Defining the Role of Lymphadenectomy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Eight-Institution Study of 695 Patients from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group

Impact of Regional Metastasis on Survival for Patients with Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the benefit of lymphadenectomy for nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNET).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) published between 1990 and 2021. Studies of functional PNET were excluded. Reported incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and survival analysis of either disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) were required for inclusion.

RESULTS

Overall, 52 studies analyzing 24,608 PNET met the inclusion criteria. The reported LNM rate for NF-PNET ranged from 7 to 64 % (median 24.5%). Reported LNM rates ranged from 7 to 51% (median 11%) for NF-PNET< 2 cm in 14 studies and 29-47% (median 38%) in NF-PNET > 2 cm. In total, 19 studies (66%) reported LNM to have a negative impact on DFS. Additionally, 21 studies (60%) reported LNM to have a negative impact on OS. Two studies investigating the impact of lymphadenectomy (LND) found LND had the greatest impact for large, high-grade tumors. The overall quality of available evidence was low as assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System.

CONCLUSIONS

Published literature evaluating the impact of regional LNM and LND in PNET is confounded by heterogeneity in practice patterns and the retrospective nature of these cohort studies. Most studies suggest high rates of LNM in NF-PNET that negatively impact DFS and OS. Given the high rate of LNM in NF-PNET and its potential detrimental effect on DFS and OS, we recommend lymphadenectomy be completed for NF-PNET > 2 cm and strongly considered for NF-PNET < 2 cm.

A cross-species transcriptomic analysis reveals a novel 2-dimensional classification system explaining the invasiveness heterogeneity of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), the second most common type of primary pancreatic tumors, display notable heterogeneity in invasiveness. Current knowledge regarding genomic alterations, including DAXX/ATRX, MEN1 mutations, and copy number variations (CNVs), provides some insights into tumor invasiveness. However, the underlying reasons for the significant variation in invasiveness between insulinoma and other types of PanNETs remain unclear. To construct a comprehensive model for the stratification of prognosis, we employed analysis of both the well-established Rip1-Tag2 (RT2) mouse model of PanNETs and human PanNETs with various functional types. Firstly, by applying single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing in PanNETs from different ages and strains of RT2 mice and human PanNETs, we introduced a 2-dimensional (2D) classification system. Based on the 2-D classification system, human PanNETs were mainly classified as benign insulinomas or non-insulinomas subclusters. Non-insulinomas subtypes mainly included gastrinomas, glucagonomas, VIPomas, and NF-PanNETs, which all exhibited potential invasiveness. In addition, we discovered an enrichment of specific CNV patterns and mutations in corresponding human PanNET subclusters. Then we denoted somatic DAXX/ATRX as the 'second hit' and confounding factors for invasiveness. Finally, by combining the 2D system, DAXX/ATRX mutation status, and tumor diameter, a group of indolent PanNETs with minimal recurrence risk was identified. In conclusion, our current work constructed a comprehensive model to elucidate the heterogeneity of invasiveness in PanNETs and improve prognostic stratification.

Clinicoradiological Factors Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lymph node metastasis of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) potentially leads to poor survival. Given the contradictory results in the literature regarding factors associated with lymph node metastasis of nonfunctioning pNENs, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the preoperative predictors of lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

Original studies reporting factors associated with lymph node metastasis in patients with nonfunctioning pNENs were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, and data from eligible studies were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis to obtain pooled estimates of odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included. Tumor size (>2 cm or >2.5 cm; OR, 5.80 [95% CI, 4.07-8.25]) and pancreatic head location (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.05-2.94]) were significant preoperative predictors of lymph node metastasis. Old age (OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.68-1.68]) and male sex (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.74-1.70]) were not significantly associated with lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

A large tumor size and pancreatic head location can be useful for planning optimal treatment in patients with nonfunctioning pNENs.

Prognostic predictors for recurrence following curative resection in grade I/II pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) have an excellent long-term survival after resection, but are associated with a high recurrence rate. Identification of prognostic factors affecting recurrences would enable identifying subgroup of patients at higher risk of recurrences, who may benefit from more aggressive treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing pancreatectomy with curative intent for grade I and II pNETs between July 2007 and June 2021 was performed. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 68 resected patients of pNETs were included in this analysis. Fifty-two patients (76.47%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 10 (14.7%) patients had distal pancreatectomy, and 2 (2.9%) patients underwent median pancreatectomy, while enucleation was performed in 4 patients (5.8%). The overall major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III/IV) and mortality rates were 33.82% and 2.94%, respectively. At a median follow-up period of 48 months, 22 (32.35%) patients had disease recurrence. The 5-year overall survival and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 90.2% and 60.8%, respectively. While OS was unaffected by different prognostic factors, multivariate analysis showed that lymph node involvement, Ki-67 index ≥5%, and presence of perineural invasion (PNI) were independently associated with recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

While surgical resection gives excellent overall survival in grade I/II pNETs, lymph node positivity, higher Ki-67 index, and PNI are associated with a high risk for recurrence. Patients with these characteristics should be stratified as high risk and evaluated for more intensive follow-up and aggressive treatment strategies in future prospective studies.

Prognostic Significance and Predictors of Nodal Recurrence After Surgery for Non-Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of nodal recurrence after surgery for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs) and its predictors have been poorly investigated. This study aimed to compare clinicopathologic features and survival between patients with nodal relapse and those with distant relapse and to identify predictors of nodal relapse after surgery for NF-PanNETs.

METHODS

All patients (n = 321) submitted to surgery for NF-PanNETs were included. Nodal recurrence was defined as the presence of one or more enlarged LNs at high-quality radiologic examinations and always confirmed by ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-PET or biopsy.

RESULTS

Altogether, 21 patients (6 %) experienced nodal (± distant) relapse, and 35 patients (11 %) had distant recurrence alone. Isolated nodal recurrence occurred for 23 % of patients with recurrence. Overall, 11 patients died of disease, one of whom (pT3N1G3) had an isolated nodal relapse. The rate of LN metastases (81 % vs 54 %; p = 0.044) and median number of positive LNs (PLN) (3 vs 0; p = 0.019) both were significantly higher for the patients with nodal (± distant) relapse than for those with distant relapse alone. Microvascular invasion (p = 0.046), T stage (p = 0.004), N stage (N1 [p = 0.049]; N2 [p = 0.001]), M stage (p < 0.001), and necrosis (p = 0.011) independently predicted nodal relapse. After distal pancreatectomy (n = 182), 13 patients experienced nodal recurrence, 9 of whom had left paraortic LNs involvement.

DISCUSSION

Lymph nodes are not rare sites of recurrence after surgery for NF-PanNETs. Lymph node involvement is a powerful determinant of nodal relapse. Nodal relapse frequently involves LNs that are not removed during standard lymphadenectomy.

Neuroendocrine neoplasm imaging: protocols by site of origin

With the relatively low incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), most radiologists are not familiar with their optimal imaging techniques. The imaging protocols for NENs should be tailored to the site of origin to accurately define local extension of NEN at time of staging. Patterns of spread and recurrence should be taken into consideration when choosing protocols for detection of recurrence and metastases. This paper will present the recommended CT and MRI imaging protocols for gastro-enteric and pancreatic NENs based on site of origin or predominant pattern of metastatic disease, and explain the rationale for MRI contrast type, contrast timing, as well as specific sequences in MRI. We will also briefly comment on PET/CT and PET/MRI imaging protocols.

PANCREATODUODENECTOMY IN PATIENT WITH VON HIPPEL-LINDAU DISEASE: A LITERATURE REVIEW

BACKGROUND

The von Hippel-Lindau disease is a highly penetrant autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by tumor predisposition in different organs.

AIM

This study aimed to describe a case of a pancreatoduodenectomy for a 30-year-old male patient with von Hippel-Lindau disease.

METHODS

We present a case study and the literature review aiming at the state-of-the-art management of a patient with pheochromocytoma, capillary hemangioblastoma in the peripheral retina, and two neuroendocrine tumors in the pancreas.

RESULTS

A larger pancreatic lesion was located in the uncinate process, measuring 31 mm. The smaller lesion was located in the proximal pancreas and was detected only on the positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan with DOTATOC-68Ga. Genetic investigation revealed a mutation in the locus NM_000551.3 c.482G>A (p.Arg161Gln) of the Von Hippel-Lindau Human Suppressor gene. The uncinate process tumor was larger than 30 mm and the patient had a mutation on exon 3; therefore, we indicated a pancreatoduodenectomy involving the proximal pancreas to resect both tumors en bloc. During the postoperative period, the patient presented a peripancreatic fluid collection, which was treated as a grade B pancreatic fistula with clinical resolution of the complication. On postoperative day 21, he was discharged home.

CONCLUSION

The management of patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is complex and must be centered on tertiary institutions with a large volume of pancreatic surgery. Although the current literature assists in decision-making in most situations, each step of the treatment requires analysis and discussion between different medical specialties, including surgeons, clinicians, radiologists, and anesthesiologists.

Sporadic nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Risk of lymph node metastases and aggressiveness according to tumor size: A multicenter international study

BACKGROUND

Although the correlation between tumor size and aggressiveness is clearly established in sporadic nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, the management of tumors ≤2 cm remains debated. In recent guidelines, the cut-off size to operate ranged from 1 to 2 cm. The aim of this retrospective study was to report the rate of lymph nodes metastases in resected sporadic nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, according to tumor size and, second, to identify risk factors of lymph node metastases and disease-free survival.

METHODS

Resected sporadic nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from 9 international expert centers were included (1999-2017). Functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, genetic syndromes, and R2 resection were excluded. Aggressiveness was defined as microvascular invasion, perineural invasion, lymph node metastases, G3 grading, distant metastases, and/or recurrence.

RESULTS

Overall, 495 resected sporadic nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were included. For tumors up to 5 cm, the risk of lymph node metastases was increased by 1.73 for every 1 cm increase in size (odds ratio = 1.73; 95% confidence interval = 1.46-2.03). Tumor size >2 cm (P < .001), perineural invasion (P = .002), microvascular invasion (P < .001), and distant metastases (P = .008) were independently associated with lymph node metastases. Tumor size >2 cm (P = .003), R1 status (P = .004), lymph node metastases (P < .001), and World Health Organization grade 3 (P = .002) were independently associated with disease-free survival. Aggressiveness rate was 13.1% in tumors ≤1 cm and 29% in tumors between 1.1 and 2 cm.

CONCLUSION

In resected sporadic nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, the risk of lymph node metastases is correlated to tumor size. Considering that sporadic nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors between 1.1 and 2 cm had a higher risk of lymph node metastases and recurrence compared to tumors ≤1 cm, the decision to perform surgery in this subgroup of patients should be individualized in surgically fit patients.

Value of lymphadenectomy in patients with surgically resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Although some factors that predict the prognosis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) have been confirmed, the predictive value of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in the prognosis of pNETs remains conflicting and it is not clear whether regional lymphadenectomy should be performed in all grades of tumors.

METHODS

We included pNET patients undergoing surgery in Shanghai pancreatic cancer institute (SHPCI). The risk factors for survival were investigated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. We evaluated the predictors of LNM using Logistic regression.

RESULTS

For 206 patients in the SHPCI series, LNM was an independent prognostic factor for entire cohort suggested by multivariate Cox regression analysis. LNM (P = 0.002) predicted poorer overall survival (OS) in grade 2/3 cohort, but there is no significant association between LNM and OS in grade 1 cohort. Grade (P < 0.001) and size (P = 0.049) predicted LNM in entire cohort. Grade (P = 0.002) predicted LNM while regardless of size in grade 2/3 cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our own retrospective data obtained from a single center series, LNM seems to be associated with poorer outcome for patients with grade 2/3 and/or grade 1 > 4 cm tumors. On the other way, LNM was seems to be not associated with prognosis in patients with grade 1 tumors less than 4 cm. Moreover, tumor grade and tumor size seem to act as independent predictors of LNM. Thus, regional lymphadenectomy should be performed in grade 2/3 patients but was not mandatory in grade 1 tumors < 4 cm. It is reasonable to perform functional sparing surgery for grade 1 patients or propose a clinical-radiological monitoring.

Multimodal Management of Grade 1 and 2 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs) are rare tumors with a recent growing incidence. In the 2017 WHO classification, p-NETs are classified into well-differentiated (i.e., p-NETs grade 1 to 3) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (i.e., p-NECs). P-NETs G1 and G2 are often non-functioning tumors, of which the prognosis depends on the metastatic status. In the localized setting, p-NETs should be surgically managed, as no benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated. Parenchymal sparing resection, including both duodenum and pancreas, are safe procedures in selected patients with reduced endocrine and exocrine long-term dysfunction. When the p-NET is benign or borderline malignant, this surgical option is associated with low rates of severe postoperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality. This narrative review offers comments, tips, and tricks from reviewing the available literature on these different options in order to clarify their indications. We also sum up the overall current data on p-NETs G1 and G2 management.

Prognostic Factors of Small Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis: A Population-Level Study

BACKGROUND

Small non-functional neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) are a heterogeneous subset of tumors with controversy regarding their optimal management. We aimed to analyze the prognostic factors of patients with small NF-PNETs and create a risk score for lymph node metastasis (LNM).

METHODS

Data of 751 patients with NF-PNETs ≤ 2 cm were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariate survival analysis was performed to analyze the prognostic factors. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for LNM.

RESULTS

Of the 751 patients, 99 (13.2%) were confirmed to have LNM. In multivariate survival analysis, LNM (hazard ratio [HR], 2.12; 95% CI, 1.04-4.32, p = 0.040) was independently associated with disease-specific survival. Logistic regression identified that tumor location in the head of the pancreas (odds ratio [OR], 4.33; 95% CI, 2.75-6.81; p < 0.001), size ≥ 1.5-2 cm (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.17-2.87; p = 0.009), and grade III-IV (OR, 7.90; 95% CI, 1.79-34.90; p = 0.006) were independent risk factors of LNM. According to the OR value, the risk of LNM was scored as follows: a score of 1 for tumors located in the body/tail of the pancreas and 4 for those located in the head; a score of 1 for tumors <1 cm and 2 for those ≥1.5-2 cm; and a score of 1 for tumors with grade I-II and 8 for those with grade III-IV. Finally, the median score for this cohort was 4, with an interquartile range of 3-6. Therefore, patients were classified as three groups based on the risk score system: a total score of 1-3 for low risk, 4-6 for intermediate risk (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.59-5.60; p = 0.001), and 7-14 for high risk (OR, 8.94; 95% CI, 4.50-17.7; p < 0.001), with an incidence of LNM 5.0%, 13.5%, and 31.8%, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection with regional lymphadenectomy is recommended for small NF-PNETs with malignant potential of LNM. A risk score for LNM based on tumor grade, location, and size may preoperatively predict LNM of small NF-PNETs and guide clinical practice.

Prognostic factors for relapse in resected gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neoplasms (GEP-NENs)can potentially be cured through surgical resection, but only 42-57% achieve 5-year disease-free survival.There is a lack of consensus regarding the factorsassociated withrelapse followingresection ofGEP-NENs.

METHODS

Asystematic review identified studies reporting factors associated with relapse in patients with GEP-NENs following resection of a primary tumour. Meta-analysis was performed to identify the factors prognostic for relapse-free survival (RFS)oroverall survival (OS).

RESULTS

63 studies comprising 13,715 patients were included; 56 studies reported on pancreatic NENs (12,418 patients), 24 reported on patients with grade 1-2 tumours (4,735 patients). Median follow-up was 44.2 months, median RFS was 32 months. Pooling of multivariable analyses of GEP-NENs (all sites and grades) found the following factors predicted worse RFS (all p values < 0.05): vascular resection performed, metastatic disease resected, grade 2 disease, grade 3 disease, tumour size > 20 mm, R1 resection, microvascular invasion, perineural invasion, Ki-67 > 5% and any lymph node positivity. In a subgroup of studies comprising exclusively of grade 1-2 GEP-NENs, R1 resection, perineural invasion, grade 2 disease, any lymph node positivity and tumour size > 20 mm predicted worse RFS (all p values < 0.05). Few OSdata were available for pooling; in univariableanalysis(entire cohort), grade 2 predicted worse OS (p = 0.007), whileR1 resectiondid not (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

The factors prognostic for worse RFS following resection of a GEP-NEN identified in this meta-analysis could be included in post-curative treatment surveillance clinical guidelines and inform the stratification and inclusion criteria of future adjuvant trials.

New Nodal Staging for Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-institutional and National Data Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prognostic role of metastatic lymph node (LN) number and the minimal number of LNs for optimal staging of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs).

BACKGROUND

Prognosis relative to number of LN metastasis (LNM), and minimal number of LNs needed to evaluate for accurate staging, have been poorly defined for pNETs.

METHODS

Number of LNM and total number of LN evaluated (TNLE) were assessed relative to recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in a multi-institutional database. External validation was performed using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry.

RESULTS

Among 854 patients who underwent resection, 233 (27.3%) had at least 1 LNM. Patients with 1, 2, or 3 LNM had a comparable worse RFS versus patients with no nodal metastasis (5-year RFS, 1 LNM 65.6%, 2 LNM 68.2%, 3 LNM 63.2% vs 0 LNM 82.6%; all P < 0.001). In contrast, patients with ≥4 LNM (proposed N2) had a worse RFS versus patients who either had 1 to 3 LNM (proposed N1) or node-negative disease (5-year RFS, ≥4 LNM 43.5% vs 1-3 LNM 66.3%, 0 LNM 82.6%; all P < 0.05) [C-statistics area under the curve (AUC) 0.650]. TNLE ≥8 had the highest discriminatory power relative to RFS (AUC 0.713) and OS (AUC 0.726) among patients who had 1 to 3 LNM, and patients who had ≥4 LNM in the multi-institutional and SEER database (n = 2764).

CONCLUSIONS

Regional lymphadenectomy of at least 8 lymph nodes was necessary to stage patients accurately. The proposed nodal staging of N0, N1, and N2 optimally staged patients.

Update on gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

The incidence gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) has dramatically risen over the last three decades, probably due to the increased detection of asymptomatic lesions. The diagnostic work-up for patients with suspected GEP-NENs is based on conventional imaging, endoscopy, pathology, and functional imaging, including ⁶⁸Gallium-DOTATATE PET and ¹⁸F-FDG PET. The choice of the best treatment strategy should be based on the evaluation of tumor-related features and patient's characteristics. A conservative management, consisting of active surveillance or endoscopic resection, has been advocated for patients with small, incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning tumors without features of aggressiveness. On the other hand, surgery with lymphadenectomy, also with a minimally invasive approach, represents the gold standard for the curative treatment of localized disease. Moreover, surgical resection plays an important role also in the context of a multimodal treatment strategy for patients with advanced GEP-NENs. Finally, a wide range of medical therapies, comprising somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, target therapies and several chemotherapy regimens, can be offered to patients with advanced GEP-NENs not amenable of surgical resection, according to the biological and molecular features of their disease.

Risk Factors for Recurrence in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor and Size as a Surrogate in Determining the Treatment Strategy: A Korean Nationwide Study

INTRODUCTION

The prognostic factors of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) are unclear, and the treatment guidelines are insufficient. This study aimed to suggest a treatment algorithm for PNET based on risk factors for recurrence in a large cohort.

METHODS

Data of 918 patients who underwent curative intent surgery for PNET were collected from 14 tertiary centers. Risk factors for recurrence and survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 86.5%. Risk factors for recurrence included margin status (R1, hazard ratio [HR] 2.438; R2, HR 3.721), 2010 WHO grade (G2, HR 3.864; G3, HR 7.352), and N category (N1, HR 2.273). A size of 2 cm was significant in the univariate analysis (HR 8.511) but not in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.407). Tumor size was not a risk factor for recurrence, but strongly reflected 2010 WHO grade and lymph node (LN) status. Tumors ≤2 cm had lower 2010 WHO grade, less LN metastasis (p < 0.001), and significantly longer 5-year DFS (77.9 vs. 98.2%, p < 0.001) than tumors >2 cm. The clinicopathologic features of tumors <1 and 1-2 cm were similar. However, the LN metastasis rate was 10.3% in 1-2-cm sized tumors and recurrence occurred in 3.0%. Tumors <1 cm in size did not have any LN metastasis or recurrence.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Radical surgery is needed in suspected LN metastasis or G3 PNET or tumors >2 cm. Surveillance for <1-cm PNETs should be sufficient. Tumors sized 1-2 cm require limited surgery with LN resection, but should be converted to radical surgery in cases of doubtful margins or LN metastasis.

Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors for Recurrence of Resected Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WDPNETs) are a group of rare and heterogeneous tumors. However, the prognostic factors for recurrence after curative resection still remain controversial. We aim to illustrate the prognostic factors for recurrence of resected WDPNETs.

METHODS

All relevant articles published through June 2020 were identified via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Articles that examined the prognostic factors of WDPNETs were enrolled.

RESULTS

Ten articles were finally included in this study. From 1993 to 2018, 2,863 patients underwent curative resection and 358 patients had recurrence, and the combined recurrence rate was 13%. Furthermore, the pooled data indicated that patients with G2, positive lymph node and surgical resection margin, vascular invasion, and perineural invasion had a decreased disease-free survival for WDPNETs. However, gender, function, and tumor size had no significant relationship with WDPNETs recurrence.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrated that G2, positive lymph node and surgical resection margin, vascular invasion, and perineural invasion could be prognostic factors for recurrence of resected WDPNETs, indicating that patients with these high-risk factors need closer postoperative follow-up and may benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia: The rules for non-operative management

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) with favorable pathological and clinical features may be considered as indolent lesions, and therefore be amenable to conservative management. According to the primary tumor site, different non-aggressive approaches, based on endoscopic resection or simple active surveillance, can be proposed to selected patients fulfilling specific criteria. Tumor size, Ki67 proliferative index and depth of invasion are markers that can be used in order to identify these subjects. Patients with type I gastric NENs <1 cm as well as those with non-ampullary duodenal NENs <1 cm with no associated syndrome can be safely managed by endoscopic resection. On the other hand, an active surveillance approach is preferred over surgery for patients with asymptomatic, non-functioning pancreatic NENs ≤2 cm without dilation of the main pancreatic duct or bile duct. As far as NENs of the appendix are concerned, appendectomy should be considered as curative when a R0 resection has been achieved in the presence of a tumor ≤1.5 cm, graded as G1 and without lymphovascular invasion. Finally, G1 rectal NENs ≤1 cm without invasion of the muscular layer can be safely treated by endoscopic resection. Therefore, surgeons should be aware of the existence of indolent GEP-NENs, in order to avoid unnecessary operations with associated postoperative complications.

Clinical and Molecular Risk Factors for Recurrence Following Radical Surgery of Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are increasingly diagnosed neoplasms. For localized disease, surgery is the first-line therapy and is curative in most cases. However, although recurrence is a rare event, it can still occur up to 10 years from surgery, worsening the prognosis. Many clinical and pathological factors have been associated with recurrence; however, it is currently unclear how to accurately discern patients at risk for relapse of disease from those that should be considered cured. In this review, we focus on clinical, pathological, and molecular factors associated with recurrence and discuss available prediction tools to assess the risk of recurrence following surgery.

Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Lymph Node Metastases of Resected Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical strategy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is unknown. However, current guidelines recommend a watch-and-wait strategy for small nonfunctional PNETs (NF-PNETs). The aim of this study is to investigate the risk stratification and prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis (LNM) of PNETs to guide decision-making for lymphadenectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies reporting either risk factors of LNM in resected PNETs or survival of patients with LNM. The weighted average incidence of LNM was calculated according to tumor characteristics. Random-effects metaanalyses were performed, and pooled hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to determine the impact of LNM on overall survival (OS). In subgroup analyses, NF-PNETs were assessed.

RESULTS

From a total of 5883 articles, 98 retrospective studies with 13,374 patients undergoing resection for PNET were included. In all PNETs, the weighted median rates of LNM were 11.5% for small (≤ 2 cm) PNETs and 15.8% for G1 PNETs. In NF-PNETs, the rates were 11.2% for small PNETs and 10.3% for G1 PNETs. LNM of all PNETs (HR 3.87, 95% CI 3.00-4.99, P < 0.001) and NF-PNETs (HR 4.98, 95% CI 2.81-8.83, P < 0.001) was associated with worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

LNM is potentially prevalent even in small and well-differentiated PNETs and is associated with worse prognosis. A watch-and-wait strategy for small NF-PNETs should be reappraised, and oncologic resection with lymphadenectomy can be considered. Prospective and controlled studies are needed in the future.

Head and body/tail pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors have different biological characteristics and clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

The incidence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) has continued to increase, but for pNETs, there is still no distinction between treatments based on anatomical location. We aim to determine whether NETs located at the head and body/tail of the pancreas are different.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2016), we focused on pNETs patients with comprehensive information. The patients were divided into two groups based on tumors' location. We compared the characteristics of the two groups and assessed the risk factors for lymphatic metastasis. Survival analysis was performed based on the biological characteristics of the tumor.

RESULTS

In all 3011 patients, pNETs were more common in the body/tail (62.94%) than in the head (37.06%) of the pancreas. The risk factors for lymph node metastasis in the two groups were different. Nonmetastatic, low-grade pancreatic body/tail NETs had the best prognosis (p < 0.001). For low-grade tumors (G1-G2), lymphatic metastasis did not significantly affect the prognosis of patients with pancreatic head NETs (p = 0.098) but affected the overall survival of patients with pancreatic body/tail NETs (p < 0.001). The tumors at the pancreatic head were larger (p = 0.001), more likely to have positive lymph nodes (p < 0.001) and more prone to locally advanced and distant invasion (p < 0.001). The prognosis of pancreatic head NETs 21-40 mm was worse than that of body/tail pNETs (p < 0.001). For non-functional NETs, the overall survival of pancreatic body/tail tumors was better (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The pancreatic head and pancreatic body/tail NETs have different biological characteristics and clinical outcomes and they should be treated differently.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A review of serum biomarkers, staging, and management

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with complicated treatment options that depend on pathological grading, clinical staging, and presence of symptoms related to hormonal secretion. With regard to diagnosis, remarkable advances have been made: Chromogranin A is recommended as a general marker for pNETs. But other new biomarker modalities, like circulating tumor cells, multiple transcript analysis, microRNA profile, and cytokines, should be clarified in future investigations before clinical application. Therefore, the currently available serum biomarkers are insufficient for diagnosis, but reasonably acceptable in evaluating the prognosis of and response to treatments during follow-up of pNETs. Surgical resection is still the only curative therapeutic option for localized pNETs. However, a debulking operation has also been proven to be effective for controlling the disease. As for drug therapy, steroids and somatostatin analogues are the first-line therapy for those with positive expression of somatostatin receptor, while everolimus and sunitinib represent important progress for the treatment of patients with advanced pNETs. Great progress has been achieved in the combination of systematic therapy with local control treatments. The optimal timing of local control intervention, planning of sequential therapies, and implementation of multidisciplinary care remain pending.

Surgical Principles in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OPINION STATEMENT

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are increasingly recognized entities, whose incidence has dramatically grown during the last two decades. Surgery plays a pivotal role in their management as it represents the only chance of cure. Since PanNENs display a wide range of aggressiveness, their surgical management needs to be tailored on tumor's and patient's characteristics. Currently, there are several open questions and burning issues in the field of PanNEN, such as the management of asymptomatic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNET) ≤ 2 cm. An active surveillance of these small lesions has been demonstrated to be safe although the available evidences are only based on retrospective studies. On the other hand, formal pancreatic resection associated with lymphadenectomy represents the gold standard for patients with localized NF-PanNEN > 2 cm or NF-PanNEN ≤ 2 cm in the presence of symptoms, dilation of the main pancreatic duct or suspicion of nodal metastases. Surgery plays also an important role in the setting of metastatic disease. In particular, surgery is generally recommended in the presence of low-grade, resectable, metastatic disease, but several series have reported also a survival benefit of palliative primary tumor resection in patients with unresectable liver metastases. The role of surgery in PanNEN G3 is still controversial. Indeed, surgery is associated with an improved survival in patients with well-differentiated PanNET G3, whereas there is almost no survival benefit in case of poorly differentiated lesions.

Prognostic importance of lymph node yield after curative resection of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of lymph nodes (LNs) metastases and the optimum number of LN yield in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs) undergoing curative resection is still debatable. Many studies have demonstrated that cure rate for patients with GEP NETs can be improved by the resection of the primary tumour and regional lymphadenectomy

AIM

To evaluate the effect of lymph node (LN) status and yield on relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with resected GEP NETs.

METHODS

Data on patients who underwent curative resection for GEP NETs between January 2002 and March 2017 were analysed retrospectively. Grade 3 tumours (Ki67 > 20%) were excluded. Univariate Cox proportional hazard models were computed for RFS and OS and assessed alongside cut-point analysis to distinguish a suitable binary categorisation of total LNs retrieved associated with RFS.

RESULTS

A total of 217 patients were included in the study. The median age was 59 years (21-97 years) and 51% (n = 111) were male. Primary tumour sites were small bowel (42%), pancreas (25%), appendix (18%), rectum (7%), colon (3%), gastric (2%), others (2%). Median follow up times for all patients were 41 mo (95%CI: 36-51) and 71 mo (95%CI: 63–76) for RFS and OS respectively; 50 relapses and 35 deaths were reported. LNs were retrieved in 151 patients. Eight or more LNs were harvested in 106 patients and LN positivity reported in 114 patients. Three or more positive LNs were detected in 62 cases. The result of univariate analysis suggested perineural invasion (P = 0.0023), LN positivity (P = 0.033), LN retrieval of ≥ 8 (P = 0.047) and localisation (P = 0.0049) have a statistically significant association with shorter RFS, but there was no effect of LN ratio on RFS: P = 0.1 or OS: P = 0.75. Tumour necrosis (P = 0.021) and perineural invasion (P = 0.016) were the only two variables significantly associated with worse OS. In the final multivariable analysis, localisation (pancreas HR = 27.33, P = 0.006, small bowel HR = 32.44, P = 0.005), and retrieval of ≥ 8 LNs (HR = 2.7, P = 0.036) were independent prognostic factors for worse RFS.

CONCLUSION

An outcome-oriented approach to cut-point analysis can suggest a minimum number of adequate LNs to be harvested in patients with GEP NETs undergoing curative surgery. Removal of ≥ 8 LNs is associated with increased risk of relapse, which could be due to high rates of LN positivity at the time of surgery. Given that localisation had a significant association with RFS, a prospective multicentre study is warranted with a clear direction on recommended surgical practice and follow-up guidance for GEP NETs.

Trends in the Number of Lymph Nodes Evaluated Among Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States: A Multi-Institutional and National Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of routine lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) remains poorly defined. The objective of the current study was to investigate trends in the number of lymph nodes (LN) evaluated for pNET treatment at a nationwide level.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for pNET between 2000 and 2016 were identified in the U.S. Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group (US-NETSG) database as well as the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The number of LNs examined was evaluated over time.

RESULTS

The median number of evaluated LNs increased roughly fourfold over the study period (US-NETSG, 2000: 3 LNs vs. 2016: 13 LNs; SEER, 2000: 3 LNs vs. 2016: 11 LNs, both p < 0.001). While no difference in 5-year OS and RFS was noted among patients who had 1-3 lymph node metastases (LNM) vs. ≥ 4 LNM between 2000-2007 (OS 73.5% vs. 69.9%, p = 0.12; RFS: 64.9% vs. 40.1%, p = 0.39), patients who underwent resection and LN evaluation during the period 2008-2016 had an incrementally worse survival if the patient had node negative disease, 1-3 LNM and ≥ 4 LNM (OS 86.8% vs. 82.7% vs. 74.9%, p < 0.001; RFS: 86.3% vs. 64.7% vs. 50.4%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, a more recent year of diagnosis, pancreatic head tumor location, and tumor size > 2 cm were associated with 12 or more LNs evaluated in both US-NETSG and SEER databases.

CONCLUSION

The number of LNs examined nearly quadrupled over the last decade. The increased number of LNs examined suggested a growing adoption of the AJCC staging manual recommendations regarding LN evaluation in the treatment of pNET.

A novel preoperative risk score to predict lymph node positivity for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: An NCDB analysis to guide operative technique

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Staging and type of resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (R-NETS) relies on preoperative identification of lymph node (LN) involvement. Study objective was to develop a Preoperative Rectal Stratification Score (PReSS) for LN-positivity and to assess the association of PReSS with overall survival (OS).

METHODS

All patients in the National Cancer Database (2004-2014) with non-metastatic/nonfunctional R-NETS were included. Tumor size was divided into three categories (<1, 1-2, and ≥2 cm).

RESULTS

Among 383 patients, median age was 57 years, 52% were male (n = 200), median tumor size was 1.4 cm, 43% had positive LNs (n = 163). On univariate analysis, age  > 60, poorly differentiated grade, depth of invasion past submucosa, and size >1 cm were associated with LN positivity. On multivariable analysis, depth of invasion past submucosa, and increasing tumor size >1 cm remained associated with LN positivity. As these can be determined preoperatively, incidence of LN positivity was determined for each combination of tumor size and depth of invasion. Each variable was assigned a score to create a PReSS of four groups (0-3) associated with an increasing rate of LN-positivity (PReSS group 0: 11%, 1: 38%, 2: 50%, 3: 78%, P < .01). PReSS correlated with 10-year OS (PReSS 0: 90%; 1: 81%; 2: 59%; 3: 41%).

CONCLUSION

For R-NETS, depth of invasion and tumor size predict LN positivity and both can be obtained preoperatively. PReSS incorporates both variables and stratifies tumors into four risk groups of progressively increasing LN positivity and should be used to guide surgical approach.

Therapeutic index of lymphadenectomy among patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A multi‐institutional analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefit derived from lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) based on clinicopathological characteristics remains unclear.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for pNET between 1997 and 2016 were identified using a multi-institutional dataset. The therapeutic index of LND relative to patient characteristics was calculated.

RESULTS

Among 647 patients, the median number of lymph nodes (LNs) evaluated was 10 (interquartile range: 4-16) and approximately one quarter of patients had lymph node metastasis (LNM) (N = 159, 24.6%). Among patients with LNM, 5-year recurrence-free survival was 56.0%, reflecting a therapeutic index value of 13.8. The therapeutic index was highest among patients with a moderately/poorly-differentiated pNET (21.5), Ki-67 ≥ 3% (20.1), tumor size ≥2.0 cm (20.0), and tumor location at the head of the pancreas (20.0). Patients with ≥8 LNs evaluated had a higher therapeutic index than patients who had 1 to 7 LNs evaluated (≥8: 17.9 vs 1-7: 7.5; difference of index: 11.4).

CONCLUSION

LND was mostly beneficial among patients with pNETs >2 cm, Ki-67 ≥ 3%, and lesions located at the pancreatic head as identification of LNM was most common among individuals with these tumor characteristics. Evaluation of ≥8 LNs was associated with a higher likelihood of identifying LNM as well as a higher therapeutic index, and therefore this number of LNs should be considered the goal.