1
|
Michel AM, Yi H, Amenta J, Collins N, Vaynrub A, Umakanth S, Anderson G, Arnold K, Law C, Pruthi S, Sandoval-Leon A, Shirley R, Perdekamp MG, Colonna S, Krisher S, King T, Yee LD, Ballinger TJ, Braun-Inglis C, Mangino DA, Wisinski K, DeYoung CA, Ross M, Floyd J, Kaster A, VanderWalde L, Saphner TJ, Zarwan C, Lo S, Graham C, Conlin A, Yost K, Agnese D, Jernigan C, Hershman DL, Neuhouser ML, Arun B, Crew KD, Kukafka R. Use of web-based decision support to improve informed choice for chemoprevention: a qualitative analysis of pre-implementation interviews (SWOG S1904). BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2024; 24:272. [PMID: 39334347 PMCID: PMC11430334 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02691-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with high-risk breast lesions, such as atypical hyperplasia (AH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), have a 4- to tenfold increased risk of breast cancer compared to women with non-proliferative breast disease. Despite high-quality data supporting chemoprevention, uptake remains low. Interventions are needed to break down barriers. METHODS The parent trial, MiCHOICE, is a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and implementation of patient and provider decision support tools to improve informed choice about chemoprevention among women with AH or LCIS. For this pre-implementation analysis, 25 providers participated in semi-structured interviews prior to accessing decision support tools. Interviews sought to understand attitudes/beliefs and barriers/facilitators to chemoprevention. RESULTS Interviews with 25 providers (18 physicians and 7 advanced practice providers) were included. Providers were predominantly female (84%), white (72%), and non-Hispanic (88%). Nearly all providers (96%) had prescribed chemoprevention for eligible patients. Three themes emerged in qualitative analysis. The first theme describes providers' confidence in chemoprevention and the utility of decision support tools. The second theme elucidates barriers to chemoprevention, including time constraints, risk communication and perceptions of patients' fear of side effects and anxiety. The third theme is the need for early implementation of decision support tools. CONCLUSIONS This qualitative study suggests that providers were interested in the early inclusion of decision aids (DA) in their chemoprevention discussion workflow. The DAs may help overcome certain barriers which were elucidated in these interviews, including patient level concerns about side effects, clinic time constraints and difficulty communicating risk. A multi-faceted intervention with a DA as one active component may be needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was registered with the NIH clinical trial registry, clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04496739.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alissa M Michel
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Haeseung Yi
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Jacquelyn Amenta
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Nicole Collins
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Anna Vaynrub
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Subiksha Umakanth
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Garnet Anderson
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katie Arnold
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cynthia Law
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | | | - Ana Sandoval-Leon
- Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Sarah Colonna
- Huntsman Cancer Institute / University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Stacy Krisher
- Holy Redeemer Hospital and Medical Center, Meadowbrook, PA, USA
| | - Tari King
- Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa D Yee
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Tarah J Ballinger
- Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | - Kari Wisinski
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Masey Ross
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Justin Floyd
- Cancer Care Specialists of Illinois, Heartland NCORP, Decatur, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Shelly Lo
- Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Cathy Graham
- Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Kathleen Yost
- Cancer Research Consortium of West Michigan NCORP, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Doreen Agnese
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Dawn L Hershman
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | | | - Banu Arun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katherine D Crew
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Rita Kukafka
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dalton JC, Thomas SM, Chiba A, Wang T, Hwang ES, Plichta JK. Subsequent percutaneous breast biopsies after initial atypia diagnosis: The patient burden of long-term follow up. Am J Surg 2024:115993. [PMID: 39368939 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2024] [Revised: 09/16/2024] [Accepted: 09/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast atypia increases overall breast cancer risk, potentially necessitating future interventions. This study examines the frequency and outcomes of additional percutaneous biopsies after an atypia diagnosis. METHODS Adult patients with breast atypia (atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ) at a single institution were reviewed for subsequent core needle biopsies (CNBs) and corresponding malignant outcomes. RESULTS Among 432 patients, median age at diagnosis was 54.8 y. Seventy-one (71/432, 16.4 %) patients developed a breast malignancy. During a median follow-up of 7.4 y, 113 patients underwent 149 additional CNBs. Twenty-six patients (26/113, 23.0 %) had >2 additional CNBs. Approximately half (79/149, 53.0 %) of all additional CNBs occurred within 5 years after breast atypia diagnosis. CONCLUSION A considerable number of patients with breast atypia undergo additional percutaneous biopsies, especially within 5 years post-atypia diagnosis. Our study highlights the significant burden of surveillance and the need for tailored follow-up strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet C Dalton
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27707, USA
| | - Samantha M Thomas
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, 10 Bryan Searle Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Akiko Chiba
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27707, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, 10 Bryan Searle Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Ton Wang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27707, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, 10 Bryan Searle Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27707, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, 10 Bryan Searle Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jennifer K Plichta
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27707, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, 10 Bryan Searle Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 215 Morris St, Durham, NC 27701, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Connors BM, Thompson JL, Miodonski MA, Sinco B, Pleasant VA, Williams-Morad MA, Hughes TM, Pilewskie ML. Has the Option of Low-Dose Tamoxifen Impacted Chemoprevention Uptake Among Women with Breast Intra-Epithelial Neoplasia? Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-16025-x. [PMID: 39287905 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16025-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Bess M Connors
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
| | | | | | - Brandy Sinco
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Versha A Pleasant
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Tasha M Hughes
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
McGuinness JE, Anderson GL, Mutasa S, Hershman DL, Terry MB, Tehranifar P, Lew DL, Yee M, Brown EA, Kairouz SS, Kuwajerwala N, Bevers TB, Doster JE, Zarwan C, Kruper L, Minasian LM, Ford L, Arun B, Neuhouser ML, Goodman GE, Brown PH, Ha R, Crew KD. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on a deep learning-based mammographic evaluation in SWOG S0812. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae042. [PMID: 38814817 PMCID: PMC11216724 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Deep learning-based mammographic evaluations could noninvasively assess response to breast cancer chemoprevention. We evaluated change in a convolutional neural network-based breast cancer risk model applied to mammograms among women enrolled in SWOG S0812, which randomly assigned 208 premenopausal high-risk women to receive oral vitamin D3 20 000 IU weekly or placebo for 12 months. We applied the convolutional neural network model to mammograms collected at baseline (n = 109), 12 months (n = 97), and 24 months (n = 67) and compared changes in convolutional neural network-based risk score between treatment groups. Change in convolutional neural network-based risk score was not statistically significantly different between vitamin D and placebo groups at 12 months (0.005 vs 0.002, P = .875) or at 24 months (0.020 vs 0.001, P = .563). The findings are consistent with the primary analysis of S0812, which did not demonstrate statistically significant changes in mammographic density with vitamin D supplementation compared with placebo. There is an ongoing need to evaluate biomarkers of response to novel breast cancer chemopreventive agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E McGuinness
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Garnet L Anderson
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- SWOG Cancer Research Network, Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Simukayi Mutasa
- Department of Radiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parisa Tehranifar
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Danika L Lew
- SWOG Cancer Research Network, Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Monica Yee
- SWOG Cancer Research Network, Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Eric A Brown
- William Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Troy, MI, USA
| | - Sebastien S Kairouz
- Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Heartland National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Decatur, IL, USA
| | - Nafisa Kuwajerwala
- William Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Troy, MI, USA
| | - Therese B Bevers
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John E Doster
- Anderson Area Cancer Center, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Anderson, SC, USA
| | | | - Laura Kruper
- Department of Breast Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Lori M Minasian
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Leslie Ford
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Banu Arun
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marian L Neuhouser
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gary E Goodman
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Pacific Cancer Research Consortium National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Powel H Brown
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard Ha
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine D Crew
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alhassan B, Rjeily MB, Villareal-Corpuz V, Prakash I, Basik M, Boileau JF, Martel K, Pollak M, Foulkes WD, Wong SM. Awareness and Candidacy for Endocrine Prevention and Risk Reducing Mastectomy in Unaffected High-Risk Women Referred for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:981-987. [PMID: 37973648 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14566-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Primary prevention of breast cancer in women at elevated risk includes several strategies such as endocrine prevention and risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM). The objective of this study was to evaluate awareness of different preventive strategies across high-risk subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women referred for high risk evaluation between 2020 and 2023 completed an initial risk-assessment questionnaire that included questions around perceived lifetime risk and consideration of preventive strategies. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-squared tests were used to compare differences across different high-risk subgroups. RESULTS 482 women with a median age of 43 years (20-79 years) met inclusion criteria; 183 (38.0%) germline pathogenic variant carriers (GPV), 90 (18.7%) with high-risk lesions (HRL) on breast biopsy, and 209 (43.4%) with strong family history (FH) without a known genetic predisposition. Most high-risk women reported that they had considered increased screening and surveillance (83.7%) and lifestyle strategies (80.6%), while fewer patients had considered RRM (39.8%) and endocrine prevention (27.0%). Prior to initial consultation, RRM was more commonly considered in GPV carriers (59.4%) relative to those with HRL (33.3%) or strong FH (26.3%, p < 0.001). Based on current guidelines, 206 (43%) patients were deemed eligible for endocrine prevention, including 80.5% with HRL and 39.0% with strong FH. Prior consideration of endocrine prevention was highest in patients with HRL and significantly lower in those with strong FH (47.2% HRL versus 31.1% GPV versus 18.7% FH, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Endocrine prevention is the least considered preventive option for high-risk women, despite eligibility in a significant proportion of those presenting with HRL or strong FH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basmah Alhassan
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Marianne Bou Rjeily
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Victor Villareal-Corpuz
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Ipshita Prakash
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mark Basik
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Karyne Martel
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Michael Pollak
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Division of Human Genetics, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Stephanie M Wong
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada.
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pegington M, Zhen Tam H, Brentnall A, Sestak I, Adams J, Blake GM, Gareth Evans D, Howell A, Cuzick J, Harvie M. Body composition changes during breast cancer preventive treatment with anastrozole: Findings from the IBIS-II trial. Prev Med Rep 2024; 38:102620. [PMID: 38375161 PMCID: PMC10874867 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Uptake to anastrozole for breast cancer prevention is low, partly due to women's concerns about side effects including gains in weight and specifically gains in body fat. Previous evidence does not link anastrozole with gains in weight, but there is a lack of data on any effects on body composition i.e. changes in fat and fat free mass. Here we assess association of anastrozole with body composition changes in a prospective sub-study from the second international breast intervention trial (IBIS-II). Methods Participants had DXA scans at baseline and for five years of anastrozole/placebo and beyond (between March 2004 and September 2017. Primary outcomes were changes in body weight, body fat and fat free mass at 9-18 months. A linear model was used to estimate the size of a differential effect in these outcomes by randomised treatment allocation adjusted for baseline value and time since last scan, age, 10-year breast cancer risk, smoking and HRT status. Results 203 postmenopausal women were recruited (n = 95 anastrozole, n = 108 placebo), mean age 58 years (SD = 5.4), BMI 28.0 kg/m2 (SD = 5.5). There was no evidence of a strong association between anastrozole or placebo and endpoints at 9-18 months; effect size (95 %CI) for anastrozole minus placebo for body weight (per/kg) -0.11 (-1.29-1.08); body fat 0.11 (-0.75-0.96) and fat free mass -0.30 (-0.79-0.19). Conclusions There is unlikely to be a clinically significant change to body composition with anastrozole for breast cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Pegington
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Hui Zhen Tam
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Adam Brentnall
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Ivana Sestak
- Centre for Prevention, Detection and Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Judith Adams
- Centre for Imaging Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Glen M. Blake
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, UK
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NW Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, UK
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Prevention, Detection and Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Michelle Harvie
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Padamsee TJ, Bijou C, Swinehart-Hord P, Hils M, Muraveva A, Meadows RJ, Shane-Carson K, Yee LD, Wills CE, Paskett ED. Risk-management decision-making data from a community-based sample of racially diverse women at high risk of breast cancer: rationale, methods, and sample characteristics of the Daughter Sister Mother Project survey. Breast Cancer Res 2024; 26:8. [PMID: 38212792 PMCID: PMC10785448 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01753-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To understand the dynamics that limit use of risk-management options by women at high risk of breast cancer, there is a critical need for research that focuses on patient perspectives. Prior research has left important gaps: exclusion of high-risk women not in risk-related clinical care, exclusion of non-white populations, and lack of attention to the decision-making processes that underlie risk-management choices. Our objective was to create a more inclusive dataset to facilitate research to address disparities related to decision making for breast cancer risk management. METHODS The Daughter Sister Mother Project survey collects comprehensive information about the experiences of women at high risk of breast cancer. We collected novel measures of feelings about and reactions to cancer screenings; knowledge, barriers, and facilitators of risk-management options; beliefs related to cancer risk and risk management; and involvement with loved ones who had cancer. Eligible individuals were non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic Black adult women who self-identified as having high risk of breast cancer and had no personal history of cancer. Between October 2018 and August 2019, 1053 respondents completed the online survey. Of these, 717 were confirmed through risk prediction modeling to have a lifetime breast cancer risk of ≥ 20%. Sociodemographic characteristics of this sample were compared to those of nationally representative samples of the US population: the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey and the Pew Research Center report: Jewish Americans in 2020. RESULTS The sample of 717 women at objectively high risk of breast cancer was largely (95%) recruited from non-clinical sources. Of these respondents, only 31% had seen a genetic counselor, 34% had had genetic testing specific to breast cancer risk, and 35% had seen at least one breast or cancer care specialist. The sample includes 35% Black respondents and 8% with Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry. Although encompassing a substantial range of ages, incomes, and education levels, respondents are overall somewhat younger, higher-income, and more educated than the US population as a whole. CONCLUSIONS The DSM dataset offers comprehensive data from a community-based, diverse sample of women at high risk of breast cancer. The dataset includes substantial proportions of Black and Ashkenazi Jewish women and women who are not already in clinical care related to their breast cancer risk. This sample will facilitate future studies of risk-management behaviors among women who are and are not receiving high-risk care, and of variations in risk-management experiences across race and ethnicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasleem J Padamsee
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43220, USA.
| | - Christina Bijou
- Department of Sociology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Paige Swinehart-Hord
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43220, USA
| | - Megan Hils
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43220, USA
| | - Anna Muraveva
- Government Resources Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Rachel J Meadows
- Center for Epidemiology and Healthcare Delivery Research, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | | | - Lisa D Yee
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Celia E Wills
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Electra D Paskett
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Riddle L, Joseph G, Caruncho M, Koenig BA, James JE. The role of polygenic risk scores in breast cancer risk perception and decision-making. J Community Genet 2023; 14:489-501. [PMID: 37311883 PMCID: PMC10576692 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-023-00655-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have the potential to improve the accuracy of clinical risk assessments, yet questions about their clinical validity and readiness for clinical implementation persist. Understanding how individuals integrate and act on the information provided by PRS is critical for their effective integration into routine clinical care, yet few studies have examined how individuals respond to the receipt of polygenic risk information. We conducted an embedded Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) study to examine if and how unaffected participants in a US population breast cancer screening trial understood and utilized PRS, as part of a multifactorial risk score combining traditional risk factors with a genetic risk assessment, to make screening and risk-reduction decisions. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 trial participants who were designated at elevated risk for breast cancer due to their combined risk score. Interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Participants understood PRS conceptually and accepted it as one of many risk factors to consider, yet the value and meaning they ascribed to this risk estimate varied. Most participants reported financial and insurance barriers to enhanced screening with MRI and were not interested in taking risk-reducing medications. These findings contribute to our understanding of how PRS may be best translated from research to clinical care. Furthermore, they illuminate ethical concerns about identifying risk and making recommendations based on polygenic risk in a population screening context where many may have trouble accessing appropriate care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Riddle
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mikaella Caruncho
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Barbara Ann Koenig
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Elyse James
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cai S. The Breast Surgeon's Role in Risk-Reducing Medication Uptake. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5962-5964. [PMID: 37639027 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14162-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
The role of the breast surgeon continues to evolve in an era of improved precision pharmacological agents combating breast cancer and de-escalation of locoregional treatments. Surgical breast oncologists should lead the effort to create preventive strategies and help to improve the uptake of risk-reducing medications (RRMEDS) for women at higher risk of developing breast cancer. Helping women to understand their risk of developing breast cancer will help the initiation of RRMEDS. Fear of side effects caused by these RRMEDS remains a significant obstacle for uptake. Low-dose tamoxifen has shown to help mitigate side effects and reduce attrition rate of women who initiated therapy and should be considered as part of the surgeon's armamentarium for RRMEDS.
Collapse
|
10
|
Manna EDF, Serrano D, Aurilio G, Bonanni B, Lazzeroni M. Chemoprevention and Lifestyle Modifications for Risk Reduction in Sporadic and Hereditary Breast Cancer. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2360. [PMID: 37628558 PMCID: PMC10454363 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11162360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Female breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide. Risk assessment helps to identify women at increased risk of breast cancer and allows the adoption of a comprehensive approach to reducing breast cancer incidence through personalized interventions, including lifestyle modification, chemoprevention, intensified surveillance with breast imaging, genetic counseling, and testing. Primary prevention means acting on modifiable risk factors to reduce breast cancer occurrence. Chemoprevention with tamoxifen, raloxifene, anastrozole, and exemestane has already shown benefits in decreasing breast cancer incidence in women at an increased risk for breast cancer. For healthy women carrying BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variants, the efficacy of chemoprevention is still controversial. Adopting chemoprevention strategies and the choice among agents should depend on the safety profile and risk-benefit ratio. Unfortunately, the uptake of these agents has been low. Lifestyle modifications can reduce breast cancer incidence, and the recommendations for BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 P/LP germline variant carriers are comparable to the general population. This review summarizes the most recent evidence regarding the efficacy of chemoprevention and lifestyle interventions in women with sporadic and hereditary breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliza Del Fiol Manna
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (D.S.); (G.A.); (B.B.); (M.L.)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Law R, Krupa K, Rusby J. Preventative therapy for breast cancer: a clinical experience. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023:10.1007/s10549-023-06985-1. [PMID: 37336835 PMCID: PMC10361902 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06985-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast Cancer incidence in the UK is estimated to rise to 71,000 per year by 2035. Preventative strategies could significantly reduce this. Preventative therapy reduces women's risk of oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer, but uptake remains low. Having established a preventative therapy clinic as part of a wider breast cancer prevention project, we explored qualitative data to inform future preventative efforts. METHOD Women aged 30 to 60 who had benign diagnoses at a symptomatic breast clinic or were under mammographic surveillance in the moderate risk family history clinic were invited to participate in the study. Those who expressed an interest and completed an initial questionnaire had their breast cancer risk calculated using the IBIS risk calculator. Those at increased risk were invited to a consultation about preventative therapy. RESULTS 182 women were identified as increased risk (≥ 17% lifetime or ≥ 3% 10-year risk NICE guidelines: Familial breast cancer: classification, care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer, 20131) of whom 91 women (50%) would not have been identified by family history criteria alone. 96% attended a risk/prevention consultation and all eligible women accepted screening mammography but only 14 (8%) women requested a preventative therapy prescription during the duration of the study. Reluctance to take medication and inconvenient time of life were common reasons for declining preventative therapy. Despite this, the majority were grateful for breast cancer risk and prevention information. CONCLUSIONS Women at increased risk of breast cancer accept additional screening but are reluctant to take preventative therapy. This suggests that stratified screening methods using risk calculations would have high uptake. Raising awareness of preventative therapy is important and the breast cancer community has yet to find the optimum timing and formula for discussing it and must accept women's informed preferences above artificial targets. REGISTRATION NUMBERS The PIONEER study was granted Health Research Authority (HRA) ethical approval by the Westminster Ethics Committee. IRAS project ID 265619, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04574063. Recruitment began in September 2020 and was completed in October 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah Law
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | | | - Jennifer Rusby
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Xholli A, Azioni G, Di Vora R, Paudice M, Bucimazza I, Cedolini C, Cagnacci A. Risk-Reducing Breast and Gynecological Surgery for BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041422. [PMID: 36835955 PMCID: PMC9967164 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
This narrative review aims to clarify the role of breast and gynecological risk-reduction surgery in BRCA mutation carriers. We examine the indications, contraindications, complications, technical aspects, timing, economic impact, ethical issues, and prognostic benefits of the most common prophylactic surgical options from the perspectives of a breast surgeon and a gynecologist. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE databases. The databases were explored from their inceptions to August 2022. Three independent reviewers screened the items and selected those most relevant to this review's scope. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are significantly more likely to develop breast, ovarian, and serous endometrial cancer. Because of the Angelina effect, there has been a significant increase in bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) since 2013. BRRM and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) significantly reduce the risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. RRSO has significant side effects, including an impact on fertility and early menopause (i.e., vasomotor symptoms, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, cognitive impairment, and sexual dysfunction). Hormonal therapy can help with these symptoms. Because of the lower risk of developing breast cancer in the residual mammary gland tissue after BRRM, estrogen-only treatments have an advantage over an estrogen/progesterone combined treatment. Risk-reducing hysterectomy allows for estrogen-only treatments and lowers the risk of endometrial cancer. Although prophylactic surgery reduces the cancer risk, it has disadvantages associated with early menopause. A multidisciplinary team must carefully inform the woman who chooses this path of the broad spectrum of implications, from cancer risk reduction to hormonal therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Bertozzi
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, UD, Italy
- Ennergi Research (Non-Profit Organisation), 33050 Lestizza, UD, Italy
| | - Ambrogio P. Londero
- Ennergi Research (Non-Profit Organisation), 33050 Lestizza, UD, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Infant Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, GE, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Anjeza Xholli
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Azioni
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Roberta Di Vora
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, UD, Italy
| | - Michele Paudice
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Ines Bucimazza
- Department of Surgery, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa
| | - Carla Cedolini
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, UD, Italy
- Ennergi Research (Non-Profit Organisation), 33050 Lestizza, UD, Italy
| | - Angelo Cagnacci
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Infant Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, GE, Italy
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
James JE, Riddle L, Caruncho M, Koenig BA, Joseph G. A qualitative study of unaffected ATM and CHEK2 carriers: How participants make meaning of 'moderate risk' genetic results in a population breast cancer screening trial. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:1421-1433. [PMID: 35877161 PMCID: PMC9722572 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Relatively little is known about experiences of individuals with a pathogenic variant in a moderately penetrant breast cancer gene, particularly those without a personal history of cancer. The WISDOM trial is testing a model of risk-based breast cancer screening that integrates genomic (nine genes and polygenic risk) and other risk factors. In the context of an embedded Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) study of WISDOM, we conducted qualitative interviews at two timepoints post-result disclosure with 22 ATM and CHEK2 carriers. Results disclosure and interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed using a grounded theory analysis framework. We found that participants minimized the significance of their results in comparison to BRCA; were surprised but not alarmed by the results in the absence of family history; did not fundamentally change their perception of their breast cancer risk despite the new genomic information; exhibited variable responses to WISDOM's screening and risk reduction recommendations; and shared test results with family but did not strongly encourage cascade testing. Participants viewed the results as having limited utility and responded accordingly. Our study offers important insights into how genetic test results for moderate-risk genes are received, understood, and acted upon in population screening context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Elyse James
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Leslie Riddle
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mikaella Caruncho
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Barbara Ann Koenig
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mallory MA, Whiting K, Park A, Gönen M, Gilbert E, King TA, Pilewskie ML. Synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer among women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 194:137-148. [PMID: 35488092 PMCID: PMC11325477 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06532-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) confers increased cancer risk in either breast, but it remains unclear if this population is at increased risk for bilateral breast cancer (BC) development. Here we report bilateral BC incidence among women with a history of LCIS. METHODS Women with classic-type LCIS diagnosed from 1980 to 2017 who developed unilateral BC (UBC) or bilateral BC were identified. Bilateral BC was categorized as synchronous (bilateral BC diagnosed < 6 months apart; SBBC) or metachronous (bilateral BC diagnosed ≥ 6 months apart; MBBC). Five-year incidence rates of bilateral BC among this population were evaluated. Comparisons were made to identify factors associated with bilateral BC. RESULTS At 7 years' median follow-up, 249/1651 (15%) women with LCIS developed BC; 34 with bilateral BC (2%). There were no clinicopathologic feature differences between those with UBC and bilateral BC. SBBC occurred in 18 without significant differences versus UBC. Among 211 with UBC and a contralateral breast at risk, 16 developed MBBC at a median follow-up of 3 years. MBBC patients were less likely to receive endocrine therapy and more likely to receive chemotherapy versus UBC. Tumor histology was not associated with MBBC. Estimated 5-year MBBC risk was 6.4%. Index estrogen/progesterone receptor positivity and endocrine therapy were the only factors associated with MBBC risk. CONCLUSION Bilateral BC occurred in 2% of women with LCIS history at median follow-up of 7 years. Similar to the general BC population, a decrease in MBBC is seen among women with a history of LCIS who develop hormone receptor-positive disease and those who receive endocrine therapy, highlighting the protective effects of this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Anne Mallory
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karissa Whiting
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Park
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth Gilbert
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa L Pilewskie
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, 300 East 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bychkovsky B, Laws A, Katlin F, Hans M, Knust Graichen M, Pace LE, Scheib R, Garber JE, King TA. Initiation and tolerance of chemoprevention among women with high-risk breast lesions: the potential of low-dose tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 193:417-427. [PMID: 35378642 PMCID: PMC8978759 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06577-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE High-risk lesions (HRLs) of the breast are an indication for chemoprevention, yet uptake is low, largely due to concerns about side effects. In 2019, low-dose (5 mg) tamoxifen was demonstrated to reduce breast cancer risk with improved tolerance. We describe chemoprevention uptake in an academic clinic before and after the introduction of low-dose tamoxifen. METHODS Females age ≥ 35 with HRLs who established care from April 2017 through January 2020 and eligible for chemoprevention were included. Rates of chemoprevention initiation before and after the introduction of low-dose tamoxifen (pre-2019 vs. post-2019) were compared with chi-squared tests. Logistic regression identified demographic and clinical factors associated with chemoprevention initiation. Kaplan-Meier methods determined the rates of discontinuation. RESULTS Among 660 eligible females with HRLs, 22.7% initiated chemoprevention. Median time from first visit to chemoprevention initiation was 54 days (interquartile range (IQR): 0-209); 31.0% (46/150) started chemoprevention > 6 months after their initial visit. Chemoprevention uptake was not significantly different pre-2019 vs. post-2019 (21.2% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.16); however, post-2019, low-dose tamoxifen became the most popular option (41.5%, 34/82). On multivariable analyses, age and breast cancer family history were significantly associated with chemoprevention initiation. Discontinuation rates at 1 year were lowest for low-dose tamoxifen (6.7%) vs. tamoxifen 20 mg (15.0%), raloxifene (20.4%), or an aromatase inhibitor (20.0%). CONCLUSION In this modern cohort, 22.7% of females with HRLs initiated chemoprevention with 31.0% initiating chemoprevention > 6 months after their first visit. Low-dose tamoxifen is now the most popular choice for chemoprevention, with low discontinuation rates at 1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Bychkovsky
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alison Laws
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fisher Katlin
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marybeth Hans
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary Knust Graichen
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lydia E Pace
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Women's Health, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rochelle Scheib
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Judy E Garber
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Samimi G, Douglas J, Heckman-Stoddard BM, Ford LG, Szabo E, Minasian LM. Report from an NCI Roundtable: Cancer Prevention in Primary Care. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022; 15:273-278. [PMID: 35502552 PMCID: PMC9306398 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-21-0599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The Division of Cancer Prevention in the NCI sponsored a Roundtable with primary care providers (PCP) to determine barriers for integrating cancer prevention within primary care and discuss potential opportunities to overcome these barriers. The goals were to: (i) assess the cancer risk assessment tools available to PCPs; (ii) gather information on use of cancer prevention resources; and (iii) understand the needs of PCPs to facilitate the implementation of cancer prevention interventions beyond routine screening and interventions. The Roundtable discussion focused on challenges and potential research opportunities related to: (i) cancer risk assessment and management of high-risk individuals; (ii) cancer prevention interventions for risk reduction; (iii) electronic health records/electronic medical records; and (iv) patient engagement and information dissemination. Time constraints and inconsistent/evolving clinical guidelines are major barriers to effective implementation of cancer prevention within primary care. Social determinants of health are important factors that influence patients' adoption of recommended preventive interventions. Research is needed to determine the best means for implementation of cancer prevention across various communities and clinical settings. Additional studies are needed to develop tools that can help providers collect clinical data that can enable them to assess patients' cancer risk and implement appropriate preventive interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goli Samimi
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.,Corresponding Author: Goli Samimi, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850. Phone: 240-276-6582; E-mail:
| | | | | | - Leslie G. Ford
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Eva Szabo
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Lori M. Minasian
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Matar R, Sevilimedu V, Park A, King TA, Pilewskie M. Comparison of Outcomes for Classic-Type Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Managed with Surgical Excision After Core Biopsy Versus Observation. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:1670-1679. [PMID: 34671879 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10828-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies report low upgrade rates following excision for classic-type lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) with radiologic-pathologic concordance. Thus, in the absence of other high-risk lesions, observation has become standard. We report long-term outcomes of excision versus observation following a core biopsy diagnosis of classic-type LCIS. METHODS Women with LCIS treated from 2013-2020 and managed with excision or observation were identified from a prospective database. Women with cancer upgrade at excision or history of cancer were excluded. We compared rates and characteristics of subsequent breast cancers by clinical management strategy. RESULTS Of 312 women, 170 (54%) underwent excision and 142 (46%) were managed with observation. Among the excision group, 36 of 170 (21%) had radiologic-pathologic concordant LCIS without other high-risk lesions, mass, or symptoms (concordant LCIS excision group). Overall, at 3.1 years median follow-up, 11 (6.5%) women managed with excision and 11 (7.7%) women managed with observation developed cancer. Cancer development was not associated with management choice (overall excision cohort vs. observation group [p = 0.8]) and did not differ between the concordant LCIS excision and observation groups (p > 0.9). The 5-year cancer development rate was 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-31.6%) in the concordant LCIS excision group and 10.3% (95% CI 5.5-18.6%) in the observation group. CONCLUSIONS No difference in breast cancer rates existed among women with a core-biopsy diagnosis of classic-type LCIS managed with excision or observation. These data support management of LCIS as a risk factor, with consideration of chemoprophylaxis, rather than as an indication for surgical excision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina Matar
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Park
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa Pilewskie
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Matar R, Pilewskie M. ASO Author Reflections: Observation After a Core Biopsy Diagnosis of Classic-Type LCIS Is a Safe Standard of Practice. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:1680-1681. [PMID: 34689265 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10833-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Regina Matar
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa Pilewskie
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Thompson PA, Huang C, Yang J, Wertheim BC, Roe D, Zhang X, Ding J, Chalasani P, Preece C, Martinez J, Chow HHS, Stopeck AT. Sulindac, a Nonselective NSAID, Reduces Breast Density in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:5660-5668. [PMID: 34112707 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of sulindac, a nonselective anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), for activity to reduce breast density (BD), a risk factor for breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN An open-label phase II study was conducted to test the effect of 12 months' daily sulindac at 150 mg twice daily on change in percent BD in postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients on aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Change in percent BD in the contralateral, unaffected breast was measured by noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and reported as change in MRI percent BD (MRPD). A nonrandomized patient population on AI therapy (observation group) with comparable baseline BD was also followed for 12 months. Changes in tissue collagen after 6 months of sulindac treatment were explored using second-harmonic generated microscopy in a subset of women in the sulindac group who agreed to repeat breast biopsy. RESULTS In 43 women who completed 1 year of sulindac (86% of those accrued), relative MRPD significantly decreased by 9.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), -14.6 to -4.7] at 12 months, an absolute decrease of -1.4% (95% CI, -2.5 to -0.3). A significant decrease in mean breast tissue collagen fiber straightness (P = 0.032), an investigational biomarker of tissue inflammation, was also observed. MRPD (relative or absolute) did not change in the AI-only observation group (N = 40). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to indicate that the NSAID sulindac may reduce BD. Additional studies are needed to verify these findings and determine if prostaglandin E2 inhibition by NSAIDs is important for BD or collagen modulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia A Thompson
- Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York. .,Department of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Chuan Huang
- Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.,Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.,Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Jie Yang
- Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.,Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | | | - Denise Roe
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Xiaoyue Zhang
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Jie Ding
- Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Pavani Chalasani
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona.,Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Christina Preece
- Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.,Department of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Jessica Martinez
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona.,Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | - Alison T Stopeck
- Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.,Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Huilgol YS, Keane H, Shieh Y, Hiatt RA, Tice JA, Madlensky L, Sabacan L, Fiscalini AS, Ziv E, Acerbi I, Che M, Anton-Culver H, Borowsky AD, Hunt S, Naeim A, Parker BA, van 't Veer LJ, Esserman LJ. Elevated risk thresholds predict endocrine risk-reducing medication use in the Athena screening registry. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:102. [PMID: 34344894 PMCID: PMC8333106 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00306-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Risk-reducing endocrine therapy use, though the benefit is validated, is extremely low. The FDA has approved tamoxifen and raloxifene for a 5-year Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT) risk ≥ 1.67%. We examined the threshold at which high-risk women are likely to be using endocrine risk-reducing therapies among Athena Breast Health Network participants from 2011-2018. We identified high-risk women by a 5-year BCRAT risk ≥ 1.67% and those in the top 10% and 2.5% risk thresholds by age. We estimated the odds ratio (OR) of current medication use based on these thresholds using logistic regression. One thousand two hundred and one (1.2%) of 104,223 total participants used medication. Of the 33,082 participants with 5-year BCRAT risk ≥ 1.67%, 772 (2.3%) used medication. Of 2445 in the top 2.5% threshold, 209 (8.6%) used medication. Participants whose 5-year risk exceeded 1.67% were more likely to use medication than those whose risk was below this threshold, OR 3.94 (95% CI = 3.50-4.43). The top 2.5% was most strongly associated with medication usage, OR 9.50 (8.13-11.09) compared to the bottom 97.5%. Women exceeding a 5-year BCRAT ≥ 1.67% had modest medication use. We demonstrate that women in the top 2.5% have higher odds of medication use than those in the bottom 97.5% and compared to a risk of 1.67%. The top 2.5% threshold would more effectively target medication use and is being tested prospectively in a randomized control clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yash S Huilgol
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Holly Keane
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Yiwey Shieh
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert A Hiatt
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Tice
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Leah Sabacan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Elad Ziv
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Irene Acerbi
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mandy Che
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Arash Naeim
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Laura J Esserman
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mojeiko G, Passos JS, Apolinário AC, Lopes LB. Topical transdermal chemoprevention of breast cancer: where will nanomedical approaches deliver us? Nanomedicine (Lond) 2021; 16:1713-1731. [PMID: 34256574 DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2021-0130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the high incidence of breast cancer, there are few pharmacological prevention strategies for the high-risk population and those that are available have low adherence. Strategies that deliver drugs directly to the breasts may increase drug local concentrations, improving efficacy, safety and acceptance. The skin of the breast has been proposed as an administration route for local transdermal therapy, which may improve drug levels in the mammary tissue, due to both deep local penetration and percutaneous absorption. In this review, we discuss the application of nanotechnology-based strategies for the delivery of well established and new agents as well as drug repurposing using the topical transdermal route to improve the outcomes of preventive therapy for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Mojeiko
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Julia Sapienza Passos
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Luciana Biagini Lopes
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Su M, Huynh V, Bronsert M, Su E, Goode J, Lock A, Banden S, Ahrendt G, Afghahi A, Arruda J, Tevis S. Longitudinal Risk Management for Patients with Increased Risk for Breast Cancer. J Surg Res 2021; 266:421-429. [PMID: 34102512 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aims to characterize longitudinal care management and evaluate the relationship between various patient factors and the likelihood of choosing risk-reducing behaviors in women with increased risk of developing breast cancer. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate all adult female patients who had at least one clinic visit with a surgical provider for discussion of breast cancer risk assessment between January, 2017 to July, 2020 at an academic center. Patients with prior history of breast cancer were excluded. Patient details and strategies pursued at clinic visits were recorded. A time-to-event analysis was performed, and hazard ratios were determined to characterize associations between patient characteristics and time to pursuing risk-reducing care management. RESULTS There were 283 participants with at least one follow-up visit and 48 (17.0%) ultimately changed their initial strategy to either chemoprevention or prophylactic mastectomy. Patients with gene mutations were 6 times more likely to engage in risk-reducing management compared to those without (hazard ratio (HR) 5.99, P < 0.001). Those with histories of high-risk proliferative changes (HR 7.62, P < 0.001) and hysterectomy (HR 2.99, P = 0.019) were also more likely to engage in risk-reducing management. Age, race, and increased predicted risk of developing breast cancer (estimated by various calculators) were not associated with increased likelihood of engaging in risk-reducing strategies. CONCLUSION Known gene mutations, history of high-risk proliferative changes, and prior hysterectomy were factors associated with women who were more likely to engage in risk-reducing strategies. These findings, when paired with patient reported outcome measures, may help guide shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm Su
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Victoria Huynh
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Michael Bronsert
- University of Colorado, Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS) and Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research (SOAR) Program, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Erica Su
- Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jennifer Goode
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Allison Lock
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Serenity Banden
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Gretchen Ahrendt
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Anosheh Afghahi
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jaime Arruda
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sarah Tevis
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lee J, Lee JS, Lee JE, Kim Z, Han SW, Hur SM, Choi YJ, Park S. A Nationwide Study on the Incidence of Breast Cancer in Korean Women with Osteoporosis Receiving Raloxifene Treatment. J Breast Cancer 2021; 24:280-288. [PMID: 34128366 PMCID: PMC8250100 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Raloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), and raloxifene treatment for osteoporosis is reimbursable under the Korean National Health Insurance. Evidence suggests that SERMs use reduces the risk of breast cancer in Asian population. Herein, we retrospectively investigated the protective effect of raloxifene on breast cancer rates in Korean population. Methods Using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database, we selected women with osteoporosis aged 50 years and above. Patients treated for at least 2 years with raloxifene were assigned to the user group, whereas the remaining patients were assigned to the non-user group. The effect on breast cancer risk was assessed using the Cox proportional-hazards model with a time-dependent covariate to adjust for immortal time bias. Results A total of 322,870 women who were registered between 2010 and 2011 were included. The user group comprised 0.7% (n = 2,307) of the total population. The mean age was 65.7 ± 8.0 years and 67.2 ± 8.6 years in the user and non-user groups, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the previous use of estrogen replacement between the 2 groups (p = 0.087). The incidence of breast cancer per 1,000 person-years was 0.49 (n = 8) and 0.68 (n = 1,714) in the user and non-user groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32–1.27). HR decreased with increase in the treatment duration, but this change was not statistically significant (HR, 1.00, 95% CI, 0.32–3.11 in 2–3 years; HR, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.20–1.94 in 3–4 years; and HR, 0.41, 95% CI, 0.10–1.65 in 4–5 years). Conclusion Long-term treatment with raloxifene in women with osteoporosis was not significantly associated with a reduction in breast cancer rates. However, further investigation is required for a conclusive proof.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihyoun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Sung Lee
- Clinical Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Eun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Zisun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Sun Wook Han
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Sung Mo Hur
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Young Jin Choi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea
| | - Sungmin Park
- Department of Breast Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Padamsee TJ, Hils M, Muraveva A. Understanding low chemoprevention uptake by women at high risk of breast cancer: findings from a qualitative inductive study of women's risk-reduction experiences. BMC Womens Health 2021; 21:157. [PMID: 33863327 PMCID: PMC8052843 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01279-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemoprevention is one of several methods that have been developed to help high-risk women reduce their risk of breast cancer. Reasons for the low uptake of chemoprevention are poorly understood. This paper seeks a deeper understanding of this phenomenon by drawing on women's own narratives about their awareness of chemoprevention and their risk-related experiences. METHODS This research is based on a parent project that included fifty in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of African American and White women at elevated risk of breast cancer. This specific study draws on the forty-seven interviews conducted with women at high or severe risk of breast cancer, all of whom are eligible to use chemoprevention for breast cancer risk-reduction. Interviews were analyzed using grounded theory methods. RESULTS Forty-five percent of participants, and only 21% of African American participants, were aware of chemoprevention options. Women who had seen specialists were more likely to be aware, particularly if they had ongoing specialist access. Aware and unaware women relied on different types of sources for prevention-related information. Those whose main source of information was a healthcare provider were more likely to know about chemoprevention. Aware women used more nuanced information gathering strategies and worried more about cancer. Women simultaneously considered all risk-reduction options they knew about. Those who knew about chemoprevention but were reluctant to use it felt this way for multiple reasons, having to do with potential side effects, perceived extreme-ness of the intervention, similarity to chemotherapy, unknown information about chemoprevention, and reluctance to take medications in general. CONCLUSIONS Lack of chemoprevention awareness is a critical gap in women's ability to make health-protective choices. Future research in this field must consider complexities in both women's perspectives on chemoprevention and the reasons they are reluctant to use it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasleem J. Padamsee
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
| | - Megan Hils
- Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio, Worthington, OH USA
| | - Anna Muraveva
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cen C, Chun J, Schnabel F. Management of women at increased risk for breast cancer secondary to high-risk proliferative lesions and family history of the disease. Breast J 2020; 26:1543-1548. [PMID: 32741042 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Women with breast biopsies showing high-risk proliferative lesions such as atypical hyperplasia (AH) and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) have an increased risk of developing breast cancer. Other factors including age, family history of breast cancer, and extent of AH may play a role in increasing breast cancer risk. In addition to women with AH, there is a subset of women with a positive family history of breast cancer, without a known germline mutation, which places them also at an increased risk for breast cancer. Clinical management, screening, chemoprevention, and surgical risk-reduction are discussed in this review to inform the management of these high-risk women. Advanced imaging technology, pharmacologic research into different targets, and innovations in breast reconstruction are changing the way in which patients are counseled of their individual risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Cen
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer Chun
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Freya Schnabel
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zeng Z, Vo A, Li X, Shidfar A, Saldana P, Blanco L, Xuei X, Luo Y, Khan SA, Clare SE. Somatic genetic aberrations in benign breast disease and the risk of subsequent breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:24. [PMID: 32566745 PMCID: PMC7293275 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0165-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
It is largely unknown how the development of breast cancer (BC) is transduced by somatic genetic alterations in the benign breast. Since benign breast disease is an established risk factor for BC, we established a case-control study of women with a history of benign breast biopsy (BBB). Cases developed BC at least one year after BBB and controls did not develop BC over an average of 17 years following BBB. 135 cases were matched to 69 controls by age and type of benign change: non-proliferative or proliferation without atypia (PDWA). Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed for the BBB. Germline DNA (available from n = 26 participants) was utilized to develop a mutation-calling pipeline, to allow differentiation of somatic from germline variants. Among the 204 subjects, two known mutational signatures were identified, along with a currently uncatalogued signature that was significantly associated with triple negative BC (TNBC) (p = 0.007). The uncatalogued mutational signature was validated in 109 TNBCs from TCGA (p = 0.001). Compared to non-proliferative samples, PDWA harbors more abundant mutations at PIK3CA pH1047R (p < 0.001). Among the 26 BBB whose somatic copy number variation could be assessed, deletion of MLH3 is significantly associated with the mismatch repair mutational signature (p < 0.001). Matched BBB-cancer pairs were available for ten cases; several mutations were shared between BBB and cancers. This initial study of WES of BBB shows its potential for the identification of genetic alterations that portend breast oncogenesis. In future larger studies, robust personalized breast cancer risk indicators leading to novel interception paradigms can be assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zexian Zeng
- Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
| | - Andy Vo
- Committee on Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Xiaoyu Li
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Ali Shidfar
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Paulette Saldana
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Luis Blanco
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Xiaoling Xuei
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN USA
| | - Yuan Luo
- Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Seema A. Khan
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Susan E. Clare
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Minami C, Pilewskie ML. ASO Author Reflections: Conceptualizing Risk in Women with Lobular Carcinoma In Situ. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:1852-1853. [PMID: 32246310 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08281-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Minami
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa L Pilewskie
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bandera BC, Voci A, Nelson DW, Stern S, Barrak D, Fischer TD, DiNome ML, Goldfarb M. Disparities in Risk Reduction Therapy Recommendations for Young Women With Lobular Carcinoma In-Situ. Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 20:e397-e402. [PMID: 32081572 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 10/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endocrine therapy (ET) significantly reduces the risk of breast cancer development in high-risk patients diagnosed with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). However, the variables impacting recommendation and use of ET in young adults (YAs) is not well-studied. We examined the role of provider recommendation and patient acceptance for ET for YAs with LCIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for women aged < 40 years with primary LCIS between 2000 and 2012. Socioeconomic, demographic, and treatment variables were examined to determine their impact on ET provider recommendation and initial patient acceptance of risk-reducing therapy. RESULTS Among 1650 YA patients with LCIS, only 749 (45.4%) were recommended ET. On multivariable analysis, women > 30 years of age were more likely recommended ET than women < 30 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.47), African Americans more than other ethnicities (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0), and YAs treated in New England were more likely than those in the rest of the country (OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 2.0-5.2). Among YA women recommended ET, only 20.2% had a documented refusal. Only geography appeared to independently impact the likelihood of refusal, with YAs in the Southeastern-Central United States being most likely to refuse ET (OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.2-24.0). CONCLUSION ET is underutilized for risk-reduction in YAs with LCIS. This underuse appears dependent on disparities in provider recommendation practices rather than non-acceptance of therapy. This may reflect regional practice patterns, community standards of care, or provider bias regarding the significance of LCIS as a risk factor for development of invasive cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley C Bandera
- Department of Surgery, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Present affiliation: Department of Surgery, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Augusta, CA
| | - Amy Voci
- Department of Surgery, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Present affiliation: Department of Surgery, Carolina Medical Center, Charlotte, NC
| | - Daniel W Nelson
- Department of Surgery, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Present affiliation: Department of Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX
| | - Stacey Stern
- Department of Surgery, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Dany Barrak
- Department of Surgery, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Trevan D Fischer
- Department of Surgery, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Maggie L DiNome
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Melanie Goldfarb
- Department of Surgery, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tuohy VK, Johnson JM, Mazumder S. Primary immunoprevention of adult onset cancers by vaccinating against retired tissue-specific self-proteins. Semin Immunol 2020; 47:101392. [PMID: 31926646 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2020.101392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Despite the enormous success of childhood prophylactic vaccination against diseases caused by pathogens, there is currently no similar preventive vaccine program against diseases confronted with age like breast cancer and ovarian cancer. With the exception of the annual influenza vaccine, current recommendations for adult vaccination are for either primary vaccines not received during childhood or for booster vaccinations to maintain the immunity against pathogens already induced during childhood. Here we describe a strategy to provide prophylactic pre-emptive immunity against the development of adult onset cancers not associated with any definitive etiopathogenic agent. We propose that safe and effective pre-emptive immunity may be induced in cancer-free subjects by vaccination against immunodominant tissue-specific self-proteins that are 'retired' from expression in normal tissues as part of the normal aging process but are expressed in tumors that emerge with age. Primary immunoprevention of adult onset cancers like breast cancer and ovarian cancer represents a great challenge and an even greater unmet need for our current healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent K Tuohy
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Justin M Johnson
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Suparna Mazumder
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Minami CA, Zabor EC, Gilbert E, Newman A, Park A, Jochelson MS, King TA, Pilewskie ML. Do Body Mass Index and Breast Density Impact Cancer Risk Among Women with Lobular Carcinoma In Situ? Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:1844-1851. [PMID: 31898097 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08126-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Both body mass index (BMI) and breast density impact breast cancer risk in the general population. Whether obesity and density represent additive risk factors in women with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is unknown. METHODS Patients diagnosed with LCIS from 1988 to 2017 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. BMI was categorized by World Health Organization classification. Density was captured as the mammographic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) value. Other covariates included age at LCIS diagnosis, menopausal status, family history, chemoprevention, and prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer-free probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression models were used for univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS A total of 1222 women with LCIS were identified. At a median follow-up of 7 years, 179 women developed breast cancer (121 invasive, 58 ductal carcinoma in situ); 5- and 10-year cumulative incidences of breast cancer were 10% and 17%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, increased breast density (BIRADS C/D vs. A/B) was significantly associated with increased hazard of breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 2.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-3.88), whereas BMI was not. On multivariable analysis, chemoprevention use was associated with a significantly decreased hazard of breast cancer (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.84). Exploratory analyses did not demonstrate significant interaction between BMI and menopausal status, BMI and breast density, BMI and chemoprevention use, or breast density and chemoprevention. CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer risk among women with LCIS is impacted by breast density. These results aid in personalizing risk assessment among women with LCIS and highlight the importance of chemoprevention counseling for risk reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina A Minami
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily C Zabor
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Ashley Newman
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Park
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maxine S Jochelson
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa L Pilewskie
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Flanagan MR, Pilewskie ML. ASO Author Reflections: Variation in the Use of Chemoprevention According to Breast Cancer Risk Factor. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:616. [PMID: 31102089 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07460-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan R Flanagan
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa L Pilewskie
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wood ME, Cuke M, Bedrosian I. Prevention Therapy for Breast Cancer: How Can We Do Better? Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1970-1972. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07243-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|