1
|
Ito S, Takamoto T, Nara S, Ban D, Mizui T, Nagata H, Takamizawa Y, Moritani K, Tsukamoto S, Kanemitsu Y, Kinugasa Y, Esaki M. RAS mutation associated with short surgically controllable period in colorectal liver metastases: a retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:247. [PMID: 39267117 PMCID: PMC11391794 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03529-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2024] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic implications of the RAS status in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) remain unclear. This study investigated the prognostic significance of RAS status after curative hepatectomy, focusing on surgical controllability. METHODS This retrospective study included liver-only CRLM patients who underwent the first hepatectomy between 2015 and 2022 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), surgically controllable period (SCP), and overall survival (OS) were compared between RAS wild-type (RAS-wt) and mutant (RAS-mt) patients. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors for each outcome and independent risk factors for less than 1 year SCP. RESULTS A total of 150 patients were evaluated, comprising 63 patients with RAS-mt status. There was no significant difference in RFS between RAS-mt and RAS-wt (7.00 vs. 8.03 months, p = 0.48). RAS-mt patients exhibited worse SCP (11.80 vs.21.13 months, p < 0.001) and OS (44.03 vs. 70.03 months, p < 0.001) compared to RAS-wt. Multivariate analysis identified RAS-mt as an independent prognostic factor for both OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.37, p < 0.001) and SCP (HR: 2.20, p < 0.001), and as an independent risk factor for less than 1 year of SCP (odds ratio, 2.31; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS CRLM with RAS mutations should be considered for strict surgical indications with preoperative chemotherapy and thorough examination, considering the possibility of short SCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sono Ito
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan
| | - Takeshi Takamoto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
| | - Satoshi Nara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Daisuke Ban
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Takahiro Mizui
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Nagata
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Takamizawa
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Konosuke Moritani
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tsukamoto
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yukihide Kanemitsu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kinugasa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan
| | - Minoru Esaki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boyev A, Tzeng CWD, Maki H, Arvide EM, Mrema DE, Jain AJ, Haddad A, Lendoire M, Malik N, Odisio BC, Chun YS, Tran Cao HS, Vauthey JN, Newhook TE. Local Therapy Improves Survival for Early Recurrence After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2547-2556. [PMID: 38148351 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14806-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early recurrence following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is associated with worse survival; yet, impact of further local therapy is unclear. We sought to evaluate whether local therapy benefits patients with early recurrence following hepatectomy for CLM. METHODS Clinicopathologic and survival outcomes of patients managed with hepatectomy for CLM (1/2001-12/2020) were queried from a prospectively maintained database. Timing of recurrence was stratified as early (recurrence-free survival [RFS] < 6 months), intermediate (RFS 6-12 months), and later (RFS > 12 months). Local therapy was defined as ablation, resection, or radiation. RESULTS Of 671 patients, 541 (81%) recurred with 189 (28%) early, 180 (27%) intermediate, and 172 (26%) later recurrences. Local therapy for recurrence resulted in improved survival, regardless of recurrence timing (early 78 vs. 32 months, intermediate 72 vs. 39 months, later 132 vs. 65 months, all p < 0.001). Following recurrence, treatment with local therapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.24), liver and extrahepatic recurrence (HR = 1.81), RAS + TP53 co-mutation (HR = 1.52), and SMAD4 mutation (HR = 1.92) were independently associated with overall survival (all p ≤ 0.002). Among patients with recurrence treated by local therapy, patients older than 65 years (HR 1.79), liver and extrahepatic recurrence (HR 2.05), primary site or other recurrence (HR 1.90), RAS-TP53 co-mutation (HR 1.63), and SMAD4 mutation (HR 2.06) had shorter post-local therapy survival (all p ≤ 0.04). CONCLUSIONS While most patients recur after hepatectomy for CLM, local therapy may result in long-term survival despite early recurrence. Somatic mutational profiling may help to guide the multidisciplinary consideration of local therapy after recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Boyev
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elsa M Arvide
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Deborah E Mrema
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anish J Jain
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neha Malik
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12062313. [PMID: 36983314 PMCID: PMC10051553 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Local recurrence after colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection severely affects survival; however, the required surgical margin width remains controversial. This study investigated the impact of KRAS status on surgical margin width and local recurrence rate (LRR) post-CRLM resection. Overall, 146 resected CRLMs with KRAS status (wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS): 98, KRAS mutant (mKRAS): 48) were included. The LRR for each group, R1 (margin positive) and R0 (margin negative), was analyzed by KRAS status. R0 was further stratified into Ra (margin ≥ 5 mm) and Rb (margin < 5 mm). Patients with local recurrence had significantly worse 5-year overall survival than those without local recurrence (p = 0.0036). The mKRAS LRR was significantly higher than wtKRAS LRR (p = 0.0145). R1 resection resulted in significantly higher LRRs than R0 resection for both wtKRAS and mKRAS (p = 0.0068 and p = 0.0204, respectively), and while no significant difference was observed in the Ra and Rb LRR with wtKRAS, the Rb LRR with mKRAS (33.3%) was significantly higher than Ra LRR (5.9%) (p = 0.0289). Thus, R0 resection is sufficient for CRLM with wtKRAS; however, CRLM with mKRAS requires resection with a margin of at least 5 mm to prevent local recurrence.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wensink GE, Bolhuis K, Elferink MAG, Fijneman RJA, Kranenburg O, Borel Rinkes IHM, Koopman M, Swijnenburg RJ, Vink GR, Hagendoorn J, Punt CJA, Roodhart JML, Elias SG. Predicting early extrahepatic recurrence after local treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 2023; 110:362-371. [PMID: 36655278 PMCID: PMC10364507 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients who develop early extrahepatic recurrence (EHR) may not benefit from local treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). This study aimed to develop a prediction model for early EHR after local treatment of CRLMs using a national data set. METHODS A Cox regression prediction model for EHR was developed and validated internally using data on patients who had local treatment for CRLMs with curative intent. Performance assessment included calibration, discrimination, net benefit, and generalizability by internal-external cross-validation. The prognostic relevance of early EHR (within 6 months) was evaluated by landmark analysis. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 35 months, 557 of the 1077 patients had EHR and 249 died. Median overall survival was 19.5 (95 per cent c.i. 15.6 to 23.0) months in patients with early EHR after CRLM treatment, compared with not reached (45.3 months to not reached) in patients without an early EHR. The EHR prediction model included side and stage of the primary tumour, RAS/BRAFV600E mutational status, and number and size of CRLMs. The range of 6-month EHR predictions was 5.9-56.0 (i.q.r. 12.9-22.0) per cent. The model demonstrated good calibration and discrimination. The C-index through 6 and 12 months was 0.663 (95 per cent c.i. 0.624 to 0.702) and 0.661 (0.632 to 0.689) respectively. The observed 6-month EHR risk was 6.5 per cent for patients in the lowest quartile of predicted risk compared with 32.0 per cent in the highest quartile. CONCLUSION Early EHR after local treatment of CRLMs can be predicted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G E Wensink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Karen Bolhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Remond J A Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Inne H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geraldine R Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanine M L Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Survival by Number and Sites of Resections of Recurrence after First Curative Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:2503-2511. [PMID: 36127553 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05456-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence after curative hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is common. We sought to determine if number and sites of resections of recurrence after hepatectomy for CRLM impact survival. METHODS The study included patients who underwent resection of recurrence following complete curative-intent resection of CRLM during 1998-2016 at two academic medical centers in Houston, USA, and Rome, Italy. The survival impacts of number and sites of resections of recurrence were evaluated. Patients with synchronous extrahepatic disease at curative CRLM resection were excluded. RESULTS Among 2163 patients who underwent curative hepatectomy, 1456 (67.3%) developed a recurrence. Four hundred seventy-eight patients underwent one (322/478; 67.4%) or two or more (156/478; 32.6%) resections of recurrence. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was higher in patients with resected than unresected recurrence (70.2% vs. 24.0%; p < 0.001). In patients who underwent only one resection of recurrence, the 5-year OS rate differed by location (lung, 81.6%; liver, 64.3%; other, 54.1%). In patients who underwent two or more resections of recurrence, the 5-year OS rate was similar for liver-only resection (87.5%) and resection of liver and other sites (66.1%) (p = 0.223) and for liver-only resection and other-sites-only resection (80.7%) (p = 0.258); 5-year OS rate by site of first resection of recurrence did not differ between liver (78.5%) and lung (81.8%) (p = 0.502) but was worse for other sites (61.1%) than for lung (p = 0.045). CONCLUSION When recurrence after initial CRLM resection is resectable, the ability to undergo resection was associated with improved survival and can be considered as an option regardless of the number of recurrence and resection. Sites of resection of recurrence impact survival and should be considered.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang HW, Wang LJ, Jin KM, Bao Q, Li J, Ge SK, Wang K, Xing BC. Impact of Age of Onset on Survival after Hepatectomy for Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Real-World Single-Center Experience. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:8456-8467. [PMID: 36354726 PMCID: PMC9689561 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29110666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of early-onset CRC is increasing. However, the effect of age of onset on the long-term outcome of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the age of onset and the oncological outcome of CRLM patients and to investigate whether the prognostic role of RAS mutation is altered with age. METHODS We retrospectively investigated consecutive patients at our institution who underwent initial liver resection between 2006 and 2020. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to balance the confounders among early- (≤45 years; EOCRLM), intermediate- (46-70 years; IOCRLM), and late-onset (>70 years; LOCRLM) groups. The prognostic role of RAS was assessed based on age group. RESULTS A total of 1189 patients were enrolled: 162 in the EOCRLM group, 930 in the IOCRLM group, and 97 in the LOCRLM group. No difference in disease-free survival (DFS) was found between the three groups. However, EOCRLM were more likely to develop extrahepatic and extrapulmonary metastasis and had significantly lower five-year OS rates than IOCRLM. After IPTW, EOCRLM remained a negative prognostic predictor. RAS mutations were significantly associated with worse survival than wild-type RAS in EOCRLM and IOCRLM. However, RAS mutation did not predict the prognosis of patients with LOCRLM. CONCLUSIONS Patients with EOCRLM had a significantly lower OS than IOCRLM patients and age influences the prognostic power of RAS status. These findings may be helpful for doctors to guide the clinical treatments and develop follow-up strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Wei Wang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian District, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Li-Jun Wang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian District, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Ke-Min Jin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian District, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Quan Bao
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian District, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Juan Li
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian District, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Si-Kai Ge
- Department of Mathematics Science, Xi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University, Suzhou 215127, China
| | - Kun Wang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian District, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Bao-Cai Xing
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian District, Beijing 100142, China
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Narayan RR, Datta J, Goldman DA, Aveson VG, Walch HS, Sanchez-Vega F, Gönen M, Balachandran VP, Drebin JA, Jarnagin WR, Kingham TP, Wei AC, Schultz N, Kemeny NE, D'Angelica MI. Genomic Predictors of Recurrence Patterns After Complete Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases and Adjuvant Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7579-7588. [PMID: 35896920 PMCID: PMC9561013 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12085-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite curative hepatectomy, most colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) patients relapse locally within 2 years. Genomic predictors for hepatic recurrence are poorly understood. This study was designed to identify genomic signatures for recurrence in resected CRLM patients treated with adjuvant hepatic artery infusion (HAI) and/or systemic (SYS) chemotherapy. METHODS Patients undergoing curative hepatectomy and adjuvant HAI+SYS or SYS between January 2000 and October 2017 with next-generation sequencing data were catalogued. Gene and signaling-level alterations were checked for association with time to any (AR), liver (LR), and extrahepatic recurrence (ER) by using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS Of 172 receiving HAI+SYS, 100 patients recurred, with 69 LR and 83 ER. Five- and ten-year LR-free rates were 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48-65%) and 51% (95% CI 41-60%), respectively. Five- and 10-year ER-free, rates were 51% (95% CI 43-58%) and 45% (95% CI 36-54%), respectively. More ER was observed with tumors harboring altered KRAS (38% [95% CI 25-50%] vs. 63% [95% CI 53-71%], p-adj = 0.003) and RAS/RAF (36% [95% CI 25-48%] vs. 66% [95% CI 56-74%], p-adj < 0.001) than wild-type. Co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was associated with worse AR (26% [95% CI 14-40%] vs. 48% [95% CI 39-57%], p-unadj < 0.001), ER (30% [95% CI 17-45%] vs. 62% [95% CI 53-70%], p-unadj < 0.001), and LR rate (40% [95% CI 24-57%] vs. 70% [95% CI 60-77%], p-unadj = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, controlling for clinical risk score, ablation, margin status, and primary T-stage, co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was associated with increased risk for AR (HR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.38-3.31, p-unadj < 0.001), LR (HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.06-3.02, p-unadj = 0.029), and ER (HR = 2.81, 95% CI 1.78-4.44, p-unadj < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Altered KRAS, RAS/RAF, and RAS/RAF-TP53 associated with earlier local and distant recurrence in resected CRLM patients receiving adjuvant HAI+SYS. Co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was a novel predictor of LR warranting investigation of whether genomic cooperativity is associated with this relapsing phenotype. Systemic therapies tailored to high-risk tumor biology are needed to reduce distant relapse after hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raja R Narayan
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jashodeep Datta
- Department of Surgery, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Debra A Goldman
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victoria G Aveson
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Henry S Walch
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Francisco Sanchez-Vega
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vinod P Balachandran
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Drebin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alice C Wei
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy E Kemeny
- Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael I D'Angelica
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dias Carvalho P, Martins F, Mendonça S, Ribeiro A, Machado AL, Carvalho J, Oliveira MJ, Velho S. Mutant KRAS modulates colorectal cancer cells invasive response to fibroblast‐secreted factors through the HGF/C‐MET axis. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:1810-1823. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrícia Dias Carvalho
- i3S ‐ Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto Portugal
- IPATIMUP – Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal
- ICBAS ‐ Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto Porto Portugal
| | - Flávia Martins
- i3S ‐ Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto Portugal
- IPATIMUP – Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal
- Department of Pathology FMUP – Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto Porto Portugal
| | - Susana Mendonça
- i3S ‐ Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto Portugal
- IPATIMUP – Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal
- Department of Pathology FMUP – Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto Porto Portugal
| | - Andreia Ribeiro
- i3S ‐ Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto Portugal
- IPATIMUP – Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal
| | - Ana Luísa Machado
- i3S ‐ Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto Portugal
- IPATIMUP – Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal
- Department of Pathology FMUP – Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto Porto Portugal
- Ciências Químicas e das Biomoléculas, Centro de Investigação em Saúde e Ambiente, Escola Superior de Saúde do Porto, Instituto Politécnico do Porto Porto Portugal
| | - Joana Carvalho
- i3S ‐ Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto Portugal
- IPATIMUP – Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal
| | - Maria José Oliveira
- i3S ‐ Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto Portugal
- INEB – Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Porto Porto Portugal
| | - Sérgia Velho
- i3S ‐ Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto Portugal
- IPATIMUP – Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hori Y, Seo S, Yoh T, Ueno K, Morino K, Toda R, Nishio T, Koyama Y, Fukumitsu K, Ishii T, Hata K, Masui T, Taura K, Hatano E. Impact of Preoperative CEA Uptrend on Survival Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastasis After Hepatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6745-6754. [PMID: 35691953 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11973-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has been reported as a prognostic factor in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) after hepatectomy. However, the impact of a preoperative "CEA uptrend" on prognosis after hepatectomy in these patients remains unknown. This study assessed the impact of CEA uptrend on prognosis in patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM. METHODS Consecutive patients with CRLM who underwent hepatectomy between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with CRLM for whom CEA was measured both around 1 month before (CEA-1m) and within 3 days (CEA-3d) before hepatectomy were enrolled. A CEA-3d higher than both the upper limit of normal (5 ng/ml) and CEA-1m was defined as a CEA uptrend. RESULTS Study participants comprised 212 patients with CRLM. Of these, 88 patients (41.5%) showed a CEA uptrend. CEA uptrend indicated better discriminatory ability (corrected Akaike information criteria, 733.72) and homogeneity (likelihood ratio chi-square value, 18.80) than CEA-3d or CEA-1m. Patients with CEA uptrend showed poorer overall survival than those without CEA uptrend (p < 0.001). After adjusting for known prognostic factors, the prognostic significance of CEA uptrend retained (hazard ratio 2.63, 95% confidence interval 1.63-4.26, p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, the prognostic significance of CEA uptrend was retained irrespective of the status of RAS mutation or response to preoperative chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS CEA uptrend offers better prediction of survival outcomes than conventional CEA measurements in patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutaro Hori
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Satoru Seo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Tomoaki Yoh
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kentaro Ueno
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koshiro Morino
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Rei Toda
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Nishio
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yukinori Koyama
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ken Fukumitsu
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takamichi Ishii
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koichiro Hata
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Masui
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kojiro Taura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rhaiem R, Rached L, Tashkandi A, Bouché O, Kianmanesh R. Implications of RAS Mutations on Oncological Outcomes of Surgical Resection and Thermal Ablation Techniques in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:816. [PMID: 35159083 PMCID: PMC8834154 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. More than 50% of patients with CRC will develop liver metastases (CRLM) during their disease. In the era of precision surgery for CRLM, several advances have been made in the multimodal management of this disease. Surgical treatment, combined with a modern chemotherapy regimen and targeted therapies, is the only potential curative treatment. Unfortunately, 70% of patients treated for CRLM experience recurrence. RAS mutations are associated with worse overall and recurrence-free survival. Other mutations such as BRAF, associated RAS /TP53 and APC/PIK3CA mutations are important genetic markers to evaluate tumor biology. Somatic mutations are of paramount interest for tailoring preoperative treatment, defining a surgical resection strategy and the indication for ablation techniques. Herein, the most relevant studies dealing with RAS mutations and the management of CRLM were reviewed. Controversies about the implication of this mutation in surgical and ablative treatments were also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami Rhaiem
- Faculty of Medecine, University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51100 Reims, France; (O.B.); (R.K.)
- Hepatobiliary, Pancreas, Endocrine and Digestive Surgical Oncology Department, Robert Debré Hospital, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France; (L.R.); (A.T.)
| | - Linda Rached
- Hepatobiliary, Pancreas, Endocrine and Digestive Surgical Oncology Department, Robert Debré Hospital, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France; (L.R.); (A.T.)
| | - Ahmad Tashkandi
- Hepatobiliary, Pancreas, Endocrine and Digestive Surgical Oncology Department, Robert Debré Hospital, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France; (L.R.); (A.T.)
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Faculty of Medecine, University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51100 Reims, France; (O.B.); (R.K.)
- Digestive Oncology and Hepatogastroenterology Department, Robert Debré Hospital, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France
| | - Reza Kianmanesh
- Faculty of Medecine, University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51100 Reims, France; (O.B.); (R.K.)
- Hepatobiliary, Pancreas, Endocrine and Digestive Surgical Oncology Department, Robert Debré Hospital, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France; (L.R.); (A.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The application of radiomics in predicting gene mutations in cancer. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:4014-4024. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08520-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
12
|
Takeda Y, Mise Y, Takahashi Y, Ito H, Inoue Y, Yoshioka R, Ono Y, Saiura A. Limited Prognostic Value of KRAS in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:2383-2391. [PMID: 34851437 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11015-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND RAS mutation status is considered a powerful prognostic factor in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). However, whether its prognostic power is robust regardless of administration of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden remains unclear. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for CLM from April 2010 through March 2017 in two hospitals were included. The prognostic value of KRAS was compared based on whether patients received preoperative chemotherapy and their tumor burden score (TBS). RESULTS We included 409 patients (median follow-up 38 months). In the preoperative chemotherapy group, patients with mutant KRAS (mt-KRAS) CLM had poorer overall survival (OS) than those with wild KRAS (wt-KRAS; 5-year OS: 37.7% vs 53.8%, p = 0.024), although their OS was not different from patients undergoing upfront surgery. Similarly, patients with mt-KRAS had poorer OS than those with wt-KRAS in TBS of 3-9 (5-year OS: 33.1% vs 63.2%, p = 0.001), although their OS was not different from patients with TBS < 3 or ≥ 9. In multivariate analysis, mt-KRAS was an independent prognostic factor of OS among patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.034-2.491; p = 0.035) and patients with TBS of 3-9 (HR 1.836, 95% CI 1.176-2.866; p = 0.008). However, it was not a prognostic factor in patients who underwent upfront surgery or with TBS > 3 or ≥ 9. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, the prognostic value of KRAS depends on their history of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinori Takeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Mise
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ito
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryuji Yoshioka
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ono
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. .,Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mauri G, Monfardini L, Garnero A, Zampino MG, Orsi F, Della Vigna P, Bonomo G, Varano GM, Busso M, Gazzera C, Fonio P, Veltri A, Calandri M. Optimizing Loco Regional Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: Technical Aspects and Biomarkers, Two Sides of the Same Coin. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2617. [PMID: 34073585 PMCID: PMC8198296 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and has a high rate of metastatic disease which is the main cause of CRC-related death. Oligometastatic disease is a clinical condition recently included in ESMO guidelines that can benefit from a more aggressive locoregional approach. This review focuses the attention on colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and highlights recommendations and therapeutic locoregional strategies drawn from the current literature and consensus conferences. The different percutaneous therapies (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, irreversible electroporation) as well as trans-arterial approaches (chemoembolization and radioembolization) are discussed. Ablation margins, the choice of the imaging guidance as well as characteristics of the different ablation techniques and other technical aspects are analyzed. A specific attention is then paid to the increasing role of biomarkers (in particular molecular profiling) and their role in the selection of the proper treatment for the right patient. In conclusion, in this review an up-to-date state of the art of the application of locoregional treatments on CRLM is provided, highlighting both technical aspects and the role of biomarkers, two sides of the same coin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Mauri
- Divisione di Radiologia Interventistica, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (F.O.); (P.D.V.); (G.B.); (G.M.V.)
- Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Emato-Oncologia, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Garnero
- Radiodiagnostica 1 U. A.O.U., San Luigi Gonzaga di Orbassano, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Torino, Italy; (A.G.); (M.B.); (A.V.); (M.C.)
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy;
| | - Maria Giulia Zampino
- Divisione di Oncologia Medica Gastrointestinale e Tumori Neuroendocrini, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Franco Orsi
- Divisione di Radiologia Interventistica, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (F.O.); (P.D.V.); (G.B.); (G.M.V.)
| | - Paolo Della Vigna
- Divisione di Radiologia Interventistica, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (F.O.); (P.D.V.); (G.B.); (G.M.V.)
| | - Guido Bonomo
- Divisione di Radiologia Interventistica, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (F.O.); (P.D.V.); (G.B.); (G.M.V.)
| | - Gianluca Maria Varano
- Divisione di Radiologia Interventistica, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (F.O.); (P.D.V.); (G.B.); (G.M.V.)
| | - Marco Busso
- Radiodiagnostica 1 U. A.O.U., San Luigi Gonzaga di Orbassano, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Torino, Italy; (A.G.); (M.B.); (A.V.); (M.C.)
| | - Carlo Gazzera
- Radiodiagnostica 1 U, A.O.U. Città della Scienza e della Salute, 10126 Torino, Italy;
| | - Paolo Fonio
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy;
- Radiodiagnostica 1 U, A.O.U. Città della Scienza e della Salute, 10126 Torino, Italy;
| | - Andrea Veltri
- Radiodiagnostica 1 U. A.O.U., San Luigi Gonzaga di Orbassano, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Torino, Italy; (A.G.); (M.B.); (A.V.); (M.C.)
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy
| | - Marco Calandri
- Radiodiagnostica 1 U. A.O.U., San Luigi Gonzaga di Orbassano, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Torino, Italy; (A.G.); (M.B.); (A.V.); (M.C.)
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ahmed A, Stauffer JA, LeGout JD, Burns J, Croome K, Paz-Fumagalli R, Frey G, Toskich B. The use of neoadjuvant lobar radioembolization prior to major hepatic resection for malignancy results in a low rate of post hepatectomy liver failure. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:751-761. [PMID: 34012663 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neoadjuvant yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is increasingly being used as a strategy to facilitate resection of otherwise unresectable tumors due to its ability to generate both tumor response and remnant liver hypertrophy. Perioperative outcomes after the use of neoadjuvant lobar TARE remain underinvestigated. Methods A single center retrospective review of patients who underwent lobar TARE prior to major hepatectomy for primary or metastatic liver cancer between 2007 and 2018 was conducted. Baseline demographics, radioembolization parameters, pre- and post-radioembolization volumetrics, intra-operative surgical data, adverse events, and post-operative outcomes were analyzed. Results Twenty-six patients underwent major hepatectomy after neoadjuvant lobar TARE. The mean age was 58.3 years (17-88 years). 62% of patients (n=16) had primary liver malignancies while the remainder had metastatic disease. Liver resection included right hepatectomy or trisegmentectomy, left or extended left hepatectomy, and sectorectomy/segmentectomy in 77% (n=20), 8% (n=2), and 15% (n=4) of patients, respectively. The mean length of stay was 8.3 days (range, 3-33 days) and there were no grade IV morbidities or 90-day mortalities. The incidence of post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) was 3.8% (n=1). The median time to progression after resection was 4.5 months (range, 3.3-10 months). Twenty-three percent (n=6) of patients had no recurrence. The median survival was 28.9 months (range, 16.9-46.8 months) from major hepatectomy and 37.6 months (range, 25.2-53.1 months) from TARE. Conclusions Major hepatectomy after neoadjuvant lobar radioembolization is safe with a low incidence of PHLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Altan Ahmed
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.,Department of Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Justin Burns
- Department of Transplantation, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Gregory Frey
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Beau Toskich
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Liang JY, Lin HC, Liu J, Wang DS, Yuan YF, Li BK, Zheng Y, Wu XJ, Chen G, Wang FH, Wang ZQ, Pan ZZ, Wan DS, Xu RH, Li YH. A novel prognostic nomogram for colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients with recurrence after hepatectomy. Cancer Med 2021; 10:1535-1544. [PMID: 33539664 PMCID: PMC7940234 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to construct a nomogram to predict personalized post-recurrence survival (PRS) among colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) patients with post-hepatectomy recurrence. METHODS Colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who received initial hepatectomy and had subsequent recurrence between 2001 and 2019 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from China were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort and a validation cohort on a ratio of 2:1. Univariable analysis was first employed to select potential predictive factors for PRS. Then, the multivariable Cox regression model was applied to recognize independent prognostic factors. According to the model, a nomogram to predict PRS was established. The nomogram's predictive capacity was further assessed utilizing concordance index (C-index) values, calibration plots, and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS About 376 patients were finally enrolled, with a 3-year PRS rate of 37.3% and a 5-year PRS rate of 24.6%. The following five independent predictors for PRS were determined to construct the nomogram: the largest size of liver metastases at initial hepatectomy, relapse-free survival, CEA level at recurrence, recurrent sites, and treatment for recurrence. The nomogram displayed fairly good discrimination and calibration. The C-index value was 0.742 for the training cohort and 0.773 for the validation cohort. Patients were grouped into three risk groups very well by the nomogram, with 5-year PRS rates of 45.2%, 23.3%, and 9.0%, respectively (p < 0.001) in the training cohort and 36.0%, 9.2%, and 4.6%, respectively (p < 0.001) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION A novel nomogram was built and validated to enable the prediction of personal PRS in CRLM patients with post-hepatectomy recurrence. The nomogram may help physicians in decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie-Ying Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao-Cheng Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingwen Liu
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - De-Shen Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yun-Fei Yuan
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Bin-Kui Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yun Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Jun Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Gong Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Feng-Hua Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Qiang Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Zhong Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - De-Sen Wan
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Rui-Hua Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu-Hong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Manuel O'Connor
- GI Clinical Oncology & GI Surgical Oncology, Instituto Alexander Fleming, Av Cramer 1180, Buenos Aires, C1426ANZ, Argentina
| | - Fernando Sanchez Loria
- GI Clinical Oncology & GI Surgical Oncology, Instituto Alexander Fleming, Av Cramer 1180, Buenos Aires, C1426ANZ, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Buisman FE, Filipe WF, Kemeny NE, Narayan RR, Srouji RM, Balachandran VP, Boerner T, Drebin JA, Jarnagin WR, Kingham TP, Wei AC, Grünhagen DJ, Verhoef C, Koerkamp BG, D'Angelica MI. Recurrence After Liver Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Repeat Resection or Ablation Followed by Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:808-816. [PMID: 32648182 PMCID: PMC7801355 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08776-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy after complete resection or ablation of recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients from two centers who were treated with resection and/or ablation of recurrent CRLM only between 1992 and 2018. Overall survival (OS) and hepatic disease-free survival (hDFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The Cox regression method was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Of 374 eligible patients, 81 (22%) were treated with adjuvant HAIP chemotherapy. The median follow-up for survivors was 65 months (IQR 32–118 months). Patients receiving adjuvant HAIP were more likely to have multifocal disease and receive perioperative systemic chemotherapy at time of resection for recurrence. A median hDFS of 46 months (95% CI 29–81 months) was found in patients treated with adjuvant HAIP compared with 18 months (95% CI 15–26 months) in patients treated with resection and/or ablation alone (p = 0.001). The median OS and 5-year OS were 89 months (95% CI 52–126 months) and 66%, respectively, in patients treated with adjuvant HAIP compared with 57 months (95% CI 47–67 months) and 47%, respectively, in patients treated with resection and/or ablation only (p = 0.002). Adjuvant HAIP was associated with superior hDFS (adjusted HR 0.599, 95% CI 0.38–0.93, p = 0.02) and OS (adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38–0.92, p = 0.02) in multivariable analysis. Conclusion Adjuvant HAIP chemotherapy after resection and/or ablation of recurrent CRLM is associated with superior hDFS and OS. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08776-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian E Buisman
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Wills F Filipe
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nancy E Kemeny
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Raja R Narayan
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.,Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Rami M Srouji
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Vinod P Balachandran
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Boerner
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Drebin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Alice C Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael I D'Angelica
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.,Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Okuno M, Hatano E, Toda R, Nishino H, Nakamura K, Ishii T, Seo S, Taura K, Yasuchika K, Yazawa T, Zaima M, Kanazawa A, Terajima H, Kaihara S, Adachi Y, Inoue N, Furumoto K, Manaka D, Tokuka A, Furuyama H, Doi K, Hirose T, Horimatsu T, Hasegawa S, Matsumoto S, Sakai Y, Uemoto S. Conversion to complete resection with mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab or cetuximab based on K-RAS status for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (BECK study): Long-term results of survival. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2020; 27:496-509. [PMID: 32362018 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE To investigate the long-term outcome and entire treatment course of patients with technically unresectable CRLM who underwent conversion hepatectomy and to examine factors associated with conversion to hepatectomy. METHODS Recurrence and survival data with long-term follow-up were analyzed in the cohort of a multi-institutional phase II trial for technically unresectable colorectal liver metastases (the BECK study). RESULTS A total of 22/12 patients with K-RAS wild-type/mutant tumors were treated with mFOLFOX6 + cetuximab/bevacizumab. The conversion R0/1 hepatectomy rate was significantly higher in left-sided primary tumors than in right-sided tumors (75.0% vs 30.0%, P = .022). The median follow-up was 72.6 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in the entire cohort was 48.1%. In patients who underwent R0/1 hepatectomy (n = 21), the 5-year RFS rate and OS rate were 19.1% and 66.3%, respectively. At the final follow-up, seven patients had no evidence of disease, five were alive with disease, and 20 had died from their original cancer. All 16 patients who achieved 5-year survival underwent conversion hepatectomy, and 11 of them underwent further resection for other recurrences (median: 2, range: 1-4). CONCLUSIONS Conversion hepatectomy achieved a similar long-term survival to the results of previous studies in initially resectable patients, although many of them experienced several post-hepatectomy recurrences. Left-sided primary was found to be the predictor for conversion hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Okuno
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Rei Toda
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroto Nishino
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kojiro Nakamura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takamichi Ishii
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Satoru Seo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kojiro Taura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kentaro Yasuchika
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takefumi Yazawa
- Department of Surgery, Shiga General Hospital, Moriyama, Japan
| | - Masazumi Zaima
- Department of Surgery, Shiga General Hospital, Moriyama, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Kanazawa
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, Izumo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Terajima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Oncology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kaihara
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | | | - Naoya Inoue
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Electric Power Hospital, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Clinical Laboratory, Yamato Takada Municipal Hospital, Yamato Takada, Japan
| | - Katsuyoshi Furumoto
- Department of Surgery, Kishiwada City Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Koseikai Takeda Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Dai Manaka
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Atsuo Tokuka
- Department of Surgery, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, Izumo, Japan
| | | | - Koji Doi
- Department of Surgery, Fukui Red Cross Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Hirose
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Otsu Red Cross Hospital, Otsu, Japan
| | - Takahiro Horimatsu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Suguru Hasegawa
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shigemi Matsumoto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshiharu Sakai
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinji Uemoto
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jethwa KR, Jang S, Mullikin TC, Harmsen WS, Petersen MM, Olivier KR, Park SS, Neben-Wittich MA, Hubbard JM, Sandhyavenu H, Whitaker TJ, Waltman LA, Kipp BR, Merrell KW, Haddock MG, Hallemeier CL. Association of tumor genomic factors and efficacy for metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic colorectal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2020; 146:29-36. [PMID: 32114263 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To report tumor genomic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and local failure (LF) for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who received metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). MATERIALS/METHODS This was a retrospective review of patients with CRC who received metastasis-directed SBRT. Tumor genomic alterations were identified through KRAS, BRAF, or a 50-gene next generation sequencing panel. OS and LF were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and competing-risk methods. RESULTS Eighty-five patients and 109 lesions were treated between 2008 and 2018. The median patient follow-up was 50 months (IQR: 28-107). The median and 5-year OS was 34 months and 26% (95% CI: 16-41%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of LF was 30% (95% CI: 23-41%). Univariate associates with OS included patient age ≥60 years, bone metastasis, increasing tumor size, KRAS mutation, and combined KRAS and TP53 mutation, while increasing tumor size, bone metastasis, biologically effective dose <100 Gy, and combined KRAS and TP53 mutation were associated with LF. Multivariate associates with OS included patient age ≥60 years (HR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.2-4.8, p = 0.01), lesion size per 1 cm (HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.5, p < 0.01), and KRAS mutation (HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.3, p < 0.01), while no multivariable model for LF retained more than a single variable. CONCLUSION Genomic factors, in particular KRAS and TP53 mutation, may assist in patient selection and radiotherapeutic decision-making for patients with oligometastatic CRC. Prospective validation, ideally with genomic correlation of all irradiated metastases, is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States; Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
| | - Samuel Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | - Trey C Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | - William S Harmsen
- Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | - Molly M Petersen
- Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | - Kenneth R Olivier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | | | - Joleen M Hubbard
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | | | - Thomas J Whitaker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | - Lindsey A Waltman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | - Benjamin R Kipp
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | - Kenneth W Merrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | - Michael G Haddock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sveen A, Kopetz S, Lothe RA. Biomarker-guided therapy for colorectal cancer: strength in complexity. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2020; 17:11-32. [PMID: 31289352 PMCID: PMC7577509 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-019-0241-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 194] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The number of molecularly stratified treatment options available to patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing, with a parallel rise in the use of biomarkers to guide prognostication and treatment decision-making. The increase in both the number of biomarkers and their use has resulted in a progressively complex situation, evident both from the extensive interactions between biomarkers and from their sometimes complex associations with patient prognosis and treatment benefit. Current and emerging biomarkers also reflect the genomic complexity of CRC, and include a wide range of aberrations such as point mutations, amplifications, fusions and hypermutator phenotypes, in addition to global gene expression subtypes. In this Review, we provide an overview of current and emerging clinically relevant biomarkers and their role in the management of patients with CRC, illustrating the intricacies of biomarker interactions and the growing treatment opportunities created by the availability of comprehensive molecular profiling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Sveen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Scott Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhang Q, Peng J, Ye M, Weng W, Tan C, Ni S, Huang D, Sheng W, Wang L. KRAS Mutation Predicted More Mirometastases and Closer Resection Margins in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:1164-1173. [PMID: 31720935 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08065-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of micrometastases is a source of recurrence after surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The KRAS mutation is common in colorectal cancer, however the correlation between KRAS status and micrometastases has not been thoroughly clarified. METHODS We enrolled a cohort of 251 consecutive CRLM patients who received complete liver surgery with known KRAS mutation status, and collected clinicopathological information, including micrometastases, margin status, preoperative chemotherapy, and liver recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. RESULTS KRAS-mutant (mutKRAS) patients had a higher incidence (60.3 vs. 40.8%; p = 0.002) and higher number of micrometastases [2.0 (range 0-38.0) vs. 0 (range 0-15.0); p < 0.001] than KRAS wild-type (wtKRAS) patients. The micrometastases in the mutKRAS group were more distant than those in the wtKRAS group [0.7 (range 0.1-9.0) vs. 0.6 (range 0.2-5.0) mm; p = 0.018). The mutKRAS group had more involved margin resections (21.5 vs. 9.2%; p = 0.07) and narrower margin widths [2.0 (range 0-40.0) vs. 4.3 (0-50.0) mm; p = 0.002] than the wtKRAS group. In addition, preoperative chemotherapy was associated with a lower rate of micrometastases in mutKRAS CRLM tumors (p < 0.05). mutKRAS status, positive margins, and micrometastases were all related to worse LRFS and OS (p < 0.05); however, micrometastases were not significantly correlated with OS in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.106). CONCLUSIONS mutKRAS patients had more micrometastases, increased R1 resections, and narrower margins. The presence of micrometastases may have led to the narrow margin width observed in these cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiongyan Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Junjie Peng
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Ye
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiwei Weng
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Cong Tan
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shujuan Ni
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan Huang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiqi Sheng
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Urbonas T, Anderson EM, Gordon-Weeks AN, Kabir SI, Soonawalla Z, Silva MA, Gleeson FV, Reddy S. Factors predicting ablation site recurrence following percutaneous microwave ablation of colorectal hepatic metastases. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1175-1184. [PMID: 30777696 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Revised: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microwave ablation (MWA) is a recognised treatment option for liver metastases. The size of the tumour is a well-established factor that influences the success of MWA. However, the effect of "heat sink" on the success of MWA for hepatic metastases is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether heat sink effect is a factor that contributes to ablation site recurrence (ASR). METHODS A prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent percutaneous MWA for treatment of colorectal liver metastases was analysed. Imaging and demographic characteristics were compared between metastases that recurred following ablation and those that did not. Proximity to a large hepatic vein was defined as <10 mm. RESULTS 126 ablations in 87 patients met the inclusion criteria and were studied over a median follow-up period of 28 (12-75) months. ASR was detected in 43 ablations (34%) and was associated with clinical risk score (CRS) ≥2 (OR 2.2 95% CI 1.3-3.3, p = 0.029), metastasis size (OR 0.953 95% CI (0.929-0.978), p < 0.001) and proximity to a large hepatic vein (OR 7.5 95%CI 2.4-22.8, p < 0.001). Proximity to a large hepatic vein was not associated with reduced overall survival (OS) but was associated with liver-specific recurrence (HR 4.7 95%CI 1.7-12.5, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS In addition to tumour size proximity to large hepatic venous structures is an independent predictor of ASR and liver-specific recurrence following MWA. However, this was not associated with overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Urbonas
- Department of HPB Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
| | - Ewan M Anderson
- Department of Radiology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Alex N Gordon-Weeks
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Syed I Kabir
- Department of HPB Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Zahir Soonawalla
- Department of HPB Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Michael A Silva
- Department of HPB Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Fergus V Gleeson
- Department of Radiology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Srikanth Reddy
- Department of HPB Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nierop PMH, Galjart B, Höppener DJ, van der Stok EP, Coebergh van den Braak RRJ, Vermeulen PB, Grünhagen DJ, Verhoef C. Salvage treatment for recurrences after first resection of colorectal liver metastases: the impact of histopathological growth patterns. Clin Exp Metastasis 2019; 36:109-118. [PMID: 30843120 PMCID: PMC6445820 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-019-09960-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The majority of patients recur after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Patients with CRLM displaying a desmoplastic histopathological growth pattern (dHGP) have a better prognosis and lower probability of recurrence than patients with non-dHGP CRLM. The current study evaluates the impact of HGP type on the pattern and treatment of recurrences after first resection of CRLM. A retrospective cohort study was performed, including patients with known HGP type after complete resection of CRLM. All patients were treated between 2000 and 2015. The HGP was determined on the CRLM resected at first partial hepatectomy. The prognostic value of HGPs, in terms of survival outcome, in the current patient cohort were previously published. In total 690 patients were included, of which 492 (71%) developed recurrent disease. CRLM displaying dHGP were observed in 103 patients (21%). Amongst patients with dHGP CRLM diagnosed with recurrent disease, more liver-limited recurrences were seen (43% vs. 31%, p = 0.030), whereas patients with non-dHGP more often recurred at multiple locations (34% vs. 19%, p = 0.005). Patients with dHGP CRLM were more likely to undergo curatively intended local treatment for recurrent disease (adjusted odds ratio: 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.46-3.84]; p < 0.001) compared to patients with non-dHGP. The present study demonstrates that liver-limited disease recurrence after complete resection of CRLM is more often seen in patients with dHGP, whereas patients with non-dHGP more frequently experience multi-organ recurrence. Recurrences in patients with dHGP at first CRLM resection are more likely to be salvageable by local treatment modalities, but no prognostic impact of HGPs after salvage therapy for recurrent disease was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter M H Nierop
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Boris Galjart
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik J Höppener
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eric P van der Stok
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Peter B Vermeulen
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, (GZA Hospitals and University of Antwerp), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Margonis GA, Kreis ME, Wolfgang CL, Weiss MJ. Mutation status and surgical selection. J Surg Oncol 2019; 119:616-622. [PMID: 30779134 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Current evidence cannot support denying metastasectomy in otherwise resectable patients solely based on their overall KRAS or BRAF mutational status. The combination of KRAS or BRAF mutational status with certain clinicopathologic characteristics has defined groups of patients who may not derive benefit from metastasectomy, but external validation is needed. The effect of certain KRAS or BRAF variants on survival may be more pronounced and therefore future studies should consider them for surgical selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios A Margonis
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Martin E Kreis
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Okuno M, Conrad C. ASO Author Reflections: Can We Predict an Unsalvageable Recurrence Following Colorectal Liver Metastasectomy? Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:549-550. [PMID: 30565037 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-7015-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Okuno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|