enhanced recovery after surgery: Current status and future progress. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2021; 35:479-489. [PMID: 34801211 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways were first introduced almost a quarter of a century ago and represent a paradigm shift in perioperative care that reduced postoperative complications and hospital length of stay, improved postoperative quality of life, and reduced overall healthcare costs. Gradual recognition of the generalizability of the interventions and transferable improvements in postoperative outcomes, led them to become standard of care for several surgical procedures. In this article, we critically review the current status of ERAS pathways, address related controversies, and propose measures for future progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie E Rollins
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Dileep N Lobo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rajan N, Joshi GP. Management of postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults: current controversies. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2021; 34:695-702. [PMID: 34560688 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continue to plague the surgical patient population with an adverse impact on postoperative outcomes. The aim of this review is to critically assess current evidence for PONV management, including studies evaluating baseline risk reduction and antiemetic prophylaxis, to provide a pragmatic approach to prevention and treatment of PONV in routine clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple recent reviews and guidelines have been published on this topic with some limitations. In the current ERAS era, all patients irrespective of their PONV risk should receive two to three antiemetics for prophylaxis. Patients at a high risk of PONV [i.e. prior history of PONV, history of motion sickness, high opioid requirements after surgery (e.g. inability to use nonopioid analgesic techniques)] should receive three to four antiemetics for prophylaxis. SUMMARY This review provides a practical approach to PONV prevention based on recent literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niraja Rajan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State Health, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vetter TR, Joshi GP. Enhanced Recovery in an Ambulatory Surgical Oncology Center: The Tip of the Scalpel. Anesth Analg 2021; 133:1387-1390. [PMID: 34784325 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R Vetter
- From the Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ambulatory surgery is associated with improved patient experience while reducing overall costs without compromising patient safety. Patient-centered care is crucial for further expansion and success of ambulatory surgery because it is associated with superior patient experience and improved patient satisfaction. This article discusses the approach to improving patient-centered care and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). RECENT FINDINGS It is necessary to recognize that each patient is different and may have different needs and preferences. Patient education and shared decision-making are critical components of patient-centered care. Shared decision-making emphasizes patient engagement in an effort to improve PROs. Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery principles in ambulatory surgery is necessary to improve PROs. SUMMARY Delivery of patient-centered care will require modification of the current approach to perioperative care. It is imperative to measure PROs by implementing a comprehensive continuous quality improvement program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Davila V, Joshi GP. Looking Forward to Progress in Perioperative Care: Anesthetic Technique and Discharge Destination After Total Joint Replacement. Anesth Analg 2021; 133:1375-1378. [PMID: 34784323 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Davila
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Azizad O, Joshi GP. Telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation: review of current literature and recommendations for future implementation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2021; 34:672-677. [PMID: 34608053 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The in-person preanesthesia visit serves multiple purposes including identification and optimization of comorbid conditions as well as patient education. However, it imposes a significant burden on patients and healthcare providers. In this review, we define the scope of telemedicine and present the most up-to-date literature supporting its role for the preanesthesia evaluation. The opportunities and challenges are discussed and approaches to implementation of telemedicine in preanesthesia care are offered. Finally, the future of telemedicine as it pertains to preanesthesia care is examined. RECENT FINDINGS Although telemedicine for preanesthesia practice was proposed almost two decades ago, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated its implementation. The potential benefits of telemedicine include improved patient satisfaction as well as the ability to provide cost-effective specialty services while reducing the burden on healthcare providers. Limitations to telemedicine include lack of technology, training, regulatory barriers, and an inability to perform a physical exam. SUMMARY Telemedicine will continue to expand and its application to the preanesthesia evaluation is a clear example of how technology will revolutionize anesthesia practice. In order for telemedicine to continue to expand in the postpandemic period, steps must be taken to ensure that healthcare facilities and providers keep up with the times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omaira Azizad
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Joshi GP. General anesthetic techniques for enhanced recovery after surgery: Current controversies. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2021; 35:531-541. [PMID: 34801215 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
General anesthesia technique can influence not only immediate postoperative outcomes, but also long-term outcomes beyond hospital stay (e.g., readmission after discharge from hospital). There is lack of evidence regarding superiority of total intravenous anesthesia over inhalation anesthesia with regards to postoperative outcomes even in high-risk population including cancer patients. Optimal balanced general anesthetic technique for enhance recovery after elective surgery in adults includes avoidance of routine use preoperative midazolam, avoidance of deep anesthesia, use of opioid-sparing approach, and minimization of neuromuscular blocking agents and appropriate reversal of residual paralysis. Given that the residual effects of drugs used during anesthesia can increase postoperative morbidity and delay recovery, it is prudent to use a minimal number of drug combinations, and the drugs used are shorter-acting and administered at the lowest possible dose. It is imperative that the discerning anesthesiologist consider whether each drug used is really necessary for accomplishing perioperative goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Girish P Joshi
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9068, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rosero EB, Romito BT, Joshi GP. Failure to rescue: A quality indicator for postoperative care. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2021; 35:575-589. [PMID: 34801219 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative complications occur despite optimal perioperative care and are an important driver of mortality after surgery. Failure to rescue, defined as death in a patient who has experienced serious complications, has emerged as a quality metric that provides a mechanistic pathway to explain disparities in mortality rates among hospitals that have similar perioperative complication rates. The risk of failure to rescue is higher after invasive surgical procedures and varies according to the type of postoperative complication. Multiple patient factors have been associated with failure to rescue. However, failure to rescue is more strongly correlated with hospital factors. In addition, microsystem factors, such as institutional safety culture, teamwork, and other attitudes and behaviors may interact with the hospital resources to effectively prevent patient deterioration. Early recognition through bedside and remote monitoring is the first step toward prevention of failure to rescue followed by rapid response initiatives and timely escalation of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric B Rosero
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Bryan T Romito
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Huang F, Wang M, Chen H, Cheng N, Wang Y, Wu D, Zhou S. Analgesia and patient comfort after enhanced recovery after surgery in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: a randomised controlled pilot study. BMC Anesthesiol 2021; 21:237. [PMID: 34600487 PMCID: PMC8487110 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01458-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty(UPPP) is the most prevalent surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, but postoperative pharyngeal pain may affect patient comfort. The enhanced recovery after surgery pathway has been proved beneficial to many types of surgery but not to UPPP yet. The aim of this pilot study was to preliminarily standrize an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for UPPP, to assess whether it has positive effects on reducing postoperative pharyngeal pain and improving patient comfort, and to test its feasibility for an international multicentre study. Methods This randomised controlled study analysed 116 patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) who were undergoing UPPP in a single tertiary care hospital. They were randomly divided according to treatment: the ERAS group (those who received ERAS treatment) and the control group (those who received traditional treatment). Ninety-five patients completed the assessment (ERAS group, 59 patients; control group, 36 patients). Pharyngeal pain and patient comfort were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 30 min and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after UPPP. Complications, hospitalisation duration, and hospital cost were recorded. Results The VAS scores for resting pain and swallowing pain were significantly lower in the ERAS group than those in the control group at 30 min and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Patient comfort was improved in the ERAS group. The hospitalisation duration and cost were comparable between the groups. The incidence of complications showed an increasing trend in the ERAS group. Conclusion The ERAS protocol significantly relieved pharyngeal pain after UPPP and improved comfort in patients with OSA, which showed the prospect for an larger study. Meanwhile a potential increase of post-operative complications in the ERAS group should be noticed. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (23/09/2018, ChiCTR1800018537)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Minxue Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Huixin Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Nan Cheng
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yanling Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Di Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shaoli Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mena GE, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Vaporciyan A, Mehran R, Lasala JD, Williams W, Patel C, Woodward T, Kruse B, Joshi G, Rice D. Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine Infusions in an Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery Program: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 36:1064-1072. [PMID: 34690059 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.09.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of intraoperative dexmedetomidine and ketamine on postoperative pain and opioid consumption within an ERAS program in thoracic pulmonary oncologic surgery. DESIGN Retrospective, propensity-score matched analysis SETTING: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program. PARTICIPANTS Patients undergoing thoracic pulmonary oncologic surgery between March 2016 and April 2020. INTERVENTIONS Continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine and ketamine. MEASUREMENTS & MAIN RESULTS The authors initially analyzed data of 1,630 patients undergoing thoracic pulmonary oncologic surgery within their ERAS program. In total, 117 matched pairs were included in this analysis. Patients in the intraoperative dexmedetomidine + ketamine group were more likely to be opioid-free (76.6% vs 60.9%, P<0.01). Raw analysis showed lower pain scores at PACU admission (2.8±2.0 vs 3.4±2.0, P=0.03) and less opioid consumption at PACU admission (5 MED [0-10] vs 7.5 MED [0-15], P=0.03) in the dexmedetomidine + ketamine group; however, these differences were not present after adjusting for multiplicity. There were no significant differences in the length of PACU stay (1.9 hours [1.5-2.8] vs 2.0 hours [1.4-2.9], P=0.48) or hospital stay (three days [two-five] vs three days [two-five], P=0.08). Both groups had similar rates of pulmonary complications (5.9% vs 9.4%, P=0.326), ileus (0.9% vs 0.9%, P=1.00), and 30-day readmission (2.6% vs 4.3%, P=0.722). CONCLUSIONS There were no differences in postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption throughout their hospital stay between patients receiving concomitant dexmedetomidine and ketamine infusions versus patients who did not receive these infusions during thoracic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel E Mena
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Andres Zorrilla-Vaca
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
| | - Ara Vaporciyan
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Reza Mehran
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Javier D Lasala
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wendell Williams
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Carla Patel
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - TaCharra Woodward
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brittany Kruse
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Girish Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - David Rice
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Opioid Overprescribing and Procedure-Specific Opioid Consumption Patterns for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147:669e-679e. [PMID: 33761520 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid prescribing practices contribute to opioid misuse, dependency, and diversion. There are currently no comprehensive and quantitative evidence-based guidelines that give procedure-specific recommendations regarding opioid prescribing in plastic surgery. METHODS A retrospective review of 479 plastic surgery patients encompassing 23 different plastic surgery procedure categories was performed. Opioid prescribing patterns and patient-reported opioid use at 1 and 3 months postoperatively are reported. RESULTS Opioid overprescribing was common, averaging an excess of 13 pills per patient across all procedure categories (prescribed versus consumed, 25.4 ± 23.1 versus 12.1 ± 19.7; p = 3.0 × 10-19), with a total excess of 5895 pills (30,967 oral morphine equivalents) for the study's sample. Fifty-two percent of all opioid pills prescribed went unused. Opioid consumption ranged between four and 37 pills across procedure categories. A greater proportion of patients who reported a history of preoperative opioid use were still using opioids at the time of their 1-month and 3-month follow-up appointments (62 percent versus 9 percent at 1 month, and 31 percent versus 1 percent at 3 months). Most patients (83 percent) did not store opioids in a locked location, and 64 percent did not dispose of opioids at 1 month. CONCLUSIONS Opioids are commonly overprescribed by plastic surgery providers. This study determined procedure-specific opioid consumption patterns, which can help providers reduce opioid waste. In addition, patients do not properly store or dispose of opioids, demonstrating the need for better patient education.
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Hardman MI, Olsen DA, Amundson AW. Multimodal Analgesia Decreases Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Living Liver Donation. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2021; 5:583-589. [PMID: 34195550 PMCID: PMC8240150 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effects of multimodal analgesia on postoperative opioid consumption and perioperative pain management in patients undergoing living liver donation. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of 129 patients who underwent living liver donation between 2006 and 2015. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts, pre–multimodal analgesia and multimodal analgesia, to allow intergroup analysis. All patients received an intrathecal opioid injection and underwent donor hepatectomy. Primary outcome data compared opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents for postoperative days (PODs) 0 to 4 between the cohorts. Secondary outcomes compared yearly averaged cumulative opioid consumption on PODs 0 to 4 in oral morphine equivalents; yearly averaged numeric rating scale pain scores; hospital length of stay; and percentage of patients receiving intravenous ketorolac, ketamine, or transversus abdominis plane blocks. Results For PODs 0 to 4, a 50% reduction in overall opioids administered postoperatively (359 mg vs 179 mg; P<.01) was observed in the multimodal analgesia cohort, whereas no significant difference was found in year-to-year average postoperative pain scores (4.5 vs 3.6). The proportion of patients receiving ketorolac increased to more than 90% by 2013. More than 40% of all patients in the multimodal analgesia group received a perioperative regimen of acetaminophen, gabapentin, ketamine, and transverse abdominal plane blocks (0% in pre–multimodal analgesia). Mean hospital length of stay was reduced from 7.7 to 6.6 days (P<.01). Conclusion Implementation of multimodal analgesia to manage perioperative pain in living liver donation resulted in a 50% reduction of postoperative opioid consumption. Clinically satisfactory average pain scores were maintained for PODs 0 to 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David A Olsen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cappelleri G, Fanelli A, Ghisi D, Russo G, Giorgi A, Torrano V, Lo Bianco G, Salomone S, Fumagalli R. The Role of Regional Anesthesia During the SARS-CoV2 Pandemic: Appraisal of Clinical, Pharmacological and Organizational Aspects. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:574091. [PMID: 34149401 PMCID: PMC8213435 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.574091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV2 is spreading over millions of people worldwide, leading to thousands of deaths, even among the healthcare providers. Italy has registered the deaths of 337 physicians and more than 200 nurses as of March 14, 2021. Anesthesiologists are at higher risk as they are the care providers in both ICU and operating rooms.Although the vaccination of healthcare providers has been the prioirity, physicians are still continually exposed to the virus and potentially risk contagion and must thus protect themselves and their patients from the risks of infection while providing the best care to their surgical patients.Regional anesthesia allows for a reduction in airway manipulation, reducing environmental contamination as a result. Furthermore, regional anesthesia reduces the opioid requirements as well as the muscle paralysis due to muscle-relaxants and should be recommended whenever possible in COVID-19 patients. Our aim is to evaluate the advantages and criticisms of regional anesthesia in the management of surgical patients in the pandemic age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Fanelli
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Daniela Ghisi
- Anesthesia, Postoperative Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute (IRCCS), Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianluca Russo
- Anesthesia, Postoperative Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Lodi Hospital, Lodi, Italy
| | - Antonio Giorgi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Vito Torrano
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Asst Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuliano Lo Bianco
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.,Anesthesiology and Pain Department, Fondazione Istituto G.Giglio, Cefalú, Italy
| | - Salvatore Salomone
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Roberto Fumagalli
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.,University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sun H, Chen D, Warner DO, Zhou Y, Nemergut EC, Macario A, Keegan MT. Anesthesiology Residents' Experiences and Perspectives of Residency Training. Anesth Analg 2021; 132:1120-1128. [PMID: 33438965 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anesthesiology residents' experiences and perspectives about their programs may be helpful in improving training. The goals of this repeated cross-sectional survey study are to determine: (1) the most important factors residents consider in choosing an anesthesiology residency, (2) the aspects of the clinical base year that best prepare residents for anesthesia clinical training, and what could be improved, (3) whether residents are satisfied with their anesthesiology residency and what their primary struggles are, and (4) whether residents believe their residency prepares them for proficiency in the 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Core Competencies and for independent practice. METHODS Anesthesiologists beginning their US residency training from 2013 to 2016 were invited to participate in anonymous, confidential, and voluntary self-administered online surveys. Resident cohort was defined by clinical anesthesia year 1, such that 9 survey administrations were included in this study-3 surveys for the 2013 and 2014 cohorts (clinical anesthesia years 1-3), 2 surveys for the 2015 cohort (clinical anesthesia years 1-2), and 1 survey for the 2016 cohort (clinical anesthesia year 1). RESULTS The overall response rate was 36% (4707 responses to 12,929 invitations). On a 5-point Likert scale with 1 as "very unimportant" and 5 as "very important," quality of clinical experience (4.7-4.8 among the cohorts) and departmental commitment to education (4.3-4.5) were rated as the most important factors in anesthesiologists' choice of residency. Approximately 70% of first- and second-year residents agreed that their clinical base year prepared them well for anesthesiology residency, particularly clinical training experiences in critical care rotations, anesthesiology rotations, and surgery rotations/perioperative procedure management. Overall, residents were satisfied with their choice of anesthesiology specialty (4.4-4.5 on a 5-point scale among cohort-training levels) and their residency programs (4.0-4.1). The residency training experiences mostly met their expectations (3.8-4.0). Senior residents who reported any struggles highlighted academic more than interpersonal or technical difficulties. Senior residents generally agreed that the residency adequately prepared them for independent practice (4.1-4.4). Of the 6 ACGME Core Competencies, residents had the highest confidence in professionalism (4.7-4.9) and interpersonal and communication skills (4.6-4.8). Areas in residency that could be improved include the provision of an appropriate balance between education and service and allowance for sufficient time off to search and interview for a postresidency position. CONCLUSIONS Anesthesiology residents in the United States indicated they most value quality of clinical training experiences and are generally satisfied with their choice of specialty and residency program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huaping Sun
- From the American Board of Anesthesiology, Raleigh, North Carolina
| | - Dandan Chen
- From the American Board of Anesthesiology, Raleigh, North Carolina
| | - David O Warner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota
| | - Yan Zhou
- From the American Board of Anesthesiology, Raleigh, North Carolina
| | - Edward C Nemergut
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Alex Macario
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Mark T Keegan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
Ellis DB, Agarwala A, Cavallo E, Linov P, Hidrue MK, Del Carmen MG, Sisodia R. Implementing ERAS: how we achieved success within an anesthesia department. BMC Anesthesiol 2021; 21:36. [PMID: 33546602 PMCID: PMC7863438 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01260-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Massachusetts General Hospital is a large, quaternary care institution with 58 operating rooms, 164 anesthesiologists, 76 certified nurse anesthetists (CRNAs), an anesthesiology residency program that admits 25 residents annually, and 35 surgeons who perform laparoscopic, vaginal, and open hysterectomies. In March of 2018, our institution launched an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing hysterectomy. To implement the anesthesia bundle of this pathway, an intensive 14-month educational endeavor was created and put into effect. There were no subsequent additional educational interventions. Methods We retrospectively reviewed records of 2570 patients who underwent hysterectomy between October 2016 and March 2020 to determine adherence to the anesthesia bundle of the ERAS Hysterectomy pathway. RESULTS: Increased adherence to the four elements of the anesthesia bundle (p < 0.001) was achieved during the intervention period. Compliance with the pathway was sustained in the post-intervention period despite no additional actions. Conclusions Implementing the anesthesia bundle of an ERAS pathway in a large anesthesia group with diverse providers successfully occurred using implementation science-based approach of intense interventions, and these results were maintained after the intervention ceased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan B Ellis
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Aalok Agarwala
- Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, USA.,Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Elena Cavallo
- Massachusetts General Physicians Organization, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, USA
| | - Pam Linov
- Massachusetts General Physicians Organization, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, USA
| | - Michael K Hidrue
- Massachusetts General Physicians Organization, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, USA
| | - Marcela G Del Carmen
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Rachel Sisodia
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jensen BT. Organization Factors in the ERAS Bladder Cancer Pathway: The Multifarious Role of the ERAS Nurse, Why and What Is Important? Semin Oncol Nurs 2021; 37:151106. [PMID: 33431234 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This paper provides an overview of the multifarious role of nursing in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in advanced bladder cancer surgery with procedure-specific recommendations in radical cystectomy pathways. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases including PubMed and CINAHL. CONCLUSION The growing evidence of preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative interventions and the concept of reacting proactively in ERAS, has led to the paradigm shift in the surgical pathway with establishment of nurse-led multi-professional prehabilitation academies. Moreover, although most patients will recover in real-life at home, there is a need for a change in postoperative and discharge management. Thus, a highly skilled discharge nurse is required to secure a comprehensive, safe discharge plan adjusted to the patient's needs in close cooperation with the primary care setting, family, and survivorship clinic if needed. Limited efforts have been made to evaluate rational principles and goals for rehabilitation after radical cystectomy; an important issue with major patient and perhaps socioeconomic consequences, wherein the ERAS nurse may take the future lead. IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE It has become a governmental demand in many countries to involve the patient and family in treatment decisions and care by using shared decision tools, and to educate and inform each family in concordance with the patient's needs and preferences, and the health care systems must react accordingly. However, to provide person-centeredness care within advanced surgical pathways, there remains a need for thought-leaders, strategic planners, managers, and decision-makers to anchor the process of change and stop "we do it anyway" arguments to defend organizational cultures that are not conducing the evidence-recommend practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Thoft Jensen
- Department of Urology & Urological Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhao DQ, Qian GY, Jin J, Yao YP, Bian XM, Zhang WP. Acupuncture therapy strategy options in postoperative management after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A protocol for systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e24199. [PMID: 33429810 PMCID: PMC7793448 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000024199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a common surgery accompanied by some unpleasant adverse effects. Clinical trials indicated that acupuncture therapy may help reduce complications in LC. However, no systematic reviews have been conducted on the topic. Therefore, we will evaluate the current evidence and provide a rank for the efficacy of acupuncture therapy in LC by performing Bayesian network meta-analysis. METHODS A total of 9 databases will be searched from inception to 10 December 2020. Randomized control trails met the criterion will be included. Quality evaluation of included studies will be performed using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. STATA 14.0, Addis 1.16.8, R 3.6.3, and OpenBUGS 3.2.3 will be used to conduct pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. The evidence will be assessed by the Grades of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation. RESULTS This review will be based on clinical evidence to choose the best choice of acupuncture treatment for LC. And the results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CONCLUSION Through this systematic review, we will summarize the best available evidence of acupuncture therapy in LC and help to improve the clinical decision-making ability in LC domain. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION The protocol has been registered on INPLASY2020120056.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-qin Zhao
- Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province
- Zhuji Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Zhuji, 311800, China
| | - Guang-yu Qian
- Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province
- Zhuji Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Zhuji, 311800, China
| | - Jing Jin
- Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province
- Zhuji Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Zhuji, 311800, China
| | - Yin-ping Yao
- Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province
- Zhuji Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Zhuji, 311800, China
| | - Xing-mao Bian
- Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province
- Zhuji Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Zhuji, 311800, China
| | - Wei-ping Zhang
- Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province
- Zhuji Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Zhuji, 311800, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Practical Review of Abdominal and Breast Regional Analgesia for Plastic Surgeons: Evidence and Techniques. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2020; 8:e3224. [PMID: 33425573 PMCID: PMC7787285 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Regional analgesia has been increasing in popularity due to its opioid- sparing analgesic effects and utility in multimodal analgesia strategies. Several regional techniques have been used in plastic surgery; however, there is a lack of consensus on the indications and the comparative efficacy of these blocks. The goal of this review is to provide evidence-based recommendations on the most relevant types of interfascial plane blocks for abdominal and breast surgery. A systematic search of the PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify the evidence associated with the different interfascial plane blocks used in plastic surgery. The search included all studies from inception to March 2020. A total of 126 studies were included and used in the synthesis of the information presented in this review. There is strong evidence for using the transversus abdominis plane blocks in both abdominoplasties as well as abdominally-based microvascular breast reconstruction as evidenced by a significant reduction in post-operative pain and opioid consumption. Pectoralis (I and II), serratus anterior, and erector spinae plane blocks all provide good pain control in breast surgeries. Finally, the serratus anterior plane block can be used as primary block or an adjunct to the pectoralis blocks for a wider analgesia coverage of the breast. All the reviewed blocks are safe and easy to administer. Interfascial plane blocks are effective and safe modalities used to reduce pain and opioid consumption after abdominal and breast plastic surgery.
Collapse
|
35
|
Enhanced recovery after breast reconstruction with a pedicled Latissimus Dorsi flap-A prospective clinical study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 74:1725-1730. [PMID: 33342743 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.11.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We have previously implemented and published an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for autologous breast reconstruction using DIEP flaps. The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is another commonly used flap for autologous breast reconstruction (ABR). The aim of the present study was to use our experience from the ERAS program in DIEP flap reconstruction to optimize our LD breast reconstruction program. MATERIAL AND METHODS We examined our data for a 10-year period (n = 135) and compared this with two different surgical team approaches, within the same unit. One team implemented an ERAS program (n = 18), the other did not (n = 12). Data were collected prospectively. In the ERAS group, patient information was revised, multimodal analgesia was introduced, drain handling was optimised and functional discharge criteria was introduced. Fulfilment of functional discharge criteria were assessed twice daily and specified reasons for not allowing discharge registered. RESULTS All patients had a breast reconstruction using a unilateral LD flap. Patient and surgical parameters were comparable. Length of stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS group (3.2 days) compared to the historical (6.9) and non-ERAS (TRAS) group (6.3) (p<0.0001). Drains were removed significantly faster in the ERAS group (day 3.9) vs day 6.3 (historical) and day 7.0 (TRAS) (p<0.0001). Time to drain removal was the main reason for extended LOS. There were no differences in reoperations, readmissions or complications between the three groups. All patients in the ERP group were ambulating, pain free, had abdominal function, were eating and managing personal hygiene on POD 1. CONCLUSIONS LOS was safely reduced to 3 days for LD breast reconstruction in the ERAS group. By discharging patients with drains, it should theoretically be possible to reduce LOS to 1 day, as all other discharge criteria have then been fulfilled.
Collapse
|
36
|
Epidural analgesia for postoperative pain: Improving outcomes or adding risks? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2020; 35:53-65. [PMID: 33742578 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Current evidence shows that the benefits of epidural analgesia (EA) are not as impressive as believed in the past, while the risks of adverse effects and serious complications are greater than previously estimated. There are many reasons for the decreasing role of epidural technique in clinical practice (table). Indeed, EA can cause harm and hinder early mobilization in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes. Some ERAS interventions are complex, confusing, sometimes contradictory and apparently unimplementable. In spite of much hype and after almost 25 years, the originator of the concept has described the current status of ERAS as 'far from good'. Outpatient surgery setup has been a remarkable success for many major surgical procedures, and it predates ERAS and appears to be a simpler and better model for reducing postoperative morbidity and hospitalization times. Systematic reviews of comparative studies have shown that less invasive and safer but equally effective alternatives to EA are available for almost all major surgical procedures. These include: paravertebral block, peripheral nerve blocks, catheter wound infusion, periarticular local infiltration analgesia, preperitoneal catheters and transversus abdominis plane block. Increasingly, these non-EA methods are being used as surgeon-delivered regional analgesia (RA) techniques. This encouraging trend of active surgeon participation, with anaesthesiologist collaboration, will undoubtedly improve the decades-old twin problems of underused RA techniques and undertreated postoperative pain. The continued use of EA at any institution can only be justified by results from its own audits; however, regrettably only very few institutions perform such regular audits.
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Implementation of enhanced recovery pathways have allowed migration of complex surgical procedures from inpatient setting to the outpatient setting. These programs improve patient safety and patient-reported outcomes. The present article discusses the principles of enhanced recovery pathways in adults undergoing ambulatory surgery with an aim of improving patient safety and postoperative outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS Procedure and patient selection is one of the key elements that influences perioperative outcomes after ambulatory surgery. Other elements include optimization of comorbid conditions, patient and family education, minimal preoperative fasting and adequate hydration during the fasting period, use of fast-track anesthesia technique, lung-protective mechanical ventilation, maintenance of fluid balance, and multimodal pain, nausea, and vomiting prophylaxis. SUMMARY Implementation of enhanced recovery pathways requires a multidisciplinary approach in which the anesthesiologist should take a lead in collaborating with surgeons and perioperative nurses. Measuring compliance with enhanced recovery pathways through an audit program is essential to evaluate success and need for protocol modification. The metrics to assess the impact of enhanced recovery pathways include complication rates, patient reported outcomes, duration of postoperative stay in the surgical facility, unplanned hospital admission rate, and 7-day and 30-day readmission rates.
Collapse
|
38
|
Højvig JH, Pedersen NJ, Charabi BW, Wessel I, Jensen LT, Nyberg J, Mayman-Holler N, Kehlet H, Bonde CT. Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol. JPRAS Open 2020; 26:91-100. [PMID: 33225037 PMCID: PMC7666314 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2020.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Microvascular reconstructions after head and neck cancer are among the most complicated procedures in plastic surgery. Postoperative complications are common, which often leads to prolonged hospital stay. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a peri- and postoperative care concept with the aim of achieving pain- and risk-free surgery. It has been previously established as superior to conventional care for a wide variety of procedures, including microsurgical procedures such as reconstructions of the breast. Several ERAS protocols for microvascular head and neck cancer reconstructions have been proposed, although most of these are based on extrapolated evidence from different surgical specialties. Results from the implementation of ERAS for these procedures are inconsistent. Methods The current study investigates our clinical experience of head and neck cancer reconstruction for the period of 2014-2016 with the aim of establishing a list of functional discharge criteria. By combining these with the current published knowledge on the subject, we developed an ERAS protocol. Results We performed 89 microvascular procedures in the study period, of which 58 were in the oral cavity/sinuses and 31 were laryngopharyngeal. Most cases were squamous cell carcinoma (89%). The average LOS was 20.3 days in both groups. Postoperative complications included infection (37%), 30-days re-operations (19%), and re-admissions (17%). Furthermore, we identified the following discharge criteria: adequate pain relief, ambulation, sufficient nutritional intake, normal infection-related blood parameter results and absence of fever, bowel function, and closure of tracheostomy. Conclusion Based on our retrospective analysis and identified discharge criteria, we present an approach to develop an ERAS protocol for microvascular reconstruction after head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens H Højvig
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nicolas J Pedersen
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Birgitte W Charabi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck surgery & Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Irene Wessel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck surgery & Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisa T Jensen
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jan Nyberg
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nana Mayman-Holler
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Kehlet
- Department of Surgical Pathophysiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian T Bonde
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Implications of Practice Variability: Comment. Anesthesiology 2020; 133:944-945. [DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
40
|
Kiong KL, Vu CN, Yao CMKL, Kruse B, Zheng G, Yu P, Weber RS, Lewis CM. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery: A Case-Matched Analysis of Perioperative and Pain Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:867-876. [PMID: 32964371 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09174-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are well established in certain surgical specialties because findings have shown significant improvements in outcomes. Convincing literature in head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery is lacking. This study aimed to assess the effect of an ERAS pathway on National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)-based occurrences and pain-related outcomes in HNC surgery. METHODS The study matched 200 patients undergoing head and neck oncologic surgery on an ERAS pathway between 1 March 2016 and 31 March 2019 with control subjects (1:1 ratio) during the same period. Demographic and perioperative data collected from the NSQIP database were extracted. Pain scores and medication usage were electronically extracted from our electronic medical record system and compared. Risk factors for high opioid usage also were assessed. RESULTS Both groups were statistically similar in baseline characteristics. The ERAS group had fewer planned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (4% vs. 14%; p < 0.001), a shorter mean hospital stay (7.2 ± 2.3 vs. 8.7 ± 4.2 days; p < 0.001), and fewer overall complications (18.6% vs. 27.0%; p = 0.045). Morphine milligram equivalent requirements over 72 h were significantly reduced during 72 h in the ERAS group (138.8 ± 181.5 vs. 207.9 ± 205.5; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors for high opioid analgesic usage included preoperative opioid usage, age younger than 65 years, race, patient-controlled analgesia use, and ICU admission. CONCLUSION The study findings showed that ERAS in HNC surgery can result in improved outcomes and resource use, and that these results are sustainable. The outcomes described in this report can be further used to optimize ERAS pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberley L Kiong
- Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Catherine N Vu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher M K L Yao
- Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brittany Kruse
- Institute for Cancer Care Innovation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gang Zheng
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peirong Yu
- Department of Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Randal S Weber
- Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carol M Lewis
- Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Vetter TR, Joshi GP.. Ambulatory Extended Recovery: Coming to an Operating Theater Near You. Anesth Analg 2020; 131:695-698. [DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000004984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
42
|
Rational Perioperative Opioid Management in the Era of the Opioid Crisis. Anesthesiology 2020; 132:603-605. [PMID: 32058348 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
43
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The present review aims to address the feasibility of opioid free anesthesia (OFA). The use of opioids to provide adequate perioperative pain management has been a central practice of anesthesia, and only recently has been challenged. Understanding the goals and challenges of OFA is essential as the approach to intraoperative analgesia and postsurgical management of pain has shifted in response to the opioid epidemic in the United States. RECENT FINDINGS OFA is an opioid sparing technique, which focuses on multimodal or balanced analgesia, relying on nonopioid adjuncts and regional anesthesia. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, often under the auspices of a perioperative pain service, can help guide and promote opioid reduced and OFA, without negatively impacting perioperative pain management or recovery. SUMMARY The feasibility of OFA is evident. However, there are limitations of this approach that warrant discussion including the potential for adverse drug interactions with multimodal analgesics, the need for providers trained in regional anesthesia, and the management of pain expectations. Additionally, minimizing opioid use perioperatively also requires a change in current prescribing practices. Monitors that can reliably quantify nociception would be helpful in the titration of these analgesics and enable anesthesiologists to achieve the goal in providing personalized perioperative medicine.
Collapse
|
44
|
Basics and Best Practices of Multimodal Pain Management for the Plastic Surgeon. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2020; 8:e2833. [PMID: 33154874 PMCID: PMC7605865 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Pain management is a central focus for the plastic surgeon’s perioperative planning, and it no longer represents a postoperative afterthought. Protocols that rely on opioid-only pain therapy are outdated and discouraged, as they do not achieve optimal pain relief, increase postoperative morbidity, and contribute to the growing opioid epidemic. A multimodal approach to pain management using non-opioid analgesic techniques is an integral component of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Careful perioperative planning for optimal pain management must be achieved in multidisciplinary collaboration with the perioperative care team including anesthesiology. This allows pain management interventions to occur at 3 critical opportunities—preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings.
Collapse
|
45
|
|
46
|
Foss NB, Kehlet H. Challenges in optimising recovery after emergency laparotomy. Anaesthesia 2020; 75 Suppl 1:e83-e89. [PMID: 31903571 DOI: 10.1111/anae.14902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Standardised peri-operative care pathways for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy for non-traumatic pathologies have been shown to be inadequate and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recent research has highlighted this problem and showed that simple pathways with 'rescue' interventions have been associated with reduced mortality when implemented successfully. These rescue pathways have focused on early diagnosis and surgery, specialist surgeon and anaesthetist involvement, goal-directed therapy and intensive or intermediary postoperative care for high-risk patients. In elective surgery, enhanced recovery has resulted in reduced length of stay and morbidity by the application of procedure-specific, evidence-based interventions inside rigorously implemented patient pathways based on multidisciplinary co-operation. The focus has been on attenuation of peri-operative stress and pain management to facilitate early recovery. Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy are a heterogeneous group consisting mostly of patients with intestinal perforations and/or obstruction with varying levels of comorbidity and frailty. However, present knowledge of the different pathophysiology and peri-operative trajectory of complications in these patient groups is limited. In order to move beyond rescue pathways and to establish enhanced recovery for emergency laparotomy, it is essential that research on both the peri-operative pathophysiology of the different main patient groups - intestinal obstruction and perforation - and the potentially differentiated impact of interventions is carried out. Procedure- and pathology-specific knowledge is lacking on key elements of peri-operative care, such as: multimodal analgesia; haemodynamic optimisation and fluid management; attenuation of surgical stress; nutritional optimisation; facilitation of mobilisation; and the optimal use and organisation of specialised wards and improved interdisciplinary collaboration. As such, the future challenges in improving peri-operative patient care in emergency laparotomy are moving from simple rescue pathways to establish research that can form a basis for morbidity- and procedure-specific enhanced recovery protocols as seen in elective surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N B Foss
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - H Kehlet
- Section for Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kehlet H. Enhanced postoperative recovery: good from afar, but far from good? Anaesthesia 2020; 75 Suppl 1:e54-e61. [DOI: 10.1111/anae.14860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H. Kehlet
- Section of Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Copenhagen Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Højvig JH, Kehlet H, Bonde CT. Enhanced Recovery After Head and Neck Cancer Reconstruction With a Free Flap—What Is Next? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 78:10-11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
49
|
Postoperative pain management in the era of ERAS: An overview. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2019; 33:259-267. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
50
|
Interfascial plane blocks. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2019; 33:303-315. [PMID: 31785716 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Many novel interfascial plane blocks have been developed in the last 10 years in the effort to improve perioperative pain management that are safe, efficacious, efficient, and inexpensive. These blocks have been widely adopted into clinical practice despite relatively few high-quality clinical investigations of the techniques and how they affect perioperative outcomes. This article defines interfascial plane blocks, discusses the potential benefits, reviews the most common techniques and evidence supporting their indication, and guides clinicians in selecting an appropriate interfascial plane block for different types of surgical procedures.
Collapse
|