Performance Analysis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Staging System for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma and Development of a New Staging Algorithm for Sarcoma-Specific Survival

Surgically treated pelvic liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma: The effect of tumor size on cancer-specific survival

INTRODUCTION

In soft tissue pelvic liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma, it is unknown whether a specific tumor size cut-off may help to better predict prognosis, defined as cancer-specific survival (CSS). We tested whether different tumor size cut-offs, could improve CSS prediction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surgically treated non-metastatic soft tissue pelvic sarcoma patients were identified (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 2004-2019). Kaplan-Meier plots, univariable and multivariable Cox-regression models and receiver operating characteristic-derived area under the curve (AUC) estimates were used.

RESULTS

Overall, 672 (65 %) liposarcoma (median tumor size 11 cm, interquartile range [IQR] 7-16) and 367 (35 %) leiomyosarcoma (median tumor size 8 cm, IQR 5-12) patients were identified. The p-value derived ideal tumor size cut-off was 17.1 cm, in liposarcoma and 7.0 cm, in leiomyosarcoma. In liposarcoma, according to p-value derived cut-off, five-year CSS rates were 92 vs 83 % (≤17.1 vs > 17.1 cm). This cut-off represented an independent predictor of CSS and improved prognostic ability from 83.8 to 86.8 % (Δ = 3 %). Similarly, among previously established cut-offs (5 vs 10 vs 15 cm), also 15 cm represented an independent predictor of CSS and improved prognostic ability from 83.8 to 87.0 % (Δ = 3.2 %). In leiomyosarcoma, according to p-value derived cut-off, five-year CSS rates were 86 vs 55 % (≤7.0 vs > 7.0 cm). This cut-off represented an independent predictor of CSS and improved prognostic ability from 68.6 to 76.5 % (Δ = 7.9 %).

CONCLUSIONS

In liposarcoma, the p-value derived tumor size cut-off was 17.1 cm vs 7.0 cm, in leiomyosarcoma. In both histologic subtypes, these cut-offs exhibited the optimal statistical characteristics (univariable, multivariable and AUC analyses). In liposarcoma, the 15 cm cut-off represented a valuable alternative.

Evaluation of AJCC staging system and proposal of a novel stage grouping system in retroperitoneal liposarcoma: the Fudan Zhongshan experience

Background

Overall survival (OS) varies significantly among individuals with heterogeneous retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS), even among those with the same clinical stage. Improved staging of RPLS is a critical unmet need, given the disappointing results of external validations of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system.

Methods

The cohort study included 220 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for primary RPLS at the largest sarcoma centre of Fudan University in China from September 2009 to August 2021, combined with 277 adult patients with RPLS in the SEER database from 1975 to 2020. Data analysis was performed from December 2021 to December 2022. Patients were retrospectively restaged according to the 8th and 7th editions of the TNM staging system as well as the new TNM (nTNM) staging system. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Comparative analysis of postoperative survival was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between subgroups were tested using the log-rank test. The OS prediction nomogram was generated based on baseline variables and tumour characteristics. Harrell's consistency index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), and calibration curves were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram.

Results

A total of 497 patients were enrolled in the study, including 282 (56.7%) male patients. The median follow-up was 51 months (interquartile range, IQR, 23-83), and the OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 87.9%, 75.3%, and 64.9%, respectively. According to the staging distribution of the AJCC 7th edition, 6 patients were stage IA (1.2%), 189 patients were stage IB (38%), 12 patients were stage IIA (2.4%), 150 patients were stage IIB (30.1%), 131 patients were stage III (26.3%), and 9 patients were stage IV (1.8%). With the 8th edition staging, this distribution changed: 6 patients (1.2%) were stage IA, 189 patients (38%) were stage IB, 12 patients (2.4%) were stage II, 24 patients (4.8%) were stage IIIA, 257 patients (51.7%) were stage IIIB, and 9 patients (1.8%) were stage IV. 182 patients (36.6%) were reclassified according to the nTNM staging system with the new T stage classification. The C-index and log-rank score improved after implementation of nTNM implementation. The nTNM system was associated with improved identification of high-risk patients compared with the AJCC 7th and 8th TNM. The FNCLCC stage proved to be highly prognostic with significant intergroup differences in OS. The calibration curve shows a high degree of agreement between the actual OS rate and the nomogram estimated OS rate.

Conclusion

Compared with 8th AJCC TNM, 7th AJCC TNM staging system showed a more homogeneous staging distribution and a slight improvement in the prognostic accuracy of RPLS. The revised T-stage and nTNM systems showed better risk stratification performance. The FNCLCC stage was found to have high prognostic value, further emphasising histological grade is the least negligible prognostic factor in predicting patient survival. The constructed nomogram model enables individualized prognostic analysis and helps to develop risk-adapted therapy for RPLS patients.

Epidemiology, pathological characteristics and survival of retroperitoneal soft‑tissue sarcomas compared with non‑retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas

Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcomas (RPS) are rare forms of mesenchymal tumors that account for ~0.15% of all malignancies. The purpose of the present study was to determine the differences between RPS and non-RPS anatomopathological and clinical features and to analyze whether the hazard ratio for short-term mortality differs between patients with RPS and non-RPS, after adjusting for differences in baseline anatomopathological and clinical features. The Veneto Cancer Registry, a high-resolution population-based dataset spanning the regional population, was used as a data source for the analysis. The current analysis focuses on all incident cases of soft-tissue sarcoma recorded by the Registry from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018. A bivariate analysis was carried out to compare demographic and clinical characteristics in RPS and non-RPS. Short-term mortality risk was analyzed by primary tumor site. The significance of variations in survival by site group was determined using Kaplan-Meier curves and the Log-rank test. Finally, Cox regression was used to assess the hazard ratio for survival by sarcoma group. RPS accounted for 22.8% of the total sample (92 out of 404 cases). The mean age at diagnosis was 67.6 years for RPS vs. 63.4 for non-RPS; 41.3% of RPS were >150 mm vs. 5.5% for non-RPS. Stages III and IV were more prevalent in RPS (53.2 vs. 35.6%), despite the fact that, in both groups, advanced stages are the most common onset at diagnosis. Regarding surgical margins, the present study showed that R0 is the most prevalent in non-RPS (48.7%), while R1-R2 is the most frequent in patients with RPS (39.1%). The 3-year mortality rate for retroperitoneum was 42.9 vs. 25.7%. Comparing RPS and non-RPS, the multivariable Cox model showed a hazard ratio of 1.58 after adjusting for all other prognostic factors. RPS clinical and anatomopathological characteristics differ from those of non-RPS. Overall, despite adjusting for other prognostic factors, the retroperitoneum site was an independent prognostic factor associated with a worse overall survival in sarcoma patients compared with other sites.

A competing risk-based nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival in patients with retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma

Considering the rarity and aggressive nature of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma (RLMS), several prognostic factors might contribute to the cancer-specific mortality of these patients. This study aimed to construct a competing risk-based nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with RLMS. In total, 788 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2015) were included. Based on the Fine & Gray's method, independent predictors were screened to develop a nomogram for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS. After multivariate analysis, CSS was found significantly associated with tumor characteristics (tumor grade, size, range), as well as surgery status. The nomogram showed solid prediction power and was well calibrated. Through decision curve analysis (DCA), a favorable clinical utility of the nomogram was demonstrated. Additionally, a risk stratification system was developed and distinctive survival between risk groups was observed. In summary, this nomogram showed a better performance than the AJCC 8th staging system and can assist in the clinical management of RLMS.

125I Radioactive Seed Localization vs. Conventional Surgery for the Treatment of Mesenchymal Tumours: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

PURPOSE

Radioguided localization can assist the surgery of hard-to-find lesions. The aim was to evaluate the results of the 125I Radioactive Seed Localization (RSL) technique to guide a margin-free tumoral resection of mesenchymal tumours compared to conventional surgery and its influence in oncological outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of all consecutive patients who underwent 125I RSL for the surgery of a mesenchymal tumour from January 2012 to January 2020 in a tertiary referral centre in Spain. The control group was formed by patients with conventional surgery in the same period and centre. A Propensity Score matching at 1:4 ratio selected the cases for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 10 lesions excised in 8 radioguided surgeries were compared to 40 lesions excised in 40 conventional surgeries, with equal proportion of histological subtypes in each group. There was a higher proportion of recurrent tumours in the RSL group (80 % [8/10] vs. 27.5 % [11/40]; p: 0.004). An R0 was achieved in 80 % (8/10) of the RSL group and 65 % (26/40) of the conventional surgery group. The R1 rate was 0 % and 15 % (6/40), and the R2 rate was 20 % (2/10 and 8/40) in the RSL group and conventional surgery group, respectively (p: 0.569). No differences were detected in disease-free or overall survival between the different histological subtypes in the subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

The 125I RSL technique of a challenging sample of mesenchymal tumours achieved a similar margin-free tumoral resection and oncological outcomes as conventional surgery.

Staging Systems and Nomograms for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Reliable tools for prognosis prediction are crucially needed by oncologists so they can tailor individual treatments. However, the wide spectrum of histologies and prognostic behaviors of sarcomas challenges their development. In this field, nomograms could definitely better account for their granularity compared to the more widely used AJCC/UICC TNM staging system. Nomograms are predictive tools that incorporate multiple risk factors and return a numerical probability of a clinical event. Since the development of the first nomogram in 2002, several other nomograms have been built, either general, site-specific, histology-specific, or both. Recently, some new “dynamic” nomograms and prognostic tools have been developed, allowing doctors to “recalculate” a patient’s prognosis by taking into account the time since primary surgery, the event history, and the potential time-dependent effect of covariates. Due to these new tools, prognosis prediction is no longer limited to the time of the first computation but can be adapted and recalculated based on the occurrence (or not) of any event as time passes from the first computation. In this review, we aimed to give an overview of the available nomograms for STS and to help clinicians in the process of selecting the best tool for each patient.

Epidemiologic Survey of Myxofibrosarcoma Using Data from the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry in Japan

BACKGROUND

Myxofibrosarcoma is a common sarcoma among older patients, with locally infiltrative behavior and a predilection for local postoperative recurrence. Some studies have reported the factors affecting prognosis, although only a few have mentioned the previous staging classification systems. This study investigated the clinical overview and prognosis of myxofibrosarcoma to determine the optimal treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the records of 349 patients with myxofibrosarcoma in the nationwide Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry in Japan from 2006 to 2015. Clinical features, treatment options, and patient outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 349 patients were identified. The overall survival rates were 93.1% at 2 years and 84.3% at 5 years. A multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. The study identified four significant prognostic factors for survival: tumor size, depth, compartment status, and location. The prognostic score was calculated by summing the scores of all the factors. The overall survival rate was 69.3% at 5 years for the patients with prognostic scores of 6 or higher. Conversely, the patients with prognostic scores of 2 or lower had a survival rate of 95.6% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Among myxofibrosarcomas, those larger than 5 cm, deep-seated, invaded into the external compartment, or in axial body parts were associated with a significantly worse prognosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy did not contribute significantly to a better prognosis. Previous staging classification systems are impractical for prognosis prediction. Therefore, new classifications are needed. Further research on new treatment methods for patients with a poor prognosis will be crucial in the future.

Clinicopathologic features, prognostic factors, and outcomes of visceral sarcomas: A retrospective 12-year single-center study

Background

Visceral sarcomas are a rare form of soft tissue sarcoma. This study aimed to evaluate the survival and prognostic factors and effective treatments for visceral sarcomas.

Methods

All patients with visceral sarcoma referred to our center between January 2010 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank test were used for survival analysis.

Results

A total of 53 patients with visceral sarcoma were analyzed in this study with the median age at diagnosis of 57 (range, 24-77) years. Among them, 37 (69.8%) and 16 (30.2%) patients had localized and metastatic diseases at the initial presentation, respectively, and 44 patients underwent surgical resection. The median follow-up, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 63.0 (range, 2-130), 42.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.879-73.121) and 45.0 months (95% CI 9.938-80.062), respectively. The 5-year EFS and OS rates were 44% and 46%, respectively. Univariate analysis of prognostic indicators illustrated that metastasis at presentation, surgery, surgical margin and the types of surgery were significantly associated with OS and EFS. In this study, combined chemotherapy or radiotherapy had no effects on EFS and OS.

Conclusion

Primary visceral sarcoma is an uncommon and aggressive malignant tumor with a higher rate of local recurrence. In the largest cohort of visceral sarcomas in China to date, we identified metastases at presentation, surgery, surgical margin, and the types of surgery as independent predictors of survival. The combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy did not affect survival.

Do coagulation or fibrinolysis reflect the disease condition in patients with soft tissue sarcoma?

BACKGROUND

Coagulation and fibrinolysis are distinct processes that are highly correlated. Cells control coagulation and fibrinolysis by expression of tissue factor and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor on their surface. Tumor cells express these proteins, adjust their microenvironment and induce tumor exacerbation. We hypothesized that the expression of plasma markers for coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) was dependent on the level of tumor malignancy. To elucidate which markers are predictive of recurrence, metastasis and prognosis, coagulation or fibrinolysis, we analyzed the correlation between plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), soluble fibrin (SF), plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex (PIC), D-dimer (DD) and clinical parameters in patients with STSs.

METHODS

TAT, SF, PIC or DD were measured in pre-treatment blood samples from 64 patients with primary STSs and analyzed with clinicopathological parameters, and 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS), 5-year metastasis free survival (MFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The metastasis group had significantly higher DD (p = 0.0394), PIC (p = 0.00532) and SF (p = 0.00249) concentrations than the group without metastasis. The group that died of disease showed significantly higher DD (p = 0.00105), PIC (p = 0.000542), SF (p = 0.000126) and TAT (p = 0.0373) than surviving patients. By dividing the patients into low and high groups, the group with high DD, PIC, SF and TAT showed significantly lower 5-year MFS and 5-year OS than the corresponding low group. Furthermore, in multivariate COX proportional hazard analysis of continuous variables for 5-year MFS, only PIC was found to be a significant factor (HR: 2.14).

CONCLUSION

Fibrinolysis was better than coagulation at reflecting the disease condition of patients with STS. Notably, PIC levels ≥ 1.1 can not only predict the risk of metastasis and poor prognosis, but also increasing PIC levels correspond to further increases in risks of metastasis and poor prognosis.

Impact of time to first relapse on long-term outcome in adult retroperitoneal sarcoma patients after radical resection

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is one of the major causes of treatment failure and death. We attempted to assess the effects of time to local recurrence (TLR) on the survival after recurrence (SAR) and overall survival (OS) of RPS.

METHODS

Included in this study were 224 patients who underwent R0 resection for primary RPS at our institution between January 2000 and December 2020, 118 of whom had local recurrence. Based on the median TLR (19.8 months), patients were divided into two groups: early local recurrence (ELR < 20 months) and late local recurrence (LLR > 20 months). The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to calculate the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), SAR and OS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore the prognostic value of TLR.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 60.5 months for the entire cohort and 58.5 months for the recurrence cohort. There were 60 (50.8%) patients in the ELR group and 58 (49.2%) in the LLR group. The ELR group exhibited a worse SAR (29.2 months vs. 73.4 months, P < 0.001), OS (41.8 months vs. 120.9 months, P < 0.001), and a lower 5-year OS rate (35.9% vs. 73.2%, P = 0.004) than the LLR group. Furthermore, multivariate analysis indicated that TLR was an independent prognostic indicator for SAR (P = 0.014) and OS (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with RPS, ELR after R0 resection presents adverse effects on OS and SAR than those with LLR, and TLR could serve as a promising predictor for OS and SAR.

Delayed retroperitoneal liposarcoma diagnosis and management in a patient with massive obesity

People suffering from extreme obesity may be exposed to delayed diagnosis and treatment of cancer. A 37-year-old woman (weight = 245 kg, body mass index (BMI) = 79 kg/m²), presented a sepsis associated with nonspecific abdominal pain for 4 months. After several unsuccessful attempts due to her weight and a large waist circumference, abdominal CT scan was finally successfully performed and showed a large retroperitoneal mass. An ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy was performed and was in favor of a liposarcoma. Surgery was performed to remove the entire tumor of an estimated weight of 98 kg, a giant retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma. This case highlights the difficulties to screen, diagnose, and manage cancers encountered in patients suffering from massive obesity.

A multi-institutional validation study of prognostic nomograms for retroperitoneal sarcoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prognostic nomograms for patients undergoing resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) include the Sarculator and Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) sarcoma nomograms. We sought to validate the Sarculator and MSK nomograms within a large, modern multi-institutional cohort of patients with primary RPS undergoing resection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of primary RPS between 2000 and 2017 across nine high-volume US institutions were identified. Predicted 7-year disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and 4-, 8-, and 12-year disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated from the Sarculator and MSK nomograms, respectively. Nomogram-predicted survival probabilities were stratified in quintiles and compared in calibration plots to observed survival outcomes assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates. Discriminative ability of nomograms was quantified by Harrell's concordance index (C-index).

RESULTS

Five hundred and two patients underwent resection of primary RPS. Histologies included leiomyosarcoma (30%), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (23%), and well-differentiated liposarcoma (15%). Median tumor size was 14.0 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 8.5-21.0 cm). Tumor grade distribution was: Grade 1 (27%), Grade 2 (17%), and Grade 3 (56%). Median DFS was 31.5 months; 7-year DFS was 29%. Median OS was 93.8 months; 7-year OS was 51%. C-indices for 7-year DFS, and OS by the Sarculator nomogram were 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62-0.69) and 0.69 (95%CI: 0.65-0.73); plots demonstrated good calibration for predicting 7-year outcomes. The C-index for 4-, 8-, and 12-year DSS by the MSK nomogram was 0.71 (95%CI: 0.67-0.75); plots demonstrated similarly good calibration ability.

CONCLUSIONS

In a diverse, modern validation cohort of patients with resected primary RPS, both Sarculator and MSK nomograms demonstrated good prognostic ability, supporting their ongoing adoption into clinical practice.

[French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: retroperitoneal sarcoma]

OBJECTIVE

- To update French urological guidelines on retroperitoneal sarcoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

- Comprehensive Medline search between 2018 and 2020 upon diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Level of evidence was evaluated.

RESULTS

- Chest, abdomen and pelvis CT is mandatory to evaluate any suspected retroperitoneal sarcoma. MRI sometimes helps surgical planning. Before histological confirmation through biopsy, the patient must be registered in the French sarcoma pathology reference network. The biopsy standard should be an extraperitoneal coaxial percutaneous sampling before any retroperitoneal mass therapeutic decision. Surgery is retroperitoneal sarcoma cornerstone. The main objective is grossly negative margins and can be technically challenging. Multimodal treatment risks and benefits must be discussed in multidisciplinary teams. The relapse rate is related to tumor grade and surgical margins. Reported Negative margins rate thus encourage surgery in high-volume centers.

CONCLUSION

- Retroperitoneal sarcoma prognosis is poor and closely related to the quality of initial management. Centralization through dedicated sarcoma pathology network in a high-volume center is mandatory.

Risk Assessment of Visceral Sarcomas: A Comparative Study of 2698 Cases from the SEER Database

Soft tissue sarcomas arising in visceral organs are rare and lack validated tumor-staging protocols. Clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of 2698 visceral sarcomas identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database were compared with sarcomas arising in the extremities/trunk (n = 10,237) or retroperitoneum (n = 1067) using standard statistical techniques. Important prognostic criteria for visceral sarcomas, as in other anatomic sites, included tumor size, histologic grade, and presence of metastatic disease. After adjustment for pertinent confounding factors, visceral sarcomas showed cancer-specific survival rates similar to those arising in the retroperitoneum but had worse outcomes than sarcomas in the extremities/trunk. Therefore, the prognostic performance of two different staging algorithms for retroperitoneal sarcomas was evaluated for their use in staging sarcomas of visceral organs. The current AJCC 8th edition and the recently derived Vanderbilt system for staging retroperitoneal sarcoma both showed adequate discrimination, as assessed by multiple clinical concordance indices, and no evidence of miscalibration. Therefore, the authors concluded that previously validated staging systems for retroperitoneal sarcomas based on conventional prognostic factors (histologic grade, tumor size, and presence of metastatic disease) are applicable to visceral sarcomas and should be incorporated into the next edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.

Glottic Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Pleomorphic sarcoma of the larynx is a rare variant of laryngeal cancer. We present the case of a 59-year-old male patient who has been smoking for 40 years. He presented with signs and symptoms of an obstructive glottic mass. The diagnostic workup pointed to a malignant pathology; the histopathology report confirmed the diagnosis of glottic undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (malignant fibrous histiocytoma).

A Proposed Staging System for Improved Prognostication of MDM2-amplified Liposarcoma

Despite the release of anatomic site-specific staging systems for soft tissue sarcomas in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual, the algorithms for sarcomas arising in the extremities/trunk and retroperitoneum differ only in the staging of lymph node metastasis. The retroperitoneum not only provides a larger potential space for tumor growth before the clinical presentation, but its anatomic complexities complicate surgical resection and adversely affect disease-free survival. Here, we propose a new staging system for MDM2-amplified liposarcomas (well-differentiated and dedifferentiated subtypes) that properly emphasizes retroperitoneal localization, degree of differentiation (histologic subtype), and presence of distant metastasis. A retrospective cohort of 4146 adult patients with surgically resected liposarcoma was extracted from the SEER database to compare the natural history of MDM2-amplified liposarcomas arising in the extremities/trunk or retroperitoneum. Separate training and validation datasets were created, and Cox proportional hazard regression, multivariable nonlinear regression, and nomographic analyses determined the most significant parameters in predicting sarcoma-specific death. A new staging system was derived and its predictive accuracy was compared with the AJCC, eighth edition system using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves and multiple concordance indices. Multivariable analysis showed that dedifferentiation (hazard ratio [HR]=3.7±0.5; P<0.0005), retroperitoneal location (HR=3.2±0.5; P<0.0005), and distant metastasis (HR=2.4±0.6; P=0.002), but not categorized tumor size (pT category), had the largest effects on sarcoma-specific survival. A new staging system based on these predictive factors demonstrated better discrimination between tumor stages, higher concordance with clinical outcomes, and greater predictive accuracy than the AJCC eighth edition staging system (86±1% vs. 83±2%; P=0.005). Statistical analysis of a large national cohort failed to confirm that categorized tumor size is a useful criterion by which to stage MDM2-amplified liposarcoma. A simplified staging system based on anatomic location and dedifferentiation outperforms the current AJCC staging system. Anatomic localization and histologic grade, and not tumor size, should be included in any future liposarcoma-specific staging system.

Retroperitoneal tumors: Review of diagnosis and management

Retroperitoneal tumors are extremely rare tumors occurring in the retroperitoneum. Retroperitoneal tumors are divided into benign tumors and malignant tumors, including retroperitoneal sarcoma. Approximately 70-80% of primary retroperitoneal soft-tissue tumors are malignant; however, these only account for 0.1-0.2% of all malignancies. Retroperitoneal sarcoma is an orphan malignant disease with a low incidence. The information on benign retroperitoneal tumors is limited. The American Joint Committee on Cancer/TNM classification updated to the 8th edition in 2017. In 2010, three new drugs for soft tissue sarcoma were approved based on the results of phase III trials, but the histological subtypes of the patients enrolled in the trials of each drug differed. Recently, in addition to surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma, the effectiveness of perioperative radiation therapy has become interesting. For malignant retroperitoneal tumors and retroperitoneal sarcoma, survival improvement and locoregional recurrence prevention can be undertaken by carrying out surgery to secure negative margins with wide and combined resection of some adjacent organs, and cooperation with a trained medical team comprising of radiologists, pathologists and medical oncologists in centralized hospitals. Some clinical trials aimed at further improving treatment results by adding preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy based on histological confirmation using a correct needle biopsy are in progress. In recent years, molecular profiling has been used to select eligible patients for chemotherapy. In the future, precision medicine with next-generation sequencing technology will be expected among the diverse and potential future treatments for retroperitoneal sarcoma. In this review, we summarized the current state of retroperitoneal tumors and retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Risk factors for survival of head and neck soft tissue sarcomas: A comparison between 7th and 8th edition AJCC staging systems

OBJECTIVES

Soft tissue sarcomas of the head and neck (HNSTS) show various histological types and clinical behaviour. Recently, the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) proposed a staging system for HNSTS independent of other body soft tissue sarcomas, which requires validation. Therefore, we evaluated the prognostic factors for the survival of HNSTS patients through a comparison between previous and current AJCC staging systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study involved 135 consecutive HNSTS patients who underwent primary surgery, chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy. Patients were grouped into staged (S) and not staged (NS) cancer according to the AJCC 8th edition staging. Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) in all, S or NS patients.

RESULTS

Median follow-up period was 75 months and the 5-year OS and PFS rates of all patients were 67.8% and 53.4%, respectively, which was similar between S and NS groups. Age, tumour size and grade, overall stage (7th edition) and resection margin were the significant prognostic factors for OS and PFS in all patients and NS group (all P < 0.05), whereas positive resection margin was the only significant factor for OS and PFS in the S group (P < 0.001). While OS was poorly discriminated among different 8th edition T-categories, different 7th edition showed good discrimination among overall stages in all patients and the NS group.

CONCLUSION

The revised staging system may not provide an improved risk stratification for survival of HNSTS patients.

Applicability of the Sarculator and MSKCC nomograms to retroperitoneal sarcoma prognostication in an Asian tertiary center

AIM

To study the applicability of 2 common nomograms in retroperitoneal sarcoma patients treated in an Asian tertiary hospital, and to study relapse patterns.

METHODS

Patients from 1st January 2000 to 31st December 2017 were retrospectively analysed. R2 resection from an external institution were ineligible. Harrel's C concordance index and calibration plots were used to assess nomograms' accuracy.

RESULTS

109 patients were eligible, with a median age of 56, median tumour size of 16 cm and median follow up of 44.1 months. Most common subtypes were DDLPS (46.8%), LMS (19.3%) and WDLPS (13.8%). Overall, 81.1% had passed away from sarcoma. Recurrence patterns differed with subtypes; 6.7% of WDLPS and 66.7% of LMS had distant relapses. WDLPS patients had a median sarcoma specific survival of 139 months (122-NA), while the rest had a median SSS of 72.3 months (59.7-NA). The 5-years and 7-year OS were 63.0% (95% CI: 53.6%-74.0%) and 51.6% (41.1%-64.8%) respectively. The 5-years and 7-year DFS were 22.4% (15.5%-32.3%) and 17.5% (11%-27.8%) respectively. The 4-years, 8-years and 12-year SSS were 71.3% (62.7%-81.0%), 51.8% (40.8%-65.8%) and 32.2% (19.7%-52.6%) respectively. The concordance indices for 7-year DFS and OS (Sarculator) were 0.63 and 0.73. The concordance indices for 4-, 8- and 12-year SSS (MSKCC) were 0.64, 0.72 and 0.72.

CONCLUSION

Both nomograms were effective in our cohort. Both nomograms can be further improved by specifying the type of relapse and including a longer-term endpoint for the Sarculator.

An Evaluation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB): Does Size Matter?

OBJECTIVES

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are often large at diagnosis calling into question the seventh edition AJCC size classification of <5 cm (T1) or ≥5 cm (T2). The eighth edition expands T stage into 4 categories (T1: ≤5 cm, T2: 5<x≤10 cm, T3: 10<x≤15 cm, T4: >15 cm). We evaluated the prognostic ability of the eighth edition using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

METHODS

Patients with RPS treated between 1998 and 2011 were identified from the NCDB; overall survival (OS) was compared.

RESULTS

Of the 6427 patients identified, 9% had tumors ≤5 cm (n=580), 19.4% 5<x≤10 cm (n=1246), 20.2% 10<x≤15 cm (n=1298) and 47.4% >15 cm (n=3045). With the eighth edition, stage II patients (G2/3 ≤5 cm) have a similar OS to stage IIIA patients (G2/3 5 cm<x≤10 cm), and patients with larger tumors (stage IIIB, G2/3>10 cm) show a decrease in OS. Tumor size as a continuous variable had a modest effect on survival (HR, 1.004; P=0.04). On multivariate analysis, higher T-stage was associated with decreased OS (T4 HR, 1.3; P<0.001) but high grade and incomplete resection (R2) were stronger prognostic factors. The c-index for both editions were similar (80.13 eighth vs. 80.08 seventh).

CONCLUSIONS

The eighth edition AJCC staging system for retroperitoneal sarcoma incorporates larger tumor size parameters that better characterize most patients, but tumor size alone is only a modest predictor of outcome.

[French ccAFU guidelines - Update 2018-2020: Retroperitoneal sarcoma]

OBJECTIVE

To update French urological guidelines on retroperitoneal sarcoma.

METHODS

Comprehensive Medline search between 2016 and 2018 upon diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Level of evidence was evaluated.

RESULTS

Chest, abdomen and pelvis CT is mandatory to evaluate any suspected retroperitoneal sarcoma. MRI sometimes helps surgical planning. Before histological confirmation through biopsy, the patient must be registered in the French sarcoma pathology reference network. The biopsy standard should be an extraperitoneal coaxial percutaneous sampling before any retroperitoneal mass therapeutic decision. Surgery is retroperitoneal sarcoma cornerstone. The main objective is grossly negative margins and can be technically challenging. Multimodal treatment risks and benefits must be discussed in multidisciplinary teams. The relapse rate is related to tumor grade and surgical margins.

CONCLUSION

Retroperitoneal sarcoma prognosis is poor and closely related to the quality of initial management. Centralization through dedicated sarcoma pathology network in a high-volume center is mandatory.

The Vanderbilt staging system for retroperitoneal sarcoma: a validation study of 6857 patients from the National Cancer Database

The Vanderbilt staging system for retroperitoneal sarcoma incorporates information regarding the histologic subtype of sarcoma and outperforms the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC staging systems by several different statistical criteria. The current study was performed using an independent patient cohort from the National Cancer Database (n = 6857) to validate this proposed staging system. Each staging system was assessed for degree of discrimination by pairwise comparisons of adjacent stage categories. Predictive accuracy of 5-year overall survival was performed by comparison of areas under receiver operating characteristic curves generated from logistic regression. Three different concordance indices (Harrell's c, Somers' D, and Gönen and Heller's K) were calculated using bootstrap methods. Amount of variation in observed outcomes explained by each staging system was assessed using O'Quigley's ρ²k and Royston's R². Bayesian information criteria were also assessed as measures of model fit. The revised AJCC 8th edition T categories were not effective in categorizing risk of death. The Vanderbilt staging system showed the best discrimination between adjacent tumor stages, highest predictive accuracy for 5-year overall survival, a higher degree of concordance with and explained variation of clinical outcomes, and resulted in the best fitting regression model. These results obtained with an independent dataset validate the Vanderbilt staging system for retroperitoneal sarcoma and demonstrate its superiority in risk stratification over current and prior editions of the AJCC staging system.

RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU — Actualisation 2018—2020 : sarcomes rétropéritonéaux French ccAFU guidelines — Update 2018—2020: Retroperitoneal sarcoma

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.010. C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.010. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.