1
|
Algera MD, Van de Vijver KK, van Driel WJ, Slangen BFM, Lof FC, van der Aa M, Kruitwagen RFPM, Lok CAR. Outcomes of patients with early stage mucinous ovarian carcinoma: a Dutch population-based cohort study comparing expansile and infiltrative subtypes. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024:ijgc-2023-004955. [PMID: 38460968 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the outcomes of patients with early stage mucinous ovarian carcinoma based on subtype (expansile vs infiltrative). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed all surgically treated patients with mucinous ovarian carcinoma in the Netherlands (2015-2020), using data from national registries. Subtypes were determined, with any ambiguities resolved by a dedicated gynecologic pathologist. Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I were categorized into full staging, fertility-sparing, or partial stagings. Outcomes were overall survival and recurrence free survival, and recurrence rates. RESULTS Among 409 identified patients, 257 (63%) had expansile and 152 (37%) had infiltrative tumors. Patients with expansile tumors had FIGO stage I more frequently (n=243, 95% vs n=116, 76%, p<0.001). For FIGO stage I disease, patients with expansile and infiltrative tumors underwent similar proportions of partial (n=165, 68% vs n=78, 67%), full (n=32, 13% vs n=23, 20%), and fertility-sparing stagings (n=46, 19% vs n=15, 13%) (p=0.139). Patients with expansile FIGO stage I received less adjuvant chemotherapy (n=11, 5% vs n=24, 21%, p<0.001), exhibited better overall and recurrence free survival (p=0.006, p=0.012), and fewer recurrences (n=13, 5% vs n=16, 14%, p=0.011). Survival and recurrence rates were similar across the expansile extent of staging groups. Patients undergoing fertility-sparing staging for infiltrative tumors had more recurrences compared with full or partial stagings, while recurrence free survival was similar across these groups. Full staging correlated with better overall survival in infiltrative FIGO stage I (p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS While most patients with FIGO stage I underwent partial staging, those with expansile had better outcomes than those with infiltrative tumors. Full staging was associated with improved overall survival in infiltrative, but not in expansile FIGO stage I. These results provide insight for tailored surgical approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Daniël Algera
- Maastricht University GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Koen K Van de Vijver
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Willemien J van Driel
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brigitte F M Slangen
- Maastricht University GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Fabienne C Lof
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - R F P M Kruitwagen
- Maastricht University GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christianne A R Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aronson SL, Lopez-Yurda M, Koole SN, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, Schreuder HWR, Hermans RHM, de Hingh IHJT, van Gent MDJM, Arts HJG, van Ham MAPC, van Dam PA, Vuylsteke P, Aalbers AGJ, Verwaal VJ, Van de Vijver KK, Aaronson NK, Sonke GS, van Driel WJ. Cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OVHIPEC-1): final survival analysis of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:1109-1118. [PMID: 37708912 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00396-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The OVHIPEC-1 trial previously showed that the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery resulted in improved progression-free and overall survival compared with cytoreductive surgery alone at 4·7 years of follow-up in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer who were ineligible for primary cytoreduction. We report the final survival outcomes after 10 years of follow-up. METHODS In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, patients with primary epithelial stage III ovarian cancer were recruited at eight HIPEC centres in the Netherlands and Belgium. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18-76 years, had not progressed during at least three cycles of neoadjuvant carboplatin plus paclitaxel, had a WHO performance status score of 0-2, normal blood counts, and adequate renal function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo interval cytoreductive surgery without HIPEC (surgery group) or with HIPEC (100 mg/m2 cisplatin; surgery-plus-HIPEC group). Randomisation was done centrally by minimisation with a masked web-based allocation procedure at the time of surgery when residual disease smaller than 10 mm diameter was anticipated, and was stratified by institution, previous suboptimal cytoreductive surgery, and number of abdominal regions involved. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and a secondary endpoint was overall survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all randomly assigned patients). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00426257, and is closed. FINDINGS Between April 1, 2007, and April 30, 2016, 245 patients were enrolled and followed up for a median of 10·1 years (95% CI 8·4-12·9) in the surgery group (n=123) and 10·4 years (95% CI 9·5-13·3) in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group (n=122). Recurrence, progression, or death occurred in 114 (93%) patients in the surgery group (median progression-free survival 10·7 months [95% CI 9·6-12·0]) and 109 (89%) patients in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group (14·3 months [12·0-18·5]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·63 [95% CI 0·48-0·83], stratified log-rank p=0·0008). Death occurred in 108 (88%) patients in the surgery group (median overall survival 33·3 months [95% CI 29·0-39·1]) and 100 (82%) patients in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group (44·9 months [95% CI 38·6-55·1]; HR 0·70 [95% CI 0·53-0·92], stratified log-rank p=0·011). INTERPRETATION These updated survival results confirm the long-term survival benefit of HIPEC in patients with primary stage III epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery. FUNDING Dutch Cancer Foundation (KWF Kankerbestrijding).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lot Aronson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marta Lopez-Yurda
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Simone N Koole
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ralph H M Hermans
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, GROW-School for Oncology Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Mignon D J M van Gent
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Henriëtte J G Arts
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Maaike A P C van Ham
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Peter A van Dam
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Peter Vuylsteke
- Department of Medical Oncology, UCL Louvain, CHU Namur Sainte-Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Willemien J van Driel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kang E, Weir A, Meagher NS, Farrington K, Nelson GS, Ghatage P, Lee C, Riggan MJ, Bolithon A, Popovic G, Leung B, Tang K, Lambie N, Millstein J, Alsop J, Anglesio MS, Ataseven B, Barlow E, Beckmann MW, Berger J, Bisinotto C, Bösmüller H, Boros J, Brand AH, Brooks‐Wilson A, Brucker SY, Carney ME, Casablanca Y, Cazorla‐Jiménez A, Cohen PA, Conrads TP, Cook LS, Coulson P, Courtney‐Brooks M, Cramer DW, Crowe P, Cunningham JM, Cybulski C, Darcy KM, El‐Bahrawy MA, Elishaev E, Erber R, Farrell R, Fereday S, Fischer A, García MJ, Gayther SA, Gentry‐Maharaj A, Gilks CB, Grube M, Harnett PR, Harrington SP, Harter P, Hartmann A, Hecht JL, Heikaus S, Hein A, Heitz F, Hendley J, Hernandez BY, Polo SH, Heublein S, Hirasawa A, Høgdall E, Høgdall CK, Horlings HM, Huntsman DG, Huzarski T, Jewell A, Jimenez‐Linan M, Jones ME, Kaufmann SH, Kennedy CJ, Khabele D, Kommoss FKF, Kruitwagen RFPM, Lambrechts D, Le ND, Lener M, Lester J, Leung Y, Linder A, Loverix L, Lubiński J, Madan R, Maxwell GL, Modugno F, Neuhausen SL, Olawaiye A, Olbrecht S, Orsulic S, Palacios J, Pearce CL, Pike MC, Quinn CM, Mohan GR, Rodríguez‐Antona C, Ruebner M, Ryan A, Salfinger SG, Sasamoto N, Schildkraut JM, Schoemaker MJ, Shah M, Sharma R, Shvetsov YB, Singh N, Sonke GS, Steele L, Stewart CJR, Sundfeldt K, Swerdlow AJ, Talhouk A, Tan A, Taylor SE, Terry KL, Tołoczko A, Traficante N, Van de Vijver KK, van der Aa MA, Van Gorp T, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, van‐Wagensveld L, Vergote I, Vierkant RA, Wang C, Wilkens LR, Winham SJ, Wu AH, Benitez J, Berchuck A, Candido dos Reis FJ, DeFazio A, Fasching PA, Goode EL, Goodman MT, Gronwald J, Karlan BY, Kommoss S, Menon U, Sinn H, Staebler A, Brenton JD, Bowtell DD, Pharoah PDP, Ramus SJ, Köbel M. CCNE1 and survival of patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: An Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study. Cancer 2023; 129:697-713. [PMID: 36572991 PMCID: PMC10107112 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cyclin E1 (CCNE1) is a potential predictive marker and therapeutic target in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Smaller studies have revealed unfavorable associations for CCNE1 amplification and CCNE1 overexpression with survival, but to date no large-scale, histotype-specific validation has been performed. The hypothesis was that high-level amplification of CCNE1 and CCNE1 overexpression, as well as a combination of the two, are linked to shorter overall survival in HGSC. METHODS Within the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium, amplification status and protein level in 3029 HGSC cases and mRNA expression in 2419 samples were investigated. RESULTS High-level amplification (>8 copies by chromogenic in situ hybridization) was found in 8.6% of HGSC and overexpression (>60% with at least 5% demonstrating strong intensity by immunohistochemistry) was found in 22.4%. CCNE1 high-level amplification and overexpression both were linked to shorter overall survival in multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age and stage, with hazard stratification by study (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.47, p = .034, and HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.32, p = .015, respectively). This was also true for cases with combined high-level amplification/overexpression (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09-1.47, p = .033). CCNE1 mRNA expression was not associated with overall survival (HR, 1.00 per 1-SD increase; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06; p = .58). CCNE1 high-level amplification is mutually exclusive with the presence of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and shows an inverse association to RB1 loss. CONCLUSION This study provides large-scale validation that CCNE1 high-level amplification is associated with shorter survival, supporting its utility as a prognostic biomarker in HGSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun‐Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of CalgaryFoothills Medical CenterCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Ashley Weir
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and HealthUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Adult Cancer ProgramLowy Cancer Research CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical ResearchParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Nicola S. Meagher
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and HealthUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of SydneyA Joint Venture With Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kyo Farrington
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of CalgaryFoothills Medical CenterCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Gregg S. Nelson
- Department of OncologyDivision of Gynecologic OncologyCumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of OncologyDivision of Gynecologic OncologyCumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Cheng‐Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonAlbertaCanada
| | - Marjorie J. Riggan
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyDivision of Gynecologic OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Adelyn Bolithon
- Adult Cancer ProgramLowy Cancer Research CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- School of Women's and Children's HealthFaculty of Medicine and HealthUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Gordana Popovic
- Stats CentralMark Wainwright Analytical CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Betty Leung
- Prince of Wales Clinical SchoolUNSW Medicine and HealthUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Katrina Tang
- Department of Anatomical PathologyPrince of Wales HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Neil Lambie
- Canterbury Health LaboratoriesChristchurchNew Zealand
| | - Joshua Millstein
- Division of BiostatisticsDepartment of Population and Public Health SciencesKeck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Department of OncologyCentre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE)University of British ColumbiaBC Cancerand Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic OncologyEvangelische Kliniken Essen‐Mitte (KEM)EssenGermany
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyLudwig Maximilian University MunichMunichGermany
| | - Ellen Barlow
- Gynaecological Cancer CentreRoyal Hospital for WomenSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐NurembergUniversity Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Jessica Berger
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Christiani Bisinotto
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsRibeirão Preto Medical SchoolUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
| | - Hans Bösmüller
- Institute of Pathology and NeuropathologyTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Jessica Boros
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical ResearchUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Alison H. Brand
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Angela Brooks‐Wilson
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreBC CancerVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Michael E. Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyJohn A. Burns School of MedicineUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluHawaiiUSA
| | - Yovanni Casablanca
- Uniformed Services of the Health Sciences Gynecologic Cancer Center of ExcellenceBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | | | - Paul A. Cohen
- Department of Gynaecological OncologySt John of God Subiaco HospitalSubiacoWestern AustraliaAustralia
- Division of Obstetrics and GynaecologyMedical SchoolUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Thomas P. Conrads
- Women's Health Integrated Research CenterInova Health SystemFalls ChurchVirginiaUSA
| | - Linda S. Cook
- EpidemiologySchool of Public HealthUniversity of ColoradoAuroraColoradoUSA
- Community Health SciencesUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Madeleine Courtney‐Brooks
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Daniel W. Cramer
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology CenterDepartment of Obstetrics and GynecologyBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Philip Crowe
- Prince of Wales Clinical SchoolUNSW Medicine and HealthUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of SurgeryPrince of Wales Private HospitalRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Julie M. Cunningham
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and PathologyInternational Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Kathleen M. Darcy
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of ExcellenceDepartment of Gynecologic Surgery and ObstetricsUniformed Services University of the Health SciencesWalter Reed National Military Medical CenterBethesdaMarylandUSA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, IncBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - Mona A. El‐Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and ReproductionImperial College LondonHammersmith HospitalLondonUK
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of PathologyComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐NurembergUniversity Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Rhonda Farrell
- Prince of Wales Private HospitalRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Anna Fischer
- Institute of Pathology and NeuropathologyTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - María J. García
- Computational Oncology GroupStructural Biology ProgrammeSpanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
| | - Simon A. Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics CoreCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - C. Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - AOCS Group
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical ResearchUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Paul R. Harnett
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer CentreWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Shariska Petersen Harrington
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Obstetrics and GynecologyThe University of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityKansasUSA
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic OncologyEvangelische Kliniken Essen‐Mitte (KEM)EssenGermany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological OncologyHSK, Dr. Horst‐Schmidt KlinikWiesbadenWiesbadenGermany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of PathologyComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐NurembergUniversity Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Jonathan L. Hecht
- Department of PathologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐NurembergUniversity Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic OncologyEvangelische Kliniken Essen‐Mitte (KEM)EssenGermany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological OncologyHSK, Dr. Horst‐Schmidt KlinikWiesbadenWiesbadenGermany
- Center for PathologyEvangelische Kliniken Essen‐MitteEssenGermany
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | | | | | - Sabine Heublein
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
| | - Akira Hirasawa
- Department of Clinical Genomic MedicineGraduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayama UniversityOkayamaJapan
| | - Estrid Høgdall
- Department of PathologyHerlev HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Claus K. Høgdall
- Department of GynaecologyRigshospitaletUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Hugo M. Horlings
- Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - David G. Huntsman
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
- Department of Molecular OncologyBC Cancer Research CentreVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Department of Genetics and PathologyInternational Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
- Department of Genetics and PathologyUniversity of Zielona GoraZielona GoraPoland
| | - Andrea Jewell
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Obstetrics and GynecologyThe University of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityKansasUSA
| | | | - Michael E. Jones
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Scott H. Kaufmann
- Division of Oncology Research and Department of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental TherapeuticsMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Catherine J. Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical ResearchUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Dineo Khabele
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Obstetrics and GynecologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | | | - Roy F. P. M. Kruitwagen
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- GROW – School for Oncology and ReproductionMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Department of Human GeneticsLaboratory for Translational GeneticsKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- VIB Center for Cancer BiologyVIBLeuvenBelgium
| | - Nhu D. Le
- Cancer Control ResearchBC Cancer AgencyVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Marcin Lener
- International Hereditary Cancer CenterDepartment of Genetics and PathologyPomeranian Medical University in SzczecinSzczecinPoland
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of MedicineDepartment of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Yee Leung
- Division of Obstetrics and GynaecologyFaculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyWestern AustraliaAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyKing Edward Memorial HospitalSubiacoWestern AustraliaAustralia
- Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology GroupCamperdownAustralia
| | - Anna Linder
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyInst of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer ResearchUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Liselore Loverix
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Gynecology and ObstetricsLeuven Cancer InstituteLeuvenBelgium
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and PathologyInternational Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Rashna Madan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineThe University of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityKansasUSA
| | | | - Francesmary Modugno
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Public HealthPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
- Women's Cancer Research CenterMagee‐Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Susan L. Neuhausen
- Department of Population SciencesBeckman Research Institute of City of HopeDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| | - Alexander Olawaiye
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Siel Olbrecht
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Gynecology and ObstetricsLeuven Cancer InstituteLeuvenBelgium
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- David Geffen School of MedicineDepartment of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - José Palacios
- Department of PathologyHospital Ramón y CajalInstituto Ramon y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRyCIS)CIBERONCUniversidad de AlcaláMadridSpain
| | - Celeste Leigh Pearce
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Michigan School of Public HealthAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Malcolm C. Pike
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsMemorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Population Health and Public Health SciencesKeck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Carmel M. Quinn
- The Health Precincts BiobankUNSW Biospecimen ServicesMark Wainwright Analytical CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Ganendra Raj Mohan
- Department of Gynaecological OncologySt John of God Subiaco HospitalSubiacoWestern AustraliaAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyKing Edward Memorial HospitalSubiacoWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Cristina Rodríguez‐Antona
- Hereditary Endocrine Cancer GroupSpanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO)MadridSpain
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐NurembergUniversity Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Andy Ryan
- MRC Clinical Trials UnitInstitute of Clinical Trials & MethodologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Women's CancerInstitute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Stuart G. Salfinger
- Department of Gynaecological OncologySt John of God Subiaco HospitalSubiacoWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Naoko Sasamoto
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology CenterDepartment of Obstetrics and GynecologyBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Joellen M. Schildkraut
- Department of EpidemiologyRollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | | - Mitul Shah
- Department of OncologyCentre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Naveena Singh
- Department of PathologyBarts Health National Health Service TrustLondonUK
| | - Gabe S. Sonke
- Department of Medical OncologyThe Netherlands Cancer Institute ‐ Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Linda Steele
- Department of Population SciencesBeckman Research Institute of City of HopeDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| | - Colin J. R. Stewart
- School for Women's and Infants' HealthUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyInst of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer ResearchUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Anthony J. Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Division of Breast Cancer ResearchThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE)University of British ColumbiaBC Cancerand Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Adeline Tan
- Division of Obstetrics and GynaecologyFaculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyWestern AustraliaAustralia
- Gynaepath WAClinipath (Sonic Healthcare)Osbourne ParkAustralia
| | - Sarah E. Taylor
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Kathryn L. Terry
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology CenterDepartment of Obstetrics and GynecologyBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Aleksandra Tołoczko
- Department of Genetics and PathologyPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Koen K. Van de Vijver
- Department of PathologyGhent University HospitalCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG)GhentBelgium
- Department of PathologyAntwerp University HospitalAntwerpBelgium
| | - Maaike A. van der Aa
- Department of ResearchNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL)UtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Toon Van Gorp
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Gynecology and ObstetricsLeuven Cancer InstituteLeuvenBelgium
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Gynecology and ObstetricsLeuven Cancer InstituteLeuvenBelgium
| | - Lilian van‐Wagensveld
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- GROW – School for Oncology and ReproductionMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- Department of ResearchNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL)UtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Gynecology and ObstetricsLeuven Cancer InstituteLeuvenBelgium
| | - Robert A. Vierkant
- Department of Quantitative Health SciencesDivision of Clinical Trials and BiostatisticsMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health SciencesDivision of Computational BiologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | | | - Stacey J. Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health SciencesDivision of Computational BiologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Anna H. Wu
- Department of Population Health and Public Health SciencesKeck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Javier Benitez
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
- Human Genetics GroupSpanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyDivision of Gynecologic OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Anna DeFazio
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of SydneyA Joint Venture With Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical ResearchUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐NurembergUniversity Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health SciencesDivision of EpidemiologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Marc T. Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control ProgramCedars‐Sinai CancerCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and PathologyInternational Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Beth Y. Karlan
- David Geffen School of MedicineDepartment of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials UnitInstitute of Clinical Trials & MethodologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Hans‐Peter Sinn
- Institute of PathologyHeidelberg University HospitalHeidelbergGermany
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology and NeuropathologyTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - James D. Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - David D. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Paul D. P. Pharoah
- Department of OncologyCentre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Department of Public Health and Primary CareCentre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and HealthUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Adult Cancer ProgramLowy Cancer Research CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of CalgaryFoothills Medical CenterCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Jaeghere EA, Tuyaerts S, Van Nuffel AMT, Belmans A, Bogaerts K, Baiden-Amissah R, Lippens L, Vuylsteke P, Henry S, Trinh XB, van Dam PA, Aspeslagh S, De Caluwé A, Naert E, Lambrechts D, Hendrix A, De Wever O, Van de Vijver KK, Amant F, Vandecasteele K, Denys HG. Pembrolizumab, radiotherapy, and an immunomodulatory five-drug cocktail in pretreated patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical or endometrial carcinoma: Results of the phase II PRIMMO study. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2023; 72:475-491. [PMID: 35960332 PMCID: PMC9870976 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-022-03253-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
A phase II study (PRIMMO) of patients with pretreated persistent/recurrent/metastatic cervical or endometrial cancer is presented. Patients received an immunomodulatory five-drug cocktail (IDC) consisting of low-dose cyclophosphamide, aspirin, lansoprazole, vitamin D, and curcumin starting 2 weeks before radioimmunotherapy. Pembrolizumab was administered three-weekly from day 15 onwards; one of the tumor lesions was irradiated (8Gyx3) on days 15, 17, and 19. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate per immune-related response criteria (irORR) at week 26 (a lower bound of the 90% confidence interval [CI] of > 10% was considered efficacious). The prespecified 43 patients (cervical, n = 18; endometrial, n = 25) were enrolled. The irORR was 11.1% (90% CI 2.0-31.0) in cervical cancer and 12.0% (90% CI 3.4-28.2) in endometrial cancer. Median duration of response was not reached in both cohorts. Median interval-censored progression-free survival was 4.1 weeks (95% CI 4.1-25.7) in cervical cancer and 3.6 weeks (95% CI 3.6-15.4) in endometrial cancer; median overall survival was 39.6 weeks (95% CI 15.0-67.0) and 37.4 weeks (95% CI 19.0-50.3), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 10 (55.6%) cervical cancer patients and 9 (36.0%) endometrial cancer patients. Health-related quality of life was generally stable over time. Responders had a significantly higher proportion of peripheral T cells when compared to nonresponders (p = 0.013). In conclusion, PRIMMO did not meet its primary objective in both cohorts; pembrolizumab, radiotherapy, and an IDC had modest but durable antitumor activity with acceptable but not negligible toxicity.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT03192059) and EudraCT Registry (number 2016-001569-97).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emiel A. De Jaeghere
- Department of Medical Oncology (Route 535), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sandra Tuyaerts
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory for Medical and Molecular Oncology (LMMO), VUB, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Ann Belmans
- Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre (L-BioStat), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kris Bogaerts
- Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre (L-BioStat), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Regina Baiden-Amissah
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lien Lippens
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter Vuylsteke
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Université Catholique de Louvain Namur (Sainte-Elisabeth), Namur, Belgium
| | - Stéphanie Henry
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Université Catholique de Louvain Namur (Sainte-Elisabeth), Namur, Belgium
| | - Xuan Bich Trinh
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Senology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
- Multidisciplinary Oncologic Centre Antwerp (MOCA), University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
- Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), Edegem, Belgium
| | - Peter A. van Dam
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Senology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
- Multidisciplinary Oncologic Centre Antwerp (MOCA), University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
- Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), Edegem, Belgium
| | - Sandrine Aspeslagh
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alex De Caluwé
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, General Hospital Sint-Maarten, Mechlin, Belgium
| | - Eline Naert
- Department of Medical Oncology (Route 535), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - An Hendrix
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Olivier De Wever
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen K. Van de Vijver
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katrien Vandecasteele
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hannelore G. Denys
- Department of Medical Oncology (Route 535), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Wagensveld L, van Baal JOAM, Timmermans M, Gaillard D, Borghuis L, Coffelt SB, Rosenberg EH, Lok CAR, Nijman HW, Kooreman LFS, Sanders J, de Bruijn M, Wessels LFA, van der Wiel R, Rausch C, Broeks A, Kruitwagen RFPM, van der Aa MA, Sonke GS, Schouten PC, Van de Vijver KK, Horlings HM. Homologous Recombination Deficiency and Cyclin E1 Amplification Are Correlated with Immune Cell Infiltration and Survival in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235965. [PMID: 36497449 PMCID: PMC9738162 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND How molecular profiles are associated with tumor microenvironment (TME) in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is incompletely understood. Therefore, we analyzed the TME and molecular profiles of HGSOC and assessed their associations with overall survival (OS). METHODS Patients with advanced-stage HGSOC treated in three Dutch hospitals between 2008-2015 were included. Patient data were collected from medical records. BRCA1/2 mutation, BRCA1 promotor methylation analyses, and copy number variations were used to define molecular profiles. Immune cells were assessed with immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS 348 patients were categorized as BRCA mutation (BRCAm) (BRCAm or promotor methylation) (30%), non-BRCA mutated HRD (19%), Cyclin E1 (CCNE1)-amplification (13%), non-BRCAmut HRD and CCNE1-amplification (double classifier) (20%), and no specific molecular profile (NSMP) (18%). BRCAm showed highest immune cell densities and CCNE1-amplification lowest. BRCAm showed the most favorable OS (52.5 months), compared to non-BRCAmut HRD (41.0 months), CCNE1-amplification (28.0 months), double classifier (27.8 months), and NSMP (35.4 months). Higher immune cell densities showed a favorable OS compared to lower, also within the profiles. CD8+, CD20+, and CD103+ cells remained associated with OS in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Molecular profiles and TME are associated with OS. TME differs per profile, with higher immune cell densities showing a favorable OS, even within the profiles. HGSOC does not reflect one entity but comprises different entities based on molecular profiles and TME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilian van Wagensveld
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| | - Juliette O. A. M. van Baal
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maite Timmermans
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Duco Gaillard
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lauri Borghuis
- Department of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Seth B. Coffelt
- Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
- Cancer Research UK, Beatson Institute, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK
| | - Efraim H. Rosenberg
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christianne A. R. Lok
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans W. Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Loes F. S. Kooreman
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco de Bruijn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lodewyk F. A. Wessels
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rianne van der Wiel
- Department of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Rausch
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- BioLizard nv, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roy F. P. M. Kruitwagen
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike A. van der Aa
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gabe S. Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip C. Schouten
- Department of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koen K. Van de Vijver
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology & Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hugo M. Horlings
- Department of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Van Bockstal MR, François A, Altinay S, Arnould L, Balkenhol M, Broeckx G, Burguès O, Colpaert C, Dedeurwaerdere F, Dessauvagie B, Duwel V, Floris G, Fox S, Gerosa C, Hastir D, Jaffer S, Kurpershoek E, Lacroix-Triki M, Laka A, Lambein K, MacGrogan GM, Marchio C, Martinez MDM, Nofech-Mozes S, Peeters D, Ravarino A, Reisenbichler E, Resetkova E, Sanati S, Schelfhout AM, Schelfhout V, Shaaban A, Sinke R, Stanciu-Pop CM, van Deurzen CHM, Van de Vijver KK, Van Rompuy AS, Vincent-Salomon A, Wen H, Wong S, Bouzin C, Galant C. Interobserver variability in the assessment of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple-negative invasive breast carcinoma influences the association with pathological complete response: the IVITA study. Mod Pathol 2021; 34:2130-2140. [PMID: 34218258 PMCID: PMC8595512 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00865-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
High stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are associated with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Histopathological assessment of sTILs in TNBC biopsies is characterized by substantial interobserver variability, but it is unknown whether this affects its association with pCR. Here, we aimed to investigate the degree of interobserver variability in an international study, and its impact on the relationship between sTILs and pCR. Forty pathologists assessed sTILs as a percentage in digitalized biopsy slides, originating from 41 TNBC patients who were treated with NAC followed by surgery. Pathological response was quantified by the MD Anderson Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) score. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated per pathologist duo and Bland-Altman plots were constructed. The relation between sTILs and pCR or RCB class was investigated. The ICCs ranged from -0.376 to 0.947 (mean: 0.659), indicating substantial interobserver variability. Nevertheless, high sTILs scores were significantly associated with pCR for 36 participants (90%), and with RCB class for eight participants (20%). Post hoc sTILs cutoffs at 20% and 40% resulted in variable associations with pCR. The sTILs in TNBC with RCB-II and RCB-III were intermediate to those of RCB-0 and RCB-I, with lowest sTILs observed in RCB-I. However, the limited number of RCB-I cases precludes any definite conclusions due to lack of power, and this observation therefore requires further investigation. In conclusion, sTILs are a robust marker for pCR at the group level. However, if sTILs are to be used to guide the NAC scheme for individual patients, the observed interobserver variability might substantially affect the chance of obtaining a pCR. Future studies should determine the 'ideal' sTILs threshold, and attempt to fine-tune the patient selection for sTILs-based de-escalation of NAC regimens. At present, there is insufficient evidence for robust and reproducible sTILs-guided therapeutic decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mieke R. Van Bockstal
- Department of pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert 1200, Belgium
| | - Aline François
- Department of pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert 1200, Belgium
| | - Serdar Altinay
- Department of Pathology, University of Health Sciences, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Health Application and Research Center, 34147 Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Laurent Arnould
- Département de Biologie et de Pathologie des Tumeurs, Centre George-François Leclerc, 1 Rue Pr. Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Maschenka Balkenhol
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9100, 6500, HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - Octavio Burguès
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Av. De Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Cecile Colpaert
- Department of Pathology, AZ Turnhout Campus Sint-Jozef, Steenweg op Merksplas 44, 2300 Turnhout, Belgium
| | | | - Benjamin Dessauvagie
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia,Anatomical Pathology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, Perth, Australia
| | - Valérie Duwel
- Department of pathology, AZ Klina Brasschaat, Augustijnslei 100, 2930 Brasschaat, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium,Department of Imaging and Pathology, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stephen Fox
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
| | - Clara Gerosa
- Department of Pathology, University of Cagliari, AOU San Giovanni di Dio, Via Ospedale 54, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Delfyne Hastir
- Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 25, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Shabnam Jaffer
- Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai Hospital and Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York, NY10029 USA
| | | | - Magali Lacroix-Triki
- Department of Pathology, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 Rue Edouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Andoni Laka
- Department of Pathology, Clinique Notre-Dame de Grâce (CNDG), Chaussée de Nivelles 212, 6041 Gosselies, Belgium
| | - Kathleen Lambein
- Department of Pathology, AZ St Lucas Hospital, Groenebriel 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gaëtan Marie MacGrogan
- Surgical Pathology Unit, Department of Pathobiology, Institut Bergonié, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Caterina Marchio
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy,Pathology Unit, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Candiolo, Italy
| | | | - Sharon Nofech-Mozes
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Dieter Peeters
- Department of Pathology, AZ St Maarten, Liersesteenweg 435, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium,Histopathology, Imaging and Quantification Unit, HistoGeneX, Sint-Bavostraat 78, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Alberto Ravarino
- Department of Pathology, University of Cagliari, AOU San Giovanni di Dio, Via Ospedale 54, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Emily Reisenbichler
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, 310 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT06510, United States
| | - Erika Resetkova
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX77030, Texas, USA
| | - Souzan Sanati
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Rm8612, Los Angeles, CA90048, United States
| | - Anne-Marie Schelfhout
- Department of Pathology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, 9300 Aalst, Belgium
| | - Vera Schelfhout
- Department of Pathology, AZ St Maarten, Liersesteenweg 435, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Abeer Shaaban
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Renata Sinke
- Pathan BV, Kleiweg 500, 3045 PM Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Claudia M Stanciu-Pop
- Department of Pathology, CHU UCL Namur, Site Godinne, Avenue Docteur G. Thérasse 1, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Carolien HM van Deurzen
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koen K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Pôle de Médicine Diagnostique & Théranostique, INSERM U934, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Hannah Wen
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065
| | - Serena Wong
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, 310 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT06510, United States
| | - Caroline Bouzin
- 2IP IREC Imaging Platform, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Research (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 55, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christine Galant
- Department of pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert 1200, Belgium,Institute of Clinical and Experimental Research (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 55, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dasgupta S, de Jonge E, Van Bockstal MR, Wong-Alcala LSM, Wilhelmus S, Makkus LACF, Schelfout K, Van de Vijver KK, Smits S, Marbaix E, Koljenović S, van Kemenade FJ, Ewing-Graham PC. Histological interpretation of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) remains challenging-observations from a bi-national ring-study. Virchows Arch 2021; 479:305-315. [PMID: 33682013 PMCID: PMC8364542 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03070-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) is a premalignant lesion that is known to progress rapidly to invasive carcinoma. Accurate histological diagnosis is therefore crucial to allow appropriate treatment. To identify reliable diagnostic features, we evaluated the inter-observer agreement in the histological assessment of dVIN, among a bi-national, multi-institutional group of pathologists. Two investigators from Erasmus MC selected 36 hematoxylin-eosin-stained glass slides of dVIN and no-dysplasia, and prepared a list of 15 histological features of dVIN. Nine participating pathologists (i) diagnosed each slide as dVIN or no-dysplasia, (ii) indicated which features they used for the diagnosis, and (iii) rated these features in terms of their diagnostic usefulness. Diagnoses rendered by > 50% participants were taken as the consensus (gold standard). p53-immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed for all cases, and the expression patterns were correlated with the consensus diagnoses. Kappa (ĸ)-statistics were computed to measure inter-observer agreements, and concordance of the p53-IHC patterns with the consensus diagnoses. For the diagnosis of dVIN, overall agreement was moderate (ĸ = 0.42), and pair-wise agreements ranged from slight (ĸ = 0.10) to substantial (ĸ = 0.73). Based on the levels of agreement and ratings of usefulness, the most helpful diagnostic features were parakeratosis, cobblestone appearance, chromatin abnormality, angulated nuclei, atypia discernable under × 100, and altered cellular alignment. p53-IHC patterns showed substantial concordance (ĸ = 0.67) with the consensus diagnoses. Histological interpretation of dVIN remains challenging with suboptimal inter-observer agreement. We identified the histological features that may facilitate the diagnosis of dVIN. For cases with a histological suspicion of dVIN, consensus-based pathological evaluation may improve the reliability of the diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shatavisha Dasgupta
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Postbus 2040, Be-building, 3000CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elf de Jonge
- Department of Pathology, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | - Mieke R. Van Bockstal
- Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Suzanne Wilhelmus
- Department of Pathology, Pathan B.V., Laboratory for Pathology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Katrien Schelfout
- Department of Pathology, Bravis Ziekenhuis, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Ziekenhuis Geel, Geel, Belgium
| | - Koen K. Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sander Smits
- Department of Pathology, Pathan B.V., Laboratory for Pathology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Etienne Marbaix
- Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Senada Koljenović
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Postbus 2040, Be-building, 3000CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Folkert J. van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Postbus 2040, Be-building, 3000CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia C. Ewing-Graham
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Postbus 2040, Be-building, 3000CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Boer LL, Kho E, Van de Vijver KK, Vranken Peeters MJTFD, van Duijnhoven F, Hendriks BHW, Sterenborg HJCM, Ruers TJM. Optical tissue measurements of invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ for surgical guidance. Breast Cancer Res 2021; 23:59. [PMID: 34022928 PMCID: PMC8141169 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-021-01436-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although the incidence of positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery has decreased, both incomplete resection and unnecessary large resections still occur. This is especially the case in the surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), an optical technology based on light tissue interactions, can potentially characterize tissue during surgery thereby guiding the surgeon intraoperatively. DRS has shown to be able to discriminate pure healthy breast tissue from pure invasive carcinoma (IC) but limited research has been done on (1) the actual optical characteristics of DCIS and (2) the ability of DRS to characterize measurements that are a mixture of tissue types. Methods In this study, DRS spectra were acquired from 107 breast specimens from 107 patients with proven IC and/or DCIS (1488 measurement locations). With a generalized estimating equation model, the differences between the DRS spectra of locations with DCIS and IC and only healthy tissue were compared to see if there were significant differences between these spectra. Subsequently, different classification models were developed to be able to predict if the DRS spectrum of a measurement location represented a measurement location with “healthy” or “malignant” tissue. In the development and testing of the models, different definitions for “healthy” and “malignant” were used. This allowed varying the level of homogeneity in the train and test data. Results It was found that the optical characteristics of IC and DCIS were similar. Regarding the classification of tissue with a mixture of tissue types, it was found that using mixed measurement locations in the development of the classification models did not tremendously improve the accuracy of the classification of other measurement locations with a mixture of tissue types. The evaluated classification models were able to classify measurement locations with > 5% malignant cells with a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.41 or 0.40. Some models showed better sensitivity whereas others had better specificity. Conclusion The results suggest that DRS has the potential to detect malignant tissue, including DCIS, in healthy breast tissue and could thus be helpful for surgical guidance. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-021-01436-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne L de Boer
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Postbus 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands.
| | - Esther Kho
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Postbus 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands
| | - Koen K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, and Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Frederieke van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Postbus 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands
| | - Benno H W Hendriks
- Philips Research, In-body Systems Group, Eindhoven, Netherlands.,Biomechanical Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Henricus J C M Sterenborg
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Postbus 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Theo J M Ruers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Postbus 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands.,Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kramer I, Schaapveld M, Oldenburg HSA, Sonke GS, McCool D, van Leeuwen FE, Van de Vijver KK, Russell NS, Linn SC, Siesling S, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Schmidt MK. The Influence of Adjuvant Systemic Regimens on Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk and Receptor Subtype. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 111:709-718. [PMID: 30698719 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Revised: 08/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing number of breast cancer (BC) survivors are at risk of developing contralateral breast cancer (CBC). We aimed to investigate the influence of various adjuvant systemic regimens on, subtype-specific, risk of CBC. METHODS This population-based cohort study included female patients diagnosed with first invasive BC between 2003 and 2010; follow-up was complete until 2016. Clinico-pathological data were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and additional data on receptor status through linkage with PALGA: the Dutch Pathology Registry. Cumulative incidences (death and distant metastases as competing risk) and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated for all invasive metachronous CBC and CBC subtypes. RESULTS Of 83 144 BC patients, 2816 developed a CBC; the 10-year cumulative incidence was 3.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.7% to 4.0%). Overall, adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.80), endocrine therapy (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.52), and trastuzumab with chemotherapy (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.73) were strongly associated with a reduced CBC risk. Specifically, taxane-containing chemotherapy (HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.62) and aromatase inhibitors (HR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.44) were associated with a large CBC risk reduction. More detailed analyses showed that endocrine therapy statistically significantly decreased the risk of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive CBC (HR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.47) but not ER-negative CBC (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.93) compared with no endocrine therapy. Patients receiving chemotherapy for ER-negative first BC had a higher risk of ER-negative CBC from 5 years of follow-up (HR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.62 to 4.99) compared with patients not receiving chemotherapy for ER-negative first BC. CONCLUSION Endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, as well as trastuzumab with chemotherapy reduce CBC risk. However, each adjuvant therapy regimen had a different impact on the CBC subtype distribution. Taxane-containing chemotherapy and aromatase inhibitors were associated with the largest CBC risk reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Kramer
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Hester S A Oldenburg
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Koen K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicola S Russell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Department of Surgical Oncology.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Service Research, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
de Boer LL, Kho E, Jóźwiak K, Van de Vijver KK, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, van Duijnhoven F, Hendriks BHW, Sterenborg HJCM, Ruers TJM. Influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on diffuse reflectance spectra of tissue in breast surgery specimens. J Biomed Opt 2019; 24:115004. [PMCID: PMC7003145 DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.24.11.115004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) can discriminate different tissue types based on optical characteristics. Since this technology has the ability to detect tumor tissue, several groups have proposed to use DRS for margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Nowadays, an increasing number of patients with breast cancer are being treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Limited research has been published on the influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the optical characteristics of the tissue. Hence, it is unclear whether margin assessment based on DRS is feasible in this specific group of patients. We investigate whether there is an effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on optical measurements of breast tissue. To this end, DRS measurements were performed on 92 ex-vivo breast specimens from 92 patients, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were generated, comparing the measurements of patients with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy in datasets of different tissue types using a significance level of 5%. As input for the GEE models, either the intensity at a specific wavelength or a fit parameter, derived from the spectrum, was used. In the evaluation of the intensity, no influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was found, since none of the wavelengths were significantly different between the measurements with and the measurements without neoadjuvant chemotherapy in any of the datasets. These results were confirmed by the analysis of the fit parameters, which showed a significant difference for the amount of collagen in only one dataset. All other fit parameters were not significant for any of the datasets. These findings may indicate that assessment of the resection margin with DRS is also feasible in the growing population of breast cancer patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, it is possible that we did not detect neoadjuvant chemotherapy effect in the some of the datasets due to the small number of measurements in those datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne L. de Boer
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Kho
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Koen K. Van de Vijver
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Ghent University Hospital, Department of Pathology, Gent, Belgium
| | | | | | - Benno H. W. Hendriks
- Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Delft University of Technology, Biomechanical Engineering Department, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Henricus J. C. M. Sterenborg
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Theo J. M. Ruers
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- University of Twente, TNW, Technical Medical Centre, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kho E, de Boer LL, Post AL, Van de Vijver KK, Jóźwiak K, Sterenborg HJCM, Ruers TJM. Imaging depth variations in hyperspectral imaging: Development of a method to detect tumor up to the required tumor-free margin width. J Biophotonics 2019; 12:e201900086. [PMID: 31290280 DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201900086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Revised: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Hyperspectral imaging is a promising technique for resection margin assessment during cancer surgery. Thereby, only a specific amount of the tissue below the resection surface, the clinically defined margin width, should be assessed. Since the imaging depth of hyperspectral imaging varies with wavelength and tissue composition, this can have consequences for the clinical use of hyperspectral imaging as margin assessment technique. In this study, a method was developed that allows for hyperspectral analysis of resection margins in breast cancer. This method uses the spectral slope of the diffuse reflectance spectrum at wavelength regions where the imaging depth in tumor and healthy tissue is equal. Thereby, tumor can be discriminated from healthy breast tissue while imaging up to a similar depth as the required tumor-free margin width of 2 mm. Applying this method to hyperspectral images acquired during surgery would allow for robust margin assessment of resected specimens. In this paper, we focused on breast cancer, but the same approach can be applied to develop a method for other types of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Kho
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lisanne L de Boer
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anouk L Post
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Koen K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Henricus J C M Sterenborg
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Theo J M Ruers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kho E, Dashtbozorg B, de Boer LL, Van de Vijver KK, Sterenborg HJCM, Ruers TJM. Broadband hyperspectral imaging for breast tumor detection using spectral and spatial information. Biomed Opt Express 2019; 10:4496-4515. [PMID: 31565506 PMCID: PMC6757478 DOI: 10.1364/boe.10.004496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Complete tumor removal during breast-conserving surgery remains challenging due to the lack of optimal intraoperative margin assessment techniques. Here, we use hyperspectral imaging for tumor detection in fresh breast tissue. We evaluated different wavelength ranges and two classification algorithms; a pixel-wise classification algorithm and a convolutional neural network that combines spectral and spatial information. The highest classification performance was obtained using the full wavelength range (450-1650 nm). Adding spatial information mainly improved the differentiation of tissue classes within the malignant and healthy classes. High sensitivity and specificity were accomplished, which offers potential for hyperspectral imaging as a margin assessment technique to improve surgical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Kho
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Behdad Dashtbozorg
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Lisanne L. de Boer
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Koen K. Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Gent, Belgium
| | - Henricus J. C. M. Sterenborg
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Theo J. M. Ruers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522NB Enschede, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schuurman MS, Timmermans M, van Gorp T, de Vijver KKV, Kruitwagen RFPM, Lemmens VEPP, van der Aa MA. Trends in incidence, treatment and survival of borderline ovarian tumors in the Netherlands: a nationwide analysis. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:983-989. [PMID: 31135241 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1619935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Background: Population-based data on borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are scarce and information regarding recent trends in incidence, treatment and survival is lacking. The purpose of this study was to analyze these trends in the Netherlands and to assess the risk of developing a subsequent invasive ovarian tumor. Material and methods: All consecutive patients diagnosed with BOTs between 1993 and 2016 (n = 7113) were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Annual age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated. Relative survival (RS) analyses and multivariable analyses estimating excess mortality were conducted. Patients with a subsequent invasive ovarian tumor were identified by the NCR. Results: Age-adjusted incidence increased from 2.1/100,000 person-years in 1993 to 4.2/100,000 in 2011, after 2011 the incidence declined. The proportion of bilateral tumors decreased over time from 16% in 1993-1998 to 11% in 2005-2010 and remained stable onwards. Survival improved over time (excess mortality ratioadjusted 2011-2016 versus 1993-1998: 0.25; 95%CI: 0.13-0.47). Five-year RS increased from 91% in 1993-1998 to 98% in 2011-2016 and 10-year RS from 88% in 1993-1998 to 96% in 2005-2010. Fewer patients were treated with chemotherapy (4.4% in 1993-1998 versus 0.7% in 2011-2016). During a median follow-up time of 8 years, 0.9% developed a subsequent invasive ovarian carcinoma. Conclusions: The incidence of BOTs increased over time from 1993 until 2010 but declined since 2011. This decline may be partly due to changes in the classification of gynecological tumors, as serous BOTs are now more often diagnosed as low grade serous ovarian cancers. Survival is high and has improved since 1993. The risk of a subsequent invasive ovarian carcinoma seems low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda S. Schuurman
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maite Timmermans
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Toon van Gorp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen K. Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Roy F. P. M. Kruitwagen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Valery E. P. P. Lemmens
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike A. van der Aa
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
de Boer LL, Kho E, Nijkamp J, Van de Vijver KK, Sterenborg HJCM, ter Beek LC, Ruers TJM. Method for coregistration of optical measurements of breast tissue with histopathology: the importance of accounting for tissue deformations. J Biomed Opt 2019; 24:1-12. [PMID: 31347338 PMCID: PMC6995961 DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.24.7.075002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
For the validation of optical diagnostic technologies, experimental results need to be benchmarked against the gold standard. Currently, the gold standard for tissue characterization is assessment of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections by a pathologist. When processing tissue into H&E sections, the shape of the tissue deforms with respect to the initial shape when it was optically measured. We demonstrate the importance of accounting for these tissue deformations when correlating optical measurement with routinely acquired histopathology. We propose a method to register the tissue in the H&E sections to the optical measurements, which corrects for these tissue deformations. We compare the registered H&E sections to H&E sections that were registered with an algorithm that does not account for tissue deformations by evaluating both the shape and the composition of the tissue and using microcomputer tomography data as an independent measure. The proposed method, which did account for tissue deformations, was more accurate than the method that did not account for tissue deformations. These results emphasize the need for a registration method that accounts for tissue deformations, such as the method presented in this study, which can aid in validating optical techniques for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne L. de Boer
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Kho
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper Nijkamp
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koen K. Van de Vijver
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Ghent University Hospital, Department of Pathology, Gent, Belgium
| | - Henricus J. C. M. Sterenborg
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leon C. ter Beek
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Theo J. M. Ruers
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- University of Twente, Faculty of Science and Technology, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Koole SN, van Lieshout C, van Driel WJ, van Schagen E, Sikorska K, Kieffer JM, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, Schreuder HWR, Hermans RH, de Hingh IH, van der Velden J, Arts HJ, Massuger LFAG, Aalbers AG, Verwaal VJ, Van de Vijver KK, Aaronson NK, van Tinteren H, Sonke GS, van Harten WH, Retèl VP. Cost Effectiveness of Interval Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Stage III Ovarian Cancer on the Basis of a Randomized Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:2041-2050. [PMID: 31251694 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In the randomized open-label phase III OVHIPEC trial, the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS) improved recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with stage III ovarian cancer. We studied the cost effectiveness of the addition of HIPEC to interval CRS in patients with ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We constructed a Markov health-state transition model to measure costs and clinical outcomes. Transition probabilities were derived from the OVHIPEC trial by fitting survival distributions. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as euros per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), was calculated from a Dutch societal perspective, with a time horizon of 10 years. Univariable and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the decision uncertainty. RESULTS Total health care costs were €70,046 (95% credibility interval [CrI], €64,016 to €76,661) for interval CRS compared with €85,791 (95% CrI, €78,766 to €93,935) for interval CRS plus HIPEC. The mean QALY in the interval CRS group was 2.12 (95% CrI, 1.66 to 2.64 QALYs) and 2.68 (95% CrI, 2.11 to 3.28 QALYs) in the interval CRS plus HIPEC group. The ICER amounted to €28,299/QALY. In univariable sensitivity analysis, the utility of recurrence-free survival and the number of days in the hospital affected the calculated ICER most. CONCLUSION On the basis of the trial data, treatment with interval CRS and HIPEC in patients with stage III ovarian cancer was accompanied by a substantial gain in QALYs. The ICER is below the willingness-to-pay threshold in the Netherlands, indicating interval CRS and HIPEC is cost effective for this patient population. These results lend additional support for reimbursing the costs of treating these patients with interval CRS and HIPEC in countries with comparable health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone N Koole
- 1The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,2Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christiaan van Lieshout
- 1The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,3University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Willemien J van Driel
- 1The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,2Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,4The Dutch Gynecological Oncology Group, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,5The Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ignace H de Hingh
- 5The Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.,9Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobus van der Velden
- 2Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,10Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henriette J Arts
- 11University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Arend G Aalbers
- 1The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Neil K Aaronson
- 1The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Gabe S Sonke
- 1The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,4The Dutch Gynecological Oncology Group, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wim H van Harten
- 1The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,3University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- 1The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,3University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Peters EEM, Bartosch C, McCluggage WG, Genestie C, Lax SF, Nout R, Oosting J, Singh N, Smit HCSH, Smit VTHBM, Van de Vijver KK, Bosse T. Reproducibility of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) assessment in endometrial cancer. Histopathology 2019; 75:128-136. [PMID: 31155736 PMCID: PMC6852322 DOI: 10.1111/his.13871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Aims Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in endometrial cancer (EC) is an important prognostic variable impacting on a patient's individual recurrence risk and adjuvant treatment recommendations. Recent work has shown that grading the extent of LVSI further improves its prognostic strength in patients with stage I endometrioid EC. Despite this, there is little information on the reproducibility of LVSI assessment in EC. Therefore, we designed a study to evaluate interobserver agreement in discriminating true LVSI from LVSI mimics (Phase I) and reproducibility of grading extent of LVSI (Phase II). Methods and results Scanned haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides of endometrioid EC (EEC) with a predefined possible LVSI focus were hosted on a website and assessed by a panel of six European gynaecological pathologists. In Phase I, 48 H&E slides were included for LVSI assessment and in Phase II, 42 H&E slides for LVSI grading. Each observer was instructed to apply the criteria for LVSI used in daily practice. The degree of agreement was measured using the two‐way absolute agreement average‐measures intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Reproducibility of LVSI assessment (ICC = 0.64, P < 0.001) and LVSI grading (ICC = 0.62, P < 0.001) in EEC was substantial among the observers. Conclusions Given the good reproducibility of LVSI, this study further supports the important role of LVSI in decision algorithms for adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke E M Peters
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Carla Bartosch
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Catherine Genestie
- Department of BioPathology, University Paris-Saclay, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Sigurd F Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II and Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Remi Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Oosting
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Huub C S H Smit
- Department of Pathological Anatomy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Vincent T H B M Smit
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Visser NCM, van der Putten LJM, van Egerschot A, Van de Vijver KK, Santacana M, Bronsert P, Hirschfeld M, Colas E, Gil-Moreno A, Garcia A, Mancebo G, Alameda F, Krakstad C, Tangen IL, Huvila J, Schrauwen S, Koskas M, Walker F, Weinberger V, Minar L, Hausnerova J, Snijders MPLM, van den Berg-van Erp S, Matias-Guiu X, Trovik J, Amant F, Massuger LFAG, Bulten J, Pijnenborg JMA. Addition of IMP3 to L1CAM for discrimination between low- and high-grade endometrial carcinomas: a European Network for Individualised Treatment of Endometrial Cancer collaboration study. Hum Pathol 2019; 89:90-98. [PMID: 31054899 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2019.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Discrimination between low- and high-grade endometrial carcinomas (ECs) is clinically relevant but can be challenging for pathologists, with moderate interobserver agreement. Insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3) is an oncofoetal protein that is associated with nonendometrioid endometrial carcinomas but has been limited studied in endometrioid carcinomas. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of IMP3 in the discrimination between low- and high-grade ECs and its added value to L1CAM. IMP3 and L1CAM expression was assessed in tumors from 378 patients treated for EC at 1 of 9 participating European Network for Individualised Treatment of Endometrial Cancer centers. IMP3 was expressed in 24.6% of the tumors. In general, IMP3 was more homogeneously expressed than L1CAM. IMP3 expression was significantly associated with advanced stage, nonendometrioid histology, grade 3 tumors, deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, distant recurrences, overall mortality, and disease-related mortality. Simultaneous absence of IMP3 and L1CAM expression showed the highest accuracy for identifying low-grade carcinomas (area under the curve 0.766), whereas simultaneous expression of IMP3 and L1CAM was strongly associated with high-grade carcinomas (odds ratio 19.7; 95% confidence interval 9.2-42.2). Even within endometrioid carcinomas, this combination remained superior to IMP3 and L1CAM alone (odds ratio 8.6; 95% confidence interval 3.4-21.9). In conclusion, IMP3 has good diagnostic value and together with L1CAM represents the optimal combination of diagnostic markers for discrimination between low- and high-grade ECs compared to IMP3 and L1CAM alone. Because of the homogenous expression of IMP3, this marker might be valuable in preoperative biopsies when compared to the more patchy L1CAM expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole C M Visser
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Louis J M van der Putten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Alex van Egerschot
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maria Santacana
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Oncological Pathology Group, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, CIBERONC, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Centre-University of Freiburg, 79085, Freiburg, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Centre Freiburg, Medical Centre-University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79085, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marc Hirschfeld
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Colas
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynaecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynaecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, 08193, Barcelona, Spain; Gynecological Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, 8035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angel Garcia
- Pathology Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, 8035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Mancebo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital del Mar, 8003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Alameda
- Department of Pathology, Hospital del Mar, 8003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Camilla Krakstad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, 5021, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ingvild L Tangen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, 5021, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jutta Huvila
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, 20500, Turku, Finland
| | - Stefanie Schrauwen
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Martin Koskas
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, 75877, Paris, France
| | - Francine Walker
- Pathology Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, 75877, Paris, France
| | - Vit Weinberger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lubos Minar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jitka Hausnerova
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marc P L M Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500, GS, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Oncological Pathology Group, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, CIBERONC, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - Jone Trovik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, 5021, Bergen, Norway
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, 3000, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Academic Medical Centre, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kho E, de Boer LL, Van de Vijver KK, van Duijnhoven F, Vrancken Peeters MJT, Sterenborg HJ, Ruers TJ. Hyperspectral Imaging for Resection Margin Assessment during Cancer Surgery. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:3572-3580. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-2089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Revised: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
19
|
Cornel KMC, Wouters K, Van de Vijver KK, van der Wurff AAM, van Engeland M, Kruitwagen RFPM, Pijnenborg JMA. Gene Promoter Methylation in Endometrial Carcinogenesis. Pathol Oncol Res 2018; 25:659-667. [PMID: 30430425 PMCID: PMC6449282 DOI: 10.1007/s12253-018-0489-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Up to 60% of untreated atypical hyperplastic endometrium will develop into endometrial carcinoma (EC), and for those who underwent a hysterectomy a coexisting EC is found in up to 50%. Gene promoter methylation might be related to the EC development. The aim of this study is to determine changes in gene promoter profiles in normal endometrium, atypical hyperplasia (AH) and EC in relation to K-Ras mutations. A retrospective study was conducted in patients diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia with and without subsequent EC. Promoter methylation of APC, hMLh1, O6-MGMT, P14, P16, RASSF1, RUNX3 was analysed on pre-operative biopsies, and correlated to the final histological diagnosis, and related to the presence of K-Ras mutations. In the study cohort (n=98), differences in promoter methylation were observed for hMLH1, O6-MGMT, and P16. Promoter methylation of hMLH1 and O6-MGMT gradually increased from histologically normal endometrium to AH to EC; 27.3, 36.4% and 38.0% for hMLH1 and 8.3%, 18.2% and 31.4% for O6-MGMT, respectively. P16 promoter methylation was significantly different in AH (7.7%) compared to EC (38%). K-Ras mutations were observed in 12.1% of AH, and in 19.6% of EC cases. No association of K-Ras mutation with promoter methylation of any of the tested genes was found. In conclusion, hMLH1 and O6-MGMT promoter methylation are frequently present in AH, and thus considered to be early events in the carcinogenesis of EC, whereas P16 promoter methylation was mainly present in EC, and not in precursor lesions supporting a late event in the carcinogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlijn M C Cornel
- GROW- School for Oncology &Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands. .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Kim Wouters
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Manon van Engeland
- GROW- School for Oncology &Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Roy F P M Kruitwagen
- GROW- School for Oncology &Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van Driel WJ, Koole SN, Sikorska K, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, Schreuder HWR, Hermans RHM, de Hingh IHJT, van der Velden J, Arts HJ, Massuger LFAG, Aalbers AGJ, Verwaal VJ, Kieffer JM, Van de Vijver KK, van Tinteren H, Aaronson NK, Sonke GS. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 378:230-240. [PMID: 29342393 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1708618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 832] [Impact Index Per Article: 138.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of newly diagnosed advanced-stage ovarian cancer typically involves cytoreductive surgery and systemic chemotherapy. We conducted a trial to investigate whether the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery would improve outcomes among patients who were receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS In a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 245 patients who had at least stable disease after three cycles of carboplatin (area under the curve of 5 to 6 mg per milliliter per minute) and paclitaxel (175 mg per square meter of body-surface area) to undergo interval cytoreductive surgery either with or without administration of HIPEC with cisplatin (100 mg per square meter). Randomization was performed at the time of surgery in cases in which surgery that would result in no visible disease (complete cytoreduction) or surgery after which one or more residual tumors measuring 10 mm or less in diameter remain (optimal cytoreduction) was deemed to be feasible. Three additional cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel were administered postoperatively. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival. Overall survival and the side-effect profile were key secondary end points. RESULTS In the intention-to-treat analysis, events of disease recurrence or death occurred in 110 of the 123 patients (89%) who underwent cytoreductive surgery without HIPEC (surgery group) and in 99 of the 122 patients (81%) who underwent cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (surgery-plus-HIPEC group) (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.87; P=0.003). The median recurrence-free survival was 10.7 months in the surgery group and 14.2 months in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group. At a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 76 patients (62%) in the surgery group and 61 patients (50%) in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group had died (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.94; P=0.02). The median overall survival was 33.9 months in the surgery group and 45.7 months in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group. The percentage of patients who had adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was similar in the two groups (25% in the surgery group and 27% in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group, P=0.76). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer, the addition of HIPEC to interval cytoreductive surgery resulted in longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival than surgery alone and did not result in higher rates of side effects. (Funded by the Dutch Cancer Society; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00426257 ; EudraCT number, 2006-003466-34 .).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willemien J van Driel
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Simone N Koole
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Karolina Sikorska
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Jules H Schagen van Leeuwen
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Henk W R Schreuder
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Ralph H M Hermans
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Jacobus van der Velden
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Henriëtte J Arts
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Victor J Verwaal
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Jacobien M Kieffer
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Koen K Van de Vijver
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Harm van Tinteren
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- From the Departments of Gynecology (W.J.D., S.N.K.), Biometrics (K.S., H.T.), Surgical Oncology (A.G.J.A.), Pathology (K.K.V.V.), and Medical Oncology (S.N.K., G.S.S.) and the Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (J.M.K., N.K.A.), the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam (W.J.D., S.N.K., J.V.), the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group (W.J.D., J.H.S.L., H.W.R.S., R.H.M.H., J.V., H.J.A., L.F.A.G.M., G.S.S.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.V.), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (J.H.S.L.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (H.W.R.S.), the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (R.H.M.H.) and Surgery (I.H.J.T.H.), Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (I.H.J.T.H., A.G.J.A.), the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen (H.J.A.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (L.F.A.G.M.) - all in the Netherlands; and the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (V.J.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
van Baal JOAM, van Noorden CJF, Nieuwland R, Van de Vijver KK, Sturk A, van Driel WJ, Kenter GG, Lok CAR. Development of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review. J Histochem Cytochem 2017; 66:67-83. [PMID: 29164988 DOI: 10.1369/0022155417742897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) metastasizes intra-abdominally with often numerous, superficial, small-sized lesions. This so-called peritoneal carcinomatosis is difficult to treat, and peritoneal recurrences are frequently observed, leading to a poor prognosis. Underlying mechanisms of interactions between EOC and peritoneal cells are incompletely understood. This review summarizes and discusses the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis from a cell-biological perspective, focusing on characteristics of EOC and peritoneal cells. We aim to provide insight into how peritoneum facilitates tumor adhesion but limits size of lesions and depth of invasion. The development of peritoneal carcinomatosis is a multistep process that requires adaptations of EOC and peritoneal cells. Mechanisms that enable tumor adhesion and growth involve cadherin restructuring on EOC cells, integrin-mediated adhesion, and mesothelial evasion by mechanical forces driven by integrin-ligand interactions. Clinical trials targeting these mechanisms, however, showed only limited effects. Other factors that inhibit tumor growth and deep invasion are virtually unknown. Future studies are needed to elucidate the exact mechanisms that underlie the development and limited growth of peritoneal carcinomatosis. This review on development of peritoneal carcinomatosis of EOC summarizes the current knowledge and its limitations. Clarification of the stepwise process may inspire future research to investigate new treatment approaches of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette O A M van Baal
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J F van Noorden
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Biology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rienk Nieuwland
- Laboratory of Experimental Clinical Chemistry, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koen K Van de Vijver
- Division of Diagnostic Oncology & Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Auguste Sturk
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willemien J van Driel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gemma G Kenter
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christianne A R Lok
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stiekema A, Van de Vijver KK, Boot H, Broeks A, Korse CM, van Driel WJ, Kenter GG, Lok CAR. Human epididymis protein 4 immunostaining of malignant ascites differentiates cancer of Müllerian origin from gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer Cytopathol 2017; 125:197-204. [PMID: 28199067 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2016] [Revised: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An accurate diagnosis of cancer of Müllerian origin is required before the initiation of treatment. An overlap in clinical presentation and cytological, histological, or imaging studies with other nongynecological tumors does occur. Therefore, immunocytochemistry markers are used to determine tumor origin. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is overexpressed in tissue of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). It has shown to be a sensitive and specific serum marker for EOC and to be of value for the differentiation between EOC and ovarian metastases of gastrointestinal origin. The objective of the current study was to evaluate HE4 immunocytochemistry in malignant ascites for differentiation between cancer of Müllerian origin, including EOC, and adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract. METHODS Cytological specimens of 115 different adenocarcinomas (45 EOCs, 46 cases of gastric cancer, and 24 cases of colorectal cancer) were stained for HE4, paired box 8 (PAX8), and other specific markers. RESULTS 91% of the ascites samples from patients with EOC stained for both HE4 and PAX8. The 4 samples without HE4 staining were a clear cell carcinoma, a low-grade serous adenocarcinoma, an undifferentiated adenocarcinoma, and a neuroendocrine carcinoma. All high-grade serous adenocarcinomas (n = 37, 100%) stained with HE4, compared with 94% that stained positively for PAX8. In cases of gastric or colorectal cancer, 25% and 21% of cases, respectively, stained positive for HE4. No PAX8 staining was observed in colorectal or gastric adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSIONS HE4 staining in ascites is feasible and appears to have a high sensitivity for high-grade serous ovarian cancer. HE4 is a useful addition to the current panel of immunocytochemistry markers for the diagnosis of EOC and for differentiation with gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:197-204. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Stiekema
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koen K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henk Boot
- Department of Gastroenterology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Core Facility-Molecular Pathology and Biobank, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Catharina M Korse
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Willemien J van Driel
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gemma G Kenter
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christianne A R Lok
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jóri B, Kamps R, Xanthoulea S, Delvoux B, Blok MJ, Van de Vijver KK, de Koning B, Oei FT, Tops CM, Speel EJ, Kruitwagen RF, Gomez-Garcia EB, Romano A. Germ-line variants identified by next generation sequencing in a panel of estrogen and cancer associated genes correlate with poor clinical outcome in Lynch syndrome patients. Oncotarget 2016; 6:41108-22. [PMID: 26517685 PMCID: PMC4747393 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2015] [Accepted: 09/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk to develop colorectal and endometrial cancers among subjects testing positive for a pathogenic Lynch syndrome mutation varies, making the risk prediction difficult. Genetic risk modifiers alter the risk conferred by inherited Lynch syndrome mutations, and their identification can improve genetic counseling. We aimed at identifying rare genetic modifiers of the risk of Lynch syndrome endometrial cancer. METHODS A family based approach was used to assess the presence of genetic risk modifiers among 35 Lynch syndrome mutation carriers having either a poor clinical phenotype (early age of endometrial cancer diagnosis or multiple cancers) or a neutral clinical phenotype. Putative genetic risk modifiers were identified by Next Generation Sequencing among a panel of 154 genes involved in endometrial physiology and carcinogenesis. RESULTS A simple pipeline, based on an allele frequency lower than 0.001 and on predicted non-conservative amino-acid substitutions returned 54 variants that were considered putative risk modifiers. The presence of two or more risk modifying variants in women carrying a pathogenic Lynch syndrome mutation was associated with a poor clinical phenotype. CONCLUSION A gene-panel is proposed that comprehends genes that can carry variants with putative modifying effects on the risk of Lynch syndrome endometrial cancer. Validation in further studies is warranted before considering the possible use of this tool in genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balazs Jóri
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rick Kamps
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Genomics & Bioinformatics, CARIM - School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sofia Xanthoulea
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bert Delvoux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J Blok
- Department of Clinical Genetics, GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Koen K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Current address: Divisions of Diagnostic Oncology & Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart de Koning
- Department of Clinical Genetics, GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Felicia Trups Oei
- Department of Clinical Genetics, GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Carli M Tops
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst Jm Speel
- Department of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Roy F Kruitwagen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Encarna B Gomez-Garcia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Romano
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kleppe M, Brans B, Van Gorp T, Slangen BF, Kruse AJ, Pooters IN, Lotz MG, Van de Vijver KK, Kruitwagen RF. The Detection of Sentinel Nodes in Ovarian Cancer: A Feasibility Study. J Nucl Med 2014; 55:1799-804. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.144329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
25
|
Litjens RJ, Van de Vijver KK, Hopman AH, Ummelen MI, Speel EJM, Sastrowijoto SH, Van Gorp T, Slangen BF, Kruitwagen RF, Krüse AJ. The majority of metachronous CIN1 and CIN3 lesions are caused by different human papillomavirus genotypes, indicating that the presence of CIN1 seems not to determine the risk for subsequent detection of CIN3. Hum Pathol 2014; 45:221-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2013] [Revised: 09/24/2013] [Accepted: 10/09/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
26
|
Ahmed Q, Hussein Y, Hayek K, Bandyopadhyay S, Semaan A, Abdul-Karim F, Al-Wahab Z, Munkarah AR, Elshaikh MA, Alosh B, Nucci MR, Van de Vijver KK, Morris RT, Oliva E, Ali-Fehmi R. Is the two-tier ovarian serous carcinoma grading system potentially useful in stratifying uterine serous carcinoma? A large multi-institutional analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 132:372-6. [PMID: 24262874 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2013] [Revised: 11/07/2013] [Accepted: 11/11/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A subset of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) may have better clinical behavior bringing up the possibility that there may be morphologic features, which would help in their categorization. The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential use of the MD Anderson Cancer Center 2-tier grading system for ovarian carcinoma in USC. METHODS Tumors assigned a combined score included in this analysis were 1) low-grade: tumors without marked atypia and 12 mitoses/10 high power field (HPF) and 2) high grade: tumors with severe nuclear atypia and >12 mitoses/10 HPF. Clinicopathologic parameters evaluated included patients' age, tumor size, myometrial invasion (MI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), lymph node (LN), FIGO stage, and patient outcome. RESULTS 140 patients with USC were included, 30 low grade uterine serous carcinoma (LGUSC) and 110 high grade uterine serous carcinoma (HGUSC). Of all parameters only 2 (MI and stage IA) reached statistical significance. 67% of LGUSC cases showed myometrial invasion versus 93.6% HGUSC cases (p = 0.003). A higher percentage of LGUSC (63.3%) versus HGUSC (32.7%) were in stage IA (p = 0.01). However, by multivariate analysis including age, LVI, stage and tumor grade only stage was an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION The presence of atypia and mitosis across a uterine serous carcinoma is notoriously variable in magnitude and extent, potentially making evaluation of these features difficult and subsequent grading subjective. Our findings thus show that actual prognostic utility of application of MDACC two-tier grading system to uterine serous carcinoma may not be applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quratulain Ahmed
- Wayne State University, Harper University Hospital, Department of Pathology, 3990 John R. Street, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
| | - Yaser Hussein
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - Kinda Hayek
- Wayne State University, Harper University Hospital, Department of Pathology, 3990 John R. Street, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
| | - Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay
- Wayne State University, Harper University Hospital, Department of Pathology, 3990 John R. Street, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
| | - Assaad Semaan
- Karmanos Cancer institute, 4100 John R St, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
| | - Fadi Abdul-Karim
- Cleveland Clinic Main Campus, Mail Code L25, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| | - Zaid Al-Wahab
- Karmanos Cancer institute, 4100 John R St, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
| | - Adnan R Munkarah
- Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
| | | | - Baraa Alosh
- Wayne State University, Harper University Hospital, Department of Pathology, 3990 John R. Street, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
| | - Marisa R Nucci
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | | | - Robert T Morris
- Karmanos Cancer institute, 4100 John R St, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
| | - Esther Oliva
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Rouba Ali-Fehmi
- Wayne State University, Harper University Hospital, Department of Pathology, 3990 John R. Street, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kleppe M, Van Gorp T, Slangen BFM, Kruse AJ, Brans B, Pooters INA, Van de Vijver KK, Kruitwagen RFPM. Sentinel node in ovarian cancer: study protocol for a phase 1 study. Trials 2013; 14:47. [PMID: 23414057 PMCID: PMC3577513 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2012] [Accepted: 02/01/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The concept of sentinel lymph node surgery is to determine whether the cancer has spread to the very first lymph node or sentinel node. If the sentinel node does not contain cancer, then there is a high likelihood that the cancer has not spread to other lymph nodes. The sentinel node technique has been proven to be effective in different types of cancer. In this study we want to determine whether a sentinel node procedure in patients with ovarian cancer is feasible when the tracers are injected into the ovarian ligaments. Methods/Design Patients with a high likelihood of having an ovarian malignancy in whom a median laparotomy and a frozen section analysis is planned and patients with endometrial cancer in whom a staging laparotomy is planned will be included. Before starting the surgical staging procedure, blue dye and radioactive colloid will be injected into the ligamentum ovarii proprium and the ligamentum infundibulo-pelvicum. In the analysis we calculate the percentage of patients in whom it is feasible to identify sentinel nodes. Other study parameters are the anatomical localization of the sentinel node(s) and the incidence of false negative lymph nodes. Trial registration Approval number: NL40323.068.12 Name: Medical Ethical Committee Maastricht University Hospital, University of Maastricht Affiliation: Maastricht University Hospital Board Chair Name: Medisch Ethische Commissie azM/UM
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein Kleppe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cornel KMC, Kruitwagen RFPM, Delvoux B, Visconti L, Van de Vijver KK, Day JM, Van Gorp T, Hermans RJJ, Dunselman GA, Romano A. Overexpression of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 increases the exposure of endometrial cancer to 17β-estradiol. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97:E591-601. [PMID: 22362820 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-2994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The local interconversions between estrone (low activity) and 17β-estradiol (potent compound) by 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (17β-HSDs) can lead to high 17β-estradiol generation in endometrial cancer (EC). OBJECTIVE Examine the balance between the 17β-HSDs reducing estrone to 17β-estradiol (types 1, 5, 12, and 7) and those oxidizing 17β-estradiol to estrone (2, 4, and 8), in EC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Reducing and oxidizing 17β-HSD activities (HPLC) and mRNA level (RT-PCR) were assessed in normal post-menopausal (n = 16), peritumoral endometrium (normal tissue beside cancer, n = 13), and 58 EC (29 grade 1, 18 grade 2, 11 grade 3). RESULTS Grade 1 EC displayed a shifted estrone reduction/17β-estradiol oxidation balance in favor of 17β-estradiol compared with controls. This was more pronounced among estrogen receptor-α (ER-α)-positive biopsies. Type 1 17β-HSD mRNA (HSD17B1 gene expression, real time PCR) and protein levels (immunohistochemistry) were higher in ER-α-positive grade 1 EC than controls. The mRNA coding for types 4, 5, 7, 8, and 12 17β-HSD did not vary, whereas that coding for type 2 17β-HSD was increased in high-grade lesions compared with controls. Three-dimensional ex vivo EC explant cultures demonstrated that 17β-HSD type 1 generated 17β-estradiol from estrone and increased tumor cell proliferation. Additional in vitro studies using EC cells confirmed that in the presence of 17β-HSD type 1, estrone induced estrogen signaling activation similarly to 17β-estradiol. Therefore, estrone was reduced to 17β-estradiol. CONCLUSIONS Type 1 17β-HSD increases 17β-estradiol exposure in grade 1 EC, thus supporting tumor growth. This enzyme represents a potential therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlijn M C Cornel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kruse AJ, van Gorp T, Van de Vijver KK. Re: Post-coital vaginal douching is risky for non-regression of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 122:202-3; author reply 203-4. [PMID: 21420156 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2011] [Accepted: 02/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
30
|
Bijsmans ITGW, Smits KM, de Graeff P, Wisman GBA, van der Zee AGJ, Slangen BF, de Bruïne AP, van Engeland M, Sieben NL, Van de Vijver KK. Loss of SerpinA5 protein expression is associated with advanced-stage serous ovarian tumors. Mod Pathol 2011; 24:463-70. [PMID: 21102419 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer, the most lethal neoplasm of the female genital tract, is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage as obvious symptoms are absent at early stages. This disease is believed to originate from malignant transformation of the ovarian surface epithelium or fallopian tube. Histologically, several subtypes are being recognized, with serous histology accounting for the majority of cases. Serous tumors include serous borderline tumors and serous carcinomas. A better understanding of the tumor biology and molecular mechanisms involved in these tumors is needed, as both patient management and prognosis differ substantially. Previous microarray analysis identified SerpinA5, a uPA inhibitor, as key regulator for indolent borderline behavior. As carcinomas are characterized by loss of SerpinA5 mRNA expression, we hypothesized that SerpinA5 protein expression is reduced or lost in carcinomas when compared with borderline tumors. We performed SerpinA5 immunohistochemical staining on 32 serous borderline tumors, 187 primary serous carcinomas and 62 serous omental metastases. Reduced or absent SerpinA5 protein staining was observed in carcinomas when compared with borderline tumors (P<0.001). SerpinA5 protein expression was significantly lowered in the omental metastases (P<0.001) when compared with the matching primary carcinoma. Interestingly, SerpinA5 protein expression was reduced in advanced-stage borderline tumors, often characterized by micropapillary growth and/or microinvasion, when compared with early-stage borderline tumors (P=0.015). In conclusion, SerpinA5 expression is significantly reduced in advanced-stage serous borderline tumors and serous carcinomas when compared with the early-stage counterparts, and reduction of expression is linked to more aggressive features of borderline tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid T G W Bijsmans
- Department of Pathology, GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Van Elssen CHMJ, Frings PWH, Bot FJ, Van de Vijver KK, Huls MB, Meek B, Hupperets P, Germeraad WTV, Bos GMJ. Expression of aberrantly glycosylated Mucin-1 in ovarian cancer. Histopathology 2011; 57:597-606. [PMID: 20955385 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03667.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Mucin 1 (MUC1) is an important tumour-associated antigen (TAA), both overexpressed and aberrantly glycosylated in adenocarcinomas. The aim of this study was to examine the MUC1-glycosylation status of primary ovarian adenocarcinomas and metastatic lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS Paraffin-embedded tissue sections of 37 primary ovarian adenocarcinomas representing all histotypes (22 serous, five mucinous, two clear-cell, eight endometrioid), four serous borderline tumours with intraepithelial carcinoma, seven sections of ovarian endometriosis and 13 metastatic lesions were analysed by immunohistochemistry. Non-neoplastic ovarian surface epithelium and serous cystadenomas were used as controls. All epithelia expressed MUC1 protein. Of primary tumours, 76% expressed the differentiation-dependent glycoform and 84% the cancer-associated glycoform (Tn/Sialyl-Tn-epitopes). In metastatic lesions this was 77% and 85%, respectively. Notably, in 57% of ovarian endometriosis and 75% of intraepithelial lesions, the cancer-associated MUC1 epitopes were expressed, whereas normal ovarian surface epithelium and serous cystadenomas did not express these epitopes. CONCLUSIONS The underglycosylated MUC1 epitopes are expressed by all histotypes of primary ovarian adenocarcinomas, by the vast majority of metastatic lesions and by possible ovarian cancer precursor lesions, but not by normal ovarian tissue. These results indicate that MUC1-associated Tn/STn-epitopes are important targets for immunotherapy and diagnostic imaging in ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catharina H M J Van Elssen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Haematology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
Van de Vijver KK, Colpaert CG, Jacobs W, Kuypers K, Hokke CH, Deelder AM, Van Marck EA. The host's genetic background determines the extent of angiogenesis induced by schistosome egg antigens. Acta Trop 2006; 99:243-51. [PMID: 17007805 DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2006] [Revised: 08/18/2006] [Accepted: 08/27/2006] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Schistosomiasis is characterised by periovular granuloma formation within the portal tract and presinusoidal venules. As inflammation wanes, continued attempts to wall off and repair hepatic injury, lead to the development of extensive fibrosis. The codependence of chronic inflammation and angiogenesis is a well-known phenomenon. Neovascularisation is a complex process of endothelial cell proliferation and remodelling of the extracellular matrix. Previous studies demonstrated the ability of schistosome soluble egg antigens (SEAs) to stimulate endothelial cell activation in vitro. In the present study, we investigated the angiogenic potential of SEA in Swiss and BALb/c mice, after infection with Schistosoma mansoni or S. haematobium and by implanting SEA-coated beads into the murine liver. Anti-CD34 and anti-Ki-67 immunohistochemical stainings demonstrated newly formed blood vessels within and at the periphery of the granulomas. However, in one third of the granulomas the pre-existing portal stroma was not destroyed by the granulomatous inflammation, angiogenesis was minimal or absent and further growth of the granuloma was prevented. In C57BL/6J and C3H/HeN inbred mice, this polarisation was even more pronounced. In 91% of the granulomas in C57BL6/J mice the portal stroma was preserved. These mice had significantly smaller granulomas, less fibrosis and less mortality as compared to the high pathology C3H/HeN mice, where 87% of the granulomas were of the angiogenic type with destruction of the pre-existing stroma, leading to more severe chronic pathology. Thus, host's genetic mechanisms regulating the degree of angiogenesis and fibrosis, determine the severity of schistosome-induced pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Antwerp University, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Van de Vijver KK, Deelder AM, Jacobs W, Van Marck EA, Hokke CH. LacdiNAc- and LacNAc-containing glycans induce granulomas in an in vivo model for schistosome egg-induced hepatic granuloma formation. Glycobiology 2005; 16:237-43. [PMID: 16282603 DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwj058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Schistosomes, major parasitic helminths, express numerous glycoconjugates that provoke humoral and cellular immune responses in the infected human host. The main pathology in schistosomiasis is due to the formation of granulomas around tissue-trapped eggs and the resulting organ damage. By using a mouse model of induction of granulomas by hepatic implantation of antigen-coated beads, it has been determined that the glycan part of schistosomal soluble egg antigens (SEA) initiates granulomogenesis. To identify which individual glycan elements in this complex SEA mixture are granulomogenic, we have tested in the same mouse model conjugates of various synthetic oligosaccharides characteristic for schistosome eggs, including GalNAcbeta1-4GlcNAc (LacdiNAc, LDN), Galbeta1-4(Fucalpha1-3)GlcNAc (Lewisx), Fucalpha1-2Fucalpha1-3GlcNAc (DF-Gn), and Fucalpha1-3GalNAcbeta1-4(Fucalpha1-3)GlcNAc (F-LDN-F). Ribonuclease (RNase) A and B, and different fetuin glycoforms were included as controls. Only beads that carry glycoconjugates with terminal LacdiNAc or Galbeta1-4GlcNAc (LacNAc, LN) elements gave rise to granulomas, with macrophage, lymphocyte, and eosinophil levels similar to the granulomatous lesions caused by schistosome eggs in a natural infection. Uncoated beads, and beads coated with fucosylated glycoconjugates or glycoconjugates lacking terminally exposed Gal or GalNAc, only attracted a monolayer of macrophages. These results indicate that the formation of hepatic granulomas is triggered specifically by glycoconjugates which carry terminal LacNAc or LacdiNAc, both constituents of the schistosome egg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Antwerp University, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Van Roon AMM, Van de Vijver KK, Jacobs W, Van Marck EA, Van Dam GJ, Hokke CH, Deelder AM. Discrimination between the anti-monomeric and the anti-multimeric Lewis X response in murine schistosomiasis. Microbes Infect 2005; 6:1125-32. [PMID: 15488731 DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2004] [Accepted: 06/21/2004] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Individuals suffering from schistosomiasis raise an immune response against Galbeta1-4(Fucalpha1-3)GlcNAcbeta (Lewis X, LeX), a trisaccharide that is expressed both in monomeric and polymeric form in different life stages of the schistosomes. In order to study a possible immunological discrimination between different presentations of LeX, i.e. as a monomer or as an oligomer (di- or trimer), the levels of antibodies against lacto-N-fucopentaose III (LNFPIII, a pentasaccharide containing monomeric LeX), and against dimeric and trimeric LeX have been measured in sera of mice with a schistosome infection. The antibody response was predominantly of the IgM type. A striking difference in intensity of the antibody response against monomeric and oligomeric LeX was observed. Furthermore, the antibody response against circulating cathodic antigen (CCA), a schistosomal antigen containing multimeric LeX, was also measured, and the response pattern differed from that of the anti-mono, di- and trimeric LeX responses. In addition, the binding pattern of a panel of monoclonal antibodies (Mabs), derived from mice infected with schistosomes, with LNFPIII, di- and trimeric LeX was measured by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). These Mabs could be divided into three different groups according to their interaction with the LeX oligosaccharides. Based on these data, we suggest that the different presentations of LeX give rise to different groups of anti-LeX antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Marie M Van Roon
- Department of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|