Appropriate gastric resection with lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer

A nomogram to predict risk of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is known as one of the most important prognostic factors for early gastric cancer (EGC) patients. Patients without LNM normally have better prognosis. However, there is no evaluation criteria to accurately assess the possibility of LN metastasis. Therefore, this study aims to establish an effective nomogram for prognosis prediction. In this study, 285 EGC patients from January 2010 to December 2015 were enrolled. Pearson’s Chi-Square (χ²) test (including continuity correction when appropriate) and logistics regression analyses was used to identify the risk factors for LN metastasis. The independent risk factors identified were then incorporated in a nomogram model. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and calibration curve. LN metastasis occurred in 59 (20.7%) EGC patients. And most of these patients were submucosal cancers (48/59). Chi-square test indicated lymphovascular emboli, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), ulcer, tumor size, tumor infiltration and histological grade were the risk factors, and multivariate logistics analyses confirmed all these six factors were independent risk factors of LN metastasis, which were selected to construct the nomogram. The nomogram proved well calibrated and had good discriminative ability (C-index value: 0.842). The proposed nomogram could result in more-accurate risk prediction for EGC patients.

The retrieval of at least 25 lymph nodes should be essential for advanced gastric cancer patients with lymph node metastasis: A retrospective analysis of single-institution database study design: Cohort study

BACKGROUND

Recently, increased evidence have shown that the better prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) patients was associated with the larger number of retrieved lymph nodes (RLNs), but the optimal number of RLNs remains controversial. In the present study, we investigated whether adequate LN retrieval (≥15) was necessary to evaluate the prognosis of patients and attempted to propose an appropriate cutoff-point for the number of RLNs.

METHODS

We reviewed 2246 GC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy in our research institution between January 1986 and January 2008. All patients were divided into several groups based on the number of RLNs. The prognostic outcomes of different patient groups were compared and clinicopathologic features were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the present study, our results indicated that ≥15 RLNs showed a better survival outcome than inadequate LN retrieval (<15), regardless of the node-negative or node-positive GC patients (P < 0.001). For the more advanced GC patients (T2-T4 stage, N1-N3 stage, and stage II-stage III), the retrieval of 25-29 LNs could provide a better survival benefit compared with <25 or ≥30 RLNs (P < 0.05). In addition, for the patients who underwent proximal or total gastrectomy, the superior prognosis was still observed in the patient group with 25-29 RLNs.

CONCLUSION

The minimal goal of 15 RLNs may not be enough to accurately evaluate prognosis of all patients and at least 25 RLNs should be necessary for advanced GC patients with lymph node metastasis.

Evolution in the surgical management of gastric cancer: is extended lymph node dissection back in vogue in the USA?

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer remains a formidable treatment challenge. For decades, treatment consisted mostly of surgical intervention for this deadly disease. With improvements in the multi-disciplinary management of solid organ malignancies, the approach to this disease is being stepwise refined.

MAIN BODY

One of the prevalent controversies in the surgical management of gastric cancer rests on the need for adequate harvesting of lymph nodes. For decades, lymph node dissection is regarded as a staging technique useful in only upstaging the disease. The adoption of D2 lymphadenectomy has been particularly slow to mature. But with prevailing data from Asia consistently demonstrating a survival benefit from lymphadenectomy, it calls into question the notion of lymphadenectomy as being solely a staging procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

As gastric resection techniques are being better defined in western countries and surgical morbidities lowered on its execution, D2 lymphadenectomy is becoming more accepted as the new standard in the management of gastric cancer.

Report from the 17th Annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference; Edmonton, Alberta; 11-12 September 2015

The 17th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (wcgccc) was held in Edmonton, Alberta, 11-12 September 2015. The wcgccc is an interactive multidisciplinary conference attended by health care professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists; pathologists; radiologists; and allied health care professionals participated in presentation and discussion sessions for the purposes of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of gastric cancer.

The impact of age on nodal metastases and survival in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

In gastric adenocarcinoma, the disparity in lymph node involvement between different age groups has not been thoroughly investigated. The objective of our study was to compare age-associated differences in adequate lymph node harvest and nodal involvement in gastric adenocarcinoma patients.

METHODS

We analyzed data extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database on 13,165 patients diagnosed with stage I-III gastric adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2011. All patients underwent surgical resection. Statistical comparisons between various age groups were done using the chi-square test and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Among 13,165 gastrectomy patients, proportion of patients that had >15 lymph nodes examined decreases significantly with increasing age (P < 0.0001). When adequately staged, older patients had a significantly lower proportion of node-positive tumors (P < 0.0001). Adequate nodal staging was also associated with improved 5-y disease-specific survival across all age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In gastric adenocarcinoma, older patients are less likely to be adequately staged. However, when adequately staged, they are less likely to have node-positive tumors. Adherence to national guidelines, regardless of age, is associated with improved survival outcomes and may alter multimodality management of gastric cancer in the elderly.

A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of lymph node metastasis in early gastric patients

Background

Early gastric cancer is defined as a lesion confined to the mucosa or submucosa, regardless of the size or lymph node metastasis. Treatment methods include endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection, wedge resection, laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy. Lymph node metastasis is strong related with survival and recurrence. Therefore, the likelihood of lymph node metastasis is one of the most important factors when determining the most appropriate treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 597 patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. The relationship between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological features was analyzed. Using multivariate logistic regression analyses, we created a nomogram to predict the lymph node metastasis probability for early gastric cancer. Receiver operating characteristic analyses was performed to assess the predictive value of the model.

Results

In the present study, 58 (9.7 %) early gastric cancer patients were histologically shown to have lymph node metastasis. The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the age at diagnosis, differentiation status, the presence of ulcers, lymphovascular invasion and depth of invasion were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer. Additionally, the tumor macroscopic type, size and histology type significantly correlated with these important independent factors. We constructed a predictive nomogram with these factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients, and the discrimination was good with the AUC of 0.860 (95 % CI: 0.809–0.912).

Conclusions

We developed an effective nomogram to predict the incidence of lymph node metastasis for early gastric cancer patients.

Nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis rate of submucosal gastric cancer by analyzing clinicopathological characteristics associated with lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND

To combine clinicopathological characteristics associated with lymph node metastasis for submucosal gastric cancer into a nomogram.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 262 patients with submucosal gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy between 1996 and 2012. The relationship between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological features was statistically analyzed. With multivariate logistic regression analysis, we made a nomogram to predict the possibility of lymph node metastasis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was also performed to assess the predictive value of the model. Discrimination and calibration were performed using internal validation.

RESULTS

A total number of 48 (18.3%) patients with submucosal gastric cancer have pathologically lymph node metastasis. For submucosal gastric carcinoma, lymph node metastasis was associated with age, tumor location, macroscopic type, size, differentiation, histology, the existence of ulcer and lymphovascular invasion in univariate analysis (all P<0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that age ≤50 years old, macroscopic type III or mixed, undifferentiated type, and presence of lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors of lymph node metastasis in submucosal gastric cancer (all P<0.05). We constructed a predicting nomogram with all these factors for lymph node metastasis in submucosal gastric cancer with good discrimination [area under the curve (AUC) =0.844]. Internal validation demonstrated a good discrimination power that the actual probability corresponds closely with the predicted probability.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a nomogram to predict the rate of lymph node metastasis for submucosal gastric cancer. With good discrimination and internal validation, the nomogram improved individualized predictions for assisting clinicians to make appropriated treatment decision for submucosal gastric cancer patients.

Biological ablation of sentinel lymph node metastasis in submucosally invaded early gastrointestinal cancer

Currently, early gastrointestinal cancers are treated endoscopically, as long as there are no lymph node metastases. However, once a gastrointestinal cancer invades the submucosal layer, the lymph node metastatic rate rises to higher than 10%. Therefore, surgery is still the gold standard to remove regional lymph nodes containing possible metastases. Here, to avoid prophylactic surgery, we propose a less-invasive biological ablation of lymph node metastasis in submucosally invaded gastrointestinal cancer patients. We have established an orthotopic early rectal cancer xenograft model with spontaneous lymph node metastasis by implantation of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled human colon cancer cells into the submucosal layer of the murine rectum. A solution containing telomerase-specific oncolytic adenovirus was injected into the peritumoral submucosal space, followed by excision of the primary rectal tumors mimicking the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique. Seven days after treatment, GFP signals had completely disappeared indicating that sentinel lymph node metastasis was selectively eradicated. Moreover, biologically treated mice were confirmed to be relapse-free even 4 weeks after treatment. These results indicate that virus-mediated biological ablation selectively targets lymph node metastasis and provides a potential alternative to surgery for submucosal invasive gastrointestinal cancer patients.

How many lymph nodes should be assessed in patients with gastric cancer? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Nodal status is one of the most important prognostic factors in gastric adenocarcinoma (GC). As such, it is important to assess an appropriate number of lymph nodes (LNs) in order to accurately stage patients. However, the number of LNs assessed in each GC case varies, and in many cases the number examined per gastric specimen is less than current recommendations.

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify and synthesize findings from all articles evaluating the association of clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes with the number of LNs assessed among GC patients.

METHODS

Systematic electronic literature searches were conducted using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1998 to 2009.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles were included in this review. Extensive resection, increased tumor size, and greater TNM staging were all associated with a greater number of LNs assessed. The disease-free survival was longer and recurrence rate was lower in patients with more LNs assessed. Overall survival, as well as survival by TNM and clinical stage, was improved among patients with an increased number of LNs assessed, but much of this appears to be due to stage migration, with the effect more pronounced in more advanced disease.

CONCLUSION

More LNs assessed resulted in less stage migration and possibly better long-term outcomes. Although current guidelines suggest 16 LNs to be assessed, especially in advanced GC, a higher number of LNs should be assessed.

Advances in research and diagnosis of early gastric cancer

The overall prognosis of gastric cancer is generally poor due to late presentation and diagnosis. When detected early, the prognosis of gastric cancer is excellent, and curative endoscopic resection may be possible, without the need for surgery. Careful endoscopic examination is important so as to avoid missed lesions. Besides the endoscopic screening for gastric cancer, other screening methods are also used in different countries and areas. This also provides us different avenues for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer.

Predicting lymph node status in patients with early gastric carcinoma using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

INTRODUCTION

Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS) is a new method we used in predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with early gastric cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-six patients with early gastric cancer diagnosed by gastroscope and confirmed by pathology after operation were examined using DCUS preoperatively. Group N1 included 15 patients with LNM and group N0 61 patients without LNM.

RESULTS

In group N1, 13 patients (87%) had marked hyperenhancement during early arterial phase using DCUS, and 2 patients (13%) were unmarked as hyperenhancement. In group N0, 24 patients (39%) had marked hyperenhancement during early arterial phase using DCUS, and 37 patients (61%) had unmarked hyperenhancement. The sensitivity and specificity of marked hyperenhancement in predicting LNM in patients with early gastric cancer was 86.7% and 60.7% respectively, and the Youden's index was 0.474. The κ value of this method was 0.89.

CONCLUSIONS

Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is a new valuable method to evaluate LNM at an early stage of gastric cancer and prognosis of early gastric cancer preoperatively.

Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer

AIM: To analyze the predictive factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early gastric cancer (EGC).

METHODS: Data from patients surgically treated for gastric cancers between January 1994 and December 2007 were retrospectively collected. Clinicopathological factors were analyzed to identify predictive factors for LNM.

RESULTS: Of the 2936 patients who underwent gastrectomy and lymph node dissection, 556 were diagnosed with EGC and included in this study. Among these, 4.1% of patients had mucosal tumors (T1a) with LNM while 24.3% of patients had submucosal tumors with LNM. Univariate analysis found that female gender, tumors ≥ 2 cm, tumor invasion to the submucosa, vascular and lymphatic involvement were significantly associated with a higher rate of LNM. On multivariate analysis, tumor size, lymphatic involvement, and tumor with submucosal invasion were associated with LNM.

CONCLUSION: Tumor with submucosal invasion, size ≥ 2 cm, and presence of lymphatic involvement are predictive factors for LNM in EGC.

Early gastric cancer: lymph node metastasis starts with deep mucosal infiltration

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of lymph node metastasis according to the depth of tumor infiltration of the mucosa and submucosa.

BACKGROUND DATA

Currently some endoscopists extend the indication for endoscopic mucosal resection in gastric cancer to the submucosa. However, the decision between endoscopic mucosectomy or gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer depends especially on the probability of lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-six patients either had subtotal resection (n = 29) or total gastrectomy (n = 97) for T1 gastric cancer. The median number of resected lymph nodes was 21 (1-63). In the histopathologic analysis of the specimens the tumors were differentiated according to their wall penetration in the upper (m1), middle (m2), lower (m3) third of the mucosa or submucosa (sm1, sm2, sm3). The greatest diameter of the lesions, the Grading and the Goseki-, Ming-, WHO-, and Laurén classification were determined.

RESULTS

Patients with m1 (n = 3) and m2 (n = 5) layer infiltration had no lymphatic metastasis compared with 13% for m3 (n = 39). The rate of lymphatic metastasis in submucosal carcinomas was 21% for sm1 (n = 29), 16% for sm2 (n = 23) and 40% for sm3 (n = 25). Carcinomas with papillary differentiation, Grading G1 or <1 cm in diameter had no lymph node metastasis. The size of tumor <2 cm or > or =2 cm showed independent influence on the rate of lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic mucosectomy in m3 carcinoma is questionable and in all submucosal carcinomas and lesions > or =2 cm it is not indicated.

Clinicopathological features associated with lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer: analysis of a single-institution experience in China

BACKGROUND

An accurate assessment of potential lymph node metastasis is an important issue for the appropriate treatment of early gastric cancer. Minimizing the number of invasive procedures used in cancer therapy is critical for improving the patient's quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinicopathological features associated with lymph node metastasis of early gastric cancer in patients from a single institution in China.

METHODS

A retrospective review of data from 410 patients surgically treated for early gastric cancer at the First Affiliated Hospital (Nanjing, China) between 1998 and 2007, was conducted. The clinicopathological variables associated with lymph node metastasis were evaluated.

RESULTS

Lymph node metastasis was observed in 12.20% of patients. The macroscopic type, tumour size, location in the stomach, depth of gastric carcinoma infiltration, and presence of vascular or lymphatic invasion showed a positive correlation with the incidence of lymph node metastasis by univariate analysis. Multivariate analyses revealed histological classification, macroscopic type, tumour size, depth of gastric carcinoma infiltration, and the presence of vascular or lymphatic invasion to be significantly and independently related to lymph node metastasis. The depth of gastric carcinoma infiltration was the strongest predictive factor for lymph node metastasis. For intramucosal cancer, tumour size was the unique risk factor for lymph node metastasis. For submucosal cancer, histological classification and tumour size were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Histological classification, macroscopic type, tumour size, depth of gastric carcinoma infiltration, and the presence of vascular or lymphatic invasion are independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with early gastric cancer in China. Minimal invasive treatment, such as endoscopic mucosal resection, may be possible for highly selected cancers.

Risk factors for lymph node metastasis and evaluation of reasonable surgery for early gastric cancer

AIM

To give the evidence for rationalizing surgical therapy for early gastric cancer with different lymph node status.

METHODS

A series of 322 early gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with more than 15 lymph nodes retrieved were reviewed in this study. The rate of lymph node metastasis was calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the independent factors for predicting lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

No metastasis was detected in No.5, 6 lymph nodes (LN) during proximal gastric cancer total gastrectomy, and in No.10, 11p, 11d during for combined resection of spleen and splenic artery and in No.15 LN during combined resection of transverse colon mesentery. No.11p, 12a, 14v LN were proved negative for metastasis. The global metastastic rate was 14.6% for LN, 5.9% for mucosa, and 22.4% for submucosa carcinoma, respectively. The metastasis in group II was almost limited in No.7, 8a LN. Multivariate analysis identified that the depth of invasion, histological type and lymphatic invasion were independent risk factors for LN metastasis. No metastasis from distal cancer (3.0 cm in diameter.

CONCLUSION

Segmental/subtotal gastrectomy plus D1/D1+No.7 should be performed for carcinoma (3.0 cm in diameter). Total gastrectomy should not be performed in proximal, so does combined resection or D2+/D3 lymphadenectomy.

Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable gastric cancer of advanced stage

BACKGROUND

Advanced, but potentially still curable gastric cancer (stages IIIA, IIIB, or stage IV M0) is associated with very high recurrence rates after gastrectomy. The value of an extended lymph node dissection (ELND) remains unclear in this setting.

METHODS

A resected gastric cancer data set was created through structured queries to the SEER 1973-2000 database. Relationships between the number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and survival outcomes were analyzed for the stage subgroups characterized by the N categories N2 or N3, and transmural tumor extension (T categories T2b or T3).

RESULTS

The study group encompassed 1,377 patients, including T2b/3N2 (n = 1,076) and T2b/3N3 stage subgroups (n = 301). Total LN count (or number of negative LNs examined; P < 0.0001), number of positive LNs (P < 0.0001), age (P < 0.0001), primary site (P = 0.0002), T category (P = 0.0271), race (P = 0.0301) and gender (P = 0.0261) were independent prognostic survival predictors. A cut point analysis yielded the ability to detect significant survival differences for LN numbers up to 30 (N2) or up to 40 (N3), always in favor of the higher number of LNs examined. Best long-term survival outcomes were observed with negative LN counts of more than 15 (N2) or more than 20 (N3).

CONCLUSIONS

Even in transmural or serosa-positive gastric cancer with advanced nodal involvement, more extensive LN dissection and analysis influences survival. Stage-based survival prediction depends on total LN number and number of negative LNs. The mechanism remains uncertain, but is not limited to stage migration. ELND during potentially curative gastrectomy is recommended even for advanced gastric cancer.

Significance of long-term follow-up of early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic outcomes for most patients with early gastric cancer are favorable. However, mortality among these patients remains a concern. Improvements in therapeutic outcomes are being sought by studying the timing and causes of death. Here, the results of surgery were evaluated to assess the appropriate treatment and follow-up schedule for early gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1169 patients with early gastric cancer underwent curative gastrectomy between 1992 and 1999. Survival time, prognostic factors, cause of death, and time of death were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis of disease-specific survival identified lymph node metastasis as an independent prognostic factor. The anatomical extent of lymph node metastasis and the number of metastatic lymph nodes influenced the rate of recurrence. Multivariate analysis of overall survival identified age as a prognostic factor. A total of 91 patients (7.8%) from the study group died: 56 from comorbid diseases, 21 from gastric cancer, and 14 from other second primary cancers. Death from gastric cancer was frequently observed within 5 years of surgical resection, whereas death from other diseases usually occurred after 5 years. Patients who died as a result of diseases other than gastric cancer tended to be older.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate lymph node dissection is necessary for patients with early gastric cancer, particularly those with risk factors associated with lymph node metastasis. Meticulous follow-up protocols that can detect second primary cancers, together with the development of treatments for comorbid diseases, are required to improve survival.

Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database

BACKGROUND

Prognosis of potentially curable (M0), completely resected gastric cancer is primarily determined by pathologic T and N staging criteria. The optimal regional dissection extent during gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma continues to be debated.

METHODS

A gastric cancer data set was created through structured queries to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1973 to 1999). Relationships between the number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and survival were analyzed for the stage subgroups T1/2N0, T1/2N1, T3N0, and T3N1.

RESULTS

In every stage subgroup, overall survival was highly dependent on the number of LNs examined. Multivariate prognostic variables in the T1/2N0M0 subgroup were number of LNs examined, age (for both, P < .0001), race (P = .0004), sex (P = .0006), and tumor size (P = .02). A linear trend for superior survival based on more LNs examined could be confirmed for all four stage subgroups. Baseline model-predicted 5-year survival with only one LN examined was 56% (T1/2N0), 35% (T1/2N1), 29% (T3N0), or 13% (T3N1). For every 10 extra LNs dissected, survival improved by 7.6% (T1/2N0), 5.7% (T1/2N1), 11% (T3N0), or 7% (T3N1). A cut-point analysis yielded the greatest survival difference at 10 LNs examined but continued to detect significantly superior survival differences for cut points at up to 40 LNs, always in favor of more LNs examined.

CONCLUSION

Although the impact of stage migration versus improved regional disease control cannot be separated on basis of the available information, the data provide support in favor of extended lymphadenectomy during potentially curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.