1
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suboptimal pain management is a common, yet largely unrecognized, problem in the postsurgical patient population. Current treatment protocols heavily rely on opioid use and, though generally effective in providing pain relief, are associated with multiple side effects. The present systematic review aims to offer plastic surgeons insight into the current state of literature on prolonged local anesthetic wound infusion regimens, evaluating both their efficacy in lowering pain scores and the potential opioid-sparing effect. METHODS A comprehensive literature search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify relevant studies published between 1980 and December 2017 evaluating the use of prolonged local anesthetic wound infusion for postoperative pain management in plastic surgery. RESULTS A total of 28 articles were selected, including 3904 patients. The overall infection rate in all patients treated with postsurgical local anesthetic wound infiltration was 0.28% (7/2536). There were no reported cases of systemic toxicity. An opioid-sparing effect was found in 92% (12/13) of studies when compared to an active comparator and 88% (7/8) of those comparing to placebo. Pain scores were decreased in 90% (9/10) of studies comparing wound infiltration to narcotic-based regimens and in 67% (6/9) of those comparing to placebo. CONCLUSIONS Continuous or intermittent wound infusion is safe and effective in reducing pain scores and opioid consumption in plastic surgery. Though the overall pain-lowering effect appears to be modest, ease of catheter insertion and patient satisfaction make this technique an alluring alternative to more validated approaches such as neuraxial or peripheral nerve blocks.
Collapse
|
2
|
Johnson AC, Colakoglu S, Reddy A, Kerwin CM, Flores RA, Iorio ML, Mathes DW. Perioperative Blocks for Decreasing Postoperative Narcotics in Breast Reconstruction. Anesth Pain Med 2020; 10:e105686. [PMID: 34150564 PMCID: PMC8207839 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.105686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Context High rates of mortality and chemical dependence occur following the overuse of narcotic medications, and the prescription of these medications has become a central discussion in health care. Efforts to curtail opioid prescribing include Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines, which describe local anesthesia techniques to decrease or eliminate the need for opioids when used in a comprehensive protocol. Here, we review effective perioperative blocks for the decreased use of opioid medications post-breast reconstruction surgery. Evidence Acquisition A comprehensive review was conducted using keywords narcotics, opioid, surgery, breast reconstruction, pain pump, nerve block, regional anesthesia, and analgesia. Papers that described a local anesthetic option for breast reconstruction for decreasing postoperative narcotic consumption, written in English, were included. Results A total of 52 papers were included in this review. Local anesthetic options included single-shot nerve blocks, nerve block catheters, and local and regional anesthesia. Most papers reported equal or even superior pain control with decreased nausea and vomiting, length of hospital stay, and other outcomes. Conclusions Though opioid medications are currently the gold standard medication for pain management following surgery, strategies to decrease the dose or number of opioids prescribed may lead to better patient outcomes. The use of a local anesthetic technique has been shown to reduce narcotic use and improve patients’ pain scores after breast reconstruction surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Clare Johnson
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Salih Colakoglu
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Angela Reddy
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Clara Marie Kerwin
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Roland A Flores
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Matthew L Iorio
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - David W Mathes
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Corresponding Author: MD, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Demsey D, Carr NJ, Clarke H, Vipler S. Managing Opioid Addiction Risk in Plastic Surgery during the Perioperative Period. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140:613e-619e. [PMID: 28953743 PMCID: PMC5783634 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000003742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Opioid addiction is a public health crisis that affects all areas of medicine. Large numbers of the population across all racial and economic demographics misuse prescription opioids and use illicit opioids. The current understanding is that opioid misuse is a disease that requires treatment, and is not an issue of choice or character. Use of opioid medication is a necessary part of postoperative analgesia, but many physicians are unsure of how to do this safely given the risk of patients developing an opioid misuse disorder. This review gives an update of the current state of the opioid crisis, explains how current surgeons' prescribing practices are contributing to it, and gives recommendations on how to use opioid medication safely in the perioperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Demsey
- Vancouver, British Columbia; and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery and the Fraser Health Substance Use Services, University of British Columbia; and the Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital
| | - Nicholas J Carr
- Vancouver, British Columbia; and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery and the Fraser Health Substance Use Services, University of British Columbia; and the Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital
| | - Hance Clarke
- Vancouver, British Columbia; and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery and the Fraser Health Substance Use Services, University of British Columbia; and the Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital
| | - Sharon Vipler
- Vancouver, British Columbia; and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery and the Fraser Health Substance Use Services, University of British Columbia; and the Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cheng GS, Ilfeld BM. A review of postoperative analgesia for breast cancer surgery. Pain Manag 2016; 6:603-618. [DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2015-0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
An online database search with subsequent article review was performed in order to review the various analgesic modalities for breast cancer surgery. Of 514 abstracts, 284 full-length manuscripts were reviewed. The effect of pharmacologic interventions is varied (NSAIDS, opioids, anticonvulsants, ketamine, lidocaine). Likewise, data from high-quality randomized, controlled studies on wound infiltration (including liposome encapsulated) and infusion of local anesthetic are minimal and conflicting. Conversely, abundant evidence demonstrates paravertebral blocks and thoracic epidural infusions provide effective analgesia and minimize opioid requirements, while decreasing opioid-related side effects in the immediate postoperative period. Other techniques with promising – but extremely limited – data include cervical epidural infusion, brachial plexus, interfascial plane and interpleural blocks. In conclusion, procedural interventions involving regional blocks are more conclusively effective than pharmacologic modalities in providing analgesia to patients following surgery for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria S Cheng
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Brian M Ilfeld
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Local Anesthetics: What's New in Minimal Pain Injection and Best Evidence in Pain Control. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 134:40S-49S. [PMID: 25255006 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000000679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY Local anesthesia in plastic surgery is undergoing a revolution. In the last 10 years, significant improvements in technique have permitted surgeons to do more and more under pure local anesthesia to increase patient safety and convenience while maintaining total patient comfort during the injection of the local anesthesia and while the procedure is accomplished. Many procedures which used to require sedation are now being performed without it. This article explores some of the new advances in local anesthesia such as painless blunt-tipped cannula local anesthetic infiltration, decreased pain with sharp needle tip injection, and long-lasting local anesthetics with delayed release from liposomal encapsulation. This article also examines the best evidence of the last 10 years of advances of pain control with local anesthesia.
Collapse
|
6
|
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Reduces Morphine Consumption in the Early Postoperative Period following Microsurgical Abdominal Tissue Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134:870-878. [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000000613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
7
|
Zhong T, Ojha M, Bagher S, Butler K, O'Neill AC, McCluskey SA, Clarke H, Hofer SOP, Srinivas C. Transversus abdominis plane block following abdominally based breast reconstruction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14:424. [PMID: 24325953 PMCID: PMC3878890 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2013] [Accepted: 11/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast reconstruction using the free muscle-sparing transversus abdominus myocutaneous or deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps are common methods for restoring mastectomy defects for breast cancer patients. Despite its increasing popularity and safety, the abdominal donor site remains a major source of postoperative pain. Conventional postoperative pain relief protocol consists primarily of a patient-controlled anesthesia device delivering intravenous opioids. Opioids can cause numerous side effects such as sedation, headache, nausea, vomiting, breathing difficulties and bladder and bowel dysfunction. A promising approach to provide postoperative pain control of the abdominal incision is the newly developed transversus abdominis plane peripheral nerve block. METHODS/DESIGN This study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trial designed to rigorously test the effectiveness of a transversus abdominis plane catheter delivering intermittent local anesthetic in reducing postoperative abdominal pain following abdominal tissue breast reconstruction. The primary objective of this study is compare the mean total opioid consumption in the first postoperative 48 hours between the control and study groups including the patient-controlled anesthesia amounts and oral narcotic doses converted to intravenous morphine equivalent units. The secondary outcome measures include the following parameters: total in-hospital cumulative opioid consumption; daily patient-reported pain scores; total in-hospital cumulative anti-nausea consumption; nausea and sedation scores; and Quality of Recovery score; time to first bowel movement, ambulation, and duration of hospital stay. DISCUSSION Autologous breast reconstruction using abdominal tissue is rapidly becoming the reconstructive option of choice for postmastectomy patients across North America. A substantial component of the pain experienced by patients after this abdominally based procedure is derived from the abdominal wall incision. By potentially decreasing the need for systemic opioids and their associated side effects, this transversus abdominis plane block study will utilize the most scientifically rigorous double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trial methodology to potentially improve both clinical care and health outcomes in breast cancer surgery patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01398982.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toni Zhong
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giordano S, Veräjänkorva E, Koskivuo I, Suominen E. Effectiveness of local anaesthetic pain catheters for abdominal donor site analgesia in patients undergoing free lower abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2013; 47:428-33. [PMID: 23627560 DOI: 10.3109/2000656x.2013.788508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
The use of an infusion pain pump with local wound catheters has increased among different surgical specialities. Autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps may cause severe abdominal donor site morbidity, and infusion devices delivering local anaesthetic are suggested to improve postoperative analgesia. This study performed a meta-analysis comparing pain pump use vs control to evaluate this issue. A systematic literature search was performed. Primary outcome was the amount of opioid use. Secondary outcomes were the amount of antiemetic drugs and the length of hospital stay. Five studies involving 248 patients were retrieved and included in the present analysis. A significantly decreased use of opioids was observed after using pain pump vs control (MD = -15.13, 95% CI = -24.20, -6.06, p = 0.001). Although not statistically significant, the pooled results showed a trend toward reduction of antiemetic medicament use (MD = -0.71, 95% CI = -2.14, 0.72, p = 0.33) and hospital stay time (MD = -0.53, 95% CI = -1.18, 0.11, p = 0.10). The use of local anaesthetic pain catheters for abdominal donor sites in microsurgical breast reconstruction might be associated with a decreased use of narcotics and antiemetic medicaments and shorter hospital stay. Further studies are needed to validate this promising treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Giordano
- Department of Plastic and General Surgery, Turku University Hospital , Turku , Finland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheters inserted under direct vision in the donor site following free DIEP and MS-TRAM breast reconstruction: A prospective cohort study of 45 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66:329-36. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.09.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2012] [Revised: 07/13/2012] [Accepted: 09/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
10
|
Beaussier M, White PF, Raeder J. Is a negative meta-analyses consisting of heterogenic studies on wound catheters sufficient to conclude that no additional studies are needed? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56:396-7; author reply 397-8. [PMID: 22192268 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02604.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2011] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|