1
|
Hertz P, Rattenborg S, Haug TR, Houlind K, Konge L, Bjerrum F. Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendicectomy- a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:597-608. [PMID: 38396135 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
AIM There is currently an increased focus on competency-based training, in which training and assessment play a crucial role. The aim of this systematic review is to create an overview of hands-on training methods and assessment tools for appendicectomy and colon and rectal surgery procedures using either an open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach. METHOD A systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted the last search on 9 March 2023. All published papers describing hands-on training, evaluation of performance data and development of assessment tools were eligible. The quality of studies and the validity evidence of assessment tools are reported. RESULTS Fifty-one studies were identified. Laparoscopic assessment tools are abundant, but the literature still lacks good-quality assessment tools for open appendicectomy, robotic colectomy and open rectal surgery. Overall, there is a lack of discussion regarding the establishment of pass/fail standards and the consequences of assessment. Virtual reality simulation is used more for appendicectomy than colorectal procedures. Only a few of the studies investigating training were of acceptable quality. There is a need for high-quality studies in open and robotic-assisted colon surgery and all approaches to rectal surgery. CONCLUSION This review provides an overview of current training methods and assessment tools and identifies where more research is needed based on the quality of the studies and the current validity evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hertz
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Lillebaelt, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Center for HR and Education, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Søren Rattenborg
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Lillebaelt Vejle, Colorectal Cancer Center South, University of Southern Denmark DK, Kolding, Denmark
| | - Tora R Haug
- Department of Surgery, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
- Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kim Houlind
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Lillebaelt, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
| | - Lars Konge
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Center for HR and Education, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Flemming Bjerrum
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Center for HR and Education, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Gastrounit, Surgical Section, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sijmons JML, Dekker JWT, Tuynman JB, Mohan HM, Smart P, Heriot AG, Walker K, Kuryba A, Matthiessen P, Tanis PJ. Evolution of surgical approach to rectal cancer resection: A multinational registry assessment. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:15. [PMID: 38183451 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04578-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgical approach to rectal cancer has evolved in recent decades, with introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques and local excision. Since implementation might differ internationally, this study is aimed at evaluating trends in surgical approach to rectal cancer across different countries over the last 10 years and to gain insight into patient, tumour and treatment characteristics. METHODS Pseudo-anonymised data of patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer between 2010 and 2019 were extracted from clinical audits in the Netherlands (NL), Sweden (SE), England-Wales (EW) and Australia-New Zealand (AZ). RESULTS Ninety-nine thousand five hundred ninety-seven patients were included (38,413 open, 55,155 MIS and 5416 local excision). An overall increase in MIS was observed from 29.9% in 2010 to 72.1% in 2019, with decreasing conversion rates (17.5-9.0%). The MIS proportion was highly variable between countries in the period 2010-2014 (54.4% NL, 45.3% EW, 39.8% AZ, 14.1% SE, P < 0.001), but variation reduced over time (2015-2019 78.8% NL, 66.3% EW, 64.3% AZ, 53.2% SE, P < 0.001). The proportion of local excision for the two periods was highly variable between countries: 4.7% and 11.8% in NL, 3.9% and 7.4% in EW, 4.7% and 4.6% in AZ, 6.0% and 2.9% in SE. CONCLUSIONS Application and speed of implementation of MIS were highly variable between countries, but each registry demonstrated a significant increase over time. Local excision revealed inconsistent trends over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Helen M Mohan
- Bowel Cancer Outcomes Registry (BCOR), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Philip Smart
- Bowel Cancer Outcomes Registry (BCOR), Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Kate Walker
- National Bowel Cancer Audit (NBOCA), Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu H, Guo R, Li H. Short-term and long-term efficacy in robot-assisted treatment for mid and low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 39:7. [PMID: 38127156 PMCID: PMC10739549 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04579-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the short-term and long-term therapeutic effects of robot-assisted laparoscopic treatment in patients with mid and low rectal cancer. METHODS A comprehensive search strategy was employed to retrieve relevant literature from PubMed, NCBI, Medline, and Springer databases, spanning the database inception until August 2023. The focus of this systematic review was on controlled studies that compared the treatment outcomes of robot-assisted (Rob) and conventional laparoscopy (Lap) in the context of mid and low rectal cancer. Data extraction and literature review were meticulously conducted by two independent researchers (HMW and RKG). The synthesized data underwent rigorous analysis utilizing RevMan 5.4 software, adhering to established methodological standards in systematic reviews. The primary outcomes encompass perioperative outcomes and oncological outcomes. Secondary outcomes include long-term outcomes. RESULT A total of 11 studies involving 2239 patients with mid and low rectal cancer were included (3 RCTs and 8 NRCTs); the Rob group consisted of 1111 cases, while the Lap group included 1128 cases. The Rob group exhibited less intraoperative bleeding (MD = -40.01, 95% CI: -57.61 to -22.42, P < 0.00001), a lower conversion rate to open surgery (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.82, P = 0.02), a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (MD = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.77 to 3.18, P = 0.001), and a lower CRM positive rate (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.95, P = 0.04). Additionally, the Rob group had lower postoperative morbidity rate (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.82, P < 0.0001) and a lower occurrence rate of complications with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.90, P = 0.02). Further subgroup analysis revealed a lower anastomotic leakage rate (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.97, P = 0.04). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the analysis of operation time (P = 0.42), occurrence rates of protective stoma (P = 0.81), PRM (P = 0.92), and DRM (P = 0.23), time to flatus (P = 0.18), time to liquid diet (P = 0.65), total hospital stay (P = 0.35), 3-year overall survival rate (P = 0.67), and 3-year disease-free survival rate (P = 0.42). CONCLUSION Robot-assisted laparoscopic treatment for mid and low rectal cancer yields favorable outcomes, demonstrating both efficacy and safety. In comparison to conventional laparoscopy, patients experience reduced intraoperative bleeding and a lower incidence of complications. Notably, the method achieves comparable short-term and long-term treatment results to those of conventional laparoscopic surgery, thus justifying its consideration for widespread clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiming Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, China
| | - Renkai Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, China
| | - Huiyu Li
- Department of General Surgery, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, 030032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sermonesi G, Tian BWCA, Vallicelli C, Abu-Zidan FM, Damaskos D, Kelly MD, Leppäniemi A, Galante JM, Tan E, Kirkpatrick AW, Khokha V, Romeo OM, Chirica M, Pikoulis M, Litvin A, Shelat VG, Sakakushev B, Wani I, Sall I, Fugazzola P, Cicuttin E, Toro A, Amico F, Mas FD, De Simone B, Sugrue M, Bonavina L, Campanelli G, Carcoforo P, Cobianchi L, Coccolini F, Chiarugi M, Di Carlo I, Di Saverio S, Podda M, Pisano M, Sartelli M, Testini M, Fette A, Rizoli S, Picetti E, Weber D, Latifi R, Kluger Y, Balogh ZJ, Biffl W, Jeekel H, Civil I, Hecker A, Ansaloni L, Bravi F, Agnoletti V, Beka SG, Moore EE, Catena F. Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:57. [PMID: 38066631 PMCID: PMC10704840 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopy is widely adopted across nearly all surgical subspecialties in the elective setting. Initially finding indication in minor abdominal emergencies, it has gradually become the standard approach in the majority of elective general surgery procedures. Despite many technological advances and increasing acceptance, the laparoscopic approach remains underutilized in emergency general surgery and in abdominal trauma. Emergency laparotomy continues to carry a high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been a growing interest from emergency and trauma surgeons in adopting minimally invasive surgery approaches in the acute surgical setting. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a review of the literature to reach a consensus on the indications and benefits of a laparoscopic-first approach in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies or abdominal trauma. METHODS This position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of 54 experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on a position statement. RESULTS A total of 323 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized clinical trial, retrospective comparative cohort studies, case series) have been selected from an initial pool of 7409 studies. Evidence demonstrates several benefits of the laparoscopic approach in stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgical emergencies or abdominal trauma. The selection of a stable patient seems to be of paramount importance for a safe adoption of a laparoscopic approach. In hemodynamically stable patients, the laparoscopic approach was found to be safe, feasible and effective as a therapeutic tool or helpful to identify further management steps and needs, resulting in improved outcomes, regardless of conversion. Appropriate patient selection, surgeon experience and rigorous minimally invasive surgical training, remain crucial factors to increase the adoption of laparoscopy in emergency general surgery and abdominal trauma. CONCLUSIONS The WSES expert panel suggests laparoscopy as the first approach for stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Sermonesi
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | - Brian W C A Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Carlo Vallicelli
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | - Fikri M Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al‑Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | | | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Joseph M Galante
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Edward Tan
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Vladimir Khokha
- Department of Emergency Surgery, City Hospital, Mozyr, Belarus
| | - Oreste Marco Romeo
- Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Care Program, Bronson Methodist Hospital, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Mircea Chirica
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France
| | - Manos Pikoulis
- 3Rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Andrey Litvin
- Department of Surgical Diseases No. 3, Gomel State Medical University, Gomel, Belarus
| | | | - Boris Sakakushev
- General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Imtiaz Wani
- Department of Surgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India
| | - Ibrahima Sall
- General Surgery Department, Military Teaching Hospital, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Enrico Cicuttin
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Adriana Toro
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, General Surgery Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Francesco Amico
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Francesca Dal Mas
- Department of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Campus Economico San Giobbe Cannaregio, 873, 30100, Venice, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Donegal Clinical Research Academy Emergency Surgery Outcome Project, Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Carcoforo
- Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Isidoro Di Carlo
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, General Surgery Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- General Surgery Department Hospital of San Benedetto del Tronto, Marche Region, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, Emergency Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Michele Pisano
- General and Emergency Surgery, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Mario Testini
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery, University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Andreas Fette
- Pediatric Surgery, Children's Care Center, SRH Klinikum Suhl, Suhl, Thuringia, Germany
| | - Sandro Rizoli
- Surgery Department, Section of Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital (HGH), Doha, Qatar
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero‑Universitaria Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Dieter Weber
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Rifat Latifi
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Zsolt Janos Balogh
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Walter Biffl
- Division of Trauma/Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Hans Jeekel
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ian Civil
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andreas Hecker
- Emergency Medicine Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Bravi
- Healthcare Administration, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Ernest Eugene Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sueda T, Tei M, Mori S, Nishida K, Yasuyama A, Nomura M, Yoshikawa Y, Tsujie M. Clinical Impact of Transanal Drainage Tube on Anastomosis Leakage Following Minimally Invasive Resection Without Diverting Stoma in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2023; 33:608-616. [PMID: 37852234 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES As one of the most serious complications of rectal cancer (RC) surgery, preventing anastomotic leakage (AL) is crucial. Several studies have suggested a positive role of the transanal drainage tube (TaDT) in AL prevention. However, whether TaDT is beneficial for AL in patients with RC remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of TaDT on AL following minimally invasive resection without diverting stoma (DS) in patients with RC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 392 consecutive patients with RC who had undergone minimally invasive resection without DS between 2010 and 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce selection bias. AL was classified as grade A, B, or C. RESULTS A TaDT was used in 214 patients overall. After PSM, we enrolled 316 patients (n=158 in each group). Before PSM, significant group-dependent differences were observed in terms of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and the use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents. The frequency of AL was 7.3% in the overall cohort and was significantly lower in the TaDT group (3.7%) than in the non-TaDT group (11.8%). The rate of grade B AL was significantly lower in the TaDT group than in the non-TaDT group (before PSM, P <0.01; after PSM, P =0.02). However, no significant differences between groups were found for grade C AL. Moreover, multivariate analysis identified the lack of a TaDT as an independent risk factor for AL in the overall and matched cohorts [before PSM, odds ratio, 3.64, P <0.01; after PSM, odds ratio, 2.91, P =0.02]. CONCLUSION These results indicated that TaDT may play a beneficial role in preventing AL, particularly of grade B, for patients with RC undergoing minimally invasive resection without DS. However, further randomized controlled trials, including patient-reported outcomes, are still needed to understand better the role of TaDT in preventing ALs in patients with RC undergoing minimally invasive resection without DS.
Collapse
|
6
|
Zaepfel S, Marcovei R, Fernandez-de-Sevilla E, Sourrouille I, Honore C, Gelli M, Faron M, Benhaim L. Robotic-assisted surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a long but safe learning curve. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2099-2108. [PMID: 37219783 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01624-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The number of robotic-assisted procedures for rectal cancer is rising. The risk of this procedure when performed by surgeon with limited robotic experience is unknown and the precise duration of the learning curve debated. We, therefore, aimed to analyze the learning curve and its related safety in a single center before the development of mentoring programs. We prospectively recorded all robotic procedures performed for colorectal cancer between 2015 and 2020 by a single surgeon. Operative times for partial and total proctectomy were analyzed. The learning curve was defined by comparison with the standard duration of the laparoscopic procedure performed in expert centers (published in GRECCAR 5 and GRECCAR 6 trials) and calculated using a cumulative summation for learning curve test (LC-CUSUM). Among the 174 patients operated for colorectal cancer, we analyzed the outcomes of the 89 patients operated by partial and total robotic proctectomy. To reach repeatedly the same surgical duration as laparoscopic procedure for partial or complete proctectomy, the LC-CUSUM identified a learning curve of 57 patients. A severe morbidity in this population, defined by Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3, was observed in 15 cases (16.8%) with an anastomotic leak rate of 13.5%. The rate of completeness of mesorectal excision was 90% and the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 15 (± 9). Using operative time as end-point, the learning curve of rectal cancer robotic surgery identified a cut-off of 57 patients. The technic remained safe with acceptable morbidity and oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Zaepfel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Raluca Marcovei
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Elena Fernandez-de-Sevilla
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Isabelle Sourrouille
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Charles Honore
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Maximiliano Gelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Matthieu Faron
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Leonor Benhaim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France.
- Centre de Recherche Des Cordeliers, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, CNRS SNC 5096, 15 rue de l'école de Médecine, 75006, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ahuja V, Paredes LG, Leeds IL, Perkal MF, King JT. Clinical outcomes of elective robotic vs laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer utilizing a large national database. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7199-7205. [PMID: 37365394 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10215-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies have shown comparable outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic approaches across a range of surgeries; however, these have been limited in size. This study investigates differences in outcomes following robotic (RC) vs laparoscopic (LC) colectomy across several years utilizing a large national database. METHODS We analyzed data from ACS NSQIP for patients who underwent elective minimally invasive colectomies for colon cancer from 2012 to 2020. Inverse probability weighting with regression adjustment (IPWRA) incorporating demographics, operative factors, and comorbidities was used. Outcomes included mortality, complications, return to the operating room (OR), post-operative length of stay (LOS), operative time, readmission, and anastomotic leak. Secondary analysis was performed to further assess anastomotic leak rate following right and left colectomies. RESULTS We identified 83,841 patients who underwent elective minimally invasive colectomies: 14,122 (16.8%) RC and 69,719 (83.2%) LC. Patients who underwent RC were younger, more likely to be male, non-Hispanic White, with higher body mass index (BMI) and fewer comorbidities (for all, P < 0.05). After adjustment, there were no differences between RC and LC for 30-day mortality (0.8% vs 0.9% respectively, P = 0.457) or overall complications (16.9% vs 17.2%, P = 0.432). RC was associated with higher return to OR (5.1% vs 3.6%, P < 0.001), lower LOS (4.9 vs 5.1 days, P < 0.001), longer operative time (247 vs 184 min, P < 0.001), and higher rates of readmission (8.8% vs 7.2%, P < 0.001). Anastomotic leak rates were comparable for right-sided RC vs LC (2.1% vs 2.2%, P = 0.713), higher for left-sided LC (2.7%, P < 0.001), and highest for left-sided RC (3.4%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Robotic approach for elective colon cancer resection has similar outcomes to its laparoscopic counterpart. There were no differences in mortality or overall complications, however anastomotic leaks were highest after left RC. Further investigation is imperative to better understand the potential impact of technological advancement such as robotic surgery on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanita Ahuja
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lucero G Paredes
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, CT, USA.
- National Clinician Scholars Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510-8088, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA.
| | - Ira L Leeds
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Melissa F Perkal
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joseph T King
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pickering OJ, van Boxel GI, Carter NC, Mercer SJ, Knight BC, Pucher PH. Learning curve for adoption of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review of oncological, clinical, and efficiency outcomes. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:6961031. [PMID: 36572404 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is gaining increasing popularity as an operative approach. Learning curves to achieve surgical competency in robotic-assisted techniques have shown significant variation in learning curve lengths and outcomes. This study aimed to summarize the current literature on learning curves for RAMIE. METHODS A systematic review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were searched, and articles reporting on learning curves in RAMIE were identified and scrutinized. Studies were eligible if they reported changes in operative outcomes over time, or learning curves, for surgeons newly adopting RAMIE. RESULTS Fifteen studies reporting on 1767 patients were included. Nine studies reported on surgeons with prior experience of robot-assisted surgery prior to adopting RAMIE, with only four studies outlining a specified RAMIE adoption pathway. Learning curves were most commonly analyzed using cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) and were typically reported for lymph node yields and operative times, with significant variation in learning curve lengths (18-73 cases and 20-80 cases, respectively). Most studies reported adoption without significant impact on clinical outcomes such as anastomotic leak; significant learning curves were more likely in studies, which did not report a formal learning or adoption pathway. CONCLUSION Reported RAMIE adoption phases are variable, with some authors suggesting significant impact to patients. With robust training through formal programmes or proctorship, however, others report RAMIE adoption without impact on clinical outcomes. A formalized adoption curriculum appears critical to prevent adverse effects on operative efficiency and patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver J Pickering
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Gijs I van Boxel
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University Hospital Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Nick C Carter
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University Hospital Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Stuart J Mercer
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University Hospital Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Benjamin C Knight
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University Hospital Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Philip H Pucher
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University Hospital Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
- Department of Pharmacology and Biosciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Avendano JP, Sudah SY, Gencarelli P, Imam N, Manzi JE, Ghajar M, Menendez ME, Nicholson AD. The learning curve for anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. JSES REVIEWS, REPORTS, AND TECHNIQUES 2023; 3:150-159. [PMID: 37588447 PMCID: PMC10426533 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite the rising incidence of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) among surgeons, little is known about the learning curve associated with these procedures. The purpose of this systematic review was to (1) identify the learning curves associated with ATSA and RTSA, (2) evaluate the effect of the learning curves on clinical outcomes, and (3) determine the number of cases needed to achieve proficiency. Methods Four online databases [PubMed (NLM), MEDLINE (OVID), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and Scopus (Elsevier)] were systematically searched and screened according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The search included results from the inception of each database to May 18, 2022. Data regarding study characteristics, patient demographics, learning curve analyses, patient reported outcome measures, range of motion, complication rates, and reoperation rates were collected. A quality assessment for each article was performed according to the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria. Results A total of 13 studies of fair to good quality were included for analysis (one of level II evidence, five of level III, and seven of level IV) with the majority originating from the United States [n = 8, 61.5%]. Overall, there were a total of 3381 cases (1861 RTSA and 1520 ATSA), with a mean patient age of 72.6 years [range: 45-92 years]. From the studies analyzed in this systematic review, for RTSA, the approximate average number of cases surgeons need to perform to move to an acceptable position on the RTSA learning curve is 25 cases. For ATSA, a wider range of 16-86 cases was derived as only two studies reported on ATSA. Conclusion Progression along the learning curve for RTSA and ATSA results in decreased operative times, improved patient-reported outcomes, and fewer complications. However, a true learning curve is difficult to quantify given the heterogeneity of reported outcome measures, individual surgeon experience at the time of data collection, and statistical analyses used across studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P. Avendano
- Department of Orthopedics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Suleiman Y. Sudah
- Department of Orthopedics, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USA
| | - Pasquale Gencarelli
- Department of Orthopedics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Nareena Imam
- Department of Orthopedics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Mina Ghajar
- Rutgers University Libraries, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sekkat H, Souadka A, Alaoui L, Rafik A, Belkhadir Z, Amrani L, Benkabbou A, Mohsine R, Majbar AM. The learning curve of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery of millennial surgeons: Lessons for a safe implementation in low- and middle-income countries. J Minim Access Surg 2023; 19:296-304. [PMID: 37056092 PMCID: PMC10246625 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_78_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to analyse the learning curve (LC) in laparoscopic rectal cancer resections of 2 millennial surgeons during the implementation of the first laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery programme in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) cancer centre. Methods All consecutive patients operated by two millennial surgeons for primary rectal adenocarcinoma between January 2018 and March 2020 were included. The LC was analysed for operative duration and conversion to open surgery using both cumulative sum (CUSUM) and/or variable life-adjusted display (VLAD) charts. Results Eighty-four patients were included, 45 (53.6%) men with a mean age of 57.3 years. Abdominoperineal resection was performed in 31 (36.9%) cases and resections were extended to other organs in 20 (23.8%) patients. Thirteen patients (15.5%) had conversion to open surgery. Using CUSUM, Learning curve based on conversion was completed at 12 cases for the first surgeon versus 10 cases for the second. While using VLAD and learning curve-CUSUM (LC-CUSUM), the cases needed were 26 vs 24 respectively. The median operative duration was 314 min with a LC completed at cases (17 vs. 26), and (18 vs. 29) using, respectively, standard and LC-CUSUM. Conclusions This study shows a safe and short LC of millennial surgeons during the implementation of a laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in an LMIC cancer centre, and the valuable use of modern statistical methods in the prospective assessment of LC safety during surgical training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamza Sekkat
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, IBN Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Amine Souadka
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, IBN Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Leila Alaoui
- Department of Statistics, Cancer Research Institute, Fez, Morocco
| | - Ali Rafik
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, IBN Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Zakaria Belkhadir
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, National Institute of Oncology, IBN Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Laila Amrani
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, IBN Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Amine Benkabbou
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, IBN Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Raouf Mohsine
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, IBN Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Anass Mohammed Majbar
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, IBN Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cuk P, Simonsen RM, Sherzai S, Buchbjerg T, Andersen PV, Salomon S, Pietersen PI, Möller S, Al-Najami I, Ellebaek MB. Surgical efficacy and learning curves of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with intracorporeal anastomosis for right-sided colon cancer: A retrospective two-center cohort study. J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:1152-1159. [PMID: 36933189 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a potential benefit on long-term outcomes following complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer when compared to conventional colectomy. This study aims to analyze the learning curve and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic CME with intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) for right-sided colon cancer in the hands of experienced colorectal surgeons. METHODS A two-center cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing right-sided colectomy from September 2021 to May 2022 at two tertiary colorectal centers in Denmark. Learning curves of surgical time were estimated using a cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM). RESULTS A total of 61 patients were included. According to the CUSUM analysis, 32 cases were needed to obtain a peak in operative time, resulting in a decrease in time consumption (group 1/learning phase: 217.2 min [SD 53.6] and group 2/plateau phase 191.6 min [SD 45.1], p = 0.05). There was a nonsignificant reduction in the rates of severe surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo > 3) (13% vs. 7%, p = 0.67) between the two groups, while the length of hospital stay remained constant (median 3.0 days, interquartile range, IQR [2.0; 4.0]). CONCLUSION The learning curve of laparoscopic CME with ICA for right-sided colon cancer demonstrated that 32 cases were needed to obtain a plateau phase expressed by operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedja Cuk
- Surgical Department, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Selab Sherzai
- Surgical Department, Hospital of South West Jutland, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Thomas Buchbjerg
- Surgical Department, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | | | - Søren Salomon
- Surgical Department, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Pia Iben Pietersen
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital-Svendborg, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Radiology, Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sören Möller
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,OPEN-Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital and Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Issam Al-Najami
- Surgical Department, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Mark Bremholm Ellebaek
- Surgical Department, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Xu Z, Zhang Y, Su H, Guan X, Liang J, Liu Q, Wang X, Zhou H. A multidimensional learning curve analysis of totally laparoscopic ileostomy reversal using a single surgeon' s experience. Front Surg 2023; 10:1077472. [PMID: 36860945 PMCID: PMC9968790 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1077472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Recently, totally laparoscopic ileostomy reversal (TLAP) has received increasing attention and exhibited promising short-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to detail the learning process of the TLAP technique. Methods Based on our initial experience with TLAP from 2018, a total of 65 TLAP cases were enrolled. Demographics and perioperative parameters were assessed using cumulative sum (CUSUM), moving average, and risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM) analyses. Results The overall mean operative time (OT) was 94 min and the median postoperative hospitalization period was 4 days, and there was an estimated 10.77% incidence rate of perioperative complications. Three unique phases of the learning curve were derived from CUSUM analysis, and the mean OT of phase I (1-24 cases) was 108.5 min, that of phase II (25-39 cases) was 92 min, and that of phase III (40-65 cases) was 80 min, respectively. There was no significant difference in perioperative complications between these 3 phases. Similarly, moving average analysis indicated that the operation time was reduced significantly after the 20th case and reached a steady state after the 36th case. Furthermore, complication-based CUSUM and RA-CUSUM analyses indicated an acceptable range of complication rates during the whole learning period. Conclusion Our data demonstrated 3 distinct phases of the learning curve of TLAP. For an experienced surgeon, surgical competence in TLAP can be grasped at around 25 cases with satisfactory short-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yueyang Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Su
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xu Guan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianwei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xishan Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Haitao Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China,Correspondence: Haitao Zhou
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
de’Angelis N, Marchegiani F, Schena CA, Khan J, Agnoletti V, Ansaloni L, Barría Rodríguez AG, Bianchi PP, Biffl W, Bravi F, Ceccarelli G, Ceresoli M, Chiara O, Chirica M, Cobianchi L, Coccolini F, Coimbra R, Cotsoglou C, D’Hondt M, Damaskos D, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Diana M, Espin‐Basany E, Fichtner‐Feigl S, Fugazzola P, Gavriilidis P, Gronnier C, Kashuk J, Kirkpatrick AW, Ammendola M, Kouwenhoven EA, Laurent A, Leppaniemi A, Lesurtel M, Memeo R, Milone M, Moore E, Pararas N, Peitzmann A, Pessaux P, Picetti E, Pikoulis M, Pisano M, Ris F, Robison T, Sartelli M, Shelat VG, Spinoglio G, Sugrue M, Tan E, Van Eetvelde E, Kluger Y, Weber D, Catena F. Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:11. [PMID: 36707879 PMCID: PMC9883976 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00476-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic and robotic approaches, is widely adopted in elective digestive surgery, but selectively used for surgical emergencies. The present position paper summarizes the available evidence concerning the learning curve to achieve proficiency in emergency MIS and provides five expert opinion statements, which may form the basis for developing standardized curricula and training programs in emergency MIS. METHODS This position paper was conducted according to the World Society of Emergency Surgery methodology. A steering committee and an international expert panel were involved in the critical appraisal of the literature and the development of the consensus statements. RESULTS Thirteen studies regarding the learning curve in emergency MIS were selected. All but one study considered laparoscopic appendectomy. Only one study reported on emergency robotic surgery. In most of the studies, proficiency was achieved after an average of 30 procedures (range: 20-107) depending on the initial surgeon's experience. High heterogeneity was noted in the way the learning curve was assessed. The experts claim that further studies investigating learning curve processes in emergency MIS are needed. The emergency surgeon curriculum should include a progressive and adequate training based on simulation, supervised clinical practice (proctoring), and surgical fellowships. The results should be evaluated by adopting a credentialing system to ensure quality standards. Surgical proficiency should be maintained with a minimum caseload and constantly evaluated. Moreover, the training process should involve the entire surgical team to facilitate the surgeon's proficiency. CONCLUSIONS Limited evidence exists concerning the learning process in laparoscopic and robotic emergency surgery. The proposed statements should be seen as a preliminary guide for the surgical community while stressing the need for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de’Angelis
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, Paris, France ,grid.410511.00000 0001 2149 7878Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Francesco Marchegiani
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, Paris, France
| | - Carlo Alberto Schena
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, Paris, France
| | - Jim Khan
- grid.4701.20000 0001 0728 6636Department of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University of Portsmouth, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- grid.414682.d0000 0004 1758 8744Intensive Care Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- grid.419425.f0000 0004 1760 3027Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Walter Biffl
- grid.415402.60000 0004 0449 3295Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Francesca Bravi
- grid.415207.50000 0004 1760 3756Healthcare Administration, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Italy
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- grid.7563.70000 0001 2174 1754General and Emergency Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Monza, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mircea Chirica
- grid.450307.50000 0001 0944 2786Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Michallon Hospital, Grenoble University, Grenoble, France
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- grid.419425.f0000 0004 1760 3027Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy ,grid.8982.b0000 0004 1762 5736Department of Clinical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209General, Emergency and Trauma Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Raul Coimbra
- grid.488519.90000 0004 5946 0028Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Riverside, CA USA
| | | | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Dimitris Damaskos
- grid.418716.d0000 0001 0709 1919Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of General and Metabolic Surgery, Poissy and Saint‐Germain‐en‐Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Unit of General Surgery, San Benedetto del Tronto Hospital, av5 Asur Marche, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Michele Diana
- grid.11843.3f0000 0001 2157 9291Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ,grid.420397.b0000 0000 9635 7370IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, Strasbourg, France
| | - Eloy Espin‐Basany
- grid.7080.f0000 0001 2296 0625Department of General Surgery, Hospital Valle de Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefan Fichtner‐Feigl
- grid.7708.80000 0000 9428 7911Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- grid.419425.f0000 0004 1760 3027Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Paschalis Gavriilidis
- grid.15628.380000 0004 0393 1193Department of HBP Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX UK
| | - Caroline Gronnier
- grid.42399.350000 0004 0593 7118Eso-Gastric Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Magellan Center, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Jeffry Kashuk
- grid.12136.370000 0004 1937 0546Department of Surgery, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Andrew W. Kirkpatrick
- grid.414959.40000 0004 0469 2139Department of General, Acute Care, Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, and Trauma Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Michele Ammendola
- grid.411489.10000 0001 2168 2547Digestive Surgery Unit, Health of Science Department, “Magna Graecia” University Medical School, “Mater Domini” Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Ewout A. Kouwenhoven
- grid.417370.60000 0004 0502 0983Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente ZGT, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - Alexis Laurent
- grid.410511.00000 0001 2149 7878Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France ,grid.412116.10000 0004 1799 3934Unit of HPB and Service of General Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Ari Leppaniemi
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- grid.415844.80000 0004 1759 7181Unit of Hepato‐Pancreato‐Biliary Surgery, General Regional Hospital “F. Miulli”, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- grid.4691.a0000 0001 0790 385XDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II” University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Ernest Moore
- grid.241116.10000000107903411Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO USA
| | - Nikolaos Pararas
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 08003Rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Andrew Peitzmann
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- grid.11843.3f0000 0001 2157 9291Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ,grid.480511.9Institute for Image‐Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ,Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, INSERM U1110, Strasbourg, France
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- grid.411482.aDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Manos Pikoulis
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 08003Rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Michele Pisano
- 1St General Surgery Unit, Department of Emergency, ASST Papa Giovanni Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Frederic Ris
- grid.150338.c0000 0001 0721 9812Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Tyler Robison
- grid.5288.70000 0000 9758 5690Minimally Invasive Surgery Fellow, Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR USA
| | | | - Vishal G. Shelat
- grid.240988.f0000 0001 0298 8161Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Giuseppe Spinoglio
- grid.420397.b0000 0000 9635 7370IRCAD Faculty Member Robotic and Colorectal Surgery‐ IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Michael Sugrue
- grid.415900.90000 0004 0617 6488Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Edward Tan
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Ellen Van Eetvelde
- grid.411326.30000 0004 0626 3362Department of Digestive Surgery, UZ, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Healthcare Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Dieter Weber
- grid.416195.e0000 0004 0453 3875Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Fausto Catena
- grid.414682.d0000 0004 1758 8744Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital‐Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kammar PS, Garach NR. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 8:11-12. [PMID: 36495901 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00379-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Praveen S Kammar
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Oncology, Speciality Surgical Oncology Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
| | - Niharika R Garach
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Oncology, Speciality Surgical Oncology Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lin CY, Liu YC, Chen MC, Chiang FF. Learning curve and surgical outcome of robotic assisted colorectal surgery with ERAS program. Sci Rep 2022; 12:20566. [PMID: 36446802 PMCID: PMC9709162 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24665-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
This study analyzed learning curve and the surgical outcome of robotic assisted colorectal surgery with ERAS program. The study results serve as a reference for future robotic colorectal surgeon who applied ERAS in clinical practice. This was a retrospective case-control study to analyze the learning curve of 141 robotic assisted colorectal surgery (RAS) by Da Vinci Xi (Xi) system and compare the surgical outcomes with 147 conventional laparoscopic (LSC) surgery in the same team. Evaluation for maturation was performed by operation time and the CUSUM plot. Patients were recruited from 1st February 2019 to 9th January 2022; follow-up was conducted at 30 days, and the final follow-up was conducted on 9th February 2022. It both took 31 cases for colon and rectal robotic surgeries to reach the maturation phase. Teamwork maturation was achieved after 60 cases. In the maturation stage, RAS required a longer operation time (mean: colon: 249.5 ± 46.5 vs. 190.3 ± 57.3 p < 0.001; rectum 314.9 ± 59.6 vs. 223.6 ± 63.5 p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, robotic surgery with ERAS program resulted in significant shorter length of hospital stay (mean: colon: 5.5 ± 4.5 vs. 10.0 ± 11.9, p < 0.001; rectum: 5.4 ± 3.5 vs. 10.1 ± 7.0, p < 0.001), lower minor complication rate (colon: 6.0% vs 20.0%, p = 0.074 ; rectum: 11.1% vs 33.3%, p = 0.102), and no significant different major complication rate (colon: 2.0% vs 6.0%, p = 0.617; rectum: 7.4% cs 7.4%, p = 1.0) to conventional LSC. Learning curve for robotic assisted colorectal surgery takes 31 cases. Robotic surgery with ERAS program brings significant faster recovery and fewer complication rate compared to laparoscopy in colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Yu Lin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Defense Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chun Liu
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Cheng Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Feng-Fan Chiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
- College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Providence University, Taichung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Burghgraef TA, Sikkenk DJ, Verheijen PM, Moumni ME, Hompes R, Consten ECJ. The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6337-6360. [PMID: 35697853 PMCID: PMC9402498 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09087-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard treatment of rectal carcinoma is surgical resection according to the total mesorectal excision principle, either by open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted or transanal technique. No clear consensus exists regarding the length of the learning curve for the minimal invasive techniques. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current literature regarding the learning curve of minimal invasive TME. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for studies with the primary or secondary aim to assess the learning curve of either laparoscopic, robot-assisted or transanal TME for rectal cancer. The primary outcome was length of the learning curve per minimal invasive technique. Descriptive statistics were used to present results and the MINORS tool was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS 45 studies, with 7562 patients, were included in this systematic review. Length of the learning curve based on intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, pathological outcomes, or a composite endpoint using a risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis was 50 procedures for the laparoscopic technique, 32-75 procedures for the robot-assisted technique and 36-54 procedures for the transanal technique. Due to the low quality of studies and a high level of heterogeneity a meta-analysis could not be performed. Heterogeneity was caused by patient-related factors, surgeon-related factors and differences in statistical methods. CONCLUSION Current high-quality literature regarding length of the learning curve of minimal invasive TME techniques is scarce. Available literature suggests equal lengths of the learning curves of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal TME. Well-designed studies, using adequate statistical methods are required to properly assess the learning curve, while taking into account patient-related and surgeon-related factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs A Burghgraef
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Daan J Sikkenk
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Paul M Verheijen
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Mostafa El Moumni
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Amsterdam, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tang B, Li T, Gao G, Shi J, Li T. Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:931426. [PMID: 35898893 PMCID: PMC9311896 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.931426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although some studies have assessed the learning curve of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer, most studies included limited sample sizes, no study used postoperative complications as an independent variable to analyze the learning curve of robotic rectal surgery, and no study evaluated the influence of the learning curve on long-term oncologic outcomes. Methods Clinical data on consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer by a single surgeon between January 2015 and December 2018 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were retrospectively collected. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) and risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) were used to visualize the learning curve of operation time and postoperative complications (CD ≥ grade II). Comparisons of clinical outcomes at different learning phases analyzed by RA-CUSUM were performed after propensity score matching. Results A total of 389 consecutive patients were included in the analysis. The numbers of patients needed to overcome the learning curves of operation time and postoperative complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer were 34 and 36, respectively. The learning process was divided into two phases based on RA-CUSUM: the learning phase (1st-36th cases) and the mastery phase (37th-389th cases). Before matching, the mastery phase had more patients with older age, lower tumor location, and neoadjuvant therapy. After matching, the two phases exhibited similar characteristics. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications in the mastery phase were reduced compared with the learning phase, with a median follow-up of 35 months, and the long-term oncologic outcomes were not significantly different between the two phases. Conclusions An experienced laparoscopic surgeon initially implements robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer, surgical outcomes improved after 36 cases, and the learning curve seemingly did not have an obvious impact on long-term oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jun Shi
- *Correspondence: Taiyuan Li, ; Jun Shi,
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ferraro L, Formisano G, Salaj A, Giuratrabocchetta S, Giuliani G, Salvischiani L, Bianchi PP. Robotic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision: Senior versus junior surgeon, a case‐matched retrospective analysis. Int J Med Robot 2022; 18:e2383. [DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Ferraro
- Division of Minimally‐Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienza della Salute Università degli studi di Milano ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Milan Italy
| | - Giampaolo Formisano
- Division of Minimally‐Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienza della Salute Università degli studi di Milano ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Milan Italy
| | - Adelona Salaj
- Division of Minimally‐Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienza della Salute Università degli studi di Milano ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Milan Italy
| | - Simona Giuratrabocchetta
- Division of Minimally‐Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienza della Salute Università degli studi di Milano ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Milan Italy
| | - Giuseppe Giuliani
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery Misericordia Hospital Grosseto Italy
| | - Lucia Salvischiani
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery Misericordia Hospital Grosseto Italy
| | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- Division of Minimally‐Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienza della Salute Università degli studi di Milano ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Milan Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Baek SJ, Piozzi GN, Kim SH. Optimizing outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery with robotic platforms. Surg Oncol 2022; 43:101786. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
20
|
Mathew DAP, Wagh DMS. Abdominoperineal Excision in current era. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2022; 32:100580. [PMID: 35668011 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
|
21
|
Jacob KC, Patel MR, Prabhu MC, Vanjani NN, Pawlowski H, Munim MA, Singh K. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Single Surgeon Learning Curve. World Neurosurg 2022; 164:e411-e419. [PMID: 35513278 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize lateral lumbar interbody fusion surgical learning curve and investigate changes in perioperative and postoperative clinical parameters associated with increased operative experience. METHODS In a case series, surgical learning curve was defined using 3-parameter asymptotic regression and piecewise linear regression, yielding learning phase (patients 1-53) and proficient phase (patients 54-179) cohorts. Using a 5-point grading scale, ipsilateral iliopsoas (hip-flexion) and quadriceps (knee-extension) muscle strength and thigh and groin sensory disturbances were compared for differences preoperatively versus postoperatively using χ2 test. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected preoperatively and postoperatively and compared between cohorts with unpaired t test. RESULTS The proficient phase cohort demonstrated significantly reduced operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative length of stay, and narcotic consumption on postoperative days 0 and 1. The proficient phase cohort displayed decreased disability at 6 weeks and 6 months and demonstrated significant improvement at all time points for disability, pain, and physical function except for 6 weeks and 2 years for physical function, whereas the learning phase cohort demonstrated improvement in disability beginning at 6 months, leg pain at all time points, and back pain through 6 months. Ipsilateral groin and thigh sensory disturbances and iliopsoas and quadriceps weakness improved with increasing operative experience. CONCLUSIONS The proficient phase cohort demonstrated significantly improved perioperative profile, reduced complication rate, and reduced rates of iliopsoas and quadriceps weakness. While the proficient phase cohort demonstrated earlier improvement in disability and physical function scores compared with the learning phase cohort, 2-year outcome measures did not differ. Long-term clinical outcomes suggest that patient safety and quality of life are not compromised during the learning phase, but patients may be particularly susceptible to femoral nerve injury early in a surgeon's practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin C Jacob
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Madhav R Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael C Prabhu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nisheka N Vanjani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Hanna Pawlowski
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mohammed A Munim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang PZT, Wilson CA, Nair SM, Bjazevic J, Dave S, Davidson J, Saklofske DH, Chahine S. The Interactive Relationship Between Instructor Perceptions and Learner Personality on Surgical Skills Performance. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2022; 79:686-694. [PMID: 35115267 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine the association between learner personality and capacity to be trained (i.e., performance improvement) on a surgical task, and how instructor perceptions of the learners' capacity to be trained interact with learner personality and performance during training and feedback. There is meaningful heterogeneity in the degree of learner surgical skills acquisition despite receiving the same amount of training. While learner personality may independently contribute to skill acquisition, the instructor-learner feedback process is also important to consider. To better understand this interpersonal relationship, it is necessary to also consider instructor factors (i.e., perceptions), and how this may contribute to learner variability in skills training. DESIGN This exploratory study employed a prospective two-phase design. Medical and non-medical undergraduate students (N = 62) completed measures of personality and participated in two 20-minute training sessions with expert feedback 2 weeks apart, performing an end-to-side anastomosis on a low-fidelity model. Learner performance and instructors' perceptions of a learner's capacity to be trained were assessed. PARTICIPANTS Sixty-two medical and non-medical undergraduate students. RESULTS There was a significant interaction between learner Extraversion and instructor's perceptions of learner capacity to be trained. Higher learner Extraversion was only associated with an increase in performance improvement for those who were considered trainable (OR = 4.83, p = 0.017). Post hoc analysis revealed a significant difference in the amount of feedback provided to participants who were considered trainable (M = 9.45) versus not trainable (M = 16.48). CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the importance of both individual learner factors and instructor perceptions on surgical skill acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claire A Wilson
- Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shiva M Nair
- Department of Urology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | | | - Sumit Dave
- Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacob Davidson
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Saad Chahine
- Faculty of Education, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jin HY, Ibahim AM, Bae JH, Lee CS, Han SR, Lee IK, Lee DS, Lee YS. Initial experience of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymph node dissection for right colon cancer using Artisential ®, a new laparoscopic articulating instrument. J Minim Access Surg 2022; 18:235-240. [PMID: 35313433 PMCID: PMC8973474 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_88_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) with D3 lymph node dissection for the right colon is becoming popular, but still technically challenging. Several articulating laparoscopic instruments had been introduced to reduce technical difficulties; however, those were not practical. This study aimed to report the first clinical experience of using ArtiSential®, a new laparoscopic articulating instrument in laparoscopic complete mesocolic with D3 lymph node dissection for right colon cancer. Patients and Methods This was a retrospective, single-institution, consecutive case study. From October 2018 to March 2020, a total of 33 patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using ArtiSential®, a new articulating instrument. We compared the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent surgery using ArtiSential® (AG) to the conventional instrument (CG). Results In total, there were 33 cases in AG and 43 cases in CG. There were no significant differences in operation time (141.0 ± 22.5 vs. 156.0 ± 50.6 min, P = 0.09), mean estimated blood loss (46.8 ± 36.2 vs. 100.8 ± 300.6 ml, P = 0.31) and intra-operative and post-operative complications. However, the number of harvested lymph nodes was higher and the length of hospital stay was shorter in AG than in CG (32.6 ± 12.2 vs. 24.6 ± 7.4, P < 0.01 and 3.0 ± 1.2 vs. 4.1 ± 2.2 days, P = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions Laparoscopic CME with D3 lymph node dissection for right colon cancer using ArtiSential®, the new articulating laparoscopic instrument is safe and technically feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeong Yong Jin
- Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Abulfetouh M. Ibahim
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Jung Hoon Bae
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul Seung Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Rim Han
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - In Kyu Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Do Sang Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Suk Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY, Lee SM, Song SH. Stepwise Improvement of Surgical Quality in Robotic Lateral Pelvic Node Dissection: Lessons From 100 Consecutive Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:599-607. [PMID: 34759242 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lateral pelvic node dissection has significant technical difficulty and a high incidence of surgical morbidity. A steep learning curve is anticipated in performing lateral pelvic node dissection. However, no study has previously analyzed the learning curve and surgical skill acquisition for this complex procedure. OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate the learning process for performing robotic total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic node dissection in patients with rectal cancer. DESIGN This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. SETTING This study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center. PATIENTS A total of 100 patients who underwent robotic total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic node dissection between 2011 and 2017 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES A cumulative sum analysis was calculated based on the number of unilateral retrieved lateral pelvic nodes. Operative time, estimated bloodloss, lateral pelvic node metastatic rate, postoperative morbidities, and local recurrence were also analyzed. RESULTS Cumulative sum modeling suggested 4 learning phases: learning I (33 patients), learning II (19 patients), consolidation (30 patients), and competence (18 patients). In the consolidation and competence phases, we adopted fluorescence imaging and standardized the surgical procedure on the basis of anatomical planes. The competence phase had the greatest number of unilateral retrieved lateral pelvic nodes (12.8 vs 4.9, 8.2, and 10.4; p < 0.001). Urinary complications, including urinary retention and postoperative α-blocker usage, were more frequently observed in learning phase I than in the competence phase (39.4% vs 16.7%, p = 0.034). During the median follow-up of 44.2 months, local recurrence in the pelvic sidewall was observed in 4 patients from learning phase I and in 1 patient from learning phase II. LIMITATIONS This study was limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSION Completeness of the lateral pelvic node dissection procedure increased with the surgeon's experience and as new imaging systems and surgical technique standardization were implemented. Further studies are warranted to determine the oncologic outcomes associated with each phase. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B774. MEJORA GRADUAL DE LA CALIDAD QUIRRGICA EN LA DISECCIN LINFTICA PLVICA LATERAL ROBTICA LECCIONES DE PACIENTES CONSECUTIVOS CON CNCER DE RECTO LOCALMENTE AVANZADO ANTECEDENTES:La disección linfática pélvica lateral tiene una dificultad técnica significativa y una alta incidencia de morbilidad quirúrgica. Se prevé una curva de aprendizaje muy pronunciada al realizar la disección linfática pélvica lateral. Sin embargo, ningún estudio ha analizado previamente la curva de aprendizaje y la adquisición de habilidades quirúrgicas para este procedimiento.OBJETIVOS:Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar el proceso de aprendizaje para realizar la escisión total de mesorrecto robótica con disección linfática pélvica lateral en pacientes con cáncer de recto.DISEÑO:Este es un análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos recopilada prospectivamente.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en un centro oncológico terciario.PACIENTES:Un total de 100 pacientes fueron sometidos a escisión total de mesorrecto robótica con disección linfática pélvica lateral entre 2011 y 2017.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE DESENLACE:Se calculó un análisis de suma acumulativa basado en el número unilateral de ganglios pélvicos laterales recuperados. También se analizaron el tiempo operatorio, la pérdida de sangre estimada, la tasa de metástasis ganglionares pélvicas laterales, las morbilidades postoperatorias y la recidiva local.RESULTADOS:El modelado total acumulativo sugirió cuatro fases de aprendizaje: aprendizaje I (33 pacientes), aprendizaje II (19 pacientes), consolidación (30 pacientes) y competencia (18 pacientes). En las fases de consolidación y competencia, adoptamos imágenes de fluorescencia y estandarizamos el procedimiento quirúrgico basado en planos anatómicos, respectivamente. La fase de competencia tuvo el mayor número de ganglios pélvicos laterales recuperados unilateralmente (12,8 frente a 4,9, 8,2 y 10,4; p < 0,001). Las complicaciones urinarias, incluida la retención urinaria y el uso posoperatorio de bloqueadores beta, se observaron con más frecuencia en la fase de aprendizaje I que en la fase de competencia (39,4% frente a 16,7%, p = 0,034). Durante la mediana de seguimiento de 44,2 meses, se observó una recidiva local en la pared lateral pélvica en cuatro pacientes de la fase de aprendizaje I y en un paciente de la fase de aprendizaje II.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIÓNES:La completitud del procedimiento de disección linfática pélvica lateral aumentó con la experiencia del cirujano y a medida que se implementaron nuevos sistemas de imágenes y estandarización de técnicas quirúrgicas. Se necesitan más estudios para determinar los resultados oncológicos asociados con cada fase. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B774.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Jin Kim
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Warps AK, Saraste D, Westerterp M, Detering R, Sjövall A, Martling A, Dekker JWT, Tollenaar RAEM, Matthiessen P, Tanis PJ. National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:5986-6001. [PMID: 35258664 PMCID: PMC9283170 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08974-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background The timing and degree of implementation of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for colorectal cancer vary among countries. Insights in national differences regarding implementation of new surgical techniques and the effect on postoperative outcomes are important for quality assurance, can show potential areas for country-specific improvement, and might be illustrative and supportive for similar implementation programs in other countries. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate differences in patient selection, applied techniques, and results of minimal invasive surgery for colorectal cancer between the Netherlands and Sweden. Methods Patients who underwent elective minimally invasive surgery for T1-3 colon or rectal cancer (2012–2018) registered in the Dutch ColoRectal Audit or Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry were included. Time trends in the application of MIS were determined. Outcomes were compared for time periods with a similar level of MIS implementation (Netherlands 2012–2013 versus Sweden 2017–2018). Multilevel analyses were performed to identify factors associated with adverse short-term outcomes. Results A total of 46,095 Dutch and 8,819 Swedish patients undergoing MIS for colorectal cancer were included. In Sweden, MIS implementation was approximately 5 years later than in the Netherlands, with more robotic surgery and lower volumes per hospital. Although conversion rates were higher in Sweden, oncological and surgical outcomes were comparable. MIS in the Netherlands for the years 2012–2013 resulted in a higher reoperation rate for colon cancer and a higher readmission rate but lower non-surgical complication rates for rectal cancer if compared with MIS in Sweden during 2017–2018. Conclusion This study showed that the implementation of MIS for colorectal cancer occurred later in Sweden than the Netherlands, with comparable outcomes despite lower volumes. Our study demonstrates that new surgical techniques can be implemented at a national level in a controlled and safe way, with thorough quality assurance. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08974-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A K Warps
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, Netherlands.,Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - D Saraste
- Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Insitutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Westerterp
- Department of Surgery, Haagland Medisch Centrum, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, Den Haag, Netherlands
| | - R Detering
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - A Sjövall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Insitutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Anna Steckséns gata 53, 171 64, Solna, Sweden
| | - A Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Insitutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Anna Steckséns gata 53, 171 64, Solna, Sweden
| | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Reinier de Graafweg 5, 2625 AD, Delft, Netherlands
| | - R A E M Tollenaar
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, Netherlands.,Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - P Matthiessen
- Department of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, von Rosens väg 1, 70185, Örebro, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Factors affecting the learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery. J Robot Surg 2022; 16:1249-1256. [DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01373-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
AbstractLearning related to robotic colorectal surgery can be measured by surgical process (such as time or adequacy of resection) or patient outcome (such as morbidity or quality of life). Time based metrics are the most commonly used variables to assess the learning curve because of ease of analysis. With analysis of the learning curve, there are factors which need to be considered because they may have a direct impact on operative times or may be surrogate markers of clinical effectiveness (unrelated to times). Variables which may impact on operation time include surgery case mix, hybrid technique, laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery experience, robotic surgical simulator training, technology, operating room team, and case complexity. Multidimensional analysis can address multiple indicators of surgical performance and include variables such as conversion rate, complications, oncological outcome and functional outcome. Analysis of patient outcome and/or global assessment of robotic skills may be the most reliable methods to assess the learning curve.
Collapse
|
27
|
Learning Curve for Metastatic Liver Tumor Open Resection in Patients with Primary Colorectal Cancer: Use of the Cumulative Sum Method. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19031068. [PMID: 35162093 PMCID: PMC8834355 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background: Liver resections have become the first-line treatment for primary and metastatic tumors and, therefore, are considered a core aspect of surgical training. This study aims to evaluate the learning curve of the extent and safety of liver resection procedures for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: This single tertiary center retrospective analysis includes 158 consecutive cases of small liver resection (SLR) (n = 107) and major liver resection (MLR) (n = 58) procedures. A cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) method was used to investigate the learning curve. Results: The operative time, total blood loss level, and incidence of adverse effects showed a learning curve. For SLRs, the CUSUM curve for operative time and blood loss level peaked at the 19th and 17th case, respectively, while for MLRs, these curves peaked at the 28th and 24th case, respectively. The CUSUM curve for minor adverse effects (MAEs) and severe adverse effects (SAEs) showed a downward slope after the 16th and 68th procedures in the SLRs group and after the 29th and 39th procedures in the MLRs cohort; however, it remained within the acceptable range throughout the entire study. Conclusion: SLR procedures were performed faster with less intraoperative blood loss and shorter postoperative stays than MLRs, and a higher number of completed procedures was required to gain stabilization and repeatability in the operating time and intraoperative blood loss level. In MLR procedures, the reduction of SAEs was accomplished significantly later than the stabilization of the operative time and intraoperative blood loss level.
Collapse
|
28
|
Katsuno H, Hanai T, Endo T, Morise Z, Uyama I. The double bipolar method for robotic total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer. Surg Today 2022; 52:978-985. [PMID: 35000035 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02418-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Although meta-analyses and systematic reviews have clarified the benefits of robotic surgery, few studies have focused on robotic rectal surgery (RRS) and the use of Endowrist® instruments. Therefore, we evaluated RRS using the double bipolar method (DBM) and compared its short-term outcomes with those of RRS using the single bipolar method (SBM). This study enrolled 157 consecutive patients and all procedures were performed by the same surgeon and recorded through short video clips. We analyzed the patient demographics and short-term clinical outcomes. Although this observational study has several limitations, the console time for total mesorectal excision using the DBM was significantly shorter than that using the SBM. Although the DBM did not demonstrate a specific learning curve, it was a safe and feasible procedure even for patients with advanced disease. Further studies are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the DBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidetoshi Katsuno
- Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University, Gotanda 1, Harisaki, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-0827, Japan.
| | - Tsunekazu Hanai
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tomoyoshi Endo
- Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University, Gotanda 1, Harisaki, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-0827, Japan
| | - Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University, Gotanda 1, Harisaki, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-0827, Japan
| | - Ichiro Uyama
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pennington Z, Judy BF, Zakaria HM, Lakomkin N, Mikula AL, Elder BD, Theodore N. Learning curves in robot-assisted spine surgery: a systematic review and proposal of application to residency curricula. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 52:E3. [PMID: 34973673 DOI: 10.3171/2021.10.focus21496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Spine robots have seen increased utilization over the past half decade with the introduction of multiple new systems. Market research expects this expansion to continue over the next half decade at an annual rate of 20%. However, because of the novelty of these devices, there is limited literature on their learning curves and how they should be integrated into residency curricula. With the present review, the authors aimed to address these two points. METHODS A systematic review of the published English-language literature on PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies describing the learning curve in spine robotics. Included articles described clinical results in patients using one of the following endpoints: operative time, screw placement time, fluoroscopy usage, and instrumentation accuracy. Systems examined included the Mazor series, the ExcelsiusGPS, and the TiRobot. Learning curves were reported in a qualitative synthesis, given as the mean improvement in the endpoint per case performed or screw placed where possible. All studies were level IV case series with a high risk of reporting bias. RESULTS Of 1579 unique articles, 97 underwent full-text review and 21 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria; 62 articles were excluded for not presenting primary data for one of the above-described endpoints. Of the 21 articles, 18 noted the presence of a learning curve in spine robots, which ranged from 3 to 30 cases or 15 to 62 screws. Only 12 articles performed regressions of one of the endpoints (most commonly operative time) as a function of screws placed or cases performed. Among these, increasing experience was associated with a 0.24- to 4.6-minute decrease in operative time per case performed. All but one series described the experience of attending surgeons, not residents. CONCLUSIONS Most studies of learning curves with spine robots have found them to be present, with the most common threshold being 20 to 30 cases performed. Unfortunately, all available evidence is level IV data, limited to case series. Given the ability of residency to allow trainees to safely perform these cases under the supervision of experienced senior surgeons, it is argued that a curriculum should be developed for senior-level residents specializing in spine comprising a minimum of 30 performed cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zach Pennington
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Brendan F Judy
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and
| | - Hesham M Zakaria
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, California Pacific Medical Center, Sutter Health, San Francisco, California
| | - Nikita Lakomkin
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Nicholas Theodore
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Huang ZX, Zhou Z, Shi HR, Li TY, Ye SP. Postoperative complications after robotic resection of colorectal cancer: An analysis based on 5-year experience at a large-scale center. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:1660-1672. [PMID: 35070071 PMCID: PMC8727186 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i12.1660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As a common gastrointestinal malignancy, colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a serious health threat globally. Robotic surgery is one of the future trends in surgical treatment of CRC. Robotic surgery has several technical advantages over laparoscopic surgery, including 3D visualization, elimination of the fulcrum effect, and better ergonomic positioning, which together lead to better surgical outcomes and faster recovery. However, analysis of independent factors of postoperative complications after robotic surgery is still insufficient.
AIM To analyze the incidence and risk factors for postoperative complications after robotic surgery in patients with CRC.
METHODS In total, 1040 patients who had undergone robotic surgical resection for CRC between May 2015 and May 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Postoperative complications were categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo (C-D) classification, and possible risk factors were evaluated.
RESULTS Among 1040 patients who had undergone robotic surgery for CRC, the overall, severe, local, and systemic complication rates were 12.2%, 2.4%, 8.8%, and 3.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that multiple organ resection (P < 0.001) and level III American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for overall complications. Multivariate analysis identified multiple organ resection (P < 0.001) and comorbidities (P = 0.029) as independent risk factors for severe complications (C-D grade III or higher). Regarding local complications, multiple organ resection (P = 0.002) and multiple bowel resection (P = 0.027) were independent risk factors. Multiple organ resection (P < 0.001) and level III ASA score (P = 0.007) were independent risk factors for systemic complications. Additionally, sigmoid colectomy had a lower incidence of overall complications (6.4%; P = 0.006) and local complications (4.7%; P = 0.028) than other types of colorectal surgery.
CONCLUSION Multiple organ resection, level III ASA score, comorbidities, and multiple bowel resection were risk factors for postoperative complications, with multiple organ resection being the most likely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Xiang Huang
- General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
- The First Clinical Medical College, Jiangxi Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Zhen Zhou
- The First Clinical Medical College, Jiangxi Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Hao-Ran Shi
- The First Clinical Medical College, Jiangxi Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Tai-Yuan Li
- General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Shan-Ping Ye
- General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Prasad P, Wallace L, Navidi M, Phillips AW. Learning curves in minimally invasive esophagectomy: A systematic review and evaluation of benchmarking parameters. Surgery 2021; 171:1247-1256. [PMID: 34852934 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.10.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive techniques are increasingly used in the treatment of esophageal cancer. The learning curve for minimally invasive esophagectomy is variable and can impact patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to review the current evidence on learning curves in minimally invasive esophagectomy and identify which parameters are used for benchmarking. METHODS A search of the major reference databases (PubMed, Medline, Cochrane) was performed with no time limits up to February 2020. Results were screened in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if an assessment of the learning curve was reported on, regardless of which (if any) statistical method was used. RESULTS Twenty-nine studies comprising 3,741 patients were included. Twenty-two studies reported on a combination of thoracoscopic, hybrid, and total minimally invasive esophagectomy, 6 studies reported robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy alone, and 1 study evaluated both robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and thoracoscopic esophagectomies. Operating time was the most frequently used parameter to determine learning curve progression (23/39 studies), with number of resected lymph nodes, morbidity, and blood loss also frequently used. Learning curves were found to plateau at 7 to 60 cases for thoracoscopic esophagectomy, 12 to 175 cases for total and thoracoscopic/hybrid esophagectomy, and 9 to 85 cases for robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. CONCLUSION Multiple parameters are employed to gauge minimally invasive esophagectomy learning curve progression. However, there are no validated or approved sets of outcomes. Further work is required to determine the optimum parameters that should be used to ensure best patient outcomes and required length of proctoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooja Prasad
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Lauren Wallace
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Maziar Navidi
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. https://www.twitter.com/Maz_Surgery
| | - Alexander W Phillips
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. https://www.twitter.com/AlexWPhillips7
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Flynn J, Larach JT, Kong JCH, Waters PS, Warrier SK, Heriot A. The learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2806-2820. [PMID: 34318575 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AIM The learning curve has implications for efficient surgical training. Robotic surgery is perceived to have a shorter learning curve than laparoscopy; however, detailed analysis is lacking. The aim of this work was to analyse studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic colorectal learning curves. Simulation studies comparing novices' learning curves were analysed in order to surmise applicability to colorectal surgery. METHOD A systematic search of Medline, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library identified colorectal papers (from 1 January 2000 to 3 March 2021) comparing robotic and laparoscopic learning curves where surgeons lacked laparoscopic colorectal experience. Simulation studies comparing learning curves were also included. The learning curve was defined as the period of ongoing improvement in speed and/or accuracy. RESULTS From 576 abstracts reviewed, three operative and 16 simulation studies were included. The robotic learning curve for right colectomy was significantly faster in one study (16 vs. 25 cases) and equal for anterior resection in two studies (44 vs. 41 cases and 55 vs. 55). One study showed fewer complications for robotic patients (14.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.013). Ten simulation studies reported faster times and eight recorded error rates favouring robotic surgery. Seven studies measured the learning curve. Four favoured laparoscopic surgery, but operating times were faster using the robotic platform. CONCLUSION Operating times for robotic surgery may be faster than laparoscopy when surgeons are inexperienced with both platforms. This may be related to a superior baseline performance rather than a shorter learning curve. Whether a shorter learning curve on the laparoscopic platform will persist for long enough to enable skills to overtake robotic ability needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Flynn
- Department of Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - José Tomás Larach
- Department of Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Joseph C H Kong
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Peadar S Waters
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Satish K Warrier
- Department of Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Alexander Heriot
- Department of Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lee TH, Park H, Baek SJ, Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J. A Minimally Invasive Pelvic Multivisceral Resection Approach for Locally Advanced Primary Colorectal Cancers: A Single-Institution Experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 32:727-732. [PMID: 34677096 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in locally advanced colorectal cancers (CRCs) suspected of direct invasion to adjacent organs or structures remains controversial. The aim of this study is to verify the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive multivisceral resection (MVR) surgery for locally advanced CRCs compared with conventional open surgery. Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected data from patients who underwent MVR for locally advanced CRCs from 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with preoperative clinically suspected T4b stage cancers were enrolled in the study. Results: There were 30 and 19 patients in the MIS and open surgery groups, respectively. Seven patients in the MIS group required conversion, and the most common reason for conversion was ureter and bladder invasion. Tumor sizes were significantly larger in the open group (5.46 cm versus 7.48 cm, P = .010), whereas the MIS group included more patients with rectal cancers (56.7% versus 21%, P = .021). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operation time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay. Curative (R0) resection was achieved in all patients, and the median follow-up period was 23 months. The 3-year overall survival in the MIS group was 73.6% and 77.9% in the open group (P = .445), and the 3-year total disease-free survival (DFS) was 59.2% and 51.4%, respectively (P = .695). Three-year local DFS was 83.3% for the MIS group, and 51.4% for the open group (P = .120). Conclusion: MIS for primary T4b CRCs without urinary tract invasion is safe and feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyunmi Park
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se-Jin Baek
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Myun Kwak
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seon-Hahn Kim
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bhattacharjee HK, Agarwal H, Singla V, Chaliyadan S, Mishra AK, Suhani S, Joshi M, Parshad R. Learning Pattern of Two-Dimensional, Three-Dimensional, and Ultra-High-Definition Endovision System on Standardized Phantom Tasks: An Ex Vivo Randomized Study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 32:675-683. [PMID: 34677083 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Three-dimensional (3D), high-definition (HD), and ultra-high-definition (4K HD) are recent additions over regular HD technology for laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning pattern of these systems on standardized phantom tasks. Methodology: Forty-five stereo-enabled resident doctors were randomly assigned into three groups. They performed three validated tasks, precision touch on flat surface, precision touch on uneven surface, surgical knot on rubber tube using either two-dimensional (2D) HD, 3D HD, or 4K HD Endovision systems. Each task was repeated 20 times. Data from four consecutive repetitions were pooled to make five blocks. Split group analysis by comparing the consecutive blocks in execution time and errors were made to see the learning pattern. A significant difference was accepted as continuous learning while no significant difference was accepted as learning stabilization. Result: Operating time was stabilized in two tasks after third block in 2D HD, one task after fourth block in 4K HD. There was continuous learning in all tasks with 3D HD. The 3D HD group was significantly faster than 2D HD and 4K HD in most of the tasks on fifth block. The error scores were similar between the consecutive blocks in 4K HD. It was stabilized after second block in 2D HD group and third block on 3D HD. Conclusion: The 3D HD Endovision system has more potential of faster execution of a task, but need more practice to reach similar safety profile. The 4K HD reached the safety plateau with minimal repetitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemanga K Bhattacharjee
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Harshit Agarwal
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Vitish Singla
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Shafneed Chaliyadan
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashwani K Mishra
- National Drug Dependence Treatment Center, Biostatistics Division, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Suhani Suhani
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Mohit Joshi
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajinder Parshad
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zhu WY, Choi WS, Wong MCM, Pu JJ, Yang WF, Su YX. The Learning Curve of Computer-Assisted Free Flap Jaw Reconstruction Surgery Using 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Plates: A Cumulative Sum Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:737769. [PMID: 34604076 PMCID: PMC8481918 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.737769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Computer-assisted jaw reconstruction (CAJR) has benefits in reducing operation time and improving reconstruction accuracy, compared to conventional freehand jaw reconstruction. However, no information is available regarding learning curves in CAJR with the use of 3D-printed patient-specific surgical plates (PSSP). The purpose of this study was to assess surgical outcomes and learning curve for the first 58 consecutive CAJR using 3D-printed PSSP performed by a single surgical team in a single institution. Methods In a prospective study, consecutive patients who underwent free flap CAJR using 3D-printed PSSP were included. The determination of proficiency, based on the cumulative sum of surgical success (no major adjustment of 3D-printed PSSP, flap survival) passing the acceptable boundary line of cumulative sum analysis, was the primary outcome. To find out any potential factors influencing the learning curve, baseline characteristics of patients were compared before and after proficiency achievement. Secondary outcomes included inflexion points of the total operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and bone graft deviation, measured by the cumulative sum analysis. Results From December 2016 to November 2020, 58 consecutive cases underwent surgery performed by a single surgical team. The overall surgical success rate was 94.8% (55/58). A three-stage learning curve of primary outcome was observed. The proficiency was achieved after 23 cases. The proportions of advanced tumor staging and concomitant surgery after obtaining proficiency were significantly higher than those before achieving proficiency (p = 0.046 and p < 0.001, respectively). Mean values of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and bone graft deviation were 532.5 ± 119.2 min, 1,006.8 ± 547.2 ml, 16.1 ± 6.3 days, and 0.9 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. Two trends of learning curve were observed in the CUSUM analyses of total operation time, length of hospital stay, and bone graft deviation, in which the first and second inflexion points occurred between 8 and 17 cases and between 43 and 46 cases, respectively. Conclusion Our results revealed a three-stage learning curve of CAJR with the use of PSSP, including initial learning, plateau, and overlearning. Based on CUSUM analysis, the surgical proficiency was achieved after 23 cases, and total operation time, length of hospital stay, and bone graft deviation stabilized after 8–17 cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wang-Yong Zhu
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Wing Shan Choi
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - May Chun Mei Wong
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Jingya Jane Pu
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Wei-Fa Yang
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Yu-Xiong Su
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Quezada-Diaz FF, Smith JJ. Options for Low Rectal Cancer: Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021; 34:311-316. [PMID: 34512198 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Low rectal cancers (LRCs) may offer a difficult technical challenge even to experienced colorectal surgeons. Although laparoscopic surgery offers a superior exposure of the pelvis when compared with open approach, its role in rectal cancer surgery has been controversial. Robotic platforms are well suited for difficult pelvic surgery due to its three-dimensional visualization, degree of articulation of instruments, precise movements, and better ergonomics. The robot may be suitable especially in the anatomically narrow pelvis such as in male and obese patients. Meticulous dissection in critical steps, such as splenic flexure takedown, nerve-sparing mesorectal excision, and distal margin clearance, are potential technical advantages. In addition, robotic rectal resections are associated with lower conversion rates to open surgery, less blood loss, and shorter learning curve with similar short-term quality of life outcomes, similar rates of postoperative complications, and equivalent short-term surrogate outcomes compared with conventional laparoscopy. Robotic surgery approach, if used correctly, can enhance the skills and the capabilities of the well-trained surgeon during minimally invasive procedures for LRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe F Quezada-Diaz
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Unruh KR, Bastawrous AL, Bernier GV, Flum DR, Kumar AS, Moonka R, Thirlby RC, Simianu VV. Evaluating the Regional Uptake of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: a Report from the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:2387-2397. [PMID: 33206328 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04875-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for colorectal disease has well-known benefits, but many patients undergo open operations. When choosing an MIS approach, robotic technology may have benefits over traditional laparoscopy and is increasingly used. However, the broad adoption of MIS, and specifically robotics, across colorectal operations has not been well described. Our primary hypothesis is that rates of MIS in colorectal surgery are increasing, with different contributions of robotics to abdominal and pelvic colorectal operations. METHODS Rates of MIS colorectal operations are described using a prospective cohort of elective colorectal operations at hospitals in the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) from 2011 to 2018. The main outcome was proportion of cases approached using open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Factors associated with increased use of MIS approaches were described. RESULTS Across 21,423 elective colorectal operations, rates for MIS (laparoscopic or robotic surgery) increased from 44% in 2011 to 75% in 2018 (p < 0.001). Approaches for abdominal operations (n = 12,493) changed from 2 to 11% robotic, 43 to 63% laparoscopic, and 56 to 26% open (p < 0.001). Approaches for pelvic operations (n = 8930) changed from 3 to 33% robotic, 40 to 42% laparoscopic, and 57 to 24% open(p < 0.001). These trends were similar for high-(100 + operations/year) and low-volume hospitals and surgeons. CONCLUSIONS At SCOAP hospitals, the majority of elective colorectal operations is now performed minimally invasively. The increase in the MIS approach is primarily driven by laparoscopy in abdominal procedures and robotics in pelvic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenley R Unruh
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9th Ave, C6-GS, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | | | - Greta V Bernier
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Clinic, University of Washington Medicine-Valley Medical Center, Renton, WA, USA
| | - David R Flum
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anjali S Kumar
- Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA
| | - Ravi Moonka
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9th Ave, C6-GS, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Richard C Thirlby
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9th Ave, C6-GS, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Vlad V Simianu
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9th Ave, C6-GS, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wen R, Zheng K, Zhang Q, Zhou L, Liu Q, Yu G, Gao X, Hao L, Lou Z, Zhang W. Machine learning-based random forest predicts anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:921-932. [PMID: 34295545 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the commonest and most serious complications after rectal cancer surgery. The previous analyses on predictors for AL included small-scale patients, and their prediction models performed unsatisfactorily. Methods Clinical data of 5,220 patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer were scrutinized to create a prediction model via random forest classifier. Additionally, data of 836 patients served as the test dataset. Patients diagnosed with AL within 6 months' follow-up were recorded. A total of 20 candidate factors were included. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was conducted to determine the clinical efficacy of our model, and compare the predictive performance of different models. Results The incidence of AL was 6.2% (326/5,220). A multivariate logistic regression analysis and the random forest classifier indicated that sex, distance of tumor from the anal verge, bowel stenosis or obstruction, preoperative hemoglobin, surgeon volume, diabetes, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and surgical approach were significantly associated with AL. After propensity score matching, the temporary stoma was not identified as a protective factor for AL (P=0.58). Contrastingly, the first year of performing laparoscopic surgery was a predictor (P=0.009). We created a predictive random forest classifier based on the above predictors that demonstrated satisfactory prediction efficacy. The area under the curve (AUC) showed that the random forest had higher efficiency (AUC =0.87) than the nomogram (AUC =0.724). Conclusions Our findings suggest that eight factors may affect the incidence of AL. Our random forest classifier is an innovative and practical model to effectively predict AL, and could provide rational advice on whether to perform a temporary stoma, which might reduce the rate of stoma and avoid the ensuing complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongbo Wen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Kuo Zheng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Qihang Zhang
- School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Leqi Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Qizhi Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Guanyu Yu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianhua Gao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Liqiang Hao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Lou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Vining CC, Skowron KB, Hogg ME. Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: learning curve, educational programs and outcomes. Updates Surg 2021; 73:799-814. [PMID: 33484423 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-00973-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The use of the robotic platform for gastrointestinal surgery was introduced nearly 20 years ago. However, significant growth and advancement has occurred primarily in the last decade. This is due to several advantages over traditional laparoscopic surgery allowing for more complex dissections and reconstructions. Several randomized controlled trials and retrospective reviews have demonstrated equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to open surgery with improved short-term outcomes. Unfortunately, there are currently no universally accepted or implemented training programs for robotic surgery and robotic surgery experience varies greatly. Additionally, several limitations to the robotic platform exist resulting in a distinct learning curve associated with various procedures. Therefore, implementation of robotic surgery requires a multidisciplinary team approach with commitment and investment from clinical faculty, operating room staff and hospital administrators. Additionally, there is a need for wider distribution of educational modules to train more surgeons and reduce the associated learning curve. This article will focus on the implementation of the robotic platform for surgery of the pancreas, stomach, liver, colon and rectum with an emphasis on the associated learning curve, educational platforms to develop proficiency and perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles C Vining
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kinga B Skowron
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Walgreens Building, Floor 2, 2650 Ridge Road, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Billmann F, Saracevic M, Schmidt C, Langan EA. Anatomical framework for pre-operative planning of laparoscopic left-sided colorectal surgery: Potential relevance of the distance between the inferior mesenteric artery and inferior mesenteric vein. Ann Anat 2021; 237:151743. [PMID: 33905810 DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The medial-to-lateral approach is favored by most colorectal surgeons for laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection and mobilisation of the left colon. The peritoneal access window, i.e. the distance between the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) must be large enough to perform the procedure safely and successfully. However, studies investigating the IMA-IMV distance and factors affecting this variable, are scarce. Therefore, we examined the IMA-IMV and D3-IMA distances to determine an anatomical framework on planning and adapting surgical therapy. BASIC PROCEDURES The IMA-IMV and D3-IMA distances were retrospectively measured in 230 patients (127 Male/103 Female, Median Age=54.5) who had undergone pre-operative CT-scanning before laparoscopic left-sided colorectal surgery. Two observers rated the images and interrater reliability was calculated. Subgroup, simple and multiple linear regression analyses were performed in order to detect potential interaction between morphometric variables and IMA-IMV distance. MAIN FINDINGS We demonstrated a significant correlation between the inferior margin of the duodenum and the origin of IMA. Determination of the IMA-IMV distance was simple and reproducible. Approximately 45% of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal procedures had a narrow distance (≤50mm). There was a sexual dimorphism in IMA-IMV distance, being consistently large in males. There were no other pre-operative factors which predicted whether the peritoneal dissection window for a medial-to-lateral approach was sufficient. CONCLUSIONS Our results provide new data for a better understanding of metric variations in abdominal vascular structures and complement previous observations. In view of our results, we recommend pre-operative measurement of the IMA-IMV before colorectal surgery where the medial-to-lateral approach is planned. Given that a narrow distance may predict a difficult dissection, this factor should be taken into account to determine the optimal surgical approach in each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franck Billmann
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Melisa Saracevic
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Constantin Schmidt
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ewan Andrew Langan
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23562 Lübeck, Germany; Dermatological Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Zhang N, Yan P, Feng L, Chu X, Li J, Li J, Guo K, Guo T, Liu X, Yang K. Top 100 most-cited original articles, systematic reviews/meta-analyses in robotic surgery: A scientometric study. Asian J Surg 2021; 45:8-14. [PMID: 33895050 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to explore and analyze the main features of the top 100 most-cited original articles, systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) in the field of robotic surgery, through scientometric analysis. VOSviewer and Excel 2019 were employed to conduct this scientometric study. We found that the majority of original articles (72/100) were published during the 2000s, while the majority of the top 100 most-cited SRs/MAs (91/100) during the 2010s. The USA was the most dominant country (n = 78), Henry Ford Health System was the most productive institution (n = 10), and Menon M was the largest contributing first author (n = 5) of the top 100 most-cited original articles. The USA was the most dominant country (n = 33), University of Padua was the most productive institution (n = 9), and Ficarra V was the largest contributing first author (n = 4) of the top 100 most-cited SRs/MAs. The top 100 most-cited original articles in robotic surgery have focused on the feasibility, outcomes and learning curve of robotic surgery for various neoplasms and cancers. The top 100 most-cited SRs/MAs have focused on the differences between robotic surgery and other types of surgery, with respect to the learning curve, costs, outcomes and experience in treating neoplasms, cancer and other diseases. In the future, the formation of cross-institutional and cross-disciplinary cooperation teams should be promoted and corresponding regulations and standards for specific diseases should be developed to regulate and promote the development of robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Zhang
- Evidence Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Peijing Yan
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610044, China
| | - Lufang Feng
- Evidence Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Xiajing Chu
- Evidence Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Jingwen Li
- Evidence Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Jieyun Li
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Kangle Guo
- Evidence Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Tiankang Guo
- General Surgery Clinical Medical Center, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Xingrong Liu
- Evidence Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
| | - Kehu Yang
- Evidence Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Howard NM, Cook DA, Hatala R, Pusic MV. Learning Curves in Health Professions Education Simulation Research: A Systematic Review. Simul Healthc 2021; 16:128-135. [PMID: 32675731 DOI: 10.1097/sih.0000000000000477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY STATEMENT Learning curves are used in health professions education to graphically represent paths to competence and expertise. However, research using learning curves often omit important information. The authors conducted a systematic review of the reporting quality of learning curves in simulation-based education research to identify specific areas for improvement. Reviewers extracted information on graphical, statistical, and conceptual elements. The authors identified 230 eligible articles. Most learning curve elements were reported infrequently, including use of an optimal linking function, detailed description of feedback or learning intervention, use of advanced visualization techniques such as overlaying and stacking, and depiction of competency thresholds. Reporting did not improve over time for most elements. Reporting of learning curves in health professions education research is incomplete and often underutilizes their desirable properties. Recommendations for improvement of the statistical, graphical, and conceptual reporting of learning curves, as well as applications to simulation research and education, are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neva M Howard
- From the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill School of Medicine (N.M.H.), Chapel Hill, NC; Center for Online Learning (D.A.C.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine; Division of General Internal Medicine (D.A.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Medicine (R.H.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and Division of Learning Analytics (M.V.P.), NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Baek SJ, Piozzi GN, Kim SH. Optimizing outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery with robotic platforms. Surg Oncol 2021; 37:101559. [PMID: 33839441 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Advanced robotic technology makes it easier to perform total mesorectal excision procedures in the narrow pelvis for rectal cancer while maintaining the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer leads to lower conversion rates and faster recovery of urogenital function than conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, longer operative time and high cost are major weaknesses of robotic surgery. To date, most other short-term surgical outcomes, pathologic outcomes, and long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic surgery have not shown significant advantages over laparoscopic surgery. However, robotic surgery is still a valid and highly anticipated surgical approach for rectal cancer because it greatly reduces the surgeon's workload and learning curve. There are also advantages when robotic techniques are applied to technically demanding procedures such as lateral pelvic lymph node dissection or intersphincteric resection. The introduction of new surgical robot systems, including the da Vinci® SP system, is expected to expand the applications of robotic surgery and provide new advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se-Jin Baek
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seon-Hahn Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Paine H, Chand M. Role of Digital Resources in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Training. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021; 34:144-150. [PMID: 33814995 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopic techniques have become the standard for many benign and malignant colorectal pathologies. Recently, the application of robotic-assisted technologies has been, and continues to be, explored. These new technologies require different skill sets and bring novel training challenges, and today's trainees must demonstrate competence in more techniques than ever. Compounding this is the reducing time spent operating in current training programs due to caps on working hours and service pressures. The need for adjunctive training strategies outside the operating room has prompted development of multimedia and digital resources to build the cognitive skills crucial in both nontechnical and technical aspects of surgery. Many are based on principles of cognitive task analysis, breaking down operations, and key decisions into nodal points to be mentally rehearsed. Resources built on this technique have shown improvements in both operative and nonoperative skills, suggesting these resources can advance trainees along the learning curve in minimally invasive surgical techniques. More work to fully elucidate the clinical benefits of such resources is required before their role as a substitute for lost operative training hours can be established. Despite this, alongside other developing technologies such as simulation, they are a promising addition to the armamentarium of the modern-day colorectal trainee.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Paine
- General Surgery Registrar, London Deanery, London, United Kingdom
| | - Manish Chand
- Department of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London Hospitals, NHS Trusts, GENIE Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zhu TS, Godse N, Clayburgh DR, Duvvuri U. Assessing the learning curve associated with a novel flexible robot in the pre-clinical and clinical setting. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:1563-1572. [PMID: 33751213 PMCID: PMC8733873 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08445-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Transoral robotic surgery has been successfully used by head and neck surgeons for a variety of procedures but is limited by rigid instrumentation and line-of-sight visualization. Non-linear systems specifically designed for the aerodigestive tract are needed. Ease of use of these new systems in both training and clinical environments is critical in its widespread adoption. Methods Residents, fellows, and junior faculty performed four tasks on an anatomical airway mannequin using the Medrobotics FLEX™ Robotic System: expose and incise the tonsil, grasp the epiglottis, palpate the vocal processes, and grasp the interarytenoid space. These tasks were performed once a day for four days; after a 4-month time gap, subjects were asked to perform these same tasks for three more days. Time to task completion and total distance driven were tracked. In addition, a retrospective analysis was performed analyzing one attending physician’s experience with clinical usage of the robot. Results 13 subjects completed the initial round of the mannequin simulation and 8 subjects completed the additional testing 4 months later. Subjects rapidly improved their speed and efficiency at task completion. Junior residents were slower in most tasks initially compared to senior trainees but quickly reached similar levels of efficiency. Following the break there was minimal degradation in skills and continued improvement in efficiency was observed with additional trials. There was significant heterogeneity in the analyzed clinical cases, but when analyzing cases of similar complexity and pathology, clear decreases in overall operative times were demonstrable. Conclusion Novice users quickly gained proficiency with the FLEX™ Robotic System in a training environment, and these skills are retained after several months. This learning could translate to the clinical setting if a proper training regimen is developed. The Medrobotics FLEX™ Robotic System shows promise as a surgical tool in head and neck surgery in this study. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08445-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toby S Zhu
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Neal Godse
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Suite 500, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Daniel R Clayburgh
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Suite 500, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, USA.,Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, USA
| | - Umamaheswar Duvvuri
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Suite 500, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Larach JT, Flynn J, Kong J, Waters PS, McCormick JJ, Murphy D, Stevenson A, Warrier SK, Heriot AG. Robotic colorectal surgery in Australia: evolution over a decade. ANZ J Surg 2021; 91:2330-2336. [PMID: 33438361 DOI: 10.1111/ans.16554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite reports of increasing adoption of robotics in colorectal surgery worldwide, data regarding its uptake in Australasia are lacking. This study examines the trends of robotic colorectal surgery in Australia during the last 10 years. METHODS Data from patients undergoing robotic colorectal surgery with the da Vinci robotic platform between 2010 and 2019 were obtained. Overall, numbers of specific colorectal procedures across Australia were obtained from the Medicare Benefit Schedule data over the same period. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to determine the statistical trends of overall and specific robotic colorectal procedures over time. RESULTS A total of 6110 robotic general surgery procedures were performed across Australia during the study period. Of these, 3522 (57.6%) were robotic colorectal procedures. An increasing trend of overall robotic colorectal procedures was seen over 10 years (Pearson's coefficient of 0.875; P = 0.001). While this applied to both the public and private sectors, 90.7% of the procedures were undertaken in the private sector. Restorative rectal resections, rectopexies, and right hemicolectomies accounted for 82.6% of the robotic colorectal procedures performed during this period with an increasing trend seen over time for each intervention. Moreover, a robotic approach was utilized in 12.5%, 41.0% and 9.0% of all restorative rectal resections, rectopexies and right hemicolectomies undertaken in Australia during 2019, respectively. CONCLUSION Robotic colorectal surgery has increased dramatically in Australia over the last 10 years, especially in the private sector. Penetration of robotic colorectal surgery in the public healthcare system will require focussed cost-benefit evaluations and governmental investment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Tomás Larach
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Julie Flynn
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,General Surgery and Gastrointestinal Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joseph Kong
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peadar S Waters
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jacob J McCormick
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,General Surgery and Gastrointestinal Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,General Surgery and Gastrointestinal Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Stevenson
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Satish K Warrier
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,General Surgery and Gastrointestinal Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander G Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,General Surgery and Gastrointestinal Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Xu J, Tang B, Li T, Jia B, Yao H, Zhao R, Yuan W, Zhong M, Chi P, Zhou Y, Yang X, Cheng L, He Y, Li Y, Tong W, Sun X, Jiang Z, Wang K, Li X, Wang X, Wei Y, Chen Z, Zhang X, Ye Y, Han F, Tao K, Kong D, Wang Z, Zhang C, He G, Feng Q. Robotic colorectal cancer surgery in China: a nationwide retrospective observational study. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:6591-6603. [PMID: 33237468 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08157-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic colorectal cancer surgery is widely accepted and applied. However, there is still no objective and comprehensive assessment on the data of nationwide multicenter series. METHOD A total of 28 medical centers in Mainland China participated in this nationwide retrospective observational study. From the first case performed in each center to the last until December 2017, patients with robotic resection for primary tumor and pathologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma were consecutively enrolled. Clinical, pathological and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 5389 eligible patients were finally enrolled in this study, composing 72.2% of the total robotic colorectal surgery volume of Mainland China in the same period. For resections of one bowel segment of primary tumor, the postoperative mortality rate was 0.08% (4/5063 cases), and the postoperative complication rate (Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher) was 8.6% (434/5063 cases). For multiple resections, the postoperative mortality rate was 0.6% (2/326 cases), and the postoperative complication rate was 16.3% (53/326 cases). Out of 2956 patients receiving sphincter-preserving surgery in only primary resection, 130 (4.4%) patients had anastomotic leakage. Traditional low anterior resection (tumor at middle rectum) (OR 2.384, P < 0.001), traditional low anterior resection (tumor at low rectum) (OR 1.968, P = 0.017) and intersphincteric resection (OR 5.468, P = 0.006) were significant independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Female gender (OR 0.557, P = 0.005), age ≥ 60 years (OR 0.684, P = 0.040), and preventive stoma (OR 0.496, P = 0.043) were significant independent protective factors. Body mass index, preoperative chemotherapy/radiotherapy, tumor size, and TNM stage did not independently affect the occurrence of anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSION Robotic colorectal cancer surgery was safe and reliable and might have advantages in patients at high risk of anastomotic leakage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianmin Xu
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| | - Bo Tang
- The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University (Southwest Hospital), Chongqing, People's Republic of China
| | - Taiyuan Li
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China
| | - Baoqing Jia
- Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongliang Yao
- The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Ren Zhao
- Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Weitang Yuan
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming Zhong
- Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Pan Chi
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanbing Zhou
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiongfei Yang
- Gansu Provincial People's Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Longwei Cheng
- Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun, People's Republic of China
| | - Yulong He
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongxiang Li
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical College, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Weidong Tong
- Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuejun Sun
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiwei Jiang
- Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Kang Wang
- Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaorong Li
- The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Wang
- Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ye Wei
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Zongyou Chen
- Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoqiao Zhang
- The 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistic Support Force (former Jinan Military General Hospital), Jinan, People's Republic of China
| | - Yingjiang Ye
- Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Fanghai Han
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Kaixiong Tao
- Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
| | - Dalu Kong
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Cheng Zhang
- The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (former the General Hospital of Shenyang Military), Shenyang, People's Republic of China
| | - Guodong He
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Qingyang Feng
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Thomas A, Altaf K, Sochorova D, Gur U, Parvaiz A, Ahmed S. Effective implementation and adaptation of structured robotic colorectal programme in a busy tertiary unit. J Robot Surg 2020; 15:731-739. [PMID: 33141410 PMCID: PMC8423644 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01169-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Safety and feasibility of robotic colorectal surgery has been reported as increasing over the last decade. However safe implementation and adaptation of such a programme with comparable morbidities and acceptable oncological outcomes remains a challenge in a busy tertiary unit. We present our experience of implementation and adaptation of a structured robotic colorectal programme in a high-volume center in the United Kingdom. METHODS Two colorectal surgeons underwent a structured robotic colorectal training programme consisting of time on simulation console, dry and wet laboratory courses, case observation, and initial mentoring. Data were collected on consecutive robotic colorectal cancer resections over a period of 12 months and compared with colorectal cancer resections data of the same surgeons' record prior to the adaptation of the new technique. Patient demographics including age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA), Clavien-Dindo grading, previous abdominal surgeries, and BMI were included. Short-term outcomes including conversion to open, length of stay, return to theatre, 30- and 90-days mortality, blood loss, and post-operative analgesia were recorded. Tumour site, TNM staging, diverting stoma, neo-adjuvant therapy, total mesorectal excision (TME) grading and positive resection margins (R1) were compared. p values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS Ninety colorectal cancer resections were performed with curative intent from June 2018 to June 2020. Thirty robotic colorectal cancer resections (RCcR) were performed after adaption of programme and were compared with 60 non-robotic colorectal cancer resections (N-RCcR) prior to implementation of technique. There was no conversion in the RCcR group; however, in N-RCcR group, five had open resection from start and the rest had laparoscopic surgery. In laparoscopic group, there were six (10.9%) conversions to open (two adhesions, three multi-visceral involvements, one intra-operative bleed). Male-to-female ratio was 20:09 in RCcR group and 33:20 in N-RCcR groups. No significant differences in gender (p = 0.5), median age (p = 0.47), BMI (p = 0.64) and ASA scores (p = 0.72) were present in either groups. Patient characteristics between the two groups were comparable aside from an increased proportion of rectal and sigmoid cancers in RCcR group. Mean operating time, and returns to theaters were comparable in both groups. Complications were fewer in RCcR group as compared to N-RCcR (16.6% vs 25%). RCcR group patients have reduced length of stay (5 days vs 7 days) but this is not statistically significant. Estimated blood loss and conversion to open surgery was significantly lesser in the robotic group (p < 0.01). The oncological outcomes from surgery including TNM, resection margin status, lymph node yield and circumferential resection margin (for rectal cancers) were all comparable. There was no 30-day mortality in either group. CONCLUSION Implementation and integration of robotic colorectal surgery is safe and effective in a busy tertiary center through a structured training programme with comparable short-term survival and oncological outcomes during learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Thomas
- Department of Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot Road, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | - K Altaf
- Department of Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot Road, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | - D Sochorova
- Department of Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot Road, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | - U Gur
- Department of Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot Road, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | - A Parvaiz
- Faculty of Health Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Shakil Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot Road, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Massel DH, Lezak BA, Summers SH, Yakkanti RR, Hui-Chou HG, Chen DL. Surgeon level of expertise reported in Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and (European Volume) publications. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2020; 45:904-908. [PMID: 32558615 DOI: 10.1177/1753193420932517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the trend in documentation of surgeon level of expertise among the Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and the Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) publications. A review of Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) databases for level of expertise between January 2015 and October 2019 was performed. Of 1042 articles identified, all 115 (20%) reporting level of expertise were published in Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). Since 2015, there has been an increase in reported level of expertise in Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) (2015: 8 (7%); 2016: 15 (13%); 2017: 22 (19%); 2018: 28 (24%); 2019: 42 (37%)). In the same period, no publications have reported level of expertise in Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume). Documenting level of expertise may provide readers with additional information for incorporation of novel techniques into their practices. It may identify procedures that require a baseline level of expertise for effective performance. Further evaluation of level of expertise criteria may improve the reliability of the numeric scale, while widespread adoption of this scale will allow future outcome analysis by level of expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin H Massel
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Bradley A Lezak
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | - David L Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Affiliation(s)
- Steven D Wexner
- Cleveland Clinic Florida, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Weston, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|