CA19-9 in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: perspective to adjust surgical and perioperative therapy

Clinical usefulness of C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index as a prognostic biomarker in patients undergoing surgical resection of pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index, which simultaneously evaluates the nutritional, immunological, and inflammatory statuses, is a new prognostic biomarker in patients with various cancers; however, no study has reported the clinical significance of the CALLY index in patients with pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether the preoperative CALLY index is a prognostic biomarker in patients undergoing surgical resection of pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 461 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgical resection between January 2013 and December 2022. The overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off value for the preoperative CALLY index was 1.9. In the low CALLY group, patients were older (p = 0.012), more patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (p = 0.002), the median tumor size was larger (p < 0.001), more patients had pathologically confirmed metastatic lymph nodes (p = 0.015) and worse pathological stage (p = 0.015), and fewer patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.003). A low CALLY index was associated with decreased OS (22.1 vs. 37.9 months) and RFS (12.4 vs. 16.4 months). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the preoperative CALLY index was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p < 0.001) and RFS (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

The preoperative CALLY index is a prognostic biomarker for both OS and RFS in patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer.

Locally Advanced Pancreas Cancer, Is There a Role for Surgery?

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) represents a unique clinical scenario in which the tumor is considered localized but unresectable due to anatomic factors. Despite a consensus against upfront surgery, no standard approach to induction therapy exists for patients with LAPC. Extended systemic therapy has shown promise in establishing tumor response and remains the standard of care. While associated with improved local control, the timing and role of radiation therapy remain in question. Following adequate response to induction chemotherapy, a safe attempt at margin-negative resection can be considered. Special attention should be given to required vascular skeletonization and/or resection with reconstruction.

Futility of Up-Front Resection for Anatomically Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Importance

There are currently no clinically relevant criteria to predict a futile up-front pancreatectomy in patients with anatomically resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Objectives

To develop a futility risk model using a multi-institutional database and provide unified criteria associated with a futility likelihood below a safety threshold of 20%.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective study took place from January 2010 through December 2021 at 5 high- or very high-volume centers in Italy. Data were analyzed during April 2024. Participants included consecutive patients undergoing up-front pancreatectomy at the participating institutions.

Exposure

Standard management, per existing guidelines.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome measure was the rate of futile pancreatectomy, defined as an operation resulting in patient death or disease recurrence within 6 months. Dichotomous criteria were constructed to maintain the futility likelihood below 20%, corresponding to the chance of not receiving postneoadjuvant resection from existing pooled data.

Results

This study included 1426 patients. The median age was 69 (interquartile range, 62-75) years, 759 patients were male (53.2%), and 1076 had head cancer (75.4%). The rate of adjuvant treatment receipt was 73.7%. For the model construction, the study sample was split into a derivation (n = 885) and a validation cohort (n = 541). The rate of futile pancreatectomy was 18.9% (19.2% in the development and 18.6% in the validation cohort). Preoperative variables associated with futile resection were American Society of Anesthesiologists class (95% CI for coefficients, 0.68-0.87), cancer antigen (CA) 19.9 serum levels (95% CI, for coefficients 0.05-0.75), and tumor size (95% CI for coefficients, 0.28-0.46). Three risk groups associated with an escalating likelihood of futile resection, worse pathological features, and worse outcomes were identified. Four discrete conditions (defined as CA 19.9 levels-adjusted-to-size criteria: tumor size less than 2 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 1000 U/mL; tumor size less than 3 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 500 U/mL; tumor size less than 4 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 150 U/mL; and tumor size less than 5 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 50 U/mL) were associated with a futility likelihood below 20%. Both disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly longer in patients fulfilling the criteria.

Conclusions and relevance

In this study, a preoperative model (MetroPancreas) and dichotomous criteria to determine the risk of futile pancreatectomy were developed. This might help in selecting patients for up-front resection or neoadjuvant therapy.

A striking elevation of CA19-9 after preoperative therapy negates prognostic benefit from radical surgery in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Identifying patients who can be spared nonbeneficial surgery is crucial, as pancreatic cancer surgery is highly invasive, with substantial negative effects on quality of life. The study objective was to investigate a useful indicator of patients who do not gain prognostic benefit from radical surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHOD

We compared factors among 609 patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy during 2005-2019. Patients were divided into a poor-prognosis group (no surgery or postresection recurrence within a year) and a good-prognosis group (no recurrence or recurrence >1 year after resection).

RESULTS

Patients who experience a recurrence within a year of resection (poor-prognosis group) did no better than patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and progressed but never made it to surgery. The value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy was the most significant indicator to predict the poor prognosis group and the elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (>200 U/mL) identified only poor prognosis group with high specificity of 96.6%. The overall survival of patients with more than 200 of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly very poor and their 2-year survival rate was only 41.4%.

CONCLUSION

A striking elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is a good indicator of poor prognosis. Patients with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 >200 U/mL after neoadjuvant therapy should not undergo radical surgery.

Differential impact of incrementally elevated CA 19-9 levels on prognosis of resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

CA 19-9 is an extremely useful biomarker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). However, the optimal cut-off and prognostic significance at higher cut-offs are yet to be determined.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis included patients with PDAC who underwent curative resection from January 2010 to May 2020 at Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai. The pretherapy CA 19-9 was dichotomized using various cut-off levels and analysed.

RESULTS

In 244 included patients, the median overall survival (OS) for those with CA19-9 level (IU/ml) < or >78, 200, 500, 1000, and 2000 was 27, 24, 23, 22, 21 months versus 18, 16, 15, 14, 13 months; respectively, and was statistically significant (p-value- 0.002, 0.001, 0.002, 0.002 and 0.004, respectively). The number of recurrences and mortality had significant correlation with CA 19-9 cut-offs. On multivariate analysis, adjuvant treatment completion (p-0.004) and decreasing or stable CA19-9 after Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) (p- 0.031) were associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic significance of CA 19-9 was observed at all the cut-off levels examined, beyond mere elevated value as per the standard cut-off level. In patients with high CA19-9 level, surgery should be offered if technically and conditionally feasible, only when a response in CA19-9 level to NAT is achieved.

Evolution of Liquid Biopsies for Detecting Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal malignancy characterised by late diagnosis and poor prognosis. Despite advancements, current diagnostic and prognostic strategies remain limited. Liquid biopsy techniques, including circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumour cells (CTCs), circulating tumour exosomes, and proteomics, offer potential solutions to improve PDAC diagnosis, prognostication, and management. A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE identified studies published between 2019 and 2024, focusing on liquid biopsy biomarkers for PDAC. A total of 49 articles were included. ctDNA research shows some promise in diagnosing and prognosticating PDAC, especially through detecting mutant KRAS in minimal residual disease assays. CTC analyses had low sensitivity for early-stage PDAC and inconsistent prognostic results across subpopulations. Exosomal studies revealed diverse biomarkers with some diagnostic and prognostic potential. Proteomics, although relatively novel, has demonstrated superior accuracy in PDAC diagnosis, including early detection, and notable prognostic capacity. Proteomics combined with CA19-9 analysis has shown the most promising results to date. An update on multi-cancer early detection testing, given its significance for population screening, is also briefly discussed. Liquid biopsy techniques offer promising avenues for improving PDAC diagnosis, prognostication, and management. In particular, proteomics shows considerable potential, yet further research is needed to validate existing findings and comprehensively explore the proteome using an unbiased approach.

Prognostic implication of extra-pancreatic organ invasion in resectable pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma in the pancreas tail

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prognostic significance of extra-pancreatic organ invasion in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the pancreas tail.

MATERIALS & METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with resectable PDAC in the pancreas tail who received upfront surgery between 2014 and 2020 at a tertiary institution. Preoperative pancreas protocol computed tomography (CT) scans evaluated tumor size, peripancreatic tumor infiltration, suspicious metastatic lymph nodes, and extra-pancreatic organ invasion. The influence of extra-pancreatic organ invasion, detected by CT or postoperative pathology, on pathologic resection margin status was evaluated using logistic regression. The impact on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models (clinical-CT and clinical-pathologic).

RESULTS

The study included 158 patients (mean age, 65 years ± 8.8 standard deviation; 93 men). Extra-pancreatic organ invasion identified by either CT (p = 0.92) or pathology (p = 0.99) was not associated with a positive resection margin. Neither CT (p = 0.42) nor pathological (p = 0.64) extra-pancreatic organ invasion independently correlated with RFS. Independent predictors for RFS included suspicious metastatic lymph node (hazard ratio [HR], 2.05; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.08-3.9; p = 0.03) on CT in the clinical-CT model, pathological T stage (HR, 2.97; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.39-6.35; p = 0.005 for T2 and HR, 3.78; 95 % CI, 1.64-8.76; p = 0.002 for T3) and adjuvant therapy (HR, 0.62; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.92; p = 0.02) in the clinical-pathologic model.

CONCLUSION

Extra-pancreatic organ invasion does not independently influence pathologic resection margin status and RFS in patients with resectable PDAC in the pancreas tail after curative-intent resection; therefore, it should not be considered a high-risk factor.

BNCT pancreatic cancer treatment strategy with glucose-conjugated boron drug

Multidisciplinary therapy centered on radical surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer is expected to prolong prognosis, but relies on CA19-9 biomarker levels to determine treatment strategy. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a chemoradiotherapy using tumor hyperaccumulator boron drugs and neutron irradiation. The purpose of this study is to investigate novel boron drug agents for BNCT for pancreatic cancer. Bioinformatics was used to evaluate the uptake of current boron amino acid (BPA) drugs for BNCT into pancreatic cancer. The expression of the amino acid transporter LAT1, a BPA uptake transporter, was low in pancreatic cancer and even lower in high CA19-9 pancreatic cancer. In contrast, the glucose transporter was high in high CA19-9 pancreatic cancers and inversely correlated with LAT1 expression. Considering the low EPR effect in pancreatic cancer, we synthesized a small molecule Glucose-BSH, which is boron BSH bound to glucose, and confirmed its specific uptake in pancreatic cancer. uptake of Glucose-BSH was confirmed in an environment compatible with the tumor microenvironment. The therapeutic efficacy and safety of Glucose-BSH by therapeutic neutron irradiation were confirmed with BNCT. We report Glucose-BSH boron drug discovery study of a Precision Medicine BNCT with application to high CA19-9 pancreatic cancer.

The Value of Biological and Conditional Factors for Staging of Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Upfront Resection: A Nationwide Analysis

BACKGROUND

Novel definitions suggest that resectability status for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) should be assessed beyond anatomical criteria, considering both biological and conditional factors. This has, however, yet to be validated on a nationwide scale. This study evaluated the prognostic value of biological and conditional factors for staging of patients with resectable PDAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A nationwide observational cohort study was performed, including all consecutive patients who underwent upfront resection of National Comprehensive Cancer Network resectable PDAC in the Netherlands (2014-2019) with complete information on preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. PDAC was considered biologically unfavorable (RB+) if CA19-9 ≥ 500 U/mL and favorable (RB-) otherwise. ECOG ≥ 2 was considered conditionally unfavorable (RC+) and favorable otherwise (RC-). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox-proportional hazard analysis, presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Overall, 688 patients were analyzed with a median overall survival (OS) of 20 months (95% CI 19-23). OS was 14 months (95% CI 10 months-median not reached) in 20 RB+C+ patients (3%; HR 1.61, 95% CI 0.86-2.70), 13 months (95% CI 11-15) in 156 RB+C- patients (23%; HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.50-2.31), and 21 months (95% CI 12-41) in 47 RB-C+ patients (7%; HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.80-1.62) compared with 24 months (95% CI 22-27) in 465 patients with RB-C- PDAC (68%; reference).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after upfront resection of anatomically resectable PDAC is worse in patients with CA19-9 ≥ 500 U/mL, while performance status had no impact. This supports consideration of CA19-9 in preoperative staging of resectable PDAC.

Predicting Recurrence-Free Survival After Upfront Surgery in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Preoperative Risk Score Based on CA 19-9, CT, and 18F-FDG PET/CT

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a preoperative risk score incorporating carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, CT, and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT variables to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) after upfront surgery in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable PDAC who underwent upfront surgery between 2014 and 2017 (development set) or between 2018 and 2019 (test set) were retrospectively evaluated. In the development set, a risk-scoring system was developed using the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, including variables associated with RFS. In the test set, the performance of the risk score was evaluated using the Harrell C-index and compared with that of the postoperative pathological tumor stage.

RESULTS

A total of 529 patients, including 335 (198 male; mean age ± standard deviation, 64 ± 9 years) and 194 (103 male; mean age, 66 ± 9 years) patients in the development and test sets, respectively, were evaluated. The risk score included five variables predicting RFS: tumor size (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29 per 1 cm increment; P < 0.001), maximal standardized uptake values of tumor ≥ 5.2 (HR, 1.29; P = 0.06), suspicious regional lymph nodes (HR, 1.43; P = 0.02), possible distant metastasis on 18F-FDG PET/CT (HR, 2.32; P = 0.03), and CA 19-9 (HR, 1.02 per 100 U/mL increment; P = 0.002). In the test set, the risk score showed good performance in predicting RFS (C-index, 0.61), similar to that of the pathologic tumor stage (C-index, 0.64; P = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

The proposed risk score based on preoperative CA 19-9, CT, and 18F-FDG PET/CT variables may have clinical utility in selecting high-risk patients with resectable PDAC.

Clinical Utility of the Combined Use of CA19-9 and DUPAN-2 in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with normal carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels can have early-stage cancer or advanced cancer without elevation of CA19-9 level; estimating their malignant potential is difficult. This study investigated the clinical utility of the combined use of preoperative CA 19-9 and Duke pancreatic monoclonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-2) levels in patients with PDAC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for PDAC between November 2005 and December 2021 were investigated. Eligible patients were classified into four groups based on these two markers. Among patients with normal CA19-9 levels, those with normal and high DUPAN-2 levels were classified into normal/normal (N/N) and normal/high (N/H) groups, respectively. Among patients with high CA19-9 levels, those with normal and high DUPAN-2 levels were classified into high/normal (H/N) and high/high (H/H) groups, respectively. Survival rates were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Among 521 patients, the N/N, N/H, H/N, and H/H groups accounted for 25.0%, 10.6%, 35.1%, and 29.4% of patients, respectively. The proportions of resectable PDAC in the N/N and H/N groups (71.5% and 66.7%) were significantly higher than those in the N/H and H/H groups (49.1% and 54.9%) (P < 0.01). The 5-year survival rates in the N/N, N/H, H/N, and H/H groups were 66.0%, 31.1%, 34.9%, and 29.7%, respectively; the rate in the N/N group was significantly better than those in the other three groups (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Only patients with normal CA19-9 and DUPNA-2 values should be diagnosed with early-stage PDAC.

Preoperative CA19‑9 level and dual time point FDG‑PET/CT as strong biological indicators of borderline resectability in pancreatic cancer: A retrospective study

Tumor resectability, which is increasingly determined based on preoperative chemotherapy, is critical in determining the best treatment for pancreatic cancers. The present study evaluated the usefulness of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and the preoperative 8F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography standardized uptake value (SUV) percentage change (SUVmax%=[(SUVmax2-SUVmax1)/SUVmax1] ×100, where SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 represent the initial and delayed phases, respectively) as biological factors indicative of tumor resectability. The present study included patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent complete surgical resection, for whom both CA19-9 and SUVmax% were documented using cut-off values of 500 U/ml and 24.25%, respectively. Patients were classified as follows: i) High CA19-9 and SUVmax%: both CA19-9 and SUVmax% were elevated; ii) high CA19-9 or SUVmax%: either CA19-9 or SUVmax% were elevated; or iii) low CA19-9 and SUVmax%: neither value met the cut-off. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated, for which univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Of the 86 patients included, 39 were classified as high CA19-9 or SUVmax% and 12 as high CA19-9 and SUVmax%, with the former group having a significantly worse RFS (vs. low CA19-9 and SUVmax%; P<0.001; vs. high CA19-9 or SUVmax%; P=0.011) and OS (vs. low CA19-9 and SUVmax%, P=0.002; vs. high CA19-9 or SUVmax%, P<0.001). Therefore, high CA19-9 and SUVmax% was an independent predictor of worse RFS (P<0.001) and OS (P=0.003). In conclusion, CA19-9 and SUVmax% can be utilized as biological indicators of resectability.

Survival benefit of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

Backgrounds/Aims

While patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) are a target population for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), formal guidelines for neoadjuvant therapy are lacking. We assessed the perioperative and oncological outcomes in patients with BRPC undergoing NAC with FOLFIRINOX for patients undergoing upfront surgery (US).

Methods

The AHPBA criteria for borderline resectability and/or a CA19-9 level > 100 μ/mL defined borderline resectable tumors retrieved from a prospectively populated institutional registry from 2007 to 2020. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) at 1 and 3 years. A Cox Proportional Hazard model based on intention to treat was used. A receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curve was constructed to assess the discriminatory capability of the use of CA19-9 > 100 μ/mL to predict resectability and mortality.

Results

Forty BRPC patients underwent NAC, while 46 underwent US. The median OS with NAC was 19.8 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10.3-44.24) vs. 10.6 months (IQR, 6.37-17.6) with US. At 1 year, 70% of the NAC group and 41.3% of the US group survived (p = 0.008). At 3 years, 42.5 % of the NAC group and 10.9% of the US group survived (p = 0.001). NAC significantly reduced the hazard of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.54; p = 0.001). CA19-9 > 100 μ/mL showed poor discrimination in predicting mortality, but was a moderate predictor of resectability.

Conclusions

We found a survival benefit of NAC with FOLFIRINOX for BRPC. Greater pre-treatment of CA19-9 and multivessel involvement on initial imaging were associated with progression of the disease following NAC.

Multimodal Approaches to Patient Selection for Pancreas Cancer Surgery

With an overall 5-year survival rate of 12%, pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive cancer that claims more than 50,000 patient lives each year in the United States alone. Even those few patients who undergo curative-intent resection with favorable pathology reports are likely to experience recurrence within the first two years after surgery and ultimately die from their cancer. We hypothesize that risk factors for these early recurrences can be identified with thorough preoperative staging, thus enabling proper patient selection for surgical resection and avoiding unnecessary harm. Herein, we review evidence supporting multidisciplinary and multimodality staging, comprehensive neoadjuvant treatment strategies, and optimal patient selection for curative-intent surgical resections. We further review data generated from our standardized approach at the Mayo Clinic and extrapolate to inform potential future investigations.

Neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer: Controversies and advances

Despite the advancements in the treatment of localized pancreatic cancer, several unresolved issues persist in clinical practice, especially in the neoadjuvant setting. These include determining the criteria for selecting patients for treatment, identifying the most effective chemotherapy regimens, understanding the role of radiotherapy, and accurately assessing how patients respond to treatment. Current strategies for assessing patients before surgery involve thoroughly evaluating their overall health status, analyzing tumor markers, and using advanced imaging techniques. However, existing methods for staging the disease still have limitations when it comes to accurately detecting metastatic cancer. The ongoing debate between performing surgery upfront or administering neoadjuvant therapy highlights the need for robust clinical evidence to guide treatment decisions effectively. This review analyzes the evidence regarding controversial topics in neoadjuvant pancreatic cancer treatment and discusses further research efforts to enhance patient outcomes. To improve the outcomes found with surgery alone, multimodal treatment with chemotherapy.

Preoperative prediction of disease-free survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients after R0 resection using contrast-enhanced CT and CA19-9

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficiency of a combination of preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in predicting disease-free survival (DFS) after R0 resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

A total of 138 PDAC patients who underwent curative R0 resection were retrospectively enrolled and allocated chronologically to training (n = 91, January 2014-July 2019) and validation cohorts (n = 47, August 2019-December 2020). Using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses, we constructed a preoperative clinicoradiographic model based on the combination of CECT features and serum CA19-9 concentrations, and validated it in the validation cohort. The prognostic performance was evaluated and compared with that of postoperative clinicopathological and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) models. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to verify the preoperative prognostic stratification performance of the proposed model.

RESULTS

The preoperative clinicoradiographic model included five independent prognostic factors (tumor diameter on CECT > 4 cm, extrapancreatic organ infiltration, CECT-reported lymph node metastasis, peripheral enhancement, and preoperative CA19-9 levels > 180 U/mL). It better predicted DFS than did the postoperative clinicopathological (C-index, 0.802 vs. 0.787; p < 0.05) and TNM (C-index, 0.802 vs. 0.711; p < 0.001) models in the validation cohort. Low-risk patients had significantly better DFS than patients at the high-risk, defined by the model preoperatively (p < 0.001, training cohort; p < 0.01, validation cohort).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinicoradiographic model, integrating preoperative CECT features and serum CA19-9 levels, helped preoperatively predict postsurgical DFS for PDAC and could facilitate clinical decision-making.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

We constructed a simple model integrating clinical and radiological features for the prediction of disease-free survival after curative R0 resection in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; this novel model may facilitate preoperative identification of patients at high risk of recurrence and metastasis that may benefit from neoadjuvant treatments.

KEY POINTS

• Existing clinicopathological predictors for prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients who underwent R0 resection can only be ascertained postoperatively and do not allow preoperative prediction. • We constructed a clinicoradiographic model, using preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) features and preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels, and presented it as a nomogram. • The presented model can predict disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with PDAC better than can postoperative clinicopathological or tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) models.

Elevated CA 19-9 is associated with worse survival in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic utility of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) in ampullary adenocarcinoma is unclear. We sought to evaluate the association between initial tumor marker levels and survival in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

This was a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma from 1999 to 2021. CA 19-9 was assessed after biliary decompression. Contal and O'Quigley method determined optimal biomarker cutoff levels which were correlated with overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox Proportional Hazards Regression.

RESULTS

A total of 180 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Patients with CA 19-9 >100 U/mL had a shorter median OS (28 vs. 132 months, p < 0.001) compared to patients with CA 19-9 ≤ 100 U/mL at diagnosis. Survival was similar between pancreaticobiliary and intestinal tumor subtypes when CA 19-9 was >100 U/mL (OS:25 vs. 33 months, p = 0.415). By Cox regression analysis, CA 19-9 >100 U/mL was independently associated with worse OS (HR 2.8, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative CA 19-9 >100 U/mL was associated with shorter OS in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. CA 19-9 may be useful when counseling patients about prognosis or when considering the role of perioperative systemic therapy.

Circulating tumor cells as potential prognostic biomarkers for early-stage pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is difficult to be diagnosed early clinically, while often leads to poor prognosis. If optimal personalized treatment plan can be provided to pancreatic cancer patient at an earlier stage, this can greatly improve overall survival (OS). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are a collective term for various types of tumor cells present in the peripheral blood (PB), which are formed by detachment during the development of solid tumor lesions. Most CTCs undergo apoptosis or are phagocytosed after entering the PB, whereas a few can escape and anchor at distal sites to develop metastasis, increasing the risk of death for patients with malignant tumors.

AIM

To investigate the significance of CTCs in predicting the prognosis of early pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine, and ChinaInfo databases were searched for articles published through December 2022. Studies were considered qualified if they included patients with early pancreatic cancer, analyzed the prognostic value of CTCs, and were full papers reported in English or Chinese. Researches were selected and assessed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria. We used a funnel plot to assess publication bias.

RESULTS

From 1595 publications, we identified eight eligible studies that collectively enrolled 355 patients with pancreatic cancer. Among these original studies, two were carried out in China; three in the United States; and one each in Italy, Spain, and Norway. All eight studies analyzed the relevance between CTCs and the prognosis of patients with early-stage pancreatic cancer after surgery. A meta-analysis showed that the patients that were positive pre-treatment or post-treatment for CTCs were associated with decreased OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.197-3.126, P = 0.007] and decreased relapse-free/disease-free/progression-free survival (HR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.137-1.419, P < 0.001) in early-stage pancreatic cancer. Additionally, the results suggest no statistically noticeable publication bias for overall, disease-free, progression-free, and recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSION

This pooled meta-analysis shows that CTCs, as biomarkers, can afford reliable prognostic information for patients with early-stage pancreatic cancer and help develop individualized treatment plans.

Survival benefit of local consolidative therapy for patients with single-organ metastatic pancreatic cancer: a propensity score-matched cross-sectional study based on 17 registries

Background

The continuous exploration of oligometastatic disease has led to the remarkable achievements of local consolidative therapy (LCT) and favorable outcomes for this disease. Thus, this study investigated the potential benefits of LCT in patients with single-organ metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods

Patients with single-organ metastatic PDAC diagnosed between 2010 - 2019 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize selection bias. Factors affecting survival were assessed by Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Results

A total of 12900 patients were identified from the database, including 635 patients who received chemotherapy combined with LCT with a 1:1 PSM with patients who received only chemotherapy. Patients with single-organ metastatic PDAC who received chemotherapy in combination with LCT demonstrated extended median overall survival (OS) by approximately 57%, more than those who underwent chemotherapy alone (11 vs. 7 months, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that patients that received LCT, younger age (< 65 years), smaller tumor size (< 50 mm), and lung metastasis (reference: liver) were favorable prognostic factors for patients with single-organ metastatic PDAC.

Conclusion

The OS of patients with single-organ metastatic pancreatic cancer who received LCT may be prolonged compared to those who received only chemotherapy. Nevertheless, additional prospective randomized clinical trials are required to support these findings.

A Simple Overview of Pancreatic Cancer Treatment for Clinical Oncologists

Pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive solid tumors and is showing increasing incidence. The aim of our review is to provide practical help for all clinical oncologists and to summarize the current management of PDAC using a simple "ABC method" (A-anatomical resectability, B-biological resectability and C-clinical conditions). For anatomically resectable PDAC without any high-risk factors (biological or conditional), the actual standard of care is represented by surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The remaining PDAC patients should all be treated with initial systemic therapy, though the intent for each is different: for borderline resectable patients, the intent is neoadjuvant; for locally advanced patients, the intent is conversion; and for metastatic PDAC patients, the intent remains just palliative. The actual standard of care in first-line therapy is represented by two regimens: FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Recently, NALIRIFOX showed positive results over gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. There are limited data for maintenance therapy after first-line treatment, though 5-FU or FOLFIRI after initial FOLFIRINOX, and gemcitabine, after initial gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, might be considered. We also dedicate space to special rare conditions, such as PDAC with germline BRCA mutations, pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas, with few clinically relevant remarks.

Radiographic duodenal invasion is associated with poor prognosis and early recurrence in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of radiographic duodenal invasion (rDI) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has yet to be fully elucidated. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of rDI in patients with PDAC after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 223 consecutive patients with resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR)-PDAC that underwent up-front PD between 2002 and 2018. rDI was assessed by preoperative multi-detector row computed tomography.

RESULTS

Ninety-three (42%) patients with PDAC had rDI, and all of them had pathological DI (pDI). The rDI(+) group had larger tumor size, BR-PDAC was more common, there was higher serum CA19-9 level, and microscopic lymphovascular invasion was more common than in the rDI(-) group. rDI was associated with significant reduction in overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, rDI was an independent prognostic factor in OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.73, P < 0.001] and RFS [HR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.78, P = 0.001]. rDI was also an independent risk factor for early recurrence within 12 months [odds ratio (OR) = 0.36; 95% CI 0.18-0.73, P = 0.005]. rDI had positive correlation with liver recurrence (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Biological aggressiveness of PDAC with rDI implies short OS and early recurrence with frequent liver metastasis. Aggressive perioperative chemotherapy is recommended to improve prognosis, especially for R-PDAC patients with rDI.

How A Patient with Resectable or Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer should Be Treated-A Comprehensive Review

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive disease with high morbidity and mortality in which long-term survival rates remain disastrous. Surgical resection is the only potentially curable treatment for early pancreatic cancer; however, the right patient qualification is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes. With the rapid development of radiographic and surgical techniques, resectability decisions are made by a multidisciplinary team. Upfront surgery (Up-S) can improve the survival of patients with potentially resectable disease with the support of adjuvant therapy (AT). However, early recurrences are quite common due to the often-undetectable micrometastases occurring before surgery. Adopted by international consensus in 2017, the standardization of the definitions of resectable PDAC (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable PDAC (BR-PDAC) disease was necessary to enable accurate interpretation of study results and define which patients could benefit from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). NAT is expected to improve the resection rate with a negative margin to provide significant local control and eliminate micrometastases to prolong survival. Providing information about optimal sequential multimodal NAT seems to be key for future studies. This article presents a multidisciplinary concept for the therapeutic management of patients with R-PDAC and BR-PDAC based on current knowledge and our own experience.

Surgical Considerations for Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging disease process with a 5-year survival rate of only 11%. Neoadjuvant therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer has multiple theoretical benefits, including improved patient selection for surgery, early delivery of systemic therapy, and assessment of response to therapy. Herein, we review key surgical considerations when selecting patients for neoadjuvant therapy and curative-intent resection. Accurate determination of resectability at diagnosis is critical and should be based on not only anatomic criteria but also biologic and clinical criteria to determine optimal treatment sequencing. Borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer is best treated with neoadjuvant therapy and resection, including vascular resection and reconstruction when appropriate. Lastly, providing nutritional, prehabilitation, and supportive care interventions to improve patient fitness prior to surgical intervention and adequately address the adverse effects of therapy is critical.

Overview of Pancreatic Cancer Epidemiology in Europe and Recommendations for Screening in High-Risk Populations

Pancreatic cancer is the seventh most common cause of death in the group of oncological diseases. Due to the asymptomatic course, early diagnosis is difficult. Currently, early detection methods are only used in high-risk groups. A literature review based on the available results of observational studies on patients with pancreatic cancer and people from high-risk groups was used to summarize the knowledge on risk factors. The GLOBOCAN 2020 data were used to assess the epidemiological situation in Europe. A summary of screening recommendations was prepared based on the available documents from medical organizations and associations. Pancreatic cancer risk factors are divided into two main groups: non-modifiable factors, e.g., hereditary factors and age, which increase the risk of developing this disease, and modifiable factors-BMI, smoking, and alcohol consumption. Hereditary factors account for 10% of pancreatic cancer cases. The highly specialized methods of early detection, (MRI, CT, or EUS) are used for screening high-risk populations. Of all the imaging methods, EUS is considered the most sensitive for pancreatic cancer and allows an accurate assessment of the size of even small lesions (<30 mm) and the extent of tumour infiltration into blood vessels. The available studies vary on the level of sensitivity and specificity of these methods for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. EUS, MRI, and CT are also expensive procedures and in some patients can be invasive, which is one of the arguments against the introduction of population screening programs based on imaging methods. Therefore, it is important to look for viable solutions that would improve early detection. This is important from the point of view of healthcare systems in Europe, where almost 29% of all global pancreatic cancer cases are reported.

Serum DUPAN-2 could be an Alternative Biological Marker for CA19-9 Nonsecretors with Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the use of serum DUPAN-2 in predicting the PC progression in CA19-9 nonsecretors.

BACKGROUND

Although we previously reported that serum CA19-9 >500U/ mL is a poor prognostic factor and an indication for enhanced neoadjuvant treatment, there is not a biomarker surrogate that equivalently predicts prognosis for CA19-9 nonsecretors.

METHODS

We evaluated consecutive PC patients who underwent pancreatectomy from 2005 to 2019. All patients were categorized as either nonsecretor or secretor (CA19-9 ≤ or >2.0U/mL).

RESULTS

Of the 984 resected PC patients, 94 (9.6%) were nonsecretors and 890 (90.4%) were secretors. The baseline characteristics were not statistically different between the 2 groups except for the level of DUPAN-2 (720 vs. 100U/mL, P < 0.001). Survival curves after resection were similar between the 2 groups (29.4 months vs. 31.3 months, P = 0.900). Survival curves of patients with DUPAN-2 >2000U/mL in the nonsecretors and patients with CA19-9 >500U/mL in the secretors were nearly equivalent as well (hazard ratio 2.08 vs. 1.89). In the multivariate analysis, DUPAN-2 >2000U/mL (hazard ratio 2.53, P = 0.010) was identified as independent prognostic factor after resection.

CONCLUSION

DUPAN-2 >2000U/mL in CA19-9 nonsecretors can be an unfavorable factor that corresponds to CA19-9 >500U/mL in CA19-9 secretors which is an indicator for enhanced neoadjuvant treatment. The current results shed light on the subset of nonsecretors with poor prognosis that were traditionally categorized in a group with a more favorable prognosis group.

Circulating Cell-Free Nucleic Acids as Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer

A lack of reliable early diagnostic tools represents a major challenge in the management of pancreatic cancer (PCa), as the disease is often only identified after it reaches an advanced stage. This highlights the urgent need to identify biomarkers that can be used for the early detection, staging, treatment monitoring, and prognosis of PCa. A novel approach called liquid biopsy has emerged in recent years, which is a less- or non-invasive procedure since it focuses on plasmatic biomarkers such as DNA and RNA. In the blood of patients with cancer, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free nucleic acids (cfNAs) have been identified such as DNA, mRNA, and non-coding RNA (miRNA and lncRNA). The presence of these molecules encouraged researchers to investigate their potential as biomarkers. In this article, we focused on circulating cfNAs as plasmatic biomarkers of PCa and analyzed their advantages compared to traditional biopsy methods.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy outcomes in borderline-resectable and locally-advanced pancreatic cancer patients

BACKGROUND

There is no agreed upon standard of care for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) or locally-advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients regarding the benefit of chemotherapy or radiation alone or in combination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We completed a retrospective cohort analysis of BRPC and LAPC patients at a cancer center with expertise in multi-disciplinary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment over a 5-year period from 03/01/2014 to 03/01/2019 (cut-off date). The total evaluable newly diagnosed, treatment naïve, BRPC, and LAPC patients with adequate organ function and ability to obtain treatment after multidisciplinary review was 52 patients. After analysis, patients were evaluated for rates of resection, extent of resection (R0 or R1), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS).

RESULTS

Patients were treated with chemotherapy alone (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel = 77% (20/26); FOLFIRINOX = 19% (5/26); single agent gemcitabine 3.8% (1/26)), or chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation (gemcitabine +5 Gy × 5 weeks), or chemoradiation alone prior to re-staging and potential resection. Of the 29% (15/52) of patients who went on to surgical resection, 73% (11/15) achieved R0 resection. An R0 resection was achieved in 35% (9/26) of patients treated with chemotherapy alone, 7.6% (1/13) in a patient treated with chemotherapy followed by radiation, and 7.6% (1/13) with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. Chemotherapy alone achieved a mPFS of 16.4 months (p  < 0.0025) and mOS of 26.2 months (p  < 0.0001), chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation was 13.0 months and 14.9 months respectively, while concurrent chemoradiotherapy was 6.9 months and 7.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

BRPC and LAPC patients capable of surgery after only receiving neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy had higher rates of R0 resection with prolonged median PFS and OS compared with any patient needing combination chemotherapy with radiotherapy.

Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

Patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are best treated with surgical resection of the primary tumour and systemic chemotherapy, which provides considerably longer overall survival (OS) durations than either modality alone. Regardless, most patients will have disease relapse owing to micrometastatic disease. Although currently a matter of some debate, considerable research interest has been focused on the role of neoadjuvant therapy for all forms of resectable PDAC. Whilst adjuvant combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care for patients with resectable PDAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems to improve OS without necessarily increasing the resection rate in those with borderline-resectable disease. Furthermore, around 20% of patients with unresectable non-metastatic PDAC might undergo resection following 4-6 months of induction combination chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy, even in the absence of a clear radiological response, leading to improved OS outcomes in this group. Distinct molecular and biological responses to different types of therapies need to be better understood in order to enable the optimal sequencing of specific treatment modalities to further improve OS. In this Review, we describe current treatment strategies for the various clinical stages of PDAC and discuss developments that are likely to determine the optimal sequence of multimodality therapies by integrating the fundamental clinical and molecular features of the cancer.

Peripheral and Portal Venous KRAS ctDNA Detection as Independent Prognostic Markers of Early Tumor Recurrence in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

KRAS circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown biomarker potential for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) but has not been applied in clinical routine yet. We aim to improve clinical applicability of ctDNA detection in PDAC and to study the impact of blood-draw site and time point on the detectability and prognostic role of KRAS mutations.

METHODS

221 blood samples from 108 PDAC patients (65 curative, 43 palliative) were analyzed. Baseline peripheral and tumor-draining portal venous (PV), postoperative, and follow-up blood were analyzed and correlated with prognosis.

RESULTS

Significantly higher KRAS mutant detection rates and copy numbers were observed in palliative compared to curative patients baseline blood (58.1% vs 24.6%; P = 0.002; and P < 0.001). Significantly higher KRAS mutant copies were found in PV blood compared to baseline (P < 0.05) samples. KRAS detection in pre- and postoperative and PV blood were significantly associated with shorter recurrence-free survival (all P < 0.015) and identified as independent prognostic markers. KRAS ctDNA status was also an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for shorter overall survival in both palliative and curative cohorts (hazard ratio [HR] 4.9, P = 0.011; HR 6.9, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS ctDNA detection is an independent adverse prognostic marker in curative and palliative PDAC patients-at all sites of blood draw and a strong follow-up marker. The most substantial prognostic impact was seen for PV blood, which could be an effective novel tool for identifying prognostic borderline patients-guiding future decision-making on neoadjuvant treatment despite anatomical resectability. In addition, higher PV mutant copy numbers contribute to an improved technical feasibility.

CA19-9 Response to First-Line Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and Second-Line Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Operable Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Response to second-line (2L) neoadjuvant therapy for operable pancreatic cancer (PC) is understudied. This study examined carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) response to first-line (1L) and 2L chemotherapy.

METHODS

The study identified patients with operable PC and elevated CA19-9 (≥ 35 U/mL with total bilirubin < 2 mg/dL) who received 1L FOLFIRINOX (FFX). The patients were restaged after 2 months and based on response, received additional FFX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) as part of total neoadjuvant therapy. Response was defined as a decrease in tumor size on computed tomography (CT) imaging or a decline in CA19-9 of 50% or more and preserved performance status.

RESULTS

For operable PC with an elevated CA19-9, 108 patients received 1L FFX. After 2 months of chemotherapy, the decision was made to continue FFX (FFX ≥ FFX) for 76 (70%) of the 108 patients and switch to GnP (FFX ≥ GnP)) for 32 (30%) of the patients. Of the 32 FFX ≥ GnP patients, 27 had no evidence of radiographic or biochemical (CA19-9) response to 1L FFX. Of these 27 patients, 26 (96%) demonstrated a response to 2L GnP. After 4 months of chemotherapy, 62 (82%) of the 76 FFX ≥ FFX patients had a CA19-9 response compared with 31 (97%) of the 32 FFX ≥ GnP patients (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of biochemical response to 2 months of 1L FFX may identify a subgroup of patients with a very high rate of response to 2L GnP, emphasizing the importance of assessing treatment response at 2-month intervals.

Validation of the Anatomical and Biological Definitions of Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer According to the 2017 International Consensus for Survival and Recurrence in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Upfront Surgery

BACKGROUND

The International Consensus Criteria (ICC) (2017) redefined patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) according to anatomical, biological, and conditional aspects. However, these new criteria have not been validated comprehensively. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to validate the anatomical and biological definitions of BR-PDAC for oncological outcomes in patients with resectable (R) and BR-PDAC undergoing upfront surgery.

METHODS

A total of 404 patients who underwent upfront surgery for R- and BR-PDAC from 2004 to 2020 were included. The patients were classified according to the ICC as follows: resectable (R) (n = 259), anatomical borderline (BR-A) (n = 43), biological borderline (BR-B) (n = 81), and anatomical and biologic borderline (BR-AB) (n = 21).

RESULTS

Compared with the R and BR-B groups, the BR-A and BR-AB groups had higher postoperative complication rates (16.5% and 27.2% vs 32.5% and 33.4%; P < 0.001) and significantly lower R0 resection rates (85.7% and 80.2% vs 65.1% and 61.9%; P = 0.003). In contrast, compared with the R and BR-A groups, the BR-B (32.1%) and BR-AB (57.1%) groups had higher early recurrence rates (within postoperative 6 months) (16.5% and 25.6% vs 32.1% and 57.1%; P < 0.001) and significantly lower 3-year recurrence-free survival rates (36.1% and 20.7% vs 12.1% and 7.8%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Anatomically defined BR-PDAC was associated with a higher risk of margin-positive resection and postoperative complication rates, while biologically defined BR-PDAC was associated with higher early recurrence rates and lower survival rates. Thus, the anatomical and biological definitions are useful in predicting the prognosis and determining the usefulness of neoadjuvant therapy.

Role of neoadjuvant treatment in resectable pancreatic cancer according to vessel invasion and increase of CA19-9 levels

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for resectable pancreatic cancer remains debatable, particularly in patients with portal vein (PV)/superior mesenteric vein (SMV) contact and elevated serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9. This study investigated the clinical significance of PV/SMV contact and CA19-9 levels, and the role of NAT in resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A total of 775 patients who underwent surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer between 2007 and 2018 were included. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis (1:3) was performed based on tumor size, lymph node enlargement, and PV/SMV contact. Subgroup analyses were performed according to PV/SMV contact and CA19-9 level.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 52 underwent NAT and 723 underwent upfront surgery. After PSM, NAT group showed better survival than upfront surgery group (median 30.0 vs 22.0 months, P = .047). In patients with PV/SMV contact, NAT tended to have better survival (30.0 vs 22.0 months, P = .069). CA19-9 >150 U/mL was a poor prognostic factor, with NAT showing a significant survival difference compared with upfront surgery (34.0 vs 18.0 months, P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant treatment showed better survival than upfront surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer. In patients with PV/SMV contact or CA19-9 >150 U/mL, NAT showed a survival difference compared to upfront surgery; therefore, NAT could be considered in these patients.

Analysis of prognostic factors for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the importance of CA19-9 decrease in patients with elevated pre-chemotherapy CA19-9 levels

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely used to treat borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the serum carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 response, in association with survival, after four cycles of NAC-gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2018, patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were treated with NAC. Patients were stratified into two groups after excluding CA19-9 non-secretor: Group L (CA19-9 ≥2 and ≤500 U/mL) and Group H (CA19-9 >500 U/mL). The CA19-9 decrease during NAC was evaluated as a response of NAC and was assessed in association with survival concomitant with other prognosis factors.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients were evaluated (Group L: n = 43, Group H: n = 44). In intention-to-treat-based analysis, Group L exhibited significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) than Group H (median PFS: 24 vs 14months). In resection cohort, no correlation was detected between the CA19-9 decrease and survival in Group L. In Group H, the CA19-9 decrease ≤80% was associated with unfavorable survival in multivariate analysis [Hazard ratio: 4.738 (P = 0.007)].

CONCLUSION

In patients with pre-treatment CA19-9 >500 U/mL, the CA19-9 decrease ≤80% was strongly associated with poor survival and new strategy should be reconsidered for these patients.

Current Treatment of Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Medical Oncologist's Perspective

Pancreatic cancer has traditionally been associated with a dismal prognosis, even in early stages of the disease. In recent years, the introduction of newer generation chemotherapy regimens in the adjuvant setting has improved the survival of patients treated with upfront resection. However, there are multiple theoretical advantages to deliver early systemic therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. So far, the evidence supports the use of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. The benefit of this treatment sequence for patients with resectable disease remains elusive. In this review, we summarize the data on adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer and describe which evidence backs the use of neoadjuvant therapy. Additionally, we address important issues faced in clinical practice when treating patients with localized pancreatic cancer.

Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Challenges for Clinical Management

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a significant worldwide health problem with a poor prognosis. A borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) is a tumor with limited vascular involvement that is technically resectable but with a high risk of positive margins (R1 resection).

Objective

To identify the current challenges that exist in the management of BR-PDAC.

Methods

A review of the literature was conducted to identify articles discussing the definitions and management of BR-PDAC.

Key Findings

Several anatomic definitions of BR-PDAC exist, and there is significant heterogeneity in their utilization across published trials. To improve the odds of a margin negative (R0) resection, a neoadjuvant treatment approach involving chemotherapy with or without radiation is currently preferred. While supporting the efficacy of a neoadjuvant approach in BR-PDAC, the largest published randomized trials have utilized older gemcitabine-based regimens. Recently published Phase II evidence and meta-analyses have supported the use of modern multi-agent regimens such as FOLFIRINOX. The utility of adding radiation to a chemotherapy backbone remains in question. Due to remnant fibrosis and edema following neoadjuvant therapy, accurately selecting patients for resection based on a restaging CT scan is challenging. Furthermore, the role of adjuvant therapy in BR-PDAC patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy needs to be defined.

Conclusion

Though progress has been made, the optimal management of BR-PDAC is uncertain. Phase III trials utilizing modern chemotherapeutic regimens are needed to establish a standard of care.

Predicting Surgical Margins in Patients With Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Resection

BACKGROUND

Many patients with borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (borderline resectable [BR]/locally advanced [LA] pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC]) undergoing resection will have positive resection margins (R1), which is associated with poor prognosis. It might be useful to preoperatively predict the margin (R) status.

METHODS

Data from patients with BR/LA PDAC who underwent a pancreatectomy between 2008 and 2018 at Brigham and Women's Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between R status and relevant preoperative factors. Significant predictors of R1 resection on univariate analysis (P < .1) were entered into a stepwise selection using the Akaike information criterion to define the final model.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients with BR/LA PDAC were included in the analysis, 60(42.3%) had R1 resections. In stepwise selection, the following factors were identified as positive predictors of an R1 resection: evidence of lymphadenopathy at diagnosis (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 0.99-4.36, P = .056), the need for pancreaticoduodenectomy (OR = 3.81, 96% CI: 1.15-15.70, P = .040), extent of portal vein/superior mesenteric vein involvement at restaging (<180°, OR = 3.57, 95% CI: 1.00-17.00, P = .069, ≥180°, OR = 7,32, 95% CI: 1.75-39.87, P = .010), stable CA 19-9 serum levels (less than 50% decrease from diagnosis to restaging, OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 0.84-6.36 P = .107), and no preoperative FOLFIRINOX (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 0.86-5.64, P = .103). The prognostic nomogram based on this model yielded a probability of achieving an R1 resection ranging from <5% (0 factors) to >70% (all 5 factors).

CONCLUSIONS

Relevant preoperative clinicopathological characteristics accurately predict positive resection margins in patients with BR/LA PDAC before resection. With further development, this model might be used to preoperatively guide surgical decision-making in patients with BR/LA PDAC.

A Pretreatment Prognostic Score to Stratify Survival in Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a pretreatment prognostic score in pancreatic cancer (PDAC).

BACKGROUND

Pretreatment prognostication in PDAC is important for treatment decisions but remains challenging. Available prognostic tools are derived from selected cohorts of patients who underwent resection, excluding up to 20% of patients with exploration only, and do not adequately reflect the pretreatment scenario.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for PDAC in Heidelberg from July 2006 to June 2014 were identified from a prospective database. Pretreatment parameters were extracted from the database and the laboratory information system. Parameters independently associated with overall survival by uni- and multivariable analyses were used to build a prognostic score. A contemporary cohort from Verona was used for external validation.

RESULTS

In 1197 patients, multiple pretreatment parameters were associated with overall survival by univariable analyses. American Society of Anesthesiology classification, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen, C-reactive protein, albumin, and platelet count were independently associated with survival and were used to create the Heidelberg Prognostic Pancreatic Cancer (HELPP)-score. The HELPP-score was closely associated with overall survival (median survival between 31.3 and 4.8 months; 5-year survival rates between 35% and 0%) and was able to stratify survival in subgroups with or without resection as well as in CA19-9 nonsecretors. In the resected subgroup the HELPP-score stratified survival independently of pathological prognostic factors. The HELPP-score was externally validated and was superior to CA19-9 in both the development and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The HELPP-score is a readily available prognostic tool based on pretreatment routine parameters to stratify survival in PDAC independently of resection status and pathological tumor stage.

Levels of tumor markers CEA/CA 19-9 in serum and peritoneal lavage predict postoperative recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer

Aim

This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of tumor markers from peritoneal lavage in selecting patients with a high risk of recurrence and predicting site-specific recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Methods

The levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 (sCEA/sCA 19-9) and paired peritoneal lavage CEA and CA 19-9 (pCEA/pCA 19-9) were measured in 90 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgery. Using the cutoff values determined by maximally selected rank statistics for disease-free survival (DFS), the risk of recurrence and its patterns were evaluated in combination with different markers and different test specimens.

Results

In univariate and multivariate analysis, an elevated pCA 19-9 level (>1.3 U/mL) was an independent prognostic marker for both DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.391; P = .018) and overall survival (HR, 3.194; P = .033). Combination analyses contributed to further stratification of a very high risk of recurrence. Of the 58 patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent curative resection, elevated pCA19-9 was also associated with inferior DFS and overall survival (OS). Patients with elevated pCA 19-9 levels were more likely to have an earlier onset of peritoneal recurrence than those with normal pCA 19-9 levels (P = .048, Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test).

Conclusion

pCA 19-9 is a reliable marker for predicting postoperative recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer after surgery. Further risk stratification can be achieved by using combination assays. The combination of pCA 19-9 and sCA19-9 also serves as a predictor of recurrence site-specific recurrence.

Resection of pancreatic adenocarcinomas with synchronous liver metastases: A retrospective study of prognostic factors for survival

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the results of synchronous liver resection for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and to identify prognostic factors for overall survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from patients who underwent the synchronous resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with liver metastases. Cox analyses were used to identify factors prognostic of overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 92 patients included in this study, preoperative chemotherapy was administered to 52 patients. The median overall survival was 18.26 months (95% confidence interval: 14.7-22.7) (from diagnosis) and 12.68 months (95% confidence interval: 9.5-15.57) from surgery; overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 70%, 10%, and 0%, respectively. Twenty-eight patients (30.4%) had median overall survival >18 months after surgery. The median overall survival from diagnosis was longer in patients undergoing preoperative treatment (22.7 vs 13.8 months; P = .01) but similar after surgery (12.6 vs 13.8 months; P = .86). Multivariate Cox analysis found CA19-9 levels <500 kU/L (hazard ratio: 0.35; 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.70; P = .003), R0 resection (hazard ratio: 0.46; 95% confidence interval: 0.24-0.88; P = .020), and adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.39; 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.88; P = .024) as independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Survival after resection of oligometastatic liver disease remains limited, reflecting the dismal prognosis of metastatic disease even after aggressive treatment. Preresection CA19-9 serum levels represent a useful tool for patient selection, and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy has a major impact on overall survival. Large comparative studies with exclusive chemotherapy are needed to validate this approach and to identify optimal candidates.

Preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and standard uptake value of positron emission tomography-computed tomography as prognostic markers in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Among various prognostic factors of pancreatic cancer, preoperative clinical information is obtained by imaging modality. This study aimed to evaluate clinical usefulness of preoperative carbohydrate antigen and preoperative standard uptake value in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as predictive biological markers for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 189 patients with PDAC who underwent preoperative PET-computed tomography were evaluated. Patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and R2 resection was excluded. The correlation between SUVmax and clinicopathologic parameters was analyzed. The C-tree statistical method was used to estimate cutoff values of logCA19-9 and SUVmax for survival rate. A multivariate analysis was conducted to identify prognostic factors for overall survival.

RESULTS

The median duration of OS was 26 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 22.4%. The optimal cutoff values for CA19-9 level was 150 U/mL and SUVmax was 5.5. When subjects were divided into three groups according to the combination of CA19-9 level and SUVmax from C-tree (high-risk group, CA19-9 > 150 U/mL and SUVmax > 5.5; intermediate-risk group, CA19-9 ≤ 150 U/mL and SUVmax > 5.5 or CA19-9 > 150 U/mL and SUVmax ≤ 5.5; and low-risk group, CA19-9 ≤ 150 U/mL and SUVmax ≤ 5.5), there was a significant 5YSR difference (5.6%, 24.3%, and 36.5%, P < .001). The multivariate analysis revealed high SUVmax, high preoperative CA19-9 level, venous invasion, and adjuvant chemotherapy were prognostic factors of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

CA19-9 and SUVmax are strong prognostic biological factors in resectable PDAC. Moreover, patients with high CA19-9 level and SUVmax are not indicated for upfront surgery.

Impact of radiologic splenic vessel invasion in resectable left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: predictor of early systemic recurrence following upfront surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors and the best candidates for neoadjuvant therapy among patients with resectable left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by analyzing the timing and pattern of recurrence following upfront surgery.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included patients with resectable left-sided PDAC who underwent upfront distal pancreatectomy from 2005 to 2015. A minimum P value approach was used to evaluate the optimal cutoff of early recurrence. The predictors of recurrence were assessed with Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 311 included patients, 241 (77.5%) had a recurrence at a median follow-up of 29.3 months. Systemic recurrence occurred in 194 patients (80.5%) and isolated local recurrence in 47 patients (19.5%). A recurrence-free survival cutoff of 12 months was selected to distinguish between early and late recurrence. The patients with early recurrence had a shorter median overall survival (16.1 vs. 39.9 months, P<0.001) and post-recurrence survival (9.6 vs. 17.2 months, P<0.001) than those with late recurrence. The patients with systemic recurrence had a shorter median overall survival (19.6 vs. 29.1 months, P=0.007) and post-recurrence survival (11.0 vs. 15.3 months, P=0.024) than those with an isolated local recurrence. In multivariable analysis, preoperative CA 19-9 ≥500 U/mL [odd ratio (OR) 2.037, P=0.035], radiologic splenic vessels invasion (OR 5.014, P<0.001), positive radial resection margin (OR 2.638, P<0.001), and no adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 2.084, P=0.001) were predictors of an early systemic recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiologic splenic vessels invasion may be considered to indicate a biologically borderline status in patients with anatomically resectable left-sided PDAC. Future clinical trials of neoadjuvant therapy targeting these patients should be conducted.

Heterogeneity of metabolic adaptive capacity affects the prognosis among pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

Evolutionary cancer has a supply mechanism to satisfy higher energy demands even in poor-nutrient conditions. Metabolic reprogramming is essential to supply sufficient energy. The relationship between metabolic reprogramming and the clinical course of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. We aimed to clarify the differences in metabolic status among PDAC patients.

METHODS

We collected clinical data from 128 cases of resectable PDAC patients undergoing surgery. Sixty-three resected tissues, 15 tissues from the low carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), 38-100 U/mL, and high CA19-9, > 500 U/mL groups, and 33 non-tumor control parts, were subjected to tandem mass spectrometry workflow to systematically explore metabolic status. Clinical and proteomic data were compared on the most used PDAC biomarker, preoperative CA19-9 value.

RESULTS

Higher CA19-9 levels were clearly associated with higher early recurrence (p < 0.001), decreased RFS (p < 0.001), and decreased DSS (p = 0.025). From proteomic analysis, we discovered that cancer evolution-related as well as various metabolism-related pathways were more notable in the high group. Using resected tissue immunohistochemical staining, we learned that high CA19-9 PDAC demonstrated aerobic glycolysis enhancement, yet no decrease in protein synthesis. We found a heterogeneity of various metabolic processes, including carbohydrates, proteins, amino acids, lipids, and nucleic acids, between the low and the high groups, suggesting differences in metabolic adaptive capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found metabolic adaptation differences among PDAC cases, pertaining to both cancer evolution and the prognosis. CA19-9 can help estimate the metabolic adaptive capacity of energy supply for PDAC evolution.

Is it justified to assess the resectability of pancreatic cancer combined with biological and conditional factors?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the biological and conditional resectability criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), as proposed by the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), as well as to identify the role of biological and conditional factors in assessing the resectability of PDAC.

METHODS

The clinical data of PDAC patients who underwent upfront open/laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD/LPD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP/LDP) at our hospital between January 2013 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who were diagnosed with anatomically resectable PDAC, as defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline of PDAC guideline Version 1.2020, were enrolled. Based on IAP-criteria, these patients were divided into two groups, including IAP-resectable (IAP-R) and IAP Borderline Resectable (IAP-BR). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups. In order to identify independent biological and conditional predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of enrolled patients, an analysis was performed through the use of a Cox proportional-hazard model.

RESULTS

Overall, 97 patients were included in this study. Among them, 38 patients were IAP-R and 59 patients were IAP-BR. Compared to the IAP-R group, the IAP-BR group had a higher early recurrence rate (62.7% vs. 42.1%; P=0.047), and the median RFS (9.2 vs. 18.3 months, P<0.01) and OS (19.1 vs. 30.6 months, P<0.05) were also significantly worse. Preoperative CA19-9 serum levels that exceeded 500 U/mL and/or an imaging diagnosis of regional lymph nodes metastasis were independently associated with OS and RFS of anatomically resectable PDAC.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of patients with PDAC that undergo resection can be predicted more accurately by assessing the resectability of pancreatic cancer combined with anatomical and biological factors according to IAP criteria. Whether conditional factors should be included in the resectability criteria needs to be validated by prospective and large cohorts.

The effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage I pancreatic cancer based on the UICC 8th edition

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with pancreatic cancer after curative resection. However, there is limited evidence regarding the efficacy and prognostic factors for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to identify patients in whom chemotherapy was effective and to detect prognostic factors for stage I pancreatic cancer based on guidelines of the 8^th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC).

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2017, 108 patients diagnosed with stage I pancreatic cancer were enrolled in this study. They were distributed into invasion (n = 68) and non-invasion (n = 40) groups. The relationship between clinicopathological variables, including various prognostic factors, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS), were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Five-year survival in all patients with stage I pancreatic cancer was 38.9%. Adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve DFS or OS in patients with stage I cancer (DFS, p = 0.26; OS, p = 0.30). In subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved DFS (multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.78; p = 0.007) and OS (multivariate-adjusted HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15-0.68; p = 0.003) in the invasion group than in non-invasion group. In contrast, in the non-invasion group, adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve DFS and OS in univariate analysis (DFS, p = 0.992; OS, p = 0.808).

CONCLUSION

For stage I pancreatic cancer, based on guidelines of the UICC 8^th edition, adjuvant chemotherapy may benefit patients with extrapancreatic invasion.