Grade 3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Refractory to Chemotherapy Successfully Treated with Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Leading to Conversion Surgery

A 59-year-old woman was diagnosed with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (P-NET; grade 3, Ki67: 25%) with multiple liver and lymph node metastases and started chemotherapy with streptozosin (500 mg/m2/day) in combination with lanreotide acetate (120 mg). After six courses of (daily) streptozosin, the patient had progressive disease, as assessed by computed tomography (CT), and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) was started as second-line treatment. As PRRT was remarkably successful and the tumor shrank, surgery was performed to resect the primary pancreatic tumor, liver metastases, and lymph node metastases. CT evaluation performed six months after the surgery showed a complete response.

Surgery enhances the effectiveness of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

With the advent of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, the timing and sequence of surgery in the treatment of metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors merits further study. We hypothesized that surgery before peptide receptor radionuclide therapy might enhance its effectiveness in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with metastatic well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with 177Lutetium-dotatate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy between 2018 and 2023 were included. Fifty-six patients underwent surgery (primary tumor resection and/or liver debulking) before peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and 33 patients did not. Primary outcome was progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Pretreatment dotatate positron emission tomography/computed tomography was used to calculate tumor volumes.

RESULTS

The surgery and no-surgery groups were well-matched. Median progression-free survival after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy was 15.6 months (interquartile range, 9.1-22.7 months) in the no-surgery group compared with 26.1 months (interquartile range, 12.7-38.1 months) in the surgery group (P = .04). On subgroup analysis, median progression-free survival was 18.1 months (interquartile range, 11.9-38.4 months) in patients who underwent primary tumor resection only compared with 26.2 months (interquartile range, 14.0-38.1 months) in patients who underwent liver debulking (P = .04). Tumor volume was lowest in patients who underwent liver debulking (median 146.07 mL3) compared with no surgery (median 626.42 mL3) (P = .001). On univariable analysis, a tumor volume <138.8 mL3 was associated with longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-4.34, P = .05), with a median progression-free survival of 38.1 months (interquartile range, 16.9-41.3 months) compared with 17.8 months (interquartile range, 10.8-28.7 months).

CONCLUSION

Surgery may enhance the effectiveness of 177Lutetium-dotatate in the treatment of metastatic well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This positive effect may be the result of a lower tumor volume in patients after surgery. Our findings fortify the concept of using surgical debulking to improve systemic therapies such as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Improves Survival in Patients Who Progress After Resection of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective treatment for advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We investigated a 2-decade experience with PRRT to determine whether PRRT confers a survival advantage to patients who progress after surgery versus other therapies.

METHODS

We identified patients from our clinic who had resection/cytoreduction of GEP-NETs, then disease progression by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), calculated from progression after surgery (no-PRRT group) or the start of PRRT. Cox regression with time-dependent covariates controlled for immortal time bias and other confounders.

RESULTS

Overall, 237 patients progressed after surgery; 95 received PRRT and 142 did not. No differences existed in sex, T or N stage, tumor grade/differentiation, primary site, or time to progression; 94% of PRRT patients had metastases at diagnosis versus 77% in the no-PRRT group. Median PFS was longer in the PRRT group versus the no-PRRT group (32.4 vs. 11.0 months, p < 0.001), as was median OS (49.8 vs. 38.4 months; p = 0.009). In subgroup analysis, the PRRT group had improved PFS in small bowel NETs and pancreatic NETs. Time-dependent covariate analysis revealed a lower risk of death associated with PRRT (hazard ratio 0.61, p = 0.028) after adjusting for sex, age, M stage, tumor grade, and primary site.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection and cytoreduction is an effective treatment for patients with GEP-NETs, but most patients with metastatic disease develop recurrent disease. Surgery followed by PRRT after progression conferred superior PFS and OS over no PRRT/other therapies, and is an effective strategy for managing patients with GEP-NETs.

Advances in Management of Nonfunctional Pancreas Neuroendocrine Tumors

This article presents updates in the surgical management of non-functional sporadic pancreas neuroendocrine tumors NET, including considerations for assessment of biologic behavior to support decision-making, indications for surgery, and surgical approaches tailored to the unique nature of neuroendocrine tumors.

Surgical Management and Long-Term Evaluation of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) arise from neuroendocrine cells and are a rare class of heterogenous tumors with increasing incidence. The diagnosis, staging, treatment, and prognosis of PNETs depend heavily on identifying the histologic features and biological mechanisms. Here, the authors provide an overview of the diagnostic workup (biomarkers and imaging), grade, and staging of PNETs. The authors also explore associated genetic mutations and molecular pathways and describe updated guidelines on surgical and systemic treatment modalities.

Critical appraisal of the adequacy of surgical indications for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

The lack of preoperative prognostic factors to accurately predict tumour aggressiveness in non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours may result in inappropriate management decisions. This study aimed to critically evaluate the adequacy of surgical treatment in patients with resectable non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours and investigate preoperative features of surgical appropriateness.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent curative surgery for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours at San Raffaele Hospital (2002-2022). The appropriateness of surgical treatment was categorized as appropriate, potential overtreatment and potential undertreatment based on histologic features of aggressiveness and disease relapse within 1 year from surgery (early relapse).

RESULTS

A total of 384 patients were included. Among them, 230 (60%) received appropriate surgical treatment, whereas the remaining 154 (40%) underwent potentially inadequate treatment: 129 (34%) experienced potential overtreatment and 25 (6%) received potential undertreatment. The appropriateness of surgical treatment was significantly associated with radiological tumour size (P < 0.001), tumour site (P = 0.012), surgical technique (P < 0.001) and year of surgical resection (P < 0.001). Surgery performed before 2015 (OR 2.580, 95% c.i. 1.570 to 4.242; P < 0.001), radiological tumour diameter < 25.5 mm (OR 6.566, 95% c.i. 4.010 to 10.751; P < 0.001) and pancreatic body/tail localization (OR 1.908, 95% c.i. 1.119 to 3.253; P = 0.018) were identified as independent predictors of potential overtreatment. Radiological tumour size was the only independent determinant of potential undertreatment (OR 0.291, 95% c.i. 0.107 to 0.791; P = 0.016). Patients subjected to potential undertreatment exhibited significantly poorer disease-free survival (P < 0.001), overall survival (P < 0.001) and disease-specific survival (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Potential overtreatment occurs in nearly one-third of patients undergoing surgery for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Tumour diameter emerges as the sole variable capable of predicting the risk of both potential surgical overtreatment and undertreatment.

Pathological complete response of initially unresectable multiple liver metastases achieved using combined peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and somatostatin analogs following pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor resection: a case report

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) serves as a novel and effective treatment option for somatostatin receptor-positive unresectable liver metastases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). However, there are few reported cases of surgical resection for initially unresectable liver metastases of PNET that were converted to resectable after PRRT. Here we report a case where PRRT and somatostatin analogs (SSAs) led to a pathological complete response of initially unresectable multiple liver metastases following PNET resection.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 52-year-old man underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for PNET at age 40 and subsequent hepatectomies for resectable liver metastases at 44 and 47 years of age. At age 48, a follow-up examination revealed unresectable multiple liver metastases, and PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy was initiated. After four cycles of PRRT, most liver metastases diminished according to imaging studies, and the remaining two hepatic lesions continued to shrink with additional lanreotide. Conversion surgery for liver metastases was successfully performed, revealing no viable tumor cells in tissue specimens. Seventeen months after surgery, imaging showed no detectable residual tumor or recurrence. We present a review of the relevant literature that highlights the significance of our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

This rare case highlights the pathological complete response of initially unresectable multiple liver metastases achieved by PRRT and SSAs following PNET resection, suggesting their potential as a multimodality treatment option for unresectable PNET.

Recurring Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: Timing and Pattern of Recurrence and Current Treatment

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe the pattern of recurrence, treatments received, as well the oncological outcomes, of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) following curative surgery.

BACKGROUND

PanNETs recur in 10% to 15% of cases following surgery. Information on the natural history and management of recurring disease is lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with PanNET that underwent curative surgery at 4 institutions between 2000 and 2019 were identified. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors, unknown tumor grade and differentiation, hereditary syndromes, unknown margin or R2 status, metastatic, and those that had neoadjuvant treatment or perioperative mortality were excluded. Clinical variables were assessed including first site of recurrence, treatment received, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 1402 patients were included: 957 (74%) had grade 1, 322 (25%) had grade 2, and 13 (1%) had grade 3 tumors. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (interquartile range: 2-8.2 years). Cumulative incidence of recurrence at 5 years was 13% (95% CI: 11%-15.2%) for distant disease, 1.4% (95% CI: 0.8%-2.3%) for locoregional recurrence, and 0.8% (95% CI: 0.4%-1.5%) for abdominal nodal recurrence. Patients who recurred had 2.89 increased risk of death (95% CI: 2-4.1) as compared with patients who did not recur. Therapy postrecurrence included: somatostatin analogs in 111 (61.0%), targeted therapies in 48 (26.4%), liver-directed therapies in 61 (33.5%), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in 30 (16.5%), and surgery in 46 (25.3%) patients. Multiple treatments were used in 103 (57%) cases. After the first recurrence, 5-year overall survival was 74.6% (95% CI: 67.4%-82.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence following surgery is infrequent but reduces survival. Most recurrences are distant and managed with multiple therapies. Prospective studies are needed to establish strategies for surveillance and the sequence of treatment to control the disease and prolong survival.

Diagnostic Approaches for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Unknown Primary (NEN-UPs) and Their Prognostic Relevance-A Retrospective, Long-Term Single-Center Experience

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a rare and heterogenous group of tumors with predominantly gastroenteropancreatic or pulmonary origin. Despite numerous diagnostic efforts, the primary tumor site remains unknown in up to 20% of the patients diagnosed with NEN. In this subgroup of NEN patients, a standard diagnostic algorithm has not yet been integrated into clinical routine. Of note, an undetermined primary tumor site in NENs is associated with an impaired clinical outcome by at least "formally" limiting treatment options exclusively approved for NENs of a certain histological origin. In this retrospective study, a patient cohort of 113 patients initially diagnosed with NEN of unknown primary (NEN-UP) was analyzed. In 13 patients (11.5%) a primary tumor site could be identified subsequently, amongst others, by performing somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-PET-based imaging, which was irrespective of the initial clinical or demographic features. Diagnostic work-up and therapeutic regimens did not differ significantly between patients with an identified or unidentified primary tumor site; only a detailed immunohistochemical assessment providing additional information on the tumor origin proved to be significantly associated with the detection of a primary tumor site. Our study revealed that a profound diagnostic work-up, particularly including SSTR-PET-based imaging, leads to additional treatment options, finally resulting in significantly improved clinical outcomes for patients with NEN-UPs.

Light It Up! The Use of DOTATATE in Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Radiolabeled somatostatin analogs are increasingly used in the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Diagnostic imaging with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT has demonstrated the improved sensitivity in detecting primary and metastatic neuroendocrine lesions compared with conventional imaging and prior generation somatostatin receptor imaging. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE is now frequently included in the management of neuroendocrine neoplasms, with prospective randomized control studies demonstrating its beneficial impact on survival and quality of life. Nonetheless, peptide rector radionuclide therapy is still considered palliative rather than curative and may be accompanied by adverse effects.

Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of Everolimus in Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Objective The effectiveness of everolimus for the management of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs), including the G3/NEC types, remains unclear. We therefore investigated the effectiveness of the drug for the management of PNENs. Methods We analyzed the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) associated with everolimus and factors influencing the PFS and OS. Results One hundred patients were evaluated. The PFS associated with the G1/G2 types tended to be significantly longer than that associated with the G3/NEC types [hazard ratio (HR), 0.45; p=0.005]. A multivariate analysis showed that the significant factors influencing the PFS were age (<65 years old; HR, 0.44; p=0.002), grade (G1/G2; HR, 0.42; p=0.006), everolimus treatment line (≤2nd; HR, 0.55; p=0.031), and presence of treatment with metformin (yes; HR, 0.29; p=0.044). The median OS was 63.8 months. In the multivariate analysis, the significant factors influencing the OS were grade (G1/G2; HR, 0.21; p<0.001), volume of liver metastasis (≤25%; HR, 0.27; p<0.001), everolimus treatment line (≤2nd; HR, 0.27; p<0.001), and presence of primary tumor resection (yes; HR, 0.33; p=0.005). Conclusion The effectiveness of everolimus in the management of G3/NEC types and prognoses tended to be poorer than those associated with the G1/G2 types. Everolimus combined with metformin and early-line treatment with everolimus may be effective for managing advanced PNENs.

Surgery, Liver Directed Therapy and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are described by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification by grade (1–3) and degree of differentiation. Grade 1 and 2; well differentiated PNETs are often characterized as relatively “indolent” tumors for which locoregional therapies have been shown to be effective for palliation of symptom control and prolongation of survival even in the setting of advanced disease. The treatment of liver metastases includes surgical and non-surgical modalities with varying degrees of invasiveness; efficacy; and risk. Most of these modalities have not been prospectively compared. This paper reviews literature that has been published on treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases using surgery; liver directed embolization and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Surgery is associated with the longest survival in patients with resectable disease burden. Liver-directed (hepatic artery) therapies can sometimes convert patients with borderline disease into candidates for surgery. Among the three embolization modalities; the preponderance of data suggests chemoembolization offers superior radiographic response compared to bland embolization and radioembolization; but all have similar survival. PRRT was initially approved as salvage therapy in patients with advanced disease that was not amenable to resection or embolization; though the role of PRRT is evolving rapidly

A Nomogram to Accurately Identify Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Metastasizing to Distant Organs: A Study Based on Two National Population-Based Cohorts From the United States and China

Background:

Distant organ metastasis is the leading cause of death in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) patients. In the present study, we aimed to develop and validate a nomogram that could accurately identify pNET metastasizing to distant organs.

Methods:

The cases extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were assigned to the training cohort and validation cohort. The cases from the Chinese Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors program were assigned to the external validation cohort. The strategy was developed with the support of a nomogram, and the predictive value of this strategy was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results:

In total, 2024 American cases were involved in the present study. Besides, 1450 and 574 patients were allocated into training and internal validation cohorts, respectively. In addition, 122 Chinese patients were assigned to the external validation cohort. The results of the univariate logistic regression analysis suggested that tumor grade, tumor size, and the number of metastatic lymph nodes were the risk of metastasis to distant organs, and these 3 clinicopathological characteristics were used to develop the nomogram. We observed that the accuracy of the nomogram for predicting metastasis to distant organs was 0.797, 0.819, and 0.837 in the training cohort, internal validation cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively.

Conclusions:

A predictive nomogram was developed and validated, and it showed an acceptable performance in predicting metastasis to distant organs. The results will enable clinicians to identify pNETs, metastasizing to distant organs, and develop an effective individualized therapeutic strategy for these patients.

The Role of Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors With Liver Metastases

Background

Liver metastases (LMs) are common in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) patients. Currently, the benefit of primary tumor resection (PTR) in the setting of PNET patients with liver metastases is still controversial in several guidelines.

Methods

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to evaluate this issue. The main index of interest in our study was overall survival time.

Results

Information on 536 PNET patients with liver metastases from the SEER database was identified. A total of 214 patients (PTR group) received primary tumor resection, and more than half of them (132 patients) had synchronous LM resection. The other 322 PNET patients (non-PTR group) with liver metastases did not receive primary tumor resection. A significant survival benefit was gained from PTR when compared with non-PTR patients, both in OS (72.93 ± 2.7 vs. 36.80 ± 2.22 months) and 3- or 5-year survival rates (75.1% vs. 28.9% and 67.9% vs. 22.3%, respectively). No difference was found between PTR alone and PTR with synchronous LM resection. From univariate and multivariate analyses, younger age (<65 years) and good or moderate tumor differentiation may be more important when considering primary tumor resection. However, we found that all grades of tumor differentiation could result in a better overall survival time after primary tumor resection.

Conclusion

Our study suggested that primary tumor resection in pancreatic neuroendocrine patients with liver metastases could result in a longer survival time. Primary tumor resection with synchronous liver metastasis resection was not related to a better survival benefit. This treatment strategy may routinely be taken into consideration in these patients.

Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies

Simple Summary

Tumor resistance, both primary and acquired, is leading to increased complexity in the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs, which would be greatly helped by reliable prognostic/predictive factors. The importance in identifying resistance is being contributed to by the increased array of possible treatments available for treating resistant advanced disease; the variable clinical course as well as response to any given treatment approach of patients within one staging or grading system, the advances in imaging which are providing increasing promising results/parameters that correlate with grading/outcome/resistance, the increased understanding of the molecular pathogenesis providing promising prognostic markers, all of which can contribute to selecting the best treatment to overcome resistance disease. Several factors have been identified that have prognostic/predictive value for identifying development resistant disease and affecting overall survival (OS)/PFS with various nonsurgical treatments of patients with advanced panNENs. Prognostic factors identified for patients with advanced panNENs for both OS/PFSs include various clinically-related factors (clinical, laboratory/biological markers, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors. Particularly important prognostic factors for the different treatment modalities studies are the recent grading systems. Most prognostic factors for each treatment modality for OS/PFS are not specific for a given treatment option. These advances have generated several controversies and new unanswered questions, particularly those related to their possible role in predicting the possible sequence of different anti-tumor treatments in patients with different presentations. Each of these areas is reviewed in this paper.

Abstract

Purpose: Recent advances in the diagnosis, management and nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) have led to an emerging need for sensitive and useful prognostic factors for predicting responses/survival. Areas covered: The predictive value of a number of reported prognostic factors including clinically-related factors (clinical/laboratory/imaging/treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological/classification/grading), and molecular factors, on therapeutic outcomes of anti-tumor medical therapies with molecular targeting agents (everolimus/sunitinib/somatostatin analogues), chemotherapy, radiological therapy with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, or liver-directed therapies (embolization/chemoembolization/radio-embolization (SIRTs)) are reviewed. Recent findings in each of these areas, as well as remaining controversies and uncertainties, are discussed in detail, particularly from the viewpoint of treatment sequencing. Conclusions: The recent increase in the number of available therapeutic agents for the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs have raised the importance of prognostic factors predictive for therapeutic outcomes of each treatment option. The establishment of sensitive and useful prognostic markers will have a significant impact on optimal treatment selection, as well as in tailoring the therapeutic sequence, and for maximizing the survival benefit of each individual patient. In the paper, the progress in this area, as well as the controversies/uncertainties, are reviewed.

Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Radiolabeled Peptides-Where Are We Now

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been one of the most successful and exciting examples of theranostics in nuclear medicine in recent decades and is now firmly embedded in many treatment algorithms for unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) worldwide. It is widely considered to be an effective treatment for well- or moderately differentiated neoplasms, which express high levels of somatostatin receptors that can be selectively targeted. This review article outlines the scientific basis of PRRT in treatment of NENs and describes its discovery dating back to the early 1990s. Early treatments utilizing Indium-111, a γ-emitter, showed promise in reduction in tumor size and improvement in biochemistry, but were also met with high radiation doses and myelotoxic and nephrotoxic effects. Subsequently, stable conjugation of DOTA-peptides with β-emitting radionuclides, such as Yttrium-90 and Lutetium-177, served as a breakthrough for PRRT and studies highlighted their potential in eliciting progression-free survival and quality of life benefits. This article will also elaborate on the key trials which paved the way for its approval and will discuss therapeutic considerations, such as patient selection and administration technique, to optimize its use.

What Are the Place and Modalities of Surgical Management for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms? A Narrative Review

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors derived from cells with neuroendocrine differentiation. They are considered malignant by default. However, their outcomes are variable depending on their presentation in the onset of hereditary syndromes, hormonal secretion, grading, and extension. Therefore, although surgical treatment has long been suggested as the only treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, its modalities are an evolving landscape. For selected patients (small, localized, non-functional panNENs), a "wait and see" strategy is suggested, as it is in the setting of multiple neuroendocrine neoplasia type 1, but the accurate size cut-off remains to be established. Parenchyma-sparring pancreatectomy, aiming to limit pancreatic insufficiency, are also emerging procedures, which place beyond the treatment of insulinomas and small non-functional panNENs (in association with lymph node picking) remains to be clarified. Furthermore, giving the fact that the liver is generally the only metastatic site, surgery keeps a place of choice alongside medical therapies in the treatment of metastatic disease, but its modalities and extensions are still a matter of debate. This narrative review aims to describe the current recommended surgical management for pancreatic NENs and controversies in light of the actual recommendations and recent literature.

PRRT: identikit of the perfect patient

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been strengthened since the publication of NETTER-1. Nevertheless, the correct positioning in the therapeutic algorithm is debated, and no optimal sequence has yet been standardized. Possible criteria to predict the response to PRRT in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) have been proposed. The aim of this review is to define the perfect identity of the eligible patient who can mostly benefit from this therapy. Possible predictive criteria which have been analysed were: primary tumor site, grading, tumor burden, FDG PET and ⁶⁸Ga-PET uptake. Primary tumor site and ⁶⁸Ga-PET uptake do not play a pivotal role in predicting the response, while tumor burden, FDG PET uptake and grading seem to represent predictive/prognostic factors for response to PRRT. The heterogeneity in trial designs, patient populations, type of radionuclides, previous therapies and measurement of outcomes, inevitably limits the strength of our conclusions, therefore care must be taken in applying these results to clinical practice. In conclusion, the perfect patient, selected by ⁶⁸Ga-PET uptake, will likely have a relatively limited liver tumor burden, a ki67 index <20% and will respond to PRRT irrespective to primary tumor. Nevertheless, we have mostly prognostic than predictive factors to predict the efficacy of PRRT in individual patients, while a promising tool could be the NETest. However, to date, the identikit of the perfect patient for PRRT is a puzzle without some pieces and still we cannot disregard a multidisciplinary discussion of the individual case to select the patients who will mostly benefit from PRRT.

Prior Resection of the Primary Tumor Prolongs Survival After Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy of Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare impact on survival after resection of primary tumors (PTs) after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

BACKGROUND

PRRT is a highly effective therapeutic option to treat locally advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 889 patients with advanced NEN (G1-G3, stage IV) treated with at least 1 cycle of PRRT. In 486 of 889 patients (55%, group 1), PT had been removed before PRRT. Group 2 constituted 403 patients (45%) with no prior PT resection. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined by 68Ga SSTR-PET/CT in all patients applying RECIST and EORTC.

RESULTS

Most patients had their PT in pancreas (n = 335; 38%) and small intestine (n = 284; 32%). Both groups received a mean of 4 cycles of PRRT (P = 0.835) with a mean cumulative administered radioactivity of 21.6 ± 11.7 versus 22.2 ± 11.2 GBq (P = 0.407). Median OS in group 1 was 134.0 months [confidence interval (CI): 118-147], whereas OS in group 2 was 67.0 months (CI: 60-80; hazard ratio 2.79); P < 0.001. Likewise, the median progression-free survival after first PRRT was longer in group 1 with 18.0 (CI: 15-20) months as compared to group 2 with 14.0 (CI: 15-18; hazard ratio 1.21) months; P = 0.012.

CONCLUSIONS

A previous resection of the PT before PRRT provides a significant survival benefit in patients with NENs stage IV.

Current status of medical treatment for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and future perspectives

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) constitute a heterogeneous group of tumors. In this review, we summarize the results of various clinical trials that have been conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of various therapeutic options for NENs. Based on the encouraging results obtained from these trials, various therapeutic options have been established for the treatment of NENs, including somatostatin analogs (SSAs), molecularly targeted drugs and cytotoxic agents. In addition, peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy has recently been evaluated for the treatment of various NENs. We also discuss the approach for selecting the appropriate drugs and sequence of treatment with the various drug classes, as recommended by different treatment guidelines. Finally, we discuss the scope for future research in this field, especially into the merits of combination therapy with molecularly targeted drugs plus SSAs, along with ongoing studies.

Neuroendocrine Tumor Theranostics: An Update and Emerging Applications in Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE. Theranostics have shown great promise for delivering precision medicine, particularly in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The clinical applications of radiolabeled somatostatin analogues in imaging and radionuclide therapy have been rapidly increasing over the past 2 decades and are currently integrated into the management guidelines of NETs. This article summarizes the available literature on different somatostatin receptor-targeting radiopharmaceuticals with theranostic potential in NETs, pheochromocytomas, and paragangliomas. We discuss the clinical application, administration, and toxicity of recent FDA-approved radionuclide therapies, including ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE in advanced gastroenteropancreatic NETs and ¹³¹I-MIBG in advanced paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. CONCLUSION. Several studies support the safety and clinical efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapies in disease control and quality-of-life improvement in patients with NETs and report potential benefits of combined radionuclide treatment approaches. The utility and pitfalls of functional imaging in therapy response assessment and surveillance of NETs remain to be established.

A combination of surgery, theranostics, and liquid biopsy - a personalised oncologic approach to treatment of patients with advanced metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Rationale: Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) of small bowel (SBNEN) frequently present with metastatic disease. Theranostics (molecular imaging followed by targeting therapy) allow for personalised medicine. Liquid biopsies enable precise identification of residual disease and real-time monitoring of therapeutic response. Our aim was to determine the clinical utility of a combination of surgery, theranostics, and a multigene blood measurement in metastasised SBNEN. Methods: Inclusion criteria were SBNEN, G1/G2 NEN, initial tumour diagnosis, stage IV NEN, positivity on 68Ga somatostatin analogue PET/CT, eligible for surgery, and 177Lu peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Blood samples for NETest were collected longitudinally. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. NETest results were assessed prior to surgery and during clinical follow-up. Results: A surgical cohort of 39 SBNEN patients met eligibility criteria. Thirty-two patients underwent ileal resection and 7 right hemicolectomy. The mean number of 177Lu PRRT cycles was 4. Mortality was nil. Surgical morbidity was 10.3%. Transient grade 1/2 toxicity occurred in 41% (PRRT). NETest scores (n=9 patients) decreased in 100% following treatment and correlated with diminished tumour volume and disease stabilization following surgery and PRRT. Median follow-up: 78 months. Median PFS and OS: 42.7 and 110 months, respectively. Progression-free survival at 1-, 3-, and 5-years was 79.4%, 57.1% and 40.5%, respectively. Overall survival at 1-, 3-, and 5-years was 97.4%, 97.4%, and 94.1%, respectively. Conclusions: Surgery combined with 177Lu PRRT is safe and provides favourable PFS and OS in selected patients with advanced SBNEN. Liquid biopsy (NETest) has the potential to accurately delineate disease status.

Development and validation of a simple-to-use nomogram to predict liver metastasis in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a large cohort study

Background

Liver metastasis is an important prognostic factor for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs), but the relationship between the clinical features of patients with pNEN and liver metastasis remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to establish and validate an easy-to-use nomogram to predict liver-metastasis in patients with pNEN.

Methods

We obtained the clinicopathologic data of 2960 patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2016. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were done to screen out independent influencing factors to establish the nomogram. The calibration plots and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of nomogram. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to compare the novel model with the conventional predictive methods.

Results

A total of 2960 patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms were included in the study. Among these, 1974 patients were assigned to the training group and 986 patients to the validation group. Multivariate logistic regression identified, tumor size, grade, other site metastasis, T stage and N stage as independent risk factors. The calibration plot showed good discriminative ability in the training and validation groups, with C-indexes of 0.850 for the training cohort and 0.846 for the validation cohort. The AUC values were 0.850 (95% CI 0.830–0.869) and 0.839 (95% CI 0.812–0.866), respectively. The nomogram total points (NTP) had the potential to stratify patients into low risk, medium risk and high risk (P < 0.001). Finally, comparing the nomogram with traditional prediction methods, the DCA curve showed that the nomogram had better net benefit.

Conclusions

Our nomogram has a good ability to predict liver metastasis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, and it can guide clinicians to provide suitable prevention and treatment measures for patients with medium- and high-risk liver metastasis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-01685-w.

Update on gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

The incidence gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) has dramatically risen over the last three decades, probably due to the increased detection of asymptomatic lesions. The diagnostic work-up for patients with suspected GEP-NENs is based on conventional imaging, endoscopy, pathology, and functional imaging, including ⁶⁸Gallium-DOTATATE PET and ¹⁸F-FDG PET. The choice of the best treatment strategy should be based on the evaluation of tumor-related features and patient's characteristics. A conservative management, consisting of active surveillance or endoscopic resection, has been advocated for patients with small, incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning tumors without features of aggressiveness. On the other hand, surgery with lymphadenectomy, also with a minimally invasive approach, represents the gold standard for the curative treatment of localized disease. Moreover, surgical resection plays an important role also in the context of a multimodal treatment strategy for patients with advanced GEP-NENs. Finally, a wide range of medical therapies, comprising somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, target therapies and several chemotherapy regimens, can be offered to patients with advanced GEP-NENs not amenable of surgical resection, according to the biological and molecular features of their disease.

Currently available treatment options for neuroendocrine liver metastases

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are frequently characterized by a high propensity for metastasis to the liver, which appears to be a dominant site of distant-stage disease, affecting quality of life and overall survival. Liver surgery with the intention to cure is the treatment of choice for resectable neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM), aiming to potentially prolong survival and ameliorate hormonal symptoms refractory to medical control. Surgical resection is indicated for patients with NELM from well-differentiated NEN, while its feasibility and complexity are largely dictated by the degree of liver involvement. As a result of advances in surgical techniques over the past decades, complex 1- and 2-stage, or repeat liver resections are performed safely and effectively by experienced surgeons. Furthermore, liver transplantation for the treatment of NELM should be anchored in a multimodal and multidisciplinary therapeutic strategy and restricted only to highly selected individual cases. A broad spectrum of interventional radiology treatments for NELM have recently been available, with expanding indications that are more applicable, as they are less limited by patient- and tumor-related parameters, being therefore important adjuncts or alternatives to surgery. Overall, liver-targeted treatment modalities may precede the administration of systemic molecular targeted agents and chemotherapy for patients with liver-dominant metastatic disease; these appear to be a crucial component of multimodal management of patients with NEN. In the present review, we discuss surgical and non-surgical liver-targeted treatment approaches for NELM, each complementing the other, with a view to assisting physicians in optimizing multimodal NEN patient care.

Role of PET/CT and Therapy Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are heterogeneous neoplasms with neuroendocrine differentiation that show peculiar clinical and histomorphological features, with variable prognosis. In recent years, advances in knowledge regarding the pathophysiology and heterogeneous clinical presentation, as well as the availability of different diagnostic procedures for panNEN diagnosis and novel therapeutic options for patient clinical management, has led to the recognition of the need for an active multidisciplinary discussion for optimal patient care. Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become indispensable for the management of panNENs. Several PET radiopharmaceuticals can be used to characterize either panNEN receptor expression or metabolism. The aim of this review is to offer an overview of all the currently used radiopharmaceuticals and of the new upcoming tracers for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), and their clinical impact on therapy management. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET/CT (SSA-PET/CT) has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy and is recommended for the staging and restaging of any non-insulinoma well-differentiated panNEN cases to carry out detection of unknown primary tumor sites or early relapse and for evaluation of in vivo somatostatin receptors expression (SRE) to select patient candidates for peptide receptor radiometabolic treatment (PRRT) with 90Y or 177Lu and/or cold analogs. SSA-PET/CT also has a strong impact on clinical management, leading to a change in treatment in approximately a third of the cases. Its role for treatment response assessment is still under debate due to the lack of standardized criteria, even though some semiquantitative parameters seem to be able to predict response. [18F]FDG PET/CT generally shows low sensitivity in small growing and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET; G1 and G2), while it is of utmost importance in the evaluation and management of high-grade NENs and also provides important prognostic information. When positive, [18F]FDG PET/CT impacts therapeutical management, indicating the need for a more aggressive treatment regime. Although FDG positivity does not exclude the patient from PRRT, several studies have demonstrated that it is certainly useful to predict response, even in this setting. The role of [18F]FDOPA for the study of panNET is limited by physiological uptake in the pancreas and is therefore not recommended. Moreover, it provides no information on SRE that has crucial clinical management relevance. Early acquisition of the abdomen and premedication with carbidopa may be useful to increase the accuracy, but further studies are needed to clarify its utility. GLP-1R agonists, such as exendin-4, are particularly useful for benign insulinoma detection, but their accuracy decreases in the case of malignant insulinomas. Being a whole-body imaging technique, exendin-PET/CT gives important preoperative information on tumor size and localization, which is fundamental for surgical planning as resection (enucleation of the lesion or partial pancreatic resection) is the only curative treatment. New upcoming tracers are under study, such as promising SSTR antagonists, which show a favorable biodistribution and higher tumor-to-background ratio that increases tumor detection, especially in the liver. [68Ga]pentixafor, an in vivo marker of CXCR4 expression associated with the behavior of more aggressive tumors, seems to only play a limited role in detecting well-differentiated NET since there is an inverse expression of SSTR2 and CXCR4 in G1 to G3 NETs with an elevation in CXCR4 and a decrease in SSTR2 expression with increasing grade. Other tracers, such as [68Ga]Ga-PSMA, [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC, [18F]SiTATE, and [18F]AlF-OC, are also under investigation.

Role of Primary Tumor Resection for Metastatic Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

While small bowel resection is well established as standard of care for curative-intent management of localized and loco-regional small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SB-NETs), resection of the primary tumor in the setting of metastatic disease is debated. This review addresses the role of primary tumor resection for stage IV well-differentiated grade 1 and 2 SB-NETs. While survival benefits have been reported for primary tumor resection in the setting of metastatic disease, these studies are limited by selection bias and thus controversial. The main clinical benefits of primary tumor resection for stage IV disease involve the prevention of potentially debilitating complications associated with mesenteric fibrosis, including intestinal obstruction, mesenteric ischemia and angina, venous congestion, malabsorption, and malnutrition. Patients with metastases undergoing initial resection of the primary SB-NETs appear to have fewer episodes of care and re-intervention for loco-regional complications than those who do not undergo resection. As recommended by the NANETS and ENETS guidelines, resection of the primary tumor for stage IV SB-NETs should be strongly considered to avoid future loco-regional complications and potentially to improve survival. All patients with stage IV SB-NETs should be assessed by a surgeon experienced in the management of NETs to consider surgical therapies, including resection of the primary tumor despite metastatic disease.

Systemic Treatment Selection for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (PanNETs)

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) are rare diseases and a good example of how research is not only feasible, but also of crucial importance in the scenario of rare tumours. Many clinical trials have been performed over the past two decades expanding therapeutic options for patients with advanced PanNETs. Adequate management relies on optimal selection of treatment, which may be challenging for clinicians due to the fact that multiple options of therapy are currently available. A number of therapies already exist, which are supported by data from phase III studies, including somatostatin analogues and targeted therapies (sunitinib and everolimus). In addition, chemotherapy remains an option, with temozolomide and capecitabine being one of the most popular doublets to use. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy was successfully implemented in patients with well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, but with certain questions waiting to be solved for the management of PanNETs. Finally, the role of immunotherapy is still poorly understood. In this review, the data supporting current systemic treatment options for locally advanced or metastatic PanNETs are summarized. Strategies for treatment selection in patients with PanNETs based on patient, disease, or drug characteristics is provided, as well as a summary of current evidence on prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Future perspectives are discussed, focusing on current and forthcoming challenges and unmet needs of patients with these rare tumours.

Histopathological and Immunophenotypic Changes of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors after Neoadjuvant Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT)

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) is an emerging therapeutic option for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). A possible role for PRRT as a neoadjuvant agent is still largely undetermined, explored only in case reports or small case series. Likewise, the histopathological and immunophenotypic changes induced by PRRT are poorly characterized. In the present study, 24 patients who underwent neoadjuvant PRRT on the basis of their disease's characteristics were retrospectively matched with 24 patients who underwent upfront surgery. A comprehensive morphological and immunohistochemical evaluation was conducted to identify the differences in the two groups. The most significant findings were that the total percentage of stroma increased significantly in patients who underwent PRRT (p < 0.0001) and the characteristics of the stroma were different in the two groups. The somatostatin receptors type 2A (SSTR2A) were retained in most patients (87%) after PRRT. The density of CD163+ M2-polarized macrophages was greater in the PRRT group (p = 0.022), and M2-polarized macrophages tended to assume an epithelioid morphology (p = 0.043). In the neoadjuvant PRRT group, none of the histological parameters considered were associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Neoadjuvant PRRT in PanNETs is associated with reduced tumor diameter, an increased percentage of stroma, preserved SSTR2A expression in most of the cases, and an increased CD163+ M2-polarized macrophages density.

Surgical Principles in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OPINION STATEMENT

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are increasingly recognized entities, whose incidence has dramatically grown during the last two decades. Surgery plays a pivotal role in their management as it represents the only chance of cure. Since PanNENs display a wide range of aggressiveness, their surgical management needs to be tailored on tumor's and patient's characteristics. Currently, there are several open questions and burning issues in the field of PanNEN, such as the management of asymptomatic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNET) ≤ 2 cm. An active surveillance of these small lesions has been demonstrated to be safe although the available evidences are only based on retrospective studies. On the other hand, formal pancreatic resection associated with lymphadenectomy represents the gold standard for patients with localized NF-PanNEN > 2 cm or NF-PanNEN ≤ 2 cm in the presence of symptoms, dilation of the main pancreatic duct or suspicion of nodal metastases. Surgery plays also an important role in the setting of metastatic disease. In particular, surgery is generally recommended in the presence of low-grade, resectable, metastatic disease, but several series have reported also a survival benefit of palliative primary tumor resection in patients with unresectable liver metastases. The role of surgery in PanNEN G3 is still controversial. Indeed, surgery is associated with an improved survival in patients with well-differentiated PanNET G3, whereas there is almost no survival benefit in case of poorly differentiated lesions.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Recent Insights

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a paradigm shifting approach to the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Although there are no prospective randomized trials directly studying PRRT in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), there are data to suggest benefit in this patient population. Collectively, the data, consisting of two prospective and six retrospective studies, show a median PFS ranging from 20 to 39 months and a median OS ranging from 37 to 79 months. There are ongoing (and upcoming) prospective, randomized trials of PRRT in panNETs, which will provide further evidence to support this approach.

Cancers Metastatic to the Liver

The liver is a common site of metastatic cancer spread, and metastatic lesions are the most common malignant liver tumors. Diagnosis of liver metastases often is established based on clinical assessment, laboratory tests, and appropriate imaging. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for resectable colorectal and neuroendocrine liver metastases. Long-term survival outcome data after treatment of hepatic metastases of noncolorectal non-neuroendocrine tumors are less robust. The treatment strategy for patients with liver metastases should be determined case by case in a multidisciplinary setting.

Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Large Cohort of Patients with Advanced Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Treated with Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

The objective of this retrospective study was to determine the role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in a large cohort of 495 patients with metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) who were treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with a long-term follow-up. Methods: The 495 patients were treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu- or ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC/DOTATATE PRRT between February 2002 and July 2018. All subjects received both ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC/TATE/NOC and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT before treatment and were followed 3-189 mo. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank testing (Mantel-Cox), and Cox regression analysis were performed for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: One hundred ninety-nine patients (40.2%) presented with pancreatic NENs, 49 with cancer of unknown primary, and 139 with midgut NENs, whereas the primary tumor was present in the rectum in 20, in the lung in 38, in the stomach in 8, and in other locations in 42. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was positive in 382 (77.2%) patients and negative in 113 (22.8%) before PRRT, whereas 100% were ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC/TATE/NOC-positive. For all patients, the median PFS and OS, defined from the start of PRRT, were 19.6 mo and 58.7 mo, respectively. Positive ¹⁸F-FDG results predicted shorter PFS (18.5 mo vs. 24.1 mo; P = 0.0015) and OS (53.2 mo vs. 83.1 mo; P < 0.001) than negative ¹⁸F-FDG results. Among the cases of pancreatic NENs, the median OS was 52.8 mo in ¹⁸F-FDG-positive subjects and 114.3 mo in ¹⁸F-FDG-negative subjects (P = 0.0006). For all patients positive for ¹⁸F-FDG uptake, and a ratio of more than 2 for the highest SUV_max on ⁶⁸Ga-somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET to the most ¹⁸F-FDG-avid tumor lesions, the median OS was 53.0 mo, compared with 43.4 mo in those patients with a ratio of less than 2 (P = 0.030). For patients with no ¹⁸F-FDG uptake (complete mismatch imaging pattern), the median OS was 108.3 mo versus 76.9 mo for an SUV_max of more than 15.0 and an SUV_max of 15.0 or less on ⁶⁸Ga-SSTR PET/CT, respectively. Conclusion: The presence of positive lesions on ¹⁸F-FDG PET is an independent prognostic factor in patients with NENs treated with PRRT. Metabolic imaging with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT complements the molecular imaging aspect of ⁶⁸Ga-SSTR PET/CT for the prognosis of survival after PRRT. High SSTR expression combined with negative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT results is associated with the most favorable long-term prognosis.

Palliative resection of primary site in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors improves survivals

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are rarely seen and have heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Mostly half of the patients had metastatic disease at presentation. Palliative resection of primary site in metastatic disease is still controversial. The aim of this study was to find out the influence of resection of primary tumor site on progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic non-functioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The secondary end point is to determine the prognostic factors influencing the survivals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted at a single medical oncology center, Antalya Education and Research Hospital. Patients who had non-functioning metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with primary site resected or unresected were compared retrospectively. Resection of metastases was excluded.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were included in the study and 29 patients had primary tumor resection. The primary site resected group had favorable outcomes with the overall survival (median unreached) compared to the median overall survival of 30 months in the unresected group (p=0.001). Median progression-free survival was also better in the primary site resected group than the unresected group (60 months vs. 14 months, respectively) (p=0.013). In multivariate analysis, unresected primary site and high-grade tumors were found to be independent prognostic factors on low survivals (Hazard ratio (HR): 4.6; 95% CI: 1.21-17.47 and HR: 10.1; 95% CI: 1.15-88.84, respectively). Age (p=0.131), gender (p=0.051), chromogranin A level (p=0.104), Ki-67 index (p=0.550), tumor size (p=0.623), and primary tumor area (p=0.154) did not influence the overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with primary site resected had improved survivals when compared to the unresected group.

Value of ileus-prophylactic surgery for metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumours

Neuroendocrine tumours of the small intestine (SINET) are a rare disease. However, a rising incidence rate and excellent long-term survival, even in the setting of metastatic disease lead to a high prevalence of SINET of up to 11/100.000. At the time of diagnosis, most patients already suffer from metastatic disease. About one third of patients demonstrate localized or regional metastatic disease at time of presentation. For those patients the indication for curative surgery is not debated and 10-year cancer specific survival of almost 90% can be achieved. Due to major limitations of existing studies actually there is no sufficient evidence in favour of ileus-prophylactic palliative surgery for metastatic SINET. Until now the available evidence favouring an ileus-prophylactic palliative small bowel resection for stage IV SI-NET must be weighed against available high-level evidence from randomized trials that showed long-term survival under systemic therapy. Importantly, there is not a single study that indicates surgery for a symptomatic patient should be postponed. Because the majority of patients are symptomatic at the time of diagnosis, the rationale for an ileus-prophylactic palliative surgery is to operate before progression of mesenteric tumour mass and desmoplasia takes place and before intestinal obstruction and ischaemia occurs. To what extent a prophylactic palliative small bowel resection will provide a survival benefit in a situation where the mesenteric tumour mass cannot be resected radically is not clearly addressed by the current level of evidence.

Resection of the primary tumor improves survival in patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with liver metastases: A SEER-based analysis

Patients who suffer from gastro‐entero‐pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP‐NENs) often present with liver metastatic disease. The efficacy of primary tumor resection (PTR) for these patients remains controversial due to the relatively heterogeneous behavior of the primary tumor and the lack of clinical evidence. In this series, GEP‐NEN patients with liver metastases (LM) were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2015. A logistic regression model was used to analyze variables that were associated with PTR. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent prognostic risk factors. In total, 1547 patients were enrolled in our study, including 897 patients who underwent PTR. Resection of the primary tumor was associated with prolonged survival in all patients (5‐year overall survival (OS) rates: 57.0% vs 15.4%, P < .001), and improved 5‐year OS rates were observed in patients with gastric, small intestinal, colorectal, and pancreatic subtypes (39.7%, 73.3%, 24.6%, and 59.7%, respectively). On the multivariate analysis, PTR was an independent prognostic factor of prolonged OS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.39‐0.59, P < .001). Patients with a young age (≤60 years), small intestinal or colorectal NENs, a large primary tumor, lymph node (LN) metastases, and high tumor differentiation were more likely to undergo PTR. However, patients with colorectal NENs or a large primary tumor (≥4 cm) were at an increased risk of death independently in the PTR subgroup. The risk factors for OS also included old age, gastric tumor location, and poor differentiation. In conclusion, although PTR prolonged OS in all GEP‐NEN patients presenting with LM, surgical recipients should be considered carefully. Age, primary tumor site, size, and differentiation might help surgeons identify patients who could benefit from PTR.

Survival and prognostic factors analysis of 151 intestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single center experience

Background

Intestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (IP-NETs) are rare tumors with heterogeneous outcomes. The aim of our study was to determine the clinical, therapeutic and pathological factors which impact the overall survival (OS) in IP-NETs.

Methods

All the patients diagnosed with IP-NETs at the Nantes University Hospital between October 1994 and October 2013 were retrospectively analysed. Patients with MEN-1 (Type 1 Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia) or Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome were excluded. Additionally, a prospective analysis of tumor grade (mitotic index and Ki67 index) was performed on tumor samples. OS was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors by log-rank test and Cox model.

Results

The study included 151 patients. Median age was 60 (range, 14-81). Primary tumor was pancreatic in 86 patients (56.95%) and intestinal in 65 patients (43.05%). Tumors were metastatic (synchronous or metachronous) in 72 patients (47.7%). The median OS was 157 months. For all IP-NETs, age >65 years (P<0.0001), Ki67 >5% (P=0.03), synchronous metastases (P=0.016), primary tumor size >25 mm (P=0.03) and emergency surgery (P=0.007) were independent poor prognostic factors.

Conclusions

In this large series of patients with IP-NET, age >65 years, Ki67 >5%, primary tumor size >25 mm, synchronous metastases and emergency surgery for acute complications have been identified as independent poor prognostic factors.

Neuroendocrine Tumor Diagnosis and Management: 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to provide a review of the use of ⁶⁸Ga tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid-DPhe1-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE) PET/CT, a functional imaging modality for assessment of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). It has become the preferred imaging modality for initial diagnosis, selection of patients for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and localization of unknown primary tumors. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline has added ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT as an appropriate test in the management of NETs.

CONCLUSION

In combination with FDG PET/CT, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT can noninvasively assess tumor heterogeneity, especially in G2 and G3 NETs, for personalized management of patients.

Successful neoadjuvant peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for an inoperable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour

Non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) can present with advanced local or distant (metastatic) disease limiting the possibility of surgical cure. Several treatment options have been used in experimental neoadjuvant settings to improve the outcomes in such cases. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PPRT) using beta emitting radiolabelled somatostatin analogues has been used in progressive pancreatic NETs. We report a 55-year-old female patient with a 12.8 cm pancreatic NET with significant local stomach and superior mesenteric vein compression and liver metastases. The patient underwent treatment with [¹⁷⁷Lutetium-DOTA^0,Tyr³]octreotate (¹⁷⁷Lu-octreotate) for the treatment of local and metastatic symptomatic disease. Six months after 4 cycles of ¹⁷⁷lutetium-octreotate, resolution of the abdominal complaints was associated with a significant reduction in tumour size and the tumour was rendered operable. Histology of the tumour showed a 90% necrotic tumour with abundant hyalinized fibrosis and haemorrhage compatible with PPRT-induced radiation effects on tumour cells. This report supports that PPRT has a role in unresectable and metastatic pancreatic NET.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy and the Treatment of Gastroentero-pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Current Findings and Future Perspectives

Purpose and Methods

Patients with inoperable and metastasized neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), particularly those with grades 1 and 2, usually receive treatment with somatostatin analogues (SSAs). Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has gained momentum over the past two decades in patients who progress on SSAs. 177Lu-DOTATATE is currently the most widely used radiopeptide for PRRT. We reviewed the recent evidence on PRRT and the treatment of gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

Results

¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE can be used as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with inoperable GEP-NETs, who might be candidate for surgery after treatment and as adjuvant therapy after surgical intervention. Combination treatments of PRRT with chemotherapy or targeted agents as well as combinations of radionuclides in patients with NETs have been explored over the last few years. The majority of patients with NETs experience partial response or have disease stabilization, a small percentage has complete response, while some 30% of patients, however, will have disease progression. The safety and efficacy of retreatment with extra cycles of PRRT as salvage therapy have been evaluated in small retrospective series.

Conclusion

Overall, there is evidence that disease control and quality of life improve significantly after 117Lu PRRT therapy. Clinical trials on this therapy are scarce, and there is a need for further studies to establish proper management guidelines.

A Systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of palliative primary resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm with liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Role of palliative pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN) resection (pPanNEN-R) is controversial. This study was designed as a meta-analysis of studies which allow a comparison of pPanNEN-R and non-surgical management (PanNEN-nR).

METHODS

All published studies until 2017 allowing for the comparison of pPanNEN-R and PanNEN-nR were reviewed. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes measures included postoperative morbidity, reoperation, readmission, length of hospital stay (LOS), and quality of life (QoL). Risk of death was compared by computing the odds-ratio (OR), while 5- and 10-year OS using weighted mean differences.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included. A total of 885 patients were included, of whom 252 (28%) underwent pPanNEN-R and 633 (72%) underwent PanNEN-nR. Overall quality of included studies was fair. The risk of death was significantly reduced in patients who underwent pPanNEN-R compared to those who underwent PanNEN-nR (OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.23-0.65). Data on postoperative morbidity, reoperation, readmission, LOS, and QoL were not adequately reported therefore a meta-analysis for the secondary outcomes was not performed.

DISCUSSION

pPanNEN-R in patients with unresectable LM seems to be associated with a better OS compared to non-surgical management but the limitations of included studies does not allow firm conclusions.