Surgeon Variability and Factors Predicting for Reoperation Following Breast-Conserving Surgery

Is the Number or Proximity of Margins Less than 2 mm Associated with an Increased Mastectomy Rate in Patients Attempting Breast Conservation Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?

BACKGROUND

Consensus guidelines recommend ≥ 2 mm margins in patients undergoing partial mastectomy (PM) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). It is unknown whether the number or proximity of margins less than 2 mm is associated with an increased mastectomy rate in patients attempting breast conservation therapy (BCT) for DCIS. The aim of this study is to examine this relationship.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An institutional database review identified 208 patients with DCIS who underwent PM at a tertiary referral center and community hospitals from July 2020 to June 2023. Patients with a history of breast cancer, previous surgery for breast cancer, ipsilateral invasive carcinoma, papillary carcinoma, Paget's disease, more lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) than DCIS present, initial mastectomy, no DCIS present, routine shave margins (of all vectors), and ≥ 2 mm margins of all six vectors were excluded. Selective intraoperative margin re-excisions were included.

RESULTS

A total of 208 patients who met inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed. 122 (25%) had one close/positive (< 2 mm) margin and 86 (18%) had two or more close/positive margins. Of the patients with one close/positive margin, 7% (9/122) eventually underwent mastectomy. Of the patients with two or more close/positive margins, 20% (17/86) eventually underwent mastectomy. Overall, no patients with opposing margins underwent mastectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing PM for DCIS have a mastectomy rate that is increased threefold, with two or more close/positive margins at initial PM, when compared with those with only one close/positive margin. The presence of opposing close/positive margins at initial PM did not increase the mastectomy rate and most were cleared with re-excision.

Contemporary Analysis of Reexcision and Conversion to Mastectomy Rates and Associated Healthcare Costs for Women Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery

PURPOSE

This study was designed to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date understanding of population-level reoperation rates and incremental healthcare costs associated with reoperation for patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using Merative™ MarketScan® commercial insurance data and Medicare 5% fee-for-service claims data. The study included females aged 18-64 years in the commercial cohort and females aged 18 years and older in the Medicare cohort, who underwent initial BCS for breast cancer in 2017-2019. Reoperation rates within a year of the initial BCS and overall 1-year healthcare costs stratified by reoperation status were measured.

RESULTS

The commercial cohort included 17,129 women with a median age of 55 (interquartile range [IQR] 49-59) years, and the Medicare cohort included 6977 women with a median age of 73 (IQR 69-78) years. Overall reoperation rates were 21.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 20.5-21.8%) for the commercial cohort and 14.9% (95% CI 14.1-15.7%) for the Medicare cohort. In both cohorts, reoperation rates decreased as age increased, and conversion to mastectomy was more prevalent among younger women in the commercial cohort. The mean healthcare costs during 1 year of follow-up from the initial BCS were $95,165 for the commercial cohort and $36,313 for the Medicare cohort. Reoperations were associated with 24% higher costs in both the commercial and Medicare cohorts, which translated into $21,607 and $8559 incremental costs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of reoperation after BCS have remained high and have contributed to increased healthcare costs. Continuing efforts to reduce reoperation need more attention.

Preoperative breast MRI positively impacts surgical outcomes of needle biopsy-diagnosed pure DCIS: a patient-matched analysis from the MIPA study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the influence of preoperative breast MRI on mastectomy and reoperation rates in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

METHODS

The MIPA observational study database (7245 patients) was searched for patients aged 18-80 years with pure unilateral DCIS diagnosed at core needle or vacuum-assisted biopsy (CNB/VAB) and planned for primary surgery. Patients who underwent preoperative MRI (MRI group) were matched (1:1) to those who did not receive MRI (noMRI group) according to 8 confounding covariates that drive referral to MRI (age; hormonal status; familial risk; posterior-to-nipple diameter; BI-RADS category; lesion diameter; lesion presentation; surgical planning at conventional imaging). Surgical outcomes were compared between the matched groups with nonparametric statistics after calculating odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

Of 1005 women with pure unilateral DCIS at CNB/VAB (507 MRI group, 498 noMRI group), 309 remained in each group after matching. First-line mastectomy rate in the MRI group was 20.1% (62/309 patients, OR 2.03) compared to 11.0% in the noMRI group (34/309 patients, p = 0.003). The reoperation rate was 10.0% in the MRI group (31/309, OR for reoperation 0.40) and 22.0% in the noMRI group (68/309, p < 0.001), with a 2.53 OR of avoiding reoperation in the MRI group. The overall mastectomy rate was 23.3% in the MRI group (72/309, OR 1.40) and 17.8% in the noMRI group (55/309, p = 0.111).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to those going directly to surgery, patients with pure DCIS at CNB/VAB who underwent preoperative MRI had a higher OR for first-line mastectomy but a substantially lower OR for reoperation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

When confounding factors behind MRI referral are accounted for in the comparison of patients with CNB/VAB-diagnosed pure unilateral DCIS, preoperative MRI yields a reduction of reoperations that is more than twice as high as the increase in overall mastectomies.

KEY POINTS

• Confounding factors cause imbalance when investigating the influence of preoperative MRI on surgical outcomes of pure DCIS. • When patient matching is applied to women with pure unilateral DCIS, reoperation rates are significantly reduced in women who underwent preoperative MRI. • The reduction of reoperations brought about by preoperative MRI is more than double the increase in overall mastectomies.

Can We Do Breast-Conserving Surgery Without Intraoperative Frozen Section of Margin?

PURPOSE

This study was a retrospective and nonrandomized study to assess the safety and reliability of identifying the surgical margin in breast cancer breast-conserving surgery (BCS) by using intraoperative ultrasonic location and specimen mammography instead of traditional intraoperative frozen pathological section.

METHODS

Among the patients who underwent BCS from May 2019 to October 2021, according to the different methods of evaluating the intraoperative margin, 104 breast cancer patients were included in the frozen edge group, 53 breast cancer patients were included in the freeze-free group, and the surgeon judged whether extended resection was needed based on the results of pathological section or evaluation of intraoperative ultrasound and mammography. The surgical margins of the two groups were judged by postoperative pathological results as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The median waiting pathology results time in the frozen edge group was 64 minutes, while the waiting time in the freeze-free group was 30 minutes, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .0001). The postoperative pathological results showed that the positive rate of the surgical margin in the frozen edge group was 0.96%. The coincidence rate of intraoperative frozen and postoperative pathological results was 99.04%. The coincidence rate between intraoperative mammography and postoperative pathological results was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

In BCS, the method of using intraoperative staining markers combined with mammography to evaluate the resection margin is highly accurate, reliable, economical and convenient, and at the same time reduces the waiting time of the operator during the operation. However, this was not a randomized controlled study, and there was patient selection bias, and its safety needs to be confirmed by long-term follow-up. In the future, it is expected to become the mainstream means of evaluating.

Intersurgeon Variability of Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Worsening Achievement Rates After Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Using the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System, we sought to evaluate surgeon performance variability via minimal clinically important difference for worsening (MCID-W) achievement rates in primary and revision total knee and hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 3,496 primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), 4,622 primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 592 revision THA, and 569 revision TKA patients. Patient factors collected included demographics, comorbidities, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System physical function short form 10a scores. Surgeon factors collected included caseload, years of experience, and fellowship training. The MCID-W rate was calculated as the percent of patients in each surgeon's cohort who achieved MCID-W. Distribution was presented via a histogram with associated average, standard deviation, range, and interquartile range (IQR). Linear regressions were performed to evaluate the potential correlation between surgeon- and patient-level factors with MCID-W rate.

RESULTS

The average MCID-W rates of the surgeons represented in the primary THA and TKA cohorts were 12.7 ± 9.2% (range, 0 to 35.3%; IQR, 6.7 to 15.5%) and 18.0 ± 8.2% (range, 0 to 36%; IQR, 14.3 to 22.0%). The average MCID-W rates among the revision THA and TKA surgeons were 36.0 ± 22.2% (range, 9.1 to 90%; IQR, 25.0 to 41.4%) and 21.2 ± 7.7% (range, 8.1 to 37.0%; IQR, 16.6 to 25.4%). Strong correlations were not found between patient- or surgeon-level factors and MCID-W rate of the surgeon.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated variance in MCID-W achievement rates across surgeons in both primary and revision joint arthroplasty, independent of patient- or surgeon-level factors.

Cost minimization in breast conserving surgery: a comparative study of radiofrequency spectroscopy and full cavity shave margins

BACKGROUND

In an effort to minimize positive margins and subsequent re-excision after breast conserving surgery (BCS), many providers and facilities have implemented either a Full Cavity Shave (FCS) approach or adding the MarginProbe Radiofrequency Spectroscopy System.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to create a functioning Pro-Forma for use by facilities and payers to evaluate and compare the cost savings of implementing FCS or MarginProbe based on personalized variable inputs.

METHODS

A decision tree demonstrating three possible surgical pathways, BCS, BCS + FCS, and BCS + MarginProbe was developed with clinical inputs for re-excision rate, mastectomy as 2nd surgery, rate of reconstruction, and rate of 3rd surgery derived by a literature review. A surgical pathway cost formula was created using the decision tree and financial inputs derived by utilizing the nation's largest database of privately billed health insurance claims and Medicare claims data (fairhealth.org). Using the surgical pathway formula and financial inputs, a customizable Pro-Forma was created for immediate cost savings analysis of BCS + FCS and BCS + Marginprobe using variable inputs. Costs are from the perspective of third-party payers.

RESULTS

Utilizing MarginProbe to reduce re-excisions for positive margins can be associated with better cost-savings than FCS due to the increased pathology processing costs by using an FCS approach. The reduction in re-excision provided by both FCS and MarginProbe offset their increased expense to various degrees with cost savings of each method improving as baseline re-excisions rates increase, until ultimately each may become cost-neutral or cost-prohibitive when compared to BCS alone. Our data suggest that in the privately insured population, MarginProbe provides a cost-savings over BCS alone when baseline re-excision rates are over 20% and that FCS becomes cost-saving when baseline re-excision rates are over 29%. For Medicare patients, MarginProbe provides a cost-savings when baseline re-excision rates exceed 34%, and FCS becomes cost-saving for re-excision rates over 52%. Our Pro-Forma allows an individual provider or institution to evaluate the cost savings of the FCS approach and/or utilization of the MarginProbe device such that the additional cost or cost-savings of utilizing one or both of these methods can be quickly calculated based on their facility's volume and baseline re-excision rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that utilizing either an FCS approach or the MarginProbe radiofrequency spectroscopy system may be a cost-saving solution to reducing the rate of re-excisions depending on a facility or practice's surgical volume and baseline re-excision rate. The degree to which each of these interventions provides an added cost or cost-savings to healthcare payers can be evaluated by utilizing the Pro-Forma outlined herein with customizable variable inputs.

Does cavity margin shaving reduce residual tumor and re-excision rates? A systematic review

PURPOSE

Cavity shaving (CS) is a surgical technique used in the treatment of breast cancer (BC). It may reduce margin positivity in histologic assessment and consequently reduces re- excision rates in breast conserving surgery (BCS). The evidence for this assumption is described in the present review.

METHODS

A systematic review of relevant literature in English from January 1999 to April 2019 was conducted. The analysis included studies on CS and its effects on re-excision rates and margin positivity. We searched PubMed databases for relevant publications. In total, 22 studies were included in the present review.

RESULTS

The benefit from CS on re-excision rates and histologic margin positivity was variable. Out of 22 studies, 17 reported a reduction in both re-excision rates and histologic margin positivity in margin shaved patients. Four studies could not find a significant reduction of second surgeries and residual tumor rates. One study suggested that CS after BCS was superior to single BCS only in subgroup analysis in IDC tumors.

CONCLUSION

CS is a surgical technique that was shown to reduce re-excision and margin positivity rates in most of the studies. Furthermore, it can be a useful tool to assess specimen margins and detect multifocality.

Factors influencing suboptimal pathologic margins and re-excision following breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ

INTRODUCTION

Re-excisions following breast conserving surgery (BCS) are common, occurring more frequently in ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) than its' malignant counterpart. Although one quarter of patients with breast cancer will have DCIS, there is limited information available regarding factors predisposing to inadequate pathologic margins, and the need for re-excision.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients treated for DCIS between the years 2010-2016 was conducted. Patients with DCIS undergoing BCS were identified and evaluated for demographic and pathologic factors associated with suboptimal pathologic margins and re-excision. Multivariate analysis with Wald Chi-Square testing was performed.

RESULTS

241 patients underwent BCS with suboptimal margins (SOM) in 51.7% (123/238), with 27.8% undergoing re-excision (67/241). Tumor size was the most influential variable, positively associated with SOM (OR = 10.25, CI: 5.50-19.13) and re-excision (OR = 6.36, CI: 3.92-10.31). Patient age was inversely associated with SOM (OR = 0.58, CI: 0.39-0.85) and subsequent re-excisions (OR = 0.56, CI: 0.36-0.86). Low tumour grade was associated with re-excision (OR = 1.31, CI: 0.63-2.71), while ER negative disease was associated with SOM (OR = 2.24, CI: 1.21-4.14).

DISCUSSION

Inadequate pathologic margins following BCS, and subsequent re-excision rates are common in patients with DCIS, and consistent with the literature. Tumour size is the dominant factor driving this occurrence, with patient age and tumour grade also impacting outcomes.

The Impact of the Introduction of the Breast Unit Model in a Northwestern Italian Region

Breast cancer is the most common tumor in middle-aged and older women. In 2003, the European Parliament recommended to Member States that all women with breast cancer should be treated by a multidisciplinary team and that a network of certified breast centers be organized (the centers have been called Breast Units (BUs)). With the present study, we aim to explore the impact of the introduction of the BU organizational model in the Liguria region, Italy, through different outcome indicators. An explorative retrospective analysis was conducted through the period from 2013 to 2019 to assess the impact of the introduction of the BU model in our region. We identified two periods: before (2014–2015) and after (2017–2018) the introduction of this organizational model to assess its value impact through the definition of six measurable outcome indicators. Length of hospitalization, repeated specialist outpatient diagnostic procedures and the rate of subjects who started radiotherapy treatment within 60 days improved after the introduction of BUs. The passive health migration rate only improved significantly for one local health unit (LHU), while reintervention and diagnosis–surgery time did not show any enhancement after the introduction of the BU model. The BU model seems to provide an increase in several aspects of the healthcare offered to breast cancer patients in Liguria, specifically in those areas where a shared guideline could assist healthcare workers. Future research, such as pilot studies, are needed to assess the impact of the introduction of the BU model in our reality.

Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients

Background and Objectives

Optimal margins for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remain controversial in breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. We examine the association of positive margins, reoperations, DCIS and age.

Methods

A retrospective study of histopathological reports (4489 patients). Margin positivity was defined as ink on tumor for invasive carcinoma. For DCIS, we applied 2 mm anterior and side margin thresholds, and ink on tumor in the posterior margin.

Results

The incidence of positive side margins was 20% in BCS and 5% in mastectomies (p < 0.001). Of these patients, 68% and 14% underwent a reoperation (p < 0.001). After a positive side margin in BCS, the reoperation rates according to age groups were 74% (<49), 69% (50–64), 68% (65–79), and 42% (80+) (p = 0.013). Of BCS patients with invasive carcinoma in the side margin, 73% were reoperated on. A reoperation was performed in 70% of patients with a close (≤1 mm) DCIS side margin, compared to 43% with a wider (1.1–2 mm) margin (p = 0.002). The reoperation rates were 55% in invasive carcinoma with close DCIS, 66% in close extensive intraductal component (EIC), and 83% in close pure DCIS (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Individual assessment as opposed to rigid adherence to guidelines was used in the decision on reoperation.

A New Look into Cancer-A Review on the Contribution of Vibrational Spectroscopy on Early Diagnosis and Surgery Guidance

Simple Summary

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, with the detection of the disease in its early stages, as well as a correct assessment of the tumour margins, being paramount for a successful recovery. While breast cancer is one of most common types of cancer, head and neck cancer is one of the types of cancer with a lower prognosis and poor aesthetic results. Vibrational spectroscopy detects molecular vibrations, being sensitive to different sample compositions, even when the difference was slight. The use of spectroscopy in biomedicine has been extensively explored, since it allows a broader assessment of the biochemical fingerprint of several diseases. This literature review covers the most recent advances in breast and head and neck cancer early diagnosis and intraoperative margin assessment, through Raman and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopies. The rising field of spectral histopathology was also approached. The authors aimed at expounding in a more concise and simple way the challenges faced by clinicians and how vibrational spectroscopy has evolved to respond to those needs for the two types of cancer with the highest potential for improvement regarding an early diagnosis, surgical margin assessment and histopathology.

Abstract

In 2020, approximately 10 million people died of cancer, rendering this disease the second leading cause of death worldwide. Detecting cancer in its early stages is paramount for patients’ prognosis and survival. Hence, the scientific and medical communities are engaged in improving both therapeutic strategies and diagnostic methodologies, beyond prevention. Optical vibrational spectroscopy has been shown to be an ideal diagnostic method for early cancer diagnosis and surgical margins assessment, as a complement to histopathological analysis. Being highly sensitive, non-invasive and capable of real-time molecular imaging, Raman and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopies give information on the biochemical profile of the tissue under analysis, detecting the metabolic differences between healthy and cancerous portions of the same sample. This constitutes tremendous progress in the field, since the cancer-prompted morphological alterations often occur after the biochemical imbalances in the oncogenic process. Therefore, the early cancer-associated metabolic changes are unnoticed by the histopathologist. Additionally, Raman and FTIR spectroscopies significantly reduce the subjectivity linked to cancer diagnosis. This review focuses on breast and head and neck cancers, their clinical needs and the progress made to date using vibrational spectroscopy as a diagnostic technique prior to surgical intervention and intraoperative margin assessment.

Clinical utility of the 21-gene assay in predicting response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

OncotypeDX© Recurrence Score (RS) is a multigene panel used to aid therapeutic decision making in early-stage, estrogen receptor positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer.

AIM

To compare responses to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in patients with ER+/HER2-breast cancer following substratification by RS testing.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating pathological complete response (pCR), partial response (PR), and successful conversion to breast conservation surgery (BCS) rates following NET guided by RS were retrieved. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) following estimation by Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Eight prospective studies involving 691 patients were included. The mean age was 62.6 years (range 25-85) and the mean RS was 14.5 (range 0-68). Patients with RS < 25 (OR: 4.60, 95% CI: 2.53-8.37, P < 0.001) and RS < 30 (OR: 3.40, 95% CI: 1.96-5.91, P < 0.001) were more likely to achieve PR than their counterparts. NET prescription failed to increase BCS conversion rates for patients with RS < 18 (OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.04-1.47, P = 0.120) and RS > 30 (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.64-2.49, P = 0.490) respectively. Only 22 patients achieved pCR (2.8%) and RS group failed to predict pCR following NET (P = 0.850).

CONCLUSION

Estimations from this analysis indicate that those with low-intermediate RS on core biopsy are four times more likely to respond to NET than those with high-risk RS. Performing RS testing on diagnostic biopsy may be useful in guiding NET prescription.

Human Serum Albumin Decorated Indocyanine Green Improves Fluorescence-Guided Resection of Residual Lesions of Breast Cancer in Mice

Objective

Achieving negative resection margin is critical but challenging in breast-conserving surgery. Fluorescence-guided surgery allows the surgeon to visualize the tumor bed in real-time and to facilitate complete resection. We envisioned that intraoperative real-time fluorescence imaging with a human serum albumin decorated indocyanine green probe could enable complete surgical removal of breast cancer in a mouse model.

Methods

We prepared the probe by conjugating indocyanine green (ICG) with human serum albumin (HSA). In vitro uptake of the HSA-ICG probe was compared between human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 and normal breast epithelial cell line MCF 10A. In vivo probe selectivity for tumors was examined in nude mice bearing MDA-MB-231-luc xenografts and the FVB/N-Tg (MMTV-PyMT) 634Mul/J mice model with spontaneous breast cancer. A positive-margin resection mice model bearing MDA-MB-231-luc xenograft was established and the performance of the probe in assisting surgical resection of residual lesions was examined.

Results

A significantly stronger fluorescence intensity was detected in MDA-MB-231 cells than MCF 10A cells incubated with HSA-ICG. In vivo fluorescence imaging showed that HSA-ICG had an obvious accumulation at tumor site at 24 h with tumor-to-normal tissue ratio of 8.19 ± 1.30. The same was true in the transgenic mice model. The fluorescence intensity of cancer tissues was higher than that of non-cancer tissues (58.53 ± 18.15 vs 32.88 ± 11.34). During the surgical scenarios, the residual tumors on the surgical bed were invisible with the naked eye, but were detected and resected with negative margin under HSA-ICG guidance in all the mice (8/8). Recurrence rate among mice that underwent resection with HSA-ICG (0/8) was significantly lower than the rates among mice with ICG (4/8), as well as the control group under white light (7/7).

Conclusions

This study suggests that real-time in vivo visualization of breast cancer with an HSA-ICG fluorescent probe facilitates complete surgical resection of breast cancer in a mouse xenograft model.

Lowering Re-excision Rates After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Unraveling the Intersection Between Surgeon Case Volumes and Techniques

BACKGROUND

The re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are significantly varied, with surgeon case volume as one influential factor. Surgeons with higher case volumes have been shown to have lower reoperation rates. This study attempted to determine whether this may be attributable to excessive breast tissue removal during initial BCS.

METHODS

A retrospective study analyzed referrals to the authors' cancer center during 3 years. Patients undergoing initial BCS for ductal carcinoma in situ or T1-T3 breast cancers were included. Patient age, tumor factors, surgeon case volume, and the calculated resection ratio (CRR) were analyzed. The total resection volume was divided by the optimal resection volume to produce the CRR, which reflected the magnitude of excess tissue resected during initial BCS. Comparison of the mean CRR between surgeon case-volume categories was performed with a repeated measures analysis of variance. A multivariate regression model assessed the effects of the CRR and surgeon case volume on re-excision rates.

RESULTS

Larger tumor size, lobular histology, and lower CRR were associated with increased re-excision rates. The CRR was similar for each surgeon case-volume group. Surgeon case volume was not independently associated with re-excision rates, but surgeons with very high case volumes had lower odds of re-excision than surgeons with intermediate case volumes (odds ratio 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

When control was used for the CRR, apparent differences in re-excision rates between surgeon case-volume groups were observed, suggesting that surgeons with higher case volumes may be more accurate when performing BCS.

Technology for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

As breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has become standard for treatment of breast cancer, the need for new technology to improve intraoperative margin assessment (IMA) has become clear. Close or positive margins during BCS lead to additional surgeries, treatment delay, additional stress for patients, and healthcare cost. Academia and industry have developed a diverse field of new technologies to allow surgeons to assess margins in the operating room. These technologies aim to reduce current rates of positive margins on final pathology.

METHODS

We selected recently developed IMA technologies, some of which have undergone large clinical trials and others that are still in early stage development. Technologies were categorized based on underlying methodology to differentiate malignant and normal tissue: spectroscopy, electrical properties, optical imaging and molecular imaging. Additionally, this review details clinical investigations, relevant statistical analysis as well as strengths and weaknesses of the various technologies.

CONCLUSION

Numerous technical innovations are being implemented to diminish rates of positive margins at breast tumor resection. Close collaboration among cross-disciplinary teams to further develop many of these technologies as well as completion of larger scale clinical studies are required to define an optimal approach. Development with an eye toward prioritizing sensitivity/specificity as well as healthcare cost containment has the potential to make a significant impact on this ongoing clinical need in breast cancer surgery.

Factors related to re-excision procedures following primary breast-conserving surgery for women with breast cancer in the U.S. Military Health System

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Re-excision surgery is undertaken to obtain clear margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for localized breast cancer. This study examines patient and tumor characteristics related to re-excision surgery in the universal-access Military Health System (MHS).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with pathologically confirmed stage I-III breast cancer between 1998 and 2014 in the Department of Defense Central Cancer Registry and MHS Data Repository-linked databases who received primary BCS. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression methods identified characteristics associated with re-excision surgery (lumpectomy and mastectomy) and conversion to mastectomy, given as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Of 7637 women receiving BCS, 26.3% had a re-excision and 9.9% converted to mastectomy. Tumor location, larger tumor size (≥4 cm), and regional lymph node involvement were associated with a greater likelihood of re-excision and mastectomy conversion. Pathology before BCS (AOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.44 for re-excision) and neoadjuvant treatment (AOR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36, 0.69 for re-excision) were associated with a decreased likelihood of these outcomes. Additionally, age, tumor histology, and military-specific variables were associated with mastectomy conversion.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive preoperative workup, including tumor pathology, may better inform surgical decision-making and reduce re-excision rates.

Influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on diffuse reflectance spectra of tissue in breast surgery specimens

Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) can discriminate different tissue types based on optical characteristics. Since this technology has the ability to detect tumor tissue, several groups have proposed to use DRS for margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Nowadays, an increasing number of patients with breast cancer are being treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Limited research has been published on the influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the optical characteristics of the tissue. Hence, it is unclear whether margin assessment based on DRS is feasible in this specific group of patients. We investigate whether there is an effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on optical measurements of breast tissue. To this end, DRS measurements were performed on 92 ex-vivo breast specimens from 92 patients, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were generated, comparing the measurements of patients with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy in datasets of different tissue types using a significance level of 5%. As input for the GEE models, either the intensity at a specific wavelength or a fit parameter, derived from the spectrum, was used. In the evaluation of the intensity, no influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was found, since none of the wavelengths were significantly different between the measurements with and the measurements without neoadjuvant chemotherapy in any of the datasets. These results were confirmed by the analysis of the fit parameters, which showed a significant difference for the amount of collagen in only one dataset. All other fit parameters were not significant for any of the datasets. These findings may indicate that assessment of the resection margin with DRS is also feasible in the growing population of breast cancer patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, it is possible that we did not detect neoadjuvant chemotherapy effect in the some of the datasets due to the small number of measurements in those datasets.

Factors Associated with Reoperation in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer: A Prospective Study of American Society of Breast Surgeon Members

Background

More than 20% of patients undergoing initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for cancer require reoperation. To address this concern, the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) endorsed 10 processes of care (tools) in 2015 to be considered by surgeons to de-escalate reoperations. In a planned follow-up, we sought to determine which tools were associated with fewer reoperations.

Methods

A cohort of ASBrS member surgeons prospectively entered data into the ASBrS Mastery^® registry on consecutive patients undergoing BCS in 2017. The association between tools and reoperations was estimated via multivariate and hierarchical ranking analyses.

Results

Seventy-one surgeons reported reoperations in 486 (12.3%) of 3954 cases (mean 12.7% [standard deviation (SD) 7.7%], median 11.5% [range 0–32%]). There was an eightfold difference between surgeons in the 10th and 90th percentile performance groups. Actionable factors associated with fewer reoperations included routine planned cavity side-wall shaves, surgeon use of ultrasound (US), neoadjuvant chemotherapy, intra-operative pathologic margin assessment, and use of a pre-operative diagnostic imaging modality beyond conventional 2D mammography. For patients with invasive cancer, ≥ 24% of those who underwent reexcision did so for reported margins of < 1 or 2 mm, representing noncompliance with the SSO-ASTRO margin guideline.

Conclusions

Although ASBrS member surgeons had some of the lowest rates of reoperation reported in any registry, significant intersurgeon variability persisted. Further efforts to lower rates are therefore warranted. Opportunities to do so were identified by adopting those processes of care, including improved compliance with the SSO-ASTRO margin guideline, which were associated with fewer reoperations.

Resection margins and local recurrences in breast cancer: Comparison between conventional and oncoplastic breast conserving surgery

BACKGROUND

This retrospective cohort study aims to compare surgical margins, reoperations and local recurrences after conventional or oncoplastic breast conservation surgery (BCS). Furthermore, we aim to investigate differences between various oncoplastic techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed 1800 consecutive patients with primary invasive breast cancer (N = 1707) or ductal carcinoma in situ (N = 93) who underwent BCS at Helsinki University Hospital between 2010 and 2012.

RESULTS

Conventional BCS was performed in 1189 (66.1%) patients, oncoplastic BCS in 611 (33.9%). Various oncoplastic techniques were used. Patients with oncoplastic BCS had more often multifocal (p < 0.001), larger (p < 0.001), palpable tumours (p < 0.001) with larger resection specimens (p < 0.001). The amount of resected tissue varied substantially depending on the oncoplastic technique. Patients treated with oncoplastic BCS were younger (p < 0.001) and their tumours were more aggressive according to histological grade (p < 0.001), T-stage (p < 0.001), Ki-67 (p < 0.001) and lymph node status (p < 0.001). There was no difference, however, in surgical margins (p = 0.578) or reoperation rates (p = 0.430) between the groups. A total of 152 (8.4%) patients were reoperated because of insufficient margins, 96 (8.1%) in the conventional, 56 (9.2%) in the oncoplastic BCS group. The median follow-up time was 75 (2-94) months. There was no difference in local recurrence-free survival between the conventional and oncoplastic BCS groups (log-rank test, p = 0.172).

CONCLUSIONS

Oncoplastic BCS was used for larger, multifocal and more aggressive tumours. Nevertheless, no difference in reoperation rate or local recurrences were found. Oncoplastic BCS is as safe as conventional BCS enabling breast conserving for patients who otherwise were candidates for mastectomy.