1
|
Jäger T, Schredl P, Neureiter D, Presl J, Tschann P, Königsrainer I, Pascher A, Emmanuel K, Regenbogen S, Ramspott JP. The SAlzburg PEritoneal SUrface CAlculator (SAPESUCA): The First Web-Based Application for Peritoneal Surface Area Quantification. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3134. [PMID: 37370744 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Peritoneal metastasized colorectal cancer is associated with a worse prognosis. The combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) showed promising results in selected patients, but standardization is lacking so far. We present the first tool enabling standardized peritoneal surface area (PSA) quantification in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC: The SAlzburg PEritoneal SUrface CAlculator (SAPESUCA). (2) Methods: SAPESUCA was programmed using the R-Shiny framework. The application was validated in 23 consecutive colon cancer patients who received 27 closed oxaliplatin-based HIPECs between 2016 and 2020. The programming algorithm incorporates the patient's body surface area and its correlated peritoneal surface area (PSA) based on the 13 Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) regions. (3) Results: Patients' median age was 56 years. Median PCI was 9. SAPESUCA revealed a mean PSA of 18,613 cm2 ± 1951 of all patients before compared to 13,681 cm2 ± 2866 after CRS. The Central PCI region revealed the highest mean peritonectomy extent (1517 cm2 ± 737). The peritonectomy extent correlated significantly with PCI score and postoperative morbidity. The simulated mean oxaliplatin dose differed significantly before and after CRS (558 mg/m2 ± 58.4 vs. 409 mg/m2 ± 86.1; p < 0.0001). (4) Conclusion: SAPESUCA is the first free web-based app for standardized determination of the resected and remaining PSA after CRS. The tool enables chemotherapeutic dose adjustment to the remaining PSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarkan Jäger
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Philipp Schredl
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Daniel Neureiter
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jaroslav Presl
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Peter Tschann
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Ingmar Königsrainer
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Andreas Pascher
- Department for General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Klaus Emmanuel
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Stephan Regenbogen
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
- Department for Trauma Surgery, BG Trauma Center Murnau, 82418 Murnau, Germany
- Department for Trauma Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, 67071 Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany
| | - Jan Philipp Ramspott
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
- Department for General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ihemelandu C. The Landmark Series: Scoring Systems for Primary Peritoneal Surface Malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1832-1837. [PMID: 36550329 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12941-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) represents an innovative approach to treat or prevent peritoneal metastasis. However, given the morbidity that can be associated with this procedure, adequate patient selection facilitated by scoring systems for primary peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) is paramount to ensure equitable morbidity as well as acceptable survival outcome. METHODS Seminal studies on scoring systems for PSM that have laid the foundation for adequate patient selection and prognostication are spotlighted. RESULTS Quantitative prognostic indicators have been defined for patients with PSM that enable the surgeon to make sound clinical judgements as to who may or may not benefit from CRS/HIPEC. These prognostic indicators include the histopathology of the tumor, findings on the preoperative abdominal and pelvic computerized axial tomography, the Peritoneal Cancer Index, completeness of cytoreduction score, and prior surgical score. CONCLUSIONS Scoring systems for primary peritoneal surface malignancy reviewed in this article highlight the utility of these systems for patient selection for CRS/HIPEC and prognostication.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kose S. Role of Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. J Belg Soc Radiol 2023; 107:27. [PMID: 37064170 PMCID: PMC10103720 DOI: 10.5334/jbsr.2921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) refers to metastatic spread of tumor into the peritoneal cavity. Earlier, PC was thought to be associated with grave clinical outcome. However, various advances in treatment options including cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy or early post-operative chemotherapy can prolong survival of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. These treatment options are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this article is to acquaint the radiologist about various appearances of peritoneal carcinomatosis in order to help clinicians in selecting candidates for surgery and avoid unnecessary potentially debilitating surgeries in patients with unresectable PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Snehal Kose
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IN
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ammerata G, Filippo R, Laface C, Memeo R, Solaini L, Cavaliere D, Navarra G, Ranieri G, Currò G, Ammendola M. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and colorectal cancer: From physiology to surgery. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:10852-10861. [PMID: 36338235 PMCID: PMC9631165 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The pursuit of this paper is to collect principal reviews and systematic reviews about hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) used in colorectal cancer (CRC). We focus on principal biological aspects of CRC, hyperthermia effects, and surgical procedures. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE for the principal reviews and systematic reviews published from 2010 to 2021 regarding the bimodal treatment (CRS + HIPEC) against local and advanced CRC. In the literature, from several studies, it seems that the efficacy of bimodal treatment with an accurate CRS can extend overall survival. Despite these studies, there are not still any straight guidelines more detailed and scheduled about the use of combined treatment in patients with CRC. Even if the concept is still not very clear and shared, after a careful evaluation of the published data, and after some technical and pathophysiological descriptions, we concluded that it is possible to improve the overall survival and quality of life and to reduce the tumor relapse in patients affected by locally advanced (pT4) CRC with peritoneal metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Ammerata
- Science of Health Department, Digestive Surgery Unit, University “Magna Graecia” Medical School, Catanzaro 88100, Italy
| | - Rosalinda Filippo
- Science of Health Department, Digestive Surgery Unit, University “Magna Graecia” Medical School, Catanzaro 88100, Italy
| | - Carmelo Laface
- Interventional Oncology Unit with Integrated Section of Translational Medical Oncology, National Cancer Research Centre “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari 70124, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, “F. Miulli” Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari 70124, Italy
| | - Leonardo Solaini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Forlì 40126, Italy
| | - Davide Cavaliere
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì 47121, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Navarra
- Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age, Surgical Oncology Division, “G. Martino” Hospital, University of Messina, Messina 98122, Italy
| | - Girolamo Ranieri
- Interventional Oncology Unit with Integrated Section of Translational Medical Oncology, National Cancer Research Centre “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari 70124, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Currò
- Science of Health Department, Digestive Surgery Unit, University “Magna Graecia” Medical School, Catanzaro 88100, Italy
| | - Michele Ammendola
- Science of Health Department, Digestive Surgery Unit, University “Magna Graecia” Medical School, Catanzaro 88100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Said I, Ubink I, Ewalds RSG, Arkesteijn JGT, Verheul HMW, de Wilt JHW, Dekker HM, Bremers AJA, de Reuver PR. In Patients Undergoing CRS/HIPEC for Colorectal Adenocarcinoma with Peritoneal Metastases, Presence of Ascites on Computed Tomography Imaging is not a Prognostic Marker for Survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5256-5262. [PMID: 35430666 PMCID: PMC9246798 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11718-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). Patient selection is key to optimizing outcomes after CRS/HIPEC. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of ascites diagnosed on preoperative imaging.
Methods
A prospective database of patients eligible for CRS/HIPEC between 2010 and 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. The presence of ascites, postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and completeness of cytoreduction were assessed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors for outcome.
Results
Of the 235 included patients, 177 (75%) underwent CRS/HIPEC while 58 (25%) were not eligible for CRS/HIPEC. In 42 of the 177 patients (24%) who underwent CRS/HIPEC, ascites was present on preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging. Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score was significantly higher in patients with preoperative ascites compared with patients without (11 [range 2–30] vs. 9 [range 0–28], respectively; p = 0.011) and complete cytoreduction was more often achieved in patients without ascites (96.3% vs. 85.7%; p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in median DFS and OS after CRS/HIPEC between patients with and without ascites {10 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.1–12.9) vs. 9 months (95% CI 7.2–10.8), and 25 months (95% 9.4–40.6) vs. 27 months (95% CI 22.4–31.6), respectively}.
Conclusions
Ascites on preoperative imaging was not associated with worse survival in CRS/HIPEC patients with CRPM. Therefore, excluding patients from CRS/HIPEC based merely on the presence of ascites is not advisable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Said
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Inge Ubink
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Roos S G Ewalds
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna G T Arkesteijn
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Dekker
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboudumc, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas J A Bremers
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lundy ME, Moaven O, Perry KC, Mangieri CW, Valenzuela CD, Russell GB, Bordelon R, Shen P, Votanopoulos KI, Levine EA. Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Management of Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Dissemination: 30 Years of Experience at a Single Institution. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:546-556. [PMID: 35290274 PMCID: PMC11228809 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is at the forefront of treatment for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis or "carcinomatosis" (CRC-PC). We report outcomes of the operative management of CRC-PC at a single center. STUDY DESIGN We retrospectively reviewed our database from 1992 through 2021. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Proportional hazards regression and multivariable models were used for assessments. RESULTS This study included 345 patients with mean age 53.5 years. Multivariate analysis revealed performance and resection status were associated with overall survival (OS; p < 0.001). Within the R0/R1 group, adverse impact on OS was found with increasing Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score starting at 9 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.98, CI 1.39-2.82, p = 0.0001) with the most significant hazard noted at PCI >14 (HR = 2.35, CI 1.52-3.63, p = 0.0001). Incomplete resection (R2) had significantly worse OS compared with complete CRS 33.4 (n = 206) vs R2: 12.7 months (n = 139; p < 0.0001. When stratified by PCI for the R0/R1 group, median OS for PCI less than 10, 10 to 15, and greater than 15 was 38.2, 19.7, and 22.2 m, respectively (p = 0.0007 comparing PCI less than 10 and greater than 15). Ten-year increments-1991 through 2000, 2001 through 2010, 2011 through 2020-revealed improvement in median OS (13.4 [n = 66], 19.3 [n = 139], and 29.1 months [n = 140]). However, by resection status, median OS remained stable for R0/R1 (32.3 [n = 23], 31.1 [n = 76], and 34.1 months [n = 107]) and improved for R2 (5.2 [n = 43], 14.4 [n = 63], and 14.6 months [n = 33]). Clavien-Dindo complication rate (greater than or equal to grade III) was 29.4%. CONCLUSION CRS improves outcomes for CRC-PC compared with historic outcomes with nonoperative management. This benefit is greatest with complete resection and lower disease burden. Results of CRS (with or without heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy) are improving, and surgery for CRC-PC should be routinely considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan E Lundy
- From the Department of General Surgery, Surgical Oncology (Lundy, Moaven, Perry, Mangieri, Valenzuela, Bordelon, Shen, Votanopoulos, Levine), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Omeed Moaven
- From the Department of General Surgery, Surgical Oncology (Lundy, Moaven, Perry, Mangieri, Valenzuela, Bordelon, Shen, Votanopoulos, Levine), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Kathleen C Perry
- From the Department of General Surgery, Surgical Oncology (Lundy, Moaven, Perry, Mangieri, Valenzuela, Bordelon, Shen, Votanopoulos, Levine), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Christopher W Mangieri
- From the Department of General Surgery, Surgical Oncology (Lundy, Moaven, Perry, Mangieri, Valenzuela, Bordelon, Shen, Votanopoulos, Levine), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Cristian D Valenzuela
- From the Department of General Surgery, Surgical Oncology (Lundy, Moaven, Perry, Mangieri, Valenzuela, Bordelon, Shen, Votanopoulos, Levine), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Gregory B Russell
- the Department of Biostatistics and Data Science (Russell), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Rachel Bordelon
- From the Department of General Surgery, Surgical Oncology (Lundy, Moaven, Perry, Mangieri, Valenzuela, Bordelon, Shen, Votanopoulos, Levine), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Perry Shen
- From the Department of General Surgery, Surgical Oncology (Lundy, Moaven, Perry, Mangieri, Valenzuela, Bordelon, Shen, Votanopoulos, Levine), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
- From the Department of General Surgery, Surgical Oncology (Lundy, Moaven, Perry, Mangieri, Valenzuela, Bordelon, Shen, Votanopoulos, Levine), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Edward A Levine
- From the Department of General Surgery, Surgical Oncology (Lundy, Moaven, Perry, Mangieri, Valenzuela, Bordelon, Shen, Votanopoulos, Levine), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang C, Patel A, Hegeholz D, Brown K, Shostrom V, Pottebaum M, Foster JM. Cytoreductive Surgery with HIPEC is a Safe and Effective Palliative Option in Chemorefractory Symptomatic Peritoneal Metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3337-3346. [PMID: 35211861 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11323-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The safety and efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in peritoneal metastasis in palliative settings remain poorly investigated and understood. Chemotherapy-refractory patients often present with symptomatic disease. This study investigated the safety and survival outcomes of optimal CRS/HIPEC performed primarily for palliation. METHODS Palliative CRS/HIPEC was defined as asymptomatic patients who did not respond to three or more lines of chemotherapy, progression on current chemotherapy, and/or any symptomatic disease progression, including ascites, bowel obstruction, and pain. Data collected included demographics, histology, length of stay (LOS), perioperative complications, perioperative mortality, adjuvant chemotherapy use, peritoneal recurrence, overall recurrence, and overall survival. RESULTS The median number of lines of chemotherapy received prior to CRS/HIPEC was 3.2, and 81% of patients were symptomatic. There were no postoperative deaths and the major complication rate was 22%. Ostomy creation and abdominal wall reconstruction were performed in 24% and 21% of patients, respectively. The median LOS was 11 days and successful palliation was achieved in 97% of patients. Overall survival was 13.5 months and factors associated with prolonged survival included optimal CRS (R1/R2a; p < 0.01) and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Synchronous liver metastasis in the colon cancer subset did not negatively impact survival. CONCLUSION CRS/HIPEC was performed safely in the palliative setting in patients with symptomatic progressive disease receiving multiple lines of chemotherapy. Median survival exceeded 1 year and factors associated with longer survival were optimal CRS and adjuvant chemotherapy. Liver metastasis did not preclude survival benefit in colon cancer patients. CRS/HIPEC can be considered for palliation but should be performed at high-volume centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunmeng Zhang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Asish Patel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Dalton Hegeholz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Krista Brown
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Valerie Shostrom
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Mallory Pottebaum
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Jason M Foster
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Somashekhar SP, Rohit KC, Ramya Y, Zaveri SS, Ahuja V, Namachivayam AK, Ashwin KR. Bowel Anastomosis After or Before HIPEC: A Comparative Study in Patients Undergoing CRS+HIPEC for Peritoneal Surface Malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:214-223. [PMID: 34462817 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10661-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leak after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains a dreaded complication. There is no consensus statement regarding the optimal timing for bowel anastomoses to perform after or before HIPEC. METHODS Patients who underwent CRS+HIPEC and had at least one bowel anastomosis were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate if timing of anastomosis done after or before HIPEC had an impact on bowel complication rates (anastomotic leak and perforation). RESULTS From 2013 to 2019, 214 of 370 patients underwent CRS+HIPEC and had at least one bowel anastomosis. Of these 214 patients, 104 and 110 patients had anastomosis after and before HIPEC, respectively. A total of 324 anastomoses were performed, with a mean of 0.87 anastomoses per patient (range 1-4). The incidence of anastomotic leaks was comparable between the pre- and post-HIPEC groups (3.6% vs. 4.8%; p > 0.05), as was the bowel complication rate (7.6% vs. 7.2%). After multivariate analysis, prior surgical score >1 (odds ratio [OR] 4.3), recurrent cancers (OR 7.4), and more than two anastomosis (OR 3.8) were considered independent risk factors for bowel complications. CONCLUSION Anastomosis of the bowel performed after or before HIPEC does not affect bowel complication rates (leak/perforation). Higher prior surgical score, surgery for recurrent cancers, and more than two bowel anastomosis are independent risk factors for predicting bowel complications. Prehabilitation, standardization of steps, immediate attention and repair of serosal tears, and thorough inspection of the bowel before closure helps to decrease bowel complications. The timing of anastomosis can be at the discretion of the surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S P Somashekhar
- Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - Kumar C Rohit
- Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India.
| | - Yethadka Ramya
- Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - Shabber S Zaveri
- Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - Vijay Ahuja
- Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | | | - K R Ashwin
- Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
García-Fadrique A, Estevan Estevan R, Sabater Ortí L. Quality Standards for Surgery of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:188-202. [PMID: 34435297 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10642-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standardization of surgical outcomes throughout surgical procedures is mandatory. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) should provide proficient oncological and surgical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN The aim of this study was to identify clinically relevant quality indicators and their quality standard, and to determine their acceptable quality limit. A systematic review on cytoreductive results from 2000 to 2018 was performed focusing on clinical guidelines, consensus conferences, and publications. After the selection of quality indicators, a systematic review of indexed references was performed in order to calculate the quality standard for each indicator. STUDY SELECTION Unicentric/multicentric series, comparative studies, and clinical trials. Studies were to include outcomes after cytoreduction of colorectal origin and series with more than 50 patients. Quality indicators with at least 10 series were mandatory and objective measurements were also mandatory for inclusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Quality indicators selected were 1- to 5-year survival, overall disease-free survival, 1- to 5-year disease-free survival, complete surgical resection, duration of surgery, length of stay, overall morbimortality, major morbidity, re-intervention, postoperative hemorrhage, intestinal fistula, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, postoperative medical complications, overall recurrence, and failure to rescue. RESULTS The most relevant quality indicators and critical quality limits were overall disease-free survival and 5-year overall disease-free survival (14 months and <10 months, and 14% and <4%, respectively), completeness of surgical resection (89% and <80%, respectively), overall mortality (3% and >8%, respectively), overall morbidity (47% and >63%, respectively), failure to rescue (12% and <30%, respectively), reintervention (13 and <22%, respectively), anastomotic leakage (6% and <13%, respectively), and overall recurrence (60% and <74%, respectively). CONCLUSION This is the first study to assess quality standards in CRS + HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases. The current data are of particular relevance for future studies to control the variability of this surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luis Sabater Ortí
- Hospital Clínico Universitario, Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Synchronous Liver Resection, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver and Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:754-764. [PMID: 33742615 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Synchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases have traditionally been contraindicated. More recent clinical practice has begun to promote this aggressive treatment in select patients. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, with and without liver resection, in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to July 2020. STUDY SELECTION Cohort studies comparing outcomes following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with and without liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer were reviewed. No randomized controlled trials were available. INTERVENTION Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without synchronous liver resection were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measures were perioperative mortality and major morbidity. Secondary outcomes included 3- and 5-year overall survival and 1- and 3-year disease-free survival. RESULTS Fourteen studies fitted the inclusion criteria, with 8 studies included in the meta-analysis. On pooled analysis, there was no significant difference in perioperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. Patients that underwent concomitant liver resection had worse 1- and 3-year disease-free survival and 3- and 5-year overall survival. LIMITATIONS Only a limited number of studies were available, with a moderate degree of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS The addition of synchronous liver resection to cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of resectable metastatic colorectal cancer was not associated with increased perioperative major morbidity and mortality in comparison with cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy alone. However, the presence of liver metastases was associated with inferior disease-free and overall survival. These data support the continued practice of liver resection, cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of select patients with such stage IV disease.
Collapse
|
11
|
Rossi AJ, Khan TM, Rehman SU, Nash GM, Hernandez JM. Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Versus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy After Optimal Cytoreductive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer with Isolated Peritoneal Metastasis (ICARuS). Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:4100-4101. [PMID: 34032959 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10110-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Rossi
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Tahsin M Khan
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Shahyan U Rehman
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jonathan M Hernandez
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Frühling P, Ghanipour L, Dranichnikov P, Enblad M, Birgisson H, Cashin PH. Oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with single drug versus multiple drug treatment for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases: an observational cohort study. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:516-526. [PMID: 34012645 PMCID: PMC8107596 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term survival for selected patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is possible when treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The objective of this study was to compare three different oxaliplatin-based (OX)-HIPEC regimens. Primary end-point was disease-free survival (DFS), and secondary endpoints, morbidity and overall survival (OS). METHODS This is a retrospective study of all patients with colorectal PM treated with CRS and HIPEC between 2004 and 2015 from the prospectively maintained Uppsala HIPEC database. One hundred and thirty-three patients were identified. Three HIPEC regimens were included: OX-HIPEC, OX-HIPEC + post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and oxaliplatin-irinotecan-based (OXIRI)-HIPEC. Multivariable Cox regression for DFS was performed. RESULTS Sixty-one patients received OX-HIPEC, 24 patients received OX-HIPEC + 5-FU EPIC, and 48 patients received OXIRI-HIPEC. The DFS for the OX-HIPEC group was 10.5 months, OX-HIPEC + EPIC 11.9 months, and OXIRI-HIPEC 13.4 months (OX-HIPEC vs. OXIRI HIPEC, P=0.049). The morbidity and OS did not differ between the groups. In the multivariable analysis, low peritoneal cancer index (PCI), absence of liver metastases, low completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score, and multiple drug (EPIC or OXIRI) HIPEC regimen were independent prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSIONS This study showed improved DFS with an intensification of HIPEC by adding irinotecan or EPIC compared to oxaliplatin alone without an increase in morbidity or mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petter Frühling
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Surgery, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lana Ghanipour
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Surgery, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Paul Dranichnikov
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Surgery, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Malin Enblad
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Surgery, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helgi Birgisson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Surgery, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Peter H Cashin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Surgery, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hallam S, Stockton J, Bryer C, Whalley C, Pestinger V, Youssef H, Beggs AD. The transition from primary colorectal cancer to isolated peritoneal malignancy is associated with an increased tumour mutational burden. Sci Rep 2020; 10:18900. [PMID: 33144643 PMCID: PMC7641117 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75844-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal Peritoneal metastases (CPM) develop in 15% of colorectal cancers. Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS & HIPEC) is the current standard of care in selected patients with limited resectable CPM. Despite selection using known prognostic factors survival is varied and morbidity and mortality are relatively high. There is a need to improve patient selection and a paucity of research concerning the biology of isolated CPM. We aimed to determine the biology associated with transition from primary CRC to CPM and of patients with CPM not responding to treatment with CRS & HIPEC, to identify those suitable for treatment with CRS & HIPEC and to identify targets for existing repurposed or novel treatment strategies. A cohort of patients with CPM treated with CRS & HIPEC was recruited and divided according to prognosis. Molecular profiling of the transcriptome (n = 25), epigenome (n = 24) and genome (n = 21) of CPM and matched primary CRC was performed. CPM were characterised by frequent Wnt/ β catenin negative regulator mutations, TET2 mutations, mismatch repair mutations and high tumour mutational burden. Here we show the molecular features associated with CPM development and associated with not responding to CRS & HIPEC. Potential applications include improving patient selection for treatment with CRS & HIPEC and in future research into novel and personalised treatments targeting the molecular features identified here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Hallam
- Surgical Research Laboratory, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Joanne Stockton
- Surgical Research Laboratory, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Claire Bryer
- Surgical Research Laboratory, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Celina Whalley
- Surgical Research Laboratory, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Valerie Pestinger
- Surgical Research Laboratory, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Haney Youssef
- Surgical Research Laboratory, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Andrew D Beggs
- Surgical Research Laboratory, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zou Y, Chen X, Zhang X, Shen Z, Cai J, Tan Y, Weng J, Rong Y, Lin X. Clinical outcomes of curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases combined with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. Int J Hyperthermia 2020; 37:944-954. [PMID: 32787474 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1803424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and liver metastases (LM) remains controversial. We aimed to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with CRC and concomitant PC and LM who had undergone curative surgery, including resections at both metastatic sites and synchronous intraabdominal chemotherapy. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for eligible studies. Studies focusing on the clinical effects of curative surgery and synchronous intraabdominal chemotherapy for patients with CRC and concomitant PC and LM were included. Meta-analysis results were recorded as hazard ratios (HRs), risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences. RESULTS We included 9 of 998 identified studies in the meta-analysis, involving 746 patients (221 patients with PC + LM, 525 patients with PC). Overall survival (pooled HR 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-2.13, p < 0.01) and disease-free survival (pooled HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.51-2.20, p < 0.01) were both lower in patients with PC + LM. A higher recurrence rate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.44, p = 0.02) and major postoperative morbidity (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.19-1.82, p < 0.01) were also observed in patients with PC + LM. CONCLUSION Liver resection in combination with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with CRC and synchronous hepatic and peritoneal metastases may be associated with worse survival and higher morbidity compared with patients with isolated PC. More restricted patient inclusion criteria should be established to facilitate an optimal prognosis for this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifeng Zou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xinzhi Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhihong Shen
- Department of General surgery, Jieyang City Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jieyang, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiawei Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yingxin Tan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - JingRong Weng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yuming Rong
- Department of VIP Region, Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xutao Lin
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stewart JH, Blazer DG, Calderon MJG, Carter TM, Eckhoff A, Al Efishat MA, Fernando DG, Foster JM, Hayes-Jordan A, Johnston FM, Lautz TB, Levine EA, Maduekwe UN, Mangieri CW, Moaven O, Mogal H, Shen P, Votanopoulos KI. The Evolving Management of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies. Curr Probl Surg 2020; 58:100860. [PMID: 33832580 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2020.100860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dan G Blazer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jason M Foster
- Fred and Pamela Buffet Cancer Center, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE
| | | | - Fabian M Johnston
- Complex General Surgical Oncology Program, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Timothy B Lautz
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Ugwuji N Maduekwe
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | - Perry Shen
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9030748. [PMID: 32164300 PMCID: PMC7141272 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with improved survival for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CR-PM). However, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to CRS-HIPEC is poorly understood. A retrospective review of adult patients with CR-PM who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC from 2000–2017 was performed. Among 298 patients who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC, 196 (65.8%) received NAC while 102 (34.2%) underwent surgery first (SF). Patients who received NAC had lower peritoneal cancer index score (12.1 + 7.9 vs. 14.3 + 8.5, p = 0.034). There was no significant difference in grade III/IV complications (22.4% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.650), readmission (32.3% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.114), or 30-day mortality (1.5% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.411) between groups. NAC patients experienced longer overall survival (OS) (median 32.7 vs. 22.0 months, p = 0.044) but similar recurrence-free survival (RFS) (median 13.8 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.456). After controlling for confounding factors, NAC was not independently associated with improved OS (OR 0.80) or RFS (OR 1.04). Among patients who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC for CR-PM, the use of NAC was associated with improved OS that did not persist on multivariable analysis. However, NAC prior to CRS+/-HIPEC was a safe and feasible strategy for CR-PM, which may aid in the appropriate selection of patients for aggressive cytoreductive surgery.
Collapse
|
17
|
Schaap DP, de Valk KS, Deken MM, Meijer RPJ, Burggraaf J, Vahrmeijer AL, Kusters M. Carcinoembryonic antigen-specific, fluorescent image-guided cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2020; 107:334-337. [PMID: 31960953 PMCID: PMC7079046 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D P Schaap
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - K S de Valk
- Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - M M Deken
- Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - R P J Meijer
- Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - J Burggraaf
- Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - A L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - M Kusters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yang SY, Kang JH, Kim HS, Han YD, Min BS, Lee KY. Status of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10:1251-1265. [PMID: 31949946 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.01.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) was previously considered an incurable disease with a poor survival outcome. As our understanding of its biology evolved, the paradigm of the management of PC from colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed, including the combination of macroscopic disease control, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), maximal regional chemotherapy to treat residual microscopic disease, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). As with many surgical innovations, CRS with HIPEC has evolved faster than data to support it, leaving many skeptics and critics. This review highlights the recent evidence of current practice and outcome of CRS with HIPEC. Furthermore, it also summarizes the ongoing clinical trials and potential future progress of this treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Yoon Yang
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Kang
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ho Seung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoon Dae Han
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Byung Soh Min
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kang Young Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Klos D, Riško J, Loveček M, Skalický P, Svobodová I, Krejčí D, Melichar B, Mohelníková-Duchoňová B, Lemstrová R. Trends in peritoneal surface malignancies: evidence from a Czech nationwide population-based study. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17:182. [PMID: 31694646 PMCID: PMC6836516 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1731-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study is to identify the incidence trends of primary and secondary peritoneal surface malignancies in a representative Czech population. Methods Data were obtained from patients registered in the Czech National Cancer Registry between 1979 and 2016. The incidence rates were analyzed between 2012 and 2016. To observe the incidence trends, we analyzed the data from two time periods, 1979–2005 and 2006–2016. The analyzed data included age, sex, and the histological types and primary origins of the malignancies. The Cochrane-Armitage test for linear trends was used for verification of the null hypothesis. The significance level established for hypothesis testing was p = 0.05. Results Between 2012 and 2016, 230 patients with primary peritoneal tumors were identified and divided into the following groups according to their “International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision” codes: malignant neoplasm of specified parts of the peritoneum (C48.1); malignant neoplasm of the peritoneum, unspecified (C48.2); and malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of the retroperitoneum and peritoneum (C48.8). Moreover, 549 primary tumors of the appendix (C18.1, encompassing all appendiceal malignancies) and 3137 secondary synchronous peritoneal carcinomatoses of other primary origins were documented. The age-adjusted incidence of primary peritoneal tumors in 2012–2016 was 4.36/year/1,000,000 inhabitants. The age-adjusted incidence of synchronous secondary peritoneal malignancies in 2014–2016 was 99.0/year/1,000,000 inhabitants. The diagnoses of primary peritoneal malignancies followed a stable trend between 1979 and 2016. However, the incidences of primary tumors of the appendix increased by 76.7%. Conclusions The data produced in our study ought to clarify the status of peritoneal surface malignancies in the Czech Republic, which can lead to improved planning and development of therapeutic interventions as well as physician training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dušan Klos
- Department of Surgery I, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Juraj Riško
- Department of Surgery I, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Loveček
- Department of Surgery I, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Skalický
- Department of Surgery I, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Ivana Svobodová
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.,Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Denisa Krejčí
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.,Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Bohuslav Melichar
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, CZ-779 00, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Beatrice Mohelníková-Duchoňová
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, CZ-779 00, Olomouc, Czech Republic.,Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Radmila Lemstrová
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, CZ-779 00, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Spiliotis J, Kalles V, Kyriazanos I, Terra A, Prodromidou A, Raptis A, Kopanakis N, Christopoulou A. CRS and HIPEC in patients with peritoneal metastasis secondary to colorectal cancer: The small-bowel PCI score as a predictor of survival. Pleura Peritoneum 2019; 4:20190018. [PMID: 31799372 PMCID: PMC6881666 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2019-0018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with Hyperthermic IntraPeritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) can benefit patients with peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer. The present study evaluates the small bowel subset of the Peritoneal Cancer Index (Small-Bowel-PCI score (SB-PCI), min-max 0–12) as a prognostic factor in such patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients that underwent CRS and HIPEC for recurrent colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Patient characteristics, procedure details, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results Eighty patients were included. The mean intraoperative PCI-score was 16.8, with a mean SB-PCI score of 5.9. CC0/1 was achieved in 62/80 patients. The mean follow-up period was 26.3 months. Univariate regression analysis showed that the ECOG status, the presence of severe complications, the HIPEC regimen (oxaliplatin vs. mitomycin-C), the PCI score, the SB-PCI score and the completeness of cytoreduction correlated significantly with overall survival. In multivariate analysis, the SB-PCI and CC score were identified as independent prognostic factors of survival. When the SB-PCI was stratified in three groups (0–4, 5–8 and 9–12), Kaplan–Meier curve analysis showed significant difference in survival (p<0.001). Conclusions The SB-PCI correlates with overall survival in patients with peritoneal metastases secondary to colorectal cancer in this retrospective cohort. Its use should be validated in prospective patient series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Spiliotis
- Department of Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Athens Medical Centre, Athens, Attica, Greece
| | - Vasileios Kalles
- Department of Surgery, Naval Hospital of Athens, Deinokratous 70, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Kyriazanos
- Department of Surgery, Naval Hospital of Athens, Deinokratous 70, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexios Terra
- Department of Surgery, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus, Attike, Greece
| | | | - Apostolos Raptis
- Department of Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Athens Medical Centre, Athens, Attica, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kopanakis
- Department of Surgery, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus, Attike, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Systematic review of published literature on oxaliplatin and mitomycin C as chemotherapeutic agents for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 142:119-129. [PMID: 31400583 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
|
22
|
Paredes AZ, Guzman-Pruneda FA, Abdel-Misih S, Hays J, Dillhoff ME, Pawlik TM, Cloyd JM. Perioperative Morbidity of Gastrectomy During CRS-HIPEC: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis. J Surg Res 2019; 241:31-39. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Revised: 02/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
23
|
Yong ZZ, Tan GHC, Shannon N, Chia C, Teo MCC. P.R.O.P.S. - A novel Pre-Operative Predictive Score for unresectability in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases being considered for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17:138. [PMID: 31391066 PMCID: PMC6686533 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1673-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Twenty to thirty percent of planned cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS and HIPEC) procedures are abandoned intra-operatively. Pre-operative factors associated with unresectability identified previously were used to develop a Pre-Operative Predictive Score (PROPS), which was compared with current selection criteria—Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS), Verwaal’s Prognostic Score (PS) and Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Prognostic Surgical Score (COMPASS), to determine which score provides the best prediction for unresectability. Methods Fifty-six patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin were included. Beta-coefficient values of significant variables (p < 0.05) were determined from multivariate analysis to develop PROPS. PROPS, PSDSS, PS and COMPASS were compared using a receiver operating characteristic curve to calculate its accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Results PROPS consisted of nine patient and tumour factors which were categorised into three groups: (i) poor tumour biology: previous inadequate resection, underwent multiple lines of chemotherapy and poorly differentiated or signet cell histology; (ii) heavy tumour burden: abdominal distension, palpable abdominal mass and computed tomography findings of ascites, small bowel disease and/or omental thickening; and (iii) active tumour proliferation: elevated tumour markers. Overall, PROPS achieved 86% accuracy with 100% sensitivity and 68% specificity, PSDSS achieved 85% accuracy with 100% sensitivity and 63% specificity, PS achieved 73% accuracy with 100% sensitivity and 68% specificity and COMPASS achieved 61% accuracy with 27% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Conclusions PROPS is more effective in predicting unresectability as compared to PSDSS, PS and COMPASS, and has the added advantage of using solely pre-operative factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Zihui Yong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Grace Hwei Ching Tan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Shannon
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Claramae Chia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Melissa Ching Ching Teo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hallam S, Tyler R, Price M, Beggs A, Youssef H. Meta-analysis of prognostic factors for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastasis undergoing cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy. BJS Open 2019; 3:585-594. [PMID: 31592510 PMCID: PMC6773657 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Up to 15 per cent of colorectal cancers present with peritoneal metastases (CPM). Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) aims to achieve macroscopic tumour resection combined with HIPEC to destroy microscopic disease. CRS + HIPEC is a major operation with significant morbidity and effects on quality of life (QoL). Improving patient selection is crucial to maximize patient outcomes while minimizing morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for patients with CPM undergoing CRS + HIPEC. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library electronic databases was performed using terms for colorectal cancer, peritoneal metastasis and CRS + HIPEC. Included studies focused on the impact of prognostic factors on overall survival following CRS + HIPEC in patients with CPM. Results Twenty-four studies described 3128 patients. Obstruction or perforation of the primary tumour (hazard ratio (HR) 2·91, 95 per cent c.i. 1·5 to 5·65), extent of peritoneal metastasis as described by the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) (per increase of 1 PCI point: HR 1·07, 1·02 to 1·12) and the completeness of cytoreduction (CC score above zero: HR 1·75, 1·18 to 2·59) were associated with reduced overall survival after CRS + HIPEC. Conclusion Primary tumour obstruction or perforation, PCI score and CC score are valuable prognostic factors in the selection of patients with CPM for CRS + HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hallam
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - R Tyler
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - M Price
- Institute of Applied Health Research University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - A Beggs
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - H Youssef
- Colorectal Surgery, Good Hope Hospital University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chen Y, Chen Q, Zhu Q, Liu J, Li Y, Gao X, Chen D, Zhu X. Small Molecular Theranostic Assemblies Functionalized by Doxorubicin–Hyaluronic Acid–Methotrexate Prodrug for Multiple Tumor Targeting and Imaging-Guided Combined Chemo-Photothermal Therapy. Mol Pharm 2019; 16:2470-2480. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yilin Chen
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Target Research, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China
| | - Qing Chen
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Target Research, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China
| | - Qixin Zhu
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Target Research, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China
| | - Jinxue Liu
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Target Research, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China
| | - Yang Li
- CAS Key Laboratory of Design and Assembly of Functional Nanostructures, and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Nanomaterials, Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fuzhou 350002, China
- Department of Translational Medicine, Xiamen Institute of Rare Earth Materials, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361024, P. R. China
| | - Xuemin Gao
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Target Research, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China
| | - Dengyue Chen
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Target Research, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China
| | - Xuan Zhu
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Target Research, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361002, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Solaini L, D'Acapito F, Passardi A, Framarini M, Tauceri F, Di Pietrantonio D, Frassineti GL, Casadei Gardini A, Cucchetti A, Cavaliere D, Ercolani G. Cytoreduction plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis in colorectal cancer patients: a single-center cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17:58. [PMID: 30917826 PMCID: PMC6437853 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1602-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In this study, we report our experience of cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC), focusing on the factors affecting survival. Methods All patients with surgically treated PC from colorectal cancer and with no involvement of other organs referred to our institute from March 2005 to December 2017 were included in the analysis. Results Thirty-eight patients underwent CRS-HIPEC, and all had a completeness of cytoreduction score of 0 (CC0). The median operating time was 645 min (interquartile range [IQR] 565–710). Five patients (13.1%) had Clavien-Dindo grade > 2 postoperative complications. Median overall survival (OS) was 60 months. In the Cox regression for OS, calculated on the CRS-HIPEC group, the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) > 6 (hazard ratio [HR] 4.48, IQR 1.68–11.9, P = 0.003) and significant nodal involvement (N2) (HR 3.89, IQR 1.50–10.1, P = 0.005) were independent prognostic factors. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 16 months. Only N2 (HR 2.44, IQR 1.11–5.36, P = 0.027) was a significantly negative prognostic factor for DFS in multivariate analysis. Conclusions CRS-HIPEC can substantially improve survival. However, patients with high PCI (PCI > 6) and significant nodal involvement (N2) may not benefit from the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Solaini
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, via Forlanini 34, 47121, Forlì, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, via Zamboni 33, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabrizio D'Acapito
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, via Forlanini 34, 47121, Forlì, Italy
| | - Alessandro Passardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, via Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy.
| | - Massimo Framarini
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, via Forlanini 34, 47121, Forlì, Italy
| | - Francesca Tauceri
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, via Forlanini 34, 47121, Forlì, Italy
| | - Daniela Di Pietrantonio
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, via Forlanini 34, 47121, Forlì, Italy
| | - Giovanni Luca Frassineti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, via Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Andrea Casadei Gardini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, via Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, via Forlanini 34, 47121, Forlì, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, via Zamboni 33, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| | - Davide Cavaliere
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, via Forlanini 34, 47121, Forlì, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, via Forlanini 34, 47121, Forlì, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, via Zamboni 33, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sugarbaker PH. Prevention and Treatment of Peritoneal Metastases: a Comprehensive Review. Indian J Surg Oncol 2019; 10:3-23. [PMID: 30948866 PMCID: PMC6414583 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-018-0856-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases may occur from a majority of cancers that occur within the abdomen or pelvis. When cancer spread to the peritoneal surfaces is documented, a decision regarding palliation versus an aggressive approach using cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) must be made. This decision is dependent on a well-defined group of prognostic indicators. In addition to treatment, prevention of peritoneal metastases may be an option. The clinical and pathologic features of a primary cancer can be used to select perioperative treatments that may prevent cancer cells within the abdomen and pelvis from progressing to established peritoneal metastases. In some clinical situations with appendiceal and colorectal cancers, the clinical or histopathologic features may indicate that second-look surgery plus perioperative chemotherapy should occur. Peritoneal metastases should always be considered by the multidisciplinary team for treatment or prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul H. Sugarbaker
- Center for Gastrointestinal Malignancies, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 106 Irving St., NW, Suite 3900, Washington, DC 20010 USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Systematic Review of Variations in Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2018; 7:jcm7120567. [PMID: 30572653 PMCID: PMC6306814 DOI: 10.3390/jcm7120567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), combines radical surgery with abdominal heated chemotherapy, constituting a multimodal treatment approach. Since clear standards for HIPEC conduct in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) are lacking, we aimed to provide a comprehensive structured survey. Data sources and study eligibility criteria: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, with keywords “HIPEC” and “colorectal cancer”, according to established guidelines. Articles were systematically screened, selecting 87 publications complemented by 48 publications identified through extended search for subsequent synthesis and evaluation, extracting inter alia details on used drugs, dosage, temperature, exposure times, and carrier solutions. Results: Compiled publications contained 171 reports on HIPEC conduct foremost with mitomycin C and oxaliplatin, but also other drugs and drug combinations, comprising at least 60 different procedures. We hence provide an overview of interconnections between HIPEC protocols, used drugs and carrier solutions as well as their volumes. In addition, HIPEC temperatures and dosing benchmarks, as well as an estimate of in vivo resulting drug concentrations are demonstrated. Conclusions and implications: Owing to recent developments, HIPEC conduct and practices need to be reassessed. Unfortunately, imprecise and lacking reporting is frequent, which is why minimal information requirements should be established for HIPEC and the introduction of final drug concentrations for comparability reasons seems sensible.
Collapse
|
29
|
Li Z, Fan X, Liu J, Hu Y, Yang Y, Li Z, Sun Y, Chen C, Yu M. Mesoporous silica-coated bismuth nanohybrids as a new platform for photoacoustic/computed tomography imaging and synergistic chemophotothermal therapy. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2018; 13:2283-2300. [PMID: 30284502 DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2018-0106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Polyethylene glycol modified mesoporous silica-coated bismuth nanohybrids (Bi@mSiO2-PEG) are fabricated for chemothermotherapy and multimodal imaging. MATERIALS & METHODS The Bi@mSiO2-PEG are synthesized by coating mesoporous SiO2 onto metallic Bi cores, followed by PEG modification. Their cytotoxicity, photothermal effect, drug loading, antitumor effect and imaging abilities are evaluated. RESULTS The nanohybrids show good biocompatibility, strong near-infrared absorbance, high photothermal conversion efficiency (∼36.6%), prominent infrared thermal imaging and photothermal killing efficacy on cancer cells. Utilizing the nanohybrids as potent drug carriers, a synergistic antitumor effect through chemothermotherapy is realized. Thanks to the superhigh x-ray attenuation coefficient and strong photothermal ability, high-contrast photoacoustic and x-ray computed tomography imaging are achieved. CONCLUSION These results reveal great potentials of the Bi@mSiO2-PEG for precise and efficient anticancer treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenglin Li
- State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource & Environment, School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, PR China.,Condensed Matter Science & Technology Institute, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, PR China
| | - Xuelei Fan
- State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource & Environment, School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, PR China
| | - Jing Liu
- National Centre for Nanoscience & Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China
| | - Ying Hu
- School of Life Science & Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, PR China
| | - Yingwei Yang
- College of Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, PR China
| | - Zhuo Li
- State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource & Environment, School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, PR China
| | - Ye Sun
- Condensed Matter Science & Technology Institute, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, PR China
| | - Chunying Chen
- National Centre for Nanoscience & Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China
| | - Miao Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource & Environment, School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
McGee S, AlGhareeb W, Ahmad C, Armstrong D, Babak S, Berry S, Biagi J, Booth C, Bossé D, Champion P, Colwell B, Finn N, Goel R, Gray S, Green J, Harb M, Hyde A, Jeyakumar A, Jonker D, Kanagaratnam S, Kavan P, MacMillan A, Muinuddin A, Patil N, Porter G, Powell E, Ramjeesingh R, Raza M, Rorke S, Seal M, Servidio-Italiano F, Siddiqui J, Simms J, Smithson L, Snow S, St-Hilaire E, Stuckless T, Tate A, Tehfe M, Thirlwell M, Tsvetkova E, Valdes M, Vickers M, Virik K, Welch S, Marginean C, Asmis T. Eastern Canadian Colorectal Cancer Consensus Conference 2017. Curr Oncol 2018; 25:262-274. [PMID: 30111967 PMCID: PMC6092057 DOI: 10.3747/co.25.4083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The annual Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2017 was held in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, 28-30 September. Experts in radiation oncology, medical oncology, surgical oncology, and cancer genetics who are involved in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies participated in presentations and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses multiple topics in the management of gastric, rectal, and colon cancer, including ■ identification and management of hereditary gastric and colorectal cancer (crc);■ palliative systemic therapy for metastatic gastric cancer;■ optimum duration of preoperative radiation in rectal cancer-that is, short- compared with long-course radiation;■ management options for peritoneal carcinomatosis in crc;■ implications of tumour location for treatment and prognosis in crc; and■ new molecular markers in crc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S.F. McGee
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - W. AlGhareeb
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - C.H. Ahmad
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - D. Armstrong
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - S. Babak
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - S. Berry
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - J. Biagi
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - C. Booth
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - D. Bossé
- Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, U.S.A
| | - P. Champion
- Prince Edward Island—Prince Edward Island Cancer Treatment Centre, Charlottetown
| | - B. Colwell
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - N. Finn
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - R. Goel
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - S. Gray
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - J. Green
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - M. Harb
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - A. Hyde
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - A. Jeyakumar
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - D. Jonker
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - S. Kanagaratnam
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - P. Kavan
- Quebec—McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (Kavan, Thirlwell); Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal (Tehfé)
| | - A. MacMillan
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - A. Muinuddin
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - N. Patil
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - G. Porter
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - E. Powell
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - R. Ramjeesingh
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - M. Raza
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - S. Rorke
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - M. Seal
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - F. Servidio-Italiano
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - J. Siddiqui
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - J. Simms
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - L. Smithson
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - S. Snow
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - E. St-Hilaire
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - T. Stuckless
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - A. Tate
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - M. Tehfe
- Quebec—McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (Kavan, Thirlwell); Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal (Tehfé)
| | - M. Thirlwell
- Quebec—McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (Kavan, Thirlwell); Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal (Tehfé)
| | - E. Tsvetkova
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - M. Valdes
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - M. Vickers
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - K. Virik
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - S. Welch
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - C. Marginean
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - T. Asmis
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Glockzin G, Zeman F, Croner RS, Königsrainer A, Pelz J, Ströhlein MA, Rau B, Arnold D, Koller M, Schlitt HJ, Piso P. Perioperative Systemic Chemotherapy, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients With Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis: Results of the Prospective Multicenter Phase 2 COMBATAC Trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018; 17:285-296. [PMID: 30131226 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Revised: 07/21/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as parts of an interdisciplinary treatment concept including systemic chemotherapy can improve survival of selected patients with peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer (pmCRC). Nevertheless, the sequence of the therapeutic options is still a matter of debate. Thus, the COMBATAC (COMBined Anticancer Treatment of Advanced Colorectal cancer) trial was conducted to evaluate a combined treatment regimen consisting of preoperative systemic polychemotherapy + cetuximab followed by CRS + HIPEC and postoperative systemic polychemotherapy + cetuximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS The COMBATAC trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, single-stage phase 2 trial. Twenty-six patients with synchronous or metachronous colorectal or appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis were included. Enrollment was terminated prematurely by the sponsor because of slow recruitment. Progression-free survival as primary end point and overall survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Also evaluated were morbidity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 and feasibility of the combined treatment concept. RESULTS Median progression-free survival for the intention-to-treat population (n = 25) was 14.9 months. Median overall survival was not reached during the study duration. Ninety-two adverse events were documented in 16 patients, including 14 serious adverse events in 9 patients. The overall morbidity rate was 64%, and the grade 3/4 morbidity rate was 44%. Of all grade 3/4 morbidity events, 36.4% were related to systemic chemotherapy and 22.7% to surgery, whereas 40.9% were not directly related. There was no treatment-related mortality. CONCLUSION The results of the COMBATAC trial show that the multimodal treatment concept consisting of perioperative systemic chemotherapy and CRS + HIPEC is safe and feasible. Progression-free survival in selected patients with colorectal or appendiceal peritoneal metastasis might be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Glockzin
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgery, Klinikum Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany.
| | - Florian Zeman
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Roland S Croner
- Department of Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of Surgery, University of Tübingen, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jörg Pelz
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Department of Surgery, St Bernward Hospital, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Michael A Ströhlein
- Department of Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Beate Rau
- Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Arnold
- Asklepios Tumor Center Hamburg, AK Altona, Department of Oncology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Koller
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Hans J Schlitt
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Peritoneal metastases may occur from a majority of cancers that occur within the abdomen or pelvis. When cancer spread to the peritoneal surfaces is documented, a decision regarding palliation vs. an aggressive approach using cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy must be made. The perioperative chemotherapy may be hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) administered in the operating room or early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) administered in the first 4 or 5 postoperative days. RECENT FINDINGS This decision is dependent on a well-defined group of prognostic indicators. In addition to treatment, the clinical and pathologic features of a primary cancer can be used to select perioperative treatments that may prevent cancer cells within the abdomen and pelvis from progressing to established peritoneal metastases. In some clinical situations with appendiceal and colorectal cancers, the clinical or histopathologic features may indicate that second-look surgery plus perioperative chemotherapy should occur. Peritoneal metastases should always be considered for treatment or prevention.
Collapse
|
33
|
Stiles ZE, Hinkle NM, Munene G, Dickson PV, Davidoff AM, Deneve JL. The Impact of Ostomy Creation after Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in a Newly Established Peritoneal Malignancy Program. Am Surg 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481808400618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) has improved outcomes for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and often requires ostomy creation. We examined the impact of ostomy creation in a newly established peritoneal malignancy program. A retrospective review was performed of CRS-HIPEC procedures from 2011 to 2016. Those who did and did not receive an ostomy were compared. Fifty-eight patients underwent CRS-HIPEC and an ostomy was created in 25.9 per cent. Median peritoneal cancer index (14 vs 16, P = 0.63) and multivisceral resection rates (87.9 vs 100.0%, P = 0.17) were similar between groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that bowel resection (OR 210.65, P = 0.02) was significantly associated with ostomy creation. Advanced age was noted to be inversely associated with stoma formation (OR 0.04, P = 0.04). Progression-free survival was significantly lower in the ostomy group (18 vs 23 months, P = 0.03). Those with an ostomy experienced prolonged length of stay (13.3 ± 7.4 vs 9.5 ± 3.7, P = 0.01). At follow-up, 6/10 temporary ostomies had undergone reversal and three patients experienced morbidity after reversal. Ostomy creation may occur during CRS-HIPEC and carries potential for morbidity. Ostomy creation may contribute to postoperative length of stay. Patients should be counseled preoperatively on the potential impact of ostomy placement during CRS-HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary E. Stiles
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Nathan M. Hinkle
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Gitonga Munene
- Western Michigan University Homer Stryker School of Medicine, West Michigan Cancer Center, Kalamazoo, Michigan
| | - Paxton V. Dickson
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Andrew M. Davidoff
- Western Michigan University Homer Stryker School of Medicine, West Michigan Cancer Center, Kalamazoo, Michigan
| | - Jeremiah L. Deneve
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zhang P, Yi W, Hou J, Yoo S, Jin W, Yang Q. A carbon nanotube-gemcitabine-lentinan three-component composite for chemo-photothermal synergistic therapy of cancer. Int J Nanomedicine 2018; 13:3069-3080. [PMID: 29872294 PMCID: PMC5975604 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s165232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Gemcitabine's clinical application is limited due to its short plasma half-life and poor uptake by cells. To address this problem, a drug delivery three-component composite, multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs)/gemcitabine (Ge)/lentinan (Le; MWNTs-Ge-Le), was fabricated in our study. Moreover, the combination of chemotherapy and photothermal therapy was employed to enhance antitumor efficacy. METHODS In this study, we conjugated gemcitabine and lentinan with MWNTs via a covalent and noncovalent way to functionalize with MWNTs, and the chemical structure of MWNTs-Ge-Le was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis and transmission electron microscopy. Using the composite and an 808 nm laser, we treated tumors, both in vitro and in vivo, and investigated the photothermal responses and the anticancer efficacy. RESULTS The MWNTs-Ge-Le composite could efficiently cross cell membrane, having a higher antitumor activity than MWNTs, gemcitabine and MWNTs-Ge in vitro and in vivo. Our study on the MWNTs-Ge-Le composite with an 808 nm laser radiation showed the combination of drug therapy and near-infrared photothermal therapy possesses great synergistic antitumor efficacy. CONCLUSION The MWNTs-Ge-Le three-component anticancer composite can serve as a promising candidate for cancer therapy in the combination of chemotherapy and photothermal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Zhang
- Key Laboratory for Physical Electronics and Devices of the Ministry of Education, School of Information and Electronics Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory for Information Photonic Technology of Shaanxi Province, School of Information and Electronics Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenhui Yi
- Key Laboratory for Physical Electronics and Devices of the Ministry of Education, School of Information and Electronics Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory for Information Photonic Technology of Shaanxi Province, School of Information and Electronics Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jin Hou
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi’an Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Sweejiang Yoo
- Key Laboratory for Physical Electronics and Devices of the Ministry of Education, School of Information and Electronics Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory for Information Photonic Technology of Shaanxi Province, School of Information and Electronics Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Weiqiu Jin
- Key Laboratory for Physical Electronics and Devices of the Ministry of Education, School of Information and Electronics Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory for Information Photonic Technology of Shaanxi Province, School of Information and Electronics Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qisheng Yang
- Key Laboratory for Physical Electronics and Devices of the Ministry of Education, School of Information and Electronics Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory for Information Photonic Technology of Shaanxi Province, School of Information and Electronics Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Franko J. Therapeutic efficacy of systemic therapy for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis: Surgeon's perspective. Pleura Peritoneum 2018; 3:20180102. [PMID: 30911652 PMCID: PMC6405010 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2018-0102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment choices for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis/metastases include systemic therapy and increasingly cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy delivery. These options are best considered as complementary and not exclusive alternatives. Two prospective randomized trials support use of peritonectomy procedures and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. This overview examines efficacy, limitations and landscape of systemic therapy focusing on colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Observations from literature support notions that (1) systemic therapy provides survival benefit for all prototypical patients with mCRC irrespective of metastatic disease site; (2) the magnitude of this benefit is considerably reduced among patients with peritoneal metastases who consequently experience significantly shorter overall survival; (3) efficacy of systemic therapy improved over time but at a slower pace for those with carcinomatosis; (4) this therapeutic difference has not diminished with introduction of targeted therapy, but perhaps widened; (5) further research of cytoreductive surgery and/or intraperitoneal regional therapies is thus a multidisciplinary responsibility of the entire oncology community; (6) peritonectomy procedures with intraperitoneal regional therapy are not scientifically supported in absence of systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Franko
- Chair of Surgical Oncology, Mercy Medical Center, 411 Laurel Street, Suite 2100, Des Moines, IA 50314, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dodson RM, Kuncewitch M, Votanopoulos KI, Shen P, Levine EA. Techniques for Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2152-2158. [PMID: 29388121 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6336-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca M Dodson
- Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Michael Kuncewitch
- Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Perry Shen
- Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Edward A Levine
- Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pamela K, Matthias Z, Reinhold KR, Julia P, Peter M, Alexander P, Dietmar Ö. Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): a Single-Center Experience in Austria. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22:884-893. [PMID: 29363016 PMCID: PMC5954007 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3661-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can significantly influence overall and disease-free survival in selected patients suffering from peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) of various tumor entities. Because of the extent of the therapeutic approach, the associated morbidity and mortality and the multidisciplinarity needed, implementation of a CRS + HIPEC program at an institution is often challenging. METHODS This single-center analysis included all patients (n = 60, 34 female, 26 male) with PSM from various tumor primaries [colorectal cancer (15/60; 25%), appendix neoplasia (21/60; 35%), and others (24/60; 40%)] treated with CRS + HIPEC at our institution between 2006 and 2014. Charts were reviewed for preoperative patient evaluation, procedure-specific and tumor-specific parameters, morbidity, mortality, tumor recurrence and patients' overall (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS In 57 of the 60 patients included in the investigation (57/60; 95%), a radical resection (CC 0/1) was achieved. Median operating time was 559 min (253-900) with a median need of packed red blood cells of 1.1 (0-7) or fresh frozen plasma of 4.4 (0-20) concentrates. Twenty (33.3%) patients experienced 24 Dindo-Clavien grade III/IV complications (24/63; 38.1%). Postoperative 30- and 90-day mortality was 0% in our study population. Five-year OS was 43%, 5-year DFS 33%. CONCLUSIONS Due to thorough preoperative patient evaluation, strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, and intense collaboration with other specialties, we were able to achieve an excellent 5-year OS of 43% with a CC score of 0/1 in 95% of our patient population. We were able to demonstrate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of CRS + HIPEC in patients suffering from PSM at our institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kogler Pamela
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Zitt Matthias
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria ,Department of Surgery, Dornbirn Hospital, Dornbirn, Austria
| | - Kafka-Ritsch Reinhold
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Punter Julia
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Müssigang Peter
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Perathoner Alexander
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Öfner Dietmar
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
PEGylated polydopamine-coated magnetic nanoparticles for combined targeted chemotherapy and photothermal ablation of tumour cells. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2017; 160:11-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2017] [Revised: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
39
|
Feferman Y, Bhagwandin S, Kim J, Aycart SN, Feingold D, Labow DM, Sarpel U. Conflicting Data on the Incidence of Leukopenia and Neutropenia After Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Mitomycin C. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24:3831-3836. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6112-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
40
|
Simkens GA, Rovers KP, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH. Patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2017; 9:259-266. [PMID: 28721098 PMCID: PMC5501638 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s119569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a viable option for selected patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal origin, resulting in long-term survival and even cure in some cases. However, adequate patient selection for this treatment is currently one of the major challenges. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of clinically relevant factors associated with overall survival. This may help to guide clinicians through the complex interplay of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics to adequately select patients who benefit the most from this extensive surgical treatment. First, basic principles of colorectal PM and the CRS and HIPEC treatment will be discussed. According to available literature, especially extent of peritoneal disease, completeness of cytoreduction, and signet ring cell histology have great influence on the outcome after CRS and HIPEC. Other factors that seem to have a negative prognostic value are the presence of liver metastases and the absence of treatment with neo-adjuvant systemic therapy. Prognostic models combining the above-mentioned factors, such as the Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Prognostic Surgical Score nomogram, may provide clinically relevant tools to use in everyday practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert A Simkens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kwakman R, Schrama AM, van Olmen JP, Otten RH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, de Cuba EM, Kazemier G, Te Velde EA. Clinicopathological Parameters in Patient Selection for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Metastases: A Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2017; 263:1102-11. [PMID: 26756756 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve patient selection for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) by evaluating various preoperatively assessable clinicopathological parameters as markers for survival after CRS and HIPEC. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Peritoneal metastases (PMs) originating from colorectal cancer are treated with CRS and HIPEC. Despite increasing survival, high morbidity and mortality warrant selection of patients with optimal benefit from this treatment. Many studies report a number of variables to be associated with survival after CRS and HIPEC, but no definitive analysis has been made to validate various markers. METHODS In concordance with PRISMA guidelines, we performed a literature search encompassing 4110 articles to select 50 articles that reported the influence of 1 or more clinicopathological variables on overall survival after CRS and HIPEC. In absence of RCTs, 25 cohort studies could be used to perform a meta-analysis on 10 prognostic variables. RESULTS We determined that concurrent liver metastasis, lymph node metastasis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, tumor differentiation, and signet ring cell histology are all negative prognostic variables on overall survival after CRS and HIPEC. Conversely, sex and location of primary could not be validated as prognostic markers. More research is required to make definitive conclusions about neoadjuvant chemotherapy, onset of PMs, and mucinous histology. CONCLUSIONS Current clinical practice, which selects patients based on extraperitoneal metastasis, lymph node stage, performance status, and tumor histology, is validated by our pooled analysis. Our data merit further research into neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the setting of CRS and HIPEC for PMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riom Kwakman
- *Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands†Medical Library, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands‡Department of Biomedical Statistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands§Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Huang CQ, Min Y, Wang SY, Yang XJ, Liu Y, Xiong B, Yonemura Y, Li Y. Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy improves survival for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. Oncotarget 2017; 8:55657-55683. [PMID: 28903452 PMCID: PMC5589691 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The therapeutic efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is still under debate. This meta-analysis and systematic review of published literature on this comprehensive strategy aims to evaluate its efficacy on CRC patients with PC. Methods A systemic review with meta-analysis of published literatures on treatment of CRS plus HIPEC for patients with PC from CRC was performed. In addition, a summary of study results of published literatures concerning CRS plus HIPEC treating patients with PC from CRC was also conducted. Results A total of 76 studies were selected, including 1 randomized controlled trial, 14 non-randomized controlled studies, and 61 non-controlled studies. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) in the 15 researches for meta-analysis was 2.67 (95% CI, 2.21-3.23, I2= 0%, P < 0.00001), and no significant evidence of publication bias was found. The difference of chemotherapy regimens of HIPEC was not associated with OS and DFS (disease-free survival) after CRS and HIPEC, with no significant difference of heterogeneity (P = 0.27, I2 = 24.1%). In both groups of mitomycin C based HIPEC group and oxaliplatin group, patients received HIPEC had significant better survival (P < 0.00001). The mean mortality and morbidity for HIPEC program were 2.8% and 33.0%, respectively. Conclusions This meta-analysis revealed that comprehensive therapeutic strategy of CRS plus HIPEC could bring survival benefit for selected patients with PC from CRC with acceptable safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao-Qun Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center & Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Yao Min
- Department of Ophthalmology, Central Hospital of Wuhan Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Shu-Yi Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center & Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Xiao-Jun Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center & Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Yang Liu
- NPO to Support Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Osaka, Japan
| | - Bin Xiong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center & Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Yutaka Yonemura
- NPO to Support Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center & Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Wuhan, P.R. China.,Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital of the Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mu X, Zhang F, Kong C, Zhang H, Zhang W, Ge R, Liu Y, Jiang J. EGFR-targeted delivery of DOX-loaded Fe 3O 4@ polydopamine multifunctional nanocomposites for MRI and antitumor chemo-photothermal therapy. Int J Nanomedicine 2017; 12:2899-2911. [PMID: 28435266 PMCID: PMC5391832 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s131418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Multifunctional nanocomposites that have multiple therapeutic functions together with real-time imaging capabilities have attracted intensive concerns in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. This study developed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody-directed polydopamine-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles (Fe3O4@PDA NPs) for magnetic resonance imaging and antitumor chemo-photothermal therapy. The synthesized Fe3O4@PDA-PEG-EGFR-DOX NPs revealed high storage capacity for doxorubicin (DOX) and high photothermal conversion efficiency. The cell viability assay of Fe3O4@PDA-PEG-EGFR NPs indicated that Fe3O4@ PDA-PEG-EGFR NPs had no cell cytotoxicity. However, Fe3O4@PDA-PEG-EGFR-DOX NPs could significantly decrease cell viability (~5% of remaining cell viability) because of both photothermal ablation and near-infrared light-triggered DOX release. Meanwhile, the EGFR-targeted Fe3O4@PDA-PEG-EGFR-DOX NPs significantly inhibited the growth of tumors, showing a prominent in vivo synergistic antitumor effect. This study demonstrated the potential of using Fe3O4@PDA NPs for combined cancer chemo-photothermal therapy with increased efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xupeng Mu
- Department of Central Laboratory, China-Japan Union Hospital
| | - Fuqiang Zhang
- Department of Central Laboratory, China-Japan Union Hospital
| | - Chenfei Kong
- Department of Central Laboratory, China-Japan Union Hospital
| | - Hongmei Zhang
- Department of Central Laboratory, China-Japan Union Hospital
| | - Wenjing Zhang
- Department of Central Laboratory, China-Japan Union Hospital
| | - Rui Ge
- State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials, College of Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yi Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials, College of Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jinlan Jiang
- Department of Central Laboratory, China-Japan Union Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rovers KP, Simkens GA, Punt CJ, van Dieren S, Tanis PJ, de Hingh IH. Perioperative systemic therapy for resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: Sufficient evidence for its widespread use? A critical systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2017; 114:53-62. [PMID: 28477747 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2016] [Revised: 01/17/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Despite its widespread use, no randomised studies have investigated the value of perioperative systemic therapy as adjunct to cytoreduction and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases. This systematic review evaluated the available evidence, which consists of non-randomised studies only. METHODS A systematic search identified studies that investigated the influence of neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or perioperative systemic therapy on overall survival (OS). RESULTS The 11 included studies (n=1708) were clinically heterogeneous and subject to selection bias. Studies on neoadjuvant systemic therapy revealed OS benefit (n=3), no OS benefit (n=1), and superiority of chemotherapy with bevacizumab vs. chemotherapy (n=2). Studies on adjuvant systemic therapy showed no OS benefit (n=3). Studies on perioperative systemic therapy demonstrated OS benefit (n=1), and superiority of modern vs. conventional systemic therapy(n=1). CONCLUSION Significant limitations of available evidence question the widespread use of perioperative systemic therapy in this setting, stress the need for randomised studies, and impede conclusions regarding optimal timing and regimens. Included studies may suggest a survival benefit of neoadjuvant systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Geert A Simkens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Klaver CEL, Groenen H, Morton DG, Laurberg S, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ. Recommendations and consensus on the treatment of peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin: a systematic review of national and international guidelines. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19:224-236. [PMID: 28008728 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of (inter)national guidelines on the treatment of peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer origin (PMCRC) and to determine the degree of consensus and available evidence with identification of topics for future research. METHOD A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed as well as Tripdatabase, National Guideline Clearinghouse, BMJ Best Practice and Guidelines International Network was performed to identify (inter)national guidelines and consensus statements from oncological or surgical societies on PMCRC. The quality of guidelines was assessed using the AGREE-II score. Topics followed by recommendations were extracted from the guidelines. The recommendations, highest level of supporting evidence and the degree of consensus were determined for each topic. RESULTS Twenty-one guidelines were included, in most (15) of which cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) was recommended in selected patients based on level 1b evidence. Substantial consensus was also reached on the benefit of multidisciplinary team discussion and the achievability of a (near) complete cytoreduction (CC0-1) without supporting evidence. Both evidence and consensus were lacking regarding other aspects including preoperative positron emission tomography/CT, second look surgery in high risk patients, the optimal patient selection for CRS/HIPEC, procedural aspects of HIPEC and (perioperative) systemic therapy. CONCLUSION In currently available guidelines, evidence and consensus on the treatment strategy for PMCRC are lacking. Updates of guidelines are ongoing and future (randomized) clinical trials should contribute to multidisciplinary and international consensus on treatment strategies for PMCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C E L Klaver
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Groenen
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D G Morton
- Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Laurberg
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - W A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bong TSH, Tan GHC, Chia C, Soo KC, Teo MCC. Preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio is an independent prognostic marker and superior to carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol 2017; 22:511-518. [PMID: 28138878 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-017-1092-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic significance of preoperative inflammatory-based indices, platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CPC) treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS Sixty patients with pathologically confirmed CPC treated with CRS and HIPEC between 2003 and 2015 were included. Levels of preoperative PLR, NLR, and CEA were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with OS. RESULTS Median OS was 36 months (95% CI, 26.6-45.4) and 5-year OS was 40.5% (95% CI, 27.3-51.6%). Preoperative PLR (p = 0.034) and CEA (p = 0.036) were found to be significant prognostic markers of OS, whereas NLR did not affect OS. PLR remained significant on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.035; 95% CI, 1.027-1.043; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our study indicates that preoperative PLR may be used as a prognostic marker in CPC patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC and could be useful in the preoperative setting when selecting patients for surgery. The subset of patients with PLR > 300 have a median OS of 5 months (95% CI, 0-24.6 months), indicating that CRS and HIPEC may not be superior to systemic chemotherapy in this subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Sin Hui Bong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Grace Hwei Ching Tan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Claramae Chia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Khee Chee Soo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to discuss the role of the radiologist in the treatment of peritoneal cancer, with focus placed on advanced treatment options and selection of patients with resectable disease for whom complete cytoreduction can be achieved. CONCLUSION Peritoneal cancers traditionally have been associated with significant morbidity and universal mortality; however, the management of such cancers has evolved substantially. Advanced treatment options, including cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy, are associated with significantly improved long-term patient survival. To ensure that patients benefit from aggressive multimodality treatments, the radiologist plays a pivotal role in the multidisciplinary team to ensure careful patient selection, identifying individuals with resectable disease for whom complete cytoreduction can be achieved.
Collapse
|
48
|
Waite K, Youssef H. The Role of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy with Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24:705-720. [PMID: 28058545 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5712-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective treatment for colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM), increasing overall survival in selected patients. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effect of neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy on overall survival in patients with CPM undergoing CRS and HIPEC, compared with those who receive CRS and HIPEC alone. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed database, and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines formed the structure of the review. Data regarding publication details, study design, patient pathology, treatments received, follow-up periods, overall survival and safety were collected and tabulated, and study quality was assessed using the MINORS score for non-randomized studies. RESULTS Sixteen of 288 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven publications related to the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and there was no strong evidence for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of note, one study observed worse survival outcomes when neoadjuvant therapy was used. Fourteen studies investigated the role of adjuvant chemotherapy and there was limited evidence that adjuvant systemic chemotherapy improves survival following CRS and HIPEC. CONCLUSIONS Systemic adjuvant chemotherapy may be associated with improved overall survival, but the role of systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy cannot be determined by the currently available evidence. The delivery of a combination of the two modes of systemic chemotherapy has not been investigated in a randomized controlled trial to date. Further research designed to investigate the role of these modalities in the patient's treatment is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Waite
- Good Hope Hospital, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Haney Youssef
- Good Hope Hospital, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sugarbaker PH. Improving oncologic outcomes for colorectal cancer at high risk for local-regional recurrence with novel surgical techniques. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 10:205-13. [PMID: 26643935 DOI: 10.1586/17474124.2016.1110019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Despite innovation in surgical technology, colorectal adenocarcinoma is a disease process with a risk of local and regional progression of disease. This article seeks to identify patients with primary disease who are at high risk for minimal residual disease from cancer spread after resection. These are the patients who will profit from novel perioperative surgical treatments that will improve the clearance and containment of cancer cells disseminated prior to or at the time of the adenocarcinoma resection. Clinical factors that identify these patients at high risk for local recurrence and peritoneal metastases are presented. Data regarding novel surgical techniques that include perioperative cancer chemotherapy to provide more optimal treatment are described. The perioperative timing of the revised surgical options is emphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul H Sugarbaker
- a Center for Gastrointestinal Malignancies , MedStar Washington Hospital Center , Washington , DC , USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
El-Deiry WS, Vijayvergia N, Xiu J, Scicchitano A, Lim B, Yee NS, Harvey HA, Gatalica Z, Reddy S. Molecular profiling of 6,892 colorectal cancer samples suggests different possible treatment options specific to metastatic sites. Cancer Biol Ther 2016; 16:1726-37. [PMID: 26553611 DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2015.1113356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) carries a poor prognosis with an overall 5-year survival of 13.1%. Therapies guided by tumor profiling have suggested benefit in advanced cancer. We used a multiplatform molecular profiling (MP) approach to identify key molecular changes that may provide therapeutic options not typically considered in mCRC. We evaluated 6892 mCRC referred to Caris Life Sciences by MP including sequencing (Sanger/NGS), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in-situ hybridization (ISH). mCRC metastases to liver, brain, ovary or lung (n = 1507) showed differential expression of markers including high protein expression of TOPO1 (52%) and/or low RRM1 (57%), TS (71%) and MGMT (39%), suggesting possible benefit from irinotecan, gemcitabine, 5FU/capecitabine and temozolomide, respectively. Lung metastases harbored a higher Her2 protein expression than the primary colon tumors (4% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.028). Brain and lung metastases had higher KRAS mutations than other sites (65% vs 59% vs 47%, respectively, p = 0.07, <0.01), suggesting poor response to anti-EGFR therapies. BRAF-mutated CRC (n = 455) showed coincident high protein expression of RRM1 (56%), TS (53%) and low PDGFR (22%) as compared with BRAF wild-type tumors. KRAS-mutated mCRC had higher protein expression of c-MET (47% vs. 36%) and lower MGMT (56% vs. 63%), suggesting consideration of c-MET inhibitors and temozolomide. KRAS-mutated CRC had high TUBB3 (42% vs. 33%) and low Her2 by IHC (0.5%) and HER2 by FISH (3%, p <0.05). CRC primaries had a lower incidence of PIK3CA and BRAF mutations in rectal cancer versus colon cancer (10% and 3.3%, respectively). MP of 6892 CRCs identified significant differences between primary and metastatic sites and among BRAF/KRAS sub-types. Our findings are hypothesis generating and need to be examined in prospective studies. Specific therapies may be considered for different actionable targets in mCRC as revealed by MP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wafik S El-Deiry
- a Fox Chase Cancer Center ; Philadelphia , PA , 19111 , USA.,c Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute ; Hershey , PA , 17033 , USA
| | | | - Joanne Xiu
- b Caris Life Sciences ; Phoenix , AZ , 85040 , USA
| | | | - Bora Lim
- c Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute ; Hershey , PA , 17033 , USA.,d MD Anderson Cancer Center ; Houston , TX , 77030 , USA
| | - Nelson S Yee
- c Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute ; Hershey , PA , 17033 , USA
| | - Harold A Harvey
- c Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute ; Hershey , PA , 17033 , USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|