Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma is Spread to the Peripancreatic Soft Tissue in the Majority of Resected Cases, Rendering the AJCC T-Stage Protocol (7th Edition) Inapplicable and Insignificant: A Size-Based Staging System (pT1: ≤2, pT2: >2-≤4, pT3: >4 cm) is More Valid and Clinically Relevant

Distinct clinical outcomes and biological features of specific KRAS mutants in human pancreatic cancer

KRAS mutations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are suggested to vary in oncogenicity but the implications for human patients have not been explored in depth. We examined 1,360 consecutive PDAC patients undergoing surgical resection and find that KRASG12R mutations are enriched in early-stage (stage I) disease, owing not to smaller tumor size but increased node-negativity. KRASG12R tumors are associated with decreased distant recurrence and improved survival as compared to KRASG12D. To understand the biological underpinnings, we performed spatial profiling of 20 patients and bulk RNA-sequencing of 100 tumors, finding enhanced oncogenic signaling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in KRASG12D and increased nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling in KRASG12R tumors. Orthogonal studies of mouse KrasG12R PDAC organoids show decreased migration and improved survival in orthotopic models. KRAS alterations in PDAC are thus associated with distinct presentation, clinical outcomes, and biological behavior, highlighting the prognostic value of mutational analysis and the importance of articulating mutation-specific PDAC biology.

Prognostic performance of microscopic size measurements in small invasive carcinomas arising in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas

AIMS

Small invasive carcinomas arising in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas can present as multiple, small foci. In such cases, there is no clear optimal measurement method for determining the invasive size for tumour staging and prognostication.

METHODS

In all, 117 small invasive IPMNs (size of largest invasive component ≤2 cm) from seven institutions (2000-2016) were reviewed, and all individual foci of invasive carcinoma were measured. T stages (AJCC 8th edition) based on the largest single focus size (LS), average size of all foci (AS), and total sum of all foci (TS) were examined in association with clinicopathologic parameters and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised IPMNs with invasive tubular-type (n = 82, 70%) and colloid-type (n = 35, 30%) carcinomas. The mean LS, AS, and TS were 0.86, 0.71, and 1.32 cm, respectively. Based on the LS, AS, and TS, respectively, 48, 65, and 39 cases were classified as pT1a; 22, 18, and 11 cases as pT1b; and 47, 34, and 50 cases as pT1c. Higher pT stages based on all measurements were significantly associated with small vessel, large vessel, and perineural invasion (P < 0.05). LS-, AS-, and TS-based pT stages were not significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) by univariate or multivariate analyses. However, among tubular-type carcinomas, higher LS-, AS-, and TS-based pT stages trended with lower RFS (based on 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates). All microscopic measurement methods were most predictive of RFS and OS using a 1.5-cm cutoff, with LS significantly associated with both RFS and OS by univariate and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

For invasive tubular-type carcinomas arising in IPMN, microscopic size-based AJCC pT stages were not significant predictors of patient outcomes. However, for LS, a size threshold of 1.5 cm was optimal for stratifying both RFS and OS. The AJCC 8th ed. may not be applicable for stratifying small invasive IPMNs with colloid-type histology that generally portend a more favourable prognosis.

Enhancing Neoadjuvant Virotherapy's Effectiveness by Targeting Stroma to Improve Resectability in Pancreatic Cancer

About one-fourth of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are categorized as borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced (LA). Chemotherapy and radiation therapy have not yielded the anticipated outcomes in curing patients with BR/LA PDAC. The surgical resection of these tumors presents challenges owing to the unpredictability of the resection margin, involvement of vasculature with the tumor, the likelihood of occult metastasis, a higher ratio of positive lymph nodes, and the relatively larger size of tumor nodules. Oncolytic virotherapy has shown promising activity in preclinical PDAC models. Unfortunately, the desmoplastic stroma within the PDAC tumor microenvironment establishes a barrier, hindering the infiltration of oncolytic viruses and various therapeutic drugs-such as antibodies, adoptive cell therapy agents, and chemotherapeutic agents-in reaching the tumor site. Recently, a growing emphasis has been placed on targeting major acellular components of tumor stroma, such as hyaluronic acid and collagen, to enhance drug penetration. Oncolytic viruses can be engineered to express proteolytic enzymes that cleave hyaluronic acid and collagen into smaller polypeptides, thereby softening the desmoplastic stroma, ultimately leading to increased viral distribution along with increased oncolysis and subsequent tumor size regression. This approach may offer new possibilities to improve the resectability of patients diagnosed with BR and LA PDAC.

Analysis of Recent Improvement of Survival Outcomes in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Who Underwent Upfront Surgery

Background/Aims

: Recently, patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) who underwent resection have exhibited improved survival outcomes, but comprehensive analysis is limited. We analyzed the trends of contributing factors.

Methods

: Data of patients with resected PC were retrospectively collected from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) database and separately at our institution. Cox regression analysis was conducted with the data from our institution a survival prediction score was calculated using the β coefficients.

Results

: Comparison between the periods 2013-2015 (n=3,255) and 2016-2018 (n=3,698) revealed a difference in the median overall survival (25.9 months vs not reached, p<0.001) when analyzed with the HIRA database which was similar to our single-center data (2013-2015 [n=119] vs 2016-2018 [n=148], 20.9 months vs 32.2 months, p=0.003). Multivariable analyses revealed six factors significantly associated with better OS, and the scores were as follows: age >70 years, 1; elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 at diagnosis, 1; R1 resection, 1; stage N1 and N2, 1 and 3, respectively; no adjuvant treatment, 2; FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel after recurrence, 4; and other chemotherapy or supportive care only after recurrence, 5. The rate of R0 resection (69.7% vs 80.4%), use of adjuvant treatment (63.0% vs 74.3%), and utilization of FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (25.2% vs 47.3%) as palliative chemotherapeutic regimen, all increased between the two time periods, resulting in decreased total survival prediction score (mean: 7.32 vs 6.18, p=0.004).

Conclusions

: Strict selection of surgical candidates, more use of adjuvant treatment, and adoption of the latest combination regimens for palliative chemotherapy after recurrence were identified as factors of recent improvement.

Imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - An update for all stages of patient management

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a common and lethal cancer. From diagnosis to disease staging, response to neoadjuvant therapy assessment and patient surveillance after resection, imaging plays a central role, guiding the multidisciplinary team in decision-planning.

Review aims and findings

This review discusses the most up-to-date imaging recommendations, typical and atypical findings, and issues related to each step of patient management. Example cases for each relevant condition are presented, and a structured report for disease staging is suggested.

Conclusion

Despite current issues in PDAC imaging at different stages of patient management, the radiologist is essential in the multidisciplinary team, as the conveyor of relevant imaging findings crucial for patient care.

Development and validation of a deep learning radiomics model with clinical-radiological characteristics for the identification of occult peritoneal metastases in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Occult peritoneal metastases (OPM) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are frequently overlooked during imaging. The authors aimed to develop and validate a computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning-based radiomics (DLR) model to identify OPM in PDAC before treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective, bicentric study included 302 patients with PDAC (training: n =167, OPM-positive, n =22; internal test: n =72, OPM-positive, n =9: external test, n =63, OPM-positive, n =9) who had undergone baseline CT examinations between January 2012 and October 2022. Handcrafted radiomics (HCR) and DLR features of the tumor and HCR features of peritoneum were extracted from CT images. Mutual information and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithms were used for feature selection. A combined model, which incorporated the selected clinical-radiological, HCR, and DLR features, was developed using a logistic regression classifier using data from the training cohort and validated in the test cohorts.

RESULTS

Three clinical-radiological characteristics (carcinoembryonic antigen 19-9 and CT-based T and N stages), nine HCR features of the tumor, 14 DLR features of the tumor, and three HCR features of the peritoneum were retained after feature selection. The combined model yielded satisfactory predictive performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.853 (95% CI: 0.790-0.903), 0.845 (95% CI: 0.740-0.919), and 0.852 (95% CI: 0.740-0.929) in the training, internal test, and external test cohorts, respectively (all P <0.05). The combined model showed better discrimination than the clinical-radiological model in the training (AUC=0.853 vs. 0.612, P <0.001) and the total test (AUC=0.842 vs. 0.638, P <0.05) cohorts. The decision curves revealed that the combined model had greater clinical applicability than the clinical-radiological model.

CONCLUSIONS

The model combining CT-based DLR and clinical-radiological features showed satisfactory performance for predicting OPM in patients with PDAC.

Inadequacy of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer pancreatic cancer staging system for invasive carcinoma associated with premalignant lesions in the pancreas: an analysis using the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Invasive carcinomas arising from premalignant lesions are currently staged by the same criteria as conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic information and survival data were extracted through a thorough search of histology codes from National Cancer Database (2006-2016). A total of 723 patients with invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and mucinous cystic neoplasm were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age was 67 years, and 351 patients (48.5%) were male. There were 212 (29.3%), 232 (32.1%), 272 (37.6%), and 7 (1.0%) patients with T1, T2, T3, and T4 classification. Extrapancreatic extension (EPE) was present in 284 (39.3%). Age (HR = 1.504, 95% CI 1.196-1.891), R1 or R2 resection (HR = 1.585, 95% CI 1.175-2.140), and EPE (HR = 1.598, 95% CI 1.209-2.113) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Size criteria did not significantly affect survival. The median survival was 115.9 months for patients without EPE, compared to 34.2 months for those with EPE. EPE discriminated survival better than tumor size.

DISCUSSION

The T classification of the eighth edition AJCC staging system is not adequate for invasive carcinomas associated with premalignant lesions of the pancreas. They merit a separate, dedicated staging system that uses appropriate prognostic factors.

Impact of Preoperative Tumor Size on Prognosis of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

Tumor size (TS) is a well-established prognostic factor of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, whether a uniform treatment strategy can be applied for all resectable PDACs (R-PDACs) and borderline resectable PDACs (BR-PDACs), regardless of TS, remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative TS on surgical outcomes of patients with R-PDACs and BR-PDACs.

METHODS

Chart data from three institutions were reviewed to select patients who underwent pancreatectomy for R-PDACs and BR-PDACs between January 2006 and December 2020. The patients were divided into TSsmall and TSlarge groups according to a TS cutoff value determined for each of R- and BR-PDAC using the minimum P value approach for the risk of R1 resection.

RESULTS

TS of 35 mm and 24 mm was the best cutoff value in R-PDAC and BR-PDAC, respectively. The R1 rate was higher in the TSlarge than TSsmall group, in both R- (n = 35, 37% versus n = 294, 19%; P = 0.011) and BR-PDAC (n = 89, 37% versus n = 27, 15%; P = 0.030). Overall survival was significantly better in the TSsmall than TSlarge group in R-PDAC (38.2 versus 12.1 months; P < 0.001), but comparable between the two groups in BR-DPAC (21.2 versus 22.7 months; P = 0.363). Multivariate analysis revealed TS > 35 mm as an independent predictor of worse survival in patients with R-PDAC.

CONCLUSION

Larger TS was associated with a higher R1 rate and is a worse prognostic factor in patients with R-PDAC.

Impact of resection margins and para-aortic lymph node metastases on recurrence patterns and prognosis in resectable pancreatic cancer - a long-term population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related death. To individualise management and improve survival, more accurate prognostic models are needed.

METHODS

All patients resected for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a tertiary Swedish centre during 2009-2019 were thoroughly analysed with regards to pathological and clinical parameters including tumour grade, resection margin status, para-aortic lymph node engagement (node station 16), and systemic treatment.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 275 patients. Overall median survival was 21.2 months (95% CI 17.5-24.8). Year of resection, margin status (R1 subdivided into R11mm/R1ink), perineural invasion, differentiation grade, TNM stage, and adjuvant therapy were independent factors with significant impact on survival. Margin status also significantly affected recurrence-free survival and relapse patterns, with local and peritoneal relapses being associated with R1-status (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007). Presence of para-aortic lymph node metastases was associated with shorter recurrence-free survival as compared to N1 status only.

CONCLUSION

Survival in resected pancreatic cancer is improving over time. Resection margin status is a key factor affecting recurrence patterns and prognosis. Given the poor recurrence-free survival in node station 16 metastasised patients, the rational for resection remains in doubt, and improved treatment strategies for this patient group is necessary.

Reconsidering the absence of extrapancreatic extension in T staging for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the AJCC (8th ed) Staging Manual using the National Cancer Database

PURPOSE

Although the concept of extrapancreatic extension (EPEx) was removed in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer pancreatic cancer staging system, several studies have supported the prognostic significance of EPEx. This study aimed to investigate the significance of EPEx in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent resection for PDAC between 2006 and 2016 were extracted and analyzed from the NCDB. Cases arising from premalignant lesions, those with metastases, and those treated with neoadjuvant therapy were excluded.

RESULTS

Among 37,634 patients, the median overall survival was 23 months and the 5-year survival rate was 22.7%. The EPEx prevalence was the lowest for T1 stage (63.2%) and increased with each T-stage (T2:83.4%, T3:85.8%). The overall survival was better in EPEx-negative patients than in EPEx-positive patients (median 33.7 vs. 21.5 months; p<0.001). When the T-stages were stratified by EPEx, EPEx-positive patients showed worse survival in all T-stages than EPEx-negative patients. Survival was comparable between T1 EPEx-positive and T2 or T3 EPEx-negative patients (p=0.088 and p=0.178, respectively). Furthermore, T2 and T3 EPEx-negative patients had similar survival to each other (p=0.877), and distinctly superior survival compared to T2 and T3 EPEx-positive patients (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

EPEx was an important prognostic factor in the overall cohort and in differentiating between T stages. This study strongly suggests that staging systems should reinstate EPEx and apply it to all T-stages, especially in T1, where EPEx was absent in 36% of patients.

Features of T1 pancreatic cancer and validation of the eighth edition AJCC staging system definition using a Korean-Japanese joint cohort and the SEER database

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Little is known about the features of T1 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its definition in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system needs validation. The aims were to analyze the clinicopathologic features of T1 PDAC and investigate the validity of its definition.

METHOD

Data from 1506 patients with confirmed T1 PDAC between 2000 and 2019 were collected and analyzed. The results were validated using 3092 T1 PDAC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

RESULTS

The median survival duration of patients was 50 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 45.1%. R0 resection was unachievable in 10.0% of patients, the nodal metastasis rate was 40.0%, and recurrence occurred in 55.2%. The current T1 subcategorization was not feasible for PDAC, tumors with extrapancreatic extension (72.8%) had worse outcomes than those without extrapancreatic extension (median survival 107 vs. 39 months, p < .001). Extrapancreatic extension was an independent prognostic factor whereas the current T1 subcategorization was not. The results of this study were reproducible with data from the SEER database.

CONCLUSION

Despite its small size, T1 PDAC displayed aggressive behavior warranting active local and systemic treatment. The subcategorization by the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system was not adequate for PDAC, and better subcategorization methods need to be explored. In addition, the role of extrapancreatic extension in the staging system should be reconsidered.

Utility of intraoperative pathology consultations of whipple resection specimens and their impact on final margin status

The resection margin status is a significant surgical prognostic factor for the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure). As a result, surgeons frequently rely on intraoperative consults (IOCs) involving frozen sections to evaluate margin clearance during these resections. Nevertheless, the impact of this practice on final margin status and long-term outcomes remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to assess the impact of IOCs on the clearance rate of resection margins following Whipple procedure and distal pancreatectomy. A retrospective database review of all patients who underwent Whipple procedure or distal pancreatectomy at our institution between 2018 and 2020 was performed to evaluate the utility of IOCs by gastrointestinal surgeons and its correlation with final postoperative surgical margin status. A significant variation in the frequency of IOC requests for margins among surgeons was noted. However, the use of frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment was not significantly associated with the clearance rate of final post-operative margins. More frequent use of IOC did not result in higher final margin clearance rate, an important prognostic factor following Whipple procedure.

Accuracy of models to prognosticate survival after surgery for pancreatic cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain difficult to prognosticate. Multiple models attempt to predict survival following the resection of PDAC, but their utility in the neoadjuvant population is unknown. We aimed to assess their accuracy among patients that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

We performed a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients who received NAC and underwent resection of PDAC. Two prognostic systems were evaluated: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Nomogram (MSKCCPAN) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Discrimination between predicted and actual disease-specific survival was assessed using the Uno C-statistic and Kaplan-Meier method. Calibration of the MSKCCPAN was assessed using the Brier score.

RESULTS

A total of 448 patients were included. There were 232 (51.8%) females, and the mean age was 64.1 years (±9.5). Most had AJCC Stage I or II disease (77.7%). For the MSKCCPAN, the Uno C-statistic at 12-, 24-, and 36-month time points was 0.62, 0.63, and 0.62, respectively. The AJCC system demonstrated similarly mediocre discrimination. The Brier score for the MSKCCPAN was 0.15 at 12 months, 0.26 at 24 months, and 0.30 at 36 months, demonstrating modest calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

Current survival prediction models and staging systems for patients with PDAC undergoing resection after NAC have limited accuracy.

Integrated Pathologic Score Effectively Stratifies Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used to treat patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Pathologic parameters of treated PDAC, including tumor (ypT) and lymph node (ypN) stage, and tumor response grading (TRG) are important prognostic factors in this group of patients. To our knowledge, a multifactorial prognostic score combining pathologic features including ypT, ypN, and TRG in treated PDAC patients has not been reported. Our cohort consisted of 398 PDAC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at our institution. All pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens were grossly and microscopically evaluated using a standard protocol. The integrated pathologic score (IPS) was calculated as the sum of the scores for ypT, ypN, and TRG according to either the MD Anderson grading system (IPSMDA) or the College of American Pathologists (CAP) grading system (IPSCAP). The IPSMDA and IPSCAP were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and patient survival. Using either IPSMDA or IPSCAP, PDAC patients were stratified into 3 distinct prognostic groups for both disease-free survival (DFS) ( P <0.001) and overall survival (OS) ( P <0.001). The IPSMDA and IPSCAP correlated with tumor differentiation, margin status, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and tumor recurrence ( P <0.05). In multivariate analysis, IPSMDA, IPSCAP, margin status, and tumor differentiation were independent prognostic factors for both DFS ( P <0.05) and OS ( P <0.05). However, patients with AJCC stage IB, IIA, or IIB disease had no significant difference in either DFS or OS ( P >0.05). The IPS appears to provide improved prognostic information compared with AJCC staging for preoperatively treated patients with PDAC.

The prognostic significance of duodenal wall invasion in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The most recent edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (AJCC, 8th edition) relies only on tumor size for staging resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and the presence of duodenal wall invasion (DWI) no longer has an impact on staging. However, very few studies have evaluated its significance. In this study, we aim to evaluate the prognostic significance of DWI in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

We reviewed 97 consecutive internal cases of resected pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma, and clinicopathologic parameters were recorded. All cases were staged according to the 8th edition of AJCC, and the patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of DWI.

RESULTS

Out of our 97 cases, 53 patients had DWI (55%). In univariate analysis, DWI was significantly associated with lymphovascular invasion and lymph node metastasis (AJCC 8th edition pN stage). In univariate analysis of overall survival, age > 60, absence of DWI, and African American race were associated with worse overall survival. In multivariate analysis, age > 60, absence of DWI, and African American race were associated with worse progression-free survival and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Although DWI is associated with lymph node metastasis, it is not associated with inferior disease-free/overall survival.

Delivery of aPD-L1 antibody to i.p. tumors via direct penetration by i.p. route: Beyond EPR effect

Chemotherapy for peritoneal dissemination is poorly effective owing to limited drug transfer from the blood to the intraperitoneal (i.p.) compartment after intravenous (i.v.) administration. i.p. chemotherapy has been investigated to improve drug delivery to tumors; however, the efficacy continues to be debated. As anticancer drugs have low molecular weight and are rapidly excreted through the peritoneal blood vessels, maintaining the i.p. concentration as high as expected is a challenge. In this study, we examined whether i.p. administration is an efficient route of administration of high-molecular-weight immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of peritoneal dissemination using a model of peritoneal disseminated carcinoma. After i.p. administration, the amount of anti-PD-L1 antibody transferred into i.p. tumors increased by approximately eight folds compared to that after i.v. administration. Intratumoral distribution analysis revealed that anti-PD-L1 antibodies were delivered directly from the i.p. space to the surface of tumor tissue, and that they deeply penetrated the tumor tissues after i.p. administration; in contrast, after i.v. administration, anti-PD-L1 antibodies were only distributed around blood vessels in tumor tissues via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Owing to the enhanced delivery, the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-L1 antibody in the peritoneal dissemination models was also improved after i.p. administration compared to that after i.v. administration. This is the first study to clearly demonstrate an EPR-independent delivery of ICIs to i.p. tumors by which ICIs were delivered in a massive amount to the tumor tissue via direct penetration after i.p. administration.

The effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage I pancreatic cancer based on the UICC 8th edition

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with pancreatic cancer after curative resection. However, there is limited evidence regarding the efficacy and prognostic factors for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to identify patients in whom chemotherapy was effective and to detect prognostic factors for stage I pancreatic cancer based on guidelines of the 8^th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC).

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2017, 108 patients diagnosed with stage I pancreatic cancer were enrolled in this study. They were distributed into invasion (n = 68) and non-invasion (n = 40) groups. The relationship between clinicopathological variables, including various prognostic factors, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS), were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Five-year survival in all patients with stage I pancreatic cancer was 38.9%. Adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve DFS or OS in patients with stage I cancer (DFS, p = 0.26; OS, p = 0.30). In subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved DFS (multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.78; p = 0.007) and OS (multivariate-adjusted HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15-0.68; p = 0.003) in the invasion group than in non-invasion group. In contrast, in the non-invasion group, adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve DFS and OS in univariate analysis (DFS, p = 0.992; OS, p = 0.808).

CONCLUSION

For stage I pancreatic cancer, based on guidelines of the UICC 8^th edition, adjuvant chemotherapy may benefit patients with extrapancreatic invasion.

Evaluation of the 8th Edition AJCC Staging System for the Clinical Staging of Pancreatic Cancer

The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pancreatic cancer (PC) has been validated for pathological staging; however, its significance for clinical staging remains uncertain. We validated the prognostic performance and suitability of the current staging system for the clinical staging of PC. We identified 1043 patients from our PC registry who were staged by imaging according to the 8th edition staging system and conducted analysis, including overall survival (OS) comparison. Gradual prognostic stratification according to stage hierarchy yielded significant OS differences between stage groups, except between stage I and II (p = 0.193). A substage comparison revealed no survival differences between IB (T2N0) and IIA (T3N0), which were divided by the T3 criterion only (p = 0.278). A higher N stage had significantly shorter OS than a lower N stage (all pairwise p < 0.05). However, among the 150 patients who received upfront surgery, the pathological stage was more advanced than the clinical stage in 86 (57.3%), mostly due to a false-negative cN0 (70.9%). Our results suggest that the new definition of T3 and the number-based N criteria in the 8th edition AJCC staging system may be not adequate for clinical staging. Establishing separate criteria more suitable for clinical staging should be considered.

Nationwide Validation of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System and Five Proposed Modifications for Resected Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of four proposed modifications to the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system has yet to be evaluated. This study aimed to validate five proposed modifications.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resection (2014-2016), as registered in the prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit, were included. Stratification and prognostication of TNM staging systems were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional hazard analyses, and C-indices. A new modification was composed based on overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Overall, 750 patients with a median OS of 18 months (interquartile range 10-32) were included. The 8th edition had an increased discriminative ability compared with the 7th edition {C-index 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.61) vs. 0.56 (95% CI 0.54-0.58)}. Although the 8th edition showed a stepwise decrease in OS with increasing stage, no differences could be demonstrated between all substages; stage IIA vs. IB (hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% CI 0.80-2.09; p  = 0.29) and stage IIB vs. IIA (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.75-1.83; p  = 0.48). The four modifications showed comparable prognostic accuracy (C-index 0.59-0.60); however, OS did not differ between all modified TNM stages (ns). The new modification, migrating T3N1 patients to stage III, showed a C-index of 0.59, but did detect significant survival differences between all TNM stages (p  < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 8th TNM staging system still lacks prognostic value for some categories of patients, which was not clearly improved by four previously proposed modifications. The modification suggested in this study allows for better prognostication in patients with all stages of disease.

Genomic characterization of undifferentiated sarcomatoid carcinoma of the pancreas

Undifferentiated sarcomatoid carcinoma (USC) of the pancreas is a rare but especially aggressive variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), composed of at least 80% of sarcomatoid cells. This study aimed to elucidate its clinicopathological and molecular features. The study cohort included 10 patients with pancreatic USC. Clinicopathological parameters were determined for each patient. The molecular profile was investigated using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Histologically, all tumors were hypercellular neoplasms with spindle-shaped or sarcomatoid cells. All patients showed vascular and perineural invasion. Most patients had a poor prognosis. NGS showed important similarities with conventional PDAC, including frequent alterations in the classic PDAC drivers, KRAS (100% of cases), TP53 (90%), and CDKN2A (60%). There were also some important distinctions from conventional PDAC: 1) SMAD4, a typical PDAC driver gene, was mutated in only one case (10%); 2) Another distinctive molecular feature was the recurrent KRAS amplification (30% of cases), which is very rare in conventional PDAC. It has been previously reported in another subtype of pancreatic undifferentiated carcinoma, the rhabdoid variant, and may be a key event leading to the acquisition of an undifferentiated phenotype in a subgroup of cases; 3) Lastly, in two different cases, we detected two potentially actionable targets, not belonging to the typical PDAC molecular landscape, such as MCL1 amplification and POLQ mutation. Our study sheds light on this rare tumor type, which shows aggressive biological behavior and few druggable alterations. The most distinctive molecular features of pancreatic USC are the paucity of SMAD4 alterations and recurrent KRAS amplification.

IPMN-associated pancreatic cancer: Survival, prognostic staging and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-associated carcinoma is a subtype of pancreatic cancer for which prognostic factors, the validity of the AJCC/UICC staging system and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy remain unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological, treatment and follow-up data of patients with IPMN-associated carcinoma undergoing resection between 2002 and 2018 were analyzed. Uni- and multivariable survival analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Of 424 patients undergoing resection for IPMN-associated carcinoma, 77% patients had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (IPMN-PDAC) and 23% had colloid carcinoma (IPMN-CC). Compared to IPMN-CC, IPMN-PDAC was diagnosed at more advanced tumor stages, more frequently involved lymph nodes, more frequently showed poor differentiation and were associated with higher rates of R1 resections. Resected IPMN-PDAC showed markedly shorter median overall survival than IPMN-CC (26.7 months vs. 91.3 months). The current AJCC/UICC staging system was validated for IPMN-associated carcinoma and for both of its subtypes. In multivariable analysis age ≥70 years, diabetes mellitus, high levels of Ca 19-9, IPMN-PDAC subtype, G3 tumors and higher AJCC/UICC stage were independently associated with shorter survival. Adjuvant therapy was not associated with improved survival in IPMN-associated carcinoma. Overall survival was comparable in patients receiving vs. not receiving adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after resection of IPMN-associated carcinoma depends on tumor stage, on histologic tumor subtype, grading, and Ca 19-9 levels. The current 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system is applicable for IPMN-associated carcinoma and for both of its subtypes IPMN-PDAC and IPMN-CC. The role of adjuvant therapy for IPMN-associated carcinoma remains unclear.

Tumour Size and T-Stage in Pancreatic Cancer Resection Specimens Depend on the Pathology Examination Approach

In the eighth edition of the TNM classification for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), stages T1 to T3 are defined by tumour size, size measurement being deemed objective and accurate. This study investigated whether various, currently used approaches to tumour measurement result in different tumour sizes and differences in T-stage assignment. In a series of 315 resected PDAC, tumour sizes were measured as follows: macroscopically in a single or in two perpendicular planes and with or without microscopic corroboration. Comparison of the resulting tumour sizes showed that both macroscopic measurement in two planes and microscopic corroboration gave significantly different results (p < 0.001). Compared to the most simple approach (macroscopic measurement in one plane), the comprehensive approach (macroscopic measurement in two planes with microscopic corroboration) resulted in a larger tumour size in 263 (83%) cases (mean absolute size difference: 10 mm; mean relative size change: 36%). T-stage assignment differed in 142 (45%) cases between the simple and comprehensive approach and affected 87%, 38% and 48% of the cases deemed to be stage T1, T2 and T3, respectively. In conclusion, tumour size and T-stage are highly approach-dependent. Consensus on an accurate method is required to ensure comparability of these basic data.

Perineural Invasion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC): A Saboteur of Curative Intended Therapies?

(1) Background: Perineural invasion (PNI) is a common characteristic of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and is present in most resection margins. We hypothesized that curative pancreatic tumor resection with long-term survival could only be achieved in PNI-negative patients. (2) Material and Methods: A retrospective investigation of PDAC patients who underwent curative-intended surgery during the period 2008 to 2019 was performed at our institution. (3) Results: We identified 571 of 660 (86.5%) resected patients with well-annotated reports and complete datasets. Of those, 531 patients (93%) exhibited tumors with perineural invasion (Pn1), while 40 (7%) were negative for PNI (Pn0). The majority of patients in the Pn1 group presented advanced tumor stage and positive lymph node infiltration. Patients in the Pn0 group showed an improved disease-free and long-term survival compared to the Pn1 group (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of all R0-resected patients indicated improved long-term survival and disease-free survival of R0 Pn0 patients when compared to R0 Pn1 patients (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: Our study confirmed that Pn0 improves the long-term survival of PDAC-resected cancer patients. Furthermore, PNI significantly challenges the long-term survival of formally curative (R0) resected patients. We provide new insights into the dynamics of PNI in pancreatic cancer patients which are needed to define subgroups of patients for risk stratification and multimodal treatment strategies.

Prediction of residual tumor and overall survival after first-line surgery in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings

BACKGROUND

Complete resection is the only potentially curative treatment in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) and is associated with a longer overall survival (OS) than incomplete resection of tumor. Hence, prediction of the resection status after surgery would help predict the prognosis of patients with PDA.

PURPOSE

To predict residual tumor (R) classification and OS in patients who underwent first-line surgery for PDA using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study, 210 patients with PDA who underwent MRI and first-line surgery were randomly categorized into a test group (n=150) and a validation group (n=60). The R classification was divided into R0 (no residual tumor) and R1/R2 (microscopic/macroscopic residual tumor). Preoperative MRI findings associated with R classification and OS were assessed by using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models. In addition, the prediction models for the R classification and OS were validated using calibration plots and C statistics.

RESULTS

On preoperative MRI, portal vein encasement (odds ratio 4.755) was an independent predictor for R1/R2 resection (P=0.040). Tumor size measured on MRI (hazard ratio [HR] per centimeter 1.539) was a predictor of OS, along with pathologic N1 and N2 stage (HR 1.944 and 3.243, respectively), R1/R2 resection (HR 3.273), and adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (HR 0.250) (P<0.050). Calibration plots demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative MRI was valuable for predicting R1/R2 resection using portal vein encasement. Tumor size measured on MRI was useful for the prediction of OS after first-line surgery for PDA.

The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death and the second gastrointestinal cancer-related death in the United States. Early detection and accurate diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer are paramount in guiding treatment plans, as surgical resection can provide the only potential cure for this disease. The overall prognosis of pancreatic cancer is poor even in patients with resectable disease. The 5-year survival after surgical resection is ~10% in node-positive disease compared to ~30% in node-negative disease. The advancement of imaging studies and the multidisciplinary approach involving radiologists, gastroenterologists, advanced endoscopists, medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists have a major impact on the management of pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic ultrasonography is essential in the diagnosis by obtaining tissue (FNA or FNB) and in the loco-regional staging of the disease. The advancement in EUS techniques has made this modality a critical adjunct in the management process of pancreatic cancer. In this review article, we provide an overall description of the role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.

Fractal analysis improves tumour size measurement on computed tomography in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: comparison with gross pathology and multi-parametric MRI

Objectives

Tumour size measurement is pivotal for staging and stratifying patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). However, computed tomography (CT) frequently underestimates tumour size due to insufficient depiction of the tumour rim. CT-derived fractal dimension (FD) maps might help to visualise perfusion chaos, thus allowing more realistic size measurement.

Methods

In 46 patients with histology-proven PDA, we compared tumour size measurements in routine multiphasic CT scans, CT-derived FD maps, multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and, where available, gross pathology of resected specimens. Gross pathology was available as reference for diameter measurement in a discovery cohort of 10 patients. The remaining 36 patients constituted a separate validation cohort with mpMRI as reference for diameter and volume.

Results

Median RECIST diameter of all included tumours was 40 mm (range: 18–82 mm). In the discovery cohort, we found significant (p = 0.03) underestimation of tumour diameter on CT compared with gross pathology (Δdiameter_3D = −5.7 mm), while realistic diameter measurements were obtained from FD maps (Δdiameter_3D = 0.6 mm) and mpMRI (Δdiameter_3D = −0.9 mm), with excellent correlation between the two (R² = 0.88). In the validation cohort, CT also systematically underestimated tumour size in comparison to mpMRI (Δdiameter_3D = −10.6 mm, Δvolume = −10.2 mL), especially in larger tumours. In contrast, FD map measurements agreed excellently with mpMRI (Δdiameter_3D = +1.5 mm, Δvolume = −0.6 mL). Quantitative perfusion chaos was significantly (p = 0.001) higher in the tumour rim (FD_rim = 4.43) compared to the core (FD_core = 4.37) and remote pancreas (FD_pancreas = 4.28).

Conclusions

In PDA, fractal analysis visualises perfusion chaos in the tumour rim and improves size measurement on CT in comparison to gross pathology and mpMRI, thus compensating for size underestimation from routine CT.

Key Points

• CT-based measurement of tumour size in pancreatic adenocarcinoma systematically underestimates both tumour diameter (Δdiameter = −10.6 mm) and volume (Δvolume = −10.2 mL), especially in larger tumours.

• Fractal analysis provides maps of the fractal dimension (FD), which enable a more reliable and size-independent measurement using gross pathology or multi-parametric MRI as reference standards.

• FD quantifies perfusion chaos—the underlying pathophysiological principle—and can separate the more chaotic tumour rim from the tumour core and adjacent non-tumourous pancreas tissue.

The Site of Lymph Node Metastasis: A Significant Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

While the presence and number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) are important prognostic factors for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), there is no recommendation to specify metastatic regional LN localization in the current staging system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic effect of regional metastatic LN localizations in PDAC.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Metastatic sites of 101 consecutive PDAC patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were classified as peripancreatic, perigastric, hepatica communis, hepatoduodenal, and superior mesenteric artery. The frequency of metastasis in each region and the association between the presence of metastasis in each site and overall and disease-free survival were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty cases (79.2%) had peripancreatic, 7 (6.9%) had perigastric, 6 (5.9%) had hepatica communis, 7 (6.9%) had hepatoduodenal, and 4 (4%) had superior mesenteric artery LN metastasis. The overall and disease-free survival values were significantly shorter in patients with hepatoduodenal LN metastasis (log rank; p= 0.001, p=0.017, respectively). The presence of metastatic superior mesenteric artery LN was significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival in univariate analysis (p=0.017). Hepatoduodenal LN metastasis was an independent predictor of mortality (p=0.005) in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The presence of hepatoduodenal LN metastasis is an independent poor prognostic factor for mortality. The presence of metastatic LN in the superior mesenteric artery region was significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival time, although not an independent predictor. We conclude that the metastatic regional LN sites, especially the hepatoduodenal region, have an impact on the prognosis, and should be included in synoptic pathology reports.

Resectable, borderline, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer-"the good, the bad, and the ugly" candidates for surgery?

The possibility of surgical resection strongly overrules medical oncologic treatment and is the only modality, causa sine qua non, long-term survival can be achieved in patients with pancreatic cancer. For this reason, the clinical classification of local resectability, subdividing tumors into resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced cancer, that is very technical in nature, is the one most widely used and accepted. As multimodality treatment with potent agents, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, seems to be stepping forward as the new standard of treatment of pancreatic cancer, the established technical surgical landmarks tend to get challenged. This review aims to highlight the grey zones in the current classifications for local tumor involvement with respect to the observed patient outcome in the current multimodality treatment era. It summarizes the latest reported series on the outcome of resected primary resectable, borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, and particularly vascular resections during pancreatectomy, in the background of different types of neoadjuvant therapy. It also hints what the new horizons of cancer biology tend to reveal whenever the technical hinders start being pushed aside. The current calls for the necessity of re-classification of the clinical categories of pancreatic cancer, from technically oriented to biology-focused individualized approach, are being elucidated.

Radiological tumour invasion of splenic artery or vein in patients with pancreatic body or tail adenocarcinoma and effect on recurrence and survival

BACKGROUND

Major vessel invasion is an important factor for determining the surgical approach and long-term prognosis for patients with pancreatic head cancer. However, clinical implications of vessel invasion have seldom been reported in pancreatic body or tail cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of splenic vessel invasion with pancreatic body or tail cancer compared with no invasion and investigate prognostic factors.

METHODS

This study enrolled patients who underwent upfront distal pancreatectomy from 2005 to 2018. The circular degree of splenic vessel invasion was investigated and categorized into three groups (group 1, no invasion; group 2, 0-180°; group 3, 180° or more). Clinicopathological variables and perioperative and survival outcomes were evaluated, and multivariable Cox proportional analysis was performed to evaluate prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Among 249 enrolled patients, tumour size was larger in patients with splenic vessel invasion (3.9 versus 2.9 cm, P = 0.001), but the number of metastatic lymph nodes was comparable to that in patients with no vessel invasion (1.7 versus 1.4, P = 0.241). The 5-year overall survival rates differed significantly between the three groups (group 1, 38.4 per cent; group 2, 16.8 per cent; group 3, 9.7 per cent, P < 0.001). Patients with both splenic artery and vein invasion had lower 5-year overall survival rates than those with one vessel (7.5 versus 20.2 per cent, P = 0.021). Cox proportional analysis revealed adjuvant treatment, R0 resection and splenic artery invasion as independent prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in pancreatic body or tail cancer.

CONCLUSION

Splenic vessel invasion was associated with higher recurrence and lower overall survival in pancreatic body or tail cancers suggesting a need for a neoadjuvant approach.

Validation of the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma initially receiving chemoradiotherapy and proposal of modifications

Objective: To validate the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma receiving only stereotactic body radiation therapy and chemotherapy, and to propose modifications to improve prognostic accuracy.

Methods: Patients with pathologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma without metastasis who were undergoing only chemoradiotherapy were included and staged according to the seventh and eighth editions of the AJCC staging system. Meanwhile, another group of stage T4 patients from the above enrollment with only portal vein involvement with or without tumor thrombi (PV ± PVTT) were retrieved for survival comparisons. Modifications were proposed according to the survival comparisons. A cohort from the SEER database was used for external validation of the modified staging system.

Results: A total of 683 patients were included. Patients with N2 or N1 but different T stages had significantly different survival outcomes according to the eighth edition. The survival of patients with PV ± PVTT was comparable to that of patients with T4 tumors. The concordance index of the seventh and eighth editions, and the modified staging system was 0.744 (95%CI: 0.718–0.769), 0.750 (95%CI: 0.725–0.775), and 0.788 (95%CI: 0.762–0.813), respectively. For external validation, the concordance index was 0.744 (95%CI: 0.718–0.770), 0.750 (95%CI: 0.724–0.776), and 0.788 (95%CI: 0.762–0.814), respectively.

Conclusions: The modified staging system is suggested to have the most accurate prognostic value. Hence, PV ± PVTT should be added to the definition of T4 tumors regardless of tumor size. Patients with N2 or N1 in different T stages could be regrouped into different substages. Additionally, stage III should be subclassified into IIIA (T3N2 and T4N0) and IIIB (T4N1-2).

Towards a More Standardized Approach to Pathologic Reporting of Pancreatoduodenectomy Specimens for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Cross-continental and Cross-specialty Survey From the Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society Grossing Working Group

In recent literature and international meetings held, it has become clear that there are significant differences regarding the definition of what constitutes as margins and how best to document the pathologic findings in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. To capture the current practice, Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society (PBPS) Grossing Working Group conducted an international multispecialty survey encompassing 25 statements, regarding pathologic examination and reporting of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, particularly in pancreatoduodenectomy specimens. The survey results highlighted several discordances; however, consensus/high concordance was reached for the following: (1) the pancreatic neck margin should be entirely submitted en face, and if tumor on the slide, then it is considered equivalent to R1; (2) uncinate margin should be submitted entirely and perpendicularly sectioned, and tumor distance from the uncinate margin should be reported; (3) all other surfaces (including vascular groove, posterior surface, and anterior surface) should be examined and documented; (4) carcinoma involving separately submitted celiac axis specimen should be staged as pT4. Although no consensus was achieved regarding what constitutes R1 versus R0, most participants agreed that ink on tumor or at and within 1 mm to the tumor is equivalent to R1 only in areas designated as a margin, not surface. In conclusion, this survey raises the awareness of the discordances and serves as a starting point towards further standardization of the pancreatoduodenectomy grossing and reporting protocols.

Refined prognostic staging for resected pancreatic cancer by modified stage grouping and addition of tumour grade

BACKGROUND

With changes in T and N categories the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for pancreatic cancer resulted in improved prognostic staging, but inconsistencies were observed with specific stage groups. Tumour grading remains disregarded in prognostic staging. We aimed to validate the current staging system and to investigate the possibility of further optimization by integration of grading.

METHODS

1946 patients undergoing upfront surgical resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 10/2001 to 12/2015 were identified from a prospective institutional database. Survival analyses based on the 8th UICC TNM edition were performed and rare TNM subgroups were reallocated based on survival. The impact of tumour grade on stage-specific survival was assessed and a TNMG staging system was developed.

RESULTS

The 8th UICC staging system accurately stratified prognosis except for comparable survival in stages IB (pT2N0M0) and IIA (pT3N0M0). Regrouping of pT3N0M0 and pT1N1M0 to IB and of pT1N2M0 to II resulted in a modified staging system with higher consistency. High tumour grade (G3&G4 vs G1&G2) was associated with a significantly shorter survival in all new stage groups except for stage IV modified UICC. A TNMG-based prognostic stage grouping in which high tumour grade results in grouping with tumours of the next higher pTNM-stage resulted in improvement of prognostication in non-metastatic pancreatic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The 8th edition of the UICC TNM staging system leaves room for improvement. A TNMG staging system with adjustments in group-allocation of specific rarely occurring pTNM subgroups and integration of tumour grade results in improved prognostic stratification.

CT-diagnosed extra-pancreatic extension of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a more reliable prognostic factor for survival than pathology-diagnosed extension

OBJECTIVES

To determine the correlation between CT-diagnosed extra-pancreatic extension of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), pathology-diagnosed extra-pancreatic extension, and survival in patients with PDAC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 87 patients with resected PDAC. Two radiologists evaluated negative ((i) tumours surrounded by the pancreatic parenchyma and (ii) tumours contacting the pancreatic surface) or positive ((iii) tumours with peri-pancreatic strand appearances and/or with expansive growth) CT-diagnosed extra-pancreatic extension. Clinical, pathological, and CT imaging characteristics predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Cox proportional-hazards models. Diagnostic accuracy for pathology-diagnosed extra-pancreatic extension was also assessed.

RESULTS

CT-diagnosed extra-pancreatic extension (42/87 tumours, 48.3%; κ = 0.82) had a higher hazard ratio (HR) for the DFS (HR, 5.30; p < 0.01) and OS (HR, 5.31; p < 0.01) rates than pathology-diagnosed extension in univariable analyses. It was also an independent prognostic factor for the DFS (HR, 4.22; p < 0.01) and OS (HR, 4.38; p < 0.01) rates in multivariable analyses. Of 45 tumours without CT-diagnosed extra-pancreatic extension, pathology-diagnosed extra-pancreatic extension was observed in 2/8 (25.0%) and 32/37 (86.5%) tumours with CT categories (i) and (ii), respectively. However, the differences in the survival rates between patients with CT categories (i) and (ii) were insignificant, although those in the latter category had significantly better survival rates than those with CT-diagnosed extra-pancreatic extension (category (iii)).

CONCLUSIONS

CT-diagnosed extra-pancreatic extension was a better prognostic factor than pathology-diagnosed extension and considered an independent factor for the postoperative DFS and OS rates with reasonable frequency and high reproducibility, despite the low diagnostic accuracy for predicting pathology-diagnosed extra-pancreatic extension.

KEY POINTS

• A CT-diagnosed extra-pancreatic extension had a higher hazard ratio for both disease-free survival and overall survival compared to pathology-diagnosed extension in univariable survival analyses. • A CT-diagnosed extra-pancreatic extension was a significant independent predictor of both disease-free survival and overall survival, as observed in multivariable survival analyses. • Patients with tumours contacting with the pancreatic surface on CT images (CT category (ii)) showed similar survival rates to those whose tumours were surrounded by the pancreatic parenchyma (CT category (i)), although many tumours with CT category (ii) extended pathologically beyond the pancreas.

CT Abnormalities of the Pancreas Associated With the Subsequent Diagnosis of Clinical Stage I Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma More Than One Year Later: A Case-Control Study

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is highly lethal, partly due to challenges in early diagnosis. However, the prognosis for earlier stages (carcinoma in situ or stage T1a invasive carcinoma) is relatively favorable. Objective: To investigate findings of an earlier diagnosis of PDAC on pre-diagnostic CT examinations performed at least one year before the diagnosis of clinical stage I PDAC. Methods: This retrospective study included 103 patients with clinical stage I PDAC and a pre-diagnostic CT at least one year before the CT that detected PDAC, as well as 103 control patients without PDAC on CT examinations separated by at least 10 years. The frequency and temporal characteristics of focal pancreatic abnormalities (pancreatic mass, main pancreatic duct (MPD) change, parenchymal atrophy, faint parenchymal enhancement, cyst, and parenchymal calcification) on pre-diagnostic CT examinations were determined. Results: A focal pancreatic abnormality was present on the most recent pre-diagnostic CT in 55/103 (53.4%) patients with PDAC versus 21/103 (20.4%) control patients (p<.001). In patients with PDAC, the most common focal abnormalities on pre-diagnostic CT were atrophy (39/103, 37.9%), faint enhancement (17/65, 26.2%), and MPD change (14/103, 13.6%), which were all more frequent in patients with PDAC than in control patients (p<.05). In 54/55 (98.2%) patients with PDAC, the PDAC corresponded with the site of a focal abnormality (exact location or the abnormality's upstream or downstream edge) on pre-diagnostic CT. Frequency of focal abnormalities decreased with increasing time before the CT that detected PDAC (1-2 years before diagnosis, 64.9%; 2-3 years, 49.2%; 3-5 years, 41.8%; 5-7 years, 29.7%; 7-10 years, 18.5%; over 10 years, 0%). Mean duration from the finding's initial appearance to diagnosis of PDAC was 4.6 years for atrophy, 3.3 years for faint enhancement, and 1.1 years for MPD change. Conclusion: Most patients with clinical stage I PDAC demonstrated focal pancreatic abnormalities on pre-diagnostic CT obtained at least one year before diagnosis. Focal MPD change exhibited the shortest duration from its development to subsequent diagnosis, where atrophy and faint enhancement exhibited a relatively prolonged course. Clinical impact: These findings could facilitate earlier PDAC diagnosis and thus improve prognosis.

A proposal to modify the 8th edition of the UICC staging system for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to validate and improve the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

Prognostic impact of the pathological tumor (pT) and lymph node (pN) stages between the 7th and 8th editions were compared using a single-center cohort of 311 patients who underwent curative pancreatic resection for PDAC.

RESULTS

Applying the 7th edition T staging system resulted in a clustering of pT3 cases (92.3%) and failed to show significant prognostic differences between the three pT stages. However, applying the 8th edition T staging system yielded a more even distribution and resulted in an excellent prognostic separation between the pT stages based on decreases in median survival (month [pT1: 69.4, pT2: 27.6, pT3: 16.7], p=0.001). In pN staging system, the 8th edition provided more precise prognostication in median survival (month [pN0: 41.7, pN1: 25.6, pN2: 14.4], p<0.001). Moreover, in the 8th edition pT2 category, patients with portal vein invasion (PVI) showed significantly worse survival than those without PVI (median survival months [without PVI: 38.2, with PVI: 17.1], p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 8th edition provides a more even distribution among stages and better stage discriminations compared to the 7th edition. The 8th edition pT2 category should be subdivided according to PVI status of the patient to allow for more precise patient prognostication.

Intra-pancreatic distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a common short and long-term prognosis?

The aim of the study was to compare histological features, postoperative outcomes, and long-term prognostic factors after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. From 2005 to 2017, 188 pancreaticoduodenectomies (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma n = 151, distal cholangiocarcinoma n = 37) were included. Postoperative outcomes were compared after matching on pancreatic gland texture and main pancreatic duct size. Matching according to tumor size, lymph node invasion and resection margin was used to compare overall and disease-free survival. Distal cholangiocarcinoma patients had more often "soft" pancreatic gland (P = 0.002) and small size main pancreatic duct (P = 0.001). Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients had larger tumors (P = 0.009), and higher lymph node ratio (P = 0.017). Severe morbidity (P = 0.023) and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (P = 0.018) were higher in distal cholangiocarcinoma patients. After matching on gland texture and main pancreatic duct diameter, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula was still more frequent in distal cholangiocarcinoma patients (P = 0.007). Tumor size > 20 mm was predictive of impaired overall survival (P = 0.024) and disease-free survival (P = 0.003), tumor differentiation (P = 0.027) was predictive of impaired overall survival. Survival outcomes for distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal cholangiocarcinoma were similar after matching patients according to tumor size, lymph node invasion and resection margin. Long-term outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients are similar. Postoperative course is more complicated after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. After pancreaticoduodenectomy, patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma have similar long-term oncological outcomes.

Variant anatomy of the biliary system as a cause of pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancers

BACKGROUND

The cause of most pancreatic and periampullary cancers (PAC) is unknown. Recently, anatomic variations such as pancreatobiliary maljunction have been recognized as risk factors, similar to Barrett-related gastro-esophageal cancers.

METHODS

Pre-operative MRI from 860 pancreatic/biliary resections, including 322 PACs, were evaluated for low-union (cystic duct joining the common hepatic duct inside of the pancreas or within 5 mm of the pancreatic border) RESULTS: Low-union, seen <10% of the population, was present in 44% of PACs (73% distal bile duct/cholangiocarcinoma, 42% pancreatic head, and 34% ampullary). It was significantly lower(11%) in conditions without connection to the ductal system (thus not exposed to the ductal/biliary tract contents), namely mucinous cystic neoplasms and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas(p < 0.0001). Intra-pancreatic type low-union was seen in 16% of PACs versus 2% of controls(p < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

This study establishes an association between low-union and PACs, and points to an anatomy-induced chemical/bilious carcinogenesis. This may explain why most pancreas cancers are in the head. It is possible that the same chemical milieu, caused by conditions other than low-union/insertion, may also play a role in the remaining half of PACs. This opens various treatment opportunities including milieu modifications (chemoprevention), focused screening of at-risk patients, and early detection with possible corrective actions.

The relationship between microscopic tumor size and CT tumor size in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the exact relationship between CT tumor size and the microscopic tumor size in PDAC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 310 patients with pathologically confirmed PDAC without preoperative adjuvant therapies who underwent CT examination from June 2016 and December 2018. Smooth curve fitting and a segmented regression model were used to analyze the threshold effect between CT tumor size and the microscopic tumor size.

RESULTS

The tumor size was 2.93±1.15 cm under the microscope and 3.00±1.23 cm in CT. The mean bias was 0.067 cm between CT and microscopic assessments. The accuracy of CT T stages was 61.02% (36/59), 79.41% (162/204) and 57.45% (27/47) in T1, T2 and T3, respectively. A non-linear relationship was detected between CT tumor size and the microscopic tumor size, with a turning point of 4.3 cm. On the left of the inflection point, the effect size, 95% confidence interval, and p value were 0.51, 0.40 to 0.63, and <0.0001, respectively. However, we observed no relationship between CT size and microscopic tumor size on the right of the inflection point (0.22, 0 to 0.44, 0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between CT and the microscopic tumor size is non-linear. When the CT tumor size was <4.3 cm, every 1-cm increase in CT tumor size was associated with a 0.56 cm increase in microscopic tumor size. When the CT tumor size was >4.3 cm, every 1-cm increase in CT tumor size was associated with a 0.91 cm increase in microscopic tumor size.

Subcategorizing T1 Staging in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Predicts Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database

Purpose: According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition, T1 staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) is defined as tumor limited to the pancreas, ≤2 cm. The AJCC 8th edition subcategorizes T1 staging into T1a (≤5 mm), T1b (≤1 cm), and T1c (≤2 cm) for PC despite the absence of supporting evidence. We sought to determine whether this new subcategorization has prognostic significance. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing definitive surgery for PC was performed by using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2014. Kaplan-Meier survival was computed for the subcategories. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed by using stepwise regression. Results: The NCDB captured 41,552 stages I and II patients who underwent definitive surgery for PC in this 10-year period. A total of 2090 of these patients were pathological T1N0. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients with T1a (n = 319), T1b (n = 296), and T1c (n = 1309) PC was 68.8%, 57%, and 46.6%, respectively. This subcategorization lost significance on MVA and when focused on T1N1-2 patients. Recategorizing T stage into T1a (≤1 cm) and T1b (≤2 cm) resulted in statistical significance on MVA. Conclusion: Subcategorization of the T1 stage into T1a, T1b, and T1c in resected PC does differentiate OS in patients with node-negative disease. We support the AJCC 8th edition T1 stage subcategorization, while understanding that it does not differentiate OS on MVA. When this is further subcategorized into T1a (≤1 cm) and T1b (≤2 cm), it predicts OS in resected, node-negative patients on MVA.

Microscopic size measurements in post-neoadjuvant therapy resections of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) predict patient outcomes

AIMS

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) are increasingly being treated with neoadjuvant therapy. However, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition T staging based on tumour size does not reflect treatment effect, which often results in multiple, small foci of residual tumour in a background of mass-forming fibrosis. Thus, we evaluated the performance of AJCC 8th edition T staging in predicting patient outcomes by the use of a microscopic tumour size measurement method.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and six post-neoadjuvant therapy pancreatectomies were reviewed, and all individual tumour foci were measured. T stages based on gross size with microscopic adjustment (GS) and the largest single microscopic focus size (MFS) were examined in association with clinicopathological variables and patient outcomes. Sixty-three of 106 (59%) were locally advanced; 78% received FOLFIRINOX treatment. The average GS and MFS were 25 mm and 11 mm, respectively; nine cases each were classified as T0, 35 and 85 cases as T1, 42 and 12 cases as T2, and 20 and 0 cases as T3, based on the GS and the MFS, respectively. Higher GS-based and MFS-based T stages were significantly associated with higher tumour regression grade, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, and higher N stage. Furthermore, higher MFS-based T stage was significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (P < 0.001) and shorter overall survival (OS) (P = 0.002). GS was significantly associated with OS (P = 0.046), but not with DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

In post-neoadjuvant therapy PDAC resections, MFS-based T staging is superior to GS-based T staging for predicting patient outcomes, suggesting that microscopic measurements have clinical utility beyond the conventional use of GS measurements alone.

Validation of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition of TNM staging in resected distal pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

In order to improve risk stratification and clinical management of the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) has published its eighth edition staging manual. Some major changes have been introduced in the new staging system for both T and N categories. Given the rarity of resectable disease, distal pancreatic cancer is likely underrepresented in the published clinical studies, and how the impact of the staging system actually reflects on to clinical outcomes remain unclear.

AIM

To validate the AJCC 8^th edition of TNM staging in distal PDAC.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in seven academic medical centers in the United States. Clinicopathological prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated through univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 454 patients were enrolled in the study, and were divided into 2 subgroups: Invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) (115 cases) and non-IPMN associated adenocarcinoma (339 cases). Compared to invasive IPMN, non-IPMN associated adenocarcinomas are more common in relatively younger patients, have larger tumor size, are more likely to have positive lymph nodes, and are associated with a higher tumor (T) stage and nodal (N) stage, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor recurrence, and a worse PFS and OS. The cohort was predominantly categorized as stage 3 per AJCC 7^th edition staging manual, and it’s more evenly distributed based on 8^th edition staging manual. T and N staging of both 7^th and 8^th edition sufficiently stratify PFS and OS in the entire cohort, although dividing into N1 and N2 according to the 8^th edition does not show additional stratification. For PDAC arising in IPMN, T staging of the 7^th edition and N1/N2 staging of the 8^th edition appear to further stratify PFS and OS. For PDAC without an IPMN component, T staging from both versions fails to stratify PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

The AJCC 8^th edition TNM staging system provides even distribution for the T staging, however, it does not provide better risk stratification than previous staging system for distal pancreatic cancer.

Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer based on the 8th edition of AJCC guidelines

Background

Preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer determines the choice of treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system was revised to its 8^th version in 2016, there has been no report correlating the 8^th edition of the AJCC TNM staging with preoperative MRI examinations and pathological findings. The purpose of our study is to determine the staging accuracy and evaluate the resectability by using MRI about pancreatic cancer compared with intraoperative or pathological findings according to the 8^th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system.

Methods

One hundred thirty-two patients with a pathological diagnosis of pancreatic cancer who underwent preoperative MRI were identified. The clinical data, MRI findings and pathological findings were analyzed. Preoperative MRI staging and resectability evaluation were compared with pathological findings. The accuracy of MRI for preoperative T and N staging was evaluated, and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI in evaluating the resectability were assessed. All the staging and resectability assessments were according to the 8^th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system.

Results

Analysis showed that the accuracy of MRI for evaluation of the T and N stages was 82.6% (109/132) and 74.2% (98/132), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI in assessing the resectability were 94.2% and 71.4%, respectively. Integrating the 8^th edition of the AJCC TNM stage, no significant differences were identified between the preoperative MRI and pathological results for the staging of pancreatic cancer (P=0.805).

Conclusions

MRI is highly accurate for T staging and moderately accurate for N staging. MRI provides important preoperative evaluation of the stage and resectability of pancreatic cancer based on the 8^th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: quantitative CT features are correlated with fibrous stromal fraction and help predict outcome after resection

OBJECTIVES

To identify quantitative imaging features of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) that may be prognostically favorable after resection of smaller (≤ 30 mm) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) located at head.

METHODS

This retrospective study included two independent cohorts (discovery cohort, n = 212; test cohort, n = 100) of patients who underwent resection of head PDACs ≤ 30 mm and preoperative CE-CT. We examined tumor and surrounding parenchymal attenuation differences (deltas), and tumor attenuation changes across phases (ratios). Semantic features of PDACs were evaluated by two radiologists. Clinicopathologic and imaging features for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed via multivariate Lasso-penalized Cox proportional-hazards models. Survival rates were derived by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Imaging features achieved C-indices of 0.766 (discovery cohort) and 0.739 (test cohort) for DFS, and 0.790 (discovery cohort) and 0.772 (test cohort) for OS estimates through incorporation of clinicopathologic features. The most decisive imaging feature was delta 3, denoting attenuation differences between tumor and surrounding pancreas at pancreatic phase (DFS: HR = 2.122; OS: HR = 2.375; both p < 0.001). Compared with inconspicuous (low-delta-3, < 28 HU) tumors, conspicuous (high-delta-3) tumors correlated significantly with more aggressive histologic grades (p = 0.014) and less extensive tumor fibrous stromal fractions (p < 0.001). Patients with low-delta-3 tumors ≤ 20 mm experienced the most favorable outcomes (DFS, 36 months; OS, 42 months), whereas those with high-delta-3 tumors fared poorly, regardless of tumor size (DFS, 12 months; OS, 19 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantifiable CT imaging features reflect heterogeneous fibrous stromal fractions and histologic grades of PDAC at head locations that help stratify patients with disparate clinical outcomes.

KEY POINTS

• Quantitative and semantic imaging features achieved promising results for the prognosis of resected PDAC (≤ 30 mm) at head location, through incorporation of clinicopathologic features. • Attenuation difference at tumor-parenchyma interface (delta 3) emerged as the most decisive imaging feature, enabling further stratification of patients into distinct prognostic subtypes by tumor size. • High delta 3 signifies sharper contrast between tumor and surrounding pancreas, correlating with more aggressive histologic grades and less extensive tumor fibrous stromal fractions.

Gross tumor size using the AJCC 8th ed. T staging criteria does not provide prognostic stratification for neoadjuvant treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

The 8th edition AJCC T stage criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are now size based. These criteria provide better prognostic stratification in patients without neoadjuvant therapy. Our aim was to determine if gross tumor size is prognostically significant using the 8th ed. staging criteria for neoadjuvant treated PDAC. The study included 289 patients who underwent resection for PDAC following neoadjuvant therapy. By AJCC 7th ed., there were 12 (4.2%) ypT0, 32 (11.1%) ypT1, 64 (22.1%) ypT2, and 181 (62.6%) ypT3 patients. By AJCC 8th ed., there were 12 (4.2%) ypT0, 74 (25.6%) ypT1 (6 ypT1a, 1 ypT1b, 67 ypT1c), 161 (55.7%) ypT2, and 42 (14.5%) ypT3 patients. 182 patients had negative lymph nodes and 107 had positive lymph nodes. 77 patients were ypN1 and 30 were ypN2 by 8th ed. criteria. 7th ed. T stage significantly correlated with OS (p = 0.048), while 8th ed. T stage did not correlate with OS (p = 0.13). In ypN0 patients, neither the 7th ed. or 8th ed. T stages significantly correlated with patient OS (p = 0.065 and 0.26, respectively). Higher 7th ed. T stage correlated with lymph node status (p ≤ 0.001) more strongly than 8th ed. T stage (p = 0.04). 7th ed. and 8th ed. N stage correlated with OS (p = 0.004 and p = 0.0002, respectively). By 8th ed. AJCC staging criteria, gross tumor size does not provide good prognostic stratification in neoadjuvant therapy PDAC. Mapped grossing techniques combining gross and microscopic examination to determine tumor size may provide more accurate staging of neoadjuvant treated tumors.

Preoperative prediction of futile surgery in patients with radiologically resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of this study is to identify the predictive factors for futile surgery in patients with radiologically resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and to develop a prediction model.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent pancreatic surgery for pancreatic cancer between 2006 and 2017. To identify independent risk factors for futile surgery, logistic regression and random forest analyses were performed in the training cohort, based on which a nomogram was established. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were validated in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

Of 389 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery, the laparotomy was futile in 40 patients (10.3%). In the training cohort, the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level of ≥ 150 U/mL (P = 0.003), the presence of suspicious lymph node (P = 0.013), and more extensive peripancreatic tumor infiltration (P < 0.001) were independent predictive factors for futile surgery. The bootstrap-corrected concordance index of the nomogram was high in the training cohort, 0.826 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.745-0.907. This model also showed a good discriminative performance in the validation cohort, with a concordance index of 0.831.

CONCLUSIONS

We established and validated a novel nomogram that predicts the risk of futile surgery due to occult distant metastasis in patients with radiologically resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

White paper on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from society of abdominal radiology's disease-focused panel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Part I, AJCC staging system, NCCN guidelines, and borderline resectable disease

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive gastrointestinal malignancy with a poor 5-year survival rate. Accurate staging of PDAC is an important initial step in the development of a stage-specific treatment plan. Different staging systems/consensus statements convened by different societies and academic practices are currently used. The most recent version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor/node/metastases (TNM) staging system for PDAC has shifted its focus from guiding management to assessing prognosis. In order to preoperatively define the resectability of PDAC and to guide management, additional classification systems have been developed. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, one of the most commonly used systems, provide recommendations on the management and the determination of resectability for PDAC. The NCCN divides PDAC into three categories of resectability based on tumor-vessel relationship: 'resectable,' 'borderline resectable,' and 'unresectable'. Among these, the borderline disease category is of special interest given its evolution over time and the resulting variations in the definition and the associated recommendations for management between different societies. It is important to be familiar with the evolving criteria, and treatment and follow-up recommendations for PDAC. In this article, the most current AJCC staging (8th edition), NCCN guidelines (version 2.2019-April 9, 2019), and challenges and controversies in borderline resectable PDAC are reviewed.

Is the New T1 Category as Defined in the Eighth Edition of the AJCC Pancreatic Cancer Staging System an Improvement?

BACKGROUND

The new T1 pancreatic cancer by the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system discards the concept of "extension beyond the pancreas" and focuses on size only. Furthermore, the new T1 is divided into T1a, T1b, and T1c based on size. The evidence pertaining to these changes has not been evaluated. This is to evaluate the feasibility of the new T1 definition in the pancreas head cancer cohort.

METHODS

Data from 540 patients with T1 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma as defined by the eighth edition were collected from Korea, Japan, and the USA. Invasive IPMNs were excluded. Survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 540 patients, 181 patients were T1 according to the seventh edition and 359 were down-staged to T1 from the former T3 because the concept of "extension beyond the pancreas" was discarded. The 5-year survival rate and the median survival of T1 patients were 30.6% and 27 months, respectively. Comparing tumors that extend beyond the pancreas (new T1) and those confined within the pancreas (original T1), the latter showed significantly longer median survival (43 vs. 24 months, p < 0.001). In terms of T1a/b/c, there were no significant differences in survival. Using MaxStat, subdividing into two groups using 1.1 cm as the cut-off value, yielded significantly discrete prognostic groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The new T1 definition may be more practical, but the implications of the concept of "extension beyond the pancreas" should be re-investigated. Further, the subcategorization of T1a/b/c may not be adequate and may require revision or deletion.

Proposed Modification of the 8th Edition of the AJCC Staging System for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to improve the 8th edition (8th) of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

BACKGROUND

The new 8th AJCC staging system for PDAC was released in October, 2016, and will be applied in clinical practice in 2018.

METHODS

Two large cohorts were included in this analysis. One consisted of 45,856 PDAC patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2014), and the other consisted of 3166 PDAC patients in the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) database (2005-2015).

RESULTS

Using the 8th AJCC staging system, the median overall survival of the patients in the same stage varied widely among the different substages. We proposed a modified staging system based on median OS in which we maintained the T, N, and M definitions, but regrouped the substages. In the SEER cohort, the concordance index was higher for local disease with the modified staging system [0.637; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.631-0.642] than with the 8th AJCC staging system (0.620, 95% CI 0.615-0.626). Similar findings were also observed in the FUSCC cohort. In addition, we verified the reliability of the modified staging system in an analysis of patients with different examined lymph node counts (≥15 or 1-14).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified 8th AJCC staging system for PDAC proposed in this study provides improvements and may be evaluated for potential adoption in the next edition.