1
|
Díaz S, Labra A. Exploring Sound Emission of the Lizard Pristidactylus valeriae. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:3813. [PMID: 38136850 PMCID: PMC10740820 DOI: 10.3390/ani13243813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Lizards, except geckos, are generally considered voiceless organisms, although some species emit oral sounds. For most of these "vocal lizards", however, there is almost no information on the characteristics of the sounds, precluding exploration of the functionality and evolution of the sounds. Pristidactylus are known as "grunter lizards" since individuals emit oral sounds under predation risk. We explored the characteristics of the sounds emitted by P. valeriae, recording 17 adults and 1 juvenile when they were threatened and captured by a predator. Only adults emitted sounds with open mouths and displayed aggressive postures, e.g., biting attempts. These sounds correspond to hisses, which lack amplitude or frequency modulation. The lizards emitted longer hisses when threatened than when captured by the predator, which may provide honest information on individuals' ability to escape. In addition, males may experience higher distress during threats since their hisses had higher aggregate entropy than those of the females. Finally, hissing has been documented in four of the five Leiosauridae genera, the family to which Pristidactylus belongs, suggesting that sound emission is ancestral to the family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastián Díaz
- Laboratorio de Ecología Geográfica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 7800003, Chile;
| | - Antonieta Labra
- Center for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066 Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yeh YT, Rivera M, Woolley SMN. Auditory sensitivity and vocal acoustics in five species of estrildid songbirds. Anim Behav 2023; 195:107-116. [PMID: 36582925 PMCID: PMC9794177 DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Comparative studies of acoustic communication in clades with diverse signal features provide a powerful framework for testing relationships between perception and behaviour. We measured auditory sensitivity in five species of estrildid songbirds with acoustically distinct songs and tested whether differences aligned with species differences in song frequency content. Species were chosen based on phylogeny and differences in song acoustics. Behavioural audiograms were obtained using operant training and testing. Adult audiograms were compared across species and between sexes within a species. Juvenile and adult audiograms were compared in one species. The audiograms of adults reared by their own species and those reared and tutored by another species were compared in one species. Results showed that audiograms were similar across species and similar to previous reports of songbird auditory sensitivity. Species differed in the highest frequency detected and the frequency of peak sensitivity. While hearing frequency range was not correlated with song frequency bandwidth, the frequency of peak sensitivity was highly corelated with the frequency of peak energy in song. Sensitivity did not differ based on sex, age or tutoring experience. Our findings suggest that adaptations in songbird auditory sensitivity are largely constrained by shared peripheral and central encoding mechanisms, with species-specific perception appearing only at peak sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yow-Tyng Yeh
- Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, U.S.A
- Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, U.S.A
| | - Moises Rivera
- Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, U.S.A
- Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, U.S.A
- Department of Psychology, Hunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, U.S.A
| | - Sarah M. N. Woolley
- Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, U.S.A
- Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hopkins JM, Edwards W, Schwarzkopf L. Invading the soundscape: exploring the effects of invasive species’ calls on acoustic signals of native wildlife. Biol Invasions 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s10530-022-02856-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
AbstractThe transmission and reception of sound, both between conspecifics and among individuals of different species, play a crucial role in individual fitness, because correct interpretation of meaning encoded in acoustic signals enables important context-appropriate behaviours, such as predator avoidance, foraging, and mate location and identification. Novel noise introduced into a soundscape can disrupt the processes of receiving and recognising sounds. When species persist in the presence of novel noise, it may mask the production and reception of sounds important to fitness, and can reduce population size, species richness, or relative abundances, and thus influence community structure. In the past, most investigations into the effects of novel noise have focused on noises generated by anthropogenic sources. The few studies that have explored the effects of calls from invasive species suggest native species alter behaviours (particularly their vocal behaviour) in the presence of noise generated by invasive species. These effects may differ from responses to anthropogenic noises, because noises made by invasive species are biotic in origin, and may therefore be more spectrally similar to the calls of native species, and occur at similar times. Thus, in some cases, negative fitness consequences for native species, associated with noises generated by invasive species, may constitute interspecific competition. Possible negative consequences of invasive species calls represent an overlooked, and underappreciated, class of competitive interactions. We are far from understanding the full extent of the effects of invasive species on native ones. Further investigation of the contribution of noise interference to native species’ decline in the presence of invasive species will significantly increase our understanding of an important class of interactions between invasive and native species.
Collapse
|
4
|
Labra A, Reyes‐Olivares C, Moreno‐Gómez FN, Velásquez NA, Penna M, Delano PH, Narins PM. Geographic variation in the matching between call characteristics and tympanic sensitivity in the Weeping lizard. Ecol Evol 2021; 11:18633-18650. [PMID: 35003698 PMCID: PMC8717325 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Effective communication requires a match among signal characteristics, environmental conditions, and receptor tuning and decoding. The degree of matching, however, can vary, among others due to different selective pressures affecting the communication components. For evolutionary novelties, strong selective pressures are likely to act upon the signal and receptor to promote a tight match among them. We test this prediction by exploring the coupling between the acoustic signals and auditory sensitivity in Liolaemus chiliensis, the Weeping lizard, the only one of more than 285 Liolaemus species that vocalizes. Individuals emit distress calls that convey information of predation risk to conspecifics, which may respond with antipredator behaviors upon hearing calls. Specifically, we explored the match between spectral characteristics of the distress calls and the tympanic sensitivities of two populations separated by more than 700 km, for which previous data suggested variation in their distress calls. We found that populations differed in signal and receptor characteristics and that this signal variation was explained by population differences in body size. No precise match occurred between the communication components studied, and populations differed in the degree of such correspondence. We suggest that this difference in matching between populations relates to evolutionary processes affecting the Weeping lizard distress calls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonieta Labra
- Department of BiosciencesCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES)University of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Claudio Reyes‐Olivares
- Programa de Fisiología y BiofísicaInstituto de Ciencias BiomédicasFacultad de MedicinaUniversidad de ChileSantiago de ChileChile
| | - Felipe N. Moreno‐Gómez
- Departamento de Biología y QuímicaFacultad de Ciencias BásicasUniversidad Católica del MauleTalcaChile
| | - Nelson A. Velásquez
- Departamento de Biología y QuímicaFacultad de Ciencias BásicasUniversidad Católica del MauleTalcaChile
| | - Mario Penna
- Programa de Fisiología y BiofísicaInstituto de Ciencias BiomédicasFacultad de MedicinaUniversidad de ChileSantiago de ChileChile
| | - Paul H. Delano
- Departamento de NeurocienciaFacultad de MedicinaUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile
- Centro Avanzado de Ingeniería Eléctrica y ElectrónicaAC3EUniversidad Técnica Federico Santa MaríaValparaísoChile
| | - Peter M. Narins
- Department of Integrative Biology & PhysiologyUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Manley GA. An evolutionary approach to middle-ear prostheses. Hear Res 2020; 400:108144. [PMID: 33310566 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The erroneous idea that mammalian three-ossicle middle ears are superior to single-ossicle ones has influenced thinking about prostheses. Evolutionary facts and measurements indicate that single-ossicle ears are equivalent and more flexible, supporting - in spite of new technological reconstruction techniques - their continued use as prostheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey A Manley
- Cochlear and Auditory Brainstem Physiology, Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Russell AP, Bauer AM. Vocalization by extant nonavian reptiles: A synthetic overview of phonation and the vocal apparatus. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2020; 304:1478-1528. [PMID: 33099849 DOI: 10.1002/ar.24553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Among amniote vertebrates, nonavian reptiles (chelonians, crocodilians, and lepidosaurs) are regarded as using vocal signals rarely (compared to birds and mammals). In all three reptilian clades, however, certain taxa emit distress calls and advertisement calls using modifications of regions of the upper respiratory tract. There is no central tendency in either acoustic mechanisms or the structure of the vocal apparatus, and many taxa that vocalize emit only relatively simple sounds. Available evidence indicates multiple origins of true vocal abilities within these lineages. Reptiles thus provide opportunities for studying the early evolutionary stages of vocalization. The early literature on the diversity of form of the laryngotracheal apparatus of reptiles boded well for the study of form-function relationships, but this potential was not extensively explored. Emphasis shifted away from anatomy, however, and centered instead on acoustic analysis of the sounds that are produced. New investigative techniques have provided novel ways of studying the form-function aspects of the structures involved in phonation and have brought anatomical investigation to the forefront again. In this review we summarize what is known about hearing in reptiles in order to contextualize the vocal signals they generate and the sound-producing mechanisms responsible for them. The diversity of form of the sound producing apparatus and the increasing evidence that reptiles are more dependent upon vocalization as a communication medium than previously thought indicates that they have a significant role to play in the understanding of the evolution of vocalization in amniotes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony P Russell
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Aaron M Bauer
- Department of Biology and Center for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Stewardship, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
|
8
|
Rohtla EA, Russell AP, Bauer AM. Sounding Off: Relationships between Call Properties, Body Size, Phylogeny, and Laryngotracheal Form of Geckos. HERPETOLOGICA 2019. [DOI: 10.1655/d-19-00021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anthony P. Russell
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4
| | - Aaron M. Bauer
- Department of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Charlton PE, Schatz KC, Burke K, Paul MJ, Dent ML. Sex differences in auditory brainstem response audiograms from vasopressin-deficient Brattleboro and wild-type Long-Evans rats. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0222096. [PMID: 31469871 PMCID: PMC6716658 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Rats are highly social creatures that produce ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) during social interactions. Brattleboro rats, a Long-Evans derived rat that lacks vasopressin (AVP) due to a mutation in the Avp gene, exhibit atypical social behavior, including fewer USVs with altered spectrotemporal characteristics during social interactions. It is unclear why Brattleboro rats produce atypical USVs, but one factor could be differences in auditory acuity between them and wild-type Long Evans rats with functional vasopressin. Previous studies have suggested a link between increased levels of AVP and auditory processing. Additionally, few studies have investigated sex differences in auditory perception by Long-Evans rats. Sex differences in auditory acuity have been found throughout the animal kingdom, but have not yet been demonstrated in rat audiograms. This study aimed to measure auditory brainstem response (ABR) derived audiograms for frequencies ranging from 1 to 64 kHz in male and female homozygous Brattleboro (Hom), heterozygous Brattleboro (Het), and wild-type (WT) Long-Evans rats to better understand the role of AVP and sex differences in auditory processing by these rats. We failed to detect significant differences between the ABR audiograms of Hom, Het, and WT Long-Evans rats, suggesting that varying levels of AVP do not affect auditory processing. Interestingly, males and females of all genotypes did differ in their ABR thresholds, with males exhibiting higher thresholds than females. The sex differences in auditory acuity were significant at the lowest and highest frequencies, possibly affecting the perception of USVs. These are the first known sex differences in rat audiograms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Payton E. Charlton
- Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| | - Kelcie C. Schatz
- Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| | - Kali Burke
- Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| | - Matthew J. Paul
- Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| | - Micheal L. Dent
- Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sound localization in the lizard using internally coupled ears: A finite-element approach. Hear Res 2019; 378:23-32. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
11
|
Lizard calls convey honest information on body size and bite performance: a role in predator deterrence? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s00265-019-2695-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
12
|
Paluh DJ, Bauer AM. Phylogenetic history, allometry and disparate functional pressures influence the morphological diversification of the gekkotan quadrate, a keystone cranial element. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/biolinnean/bly147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Paluh
- Department of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Aaron M Bauer
- Department of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Hummingbirds are a fascinating group of birds, but some aspects of their biology are poorly understood, such as their highly diverse vocal behaviors. We show here that the predominant vocalization of black jacobins (Florisuga fusca), a hummingbird prevalent in the mountains of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, consists of a triplet of syllables with high fundamental frequency (mean F0 ∼11.8 kHz), rapid frequency oscillations and strong ultrasonic harmonics and no detectable elements below ∼10 kHz. These are the most common vocalizations of these birds, and their frequency range is above the known hearing range of any bird species recorded to date, including hearing specialists such as owls. These observations suggest that black jacobins either have an atypically high frequency hearing range, or alternatively their primary vocalization has a yet unknown function unrelated to vocal communication. Black jacobin vocalizations challenge current notions about vocal communication in birds.
Collapse
|
14
|
Young BA. Anatomical influences on internally coupled ears in reptiles. BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS 2016; 110:255-261. [PMID: 27699482 DOI: 10.1007/s00422-016-0699-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Accepted: 09/17/2016] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Many reptiles, and other vertebrates, have internally coupled ears in which a patent anatomical connection allows pressure waves generated by the displacement of one tympanic membrane to propagate (internally) through the head and, ultimately, influence the displacement of the contralateral tympanic membrane. The pattern of tympanic displacement caused by this internal coupling can give rise to novel sensory cues. The auditory mechanics of reptiles exhibit more anatomical variation than in any other vertebrate group. This variation includes structural features such as diverticula and septa, as well as coverings of the tympanic membrane. Many of these anatomical features would likely influence the functional significance of the internal coupling between the tympanic membranes. Several of the anatomical components of the reptilian internally coupled ear are under active motor control, suggesting that in some reptiles the auditory system may be more dynamic than previously recognized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce A Young
- Department of Anatomy, Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, MO, 63501, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Manley GA. Comparative Auditory Neuroscience: Understanding the Evolution and Function of Ears. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2016; 18:1-24. [PMID: 27539715 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0579-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Comparative auditory studies make it possible both to understand the origins of modern ears and the factors underlying the similarities and differences in their performance. After all lineages of land vertebrates had independently evolved tympanic middle ears in the early Mesozoic era, the subsequent tens of millions of years led to the hearing organ of lizards, birds, and mammals becoming larger and their upper frequency limits higher. In extant species, lizard papillae remained relatively small (<2 mm), but avian papillae attained a maximum length of 11 mm, with the highest frequencies in both groups near 12 kHz. Hearing-organ sizes in modern mammals vary more than tenfold, up to >70 mm (made possible by coiling), as do their upper frequency limits (from 12 to >200 kHz). The auditory organs of the three amniote groups differ characteristically in their cellular structure, but their hearing sensitivity and frequency selectivity within their respective hearing ranges hardly differ. In the immediate primate ancestors of humans, the cochlea became larger and lowered its upper frequency limit. Modern humans show an unusual trend in frequency selectivity as a function of frequency. It is conceivable that the frequency selectivity patterns in humans were influenced in their evolution by the development of speech.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey A Manley
- Cochlear and Auditory Brainstem Physiology, Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Research Centre Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky Strasse 9-11, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Evolution of mammalian sound localization circuits: A developmental perspective. Prog Neurobiol 2016; 141:1-24. [PMID: 27032475 DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2015] [Revised: 02/27/2016] [Accepted: 02/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Localization of sound sources is a central aspect of auditory processing. A unique feature of mammals is the smooth, tonotopically organized extension of the hearing range to high frequencies (HF) above 10kHz, which likely induced positive selection for novel mechanisms of sound localization. How this change in the auditory periphery is accompanied by changes in the central auditory system is unresolved. I will argue that the major VGlut2(+) excitatory projection neurons of sound localization circuits (dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN), lateral and medial superior olive (LSO and MSO)) represent serial homologs with modifications, thus being paramorphs. This assumption is based on common embryonic origin from an Atoh1(+)/Wnt1(+) cell lineage in the rhombic lip of r5, same cell birth, a fusiform cell morphology, shared genetic components such as Lhx2 and Lhx9 transcription factors, and similar projection patterns. Such a parsimonious evolutionary mechanism likely accelerated the emergence of neurons for sound localization in all three dimensions. Genetic analyses indicate that auditory nuclei in fish, birds, and mammals receive contributions from the same progenitor lineages. Anatomical and physiological differences and the independent evolution of tympanic ears in vertebrate groups, however, argue for convergent evolution of sound localization circuits in tetrapods (amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals). These disparate findings are discussed in the context of the genetic architecture of the developing hindbrain, which facilitates convergent evolution. Yet, it will be critical to decipher the gene regulatory networks underlying development of auditory neurons across vertebrates to explore the possibility of homologous neuronal populations.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
The inner ear of mammals consists of the cochlea, which is involved with the sense of hearing, and the vestibule and three semicircular canals, which are involved with the sense of balance. Although different regions of the inner ear contribute to different functions, the bony chambers and membranous ducts are morphologically continuous. The gross anatomy of the cochlea that has been related to auditory physiologies includes overall size of the structure, including volume and total spiral length, development of internal cochlear structures, including the primary and secondary bony laminae, morphology of the spiral nerve ganglion, and the nature of cochlear coiling, including total number of turns completed by the cochlear canal and the relative diameters of the basal and apical turns. The overall sizes, shapes, and orientations of the semicircular canals are related to sensitivity to head rotations and possibly locomotor behaviors. Intraspecific variation, primarily in the shape and orientation of the semicircular canals, may provide additional clues to help us better understand form and function of the inner ear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric G. Ekdale
- Department of BiologySan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoCAUSA
- Department of PaleontologySan Diego Natural History MuseumSan DiegoCAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chen J, Jono T, Cui J, Yue X, Tang Y. The Acoustic Properties of Low Intensity Vocalizations Match Hearing Sensitivity in the Webbed-Toed Gecko, Gekko subpalmatus. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0146677. [PMID: 26752301 PMCID: PMC4709187 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The design of acoustic signals and hearing sensitivity in socially communicating species would normally be expected to closely match in order to minimize signal degradation and attenuation during signal propagation. Nevertheless, other factors such as sensory biases as well as morphological and physiological constraints may affect strict correspondence between signal features and hearing sensitivity. Thus study of the relationships between sender and receiver characteristics in species utilizing acoustic communication can provide information about how acoustic communication systems evolve. The genus Gekko includes species emitting high-amplitude vocalizations for long-range communication (loud callers) as well as species producing only low-amplitude vocalizations when in close contact with conspecifics (quiet callers) which have rarely been investigated. In order to investigate relationships between auditory physiology and the frequency characteristics of acoustic signals in a quiet caller, Gekko subpalmatus we measured the subjects’ vocal signal characteristics as well as auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to assess auditory sensitivity. The results show that G. subpalmatus males emit low amplitude calls when encountering females, ranging in dominant frequency from 2.47 to 4.17 kHz with an average at 3.35 kHz. The auditory range with highest sensitivity closely matches the dominant frequency of the vocalizations. This correspondence is consistent with the notion that quiet and loud calling species are under similar selection pressures for matching auditory sensitivity with spectral characteristics of vocalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingfeng Chen
- Department of Herpetology, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- * E-mail: (JFC); (YZT)
| | - Teppei Jono
- Department of Herpetology, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jianguo Cui
- Department of Herpetology, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xizi Yue
- Department of Herpetology, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yezhong Tang
- Department of Herpetology, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- * E-mail: (JFC); (YZT)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Colafrancesco KC, Gridi-Papp M. Vocal Sound Production and Acoustic Communication in Amphibians and Reptiles. VERTEBRATE SOUND PRODUCTION AND ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27721-9_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
20
|
Infrasonic and Seismic Communication in the Vertebrates with Special Emphasis on the Afrotheria: An Update and Future Directions. VERTEBRATE SOUND PRODUCTION AND ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27721-9_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
21
|
Carr CE, Christensen-Dalsgaard J. Sound Localization Strategies in Three Predators. BRAIN, BEHAVIOR AND EVOLUTION 2015; 86:17-27. [PMID: 26398572 DOI: 10.1159/000435946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In this paper, we compare some of the neural strategies for sound localization and encoding interaural time differences (ITDs) in three predatory species of Reptilia, alligators, barn owls and geckos. Birds and crocodilians are sister groups among the extant archosaurs, while geckos are lepidosaurs. Despite the similar organization of their auditory systems, archosaurs and lizards use different strategies for encoding the ITDs that underlie localization of sound in azimuth. Barn owls encode ITD information using a place map, which is composed of neurons serving as labeled lines tuned for preferred spatial locations, while geckos may use a meter strategy or population code composed of broadly sensitive neurons that represent ITD via changes in the firing rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine E Carr
- Department of Biology, University of Maryland Center for the Comparative and Evolutionary Biology of Hearing, College Park, Md., USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Manley GA. Fundamentals of Hearing in Amniote Vertebrates. PERSPECTIVES ON AUDITORY RESEARCH 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9102-6_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
23
|
Labra A, Silva G, Norambuena F, Velásquez N, Penna M. Acoustic Features of the Weeping Lizard's Distress Call. COPEIA 2013. [DOI: 10.1643/ce-12-026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
24
|
Carabajal AP, Sterli J, Müller J, Hilger A. Neuroanatomy of the marine Jurassic turtle Plesiochelys etalloni (Testudinata, Plesiochelyidae). PLoS One 2013; 8:e69264. [PMID: 23844257 PMCID: PMC3699497 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2013] [Accepted: 06/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Turtles are one of the least explored clades regarding endocranial anatomy with few available descriptions of the brain and inner ear of extant representatives. In addition, the paleoneurology of extinct turtles is poorly known and based on only a few natural cranial endocasts. The main goal of this study is to provide for the first time a detailed description of the neuroanatomy of an extinct turtle, the Late Jurassic Plesiochelysetalloni, including internal carotid circulation, cranial endocast and inner ear, based on the first digital 3D reconstruction using micro CT scans. The general shape of the cranial endocast of P. etalloni is tubular, with poorly marked cephalic and pontine flexures. Anteriorly, the olfactory bulbs are clearly differentiated suggesting larger bulbs than in any other described extinct or extant turtle, and indicating a higher capacity of olfaction in this taxon. The morphology of the inner ear of P. etalloni is comparable to that of extant turtles and resembles those of slow-moving terrestrial vertebrates, with markedly low, short and robust semicircular canals, and a reduced lagena. In P. etalloni the arterial pattern is similar to that found in extant cryptodires, where all the internal carotid branches are protected by bone. As the knowledge of paleoneurology in turtles is scarce and the application of modern techniques such as 3D reconstructions based on CT scans is almost unexplored in this clade, we hope this paper will trigger similar investigations of this type in other turtle taxa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariana Paulina Carabajal
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Museo Carmen Funes, Neuquén, Argentina.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Manley GA, Sienknecht UJ. The Evolution and Development of Middle Ears in Land Vertebrates. THE MIDDLE EAR 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6591-1_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
26
|
The Malleable Middle Ear: An Underappreciated Player in the Evolution of Hearing in Vertebrates. INSIGHTS FROM COMPARATIVE HEARING RESEARCH 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/2506_2013_33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
27
|
Ocklenburg S, Ströckens F, Güntürkün O. Lateralisation of conspecific vocalisation in non-human vertebrates. Laterality 2013; 18:1-31. [DOI: 10.1080/1357650x.2011.626561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
28
|
Young BA, Mathevon N, Tang Y. Reptile Auditory Neuroethology: What Do Reptiles Do with Their Hearing? INSIGHTS FROM COMPARATIVE HEARING RESEARCH 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/2506_2013_30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
29
|
Christensen CB, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Brandt C, Madsen PT. Hearing with an atympanic ear: good vibration and poor sound-pressure detection in the royal python, Python regius. J Exp Biol 2012; 215:331-42. [DOI: 10.1242/jeb.062539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY
Snakes lack both an outer ear and a tympanic middle ear, which in most tetrapods provide impedance matching between the air and inner ear fluids and hence improve pressure hearing in air. Snakes would therefore be expected to have very poor pressure hearing and generally be insensitive to airborne sound, whereas the connection of the middle ear bone to the jaw bones in snakes should confer acute sensitivity to substrate vibrations. Some studies have nevertheless claimed that snakes are quite sensitive to both vibration and sound pressure. Here we test the two hypotheses that: (1) snakes are sensitive to sound pressure and (2) snakes are sensitive to vibrations, but cannot hear the sound pressure per se. Vibration and sound-pressure sensitivities were quantified by measuring brainstem evoked potentials in 11 royal pythons, Python regius. Vibrograms and audiograms showed greatest sensitivity at low frequencies of 80–160 Hz, with sensitivities of –54 dB re. 1 m s–2 and 78 dB re. 20 μPa, respectively. To investigate whether pythons detect sound pressure or sound-induced head vibrations, we measured the sound-induced head vibrations in three dimensions when snakes were exposed to sound pressure at threshold levels. In general, head vibrations induced by threshold-level sound pressure were equal to or greater than those induced by threshold-level vibrations, and therefore sound-pressure sensitivity can be explained by sound-induced head vibration. From this we conclude that pythons, and possibly all snakes, lost effective pressure hearing with the complete reduction of a functional outer and middle ear, but have an acute vibration sensitivity that may be used for communication and detection of predators and prey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christian Brandt
- Institute of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Peter Teglberg Madsen
- Zoophysiology, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Build 1131, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bergevin C. Comparison of otoacoustic emissions within gecko subfamilies: morphological implications for auditory function in lizards. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2011; 12:203-17. [PMID: 21136278 PMCID: PMC3046335 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-010-0253-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2010] [Accepted: 11/16/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are sounds emitted by the ear and provide a non-invasive probe into mechanisms underlying peripheral auditory transduction. This study focuses upon a comparison of emission properties in two phylogenetically similar pairs of gecko: Gekko gecko and Hemidactylus turcicus and Eublepharis macularius and Coleonyx variegatus. Each pair consists of two closely related species within the same subfamily, with quantitatively known morphological properties at the level of the auditory sensory organ (basilar papilla) in the inner ear. Essentially, the comparison boils down to an issue of size: how does overall body size, as well as the inner-ear dimensions (e.g., papilla length and number of hair cells), affect peripheral auditory function as inferred from OAEs? Estimates of frequency selectivity derived from stimulus-frequency emissions (emissions evoked by a single low-level tone) indicate that tuning is broader in the species with fewer hair cells/shorter papilla. Furthermore, emissions extend outwards to higher frequencies (for similar body temperatures) in the species with the smaller body size/narrower interaural spacing. This observation suggests the smaller species have relatively improved high-frequency sensitivity, possibly related to vocalizations and/or aiding azimuthal sound localization. For one species (Eublepharis), emissions were also examined in both juveniles and adults. Qualitatively similar emission properties in both suggests that inner-ear function is adult like soon after hatching and that external body size (e.g., middle-ear dimensions and interaural spacing) has a relatively small impact upon emission properties within a species.
Collapse
|
31
|
Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Tang Y, Carr CE. Binaural processing by the gecko auditory periphery. J Neurophysiol 2011; 105:1992-2004. [PMID: 21325679 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00004.2011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Lizards have highly directional ears, owing to strong acoustical coupling of the eardrums and almost perfect sound transmission from the contralateral ear. To investigate the neural processing of this remarkable tympanic directionality, we combined biophysical measurements of eardrum motion in the Tokay gecko with neurophysiological recordings from the auditory nerve. Laser vibrometry shows that their ear is a two-input system with approximately unity interaural transmission gain at the peak frequency (∼ 1.6 kHz). Median interaural delays are 260 μs, almost three times larger than predicted from gecko head size, suggesting interaural transmission may be boosted by resonances in the large, open mouth cavity (Vossen et al. 2010). Auditory nerve recordings are sensitive to both interaural time differences (ITD) and interaural level differences (ILD), reflecting the acoustical interactions of direct and indirect sound components at the eardrum. Best ITD and click delays match interaural transmission delays, with a range of 200-500 μs. Inserting a mold in the mouth cavity blocks ITD and ILD sensitivity. Thus the neural response accurately reflects tympanic directionality, and most neurons in the auditory pathway should be directional.
Collapse
|
32
|
Manley GA, Fuchs PA. Recent advances in comparative hearing. Hear Res 2011; 273:1-6. [PMID: 21236326 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2011] [Revised: 01/10/2011] [Accepted: 01/10/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
33
|
PYGOPODS HAVE EXCEPTIONAL HEARING. J Exp Biol 2010. [DOI: 10.1242/jeb.046151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
34
|
Manley GA. Lizard auditory papillae: an evolutionary kaleidoscope. Hear Res 2010; 273:59-64. [PMID: 20435117 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2009] [Revised: 02/16/2010] [Accepted: 02/17/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The evolutionary processes that modified the structure and function of lizard auditory papillae during the separation of the familial lineages during the Jurassic have resulted in a remarkable variety of family-typical papillae. These papillae vary structurally in their size, in the patterns of the distribution of hair-cell types, in the presence or absence of sub-papillae and in the configurations of the tectorial membranes. Functional differences, however, are much smaller than the structural variations might lead one to expect. To some extent, differences in innervation patterns and tectorial configurations compensate for 10-fold differences in papillar length. Nonetheless, although lizards with tiny papillae are able to maintain frequency-selective and relatively sensitive hearing, the best selectivity and most sensitive hearing is found in the largest and most complex papillae. Fundamental considerations of the tonotopic organisation of papillae leads to a likely scheme mapping the evolution of the hearing organs found in modern lizard families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey A Manley
- Lehrstuhl für Zoologie, Technische Universität München, Liesel-Beckmann-Str. 4, Hochfeldweg 2, 85350 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|